Evaluation of the Antiplatelet Effects of Cilostazol, a Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitor, by VASP Phosphorylation and Platelet Aggregation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ticagrelor Antidote) by Mathematical Modeling
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Chalmers Publication Library Citation: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. (2016) 5, 313–323; doi:10.1002/psp4.12089 VC 2016 ASCPT All rights reserved ORIGINAL ARTICLE Unraveling the Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Ticagrelor and MEDI2452 (Ticagrelor Antidote) by Mathematical Modeling J Almquist1,2,3, M Penney4, S Pehrsson3, A-S Sandinge3, A Janefeldt3, S Maqbool4, S Madalli5, J Goodman4, S Nylander3 and P Gennemark3* The investigational ticagrelor-neutralizing antibody fragment, MEDI2452, is developed to rapidly and specifically reverse the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor. However, the dynamic interaction of ticagrelor, the ticagrelor active metabolite (TAM), and MEDI2452, makes pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis nontrivial and mathematical modeling becomes essential to unravel the complex behavior of this system. We propose a mechanistic PK model, including a special observation model for post-sampling equilibration, which is validated and refined using mouse in vivo data from four studies of combined ticagrelor-MEDI2452 treatment. Model predictions of free ticagrelor and TAM plasma concentrations are subsequently used to drive a pharmacodynamic (PD) model that successfully describes platelet aggregation data. Furthermore, the model indicates that MEDI2452-bound ticagrelor is primarily eliminated together with MEDI2452 in the kidneys, and not recycled to the plasma, thereby providing a possible scenario for the extrapolation to humans. We anticipate the modeling work to improve PK and PD understanding, experimental design, and translational confidence. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. (2016) 5, 313–323; doi:10.1002/psp4.12089; published online 16 June 2016. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE TOPIC? þ A mathematical model describing the simultaneous þ Antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of athero- PKs of ticagrelor and MEDI2452 in the mouse is pre- thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syn- sented. -
Clopidogrel Compared with Other Antiplatelet Agents For
Canadian Agency for Agence canadienne Drugs and Technologies des médicaments et des in Health technologies de la santé CADTH Technology Report Issue 131 Clopidogrel Compared with Other Antiplatelet November 2010 Agents for Secondary Prevention of Vascular Events in Adults Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses Supporting Informed Decisions Until April 2006, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) was known as the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Publications can be requested from: CADTH 600-865 Carling Avenue Ottawa ON Canada K1S 5S8 Tel: 613-226-2553 Fax: 613-226-5392 Email: [email protected] or downloaded from CADTH’s website: http://www.cadth.ca Cite as: Chen SY, Russell E, Banerjee S, Hutton B, Brown A, Asakawa K, McGahan L, Clark M, Severn M, Cox J, Sharma M. Clopidogrel Compared with Other Antiplatelet Agents for Secondary Prevention of Vascular Events in Adults Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses [Internet]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2010 (Technology report; no. 131). [cited 2010-11-01]. Available from: http://www.cadth.ca/preview.php/en/publication/2708 Production of this report is made possible by financial contributions from Health Canada and the governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Nunavut, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, and Yukon. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health takes sole responsibility for the final form and content of this report. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Health Canada or any provincial or territorial government. -
Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play
The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Executive Agency for Health and Consumers Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play 24 January 2012 Final Report Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play Acknowledgements Matrix Insight Ltd would like to thank everyone who has contributed to this research. We are especially grateful to the following institutions for their support throughout the study: the Pharmaceutical Group of the European Union (PGEU) including their national member associations in Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom; the European Medical Association (EMANET); the Observatoire Social Européen (OSE); and The Netherlands Institute for Health Service Research (NIVEL). For questions about the report, please contact Dr Gabriele Birnberg ([email protected] ). Matrix Insight | 24 January 2012 2 Health Reports for Mutual Recognition of Medical Prescriptions: State of Play Executive Summary This study has been carried out in the context of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross- border healthcare (CBHC). The CBHC Directive stipulates that the European Commission shall adopt measures to facilitate the recognition of prescriptions issued in another Member State (Article 11). At the time of submission of this report, the European Commission was preparing an impact assessment with regards to these measures, designed to help implement Article 11. -
