DOCSLIB.ORG

What Is New About Today's EU-Russia Border?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Is New About Today's EU-Russia Border? What’s New About Today’s EU-Russia Border Vadim Kononenko Researcher The Finnish Institute of International Affairs [email protected] Working Papers 50 (2004) Ulkopoliittinen instituutti (UPI) – The Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA) WHAT’S NEW ABOUT TODAY’S EU-RUSSIA BORDER? Vadim Kononenko Researcher The Finnish Institute of International Affairs Mannerheimintie 15 A, 00260 Helsinki, Finland Tel. +358 (0)9-43420719 Fax +358 (0)9-43420769 Email: [email protected] http://www.upi-fiia.fi WHAT’S NEW ABOUT TODAY’S EU-RUSSIA BORDER?1 Introduction: The paradoxes of the ‘new EU-Russia border’ On May 1st 2004, the EU reshaped its eastern borders by taking on board ten new member states. Among the many neighbours the EU meets across its enlarged borders, Russia occupies a very specific place. With all the talk about the emerging new EU neighbourhood, one may find it paradoxical that Russia is regarded as one of these new neighbours.2 There seems to be nothing new about Russia and the EU being neighbours, as they have had a common border for nine years already, since the accession of Finland to the EU in 1995. In this regard, the border that emerged in 2004 can be seen as simply a continuation of the existing 1300-km borderland in the north and as a result of the long-planned accession of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland to the European Union.3 Added to this is the notion that, for all these countries, the existence of a border with Russia had become a reality more than a decade ago, after every legal and political tie with the dissolving Soviet Union had forever been severed.4 Later, as 1 An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the NorFA Research Seminar ‘Identities in Transition’ in Tallinn, June 1-7, 2004. I am grateful to all of the participants for their comments. I would like to also thank Lynn Nikkanen for checking the English language. 2 See, for instance, Commission of the European Communities: Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament, “Wider Europe – Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours.” Brussels, 11.03.03 COM (2003) 104. 3 See, for instance, Patten Ch. The Wider Europe – New Neighbourhood Initiative: an opportunity for cooperation. Speech at “Wider Europe: intensification of cooperation in Central-European Europe through the common border with the enlarged EU”, Kyiv, November 2003, available at http://europa.eu.int 4 It is noteworthy that the new independent Baltic states and Russia failed to conclude a border treaty thus leaving the border issue a potential political ‘hot spot’. The EU enlargement, particularly the Kaliningrad problem, prompted Russia to ratify the border treaty with Lithuania. The respective treaties with Latvia and Estonia are yet to be 2 preparations for these countries to join the Union got underway, they, in order to comply with the EU’s Copenhagen criteria for the new applicants, were to transform their external borders and policies according to the EU’s Schengen acquis. 5 Yet it can be argued that the eastern EU-Russian border should not be regarded simply as an extension of the existing one, as there are several factors that suggest a change. First and foremost, on the EU side, the border is still in the making. By nature, the ‘historic’ eastern enlargement of 2004 was not a linear process but rather piecemeal and incremental. In many respects it is still waiting to be finalized. Some of the organizing policy instruments that make the emerged border a full-fledged EU external border are yet to be implemented, and not before the EU is ready to open its internal borders and lift all the restrictions for the new members. Further, according to the Commission’s plan, the design of various EU policy instruments of cross-border cooperation and assistance, such as INTERREG, Tacis-CBC and PHARE, will be re-shaped and a New Neighbourhood Instrument (NNI) will be put in place from 2007 onwards.6 Furthermore, with the latest enlargement round, the balance of interest might have shifted in the EU, affecting its external behaviour. In this context, it is worthwhile examining the way in which the new Baltic members define concluded. Thus, another paradoxical aspect: the ungratified inter-state border between Russia and the two Baltic states had become a functioning Russian-EU border. 5 The preparations of these countries for EU membership started by concluding the “Europe Agreement” with the EC in the mid-1990s 6 Paving the way for a New Neighbourhood Instrument, Communication from Commission of the European Communities COM (2003) 393, Brussels, July 2003 3 their interests and policies vis-à-vis the Russian border in the complex environment of the EU. Second, there are changes in Russia that do, and will, affect the EU’s evolving border policy. The Russia of 2004 is different from the Russia of 1995.7 This is particularly true when comparing Russia’s attitudes towards the EU in 1995 and on the eve of the latest enlargement. It is well known that Moscow presented a list of concerns regarding the recent enlargement and even threatened to freeze its relations with the EU by declining to extend the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement – the foundational treaty and the legal basis of Russia-EU dialogue. On a more conceptual level, this paper takes a closer look at the wider EU- Russian border by focusing on the factors of change of the EU’s ‘border policies’ – instruments, programmes, and projects – brought into existence by the interplay of states, regions, institutions and individuals, a multiplicity of actors so characteristic of contemporary European politics. The notion of ‘border’ is viewed here in Anssi Paasi’s terms as a “social process and a discourse”, including an attempt to add to it a political dimension or, what Paasi himself called, “the links between boundaries and power”.8 In examining the evolution and transformation of the EU’s ‘border policies’ in time and space, this paper raises two questions: What is the European Union’s Russian border and what are the factors of change? This paper’s major observation is that the transition of the EU-Russian border between 7 See below for more on this. 4 the years 1995 and 2004 ran parallel with the process of enlargement. This paper also argues that while organizing its external border in the European North – in Karelia and eventually in the Baltics – the European Union is engaged in the process of contesting the notion of ‘the EU’s outer/Russian border’ and subsequently ‘the EU’s border/external policy’. In other words, this process can be described in terms of social construction through discourse in which the principle partakers are the EU institutions, member states, border regions and, to an extent, external actors like Russia and Russia’s border regions. In addition, this paper goes one step further in analyzing the external element of the EU’s border-making process. It is noteworthy that Russia is both a policy recipient and part of the EU’s discursive game, as well as an actor with its own mode development. 8 Paasi A. Boundaries as Social Processes: Territoriality in the World of Flows in Newman D. (ed). Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, Frank Cass, London 1999 pp. 69-89. 5 1. Between the rounds of enlargement: The EU in need of a policy for its Russian border Origins of the EU’s Russian border For the EU, the need to define its policy towards Russia’s border is commonly held to be one of the repercussions of the accession of Finland to the EU in 1995.9 There was a ‘historic’ momentum when the EU encountered the post-Soviet Russia in the North, on the Finnish-Russian border, and there was also an emerging need for the EU to introduce itself not only to Moscow – with whom the political dialogue had already been opened by signing the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement in 1994 – but also to the bordering regions in Russia’s Northwest. On the EU side, expectations and concerns were voiced by the new member states – primarily Finland but also Sweden – regarding the role and impact of the EU’s ‘presence’ in the region. During the accession period, the two states were in the process of defining their respective foreign policies towards their Baltic neighbours and Northwest Russia. They were seeking ways to accommodate their respective foreign and security policies, as well as the shared ‘Nordic’ interests, to EU membership.10 As far as the new members were concerned, Finland was referred to as being especially 9 Besides Finland, Sweden and Austria joined the EU the same year. 10 See, for instance, Huldt Bo (et al) Finnish and Swedish Security – Comparing National Policies, SI Series 2001. 6 interested in providing the EU with a special agenda towards its Russian border and the wider European North.11 What is more, the Finnish border regions were very active in promoting the cross-border cooperation with Russia.12 The decentralization of the centre- periphery relations that followed the breakup of the Soviet state enabled Northwestern Russia to develop closer contact with the neighbouring regions and municipalities across the border. For the Finnish border regions, such as North Karelia, Kainuu, and Northern Ostrobothnia, this was the moment to restore the broken connection with former parts of Finland ceded to the Soviet Union after World War II. 13 Furthermore, some contacts existed between the Finnish and Russian regions of Kuhmo and Kostamuksha, mainly in the form of twinning and limited economic cooperation established in the late 1980s.14 In the EU, the Finnish regions were seeking both financial resources and political assistance with respect to cooperation with Russia’s regions and, concomitantly, to avoid making this cross-border cooperation appear suspicious in the eyes of Moscow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arctic Strategies and Policies
