DOCSLIB.ORG

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women United Nations CEDAW/C/NOR/7 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 26 March 2007 against Women Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Seventh periodic report of States parties Norway* * The present report is being issued without formal editing. For the initial report submitted by the Government of Norway, see CEDAW/C/5/Add.7 which was considered by the Committee at its third session. For the second periodic report, see CEDAW/C/13/Add.15 which was considered by the Committee at its tenth session. For the third periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/3 which was considered by the Committee at its fourteenth session. For the fourth periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/4 which was considered by the Committee at its fourteenth session. For the fifth periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/5 which was considered by the Committee at its twenty-eighth session. For the sixth periodic report, see CEDAW/C/NOR/7 which was considered by the Committee at its twenty-eighth session. 07-28616 (E) 280607 *0728616* CEDAW/C/NOR/7 1. Part I Legislation, gender equality machinery and basic rights .......... 5 1.1 Article 2...................................................... 5 1.1.1 Article 2a Gender equality in basic legislation ................ 5 1.1.2 Article 2b The Gender Equality Act......................... 8 1.1.3 Article 2c National gender equality machinery ............... 9 1.1.4 Article 2d Efforts of the public authorities to promote gender equality................................................ 13 1.1.5 Article 2e.............................................. 15 1.1.6 Article 2f and 2g........................................ 16 1.2 Article 3 Gender equality and human rights........................ 16 1.3 Article 4..................................................... 24 1.3.1 Article 4.1 Special measures to promote gender equality....... 24 1.3.2 Article 4.2 Protection of the reproductive role of women....... 25 1.4 Article 5..................................................... 25 1.4.1 Article 5a Gender roles................................... 25 1.4.2 Article 5b The joint responsibility of women and men for children and families.................................... 29 1.5 Article 6 Violence, trafficking in women and prostitution............. 29 2. Part II ........................................................... 48 2.1 Article 7 Political participation................................... 48 2.1.1 Article 7a Elections and elected bodies ..................... 48 2.1.2 Article 7b Public positions................................ 52 2.1.3 Article 7c Non-governmental organisations.................. 52 2.2 Article 8 Representation at the International Level.................. 53 2.3 Article 9 Nationality........................................... 54 2.4 Article 10 Education........................................... 54 2.5 Article 11 Working Life......................................... 68 2.5.1 Article 11. 1a The right to work........................... 68 2.5.2 Article 11. 1b Equal opportunities in working life ............ 72 2.5.3 Article 11. 1c Education.................................. 81 2.5.4 Article 11. 1d Equal pay.................................. 81 2 07-28616 CEDAW/C/NOR/7 2.5.5 Article 11. 1e Social security and pensions.................. 84 2.5.6 Article 11. 2a Discrimination on the basis of marital status and pregnancy.............................................. 85 2.5.7 Article 11. 2b Leave of absence in connection with pregnancy and childbirth........................................... 86 2.5.8 Article 11. 2c Day care centres, etc......................... 87 2.5.9 Article 11. 2d Rights during pregnancy..................... 90 2.6 Article 12 Health.............................................. 91 2.7 Article 13.................................................... 94 2.7.1 Article 13 a The right to family benefits..................... 94 2.7.2 Article 13 b Economic rights .............................. 94 2.7.3 Article 13 c The right to participate in leisure activities, sports and cultural life......................................... 94 2.8 Article 14 Women in rural areas.................................. 96 2.9 Article 15 Gender equality in the legal system...................... 98 2.10 Article 16 Eliminate the discrimination of women in all matters relating to marriage and family affairs............................. 