7 Avenue Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:00 P.M

TOWN OF CANMORE RECORD OF WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS Special Meeting Council Chamber at the Canmore Civic Centre, 902 – 7 Avenue Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.

This document contains the written submissions received in response to the notice of public hearing for the following question:

Is it prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the City of Calgary’s bid to co-host the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games?

Submissions are sorted in alphabetical order. If you are viewing the electronic version, please use the bookmarks feature to scroll through the document.

This record of written submissions was compiled by Cheryl Hyde, Municipal Clerk, on October 31, 2018.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 1 of 132 From: canmoreandersons Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 11:20 AM To: Cheryl Hyde; Council Subject: “Non-statutory public hearing for the Olympic bid”

October 30, 2018

Thank you for the opportunity through today’s public hearing to provide my opinion on Canmore’s pending Olympic decision. First, our family loves sports. We watch every kind of sport and it is a big part of our lives. We support athletes and their quest to compete at the highest levels. I attended both the NoCalgary and BidCo meetings, as it is important to consider all sides before making an important decision. I do still however have may critical questions without sufficient answers, these are a few that come to mind: 1) At the NoCalgary meeting we were told it will cost anywhere from $2,000 to $6,000 per Calgary household to host the games, what is the actual cost to each Canmore household to host the games? 2) It was stated at the Bidco meeting that just a “portion” of the money from Bidco will go toward Flood Mitigation and the Pedestrian overpass for the Athletes Village, how much exactly is a portion? Where will the remaining funding come from exactly? 3) Why is even the thought of building near the flood zone even a consideration, did we not learn anything from the 2013 flood? And to follow that, who would think it is a good investment to put your entire life savings into buying a property in a flood zone even with an attempted mitigation? 4) Is the proposed $2,000,000 for flood mitigation anywhere near sufficient to guarantee future homeowners that their homes will not be destroyed in the next flood? 5) Based on your numbers of $74,000,000 ($64,000,000 in short term financing to fund construction plus $10,000,000 Canmore) as Canmore’s contribution, divided by 218 units sold as PAH that means $339,449 per unit – this is just basic minimum estimated costs. This still seems hardly affordable for the people who we know need it. Unless your target market can afford it, it does not contribute to solving the housing problem. What if re-purposing them costs more or there are oversights (ie. Like McArthur Place, the $600,000 “oversight” added cost from not building drainage properly), they don’t sell well and we are left carrying a significant part of the loan? Isn’t it a real possibility we could be in the same situation as before with Palliser and have to end up selling them as market housing?

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 2 of 132 Additionally, I think the IOC has a long way to go to prove they are reforming, I believe they are still as corrupt as ever. (Watch the movie ICARUS before you vote). It was reported that IOC Pitchman Christophe Dubi from the IOS said, “there won’t be any cost overruns here” The fact is every Olympic Games since 1968 have had cost overruns. If the IOC expects us to believe this would be the first without any overruns then they should simply back up their words with action to commit to covering all overruns. I think now we need to send them a strong message we want our athletes to be able to compete on a fair playing field and we expect far greater ethics and morals from the IOC before we would consider hosting again. When I add up all the plusses and minuses, I believe there is too much uncertainty in the argument of “affordable housing” concerning Canmore taxpayers in relation to this Olympic Village mega project. I unfortunately cannot support this initiative at this time to host the Olympics and I ask that you join me in a vote of NO.

Kay Anderson

Canmore resident

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 3 of 132 From: Shawn Biggings Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 6:55 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: John Borrowman; Joanna McCallum; Rob Seeley; [email protected]; [email protected]; Karen Marra; Esme Comfort Subject: Public Hearing, Oct 30, 2018. Re: Is it prudent for Canmore to participate in the 2026 Olympic bid?

Mayor and Council,

Possibly too little too late, but we would like you to know that we are not at all in favour of co-hosting the 2026 Olympics

Our primary reasons are: 1. Potential of economic devastation to our community 2. Social erosion and disruption as a result of the massive influx of short term workers and visitors 3. Overcrowding

We do not believe that Canmore needs the Olympics to advertise us to the world. Athletes will continue to train here and the world has already found us. The housing is attractive, but the likely overruns and resulting debt would are not worth the risk.

This is not 1988. This community could face decades of angst by moving forward with this bid.

Please protect this community.

Thank you,

Shawn Biggings & Russ Bignold 421 Eagle Heights Canmore Alberta, T1W 3C9 Office & Home: 403-678-5744 Cell: 403-678-8553

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 4 of 132 From: Wanda Bogdane Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 12:06 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

Dear Town of Canmore Council (and involved Administration),

I contemplated not sending in a letter, as I was involved in the Explore 2026 project earlier last year; contracted to lead the community engagement. I kept my personal views exclusively out of the work, however as a resident and no longer being involved with the file, I hope I can include my voice in the mix of our community now.

With regards to whether it is or is not prudent for Canmore to participate in a bid, I say yes it is. After having read extensive reports, research materials, and background for months on the topic, and having spoken to hundreds of people across our community and beyond, I feel the benefits of participating in a bid far outweigh the risks or downside.

Embarking on an endeavour such as this won’t be perfect, and we have issues in our community to carefully consider. That said, we can advance some of these issues thanks to the leverage we’ll receive from the Olympics occurring. Being able to add affordable housing, create measures to live more accessibly and sustainably (i.e. developing a composting program, creating a major transit hub and enhancing our waste management systems) and reinvigorate our community’s spirit would be incredible outcomes. Not to mention having a tremendous reason to hopefully receive Resort Municipality Status. There are a long list of many many more benefits, but for the sake of brevity, I won’t belabour this aspect.

There are also however concerns. I feel we need to be incredibly careful financially as our community is so expensive to live in already. We want to retain as many of the down to earth, hard working mountain people who make Canmore so special. We need to ensure the facilities developed are done so with an intention for use over the long‐term, and to learn from some of the infrastructure mishaps that resulted from the 1988 Olympics. Based on the research I’ve read, I do not feel the Olympics will have significant bearing on our trajectory as a tourism designation… we’re already on that path and like Whistler, I suspect the Olympics would have minimal influence on a long‐term spike.

I have seen this council and administration do great things in recent years, and do that work responsibly and thoughtfully. I believe we can do this with a 2026 Olympics as well. I hope that you hear the many sides of the discussion, as there are rich take‐aways and lessons to integrate so we can do a great job with a 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games for our future. I do not, however, feel these risks should paralyze us in fear from seizing an incredible opportunity and demonstrating to the world the Canmore and Canadian way of doing things.

Thank you for considering the community’s voice from start to end of this weighty issue. As you contemplate the next steps for us, I wish you the energy to do so optimistically and with the confidence in yourselves and your community, that many of us residents have in you already.

Kind regards,

Wanda Bogdane

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 5 of 132 From: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:00 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Bow Valley Chamber of Commerce - Expression of Support 2026 Olympic Bid Attachments: BVCC OLYMPIC SURVEY RESULTS.docx

Good morning Cheryl,

Perhaps an optimist with yesterday’s late breaking news out of Calgary, I am writing on behalf of the Bow Valley Chamber of Commerce in support of the 2026 Olympic bid, and a request that the Town of Canmore express it’s support as well.

Perhaps a strong, positive, Town of Canmore message today, will bolster the City of Calgary to continue the work to bring together Calgary, Alberta and Canada behind a 2026 Olympic bid.

Chamber Board Members to be in attendance at the Town’s public hearing this week, and we offer this information for distribution.

The Chamber surveyed members in May 2018 and offered findings to our community, including the Town of Canmore, in early June 2018. Those results are again provided below. Attached is a word document which summarizes the results and the themes that evolved from the comments/concerns.

The numbers speak for themselves.

Our members are strongly supportive of the 2026 Olympic opportunity, and the Chamber respectfully requests that the Town take our membership voice into consideration in its deliberation.

 Are there challenges? Yes.

 Are there opportunities? Yes.

 Progress is not easy, the future is coming and requires vision, and no one vision will be universal.

The Chamber respectfully submits that the opportunities outstrip the challenges. The 2026 Olympics provide Canmore a unique opportunity to develop, plan and execute a vision ‐ in anticipation of future generations.

Thank you for your attention, and the Town’s commitment to our community.

Yours respectfully,

Janet

Janet Nystedt, President Bow Valley Chamber of Commerce p: 403.604.0547 a: PO Box 8525, Canmore, AB T1W 2V2

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 6 of 132 w: www.BowValleyChamber.com

MAY 31, 2018 UPDATE

BVCC Olympic Survey The results are in!

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 7 of 132 The Chamber’s Olympic Survey show that our business community is generally supportive of an Olympic opportunity. The Board will be discussing the results at our next meeting, June 4th, and will start the discussion on actioning the results.

READ FULL RESULTS

3 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 8 of 132 The Chamber recently issued a press release requesting that the Town of Canmore “pause” on enforcement and drafting of new signage bylaws. We are pleased that the Town’s planning department engaged with the media on our memberships’ concerns. We have arranged a meeting with the planning department on May 31st to continue the discussion on appropriate temporary signage in Canmore. Stay tuned!

I BELONG: Cornerstone Theatre

4 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 9 of 132 UPCOMING EVENTS

5 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 10 of 132 How productive is your business compared to others in your industry?

Use BDC’s free productivity too and how out where you stand compared to other Canadian businesses in your industry.

6 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 11 of 132

MEMBER BENEFITS

The Esso Business Card Program is a convenient and secure way for business to control and manage fuel expenses. Whether you have a small sales force or a large fleet of service vehicles, the Esso Business Card Program gives you exceptional fuel savings.

Amplify your savings by taking advantage of the discounts and offers available through our new Member-2-Member discount program.

Extend and Offer to Members Current Offers

“Dreaming, after all, is a form of planning”

7 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 12 of 132 Copyright © 2018 Bow Valley Chamber of Commerce, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you are a member, partner or you opted in at our website.

Our mailing address is: Bow Valley Chamber of Commerce The Centre for Business Excellence #202, 1080, Railway Avenue Canmore, AB T1W 1P4 Canada

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

8 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 13 of 132 BOW VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OLYMPIC SURVEY RESULTS

Would the Olympics benefit your business? 73 Responses

 Yes: 54 (74%)  No: 19 (26%)

Would the Olympics benefit your business community as a whole? Please identify your business community in the comment box below (Canmore, Banff, Lake Louise, Morley, Exshaw, Kananaskis, or others!) 72 Response

 Yes: 61 (85%)  No: 11 (15%) Of those who indicated location of business: 34 Canmore, 2 Banff, remainder serving various locations in the Bow Valley.

Should the Town of Canmore support the 2026 Olympic bid? 69 responses

 Yes: 53 (77%)  No: 16 (23%)

Should the Bow Valley Chamber of Commerce champion a "Yes" campaign? 71 responses

 Yes: 51 (72%)  No: 20 (28%)

The Chamber invited its members to express their concerns on the 2026 Olympic opportunity. General themes include:

 Congestion/Transportation  Cost/Debt

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 14 of 132  Increase to Cost/Quality of Living and Housing Affordability  Environment Impact – waste management, carbon footprint, water usage  Infrastructure Legacy – affordable housing, passenger rail to Calgary, Nordic Centre upgrades, pedestrian bridge over highway, event site  Impact on Canmore community/home in the future

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 15 of 132 From: Judy Brese Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 9:59 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Re: Olympic vote

The submission that I would like to be part of at the hearing is for the folks in attendance to be able to give a yay, nay or undecided response, as the group would be a partial representation of Canmorites, it would perhaps help in the decision about the Olympic proposals

I will not be in attendance. All the best to you all in the deliberations, it is a difficult decision. Thanks for all you and the council's dedicated efforts.

Sincerely,

Judy Brese

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 16 of 132 From: Erik Carleton Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:45 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic bid

Dear Council Members,

Thank you for your efforts in considering difficult issues, such as the Olympic Bid.

I support Canmore's participation in the Calgary 2026 bid. The 88 Olympics put a mark on me, and its legacies brought me to Canmore. I initially came here for elite ski training, but have now decided to stay for the community and all that it offers. The Nordic Centre is a big part of our community, and could use some refurbishment. I now am a home owner through the PAH program, and I understand the need for it.

I believe the redevelopment at the Nordic Centre along with the new developments, especially PAH, are essential and will be built sooner if the Olympics come. I like the current direction of our Town towards accessibility, more active modes of transportation, and mass transit. Hosting the Olympics and Paralympics would necessitate acceleration of these initiatives as well.

Kind regards, Erik Carleton Canmore

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 17 of 132 From: Kris Charchun Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 9:46 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

Hello Cheryl I will not be able to make the public hearing tonight. I would like to have my opinion valued.

I believe the Olympics to Calgary and Canmore would be very beneficial to our community. I believe we have the planning and knowledge that will protect our local values with expanding our infrastructure in a productive way. Our Valley is very population sensitive and the planning that is needed to take Canmore and area to the the next level of development should be part of the towns master plan. We have the possibility of outside funding for this development plan with the Olympic fund, provincial funds, and federal funds. A substantial amount of the development required to hold the games will be the same as what the towns future requirements and needs will be. The pace of development might be accelerated but the quality, design, and usability should be and will be word class and keep with the same high standard of building and design the last games have set of Canmore. I believe in our towns leaders to work toward the best infrastructure needs for the Olympics as well as the after Olympics usage. Nothing from the last games went to waste and it kind of built the town up to a level that would of taken much longer to achieve. All of the amenities and infrastructure built for the 88 games has stood the test of time. I am sure it is close or over the estimated design period of usage but still holds our residents in house and holds world class events. I look forward to seeing what the town gets for upgrades and new infrastructure from the 2026 games. The Olympic Games should be held in a place where there is a great respect for games and athletes. Canmore is as good as any for support of our own Athletes and hols some of the best venues in the world. This is a world event to show off what we have and what we are capable of. We will only set our levels higher and gain from the experience. I have been keeping up to speed with the other countries and Olympic bids and I believe Canada has the most sustainable and reusable bid. This will be the most green Olympics in the modern age.

My vote is yes for Olympics. Development is coming weather we like it or not. This opportunity gives Canmore unimaginable benefits to grow and work with in the future. I believe we will get every dollar spent back form the games as well as the opportunity to profit on the new amenities and infrastructure after the games. We have already done the games once and won, we can do it again.

-- Regards, KRIS CHARCHUN

132 -105 Bow Meadows Crescent Canmore Alberta T1W 2W8 p. 403 678 4588 f. 403 678 5531 w. www.canglass.com

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 18 of 132 From: Liam Christie Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 5:02 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Non-statutory public hearing for the bid

Come on Calgary and Canmore!!!! Get with it. Dream. Dream BIG. We have a chance to bring the Olympics to our back yard!!!!! That’s awesome. I recall being on the sea bus after a game in Vancouver and all 150 passengers broke out in song with “Oh Canada” at the top of our lungs. Invigorating. The energy market is gloomy. Let’s celebrate something to get excited about. Let’s just do it. The ol' 'can-do” attitude. We’ll make it work. It’s good for business. November 13th. YES.

W. B. (Liam) Christie TEC Canada Chair

T.E.C. (The Executive Committee) Ltd. 1200, 833 4th AVENUE SW / CALGARY, AB T2P 3T5 T 403.262.1010 / C 403.874.1965 TEC-Canada.com

This email, its contents and any attached files or related links are, and include, the confidential and proprietary property of T.E.C. (The Executive Committee) Ltd. They may not be copied, modified, retransmitted or used, in whole or in part, for any purpose whatsoever without TEC Canada’s prior written authorization. Any disclosure or use of the confidential and proprietary information contained herein or otherwise related to the information may cause serious harm ordamage to TEC Canada. If you are not an intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 19 of 132

Subject: FW: "Non-statutory public hearing for the bid."

From: alasdair coats Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 1:27 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Council Subject: "Non‐statutory public hearing for the bid."

Dear Sir/Madam,

Regarding the Olympic Bid, I feel strongly that Canmore should not be a part of this, should not host any part of the Olympics.

We are having trouble NOW mitigating conflicts between humans and wildlife, and protecting the natural environment from ever increasing numbers of people. This problem would obviously be much greater with the extra thousands of people which the Olympics would attract. It cannot help but have a negative impact on the environment.

Should Canmore decide to be a part of the Olympic Bid, the resulting international exposure would once again draw large numbers of people wanting to make Canmore their home. In 1988 we had room to grow. Now, we don't. The valley is full of human settlement already, and wildlife is seriously challenged to find their way safely through it.

We have to make a serious decision at this point in time. Which do we want more; more money, prestige and fame; or the beautiful natural environment with it's myriad of wildlife which was what drew people here in the first place. We cannot have both.

Please forego these Olympics. Let the natural surroundings be our legacy, now and forever.

Sincerely,

Alasdair L. Coats.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 20 of 132 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 21 of 132 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 22 of 132 From: Greg Cote Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 9:32 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Letter in Support of 2026 Olympic Bid Participation

Dear Council,

On behalf of my family, I am writing to you to express our support for Canmore's participation in the 2026 Olympic Bid. We believe strongly in our community and its development and believe the Olympic Games can bring us together. We also support the plans for affordable housing post Games. As a responsible community, we cannot miss the opportunity to create a legacy for our community.

Your truly,

Greg Cote Canmore, AB

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 23 of 132 From: Jon Eade Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 2:26 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid - Non Statutory Public Hearing Input

No to the 2026 Olympics

I am writing to Council to advocate that Canmore decline to participate in Calgary's potential upcoming bid to host the 2026 Winter Olympic games. Of course the recent press reports (October 27 and 28) of the Federal Governments funding constraints may negate a need for a council vote, I still see it as prudent to make comments for consideration by Council.

