DOCSLIB.ORG

Itap Managed Care Working Group Task Team 1: Chronic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Itap Managed Care Working Group Task Team 1: Chronic ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 ITAP MANAGED CARE WORKING GROUP TASK TEAM 1: CHRONIC DISEASE CONDITIONS (CDL’s) – GLAUCOMA – Explanatory note to the Managed Care minimum reporting data specification (excel spreadsheet) The aim of the project is to measure the value added by managed care organisations, by means of capturing, measuring and reporting on clinical process indicators to demonstrate the clinical outcome/s achieved. Hence this is by no means a representation of the full protocol, policy or guideline on Glaucoma management. Additionally, these process indicators and or outcomes achieved will be reported on within the Annual statutory returns. 1 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 Meetings and discussions were held with industry representatives and subject matter experts prior to finalising the minimum data specification. 1) Goal The value of managing a disease is to establish measurable goals that result in quality of care. (Diagnosis, treatment and care of all beneficiaries should be in line with evidence base medicine, cost effectiveness and affordability). · Maintain the individuals visual function and related quality of life at a sustainable cost. · Lower IOP and slow rate of visual field deterioration. Target IOP is specific to each individual. · Prevent complications and optimally manage the progression of disease. 2) Identification of beneficiaries that have Glaucoma / or registered on a managed care program Please ensure the relevant consent has been obtained and confidentially maintained when obtaining personal health information. Identification of beneficiaries registered on the program may include · Registered on chronic and or disease management programs · ICD-10 Codes or other relevant clinical coding · Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC Class) · National stock numbers (State stock code) 3) Minimum data specification: Process indicators, clinical outcomes and data The level of Active Management of Glaucoma will depend on the nature of the contract, the level of services covered and the fee structure for those services, e.g. screening, medication, procedures etc. 2 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 The minimum required fields for the effective collection of appropriate data to demonstrate the value of the managed care interventions for the below mentioned categories are detailed by way of process indicators (see attached spreadsheet). · Diagnosis The diagnosis of Glaucoma is made by the specified registered practitioner. o Congenital Glaucoma o Closed Angle Glaucoma o Open Angle Glaucoma · Investigations o Tonometry o Fundus examination o Gonooiscopy o Disc and Nerve Fibre layer analysis o Disc Photography o Optical coherence tomography o Central corneal thickness measurement · Discipline Type The service providers must be registered with their relevant statutory bodies and as indicated by discipline coded list provided by BHF. 4) Treatment – Glaucoma Congenital Glaucoma Closed Angle Glaucoma Open Angle Glaucoma Surgery / Medication Medication, Laser and / or Drainage / Medication (first line / Second line) Cataract Surgery Drainage surgery 3 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 Medication: - S01E - Antiglaucoma preparations and miotics * Please note these recommendations do not replace the published algorithms, PMB entitlements etc. It is a means of measuring the value and quality of care provided. * The above is merely the initial phase of the ITAP Task Team 1- CDL project and as such is not exhaustive. Full details can be seen on the accompanying excel spreadsheets. 5) Clinical Outcomes measures · Number of all cause admissions · Number of admissions for Glaucoma · Number of Beneficiaries treated on medication alone · Number of Beneficiaries that had surgery · Number of beneficiaries that had repeated surgery / theatre · Cost of medication pre-surgery versus post-surgery * Information in regards to ICD-10 coding may be found on the following site http://www.health.gov.za/index.php/shortcodes/2015-03-29-10-42-47/2015-06-10-09-23-36/2015-06-10-09-26-11 6) Reporting (MCO and Scheme) *Definitions will be the same utilised within the Annual statutory returns – see Circular 10 of 2015. For full details http://www.medicalschemes.com/files/Circulars/Circular10Of2015.pdf All reports to be submitted to the Scheme for inclusion in the Annual Statutory Returns. Please complete the section relevant to the service rendered by your organisation. 