    1 Arctic Strategies and Policies Inventory and Comparative Study Lassi Heininen April 2012 Northern Research Forum 2 Arctic Strategies and Policies: Inventory and Comparative Study © Lassi Heininen, 2011; 2nd edition April 2012 Published by: The Northern Research Forum & The University of Lapland Available at: http://www.nrf.is Author: Lassi Heininen, PhD., University of Lapland, Northern Research Forum Editor: Embla Eir Oddsdóttir, The Northern Research Forum Secretariat Photograps: © Embla Eir Oddsdóttir Printing and binding: University of Lapland Press / Stell, Akureyri, Iceland Layout and design: Embla Eir Oddsdóttir Arc c strategies and policies 3 Contents Introduction – 5 Background – 7 Inventory on Arctic Strategies and State Policies – 13 1. Canada – 13 2. The Kingdom of Denmark – 17 3. Finland – 23 4. Iceland – 29 5. Norway – 35 6. The Russian Federation – 43 7. Sweden – 49 8. The United States of America – 53 9. The European Union – 57 Comparative Study of the Arctic Strategies and State Policies – 67 (Re)constructing, (re)defi ning and (re)mapping – 68 Summary of priorities, priority areas and objectives – 69 Comparative study of priorities/priority areas and objectives – 71 International Cooperation – 77 Conclusions – 79 References – 83 Appendix - tables – 91 Northern Research Forum 4 Arc c strategies and policies 5 tors and dynamics, as well as mapping rela- Introduction onships between indicators. Furthermore, it is relevant to study the Arc c states and their policies, and to explore their changing posi- In the early twenty-fi rst century interna onal on in a globalized world where the role of a en on and global interest in the northern- the Arc c has become increasingly important most regions of the globe are increasing, at in world poli cs.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Sequence Stratigraphy of the Ordovician of Baltoscandia …………………………………………… 20 Druzhinina, O
    Baltic Stratigraphical Association Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Natural History Museum of Latvia THE EIGHTH BALTIC STRATIGRAPHICAL CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Rīga, 2011 The Eigth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference 28 August – 1 September 2011, Latvia Abstracts Edited by E. Lukševičs, Ģ. Stinkulis and J. Vasiļkova Scientific Committee: Organisers: Prof. Algimantas Grigelis (Vilnius) Baltic Stratigraphical Association Dr. Olle Hints (Tallinn) Department of Geology, University of Latvia Dr. Alexander Ivanov (St. Petersburg) Natural History Museum of Latvia Prof. Leszek Marks (Warsaw) Northern Vidzeme Geopark Prof. Tõnu Meidla (Tartu) Dr. Jonas Satkūnas (Vilnius) Prof. Valdis Segliņš (Riga) Prof. Vitālijs Zelčs (Chairman, Riga) Recommended reference to this publication Ceriņa, A. 2011. Plant macrofossil assemblages from the Eemian-Weichselian deposits of Latvia and problems of their interpretation. In: Lukševičs, E., Stinkulis, Ģ. and Vasiļkova, J. (eds). The Eighth Baltic Stratigraphical Conference. Abstracts. University of Latvia, Riga. P. 18. The Conference has special sessions of IGCP Project No 591 “The Early to Middle Palaeozoic Revolution” and IGCP Project No 596 “Climate change and biodiversity patterns in the Mid-Palaeozoic (Early Devonian to Late Carboniferous)”. See more information at http://igcl591.org. Electronic version can be downloaded at www.geo.lu.lv/8bsc Hard copies can be obtained from: Department of Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia Raiņa Boulevard 19, Riga LV-1586, Latvia E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-9984-45-383-5 Riga, 2011 2 Preface Baltic co-operation in regional stratigraphy is active since the foundation of the Baltic Regional Stratigraphical Commission (BRSC) in 1969 (Grigelis, this volume).
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Baltic Sea Strategy
    EU BALTIC SEA STRATEGY REPORT FOR THE KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG LONDON OFFICE www.kas.de This paper includes résumés and experts views from conferences and seminars facilitated and organised by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung London and Centrum Balticum. Impressum © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronical or mechanical, without permission in writing from Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, London office, 63D Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1PH. ABBREVIATIONS AC Arctic Council AEPS Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy ALDE Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe BaltMet Baltic Metropoles BCCA Baltic Sea Chambers of Commerce Association BDF Baltic Development Forum BEAC Barents Euro-Arctic Council BEAR Council of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region BENELUX Economic Union of Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg BFTA The Baltic Free Trade Area BSCE Black Sea Economic Cooperation Pact BSPC The Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference BSR Baltic Sea Region BSSSC Baltic Sea States Subregional Cooperation CBSS The Council for Baltic Sea States CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CEFTA Central European Free Trade Agreement CIS The Commonwealth of Independent States COMECON Council for Mutual Economic Assistance CPMR Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EEA European Economic Area EEC European Economic Community EFTA European Free Trade Agreement EGP European Green Party ENP European
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy Papers on the Arctic Or High North: a Comparative Study and Analysis
    Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis [ 1 ] Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis By Alyson JK Bailes & Lassi Heininen Alþjóðamálastofnun og Rannsóknarsetur um smáríki háskólaútgáfan • mmxii [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Preface he future challenges expected in the environmental, eco- nomic, security and other spheres as the Arctic ice melts Thave become a hot topic in governmental, as well as aca- demic and media, circles. In the last decade, each of the eight coun- tries that founded the Arctic Council – Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation, Sweden and the USA – has published at least one major policy document on the topic; and the European Union as an institution has followed suit. Many of these documents describe themselves as ‘strategies’, making them also a sub-set of any comprehensive national security strategy that exists. The individual documents reveal a lot about national concerns and priorities, both international and domestic, and about national as- sumptions and preferences regarding the future governance frame- work for addressing Arctic challenges. That does not, of course, mean that their every word can or should be taken at face value. What is the relevance of small state studies in this context? Among world regions, the Arctic presents one of the sharpest con- trasts in neighbouring states’ sizes, ranging from the mighty USA and Russian Federation to five Nordic states none of which exceeds 10 million souls. Even smaller are the populations of Greenland Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis and the Faroes, which – while part of the realm of Denmark – face © Alyson JK Bailes & Lassi Heininen ISBN XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX their own distinct Arctic issues, and are starting to develop their own Arctic policy-forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy Papers on the Arctic Or High North: a Comparative Study and Analysis
    Institute of International Affairs Centre for Small State Studies Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis alyson jk bailes & lassi heininen [ 1 ] Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis [ 1 ] Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis By Alyson JK Bailes & Lassi Heininen Centre for Small State Studies Institute of International Affairs MMXII [ 3 ] Strategy Papers on the Arctic or High North: A comparative study and analysis © Alyson JK Bailes & Lassi Heininen isbn 978-9979-54-979-6 Cover & layout: Ragnar Helgi Ólafsson. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. [ 4 ] Preface he future challenges expected in the environmental, eco- nomic, security and other spheres as the Arctic ice melts Thave become a hot topic in governmental, as well as aca- demic and media, circles. In the last decade, each of the eight coun- tries that founded the Arctic Council – Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation, Sweden and the USA – has published at least one major policy document on the topic; and the European Union as an institution has followed suit. Many of these documents describe themselves as ‘strategies’, making them also a sub-set of any comprehensive national security strategy that exists. The individual documents reveal a lot about national concerns and priorities, both international and domestic, and about national as- sumptions and preferences regarding the future governance frame- work for addressing Arctic challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timing and Extent of the Eruption of the Siberian Traps Large Igneous Province: Implications for the End-Permian Environmental Crisis
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 277 (2009) 9–20 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The timing and extent of the eruption of the Siberian Traps large igneous province: Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis Marc K. Reichow a,⁎, M.S. Pringle b, A.I. Al'Mukhamedov c, M.B. Allen d, V.L. Andreichev e, M.M. Buslov f, C.E. Davies g, G.S. Fedoseev f, J.G. Fitton h, S. Inger i, A.Ya. Medvedev c, C. Mitchell j, V.N. Puchkov k, I.Yu. Safonova f, R.A. Scott l, A.D. Saunders a a Department of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK b Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA c Institute of Geochemistry, Favorsky Street, Post Office Box 4019, Irkutsk 664033, Russia d Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, Durham, UK e Institute of Geology, Komi Scientific Centre, Uralian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Pervomayskaya Street 54, Syktyvkar 167982, Russia f Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch Russian Academy Sciences, Koptyuga ave. 3, Novosibirsk-90 630090, Russia g Woodside Energy Ltd, 240 St Georges Terrace, Perth 6000, Australia h School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK i Staff Development Unit, Wessex House 3.32, University of Bath, BA2 7AY, UK j Scottish Natural Heritage, Battleby, Redgorton, Perth. PH1 3EW, UK k Ufimskii National Centre, Institute of Geology, 450000 Ufa, Karl Marx Street 16/2, Russia l Cambridge Arctic Shelf Programme (CASP), West Building, 181A, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DG, UK article info abstract Article history: We present new high-precision 40Ar/39Ar ages on feldspar and biotite separates to establish the age, duration Received 28 March 2008 and extent of the larger Siberian Traps volcanic province.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Geopolitical Diversity of ”The Baltic': Then And
