DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Leaflet “Cross-Border Cooperation Programme ENPI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TERRITORIAL COOPERATION 2007-2013

CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME –

ENPI MEDITERRANEAN SEA BASIN

The publication might be co-financed by the European Union

August 2010

This document provides basic information and it is not exhaustive. Further information about the Programme may be found at the Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund website of the Planning Bureau (www.structuralfunds.org.cy) under the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes category as well as at the Programme’s website

(www.enpicbcmed.eu).

1

Cross-border Cooperation Programme ENPI Mediterranean Sea Basin, 2007- 2013

The European Neighbourhood Policy was established under the framework of the 2004 enlargement of the EU, in order to avoid the creation of new dividing lines between the enlarged EU and neighbouring countries and also to enhance stability, security and prosperity of all parties involved. The actions under the framework of this policy are financed by the Financing Instrument of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Policy. Cyprus participates only in one of the programmes of this policy, the Cross-border Cooperation Programme ENPI Mediterranean Sea Basin together with regions from Algeria, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Portugal, Spain, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, the UK, Israel, Lebanon, Malta and the Palestinian Authority, as indicated below:

Eligible countries and territories*

Cyprus: the whole country

Egypt: Marsa Matruh, Al Iskandanyah, Al Buhayrah, Kafr ash Shaykh, Ad Daqahliyah, Dumyat, Ash Sharquiyah, Al Isma’iliyah, Bur Sa’id, Shamal Sina France: Corse, Languedoc-Roussillon, Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur Greece: Anatoliki Makedonia - Thraki, Kentriki Makedonia, Thessalia, Ipeiros, Ionia Nisia, Dytiki Ellada, Sterea Ellada, Peloponnisos, Attiki, Voreio Aigaio, Notio Aigaio, Kriti

Israel: the whole country

Italy: Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Lazio, Liguria, Puglia, Sardegna, Sicilia, Toscana Jordan: Irbid, Al-Balga, Madaba, Al-Karak, Al-Trafila, Al-Aqaba

Lebanon: the whole country Malta: the whole country Morocco**: Oriental, Taza-Al Hoceima-Taounate, Tanger-Tétouan Palestinian Authority: the whole country Portugal: Algarve

Spain: Andalucía, Cataluña, Comunidad Valenciana, Murcia, Islas Baleares, Ceuta, Melilla

Syria: Latakia, Tartous

Tunisia: Médenine, Gabès, Sfax, Mahdia, Monastir, Sousse, Nabeul, Ben Arous, Tunis, Ariana, Bizerte, Béja, Jendouba

* Gibraltar, Libya and Algeria have not participated to any of the Programme’s procedures. Turkey has requested to be excluded from the Programme as it is a pre accession country. ** Morocco has postponed its participation to the Programme. The Programme has been approved by the European Commission on 14th August 2008.

The general objective of the Programme is to contribute to promoting the sustainable and harmonious cooperation process at the Mediterranean Basin level by dealing with the common challenges and enhancing its endogenous potential.

2
The Total Programme Budget is 189.2 million euros. The European Union’s overall financial contribution to the Programme will be approximately 173.6 million euros of which 156.3 million euros will be dedicated to the financing of projects and the remaining 17.3 million euros will be used as Technical Assistance. The co-financing rate from the EU will be up to 90% while the remaining 10% will be provided by the project partners´ own resources.

The following priorities and measures have been established for the achievement of the Programme’s objectives:

  • PRIORITY
  • MEASURES

1.1. Support to innovation and research in the process of local development of the Mediterranean Sea Basin countries 1.2. Strengthening economic clusters creating synergies

1. Promotion of socio-economic development and enhancement of among potentials of the Mediterranean Sea Basin countries territories

1.3. Strengthening the national strategies of territorial planning by integrating the different levels, and promotion of balanced and sustainable socio-economic development 2.1. Prevention and reduction of risk factors for the environment and enhancement of natural common heritage 2.2. Promotion of renewable energy use and improvement of energy efficiency contributing to addressing, among other challenges, climate change

2. Promotion of environmental sustainability at the basin level

3. Promotion of better conditions 3.1. Support to people flows among territories as a means of and modalities for ensuring the mobility of persons, goods and capitals*

cultural, social and economic enrichment 3.2. Improvement of conditions and modalities of circulation of goods and capitals among the territories 4.1. Support to mobility, exchanges, training and professionalism of young people 4.2. Support to the artistic creativity in all its expressions to encourage dialogue among communities

4. Promotion of cultural dialogue and local governance

4.3. Improvement of the governance processes at local level
*Tunisia and Egypt consider that issues related to Priority 3 fall under the exclusive competence of their central administrations. As a consequence, the participation of actors coming from the eligible territories of these two countries to the projects related to Priority 3 is not envisaged.

