DOCSLIB.ORG

Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Matthew Immelg Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Revision and Reclassification of the Genera of Phalacridae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Matthew immelG Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gimmel, Matthew, "Revision and Reclassification of the Genera of Phalacridae (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2857. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2857 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. REVISION AND RECLASSIFICATION OF THE GENERA OF PHALACRIDAE (COLEOPTERA: CUCUJOIDEA) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Matthew Gimmel B.S., Oklahoma State University, 2005 August 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the following individuals for accommodating and assisting me at their respective institutions: Roger Booth and Max Barclay (BMNH), Azadeh Taghavian (MNHN), Phil Perkins (MCZ), Warren Steiner (USNM), Joe McHugh (UGCA), Ed Riley (TAMU), Mike Thomas and Paul Skelley (FSCA), Mike Ivie (MTEC/MAIC/WIBF), Richard Brown and Terry Schiefer (MEM), Andy Cline (CDFA), Fran Keller and Steve Heydon (UCDC), Cheryl Barr (EMEC), Norm Penny and Jere Schweikert (CAS), Mike Caterino (SBMN), Michael Wall (SDMC), Don Arnold (OSEC), Zack Falin (SEMC), Arwin Provonsha (PURC), Cate Lemann and Adam Slipinski (ANIC), and Harold Labrique (MHNL). I thank Richard Thompson (BMNH) and Zdeněk Švec (Prague, Czech Republic) for their support and discussing with me some tedious details concerning phalacrid taxonomy. I thank Roger Booth and Al Newton for taking time to assist me with clarification of the type status of certain George Champion specimens. Many individuals generously donated fresh specimens to help me in my research, but I especially thank Andy Cline (CDFA) and Jim Cornell (Charlotte, North Carolina) for their particularly generous contributions. A tremendous thanks goes to Stephanie Gross (Louisiana State University) for her help, guidance, and work ethic with regard to the molecular portion of this work; that section would not have been possible without her. Hector Urbina (LSU) also donated his time and expertise to issues regarding the molecular analysis. I benefitted daily from scientific and other conversations with my museum-mates, Michael Ferro, Jong-Seok Park, Alexey Tishechkin, Igor Sokolov, and Stephanie Gil. Victoria Bayless has shown me, by her own example at the LSAM, what a proper insect museum should look like. I owe her an enormous thanks for all of her assistance over the years and for being a voice of sanity during my time here. I thank John Lawrence (Gympie, Australia) and Adam Ślipiński (CSIRO, Canberra, Australia) for their encouragement and advice. I thank Rich Leschen (Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand) for insisting that I examine Phalacridae with the widest possible lens, and for his lively criticisms of my morphological analysis. I thank Warren Steiner (USNM) for sharing his drawings and conclusions from an unfinished manuscript on Acylomus, and for being so generous with his time and skill while passing me the torch of phalacrid knowledge. I thank the members of my committee: Dorothy Prowell, Meredith Blackwell, and Frederick Sheldon, for their helpful advice and challenging me when necessary. Most of all, I thank my major professor, Chris Carlton, for his friendship and for his unique non-meddling but enthusiastic and knowledgeable style of advising, which provided inspiration for and meshed extremely well with my own working style. I am a much better scientist as a result of my interactions with Chris. On a personal note, I would like to thank Crystal Maier for her love, support, encouragement, and patience during the time leading up to the completion of this life-consuming project. I thank my parents, Dennis Gimmel and Susan Allison, for providing me every opportunity in their power, and allowing me just the right amount of freedom, to pursue my interest in natural history. Thanks, Mom and Dad. This research was partially funded by NSF DEB-0516311 to Chris Carlton and Victoria Bayless. Travel to foreign museums was partially funded by an Ernst Mayr Travel Grant from Harvard University. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................v ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1 1.1 PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF PHALACRIDAE.......................................1 1.2 TAXONOMIC HISTORY OF PHALACRIDAE .............................................2 1.3 IMMATURE STAGES AND HABITS OF PHALACRIDAE .........................4 1.4 PHALACRIDAE IN THE FOSSIL RECORD ..................................................5 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS .....................................................................................6 2.1 SPECIMENS......................................................................................................6 2.2 GUIDELINES FOR GENERIC REVISION .....................................................8 2.3 INTRODUCTION TO PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS ...................................9 2.4 MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................9 2.5 MOLECULAR ANALYSIS ............................................................................20 2.6 COMBINED ANALYSIS ...............................................................................21 2.7 OTHER METHODS ........................................................................................23 3 PHYLOGENETIC RESULTS .......................................................................................24 3.1 RESULTING TREES ......................................................................................24 3.2 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................24 3.3 LITERATURE CITED (FOR CHAPTERS 1–3) ............................................26 4 SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT .....................................................................................36 4.1 FAMILY PHALACRIDAE LEACH, 1815 .....................................................36 4.2 REVISED CHECKLIST OF HIGHER TAXA OF PHALACRIDAE ............39 4.3 KEY TO WORLD GENERA OF PHALACRIDAE .......................................43 4.4 SUBFAMILY PHAENOCEPHALINAE MATTHEWS, 1899 ......................53 4.5 SUBFAMILY EUSTILBINAE GUILLEBEAU, 1892 ...................................60 4.6 SUBFAMILY BIOPHYTINAE GUILLEBEAU, 1894 ..................................75 4.7 SUBFAMILY PHALACRINAE LEACH, 1815 .............................................81 4.8 OLIBROPORINAE, SUBFAM. NOV. ...........................................................87 4.9 SUBFAMILY OCHROLITINAE GUILLEBEAU, 1894 ...............................98 4.10 SUBFAMILY OLIBRINAE GUILLEBEAU, 1892 ....................................102 4.11 OLIBROSOMINAE, SUBFAM. NOV. ......................................................111 4.12 PHALACRIDAE INCERTAE SEDIS ..........................................................118 4.13 NOMEN INQUIRENDUM .........................................................................146 4.14 TAXA REMOVED FROM PHALACRIDAE ............................................147 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................230 iii REFERENCES (FOR CHAPTER 4 AND APPENDIX B) .........................................................231 APPENDIX A: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTER MATRIX ...............................................260 APPENDIX B: WORLD CATALOGUE OF PHALACRIDAE .................................................261 VITA ............................................................................................................................................459 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Phalacrid species-group taxa described over time, 1767–2006. ...................................... 4 Figure 2. Strict consensus tree from maximum parsimony analysis of morphological matrix. ... 29 Figure 3. Strict consensus tree from maximum parsimony analysis of 18S rDNA sequence data ................................................................................................................................................ 30 Figure 4. Resulting tree from Bayesian analysis of 18S rDNA sequence data.. ........................... 31 Figure 5. Best ML tree from maximum likelihood analysis of 18S rDNA sequence data.. ......... 32 Figure 6. Strict consensus tree (of 86 MP trees) from maximum parsimony analysis of concatenated morphological + 18S rDNA sequence data. ..........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E

