DOCSLIB.ORG

Rīgas Brīvostas Kuģu Ceļu Izmēri

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rīgas Brīvostas Kuģu Ceļu Izmēri Freeport of Riga Authority Harbour master Cabinet Regulations No.77 A. Smits Adopted 4 Feb 2020 28.01.2021. Free Port of Riga Regulations Addendum 2. 1. PARTICULARS OF SHIP CHANNELS MAX MAX CHANNEL VESSELS VESSELS BREATH, REMARKS No. DRAUGHT, m LENGTH SHIP CHANNEL m (LOA), m 1 For passenger 1. Buoy “B” up to berth ZO-18 100 15.0 260/3001 vessels with draft allowed 2. Berth ZO-18 up to berth KRS-4 100 14.5 260/3001 3. Berth KRS-4 up to berth KS-29 100 13.2 260/3001 4. Berth KS-29 up to berth EO-14 100 12.3 260/3001 5. Berth EO-14 up to Mouth of Eksportosta 120 10.0 230/3001 6. Mouth of Eksportosta up to berth MK-4 120 8.6 3001 Milgravis Channel up to Sarkandaugava 2 7. 80 9.0/7.1 190/2302 Ships proceeding Channel for repairs 8. Milgravis Channel up to berth JM-26/RKR-7 - 9.0/7.1 190/2302 9. Sarkandaugava Channel up to berth SD-3; 90 9.0 190 1. Max vessel’s draft indicated at Mean Sea Level. 2. Depending on actual water level max vessel’s draft may differ from what is indicated in the table. 3. Vessel’s movement in/out from Eksportosta, Pilmuiza, Kremeri, Zvejas osta and Daugavgriva basins may be restricted if current velocity in river Daugava exceeds 1.5kts. The decision shall be taken on case by case basis taking into account all factors affecting safe navigation. 4. Any changes to the Addendum 2 shall be done by order of the harbour master only. Freeport of Riga Authority Harbour master Cabinet Regulations No.77 A. Smits Adopted 4 Feb 2020 28.01.2021. Free Port of Riga Regulations Addendum 2. 2. PARTICULARS OF COMMERCIAL BERTHS BERTHS MAX VESSELS No AND DATE OF No. PORT AREA HARBOUR REMARKS LENGTH, DRAFT, LOA, NUMBER MASTER m m m ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Vessels with draft exceeding 7.9m to be 1. MK-3 240 8.1 210 berthed at MK-3 only with use of not more than 160m of berth MK-4. MUITAS Nr.KR/31, 2. Vessels up to LOA 300m is allowed to berth KRASTMALA 27.01.2021 at MK-3/MK-4. 2. MK-4 222 7.9 190 3. Vessel is not to be moored closer than 20m from berth’s South end. Vessels up to LOA 280m are allowed to berth 3. JURAS JPS-1 132 7.6 110 Nr.2, PASAZIERU at JPS-1/JPS-2, draft in this case not to exceed 07.01.2019 4. STACIJA JPS-2 217 6.9 180 6.9m. 41 AO 112 - - Nr.KR/20, 5. ANDREJOSTA AO-1 64.6 - Mooring of vessels is not allowed. - 26.01.2021 6. AO-2 135 - - 7. AS-3 120 - - Nr.KR/21, Mooring of vessels is not allowed. 8. AS-4 119 - - 26.01.2021 ANDREJSALA 1. Ro-Ro and Passenger vessels only are Nr.2, allowed to berth at AS-5. 9. AS-5 144 7.6 150 20.01.2020 2. Vessel's hull not to overhang more than 15m over berth's N end. EKSPORTOSTAS Nr.35, 10. ED 170 - Berthing of vessels is not allowed. DAMBIS - 20.01.2020 1. Ro-Ro and Passenger vessels only are allowed to berth at EO-6. 2. Vessels up to LOA 230m are allowed to berth at EO-6/EO-7, draft in this case not to Nr.3, 11. EO-6 240 10.0 exceed 9.2m. 200 20.01.2020 3. In cases when berth EO-7, EO-8 or both are occupied with vessels permission to berth/unberth the vessel to be obtained from harbour master in advance. 1. Vessels up to LOA 230m are allowed to berth at EO-7/EO-8, draft in this case not to 12. EO-7 190 9.2 170 exceed 9.1m. 2. In case vessel is berthed at 6m wide floating Nr.4, pontoons draft increases to 10.0m. EKSPORTOSTA 20.01.2020 3. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at berths EO-7 and EO-8 is forbidden. 13. EO-8 188.5 9.1 170 4. Neither handling nor open storage of bulk or liquid cargoes are allowed at berths EO-7 un EO-8. 1. Vessels up to LOA 170m are allowed to 14. EO-9 130 6.9 120 berth at EO-9/EO-10. 2. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at Nr.5, berths EO-9 and EO-10 is forbidden. 20.01.2020 3. Neither handling nor open storage of bulk or 15. EO-10 150 6.9 130 liquid cargoes are allowed at berths EO-9 un EO-10. 1. Vessels up to LOA 170m are allowed to 16. EO-11 140 6.9 120 Nr.6, berth at EO-11/EO-12. 20.01.2020 17. EO-12 159 6.9 130 2. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at Freeport of Riga Authority Harbour master Cabinet Regulations No.77 A. Smits Adopted 4 Feb 2020 28.01.2021. Free Port of Riga Regulations Addendum 2. berths EO-11 and EO-12 is forbidden. 