Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: a Baseline Study Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: a Baseline Study Table of Contents Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study Table of Contents Research Team 3 Gratitude and acknowledgement 4 The Human Rights Resource Centre 5 Foreword 6 Limitations of this report 7 Executive Summary 9 Synthesis 19 Annex 113 Brunei Darussalam 165 Cambodia 213 Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study Published by Human Rights Resource Centre Human Rights Resource Centre University of Indonesia - Depok Campus Guest House Complex (next to Gedung Vokasi) Depok Indonesia 16424 Phone/Fax : (62 21) 786 6720 Email: [email protected] Web: www.hrrca.org This publication may be freely used, quoted, reproduced, translated or distributed in part or in full by any non-profit organisation provided copyright is acknowledged and no fees or charges are made. ISBN: 978-602-17986-0-7 3 Research Team Editors The research assistants: Professor David Cohen Judelyn Macapili (HRRC Adviser, University of California, Berkeley). (The Philippines Commission on Human Rights Region IX) Dr. Kevin Tan Muhammad Subarkah Syafruddin (HRRC Governing Board Member, National University (Faculty of Law University of Indonesia) of Singapore. Natalia Rialucky Tampubolon Faith Suzzette Delos Reyes-Kong (Faculty of Law University of Indonesia) (Team Leader of the Baseline Study, Lawyer & Researcher, Wong Li Ru ECCC Trial Monitor for AIJI ). (Singapore Management University) Country Researchers Sovanna Sek HRRC: (Cambodia) Marzuki Darusman Ranyta Yusran Prof. Dr. Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, SH, MA, Ph.D (Centre for International Law, National University Rully Sandra of Singapore) Ati Suryadi Ismail Jaclyn Ling-Chien Neo (J.SD Candidate, Yale Law School-National University Singapore School of Law) Hnin Wut Yee (Myanmar) Delphia Lim (LL.M Candidate, Harvard Law School) Francis Tom F. Temprosa (Philippines) Kitti Jayangakula (Eastern Asia University) Huong Le Thu (Ph.D Candidate in Asia-Pacific Studies, National Chengchi University) 4 Gratitude and Acknowledgement: HRRC: Kanda Vajrabhaya (Chairperson of ACWC), the Philippines: representatives of ACWC, Deepa Bharathi (UN Women), Prof. Aurora de Dios of Miriam College and Dr. Aurora Heru Kasidi (Ministry of Women Empowerment and Parong of Amnesty International. Child Protection, Republic of Indonesia), Mary Agnes James (OSI) Singapore: Ho Huayu, Wong Li Ru, Esther Ng Feng Qing for their The team leader: invaluable research assistance. Grateful for the invaluable guidance provided by the HRRC team of Advisers and the contributions of the Thailand: HRRC Country Rapporteurs and Research Assistants, HRRC, the advisors, the team and all country rapporteurs Mdm Kanda Vajrabhaya, Datuk Chiam Heng Keng, Deepa of this project and Eastern Asia University. Warmest Bharathi. The utmost gratitude to Susan N. Delos Reyes, thanks to my parents for their encouragement and Norjamin Gallardo-Delos Reyes, Frances P. Cantillo, and support. Sawanya Phakphian for their input and assistance. Vietnam: Indonesia : The advisors and the research team, as well as my dear Ahmad Taufan Damanik, Rita Serena Kolibonso, Achie fellow country rapporteurs. Special thanks to my dear Sudiarti Luhulima, Justina Rostiawati, LM Gandhi parents who have blessed me with their unconditional Lapian, Priyadi Santosa, Rita Kolibonso, Roichatul love and unlimited support. Aswidah, Saparinah Sadli, Sjamsiah Ahmad, Kartini Isabelle Pouchous, Justina Rostiawati for their inputs to the report. Laos: Wong Li Ru, Beverly Ng Lin Yin, Trent Ng Yong En for their invaluable research assistance. Malaysia: Women’s Aid Organisation, Teo Lee Ken from Institute of Ethnic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for the assistance in writing the report. Myanmar: HRRC, the advisors (David and Kevin), the team leader (Faith) and my family members especially my niece, my parents, my sisters, brothers, relatives and friends. 5 Human Rights Resource Centre The Human Rights Resource Centre and its foundation rights training, research, and education. The activities of were officially registered by the Ministry of Law and HRRC will be concentrated in three areas: (i) research, Human Rights on 31 March 2010 (Keputusan Menteri analysis and data collection/presentation; (ii) training Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia and capacity building; and (iii) support for educational Nomor: AHU.1173.AH.01.04.Tahun 2010). It is a programs at universities throughout the region. not for profit foundation under Indonesian Law. The Centre has been established with the independence The HRRC encompasses a network of Partner and Affiliated necessary to implement its own research, training and Institutions that taps into the region’s rich academic educational agenda. While the HRRC is hosted at the research community. Current Partner Institutions include University of Indonesia, it has an autonomous structure University