4 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 6.1 By Managed Care Organisation: Management out of hospital - Time period: Benefit year (Reporting period – Start and end) - Per benefit option - Per Scheme - Member - Beneficiary - Service Date (Benefit Year) - Gender – Male / Female - Age (Age of the beneficiary is to be calculated as the Year of Reporting - Year of Birth) a) Program Demographics Actual number of beneficiaries registered for Glaucoma on the Pharmacy Benefit and or Active Number of new registrations in Number of beneficiaries who left Year: Bi- disease management program the period program * Annual (Longer than 6 months on program) Male Female Male Female Male Female Under 1 1 to 4 4 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 5 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79 80 to 84 85 and above Total *Left the program – This may include various reason codes i.e. left the scheme, death, suspensions etc. b) Clinical Management Total Number of beneficiaries Total Number of Beneficiaries that Total Number of Beneficiaries Year: treated with medication only had surgery (Laser / Drainage identified with 2 or more co- Annual Surgery) morbidities Age Female Male Female Male Male Female Groups Under 1 1 to 4 4 to 9 10 to 14 6 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79 80 to 84 85 and above Total Co-morbidities o Hypertension o Diabetes o Eye Injury o Cortisone use 6.2 Management in Hospital - Time period: 1 January to 31 December (Service dates / financial year), define per quarter - Per benefit option - Per Scheme - Hospital Admissions: 7 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 o All cause admissions o Glaucoma admissions - Hospital Category o Day Admission o Long Stay o Readmission - Gender - Age Admission definitions § Glaucoma related admission - please refer to attached list of ICD10 Codes. § Mortality / Exit codes – Where a hospital notifies the schemes / MCO / Administrator that a member is deceased. See attached § Emergency room – Definition as per Circular 10 of 2015 § Hospital admission · A day case is when admission day is same as discharge date · A long stay is when discharge date is after the admission day. · A re-admission is when a patient from hospital is readmitted within 90 days of previous discharge date. 8 ITAP TT1 MC - Glaucoma – Sept 17 a) Hospital Category: Day Case Scheme Total number Total number Admission per category Mortality Claimed Risk of of admissions Surgical Medical Paediatric Emergency (Exit amount paid admissions (Glaucoma) Room (Only) Codes = amount (All Cause) Related Expire) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female b) Hospital Category: Long Stay Scheme Total number Total number Admission per category Mortality Claimed Risk of of related (Exit amount paid admissions admissions Surgical Medical Paediatric Emergency Codes = amount (All Cause) (Glaucoma) Room (Only) Expire) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female c) Hospital Category: Re-admission Scheme Total number Total number Admission per category Mortality Claimed Risk of of related (Exit amount paid admissions admissions Surgical Medical Paediatric Emergency Codes = amount (All Cause) (Glaucoma) Room (Only) Expire) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female 7) References · Task Team 1 of the Managed Care ITAP working group; · Standard treatment guidelines and Essential medicine list · Circular 10 of 2015 · South African Glaucoma Society 9 Entry and Process Disease Management Verification Indicators Program Algorithm Outcomes Data Spec ICD10 Description ATC Class ATC Class Investigation Tariff Code Tariff Description Program Algorithm Outcome Data specs H40 Glaucoma S01E Antiglaucoma preparations and miotics Initial Diagnosis Date of Diagnosis CDL Algorithm No of hosp admissions (All Cause) Membership H40.0 Glaucoma suspect 3009 Basic capital equipment used in own rooms by ophthalmologists. Only to be charged at first and follow-up consultations. Not to be charged for post-operative follow-up consultations Date of Registration No of hosp admissions (Glaucoma) Scheme name H40.1 Primary open-angle glaucoma 3014 Tonometry per test with maximum of 2 tests for provocative tonometry (one or both eyes) Number of beneficiaries treated with medication only Option name H40.2 Primary angle-closure glaucoma 3003 Fundus contact lens or 90 D lens examination (not to be charged with item 3004 or item 3012) Numer of beneficiaries that underwent surgery Member No H40.3 Glaucoma secondary to eye 3002 trauma Gonioscopy Dependent code H40.4 Glaucoma secondary to eye 3026 Digital Tomography of optic nerve with Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO). inflammation Limited to two exams per annum Number of beneficiaries who post surgery Date of birth H40.5 Glaucoma secondary to other eye 3027 disorders Fundus photography 0-5 days post-operative procedure - Theatre revisist Gender H40.6 Glaucoma secondary to drugs 3028 