My reasons for suggesting that Council take a “No” position can be summmarised as follows :

Perpetual Affordable Housing

We all acknowledge that Canmore is in need of significantly more PAH units. But before we jump on the band wagon of assuming that a successful bid will result in the resolution (at least in part) of this critical issue, we need to reflect on how we come to be in this situation today. The 1988 Olympics put Canmore “on the map” as a wonderful place to visit (tourism), and / or to have a weekend retreat or second home from which to enjoy the amenities this mountain community offers, all of which have placed pressure on housing costs and availability.

Step forward to post 2026. The Olympic games today have significantly more world wide exposure than was in place in 1988. Games coverage has expanded from just TV to significantly more other social media forms. This in turn will result in a much higher level of exposure of Canmore to the world than occurred in 1988, with an almost certain expanded interest in visitation to the area and enhanced level of interest in obtaining a secondary residence in the community.

This will result in an exacerbated situation significantly above today's demand for affordable housing.

In essence being a partner host in 2026 may address the PAH problem we see today, but it will only lead to a much larger problem of the same issue post 2026. Something which will be much more of a challenge to address than today's difficult but manageable situation.

Legacy Facilities

The Nordic Centre today remains a world class facility, as evidenced by its continuing use as a host venue for world cup events. The core essence of the centre are the actual ski trails and the biathalon range. These may see an modicum of improvement if the 2026 games are hosted, but the trails etc do not require any enhancement to be classified as world class.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 24 of 132 While the supporting buildings may be in need of renovation and modernisation, they are not a critical aspect of the facility remaining as a training ground for our up and coming winter athletes. I am confident, that as part of the Provincial Parks portfolio, the Canmore Nordic Centre will see the necessary financial expenditures to maintain the facilities in good condition. These expenditure I believe will be made even without the facility hosting some Olympic events. Thus the legacy Canmore can expect from being a partner host for 2026 WILL NOT be critical to affording athletes an ongoing venue for training etc. The legacy will only be cosmetic In nature and not core to athletic development.

Canmore as an “equal” partner to Calgary ?

For the Calgary Olympic Bid committee to say that Canmore (and Whistler) is an “equal” partner in any bid process, is in my mind misleading at best. The bid will be based on the games being the “2026 CALGARY Winter Olympics”. I acknowledge that this description is almost certainly politically necessary, so I do not take issue with the description per se, but Calgary cannot be a host city under the present bid parameters without the use of the Nordic Centre, with the resultant need to have Canmore as a partner,

Looking at the population base of Canmore compared to Calgary, the latest numbers I have seen show that Canmore's permanent population is just slightly more than 1% of Calgary's of circa 1.25 million. To suggest Canmore is an equal partner is disingenuous to say the least, and in my mind stated to encourage Canmore's participation. Calgary cannot host the Olympics without Canmore. Whilst I am not in support of hosting the 2026 games, I will state that if Council does decide to proceed in the participation of the bid process, Council must be clear to the bid committee that the only equitable way to share costs should be on a per capita population base and not on any perceived “benefit accrual” basis that appears to being proposed today.

As a further observation here I would suggest that a “No” vote by Council for participation would provide the town with more say in any bid process (ie more leverage) should Calgary vote to proceed, than a “Yes” vote by Canmore would.

Present Council Mandate

As far as I can recall, the 2026 Winter Olympics were not an issue or discussion point during the last municipal election. Whilst acknowledging that Council was elected to oversee the running of the town, I would ask Council to consider whether a decision in regards to co- hosting the Olympics is in fact within their present mandate. Given the magnitude and long term significance of the potential debt load required, already outlined by administration to support the enhancement of town infrastructure, I advocate that Council seek residents endorsement to proceed by way of a plebiscite before a “Yes” vote is taken. As outlined above Canmore is a “mouse” potentially in bed with an “elephant”, and a small delay on Canmore's part will have little or no impact on Calgary's decision. So at this stage Council should vote “No” in order to buy some breathing room, and to allow for the development of more clarity on the implications, especially on financial commitment, before proceeding further.

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 25 of 132

Respectfully yours

Jon Eade

75 Ridge Road,

CANMORE T1W 1G5

October 28 2018

3 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 26 of 132 From: Field, Adrian Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 8:45 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: 'Kerry Field ([email protected])' Subject: FW: Public Hearing, Oct 30, 2018. Re: Is it prudent for Canmore to participate in the 2026 Olympic bid?

Hi Cheryl

I’m writing in favour of the Olympic bid.

1. Canmore will receive a legacy of affordable housing. 2. Canmore’s contributions to the affordable housing/athlete’s village project are things which we need to do/supply anyway (bridge, creek flood mitigation and land) Federal and Provincial contributions associated with the games will not be spent in Canmore or Calgary without the games. 3. Canmore will receive economic benefit during and after the games (as Whistler did). This benefit, properly managed, can provide as source of funding for further affordable housing and improvements to transit services. 4. If successful in attaining resort municipality status Canmore will be eligible for operational funding which could help sustain housing, transit and other essential community services that would otherwise have a higher associated tax burden. 5. Transit, needed for the games, could continue afterwards. 6. If the Olympic Games is to continue then I don’t dispute that improvements regarding corruption and cheating need to happen. The way to make those improvements is to be involved. Canada is well placed to help make improvements. Canmore, in particular, has a strong (arguably the world’s strongest) contingent of Olympic athletes who could help effect change. 7. The games will inspire young athletes ‐ a value which is at the very core of our community. 8. Canmore’s spirit of volunteerism will help deliver an event that is efficiently and sustainably managed. 9. Local businesses will benefit during and after the games. The valley is already successful in the summer, the games will be an opportunity to help showcase winter attractions and will boost visitor numbers in winter ‐ helping alleviate stresses associated with seasonal variably in staffing levels and business revenue. 10. Canmore will further its reputation as an international training ground for the world’s best athletes. This will provide lasting economic impact in itself in addition to the associated sports tourism dollars.

Making a decision will require careful consideration of all of the facts as well as public opinion.

Canmore arguably owes its current economic status, cultural vibrancy and community success to the 1988 Olympics. We have a chance to be part of an event that will inspire generations and build community for decades to come.

Bring it on

Thank you for your consideration

Adrian, Kerry, Lucy and Ben Field

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 27 of 132 From: Gary Finley Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 11:03 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic bid opposition

I write to express the objections that my wife and I have to the idea of Canmore's participation in Calgary’s bid for the 2026 Winter Olympics.

We emphatically do not agree with the bid proponent’s claims that Canmore “needs” more tourist development or infrastructure, and do not believe that hosting another winter olympics would be to the advantage of the people of Canmore.

As for the claims of positive economic impact for the town, those are identical to the ones that have been made many times around the world by the proponents of previous olympic bids. The numerous examples of their financial debacles should be conclusive proof that these olympic hosting proposals always overstate the potential benefits and vastly underestimate the costs of hosting an olympic games.

We strongly oppose the idea of Canmore’s participation in Calgary’s olympic bid.

————— Gary Finley (403) 953-1660

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 28 of 132 From: Godfrey, Paul Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 1:55 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Public Hearing, Oct 30, 2018. Re: Is it prudent for Canmore to participate in the 2026 Olympic bid?

Hi Cheryl

I hope to make it to the meeting tomorrow but in case I can’t I’d like to be on record as being in support of Canmore’s participation in the 2026 Olympic bid.

Thanks

Paul Godfrey, Director, Operations, Town of Banff. Sent from mobile device.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 29 of 132 From: Reed Godfrey Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:46 AM Cheryl To: Hyde Subject: In support

I am in support of Calgary/Canmore 2026.

Thanks

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 30 of 132 From: Ty Godfrey Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 9:44 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: In support

In support of Calgary and Canmore 2026 Olympics.

Ty Godfrey

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 31 of 132 From: Shelley Gregorash Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 3:39 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

I am in support of the Town of Canmore submitting a shared bid with the City of Calgary to host the 2026 Olympics. I believe that the Town of Canmore would benefit in so many ways and much needed infrastructure would be addressed. If Calgary/Canmore was to be awarded the Olympics, I would look forward to volunteering as much as I possibly could.

Shelley Gregorash 403‐609‐4447

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 32 of 132 From: Gaye Harden Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 1:49 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: olympic bid thanks but no thanks

As much as I’d like to support the Olympic bid, I can’t: ‐ It’s not an opportunity to work WITH the IOC but rather working with what the IOC contributes financially with zero financial flexibility from the IOC despite changing economic conditions between now and 2026. ‐ Why should Calgary/Canmore assume all risk with the IOC assuming zero risk? ‐ The IOC’s track record on many fronts is extremely weak. I cannot support getting into a business arrangement with such a corrupt, top heavy, drug‐in‐sport endorsing entity.

Thanks for the Town’s hard work on the Olympic bid.

Gaye Harden

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 33 of 132 From: Caroline Hedin Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:00 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Non statutory public hearing for the bid

Please say no to the Olympics for the following reasons:

‐this is not our bid ‐the event is not worth the cost when we have so many other pressing needs in canmore and beyond for social services, education and affordable housing. Spending millions of dollars on a sporting event is non financially or socially prudent ‐ the bow valley is already at capacity for visitors. Our wildlife, our infrastructure and our landscape cannot handle additional visitor flow.

This proposal does not make sense for the bow valley. Please say no.

Sincerely

Caroline Hedin

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 34 of 132 Council and Mayor

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on Canmore’s Olympic bid decision.

I love the Olympics and was initially excited we could be hosting the games again (once I heard that no events would be occurring in the National Park that is). However, the more I have looked into the financial legacy of past Olympics, the stronger grows my opposition to this event.

With convincing pro-Olympics arguments coming from BidCo and the Town of Canmore whilst the NoCalgary side presents equally compelling arguments to the counter, I went looking for an unbiased, expert opinion to help inform my own decision. I went to the research to see what economics experts had to say. What I found, and what I will share with you below is both alarming and sobering.

In 2016, Oxford University’s Business School conducted an analysis of the cost overruns of previous Olympic Games. In their own words, they did this because “a focus on cost overruns as compared to the original budget is critical for future host cities to understand the implications of the investment they are undertaking.”

(This study is a very quick, and extremely informative read and I think it should be required reading for all councillors in Canmore and Calgary, faced with making this decision. It’s unbiased, refers to other economic studies and is very thorough. It is found here http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/6195/ )

The Oxford report looked at all the Olympic Games, winter and summer from 1960 to 2016 for which accurate data existed for Bid budgets and the final cost of the Games. They looked at all the direct, sports-related costs of holding the Games (venues, athletes’ villages, security etc.). It is important to note however that they did not incorporate the costs of the secondary supportive infrastructure expenses, like roads and infrastructure upgrades, public transit upgrades etc that hosting cities also undertook to host the Games. They clearly state this means the real cost overruns were likely much higher than reported in their analysis. And, even with this limitation, the results of their analysis are extremely sobering.

Here’s some of what they found:

 Since 1968 every Olympic Games had cost overruns; none came in on budget. NOT A SINGLE ONE,

 The average cost overrun for the Winter Olympics since 1968 has been 142%

 The Olympics have the highest average cost overrun of any type of megaproject. The report states the Olympics are “the most costly and financially most risky type of megaproject that exists”

A particularly unsettling paragraph from the report states : “Unfortunately, Olympics officials and hosts often misinform about the costs and cost overruns of the Games. For instance, in 2005 London secured the bid for the 2012 Summer Games with a cost estimate that two years later proved inadequate and was revised upwards with around 100 percent. Then, when it turned out that the final outturn costs were slightly below the revised budget, the organizers falsely, but very publicly, claimed that the London Games had come in under budget. Such deliberate misinformation of the public about cost and cost

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 35 of 132 overrun treads a fine line between spin and outright lying. It is unethical, no doubt, but very common. We can therefore not count on organizers and governments to provide us with reliable information about the real costs and cost overruns of the Olympic Games. Independent studies are needed, like the one presented here.”

The further out a project is, whether it is your own small renovation, or the Olympic Games, the harder it is to have an accurate prediction of the costs of competing the project. In this specific case, the unknowns are significant: Interest rates, the cost of borrowing, availability and cost of labour and supplies, and unexpected developments once construction begins, to name but a few.

To provide some further context, here are a few examples of some of the Town of Canmore’s own recent project costing experiences (for projects about to be undertaken, thus much more accurate cost predictions than for the Olympics):

 New Server Room in civic centre: A cost increase of 50%, from $200 000 to $300 000  Cougar Creek flood mitigation: Cost increase of 24% from 39 million to 48 million  Rec Centre renovation: Cost increase of 19% from 10.8 million to 12.9 million

Have we had some big projects come in on budget? Absolutely, but these examples show the risk of what can happen, and arguably, is far more likely to happen, for a project that is years away from being started.

The security costs for the London games are another good example of what can go wrong. The final security budget ended up being 1.6 billion, or 400% over the 361 million figure that was used in London’s initial Bid proposal. Another example of how hard it is to budget accurately so far in advance of a project’s start and completion date.

Granted the allure of 218 PAH units with only a 4 million dollar cost to the TOC (with a further 6 million in land value) is tempting but, again, what is the risk of this project going over budget?

What if we see an economic downturn and re-purposed units don’t sell well and Canmore is left carrying all or part of our 66 million dollar loan past it’s due date?

What if costs of re-purposing end up being substantially higher than predicted?

History would say many of these scenarios are likely.

What then is the real cost of these PAH units?

The IOC has legally protected themselves from covering any cost overrun so, who does it fall to? We the taxpayers. Imagine if there was even just a 25% cost overrun on the $116 million dollar athletes’ village project; that’s a $29 million dollar increase in project cost (almost three times our town’s initial investment in the village.) A 50% cost overrun would be a $58 million dollar cost to be borne by the tax-payer.

Vancouver’s Athletes Village model was similar to what we see proposed here in Canmore; re-purpose the building to include 262 PAH units and sell the rest to offset building costs. Building cost over-runs and the bankruptcy of the developer resulted in the city of Vancouver assuming the $630 of debt and

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 36 of 132 tax payers picking up the $ 110 million price tag to finish the project. Subsequent sales of re-purposed units within the Athletes Village was also much slower than predicted in their initial economic modelling. A similar situation of slow re-sales happened in the Whistlers Athlete Village. Carrying debt past the due date of a loan, particularly when that is a loan of 66 million, would be extremely costly for Canmore citizens.

So, if our ten million dollar investment in the games, to get 218 PAH units was a sure thing, then I can see this being a good decision. But, it is far from a sure thing, in fact, the shocking reality of Olympic financial history would say it is surely going to cost more. Is this a prudent way to proceed, or are we being blinded by the glow of the PAH pot of gold at the end of the Olympic rainbow?

We are considering undertaking what I think is Canmore’s biggest capital project ever, to increase our debt load well above what it has ever been, all to be part of the riskiest financial megaproject in existence.

And, to add insult to injury this project has us teaming up with the most corrupt sporting organization in the world, who takes on none of the financial risks of hosting whilst allowing, indeed celebrating, government sanctioned cheating athletes. All for the sake of 218 PAH units and the possibility, but far from certainty, of getting Resort Municipality Status. Add in the fact that the world focus on Canmore could also result in accelerated pressure on our town and drive the cost of living up even higher, and it just seems like a bad deal.

It just doesn’t make sense; there is too much uncertainty, the potential downsides if forces beyond our control drive costs higher, are frightening. I feel this would be an irresponsible gamble with tax-payers money and hope that, as our elected representatives, you can see past the glitter, glory and perks of being a Games host ,and see the reality of what is really at risk.

As always, thank you for your time and efforts in helping guide our town through difficult decisions like this one.

Sincerely, Tracey Henderson Canmore Resident

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 37 of 132

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 38 of 132 From: Jim Hendry Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 10:15 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: non statuatory public hearing for the bid

Importance: Low

Yes lets have the Olympics will be fun.

Jim Hendry Canmore Resident

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 39 of 132 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Christine Iversen Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 6:50 PM To: Council Subject: Olympics

To the council:

I am against having the 2026 Olympics in Canmore:We are over‐ populated and highly taxed as it is . The benefits 8 years from now are questionable.Yes, we need affordable housing, however an Olympic influx may not solve that problem.

There are so many other places where we could spend our precious dollars.. protecting wildlife and improving the existing infrastructure..and finding ways for Canmore to help mitigate climate change. We have an obligation to our grandchildren to protect the resources that already exist. We don’t need an Olympic spectacle .

The Olympics are a corrupt organization. This has been shown time and again with athletes from various countries taking drugs, and bribes being common place. It’s exciting to think about being a part of a huge party..but at what cost? To our integrity, to our pocketbook, to our future ..?

Please say no to Canmore being part of Olympics in 2026

Sincerely

Christine Iversen 403-609-8339

6-137 Wapiti Close Canmore T1W3B2

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 40 of 132 ------Original message ------From: r.pjanes Date: 2018-10-27 5:48 PM (GMT-05:00) To: John Borrowman , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Just Say No - 2026 Olympics

Dear Mayor and Council,

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 41 of 132 We are writing to express our complete opposition to the proposed 2026 Olympic Games in Canmore. There are far too many reasons underlying our opposition to include here, so in the interests of brevity, we highlight the following:

1. It is a matter of record that the IOC is a corrupt and self-serving club, and their arrogance and self-claimed superiority has reached a new high. One need only mention the re-admission of Russian athletes to the Games, in the wake of their direct involvement in the largest doping scandal in Olympic history. The IOC cares nothing about the athletes and the nature of clean competition. Ask Becky Scott for firsthand evidence. The IOC are petty corporatists and marketplace ideologues, and Canmore has no business supporting their duplicity. The continuous, dishonest behavior of the IOC has made hosting the Olympics a moral decision.