3
Based on article 14 of EC Regulation 1638/2006 and the respective national legislation of the Mediterranean Partner Countries, the following are the potential beneficiaries of the Programme:

Public Bodies Local and Regional Authorities Bodies Governed by Public Law

Based on Directive 2004/18/EC a ‘body governed by public law’ means any body: (a) established for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character;

(b) having legal personality; and (c) financed, for the most part, by the State, regional or local authorities, or other bodies governed by public law; or subject to management supervision by those bodies; or having an administrative, managerial or supervisory board, more than half of whose members are appointed by the State, regional or local authorities, or by other bodies governed by public law.

Private Bodies

Participation of private companies and of other bodies defined as economic operators1, regardless of their legal status, private or governed by public law, to the call for proposals is subject to the following limitation: the outputs of the project should not generate income during the project duration. Moreover, for EU Member States, according to Commission Regulation (EC) 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006, participation of private companies and other organisations defined as economic operators, regardless of their legal status, private or governed by public law, is subject to the following limitations: project activities must not generate a competitive advantage and the gross amount of public funding granted does not exceed the thresholds set by the de minimis regime. Based on the relevant Regulation, state aid is granted to all companies with some exemptions. The total state aid granted to a specific company cannot exceed the amount of 200.000 euro in any period of 3 financial years. The total stated aid granted to companies in the field of transportation cannot exceed the amount of 100.000 euro in any period of 3 financial years. The critical period is defined based on the financial year of each company.

International Organisations

International organisations are international public-sector organisations set up by intergovernmental agreements, and specialised agencies set up by such organisations – these organisations may have worldwide or regional scope. Examples of such organisations are the following: International Labour Organisation, Food and Agriculture Organisation, World Health Organisation etc.

In the framework of the implementation of projects the following horizontal policies should be respected:

1 Based on article 1(8) of the above mentioned Directive, the terms ‘contractor’, ‘supplier’ and ‘service provider’ mean any natural or legal person or public entity or group of such persons and/or bodies which offer on the market, respectively, the execution of works and/or a work, products or services. The term ‘economic operator’ shall cover equally the concepts of contractor, supplier and service provider.

4
---
Equality of opportunity, non-discrimination, respect for human rights. Environmental sustainability. Communication and visibility.

The type and main characteristics of projects co-financed by the Programme are the following:

Type 1: Standard projects Type 2: Strategic projects

  • Partnership Theme
  • It will concern all the
  • Projects will be selected based

priorities and measures of on the terms of reference that the Programme. Examples will guide Lead Partners to of indicative actions can be found in the Joint Operational Programme and the Guidelines for Applicants. specific priorities, interventions and types of projects to be cofinanced.

Partnership
• Should involve at least 3 • Should involve at least 4 partners coming from three different countries of which at least one partners coming from four different countries of which one coming from EU Member

  • Countries and at least one from
  • coming
  • from
  • EU

Member Countries and at least one from Mediterranean Partner Countries.
Mediterranean Countries.
Partner
More details will be determined in the call of proposals and the

• At least 50% of the terms of reference. total eligible costs of a project dedicated to activities implemented in

  • shall
  • be

Mediterranean Partner Countries.

• During the selection process a value added will be recognised to projects partners from more than one Mediterranean involving
Partner Country.
• The participation of partners adjoining regions of Nomenclature of Territorial Units for

  • located
  • in

5
Statistics System (NUTS II) or equivalent may be allowed according to

certain conditions. The amount of resources devoted participation partners

  • to
  • the

of

  • the
  • of

  • adjoining
  • regions

should not exceed 20% of allocations to the specific project.

• Associates, Subcontractors Organisations and being awarded sub-grants are not considered to be project partners.

  • Duration
  • Up to 48 months (the Will be determined in the call of

  • duration
  • of
  • the proposals and the terms of

implementation period reference. of projects will be determined in every call for proposals)
Project Total Eligible Minimum: 500,000 euros Will be determined in the call of

  • Cost*
  • Maximum: 2 m euro
  • proposals and the terms of

reference.
It is noted that for Priority

4 the minimum amount is decreased to 200.000 euros for 50% of the total budget allocated to this Priority.