Optical Coherent Tomography (OCT) of Optic nerve or macula: Per eye - annual Repeat surgery - 60 to 360 days post initial surgery H40.8 Other glaucoma 3017 Retinal threshold test inclusive of computer disc storage for Delta of Statpak programs - annual Claims H40.9 Glaucoma, unspecified 3020 Special eye investigations: Pachymetry: Only when own instrument is used, per eye. Only in addition to corneal surgery (once per life) Number of drops before vs after surgery (180days) Date of service H42.8 Glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere Cost of drops before surgery versus cost of drops after surgery Doctor type Q15.0 Congenital glaucoma Management Practice number 3026 Digital Tomography of optic nerve with Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PET Imaging of Occult Tumours by Temporal Integration of Tumour-Acidosis Signals from Ph-Sensitive 64Cu-Labelled Polymers
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0416-1 PET imaging of occult tumours by temporal integration of tumour-acidosis signals from pH-sensitive 64Cu-labelled polymers Gang Huang 1, Tian Zhao1, Chensu Wang 1, Kien Nham2, Yahong Xiong2, Xiaofei Gao3, Yihui Wang3, Guiyang Hao 2, Woo-Ping Ge3, Xiankai Sun2, Baran D. Sumer 4* and Jinming Gao 1,4* Owing to the diversity of cancer types and the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of tumour signals, high-resolution imaging of occult malignancy is challenging. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography allows for near-universal cancer detec- tion, yet in many clinical scenarios it is hampered by false positives. Here, we report a method for the amplification of imaging contrast in tumours via the temporal integration of the imaging signals triggered by tumour acidosis. This method exploits the catastrophic disassembly, at the acidic pH of the tumour milieu, of pH-sensitive positron-emitting neutral copolymer micelles into polycationic polymers, which are then internalized and retained by the cancer cells. Positron emission tomography imaging of the 64Cu-labelled polymers detected small occult tumours (10–20 mm3) in the brain, head, neck and breast of mice at much higher contrast than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, 11C-methionine and pH-insensitive 64Cu-labelled nanoparticles. We also show that the pH-sensitive probes reduce false positive detection rates in a mouse model of non-cancerous lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation. This macromolecular strategy for integrating tumour acidosis should enable improved cancer detection, surveil- lance and staging. ancer exhibits diverse genetic and histological differences tumours over the surrounding normal tissues often leads to false from normal tissues1.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Cardiac Amyloidosis with 99MTC- Pyrophosphate (PYP) Quantitative Spect
    Assessment of Cardiac Amyloidosis With 99MTC- pyrophosphate (PYP) Quantitative Spect Chao Ren Peking Union Medical College Hospital Jingyun Ren Peking Union Medical College Hospital Zhuang Tian Peking Union Medical College Hospital Yanrong Du Peking Union Medical College Hospital Zhixin Hao Peking Union Medical College Hospital Zongyao Zhang Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Wei Fang Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Fang Li Peking Union Medical College Hospital Shuyang Zhang Peking Union Medical College Hospital Bailing Hsu University of Missouri-Columbia Li Huo ( [email protected] ) Peking Union Medical College Hospital https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1216-083X Original research Keywords: ATTR cardiomyopathy, 99mTc-PYP quantitative SPECT, standardized uptake value, diagnostic feasibility, the operator reproducibility Posted Date: June 5th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-32649/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/25 Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on January 7th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00342-7. Page 2/25 Abstract Background: 99mTc-PYP scintigraphy provides differential diagnosis of ATTR cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) from lightchain cardiac amyloidosis and other myocardial disorders without biopsy. This study was aimed to assess the diagnostic feasibility and the operator reproducibility of 99mTc-PYP quantitative SPECT. Method:Thirty-seven consecutive patients underwent a99mTc-PYP thorax planar scan followed by SPECT and CT scans to diagnose suspected ATTR-CM were enrolled. For the quantitative SPECT, phantom studies were initially performed to determine the image conversion factor (ICF) and partial volume correction (PVC) factor to recover 99mTc-PYP activity concentration in myocardium for calculating the standardized uptake value (SUV) (unit: g/ml).
