DOCSLIB.ORG

“Schlaglicht Israel”!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Schlaglicht Israel”! Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 3/17 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-15. Februar Die Themen dieser Ausgabe Netanyahu bei Trump ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Räumung von Amona und umstrittenes Reglementierungsgesetz ........................................................................... 4 Wieder Krieg im Gazastreifen? ................................................................................................................................. 6 Medienquerschnitt .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Netanyahu bei Trump ness. He clearly sees who the Middle East good Im Vorfeld der Reise von Regierungschef Benjamin guys and bad guys are. (…) The meeting between Netanyahu nach Washington, dämpfte der neue US- Netanyahu and Trump will put a lock on the past Präsident Donald Trump die Erwartungen in Israel. eight years and usher in a new chapter in the history In einem exklusiven Interview mit der Tageszeitung of our region. (…) The time has come to put pres- Israel Hayom erklärte Trump, dass ein Umzug der sure on these who really sow murder and put world Botschaft von Tel Aviv nach Jerusalem, wie er ihn peace at risk: the various Islamic terrorist organiza- zuvor in Aussicht gestellt hatte, „wohl überlegt“ sein tions, from Hamas to Hezbollah, and dark regimes müsse. Auch bei Israels Bau von Wohnungen für like the Palestinian Authority under President Siedler im besetzten Westjordanland signalisierte Mahmoud Abbas and, of course, the evildoers in Trump, sie seien der Lösungsfindung zwischen Tehran. (…) What's more, the Americans will no Israel und den Palästinensern wenig förderlich. longer see the Jewish hold on Jerusalem and Judea Insgesamt stand Netanyahus Antrittsbesuch beim and Samaria as something to be condemned. (…) neuen Chef im Weißen Haus jedoch unter günstigen Ariel Bolstein, IHY, 01.02.17 Vorzeichen. Nach acht Jahren stark angespannter Beziehungen und offener Antipathie von Seiten des Netanyahu and Trump: A relationship based on früheren US-Präsidenten Barack Obama traf Netan- flattery and groveling yahu diesmal einen Politiker, der gegenüber Israel (…) Netanyahu, who always argued that his murky Hayom erklärte: „Ich habe ihn (Netanyahu) immer relationship with the previous president was not his gemocht.“ fault but Barack Obama’s, will do anything to ensure that the new president looks like his best friend, More than a symbol partner and supporter. (…) But it seems that with (…) For Trump to set a meeting with Netanyahu so Trump, like with Netanyahu, flattery and groveling quickly after taking office carries symbolic meaning generate the opposite outcome. And the closer and for both Israel and its leader, and emphasizes that more loyal the flatterer, the faster he is betrayed and Israel is the superpower's most important ally. (…) A thrown to the dogs. When the Israeli Right rejoiced vast majority of those in Congress see Israel as a after the elections and increased the pressure to key, irreplaceable ally and a partner in the values of expand settlement construction, move the US em- freedom. The American defense establishment sees bassy to Jerusalem, confiscate land, and legalize us similarly. Now the top of the pyramid is joining outposts, Netanyahu told everyone to calm down them, and he is not hampered by ideological blind- and asked them not to present Trump with difficult 1 facts. In other words, let him carry out what he sors that Israeli communities are an obstacle to promised in his own time. (…) The flattery reached peace. (…) Trump and his top advisers have made new heights with Netanyahu’s miserable tweet, in clear that they see no upside to US support for the which he first of all praised himself, but also flattered PLO. (…) The administration’s desire to disengage Trump on the future construction of a wall on the from the PLO is well aligned with Israel’s strategic Mexico border. (…) At the same time, a storm began interests. No good has ever come to Israel from US washing though the world. By signing an executive support for the PLO. (…) order banning the entry of citizens of seven coun- Caroline B. Glick, JPO, 09.02.17 tries defined as infected by terrorism, the Trump administration enraged nearly the entire world, apart First Netanyahu-Trump meeting will focus on from Israel. (…) Almost all governments in the world Iran, not Gaza issued a condemnation. (…) And the Israeli govern- (…) Iran has two bitter enemies in Trump’s cabinet: ment, led by Netanyahu, is silent. (…) It is very