ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: CITY of GRACE: POWER
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: CITY OF GRACE: POWER, PERFORMANCE, AND BODIES IN COLONIAL SOUTH CAROLINA Matthew Thomas Shifflett, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014 Dissertation directed by: Professor Heather S. Nathans School of Theatre, Dance, and Performance Studies Colonial Charles Town, South Carolina, was widely reputed to be one of the most refined and genteel cities in the early British Empire. As its planters and merchants grew rich from the overseas rice trade, they sought to embody their new elite status by learning the courtly styles of European social dancing, using dances such as the minuet to cultivate a sense of physical “grace.” This sense of grace allowed them to construct cosmopolitan identities and differentiate a social order that consolidated their power over the colony. Meanwhile, other social factions, such as the colony’s large slave majority and the emerging class of middling tradesmen, sought their own share in controlling the vocabulary through which bodies might mean. “City of Grace: Power, Performance, and Bodies in Colonial South Carolina” puts colonial Charles Town’s “bodies” into conversation in order to highlight how bodily behaviors such as dancing, posture, and comportment could organize power relations in an eighteenth-century British colony. This dissertation considers in turn the part that four groups played in the conflict over the values assigned to Charles Town’s bodies: the wealthy elites who sought to use “grace” as a means to proclaim and ensure their status, the dancing masters who sought to capitalize on the elites’ need for training, the African slaves whose syncretized performances of their own ethnically-specific dances troubled elite ideals of a graceful “white” body, and the emerging cohort of middling tradespeople and evangelical believers who critiqued the pretensions of elite manners. By using sources such as dancing manuals, paintings, and private letters, I put the colonial body back “on its feet,” in order to understand the kinesthetic qualities of movement itself as a site for creating and transmitting meaning. Within this framework, I suggest that genteel grace was a strategy by which eighteenth-century elites sought to perform class status without betraying the artificiality of the performance. CITY OF GRACE: POWER, PERFORMANCE, AND BODIES IN COLONIAL SOUTH CAROLINA by Matthew Thomas Shifflett Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 Advisory Committee: Professor Heather S. Nathans, Chair Professor Richard J. Bell Professor Gay Gibson Cima Professor Clare A. Lyons Professor Laura J. Rosenthal © Copyright by Matthew Thomas Shifflett 2014 This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of Dr. James W. Parker and Dr. Linda Livingstone Acknowledgements My greatest blessing in life has been the magnanimity of my teachers, and it is to them that I owe my every success. Some have been teachers in an institutional setting, while many have not. All of them made a difference in my life through their one-on-one engagement with a sometimes awkward, often sensitive, and always odd young man. I have driven myself over the years to live up to their investment, even though I know that to do so is both impossible and unnecessary. They have been my champions without thought of reward. My debt to them is inexhaustible. I thank the teachers and colleagues who have shepherded me through my institutional education. In particular, I thank Aaron Anderson, Noreen Barnes, Laura Browder, the late Carol Cuneo, Sandra Harris, Terry Oggel, Janet Rodgers, and Catherine Schuler for their faith in me over the years, even when I did my best to frustrate them. My fellow students have always been a considerable source of joy and inspiration for me, and I want to acknowledge two of them in particular. Jessica Krenek and Kate Spanos have gotten me over this mountain with their cheer, their patience, and their encouragement. They are my dear hearts. I also thank my committee, whose engagement with my work has accounted for the highest pleasures of this process. My committee was a “dream team” who were not only able to speak to my research from their own scholarship, but who offered a harmony of mentorship styles that helped me overcome this project’s obstacles. In particular, I am grateful to Heather Nathans, who has guided my work with patience, energy, and compassion. I cannot imagine achieving even half of what I have achieved in the last six years were it not for her mentorship. I am grateful to the American Society for Theatre Research, both for their munificence in the form of a travel grant and for being my