1. Vessels up to LOA 260m are allowed to 18. EO-14 210 12.3 200 berth at EO-14/EO-15. Nr.7, 2. Max draft is restricted to 12.0m for vessels to 20.01.2020 be turned around. 3. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at 19. EO-15 212 12.3 200 berths EO-14 and EO-15 is forbidden. 1. Vessels up to LOA 230m are allowed to berth at PM-16/PM-17. 20. PM-16 145.8 10.0 125 2. In cases when berth PM-19 or PM-20 or Nr.8, PM-21 are occupied with vessels permission to 20.01.2020 berth/unberth the vessel to be obtained from harbour master in advance. 21. PM-17 150 10.0 125 3. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at berths PM-16 and PM-17 is forbidden. Nr.9, Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at 22. PM-18 103 8.5 80 20.01.2020 berths PM-18 is forbidden. 1. Vessels up to LOA 200m are allowed to berth at PM-19. For vessels with LOA over 150m berthing to be aligned with berth’s PM- 20 operator in advance. 2. In cases when berth PM-16 or PM-17 or Nr.10, 23. PM-19 170.9 10.0 150 PM-20 are occupied with vessels permission to 20.01.2020 berth/unberth the vessel to be obtained from harbour master in advance. PILMUIZAS 3. Generally berthing port side alongside. BASEINS 4. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at berths PM-19 is forbidden. 1. Vessels up to LOA 230m are allowed to berth at PM-19/PM-20. For vessels with LOA over 180m berthing to be aligned with berth’s PM-19 operator in advance. Nr.11, 2. In cases when berth PM-16 or PM-17 or 24. PM-20 217.75 10.0 180 20.01.2020 PM-19 or PM-21 are occupied with vessels permission to berth/unberth the vessel to be obtained from harbour master in advance. 3. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at berths PM-20 is forbidden. 1. Vessels up to LOA 260m are allowed to berth at PM-21. 2. For vessels with LOA over 230m max Nr.12, 25. PM-21 349.13 11.9 230 sailing draft to be agreed with harbour master in 20.01.2020 advance. 3. Storage and/or handling of coal cargoes at berths PM-21 is forbidden. 1. Vessel in ballast condition to be berthed stbd Nr.13, side alongside. 26. KS-28 140 11.9 230 20.01.2020 2. For vessels with LOA over 180m, head and stern lines by mooring boat. 1. Vessels with DW up to 60000t are allowed to berth at KS-29/30. 2. Ship’s coming to discharge cargo with LOA KS- Nr.13, 27. 330 13.1 230 over 200m and draft over 12.0m to be berthed 07.01.2019 KUNDZINSALA 29/30 port side alongside. Vessels with LOA over 200m draft of which after loading to exceed 12.0m to be berthed stbd side alongside. 28. KS-32 150 11.7 130 Nr.14, Vessels up to LOA 250m are allowed to berth 29. KS-33 150 11.7 130 07.01.2019 at KS-32/KS-33/KS-34. 30. KS-34 149 11.7 130 Nr.60, 1. Only vessels equipped with bow thruster or 31. KS-36 210 7.6 123 03.04.2019 twin screw ships are allowed to berth at KS- Freeport of Riga Authority Harbour master Cabinet Regulations No.77 A. Smits Adopted 4 Feb 2020 28.01.2021. Free Port of Riga Regulations Addendum 2. 36. 2. Tug’s assistance for berthing/unberthing is compulsory if wind velocity exceeds 10m/s and/or current in Daugava river exceeds 1,5kts. 3. Vessels with DW up to 8000t are allowed to berth at KS-36. 4. Vessels with beam up to 16.5m are allowed to berth at KS-36. 5. Berthing port side alongside. 1. Vessels with DW up to 58000t are allowed Nr.16, 32. KS-36A 119.4 13.2 195 to berth at KS-36A. 07.01.2019 2. Headlines and stern laines by mooring boat.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chronicle Henry of Livonia
    THE CHRONICLE of HENRY OF LIVONIA HENRICUS LETTUS TRANSLATED WITH A NEW INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY James A. Brundage � COLUMBIA UNIVERSI'IY PRESS NEW YORK Columbia University Press RECORDS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION is a series published under the aus­ Publishers Since 1893 pices of the InterdepartmentalCommittee on Medieval and Renaissance New York Chichester,West Sussex Studies of the Columbia University Graduate School. The Western Records are, in fact, a new incarnation of a venerable series, the Co­ Copyright© University ofWisconsin Press, 1961 lumbia Records of Civilization, which, for more than half a century, New introduction,notes, and bibliography© 2003 Columbia