2. The budgeting – the Bidco budget is incomplete and naïve, considering the costs of security, renovations to existing facilities, and the construction of new ones to mention only several. Security at the Vancouver Olympics cost over 900 million dollars. How is that Bidco can estimate 610 million dollars for security eight years in advance of the games? Cost overruns are the most enduring legacy of the Olympic games. The politicians who vote yes come and go. The taxpayers remain to sort out the inevitable mess.

3. Implications for Canmore – a participant at the October 26tth public meeting noted that Canmore had no future without the 2026 Olympics. This comment about Canmore’s future is so preposterous and so limited that we feel compelled to respond. Canmore has more natural and human assets than most small towns in the world. Because of insufficient imagination and attention to fulfilling this potential, we are now overpopulated and overused, along with all of the stresses that occur when money, consumption, and real estate development dominate the public agenda.

It is now time to say that enough is enough. Canmore must assume responsibility for itself – we cannot compost; we have no long-term climate adaptation plan; we need truly affordable housing, and so on. The Olympics are not the solution to these challenges. They will simply create more stresses and divert limited life energy and attention to what is largely a two week spectacle. We need a vision for Canmore’s future that is based on self-reliance, foresight and courage - not economic opportunism.

Thank you very much for considering this letter. Please do the right thing for Canmore’s future, and consider what the contemporary Olympic legacy really is – confusion, materialism, debt and distraction.

Sincerely,

Robert and Priscilla Janes

104 Prendergast Place Canmore, Alberta T1W 2N5, Canada Tel. 403-678-2117

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 42 of 132

3 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 43 of 132 From: Kristen Johnson Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:03 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic bid

Dear Mayor & Town Council

Thank you for providing our community with the opportunity to attend the public hearing this evening. I had to leave early, however I appreciated the chance to hear so many voices and perspectives sharing their thoughts on what in my mind is a fairly pivotal moment in deciding which direction Canmore's future takes (with a nod to Mr Meier's presentation remarks).

I have no doubt that the '88 Olympic games provided the region with numerous positive legacies that have enabled countless Albertans and visitors to recreate and appreciate the incredible surroundings of Canmore and Kananaskis.

However, I have decided that I am on the "negative" side for the 2026 bid and here is why:

-From a philosophical and ethical perspective, I am uncomfortable with our town supporting a bid that supports an organization (the IOC) who have deemed acceptable the actions of Russia's state-sponsored doping program. Canmore is home to so many athletes and an epicentre for athletic development and it is wrong for us to accept hosting with this knowledge.

-I don't believe that Canmore "needs" these games to happen in order to help advance our community's vision for our future. A lot of the supporters speak to the opportunities that we'll miss out on with regards to the development of affordable housing, investment into infrastructure to support the games, and legacy funding to support sport and other social and environmental initiatives (which haven't been clearly defined by Bidco, in my opinion).

Yet, if the Olympic bid had not come along, would we as a town be clamoring to be a participant in a multi- billion dollar event as the best way to advance our community? Canmore possesses natural and human assets far greater than many comparable communities. I am confident that the passion, knowledge and creativity of our community, paired with a responsible council that listens to our voices and respects a community vision and the natural environment that we are fortunate to co-exist with, paves the way to a positive future for the town.

-Finally, a point made this evening (by Mr Meier) got me thinking about the "two paths" and his comment that the Olympic path makes the most sense and is the best thing for us. My fear is that if we say yes to being part of a bid, and we board that "Olympic train", to use an analogy, are we prepared to accept that once we're on the train, there's no getting off? We're part of the games, regardless of how "off the rails" the journey goes. The games have an immovable "station" or end point, in that the date can't be delayed (a reminder to the point made this evening about how EVERY olympics has had cost overruns...I think 140% was the average quoted?).

So, how far off the tracks will things go, financially, environmentally, socially...to make sure the we/Calgary meet our commitments to the Games? WHich, ultimately, is a commitment that serves the IOC and the grand spectacle of the games. I have little faith that the IOC has any sincere interest in what happens to the host cities, and worry that being part of the whole thing makes Canmore less in control of it's own destiny as we will be pressured into making concessions or worse about our community's future to serve the Olympics and the IOC.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 44 of 132

As our representatives I urge you to not put us on this "train" and keep Canmore's future under control by us, the community.

Thanks, Kristen Johnson

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 45 of 132 From: Timothy Johnson Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:47 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic bid

Dear Ms. Hyde, Mayor Borrowman and Council,

I am writing to express my opposition to Canmore's support of the 2026 Olympic Games bid. Having attended the October 2 town council meeting, I have reflected on Councillor McCallum's framing of the question of whether or not it is prudent for Canmore to co-host the 2026 games and have decided it is not, for the following reasons.

1) Lack of a clear financial overall cost to the Games. The Winter Olympics have averaged 140% cost overruns since the 1960's and I worry that the current cost structure does not convince me that cost overruns can be mitigated, leading to an increased financial burden on the community.

2) I oppose supporting what is largely a multi-week spectacle that supports the IOC, an organization that I view as corrupt and morally unsound whose actions around state-sanctioned doping should not be accepted by our community. I am not comfortable with a community that has such deep roots in fostering athletic development supporting the IOC.

3) As an 18-year resident I am concerned that our community cannot support an influx of population (residents, and visitors) similar to what followed the '88 games. From an environmental standpoint, the Bow Valley is a crucial landscape connecting the protected areas of our National Park systems and Kananaskis Country and I worry that the "make it happen, it's the Olympics" mindset could negatively influence the future development of Canmore and the Bow Valley. I'm concerned that putting the Bow Valley on the world stage once again will accelerate our growth trajectory and have irreversible effects on the long‐term environmental functionality of the region and exacerbate our existing challenges of human‐wildlife conflict and the fracturing of wildlife habitat.

In terms of the social effects on our community, affordability needs to be addressed now, not 8 years from now with the provision of a limited number of "affordable" (not really affordable to the large population of service workers that make up a large portion of our workforce and community) housing units. I use "limited" in the sense of being well below what the Town has identified in terms of housing units as needs for improving our housing challenges.

Thank you very much for considering my submission and for helping facilitate the public engagement opportunities related to the bid that have taken place over the past months. I appreciate the challenges that our community faces in making an informed decision on the proposed bid and trust that you will listen to the voices of our community in regards to our collective future.

Sincerely,

Timothy Johnson 165-901 Benchlands Trail Canmore AB

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 46 of 132 From: Cathy Jones Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:27 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic BID

Hello, I believe it is NOT prudent for Canmore to engage financially in the Olympics. Yes we need affordable housing but we need more now. In nine years we will be in another crisis that can be averted between now and then. We need to upgrade our current infracture NOW for our increasing numbers of visitors. We have been neglecting the RV and tent travellers. There is no guarantee that the cost of the Athletes Village and the bridge over the TCH will be as low as predicted. When a Town has to ask the bank for a loan greater than policy dictates then you must know we cannot afford to pay for the Village. I do not want, nor can I and my husband afford higher taxes. There are many of us living here and productive in events, volunteering and using the town facilities that make less than $100,00.00/year. I do not believe Calgary will suffer if we say NO. We have no venues under the jurisdiction of the Town of Canmore. We can still provide Volunteers and smaller items that the Village and bridge. Respectfully Cathy Jones

1 From: Trevor Kiers Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 3:18 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Support for 2026

Hi there,

I’m writing to you today to put forth my support for the 2026 Olympic bid.

I could easily write out all the reasons for which I have chosen to support the bid, but from what I understand you’re simply looking for numbers.

Please allow this email to represent another vote for yes.

Thank you. --

Trevor,

"Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you're right" - Henry Ford

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 48 of 132 From: Sean Krausert Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 5:56 PM Cheryl To: Hyde Cc: John Borrowman Subject: Olympic Bid

October 28, 2018

Greetings Town Council,

RE - Public Feedback re the 2026 Winter Olympics Bid

Thank-you for this opportunity to provide input into your decision-making with respect to the 2026 Winter Olympics Bid. That said, it will be interesting to see if reports of Calgary Council being asked to kill the bid come to pass, in which case no need reading any further.

It's an excellent question as to whether it is prudent for Canmore to be involved in a 2026 Winter Olympics Bid. As you know, you have to take all public feedback with a grain of salt, including this feedback, as none of those expressing views and providing feedback are charged with acting in the best interests of the community as a whole. The feedback you receive will be valuable, but everyone except you has the luxury of their own bias and personal objectives, which undoubtedly will flavour their feedback and ultimately serve each person's self- interest either directly or indirectly. Only you are asked to stand above your biases and personal objectives and act in the best interests of the community as a whole, and so it is only you that can decide if the decision is prudent or not.

As you sort through the plethora of information that will be directed towards you, I encourage you to focus on the actual costs and benefits of potentially being involved in the 2026 Winter Olympics Bid. There will be valid concerns raised against the Olympics and worthy considerations in favour of the Olympics, but there will also be a number of "red herrings" that must be disregarded. "Red herrings", in my mind, are those things that will exist regardless of whether or not Canmore is involved in an Olympic bid.

I see many potential issues being raised, including the following, and offer thoughts on each for your consideration:

 Impact on Affordability . . . Some will say that a 2026 Olympic Bid will negatively impact affordability in Canmore. However, I would argue that ship has already sailed. Canmore is already the most expensive place to live in Alberta, and one of the most expensive places to live in Canada. Some excellent efforts are underway to counteract the lack of affordability, and the question must be whether a potential bid would work against or support such efforts. Personally, I think that the legacy of more affordable housing, increased business opportunities and an influx of visitor dollars will outweigh any increased pressure on the value of land and the cost of living in town.

 Rate of Development . . . While affordability in Canmore will not be nearly affected by a 2026 Winter Olympics as it was by the 1988 Winter Olympics, I do believe that the increased spotlight on Canmore will cause an increase in the rate of development in town, particularly in Three Sisters and SilverTip. This can be a positive if managed well, but it will put pressure on Council and

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 49 of 132 Administration to keep up and stay ahead of the change. Likewise, if the growth outpaces the Town's ability to keep pace, then this could be a negative.

 Environmental Concerns . . . I don't understand how this is related to an Olympic bid. Presumably, Canmore will apply the same environmental protection with respect to development regardless of whether such development flows from an Olympic bid or not. Of course, I encourage you to not relax environmental protections if an Olympic bid were to proceed and be successful.

 Carrying Capacity of the Our Valley . . . Once again, like environmental concerns, this is a question that exists regardless of the Olympic bid, and if anything only the pace of change will be affected. Responsible adaptation to growth will have to be made by the Town to handle increased population, and such will be an issue that will have to be dealt with whether or not Canmore co-hosts the Winter Olympics in 2026. Of course, the biggest factor in this issue is the private ownership of land and the rights of landowners to develop, which results in population growth, and this is not impacted by an Olympic bid.

 Economic Impact . . .There are potential positives and negatives with respect to economic impact. Without a doubt, co-hosting the Winter Olympics will result in priceless promotion of our Town on a global scale, and such can benefit our tourism-based economy. There will be millions of dollars pouring into the community through visitor spend, which will result in prosperity for many businesses - directly and indirectly. The question is whether there will be an impact on municipal taxes? If so, how much and can it be absorbed by the tax base?

 Olympic Legacy . . . From my perspective, this is a key issue. To be crass . . . what will we get? More affordable housing than we would have otherwise been able to provide is an excellent start. Upgrades to sporting facilities would also be welcome. Is there any chance of making progress towards getting provincial designation as a tourism community and given the power to institute levies on tourists, which is normal and anticipated by visitors all around the world? All of these would make an Olympic bid particularly attractive to the Town, with the latter option being the ultimate prize.

Personally, I could take or leave the Winter Olympics coming to Canmore. Yes, it would be exciting to have such a high caliber event in our community, but it will also come with headaches. However, from the perspective of what's in the best interests of Canmore as a whole, I think you need to give serious consideration of being involved with the bid (if it goes ahead). Of course, you have the best information and are in the best position to make this decision.

Best regards,

Sean Krausert

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 50 of 132 From: Steve Lee Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 2:47 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic bid - non- statutory public hearing for the bid

With reference to the question “ is it prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the city of Calgary’s bid to co host the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games,” I would voice my objections to the bid for the following reasons:‐

The cost of hosting the games to the tax payer is as yet undefined but will certainly come with a hefty bill to local residents. The cost of living to Canmorites is already high and participating in the games will only increase this cost. Add in over‐ runs to the Olympic budget which are certain to happen and this will only further increase the cost to local residents. It is my opinion that increased costs significantly out weigh the proposed benefits suggested by council and others.

The town of Canmore is already extremely busy and the potential award of the games will only serve to increase the size of the town and thus further dilute the uniqueness of the town.

Finally, I disagree with council saying that they should be the ones to decide whether or not to participate in the games. While agreeing that the vast majority of matters in the town should be discussed and decided by the town council , when it comes to a major one time event such as the Olympics then ‐ as in Calgary ‐ there should be a plebiscite for local citizens to determine the outcome. Perhaps the council does not agree to a plebiscite as it is afraid that it might not get the desired outcome?

Steve Lee

231 Miskow Close Canmore

Sent from my iPad

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 51 of 132 From: John Christopher Levy Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 8:08 PM Cheryl To: Hyde Subject: Non-statutory Public Hearing re Olympics

Dear Ms. Hyde:

Please add the following e‐mail to the Public Record for this hearing. Given the recent remarks by Mayor Borrowman about Public Hearings and those who attend them I do not intend to waste my time by actually attending. Nevertheless I would like my strongly held views is opposition to any participation at all by Canmore in any bid for the Olympics to be on record.

I am opposed to Canmore becoming involved in any way at all with any proposal that will include it in any bid for the Winter Olympics 2026. I have four basic reasons for this position.

First, ethics and integrity. The IOC is a self‐serving and self‐perpetuating oligarchy utterly devoid of integrity. To support anything that it does is to support its appalling record. I recognize the utility of international events for high‐calibre athletes, but the IOC must be abolished and be replaced by a different organization. It is true that in some circles the financial cost of integrity is regarded as too high: see President Trump on condemning Saudi Arabia for murder. However the financial costs of cancelling contracts with Saudi Arabia are capable of reasonably precise calculation. The financial costs of not participating in a possible Calgary bid for the Winter Olympics are at best the merest wishful thinking, as are the financial gains to a handful of people in Canmore if we do participate.

Second, the overall financial structure of a Calgary bid for the Games. It is becoming more and more apparent that the Province will not increase its possible contribution, and that the Federal Government will not contribute the amount that Calgary seems to be hoping for. These are prudent moves by levels of Government having massive deficits. Any attempt by Canmore to join in a possible bid will almost certainly saddle the Town with substantial and somewhat unpredictable costs, in addition to the already large sums spend on trips to Korea and the suchlike. When this is connected to the unpredictable but very real costs of Canmore becoming a City, the burden on already very heavily taxed and fee'd residents will become completely unbearable.

Third, the proposal for Canmore to borrow huge sums, requiring an increase in its existing debt limits, when the prospects of recouping this money strike me as much less realistic than the Mayor and Administration would want us to believe. While the CCHA does indeed already own the land that the Athletes Village will be built on, it will have to have the funds to purchase the buildings after the Olympics are over. Where will this money come from? Given that the CCHA is simply a wholly owned subsidiary of the Town, which appoints all its Directors, any attempt by the CCHA to raise this money outside the framework of the Town debt limits will likely involve the Town as at least a guarantor. The Town itself will be so far in debt that it will not itself likely be able to provide any money, and will have little financial credibility as a guarantor. The prospect of the CCHA being able to sell most of the units is also highly debateable. The CCHA and the Town persist in a view that many of us reject as unfounded in the evidence: namely, that what Canmore needs is masses of so‐called "affordable" housing for purchase. At best this might result in sales to speculators/investors who will rent out the units or carry them for resale at a profit thus making it plain that what Canmore really needs is affordable 1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 52 of 132 rental accommodation. At worst, the CCHA will be stuck with units that do not sell and will therefore not be able to repay the money borrowed by the Town to finance the buildings. Even if the CCHA itself rents out the units that will not give the necessary capital up front to repay the Town. In other words, the entire set of social and financial premises underlying this proposal are arguably false and the alleged favourable financial implications are premised on these falsehoods.

Fourth, it is rapidly becoming apparent that the only "wild" animals and "green" space that will be found in Canmore will be in pictures on the side of buses. The demands of the Olympics will be the final nail in the coffin.

I hope that Council will see financial, ethical and environmental sense and vote against any further involvement of any sort with any Olympic proposal.

Yours truly

J. Chris Levy Canmore Resident and Homeowner.

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 53 of 132 October 29, 2018

Dear Ms. Hyde,

Please count this note as my strong opposition to Canmore’s involvement in a potential 2026 Olympic bid from Calgary.

Canmore has many issues that require addressing, and it is tempting to see the Olympics as an opportunity to address them. I have seen no evidence, however, that the financial contribution of the Olympic games would make it possible for Canmore to address these issues in ways that compensate for the harm done by hosting an international event of this cost and scale, much less improve on the situation we currently know. If the Olympic legacy funds were in an astronomical range that allowed Town to, for example, purchase the remaining undeveloped lands in Three Sisters Mountain Village or Silvertip and do something truly radical for affordability and wildlife, then we would have something to consider. From what I hear, the legacy funding under consideration is nowhere near that kind of range.

Affordability is the most obviously pressing issue, and one that is likely to be at the forefront of the Olympic conversation. Affordable housing in Canmore remains contingent on the real estate market rather than the needs of local residents or businesses. That means housing that is built with affordability in mind will not retain true affordability (if it ever meets that criteria to begin with) if the housing demand, quantitatively and qualitatively, continues to outpace availability. The Olympics will only exacerbate that problem. I was born and raised in Canmore (I was here for the 1988 games) and am a professional with a young family. Canmore is already unrealistic for me, my family, and my peers in the long term, and that includes existing and planned affordable housing options. Doubling down on the existing strategy while enhancing Canmore’s global profile to the elite classes of the world will only make this problem worse, even if the Olympics increase our overall supply of “affordable” housing options.

