Achene Morphology; an Aid to Taxonomy of Indian Plants. I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Achene Morphology; an Aid to Taxonomy of Indian Plants. I ACHENE MORPHOLOGY; AN AID TO TAXONOMY OF INDIAN PLANTS. I. COMPOSITAE. LIGULIFERAE G urcharan Singh, Bimai, Misri and P. Kachroo Department o f Botany, Kashmir UnivcrsUy, Srinagar A bstr a c t The morphology of achcncs of hguliferous composilae of India has been discussed with special reference to their use in identification of taxa. A key to the genera based on achene characters is presented. Diagnostic characters of the species found in India are also given. A representative sample of each genus is illustrated. I ntroduction drupaceous Chrysanlhemoicles of Africa, fruit is an achene, and shows sufTicient Plasticity is an attribute of nature which consistency within a species and diversity enables living beings to survive over dis­ of characters in dilTerent taxa; yet reliance crepancies of environment. The mainaimof’ merely on achene structure for such a large taxonomy has been to sort out least plastic group would obscure the very value of characters so as to form the basis of classi- characters. This is, however, a valuable lication. The somatic bodies arc more plas­ tool in regional floras. In fact, characters tic as compared to gametic bodies and as of achene supplcniented by other charac­ such latter have been greatly exploited for ters have been extensively used in several taxonomic purposes. The characters of taxonomic works dealing with Compositae seed and fruit, in this connection, have re­ (Hooker, 1872-97; Rydberg, 1954; Ferris, ceived more attention in most of the fami­ 1960; Gupta, 1968, etc). lies of flowering plants. In the proposed Indian Compositae are represented by ca series, of which the present treatise is the 697 species (Datta, 1965). Though treated first communication, the detailed morpho­ variably, there is general agreement in logical characters of achene are being ex- recognizing two subdivisions in the family: r>loitedfor taxonomic studies independent Tubiflorae withca 12 tribes and Liguliflorae if other characters. This in addition, may with a single tribe Cichorieae. The latter serve to identify the seeds of the concerned characterised by presence of only ligulate nlants. florets and milky latex is so distinct from Compositae, easily the largest family of other Compositae that some authors lowering plants, embraces nearly 2 0 , 0 0 0 prefer to remove the ligulate genera into a Decies distributed in about 950 genera separate family, Cichoriaceae (Rydberg, Lawrence, 1951). In all of them, excepting 1954), It is represented in India by ca 22 genera with nearly 80 species, barring Accepted for publication on December 7 ,1972. numerous species of Taraxacum recognised byV onSoest (1963). stra ig h t........................................................ 9 Twenty two liguliferous Compositae Pappus uniseriate achenes slightly genera are studied for their aehene charac­ curved upwards and narrowed into ters. To determine the range of flexibility inconspicuous (less than a mm) if any of achene structure large number beak ...................................................Pier is. of fresh as well as herbarium specimens 9. Achenes short, 5-6 mm long usually were examined. The representative species b ro a d e r..........................................Epilasia are described in detail and illustrated, for Achenes longer than 8 mm, usually other Indian species only distinguishing narrow........................................Scorzonera characters are given. The characters which 10. Achenes beaked conspicuously... 11 were most static were selected for diagnosis Achenes beakless or inconspicuously of taxa. In a very few cases where actual so (beak less than a m m )...................2 0 specimens were not available for exami­ 11. Achenes with toothed ring below the nation help was taken from literature. b e a k .............................................ChonJrilla Achenes without a toothed ring below KEY TO SEEDS OF THE INDIAN the beak......................................................1 2 LIGULI FERAE 12. Achenes echinate near apex, strongly 4-,‘5 angled, (at least lower ones are so) 1. Pappus a b s e n t..........................................2 ...................................................... Taraxacum Pappus p resen t..........................................3 Achenes not echinate ab o v e............13 2. Achene straight or slightly curvcdbut J3. Achenes less than 4 nim long (incl. not sickle shaped, without prickles... beak) ..........................................................14 ..........................................................Lapsana Achenes more than 4 m m long (incl. Achene strongly curved and sickle beak) .......................................................... 