University Press published sources and studies concerning great literary and historical All rights reserved landmarks. Many of the volumes of that series retain value, especially for their translations into English of primary sources, and the Medieval and Renaissance Studies Committee is pleased to cooperate with Co­ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublicationData lumbia University Press in reissuing a selection of those works in pa­ Henricus, de Lettis, ca. II 87-ca. 12 59. perback editions, especially suited for classroom use, and in limited [Origines Livoniae sacrae et civilis. English] clothbound editions. The chronicle of Henry of Livonia / Henricus Lettus ; translatedwith a new introduction and notes by James A. Brundage. Committee for the Records of Western Civilization p. cm. - (Records of Western civilization) Originally published: Madison : University of Wisconsin Press, 1961. Caroline Walker Bynum With new introd. Joan M. Ferrante Includes bibliographical references and index. CarmelaVircillo Franklin Robert Hanning ISBN 978-0-231-12888-9 (cloth: alk. paper)---ISBN 978-0-231-12889-6 (pbk.: alk.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Riga (Latvia)
    EUROSION Case Study GULF OF RIGA (LATVIA) Contact: Ramunas POVILANSKAS 31 EUCC Baltic Office Tel: +37 (0)6 312739 or +37 (0)6 398834 e-mail: [email protected] 1 EUROSION Case Study 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA The length of the Latvian coastline along the Baltic proper and the Gulf of Riga is 496 km. Circa 123 km of the coastline is affected by erosion. The case area ‘Gulf of Riga’ focuses on coastal development within the Riga metropolitan area, which includes the coastal zone of two urban municipalities (pilsetas) – Riga and Jurmala (Figure 1). Riga is the capital city of Latvia. It is located along the lower stream and the mouth of the Daugava river. Its several districts (Bulli, Daugavgriva, Bolderaja, Vecdaugava, Mangali and Vecaki) lie in the deltas of Daugava and Lielupe rivers and on the Gulf of Riga coast. Jurmala municipality is adjacent to Riga from the west. It stretches ca. 30 km along the Gulf of Riga. It is the largest Latvian and Eastern Baltic seaside resort. 1.1 Physical process level 1.1.1 Classification According to the coastal typology adopted for the EUROSION project, the case study area can be described as: 3b. Wave-dominated sediment. Plains. Microtidal river delta. Within this major coastal type several coastal formations and habitats occur, including the river delta and sandy beaches with bare and vegetated sand dunes. Fig. 1: Location of the case study area. 1.1.2 Geology Recent geological history of the case area since the end of the latest Ice Age (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Rīgas Ūdens» Galvenie Objekti
    03.04.2019 Variations in industrial wastewater composition at inflow of Riga wastewater treatment plant «Daugavgriva», Latvia Numbers and Facts Information about SIA «Rīgas ūdens» 2018 • Riga city service territory 307 km2 • Riga citizens 677 295 connected to town water&sewage network 619 703 PE - 701 534 • Clients – 15 000 • Drinking water supply 39,147 million/m3 • Treated wastewater 47,540 million /m3 • Financial turnover 45,6 million /EUR • Employees 772 EU co-financed projects Project «Development of Water Management in Riga, 5th stage» 2018 – 2019 Planned activities of the Project Project funding in Berģi, Imanta and Beberbeķi: 26, 07 million/EUR Including Cohesion • New Sewerage network 34,59 km; fund cofunding • Sewer network reconstruction 0,44 km, 9, 93 million/EUR • 18 new Sewerage Pumping Stations. In addition to 2014-2020 period planned activities of 24,73 km new centralized water supply networks will be built and 0,41 km reconstructed (financed as project non-related expenses). Planned project period is 69 months with the deadline on 31th December in 2023 Investments Main investments in drinking water and sewer networks Investment type 2016 2017 2018 Water network rehabilitation ~ 0,9 km ~ 8,2 km ~ 3,6 km Gravity sewer rehabilitation ~ 3,4 km ~ 10,7 km ~ 9,9 km Pressure sewer rehabilitation 0 km ~ 1 km ~ 8,9 km Fire hydrants replaced 510 483 472 Valves replaced (DN≥100 mm) 1447 1133 1010 Water supply network Water Supply Riga city Remberģi Centralized water supply system Baltezers-1 scheme in 2019 Baltezers Baltezers-2 Zaķumuiža RĪGA 1 416 km water supply network 15 water pumping stations Daugava 01.12.2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Transformation of Riga's Microrayons