Secretary of Defense James Mattis and National tempting to define Netanyahu’s silence in light of the Security Adviser Michael Flynn. They both fought in violence, racism and even anti-Semitism of the new Iraq a decade ago—Mattis as a division commander, administration as an attempt to satisfy Trump with Flynn as a senior intelligence officer. They saw with flattery and support to achieve practical goals in the their own eyes Iranians killing American soldiers, future. A more thorough examination reveals a con- intentionally. They have not forgiven the Iranians. cerning suspicion that there is more to it than a dirty (…) When it comes to Iran, these two side with tactic. Netanyahu. (…) He has a golden opportunity here. Sima Kadmon, YED, 07.02.17 He must not succeed too much, however. If he con- vinces Trump to bomb Iran, the immediate Iranian Beautiful Friendship response won’t be on American soil but in Israel, in (…) When Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the form of thousands of rockets that will be arrives in the US capital next week, he will be greet- launched from Lebanon and Syria. In addition, when ed by the most supportive political climate Israel has the war will get more complicated, as wars do, the ever seen in Washington. (…) radical Jewish war opponents in America will point an accusing groups have been unsuccessful in rallying the more finger at Israel. moderate leftist Jewish leadership to their cause. Nahum Barnea, YED, 12.02.17 Case in point is the widespread support Trump’s appointment of David Friedman to serve as his Israel treating Trump stupidly ambassador to Israel is receiving from the communi- Less than a month after taking office, President ty. (…) Given this political climate, Netanyahu must Trump is rapidly back-tracking on his campaign use his meeting with Trump to develop a working promises concerning Israel, including moving the alliance to secure Israel’s long-term strategic inter- American embassy to Jerusalem, approving settle- ests both on issues of joint concern and on issues ment expansion in the West Bank and abandoning that concern Israel alone. The first issue on the the two-state "solution." Why? The inauguration of agenda must be Iran. (…) Then there is Syria. And the Trump (…) was followed by euphoria on the part Russia. (…) Netanyahu must present Trump with a of Israelis in general and a massive display of hubris viable plan to reconstitute US-Russian ties in ex- on the part of the government in Jerusalem. Without change for Russian abandonment of its alliance with giving the administration even the courtesy of wait- Tehran and its cooperation with Iran and Hezbollah ing until the prime minister had met with Trump (…) in Syria.(…) Then there are the Sunnis. For the past politicians such as Naftali Bennett are exacerbating six years, Netanyahu successfully withstood the folly by threatening Netanyahu with violent retri- Obama’s pressure by developing an informal alli- bution if he retreats even one centimeter from those ance with Sunni regimes that share its opposition to premature measures. Such behavior would seriously Iran and to the Muslim Brotherhood. (…) Will Trump annoy even a new president less prickly than Trump, push Israel to make concessions to the PLO or who is notoriously sensitive to perceived slights. (…) won’t he? The short answer is that it doesn’t appear It may be that the PM is trying to divert attention that Trump has the slightest intention of doing so. from what may be an impending indictment for cor- (…) Not only did the administration’s statement not ruption, as well as protecting his right flank. But the reject Israel’s right to build new communities, it re- motive doesn't matter. What matters is that such jected completely the position of Trump’s predeces- behavior is incredibly stupid and counter-productive 2 and is a terrible start for what looked like what was an Israeli diplomatic commitment by publicly ac- going to be an excellent bilateral relationship for the knowledging joint strategic interests and strong next four or eight years. (…) security cooperation in the region. (…) In conclu- Norman Bailey, GLO, 12.02.17 sion, President Trump should carefully craft the U.S.