    Chapter 4 Dimensions and Geopolitical Diversity of ‘the Baltic’: Then and Now Sonoko Shima Introduction What is today called ‘the Baltic’ has various dimensions and geopolitical diversity. The term the ‘Baltic States’ have been used generally to refer to the three states on the south-eastern coast of the Baltic Sea: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. After attaining full membership in the EU and NATO in 2004, we can see other dimensions of the phrase ‘the Baltic’ developing, such as the Baltic Sea Region, the Baltic Sea Area, the Baltic Area, Das Baltikum, the Baltic world, the Baltic Sea States, the Northern and the Baltic, the Baltic Rim, North-Eastern Europe, the Baltic States, Baltoscandia, Mare Balticum, amongst others. They include many countries in the region surrounding the Baltic Sea. This phenomenon, which means the changing of the concept of the term ‘Baltic’, is a result of the ending of the Cold War as the division of the Iron Curtain had been removed and the border of the European Union shifted eastwards. These attempts to build another notion of ‘the Baltic’, which developed in the 1990s, have been worked out from above, such as EU policy or foreign policy. According to a recent article in the Latvian newspaper Diena (11 Nov. 2005), there has been some discussion about Latvian history textbooks - 69 - SONOKO SHIMA these days in Latvia. Each teacher is allowed to choose his/her own textbook to use in class. It is not at all difficult to understand that many kinds of textbooks of Latvian history have been published since her re-independence in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Turbidites and Black Shales of Bennett Island
    Geological Magazine Ordovician turbidites and black shales of www.cambridge.org/geo Bennett Island (De Long Islands, Russian Arctic), and their significance for Arctic correlations and palaeogeography Original Article 1 1 2,3 Cite this article: Danukalova MK, Maria K. Danukalova , Alexander B. Kuzmichev , Nikolai V. Sennikov Kuzmichev AB, Sennikov NV, and and Tatiana Yu. Tolmacheva4 Tolmacheva TY (2020) Ordovician turbidites and black shales of Bennett Island (De Long 1 2 Islands, Russian Arctic), and their significance Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky lane 7, Moscow, 119017, Russia; Trofimuk Institute for Arctic correlations and palaeogeography. of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptug ave. 3, Geological Magazine 157: 1207–1237. https:// Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia; 3Novosibirsk State University, Pirogov St. 2, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia and doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819001341 4Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute, Sredny ave. 74, St. Petersburg, 199106, Russia Received: 23 January 2019 Revised: 7 October 2019 Abstract Accepted: 17 October 2019 Bennett Island stands alone in a remote part of the Arctic and information on its geology is First published online: 17 January 2020 essential to ascertain relations with other terranes in order to restore the early Palaeozoic Keywords: Arctic palaeogeography. Lower Palaeozoic sedimentary rocks throughout the island were stud- New Siberian Islands; Siberia; graptolites; ied thoroughly for the first time. The Ordovician section (> 1.1 km thick) comprises three units: conodonts; early Palaeozoic; depositional Tremadocian, lowest Floian black shale (130–140 m); Floian, lower Dapingian carbonate environments; palaeoreconstructions turbidite (> 250 m); and Dapingian, lower Darriwilian siliciclastic turbidite (> 730 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Trilobites and Biofacies in the Earlyœmiddle Ordovician of Baltica
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2013, 62, 4, 205–230 doi: 10.3176/earth.2013.16 Trilobites and biofacies in the Early–Middle Ordovician of Baltica and a brief comparison with the Yangtze Plate Jan Bergström a, Helje Pärnasteb and Zhou Zhiyic a Department of Palaeozoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 5007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] c Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, China; [email protected] Received 27 June 2012, accepted 9 September 2013 Abstract. Baltica except for Baltoscandia was subject to an early Tremadocian immigration of trilobites similar to that on other plates. In Baltoscandia the Olenid biofacies lingered on until it was replaced by the late Tremadocian Ceratopyge biofacies. For the rest of the time (Floian to mid-Darriwilian), Baltoscandia had fairly monotonous lithologies and faunas, constituting a single Asaphid biofacies with lateral variations expressed as differences largely in the relative abundance of species. In the South Urals immigration started in the earliest Tremadocian with fairly rich deep-water faunas. A poorer fauna is known from the Polar Urals. A slightly younger, sparse fauna is known from Paj-Khoj. Over most of the Ural border north of the South Urals there was a further development of first a Ceratopyge biofacies, then an eastern Asaphid biofacies, together with more siliciclastic input to the lithofacies and with fewer asaphids than in Baltoscandia. In the South Urals there was a development in the Darriwilian of a Cheirurid biofacies following the Ceratopyge biofacies.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltica from the Late Precambrian to Mid-Palaeozoic Times: the Gain and Loss of a Terrane’S Identity