15 shaped, with rows of strong prickles 14. Achenes usually sm ooth................Ixer/s .........................................................Koflpinia Achenes usually with muricate ribs 3. Pappus pJaeaceous .................................4 ....................................................Laduca (pp) Pappus hairy...............................................5 15. Achenes strongly compressed............16 4. Achene short straight............Cichorium Achenes terete or slightly compressed Achene curved almost sickle shaped . and 4 angled ..........................Crepis (ppj ....................................................Garhadiolus 16. Achenes with beak less than 0.75 the 5. Hairs plumose ..........................................6 length of body........................................17 Hairs not plumose, sim ple.................10 Achenes with beak more than 0.75 the 6 . Beak (at least on inner achene) conspi­ length of b o d y ......................................18 cuous.............................................................. 7 17. Achenes usually more than 5 mm long Beak absent or inconspicuous (less ................................................Cicerbita (pp) than a mm long)................................... 8 Achenes usually less than 5 mm long 7. Outer achenes beak less, inner with a ..................................................Lactuca (pp) very slender beak, pappus hairs atta­ 18. Body of achenes cleft at top into which ched individually..............Hypochaeris base of beak fits i n ................................. 1 ^ All achenes beaked, beak gradually Body of achcne entire at top, conti­ narrowed from body and stout, pappus nuous into beak ..............Lactuca (pp) hairs forming a deciduous ring........... 19. Beak more than 1.5 times the length .................................................... Tragopogon of b o d y ................................. Lactuca (ppS 8 . Pappus multiseriate, achenes almost Beak almost equalling or shorter than b o d y ...................................Cicerhiia (pp) collar. Pappus absent. 20. Achcacs strongly compressed, faces Koelplnla.—Koclpinia linearis Pall. usually strongly 3 ribbed... (Fig.2).—Achenes curved sickle shaped, Achenes terete or angled or slightly 1.2-1.8 cm long, cylindrical, faintly ribbed, com pressed.............................................. 2 1 dorsal surface with prickles arranged in 21. Pappus uniseriatc, rigid, brittle, persis- rows. Prickles 1.5-3 mm long, hooked at tent, usually tawny, achenes dark apex, those at apex of achene spreading coloured.....................................Hieracium stellately, 6-9 in number. Achene glochidi- Pappus multiscriate, hairs usually soft, ate all over. Pappus absent, deciduous silvery.................................. 22 Cichorium.— Cichorium infyhus Linn. 22. Pappus hairs forming a deciduous ring (Fig. 3).— Achene short, 2-3 mm longca 1.5 ..................................................................... 23 mm broad, mottled, 5-anglcd, angles dark- Pappus hairs individually deciduous greyish. Achenes broadest nearapex which ......................................................................24 is truncate, gradually narrowed towards 23. Achenes 4 angled, constricted above, base. Pappus paleaceous, pales 2-3 seriate, ribs 4 strong...............................Picridium few, 0.4-0.6 mm long. Achenes subterete or slightly com- Garhadlolu*.— Garhadiolus minutis- pressed, ribs 4-5, usually not constric- sinm.—(Bunge) kit. (Fig. 4).