DOCSLIB.ORG

Classification Framework for Free Space Optical Communication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classification Framework for Free Space Optical Communication 1 Classification Framework for Free Space Optical Communication Links and Systems Abdelbaset S. Hamza, Member, IEEE, Jitender S. Deogun, Member, IEEE, Dennis R. Alexander Abstract—Free Space Optical (FSO) communication technol- performance-sensitive. The IoT market is expected to grow ogy, also known as Optical Wireless Communications (OWC), has from 9.1 billion devices and objects connected to the In- regained a great interest over the last few years. In some cases, ternet in 2013 to 28.1 billion by 2020 [1], that is more FSO is seen as an alternative to existing technologies, such as radio frequency. In other cases, FSO is considered as a strong than three times the global population expected by 2020. candidate to complement and integrate with next-generation As such applications and systems rapidly move closer to technologies, such as 5G wireless networks. Accordingly, FSO end users, wireless communication systems, are the favored technology is being widely deployed in various indoor (e.g., data communication technologies as they allow for user mobility. centers), terrestrial (e.g., mobile networks), space (e.g., inter- Moreover, wireless technologies avoid most of the inherent satellite and deep space communication), and underwater systems (e.g., underwater sensing). As the application portfolio of FSO complexity that wired technologies suffer from, such as, long technology grows, so does the need for a clear classification for setup time, right of the way for digging, and the sunk cost once FSO link configurations. Most existing surveys and classifications the cables are laid [2]. It is expected that two-thirds of total are single-level classifications, and thus not inclusive enough to IP traffic by 2020 will be generated by wireless and mobile accommodate recent and emerging changes and developments of devices [3]. different FSO link configurations and systems. In this paper, we propose a multi-level classification framework to classify Figure 1 depicts part of the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum existing and future indoor, terrestrial, space, underwater, and and the frequency (and wavelength) ranges for each band of heterogenous FSO links and systems using common and simple the spectrum. As the frequency increases, the wavelength and unified notation. We use the proposed classification to review effective area of an antenna decrease. The carrier frequency and summarize major experimental work and systems in the is selected based on the application. For example, ground- area until 2017. Using the proposed classification and survey, we aim to give researchers a jump-start to tap into the grow- to-submarine communications utilize audio waves due to its ing and expanding realm of the FSO technology in different very long wavelengths (i.e., very low frequency and very environments. The proposed classification can also help organize large antenna) and the limited propagation capability of RF and systematically present the progress in the research on FSO signals in electrical conductors such as salt water due to technology. This makes the identification of the market needs for absorption. On the other hand, radio frequencies in the Ultra standards an easier task. Moreover, different entities involved in the standardization process including academic, industry, and High Frequency (UHF) and Super High Frequency (SHF) band regulatory organizations can use the proposed classification as a range are capable of penetrating windows, walls, and ceils. unified language to communicate during the early stages of stan- Therefore, the IEEE 802.11b/g/n (WiFi) networks utilize the dard development which require ambiguity-free discussions and unlicensed 2.4 GHz UHF and 5 GHz SHF radio bands. exchange of ideas between different standardization entities. We RF is a mature technology and is being widely deployed in use the proposed classification to review existing standards and recommendations in the field of FSO. It is also envisioned that many indoor, terrestrial, and space communication systems. the proposed classification can be used as a unified framework However, the propagation nature of the RF communication to define different FSO channel models for simulation tools. systems raises a problem of interference, which in turn af- Index Terms—Classification, Free Space Optical (FSO), In- fects the usability of frequencies, and hence, the capacity. door, Optical Wireless Communications (OWC), Space, Survey, Therefore, the RF spectrum is regulated by the local and Terrestrial, Underwater, Wireless Communications. international authorities to limit the interference, and guarantee proper operation and coexistence of systems relying on RF. I. INTRODUCTION As the applications of RF communication are progressively increasing, the RF