of Indonesia, University of the Philippines, and independent funding to ensure its independence University of Malaya, the Law School of the National and regional focus. The HRRC is a genuinely regional University of Singapore, Singapore Management institution that will employ in its operations the most University, Pannasastra University of Cambodia, Ateneo capable and qualified individuals from across ASEAN. the Manila University in the Philippines, Chulalongkorn University in Thailand, and Gadjah Mada University The Human Rights Resource Centre (HRRC) has been in Indonesia. The Islamic University of Indonesia in designed to support the work of ASEAN human rights Yogyakarta, which has a strong interest in human rights bodies, by providing an independent forum for regional education, is HRRC’s first affiliate institution. experts to engage in research and capacity building, as well as training and teaching that addresses human Through collaboration with these partner and affiliated rights issues in ASEAN. Its overarching goal is to develop university-based institutions across ASEAN, the HRRC’s regional networks of experts on human rights issues in research, training, and capacity building projects ASEAN in order to promote a better understanding of will contribute to the development of human rights human rights in the region. throughout the region. The HRRC is headed by Mr. Marzuki Darusman as Executive Director and includes a core research staff with direct experience in leading regional projects in human For further information about HRRC: Human Rights Resource Centre University of Indonesia - Depok Campus Guest House Complex (next to Gedung Vokasi) Depok Indonesia 16424 Phone/Fax : (62 21) 786 6720 Email: [email protected] Web: www.hrrca.org 6 Foreword I am pleased to present you with the second baseline study from the Human Rights Resource Centre and it is my sincere hope that this baseline study on women and children rights would serve as the much needed and useful reference source of information of near policy quality thus serving its intended purpose of supporting the ASEAN Commission on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Women and Children (ACWC) and the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) in their works and initiatives also the Marzuki Darusman works of the NGO communities and movement in Executive Director ASEAN. With half of the almost 600 millions people in ASEAN The study would not be possible without the hard are women and children, it is critical that their rights work of Ms. Faith Suzette and a research team of are protected. This study is a big undertaking in nine rapporteurs and four research assistants who terms of subject and it is also the first study which benefited from the expert guidance of two eminent compiles the situation and condition of women and advisers Dr. Kevin Tan and Prof. David Cohen, and children in the 10 ASEAN member states affected by the support of ACWC and UN WOMEN. I also violence, exploitation, and abuses & discrimination express our highest appreciation to the Embassy of in migration. The rapporteurs scrutinized the Norway in Indonesia, USAID, the Open Society secondary sources of published materials from Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and the government, NGOs, police, and other institutions East West Center for their on-going support in and academically analyzed to bringforth this study. making this study a possibility. As a baseline study, I hope that this document would aspire and assists not only the human rights bodies in ASEAN but also the stakeholders to conduct a follow up research and to take actions to protect the rights of women and children in ASEAN. Jakarta, December 2012 Marzuki Darusman Executive Director 7 Limitations of this report Dr. Kevin Tan “Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse & Discrimination in Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study” This is a Baseline Study on the subjects of Exploitation, Violence and Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN. It is not an attempt at a comprehensive empirical survey of the situation in the ASEAN states. That would have been impossible given limitations of time and resources available to the researchers and to the Centre. Rather, it is a compilation, categorisation and analysis of the published material on the subject. It is important to note that researchers could only work with materials that are in fact published and made widely available to the general public. Confidential reports and undisclosed statistics held by various government departments would obviously
Recommended publications
  • Discrimination and Violence Against Women in Brunei Darussalam On