In terms of environmental impact, we know our community as it stands is taking up too much room to expect many of our wildlife species to persist over time. Our position in the front ranges of the Rockies, in the best migratory valley for wide-ranging animals within an interconnected corridor in the last best refuge for many species, means that when we decide to make wildlife movement harder at home, the impacts are felt from Morley to Montana, and Lake Louise to Liard. The Olympics will only push us to develop faster, which makes it impossible to assess the impacts our changing footprint have in time to make adjustments. The number of people in town for the games themselves would be massive, especially for a town that already struggles mightily to keep visitors or residents on legal trails, undertaking legal recreation activities. As a community, we’re already failing at human and traffic management. I don’t see how the Olympics would improve a situation that already threatens to make Canmore unnavigable for much of the year for residents and wildlife alike.

Further, the Olympics have a terrible legacy of gentrification at the hands of global capital, forceful erasure of social activism and opposition, and the simultaneous corporatization and nationalistic appropriation of everything from Indigenous artistic expression to common lands. I want no part of a community that overlooks these forms of violence.

Every large-scale decision for Canmore at this stage seriously constrains our options in the future. Events like the Olympics should only be considered if we believe they will solve these problems as much as possible; making minor improvements is no longer sufficient.

Thank you for hearing my comments.

Sincerely,

Adam Linnard / 1413A 1st Ave / Canmore, AB / T1W 1M6

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 54 of 132 From: Warren Lippitt < Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 2:55 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Public Hearing, Oct 30, 2018. Re: Is it prudent for Canmore to participate in the 2026 Olympic bid? Attachments: BenefitsofHosting.2026-OPWG.Remple.Oct2018.pdf

Hi Cheryl,

I'm writing to express my support for Canmore hosting the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic games. I've attached a letter that has been submitted to you by Ron Remple. I think he's articulated the reasons for hosting very well, so rather than re-writing everything in his letter, I'd simply like to support his position.

Thank you,

Warren Lippitt

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 55 of 132 1 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Palliser Highway Crossing A Proposal for the Legacy of the Calgary 2026 Bid

By Jessie Loucks, a concerned resident

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 56 of 132 2 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Contents ...... 1 A Proposal for Palliser Lane Legacy 2026...... 4 A Necessary Addition ...... 4 Why not bike? ...... 4 Why not drive? ...... 5 Why Build It? ...... 5 How Do We Build It? ...... 6 What Are The Options? ...... 6 Pedestrian Bridge/Overpass ...... 6 Underpass ...... 7 Can it be done? ...... 7 Directly Benefitting Communities ...... 8 Overall Environmental Impact ...... 8 Palliser Trail Residents ...... 8 Canmore Collegiate High School – Cougar Creek ...... 8 Local Churches & Hospitals ...... 8 Future Development and Secondary Benefits ...... 9 Mountain Ave & Hospital Place ...... 9 2nd Ave & Bow Valley Trail ...... 9 Businesses along Bow Valley Trail ...... 9 Tourism Businesses ...... 9 Conclusion ...... 10 Articles ...... 11 #1 Benchlands Trail Overpass ...... 11 #2 Palliser Pedestrian Route ...... 11 #3 Cyclist in Benchlands Trail Overpass ...... 12 #5 Palliser Footpaths from Satellite ...... 13 #6 Pedestrian Overpass Terrible Photoshop 1 ...... 13 #7 Pedestrian Overpass Terrible Photoshop 2 ...... 14 #9 Proposed Location of Pedestrian Underpass ...... 15

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 57 of 132 3 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#10 Canmore Collegiate High school Routes ...... 16 #11 Improved Route to High school With Crossing ...... 16 #12 Mountain Ave & Hospital Place Improvements ...... 17 #13 Pedestrian Roundabout ...... 17 #14 Mountain Ave & Bow Valley Trail ...... 18 #15 Cougar Creek Pedestrian Underpass ...... 18

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 58 of 132 A Proposal for Palliser Lane Legacy 2026 4 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

A Proposal for Palliser Lane Legacy 2026

A Necessary Addition

The existing buildings along Palliser Lane are in dire need of a new highway crossing. In October 2017 mayor of Canmore John Barrowman said “We will be having a discussion at some point in the future on a pedestrian crossing on this location.”1 With the opportunity of the OPWG sustainability and legacy funding, the time for that conversation is now.

With over 300 residents in the apartments at 200 Palliser Lane2, a projected 300 residents in 140 residential units at 1451 Palliser Trail3, and 112 guest rooms at the Holliday Inn4, there is plenty of traffic going in and out of the Palliser Trail area. The 2026 OPWG bid plans to build more residential units in the area5, which will only increase number of cars on the road. With Canmore’s existing parking issues6, there needs to be a better way for the Palliser residents to more easily access the downtown area by bike or foot. The current path to walk from any of these locations to the nearest grocery store averages about 20-25mins7. It crosses 5 intersections, 3 of which are some of the busiest intersections in Canmore.

Why not bike?

While cycling is possible by the current routes, the current path crosses several on and off ramps, and involve drivers accelerating/decelerating quickly, right hand turns, and an infinite number of blind spots. I have been in a Taxi that almost struck a cyclist on the Benchlands overpass, as the cyclist was in a blind spot and my driver was focused on getting me to my destination quickly. To cycle through the Benchlands Trail overpass is to attempt to pass as a vehicle, or to walk your bike on the crosswalks.

1 Canmore Rental Project Gets Development Permit Approval, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2017, https://goo.gl/STqThr 2 Tonia Medina, Licensed Associate, Property Manager, PEKA Professional Property Management LTD. 3 Canmore rental project gets development permit approval, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2017, https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/canmore-rental-projects-get-development-permit-approval-20171012 4 https://www.ihg.com/holidayinn/hotels/us/en/canmore/yyccm/hoteldetail

5 BidCO Hosting Plan, Calgary 2026, https://goo.gl/ePEJxd 6 Parking Issues Raised at Hearing, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2017, https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/parking- issues-raised-at-hearing-20120511 7 Google Maps, Directions from Palliser Lane to Save On Foods, 2018 https://goo.gl/N8VWzF

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 59 of 132 Why Build It? 5 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Why not drive? Driving in Canmore has long been a hot topic. Parking has always been a headache, with 80-85% of the spots being full8 at all times, and overfull about 21% of the time during peak business hours9. Approximately 80% of people flowing into Downtown Canmore do so by car10. This has a negative impact on the congestion of the downtown area, not to mention the environmental impact of residents driving such a short distance. The apartments at Palliser Lane have approximately 0.8 parking stalls per unit, and the REIT building have about 0.6 parking stalls per unit11. This intentional reduction of parking space results in residents using the visitor parking spaces, as the current pedestrian and cyclist route make transporting anything daunting. The convenience of a car is hard to ignore, when it’s safer, faster, and easier to drive to the grocery store.

Why Build It?

The benefits of a new highway crossing would far outweigh the price. A new highway crossing would improve the safety for all users of the road by rerouting the traffic of the pedestrians and cyclists. It would improve accessibility, and it could be used as an Olympic Legacy monument and compliment the “$116 million Olympic Athlete’s Village being created for the Games before being handed over to Canmore as an affordable housing project.”12

Canmore has a goal of transitioning to a more pedestrian and cyclist friendly town13, but many people in the exiting Palliser buildings opt to drive. There are many safety concerns for pedestrians and cyclists that can be mediated with a new highway crossing. The current fastest route from the Palliser apartments to get to the nearest grocery store goes over the Benchlands Trail overpass (Article 1); through the Palliser/Benchlands Trail and Benchlands Trail/Bow Valley Trail/Railway Ave intersections. Walking from the apartments on Palliser Trail through the safest route currently takes between 20-25 minutes (Article 2), not accounting for stoplights. Pedestrians also must walk through no fewer than 6 crosswalks, and 4 lane traffic in at least two of the crosswalks. In addition, the bike paths along the current overpass are ambiguously marked (article 3). The route puts the cyclist in several blind spots, merging lanes, and right hand turn lanes.

8Plan Update Targets Solutions to Canmore’s Congestions Issues, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2018 https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/plan-update-targets-solutions-to-canmores-congestion-issues-20180607 9 Plan Update Targets Solutions to Canmore’s Congestions Issues, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2018 https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/plan-update-targets-solutions-to-canmores-congestion-issues-20180607

10 Plan Update Targets Solutions to Canmore’s Congestions Issues, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2018 https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/plan-update-targets-solutions-to-canmores-congestion-issues-20180607 11 Palliser Trail – Environmental Impact Statement (Phase 1), WSP Canada Inc, June 2017 12 Window Of Opportunity is Open for Canmore, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2018, https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/window-of-opportunity-is-open-for-canmore-20180920 13Plan Update Targets Solutions to Canmore’s Congestions Issues, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2018 https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/plan-update-targets-solutions-to-canmores-congestion-issues-20180607

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 60 of 132 How Do We Build It? 6 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

A new highway crossing in the Palliser area removes many of those hazards and uses existing infrastructure to complete a new and safer path.

The Town of Canmore is already aware of illegal highway crossings in the Palliser area14. Crossing over the highway in the Palliser Lane area reduces travel time to the nearest grocery store to 15mins or less for both cyclist and pedestrians. This is dangerous for the crossers, and for all the drivers on the Highway 1 which has a speed limit of 110km/hr. Danger doesn’t discourage people from crossing, as people can be seen crossing the highway every day (Article 4). The residents at Palliser Lane have even gouged paths into the grass that can be seen from google satellite images (Article 5). These crossings are frequent, with several dozen people crossing the highway in a day. This will only increase as the units at Palliser Trail are finished, and more so if more housing is put in as planned15.

How Do We Build It?

There is an opportunity for a new highway crossing in the Calgary 2026 Olympic Games. This would help avoid the tax implication for the crossing, as “taxpayers should not contribute to the direct operating costs of hosting the 2026 OPWG” (16). The 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Council Committee even states that; “We believe that is reasonable for the capital costs for the facilities to host the 2026 OPWG be borne by entities including the municipal, provincial and federal governments given that the assets will generate long term benefits for the community.” 17 . There are many improvements that could generate long term benefits for the community, but a new highway crossing is an urgent one that will only become more beneficial as the area develops.

What Are The Options?

Pedestrian Bridge/Overpass

While a pedestrian overpass could be an expensive development, we have a unique opportunity to fund a critical piece of infrastructure as a legacy project associated with the OPWG 2026. Pedestrian overpasses provide the opportunity for a new, striking structure with signs for promotional material or public

14 Canmore Rental Projects Gets Development Permit Approval, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2017, https://goo.gl/STqThr 15 Window Of Opportunity Is Open For Canmore, Rocky Mountain Outlook, 2018, https://www.rmoutlook.com/article/window-of-opportunity-is-open-for-canmore-20180920 16 Principles for Pursuing the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (From Council Report C2017-0616) https://pub-calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=50760 17 Principles for Pursuing the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, Council Report C2017-0616, 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games Council Committee, https://pub- calgary.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=50760

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 61 of 132 Can it be done? 7 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks notice (Article 6 & 7). It would be easy to change signage to suit the Olympics or any other large event, and would be seen by up to 22,000 people a day18. As for price point, the recent Chinook Mall Overpass in Calgary ranged only 120 meters and had a price tag of $13 million19. A pedestrian overpass in the Palliser area would need to range at minimum 108m at the shortest distance between Palliser Lane and Mountain Ave (Article 8). In contrast, a wildlife overpass near Lac Des Arc was proposed to the starting price of $7 million20.

Underpass

An underpass would take longer to construct and likely would disrupt traffic the most during construction, as well as being the most expensive. It would be costly to tunnel under the highway and build a structure deep enough for pedestrians, cyclists and otherwise. However, an underpass is friendlier to accessibility with shallower grades required to go downhill. The above ground portion could be used as a public space, by adding green space, a small park or a statue. Underground space could be utilized for advertisement, but only to the pedestrian and cyclist traffic. The walls could be dedicated to museum space, gallery space, or public notices. There is plenty of space in front of the existing Palliser building for this underpass, and could be built to include even elevators (Article 9). The Town of Canmore built a highway underpass in the Cougar Creek area in 2010 for approximately 4.5 million21.

Can it be done?

The Town of Canmore has had a similar project completed in 2010. Lombard North Group and Associated Engineering of Calgary collaborated with Town of Canmore in 201022 on the Cougar Creek Pedestrian Underpass (Article 15). The underpass was budgeted at 4.5 million dollars, and fell just under budget23.

18 Bow Valley Gap Overpass, Stephen Legault, 2018, https://goo.gl/hKDD9d 19 Pedestrian bridge opens crossing Macleod Trail at 61st Avenue S.W. , CBC News, December 8, 2017, https://goo.gl/a9BDX5

20 Conservationists propose a new wildlife overpass, Rocky Mountain Outlook, March 15, 2018, https://goo.gl/fp9d8R 21 Report To Council, Town of Canmore, Feb 14th, 2012 22 Cougar Creek Pedestrian Underpass, Lombard North Group, 2010, http://lombardnorth.ca/project/cougar- creek-pedestrian-underpass/ 23 Report To Council, Feb 14th, 2012

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 62 of 132 Directly Benefitting Communities 8 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Directly Benefitting Communities

Overall Environmental Impact

Without proper investigation it’s impossible to determine the true environmental impact of overpass vs. underpass at this time. What can be guaranteed is that if the walkability of the area is improved, there will inherently be more pedestrians and cyclists. This in turn will reduce the number of cars on the road as well as the number of parking spaces needed per permanent resident.

Palliser Trail Residents

Palliser Trail is a rapidly expanding community, set to directly benefit from the games through additional housing. Making the area more walkable is a surefire way to ensure that the majority of those residents will not need vehicles, and therefore fewer parking spaces. Having an easily accessible walking route will also contribute to a healthy and active lifestyle.

Canmore Collegiate High School – Cougar Creek

The route to the Canmore Collegiate High school is improved with a highway crossing near the Palliser buildings, but it also benefits the Cougar Creek area. The current route passes through the Benchlands Trail Overpass and can take up to 12 minutes (article 10). Rerouting via Palliser reduces the estimated travel time, and removes the cyclists from the overpass almost completely (article 11).

Local Churches & Hospitals

Adding a highway crossing at Palliser connects a route for the churches and hospitals. Not far from the area for the proposed crossing is the Lutheran Church, Kingdom Hall of Jehovah’s Witness, and the brand new Our Ladies of the Rockies Parish. The route can be extended to add a pedestrian path or secondary vehicle path to the Canmore Hospital.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 63 of 132 Future Development and Secondary Benefits 9 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Future Development and Secondary Benefits

Mountain Ave & Hospital Place

In addition to the crossing, the area around Mountain Ave and the Hospital could benefit from better paving and sidewalks (Article 12). This area leads to the intersection of Mountain and 2nd Ave, and eventually to a crosswalk at 2nd and Bow Valley Trail. The residents of the Mountain Avenue area will also be able to more easily access the Dog Park in front of the existing Pallsier buildings.

2nd Ave & Bow Valley Trail

Improving this area will benefit all the residents in the 2nd Ave area, and link pedestrians and cyclists from the Palliser area without the need of a vehicle (Article 14). A sidewalk is needed in the area, in addition to clearly marked bike lanes to link with the existing paths on Bow Valley Trail.

Businesses along Bow Valley Trail

The proposed improvements lead into the pedestrian path near Spice Hut (Article 13). This area links with current pathways to businesses along Bow Valley Trail and would increase local foot and cyclist traffic, thereby creating more customers for the area.

Tourism Businesses

It is possible to provide tour bus parking near the highway crossing, and increase tourist traffic without increasing town parking requirements. It would put tourists close to the heart of town without interrupting existing traffic flow, and remove them from major intersections in the area.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 64 of 132 Conclusion 10 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Conclusion

Canmore is a rapidly growing community, and the Olympics bring along a lot of opportunity for further improvements to be made and growth to be had. Canmore has a lot of issues that require addressing, and some that are already a part of the Olympic 2026 plan. Within the Olympic improvements to affordable housing through athletic housing, additional consideration is needed for how those athletes will travel during the games, and how residents of those units will travel after the games are over. There is already a lot of development in the Palliser Area to justify a highway crossing. The illegal pedestrian and cyclist highway crossings prove how urgently it is needed.

The Olympics provide a unique opportunity for the Town of Canmore to funding the crossing without using local tax money. It would benefit the community long term, and fits the requirements of the Principles for Pursuing the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. It would benefit local residents and businesses and compliment the already proposed improvements for the 2026 games. It could easily become a legacy structure, with public heritage sites for an underpass and art opportunities for an overpass.