—Achenes ted above..........................................Launea 5-9 mm long, curved, cylindrical. Outer 24. Achenes slightly comprcssed, narrowed achenes glabrous gradually narrowed, at both ends, pappiferous disc distinct abovefrom the base, enclosed in involucre ......................................................................25. bracts. Inner with more prominent pappus Achenes not compressed, terete or than in outer achenes. Pappus palaeaceous, angled, pappiferous disc not distinct.. pales fringed, usually less than a mm long. ......................................................................26 All achenes faintly ribbed. 25. Achenes narrowly linear, less than 5 Hypochaaris.— Nypoc/iacris glahra mm long........................................Youngia Linn.—Achenes of two types: outer 4-5 Achenes narrowly oblong usually more mm long, nearly ) mm broad, linear oblong, than 4 mm long...................Prenanihes truncate, beakless, pappus plumose short- 26. Achenes very slender, curved, broader ly exceeding the achene; inner 7-10 mm towards base....................... Phaecasiutv long, beaked, beak slender longer than the Achenes slender, straight, narrowed body, pappus as long as beak, towards both ends, usually narrowly Tragopogon.— Tragopogon kashmiriam linear........................................(pp). Singh (Fig. 5).—Achenes
Recommended publications
  • 5. Tribe CICHORIEAE 菊苣族 Ju Ju Zu Shi Zhu (石铸 Shih Chu), Ge Xuejun (葛学军); Norbert Kilian, Jan Kirschner, Jan Štěpánek, Alexander P
    Published online on 25 October 2011. Shi, Z., Ge, X. J., Kilian, N., Kirschner, J., Štěpánek, J., Sukhorukov, A. P., Mavrodiev, E. V. & Gottschlich, G. 2011. Cichorieae. Pp. 195–353 in: Wu, Z. Y., Raven, P. H. & Hong, D. Y., eds., Flora of China Volume 20–21 (Asteraceae). Science Press (Beijing) & Missouri Botanical Garden Press (St. Louis). 5. Tribe CICHORIEAE 菊苣族 ju ju zu Shi Zhu (石铸 Shih Chu), Ge Xuejun (葛学军); Norbert Kilian, Jan Kirschner, Jan Štěpánek, Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Evgeny V. Mavrodiev, Günter Gottschlich Annual to perennial, acaulescent, scapose, or caulescent herbs, more rarely subshrubs, exceptionally scandent vines, latex present. Leaves alternate, frequently rosulate. Capitulum solitary or capitula loosely to more densely aggregated, sometimes forming a secondary capitulum, ligulate, homogamous, with 3–5 to ca. 300 but mostly with a few dozen bisexual florets. Receptacle naked, or more rarely with scales or bristles. Involucre cylindric to campanulate, ± differentiated into a few imbricate outer series of phyllaries and a longer inner series, rarely uniseriate. Florets with 5-toothed ligule, pale yellow to deep orange-yellow, or of some shade of blue, including whitish or purple, rarely white; anthers basally calcarate and caudate, apical appendage elongate, smooth, filaments smooth; style slender, with long, slender branches, sweeping hairs on shaft and branches; pollen echinolophate or echinate. Achene cylindric, or fusiform to slenderly obconoidal, usually ribbed, sometimes compressed or flattened, apically truncate, attenuate, cuspi- date, or beaked, often sculptured, mostly glabrous, sometimes papillose or hairy, rarely villous, sometimes heteromorphic; pappus of scabrid [to barbellate] or plumose bristles, rarely of scales or absent.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Plant Drosophila”: E. B. Babcock, the Genus Crepis, and the Evolution of a Genetics Research Program at Berkeley, 1915–1947
    HSNS3903_02 6/26/09 11:04 AM Page 300 ∗ VASSILIKI BETTY SMOCOVITIS The “Plant Drosophila”: E. B. Babcock, the Genus Crepis, and the Evolution of a Genetics Research Program at Berkeley, 1915–1947 The student of genetics must be ready to resort to the use of any living organism that gives promise of revealing the natural laws upon which the future science of breeding will be grounded. E. B. Babcock, 19131 The Crepis investigations carried on by the Babcock group are the American evolutionary investigations that seem to have attracted the largest attention outside of America next to the Drosophila investigations. One reason for this is their wider systematical aspect. Jens Clausen, 19342 *Departments of Zoology and History, Affiliate in Botany, University of Florida, Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611; [email protected]fl.edu, [email protected]fl.edu. The following abbreviations are used: APS, American Philosophical Society Library, Philadel- phia, PA; CAS, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA; CIW, Carnegie Institution of Washington; CP, Carnegie Papers, Missouri Botanical Garden Archives, St. Louis, MO; EBB, Ernest Brown Babcock Papers, TBL; JHB, Journal of the History of Biology; JAJ, James Angus Jenkins Papers, TBL; RG, Rockefeller Foundation Archives, Sleepy Hollow, NY, http://www.rockarch.org/collections/rf/; TBL, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley; UC, University of California; UCGD, University of California, Berkeley, Genetics Department, APS. Interviews with G. Ledyard Stebbins are transcribed and in the author’s possession. 1. “Division of Genetics: Report to the Director of the Experiment Station, 11 June 1913,” EBB, Folder The Division of Genetics of the Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Washington Baltimore Area
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area Part I Ferns, Fern Allies, Gymnosperms, and Dicotyledons by Stanwyn G. Shetler and Sylvia Stone Orli Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History 2000 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0166 ii iii PREFACE The better part of a century has elapsed since A. S. Hitchcock and Paul C. Standley published their succinct manual in 1919 for the identification of the vascular flora in the Washington, DC, area. A comparable new manual has long been needed. As with their work, such a manual should be produced through a collaborative effort of the region’s botanists and other experts. The Annotated Checklist is offered as a first step, in the hope that it will spark and facilitate that effort. In preparing this checklist, Shetler has been responsible for the taxonomy and nomenclature and Orli for the database. We have chosen to distribute the first part in preliminary form, so that it can be used, criticized, and revised while it is current and the second part (Monocotyledons) is still in progress. Additions, corrections, and comments are welcome. We hope that our checklist will stimulate a new wave of fieldwork to check on the current status of the local flora relative to what is reported here. When Part II is finished, the two parts will be combined into a single publication. We also maintain a Web site for the Flora of the Washington-Baltimore Area, and the database can be searched there (http://www.nmnh.si.edu/botany/projects/dcflora).
    [Show full text]
  • The Tribe Cichorieae In
    Chapter24 Cichorieae Norbert Kilian, Birgit Gemeinholzer and Hans Walter Lack INTRODUCTION general lines seem suffi ciently clear so far, our knowledge is still insuffi cient regarding a good number of questions at Cichorieae (also known as Lactuceae Cass. (1819) but the generic rank as well as at the evolution of the tribe. name Cichorieae Lam. & DC. (1806) has priority; Reveal 1997) are the fi rst recognized and perhaps taxonomically best studied tribe of Compositae. Their predominantly HISTORICAL OVERVIEW Holarctic distribution made the members comparatively early known to science, and the uniform character com- Tournefort (1694) was the fi rst to recognize and describe bination of milky latex and homogamous capitula with Cichorieae as a taxonomic entity, forming the thirteenth 5-dentate, ligulate fl owers, makes the members easy to class of the plant kingdom and, remarkably, did not in- identify. Consequently, from the time of initial descrip- clude a single plant now considered outside the tribe. tion (Tournefort 1694) until today, there has been no dis- This refl ects the convenient recognition of the tribe on agreement about the overall circumscription of the tribe. the basis of its homogamous ligulate fl owers and latex. He Nevertheless, the tribe in this traditional circumscription called the fl ower “fl os semifl osculosus”, paid particular at- is paraphyletic as most recent molecular phylogenies have tention to the pappus and as a consequence distinguished revealed. Its circumscription therefore is, for the fi rst two groups, the fi rst to comprise plants with a pappus, the time, changed in the present treatment. second those without.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
    cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P.