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Medicine for Medical Students and Junior Doctors
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS AND JUNIOR DOCTORS Dr JOHN W FRANK M.Sc, FRCP, FRCR, FBIR PAST PRESIDENT, BRITISH NUCLEAR MEDICINE SOCIETY DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1ST MEDICAL FACULTY, CHARLES UNIVERSITY, PRAGUE 2009 [1] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would very much like to thank Prof Martin Šámal, Head of Department, for proposing this project, and the following colleagues for generously providing images and illustrations. Dr Sally Barrington, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, St Thomas’s Hospital, London Professor Otakar Bělohlávek, PET Centre, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague Dr Gary Cook, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London Professor Greg Daniel, formerly at Dept of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, currently at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Past President, American College of Veterinary Radiology Dr Andrew Hilson, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, Past President, British Nuclear Medicine Society Dr Iva Kantorová, PET Centre, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague Dr Paul Kemp, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, Southampton University Hospital Dr Jozef Kubinyi, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University Dr Tom Nunan, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, St Thomas’s Hospital, London Dr Kathelijne Peremans, Dept of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent Dr Teresa Szyszko, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, St Thomas’s Hospital, London Ms Wendy Wallis, Dept of Nuclear Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London Copyright notice The complete text and illustrations are copyright to the author, and this will be strictly enforced. Students, both undergraduate and postgraduate, may print one copy only for personal use. Any quotations from the text must be fully acknowledged. It is forbidden to incorporate any of the illustrations or diagrams into any other work, whether printed, electronic or for oral presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Technique for Standardized Central Analysis of 6-18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA PET Data from a Multicenter Study
    A Technique for Standardized Central Analysis of 6-18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA PET Data from a Multicenter Study Alan L. Whone, MRCP1; Dale L. Bailey, PhD2; Philippe Remy, PhD3; Nicola Pavese, MD1; and David J. Brooks, DSc1 1Division of Neuroscience and MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; and 3CEA-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unite´ de Recherche Associe´e 2210, Service Hospitalier Frederic Joliot, Orsay, France tralized analysis offers the potential for improved detection of We have recently completed a large 6-18F-fluoro-L-DOPA (18F- outcomes due to the standardization of the analytic approach DOPA) PET study comparing rates of loss of dopamine terminal and allows the analysis of large numbers of PET studies. function in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients taking either the Key Words: PET; 18F-DOPA; Parkinson’s disease; progression; dopamine agonist ropinirole or L-DOPA. This trial involved a central analysis “distributed acquisition/centralized analysis” method, in which J Nucl Med 2004; 45:1135–1145 18F-DOPA images were acquired at 6 different PET centers around the world and then analyzed at a single site. To our knowledge, this is the first time such a centralized approach has been employed with 18F-DOPA PET and this descriptive basic science article outlines the methods used. Methods: One hun- With rapid advances in molecular medicine, the pro- dred eighty-six PD patients were randomized (1:1) to ropinirole duction of neuroprotective or neurorestorative agents that or L-DOPA therapy, and 18F-DOPA PET was performed at base- affect the progression of degenerative conditions such as line and again at 2 y.
    [Show full text]
  • [123I]FP-CIT SPECT in Atypical Degenerative Parkinsonism
    CONTRAST AGENT EVALUATION [123I]FP-CIT SPECT in atypical degenerative parkinsonism One of the most widely used techniques to support the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease is the SPECT scan with [123I]FP-CIT. This tracer binds reversibly and visualizes the striatal presynaptic dopamine transporters. Several uncertainties remain on the value of [123I]FP-CIT and SPECT in atypical degenerative parkinsonian syndromes. In this concise review, we discuss the contribution of SPECT and [123I]FP-CIT in supporting the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and their role in the differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and atypical degenerative parkinsonism. The chemistry, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of [123I]FP-CIT are also discussed. 1,2,3 KEywordS: atypical degenerative parkinsonism n FP-CIT n ioflupane n SPECT Ioannis U Isaias* , Giorgio Marotta4, Gianni Pezzoli2, Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most dystonic tremor [15] and psychogenic parkin- Osama Sabri5 [1] [16,17] 5,6 common neurodegenerative disorder , yet sonism . In this concise review, we will & Swen Hesse 123 early accurate diagnosis remains challenging. discuss the role of SPECT and [ I]FP-CIT in 1Università degli Studi di Milano, The estimated prevalence of PD is 0.5–1% in supporting the clinical diagnosis of PD and its Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana, those aged 65–69 years and 1–3% in those aged differential diagnosis with ADP. Milano, Italy 2Centro per la Malattia di Parkinson e i ≥80 years [1]. Although the clinical diagnosis of Disturbi del Movimento,
    [Show full text]
  • USAN Naming Guidelines for Monoclonal Antibodies |