99 2.10.1 Article 16 b............................................ 99 2.10.2 Article 16 d and f....................................... 103 07-28616 3 CEDAW/C/NOR/7 Introduction This is Norway’s seventh periodic report to the United Nations on Norway’s implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. The report covers the period 2002 – 2005 and was completed in September 2006. In accordance with the guidelines for preparing periodic reports, we have sought to keep the report as short as possible. The report follows the structure of the Articles of the Convention. Our aim has been to describe the changes that have been made since our last report, and we have referred to previous reports wherever this is appropriate. We have also focused on responding to the comments of the CEDAW Committee in connection with its examination of Norway’s fifth and sixth periodic report, which took place in January 2003. In October 2005, the Ministry of Children and Equality asked the other ministries to contribute reports relating to their particular spheres of responsibility. The Ministry also contacted the Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud to request assistance in preparing Norway’s seventh periodic report. The Ombud commented on the ministries’ contributions to the report, in addition to providing information on his own experience in this field. On the basis of the input from the ministries and the Ombud, a draft report was prepared and circulated widely for consultative comment to a number of women’s and gender equality organisations, human rights organisations, the social partners and government ministries. The Ministry of Children and Equality also invited all the consultative bodies to a meeting. The Ministry has incorporated the contributions from the consultation round and the meeting into the final version of Norway’s seventh periodic report. The final report will be distributed to all the consultative bodies. According to the CEDAW reporting guidelines, the report must describe Norway’s follow-up of the Beijing Platform for Action. Norway has submitted three reports to the United Nations on its follow-up of the Beijing Platform for Action, the latest in 2004. We further refer to the fact that a Milestones conference to monitor follow-up on the Beijing Platform for Action has been organised annually since 2000 by the Government in cooperation with the umbrella organisation Forum for Women and Development and the former Centre for Gender Equality. FOKUS organises Norwegian NGOs active in development cooperation targeting women and receives financial support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The CEDAW Committee’s examination of Norway’s sixth periodic report in January 2003 and Norway’s implementation of the CEDAW Convention were one of the topics at the conference in 2004. 4 07-28616 CEDAW/C/NOR/7 1. Part I. Legislation, gender equality machinery and basic rights 1.1 Article 2 1.1.1 Article 2a Gender equality in basic legislation The Gender Equality Act The Gender Equality Act prohibits discrimination based on gender in all areas of society, except for internal matters in religious communities. The Act permits positive differential treatment in order to promote gender equality, particularly with a view to advancing the position of women. The Act came into force in 1979, and has subsequently been amended several times, most recently in 2005. Further information has been provided on the Gender Equality Act in previous reports. The latest amendments are reported in the section on Article 2 b) below. Incorporation of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women into the Gender Equality Act. Norway ratified the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women without reservation on 21 May 1981, with entry into effect on 3 September of the same year. On 6 October 1999, the United Nations 54th General Assembly adopted an optional protocol to the CEDAW Convention, which was ratified by Norway on 5 March 2002. The CEDAW Convention and the Optional Protocol were incorporated into the Gender Equality Act by the Act of 10 June 2005. The Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud is charged with monitoring that Norwegian law and administrative practice are in accordance with Norway’s obligations pursuant to the Convention. It should be emphasised that this does not change the fact that it is the Government, not the Ombud, who has overall responsibility for monitoring implementation of conventions nationally and internationally and who has a duty to submit reports. Prior to the resolution passed by the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) regarding incorporation of the Convention into the Gender Equality Act, there was a lengthy public debate on the appropriate incorporation of human rights conventions into Norwegian law. The starting point for the debate was the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Þingvellir National Park