    [Show full text]
  • California Plant Pest Rating Proposal For
    Figure 1: Youngia japonica (Photo: Zoya Akulova, 2018) California Plant Pest Rating Proposal for Youngia japonica (L.) DC. (Japanese hawkweed) Synonym: Crepis japonica (L.) Benth. Family: Asteraceae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: B | Proposed Seed Rating: R *Comment Period: 5/22/2019 through 7/6/2019 Initiating Event: A find of this plant was submitted to the Plant Laboratory for identification in February, 2018. History & Status: Background: Youngia japonica is an annual or biennial, terrestrial plant. It has solitary and erect stems with a basal rosette of leaves that are slightly hairy to the touch (Spurr, 2006; Ohwi, 1984). The flower stalks are branched at the top with up to thirty clustered flower heads. The flowers are yellow, approximately 1 cm across, and resemble a small dandelion (Keener et al., 2018). The fruit of Youngia japonica is an achene with a tuft of pappus bristles, much like a dandelion fruit. (Keener et al., 2018). The seedhead is ¼ to ½ inch in diameter. Youngia japonica grows well in response to human disturbance and is found in areas such as roadsides, cultivated fields, and lawns (Spurr, 2006; Long and Lakela, 1976). It can grow in a variety of light environments and prefers moist soils, although it can tolerate drier soils (CSIRO, 2019). The plant forms a short, thick taproot but can be removed by hand weeding (Keener et al., 2018). Synonyms: Prenanthes japonica L.; Crepis japonica (L.) Benth. Worldwide Distribution: Youngia japonica is native to eastern Asia. It has been introduced to Mexico, Central America, South America, Europe, Africa, the Pacific Islands, and Australia (Spurr, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control Agent Information 11
    A PETITION FOR THE INTRODUCTION AND FIELD RELEASE OF THE CHONDRILLA ROOT MOTH, BRADYRRHOA GILVEOLELLA (TREITSCHKE), FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF RUSH SKELETONWEED IN NORTH AMERICA Submitted by J. L. Littlefield1, J. Birdsall2, J. Helsley3, and G. Markin4 1 Research Entomologist. Department of Entomology, Montana State University, PO Box 173020, Bozeman, MT 59717- 3020. Phone: (406) 994-4722, Fax: (406) 994-5587, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Botanist. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-2780. Phone: (406) 994-1784, Fax: (406) 994-5916, e-mail: jbirdsall/[email protected] 3 Research Assistant. Department of Entomology, Montana State University, PO Box 173020, Bozeman, MT 59717-3020. 4 Research Entomologist. U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-2780. Phone: (406) 994-4892, Fax: (406) 994-5916. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 Nature of the Problem 1 1. History of Introduction and Spread 1 2. Present Distribution in North America 1 3. Sectors Affected and Magnitude of the Problem 1 4. Consensus that the Weed is a Suitable Target for Control 2 Proposed Action 2 II. TARGET WEED INFORMATION 2 Taxonomy of the Target Weed 2 1. Classification 2 2. Identifier 2 3. Problems in identification or taxonomy 3 4. Origin and location of herbarium specimens and the date of depository 3 Description of the Target Weed 3 Distribution of the Target Weed 3 1. Native Range 3 2. Worldwide Areas of Introduction, Pattern of Movement, and Limit 5 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Youngia Zhengyiana (Asteraceae, Crepidinae), a New Species from South China, with Notes on the Systematics of Youngia Inferred from Morphology and Nrits Phylogeny
    Phytotaxa 170 (4): 259–268 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.170.4.3 Youngia zhengyiana (Asteraceae, Crepidinae), a new species from south China, with notes on the systematics of Youngia inferred from morphology and nrITS phylogeny TAO DENG1,2,5, JIAN-WEN ZHANG1,5, XIN-XIN ZHU1,2,5, DAI-GUI ZHANG3, ZE-LONG NIE1 & HANG SUN1,4* 1 Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, P.R. China. 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, P.R. China. 3 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, Jishou University, Jishou, Hunan 416000, China 4 Email: [email protected] 5 The authors contributed equally to this study. * Corresponding author. Abstract Youngia zhengyiana, a new species of Youngia sect. Mesomeris (Asteraceae: Crepidinae) from Guizhou province of south China is described and illustrated. The placement of this species within Youngia is assessed based on a molecular phyloge- netic analysis of the nuclear ribosomal ITS and on morphological comparisons with related species. The new species can be easily distinguished by morphology from the only species known to possess 5 florets, Y. szechuanica. The infrageneric classification and the recently debated circumscription of Youngia are discussed in the light of the nrITS phylogeny, which includes several species for the first time. Pseudoyoungia is confirmed as a congener of Youngia. The redefined Youngia is still non-monophyletic with Lapsanastrum nested within it.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Fort Sumter National Monument, 2012