    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E

    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)

    An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
  • Paropsine Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in South-Eastern Queensland Hardwood Plantations: Identifying Potential Pest Species

    Paropsine Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in South-Eastern Queensland Hardwood Plantations: Identifying Potential Pest Species

    270 Paropsine beetles in Queensland hardwood plantations Paropsine beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in south-eastern Queensland hardwood plantations: identifying potential pest species Helen F. Nahrung1,2,3 1School of Natural Resource Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia; and 2Horticulture and Forestry Science, Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Gate 3, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia 3Email: [email protected] Revised manuscript received 17 May 2006 Summary The expansion of hardwood plantations throughout peri-coastal Australia, often with eucalypt species planted outside their native Paropsine chrysomelid beetles are significant defoliators of ranges (e.g. E. globulus Labill. in Western Australia; E. nitens Australian eucalypts. In Queensland, the relatively recent (Deane and Maiden) Maiden in Tasmania), resulted in expansion of hardwood plantations has resulted in the emergence unpredicted paropsine species emerging as pests. For example, of new pest species. Here I identify paropsine beetles collected C. agricola (Chapuis) was not considered a risk to commercial from Eucalyptus cloeziana Muell. and E. dunnii Maiden, two of forestry but became a significant pest of E. nitens in Tasmania the major Eucalyptus species grown in plantations in south-eastern (de Little 1989), and the two most abundant paropsine species Queensland, and estimate the relative abundance of each (C. variicollis (Chapuis) and C. nobilitata (Erichson)) in paropsine species. Although I was unable to identify all taxa to E. globulus plantations in WA were not pests of native forest species level, at least 17 paropsine species were collected, about there (compare Selman 1994; Loch 2005), nor were they initially one-third of which have not been previously associated with considered pests of E.
  • Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - New Sites and Host Affiliation

    Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - New Sites and Host Affiliation