-led third party’s effort in pursuing the trend for Seeing eye to eye an Israeli-Palestinian two-state reality. Peace is still (…). Trump campaigned on setting a different tone possible. (…) The formula of “nothing is agreed until with Israel, promising to upgrade the relationship in everything is agreed”, applied in Camp David 2000 both substance and attitude. (…).The early timing of and the subsequent 2008 Annapolis talks should be the visit seems to reflect its importance for both replaced by the credo “whatever is agreed will be leaders. Even if no major announcements are made, implemented.” the meeting presents an opportunity to demonstrate Gilead Sher and Jonathan Heuberger, TOI, 14.02.17 a new, friendlier mood at the very outset of Trump’s presidency. (…) Trump shares Israel’s concern over Trump will be the arbitrator between Israel's the destabilizing effect of Iranian influence in the petty rivals region. (…) The only conceivable future for the Go- It’s as if we’ve sent our prime minister into the heart lan Heights is under Israeli rule. This simple fact of darkness (…), Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to should be clarified during Netanyahu’s meeting with warn his rivals on the fervent right that Israel Trump. (…) Today it is clear to all that, in any con- shouldn’t get into a confrontation with the new U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Documents to the Amicus Brief Submitted to the Jerusalem District Court
    בבית המשפט המחוזי בירושלים עת"מ 36759-05-18 בשבתו כבית משפט לעניינים מנהליים בעניין שבין: 1( ארגון Human Rights Watch 2( עומר שאקר העותרים באמצעות עו"ד מיכאל ספרד ו/או אמילי שפר עומר-מן ו/או סופיה ברודסקי מרח' דוד חכמי 12, תל אביב 6777812 טל: 03-6206947/8/9, פקס 03-6206950 - נ ג ד - שר הפנים המשיב באמצעות ב"כ, מפרקליטות מחוז ירושלים, רחוב מח"ל 7, מעלות דפנה, ירושלים ת.ד. 49333 ירושלים 9149301 טל: 02-5419555, פקס: 026468053 המכון לחקר ארגונים לא ממשלתיים )עמותה רשומה 58-0465508( ידיד בית המשפט באמצעות ב"כ עו"ד מוריס הירש מרח' יד חרוצים 10, ירושלים טל: 02-566-1020 פקס: 077-511-7030 השלמת מסמכים מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בהמשך לדיון שהתקיים ביום 11 במרץ 2019, ובהתאם להחלטת כב' בית המשפט, מתכבד ידיד בית המשפט להגיש את ריכוז הציוציו של העותר מס' 2 החל מיום 25 ליוני 2018 ועד ליום 10 למרץ 2019. כפי שניתן להבחין בנקל מהתמצית המצ"ב כנספח 1, בתקופה האמורה, אל אף טענתו שהינו "פעיל זכויות אדם", בפועל ציוציו )וציוציו מחדש Retweets( התמקדו בנושאים שבהם הביע תמיכה בתנועת החרם או ביקורת כלפי מדינת ישראל ומדיניותה, אך נמנע, כמעט לחלוטין, מלגנות פגיעות בזכיות אדם של אזרחי מדינת ישראל, ובכלל זה, גינוי כלשהו ביחס למעשי רצח של אזרחים ישראלים בידי רוצחים פלסטינים. באשר לטענתו של העותר מס' 2 שחשבון הטוויטר שלו הינו, בפועל, חשבון של העותר מס' 1, הרי שגם כאן ניתן להבין בנקל שטענה זו חסרת בסיס כלשהי. ראשית, החשבון מפנה לתפקידו הקודם בארגון CCR, אליו התייחסנו בחוות הדעת המקורית מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בסעיף 51.
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu Incita All’
    Israele guarda con nervosismo come Trump abbandoni i suoi alleati siriani Lily Galili – Tel Aviv, Israele 10 ottobre 2019 – Middle East Eye Negli ultimi giorni la leadership israeliana ha imparato due cose: a non credere di sapere cosa farà il presidente USA e a non fidarsi di lui come alleato. Durante il Capodanno ebraico è successa una cosa incredibile: per la prima volta il presidente Trump è stato paragonato, nei media israeliani, al suo predecessore, Barack Obama. Non è cosa di poco conto. Per la maggioranza degli israeliani, che si colloca fra il centro e l’estrema destra, Trump è un idolo americano, il migliore amico che Israele abbia mai avuto alla Casa Bianca. Barack Hussein Obama era, per quegli stessi israeliani, l’epitome di tutti i mali. Secondo il Pew, un centro di ricerca con sede a Washington, uno studio recente ha rilevato che solo 2 Paesi su 37 preferiscono Trump a Obama: Russia e Israele. E probabilmente è ancora così. Ma il senso di preoccupazione e di tradimento incombente, innescato dal ritiro improvviso delle truppe americane dal nord della Siria e dall’abbandono senza scrupoli dei curdi, alleati sia dell’America che di Israele, ora cancella l’iniziale adorazione. Né i militari né i politici israeliani considerano la riduzione delle truppe Usa e l’offensiva militare turca che ne è seguita come un pericolo imminente per Israele. Finora ‘i disordini’, come le fonti ufficiali tendono a descrivere la situazione, sono confinati a una regione lontana dal confine tra Israele e la Siria. Ci sono comunque due elementi che preoccupano notevolmente Israele.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DAVID BERG INSTITUTE for LAW and HISTORY at Tel Aviv University ______
