DOCSLIB.ORG

Ukraine Humanitarian Snapshot Crossing Points

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ukraine Humanitarian Snapshot Crossing Points UKRAINE CROSSING POINTS - Snapshot: July 2021 Despite the 15.5 per cent increase in civilian movement across the “contact line” in July compared to June (97,000 vs. 82,000), the number of civilian crossings remains low, representing just 7.5 per cent of 1.3 million crossings recorded in July 2019. Since the movement across the “contact line” remains limited to certain categories of people, 212,471 individuals, many of whom are likely residents of non-Government-controlled areas (NGCA), opted to transit through the Russian Federation via the crossing points (CPs) “Milove” (Luhanska oblast) and “Hoptivka” (Kharkivska oblast) to enter Government-controlled areas (GCA) in July. However, the limited capacity of these border crossing points and long processing times are reported to have resulted in people spending up to 24 hours to cross to GCA. OPERATIONAL UPDATES ENTRY/EXIT CROSSING POINTS (EECPs) MAP EECP KEY FIGURES (July 2021) On 22 July, the President signed a law cancelling administrative fines for crossing the uncontrolled section of Legend the Ukrainian-Russian border to transit to GCA from NGCA.¹ Following the entry into force of this law, NGCA 'Contact line' as of August 2018 Number of ‘contact line’ residents will no longer be required to pay these fines at “Milove” and “Hoptivka” crossing points while COVID-19 ≈ k crossings by people Non-operational EECP 97 restrictions are in place provided that their justification for crossing falls under certain humanitarian exemptions.² While the law provides the possibility for the State Border Guard Service to exempt a person from paying a fine on Operational EECP Number of ‘contact line’ other grounds, reportedly, it hasn't been applied consistently to date. In addition, the application of this law should Partially operational EECP ≈ crossings by vehicles be extended beyond the period of COVID-19-related quarantine and apply in case of any other emergency-triggered 550 ‘Hoptivka’ Planned EECP closure of the “contact line” or introduction of severe movement restrictions. <1% Kharkiv On 28 July, to mitigate transmission of the COVID-19 Delta variant, the Government announced the 4% reinstatement of app-monitored self-quarantine³ for people crossing international borders and the “contact line”. Stanytsia Luhanska Travellers vaccinated with WHO-approved vaccines4 will be exempt from self-quarantine, however NGCA residents Civilian vaccinated with Sputnik vaccines, will be required to provide a negative COVID-19 test result and/or KHARKIVSKA crossings of Novotroitske self-quarantine. Furthermore, NGCA residents transiting through the Russian Federation (RF) to enter GCA may be OBLAST ‘Milove’ contact line in Marinka LUHANSKA July 2021 affected by a new mandatory 14-day self-quarantine without the possibility to cancel it for all travellers who spent GCA over seven days in COVID-19 Delta strain high exposure areas, which includes the RF. Travellers spending less than seven days in the RF will be required to provide a negative COVID-19 test, which might further increase Sievierodonetsk 95% processing times and lead to longer queues at the border crossing points. ‘Zolote’ ‘Shchastia’ Kramatorsk ‘Stanytsia MAIN REASONS TO CROSS On 28 July, the Cabinet of Ministers approved free-of-charge bus transportation services for people crossing the Luhansk Luhanska’ “contact line” on foot. Bus services will be provided by the State Enterprise “Reintegration and Reconstruction” to ‘Maiorske’ (bridge) DONETSKA assist the elderly, people with disabilities, women with children and other low-mobility groups to cross the EECPs.5 LUHANSKA Visiting relatives GCA Humanitarian partners are working closely with the Ministry for Reintegration and the municipal company to work NGCA out the modality and technicalities of the provision of transportation services. processing times and lead to longer Donetsk queues at the border crossing points. ‘Marinka’ DONETSKA Withdrawing cash NGCA ‘Novotroitske’ 1. The Parliament had adopted the law on 29 June, and it was pending President’s signature for some time. RUSSIAN 2. The detailed list is available at link. FEDERATION 3. The provision came into force on 5 August. Recovering a pension 4. WHO approved vaccines as of 15 July 2021 available at link. ‘Hnutove’ 5. Ministry for Reintegration. Sea of Azov COMPARISON OF THE MONTHLY CIVILIAN CROSSINGS (2019 - 2021) CIVILIAN CROSSINGS AT CPs WITH RF CIVILIAN CROSSINGS AT EECPs EECP GCA to NGCA