    Earth-Science Reviews 72 (2005) 39–66 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Baltica from the late Precambrian to mid-Palaeozoic times: The gain and loss of a terrane’s identity L. Robin M. Cocks*, Trond H. Torsvik Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Geodynamics Centre NGU, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Received 1 January 2005; accepted 15 April 2005 Abstract The old terrane of Baltica occupies the mass of northern Europe eastwards to the Urals and lies mostly to the north of the Trans-European Suture Zone. The core, the East European Craton, is thick and formed of rocks dating back to well over 3 billion yr, and Protobaltica can be identified as forming part of the supercontinent of Rodinia at about 1 billion yr ago. Following Rodinia’s break up at about 800 Ma, Protobaltica remained attached to Laurentia until it became the newly independent Baltica at between 570 and 550 Ma, with the inauguration of plate spreading to form the northern part of the Iapetus Ocean. To the south, during the Early Cambrian, Baltica was separated from Gondwana by the relatively narrow Ran Ocean. Baltica remained a separate terrane until its docking, firstly with Avalonia at the very end of the Ordovician (443 Ma), and then with Laurentia during the Silurian in the Scandian part of the Caledonide Orogeny. The terrane was much enlarged in the Vendian to include the areas such as Timan–Pechora now lying to the north as they became accreted to Baltica during the late Precambrian Timanide Orogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambrian–Ordovician Succession at Lanna, Sweden: Stratigraphy and Depositional Environments
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2018, 67, 2, 133–148 https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2018.10 The Cambrian–Ordovician succession at Lanna, Sweden: stratigraphy and depositional environments Anders Lindskoga,b, Anna M. L. Lindskogb, Jan V. Johanssonc, Per Ahlberga and Mats E. Erikssona a Department of Geology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b Henrik Smithsgatan 15C, SE-211 56 Malmö, Sweden; [email protected] c Testa Knällinge 408, SE-697 94 Sköllersta, Sweden; [email protected] Received 10 October 2017, accepted 20 February 2018, available online 3 April 2018 Abstract. A ca 20 m thick succession of upper Furongian (Cambrian Stage 10) through Middle Ordovician (Darriwilian) strata exposed at Lanna, in the province of Närke, south-central Sweden, is described. The upper Furongian is represented by the Alum Shale Formation and reflects an overall shallowing trend that ultimately resulted in emergence above sea level and subaerial conditions. Hence, as in most other areas in south-central Sweden, the boundary between the Cambrian and the Ordovician is marked by a prominent disconformity and significant hiatus. In Närke, the hiatus spans the middle Stage 10 through the uppermost Tremadocian or lowermost Floian. The presence of stromatolites indicates quite shallow marine conditions during the latest Cambrian. The Ordovician succession is characterized by flatly bedded ‘orthoceratite limestone’, belonging to the ‘Latorp’, ‘Lanna’ and ‘Holen’ limestones (‘topoformations’). Widely varying microfacies characteristics in the ‘orthoceratite limestone’ suggest that the depositional environment underwent substantial changes through time, largely due to changes in sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016–2017 Double Issue № 12–13
    The Retrospective Methods Network Newsletter 2016–2017 Double Issue № 12–13 RMN Newsletter is edited by Frog Helen F. Leslie-Jacobsen, Joseph S. Hopkins and Robert W. Guyker Jr. Published by Folklore Studies / Dept. of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art Studies University of Helsinki, Helsinki 1 RMN Newsletter is a medium of contact and communication for members of the Retrospective Methods Network (RMN). The RMN is an open network which can include anyone who wishes to share in its focus. It is united by an interest in the problems, approaches, strategies and limitations related to considering some aspect of culture in one period through evidence from another, later period. Such comparisons range from investigating historical relationships to the utility of analogical parallels, and from comparisons across centuries to developing working models for the more immediate traditions behind limited sources. RMN Newsletter sets out to provide a venue and emergent discourse space in which individual scholars can discuss and engage in vital cross- disciplinary dialogue, present reports and announcements of their own current activities, and where information about events, projects and institutions is made available. RMN Newsletter is edited by Frog, Helen F. Leslie-Jacobsen, Joseph S. Hopkins and Robert W. Guyker Jr., published by Folklore Studies / Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art Studies University of Helsinki PO Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 D 230) 00014 University of Helsinki Finland The open-access electronic edition of this publication is available on-line at: http://www.helsinki.fi/en/beta/retrospective-methods-network © 2017 RMN Newsletter; authors retain rights to reproduce their own works and to grant permissions for the reproductions of those works.
    [Show full text]