Expression of Exogenous Wt-P53 Does Not Affect Normal Hematopoiesis: Implications for Bone Marrow Purging
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Gene Therapy (1997) 4, 1371–1378 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0969-7128/97 $12.00 Expression of exogenous wt-p53 does not affect normal hematopoiesis: implications for bone marrow purging R Scardigli1,2, G Bossi1, G Blandino1,3, M Crescenzi1, S Soddu1 and A Sacchi1 1Molecular Oncogenesis Laboratory, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, CRS, Via delle Messi d’Oro 156, 00158 Rome, Italy Some gene therapy approaches for cancer treatment undertook a series of experiments to assess whether trans- attempt to transduce onco-suppressor genes into tumor duction of wt-p53 into normal hematopoietic cells is harm- cells. A central problem of this strategy is the targeting of ful. Two different wt-p53-recombinant retroviruses were tumor cells to avoid damage to normal ones. It has been used to infect primary, murine BM cells. Expression of noticed that transduction of wt-p53 into a large number of exogenous wt-p53 in these cells did not affect in vitro col- cancer cells induces tumor suppression. In contrast, some ony formation, and did not induce any observable effects observations suggest that introduction of exogenous wt- on morphology and differentiation. In contrast, the same p53 into nontransformed cells does not impair proliferation. viruses suppressed the tumor phenotype of v-src-transfor- If normal bone marrow (BM) cells are not affected by med 32D cells. These results might open the way to gene wt-p53 transduction, BM purging from p53-responding therapy approaches to leukemias with the p53 gene with- leukemic cells might be achieved in vitro by delivering out the need to target specifically and uniquely the tumor the wild-type onco-suppressor to all marrow cells. We cells, sparing the normal ones. Keywords: onco-suppressor; retroviral vector; leukemia; gene therapy; tumor targeting Introduction mutations.7–9 Various effects ranging from growth arrest7,10 to apoptosis11,12 or differentiation13–15 have been One of the critical steps in tumor gene therapy with described, making the wt-p53 gene a promising tool for tumor-suppressing agents (eg toxins, prodrugs, onco- tumor gene therapy. Interestingly, it was originally suppressor genes) is the transduction of the appropriate observed that introduction of exogenous wt-p53 into non- target cells. Tissue-specific methods for gene transfer or transformed, wt-p53 expressing cells, such as normal rat expression are being developed. Viral vectors are embryo fibroblasts,16,17 and VACO 235 adenoma cells7 directed to target specific cell types through chimeric coat causes no observable phenotype, suggesting that the vari- proteins containing the viral env and eukaryotic ligands, ous effects induced by wt-p53 expression might occur 1 such as EPO, or by bi-specific molecular adaptors that only in tumor cells. 2 recognize both env protein and cellular receptors. It was observed that low-level UV irradiation can acti- Another strategy is based on inserting tissue-specific pro- vate sequence-specific transcription by wt-p53 without an moters into retroviral long terminal repeats (LTRs). These increase in p53 protein levels. This activation can also be modifications drive exogenous gene transcription only in induced by antibodies specific to the C-terminal negative 3 particular tissues. An alternative approach to these stra- regulatory domain of p53 or by small peptides derived tegies might be offered by transduction of genes whose from this domain. It has thus been suggested that post- expression is detrimental only for tumor cells while not translational modifications of this negative regulatory harmful for normal ones. Some observations suggest that domain in vivo are rate-limiting steps for wt-p53 acti- the p53 onco-suppressor might belong to this type of vation.18,19 Recently, we found that expression of tem- gene. perature-sensitive p53 in its wild-type configuration Genetic modifications of the p53 onco-suppressor gene affects neither morphology nor proliferation of nontrans- are the most frequent alterations found in human can- formed, murine 32D myeloid progenitors maintained in 4–6 cers. In the past few years, a large number of experi- their normal culture conditions. In contrast, an acceler- ments have been performed to study the suppressor ated apoptotic cell death was observed after IL-3 with- activities of exogenous wt-p53 expression in tumor cells drawal,20 suggesting that this event might trigger the that have lost their normal alleles or bear p53 post-translational modifications that activate wt-p53, which would otherwise remain inactive in nonstressing conditions, in these nontransformed cells. However, Correspondence: S Soddu or A Sacchi when we transformed 32D cells with different oncogenes, Present addresses: 2Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Universite´ Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France; and 3Depart- wt-p53 expression was then able to induce tumor-sup- ment of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel pressing effects