Cilostazol Protects Rats Against Alcohol‑Induced Hepatic Fibrosis Via Suppression of TGF‑Β1/CTGF Activation and the Camp/Epac1 Pathway
EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 17: 2381-2388, 2019 Cilostazol protects rats against alcohol‑induced hepatic fibrosis via suppression of TGF‑β1/CTGF activation and the cAMP/Epac1 pathway KUN HAN, YANTING ZHANG and ZHENWEI YANG Department of Gastroenterology, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710003, P.R. China Received July 2, 2018; Accepted November 23, 2018 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7207 Abstract. Alcohol abuse and chronic alcohol consump- Introduction tion are major causes of alcoholic liver disease worldwide, particularly alcohol‑induced hepatic fibrosis (AHF). Liver Liver fibrosis is a wound‑healing response to a variety of liver fibrosis is an important public health concern because of its insults, including excessive alcohol intake. Alcohol abuse and high morbidity and mortality. The present study examined chronic alcohol consumption are major causes of alcoholic the mechanisms and effects of the phosphodiesterase III liver disease (ALD) worldwide (1). Alcohol‑induced hepatic inhibitor cilostazol on AHF. Rats received alcohol infu- fibrosis (AHF) may cause serious hepatic cirrhosis, and is sions via gavage to induce liver fibrosis and were treated widely accepted as a milestone event in ALD (2). However, with colchicine (positive control) or cilostazol. The serum recent evidence indicates that liver fibrosis is reversible and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and acetaldehyde dehydro- that the liver may recover from cirrhosis (3). Therefore, eluci- genase (ALDH) activities and the albumin/globulin (A/G), dation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms is urgently enzymes and hyaluronic acid (HA), type III precollagen required to prevent AHF. (PC III), laminin (LA), and type IV collagen (IV‑C) levels The exact mechanism remains unclear, but certain changes were measured using commercially available kits. -
Multifactorial Background for a Low Biological Response to Antiplatelet Agents Used in Stroke Prevention
medicina Review Multifactorial Background for a Low Biological Response to Antiplatelet Agents Used in Stroke Prevention Adam Wi´sniewski Department of Neurology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toru´n, Skłodowskiej 9 Street, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected]; Tel.: +48-79-0813513 Abstract: Effective platelet inhibition is the main goal of the antiplatelet therapy recommended as a standard treatment in the secondary prevention of non-embolic ischemic stroke. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and clopidogrel are commonly used for this purpose worldwide. A low biological response to antiplatelet agents is a phenomenon that significantly reduces the therapeutic and protective properties of the therapy. The mechanisms leading to high on-treatment platelet reactivity are still unclear and remain multifactorial. The aim of the current review is to establish the background of resistance to antiplatelet agents commonly used in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke and to explain the possible mechanisms. The most important factors influencing the incidence of a low biological response were demonstrated. The similarities and the differences in resistance to both drugs are emphasized, which may facilitate the selection of the appropriate antiplatelet agent in relation to specific clinical conditions and comorbidities. Despite the lack of indications for the routine assessment of platelet reactivity in stroke subjects, this should be performed in selected patients from the high-risk group. Increasing the detectability of low antiaggregant responders, in light of its negative impact on the prognosis and clinical outcomes, can contribute to a more individualized approach and modification of the antiplatelet therapy to maximize the therapeutic effect in the secondary prevention of stroke. -
Wo 2010/075090 A2
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date 1 July 2010 (01.07.2010) WO 2010/075090 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07D 409/14 (2006.01) A61K 31/7028 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C07D 409/12 (2006.01) A61P 11/06 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (21) International Application Number: DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US2009/068073 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 15 December 2009 (15.12.2009) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, (25) Filing Language: English SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, (26) Publication Language: English TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/122,478 15 December 2008 (15.12.2008) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): AUS- ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, PEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. -
PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. -
Cilostazol Tablets, USP50 Mg and 100 Mgrx Only
CILOSTAZOL - cilostazol tablet Physicians Total Care, Inc. ---------- Cilostazol Tablets, USP 50 mg and 100 mg Rx only CONTRAINDICATION Cilostazol and several of its metabolites are inhibitors of phosphodiesterase III. Several drugs with this pharmacologic effect have caused decreased survival compared to placebo in patients with class III-IV congestive heart failure. Cilostazol is contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure of any severity. DESCRIPTION Cilostazol is a quinolinone derivative that inhibits cellular phosphodiesterase (more specific for phosphodiesterase III). The empirical formula of cilostazol is C20H27N5O2, and its molecular weight is 369.46. Cilostazol is 6-[4-(1-cyclohexyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl)butoxy]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone, CAS-73963-72-1. The structural formula is: Cilostazol occurs as white to off-white crystals or as a crystalline powder that is slightly soluble in methanol and ethanol, and is practically insoluble in water, 0.1 N HCl, and 0.1 N NaOH. Cilostazol Tablets, USP for oral administration are available as 50 mg or 100 mg round, white debossed tablets. Each tablet, in addition to the active ingredient, contains the following inactive ingredients: carboxymethylcellulose calcium, corn starch, hypromellose, magnesium stearate and microcrystalline cellulose. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Mechanism of Action The mechanism of the effects of Cilostazol Tablets, USP on the symptoms of intermittent claudication is not fully understood. Cilostazol Tablets, USP and several of its metabolities are cyclic AMP (cAMP) phosphodiesterase III inhibitors (PDE III inhibitors), inhibiting phosphodiesterase activity and suppressing cAMP degration with a resultant increase in cAMP in platelets and blood vessels, leading to inhibition of platelet aggregation and vasodilation, respectively. -
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Abstracts Heart: first published as 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.420 on 12 October 2011. Downloaded from Acute coronary syndrome http://heart.bmj.com/ [gw22-e0217] INFLUENCE OF RANITIDINE ON GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE AND THROMBOSIS INDUCED BY DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION Zhangqiang Chen, Lang Hong, Hong Wang, Qiulin Yao, Heng Li Lai, Linxiang Lu Jiangxi Provincial People´s Hospital, Jiangxi, China on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.420 Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment. method of coronary heart disease, particularly acute coronary syndrome. A large number of evidence-based medicine has shown that patients with coro- nary heart disease after PCI obtain clinical signifi cant benefi t in conjunction with clopidogrel and aspirin therapy, while the most common side effects of antiplatelet drugs is of gastric injury, that can lead to gastric bleeding, Thus, the American Heart Association/American Gastroenterological Association/ American Heart Association guidelines proposed the patients for the acceptance of dual antiplatelet therapy were treated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to reduce gastrointestinal complications such as ulcers and bleeding risk in 2008. But recently, the observation of basic and clinical research suggests that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) can reduce clopidogrel inhibi- tory effect on platelet aggregation, increasing major adverse cardiac events (MACE). H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine do not pass cytochrome P450 metabolism, would such gastric mucosa protective agents affect the clopidogrel and aspirin Heart October 2011 Vol 97 Suppl 3 A143 Heartnjl.indd Sec1:143 10/4/2011 10:07:32 PM Abstracts Heart: first published as 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300867.420 on 12 October 2011. -
Guideline for Preoperative Medication Management
Guideline: Preoperative Medication Management Guideline for Preoperative Medication Management Purpose of Guideline: To provide guidance to physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), pharmacists, and nurses regarding medication management in the preoperative setting. Background: Appropriate perioperative medication management is essential to ensure positive surgical outcomes and prevent medication misadventures.1 Results from a prospective analysis of 1,025 patients admitted to a general surgical unit concluded that patients on at least one medication for a chronic disease are 2.7 times more likely to experience surgical complications compared with those not taking any medications. As the aging population requires more medication use and the availability of various nonprescription