    SOUTH Muara CHINA Bandar Seri SEA Begawan Tutong Bangar Seria Kuala Belait Sukang MALAYSIA MALAYSIA I N D 10 km O N E SIA Discrimination and Violence Against Women in Brunei Darussalam on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Presented to the 59th Session of The Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) Discrimination and Violence Against Women in Brunei Darussalam on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Presented to the 59th Session of The Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) November 2014 • Geneva Submitted by: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Syariah Penal Code Order 2013 ................................................................................................................... 1 Discrimination Against LBT Women (Articles 1 and 2) ............................................................................. 3 Criminalization of Lesbians and Bisexual Women ...................................................................................... 3 Criminalization of Transgender Persons .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Int Cedaw Ngo Brn 18687 E
    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN 59th Session of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 20 October – 7 November 2014 THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS’ SUBMISSION TO THE UN COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN IN ADVANCE OF THE EXAMINATION OF BRUNEI DARUSSALAM’S INITIAL AND SECOND PERIODIC REPORTS UNDER ARTICLE 18 OF THE CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN Submitted on 3 October 2014 Composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world, the International Commission of Jurists promotes and protects human rights through the Rule of Law, by using its unique legal expertise to develop and strengthen national and international justice systems. Established in 1952, active on the five continents, the ICJ aims to ensure the progressive development and effective implementation of international human rights and international humanitarian law; secure the realization of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights; safeguard the separation of powers; and guarantee the independence of the judiciary and legal profession. P.O. Box, 91, Rue des Bains, 33, 1211 Geneva 8, Switzerland Tel: +41(0) 22 979 3800 – Fax: +41(0) 22 979 3801 – Website: http://www.icj.org E-mail: [email protected] Introduction 1. During its 59th session, from 20 October to 7 November 2014, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW or the Committee) will examine Brunei Darussalam’s implementation of the provisions of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (the Convention), including in light of the state party’s initial and second periodic reports.1 The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) welcomes the opportunity to submit the following observations to the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunei Darussalam
    Statelessness Network Asia Pacific, Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights, The Brunei Project and Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion Joint Submission to the Human Rights Council at the 33rd Session of the Universal Periodic Review (Third Cycle, April - May 2019) Brunei Darussalam 4 October 2018 Statelessness Network Asia Pacific, The Brunei Project, Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights and Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion Joint Submission to the Human Rights Council at the 33rd Session of the Universal Periodic Review Brunei Darussalam Introduction 1. The Statelessness Network Asia Pacific, The Brunei Project, the Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights, and the Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion make this joint submission to the Human Rights Council at the 33rd Session of the Universal Periodic Review on the challenges pertaining to citizenship, statelessness and the enjoyment of fundamental human rights in Brunei Darussalam.1 2. The Statelessness Network Asia Pacific2 is a civil society coalition with the goal of promoting collaboration and information sharing on addressing statelessness in Asia and the Pacific. SNAP is driven by a diverse membership and through direct engagement and contribution from its members and stakeholders, particularly formerly stateless persons, stateless persons and persons at risk of statelessness. 3. The Brunei Project3 is an independent human rights initiative that has been monitoring and raising awareness about human rights in Brunei since May 2015. It’s primary method of engagement is through social media, actively seeking out opportunities to increase awareness about human rights through independent projects and in collaboration with like-minded organisations regionally and internationally. 4. The Global Campaign for Equal Nationality Rights4 mobilizes international action for the removal of gender discriminatory provisions from all nationality laws through its coalition of national and international organizations and activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993–2005 WHO Global Database on Anaemia
    Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005 WHO Global Database on Anaemia Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005 WHO Global Database on Anaemia Editors Bruno de Benoist World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland Erin McLean World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland Ines Egli Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, ETH – Zurich, Switzerland Mary Cogswell Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, Georgia WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005 : WHO global database on anaemia / Edited by Bruno de Benoist, Erin McLean, Ines Egli and Mary Cogswell. 1.Anemia – prevention and control. 2.Anemia – epidemiology. 3.Prevalence. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 159665 7 (NLM classification: WH 155) © World Health Organization 2008 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • £MALAYSIA @The Cane to Claim More Victims
    £MALAYSIA @The cane to claim more victims The Malaysian Government has introduced a bill in parliament to make caning a mandatory punishment for white collar criminal offenders. In August 1993, Justice Minister Datuk Syed Hamid Albar introduced the Penal Code (Amendment) Bill 1993 for its first reading in parliament. The Bill seeks to enhance the penalty for criminal breach of trust from a fine and/or three years' imprisonment to 10 years' imprisonment, fine and mandatory caning by amending Section 406 of the Penal Code. The Bill is expected to be approved by parliament. The Justice Minister said the penalty had to be harsher to deter the increasing number of white collar crimes. Caning is already widely used in Malaysia as a supplementary punishment to imprisonment for some 40 crimes listed in the Penal Code including robbery, rape, kidnapping and causing grievous hurt. According to Section 289 of the Criminal Procedure Code, caning cannot be inflicted on females, males sentenced to death and males who are over 50 years of age. The maximum number of strokes of the cane that can be inflicted are 24 in the case of an adult and 10 in the case of a youthful offender. The Shari'a courts can also impose caning on male Muslim offenders for some crimes under Islamic law including drinking of alcohol and adultery. According to Section 290 of the Criminal Procedure Code, caning "shall not be inflicted unless a Medical Officer is present and certifies that the offender is in a fit state of health to undergo such a punishment..
    [Show full text]
  • Children in Brunei Darussalam: Their Educational, Legal and Social Protections
    e-ISSN 2289-6023 International Journal of Islamic Thought ISSN 2232-1314 Vol. 11: (June) 2017 Children in Brunei Darussalam: Their Educational, Legal and Social Protections AMY YOUNG, PG NORHAZLIN PG HJ MUHAMMAD, OSMAN BAKAR, PATRICK O’LEARY & MOHAMAD ABDALLA1 ABSTRACT The past two decades of academic work, have cemented the idea that childhood is a social construction. As such, how children are conceptualized, educated, protected and interacted with differs from society to society, given the values inherent in each social construction. Culture, history and geography all influence the daily lives of children, and the inherent protections that children are offered in each society. This paper examines child protection provisions embedded in Brunei Darussalam by critically reviewing the sparse literature available. While much academic work has been done on Brunei Darussalam’s political system and unique ideology, little has been written on the children of Brunei. Specifically, the focus taken is on the protections offered by the Bruneian legal and education systems, family and cultural institutions, and on Brunei’s international commitments to ensuring child wellbeing. Keywords: Brunei Darussalam, child, childhood, Islam, shariah law Negara Brunei Darussalam is an Islamic sultanate with a particular vision for its people and children. Yet little academic work has focused on children in Brunei. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is central to the way children are viewed worldwide. It reflects an awareness that children are not just passive recipients of adult culture in need of protection and provision, but also beings in their own right who participate and interact with the world (Alderson 2012a, 2012b, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibiting All Corporal Punishment in Schools: Global Report 2011
