Impacts of Vaccinium Arboreum Rootstocks on Vegetative Growth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impacts of Vaccinium Arboreum Rootstocks on Vegetative Growth HORTSCIENCE 55(1):40–45. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14585-19 and increase iron and ammonium availability. In the southeastern United States, pine bark is Vaccinium arboreum the common soil amendment used to increase Impacts of soil organic matter and is typically incorpo- rated into the top soil layer (Williamson Rootstocks on Vegetative Growth and et al., 2018). Without soil amendments, blueberry growth and yields decrease, and Yield in Two Southern Highbush plants become chlorotic and nonproductive. However, soil amendments required for es- tablishment and maintenance of blueberry Blueberry Cultivars plantings are costly (Julian et al., 2012) and Rebecca L. Darnell and Jeffrey G. Williamson may not be sustainable in the long term. Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Vaccinium arboreum is a wild blueberry native to the southeastern United States. It is a 32611 single-trunk, small tree that is adapted to low- Deanna C. Bayo and Philip F. Harmon organic matter mineral soils. Furthermore, this species tolerates soil pH up to 6.5 and—contrary Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 to cultivated Vaccinium—can assimilate nitro- Additional index words. bacterial leaf scorch, fruit quality, grafting, sparkleberry, Vaccinium gen in the nitrate form (Darnell and Hiss, 2006), corymbosum, interspecific hybrid which is the predominant nitrogen form at higher pH. Because of the broader soil adapta- Abstract. Vaccinium arboreum Marsh is a small tree adapted to low-organic matter soils tion of V. arboreum compared with cultivated and is one of the few ericaceous species that tolerates soil pH greater than 6.0. It has a Vaccinium species, studies have examined the deep root system and is more drought tolerant than cultivated blueberry. The use of V. use of V. arboreum as a rootstock to increase arboreum as a rootstock for commercial blueberry production has been studied soil adaptability of commercial blueberry pro- previously in young blueberry plantings. The objective of the current study was to duction. Ballington (1996, 1998) found that expand on earlier work and evaluate growth, productivity, and tolerance to bacterial leaf grafting rabbiteye blueberry (V. virgatum)onto scorch (Xylella fastidiosa) in established plantings of own-rooted vs. grafted southern V. arboreum rootstocks increased plant growth highbush blueberry (SHB). Two field plantings of grafted and own-rooted ‘Meadowlark’ and yield compared with own-rooted plants. and ‘Farthing’ SHB were established in May 2011: one at the University of Florida– More recently, Casamali et al. (2016) reported Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF-IFAS) Plant Science Research and that SHB (V. corymbosum interspecific hybrid) Education Unit in Citra, FL, and the other at a commercial blueberry farm in Archer, grafted onto V. arboreum had increased yields FL. At both sites, four rootstock–scion combinations were grown in either pine bark- compared with own-rooted plants when grown amended or nonamended soil. Canopy volume was greater in grafted compared with on nonamended soil, and similar yields com- own-rooted ‘Meadowlark’ at both locations throughout the 4 years of the study (2015– pared with own-rooted plants on amended soil 18), whereas canopy volume in ‘Farthing’ was not consistently different. For both during the first 2 years of production. Thus, the cultivars and both locations, canopy volume was greater on amended compared with use of V. arboreum as a rootstock for grafted nonamended soil. Although canopy growth was not consistently increased in the grafted SHB cultivars has the potential to decrease the compared with own-rooted plants, yield was greater in grafted plants of both cultivars at use of pine bark (or other soil amendments) both locations. Cumulative yield over the 4 years was similar between grafted plants needed for optimal blueberry production, ex- grown on both amended and nonamended soil, and was significantly greater than yield of pand production areas to different soil types, and own-rooted plants on nonamended soil, suggesting the use of this rootstock may decrease increase sustainability. the requirement for pine bark amendment. In general, grafted plants produced larger Although results from short-term research berries, with no negative impacts on fruit soluble solids, titratable acidity, or firmness. trials indicate the potential of using V. arbor- ‘Meadowlark’—an SHB cultivar that exhibits high sensitivity to bacterial leaf scorch— eum as a rootstock for blueberry, data from displayed decreased development of bacterial leaf scorch symptoms