    URBAN TRANSFORMATION OF RIGA‘S MICRORAYONS FROM A SUSTAINABLE URBAN DESIGN PERSPECTIVE CASE STUDY: MEŽCIEMS JOMANTE VALIULYTE INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE 2013 ISU URBANISM Master Thesis, 30ects, Spring Semester 2013 Spatial Planning with an emphasis on Urban Design in China and Europe Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH) Karlskrona, Sweden Institute for Sustainable Urbanism (ISU), TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany Tutors: Prof.Jana Revedin (BTH); Prof.Dr. Vanessa Miriam Carlow (ISU) Pictures, maps and drawings are made by the author, the ones which are used from other sources are explained in APPENDIX 2 of this thesis. Copyright©Jomante Valiulyte ([email protected]) CAD drawings were provided by ISU. ABSTRACT Today, almost every town in Europe has a district of mass housing estates. Espe- plemented, would transform Riga into an attractive and sustainable city. These cially European countries, which were in the former Soviet Union, are facing ample strategies also have the potentials to transform other areas plagued by the prob- issues on dealing with mass housing districts, which cover a great part of cities. lems associated with mass housing estates. Most of them are in a critical condition and in necessary need of renovation. Never- theless, they are strongly criticized by researchers, as uncomfortable places to live, Key Words: mass housing estates, sustainable revitalisation, microrayon, urban which do not fit the human scale. These post – Soviet mass housing estates, which transformation, sustainable urban design. are called ‘microrayons’, is an immense headache to all post - Soviet countries. Riga, which is the capital of Latvia and the biggest city in the Baltic States, can be considered as a special case because of its historical and political situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report
    Ministry of Transport Republic of Latvia Mobility Plan and Action Program for Riga and Pieriga SEA Report Mobility Plan Riga and Pieriga Tornu iela 4, III C, office no. 203 Riga, LV-1050 Latvia Phone: +371 7 223 144 Fax: +371 7 223 830 INDEX P. ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Framework 1 1.2. Project background 1 1.3. Objectives of the RPMP 2 1.4. Strategic Environmental Assessment 3 1.5. SEA Scoping 5 1.6. Consultation meetings 5 1.7. Relation SEA and RPMP 6 1.8. Contents of the report 6 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 7 2.1. SEA Directive 7 2.2. Other EU regulations 8 2.3. Other international conventions 11 2.4. Latvian regulations 11 2.4.1. SEA regulations 11 2.4.2. Other relevant Latvian regulations 14 2.4.3. Latvian transport development policy documents 16 3. THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 17 3.1. Introduction 17 3.2. About Riga and Pieriga 17 3.3. Climate, air, water, soil and the landscape 18 3.3.1. Climate 18 3.3.2. Air 19 3.3.3. Noise 25 3.3.4. Water 30 3.3.5. Landscape and soil 30 3.4. Flora and fauna 31 3.4.1. Biological diversity 31 3.4.2. Special protected areas 31 3.5. Cultural heritage 32 4. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT MOBILITY IN RIGA AND PIERIGA 33 4.1. The study area 33 4.2. Socio-economic characteristics 35 4.3. The policy framework 37 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Plan for Riga City