intellectual home during this project. I have not only been fortunate enough to share my work in ASTR’s working sessions several times throughout this process, but I have also benefitted from the attention of several of the warm and kind scholars that make attending an ASTR conference such a delight. In particular, I thank Odai Johnson, Julia Walker, and Gary Jay Williams for their encouragement and graciousness over the years. I thank Gary Jay Williams also for sharing with me portions of his book-in-progress that address the theatre in colonial South Carolina. His work has been of great help to me. I have dedicated this work to the memory of two individuals who had a deep and incalculable effect on me as a young man. They were both theatre history teachers, although neither of them ever taught me in any formal capacity. But they both devoted many afternoons to conversation with me over the course of my young adulthood, Linda over Earl Grey tea in her glad, sunny living room and Jim in the gardens of his eighteenth-century farmhouse in rural Virginia. They each in their way taught me to have courage in my oddity and to follow obscure paths with the faith that I would find rare treasures. I think of them often and I wish they had lived to read this work. Lastly, I thank the network of friends and family that keep my life worth putting down a book for. I thank my parents and my siblings for their humor and energy. I thank my best friends, Lonnie Jones, Katy Hilton, and Lesslie Dodge Crane, for drawing me into trouble while keeping me out of danger. And I thank my wife Sarah Yount for being my companion and co-conspirator in all manner of adventures. Table of Contents List of Figures. ................................................................................................................. vi Introduction:………………………………………………………......………. ......................... 1 Chapter 1: The “Genteel Science”: Social Dancing and “Grace" ..................................... 26 Chapter 2: “The Manners-Making Crew”: The Plight of Dancing Masters in Eighteenth- Century Charles Town………………………………………………………. ..... 80 Chapter 3: “Pushing and Dancing”: Dance and Martial Arts in the Construction of the “African” Body ................................................................................................... 123 Chapter 4: A New Grace: The Rise of the Benevolent Class ......................................... 175 Epilogue: Gabriel Transformed…………………………………………………. ......... 225 Appendix: The Dancing Master, A Satyr……………………………………………….232 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 239 List of Figures FIGURE A: Ashley Hall Ruins……………………………………………………………1 FIGURE B: Charles Fraser Painting………………………………………………………2 FIGURE C: Drayton Hall…………………………….………………………………….27 FIGURE D: Drayton Hall, Stair Hall……………………………………………………28 FIGURE E: Drayton Hall Ballroom…………………………………………………….28 FIGURE F: Exact Prospect of Charles Town, Bishop Roberts…………………………37 FIGURE G: Feuillet’s notation system…………………………………………………44 FIGURE H: Kellom Tomlinson’s Art of Dancing………………………………………45 FIGURES I-M: Bickham illustrations of minuet……………………………………….52 FIGURE N: Taking hands (Bickham illustration)………………………………………53 FIGURE O: Panoramic View of London, 1751…………………………………………68 FIGURE P: Peter Manigault, by Allen Ramsay……………...………………………….76 FIGURE Q: Elizabeth Manigault, by Jeremiah Theus…………………………………..77 FIGURE R: Pink house…………………………………………………………………..37 FIGURE S: The Old Plantation………………………………………………………...149 FIGURE T: William Byrd III, by Charles Bridges……………………………………..157 FIGURE U: Liberty Displaying the Arts and Sciences…………………………………229 1 Introduction FIGURE A: The Ruins of Ashley Hall, photo by Gazie Nagle. All that is left now of Ashley Hall are the ruins of a semicircular set of rust- colored sandstone steps. Those steps once led to a brick Georgian mansion, one of the finest in South Carolina, replete with an alley of live oak trees leading to the door. Now Spanish moss hangs drowsily off the remaining oaks, and willowy tufts of Pampas grass have overtaken the lane. The ruins stand shaded by a canopy of cypress and tupelo, grown up from the blackwater swamp that lies just yards away. One can imagine the graceful façade that once rose behind these steps, with a strictly symmetrical arrangement 2 of multi-pane windows balanced according to classical proportions. But the building itself is gone, burned to the ground at the end of the Civil War. An 1803 painting by Charles Fraser provides little help; the building is almost completely obscured by trees. Nothing remains of the original structure—no material, pictorial, or anecdotal clues to the architectural face that greeted visitors to the home of four generations of the