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Title: Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - new sites and host affiliation Author: Artur Taszakowski, Bartosz Baran, Natalia Kaszyca, Łukasz Depa Citation style: Taszakowski Artur, Baran Bartosz, Kaszyca Natalia, Depa Łukasz. (2015). Genus Claviger Preyssler, 1790 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) in the Low Beskid Mts.(Poland) - new sites and host affiliation. "Nature Journal" (Nr 48 (2015), s. 114-119) NATURE JOURNAL VOL. 48: 114–119 (2015) OPOLE SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY GENUS CLAVIGER PREYSSLER , 1790 (C OLEOPTERA : STAPHYLINIDAE : PSELAPHINAE ) IN THE LOW BESKID MTS . (P OLAND ) – NEW SITES AND HOST A FFILIATION 1,3 2,4 1,2,5 1,6 ARTUR TASZAKOWSKI , BARTOSZ BARAN , NATALIA KASZYCA , ŁUKASZ DEPA 1 University of Silesia, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Zoology, Bankowa 9, 40 – 007 Katowice 2Students’ Scientific Association of Zoologists „Faunatycy” U Ś [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT : In the area of Poland there occur two species of the genus: Claviger longicornis P.W.J. Müller, 1818 and Claviger testaceus Preyssler, 1790. Both species are rare in Poland. Beetles of the genus Claviger are specialized myrmecophiles and are dependent on their host ants throughout the whole life cycle. During the field research, which were conducted in the Low Beskid Mts. (South-Eastern Poland), new sites of both species were found. C. longicornis was recorded in a colony of Lasius sabularum (Bondroit, 1918) and this is the first record of this ant as its host .
  • A Review of the Japanese Kateretidae Fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)

    A Review of the Japanese Kateretidae Fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea)

    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 9.xii.2011 Volume 51(2), pp. 551–585 ISSN 0374-1036 A review of the Japanese Kateretidae fauna (Coleoptera: Cucujoidea) Sadatomo HISAMATSU Entomological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Tarumi 3–5–7, Matsuyama, 790–8566 Japan; e–mail: [email protected] Abstract. The family Kateretidae of Japan is revised. Nine species belonging to 6 genera are recognized, including: Kateretes japonicus Hisamatsu, 1985, K. takagii S-T. Hisamatsu, 2006, Platamartus jakowlewi Reitter, 1892, Heterhelus (Heterhelus) scutellaris (Heer, 1841), H. (Heterhelus) morio (Reitter, 1878), H. (Boreades) solani (Heer, 1841), Sibirhelus corpulentus (Reitter, 1900), Brachyp- terus urticae (Fabricius, 1792), and Brachypterolus pulicarius (Linnaeus, 1758). Heterhelus morio, which was synonymized under H. scutellaris by KIREJTSHUK (1989), is found to be a valid species, and is herein resurrected. Platamartus jakowlewi is newly recorded from Japan. Brachypterolus shimoyamai Hisamatsu, 1985, syn. nov., is synonymized under Brachypterolus pulicarius. Dorsal habitus images, illustrations of male and female genitalia, and other important diagnostic characters are provided for all species. A key for identifi cation of all Japanese taxa is also provided. Key words. Coleoptera, Kateretidae, taxonomy, new synonym, new record, key, Japan, Palaearctic Region Introduction The family Kateretidae, belonging to the superfamily Cucujoidea, is mainly distributed in the Holarctic Region, and comprises about 95 species within 14 genera worldwide (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010). Both larval and adult Kateretidae are anthophagous: the larvae are monophagous or oligophagous, while adults are more generalized feeders, occurring on true host plants only during mating and ovipositing periods; otherwise, they feed on a broader assortment of fl owering plants (JELÍNEK & CLINE 2010).
  • Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a Description of Sciaphyes Shestakovi Sp.N

    Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a Description of Sciaphyes Shestakovi Sp.N

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 69 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fresneda Javier, Grebennikov Vasily V., Ribera Ignacio Artikel/Article: The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp.n. from the Russian Far East 99-123 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 99 69 (2) 99 –123 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312, 21.07.2011 The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp. n. from the Russian Far East JAVIER FRESNEDA 1, 2, VASILY V. GREBENNIKOV 3 & IGNACIO RIBERA 4, * 1 Ca de Massa, 25526 Llesp, Lleida, Spain 2 Museu de Ciències Naturals (Zoologia), Passeig Picasso s/n, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] 3 Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada [[email protected]] 4 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37 – 49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] * Corresponding author Received 26.iv.2011, accepted 27.v.2011. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 21.vii.2011. > Abstract The tribe Leptodirini of the beetle family Leiodidae is one of the most diverse radiations of cave animals, with a distribution centred north of the Mediterranean basin from the Iberian Peninsula to Iran. Six genera outside this core area, most notably Platycholeus Horn, 1880 in the western United States and others in East Asia, have been assumed to be related to Lepto- dirini.
  • DIET of the EASTERN BRISTLEBIRD Dasyornis Brachypterus in NEW SOUTH WALES