Outside of the Olympics, the new highway crossing is desperately needed. Please consider adding a highway crossing to the Olympic Bid, and consider the improvements for the surrounding area as extensions of that. The Palliser lands are put in a precarious position with the impending growth, and by extension the Town of Canmore if the area’s pedestrian and cyclist routes are improved upon soon.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 65 of 132 Articles 11 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

Articles #1 Benchlands Trail Overpass, Google, 2018, https://goo.gl/zs4GmB

#2 Palliser Pedestrian Route, Google Maps, 2018, https://goo.gl/ocXrTB

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 66 of 132 Articles 12 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#3 Cyclist in Benchlands Trail Overpass, By Jessie Loucks, Aug 22, 2018

#4 Palliser Crossings Compilation, By Jessie Loucks, Photos Taken Between Aug 20 - Sept 26, 2018

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 67 of 132 Articles 13 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#5 Palliser Footpaths from Satellite, Google Maps, 2018, https://goo.gl/pUEDYT

#6 Pedestrian Overpass Terrible Photoshop 1, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 68 of 132 Articles 14 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#7 Pedestrian Overpass Terrible Photoshop 2, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

#8 Proposed Location of Pedestrian Overpass, Google, 2018, https://goo.gl/2A5QQP

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 69 of 132 Articles 15 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#9 Proposed Location of Pedestrian Underpass, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 70 of 132 Articles 16 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#10 Canmore Collegiate High school Routes, Google, 2018

#11 Improved Route to High school With Crossing, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 71 of 132 Articles 17 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#12 Mountain Ave & Hospital Place Improvements, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

#13 Pedestrian Roundabout, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 72 of 132 Articles 18 Palliser Highway Crossing Proposal by Jessie Loucks

#14 Mountain Ave & Bow Valley Trail, by Jessie Loucks, 2018

#15 Cougar Creek Pedestrian Underpass, Lombard North Group, 2010

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 73 of 132 From: Emma Lunder Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:08 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Support for Olympic Bid

To whom it may concern,

I am writing to express my total support for Canmore supporting Calgary's Olympic bid for the 2026 Games.

I am an athlete who moved to Canmore over 8 years ago, and have benefited immensely from the legacy of the '88 Olympic Games. I train at the Nordic Center ever single day, I've rented a room in Canmore ever since I moved here, I've been employed as a barista for the last 8 years, and volunteer with local organizations.

I truly believe hosting the 2026 Olympics creates opportunities and benefits for the next generation such as continuing to build healthy lifestyles and active living, job creation, and continuing the amazing culture we have here in Alberta. We will need to spend tax payer money regardless to do something to fix facilities, and it is a price-tag that is attached whether we go forward with the Olympics or not. Canmore benefited massively from the 1988 Olympics, and is now home to XC, Biathlon and Paralympic national teams, as well as having a world class Nordic Center for thousands of locals and visitors to enjoy every single year. The biggest impact for me is how the Olympics affects the youth of today - many kids will launch into lifelong physical activity because of inspiration coming from the Games, and by saying yes we guarantee amazing facilities for the next two decades to come. These games are a positive piece in Canmore's future, and will provide long term benefits to the town.

Thanks so much for taking the time to read this,

Emma Lunder Canadian Biathlete

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 74 of 132 October 29, 2018

I say no to pursuing the Olympic 2026 bid.

The money to host the 2026 Olympics would come from the municipal government, the Alberta provincial government and the Canadian federal government (plus 20% from the I.O.C.) Any of the above sources that have the word “government” in the name means that it is actually our money, the Canadian Tax Payers who will pay, thus increasing our debt. Is funding another Olympics really the best use of Canadians' tax dollars?

Calgary’s budget of $5.23-billion is likely vastly under estimated. According to the Globe and Mail the 2010 Winter Olympics cost more than $7-billion to stage. Here is a quote from Partisan Issues “the 2026 Calgary Winter Olympics will cost double what they say, if history is a guide”.

If Olympics were so lucrative, cities around the world would be aggressively vying for them, as they were pre-1988. This was before they learned the expensive “hosting” lesson. It was Calgary’s 4th bid attempt to finally get the Olympics in ‘88. Many western cities are now not allowing tax payers money to fund their city’s bid or the games.

I see that Canmore already made a decision to request provincial permission to increase our municipal debt. Increasing dept is not a good thing.

Respectfully submitted,

B.F. MacKenzie 546 Grotto Road Canmore, Alberta

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 75 of 132 No To Olympics 2026! In Calgary Canmore Edmonton Callaghan Valley (Vancouver?) * The opening and closing ceremonies - very costly! * Security – very costly! * Hosting I.O.C. very very costly! * Drug testing – a nightmare! * The Federal Government, Provinical Government and Municipal Government are already far in debt. * We already host numerous World Cup events in Winter Sport – Cross Country, Biathlon, Downhill, Speedskating, Figure Skating, Sliding sports, Skier Cross etc. * Canmore Town should budget and plan for infrastructure, housing and transportation requirements independent from Olympics. * Stay within our budget and do not borrow more! Respectfully submitted; Robin MacKenzie 546 Grotto Road Canmore, Alberta

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 76 of 132 From: Joanna McCallum Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 6:13 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Fwd: Just Say No - 2026 Olympics

From: doug

Date: October 27, 2018 at 6:10:27 PM MDT To: John Borrowman , , , , , , Subject: Fwd: Just Say No - 2026 Olympics

Dear Mayor Borrowman and Council

I am in total agreement with this letter and I would like to thank Robert Janes for a clear and succinct document of pure facts.

Because of business travel, I am not able to attend the remaining events this weekend.

Any thought that the simplicity of the games in Canmore in 1988 need to be cast aside, a serious reality check needs to be the rule in 2018.

As a local who has seen our valley and town explode with development, I believe sincerely, that a No Vote on the Olympics is the only answer

Douglas MacLean Box 8165 Canmore,AB.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

------Original message ------From: [email protected] Date: 2018-10-27 5:48 PM (GMT-05:00) To: John Borrowman , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Just Say No - 2026 Olympics

Dear Mayor and Council,

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 77 of 132 We are writing to express our complete opposition to the proposed 2026 Olympic Games in Canmore. There are far too many reasons underlying our opposition to include here, so in the interests of brevity, we highlight the following:

Sincerely,

Robert and Priscilla Janes

104 Prendergast Place Canmore, Alberta T1W 2N5, Canada Tel. 403-678-2117

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 78 of 132

3 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 79 of 132 From: Kim Manning Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 8:07 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: 2026 Olympics

Hi there

My question is in regard to infrastructure. Currently after every long weekend or holiday weekend those of us living in South Canmore are subjected to the smell of sewerage when the wind blows up valley. So if our sewer infrastructure cannot handle a long weekend what is in the plans to accommodate the pressure on the system from what will be about a month from even more people contributing to the system?

Thanks

Kim Manning

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 80 of 132 October 30, 2018

Your Worship and Members of Council:

As I prepare this submission it is not clear if the Calgary 2016 Bid will go forward. Should the bid continue, I believe it is prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the bid process for the following reasons:

 While it is unclear what direction the bid will take, hopefully the Town of Canmore can re-evaluate its direction as more substantial information becomes available.  The Nordic Centre, as a Provincial asset, will be used if the Bid is awarded. By being part of the bid process, Canmore has the opportunity for input to shape and manage the Games impacts on our community.  There will be economic benefits to our community from the Games. There will also be challenges that remain long after the Closing Ceremonies. The challenges and how they are managed will be critical to the long-term future of Canmore.

The issues related to the impact on taxpayers, housing affordability, and transportation raised at the Bid Co meeting are not exclusively associated with the Games.

The 1988 Games opened the World’s eyes to the beauty and opportunity of this area. We cannot put Pandora back in the box. Others will not want to come to this area to work, live and play as they have over the last thirty years. Council members today and in the future must determine the development direction for the community, ensuring there is adequate infrastructure, housing, amenities and transportation networks that make this a livable, safe community while preserving the nature green space and wildlife experiences.

The high cost of housing is not unique to Canmore. It is a product of both supply and demand. To make housing affordable density must be addressed. To deal with congestion and transportation, urban sprawl and long-term community planning must be addressed. These issues are with us even if the Calgary 2016 Games bid is successful.

Respectfully Deborah Mayberry 163 Morris, Canmore Alberta

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 81 of 132 From: Brian McKinlay Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 5:26 PM Cheryl To: Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

After attending the Calgary 2026 presentation at the Nordic Centre today, I strongly support Canmore's participation. The Olympics present such great opportunities for the local economy, affordable housing, and legacy sports facilities. Mary Morin's group presented a solid risk management plan to prevent potential overruns and taxpayer burden. I also like that Nakiska would get a major upgrade to encourage alpine skiing outside of the national park. I'd look forward to volunteering at the games - they would, as in '88, create a positive community spirit.

Brian McKinlay 609A 5 St, Canmore

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 82 of 132 “Non - stautory public hearing for the bid” Is it prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in a bid for the 2026 Olympic Games? In a word NO! Not only is it not prudent, it is foolish and extremely undemocratic for the Town Council of 7 individuals to make this decision on behalf of the 14,000 citizens. Not one of the council members mentioned this in their platform during the recent elections and although the Town is asking for public input they have stated that council alone will make the decision. Non statistically relevant figures have regularly been used to indicate public input and approval. For instance the input of 2000 residents of Calgary, Banff, Cochrane and Canmore in 2016 that showed broad support for the Bid represents less than 0.16% of the population; the phase one open house in Canmore hosted a mere 85 people and the on line survey only garnered 813 responses. These figures cannot be construed to indicate broad input or public support, but are more than likely an indication of support from special interest groups that stand to profit from the games being co-hosted here. The Town of Canmore, the City of Calgary, the Province of Alberta, and the Government of Canada are all in debt. The Province is forecasting a $71.1 billion debt for 2018, yet they announce $700 million available towards a potential 2026 Olympics. Canmore has $40 million debt and would have to increase its debt over mandated levels to achieve its budgeted participation. The roughly $30 million just for a bid could be spent in so many better ways, or, better yet, not spent. Albertans lead the country in consumer debt and Canadian households lead the world in debt. Recent polls show the majority of Canadians want a balanced budget, as do 70% of Albertans. Why then should tax payers \ spend $3 Billion on this project. The citizens of Stockholm got it right when they said no taxpayer funding would be provided for a Winter Olympic. I too watch the Olympics on TV and support the concept but only if taxpayers are not the funders. The University of Oxford recently published a paper (“Olympic Proportions: Costs and Cost Overruns at the Olympics 1960-2012”). I would urge everyone to read this academic paper, and many of the references included therein. The conclusions will probably not surprise anyone: budgets for Olympics are routinely overrun (average overrun close to 200%). The most recent Korea Olympics cost $13 Billion vs the budget of $7 Billion; the 2014 budget of $12 billion ended up costing $51 billion. The IOC requires that bid documents contain a guarantee that cost overruns will be paid by the host city and government. Canmore Town Council is potentially burdening future generations with massive tax hikes to fund the folly of an Olympics bid. Not mentioned in most of the budget figures is the ongoing costs after the Olympics. Sydney spends $30million per year to maintain rarely used facilities, South Korea expects to spend $8.5m/yr; China spends $10 m/year. Arthur McMullen, #1, 127 Carey, Canmore, Ab

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 83 of 132 From: Naia Noyes-West Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 6:38 PM To: Cheryl Hyde; Council Subject: olympics

What we know: An Olympic bid is very expensive

 The cost of the bid is $53 million  If we bid and do not get picked we do not get our money back  The hosting cost to Canmore would be $10 million, deepening our debt  The hosting cost to Calgary would be $3 million, deepening their debt  The hosting cost to the Provincial would be $700 million, deepening Alberta's debt  The above are explicit costs, they do not include implicit costs (aka: the where this money could be spent but will now be taken from instead: like education, health care, transit, the arts, affordable housing, parks and rec, cleaning up our tailings ponds, fixing the 65 year old environmental hazard/stranded asset we just purchased from Kinder Morgan, twining it, and placing environmental protection plans for it for $15 billion dollars, and helping our workforce transition to an economy that isn't dependent on the most volatile market in the world)

What we don't know. How big of a risk we are taking.

 If Calgarians will decide they want to bid  If Calgary will even get chosen to host  What the real cost will be. Every other Olympic host underestimated their costs  What the environmental impacts will be (or if we'll even be getting a proper environmental assessment given recent council decisions...)  What the social impacts will be  If the PAH will even be successful. For a case study, check out what happened to Vancouver's planned athletes village converted PAH.

I sure do hope someone is going AT LEAST do a simple calculation of those cost probabilities and share this information transparently with the public before we go ahead and make a completely uniformed decision based on our subjective perceptions of risk (because those are usually WAY OFF)

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 84 of 132 From: Stephanie O'Brien Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:35 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: John Borrowman; Ron Remple; Janet Nystedt; Norbert Meier Subject: YES2026 How long have you lived in Canmore?

Hello Cheryl, My letter is late - sorry. Steff

How long have you lived in Canmore? This is the most asked question by locals to settle community hierarchy.

Canmore is a desirable place to live, raise a family and own a business. Canmore will reach build out in the next 20-30 years (our lifetime) whether we have the Olympics or not. As such I believe the funding that comes with the Olympics would provide us with an opportunity to strategically examine all our priorities and needs at once. It would be nice to move the needle on a few capital projects which may not take place without this cashflow injection. Ron Remple's personal opinion does a great job of laying out the issues and economic development potential for the Town of Canmore. The current council and past council, made up of mostly the same individuals, have done more to positively impact our day to day life than many councils before them. I know they will make the right decision on November 6th for our town.

Oh, and I've been here since 1993.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 85 of 132

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 86 of 132 From: PATRICK OCONNOR Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 4:15 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: Council Subject: Non-statutory public hearing for the bid

Dear Town Council:

I don't believe the 2026 Winter Olympics can be or will be clean.

Every council member in Canmore and Calgary should watch this Academy Award winning documentary on blood doping in professional sports and at the Sochi Olympics by Russia. Russia has not taken responsibility for its blood doping at the Sochi Games.

New Trailer from Icarus (2017)

New Trailer from Icarus (2017) When Bryan Fogel sets out to uncover the truth about doping in sports, a chance meeting with a Russian scientist...

Alberta's own Becky Scott has resigned from WADA.

Beckie Scott resigns over reinstatement of Russia's anti-doping agency | CBC Sports

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 87 of 132

Beckie Scott resigns over reinstatement of Russia's anti-doping agency ... Canadian Olympic champion Beckie Scott has resigned from the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA) Compliance Re...

I was in Canmore for the 1988 Winter Olympics. It was one of the most inspirational experiences of my life, but I do not trust the Russians - or the Chinese for that matter - to compete fairly.

Furthermore, Canmore has already benefited from massive growth and now has house prices that are out of reach for most people who live and work in the Bow Valley.

We had our fun in '88. That's enough.

Patrick O'Connor, Banff, Alberta

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 88 of 132 From: Jon Olthuis Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 6:43 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: non-statutory public hearing for the bid

As a young millenial family living in the valley, we just wanted to mention several concerns about hosting the 2026 Olympics. This doesn't necessarily mean we are not supporters of the games, but we have trouble supporting the way the event is operated in recent games, mainly the excessive costs. In addition:

- The long-term benefit of legacy facilities left after the games could be offset by increased cost to operate and likely related taxes or usage fees. For example, it would be likely the Nordic Centre fees would either increase, or the deficit to operate.

- The pace of change and growth in the valley is already quite rapid, and with a bid, this pace could increase. We appreciate the benefits of growth in the Valley, but are always concerned that the pace can make it difficult to properly assess all impact of the growth

- With the increased cost of carbon, we have concern that all infrastructure and operations costs could be more expensive by the time the Olympics arrive in 2026.

Thanks for your time,

Jon & Stephanie Olthuis

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 89 of 132 From: Terry O Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 6:42 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid - Vote Against

Thank you for letting me submit our opinion. We are both of the opinion that Canmore should not engage in hosting the Olympics due to the potential of been responsible for any cost over runs or shortages in funding. Currently the Province of Alberta and the federal government are running high deficits and any funding should be going to pay down that debt. The Town of Canmore I believe has 40 million dollars of debentures they have to pay off and any added debt will have to be paid for by residents of Canmore. It may be rosie to think of all the benefits that may come with the Olympics but I think their days are done especially with the cost of them.

Terry & Fay O'Reilly 308 - 701 Benchlands Trail Canmore, AB T1W 3G9

403.675.7113

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 90 of 132 From: Alain Parent Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:51 PM Cheryl To: Hyde Subject: Olympics in Canmore

I am strongly in favour of having the Olympics come back to Canmore. We are a community perfectly suited to host nordic sports.

Even if you don't like sports, the town stand to greatly benefit from hosting the games for many reasons, notably for the transfer of the Olympic village into low cost housing.

--- Alain Parent

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 91 of 132 Speaking Notes for October 30th Canmore Council Forum

• Good afternoon your Worship, members of Council, thank you for inviting us here tonight. My name is Casey Peirce. I live in Canmore and volunteer with the YES 2026 Canmore Committee. I believe that it is prudent for Canmore to host the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games in partnership with Calgary in 2026.

• It’s a challenge to choose just one way that the Games will benefit our community, however as a person who takes the Roam bus route 3 every day from Canmore to my office in Banff and back, I would like to discuss congestion, transit and parking.

• I think we’ve all cringed when seeing people running across the TCH to get from Palliser lands to the centre of town. Creating safe and efficient ways for residents to connect with downtown must be a priority. Town administration has said a pedestrian overpass is urgently required and I agree. Hosting the 2026 Games will help achieve that through bid based dedicated infrastructure funding to support a project that we already know we need to build. This external funding only comes to us if we bid for the Games, otherwise the costs are all on the tax payer. Why would we say no to funding that we need that will keep our costs down for a project that we have to build?

• The future of parking and transit in Canmore must be based on a vision that balances more pedestrian friendly access with ways to get people out of their vehicles. The recent partnerships between towns and transit organizations in the Bow Valley have already resulted in excellent mass transit options that deliver to the majority of key destinations in town and in the mountains. This is an excellent first step in encouraging more environmentally responsible and sustainable ways to travel, but we have a long way to go, and the Games can help us get there.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 92 of 132 • There are many opportunities, revenue tools and partner funding that come along with an Olympic and Paralympic bid. For example, everyone can agree that the Canada Line train from the Vancouver airport downtown is an excellent addition to the city and is lauded as a success that came out of the Games in 2010. But did you know that it was not even a part of their official Games bid plan? The Canada Line was a partner funded initiative on the side that came about because Vancouver leveraged the Games for private funding that the tax payers would have eventually been on the hook for to get that project done.