    Prohibiting all corporal punishment in schools: Global Report 2011 “Children do not lose their human rights by virtue of passing through the school gates.” Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No. 1, 2001 Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children Children’s right to legal protection CONTENTS from corporal punishment Children’s right to legal protection from corporal punishment ..3 Research on corporal punishment in schools ...........................7 Worldwide progress towards prohibition ...................................8 Understanding prohibition .......................................................12 Key elements of implementing and enforcing prohibition in schools ..............................................................................14 Resources to support the promotion, enactment and implementation of prohibition ...............................................15 Spectators at a community march against child abuse, Zambia Corporal punishment of children – wherever it occurs and whoever the perpetrator – breaches their fundamental rights to protection from all forms of violence and to respect for their human dignity. Its legality breaches their right to equality under the law. When it happens in schools, corporal punishment also violates children’s right to education. It is shocking that decades since the Convention on the Rights of the Child confirmed that human rights belong to children as to all other people, children continue to be assaulted in the name of “discipline” in homes, schools
    [Show full text]
  • Brunei Darussalam 59 Th CEDAW Session October 2014
    Musawah Comprehensive Fact-Sheet on Muslim Family Laws: Brunei Darussalam 59 th CEDAW Session October 2014 I. INTRODUCTION This is the CEDAW Committee’s first engagement with the Government of Brunei Darussalam, which acceded to the CEDAW Convention on 24 May 2006, and entered reservations to Article 9.2 and Article 29.1 , and a general reservation ‘regarding those provisions of [CEDAW] that may be contrary to the Constitution of Brunei Darussalam and to the beliefs and principles of Islam, the official religion of Brunei Darussalam. ’1 In response to the CEDAW Committee’s list of issues and questions (2014), the Government of Brunei Darussalam stated that ‘ without prejudice to the generality of CEDAW, [it] wishes to retain its reservations’ (para. 8). The Government has also noted in its responses that it still has not ratified the Optional Protocol (para. 73). The information and analysis presented in this comprehensive fact-sheet is based on field research carried out in Brunei in October 2014. Musawah researchers interviewed over 20 women on their first-hand experiences of gender discrimination in marriage and family relations. The report also makes use of official materials produced and circulated by the Government within the State party territory. Although research documenting realities of family life on the ground is meant to be illustrative, and in no way comprehensive, secondary research, including review of other analysis on gender discrimination in Brunei, suggests that the types of women’s human rights abused documented are common. The seriously limited space for free association, expression, and assembly, including the monitoring of discussion of Government law and policy in person, print and online spaces, imposed significant obstacles on Musawah researchers, including connecting with respondents willing to engage in open discussion of gender discrimination in law and in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunei Darussalam
    Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study Brunei Darussalam Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration 166 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM A!ecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration A!ecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 167 Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration Affecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study BRUNEI DARUSSALAM Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration 168 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM A!ecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study Violence, Exploitation, and Abuse and Discrimination in Migration A!ecting Women and Children in ASEAN: A Baseline Study BRUNEI DARUSSALAM 169 Table of Contents A. OVERVIEW 173 D. ABUSE AND DISCRIMINATION IN MIGRATION 201 1. Description of the Problem 202 B. VIOLENCE 175 a. Prevalence of Abuse and 1. Description of the Problem 175 Discrimination in Migration 202 a. Prevalence of Violence 175 b. Root Causes of Abuse and Discrimination b. Root Causes of Violence and in Migration and Aggravating Practices 203 Aggravating Practices 178 c. Impact of Abuse and Discrimination c. Impact of Violence 179 in Migration 203 2. De Jure State Responses 180 2. De Jure State Responses 203 a. Bases of State Responsibility 180 a. Bases of State Responsibility 203 b. National Policies against Violence 181 b. National Policies Against Abuse c. Assessment of State Policies 183 and Discrimination in Migration 204 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Asie Observatoire Pour La Protection Des Défenseurs Des Droits De L'homme Rapport Annuel 2011
