DOCSLIB.ORG

A Field Guide to the Fossils of Scientists' Cliffs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Field Guide to the Fossils of Scientists' Cliffs A Field Guide to the Fossils of Scientists’ Cliffs A brief introduction to the geological history of the area, with descriptions of the common (and not so common) fossils found here. July 2004 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 0 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. GEOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 NAMING ROCK/SOIL UNITS ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 CALVERT CLIFFS’ GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 STRATIGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1 Calvert Formation ............................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Choptank Formation ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.3.3 St. Mary's Formation ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 CROSS SECTIONS OF THE CLIFFS .................................................................................................................... 13 3. FOSSIL IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 VERTEBRATE FOSSILS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Sharks .................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.1.1 Thesher Sharks ................................................................................................................................................ 21 3.1.1.2 Tiger Sharks .................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1.3 Giant White Shark ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1.4 Sand Tiger Sharks ........................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1.5 Mako Sharks ................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1.6 Snaggletooth Sharks ........................................................................................................................................ 24 3.1.1.7 Angel Sharks ................................................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.1.8 Lemon Sharks ................................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1.1.9 Requiem Sharks .............................................................................................................................................. 26 3.1.1.10 Seven Gill Sharks ....................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.1.11 Hammer Head Sharks ................................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.2 Skates and Rays ................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2.1 Ray Teeth ........................................................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.2.1.1 Eagle Rays (Myliobatis) ............................................................................................................................. 28 3.1.2.1.2 Spotted-Eagle or Duck-Billed Ray (Aetobatus) ......................................................................................... 28 3.1.2.1.3 Cow-Nosed Ray (Rhinoptera).................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.2.2 Caudal Spine of the Miocene Stingrays .......................................................................................................... 29 3.1.3 Bony Fishes .......................................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.3.1 Hyperostoses “Tilly Bones” ............................................................................................................................ 32 3.1.3.2 Ocean Sunfish ................................................................................................................................................. 32 3.1.3.3 Black Drum ..................................................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.4 Reptiles ................................................................................................................................................ 34 3.1.4.1 Turtles ............................................................................................................................................................. 34 3.1.4.1.1 Leatherback Turtles ................................................................................................................................... 34 3.1.4.2 Crocodiles ....................................................................................................................................................... 35 3.1.5 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.1.5.1 Marine Mammals ............................................................................................................................................ 36 3.1.5.1.1 Whales and Dolphins (Cetaceans) ............................................................................................................. 37 3.1.5.1.2 Seals ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 3.1.5.1.3.1 Sea Cows (Dugongs).................................................................................................................................. 39 1 3.1.5.2 Land Mammals ............................................................................................................................................... 40 3.1.5.2.1.1 Camels ....................................................................................................................................................... 40 3.1.5.3 Epiphysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 41 3.1.6 Birds..................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2 INVERTEBRATE FOSSILS ................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2.1 Mollusks ............................................................................................................................................... 42 Figure 6. Common Shell Fossils of Calvert County ........................................................................................................ 43 3.2.1.1 Bivalves ........................................................................................................................................................... 44 3.2.1.1.1 Scallop Shells ............................................................................................................................................. 45 3.2.1.1.2 Isognomon maxillata