    THE DAVID BERG INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND HISTORY at Tel Aviv University ___________ 2013‐2014 Annual Report Submitted by Assaf Likhovski, Director The David Berg Institute for Law and History Buchmann Faculty of Law Tel Aviv University [email protected] 011 (972) 3‐640‐8018 We are delighted to submit the 2013‐2014 Annual Report for The David Berg Institute for Law and History at the TAU Buchmann Faculty of Law. We are particularly proud of several new activities for young legal historians that were launched this year. The David Berg Summer School for Young Legal Historians (item no. 2) provided graduate students and young untenured faculty the opportunity to present their research projects to leading senior legal historians, who provided valuable commentary. The Institute supported a yearlong series of meetings initiated and organized by young legal history graduate students at TAU (item no. 15); and we hosted our first post‐doctoral student (item no. 16). The David Berg Institute also completed two major projects essential to the Israeli legal history infrastructure. We collaborated with the Nevo Legal Database and the TAU David J. Light Law Library on the digitization of the Hebrew version of the Mandatory Palestine Gazette (item no. 17); and completed work on a new updated bibliography of secondary sources on Israeli legal history (item no. 18). This was in addition to the support the Institute provides to legal history‐related research by TAU graduate students and faculty, and to our many conferences, symposia and lectures. This year, for the first time, we videotaped some of these events, and they are now available for viewing online (see items 1, 5 & 13).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 14/15 Aktuelles Aus
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 14/15 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 16. – 31. Juli Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Iran-Abkommen ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Freiheit für Jonathan Pollard ............................................................................................................................ 3 3. Zehn Jahre nach Gaza-Abzug ......................................................................................................................... 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Iran-Abkommen weapons. (…) The West could use a lot more back- Als einen „historischen Irrtum“ bezeichnete Premi- bone and fewer "historic" agreements. Selah! erminister Benjamin Netanyahu das Atomabkom- Norman A. Bailey, GLO, 16.07.15 men, auf das sich Iran mit den fünf UN-Vetomächten und Deutschland geeinigt hat. Israel sei, so betonte Six strikes against Iran deal er, nicht an das Abkommen gebunden. Netanyahu (…) The way in which the negotiations were con- kündigte an, sich vor dem US-Kongress gegen das ducted underscored the weakness of the U.S. The Abkommen starkzumachen. Dort haben viele Re- Obama administration was willing to offer almost publikaner ihren Widerstand gegen die Vereinba- unlimited concessions to the skillful Iranian negotia- rung angekündigt. Kritiker Netanyahus in Israel
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Middle East News Update
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, May 15 Headlines: ● Netanyahu Postpones Government Swearing-In Until Sunday ● Peretz Joins New Gov’t as Minister of Jerusalem Affairs ● Bibi, Gantz Will ‘Take a While’ to Decide on Annexation ● Senate Legislation Seeks to Lessen Dependence on China ● EU Condemns Hate Speech in Palestinian Textbooks ● Palestinians Vow to Foil Annexation and Trump Plan ● Clashes Erupt in Wadi Ara Over Sheba Stabber's Death ● Netanyahu Orders Opening of Schools in 'Safe' Areas Commentary: ● Israel Hayom: “Politicians Can Scent Weakness from Afar” − By Matti Tuchfeld ● Ma’ariv: “Tar and Feather” − By Ben Caspit S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 The Hon. Robert Wexler, President News Excerpts May 15, 2020 Ynet News Likud Rebellion Delays Knesset Swearing-In Prime Minister Netanyahu delayed the swearing-in of the new government, just hours before it was due to take place, until Sunday. The prime minister has not yet finalized a new position for seven of his close supporters most of whom were ministers in his recent cabinet. A significant portion of the posts have not yet been filled, leaving responsibility for budgets worth tens of billions of shekels to last-minute horse trading. "It's stuck with some of the ministries. Netanyahu has yet to reach a deal with Yoav Galant, Ze'ev Elkin, Nir Barkat, Gila Gamliel, Tzipi Hotoveli, David Amsalem and Avi Dichter," Likud officials said. The former Shin Bet chief told his associates: "Such disrespect is not shown only to me, but spits in the face of 130,000 Likud officials who elected me to the top 10 of the Likud." Blue & White leader Benny Gantz agreed to the delay in order to give Netanyahu more time to allocate cabinet posts to those Likud members, a joint statement said.