NGCA to GCA 1.2M CP Inflow Outflow Number of crossings in JUNE JULY JUNE JULY JUNE JULY JUNE JULY 2019 STANYTSIA 46,53840,591 45,228 0.9M HOPTIVKA 77,382 80,578 62,674 72,627 LUHANSKA 37,851 2020 MILOVE 27,615 28,769 25,967 30,497 NOVOTROITSKE 1,402 2,567 1,952 2,688 0.6M 2021 TOTAL 104,997 109,347 88,641 103,124 MAIORSKE 0 0 0 0 0.3M MARINKA 9 6 20 7 29k 40k 55k 53k 52k 82k 97k HNUTOVE 0 0 0 0 Jan Feb March AprilMay June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec TOTAL 39,262 49,111 42,563 47,923 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Creation date: 12 August 2021 Sources: OCHA, R2P, SBGS, humanitarian partners Feedback: [email protected] www.unocha.org www.reliefweb.int www.facebook.com/ochaukraine.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Humanitarian Snapshot
    UKRAINE CROSSING POINTS - Snapshot: July 2021 Despite the 15.5 per cent increase in civilian movement across the “contact line” in July compared to June (97,000 vs. 82,000), the number of civilian crossings remains low, representing just 7.5 per cent of 1.3 million crossings recorded in July 2019. Since the movement across the “contact line” remains limited to certain categories of people, 212,471 individuals, manyof whom are likely residents of non-Government-controlled areas (NGCA), opted to transit through the Russian Federation via the crossing points (CPs) “Milove” (Luhanska oblast) and “Hoptivka” (Kharkivska oblast) to enter Government-controlled areas (GCA) in July. However, the limited capacity of these border crossing points and long processing times are reported to have resulted in people spending up to 24 hours to cross to GCA. OPERATIONAL UPDATES ENTRY/EXIT CROSSING POINTS (EECPs) MAP EECP KEY FIGURES (July 2021) On 22 July, the President signed a law cancelling administrative fines for crossing the uncontrolled section of the Ukrainian-Russian border to transit to GCA from NGCA.¹ Following the entry into force of this law, NGCA Legend Number of ‘contact line’ 'Contact line' as of August 2018 residents will no longer be required to pay these fines at “Milove” and “Hoptivka” crossing points while COVID-19 ≈ k crossings by people Planned EECP 97 restrictions are in place provided that their justification for crossing falls under certain humanitarian exemptions.² Non-operational EECP While the law provides the possibility for the State Border Guard Service to exempt a person from paying a fine on Number of ‘contact line’ other grounds, reportedly, it hasn't been applied consistently to date.
    [Show full text]
  • (CONSULTING SERVICES – FIRMS SELECTION) UKRAINE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Loan No.: 8549-UA
    REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (CONSULTING SERVICES – FIRMS SELECTION) UKRAINE ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Loan No.: 8549-UA Assignment Title: Consultancy Services for design and bidding documents elaboration for repair (rehabilitation) of the road R-66 KPP “Demyno-Oleksandrivka”-Svatove-Lysychansk-Luhansk sections km 30+000 – km 86+600, km 93+400 – km 145+075 and the road N-26 Chuguyiv-Milove section: km 136+000 – km 148+000 and T-13-02 KPP “Tanyushivka”-Starobilsk-Bahmut section km 76+000 – km 121+400. Reference No.: CS-23 BACKGROUND The State Road Agency of Ukraine (Ukravtodor) has received financing from the World Bank (“Bank”) toward the cost of the Road Sector Development Project and intends to apply part of the proceeds for consulting services. PURPOSE OF ASSIGNMENT The key objective is to undertake engineering surveys, design, preparation of bidding documents and cost estimate for repair (rehabilitation) of the road R-66 KPP “Demyno-Oleksandrivka”-Svatove- Lysychansk-Luhansk sections km 30+000 – km 86+600 (56.6 km in length), km 93+400 – km 145+075 (51.7 km in length) and the road N-26 Chuguyiv-Milove section: km 136+000 – km 148+000 (12 km in length) and T-13-02 KPP “Tanyushivka”-Starobilsk-Bahmut section km 76+000 – km 121+400 (45.4 km in length). The main tasks are divided into phases with the continuation of the Consultant’s appointment to carry out a subsequent phase is dependent on the Consultant’s satisfactory performance in carrying out the services under the previous phase/s. • Phase I: development of the design