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology the University of Michigan
    CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN VOL. 29.. No. 3. PP. 69-87 November 30. 1994 PROTOSIREN SMITHAE, NEW SPECIES (MAMMALIA, SIRENIA), FROM THE LATE MIDDLE EOCENE OF WADI HITAN, EGYPT BY DARYL P. DOMNING AND PHILIP D. GINGERICH MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Philip D. Gingerich, Director This series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for publication of papers based chiefly on collections in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals on request. A list of the separate issues may also be obtained by request. Correspondence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109-1079. VOLS. 2-29. Parts of volumes may be obtained if available. Price lists are available upon inquiry. PROTOSIREN SMITHAE, NEW SPECIES (MAMMALIA, SIRENIA), FROM THE LATE MIDDLE EOCENE OF WADI KITAN, EGYPT Abstract-Protosiren smithae is a new protosirenid sirenian described on the basis of associated cranial and postcranial material from the late middle Eocene (latest Bartonian) Gehannam Formation of Wadi Hitan (Zeuglodon Valley), Fayum Province, Egypt. The new species is similar to Protosiren fraasi Abel, 1907, from the earlier middle Eocene (Lutetian) of Egypt, but it is younger geologically and more derived morphologically. P. smithae is probably a direct descendant of P. fraasi. The postcranial skeleton of P. imithae- includes well-developed hindlimbs, which suggest some lingering amphibious tendencies in this otherwise aquatically-adapted primitive sea cow.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Leonardtown 30 X 60- Minute
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Leonardtown 30 X 60- Minute Quadrangle, Maryland and Virginia by Lucy McCartan1 Wayne L. Newell1 James P. Owens1 * Gary M. Bradford1** Open-File Report 95-665 Prepared in cooperation with the Maryland Geological Survey This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Reston, Va. *Deceased **Volunteer for Science CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Map contruction 4 Mapping paradigms 4 Time 5 Depositional environments 5 Previous work 6 Geologic overview 6 Structural setting 7 Ground-water chemistry 9 Discussion of selected stratigraphic units 10 Pleistocene deposits 11 Lowland unit Q2 11 Lowland unit Q3 11 Lowland unit Q4 11 Lowland unit Q5 12 Pliocene deposits 13 Upland unit T1 13 Yorktown Formation 14 Miocene deposits 14 Eastover Formation 14 St. Marys Formation 15 Choptank Formation 15 Calvert Formation 16 Pre-Miocene units 16 Nanjemoy Formation 17 Marlboro Clay 18 Aquia Formation 18 Acknowledgements 19 References cited 20 Description of map units 26 TABLES Units found only below land surface (see cross sections) 28 Table 1 Regional correlation of stratigraphic units 29 Table 2 Ground-water chemistry of selected formations 30 Table 3 Some typical characteristics of stratigraphic units 34 FIGURES Explanation of map units 35 Map symbols 36 Figure 1 Map showing distribution of depositional lithofacies of the Yorktown Formation 37 GEOLOGIC MAP AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE LEONARDTOWN 30 X 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA by Lucy McCartan, W.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans Robert W. BOESSENECKER Department of Geology, University of Otago, 360 Leith Walk, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, 9054 (New Zealand) and Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University 200 Traphagen Hall, Bozeman, MT, 59715 (USA) and University of California Museum of Paleontology 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA, 94720 (USA) [email protected] Boessenecker R. W. 2013. — A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans. Geodiversitas 35 (4): 815-940. http://dx.doi.org/g2013n4a5 ABSTRACT e newly discovered Upper Miocene to Upper Pliocene San Gregorio assem- blage of the Purisima Formation in Central California has yielded a diverse collection of 34 marine vertebrate taxa, including eight sharks, two bony fish, three marine birds (described in a previous study), and 21 marine mammals. Pinnipeds include the walrus Dusignathus sp., cf. D. seftoni, the fur seal Cal- lorhinus sp., cf. C. gilmorei, and indeterminate otariid bones. Baleen whales include dwarf mysticetes (Herpetocetus bramblei Whitmore & Barnes, 2008, Herpetocetus sp.), two right whales (cf. Eubalaena sp. 1, cf. Eubalaena sp. 2), at least three balaenopterids (“Balaenoptera” cortesi “var.” portisi Sacco, 1890, cf. Balaenoptera, Balaenopteridae gen. et sp. indet.) and a new species of rorqual (Balaenoptera bertae n. sp.) that exhibits a number of derived features that place it within the genus Balaenoptera. is new species of Balaenoptera is relatively small (estimated 61 cm bizygomatic width) and exhibits a comparatively nar- row vertex, an obliquely (but precipitously) sloping frontal adjacent to vertex, anteriorly directed and short zygomatic processes, and squamosal creases.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3
