DOCSLIB.ORG

Anke Over Kjennelse/Beslutning I Sivile Saker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anke Over Kjennelse/Beslutning I Sivile Saker ANKE OVER KJENNELSE/BESLUTNING I SIVILE SAKER Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 192 147 182 185 184 Borgarting 590 592 539 600 548 Eidsivating 144 169 132 129 143 Frostating 170 191 115 163 147 Gulating 313 307 305 286 265 Hålogaland 170 160 152 132 170 Totalt 1579 1566 1425 1495 1457 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 192 151 188 186 179 Borgarting 592 605 526 597 543 Eidsivating 138 170 134 122 143 Frostating 160 178 140 145 160 Gulating 311 306 307 258 289 Hålogaland 164 162 154 134 171 Totalt 1557 1572 1449 1442 1485 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 21 17 13 12 15 Borgarting 118 102 110 117 122 Eidsivating 17 16 14 21 20 Frostating 35 47 22 40 29 Gulating 35 37 36 63 39 Hålogaland 17 15 13 11 10 Totalt 243 234 208 264 235 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.2 Borgarting 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.3 Eidsivating 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 Frostating 1.9 2.7 2.5 1.7 2.6 Gulating 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 Hålogaland 1.2 1.3 1.3 0.9 1.0 Veid gj.snitt 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.9 Side 1 ANKE OVER DOM I SIVILE SAKER Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 267 245 219 233 219 Borgarting 830 757 721 728 696 Eidsivating 185 157 185 172 162 Frostating 260 250 225 223 203 Gulating 387 382 365 338 323 Hålogaland 199 186 204 190 161 Totalt 2128 1977 1919 1884 1764 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 276 240 240 233 207 Borgarting 751 711 739 756 719 Eidsivating 169 175 166 178 162 Frostating 248 267 216 214 207 Gulating 413 398 322 352 296 Hålogaland 201 196 201 192 164 Totalt 2058 1987 1884 1925 1755 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 122 128 107 107 122 Borgarting 524 569 552 522 501 Eidsivating 89 69 89 83 84 Frostating 117 98 104 114 111 Gulating 160 139 179 165 192 Hålogaland 74 63 65 64 58 Totalt 1086 1066 1096 1055 1068 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 5.7 6.3 5.9 6.2 6.5 Borgarting 6.9 8.2 8.5 9.3 8.0 Eidsivating 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.7 Frostating 4.6 5.5 4.3 5.9 6.0 Gulating 5.6 5.3 4.7 5.7 6.7 Hålogaland 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.2 4.7 Veid gj.snitt 5.8 6.4 6.3 7.0 6.8 Side 2 OVERSKJØNN Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 8 15 10 5 9 Borgarting 17 15 28 23 18 Eidsivating 5 16 5 11 6 Frostating 9 14 9 10 13 Gulating 19 16 13 17 12 Hålogaland 5 5 8 6 6 Totalt 63 81 73 72 64 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 4 12 10 10 7 Borgarting 16 11 14 28 15 Eidsivating 10 13 7 8 8 Frostating 10 13 8 8 11 Gulating 20 18 18 11 12 Hålogaland 8 4 6 8 7 Totalt 68 71 63 73 60 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 7 10 10 5 7 Borgarting 9 13 25 20 23 Eidsivating 5 8 6 9 7 Frostating 4 5 6 8 10 Gulating 13 10 5 12 11 Hålogaland 1 3 5 3 2 Totalt 39 49 57 57 60 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 11.2 6.5 10.1 9.6 10.9 Borgarting 8.1 10.1 9.8 10.1 10.7 Eidsivating 11.1 7.6 10.1 10.1 8.6 Frostating 5.9 6.6 6.2 6.8 11.7 Gulating 9.9 8.8 8.1 9.2 9.5 Hålogaland 7.9 7.6 5.5 5.9 7.6 Veid gj.snitt 8.9 7.9 8.5 9.1 10.0 Side 3 FØRSTEINSTANSSAK Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 19 10 7 12 12 Borgarting 50 40 45 47 38 Eidsivating 15 7 8 16 13 Frostating 8 9 7 13 9 Gulating 10 13 34 25 17 Hålogaland 8 5 7 7 8 Totalt 110 84 108 120 97 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 18 19 7 10 10 Borgarting 43 38 41 49 47 Eidsivating 11 16 6 10 18 Frostating 15 3 9 12 13 Gulating 14 15 14 26 23 Hålogaland 6 9 3 9 9 Totalt 107 100 80 116 120 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 16 7 7 9 11 Borgarting 41 43 46 44 35 Eidsivating 14 5 7 13 8 Frostating 3 9 7 8 4 Gulating 8 6 26 25 18 Hålogaland 6 2 6 4 3 Totalt 88 72 99 103 79 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 9.0 10.3 11.2 7.4 6.8 Borgarting 8.7 10.1 11.1 9.9 9.3 Eidsivating 6.8 9.1 8.7 6.5 6.7 Frostating 6.3 9.6 6.8 8.2 8.6 Gulating 9.1 7.5 5.6 8.4 9.6 Hålogaland 4.7 5.9 6.0 6.4 3.6 Veid gj.snitt 8.1 9.2 9.3 8.6 8.3 Side 4 ANKE OVER KJENNELSE/BESLUTNING I STRAFFESAKER Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 511 453 443 411 477 Borgarting 1348 1363 1321 1262 1165 Eidsivating 250 219 272 279 327 Frostating 289 283 257 272 308 Gulating 672 624 585 548 491 Hålogaland 