    DIET of the EASTERN BRISTLEBIRD Dasyornis Brachypterus in NEW SOUTH WALES

    Corella, 2004, 28(3): 79-81 DIET OF THE EASTERN BRISTLEBIRD Dasyornis brachypterus IN NEW SOUTH WALES LINDA GIBSON1 and JACK BAKER2 'Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010 'Institute of Conservation Biology. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, New South Wales 2522 Received: I October 2003 7 The diet of the Eastern Bristlebird Oasyomis brachypterus in New South Wales was determined from observations and an analysis of faeces, stomach and gut contents of 18 birds caught in or obtained from Booderee National Park, Jervis Bay and Barren Grounds Nature Reserve, New South Wales. The study showed these birds largely take mobile terrestrial invertebrate species, the majority of which are ants and beetles. There is some indication that plant material, especially seeds, are also part of the diet. Observations suggest that the diet is opportunistic and based on foraging behaviour of 'peck it and see'. INTRODUCTION STUDY AREA AND METHODS Dasyornis brachypterus The specimens used in this study were obtained from two sites. The rare Eastern Bristlebird ° ° (Passeriformes: Pardalotidae), is a small, semi-flightless, Booderee National Park, (35 08'S, l 50 45'E) a Commonwealth of Australia owned area that occupies most of the Bherwerre brownish bird inhabiting low, dense vegetation in coastal Peninsula, on the southern side of Jervis Bay, on the south coast and near coastal south-eastern Australia. It once occurred of New South Wales and Barren Grounds Nature Reserve (34°40'S, in an almost continuous distribution from southern l 50 °42'E) on the lllawarra plateau, west of Kiama, New South Queensland to western Victoria (Baker 1997).
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45

    T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45

    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
  • Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Jamaica and Puerto Rico, with a Discussion of Wing Dimorphism*

    Coleoptera: Leiodidae) from Jamaica and Puerto Rico, with a Discussion of Wing Dimorphism*

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carleton University's Institutional Repository NEW RECORDS AND SPECIES OF LEIODINAE AND CATOPINAE (COLEOPTERA: LEIODIDAE) FROM JAMAICA AND PUERTO RICO, WITH A DISCUSSION OF WING DIMORPHISM* BY STEWART B. PECK Department of Biology, Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada Since my earlier reports on the Leiodidae of Jamaica and Puerto Rico (Peck, 1970, 1972), I have had the opportunity to spend an additional 13 weeks in field work on these islands. In Jamaica this was from mid-December to mid-January, 1972-1973, and from late July to early September, 1974. In Puerto Rico it was from early to late May, 1973, and a week in June, 1974. This has resulted in new data on the leiodids of these islands, which are presented here. Ad- ditional data and information on forest habitat sites may be found in Peck and Kukalova-Peck (1975), and on cave sites in Peck (1974, 1975). Methods and materials are similar to those utilized for my earlier papers. Collections were primarily made in forests with pitfall traps baited with carrion and human dung (Newton and Peck, 1975); by Berlese-Tullgren funnel extraction of arthropods from sifted forest litter, and from bat guano accumulations in caves. In this work, 259 kg (770 liters) of sifted forest litter were processed for Jamaica and 93 kg (171 liters) for Puerto Rico, in addition to many other extractions from samples of bat guano. Most of the arthropod residues from these collections are deposited with the Field Mu- seum (Chicago).
  • Profound Head Modifications in Claviger Testaceus (Pselaphinae, Staphylinidae, Coleoptera) Facilitate Integration Into Communities of Ants

    Profound Head Modifications in Claviger Testaceus (Pselaphinae, Staphylinidae, Coleoptera) Facilitate Integration Into Communities of Ants