    About plan Flood Risk Management Plan for Riga City Different territories of Riga City flood for various reasons (spring spate, intense precipitation, wind surges, malfunctioning melioration and rainwater drainage systems) or for combinations of reasons, posing a threat to residential areas, manufacturing or public buildings and other forms of infrastructure. In addition, flood may cause environment pollution from manufacturing companies and present risks to monuments of architecture and culture, and it potentially endangers specially protected nature territories and sites. The most serious flood risks that endanger Riga City are connected with wind surges in Riga Bay (as opposed to spring spate, downpours or melting snow); therefore, the most significant flood prevention measures are linked with protection against flooding caused by wind surges. Observations so far indicate that simultaneous occurrence of spring spate and wind surges is impossible, and since the risk of spring spate is lower, then, whilst primarily protecting territories from sea water surges, they will also be protected from flooding caused by spring spate. According to the climate change forecasts, the frequency and extent of flooding in future will grow, thus increasing the risk of flooding even more. To ensure sustainable development of the city it is necessary to reduce the flood risk endangering inhabitants and property by balancing environment, social and economic interests. The reduction of risk will considerably lessen the damage that flood could cause the owners and governments at all levels. The aim of flood risk management is to manage the flood risk in a way that the balance is obtained among the environmental, social and economic needs that are and will be influenced by flood risk prevention measures.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Conference Programme
    BALTIC URBCULTURAL PLANNING CONFERENCE 2019 4TH - 6TH OF JULY 2019, KIEL (DE) DAY 3 - 06/07 14:45-16:45 SESSION 14 - WORKSHOPS (select 2 of 8) URBAN Anscharpark Neighborhood cases of Art and Culture driven The first Baltic UrbCulturalPlanning Conference Urban Trans- Social Innovation from Baltic Sea Region TRANSFORMATION formation through Art and Culture is happening in Kiel: a ga- 09:15-10:45 SESSION 11 - PLENARY SESSION 1) Finland: Satakunta - Pori - city high street thering of urbanists and city planners, artists, researchers and Petruskirche Tina Saaby (DK) Kati Fager, Sanna Pajunen-Kyynäräinen, Harri Sippola THROUGH academics, students, community organizers, politicians and Former City Architect for Copenhagen City Council 2) Latvia: Riga - Bolderaja and Daugavgriva fortress activists, to explore key aspects of taking an art and cultural Prof. Dr. Franco Bianchini (IT, UK) Liene Jurgelāns, Jānis Ķīnasts, Justīne Panteļejeva, Jānis Ušča, perspective in urban strategies and practice. It is a transdisci- Founder and director of The Culture, Place and Policy Insti- Zanda Jaunskunga ART AND CULTURE plinary approach, which is being reflected in programme of tute, Hull University 3) Latvia: Riga - Sarkandaugava the conference. The starting point is to think in an integrated Alija Turlaja, Kaspars Lielgalvis, Jonas Buechel, Jānis Ušča, and connected way. Only then can we discern the linkages 11:15-12:45 SESSION 12 - 3 PARALLEL WORKSHOPS Guntars Ruskuls and dependencies that help us understand the deeper dy- Anscharpark 7) From participation to Cultural Co-Creation (A) 4) Poland: Pomerskie - Gdansk - Stare Przemiešcie namics of cities and how to make the most of our potential. Janin Walter (DE) Natalia Brylowska, Katarzyna Werner One of the main challenges is how to reinvigorate public and Urban Catalyst 5) Poland: Pomerskie - Gdansk - Nowy Port shared commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Implications of EU Enlargement
    Security Implications of EU Enlargement By Dr. Gerd Föhrenbach* I. Introduction of conflicts, the democratization of state II. Political Aspects structures, and the modernization of 1 The introduction of the Euro on Janu- economies and societies. However, the The Treaty on European Union ary 1, 2002 was a defining moment for old member states do not yet seem to many people in the participating coun- be fully aware of the challenges that come The Treaty of Amsterdam, which came tries. The new currency has drawn atten- with the entry of 12, perhaps even 18 into force on 1 May 1999, referred for the tion to the European Union (EU) and new members.2 The debate in the gen- first time to the territorial integrity of the stimulated the debate on the future of eral public has largely focused on finan- EU and the preservation of its external the Union. It has become clear that after cial issues. borders. According to Article 11, paragraph the introduction of the Euro the next The accession of the new members will 1 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), big project which EU members will have have not only economic and financial the Union shall define and implement a to deal with is the admission of a number consequences, but will also affect security common foreign and security policy of new members. policy. The following analysis concentrates (CFSP), whose objectives include: The enlargement of the EU, which will on the implications of EU enlargement - to safeguard the common values, probably begin in 2004, creates many in the field of security policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Riga Municipality Annual Report 2016