171 143 169 139 185 Totalt 3241 3085 3047 2911 2953 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 508 453 445 410 477 Borgarting 1337 1352 1302 1263 1170 Eidsivating 256 219 270 283 323 Frostating 294 279 255 273 309 Gulating 671 621 582 546 492 Hålogaland 163 145 171 137 183 Totalt 3229 3069 3025 2912 2954 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 4 4 2 3 3 Borgarting 20 30 33 32 23 Eidsivating 3 3 3 1 5 Frostating 4 7 9 8 6 Gulating 22 11 13 15 12 Hålogaland 9 2 0 2 4 Totalt 62 57 60 61 53 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2016 2018 2019 2020 Agder 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 Borgarting 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 Eidsivating 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 Frostating 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gulating 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Hålogaland 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 Veid gj.snitt 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 Side 5 ANKEPRØVING I STRAFFESAKER Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 514 479 450 460 392 Borgarting 1307 1141 1055 1085 1027 Eidsivating 318 321 316 296 293 Frostating 309 286 306 301 300 Gulating 550 534 511 483 446 Hålogaland 307 287 274 291 299 Totalt 3305 3048 2912 2916 2757 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 518 482 449 451 373 Borgarting 1262 1235 996 1078 983 Eidsivating 323 329 313 292 296 Frostating 309 266 326 304 268 Gulating 547 516 531 460 427 Hålogaland 295 290 268 274 309 Totalt 3254 3118 2883 2859 2656 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 10 1 5 10 28 Borgarting 188 94 150 155 198 Eidsivating 15 9 13 16 12 Frostating 24 37 14 10 40 Gulating 28 40 17 34 48 Hålogaland 0 8 10 22 11 Totalt 265 189 209 247 337 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 Borgarting 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.6 Eidsivating 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 Frostating 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 Gulating 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 Hålogaland 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 Veid gj.snitt 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 Silingsprosent - saker henvist 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 36.9 % 36.5 % 48.1 % 46.3 % 33.8 % Borgarting 39.9 % 41.1 % 41.1 % 41.7 % 31.3 % Eidsivating 38.4 % 36.2 % 35.8 % 41.1 % 27.4 % Frostating 43.0 % 40.6 % 40.5 % 40.5 % 33.6 % Gulating 36.7 % 39.5 % 40.4 % 44.6 % 35.1 % Hålogaland 34.9 % 39.3 % 41.4 % 43.4 % 32.0 % Side 6 FAGDOMMERSAKER Innkomne saker 1 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 64 49 58 73 46 Borgarting 114 104 86 101 89 Eidsivating 28 30 30 38 20 Frostating 31 19 23 15 23 Gulating 45 59 50 51 39 Hålogaland 21 20 21 28 27 Totalt 303 281 268 306 244 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 68 60 51 57 61 Borgarting 125 127 117 113 105 Eidsivating 31 32 32 36 22 Frostating 29 21 27 10 24 Gulating 49 52 52 49 46 Hålogaland 28 16 26 20 35 Totalt 330 308 305 285 293 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 18 8 15 31 16 Borgarting 63 56 36 41 39 Eidsivating 9 9 8 10 7 Frostating 10 8 4 7 8 Gulating 10 15 15 19 13 Hålogaland 5 9 5 13 6 Totalt 115 105 83 121 89 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 3.8 4.2 4.1 4.6 5.0 Borgarting 5.8 6.9 7.3 5.4 6.0 Eidsivating 3.6 4.9 3.9 3.3 3.4 Frostating 4.1 4.8 4.3 5.0 5.1 Gulating 4.3 4.1 3.7 4.4 6.5 Hålogaland 3.9 4.0 4.5 4.6 3.7 Veid gj.snitt 4.7 5.4 5.3 4.7 5.3 1 Enkelte ankesaker prøves først etter at tallene til årsstatistikken er hentet ut.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Þingvellir National Park
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1152.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Þingvellir National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: ICELAND CRITERIA: C (iii) (vi) CL DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (iii): The Althing and its hinterland, the Þingvellir National Park, represent, through the remains of the assembly ground, the booths for those who attended, and through landscape evidence of settlement extending back possibly to the time the assembly was established, a unique reflection of mediaeval Norse/Germanic culture and one that persisted in essence from its foundation in 980 AD until the 18th century. Criterion (vi): Pride in the strong association of the Althing to mediaeval Germanic/Norse governance, known through the 12th century Icelandic sagas, and reinforced during the fight for independence in the 19th century, have, together with the powerful natural setting of the assembly grounds, given the site iconic status as a shrine for the national. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Þingvellir (Thingvellir) is the National Park where the Althing - an open-air assembly, which represented the whole of Iceland - was established in 930 and continued to meet until 1798. Over two weeks a year, the assembly set laws - seen as a covenant between free men - and settled disputes. The Althing has deep historical and symbolic associations for the people of Iceland. Located on an active volcanic site, the property includes the Þingvellir National Park and the remains of the Althing itself: fragments of around 50 booths built of turf and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy in the Nordic Countries 2
    Genealogy in The Nordic Countries 2 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 Presenter: 3 Finn Karlsen, Norway Retired consultant from the Regional State Archive in Trondheim 23.09.2018 4 Short history OF THE SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES Important years 5 1262 Iceland makes an agreement with Norway 1397 Kalmar Union between Danmark, Sweden and Norway with Iceland 1523 Kalmar union ends and Denmark, Norway and Iceland ruled by a common Danish King 1814 Norway gets its constitution, but ends up in union with Sweden 1905 Norway independent 1907 Iceland independent, but with Danish king 1944 Iceland total independence with President Border changes that might 6 influence our research Norway – Sweden Denmark – Sweden Denmark - Germany 7 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 8 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 9 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 10 Denmark Germany 1864 11 Prince-archives (Fyrstedømmenes arkiver) at National Archive in Copenhagen Ordinary archives like The church records at Landsarkivet in Aabenraa archives Some documents specially for the southern part of Slesvig are at the archive in Slesvig Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 Early laws Norway: Frostating, Gulating and Eidsivating regional Laws 1274 King Magnus made common laws for Norway Laws Denmark: Jyske law, Skånske law and Sjællands law Iceland: 930 (written 1117) Graagaas 1264 Jarnsida 1281 Jonsbok Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 12 13
    [Show full text]
  • The Hostages of the Northmen: from the Viking Age to the Middle Ages
    Part IV: Legal Rights It has previously been mentioned how hostages as rituals during peace processes – which in the sources may be described with an ambivalence, or ambiguity – and how people could be used as social capital in different conflicts. It is therefore important to understand how the persons who became hostages were vauled and how their new collective – the new household – responded to its new members and what was crucial for his or her status and participation in the new setting. All this may be related to the legal rights and special privileges, such as the right to wear coat of arms, weapons, or other status symbols. Personal rights could be regu- lated by agreements: oral, written, or even implied. Rights could also be related to the nature of the agreement itself, what kind of peace process the hostage occurred in and the type of hostage. But being a hostage also meant that a person was subjected to restric- tions on freedom and mobility. What did such situations meant for the hostage-taking party? What were their privileges and obli- gations? To answer these questions, a point of departure will be Kosto’s definition of hostages in continental and Mediterranean cultures around during the period 400–1400, when hostages were a form of security for the behaviour of other people. Hostages and law The hostage had its special role in legal contexts that could be related to the discussion in the introduction of the relationship between religion and law. The views on this subject are divided How to cite this book chapter: Olsson, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnus Barefoot from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Magnus Barefoot From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the second Norwegian king named Magnus Olafsson. For the earlier Norwegian king, see Magnus the Good. Magnus Barefoot Drawing of a coin from the reign of Magnus Barefoot (with confused legend)[1] King of Norway Reign September 