spectrum becomes more congested, scarce MERGING Big Data applications and systems found and thus expensive to acquire. Several efforts are put from E in disciplines like social media and Internet-of-Things research and industry to stretch the capability of existing (IoT), are characterized by being bandwidth-intensive and wireless technologies (e.g., alleviating interference) and to A.S. Hamza was with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, develop new ones to fulfill the emerging needs [4], [5]. NE, 68588 USA. He is now with the Department of Computer Sci- Free Space Optical (FSO) communication, also known as ence, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, 28608 USA (e-mail: Optical Wireless Communication (OWC) as discussed later in [email protected]). J.S. Deogun is with the Department of Computer Science and Computer Section II-A, is being extensively investigated over the last few Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588 USA (e- decades as an attractive alternative technology to RF. Similar mail: [email protected]). to fiber optics, data are used to modulate a light beam in FSO. D.R. Alexander is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588 USA (e-mail: The light beam then propagates from one point to another, [email protected]). however, in a wireless manner. The recent spike in interest 2 Fig. 1: Part of the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum showing the frequency (and wavelength) ranges for each band. in FSO technology stems from the fact that FSO combines RF-sensitive navigation and avionics electronic systems [21]. high-bandwidth of optical communication systems and the Moreover, the next generations of wireless communication flexibility of wireless technologies. systems (e.g., 5G) incorporate several complementary access FSO technology operates in a broad spectrum (see Fig- technologies along with the RF technology, including FSO ure 1) including Near Infrared (NIR), Visible Light (VL), [22], [23]. and Ultraviolet (UV) bands. Conventionally, terrestrial and A preliminary optical communication experiment was space FSO links operate in the NIR band similar to fibre- among the secondary objectives of the mission Gemini 7 optic systems [6]. As will be shown in subsequent sections, conducted by NASA in 1965 [24]. The experiment was terrestrial systems can also operate in the VL [7] and UV only partially completed due to the cloud obscuration and [8] bands. On the other hand, Indoor FSO links commonly the spacecraft altitude restrictions [25]. Three years later, operate in the NIR [9] and VL [10] bands, whereas, underwater Erhard Kube published the original FSO communications OWC systems operate in the NIR [11] and VL [12] bands. white paper ”Information transmission by light beams through The extremely short wavelengths (i.e., high frequencies) at the atmosphere” [26]. In this paper, E. Kube explained the which FSO systems operate make FSO detectors immune to possibility of transmitting data through the atmosphere using multipath fading (i.e., large fluctuations in received signal green (0.6 µm) and red (0.8 µm) laser sources. Continued magnitude and phase) as opposed to RF links, which are development of lasers led to the development of a small and highly susceptible to multipath fading. This can be attributed continuous-beam semiconductor light sources that work at to the spatial diversity resulting from the fact that FSO detector room temperature by Zhores Alferov in 1970. This invention areas are extremely large compared to the wavelengths [13]. opened new horizons for the development of OWC systems. In addition to the unregulated spectrum, most of the optical In 1979, Gfeller and Bapst introduced the first indoor OWC components used in FSO links are cheaper, smaller, lighter system in which the diffuse emissions in the infrared (IR) and have lower power consumption as compared to that of band were used [27]. The continued research and development RF components leading to cost and energy saving [14]–[18]. by academic institutions, industry and military organizations, Although most of the FSO components are cheaper, lighter, enabled the FSO communication to find its place in many and smaller than that of RF links, one must keep in mind that applications, such as, mobile networks backhaul [28], [29], FSO networking solutions are not as mature and commercially space communication [30], underwater (UW) sensing [31], available as their RF counterpart. We believe that this is a [32], wireless sensor networks (WSNs) [8], indoor local area main contributor to the fact that FSO commercial solutions networks [33], [34], data center networks (DCNs) [9] and can be sometimes more expensive and bulkier especially in the many other applications. case of terrestrial FSO links [19]. As the technology becomes more popular and with the expected increase in the market A. Motivation and Contribution competition, the price of FSO solutions is expected to drop. Advantages of the FSO technology have been known for a On the other hand, as the technology matures, designer of long time. However, utilization of these advantages was facil- FSO solutions will be able to develop the best design practices itated by recent development and advances in FSO enabling which will influence the size of the modules used in the FSO technologies. As a result, a large number of research papers systems. on new FSO applications has been published recently.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For