* It is clarified that the above amounts concern the Programme’s and the Partnership’s contributions. However projects with higher budget can be accepted bearing in mind that the maximum Programme contribution will not exceed 1.800.000 euros, i.e. the 90% of the project total eligible cost.

The Lead Partner Principle is applicable at project level. This means a Lead Partner is necessary for each project, who bears legal responsibility and liability for the whole partnership vis-à-vis the Joint Managing Authority and is also responsible for the communication, implementation and coordination of actions with the Project Partners. The obligations of the Lead Partner are set in chapter 2.2 of the Guidelines to Applicants.

6

Eligible Expenses

To be considered eligible for Programme financing, the expenditure of a project must respect the provision of article 14 of the General Conditions to the Standard Grant Contract. Therefore they must meet the following criteria:

• they are incurred during the implementation of the project with the exception of costs relating to final reports, expenditure verification and evaluation of the project, whatever the time of actual disbursement by the Lead Partner and/or its partners;
• must be indicated in the estimated overall budget of the Project; • must be necessary for the implementation of the Project which is the subject of the grant;
• they are identifiable and verifiable, in particular being recorded in the accounting records of the Lead Partner;
• must be reasonable, justified and comply with the requirements of sound financial management, in particular regarding economy and efficiency;
• must be in accordance with applicable legislation at European and national level, in particular with public procurement rules.

Categories of Eligible Expenses

Actual gross salaries including social security
Staff Cost charges and other remuneration-related costs.

Travel and subsistence costs for staff and other persons taking part in the project. The amount of the subsistence costs is set by the European Commission and is found at the following internet address:
Travel and subsistence costs

http://europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/perdiem/index

en.html

  • Infrastructures
  • Usually concerning small investments.

  • Purchase or rental costs for
  • For the purposes of the project, and costs of

equipment and supplies (new or services, provided they correspond to market rates. used)

Cost of consumables
A lump sum not exceeding 7% of the total amount of direct eligible costs may be claimed as indirect
Administrative Costs costs to cover the administrative overheads

incurred by the Lead Partner for the project. The

7flat-rate funding in respect of indirect costs does not need to be supported by accounting documents.

Subcontracting expenditure

Other costs
Costs deriving directly from the requirements of the Grant Contract (for example, information and dissemination activities, evaluations, external audits, translation, etc.) including financial service costs (in particular the cost of bank transfers and financial guarantees).

Moreover, a contingency reserve not exceeding 5% of the eligible costs may be included in the budget of the Project. It can only be used with the prior written authorisation of the Joint Managing Authority.

Ineligible Expenses

••••••

debts and provisions for losses or debts; interest owed; items already financed in another framework; purchases of land or buildings; currency exchange losses; taxes, including VAT, unless the Beneficiary (or the Beneficiary’s partners) cannot reclaim them and the applicable regulations do not forbid coverage of taxes;

••

credits to third parties; the costs incurred by the beneficiaries’ associates with the exception of travel and accommodation costs.

Stages of Submission/Approval of Proposals

• Preparation of Proposals

  • -
  • Initial project idea: potential beneficiaries may submit their project idea to a

database found in the webpage of the Programme, www.enpicbcmed.eu, by completing a special form, notifying in this way their idea to potential interested partners.

  • -
  • Search for partners: further to the database in the Programme’s webpage you

may also contact the National Contact Points of each country.

8

• Preparation of the Grant Application Form

  • -
  • The grant application form should be prepared by all participating partners

after studying the relevant documents of the Programme and especially the Guidelines for Applicants that can be found in the webpage of the Programme.

  • -
  • The application must be prepared in electronic format either in English or

French and submitted in a sealed envelope by registered mail, private courier service or by hand-together with all supporting documentation. The application pack and the relevant templates can be found in the Programme’s webpage.

  • -
  • For further information interested parties may contact the Joint Managing

Authority by e-mail or by fax no later than 21 calendar days before the deadline for the submission of the proposals.

• Submission of Proposal

  • -
  • The deadline for the submission of proposals will be specified in the call for

proposals.

• Evaluation and Selection of Projects

  • -
  • Following the closure of the call for the submission of proposals, application

forms will be examined and evaluated by the Project Selection Committee, supported by the Joint Managing Authority and the Joint Technical Secretariat, and with the assistance of external assessors. All proposals will be evaluated based on the eligibility criteria set in the Guidelines for Applicants.

-

--
The Project Selection Committee prepares a list with all the recommended projects and sends it via the Joint Managing Authority to the Joint Monitoring Committee for approval.