when grafted onto V. longer term trials are still needed. The current arboreum compared with own-rooted plants. These results indicate the potential benefits research continues the work initiated by Casa- of grafting SHB onto V. arboreum rootstock, particularly under marginal soil conditions. mali et al. (2016) and examines the use of V. However, a complete economic analysis that also takes into account any differences in arboreum as a rootstock for SHB during 4 longevity between the two systems must be done to determine whether the benefits of years after the establishment period. The using grafting are feasible financially for the grower. hypothesis tested in the current research is that SHB grafted onto V. arboreum rootstocks have increased growth and yield compared Rootstocks are commonly used in tree blackberry, raspberry, and blueberry) has with own-rooted SHB in both pine bark- fruit production and, more recently, vegeta- not been commonly adopted. Rootstocks amended and nonamended soils. The objec- ble production systems (Djidonou et al., offer many advantages to crops, including tives were to evaluate the effects of soil 2017; Zhao et al., 2018). However, the use size control (Basile and DeJong, 2018), in- treatment (amended vs. nonamended) and root of rootstocks in berry crops (strawberry, creased yields (Xu et al., 2014), increased system (own-rooted vs. grafted onto V. arbor- tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress (Liu eum) on canopy growth, yield, berry weight, et al., 2014), and enhanced soil adaptation and berry quality in two cultivars of SHB. In (Penella et al., 2015). addition, during the course of the experiment, Received for publication 23 Sept. 2019. Accepted Cultivated blueberry (Vaccinium species) root system differences in susceptibility to for publication 21 Oct. 2019. have strict soil requirements for optimum bacterial leaf scorch (Xylella fastidiosa)were Published online 12 December 2019. growth. These include low pH (4.0–5.5), high observed; thus, incidence and severity of this This material is based on work supported by the organic matter, good aeration and drainage disease were also evaluated. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer (Williamson et al., 2018), and readily avail- Services (Award 024045). able iron and ammonium (Darnell and Hiss, R.L.D. is the corresponding author. E-mail: rld@ Materials and Methods ufl.edu. 2006; Nunez et al., 2015). As a result of these This is an open access article distributed under the requirements, soil amendments and other Two field plantings of grafted and own- CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons. modifications (e.g., sulfur applications) are rooted ‘Meadowlark’ and ‘Farthing’ SHB org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). used to increase organic matter, lower pH, were established in May 2011: one at the 40 HORTSCIENCE VOL. 55(1) JANUARY 2020 UF-IFAS Plant Science Research and Edu- further data were available from that loca- Bacterial leaf scorch symptoms were cation Unit in Citra, FL, and the other at a tion. Canopy volume was determined by quantified in ‘Meadowlark’ experimental commercial blueberry farm (Straughn Farms measuring plant height and plant diameter plots in Citra five times between Aug. 2016 LLC, Archer, FL). These cultivars have high in two directions. Because of cultivar differ- and Nov. 2018. Data were acquired on yield potential (Williamson et al., 2014) and ences in canopy shape, a half-ellipsoid equa- ‘Meadowlark’ only, because that cultivar were widely planted by the industry at the tion, Eq. [1], was used to estimate canopy exhibits high sensitivity to the disease. Dis- initiation of this project. At each site, four volume in ‘Farthing’ and an elliptic cylinder ease incidence was recorded as a percentage scion–root system combinations were grown equation, Eq. [2], was used to estimate of the live plants per plot that had two or more (‘Meadowlark’ and ‘Farthing’ on their own volume in ‘Meadowlark’. leaves showing characteristic marginal roots or grafted onto V. arboreum). Details on scorch. Disease severity was quantified visu- the propagation, grafting, and sources of V. Canopy volume ʻFarthingʼ ally on a 0% to 100% scale for each of the arboreum rootstocks are given in Casamali three most symptomatic living plants per =2=3 ·p·Height et al. (2016). Plants were spaced 0.9 m in the plot. For symptoms to be considered caused row, with 3 m between rows at the Citra · ½ Diameter 1 · ½ Diameter 2 [1] by bacterial leaf scorch, and therefore quan- location; and 0.9 m in the row, with 3.3 m tified, yellow, defoliated stems and dieback between rows at the Archer location. At both Canopy volume ʻMeadowlarkʼ had to be associated with leaf scorch and not locations, the soil is Arrendondo sand, pH = p·Height · ½ Diameter 1 a result of abiotic factors or fungal diseases. 