1093 – 24 August 1103 Predecessor Olaf III Successor Sigurd I, Eystein I and Olaf Magnusson Co-ruler Haakon Magnusson (until 1095) King of Dublin Reign 1102–1103 Predecessor Domnall Gerrlámhach Successor Domnall Gerrlámhach Born 1073 Norway Died 24 August 1103 (aged 29–30) near River Quoile, Downpatrick Ulster, Ireland Burial near St. Patrick's Church, Downpatrick, Ulster, Ireland Consort Margaret of Sweden Eystein I of Norway Issue Sigurd I of Norway Olaf Magnusson of Norway Ragnild Magnusdotter Tora Magnusdatter Harald IV Gille (claimed) Sigurd Slembe (claimed) Magnus Raude (claimed) Full name Magnús Óláfsson House Hardrada Father Olaf III of Norway Mother Tora?; disputed (see below) Religion Roman Catholicism Magnus Olafsson (Old Norse: Magnús Óláfsson, Norwegian: Magnus Olavsson; 1073 – 24 August 1103), better known as Magnus Barefoot (Old Norse: Magnús berfœttr, Norwegian: Magnus Berrføtt),[2] was King of Norway (as Magnus III) from 1093 until his death in 1103. His reign was marked by aggressive military campaigns and conquest, particularly in the Norse-dominated parts of the British Isles, where he extended his rule to the Kingdom of the Isles and Dublin. His daughter, Ragnhild, was born in 1090. As the only son of King Olaf Kyrre, Magnus was proclaimed king in southeastern Norway shortly after his father's death in 1093. In the north, his claim was contested by his cousin, Haakon Magnusson (son of King Magnus Haraldsson), and the two co-ruled uneasily until Haakon's death in 1095.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway 4Th Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 1 July 2008 MIN-LANG/PR (2008) 6 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Fourth periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter NORWAY Error! Unknown document Error! Unknown Error! Unknown document property name. document property name. property name. 2006/2972 KU/KU2 ckn 18 June 2008 European Charter for Regional or Minority Language Fourth periodical report Norway June 2008 Contents Preliminary section 1. Introductory remarks 2. Constitutional and administrative structure 3. Economy 4. Demography 5. The Sámi language 6. The Kven language 7. Romanes 8. Romany 2 Part I 1. Implementation provisions 2. Bodies or organisations working for the protection and development of regional or minority language 3. Preparation of the fourth report 4. Measures to disseminate information about the rights and duties deriving from the implementation of the Charter in Norwegian legislation 5. Measures to implement the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers Part II 1. Article 7 Objects and principles 2. Article 7 paragraph 1 sub-paragraphs f, g, h 3. Article 7 paragraph 3 4. Article 7 paragraph 4 Part III 1. Article 8 Educations 2. Article 9 Judicial authorities 3. Article 9 paragraph 3 Translation 4. Article 10 Administrative authorities and public service 5. Article 10 paragraph 5 6. Article 11 Media o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph a o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph b o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph c o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph e o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph f o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph g o Article 11 paragraph 2 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
    United Nations CEDAW/C/NOR/7 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 26 March 2007 against Women Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Seventh periodic report of States parties Norway* * The present report is being issued without formal editing. For the initial report submitted by the Government of Norway, see CEDAW/C/5/Add.7 which was considered by the Committee at its third session. For the second periodic report, see CEDAW/C/13/Add.15 which was considered by the Committee at its tenth session. For the third periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/3 which was considered by the Committee at its fourteenth session. For the fourth periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/4 which was considered by the Committee at its fourteenth session. For the fifth periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/5 which was considered by the Committee at its twenty-eighth session. For the sixth periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/7 which was considered by the Committee at its twenty-eighth session. 07-28616 (E) 280607 *0728616* CEDAW/C/NOR/7 1. Part I Legislation, gender equality machinery and basic rights .......... 5 1.1 Article 2...................................................... 5 1.1.1 Article 2a Gender equality in basic legislation ................ 5 1.1.2 Article 2b The Gender Equality Act......................... 8 1.1.3 Article 2c National gender equality machinery ............... 9 1.1.4 Article 2d Efforts of the public authorities to promote gender equality...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prop. 116 L (2009–2010) Proposisjon Til Stortinget (Forslag Til Lovvedtak)