Applicants will be informed by the Joint Managing Authority in writing of the Joint Monitoring Committee decision concerning their application and the reason for the decision.

The Joint Managing Authority signs the Grant Contract with the Lead Partners of approved projects.

The procedure of Submission, Evaluation and Selection of Projects lasts approximately between 13-15 months.

Based on article 2 of the Special Conditions, approved projects may start being implemented:

--the day following that on which the Grant Contract has been fully signed, or the first day of the month following the date on which the first instalment of pre-financing is paid by the Joint Managing Authority, or

  • at a later date.
  • -

9

The certification of expenses will be undertaken by an independent auditor each time an advance is requested to the Joint Managing Authority. It is noted that for the certification of expenses of the Cypriot partners an independent auditor will need to be hired, who will be approved by the Planning Bureau and whose cost will be covered by the project under category “Other costs”. The auditors need to be members of a professional organisation of accountants/auditors.

It is noted that, were applicable, the Public Procurement Rules should be followed.

General Information about the Programme

Institutional Framework

Further information about the operational framework, management and implementation of projects is included primarily in the following documents:

-

-
Regulation 1638/2006 laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument.

Regulation 951/2007 laying down implementing rules for cross-border cooperation programmes financed under Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument.

  • -
  • Regulation No 1998/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the

Treaty to de minimis aid.

---
Practical Guide to contract procedures for EC external actions (PRAG). Public Procurement Procedures Law 12(Ι)/2006. The Joint Operational Programme, the Guidelines for Applicants, the Grant Application Form and the Grant Contract which can be found in the Programme’s webpage www.enpicbcmed.eu and also in the webpage of the Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund of the Planning Bureau

www.structuralfunds.org.cy.

10

Joint Monitoring Committee

The Joint Monitoring Committee is the decision-making body of the Programme. It consists of a delegation from each country participating in the Programme, the Director of the Joint Managing Authority without voting right, a representative of the European Commission as an observer and without any decision-making power and a representative of each Branch Office, without voting right, with advisory status.

Recommended publications
  • Financiai Innovations for SME Cre"Ditandequity Financing: The

    Financiai Innovations for SME Cre"Ditandequity Financing: The

    ..--:--' CFE/SME(2005)8/REV3 ANNEXI: A SYNOPTIC VIEW OF THE CONFERENCE STRUCTURE OFFICIAL OPENING Tuesday, 28 am PLENARY KEYNOTE SESSION: March "THE SME FINANCING GAP: THEORY ANO EVIOENCE" pm ParaUel WORKSHOP A: Session 1: TheNature Df The Workshops Credit Financing for Market Failure In Relation To SMEs: Constraints' Debt Financing and Innovative' Solutions WORKSHOPB: 1: The Nature Df The Equity . Financing .Market Failure,' In Relation To for SMEs imd" the DebtFinancing?- Role of Government . Wednesday, 29 am March ,8ession 2: What 'Role" For ,'Government? pm Plenary Session Financiai Innovations For SME Cre"ditAndEquity of the ParaUel Financing: The Contributions oÍ 'Markets And Workshops Governments Thursday, 30 am FINAL PLENARY SESSION: March CONCLUSIONS ANO RECOMMENOA TIONS BY CHAIRS 15 CFE/SME(2005)8/REV3 DRAFT CONFERENCE PROGRAMME MONDA Y 27 MARCH 2006 OFFICIAL OPENING 18:00-20:00 Mr. Luiz Inado Lula da Silva President of Brazil Mr. Luiz Fernando Furlan Minister ofDeveloprnent, Industry and Foreign Trade, Brazil High Levei Officials ji-om Brazil and invited countries Mr. Herwig Schlõgl Deputy Secretary-General, OECD KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Mr. Takao Suzuki, Chairman, Organization for Small & Medium Enterprises and Regional innovation, lapan 16 CFE/SME(2005)8/REV3 MORNING, TUESDA Y 28 MARCH 2006 PLENARY KEYNOTE SESSION: "THE SME FINANCING GAP: THEORY AND EVIDENCE" CHAIR: Mr. Henvig Schlõgl, Deputy Secretary-General, OECD Presentation o/the OECD Secretariat Background Paper: 9:00 - 9:15 M. André Laboul, Directorate for FinanciaI and Enterprise Affairs, OECD Mr. Hugh Morgan Williams, Chair cm SME Council and Vice Chair, Entrepreneurship and SME Committee, Union des Industries de la Communauté Européenne (UNICE), (invited) or Mr.
  • The Eurogroup & the Atlantic Council of the United States