6.0, and organic matter 1.4%. Each In addition, before symptom ratings, the · scion–root system combination was grown in ½ Diameter 2 [2] presence of X. fastidiosa in symptomatic either pine bark-amended or nonamended leaves and stems was confirmed via real- soil. The amended treatment consisted of soil Fruit yield and mean berry weight at both time polymerase chain reaction at the Uni- amended by incorporating a 10-cm layer of locations were determined throughout the versity of Florida Plant Diagnostic Center, pine bark into the top 20 cm of soil, whereas harvestperiodeachyear.Berrieswerehand- Gainesville, FL. Incidence data were ana- the nonamended soil did not have any soil harvested two to three times per week, lyzed using PROC NPAR1WAY in SAS 9.4 amendments incorporated.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Assessment for the Bigleaf Snowbell (Styrax Grandifolius Ait.)
    Conservation Assessment for the Bigleaf Snowbell (Styrax grandifolius Ait.) Steven R. Hill, Ph.D. Division of Biodiversity and Ecological Entomology Biotic Surveys and Monitoring Section 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, Illinois 61820 Prepared for the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Eastern Region (Region 9), Shawnee and Hoosier National Forests INHS Technical Report 2007 (65) Date of Issue: 17 December 2007 Cover photo: Styrax grandifolius Ait., from the website: In Bloom – A Monthly Record of Plants in Alabama; Landscape Horticulture at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. http://www.ag.auburn.edu/hort/landscape/inbloomapril99.html This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. 2 Conservation Assessment for the Bigleaf Snowbell (Styrax grandifolius Ait.) Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species Through Southeastern
    Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States June and July 2007 Glassy Mountain, South Carolina Participants: Kim E. Hummer, Research Leader, Curator, USDA ARS NCGR 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333-2521 phone 541.738.4201 [email protected] Chad E. Finn, Research Geneticist, USDA ARS HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, Oregon 97330 phone 541.738.4037 [email protected] Michael Dossett Graduate Student, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR 97330 phone 541.738.4038 [email protected] Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crops through the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements:................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 Part I – Southeastern United States ...................................................................................... 5 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 5 Travelog May-June 2007.................................................................................................... 6 Conclusions for part 1 .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- ERICACEAE ERICACEAE (Heath Family) A family of about 107 genera and 3400 species, primarily shrubs, small trees, and subshrubs, nearly cosmopolitan. The Ericaceae is very important in our area, with a great diversity of genera and species, many of them rather narrowly endemic. Our area is one of the north temperate centers of diversity for the Ericaceae. Along with Quercus and Pinus, various members of this family are dominant in much of our landscape. References: Kron et al. (2002); Wood (1961); Judd & Kron (1993); Kron & Chase (1993); Luteyn et al. (1996)=L; Dorr & Barrie (1993); Cullings & Hileman (1997). Main Key, for use with flowering or fruiting material 1 Plant an herb, subshrub, or sprawling shrub, not clonal by underground rhizomes (except Gaultheria procumbens and Epigaea repens), rarely more than 3 dm tall; plants mycotrophic or hemi-mycotrophic (except Epigaea, Gaultheria, and Arctostaphylos). 2 Plants without chlorophyll (fully mycotrophic); stems fleshy; leaves represented by bract-like scales, white or variously colored, but not green; pollen grains single; [subfamily Monotropoideae; section Monotropeae]. 3 Petals united; fruit nodding, a berry; flower and fruit several per stem . Monotropsis 3 Petals separate; fruit erect, a capsule; flower and fruit 1-several per stem. 4 Flowers few to many, racemose; stem pubescent, at least in the inflorescence; plant yellow, orange, or red when fresh, aging or drying dark brown ...............................................Hypopitys 4 Flower solitary; stem glabrous; plant white (rarely pink) when fresh, aging or drying black . Monotropa 2 Plants with chlorophyll (hemi-mycotrophic or autotrophic); stems woody; leaves present and well-developed, green; pollen grains in tetrads (single in Orthilia).