    ASIE OBSERVATOIRE POUR LA PROTECTION DES DÉFENSEURS DES DROITS DE L'HOMME RAPPORT ANNUEL 2011 367 ANALYSE RÉGIONALE ASIE OBSERVATOIRE POUR LA PROTECTION DES DÉFENSEURS DES DROITS DE L'HOMME RAPPORT ANNUEL 2011 En 2010-2011, les élections qui se sont déroulées dans plusieurs pays de la région Asie ont souvent été accompagnées de vastes fraudes et d’irrégu- larités, avec un renforcement des restrictions pesant sur les libertés d’ex- pression et de réunion, tandis que les Gouvernements ont muselé encore davantage l’opposition et les voix dissidentes (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Birmanie, Malaisie, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Viet Nam). En Birmanie en particulier, les premières élections nationales tenues depuis 20 ans, en novembre 2010, se sont avérées ni libres ni équitables, ayant été entachées d’une série d’irrégularités et de restrictions draconiennes sur la liberté d’as- sociation et de la presse. Bien que l’année 2010 ait aussi été marquée par la libération historique après les élections de l’assignation à domicile de la cheffe de l’opposition, Mme Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, la Birmanie attend toujours une amnistie générale, plus de 2 000 prisonniers politiques étant maintenus en détention. Une sécurité publique inadéquate et l’absence d’un climat propice aux défenseurs des droits de l’Homme ont pesé de manière significative sur le travail des militants dans toute la région (Afghanistan, Inde, Népal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thaïlande), notamment dans les zones échappant en partie à l’autorité gouvernementale, telles que les régions méridionales
    [Show full text]
  • Inflicting Harm: Judicial Corporal Punishment for Drug and Alcohol Offences in Selected Countries
    Inflicting Harm: JUDICIAL CORPORAL PUNISHMENT FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL OFFENCES IN SELECTED COUNTRIES Eka Iakobishvili © International Harm Reduction Association, 2011 ISBN 978-0-9566116-3-5 Acknowledgements This report owes a debt of gratitude to a number of people who took time to comment on the text and share their ideas. Our gratitude is owed to Elina Steinerte and Rachel Murray at the Human Rights Implementation Centre at the University of Bristol as well as Tatyana Margolin from the Law and Health Initiative and the International Harm Reduction Development Program at the Open Society Foundations, who shared invaluable insights on a number of the issues described in the report. This report would not have been possible without the untiring assistance of colleagues at Harm Reduction International: Rick Lines, Damon Barrett and Patrick Gallahue as well as Annie Kuch, Maria Phelan, Catherine Cook, Claudia Stoicescu and Andreas Woreth. Designed by Mark Joyce Copy-edited by Jennifer Armstrong Printed by Club Le Print. Published by Harm Reduction International Unit 701, 50 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7QY United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0) 207 953 7412 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ihra.net 1 1 About Harm Reduction International Harm Reduction International is one of the leading international non-governmental organisations promoting policies and practices that reduce the harms from psychoactive substances, harms that include not only the increased vulnerability to HIV and hepatitis C infection among people who use drugs, but also the negative social, health, economic and criminal impacts of drug laws and policies on individuals, communities and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Narratives
    COUNTRY NARRATIVES Country narratives 55 aware that they are carrying explosives that are then set aFGHANISTAN off remotely without their knowledge. some child soldiers (tier 2 Watch List) used by insurgent groups were sexually exploited. Boys are sometimes promised enrollment in islamic schools in afghanistan is a source, transit, and destination country Pakistan and iran, but instead are trafficked to camps for for men, women, and children subjected to trafficking in paramilitary training by extremist groups. persons, specifically forced labor and forced prostitution. trafficking within afghanistan is more prevalent than the Government of afghanistan does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of AFGHANISTAN transnational trafficking, and the majority of victims are children. afghan boys and girls are trafficked within the trafficking; however, it is making significant efforts country for forced prostitution and forced labor in brick to do so. Despite these efforts, such as the continued kilns, carpet-making factories, and domestic service. referral of identified trafficking victims to care facilities, Forced begging is a growing problem in afghanistan; the government did not show evidence of increasing Mafia groups organize professional begging rings. afghan efforts over the previous year. specifically, the afghan boys are subjected to forced prostitution and forced government did not prosecute or convict trafficking labor in the drug smuggling industry in Pakistan and offenders under its 2008 law, and punished victims iran. afghan women and girls are subjected to forced of sex trafficking with imprisonment for adultery or prostitution, forced marriages—including through prostitution. afghanistan is therefore placed on tier 2 forced marriages in which husbands force their wives Watch List.
    [Show full text]