    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Gemini: America in Space Series Ebook
    PROJECT GEMINI: AMERICA IN SPACE SERIES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Eugen Reichl | 144 pages | 28 Mar 2016 | Schiffer Publishing Ltd | 9780764350702 | English | Atglen, United States Project Gemini: America in Space Series PDF Book A-4G Skyhawk. This photo was taken of the two pilots in the spacecraft simulator at the McDonnell plant in St. This program was the turning point in the space race with the USSR; from then on the Americans took the lead. Flights lasting two weeks, into the Van Allen Belt, the first extravehicular activities, rendezvous maneuvers and docking with other spacecraft—all of this was achieved by Gemini, paving the way for the more demanding moon landing program. The channel of the intracoastal waterway can be seen near the bottom center of the image. See all 5 - All listings for this product. McDonnell later sought to extend the Gemini program by proposing a derivative which could be used to fly a cislunar mission and even achieve a crewed lunar landing earlier and at less cost than Apollo, but these proposals were rejected by NASA. Hamilton Crawford's It was not all success, however. President Lyndon B. Like almost every significant undertaking, Project Gemini also had its dramas and tragedies. These were followed by ten flights with crews in and Any condition Any condition. First space rendezvous accomplished, station- keeping for over five hours at distances from 1 to feet 0. This mission was flown by the backup crew. Gemini was the first astronaut-carrying spacecraft to include an onboard computer, the Gemini Guidance Computer , to facilitate management and control of mission maneuvers.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight. Activities for the Primary Student. Aerospace Education Services Project
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 288 714 SE 048 726 AUTHOR Hartsfield, John W.; Hartsfield, Kendra J. TITLE Human Spaceflight. Activities for the Primary Student. Aerospace Education Services Project. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, Ohio. Lewis Research Center. PUB DATE Oct 85 NOTE 126p. PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Materials (For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; Aerospace Technology; Educational Games; Elementary Education; *Elementary School Science; 'Science Activities; Science and Society; Science Education; *Science History; *Science Instruction; *Space Exploration; Space Sciences IDENTIFIERS *Space Travel ABSTRACT Since its beginning, the space program has caught the attention of young people. This space science activity booklet was designed to provide information and learning activities for students in elementary grades. It contains chapters on:(1) primitive beliefs about flight; (2) early fantasies of flight; (3) the United States human spaceflight programs; (4) a history of human spaceflight activity; (5) life support systems for the astronaut; (6) food for human spaceflight; (7) clothing for spaceflight and activity; (8) warte management systems; (9) a human space flight le;g; and (10) addition 1 activities and pictures. Also included is a bibliography of books, other publications and films, and the answers to the three word puzzles appearing in the booklet. (TW) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT U.S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION Activities CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as mewed from the person or organization originating it Minor changes have been made to norm.
    [Show full text]
  • 42881041.Pdf
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19760066765 2020-03-22T13:30:13+00:00Z NA1IONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TELS. WASHINGTON. D.C. 20546 WO 'l-',9?rj FOR RELEASE: MONDAY P.M. November 29, 1965 RELEASE NO: 65-362 KtS»8 ,'W ^\ PROJECT: GEMINI 7/6 R ^ .^ ^ fcT FEB 1976 & RECEIVED C_W^\ ^ NASA STI FACILITY. ^2 INPUT BRANCH. E X %JU^ CONTENTS o 00 (A «j cr> Title Page 7 r-t r O m C! S GENERAL NEWS RELEASE ' 1-3 a D T- Launch Vehicle Countdown 4 00 CT> ; Nominal Mission Plan - Gemini 7 5-6 X o Gemini 7 Experiments . • 7-l4 o Experiments Flown on Earlier Missions 7 S In-Flight Exerciser 7-8 & In-Flight Phonocardiogram 8 £ Bone Demineralization 8-9 • H Human Otolith Function 9 *> « Proton-Electron Spectrometer 9-10 Xp Tri-Axis Magnetometer 10 Celestial Radiometry Space Object Radiometry-10-11 & & Simple Navigation 11 ^ 2 Synoptic Terrain Photography 11-12 g Synoptic Weather Photography -12 10 Visual Acuity Astronaut Visibility 12-14 ^g Experiments to be Flown for the First Time 15-20 ™ ^ K Bioassays Body Fluids : . 15 ^ w Calcium Balance Study 15 in a a 1 v In-Flight Sleep Analysis 5-l6 f^PO Optical Communication 16-18 o> oo Landmark Contrast Measurements 18 " CM I Star Occultation Navigation 18-20 ^ g ^ Camera Equipment for Gemini 7 and 6 Missions 21-22 o> H m 16 MM Maurer Movie Camera 21 f S a 70 MM Hasselblad Camera 22 £ ,-, ~ 0) H S5 Gemini 7 to be launched no earlier than Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • News & Notes: Vol. 32, No. 4, Fourth Quarter 2015