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation of Vaccinium Arboreum by Stem Cuttings for Use As a Rootstock for Commercial Blueberry Production
    Propagation of Vaccinium arboreum by Stem Cuttings for Use as a Rootstock for Commercial Blueberry Production by Jessica Rose Bowerman A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama May 6, 2012 Keywords: sparkleberry, asexual, clonal, auxin, softwood, hardwood Copyright 2012 by Jessica Rose Bowerman Approved by James Spiers, Chair, Assistant Professor of Horticulture Eugene Blythe, Assistant Professor of Horticulture Elina Coneva, Associate Professor of Horticulture Kenneth Tilt, Professor of Horticulture ! ! Abstract Commercial blueberries, including V. corymbosum and V. ashei, have very specific needs for optimum growth; hence, growing sites are limited. They require acidic soil (pH 4.0-5.5), good drainage, thorough aeration, and a constant moderate amount of moisture. To overcome these restrictions they could be grafted onto V. arboreum, a species adapted to less desirable growing conditions. Currently, V. arboreum plants are commercially propagated from seeds. Successful asexual propagation techniques will be necessary for rapid clonal propagation of selected cultivars of V. arboreum. The objective of this experiment was to identify an efficient way to propagate V. arboreum using stem cuttings. We found that IBA quick-dip concentration (0, 1000, 2500, 5000, or 7500 ppm IBA) did not influence rooting percentage of V. arboreum. The factors that influenced rooting the most were the source of the cutting and the cutting type (softwood, semi- hardwood, or hardwood). The greatest rooting success was observed with softwood cuttings; there was also success using semi-hardwood cuttings from plants that had been cut back in February 2010 and allowed to sprout new shoots.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Vaccinium in North America
    Agriculture Canada The Genus Vaccinium 630 . 4 C212 P 1828 North America 1988 c.2 Agriculture aid Agri-Food Canada/ ^ Agnculturo ^^In^iikQ Canada V ^njaian Agriculture Library Brbliotheque Canadienno de taricakun otur #<4*4 /EWHE D* V /^ AgricultureandAgri-FoodCanada/ '%' Agrrtur^'AgrntataireCanada ^M'an *> Agriculture Library v^^pttawa, Ontano K1A 0C5 ^- ^^f ^ ^OlfWNE D£ W| The Genus Vaccinium in North America S.P.VanderKloet Biology Department Acadia University Wolfville, Nova Scotia Research Branch Agriculture Canada Publication 1828 1988 'Minister of Suppl) andS Canada ivhh .\\ ailabla in Canada through Authorized Hook nta ami other books! or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A0S9 Catalogue No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data VanderKloet,S. P. The genus Vaccinium in North America (Publication / Research Branch, Agriculture Canada; 1828) Bibliography: Cat. No.: A43-1828/1988E ISBN: 0-660-13037-8 I. Vaccinium — North America. 2. Vaccinium — North America — Classification. I. Title. II. Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. III. Series: Publication (Canada. Agriculture Canada). English ; 1828. QK495.E68V3 1988 583'.62 C88-099206-9 Cover illustration Vaccinium oualifolium Smith; watercolor by Lesley R. Bohm. Contract Editor Molly Wolf Staff Editors Sharon Rudnitski Frances Smith ForC.M.Rae Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada http://www.archive.org/details/genusvacciniuminOOvand