• I think we all know that transit is a critical piece to solving congestion issues that all popular destinations face. This is just an example of the type of projects that might be possible if we move forward with open minds, facts, vision and a plan to use those extra revenue tools that come with voting yes to pursuing an Olympic and Paralympic Games bid.

• During the Games themselves there will be great opportunities to enhance the way people move through our community. Intercept parking, shuttles and mass transit from Calgary will allow patrons to experience our region in an environmentally responsible and sustainable way that limits congestion and leaves a lasting legacy for our community for decades to come.

• The lasting legacy piece is critical as the Town of Canmore is currently planned to reach a buildout of a population of approximately 30,000. As has been stated already, the future is indeed coming, and people are coming with it whether or not we host a Games. How often have we seen growing municipalities wait too long to plan and implement their transportation strategies?

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 93 of 132 • The 2026 Games are a chance for Canmore to develop a strong transit plan to be prepared not only for the visitors that the Games bring, but for the future community flow of the planned developments, for those of us who live here now and our children and grandchildren who will continue to live here well past 2026.

• For this and many more reasons we are hearing tonight, it is extremely prudent for Canmore to support Calgary in their efforts to bid for the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games.

• Thank you

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 94 of 132

“The Olympic Agenda 2020”, a NEW Mandate ratified by IOC and how it relates to the 2026 Winter Olympic Games

Should we now have Faith in the IOC? The World believes there has been such corruption in the past decades by the IOC executive, that it is irreversible.

Consequently “The Olympic Agenda 2020” has been prepared and voted on by IOC members. It is a long document, and takes many hours to digest! Assuredly not high on your list of research regarding changes to future Olympics and specifically the 2026 Olympic Games, to be hosted by Calgary and Canmore.

The Olympic Agenda Incorporates 40 recommendations which the IOC believe initiates: Transparency Sustainability Flexibility and Legacy towards the Olympic Movement.

After reviewing 40 proposed rules and by-laws written in the Olympic Agenda 2020 report, the Evaluation Committee then presented it to the IOC for approval. This is what the IOC now represents according to the 40 rules and bylaws, ratified by the IOC.

Pre the Olympics, The Olympic Agenda 2020 report shall include an assessment of the opportunities and risks of EACH Candidature – for the 2026 Olympics, these now include: Calgary, Stockholm and Milan. The primary and the main focus above all, is to reduce costs of the Olympics, provide transparency and sustainability (to be discussed later) and to reinforce flexibility of the Olympic games – including Internal Management.

The IOC, due to the unprecedented high construction costs of Olympic facilities, now states that they specifically prefer host cities to have pre-built Olympic venues, therefore reducing capital costs, and preventing overtures. Calgary and Canmore, thanks to the 1988 Winter Olympics, has constructed and maintained 85% of its Olympic venues over the past 30 years. Our facilities in Canmore and Calgary have hosted numerous successful World Cups, national, provincial, regional and municipal competitions and events at these facilities, training 1000’s of young athletes. The Legacy of the 1988 Olympics has provided much needed revenue and continued training facilities and events for all athletes. This is reflected in the increasing number of medals awarded to Canada over the past 30 years; from 5 medals and 12th place in the 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics, to 29 medals and 3rd place in South Korea, this past February (2018).

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 95 of 132

-2- Calgary and Canmore would have to build only a few facilities to host the 2026 Olympic games. Very much approved by the IOC is housing for athletes in Calgary and Canmore, both to provide much needed affordable housing after the Olympics. In Canmore, 242 housing units, to host athletes and coaches would be built in the next 6 years, after the Olympics these would be sold as affordable housing, with the average cost at approximately $294,000 per unit.

THE IOC has also endorsed Canmore to host the 2026 Paralympics, scheduled immediately after the Olympics. For this, a 5000 seat venue will be built in Canmore for Olympic Medal ceremonies and to host cultural, and other celebratory activities. This will also remain as a permanent facility.

The other venue needed and approved is a community mid-sized arena, with a hockey rink to be build in the Foothills cluster of venues in Calgary.

The fact there are so many lasting legacy venues in Calgary and Canmore from1988, truly impressed the IOC, they have visited 9 times, at their own cost!

A major concern to all athletes, coaches and visitors to the Olympics is the subject of doping, in affect, cheating by many country’s athletes. The IOC in their 2020 mandate expresses the need to “Honour Clean Athletes!”

They want to strengthen their support for these non-doping athletes, as well, known cheating by team officials.

The IOC will contribute $10 Million to communicate the risks or, “Match-fixing” and any kind of manipulation and/or related corruption.

A further $10 Million will be added to support projects offering a NEW Scientific approach to anti-doping. Previously, the anti-doping policy was the only mandate listed.

Now the new IOC Mandate includes – “To protect clean athletes, and the integrity of sport, by leading the fight against doping, and by taking action against all forms of manipulation of competition and related corruption.”

Another much needed rule added to the document regards post-game medal disqualification.

A FORMAL ceremony will now be organized and held at the Olympic Games, for Medal winners to receive Gold, Silver or Bronze medals following the disqualification of competitors. There will also be “proper communication” during the ceremony of all those parties concerned.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 96 of 132

-3- Further, “The IOC will also work with the International Federation to achieve 50% female participation in the Olympic Games in future, and they also hope to stimulate women’s participation and involvement in sport by creating more opportunities for women before and during the Olympic Games.”

In the1988 Winter Olympics, of the 1423 athletes, there were 1122 men and only 301 female athletes. Imagine, with the insight of the IOC’s 2020 Agenda we could have as many as 1466 female athletes, and in the Paralympics, as many as 375 females athletes.

FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY – Another legendary world concern regards assets received and expenditures made by the IOC!

According to the 2020 Agenda Brief, “The financial statements of the IOC are to be prepared and audited according to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) EVEN if these higher standards are legally not required from the IOC.”

Going further, the IOC has opted to produce an annual activity and financial report, INCLUDING the allowance policy for EACH IOC member.

The IOC also wishes to develop a further CULTURAL LEGACY as well, through monitoring and evaluation of cultural elements by various Olympic Organizations who will then report back to the IOC.

An example would be: Indigenous participation during the 2026 Olympics, likely organized with dialogue and performances from all areas of Alberta with the support of Indigenous leaders. Also proposed would be more displays of local, as well as Canadian artwork and music, to be enjoyed; during, pre and post Olympics.

There is also a discussion by the IOC to develop an “Artist-in-Residence Program, to engage a steady authentic interaction with the global cultural players.” This too, the IOC feels, would further enhance a dynamic legacy.

A developmental study is also proposed by the IOC to host an Olympic House at the games “to welcome the general public to engage in dialogue with the Olympic Movement.” Again, another noticeable sign of transparency and growth by the IOC.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 97 of 132 -4- As well, the IOC will study a new concept, an “Olympic Museum on the Move”, to introduce Olympic Culture to the Public – The Torch Relay, live sites, and the Cultural Olympiad. This would travel the world to help people better understand the Olympic Movement.

Perhaps the biggest movement by the IOC away from direct sport, is to plan and create a “LAUREL OLYMPIC AWARD” for outstanding contribution to “Olympism”. That person, or organization, would be awarded for profoundly influencing the Culture, Education, Development and Peace of the Olympics. This outstanding award would be presented at each Olympic Games.

One of the most important details of The Olympic Agenda 2020 is the establishment of “the IOC Ethics Commission to review the Code of Ethics and its Rules of Procedure to be fully aligned with the Olympic Agenda 2020’s drive for more transparency, good governance and accountability.”

The IOC will contribute $1.2 Billion to the 2026 Olympic Games. It is possible, if ticket sales, merchandising and television contracts – which the IOC control - are higher than expected, that Calgary and Canmore will receive even more from the IOC.

An Olympic Television Channel will also be investigated by the IOC. This channel would document and televise the history of the Olympics, as well as featuring year-round presentation of past and present Olympic games.

So perhaps the real question is when there are so many positive changes being implemented by the IOC for improvement at future Olympic games, which would incorporate our communities of Calgary and Canmore. Do we really want to give $1.2 Billion back to the IOC if we are chosen to host the 2026 Winter Olympic Games.

-30-

Heather Peirce 403 678-4253 403 688-4253 cell

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 98 of 132 From: Suzanne Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 6:13 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: NO to Olympcs/Paralympics bid

I have now attended both the NOCalgary public meeting Oct. 24, and the Olympic Bidco meeting today.

I love the Olympics - but it is not the games it used to be. The world, too, has changed.

I have been a spectator at summer and winter Olympics. I have helped financially support a local Olympic athlete. I have watched countless hours of Olympic tv. And if Calgary/Canmore hosts the 2026 Olympics/Paralympics, I will volunteer, and offer my house free to lower income families of Olympic athletes.

But I am "voting" NO to hosting the Olympics/Paralympics in Calgary/Canmore, because:

The Olympics are mostly for the elite (athletes and spectators), and have historically displaced many hundreds of thousands of people who lived in poverty- both to create space for venues, and to "cleanse" the host cities of the "unsightly" homeless. Historically, the Olympics have not consistently left a legacy of more/better net housing for those who need it. The doping issue is not resolved, nor has the IOC shown an appetite to assertively tackle the problem. Such events increase greenhouse gases, and thus contribute to climate change, by far the most serious problem the world currently faces. Deforestation has also been associated with the Olympics- including the most recent winter ones in South Korea. Cost overruns, typically covered by taxpayers of host locales, cannot be accurately foreseen nor prevented.

Please vote AGAINST hosting the 2026 Olympics/Paralympics.

Sincerely, Suzanne Perkins, 205 Trapper Rise, Canmore

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 99 of 132 From: Gretchen Perla Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:44 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic bid

Just to say that I’ve been a longtime resident and taxpayer of Canmore for 40+ years and I am opposed to Canmore participating in the 2026 Olympic Bid. As Canmore has grown, the Olympics has grown. I fear there would be too much disruption for our town. I’m sure there are many who see $ signs but I am not one of them. We must realistically face the fact that Canmore cannot support more tourists. It is already difficult to negotiate downtown most weekends. Many residents enjoy the Nordic Center as a recreation venue. Let’s keep it that way.

Gretchen

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 100 of 132 Is it prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the City of Calgary’s bid to cohost the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games?

by Ron Perla

October 29, 2018

I am a recreational xc-skier. I have a strong emo- resources which otherwise could have been used to tional attachment to the Canmore Nordic Centre. It improve and maintain the 1988 trails. is one of the main reasons I live in Canmore. At the same time, Nordic Centre management be- Well before the 1988 Olympics several of us cleared gan to respond more and more to special interest and set track on the upper service road to the Walker groups interested in competitive events rather than mine. Kananaskis Manager, Bob Reynolds, told recreational skiing. A good example is snow-making us the Province was considering as one option to priority. In order to host early season competitive use those mine lands for the 1988 xc-events . The events, snow-making on the highly popular, recre- other options were Bragg Creek and even Calgary. ational Banff Trail is often delayed, sometimes until We wrote letters in support of the Canmore option. late in December. We were delighted when Canmore became the 1988 Russia and S. Korea both ran xc events on short venue. loops in front of large stadium areas. China will do In 1988, there were no sprint events. Don Gardner the same. In 2026, the short loop approach will con- designed long loops up to 15 km, ideal for both com- tinue for the benefit of fixed spectators. To meet this petitive and recreational skiing. Competitors looped trend, the next Olympic iteration at the Nordic Cen- thru the stadium no more than twice. Many spec- tre will require the construction of a large stadium tators chose to spread out from the stadium, around plus improved logistics for the press. This has noth- the course between viewpoints. We were left with a ing to do with recreational skiing. fine legacy of 10 and 15 km trails for both recreational Are Olympic games the only way to fund the ex- skiing and competitive skiing. The Special 15 km Red isting Nordic Centre? No, it is not the only way Trail would challenge today’s best skiers. The steep to bring in funds, nor should it be. No one knows climbing relay loops were also ahead of their time in who will host future Olympics. My point is that the terms of difficulty. Nordic Centre must plan for funding independent of There was a good balance between recreational and Olympic funding which may or may not materialize competitive skiing. I proudly purchased the Nordic in the foreseeable future. Centre’s first season pass. This recreational skier cannot support yet another Then things started to change. XC events began to large scale, Nordic Centre construction project which include an increasing number of short sprints. Even will emphasize spectator and press facilities, and long distance races were expected to pass thru the which will further pull away from the nice balance stadium multiple times for the benefit of spectators between recreational and competitive skiing we had no longer allowed on the course. The Nordic Centre in 1988. superimposed a confusing maze of short, steep loops which compromised strongly Don Gardner’s 1988 design. Construction of this new maze used precious

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 101 of 132 From: Scott Perras Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:52 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

Hi,

Former athlete here, emailing in support of a Calgary Olympic bid.

Cheers,

Scott

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 102 of 132 October 29, 2018

The Honourable John Borrowman and Members of Council Town of Canmore [email protected] ; [email protected]

re: Potential Olympic bid

Dear Mayor Borrowman and Members of Council:

Thank you for this opportunity to contribute to the Town’s deliberations regarding Calgary’s proposed bid to host the 2026 Winter Games. We would have preferred a more meaningful public plebiscite, but knowing that Council and Administration will seriously consider submitted comments and thoroughly respond to posed questions is reassuring for now.

Social, economic and environmental impacts, as well as the process of analysis and consideration, are of primary importance. But everything hinges on the financial details. When we consider how benefits might be measured, how impacts might be mitigated, who benefits, who pays and other economic questions, it is clear that a sound, transparent and reliable financial picture is absolutely essential to reach a responsible decision.

But history has shown that the costs of “bidding” on, hosting, and paying for Olympic games is anything but sound, transparent and reliable.

Central to Canmore’s participation in the Olympic bid process is that anticipation that we would benefit from—among other things—a number of “affordable” housing units. We concur that the Town and local employers should work toward providing truly perpetually affordable housing (PAH). But we are not convinced that the speculative Olympic bid provides a reliable avenue toward that goal.

According to a very reputable study by the Said Business School of the University of Oxford, winter games held since 1960 have suffered cost over-runs averaging 142 percent (See https://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/6195/1/2016-20.pdf for the entire study.) Promoters of the 2026 bid and public officials in Canmore and Calgary want to reassure us “it can’t happen here” (or in Montreal, apparently; see below). Likely citizens of Lake Placid (1980 - 324% cost overrun), Lillehammer (1994 - 277% cost overrun), Salt Lake City (2002 - 24% cost overrun), Sochi (2014 - 289% cost overrun) and other locales were fed much of the same empty promise. Vancouver did a little better in 2010 limiting cost overruns to 13%, ultimately coming in at US$2.54 billion. But even Calgary’s 1988 games came in at 65 percent over budget.

Yes, it CAN happen here. And it WILL. Perpetually unaffordable Olympics likely will not provide perpetually affordable housing.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 103 of 132

We are reminded of the famous boast of then mayor of Montreal Jean Dapreau after that city secured the 1976 summer games: "The Montreal Olympics can no more have a deficit, than a man can have a baby." Costs for the Montreal games soared into the stratosphere, eventually reaching a record 760 percent overrun that took three decades to repay. (See https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-s-big- owe-stadium-debt-is-over-1.602530 .) There is no reporting of how many Montreal men had babies over those 30 years.

The Oxford University goes on to caution us:

“Unfortunately, Olympics officials and hosts often misinform about the costs and cost overruns of the Games. … deliberate misinformation of the public about cost and cost overrun treads a fine line between spin and outright lying. It is unethical, no doubt, but very common. We can therefore not count on organizers and governments to provide us with reliable information about the real costs and cost overruns of the Olympic Games. … However, in the Games the budget is more like a fictitious minimum that is consistently overspent. Further, even more than in other megaprojects, each budget is established with a legal requirement for the host city and country government to guarantee that they will cover the cost overruns of the Games. Our data suggest the guarantee is akin to writing a blank check for the event, with certainty that the cost will be more than what has been quoted. In practice, the bid budget is really more of a down payment than it is a budget, with further installments to be paid later. (See https://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/6195/1/2016-20.pdf at p. 2 and p. 14.)

Sobering words indeed. At least they ought to be.

Certainly not every Olympic promotion is “spin” or “outright lying.” We can and do expect better from colleagues in Canmore and Calgary. But is important to appreciate that, even with the most rigorous analysis and good-faith projections, we can expect the unexpected. And the unexpected seldom surprises us by coming in under budget.

There can be no doubt that Canmore’s expected benefits will suffer as costs exceed expectations, projections encounter reality, and dollars allocated to athlete housing dwindle and dwindle. And who will be left to pick up the bills and IOUs? Canmore property tax payers!

We fully understand that financial projections can be challenging. And these projections are even more difficult in light of budgets of Olympian proportions, the heavy hand of the International Olympic Committee (which protects itself to the detriment of all other parties), the shocking history of cost overruns, and the involvement of other players beyond the Town’s control.

Since fair housing is good for the entire Canmore community, we all should be asked to invest in an effort to secure perpetually affordable housing projects. Likely we can come up with a sound and reasonable estimate of land and construction costs (including margins of error) to be completed in time for the 2026 games. And Canmore should commit $10 million (land and cash), bind Calgary 2026 for their share of the

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 104 of 132 costs ($42 million as we understand it), develop a conservative estimate and timetable to rent and/or sell the projected PAH units.