    The Eurogroup & the Atlantic Council of the United States

    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu THE EUROGROUP & THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES 1992 EUROGROUP WASHINGTON CONFERENCE SECURITY CHALLENGES IN THE 1990s: NATO'S CONTRIBUTION TO AN UNDIVIDED EUROPE JUNE 21 & 22, 1992 JW MARRIOTT HOTEL, GRAND BALLROOM 1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D. C. Page 1 of 72 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu 1992 EUROGROUP WASHINGTON CONFERENCE THE EUROGROUP The EUROGROUP was established in 1968 as an informal grouping of Defense Ministers of European governments within the framework of the NATO alliance. It aims to insure that the contribution which its twelve members-Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom- TABLE OF CONTENTS make to Alliance defense is as strong and cohesive as possible. It lays special stress on promoting practical cooperation and has technical sub- groups working in the fields of training, logistics, communcations, military medicine, and operational concepts. The defense ministers of the EUROGROUP countries meet every six months to direct this activity and to discuss major defense and security issues, Program ..................................................... especially those related to NATO's defense planning business. In addition, 2 the EUROGROUP seeks to advance open dialogue on Issues of European defense and the NATO alliance. EUROGROUP Delegations . .4 THE WASHINGTON CONFERENCE Distinguished Observers . 9 The annual conference in Washington, D.C., contributes to the multina- tional dialogue by inviting U.S. government officials, members of the private sector, and national and international media to join EUROGROUP Biographies delegations, ministers of defense, and permanent representatives to NATO in an open forum to discuss European and trans-Atlantic security issues.
  • Guide to the Council of the European Communities : December 1989

    Guide to the Council of the European Communities : December 1989

    General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES December 1989 General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, December 1989 This publication is also available in the following languages: ES ISBN 92-824-0702-0 DA ISBN 92-824-0703-9 DE ISBN 92-824-0704-7 GR ISBN 92-824-0705-5 FR ISBN 92-824-0707-1 IT ISBN 92-824-0708-X NL ISBN 92-824-0709-8 PT ISBN 92-824-0710-1 Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1990 ISBN 92-824-0706-3 Catalogue number: BX-57-89-176-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1990 Printed in Belgium CONTENTS Page Council of the European Communities 5 Presidency of the Council 7 Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States 8 List of representatives of the governments of the Member States who regularly take part in Council meetings 9 Belgium 10 Denmark 11 Federal Republic of Germany 12 Greece 15 Spain 17 France 19 Ireland 21 Italy 23 Luxembourg 29 Netherlands 30 Portugal 32 United Kingdom 35 Permanent Representatives Committee 39 Coreper II 40 Coreper I 42 Article 113 Committee 44 Special Committee on Agriculture 44 Standing Committee on Employment 44 Budget Committee 44 Scientific and Technical Research Committee (Crest) 45 Education Committee 45 Committee on Cultural Affairs 46 Select Committee on Cooperation Agreements between the Member States and third countries 46 Energy Committee 46 Standing Committee on Uranium
  • 7 November 1990)

    7 November 1990)

    Report by the WEU Assembly on the consequences of the invasion of Kuwait (7 November 1990) Caption: In a report presented to the Assembly of Western European Union (WEU) on 7 November 1990, the Defence Committee assesses developments in the situation in the Persian Gulf after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait and emphasises the importance of carrying through WEU actions to help the United Nations in the settlement of the Gulf crisis. Source: Proceedings. Thirty-sixth ordinary session. Second part, III. Assembly documents. Paris: Assembly of Western European Union, December 1990. 346 p. "Consequences of the invasion of Kuwait: continuing operations in the Gulf region. Document 1248. 7 November 1990", p. 188. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/report_by_the_weu_assembly_on_the_consequences_of_th e_invasion_of_kuwait_7_november_1990-en-c3f8d6ba-c1ae-4071-b184- 4379a7051c87.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/47 Document 1248 7th November 1990 Consequences of the invasion of Kuwait: continuing operations in the Gulf region REPORT 1 submitted on behalf of the Defence Committee2 by Mr. De Hoop Scheffer, Rapporteur TABLE OF CONTENTS RAPPORTEUR'S PREFACE DRAFT RECOMMENDATION on the consequences of the invasion of Kuwait: continuing operations in the Gulf region EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM submitted by Mr. De Hoop Scheffer, Rapporteur I. Introduction II. Developments from mid-September to date (i) Second extraordinary meeting of the WEU Council of Ministers, Tuesday, 18th September 1990 (ii) Meeting of Defence and Political Committees followed by Presi­ dential Committee meeting, Thursday, 20th September 1990 (iii) Assembly delegation to examine the WEU naval deployment in the Gulf III.
  • Mário Soares. a Politician and President of Unwritten Constitutional Competences