    [Show full text]
  • Using Vaccinium Arboreum (Sparkleberry) to Increase Soil Adaptation and Mechanical Harvest Efficiency of Blueberry
    Using Vaccinium arboreum (sparkleberry) to increase soil adaptation and mechanical harvest efficiency of blueberry Rebecca Darnell Horticultural Sciences Department University of Florida Gainesville, FL Blueberry industry in FL • Southern highbush blueberry • Based on V. corymbosum • Hybrids with wild species native to the southeastern U.S. • V. elliottii / V. darrowii / V. virgatum UF breeding program Jim Olmstead • Flavor • Crisp texture • Winter chilling requirement • Soil adaptation • Mechanical harvesting Soil adaptation Blueberry soils Mineral soils • Acidic • pH>6.0 • High organic • Low organic matter matter • Accumulate NO3 • NH4 over NH4 Photos: J. Williamson/J. Olmstead NH4 NO3 Most FL soils require amendments to be suitable for crop production Photo: J. Williamson Bark beds Bark incorporated into soil Incorporated bark with ground cloth Pine bark increases organic matter, decreases soil pH, maintains N in NH4 form Greatly increases establishment costs of SHB planting in Florida Photos: J. Williamson Q1. Are there Vaccinium species native to higher pH (nitrate predominant N form), low om soils, where amendments wouldn’t be needed? UF breeding program Mechanical harvesting Mechanical harvesting Photo: J. Williamson Harvesting Hand-harvested – Expensive – Labor intensive – Low availability Q2. Are there Vaccinium species that have an architecture more adaptable to mechanical harvesting? Vaccinium arboreum “Sparkleberry” • Native to the southeastern US • Tree-like growth habit • Deep root system – drought tolerant • Tolerates low
    [Show full text]
  • Panflora Site Plant List Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC) Generated: 7 June 2005 Copyright: Gil Nelson 186 Records
    PanFlora Site Plant List Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC) Generated: 7 June 2005 Copyright: Gil Nelson 186 Records Acer negundo (BOXELDER) Acer rubrum (RED MAPLE) Aesculus pavia (RED BUCKEYE) Agalinis divaricata (PINELAND FALSE FOXGLOVE) Albizia julibrissin (MIMOSA) Amelanchier arborea (COMMON SERVICEBERRY) Arenaria lanuginosa (SPREADING SANDWORT) Arenaria serpyllifolia (THYMELEAF SANDWORT) Arisaema dracontium (GREENDRAGON) Arisaema quinatum (PESTER-JOHN) Arisaema triphyllum (JACK-IN-THE-PULPIT) Aristida stricta beyrichiana (WIREGRASS) Aristolochia serpentaria (VIRGINIA SNAKEROOT) Aristolochia tomentosa (WOOLLY DUTCHMAN'S-PIPE; PIPEVINE) Arundinaria gigantea (SWITCHCANE) Asarum arifolium (WILD GINGER; LITTLE BROWN JUG; HEARTLEAF WILD GINGER) Asimina parviflora (SMALLFLOWER PAWPAW) Asplenium platyneuron (EBONY SPLEENWORT) Athyrium filix-femina asplenioides (SOUTHERN LADY FERN) Aureolaria flava (SMOOTH YELLOW FALSE FOXGLOVE) Baptisia lanceolata (GOPHERWEED) Berlandiera pumila (SOFT GREENEYES) Betula nigra (RIVER BIRCH) Bignonia capreolata (CROSSVINE) Boechera canadensis (SICKLEPOD) Calamintha dentata (FLORIDA CALAMINT; TOOTHED SAVORY) Callicarpa americana (AMERICAN BEAUTYBERRY) Calycanthus floridus (EASTERN SWEETSHRUB; CAROLINA ALLSPICE) Calycocarpum lyonii (CUPSEED) Carex baltzellii (BALTZELL'S SEDGE) Carex digitalis (SLENDER WOODLAND SEDGE) Carex nigromarginata floridana (BLACKEDGE SEDGE) Carpinus caroliniana (AMERICAN HORNBEAM; BLUEBEECH) Carya glabra (PIGNUT HICKORY) Carya pallida (SAND HICKORY) Ceanothus microphyllus (LITTLELEAF