We believe there is a simple solution to the conundrum of reconciling Olympic enthusiasm with fiscal reality. Instead of forcing obligating all Canmore residents to shoulder this costly risk (particularly since we have had no direct say in the outcome), why not ask only those supporting the Olympic 2016 bid to bear the full risks of cost overruns. Why not?

Canmore residents could be liable for published projected costs carrying minimal risk only. Those who wish to stick their necks out even father could incorporate, raise additional funds, secure bonds and assume risks beyond the agreed-upon budget. Likely there are businesses and individuals eager to support Calgary’s 2026 bid in this way.

Finally, in considering Canmore’s potential participation in the bid process and assumption of debt and risk, we urge you to consider the following issues and questions:

1) Costs already are above projected costs (and very likely to ride). But, at last count, Ottawa can’t afford more. Edmonton can’t afford more. Calgary can’t afford more. So, how much “more” can Canmore afford? 2) Have we secured adequate professional skills to manage the fiscal analysis, projections, probabilities, and margins of error involved in this decision? These Olympic bid issues are orders of magnitude larger and more complex that what Canmore is accustomed to. Who is crunching the numbers? 3) Canmore seems at or above “capacity” now. Services are stretched. Surrounding lands are at the breaking point. Do we need another global sporting event to put us “on the map?” 4) What other financial needs and obligations will be foregone or delayed when debt and investments are committed to the Olympic bid? (Conversely, how will a reasonable estimate of projects and costs benefit our Community’s bottom line?) 5) Certain local businesses might benefit from Olympic visitor traffic, but, under current policies, the Town will see NO additional tax revenue from hosting these games. Business pay property tax only. Unlike some other jurisdictions, we have no hotel room tax or other mechanism to generate direct revenue from our tourism-based economy. Bottom line: all taxpayers assume the risk and pay the debts; but only select businesses reap the benefits. Hardly equitable, is it? 6) Once we let this genie out of the bottle, there is no way to get it back in. An accepted Olympic bid is a legally-binding obligation.

Thank you for considering our input. We look forward to a decision that provides benefits across our entire community.

Sincerely,

Jim & Valerie Pissot 155 Benchlands Terrace Canmore, AB T1W 1G2 403.609.9958

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 105 of 132 From: Mimi Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 2:37 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Opinion

Just a brief note regarding the “non – statutory public hearing for the bid”. I am unable to attend in person, so am weighing in here as advised by a Town of Canmore notification in the Outlook.

I have listened to arguments on both sides of this issue yet stand strongly opposed to hosting events for the 2026 Olympics. The potential gains as outlined by the “yes” camp are no compensation for the fallout of bringing more pressure to this valley. Let’s put wildlife and our planet’s needs first. All the added attention that the games would bring would have a profound effect jeopardizing our quality of life.

It’s too big of a risk to take.

Build, build, build, and spend, spend, spend is not the answer in these times of crucial planetary changes. Let’s be a change agent and not be driven by monetary reasons.

This is for “The Love of Canmore”.

Sincerely, Mimi Pothaar 403‐678‐4904

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 106 of 132 From: Randy Pothaar Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 9:57 AM Cheryl Hyde To: Olympics Subject:

Do not want Olympics. Canmore is all ready maxed out.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 107 of 132 From: Sarah Purchase Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:24 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

Good afternoon,

I do hope to attend the public hearing tonight, but I imagine it will be a packed house, so passing on my support for Canmore's involvement in the 2026 bid via email is likely more efficient.

I am a relatively new resident of Canmore, but after two years of living hear and being able to purchase a PAH unit, I believe the injection of funding from the IOC, the federal government and the province will have a positive impact of residents of the Town. The proposed infrastructure upgrades, including: accessibility and connectivity; improved intersections; refurbishment of the Nordic Centre; steep creek flood mitigation, and affordable housing, will improve life in the valley on a quicker timeline than would have otherwise occurred. Most of this funding will go elsewhere if we don't bid and win. It would go to another host country (the IOC money) or another province hosting an international sporting event (the federal money). The infrastructure improvements need to be addressed at some point, and turning down a large portion of the funding from outside sources would be a poor decision.

The injection of Canadian spirit in the Calgary/Canmore area would be a great addition as well. Especially in Canmore, there is a large population of young people who are here temporarily. Creating a tight knit community here is tough, a network of volunteers to welcome the world's athletes and spectators would be a fantastic way to improve and add to community building initiatives already underway.

Thank you, Sarah Purchase

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 108 of 132 From: Bonnie Rawlyck Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 3:25 PM To: Cheryl Hyde; Council Subject: Non-statutory public hearing for the Olympic bid

Dear Ms Hyde and Town Council, Canmore,

We would like to submit our opinion that it would not be prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the City of Calgary's bid to co‐host the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic games. We feel that the positive aspects of hosting the 2026 Olympics will be significantly overshadowed by the uncertainty of the financial burden on the Town, as any over expenditures are typically borne by the hosts.

Historical review of previous Olympics confirm that projected costs were underestimated when compared with the final bill for the games. In addition there may well be costs, primarily security costs, that are simply unknowable at this stage of the bidding process. We do not need potentially onerous levels of debt to be piled on existing liabilities to fund a short term extravaganza.

Today Canmore is recognized world wide as a thriving and growing mountain town. We do not need the Olympics to confirm our status. Canmore currently provides an excellent venue for World Cup and other events. Our efforts and funds should be directed to preserving the local environment both for visitors and wildlife, with expansion of the Town handled in a gradual, considered manner.

Thank you,

Bonnie and Jack Rawlyck Canmore

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 109 of 132 October 29, 2018

Ms. Cheryl Hyde Municipal Clerk Town of Canmore Via email: [email protected]

Dear Ms. Hyde:

Unfortunately, as we are committed to a fundraising event in Calgary on October 30th (in support of the Alberta Alpine Ski Association, which is based in Canmore), we are unable to attend the Town Council Public Hearing.

We did want to share our support for the 2026 Games bid and our belief that hosting the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games will provide an extensive and broad legacy for our entire community.

Others can speak more eloquently about Games operations and investment. Our focus is sport, day-today, year over year, with athletes from our community, from our province and our country. These athletes, volunteers, officials and families are engaged every year in programs, teams and events that operate every year. They represent our community and many have the privilege of representing our country internationally. Every year. For the past 30 years since the 1988 Games.

The impact of 1988 has been and continues to be enormous. We see it visibly in the annual World Cup races at Lake Louise and the many national and provincial events run at the Canmore Nordic Centre and Nakiska. The volunteers and officials, many who were attracted to sport through the events leading up to and including 1988, are well-trained and in many cases international experts in timing, race administration, event management – and they are volunteers, not paid professionals. Their expertise is called upon across Canada and around the world – as volunteers – to help in the staging of events.

This tremendous legacy is the foundation of Canada’s international success. And it is a compelling reason to host in 2026, so we can renew this legacy of investment in people. To ensure we have the human resources to continue to stage great events at the Canmore Nordic Centre and Lake Louise and Nakiska, and the many other venues in our region.

Not enough focus is given to the human resources of sport. The athletes are visible and should be our primary focus. To provide the critical support for our athletes - current and future – is acknowledging and supporting the hundreds of volunteers who generously give the precious asset of their time to lead and support the many sport events at all levels that are run every single year in the Bow Valley.

Linking a U14 (athletes under the age of 14) alpine ski race at Nakiska with the Games may be a stretch for some. But not when considering the venue was built for the 1988 Games, was upgraded in 2006 with guidance from the provincial and national sport organizations and the many officials running these and many other events gained critical experience while training for 1988 – in timing systems, officials courses, coaching development and certification – all which require continuous upgrading over the past 30 years.

The Games bid for 2026 represents an enormous opportunity for our community and our country. It represents a positive vision that can inspire our youth and motivate our region to shine. Let’s not miss this opportunity to demonstrate leadership and vision, to inspire a generation and the world.

Yours sincerely,

Lynda & Ken Read 203 Benchlands Terrace CANMORE, Alberta T1W 1G1

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 110 of 132 Town of Canmore Mayor and Council 902 7th Ave Canmore, AB, T1W 3K1 Oct 30, 2018

Re: Public Hearing on 2026 Olympic Bid

I think that it is prudent for Canmore to participate in the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (OPWG).

Canmore is already an attractive place to live and to visit…with or without the games. Our maximum footprint has already been determined and our growth will reach a population of approximately 30,000 people. We have known this and have been planning for this since at least 1998. We also know that Alberta is growing, and Calgary is growing…this means that visitors and tourists to Canmore will increase. Growth in our population and tourists visiting Canmore will happen whether or not the Olympic games occur here in 2026.

I believe that we can use the games to obtain some key assets and tools to manage the growth that we will see. In my opinion, the top 3 legacy assets and tools that we need to proactively pursue through participating in the 2026 Olympics are: • Affordable housing. If we are able to leverage the Olympic Games to get 240+ units of affordable housing for Canmore residents, that would be a significant benefit for the community. If we can get a $116 million community asset for $4 million cash investment, I think that is a very wise use of funds. To put the housing in the CCHC- owned land on Palliser Trail would require two additional legacy assets needed by the community: o Flood mitigation o Pedestrian overpass over the Trans-Canada Highway • Upgrade the Canmore Nordic Centre. This legacy asset has had a significant impact on our community since the 1988 Olympics. By upgrading the CNC and keeping it current, we will enjoy this for decades, and future generations will have the opportunity to learn to love cross country skiing. • Long-term funding model. When Whistler was announced as the Mountain Host for the 2010 Olympics, the Resort Municipality status was expanded. This allowed Whistler to cover their costs for the games, and provided enhanced funding for marketing and infrastructure for the future of the municipality. I know that Canmore has been lobbying the Province for a similar funding model, and hosting the Olympics is a prime opportunity for that to be fulfilled.

There are other benefits to the community that we can proactively pursue by hosting the 2026 OPWG. In my opinion, these include: • Economic Development. I think there are at least two key issues.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 111 of 132 o Hosting winter sport events can diversify the existing tourism marketing. Summer in Canmore is already “full”. Winter tourism is where our growth potential is. We don’t need to attract any more tourists in the summer months. However, we do have capacity in the winter, which will keep our local businesses profitable through more of the year. o Increasing the broadband capacity in Canmore. The Town is already considering how to implement the Broadband strategy that has recently been developed. Hosting the Olympics can be used to create partnerships to implement increased broadband, which would benefit existing residents and businesses in Canmore, and attract new businesses that require higher bandwidth. • Accessibility. Hosting the Olympic and Paralympic games will give Canmore the opportunity to build upon its reputation as a welcoming and accessible place for athletes with disability to live, train, compete and enjoy a healthy mountain lifestyle. Canmore has recently hosted two Para-nordic World Cups that have been wildly successful on all fronts. The 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, through its strategic investments can enhance this legacy and set Canmore up as the most accessible mountain town in the world. This would be a lasting legacy and a cornerstone to Canmore being known as an inclusive and welcoming community for all. • Transit. The future of parking and transit in Canmore is based on a vision that balances more pedestrian and bike friendly access with ways to get people out of their vehicles. The recent partnerships between towns and transit organizations in the Bow Valley have already resulted in excellent mass transit options that deliver to the majority of key destinations in town and in the mountains. This is an excellent step in encouraging more environmentally and sustainable ways to travel, but we have a long way to go, and the Games can help us get there. There are many opportunities, revenue tools and partner funding that come along with an Olympic and Paralympic bid. For example, the Canada Line train from the Vancouver airport to downtown Vancouver is an excellent addition to that city and is lauded as a success that came out of the 2010 Games. But did you know that it was not even a part of their official Games bid plan? The Canada Line was a partner funded initiative on the side that came about because they leveraged the Games for external funding to build. This is just an example of the type of projects that could be possible if we move forward with open minds, facts, vision and a plan to use the revenue tools that come with voting yes to pursuing an Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games bid.

Ron Remple Canmore, AB [email protected]

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 112 of 132 From: Hal Retzer Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 12:53 PM To: John Borrowman; Rob Seeley; Jeff Hilstad; Esme Comfort; Karen Marra; Joanna McCallum; Vi Sandford Cc: Cheryl Hyde Subject: It isn't 1988 Anymore - Canmore Doesn't Need the 2026 Olympics

Dear Mayor and Council:

In the early 1980’s, Canmore was struggling with the recent closure of the coal mining industry. Back then, putting Canmore “on the map” with the 1988 Olympics seemed like a good idea.

Today, Canmore does not need to be “put on the map” by hosting another Olympics. Canmore has been well and truly discovered. Any more showcasing of Canmore will result in more people wanting to move or have second homes here, more expensive housing, busier streets and more pressure on our natural spaces and surrounding wildlife. We are at capacity already.

Using the Olympics to leverage more affordable housing and to obtain Resort Municipality Status seems like a good idea; however, the risks of even more upward pressure on the cost‐of‐living and the financial risk of hosting the Olympics does not seem worth it. Surely we can come up with other creative ways to obtain Resort Municipality Status and more PAH?

Please say “no” to hosting the 2026 Olympics.

Sincerely, Hal Retzer 513‐4 Street Canmore

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 113 of 132 From: Dave Rodney Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:39 PM To: Eleanor Miclette ; Dave Rodney Subject: Hello Eleanor: I heard the mayor suggest people forward a copy of their speech; & I am happy to offer mine (within the text below). Do you know who this could be forwarded to? Please advise; & have a great night! :) . DR

Town of Canmore Olympics Public Hearing October 30, 2018, 5 PM

Good evening, everyone: my name is Dave Rodney, & I am honoured to serve as the Executive Director of “Tourism Canmore Kananaskis”, or “TCK”.

I would like to begin by thanking you all for this opportunity to offer feedback on the question: “is it prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the City of Calgary’s bid to co-host the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games?”

In a word, I believe the answer is a resounding “yes”…for many reasons: including that the bid is extremely responsible from a financial perspective;

> & that hosting the world is exactly what the people of Calgary, Canmore, the Kananaskis, Alberta, & Canada need right now

…in realms that go far beyond the monetary aspect.

A short time ago, a 10 year old boy —who happens to be our son— asked me if we would ever see the Olympics again.

I told him that since the Winter & Summer Games were now staggered, we can witness the Olympics every two years.

He said he already knew that; but went on to note—rather astutely— that since he was born, the Games have been held in: China, England, Russia, & South Korea;

…& that in the future, they are scheduled for Japan, France, & again in China.

He was quick to point out that he only remembers the Vancouver & Rio Games, …since he was in “his bed sleeping” during all of the other Olympics.

He makes a very good point: the Western Hemisphere is overdue to host again; & not just for the advertising revenue!

From the local perspective, by the time 2026 rolls around, it will have been almost four decades since Alberta hosted the Games.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 114 of 132 An entire generation has NOT personally witnessed the greatest sporting event in the history of our planet;

…& other host cities & regions far beyond us have been putting THEIR name on the map…ever since 1988.

It is high time that we remind the world of who we are & what we can offer!

From the Tourism perspective, the benefits are NOT just in the weeks of the Olympics & Paralympics; far from it!

…the benefits will be enjoyed for all of the years BEFORE 2026, & also in the years that follow.

Vancouver/Whistler has posted double digit increases in tourism every year since 2010; & that is exactly what Canmore Kanananaskis needs—in the winter.

At TCK, we are tasked with finding the holy grail: —increasing tourism—from Thanksgiving to Victoria Day

…so that we can offer visitors incredible experiences in all four seasons; during which they can learn about, enjoy, & treasure Canmore Kananaskis… just like we do.

…& at the same time, ensuring employees year-round work, so they can truly make this their family home.

But that is becoming increasingly difficult, as affordable housing becomes harder to find.

This is yet another area in which the Olympics is the ANSWER: Athlete accommodation will more than double Canmore’s affordable housing portfolio (& it also includes flood mitigation, & a pedestrian overpass, by the way)…

> That’s 1,250 beds…worth $116 Million; of which Canmore is only responsible for $6 Million in value of CCHC owned land, …& $4 Million in Cash.

* Canmorites have at least three choices in this respect. They can say “NO” to the Olympics—& pay the entire affordable housing bill themselves…

…or they can choose to NOT to build it

> or they can utilize this “once in a lifetime opportunity” to have our friends from coast to coast help to pay most of the bill on their behalf!

(that only seems fair & right, since we share our playground with our fellow Canadians…every day…of every year; & this would actually be a tiny number

…in comparison to the billions of dollars of transfer & equalization payments we have shared with Canadians…every year…for decades.

Additionally: in a direct turnabout from previous practice, the IOC is NOT asking for money;

Instead, they are ready, willing, & able to write us a cheque—for well over a Billion Dollars— …& I simply cannot fathom how anyone could ever consider walking away from that incomparable opportunity!

Amongst other things, this would pay for Nordic Centre & Nakiska upgrades,

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 115 of 132 …ensuring that everyone…from elite athletes—to beginners— will enjoy the opportunity to utilize perfect places to exercise…outside!

As past provincial Minister of Wellness, there is nothing that makes me burst with pride more

…than to see healthy eating & active living…plans, programs, & policies that are positive, proactive, & preventative

…& that are designed to help keep people happy, healthy, & out of the hospital—as much as possible.

Friends: we have the extremely rare opportunity to host the world …with the most financially, ethically, culturally, & environmentally responsible Games in the history of the Olympiad

…utilizing the cleanest & most transparent processes possible.

The Olympic Games are one of the few human endeavours that unite the entire planet …& inspire everyone around the world to be the best they can be not only in Athletics; …but in every realm of human experience!

When we see someone win a gold medal; AND when we witness someone else give it everything they have

—to simply finish the race—in last place people are encouraged to turn their dreams into realities—no matter who they are.

Let’s not cancel the Olympic bid—let’s celebrate it--with everyone …especially the children of Canmore, Kananaskis, Calgary, Canada, & beyond!