    Received: 15 April 2020 Revised: 8 June 2020 Accepted: 14 June 2020 DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21232 RESEARCH ARTICLE Profound head modifications in Claviger testaceus (Pselaphinae, Staphylinidae, Coleoptera) facilitate integration into communities of ants Paweł Jałoszynski 1 | Xiao-Zhu Luo2 | Rolf Georg Beutel2 1Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland Abstract 2Institut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Clavigeritae is a group of obligate myrmecophiles of the rove beetle subfamily Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena, Jena, Pselaphinae (Staphylinidae). Some are blind and wingless, and all are believed to Germany depend on ant hosts through feeding by trophallaxis. Phylogenetic hypotheses sug- Correspondence gest that their ancestors, as are most pselaphines today, were free-living predators. Paweł Jałoszynski, Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza Morphological alterations required to transform such beetles into extreme myrmeco- ł 21, 50 335 Wroc aw, Poland. philes were poorly understood. By studying the cephalic morphology of Claviger tes- Email: [email protected] taceus, we demonstrate that profound changes in all mouthpart components took Funding information place during this process, with a highly unusual connection of the maxillae to the AEI/FEDER, UE, Grant/Award Number: CGL2013 48950 C2 hypopharynx, and formation of a uniquely transformed labium with a vestigial prementum. The primary sensory function of the modified maxillary and labial palps is reduced, and the ventral mouthparts transformed into a licking/‘sponging’ device. Many muscles have been reduced, in relation to the coleopteran groundplan or other staphylinoids. The head capsule contains voluminous glands whose appeasement secretions are crucial for the beetle survival in ant colonies. The brain, in turn, has been shifted into the neck region.
  • Comparative Morphology of the Male Genitalia in Lepidoptera

    Comparative Morphology of the Male Genitalia in Lepidoptera

    COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE MALE GENITALIA IN LEPIDOPTERA. By DEV RAJ MEHTA, M. Sc.~ Ph. D. (Canta.b.), 'Univefsity Scholar of the Government of the Punjab, India (Department of Zoology, University of Oambridge). CONTENTS. PAGE. Introduction 197 Historical Review 199 Technique. 201 N ontenclature 201 Function • 205 Comparative Morphology 206 Conclusions in Phylogeny 257 Summary 261 Literature 1 262 INTRODUCTION. In the domains of both Morphology and Taxonomy the study' of Insect genitalia has evoked considerable interest during the past half century. Zander (1900, 1901, 1903) suggested a common structural plan for the genitalia in various orders of insects. This work stimulated further research and his conclusions were amplified by Crampton (1920) who homologized the different parts in the genitalia of Hymenoptera, Mecoptera, Neuroptera, Diptera, Trichoptera Lepidoptera, Hemiptera and Strepsiptera with those of more generalized insects like the Ephe­ meroptera and Thysanura. During this time the use of genitalic charac­ ters for taxonomic purposes was also realized particularly in cases where the other imaginal characters had failed to serve. In this con­ nection may be mentioned the work of Buchanan White (1876), Gosse (1883), Bethune Baker (1914), Pierce (1909, 1914, 1922) and others. Also, a comparative account of the genitalia, as a basis for the phylo­ genetic study of different insect orders, was employed by Walker (1919), Sharp and Muir (1912), Singh-Pruthi (1925) and Cole (1927), in Orthop­ tera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera and the Diptera respectively. It is sur­ prising, work of this nature having been found so useful in these groups, that an important order like the Lepidoptera should have escaped careful analysis at the hands of the morphologists.
  • Short Invertebrate Survey

    Short Invertebrate Survey

    Naphill Common . Short Invertebrate Survey th 29 May 2009 Painted Lady Butterfly M.G.Bloxham FRES (Surveyor: invertebrates) W.R.Price & T.Hussey ( Field Assistants) 1 Contents 1 Background …………………………………………………………………...2 2 Methodology: general considerations …… ……………………………...3 2.1 Collection of specimens and equipment 2.2 Sample sites. 2.3 The Survey: conditions and progress 2.4 Examination & curation. 3. Presentation of results ………………………………………….…………..4 3.1 The species discovered 3.2 Dew Pond and surrounds 3.3 Beech Hulk (SU83725 96951) 3.4 Glade at path junction (SU 83565 96932) 3.5 Large open Glade (‘Clumps’ meadow) SU 83393 96963 3.6 Lady Horse Pond 3.7 Chapel Lane Woodland entrance 4. Conservation issues by subsite …………………………………………… 7 5 General conclusions …………………………………………….………… 9 6. Acknowledgements 7. Bibliography 8 Status definitions ……………………………………………………………..10 Appendix 1 Site map…..….……………………………………………………. 11 Appendix 2 Species lists…...……………………………………………………12 2 1. Background Naphill Common covers an area of approximately 63 hectares and consists of mature oak and beech wood with a good understorey of holly and associated woodland vegetation. In general it is possible to penetrate the woodland without too much difficulty and a good network of reasonably well defined tracks (some with information posts) exists. The woodland is considered to be ecologically important and is jointly administered by Natural England and the National Trust. Currently the administrative boundaries are not apparent in the wood, but a recent upsurge of interest in the area has seen the formation of the ‘Friends of Naphill Common’- a user group keen to promote the woodland both for its amenity value and also because of its potential as an important wildlife resource.