without the need for stressing stimuli.21 Received 4 February 1997; accepted 11 July 1997 These results suggest either that transformed cells might Exogenous wt-p53 does not affect normal hemopoiesis R Scardigli et al 1372 directly activate wt-p53 in the absence of stressing con- ditions, or that they are no longer able to maintain wt- p53 in an inactive form. We sought to take advantage of these findings for a new strategy of leukemia gene ther- apy. We proposed to purge the BM from leukemia by the functional targeting of tumor cells, while avoiding dam- age to normal ones, by delivering in vitro wt-p53 to all of the marrow cells. To begin to evaluate the feasibility of this strategy, we set up a series of experiments to verify whether the exogenous wt-p53 gene can be transduced into normal cells without untoward effects. Primary, murine BM cells were infected with two different recom- binant retroviruses carrying the human wt-p53 cDNA and the puromycin (pBabe-p53) or the neomycin (pLp53SN) selectable markers. No differences in prolifer- ation, differentiation, and colony formation in the pres- ence of different cytokines were found between the infected and the control cells, indicating that normal murine BM cells can tolerate transduction of an exogen- ous wt-p53 gene. In contrast, the same wt-p53 expressing retroviruses were able to infect and induce a suppressing effect on 32Dv-src-transformed cells, suggesting the possibility of using a single agent to transduce both nor- mal and tumor cells and obtain detrimental effects only in the latter. Results Expression of exogenous wt-p53 is not harmful to 32D myeloid progenitors The murine 32D cell line is constituted by nontumori- genic, myeloid progenitors,22,23 which are dependent on IL-3 for survival and proliferation, and differentiate into granulocytes upon granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulation.24 Because of these characteristics and the low predisposition to develop IL-3-independent Figure 1 32D parental and tsp53-transfectants maintained in the pres- subclones,25 these cells are considered an adequate model ence of IL-3 or induced to differentiate by G-CSF, at the indicated tempera- tures, were cytocentrifuged and stained with May–Grunwald Giemsa to for in vitro hemopoiesis. We found that expression of the evaluate morphological features. Each cell population cultured with IL-3 temperature-sensitive p53Val135 (ts-p53) mutant, that is constituted by undifferentiated blasts, whereas those incubated with G- behaves like wt-p53 at 32°C but not at 37°C, affects CSF are mostly constituted (80% of the alive cells) of differentiated poly- neither morphology nor proliferation of 32D cells main- morphonuclear cells. tained at a permissive temperature in their normal cul- ture conditions.20 To verify whether exogenous wt-p53 murine leukemia virus and carry the selectable markers expression is also compatible with differentiation, we for puromycin or neomycin resistance, respectively. The incubated the ts-p53-expressing 32D-tsp53#6 and 32D- murine VE and GP+E packaging cells were transfected tsp53#10 cells21 at the permissive temperature in the pres- with the different constructs to produce ecotropic retro- ence of G-CSF, to assess their granulocyte maturation, viruses, as described in Materials and methods. compared with parental 32D cells. Granulocytic differen- To confirm that the human p53 protein produced by tiation was morphologically evaluated on cytocentrifuge our packaging cells has wild-type configuration, we preparations fixed and stained with May–Grunwald immunoprecipitated the exogenous p53 with mAbs Giemsa. No difference in differentiation was observed PAb1801 and PAb1620. The first mAb recognizes human between tsp53-expressing and control cells after 12 days p53 in both wild-type and mutant configurations while of incubation at 32°C in the presence of G-CSF (Figure the second recognizes only wild-type configuration. As 1). Thus, exogenous wt-p53 expression interferes neither shown in Figure 2, both packaging cell lines – VE/Babe- with morphology and proliferation, nor with differen- p53 and GP+E/Lp53 – express an exogenous p53 protein tiation of 32D cells. with wild-type immunoreactivity. Mouse primary BM cells were infected by 24 h coculti- Infection by retroviral vectors carrying wt-p53 does not vation with mitomycin-treated packaging cells in the affect the colony forming efficiency of primary BM cells presence of IL-3. The colony forming efficiency of these The results obtained with ts-p53 protein in 32D cells infected BM cells was tested by cultivation in methyl- prompted us to evaluate the effects of exogenous wt-p53 cellulose, in the presence of IL-3, GM-CSF or EPO, and transduction in primary BM cells. We inserted the human puromycin or G418 (see Materials and methods for wt-p53 cDNA into two different retroviral vectors – details). As shown in Table 1, cells infected with the wt- pBabe-puro and pLXSN – which derive from Moloney p53 recombinant retroviruses form colonies with the Exogenous wt-p53 does not affect normal hemopoiesis R Scardigli et al 1373 Figure 2 Biochemical analysis of exogenous p53 proteins in packaging cells.