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Volume 32, Number 4 Fourth Quarter 2015 FROM A RECOLLECTION OF GEMINI FROM THE CHIEF 40 FEET AND 20 KNOTS HISTORIAN By William R. Carpentier, M.D., with John B. Charles, Ph.D. e are in the Wmiddle of the n January 1965, through a combina- 50th anniversary year Ition of preparation and luck, I joined IN THIS ISSUE: of Project Gemini. NASA’s Manned Spacecraft Center From the spring of (now Johnson Space Center) as a flight 1 From the Chief Historian 1965 through the end of 1966, 10 crewed surgeon trainee and was privileged to A Recollection of Gemini from Gemini missions successfully propelled the participate in a truly great adventure. In 1 United States from apparent perpetual also- July, I became a staff flight surgeon in the 40 Feet and 20 Knots ran to clear leader of the space race. But ask Medical Operations Office. I was soon 8 James A. Chamberlin and the most people about the space program in the assigned the job of flying in the recovery Birth of Gemini 1960s and you’ll hear about Apollo and, some- helicopter for the Gemini 5, 6, 7, and 9 times, the Mercury 7 astronauts. Gemini? missions, as well as working with the Navy 12 Francis Rogallo and the Hardly anybody remembers it, and fewer still Underwater Demolition Team (UDT) Development of Parawing Landing appreciate how it served as the critical test- swimmers in order to provide medical Craft for Project Gemini ing ground between our initial baby steps in support for astronaut rescue operations.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Kennedy Space Center, Operations and Checkout Building) First Street, Between Avenue D and Avenue E Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, LAUNCH COMPLEX 39, HAER FL-8-11-E ALTITUDE CHAMBERS FL-8-11-E (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Operations and Checkout Building) First Street, between Avenue D and Avenue E Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, LAUNCH COMPLEX 39, ALTITUDE CHAMBERS, (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Operation & Checkout Building) HAERNo. FL-8-11-E Location: Within the Operations and Checkout Building High Bay First Street, between Avenue D and Avenue E Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida U.S.G.S. 7.5. minute Cape Canaveral, Florida, quadrangle, Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates: 17.534600.3155100 Date of Installation: 1965 Designer/ Manufacturer: Stokes Equipment Division of the Pennsalt Chemical Corporation (now Pennwalt Corporation), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Installer: Pittsburgh Des Moines Steel Corporation; Elsbery Corporation; Fischer Electric Corporation Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899-0001 Present Use: Test facility (Chamber R); inactive (Chamber L) Significance: The two Altitude Chambers sit within the High Bay of the Operations and Checkout (O&C) Building. The O&C Building is located in the Industrial Area of the John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The O&C Building was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 2000 in recognition of its exceptional importance at the national level in the context of the Apollo program, for which it was used to assemble and test the Apollo spacecraft before launching.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume VII Human Spaceflight: Projects Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo
    Other Books in the NASA History Series Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program. Exploring John M. Logsdon, general editor. Volume the I: Organizing for Exploration, Volume II: External Relationships, Volume III: Using Space, Volume IV: Accessing Space, Volume V: Exploring the Cosmos, and Volume VI: Space and Earth Science, Volume VII: Human Spaceflight. NASA SP-4407, 1995–2008. UnknownSelected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program The first six volumes of this projected eight-volume documentary history have already become an essential reference for anyone interested in the history of the U.S. civil space program and its develop- ment over time. Each volume deals with specific issues in the development of the space program and includes more