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Summary of steps taken based on decisions of the previous meeting by UN OCHA OCHA to follow up on the implications of new Temporary Order of entry/exit to NGCAs for humanitarian cargo UN OCHA summarized activities based on the decisions of the last General Coordination Meeting. The movement. issue of unaccompanied minors is being addressed both at oblast and national levels. WHO keeps checking if tuberculin was delivered to all raions of the oblast. For the moment, it is confirmed that Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions and Lysychansk didn’t receive it. WHO and UN OCHA had the meetings with the authorities in Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions. The maternity hospital in Bilovodsk serves three raions and many women come for delivery from NGCAs of the oblast. The authorities asked to support the hospital with hygiene kits both for women and for newborns. At the national level UN OCHA continues to provide support in the development of the Law on “humanitarian assistance”. It is expected that the draft is finalized by June 30 and then passed for discussion to the Parliament of Ukraine. As of today only 30% of required funding has been funded or pledged as part of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The new Temporary Order on entry/exit to NGCAs has been adopted and came into force. For the moment no commercial cargoes are permitted to NGCAs due to security situation. 2. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from UN OCHA and LOMCA SES to share the estimated costs of transition center with the humanitarian partners for their participation in The number of officially registered IDPs is growing despite of difficulties in crossing the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Progress Report
    EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 Table of contents List of annexes 5 Abbreviations and acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 Background 12 COMPONENT 1 16 LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND DECENTRALISATION REFORM Result 1.1 Nationwide decentralisation reform is fully implemented in the newly established Amalgamated Territorial Communities (ATCs) in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblast under the 18 control of the Government Result 1.2 Access to quality administrative and social services is improved 26 Result 1.3 Government capacity for participatory strategic planning and transparent project 30 implementation is enhanced. COMPONENT 2 36 ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND MSMES DEVELOPMENT REFORM Result 2.1 Network of service providers is established, and market access improved 38 Result 2.2 Access to credit and financing is improved and more flexible in Complement to KFW 43 Result 2.3 Provision of technical and vocational training is of increasing quality.. 46 COMPONENT 3 52 COMMUNITY SECURITY AND SOCIAL COHESION Result 3.1. A network of citizen groups is established to promote social cohesion and sustainable 54 socio-economic development. Result 3.2 Citizen group initiatives are financially supported. 77 COMPONENT 4 79 SECTORAL REFORMS AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENTS (HEALTH) Result 4.1 The regional health care system is effectively functioning at the regional
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities
    Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance Civil Society in Donbas, Ukraine: Organizations and Activities Volodymyr Lukichov Tymofiy Nikitiuk Liudmyla Kravchenko Luhansk oblast DONBAS DONBAS Stanytsia Donetsk Luhanska Zolote oblast Mayorske Luhansk Donetsk Maryinka Novotroitske RUSSIA Hnutove Mariupol Sea of Azov About DCAF DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance is dedicated to improving the se- curity of people and the States they live in within a framework of democratic governance, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. DCAF contributes to making peace and de- velopment more sustainable by assisting partner states and international actors supporting them to improve the governance of their security sector through inclusive and participatory reforms. It creates innovative knowledge products, promotes norms and good practices, provides legal and policy advice and supports capacity building of both state- and non-state security sector stakeholders. Active in over 70 countries, DCAF is internationally recognized as one of the world’s leading centres of excellence for security sector governance (SSG) and security sector reform (SSR). DCAF is guided by the principles of neutrality, impartiality, local ownership, inclusive participation, and gender equality. www.dcaf.ch. Publisher DCAF - Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance P.O.Box 1360 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Switzerland [email protected] +41 (0) 22 730 9400 Authors: Volodymyr Lukichov, Tymofiy Nikitiuk, Liudmyla Kravchenko Copy-editor: dr Grazvydas Jasutis, Richard Steyne