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Vaccinium Journal, October-December 2019
    Mississippi Vaccinium Journal Volume 8, Issue 4 October-December 2019 Editor: Eric T. Stafne Time Marches On Contributors: • Ebrahiem Babiker My dad is a big fan of Ernest Hemingway novels, so we had many copies • Rebecca Darnell around the house while I was growing up. One of those was “For Whom the Bell Tolls”. The title was taken from a poem by John Donne. • James Polashock Part of the short poem states, “Each man's death diminishes me, • Hamidou Sakhanokho For I am involved in mankind.” In this issue we pay tribute to one of the • Barbara Smith fallen pioneers of the blueberry in Mississippi, Luis Monterde. There are • Eric Stafne also articles on grafted blueberries, stem blight, the upcoming Annual • Steve Stringer Blueberry Education Workshop and more. So please read this issue and • Jeff Williamson reflect on our fellow blueberry enthusiasts. We have lost too many of our industry stalwarts recently. But as John Donne’s poem concludes Inside this issue: the bell tolls for us all at some point and “No man is an island, Time Marches On 1 Entire of itself.” Thus, the blueberry plants (and blueberry people) are counting on us all to do our best for ourselves and each other. Annual Blueberry 1 Education WS Luis Monterde 2 Annual Blueberry Education Workshop Grafted? 3 The Mississippi State University Extension Service will be hosting a full-day conference for all blueberry growers in Mississippi and the surrounding area. Grafted, cont. 4 The date will be January 23, 2020 at the MSU Forrest County Extension Of- fice in Hattiesburg and will run from approximately 9-3pm (subject to change).
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference SFA Gardens 2003 2nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference David Creech Stephen F. Austin State University Greg Grant Stephen F. Austin State University Mark Norman Stephen F. Austin State University Dawn Parish Stephen F. Austin State University Matt Welch Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar Part of the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Creech, David; Grant, Greg; Norman, Mark; Parish, Dawn; and Welch, Matt, "2nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference" (2003). Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference. 1. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the SFA Gardens at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Welcome by David Creech Allen, Wildflowers of Louisiana 5 Breunig, Does Our Mission Matter? 10 Ferguson, The Role of Organic Materials in Gardening 12 Foss, The Texas Wildscapes Program 19 Freeborg, Native Plants and the Hydrological Cycle 24 Goodspeed, Jenkins, Midgley, What's Hot Panel Discussion 30 Grant, Running Wild With the Public 38 Hosage, Natural Historians ofTexas 39 Kip hart, Texas Roadsides: An Endangered Species?