    Prop. 116 L (2009–2010) Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til lovvedtak) Endringer i domstolloven (ekstraordinære valg til lekdommerutvalgene m.m.) og straffeloven 1902 (avvergingsplikt) Innhold 1 Hovedinnholdet i proposisjonen ........ 5 6.3 Høringsinstansenes syn ............................ 13 6.4 Departementets vurdering ....................... 13 2 Bakgrunnen for forslaget om endringer i domstolloven ...................... 6 7 Trekning av lekdommere til de 2.1 Domstoladministrasjonens høringsnotat 6 enkelte sakene ......................................... 14 2.2 Høringen ..................................................... 6 7.1 Gjeldende rett ............................................ 14 7.2 Høringsbrevets forslag .............................. 14 3 Ekstraordinære valg til 7.3 Høringsinstansenes syn ............................ 15 lekdommerutvalgene ............................. 8 7.4 Departementets vurdering ....................... 15 3.1 Gjeldende rett ............................................ 8 3.2 Høringsnotatets forslag ............................. 8 8 Valgbarhet for personer med 3.3 Høringsinstansenes syn ............................ 9 begrenset politimyndighet .................... 16 3.4 Departementets vurdering ....................... 9 9 Flytting mellom kommunene i et 4 Suppleringsvalg grunnet sletting fra domssogn .................................................. 16 lekdommerutvalgene ............................. 10 4.1 Gjeldende rett ............................................ 10 10 Avvergingsplikt etter straffeloven
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Context of Norse Jarlshof Marcie Anne Kimball Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2003 The social context of Norse Jarlshof Marcie Anne Kimball Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kimball, Marcie Anne, "The ocs ial context of Norse Jarlshof" (2003). LSU Master's Theses. 2426. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2426 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF NORSE JARLSHOF A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and the Arts and Science College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Marcie Anne Kimball B.S., Northwestern State University of Louisiana, 2000 August 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is grateful to her major professor Dr. Rebecca Saunders, Associate Professor of Anthropology, and her thesis committee members Dr. Paul Farnsworth, Associate Professor of Anthropology, and Dr. Miles Richardson, Professor of Anthropology, all of Louisiana State University. The author is also grateful to Dr. Gerald Bigelow, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Southern Maine, and to Mr. Stephen Dockrill, Director of Old Scatness Excavations, and to Dr. Julie Bond, Assistant Director of Old Scatness Excavations, for their guidance and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Norwegian Legal Culture
    Exploring the Norwegian Legal Culture Held at the Faculty of Law at the University in Bergen 25th and 26th August 2011 by Professor Dr. juris Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde 1. An outline of the lectures • A brief introduction to Norwegian state formation from app. 800 till today • A brief introduction to legal culture • Exploring the Norwegian legal culture by using the legal cultural model 2. Norwegian state formation – Middle Ages • Norway as a territory and no state till app. 1200 – The four law territories: Gulating, Frostating, Eidsivating, Borgarting • The emergence of King and Church as state power from app. 900 • The civil wars from 1130 till 1240 • The strong state app. 1250 till 1350 • The union with Sweden from 1319, and with Denmark and Sweden from 1397 2. Norwegian state formation – Early Modern Period • The Black Plague and other plagues from 1350 till 1450 • The reformation in 1536 – Norway a Danish province • The slow recovery of state power from app. 1550 • The absolute