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1152.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Þingvellir National Park DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: ICELAND CRITERIA: C (iii) (vi) CL DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (iii): The Althing and its hinterland, the Þingvellir National Park, represent, through the remains of the assembly ground, the booths for those who attended, and through landscape evidence of settlement extending back possibly to the time the assembly was established, a unique reflection of mediaeval Norse/Germanic culture and one that persisted in essence from its foundation in 980 AD until the 18th century. Criterion (vi): Pride in the strong association of the Althing to mediaeval Germanic/Norse governance, known through the 12th century Icelandic sagas, and reinforced during the fight for independence in the 19th century, have, together with the powerful natural setting of the assembly grounds, given the site iconic status as a shrine for the national. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Þingvellir (Thingvellir) is the National Park where the Althing - an open-air assembly, which represented the whole of Iceland - was established in 930 and continued to meet until 1798. Over two weeks a year, the assembly set laws - seen as a covenant between free men - and settled disputes. The Althing has deep historical and symbolic associations for the people of Iceland. Located on an active volcanic site, the property includes the Þingvellir National Park and the remains of the Althing itself: fragments of around 50 booths built of turf and stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy in the Nordic Countries 2
    Genealogy in The Nordic Countries 2 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 Presenter: 3 Finn Karlsen, Norway Retired consultant from the Regional State Archive in Trondheim 23.09.2018 4 Short history OF THE SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES Important years 5 1262 Iceland makes an agreement with Norway 1397 Kalmar Union between Danmark, Sweden and Norway with Iceland 1523 Kalmar union ends and Denmark, Norway and Iceland ruled by a common Danish King 1814 Norway gets its constitution, but ends up in union with Sweden 1905 Norway independent 1907 Iceland independent, but with Danish king 1944 Iceland total independence with President Border changes that might 6 influence our research Norway – Sweden Denmark – Sweden Denmark - Germany 7 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 8 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 9 Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 10 Denmark Germany 1864 11 Prince-archives (Fyrstedømmenes arkiver) at National Archive in Copenhagen Ordinary archives like The church records at Landsarkivet in Aabenraa archives Some documents specially for the southern part of Slesvig are at the archive in Slesvig Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 Early laws Norway: Frostating, Gulating and Eidsivating regional Laws 1274 King Magnus made common laws for Norway Laws Denmark: Jyske law, Skånske law and Sjællands law Iceland: 930 (written 1117) Graagaas 1264 Jarnsida 1281 Jonsbok Finn Karlsen - Genealogy in Nordic Countries 23.09.2018 12 13
    [Show full text]
  • The Hostages of the Northmen: from the Viking Age to the Middle Ages
    Part IV: Legal Rights It has previously been mentioned how hostages as rituals during peace processes – which in the sources may be described with an ambivalence, or ambiguity – and how people could be used as social capital in different conflicts. It is therefore important to understand how the persons who became hostages were vauled and how their new collective – the new household – responded to its new members and what was crucial for his or her status and participation in the new setting. All this may be related to the legal rights and special privileges, such as the right to wear coat of arms, weapons, or other status symbols. Personal rights could be regu- lated by agreements: oral, written, or even implied. Rights could also be related to the nature of the agreement itself, what kind of peace process the hostage occurred in and the type of hostage. But being a hostage also meant that a person was subjected to restric- tions on freedom and mobility. What did such situations meant for the hostage-taking party? What were their privileges and obli- gations? To answer these questions, a point of departure will be Kosto’s definition of hostages in continental and Mediterranean cultures around during the period 400–1400, when hostages were a form of security for the behaviour of other people. Hostages and law The hostage had its special role in legal contexts that could be related to the discussion in the introduction of the relationship