    Mário Soares. a Politician and President of Unwritten Constitutional Competences

    Mário Soares. A Politician and President of Unwritten Constitutional Competences. Rebecca Sequeira Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Content 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Charisma and Rhetoric in Theory and Practice............................................................. 3 3. The Role of Soares in the Revolutionary Phase 1974-1976........................................ 6 3.1 The Opposition in the Estado Novo and the End of the Dictatorship........................ 6 3.2 The Portuguese Parties and their Role in the Development of the Portuguese Democracy …........................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Partido Socialista................................................................................................ 9 3.2.1.1 The Development and Role of the PS in the Revolutionary Phase................................................................................................................ 10 3.2.1.2 Organization and Composition of the PS..................................... 15 3.2.2 Partido Comunista de Portugal........................................................................ 16 3.2.3 Partido Popular Democrático/ Partido Social Democrata......................... 19 3.2.4 Centro Democrático Social/ Partido Popular............................................... 21 3.3 The Birth of the II. Republic: The Legal Validity
  • Here the Programme

    Here the Programme

    Towards understanding and modelling intense electronic excitation Working Group Meeting + MC Meeting + Core Group Meeting 17 & 18 February 2020 Warsaw, Poland AGENDA Monday, 17 February 2020 8:30 – 9:00 Registration 9:00 – 9:20 Opening session 9:20 – 9:30 COST reimbursements rules (A. Benitez) 9:30 – 10:50 Session I: oral presentations + discussions • Rivera • F. Da Pieve • Solov’yov • B. Ziaja 10:50 – 11:15 Coffee break 11:15 – 12:45 Session II: oral presentations + discussions • E. Oliva • M. Dimitrijević • L. Stella • V. Tkachenko • K.A. Janulewicz 12:45 – 14:15 Lunch 12:15 – 15:00 Session III: oral presentations + discussions • T. Apostolova • S. Zakharov • M. Müller 15:00 – 18:00 Poster session (w/ refreshments), interactive discussions, experimentalist corner, core group meeting 19:00 Dinner at restaurant Folk Gospoda Tuesday, 18 February 2020 9:30 – 10:45 Session IV: oral presentations + discussions • L. Varvarezos • O. Kravcov • H. Vazquez • G. Tsibidis • P. Wachulak 10:45 – 11:10 Coffee break 11:10 – 12:40 Session V: oral presentations + concluding remarks • M. Tatarakis • K. Kaleris • V. Dimitriou • Tazes • M.B. Yelten 12:40 – 14:00 Lunch 14:00 – 16:00 MC meeting (only for invited MC members) Military University of Technology MUT Conference Center ul.gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego 9 00-908 Warszawa, POLAND DETAILED PROGRAMME ORAL PRESENTATIONS SESSION I (Monday, 9:30 – 10:50) ***80 min Multiscale approach to the interaction of intense femtosecond laser pulses with plasmonic nanoparticles I.1 Antonio Rivera Institute of Nuclear Fusion,
  • Psi-K Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus Warrington WA4 4AD