    [Show full text]
  • February 17 2020 Netanyahu’S Economic Plan: Who Will Believe the Spin?
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Monday, February 17 Headlines: • U.S. Ambassador to Israel to Lead Joint Committee on Annexation • Palestinian PM: Trump's Mideast Plan 'Will be Buried' • Security Ties with Israel Won't Last Forever, Abbas Spokesperson Says • Hospitals and Cheap Houses: Netanyahu, Barkat Unveil Financial Plan • Right-Wing Religious Parties Renew Pledge to Back Netanyahu as PM • Mandelblit, Ashkenazi Recordings from Harpaz Affair Aired for First Time • Lapid: If Democrat wins, Netanyahu-Led Israel in ‘Deep Trouble’ • J Street Calls for Democratic Group to Take Down Sanders Aattack Ad Commentary: • Ha’aretz: “Whether Gantz Wins or Loses, It Will Be on Netanyahu’s Terms” - By Anshel Pfeffer, commentator at Ha’aretz • Ma’ariv: “Netanyahu’s Economic Plan: Who Will Believe the Spin?” - By Yehuda Sharoni, commentator at Ma’ariv S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor News Excerpts February 17, 2020 Ha’aretz U.S. Ambassador to Israel to Lead Joint Committee on Annexation The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed on Saturday that its ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, will lead the joint Israeli-U.S. committee that will discuss the Israeli annexation of West Bank settlements. The committee was announced by Trump last month during the unveiling of his Middle East peace plan, which would see Israel applying sovereignty to swathes of the West Bank in exchange for parts of Israel's south and a cluster of Arab-majority towns in the north. The participants' goal, as Trump said, is to "convert the conceptual map" shown in the plan into a "more detailed and calibrated rendering so that recognition can be immediately achieved.” See also, “US-Israeli mapping committee for Trump peace plan said finalized” (TOI) Ynet News Palestinian PM: Trump's Mideast Plan 'Will be Buried' The Palestinian prime minister lashed out Sunday at U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and US Relations
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs October 28, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL33476 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Since Israel’s founding in 1948, successive U.S. Presidents and many Members of Congress have demonstrated a commitment to Israel’s security and to close U.S.-Israel cooperation. Perceptions of shared democratic values and religious affinities have contributed to strong bilateral ties. The question of Israel’s security regularly influences U.S. policy considerations regarding the Middle East, and Congress provides active oversight of executive branch dealings with Israel and other actors in the region. Israel is a leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid and a frequent purchaser of major U.S. weapons systems. By law, U.S. arms sales cannot adversely affect Israel’s “qualitative military edge” over other countries in its region. The two countries signed a free trade agreement in 1985, and the United States is Israel’s largest trading partner. Israel has many regional security concerns, and aligning U.S. and Israeli policies to address these concerns has presented persistent challenges. In a dangerous and uncertain regional environment, Israel regularly seeks assurance that the United States will bolster its regional security standing and self-defense capabilities. A new U.S.-Israel memorandum of understanding will provide Israel with $38 million in military assistance from FY2019 to FY2028, subject to congressional approval. In addition to concerns over Iran’s regional position that have increased despite or because of the 2015 international agreement on Iran’s nuclear program, Israel’s perceptions of security around its borders have changed since 2011 as several surrounding Arab countries have experienced political upheaval.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel (Includes West Bank and Gaza) 2020 International Religious Freedom Report
    ISRAEL (INCLUDES WEST BANK AND GAZA) 2020 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The country’s laws and Supreme Court rulings protect the freedoms of conscience, faith, religion, and worship, regardless of an individual’s religious affiliation. The 1992 Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty describes the country as a “Jewish and democratic state.” The 2018 Basic Law: Israel – The Nation State of the Jewish People law determines, according to the government, that “the Land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people; the State of Israel is the nation state of the Jewish People, in which it realizes its natural, cultural, religious and historical right to self-determination; and exercising the right to national self- determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish People.” In June, authorities charged Zion Cohen for carrying out attacks on May 17 on religious institutions in Petah Tikva, Ashdod, Tel Aviv, and Kfar Saba. According to his indictment, Cohen sought to stop religious institutions from providing services to secular individuals, thereby furthering his goal of separating religion and the state. He was awaiting trial at year’s end. In July, the Haifa District Court upheld the 2019 conviction and sentencing for incitement of Raed Salah, head of the prohibited Islamic Movement, for speaking publicly in favor an attack by the group in 2017 that killed two police officers at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount. In his defense, Salah stated that his views were religious opinions rooted in the Quran and that they did not include a direct call to violence.