    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2018) 48 (4): 341–362 DOI: 10.3750/AIEP/02451 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST AND CHARACTERISATION OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA (ELASMOBRANCHII AND ACTINOPTERYGII) OF THE LAGUNA DE TAMIAHUA, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3 1 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, SAGARPA, Ciudad de México 3 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México Raz-Guzmán A., Huidobro L., Padilla V. 2018. An updated checklist and characterisation of the ichthyofauna (Elasmobranchii and Actinopterygii) of the Laguna de Tamiahua, Veracruz, Mexico. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 48 (4): 341–362. Background. Laguna de Tamiahua is ecologically and economically important as a nursery area that favours the recruitment of species that sustain traditional fisheries. It has been studied previously, though not throughout its whole area, and considering the variety of habitats that sustain these fisheries, as well as an increase in population growth that impacts the system. The objectives of this study were to present an updated list of fish species, data on special status, new records, commercial importance, dominance, density, ecotic position, and the spatial and temporal distribution of species in the lagoon, together with a comparison of Tamiahua with 14 other Gulf of Mexico lagoons. Materials and methods. Fish were collected in August and December 1996 with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl from different habitats throughout the lagoon. The species were identified, classified in relation to special status, new records, commercial importance, density, dominance, ecotic position, and spatial distribution patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Contributions and Studies
    Thecachampsa antiqua (Leidy, 1852) (Crocodylidae: Thoracosaurinae) from Fossil Marine Deposits at Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina, USA Albert C. Myrick, Jr. Formation (early Pliocene; Gibson, 1983; Hazel, 1983). It ABSTRACT provides a first opportunity to study the Lee Creek crocodilian materials in relation to other similar forms of comparable geo- Fossil remains of crocodilians at Lee Creek Mine have been few and fragmentary. Nevertheless, isolated teeth and dermal plates logic age. The purpose of this paper is to describe the Lee from the spoil piles are identifiable as Thecachampsa antiqua Creek Mine crocodilian specimens and to comment on the (Leidy). This species was established by Leidy on characters of taxonomic status and paleozoogeographic implications related teeth presumably from the Calvert Formation of Virginia (late to the Lee Creek Mine occurrence and to occurrences of early to early middle Miocene), but the species is now validated by skulls and numerous elements from the middle Miocene forma- closely related forms elsewhere. tions of the Chesapeake Group. The same form is common in the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.•The Lee Creek Mine specimens cit- Florida early Pliocene, where it is represented by several fairly ed in this report were collected and donated by P.J. Harmatuk, complete skeletons known as Gavialosuchus americanus (Sell- F. Hyne, and B. Hyne. I thank L.G. Barnes (Los Angeles arás). It also is known from numerous skulls from early and mid- County Museum of Natural History) for providing refresher dle Miocene formations near Lisbon, Portugal, as Tomistoma lusitanica (Vianna and Moraes). Teeth and a dermal scute indicat- information on the California specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeezoogdieren
    CRANIUM, nr. 2 -1998 De Nederlandse fossiele zeezoogdieren. Een overzicht Klaas Post Samenvatting Onder de worden in dit Cetacea de noemer zeezoogdieren artikel de (walvissen en dolfijnen), Pinnipedia de Sirenia Fossielen worden (zeehonden, zeeleeuwen en walrussen) en (zeekoeien) samengevat. van zeezoogdieren dan Naast het feit dat zeldzaam is hun veel minder aangetroffen fossielen van landzoogdieren. ze gewoon zijn voorkomen ook recente of fossiele zeebodems en stranden. nog beperkt tot specifieke gebieden: namelijk en is de evolutie bekend dus is de of Dientengevolge er nogweinig over van zeezoogdieren en genus- soortbepaling of Verder vooral oudere literatuur foutieve informatiete bevatten en vaak nog moeilijk geheel nietmogelijk. blijkt bovendien aantal verschillende dezelfde vermelden.Het is danook niet een enorm namen voor genera en soorten te verwonderlijk dat fossiele zeezoogdieren wetenschappelijk noch populair in de belangstelling staan. De de Noordzee behoren de wereld van fossielen van Nederlanden en aangrenzende tot rijkste vindplaatsen ter zeezoogdieren. Hoe kan het ook eigenlijk anders met zo’n waterrijke geologische geschiedenis. De voortdurend Pleistoceen het Holoceenincombinatie met wisselendeNoordzeekustlijnen gedurende Mioceen,Plioceen, en vroege de vele rivieren hebben Zo worden de mondingen van grote zeer gevarieerde zeezoogdierfauna’s nagelaten. de Pleistocene walrus wereld zoveel fossielen als in Nederland! Ondanks de bijvoorbeeld van nergens ter gevonden kwaliteit deze heeft de eind links laten De kwantiteit en van fossielen wetenschap ze sinds vorige eeuw liggen. helaas vaak verloren collecties verkeren veelal in slechte staat en de bijbehorende gegevens zijn gegaan. Summary lions and and the Sirenia In this article the Cetacea (wales and delphins), the Pinnipedia (seals, sea walrusses) (sea unitedunder the mammals.Fossils of mammals found lesser thanthose of land cows) are term sea sea are to a extent also: and fossil mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Marine Demersal Fishes Captured by the Pair Trawl Fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil
    Biota Neotropica 19(1): e20170432, 2019 www.scielo.br/bn ISSN 1676-0611 (online edition) Inventory Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil Matheus Marcos Rotundo1,2,3,4 , Evandro Severino-Rodrigues2, Walter Barrella4,5, Miguel Petrere Jun- ior3 & Milena Ramires4,5 1Universidade Santa Cecilia, Acervo Zoológico, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 2Instituto de Pesca, Programa de Pós-graduação em Aquicultura e Pesca, Santos, SP, Brasil 3Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Planejamento e Uso de Recursos Renováveis, Rodovia João Leme dos Santos, Km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, SP, Brasil 4Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação de Auditoria Ambiental, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil 5Universidade Santa Cecília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sustentabilidade de Ecossistemas Costeiros e Marinhos, R. Oswaldo Cruz, 266, CEP11045-907, Santos, SP, Brasil *Corresponding author: Matheus Marcos Rotundo: [email protected] ROTUNDO, M.M., SEVERINO-RODRIGUES, E., BARRELLA, W., PETRERE JUNIOR, M., RAMIRES, M. Checklist of marine demersal fishes captured by the pair trawl fisheries in Southern (RJ-SC) Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 19(1): e20170432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2017-0432 Abstract: Demersal fishery resources are abundant on continental shelves, on the tropical and subtropical coasts, making up a significant part of the marine environment. Marine demersal fishery resources are captured by various fishing methods, often unsustainably, which has led to the depletion of their stocks. In order to inventory the marine demersal ichthyofauna on the Southern Brazilian coast, as well as their conservation status and distribution, this study analyzed the composition and frequency of occurrence of fish captured by pair trawling in 117 fishery fleet landings based in the State of São Paulo between 2005 and 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • DGS OFR46.Qxd
    State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John H. Talley, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 75 STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF THE OLIGOCENE TO PLEISTOCENE SECTION AT BETHANY BEACH, DELAWARE by Peter P. McLaughlin1, Kenneth G. Miller2, James V. Browning2, Kelvin W. Ramsey1 Richard N. Benson1, Jaime L. Tomlinson1, and Peter J. Sugarman3 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1 Delaware Geological Survey 2008 2 Rutgers University 3 New Jersey Geological Survey State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John H. Talley, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 75 STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF THE OLIGIOCENE TO PLEISTOCENE SECTION AT BETHANY BEACH, DELAWARE by Peter P. McLaughlin1, Kenneth G. Miller2, James V. Browning2, Kelvin W. Ramsey1, Richard N. Benson,1 Jaime L. Tomlinson,1 and Peter J. Sugarman3 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 2008 1Delaware Geological Survey 2Rutgers University 3New Jersey Geological Survey Use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the Delaware Geological Survey. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACTG........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTIONG................................................................................................................... 1 Previous WorkG.......................................................................................................... 2 AcknowledgmentsG.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Miocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Central Great Plains from Stable Carbon Isotopes in Large Mammals Willow H
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Sciences 7-2017 Middle Miocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Central Great Plains from Stable Carbon Isotopes in Large Mammals Willow H. Nguy University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss Part of the Geology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Nguy, Willow H., "Middle Miocene Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Central Great Plains from Stable Carbon Isotopes in Large Mammals" (2017). Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 91. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MIDDLE MIOCENE PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS FROM STABLE CARBON ISOTOPES IN LARGE MAMMALS by Willow H. Nguy A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Ross Secord Lincoln, Nebraska July, 2017 MIDDLE MIOCENE PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS FROM STABLE CARBON ISOTOPES IN LARGE MAMMALS Willow H. Nguy, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2017 Advisor: Ross Secord Middle Miocene (18-12 Mya) mammalian faunas of the North American Great Plains contained a much higher diversity of apparent browsers than any modern biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology • Number 90
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY • NUMBER 90 Geology and Paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, III Clayton E. Ray and David J. Bohaska EDITORS ISSUED MAY 112001 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Smithsonian Institution Press Washington, D.C. 2001 ABSTRACT Ray, Clayton E., and David J. Bohaska, editors. Geology and Paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, III. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, number 90, 365 pages, 127 figures, 45 plates, 32 tables, 2001.—This volume on the geology and paleontology of the Lee Creek Mine is the third of four to be dedicated to the late Remington Kellogg. It includes a prodromus and six papers on nonmammalian vertebrate paleontology. The prodromus con­ tinues the historical theme of the introductions to volumes I and II, reviewing and resuscitat­ ing additional early reports of Atlantic Coastal Plain fossils. Harry L. Fierstine identifies five species of the billfish family Istiophoridae from some 500 bones collected in the Yorktown Formation. These include the only record of Makairapurdyi Fierstine, the first fossil record of the genus Tetrapturus, specifically T. albidus Poey, the second fossil record of Istiophorus platypterus (Shaw and Nodder) and Makaira indica (Cuvier), and the first fossil record of/. platypterus, M. indica, M. nigricans Lacepede, and T. albidus from fossil deposits bordering the Atlantic Ocean. Robert W. Purdy and five coauthors identify 104 taxa from 52 families of cartilaginous and bony fishes from the Pungo River and Yorktown formations. The 10 teleosts and 44 selachians from the Pungo River Formation indicate correlation with the Burdigalian and Langhian stages. The 37 cartilaginous and 40 bony fishes, mostly from the Sunken Meadow member of the Yorktown Formation, are compatible with assignment to the early Pliocene planktonic foraminiferal zones N18 or N19.