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • I Impact O T of Th Oblasts E Conf S on Th Infr Lict in He
    15 September 2014 Kiev IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT IN LUHANSK AND DONETSK OBLASTS ON THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMARY This paper presents a summary of the damage assessment in areas affected by the armed conflict of Luhansk and Donets oblasts in the period since the beginning of the conflict until 14 September 2014. As of 14 September 2014, 1,968 facilities (including social infrastructure, residential houses, and enterprises) were reported to receive the damage, amounting to a monetary loss of total UAH 5.958 bn hryvnias, or US$ 440 mln (estimated, without account of unconfirmed damages in the residential sector, disruption of contracts, and lost profits of business enterprises). Among those reported 995 facilities are located in Luhansk oblast (UAH 1.094 million), and 783 facilities are in Donetsk oblast (UAH 3.964 billion). 190 facilities, with an estimated loss of UAH 900 m, belong to railway infrastructure situated in the territory of both oblasts. As can be seen in the consolidated table (page 6 and 7), 1230 housing buildings were damaged (667 in Luhansk and 563 in Donetsk oblasts), and this affected the shelter of 6,618 families (including 1,844 in Luhansk oblast and 4,774 in Donetsk oblast). Due to different limitations in determining the exact number of affected families, the real number of affected families is, most likely, of a greater scale than presented in this report. Indirectly (by worsened access to public services) the conflict in Donbass affected the majority of the 6,6 million population of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. It is worth noting, that the report indicates another 1873 housing buildings damaged during the conflict, however no verification (geographical/address localization) was possible by the team of data collectors, and this number remained outside the main analysis in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection Cluster Factsheet – March 2021
    UKRAINE MARCH 2021 PROTECTION HIGHLIGHTS • Security situation and civilians: The security situation along the contact line continues to be tense. The International NGO Safety Organization reported PROTECTION CLUSTER CONTACTS 533 security incidents, which is at the same level as in February, following the Raquel Trabazo, Protection Cluster escalation of hostilities at the beginning of the year. In March, partners Coordinator, [email protected] recorded 8 civilian casualties (three persons died and five injured), six of Kateryna Martynenko, Child Protection them caused by ERW incidents. The number of damages to civilian housing Sub-Cluster Coordinator further increased with 27 houses damaged as a result of shelling. [email protected] • Freedom of Movement: Two Entry Exit Crossing Points (EECP) are Olena Kochemyrovska, GBV Sub-Cluster Coordinator [email protected] operational on both sides (Stanytsia Luhanska and Novotroitske). On 19 March, free COVID-19 testing became available at the EECP Stanytsia Martin Oubrecht, Mine Action Sub- Cluster Coordinator Luhanska. However, the number of medical staff is not sufficient to cover [email protected] existing needs: every day around 850 persons were crossing the EECP while Akbar Nazriev Age and Disability TWG less than 100 persons could be tested. People have to stay in lines for several Coordinator [email protected] hours to get tested. Protection partners advocate to prioritize vulnerable Volodymyr Khorbaladze, Housing, Land people for free testing. and Property TWG Coordinator Due to the limited operation of the checkpoints, the residents of non- [email protected] government controlled areas (NGCA) are compelled to travel to GCA through the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Donbas in Flames