    [Show full text]
  • TAMA 100 – a Master Plan for Greater Israel
    SOVEREIGNTY WŽůŝƚŝĐĂů :ŽƵƌŶĂůͬ/ƐƐƵĞ ŶŽ͘ ϵ ͬEŽǀĞŵďĞƌ ϮϬϭϳ WƵďůŝƐŚĞĚďLJdŚĞ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJDŽǀĞŵĞŶƚĨŽƵŶĚĞĚďLJtŽŵĞŶŝŶ'ƌĞĞŶĂŶĚ:ƵƐƚWĞĂĐĞĨŽƌ/ƐƌĂĞů From the State of Israel To the Land of Minister Gila Gamliel presents an Israel ŽƵƚůŝŶĞĨŽƌĂƉŽůŝƟĐĂů plan: Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria and TAMA 100 – A ĂWĂůĞƐƟŶŝĂŶ^ƚĂƚĞŝŶ^ŝŶĂŝ Master Plan for ^ĐŽŽƉ͗A team of experts Greater Israel is preparing TAMA 100, a EĂƟŽŶĂůKƵƚůŝŶĞWůĂŶƚŚĂƚǁŝůů͕ ĨŽƌƚŚĞĮƌƐƚƟŵĞ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ:ƵĚĞĂ and Samaria, as an indivisible ƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨ/ƐƌĂĞů Former Minister Gideon Saar͗ ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJŵƵƐƚďĞƚŚĞ>ŝŬƵĚ͛Ɛ WŽƐŝƟŽŶ dŚĞ^ŚĂƐWĂƌƚLJŝŶĨĂǀŽƌŽĨ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJ͘ ŶŝŶƚĞƌǀŝĞǁǁŝƚŚMK Yoav Ben Tsur, ŚĞĂĚŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƟŽŶ͘ 2 / SOVEREIGNTY / Political Journal Table of Contents: Minister Gila Gamliel’s /ŶƚƌŝŐƵŝŶŐWŽůŝƟĐĂů MK Bezalel SmotrichƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐŚŝƐƉŽůŝƟĐĂů 4 WůĂŶ͗/ĨƚŚĞƌĞŝƐƚŽďĞĂWĂůĞƐƟŶŝĂŶƐƚĂƚĞ͕ 14 ƉůĂŶ͗/ŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽĂƩĂŝŶƚƌƵĞƉĞĂĐĞǁĞ ƚŚĞŶŝƚĐĂŶŽŶůLJďĞŝŶ^ŝŶĂŝ͘ ŵƵƐƚĂƉƉůLJ/ƐƌĂĞůŝ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJĂŶĚƚŚƵƐ ĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĂŶLJŽƚŚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂůĂƐƉŝƌĂƟŽŶŝŶ &ŽƌŵĞƌMinister Gideon SaarŝƐŶŽƚ ƚŚĞ>ĂŶĚŽĨ/ƐƌĂĞů͘ 6 ŝŵƉƌĞƐƐĞĚďLJƚŚƌĞĂƚƐĂŶĚƐĞůĨͲŝŶƟŵŝĚĂƟŽŶ͗ ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJŵƵƐƚďĞƚŚĞ>ŝŬƵĚ͛ƐƉŽƐŝƟŽŶ͘ MK Yehuda Glick ĞdžƉůĂŝŶƐǁŚLJĂ 15 &ĞĚĞƌĂƟŽŶŝƐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚƌĞĂůŝƐƟĐƐŽůƵƟŽŶŝŶ Rabbi Shmuel EliahuŝŶĂŶ/ŶƚĞƌǀŝĞǁ͗ ŚŝƐŽƉŝŶŝŽŶ͘ 8 ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJŝƐƚŚĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŽĨĂ ƉŽƐŝƟǀĞĐŽŵŵĂŶĚŵĞŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞdŽƌĂŚ͘ 16 Moshe Feiglin’sWůĂŶŽĨWŚĂƐĞƐ͘ Ken Abramowitz ĞdžƉůĂŝŶƐǁŚLJ/ƐƌĂĞů 9 ŵƵƐƚŚŽůĚŽŶƚŽ:ƵĚĞĂĂŶĚ^ĂŵĂƌŝĂĨŽƌŝƚƐ ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞĚĞdžŝƐƚĞŶĐĞ͘ Rep. Alan ClemmonsŝŶKnjǀĞ'ĂŽŶ͗͞EŽ 17 ŵŽƌĞƉŽůŝƟĐĂůĐŽƌƌĞĐƚŶĞƐƐ͘dŚŝƐŝƐLJŽƵƌ :ĞƌƵƐĂůĞŵʹŶŽƵƚůŝŶĞĨŽƌ^ŽǀĞƌĞŝŐŶƚLJ͘ >ĂŶĚ͘͟ LJ Prof. Robert Wolfe. ĐŽŶŽŵŝƐƚAmatzia SamkaiŽŶƚŚĞĮƌƐƚ :ƵƌŝƐƚ͕ƩLJ͘ZŽƚŵĂŶƐƚĂƚĞƐ͗dŚĞƚŚƌĞĂƚŽĨ
    [Show full text]
  • In the Eye of Storms:Israel &The Middle East