    [Show full text]
  • Università Di Pisa
    UNIVERSITÀ DI PISA Dottorato di ricerca in scienze della terra XIX Ciclo DISSERTAZIONE FINALE ANALISI SISTEMATICA, PALEOECOLOGICA E PALEOBIOGEOGRAFICA DELLA SELACIOFAUNA PLIO-PLEISTOCENICA DEL MEDITERRANEO Candidato Presidente della Scuola di Dottorato Stefano MARSILI Prof. Paolo Roberto FEDERICI Tutore Prof. Walter LANDINI Dipartimento di scienze della terra 2006 Indice INDICE ABSTRACT CAPITOLO 1 – INTRODUZIONE 1.1. Premessa. 1 1.2. Il Mediterraneo e l’attuale diversità del popolamento a squali. 4 CAPITOLO 2 – MATERIALI E METODI 7 CAPITOLO 3 – INQUADRAMENTO GEOLGICO E STRATIGRAFICO 3.1. Premessa. 15 3.2. Inquadramento geologico e stratigrafico delle sezioni campionate. 16 3.2.1. Le sezioni plioceniche della Romagna. 16 3.2.1.1. Sezione Rio Merli. 17 3.2.1.2. Sezione Rio dei Ronchi. 17 3.2.1.3. Sezione Rio Co di Sasso. 18 3.2.1.4. Sezione Rio Cugno. 19 3.2.2. Le sezioni pleistoceniche dell’Italia Meridionale. 19 3.2.2.1. La sezione di Fiumefreddo. 20 3.2.2.2. La sezione di Grammichele. 22 3.2.2.3. La sezione di Vallone Catrica. 23 3.2.2.4. La sezione di Archi. 23 3.3. Inquadramento geologico e stratigrafico dei bacini centrali del Tora-Fine, di Volterra e di Siena: premessa. 24 3.3.1. Bacino del Tora-Fine. 26 3.3.2. Bacino di Siena-Radicofani. 27 3.3.3. Bacino di Volterra. 29 3.4. Inquadramento geologico e stratigrafico delle principali località storiche. 30 3.4.1. Emilia Romagna. 30 3.4.2. Piemonte. 32 3.4.3. Liguria. 32 3.4.4. Basilicata.
    [Show full text]
  • Morton County, Kansas Michael Anthony Calvello Fort Hays State University
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Summer 2011 Mammalian Fauna From The ulF lerton Gravel Pit (Ogallala Group, Late Miocene), Morton County, Kansas Michael Anthony Calvello Fort Hays State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Calvello, Michael Anthony, "Mammalian Fauna From The ulF lerton Gravel Pit (Ogallala Group, Late Miocene), Morton County, Kansas" (2011). Master's Theses. 135. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/135 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. - MAMMALIAN FAUNA FROM THE FULLERTON GRAVEL PIT (OGALLALA GROUP, LATE MIOCENE), MORTON COUNTY, KANSAS being A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the Fort Hays State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Michael Anthony Calvello B.A., State University of New York at Geneseo Date Z !J ~4r u I( Approved----c-~------------- Chair, Graduate Council Graduate Committee Approval The Graduate Committee of Michael A. Calvello hereby approves his thesis as meeting partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Science. Approved: )<--+-- ----+-G~IJCommittee Meilnber Approved: ~J, iii,,~ Committee Member 11 ABSTRACT The Fullerton Gravel Pit, Morton County, Kansas is one of many sites in western Kansas at which the Ogallala Group crops out. The Ogallala Group was deposited primarily by streams flowing from the Rocky Mountains. Evidence of water transport is observable at the Fullerton Gravel Pit through the presence of allochthonous clasts, cross-bedding, pebble alignment, and fossil breakage and subsequent rounding.
    [Show full text]