between religion and law. The views on this subject are divided How to cite this book chapter: Olsson, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnus Barefoot from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Magnus Barefoot From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the second Norwegian king named Magnus Olafsson. For the earlier Norwegian king, see Magnus the Good. Magnus Barefoot Drawing of a coin from the reign of Magnus Barefoot (with confused legend)[1] King of Norway Reign September 1093 – 24 August 1103 Predecessor Olaf III Successor Sigurd I, Eystein I and Olaf Magnusson Co-ruler Haakon Magnusson (until 1095) King of Dublin Reign 1102–1103 Predecessor Domnall Gerrlámhach Successor Domnall Gerrlámhach Born 1073 Norway Died 24 August 1103 (aged 29–30) near River Quoile, Downpatrick Ulster, Ireland Burial near St. Patrick's Church, Downpatrick, Ulster, Ireland Consort Margaret of Sweden Eystein I of Norway Issue Sigurd I of Norway Olaf Magnusson of Norway Ragnild Magnusdotter Tora Magnusdatter Harald IV Gille (claimed) Sigurd Slembe (claimed) Magnus Raude (claimed) Full name Magnús Óláfsson House Hardrada Father Olaf III of Norway Mother Tora?; disputed (see below) Religion Roman Catholicism Magnus Olafsson (Old Norse: Magnús Óláfsson, Norwegian: Magnus Olavsson; 1073 – 24 August 1103), better known as Magnus Barefoot (Old Norse: Magnús berfœttr, Norwegian: Magnus Berrføtt),[2] was King of Norway (as Magnus III) from 1093 until his death in 1103. His reign was marked by aggressive military campaigns and conquest, particularly in the Norse-dominated parts of the British Isles, where he extended his rule to the Kingdom of the Isles and Dublin. His daughter, Ragnhild, was born in 1090. As the only son of King Olaf Kyrre, Magnus was proclaimed king in southeastern Norway shortly after his father's death in 1093. In the north, his claim was contested by his cousin, Haakon Magnusson (son of King Magnus Haraldsson), and the two co-ruled uneasily until Haakon's death in 1095.
    [Show full text]
  • Norway 4Th Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 1 July 2008 MIN-LANG/PR (2008) 6 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Fourth periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter NORWAY Error! Unknown document Error! Unknown Error! Unknown document property name. document property name. property name. 2006/2972 KU/KU2 ckn 18 June 2008 European Charter for Regional or Minority Language Fourth periodical report Norway June 2008 Contents Preliminary section 1. Introductory remarks 2. Constitutional and administrative structure 3. Economy 4. Demography 5. The Sámi language 6. The Kven language 7. Romanes 8. Romany 2 Part I 1. Implementation provisions 2. Bodies or organisations working for the protection and development of regional or minority language 3. Preparation of the fourth report 4. Measures to disseminate information about the rights and duties deriving from the implementation of the Charter in Norwegian legislation 5. Measures to implement the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers Part II 1. Article 7 Objects and principles 2. Article 7 paragraph 1 sub-paragraphs f, g, h 3. Article 7 paragraph 3 4. Article 7 paragraph 4 Part III 1. Article 8 Educations 2. Article 9 Judicial authorities 3. Article 9 paragraph 3 Translation 4. Article 10 Administrative authorities and public service 5. Article 10 paragraph 5 6. Article 11 Media o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph a o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph b o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph c o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph e o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph f o Article 11 paragraph 1 sub-paragraph g o Article 11 paragraph 2 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Prop. 116 L (2009–2010) Proposisjon Til Stortinget (Forslag Til Lovvedtak)
    Prop. 116 L (2009–2010) Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til lovvedtak) Endringer i domstolloven (ekstraordinære valg til lekdommerutvalgene m.m.) og straffeloven 1902 (avvergingsplikt) Innhold 1 Hovedinnholdet i proposisjonen ........ 5 6.3 Høringsinstansenes syn ............................ 13 6.4 Departementets vurdering ....................... 13 2 Bakgrunnen for forslaget om endringer i domstolloven ...................... 6 7 Trekning av lekdommere til de 2.1 Domstoladministrasjonens høringsnotat 6 enkelte sakene ......................................... 14 2.2 Høringen ..................................................... 6 7.1 Gjeldende rett ............................................ 14 7.2 Høringsbrevets forslag .............................. 14 3 Ekstraordinære valg til 7.3 Høringsinstansenes syn ............................ 