Two and a Half Ethical Theories: Re-Examining the Foundations of the Carnegie Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Law Faculty Scholarly Articles Law Faculty Publications 2012 Two and a Half Ethical Theories: Re-Examining the Foundations of the Carnegie Report Mark F. Kightlinger University of Kentucky College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Legal Education Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Mark F. Kightlinger, Two and a Half Ethical Theories: Re-Examining the Foundations of the Carnegie Report, 39 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 113 (2012). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Publications at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Two and a Half Ethical Theories: Re-Examining the Foundations of the Carnegie Report Notes/Citation Information Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2012), pp. 113-274 This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/352 Two and a HaH Ethical Theories: Re-examining the Foundations of the Carnegie Report MARKF. KIGHTLINGER" ABSTRACT In the past three years, the American Bar Association, several major state bar associations, the Association of American Law Schools, the New York Times, law students, and many legal educators have called for fundamental changes in the way we educate new lawyers. Some critics have suggested that legal education faces a crisis that will be exacerbated by rising tuitions, declining enrollments, and a precipitous drop in the demand for new lawyers. Most of those calling for change have relied on the critical analysis of modem legal education presented in a 2007 report by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching entitled Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession ofLaw. Despite the central role of the Carnegie Report in current debates about legal-education reform, however, no one has yet made a careful study of the theoretical foundations and, in particular, the ethical grounding of the Report itself. This Article fills that important gap in the literature by critically analyzing the three ethical frameworks that organize and underpin various aspects of the Report's account of modem legal education and its failings. Although a teleological ethical framework with roots in the philosophy of Aristotle provides the Report's backbone, the Report's treatment of that framework is incomplete, somewhat careless, and ultimately unconvincing. Competing with the teleological framework throughout the Report are an emotivist framework with relativist and possibly nihilist implications and a contractarian framework that makes little sense on its own terms and contradicts key assumptions of the core teleological framework. Before we can justify implementing educational reforms based on the Carnegie Report's analysis and recommendations, we must do a great deal of additional scholarly work to resolve a number of basic theoretical problems that threaten to undermine the intellectual foundations of the Report itself. • Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs Associate Professor of Law, University of Kentucky College of Law; 1.0., Yale Law School, 1988; Ph.D., Yale University, 1991; B.A.IM.A., Cambridge University, 1983/1995; B.A., Williams College, 1981; Partner, Covington & Burling, 1999-2004. I would like to thank my research assistant, Thomas Cothran (J.D. 2012), without whose assistance this Article would not have been possible. In particular, Thomas's research on the scholarly literature surrounding the subject of this Article proved invaluable. 113 114 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 39 Otherwise, efforts to refonn legal education may do little more than build glass houses on shifting sands. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .... 115 II. Broad Impact of Carnegie Report Justifies Careful Study ............ 119 A. The Carnegie Report and Current Efforts to Refonn Legal Education .... '" ........................................................ 120 B. Academic Discussions of the Carnegie Report ..................... 130 III. The Carnegie Report's Backbone: A Teleological Ethical Framework ................................................................. " 134 A. What Is a Teleological Ethical Theory? ............................. 135 B. The Carnegie Report Relies Heavily on a Teleological Ethical Framework ............................................................... 146 1. Fonnation and Formative Education ........................... 147 2. The Three Apprenticeships ....................................... 152 a. The Cognitive Apprenticeship .............................. 155 b. The Practical Apprenticeship ............................... 162 c. The Apprenticeship of Identity and Purpose ............. 169 d. The Third Apprenticeship Provides a Purpose for the First and Second .............................................. 180 e. The Lacuna: No Purpose for Legal Profession ........... 185 IV. Two Competing Ethical Frameworks: Emotivism and Contractarianism ............................................................ 194 A. The Shadow Ethical Framework: Emotivism..................... 194 B. A Half-Hearted Reponse? The Contractarian Framework ....... 205 V. Getting Serious about the Teleological Framework .................... 225 A. Why Build on the Carnegie Report? ................................. 226 B. Why Provide Any Type of Ethical Grounding? .................... 231 C. Propaedeutic Punch List ............................................... 233 1. What is the Telos of the Legal Profession? .................... 234 2. How Can We Ground the Telos After Jettisoning the Contractarian Argument? ......................................... 238 3. Fonnation and Character-What Are the Lawyerly . Virtues? ............................................................. 242 4. What Is the Raw, Unfonned Character of the Novice Lawyer? ............................................................ 245 2012] TWO AND A HALF ETHICAL THEORIES 115 5. What Are the Virtues or Excellences of the Law Professor? . .. .. 250 6. What Is the Proper Response to Emotivism in the Law Faculty and Law Students? . .. .. 258 a. Refutation ............................ 259 b. Incorporation .......................... 271 I. INTRODUCTION In early 2007, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching ("Carnegie Foundation") released a report entitled Educating Lawyers: Preparationfor the Profession of Law ("Carnegie Report" or "Report").' The Report paints a bleak portrait of the current state of the legal profession. Many commentators from within law schools have also pointed to troubling declines in public esteem for the profession and attorneys' apparently growing dissatisfaction with their work, offering empirical evidence that these problems are widespread and serious. According to many observers, the 'crisis of professionalism' is manifest in a decline of civility and an increase in adversarialism, a decline in the role of the counselor and in lawyers' competence, including ethical competence, and a new sense of the law as a business, subject to greater competitive economic pressures and answerable only to the bottom line. Others note a loss of calling or sense of purpose among lawyers.2 According to the Report, critics also have accused lawyers and other professionals of "professional self-absorption and irresponsible disconnection from the public."' As the Report argues, "[w]hatever the merits of 'value-free' knowledge, they do not transfer well to the idea of 'value-free' professionals."4 In response to these serious concerns about the legal profession's ethical (dis)engagement and loss of purpose, the Report calls for reforming legal education, because "[a] reawakening of professional 61an must include 1. wILLIAM M. SULLIVAN ET AL., EDUCATING LAWYERS: PREPARATION FOR THE PROFESSION OF LAW (2007) [hereinafter CARNEGIE REPORT]. 2. Id. at 136-37. 3. Id. at 7. 4. Id. at 136-37. 116 OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY LA WREVIEW [Vol. 39 revitalizing legal preparation."5 The Report "examines the dramatic way that law schools develop legal understanding and form professional identity."6 In particular, the Report focuses on the question "[h]ow effectively does legal education integrate the moral obligations of lawyering with its intellectual and clinical demands?"7 Summarizing their conclusions, the authors of the Report state: The dramatic results of the first year of law school's emphasis on well-honed skills of legal analysis should be matched by similarly strong skill in serving clients and a solid ethical grounding. If legal education were serious about such a goal, it would require a bolder, more integrated approach that would build on its strengths and address its most serious limitations. In a 2011 editorial entitled "Legal Education Reform,"9 the New York Times picked up on these themes from the Carnegie Report and sounded an alarm. According to the editorial, American legal education is in crisis. The economic downturn has left many recent law graduates saddled with crushing student loans and bleak job prospects. The law schools have been targets of lawsuits by students and scrutiny from the United States Senate for alleged false advertising about potential jobs. Yet, at the