Thank you! :) *

3 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 116 of 132 From: Stephen Ross Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 8:23 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: 2026 olympics

To whom it may concern :

I would like to voice my opinion on the subject of Canmore participating in hosting the 2026 olympics , I am in full support! This is an opportunity for Canmore and Canada to show the world what we are capable of. We did it in 1988, we built many legacy facilities and we better than broke even. In the day and age of multi Billions olympics I believe we can do it in a new way, this is a great opportunity to do some positive things for our town, our Nordic center, our affordable housing , the list is endless.

So please put me down as a Yes for the Olympics

Regards

Stephen

President

DEVONIAN PROPERTIES INC. Suite 100-729 10th Street Canmore Alberta T1W 2A3 Phone (403) 678-7106 Cell (403) 688-5977

Devonian Properties Inc. operating as Devonian Properties is a licensed Alberta Real Estate Brokerage.

This message is intended only for the person or entity named in the addressee field. This message contains information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the addressee thereof or the person responsible for its delivery, please notify us immediately by telephone and permanently delete all copies (including electronic copies) of this message that you may have. Any dissemination or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 117 of 132 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 118 of 132 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 119 of 132 From: Claudia Rustenburg Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 3:59 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: Council Subject: Non-statutory public hearing for the 2026 Olympic bid

Good day,

I have the following objections regarding hosting 2026 Olympic events in Canmore:

1. The Olympics have never stayed within budget and invariable it is the municipal taxpayer, whether residential, commercial or leaseholder, who is burdened with the outstanding debt for years. I am opposed to any municipal, provincial or federal debt for the purpose of contributing to the Olympics, as all 3 levels of government debt are already a significant taxpayer burden. 2. The Olympic Games have become increasingly corrupt and doping prone, and I don't want my tax dollars spent supporting any of these Games. 3. Canmore has enormous challenges in safeguarding wildlife habitat and connectivity, and adding more events and venues will only add stress to already stressed wildlife populations and result in more wildlife/human conflicts, the wildlife always getting the short end of the stick in the end. We can't even manage to discipline residents who leave fruit on their trees and leave their garbage out.

Thank you, C. Rustenburg Canmore, AB

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 120 of 132 From: Donna Scott Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 12:26 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: Geoff Scott Subject: NON-STATUTORY PUBLIC HEARING FOR BID -- OPPOSED

Please register my “no” vote for pursuing an Olympic bid and for Canmore to co-host the 2026 games. Why? There are SO many reasons but the #1 reason is the hefty tax burden these games will put on Canmore residents. Given that the six most recent Olympic Games, held over the decade 2004-2014, have cost on average USD 8.9 billion – not including road, rail, airport, and hotel infrastructure, which often cost more than the Games themselves – the financial size and risks of the 2026 Games warrant a big RED FLAG. Ultimately, the legacy of these games is that the hosting residents must pay it off, often for decades. 2026 will be no different.

Our elected Canmore officials have proven time and time again with our “little" infrastructure projects like Elevation Place, the Rec Centre, flood mitigation etc. that they cannot manage bidding processes and development costs on a small scale. Then they issue double inflation property tax increases every year to pay for their blunders. They’ve already agreed to put us into a $66 million debt to pay for a $166 million dollar “Athletes Village”. Bottom line, this is another ploy to gain more “affordable housing” at the tax payers expense. I’m sure the cost of this facility will spiral out of control as well. Past performance is always indicative of future behaviour.

#2 Reason: The Olympics as a fair playing ground for sport is a joke. Allowing doping countries to participate ruin it. It will never be fixed. Hats off to Beckie Scott for quitting her position as chair of the World Anti-doping Agency in protest after Russia was recently allowed back in to compete. Unbelievable.

#3 Reason: All the rewards of these games ultimately go to the wealthy, the IOC, the sponsors and the crooks who take advantage of these games for their own benefit.

#4 Reason: The town of Canmore is ALREADY on the world map as a tourist destination, bursting at the seams with the stresses and strains tourism is putting on our infrastructure. We DO NOT need any more exposure as we’re doing just fine thank you. I’ve been involved with tourism in Canmore for 15 years now. I know.

Thank you for taking my “no” vote into consideration, >Donna Scott

Donna Scott, Owner

Out’n About Vacation Chalets Upgrade to a Whole Vacation

Canmore, Alberta, Canada [email protected] Mobile: 403-609-9174 www.outnaboutchalets.com

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 121 of 132 I want to start today by saying thank you to town administration and council for all the work and difficult decisions you make every day for our town. I’d also like to give specific thank yous to Councillor MacCullum for initiating this hearing, and to Lisa DeSoto for all the effort and time you have committed to this process to date – I can’t imagine it’s been easy.

I will be referring heavily to the Social Impacts on Host Cities Analysis that was commissioned by the BidCo and created by an International Sport Event Consultant in April 2018. It was "designed to match key objectives …with areas of priority with respect to the impacts, experience, and outcomes of previous Olympic host cities." I will highlight several key pieces of information in the areas of Housing, Environment, and Economics that I think are particularly relevant to Canmore. The obvious place to start is housing.

Regarding housing, the report highlights:

“Mega-events have come to rely on social legacy areas such as housing affordability and infrastructural enhancements to rationalize public expenditure, even though past host experiences indicate the opposite is often true.

Example 1 “Evictions, displacements, and abandonment of social commitments such as affordable or social housing are also common as there are few protections ensuring social commitments are met, and little recourse or accountability.” During the Calgary 88 Olympics, excessive rent leads to the eviction of 2000 people from one of Calgary's poorest neighbourhoods adjacent to the Saddledome development. This is a problem we already experience in the valley with most of us knowing someone whom has been forced to move as rent increases.

Example 2: During the 2010 Vancouver Olympics the city and province had to step in with an additional billion ($690million and $458 million) of taxpayer dollars to ensure the village would be built on time and to save the project from failure. “This meant that 10 original commitments to deliver an equal balance of affordable, middle-income, and market housing skewed greatly towards market housing. Of the approximate 1,000 units in the development, only 28 were rented at the shelter assistance rate.”

Example 3: In Barcelona 1992, "Between the time the bid was announced and the staging of the Games, housing prices increased dramatically (250%), while number of available rental units decreased (75%) and the construction of public housing units slowed dramatically."

In terms of the ENVIRONMENT the report states “Critics have identified that environmental protections only serve a rhetorical purpose and that in reality, there is minimal oversight provided when environmental promises are broken. Meaningful incorporation of sustainable practices is not well articulated or enforced by the

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 122 of 132 IOC. The aspirational goals... attached to hosting – such as carbon neutrality and zero waste – cannot be realistically considered to be achievable targets, but continue to be used as a means of legitimacy for host organizing committees. Sydney 2000 offered ‘Green Games,’ Beijing 2008 ‘Green Olympics,’ Vancouver 2010 ‘First Sustainable Olympic Games’ and (even) Rio 2016 held a ‘Green Games for a Blue Planet’... Ironically, promises made in the name of sustainability show significantly diminished, if not negligible, returns.” Our wildlife corridor is already struggling.

The report goes on to state "Economic benefits from hosting the Olympic Games are negligible while the projections of economic benefit creation (especially in terms of GDP and job) are almost always overstated or a fraction of initial projections. Cost overruns are the most significant constant amongst previous hosts. There are no long-term positive impacts to tourism, trade, or employment.... Research has shown that Olympic Games’ budgets overrun with 100% consistency, exceeding projected budgets in real terms by 179%, making hosting the Olympic Games one of the riskiest mega-projects that exists"

The question at hand today is regarding prudence. On page 4 of the 2017-2018 budget, the Town's plan for "belt tightening initiatives" included "reducing projects to match resource capacity available to accomplish them". Cohosting the Olympics is incongruent with that plan for financial stewardship. At the hearing last Tuesday the statement was made, "Why would we leave 42million dollars on the table?" and to me the answer would be "Because that money comes with too many strings. I want our community and governance to have the flexibility and nimbleness to respond to whatever the future brings us, not to be locked in for the next 8 years with partners that don't truly know our community. In the last 8 years we've seen remarkable changes, some of which we couldn't have predicted such as the 2013 flood, some that were created by the hard work of people in this room today, such as the opening of Elevation Place, Artsplace, Roam Transit, an Affordable Services Program, and some which still require our vigilant attention such as truly affordable housing, and protecting this wildlife corridor that is a critical link for bio-diversity.

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 123 of 132 From: Jessica Stoner Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 6:11 PM Cheryl To: Hyde Subject: In support of Olympic Bid

To Whom it May Concern, I am writing to express my views to fully support the Olympic bid and hosting the Olympics and Paralympics in Canmore in 2026.

There seems to be many short and long term benefits that far outweigh the challenges it would present.

The short term can see a boost to the economy in Canmore and Calgary. Calgary needs an economic boost and strength in the Calgary economy helps ensure long term strength in Canmore's economy.

Long term, the benefits may provide some relief in the housing crunch in Canmore, with the support of federal and provincial funds, that would not be received without these events.

I believe, as a town we will add affordable housing to the inventory of Canmore housing, but by hosting the Olympics, it seems this will happen much faster and create relief sooner, maybe keeping essential residents in town, as opposed to the increasing exodus to Cochrane and other BC mountain towns.

With the hosting of the Paralympic in 2026, we will see a town that has much increased access for those with disabilities and the mobility challenged, again with the support of federal and provincial funds. This is something that our town should strive for and I would be proud be part of a fully accessible community ensuring respect and dignity for all of our residents and visitors.

Though I recognize the challenges that many have concerns about, and that they are legitimate concerns, (unknown costs, change of character of the town) I feel this town has a legacy in hosting successful Olympics and I have faith that our council will ensure, should we host the Olympics, that wise and level headed decisions will be made for the good of our community.

We have done it before, and I am comfortable that it can be done again with great success!

Thank you, Jessica Stoner

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 124 of 132

Jessica Stoner-Associate Broker RE/MAX Alpine Realty Canmore, AB 403-678-8006 [email protected] jessicastoner.ca

Update Real Estate Market Canmore Oct 2018

2 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 125 of 132 From: Hugh Tafel Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 10:58 AM To: Cheryl Hyde; Council Subject: non statutory public hearing for the bid

Dear Councillors & Mayor,

We vote NO to Olympics 2026 as the burden to taxpayers; read all residents, including renters; will be much higher than necessary. You will push even more lower income people out of town as rents will have to increase to support your budget. (And do not think housing projects will do it. All that does to help create a monster government corporation in the name of CCHC.

Furthermore, Canmore does not need to push more tourism. We are doing well and no one wants more We cannot sustain increase “bear 148’s”.

Mary Moran’s presentation to council had errors which I (Jan) pointed out to her immediately afterwards: She erroneously stated Calgary had never had a plebiscite. There was a successful YES plebiscite to introduce flouride into the drinking water 1989‐90.

Having an elite Canadian National Alpine & then Ski X athlete born and raised in Canmore, we are privy to the inner workings of how Olympics benefit a community. They are NOT necessary to be in Canmore/Calgary for an athlete to be successful.

We lived in Bow Valley at time of 1988 Olympics and volunteered/employed by so truly enjoyed benefits….but we also have recent Vancouver Olympics for our present & next generation of athletes.

It is “nice” that you’ve decided to hold this forum. But know this. A forum fools no one. It is not an exercise in democracy. It is you hoping to look like you are consulting us, those who can only vote once every 4 years. You want to know what Canmorites truly feel, next time hold a plebscite?

Lastly, while the Olympics create a big emotive response in people, the athletes, who compete, Ostensibly for our country, actually receive the least amount of the largess. Most still have to pay to play (Tristan was asked to pay annual due of $35,000). The main beneficiaries of these kinds of projects, like always, are the contractors, organizers, Maintenance staff, trainers, coaches. You want elite sport – start with funding the athletes directly.

Signed on behalf of Hugh, Jan, Tristan & Sophia Tafel Residents of the Bow Valley for 30+ years.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 126 of 132 From: Brian Talbot Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 6:05 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Public Hearing, Oct 30, 2018. Re: Is it prudent for Canmore to participate in the 2026 Olympic bid?

Cheryl,

In regard to the open house tomorrow, I am in support of Canmore participating in the Olympic Bid. I am of the opinion that the legacy of the games will be beneficial to the economy, affordable housing and the youth of the community.

Brian D. Talbot

This electronic mail message is intended only for the person or entity named in the addressee field. This message contains information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and all materials associated with it.

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 127 of 132 From: Cliff Wallis Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 7:29 AM To: Cheryl Hyde Cc: Council Subject: Non-statutory public hearing for the bid--Olympics

Importance: Low

Dear Canmore Council,

I take no position either in favor of or against the proposed Olympics bid by Calgary for 2026. I do support strong environmental protections around any such bid. It is incumbent upon all decision‐makers, federally, provincially and municipally to ensure that environmental protection is foremost in everyone’s mind.

Specifically, Canmore has the the responsibility to support the community's vision for the Bow Valley and to ensure that BidCo follows their Guiding Principles commitment to mitigate adverse impacts to residents and the region’s environment. We can do even better. Post‐games, we should have a legacy of environmental protection that is better than today, with improved ecological integrity that increases the survivability of more sensitive species.

Good luck on your deliberations and thanks for listening to my views.

Cliff Wallis P. Biol. 615 Deercroft Way SE Calgary, AB T2j 5V4 CANADA phone (403) 271-1408; cell (403) 607-1970 [email protected]

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 128 of 132 From: Sandy Wing Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 6:35 PM To: Cheryl Hyde Subject: Olympic Bid

I am a current Canmore resident and tax payer (for over 40 years). Thank you for the opportunity to submit my opinion.

I believe it is NOT prudent for the Town of Canmore to participate in the City of Calgary’s bid to co‐host the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The town currently has too much debt without incurring a significant amount of additional debt. Also, there are still too many unknowns with respect to additional costs to host the Games. There is virtually a 100% guarantee of cost overruns (all recent Olympics in the past 50 years have had overruns).

Sincerely, Sandra Wing

Sent from my iPad

1 October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 129 of 132 Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative 200-1350 Railway Avenue Canmore, AB T1W 2P6

Cheryl Hyde, Municipal Clerk Town of Canmore 902-7 Avenue Canmore, AB T1W 3K1

October 30, 2018

Dear Ms. Hyde,

We are encouraged that there have been many public engagement opportunities related to the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games in the past months, and we recognize the challenges that the community faces in making an informed decision on the proposed bid. The bid decision will have lasting impacts on Canmore, Kananaskis Country, and the Bow Valley corridor.

The 1988 Winter Olympics contributed to Canmore’s evolution from a quiet mining community to an internationally-renowned mountain town. In the past three decades, Canmore’s popularity as a place to call home, and as a tourism destination, has accelerated significantly. The population has grown by 60% from 8,354 (1996) to 13,992 (2016) and has been accompanied by increasing numbers of regional and international visitors. This increase in human activity has contributed to human- wildlife conflict in the Bow Valley, including the passive and active displacement of threatened species like grizzly bears from important habitat and movement corridors. It has also contributed to the mortality of large wildlife species on the Trans-Canada highway east of Banff National Park.

The Bow Valley lies at the heart of the Yellowstone to Yukon region and offers a rare, low-elevation connection between protected habitats in Kananaskis Country and Banff National Park. Even 22 years ago, scientists were concerned that the Bow Valley was reaching its human carrying capacity. The 1996 Banff-Bow Valley Study found that the region was at the threshold of being unsustainable for populations of grizzly bears and wolves. The study also identified that rapid residential development along the valley floor and along the sides of the valley in the Canmore area was resulting in the alienation of many of the movement corridors between Banff National Park, Wind Valley, and the lower Bow Valley. This study influenced the effort to designate functional wildlife corridors in the Bow Valley, a challenging effort that is still underway today.

The Bow Valley is a picturesque mountain town an hour drive from a quickly growing major city, and it is challenging to curb the momentum of growth. It is not the 50 days of the Olympics that will be the biggest challenge; it is the risk that putting the Bow Valley on the world stage once again will accelerate Canmore’s population and

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 130 of 132 visitation growth trajectory, and exacerbate existing human-wildlife coexistence challenges. Y2Y’s focus is on connecting and protecting nature so that humans and nature can thrive over the long term; our decisions today will affect whether there are large mammals on this landscape one hundred years from now.

Should the 2026 Olympic bid be successful, it will be imperative that the environmental and social legacy built is one that respects and maintains the Bow Valley’s ethic of living with wildlife. Bow Valley communities also pride themselves on their ability to protect critical habitats and to mitigate their impact on unprotected lands, and these efforts are ingrained as key community values. As a potential co-host of the games, the Town of Canmore has a significant opportunity to shape legacies that protect our unparalleled natural surroundings while hosting the “greenest” Games in history. Y2Y would want to work with the Town of Canmore, HostCo, and Alberta Environment and Parks in creating a long-lived legacy for nature and wildlife should a bid go forward.

As a conservation group, we acknowledge that a decision about supporting the bid for the 2026 Olympic Games is a community decision shaped by a variety of influences, priorities, and emotions. Regardless of the fate of the potential Olympic bid, we recognize that Canmore will likely continue to grow and develop as a community and as a tourist destination. We firmly believe that decisions made about visitation to and use of the Bow Valley must prioritize its role as one of the four most important places for wildlife connectivity in the Rocky Mountains. It is time to craft a vision for Canmore’s future that is focused on foresight, courage and above all, long- term respect for the land and the wildlife it sustains.

Sincerely,

Jodi Hilty, PhD President and Chief Scientist

Hilary Young, PhD Senior Alberta Program Manager (Interim)

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 131 of 132

October 30, 2018 Record of Written Submissions for Olympic Public Hearing Page 132 of 132