    Monoclonal Antibodies In October 2008, the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) Working Group Meeting on Nomenclature for Monoclonal Antibodies (mAb) met to review and streamline the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme. Based on the group's recommendations and further discussions, the INN Experts published changes to the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme. In 2011, the INN Experts published an updated "International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for Biological and Biotechnological Substances—A Review" (PDF) with revisions to the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme language. The USAN Council has modified its own scheme to facilitate international harmonization. This page outlines the updated scheme and supersedes previous schemes. It also explains policies regarding post-translational modifications and the use of 2-word names. The council has no plans to retroactively change names already coined. They believe that changing names of monoclonal antibodies would confuse physicians, other health care professionals and patients. Manufacturers should be aware that nomenclature practices are continually evolving. Consequently, further updates may occur any time the council believes changes are necessary. Changes to the monoclonal antibody nomenclature scheme, however, should be carefully considered and implemented only when necessary. Elements of a Name The suffix "-mab" is used for monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments and radiolabeled antibodies. For polyclonal mixtures of antibodies, "-pab" is used. The -pab suffix applies to polyclonal pools of recombinant monoclonal antibodies, as opposed to polyclonal antibody preparations isolated from blood. It differentiates polyclonal antibodies from individual monoclonal antibodies named with -mab. Sequence of Stems and Infixes The order for combining the key elements of a monoclonal antibody name is as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoclonal Antibody Playbook
    Federal Response to COVID-19: Monoclonal Antibody Clinical Implementation Guide Outpatient administration guide for healthcare providers 2 SEPTEMBER 2021 1 Introduction to COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy 2 Overview of Emergency Use Authorizations 3 Site and Patient Logistics Site preparation Patient pathways to monoclonal administration 4 Team Roles and Responsibilities Leadership Administrative Clinical Table of 5 Monoclonal Antibody Indications and Administration Indications Contents Preparation Administration Response to adverse events 6 Supplies and Resources Infrastructure Administrative Patient Intake Administration 7 Examples: Sites of Administration and Staffing Patterns 8 Additional Resources 1 1. Introduction to Monoclonal Therapy 2 As of 08/13/21 Summary of COVID-19 Therapeutics 1 • No Illness . Health, no infections • Exposed Asymptomatic Infected . Scope of this Implementation Guide . Not hospitalized, no limitations . Monoclonal Antibodies for post-exposure prophylaxis (Casirivimab + Imdevimab (RGN)) – EUA Issued. • Early Symptomatic . Scope of this Implementation Guide . Not hospitalized, with limitations . Monoclonal Antibodies for treatment (EUA issued): Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab1 (Lilly) Casirivimab + Imdevimab (RGN) Sotrovimab (GSK/Vir) • Hospital Adminission. Treated with Remdesivir (FDA Approved) or Tocilizumab (EUA Issued) . Hospitalized, no acute medical problems . Hospitalized, not on oxygen . Hospitlaized, on oxygen • ICU Admission . Hospitalized, high flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation
    [Show full text]
  • DICOM Conformance Template
    g GE Heathcare Technical Publications Direction 5507068-1EN (DOC1584283) Revision 1 DaTQUANT Application™ DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT Copyright 2015 by General Electric Co. Do not duplicate g GE Heathcare LIST OF REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION PAGES APPR. 1 May 2015 Initial Release All M. Mesh DATQUANT APPLICATION GE Healthcare DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT DIR 5507068-1EN (DOC1584283) REV 1 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK DATQUANT APPLICATION GE Healthcare DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT DIR 5507068-1EN (DOC1584283) REV 1 CONFORMANCE STATEMENT OVERVIEW DaTQUANT application is an application that uses NM and CT images and creates NM, SC and MFSC images. Table 0.1 provides an overview of the network services supported by the DaTQUANT application. Table 0.1 – APPLICATION SOP Classes User of Object Creator of Instances Object Instances Transfer Secondary Capture Image Storage No Yes Multi-frame True Color Secondary Capture Image Storage No Yes Nuclear Medicine Image Storage Yes Yes Computerized Tomography Image Storage Yes No 4 DATQUANT APPLICATION GE Healthcare DICOM CONFORMANCE STATEMENT DIR 5507068-1EN (DOC1584283) REV 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Overall DICOM Conformance Statement Document Structure ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 9, 2017 (February 9, 2017) REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) New York 000-19034 13-3444607 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of Incorporation) File No.) Identification No.) 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York 10591-6707 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code) (914) 847-7000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On February 9, 2017, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. issued a press release announcing its financial and operating results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2016. A copy of the press release is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference to this Item 2.02.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Book Cumulative Supplement 6 June 2011
    CUMULATIVE SUPPLEMENT 6 June 2011 APPROVED DRUG PRODUCTS WITH THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCE EVALUATIONS 31st EDITION Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Generic Drugs 2011 Prepared By Office of Generic Drugs Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration APPROVED DRUG PRODUCTS with THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCE EVALUATIONS 31st EDITION Cumulative Supplement 6 June 2011 CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ iii 1.1 How to use the Cumulative Supplement ........................................................................................... iii 1.2 Cumulative Supplement Content....................................................................................................... iv 1.3 Applicant Name Changes................................................................................................................... v 1.4 Levothyroxine Sodium........................................................................................................................ v 1.5 Availability of the Edition ................................................................................................................... vi 1.6 Report of Counts for the Prescription Drug Product List .................................................................. vii 1.7 Cumulative Supplement Legend ......................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]