than 110 key documents, many of which are published for the first time. Each is intro- duced by a headnote providing context, bibliographical details, and background information necessary to understand the document. These are organized into major sections, each beginning with an introductory essay that keys the docu- ments to major events in the history of Volume VII space exploration. Human Spaceflight: All books in the NASA History Series Projects Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo may be ordered through the Government Printing Office online at http://bookstore. ISBN 978-0-16-081381-8 gpo.gov/index.html 90000 Edited by John M. Logsdon with Roger D. Launius Visit the NASA History Office Web site at http://history.nasa.gov 9 780160 813818 National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division Artist Pierre Mion’s painting of “A Speck of Dust.” Explorer astronauts are dwarfed Office of External Relations by the immense size of craters and moun- Washington, DC tains on the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • The Space Race Documented Through Front Pages of Newspapers from Around North America
    The News Frontier The Space Race documented through front pages of newspapers from around North America Newspapers and patches generously donated to the McAuliffe-Shepard Discovery Center by Jerrid Kenney After the end of World War II, a new battle began: the Cold War. In the mid-20th century, the United States and the Soviet Union were each trying to prove they were better than the other. Both sides wanted to show the superiority of their technology, military, and, by extension, their political systems. Starting in the late 1950s, the battlefront reached space. The United States and the Soviet Union fought to first achieve milestones in space exploration—starting in 1957 with the Soviet Union’s launch of Sputnik I, continuing through the U.S.’s landing astronauts on the Moon in 1969, and ending with a handshake in space between American astronauts and Soviet cosmonauts in 1975. Witness the fight for extraterrestrial might by reading about the United States and the Soviet Union’s major feats of the Space Race, as recorded in American and Canadian newspapers in real time. The Space Race Over Time July 15-24, 1975 February 20, 1962 May 28, 1964 The Space Race comes October 4, 1957 April 12, 1961 July 20, 1969 John Glenn becomes NASA launches to an end with the Soviet Union Yuri Gagarin Neil Armstrong first American to unmanned Saturn I Apollo-Soyuz Test launches first becomes first becomes the first orbit the Earth rocket as first step Project, the in-orbit artificial satellite human in space human to walk on of the Apollo the Moon docking of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight to the Moon Spacecraft Attitude Control, MIT IAP 16.S585
    1/17/21 Earth-Moon Orbit Orbital Period: 27-1/2 days One side of Moon always faces Earth Flight to the Moon Spacecraft Attitude Control, MIT IAP 16.S585 Robert Stengel Princeton University There is no “Dark Side” January 14, 2021 1 ALL SIDES are dark once a month 2 1 2 The Earth and the Moon December 17, 1958 Earth mass = 81.4 x Moon mass Orbit eccentricity = 0.05 1st Cosmonaut Mercury 7, 1959 Class, 1959 3 4 3 4 1 1/17/21 April 12, 1961 February 20, 1962 John Glenn Vostok 1 Friendship 7 Mercury-Atlas Yuri Gagarin 5 6 5 6 Project Gemini [1965-66] Lunar Missions 10 crewed Titan II missions June 1961 Competition among contractors for the spacecraft and launch rockets US takes Space Race Lead 7 8 7 8 2 1/17/21 First Apollo Program Contract MIT Instrumentation Laboratory August 9, 1961 HOWEVER … Lunar landing technique had not been decided 9 10 9 10 Alternative Landers Saturn 3rd Stage 11 12 11 12 3 1/17/21 Proposed Saturn Launch Vehicles July 1962 Two Saturn 5s One or One Saturn 5 Nova Ten Saturn 1s Saturn 1 Saturn 5 Nova (Saturn 8) 13 14 13 14 Saturn Launch Vehicles Saturn 1B Saturn 5 The Apollo Modules Earth Orbit Missions Lunar Missions Service Command Lunar Module Module Module North American Grumman 15 16 15 16 4 1/17/21 First Manned Flight, Apollo 7 Apollo 8, December 21-27, 1968 October 11, 1968 • Earth-orbit mission to test LM planned • More ambitious mission was pursued st Eisele Schirra Cunningham • Repurposed to 1 manned flight to the Moon • 6-day mission, no Lunar Module Coast Reentry Trans- Moon’s Lunar Coast Injection “Sphere
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight: Activities for the Intermediate and Junior High Student. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, Ohio