15 lekdommerutvalgene ............................. 8 7.4 Departementets vurdering ....................... 15 3.1 Gjeldende rett ............................................ 8 3.2 Høringsnotatets forslag ............................. 8 8 Valgbarhet for personer med 3.3 Høringsinstansenes syn ............................ 9 begrenset politimyndighet .................... 16 3.4 Departementets vurdering ....................... 9 9 Flytting mellom kommunene i et 4 Suppleringsvalg grunnet sletting fra domssogn .................................................. 16 lekdommerutvalgene ............................. 10 4.1 Gjeldende rett ............................................ 10 10 Avvergingsplikt etter straffeloven
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Context of Norse Jarlshof Marcie Anne Kimball Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2003 The social context of Norse Jarlshof Marcie Anne Kimball Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Kimball, Marcie Anne, "The ocs ial context of Norse Jarlshof" (2003). LSU Master's Theses. 2426. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2426 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF NORSE JARLSHOF A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and the Arts and Science College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Marcie Anne Kimball B.S., Northwestern State University of Louisiana, 2000 August 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is grateful to her major professor Dr. Rebecca Saunders, Associate Professor of Anthropology, and her thesis committee members Dr. Paul Farnsworth, Associate Professor of Anthropology, and Dr. Miles Richardson, Professor of Anthropology, all of Louisiana State University. The author is also grateful to Dr. Gerald Bigelow, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Southern Maine, and to Mr. Stephen Dockrill, Director of Old Scatness Excavations, and to Dr. Julie Bond, Assistant Director of Old Scatness Excavations, for their guidance and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Norwegian Legal Culture
    Exploring the Norwegian Legal Culture Held at the Faculty of Law at the University in Bergen 25th and 26th August 2011 by Professor Dr. juris Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde 1. An outline of the lectures • A brief introduction to Norwegian state formation from app. 800 till today • A brief introduction to legal culture • Exploring the Norwegian legal culture by using the legal cultural model 2. Norwegian state formation – Middle Ages • Norway as a territory and no state till app. 1200 – The four law territories: Gulating, Frostating, Eidsivating, Borgarting • The emergence of King and Church as state power from app. 900 • The civil wars from 1130 till 1240 • The strong state app. 1250 till 1350 • The union with Sweden from 1319, and with Denmark and Sweden from 1397 2. Norwegian state formation – Early Modern Period • The Black Plague and other plagues from 1350 till 1450 • The reformation in 1536 – Norway a Danish province • The slow recovery of state power from app. 1550 • The absolute kingdom from 1660 – Norway again an independent kingdom – The bureaucratic state 2. Norwegian state formation – Modern Period • The Norwegian Constitution of 1814 – Norway still independent, but now in union with Sweden • Introduction of the parliamentary system in 1884 – the liberal revolution • The Labour party in government from the 1930s and the introduction of the welfare state – the socialist revolution 3. Legal Culture • An analytical tool and not an entity to deduce legal rules from • The increased references to legal culture from the 1990s – The internationalisation of law – The European Council with the ECHR and the European Union with the ECJ • A label on a black hole of knowledge? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT of the COURT 23 November 2004∗
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 November 2004∗ (Free movement of capital – taxation of dividends – tax credit granted exclusively to shareholders resident in a Contracting Party – denial of procedural rights to shareholders resident in other Contracting Parties) In Case E-1/04, REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Frostating lagmannsrett (Frostating Court of Appeal), Norway, in a case pending before it between Fokus Bank ASA and The Norwegian State, represented by Skattedirektoratet (the Directorate of Taxes) on the interpretation of the rules of free movement of capital within the EEA, THE COURT, composed of: Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Tresselt and Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judges, Registrar: Henning Harborg, ∗ Language of the Request: Norwegian. – 2 – having considered the written observations submitted on behalf of: – Fokus Bank ASA (hereinafter the “Appellant”), by Bettina Banoun, Advokat; – the Norwegian State (hereinafter the “Respondent”), by Thomas Nordby, Advokat, Office of the Attorney General (Civil Affairs), acting as Agent, and Amund Noss, Advokat, Office of the Attorney General (Civil Affairs), acting as co-agent; – the EFTA Surveillance Authority, by Niels Fenger, Director, and Per Andreas Bjørgan, Senior Legal Officer, acting as Agents; – the Commission of the European Communities, by Richard Lyal, Legal Adviser, and Hans Støvlbæk, Member of its Legal Service, acting as Agents; – the United