kingdom from 1660 – Norway again an independent kingdom – The bureaucratic state 2. Norwegian state formation – Modern Period • The Norwegian Constitution of 1814 – Norway still independent, but now in union with Sweden • Introduction of the parliamentary system in 1884 – the liberal revolution • The Labour party in government from the 1930s and the introduction of the welfare state – the socialist revolution 3. Legal Culture • An analytical tool and not an entity to deduce legal rules from • The increased references to legal culture from the 1990s – The internationalisation of law – The European Council with the ECHR and the European Union with the ECJ • A label on a black hole of knowledge? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT of the COURT 23 November 2004∗
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 November 2004∗ (Free movement of capital – taxation of dividends – tax credit granted exclusively to shareholders resident in a Contracting Party – denial of procedural rights to shareholders resident in other Contracting Parties) In Case E-1/04, REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Frostating lagmannsrett (Frostating Court of Appeal), Norway, in a case pending before it between Fokus Bank ASA and The Norwegian State, represented by Skattedirektoratet (the Directorate of Taxes) on the interpretation of the rules of free movement of capital within the EEA, THE COURT, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Tresselt and Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judges, Registrar: Henning Harborg, ∗ Language of the Request: Norwegian. – 2 – having considered the written observations submitted on behalf of: – Fokus Bank ASA (hereinafter the “Appellant”), by Bettina Banoun, Advokat; – the Norwegian State (hereinafter the “Respondent”), by Thomas Nordby, Advokat, Office of the Attorney General (Civil Affairs), acting as Agent, and Amund Noss, Advokat, Office of the Attorney General (Civil Affairs), acting as co-agent; – the EFTA Surveillance Authority, by Niels Fenger, Director, and Per Andreas Bjørgan, Senior Legal Officer, acting as Agents; – the Commission of the European Communities, by Richard Lyal, Legal Adviser, and Hans Støvlbæk, Member of its Legal Service, acting as Agents; – the United
    [Show full text]
  • Forvaltningsplan Frostating
    Frostating utvalgte kulturlandskap Frosta kommune i Trøndelag Forvaltningsplan for området – 2020-2023 Natur, kulturarv og levebrød Frosta – forslag mars 2020 vedtatt av Kommunestyret, 26.05.2020, sak 26/2020 Innhold Frosta kommune i Trøndelag .......................................................................................................... 1 1. Innledning ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Hva er Utvalgte kulturlandskap i jordbruket .................................................................. 5 1.2. Formålet med UKL-ordninga ............................................................................................. 5 1.3 Målgruppe for planen ................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Organiseringen av videre arbeidet med forvaltningsplanen ............................................. 5 2. Områdebeskrivelse ............................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Geografisk beliggenhet ................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Størrelse ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Hva slags type kulturlandskap ...................................................................................... 6 2.4. Historisk bruk og driftsformer ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Eidsivating Lagmannsrett Eidsivating Lagmannsrett
    Eidsivating årsm OMSLAG 2020 _ 1 korr_TORE 06.05.21 12:38 Side 2 EIDSIVATING LAGMANNSRETT Å maleri forside: Kari Bjertingstad. BaKsidefoto: jiri Havran/statsBygg tryKK: Printex tryKKeri as – Hamar Årrssmmee2lldd02iinn0 gg 1 2 Innhold Innledning ................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Førstelagmannen har har ordet ordet – ................................ – ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35 HistorHistorieie ................................ .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Ankedomstol for for tingretter tingretter og jordskifteretter og jordskifteretter ................................ .................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Lokalisering ................................ ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]