    Psi-K Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus Warrington WA4 4AD

    Psi-k Daresbury Science and Innovation Campus Warrington WA4 4AD 14th of January, 2010 Dear Dr. Damian Jones (cc: Dr. Peter H. Dederichs), I am writing to confirm that the quantity of 6400.00 Euros has been received by the CENTRO DE CIENCIAS DE BENASQUE “PEDRO PASCUAL”. Please find a detailed description of the expenses that amount to the sum of 8000.00 Euros agreed by the Psi-k. We look forward to receive the remaining 1600.00 Euros. The money has been used as financial support to cover the registration fee, travel and accommodation expenses for students attending the school “Time- Dependent Density-Functional Theory” held in Benasque from the 31st of August until the 9th of September, 2008. Please find enclosed a table showing the distribution of funding amongst the students and lectures. Copies of the bills will be sent to you by surface mail as soon as possible. Dr Angel Rubio, the scientific organiser of the school will send a detailed scientific report in due time. Yours sincerely, José Ignacio Latorre Director PSIK: Funding distribution Amount Daily Travel Accomodation received Surname First name NationalityAllowance support Payment support Return (euros) BURGESS Robertson Australian 523.60 0.00 0.00 583.00 6.60 1100.00 ESPINOSA Leonardo Colombia 224.40 76.50 0.00 116.50 17.40 400.00 ETZ Corina Romanian 0.00 100.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 900.00 FUKS Johanna German 224.40 115.90 0.00 560.00 0.30 900.00 GARCIA Pablo Spain 336.60 92.53 0.00 471.00 0.13 900.00 GRUNING Myrta Italian 299.20 78.84 217.96 304.00 0.00 900.00 CONOR Hogan Irish 149.60 249.75 50.65 150.00 0.00 600.00 NATARAJAN Bhaarathi Indian 561.00 41.48 0.00 305.00 7.48 900.00 SURAUD Eric French 187.00 163.40 0.00 350.00 0.40 700.00 COFFEE BREAK 700.00 Total 8000.00 Euros TIME-DEPENDENT DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY: PROSPECTS AND APPLICATIONS 4th International Workshop and School Benasque (Spain), January 2 – 15, 2010 A.
  • Investigação No Âmbito Do Projecto “Patronagem Política Em Portugal”

    Investigação No Âmbito Do Projecto “Patronagem Política Em Portugal”

    Investigação no âmbito do projecto “Patronagem Política em Portugal” Financiado pela FCT (Ref: PTDC/CPO/65419/2006) Co-financiado, desde 2010, pelo Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) através do Eixo I do Programa Operacional Fatores de Competitividade, POFC – COMPETE (Ref: COMPETE FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-007115) Research of the “Political Patronage in Portugal” project Funded by FCT (Ref: PTDC/CPO/65419/2006) Co-financed, since 2010, by the Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) through the Eixo I do Programa Operacional Fatores de Competitividade, POFC – COMPETE (Ref: COMPETE FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER- 007115) Revista Enfoques, Vol. VII N° 11, 2009 pp. 441/470 Weak Societal Roots, Strong Individual Patrons? Patronage & Party Organization in Portugal Carlos Jalali - [email protected] Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal Marco Lisi - [email protected] Instituto de Ciências Sociais - Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal We examine why patronage may constitute an important dimension of analysis in the study of Portuguese political parties and the evolution of its party system. In particular, we are interested in exploring two inter-related aspects: frst, what is the role of patronage for party organisations in Portugal? And second, how does it im- pact on intra-party functioning? Overall, access to state resources appears to be cru- cial in the rapid building of the party organisations and in their subsequent mainte- nance, potentially creating also barriers to entry for new competitors. This pattern is to a large extent explained by the context in which parties emerged in Portugal, which substantially shaped their organisational structure and societal roots. Keywords: Party; Patronage; Appointments; Portugal.
  • Open in PDF Format

    Open in PDF Format

    Biographies of eminent Portuguese politicians (names from A to L) Source: Maria Fernanda Rollo, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Av. de Berna, 26-C 1069-061 Lisboa. www.fcsh.unl.pt. Copyright: (c) Translation CVCE.EU by UNI.LU All rights of reproduction, of public communication, of adaptation, of distribution or of dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. Consult the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/biographies_of_eminent_portuguese_politicians_names_fro m_a_to_l-en-d7ef7c24-0423-403d-9e47-792b27cf5ec3.html Last updated: 05/07/2016 1/20 Biographies of eminent Portuguese politicians (names from A to L) ABREU, Augusto Cancela de Director of Sociedade Estoril and a member of the Board of Directors of Caminhos-de-ferro da Beira Alta. In the government reshuffle of 6 September 1944, became Minister for Public Works, a post which he held until 4 February 1947. Then moved to the Ministry of Home Affairs as Minister until 2 August 1950. ALMEIDA, Vasco Vieira de Born in 1932. Graduated in law in 1955. Member of MUD Juvenil (MUD-J) [youth wing of the Movement of Democratic Unity] when in grammar school. Supported Arlindo Vicente as a candidate for President of the Republic in the 1958 elections, transferring his support to Humberto Delgado when the PCP’s candidate announced that he would stand down. Was imprisoned twice: in 1958, on the day of the presidential elections, and in 1963, after being involved in the escape of some important Communist Party members from Caxias prison on 4 December 1961.
  • The Transition to a Democratic Portuguese Judicial System: (Delaying) Changes in the Legal Culture*

    The Transition to a Democratic Portuguese Judicial System: (Delaying) Changes in the Legal Culture*