    [Show full text]
  • Anke Over Kjennelse/Beslutning I Sivile Saker
    ANKE OVER KJENNELSE/BESLUTNING I SIVILE SAKER Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 192 147 182 185 184 Borgarting 590 592 539 600 548 Eidsivating 144 169 132 129 143 Frostating 170 191 115 163 147 Gulating 313 307 305 286 265 Hålogaland 170 160 152 132 170 Totalt 1579 1566 1425 1495 1457 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 192 151 188 186 179 Borgarting 592 605 526 597 543 Eidsivating 138 170 134 122 143 Frostating 160 178 140 145 160 Gulating 311 306 307 258 289 Hålogaland 164 162 154 134 171 Totalt 1557 1572 1449 1442 1485 Saker i restanse 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 21 17 13 12 15 Borgarting 118 102 110 117 122 Eidsivating 17 16 14 21 20 Frostating 35 47 22 40 29 Gulating 35 37 36 63 39 Hålogaland 17 15 13 11 10 Totalt 243 234 208 264 235 Gjennomsnittlig saksbehandlingstid (måneder) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.2 Borgarting 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.5 2.3 Eidsivating 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 Frostating 1.9 2.7 2.5 1.7 2.6 Gulating 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 Hålogaland 1.2 1.3 1.3 0.9 1.0 Veid gj.snitt 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.9 Side 1 ANKE OVER DOM I SIVILE SAKER Innkomne saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 267 245 219 233 219 Borgarting 830 757 721 728 696 Eidsivating 185 157 185 172 162 Frostating 260 250 225 223 203 Gulating 387 382 365 338 323 Hålogaland 199 186 204 190 161 Totalt 2128 1977 1919 1884 1764 Avgjorte saker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Agder 276 240 240 233 207 Borgarting 751 711 739 756 719 Eidsivating 169 175 166 178 162 Frostating 248 267 216 214 207 Gulating 413 398 322 352 296 Hålogaland 201 196 201 192
    [Show full text]
  • Forvaltningsplan Frostating
    Frostating utvalgte kulturlandskap Frosta kommune i Trøndelag Forvaltningsplan for området – 2020-2023 Natur, kulturarv og levebrød Frosta – forslag mars 2020 vedtatt av Kommunestyret, 26.05.2020, sak 26/2020 Innhold Frosta kommune i Trøndelag .......................................................................................................... 1 1. Innledning ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Hva er Utvalgte kulturlandskap i jordbruket .................................................................. 5 1.2. Formålet med UKL-ordninga ............................................................................................. 5 1.3 Målgruppe for planen ................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Organiseringen av videre arbeidet med forvaltningsplanen ............................................. 5 2. Områdebeskrivelse ............................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Geografisk beliggenhet ................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Størrelse ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Hva slags type kulturlandskap ...................................................................................... 6 2.4. Historisk bruk og driftsformer ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Eidsivating Lagmannsrett Eidsivating Lagmannsrett
    Eidsivating årsm OMSLAG 2020 _ 1 korr_TORE 06.05.21 12:38 Side 2 EIDSIVATING LAGMANNSRETT Å maleri forside: Kari Bjertingstad. BaKsidefoto: jiri Havran/statsBygg tryKK: Printex tryKKeri as – Hamar Årrssmmee2lldd02iinn0 gg 1 2 Innhold Innledning ................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Førstelagmannen har har ordet ordet – ................................ – ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35 HistorHistorieie ................................ .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Ankedomstol for for tingretter tingretter og jordskifteretter og jordskifteretter ................................ .................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Lokalisering ................................ ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]