medications continues to increase, so does the risk of polypharmacy and the need for perioperative medication guidance.2 There are no well-designed trials to support evidence-based recommendations for perioperative medication management; however, general principles and best practice approaches are available. General considerations for perioperative medication management include a thorough medication history, understanding of the medication pharmacokinetics and potential for withdrawal symptoms, understanding the risks associated with the surgical procedure and the risks of medication discontinuation based on the intended indication. Clinical judgement must be exercised, especially if medication pharmacokinetics are not predictable or there are significant risks associated with inappropriate medication withdrawal (eg, tolerance) or continuation (eg, postsurgical infection).2 Clinical Assessment: Prior to instructing the patient on preoperative medication management, completion of a thorough medication history is recommended – including all information on prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, “as needed” medications, vitamins, supplements, and herbal medications. Allergies should also be verified and documented. -
Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Cilostazol 200 Mg Controlled
2016;24(4):183-188 TCP Transl Clin Pharmacol http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2016.24.4.183 Pharmacokinetic characteristics of cilostazol 200 mg controlled-release tablet compared with two cilostazol 100 mg immediate-release tablets (Pletal) after single oral dose in healthy Korean male volunteers ORIGINAL ARTICLE Jin Dong Son1,4, Sang Min Cho2, Youn Woong Choi2, Soo-Hwan Kim3, In Sun Kwon4, Eun-Heui Jin4, Jae Woo Kim4 and Jang Hee Hong1,4,5* 1Department of Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 35015, republic of Korea, 2Korea Unit- ed Pharm.Inc., Seoul 06116, Republic of Korea, 3Caleb Multilab Inc., Seoul 06745, Republic of Korea, 4Clinical Trials Center, Chun- gnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, South Korea, 5Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 35015, Republic of Korea *Correspondence: J.H. Hong; Tel: +82-42-280-6940, Fax: +82-42-280-6940, E-mail: [email protected] Received 8 Sep 2016 Cilostazol controlled-release (CR) tablets have recently been developed by Korea United Pharm Revised 28 Nov 2016 (Seoul, Korea). The tablets use a patented double CR system, which improves drug compliance by Accepted 29 Nov 2016 allowing “once daily” administration and reduces adverse events by sustaining a more even plasma Keywords concentration for 24 h. We conducted an open, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, cross- Cilostazol, OPC-13015, over study to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and tolerability of cilostazol when OPC-13213, administered to healthy Korean male volunteers as CR or immediate release (IR) tablets (Pletal, bioequivalence, Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Gyeonggi-do, Korea). -
Use of Antiplatelet Therapies During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction
REVIEW Use of antiplatelet therapies during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction Inhibition of platelet function is necessary to achieve successful and long-lasting primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction. For many years, antiplatelet therapy in the setting of primary PCI consisted of two drugs that inhibit platelet activation (aspirin and clopidogrel) and an intravenous blocker of platelet aggregation (abciximab). The development of new, more potent oral antiplatelet drugs (prasugrel and ticagrelor) as well as new data on clopidogrel dosing regimens limited the use of abciximab after pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel. Thus, intracoronary administration of abciximab and the use of small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers (tirofiban or eptifibatide) challenge the contemporary schemes of antiplatelet treatment in primary PCI. We review recently published data with particular attention on patients and drug characteristics and propose an update of existing recommendations. 1 KEYWORDS: acute myocardial infarction n antiplatelet therapy n aspirin n cilostazol Łukasz A Małek n clopidogrel n glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers n prasugrel n primary percutaneous & Adam Witkowski†1 coronary intervention n ticagrelor 1Department of Interventional Cardiology & Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Alpejska 42, Rupture of the vulnerable atherosclerotic many years, antiplatelet therapy in the setting 04‑628 Warsaw, Poland plaque in the coronary artery wall leading of primary PCI included two oral antiplate- †Author for correspondence: Tel.: +48 22 343 4127 to activation and aggregation of platelets to let drugs, which irreversibly block platelet Fax: +48 22 613 3819 form an artery occluding thrombus is the most activation (aspirin and clopidogrel) together [email protected] frequent cause of acute myocardial infarc- with an inhibition of platelet aggregation by tion (AMI) [1–3].