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Native Plant Sale-Plant List
    Native plant sale- Coastal Discovery Museum Scientific Name Trees and Shrubs-$16-Three Galon Pots Chionanthus virginicus Sassafras albidum Vaccinium arboreum Zanthoxylum clava-herculis Magnolia virginiana Vaccinium elliottii Vaccinium myrsinites Rhododendron austrinum Perennials-$8-One Gallon Pots Amsonia tabernamontana Aquilegia canadensis Asclepias incarnata Asclepias tuberosa Asclepias perennis Asclepias verticilata Asclepias viriegata Asclepias viridis Aster divaricata Aster cordifolius Aster carolinianus Aster novae angliae Aster georgiana Baptisia alba Baptisia australis Brickellia cordifolia Callicarpa americana Cephalanthus occidentalis Chrysogonum virginianum Chrysopsis gossypina Clethra alnifolia Coreopsis lanceolata Coreopsis auriculata Dyschoriste oblongifolia Echinacea purpurea Echinacea pallida Eryngium yuccifolium Erythrina herbacea Eupatorium fistulosum Euonymus americanus Fragaria virginiana Gaillardia pulchella Geranium maculatum Helianthus angustifolius Helianthus debilis Helianthus grosseserratus Helianthus tuberosus Heliopsis helianthoides Hibiscus coccineus Hibiscus grandiflorus Hibiscus moscheutos Hydrangea quercifolia Hymenocallis occidentalis Hypericum frondosum Ilex glabra Iris cristata Monarda punctata Muhlenbergi capillaris Liatris aspera Liatris elegans Liatris spicata Lobelia cardinalis Lobelia siphilitica Penstemon laevigatus Phlox divarica Pityopsis graminifolia Ratibida pinnata Rhododendron canescens Rudbeckia fulgida Rudbeckia hirta Rudbeckia laciniata Ruellia carolinensis Salvia coccinea Sambucus canadensis
    [Show full text]
  • A Consensus Phylogenomic Approach Highlights Paleopolyploid and Rapid Radiation in the History of Ericales
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A consensus phylogenomic approach highlights paleopolyploid and rapid radiation in the history of Ericales Drew A. Larson1,4 , Joseph F. Walker2 , Oscar M. Vargas3 , and Stephen A. Smith1 Manuscript received 8 December 2019; revision accepted 12 February PREMISE: Large genomic data sets offer the promise of resolving historically recalcitrant 2020. species relationships. However, different methodologies can yield conflicting results, 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of especially when clades have experienced ancient, rapid diversification. Here, we analyzed Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA the ancient radiation of Ericales and explored sources of uncertainty related to species tree 2 Sainsbury Laboratory (SLCU), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, inference, conflicting gene tree signal, and the inferred placement of gene and genome CB2 1LR, UK duplications. 3 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA METHODS: We used a hierarchical clustering approach, with tree-based homology and 4Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) orthology detection, to generate six filtered phylogenomic matrices consisting of data Citation: Larson, D. A., J. F. Walker, O. M. Vargas, and S. A. Smith. from 97 transcriptomes and genomes. Support for species relationships was inferred 2020. A consensus phylogenomic approach highlights paleopolyploid from multiple lines of evidence including shared gene duplications, gene tree conflict, and rapid radiation
    [Show full text]
  • SC Coastal Native Plant List
    Native Plant List for Coastal South Carolina This list of plants is composed only of plants native to the coastal plain of South Carolina, and was developed for Dewees Island. The plants are therefore somewhat tolerant of salty or brackish conditions and may not include all plants that would be appropriate for freshwater riparian areas. As native plants they require less water, fertilizer, and pesticides than non-native plants when planted in the appropriate locations. Trees: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME EVG/DECID COMMENTS BLOOM TIME Acer rubrum Red Maple Decid Red fall color, fresh wet areas Feb-March Carya glabra Pignut Hickory Decid Dry or moist areas Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood Decid Smooth bark, moist areas Celtis Laevigata Hackberry Decid Corky bark ridges Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia Evg Large fragrant white flowers May-June Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Decid Moist areas Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum Decid Red fall color, moist or dry areas Pinus elliottii Slash Pine Evg Low areas Pinus palustris Longleaf Pine Evg Sandy areas Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Evg Throughout Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak Decid Dry areas Quercus falcata Southern Red Oak Decid Dry areas Quercus laurifolia Laurel Oak Evg Low or Sandy areas Quercus phellos Willow Oak Decid Low areas Quercus virginiana Live Oak Evg Dry or wet areas Sabal palmetto Cabbage Palmetto Evg Dry or wet areas Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Decid Freshwater wet areas Small Trees: SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME EVG/DECID COMMENTS BLOOM TIME Aesculus pavia Red Buckeye Decid Red flowers, fresh wet areas Apr.-May Amelanchier canadensis Serviceberry Decid White flowers, red fruit Mar.-Apr.
    [Show full text]