    IN THE EYE OF STORMS : ISRAEL & THE MIDDLE EAST Preliminary Agenda and Program Table of Contents Overview Plan PROGRAM 2 PLENARY SESSIONS (January 31-February 2) 3 HERZLIYA ROUNDTABLE SESSIONS (January 30-31) 10 SPECIAL EVENTS 14 EXPERT IDF FIELD TRIP (January 29) 15 *The program is preliminary and subject to change; as of January 30, 2012; speakers marked with asterisks are to be confirmed. 1 PLENARY SESSIONS HERZLIYA ROUNDTABLE SESSIONS PROGRAM SPECIAL EVENTS EXPERT IDF FIELD TRIP January 29 January 30 January 31 February 1 February 2 08:30-17:00 09:00-12:00 09:00-13:00 09:00-14:00 09:00-09:45 08:00-09:30 09:00-09:30 Expert IDF Field Trip Short-Term Scenarios Toward a New European The 2012 Herzliya Game: Oil Contemporary Challenges The Future of Long-Term Opening Briefing for the Middle East Strategy for the Middle @US$250 Savings and Pensions in East Head of the Opposition Israel Director of IDF Military Intelligence 09:45-11:15 10:00-11:30 10:00-12:30 10:00-12:30 09:30-11:00 09:45-11:15 09:45-11:15 It's the Women in Cyber Warfare The Nexus of Ethics, Auditing The Rise of Keep or Export? Economy: The National and Security in Terror and and Governance Political Islam The Gas US and Europe Security: An Social Networks Crime Performance Across the Findings and in the Global International Middle East: Israel's Energy Marketplace Perspective Arab Spring or Independence Islamist Winter 11:30-13:00 11:30-13:00 11:00-12:30 11:15-12:45 11:15-12:30 Israel and the Global Economy: No Peace, No Process: Israel- Cyber Warfare: The Ticking Galilee:
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 14/19 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 14/19 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-31. August Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Schlagabtausch im Norden ........................................................................................................................................... .1 2. In Israel nicht willkommen ............................................................................................................................................. .4 3. Countdown zum Urnengang .......................................................................................................................................... .6 4. Medienquerschnitt .......................................................................................................................................................... .9 1. Schlagabtausch im Norden The facts behind Nasrallahs threats directed at Israel steht offiziell hinter den Angriffen auf militäri- Israel sche Stützpunkte südlich von Damaskus. Ziel sei Nasrallah claimed the base that was attacked, lo- gewesen, der unmittelbaren Bedrohung durch irani- cated south of Damascus, was a Hezbollah base, sche „Killerdrohnen“ zu begegnen. Regierungschef despite the fact that his organization does not oper- Benjamin Netanyahu lobte die Operation der Luft- ate in the area. His aim was not only to remove waffe, die einen Angriff iranischer Milizen verhindert blame for his Iranian patrons, but also to clear the habe. Im Süden Beiruts sollen, Berichten der Hisbol- Syrian regime from any responsibility. The Hezbol- lah zufolge,
    [Show full text]