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 356 941 SE 053 002 AUTHOR Hartsfield, John W.; Hartsfield, Kendra J. TITLE Human Spaceflight: Activities for the Intermediate and Junior High Student. INSTITUTION National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, Ohio. Lewis Research Center. PUB DATE Oct 85 NOTE 83p.; For primary student activities, see ED 288 714. AVAILABLE FROMTeacher Resource Room, Visitor Information Center, NASA Lewis Research Center, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Instructional Materials (For Learner) 051) Guides - Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Aerospace Education; Biology; Class Activities; Integrated Activities; Intermediate Grades; Junior High Schools; Junior High School Students; *Learning Activities; Mathematics Instruction; Physical Sciences; Puzzles; *Science Activities; *Science Education; Science History; Science Instruction; *Space Exploration; *Space Sciences; Writing Assignments IDENTIFIERS Crossword Puzzles; Hands on Science; Rockets; Space Craft; Spacelab; Space Shuttle; *Space Travel ABSTRACT Since its beginning, space science has created high interest and continues to prod the imagination of students. This activity packet, which has been designed to enhance the curriculum and challenge gifted students, contains background information on spaceflight as well as 24 interdisciplinary classroom activities, 3 crossword puzzles, and 3 word find puzzles. Duplication of the materials for classroom use is encouraged. Sections of the document are as follows:(1) Primitive Beliefs, (2) Our Fantasy of Flight, (3) United States Human Spaceflight Programs,(4) History of Human Spaceflight Activity,(5) Food for Human Spaceflight, (6) Dressed for Spaceflight and Activity,(7) Waste Management Systems and Activity, (8) Human Spaceflight Log,(9) Activities and Pictures, and (10) Bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz the Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Infor␣ mat␣ ion Summar␣ ies PMS 017-C (KSC) September 1991 The Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz The Early Years: Mercury to Apollo-Soyuz The United States manned space flight effort has NASA then advanced to the Mercury-Atlas series of progressed through a series of programs of ever orbital missions. Another space milestone was reached increasing scope and complexity. The first Mercury launch on February 20, 1962, when Astronaut John H. Glenn, from a small concrete slab on Complex 5 at Cape Jr., became the first American in orbit, circling the Earth Canaveral required only a few hundred people. The three times in Friendship 7. launch of Apollo 11 from gigantic Complex 39 for man’s On May 24, 1962, Astronaut N. Scott Carpenter in first lunar landing engaged thousands. Each program Aurora 7 completed another three-orbit flight. has stood on the technological achievements of its Astronaut Walter N. Schirra, Jr., doubled the flight predecessor. The complex, sophisticated Space Shuttle time in space and orbited six times, landing Sigma 7 in a of today, with its ability to routinely carry six or more Pacific recovery area. All prior landings had been in the people into space, began as a tiny capsule where even Atlantic. one person felt cramped — the Mercury Program. Project Mercury Project Mercury became an official program of NASA on October 7, 1958. Seven astronauts were chosen in April, 1959, after a nationwide call for jet pilot volunteers. Project Mercury was assigned two broad missions by NASA-first, to investigate man’s ability to survive and perform in the space environment; and second, to develop the basic space technology and hardware for manned spaceflight programs to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Launch Vehicle Design
    Space Launch Vehicle Design Conceptual design of rocket powered, vertical takeoff, fully expendable and first stage boostback space launch vehicles David Woodward Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Texas at Arlington This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Masters of Science of Aerospace Engineering College of Engineering December 2017 i Declaration I hereby declare that except where specific reference is made to the work of others, this thesis is my own work and contains nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration with others, except as specified in the text and Acknowledgements. Of specific note is the MAE 4350/4351 Senior Design class that ran from January 2017 through August 2017 which was tasked with a similar project. The work presented in my thesis did not borrow from their work except for adapting their method for the estimating of the zero-lift drag coefficient of grid fins, which is referenced appropriately in the text. The methodology used to size first stage boostback launch vehicles and simulate a return-to-launch-site trajectory is of my own design and work. This thesis contains fewer than 51,000 words including appendices, bibliography, footnotes, tables and equations and has fewer than 90 figures. David Woodward January 2018 ii Acknowledgements To Dr. Chudoba, for first meeting with me back in my sophomore year and being a continual presence in my education ever since. The knowledge and skills I have developed from taking all of your classes and working in the AVD are indispensable, and I will be a far better engineer because of it.
    [Show full text]