    International Journal of Law in Context, 12,1 pp. 24–41 (2016) © Cambridge University Press 2016 doi:10.1017/S1744552315000373 The transition to a democratic Portuguese judicial system: (delaying) changes in the legal culture* † João Paulo Dias Abstract The Revolution of 25 April 1974 had a strong impact on justice in Portugal. Initially, it can be said that there was evidence of a process of democratisation involving the judicial structures, together with effective improvements to conditions allowing for independent and autonomous professional performance. However, in analysing the course of judicial reforms, it can be seen that changes took place more on a legislative level than in terms of the performance of the courts, proving that the evolution of the judicial system still demands a change of the legal culture. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to reflect on the evolution of the legal architecture in Portugal, seeking to determine whether the transition to a democratic judicial system is complete or whether, on the contrary, we are still faced with the process of justice in transition, delaying any changes in the current legal culture. I. Justice(s), democratisation, protagonists and social change: forty years after the Revolution The analysis of democratisation processes in various countries that have experienced dictatorships, such as Spain, Greece, Portugal or, more recently, Eastern and Central European countries, ‘tends to present the construction of an independent judiciary either as an automatic consequence of the institutionalisation of democracy, or as one of the ceteris paribus conditions under which the behaviour of political actors unfolds’ (Magalhães, 1995, p.
  • EMU and Portugal

    EMU and Portugal

    TASK FORCE Economic and Monetary Union Briefing 15 (Second revision) Briefing prepared by the Directorate-General for Research Economic Affairs Division The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the European Parliament Portugal’s participation in EMU at the initial stage now looks certain Luxembourg 21st April 1998 PE 166.227/rev. 2 EMU and Portugal CONTENTS Introduction 3 Compliance with the Criteria 4 a) Inflation 4 b) Long-term interest rates 5 c) Budget deficits as a % of GDP 6 d) Public Debt as a % of GDP 8 e) Normal ERM fluctuation margins 9 f) Independence of the Bank of Portugal 10 g) Growth and unemployment 11 h) Current account balance 13 i) EC Cohesion and Structural Funds 13 The Political Background 14 i) The Government (Socialist Party) 14 ii) The Social Democratic Party 14 iii) The Popular Party 14 iv) The Communist Party 14 v) The political situation 15 vi) Public opinion 15 Conclusions 16 Charts and Tables Table 1: Convergence criteria for Portugal 4 Chart 1: Inflation 5 Chart 2: Interest rates 6 Chart 3: Budget deficit 7 Chart 4: Public debt 8 Table 2: Sustainability of Portuguese debt trends 9 Table 3: Exchange rate stability 10 Chart 5: Growth 11 Chart 6: Unemployment 12 Chart 7: Unit labour costs 12 Chart 8: Current account balance 13 Authors: Alfonso Alfaro and Sonia González Editor: Ben Patterson PE 166.227/rev. 2 EMU and Portugal Introduction On the 25th March the Commission and the European Monetary Institute published their separate reports on progress towards meeting the convergence criteria for Economic and Monetary Union.
  • Redalyc.Weak Societal Roots, Strong Individual Patrons? Patronage & Party Organization in Portugal

    Redalyc.Weak Societal Roots, Strong Individual Patrons? Patronage & Party Organization in Portugal

    Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública ISSN: 0718-0241 [email protected] Universidad Central de Chile Chile Jalali, Carlos; Lisi, Marco Weak Societal Roots, Strong Individual Patrons? Patronage & Party Organization in Portugal Revista Enfoques: Ciencia Política y Administración Pública, vol. VII, núm. 11, 2009, pp. 441-470 Universidad Central de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=96011647014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Enfoques, Vol. VII N° 11, 2009 pp. 441/470 Weak Societal Roots, Strong Individual Patrons? Patronage & Party Organization in Portugal Carlos Jalali - [email protected] Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal Marco Lisi - [email protected] Instituto de Ciências Sociais - Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal We examine why patronage may constitute an important dimension of analysis in the study of Portuguese political parties and the evolution of its party system. In particular, we are interested in exploring two inter-related aspects: first, what is the role of patronage for party organisations in Portugal? And second, how does it im- pact on intra-party functioning? Overall, access to state resources appears to be cru- cial in the rapid building of the party organisations and in their subsequent mainte- nance, potentially creating also barriers to entry for new competitors. This pattern is to a large extent explained by the context in which parties emerged in Portugal, which substantially shaped their organisational structure and societal roots.