    GUIDE TO THE CONFLICT ZONE This publication is the result of work of a group of authors of various competencies: investigative journalism, politology, geography, and history. Written as a kind of vade mecum, this guidebook will familiarize the reader with the precursors, problems, terminology, and characteristics of the war in the Donbas. The book is targeted at experts, journalists, and representatives of international missions working in Ukraine. It will also interest a wide range of readers trying to understand and develop their own opinion on the situation in the east of Ukraine. The electronic version of this publication can be downloaded from https://prometheus.ngo/donbas-v-ogni Donbas In Flames УДК 908(477.61/.62-074)”2014/…”(036=111) Guide to the conflict zone ББК 26.89(4Укр55) Lviv, 2017 Д67 Editor: Alina Maiorova Authors: Mykola Balaban, Olga Volyanyuk, Christina Dobrovolska, Bohdan Balaban, Maksym Maiorov English translation: Artem Velychko, Christina Dobrovolska, Svitlana Kemblowski, Anna Shargorodskaya, Andrii Gryganskyi, Max Alginin Design: Lukyan Turetsky Activity supported by the Security Environment Canada Fund for Local Initiatives Research Center © 2017 “Prometheus” NGO Activité réalisée avec l’appui du Fonds canadien d'initiatives locales Content Foreword. When the truth is the best weapon 5 Chapter 1. Donbas - The panoramic picture 7 Donbas on the Map of Ukraine 7 As Seen by Analysts and Journalists 10 Donbas (Un)Known to the World 14 Chapter 2. Could the War be Avoided? 17 Ukrainian land 17 Rust Belt 20 Similar and different 22 Voting Rights 25 Unsolicited patronage 26 Chapter 3. Chronicles of War 31 End of February 2014 31 March 2014 32 April 2014 33 May 2014 36 June 2014 38 July 2014 39 August 2014 41 Beginning of September 2014 42 September 2014 - February 2015 42 From February 2015 to this day 44 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/Ukraine Analytical Services in Support of the Economic Resilience Activity (ERA AS)
    USAID/Ukraine Analytical Services in Support of the Economic Resilience Activity (ERA_AS) Household and Business Economic Resilience Study of Government- Controlled Areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts and Sea of Azov Region in Eastern Ukraine: 2020–2021 Study Report February 12, 2021 1 This report was prepared for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by SSG Advisors, LLC (d/b/a Resonance) This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development Ukraine Mission (USAID/Ukraine) by SSG Advisors, LLC (d/b/a Resonance), through Contract No. AID-72014118C00005 Principal USAID Contact: Larissa Piskunova, Contracting Officer’s Representative, [email protected] Principal Author: Jane Shearer, Senior Technical Advisor, SSG Advisors, LLC (d/b/a Resonance) Implemented By: SSG Advisors, LLC (d/b/a Resonance) 2000 P Street NW, Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036 Tel.: 202-548-7107 1 Mill Street, Suite 200 Burlington, VT 05401 USA Tel.: 802-735-1169 ERA_AS 2020–2021 Economic Resilience Study in Eastern Ukraine, February 2021 USAID/Ukraine Analytical Services in Support of the Economic Resilience Activity (ERA_AS) Household and Business Economic Resilience Study of Government-Controlled Areas of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts and Sea of Azov Region in Eastern Ukraine: 2020–2021 Study Report February 12, 2021 DISCLAIMER: The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • EECP Survey – 2020 Annual Report
    EECP Survey – 2020 Annual report CONTENT 3 CONTENT INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 HIGHLIGHTS 7 THE IMPACT OF QUARANTINE RESTRICTIONS ON WORK OF EECPs 12 1. DEMOGRAPHICS OF RESPONDENTS 20 2. RESIDENCE, DISPLACEMENT, AND RETURNS 23 3. FREQUENCY AND DURATION OF CROSSING 26 5. REASONS FOR CROSSING 28 5. DESTINATION OF THE TRIP 31 6. CONCERNS WHILE CROSSING THE CONTACT LINE 33 7. WAITING CONDITIONS 35 8. AWARENESS OF RESPONDENTS 36 OBSERVATIONS 38 RECOMMENDATIONS 43 ANNEX 1. EECP CROSSINGS DURING JANUARY-DECEMBER 2020 46 ANNEX 2. EECP CROSSINGS DURING JANUARY-DECEMBER 2019 47 4 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Eastern Ukraine Checkpoint Monitoring Report. January – December 2020. This report provides the results of observation of Ukraine” implemented by CF “Right to at all seven Entry-Exit Checkpoints (EECPs) Protection” (R2P) in partnership with and and the survey conducted at five of them with the financial support of the United (Hnutove, Marinka, Maiorske, Novotroitske Nations High Commissioner for Refugees EECPs in Donetska Oblast and Stanytsia (UNHCR). The objective of the survey is to Luhanska EECP in Luhanska Oblast) in 2020. explore the motivations and concerns of Due to quarantine restrictions, the report the civilians travelling between the non- is based on the survey data collected from government-controlled areas (NGCA) and the 1 January to 17 March and from 1 October government-controlled areas (GCA), as well to 28 December 2020 and on R2P monitors’ as the conditions and risks associated with observation from January to December crossing the contact line through EECPs during 2020. The survey is a part of the monitoring the quarantine period.
    [Show full text]