    Riga, 2017 CONTENT Report of Riga City Council Chairman.................................................................................................................... 4 Report of Riga City Council Finance Department Director................................................................................... 5 Riga Municipality state............................................................................................................................................. 6 Riga City population.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Riga Municipality economic state.......................................................................................................................... 7 Riga Municipality administration structure, functions, personnel........................................................................... 9 Riga Municipality property state.............................................................................................................................. 11 Value of Riga Municipal equity capital and its anticipated changes...................................................................... 11 Riga Municipality real estate property state........................................................................................................... 11 Execution of territory development plan................................................................................................................ 12 Riga
    [Show full text]
  • Latvian Real Estate Market Overview
    Latvian Real Estate Market Overview January-June, 2003 The survey of market analysis prepared by “Arco Real Estate” SIA gives us concise information on the real estate market in Latvia in year 2003. The Survey will give you a shot report on the most essential segments of the real estate market: − market of flats, − rent of dwelling premises, − single family private houses, − land plots (for construction of a single family house), − farmland, − land plots (for construction of industrial and public buildings), − market of selling space, − rent of office premises. Charts of segment analysis of the real estate market show the price of the corresponding segment at the beginning and middle of the year. Sources of information for the conducted analysis are “Arco Real Estate” SIA date base of on real property transactions, date base on supply and demand of our customers, as well as information provided by our cooperation partners and publicly available sources of information. This survey of the real estate market has been prepared for a target group, whose activities and interests are Latvian real estate market, starting from private persons to investors and bankers. “Arco Real Estate” SIA real estate market analysis is prepared on regular basis and provides a short survey for each half a year. Proposals, comments or questions please address to Evaluation Department of “Arco Real Estate” SIA: Riga, Dzirnavu str. 45/47-5 Tel.: 7365556; Fax: 7365557 E-mail: [email protected] Head of Evaluation department Maris Laukalejs E-mail: [email protected] Arco Real Estate market data research on real estate property prices in Riga and its vicinity during the first half of year 2003 Market of Flats The growth of prices of flats, which started during the second half of 2001 and continued the whole year 2002, disregarding the forecasts on the possible price stabilisation, continued in the beginning of 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Cultural Heritage Forum Gdańsk 3Rd–6Th April 2003 at the Polish Maritime Museum in Gdańsk Baltic Sea Identity Common Sea – Common Culture?