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Fort Sumter National Monument, 2012 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/711 ON THE COVER Trailing wild bean (Strophostyles helvola) in the dunes at Fort Sumter National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Fort Sumter National Monument, 2012 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/711 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, GA 30605 October 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Fort Sumter National Monument, 2010
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Fort Sumter National Monument, 2010 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/254 ON THE COVER Bushy seaside tansy (Borrichia frutescens). Photograph by Sarah L. Corbett at Fort Sumter National Monument, Fall 2011. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Fort Sumter National Monument, 2010 Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRDS—2012/254 Michael W. Byrne and Sarah L. Corbett USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia, 31558 and Joseph C. DeVivo USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network University of Georgia 160 Phoenix Road, Phillips Lab Athens, Georgia, 30605 March 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomes and Phylogeny in Some Genera of the Crepidinae by E
    188 Cytologia, Fujii jub. vol, Chromosomes and Phylogeny in Some Genera of the Crepidinae By E. B. Babcock, G. L. Stebbins, Jr., and J. A. Jenkins Division of Genetics, University of California, Berkeley, Calif. Introduction The cyto-genetic and taxonomic studies of Crepis, which have now been carried on for sixteen years, have amply demonstrated the value of this genus for such studies (Babcock and Navashin, 1930, Hollingshead and Babcock, 1930, Babcock and Cameron, 1934). In order to gain a better understanding of the origin and relationships of Crepis, and of the evolutionary processes in the subtribe Crepidinae as a whole, a study of the various other genera of this subtribe has been undertaken. This paper is intended as a preliminary report on this work, and presents the results obtained to date on the genera most nearly related to Crepis, and which have been studied sufficiently so that conclusions concerning them can be drawn. Of the six genera included in this report, only two, Lactuca and Ixeris, have been previously examined cytologically to any extent. Ishikawa (1921) reported on the meiotic chromosomes of both of these genera, and obtained cytological evidence that Ixeris should be recognized as distinct. Marchal (1920) recorded, without illustra tions, the haploid number n=8 in Lactuca perennis and L. virosa, counts that have proved erroneous (see below), while Gates and Rees (1921) made a careful study of meiosis in L. Scariola and L. sativa, obtaining the haploid number n=9 for these two species and L. muralis. In addition, the chromosome number of Lactuca (as Mulgedium) tuberosa has been counted by Poddubnaja-Arnoldi (ex Tischler 1936), of Ixeris dentata by Okabe (1932), of L (as Lactuca) denticulate by Heitz (1929), of Youngia (as Crepis) japonica by Tahara (1910) and Hollingshead and Babcock (1930), of Y (as Lactuca) depressa and of Dubyaea hispida (as Crepis bhotanica) by Babcock and Cameron (1934).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rediscovery of Youngia Atripappa (Babc.) N
    Taiwania 61(4): 362‒368, 2016 DOI: 10.6165/tai.2016.61.362 NOTE The rediscovery of Youngia atripappa (Babc.) N. Kilian in India after a century; its circumscription and nomenclature and the lectotypification of Crepis atripappa Babc. Sentu Kumar DEY and Debabrata MAITY* Taxonomy and Biosystematics Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700 019, West Bengal, India. *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (Manuscript received 5 April 2016; accepted 23 August 2016; online published 14 November 2016) ABSTRACT: Nomenclature and typification of Crepis gracilis Hook. f. & Thomson ex C.B. Clarke, C. atripappa Babc.,Youngia gracilis Hook. f. ex Babc. & Stebbins Youngia stebbinsiana S.Y. Hu and Y. atripappa (Babc.) N. Kilian are discussed. Y. atripappa (Babc.) N. Kilian is considered as correct name for the species following Kilian’s observation. The status of remaining names is also ascertained. Typification of Crepis atripappa Babc. is analyzed and the name is lectotypified following provisions of the present Code. Information on the rediscovery of the species after 105 years from India as well as of its type locality is provided. Population estimation was carried out in three successive years, from 2013 to 2015. Detailed description, illustrations, field photographs with related data are also provided for proper circumscription and to facilitate its correct as well as easy identification. KEY WORDS: Crepis atripappa, India, Lectotypification, Rediscovery, Sikkim Himalaya, Type locality, Youngia atripappa. INTRODUCTION we made special efforts to locate this species described from the region and finally, the species is rediscovered Crepis gracilis Hook. f. & Thomson ex C.B.
    [Show full text]