    BALTIC SEA IDENTITY Common Sea – Common Culture? 1st Cultural Heritage Forum Gdańsk 3rd–6th April 2003 at the Polish Maritime Museum in Gdańsk Baltic Sea Identity Common Sea – Common Culture? 1st Cultural Heritage Forum Gdańsk 3rd-6th April 2003 at the Polish Maritime Museum in Gdańsk Publication subsidized by the Ministry of Culture of Poland Editor Jerzy Litwin Subeditors: Kate Newland Anna Ciemińska Designed & typeset by Paweł Makowski Copyright © 2003 Centralne Muzeum Morskie w Gdańsku ul. Ołowianka 9–13, 80-751 Gdańsk tel. (+48-58) 301 86 11, fax (+48-58) 301 84 53 www.cmm.pl, e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 83-919514-0-5 Printed in Poland by Drukarnia Misiuro in Gdańsk CONTENTS List of contributors . 7 Note by Rafał Skąpski . 9 Note by Jerzy Litwin . 10 Introduction by Christina von Arbin . 11 PART I: “COMMON SEA – COMMON CULTURE?” Merja-Liisa Hinkkanen Common Sea, Common Culture? On Baltic Maritime Communities in the 19th Century . 17 Michael Andersen Mare Balticum – Reflections in the Wake of an Exhibition . 22 Christer Westerdahl Scando-Baltic Contacts during the Viking Age . 27 Fred Hocker Baltic Contacts in the Hanseatic Period . 35 Mirosław Kuklik Selected Issues of the Sea Fishery Heritage of the Polish Baltic Coast . .. 41 PART II: UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE – Short Reports Marcus Lindholm Underwater Cultural Heritage – a short report from the Åland Islands . 49 Friedrich Lüth Underwater Cultural Heritage – present situation along the German East Coast in the State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern . 51 Flemming Rieck Underwater Cultural Heritage – the Danish situation . 55 Willi Kramer Report from Germany (Schleswig-Holstein) . 58 Iwona Pomian Underwater Cultural Heritage in Poland .
    [Show full text]
  • Verifications Under the Terms of Article 35 of the Euratom Treaty
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Directorate H – Nuclear Energy Radiation protection TECHNICAL REPORT VERIFICATIONS UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 35 OF THE EURATOM TREATY LATVIAN NATIONAL MONITORING NETWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY REPUBLIC OF LATVIA 21 to 24 March 2006 Reference: LV-06/01 Art. 35 Technical Report – LV-06/01 VERIFICATIONS UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 35 OF THE EURATOM TREATY FACILITIES Facilities for monitoring environmental radioactivity in Latvia DATE 21 to 24 March 2006 REFERENCE LV-06/01 INSPECTORS V. Tanner (team leader) C. Gitzinger A. Godeanu-Metz Å. Wiklund (national expert on secondment – Sweden) E. Henrich (national expert on secondment – Austria) DATE OF REPORT 9 February 2007 SIGNATURES V. Tanner C. Gitzinger E. Henrich Å. Wiklund A. Godeanu-Metz Page 2 of 38 Art. 35 Technical Report – LV-06/01 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. PREPARATION AND CONDUCT OF THE VERIFICATION 7 2.1. PREAMBLE 7 2.2. PREPARATORY DOCUMENTS 7 2.3. PROGRAMME OF THE VISIT 7 2.4. REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND THE ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES 7 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 9 3.1. GENERAL 9 3.2. MONITORING PROGRAMMES AND RESPONSIBLE ORGANISATIONS 9 4. LEGAL PROVISIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MONITORING 10 4.1. LEGALLY BINDING DOCUMENTS 10 4.2. NON-BINDING DOCUMENTS 11 5. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT THE SALASPILS RESEARCH REACTOR SITE 12 5.1. GENERAL INFORMATION 12 5.2. PROVISIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGE MONITORING 12 6. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AT THE RADONS SITE IN BALDONE 14 6.1. GENERAL INFORMATION 14 6.2. PROVISIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 14 7.
    [Show full text]