April 18, 2011.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Robert Purdy, 3Rd WV Inf/6Th WV Cav & Potomac
ROBERT PURDY, CIVIL WAR SOLDIER FROM MARSHALL COUNTY Written by Linda Cunningham Fluharty, May 21, 2012 Eric McFadden sent a file (which follows) about Civil War soldier, Robert C. Purdy, of Moundsville, Marshall County. Purdy had some connection to the President Lincoln Conspiracy-Assassination trials and Eric's records are from that proceeding. At first, it seemed that the Robert Purdy was the man in the 3rd West Virginia that subsequently became the 6th West Virginia Cavalry, but evidence now indicates that the Robert C. Purdy related to the Assassination Trial enlisted in the 2nd Maryland Cavalry and was transferred to Company "M" of the Maryland 1st Regiment Potomac Home Brigade. Since only one Robert C. Purdy has been found, perhaps the same man was in both organizations. Service Records of Robert C. Purdy exist for both regiments. Robert C. Purdy in Company "I" of the 3rd Infanty/6th Cavalry was 41 when he enlisted 11 Dec 1861 in the 3rd Infantry. He was born in West Chester, NY. He received a Medical Discharge 11 July 1863. This is his family in the 1860 Census of Marshall County: PURDY (551) Robt. C...39-wm...painter...NY Minerva...38-wf...OH William...20-wm...VA Mary E...18-wf...VA Henrietta M...16-wf...OH Martha N...12-wf...OH Robert C Purdy - "alias Ashley," according to the Service Record - in Company "M" of the 1st Regiment Potomac Home Brigade, Maryland was 23 years old (one page says 33), 5'10" tall, born in Marshall County, when he enlisted 9 Sep 1864 at Cumberland, MD to serve two years. -
The Conspirator
THE CONSPIRATOR Screenplay by James Solomon Story by James Solomon & Gregory Bernstein April 1, 2008 1. MALE VOICE (over a black screen) Two men waiting at the Pearly Gates strike up a conversation. FADE UP: On FREDERICK AIKEN, 26, a handsome, young turk. AIKEN/MALE "How'd you die?" The first man asks the second. Aiken is wearing the blue and gold of the Union Army. AIKEN "I froze to death," says the second. "That's awful. What's it like to freeze to death?" PULL BACK: to reveal Aiken has been shot in the abdomen, uniform blood-soaked, slumped inside a cold, muddy BUNKER. AIKEN (CONT'D) "You get the shakes and pain in all your fingers and toes. But eventually you kind of drift off as if you're falling asleep. (a beat) How 'bout you? How'd you die?" Revealing Aiken is not alone. Best friend, NICHOLAS BAKER, 27, is nearby - right leg nearly severed above the knee. AIKEN (CONT'D) "Heart attack," says the first man. "You see my wife was cheating on me. So, I show up at home unexpectedly. I burst into the bedroom. She's all alone knitting. So, I race down to the basement to find the louse, but no one's there. I sprint up to the attic, and just as I arrive... I had a massive heart attack and died." Baker's breathing becomes labored. He is beginning to fade. AIKEN (CONT'D) The second man shakes his head. "That is so ironic!" "What do you mean?" asks the first. -
Trial Project Bibliography Boothiebarn.Com Aiken, Frederick
Trial Project Bibliography BoothieBarn.com Aiken, Frederick. Frederick Aiken to Washington Chronicle Editor, September 17, 1873. In Personal Recollections of the War of the Rebellion, edited by James Grant Wilson. New York: New York Commandery, 1891. Arnold, Samuel Bland. Memoirs of a Lincoln Conspirator. Edited by Michael W. Kauffman. Bowie (MD): Heritage Books, 1995. Blakeslee, Francis D. Personal Recollections and Impressions of Abraham Lincoln. Gardena (CA): Spanish American Institute Press, 1924. Browning, Orville Hickman. The Diary of Orville Hickman Browning Vol II, 1865 - 1881. Edited by James G. Randall. Springfield (IL): Illinois State Historical Library, 1933. Clampitt, John W. “The Trial of Mary Surratt.” North American Review 131 (September 1880): 223-240. De Chambrun, Adolphe. Impressions of Lincoln and the Civil War: a Foreigner’s Account. New York: Random House, 1952. Doster, William E. Lincoln and Episodes of the Civil War. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1915. Douglas, Henry Kyd. I Rode with Stonewall. Greenwich (CT): Fawcett Publications, 1961. Edwards, William C., ed. The Lincoln Assassination – The Court Transcripts. Self-published, Google Books, 2012. Edwards, William C., ed. The Lincoln Assassination: The Reward Files. Self-published, Google Books, 2012. Edwards, William C. and Edward Steers, Jr., ed. The Lincoln Assassination: The Evidence. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2009. Ewing, Thomas, Jr. Argument of Thomas Ewing, Jr., on the Jurisdiction and on the Law and the Evidence in the Case of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd. Washington, D.C.: H. Polkinhorn & Son, 1865. Frank, Seymour J. “The Conspiracy to Implicate the Confederate Leaders in Lincoln’s Assassination.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 40, no. -
Hatching Execution: Andrew Johnson and the Hanging of Mary Surratt
Hatching Execution: Andrew Johnson and the Hanging of Mary Surratt Sarah Westad History 489: Research Seminar December 2015 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Contents Abstract iii Figures iv Introduction 1 Historiography 10 Primary Source Analysis 22 Conclusion 33 Works Cited 35 ii Abstract In 1865, the American Civil War and the assassination of US President Abraham Lincoln plunged the country into a state of panic. Federal officials quickly took to the ranks, imprisoning hundreds of suspected rebels believed to be involved in the assassination. Ultimately, only eight individuals, dubbed conspirators, were prosecuted and charged with murdering the Commander- in-Chief. During their trials, new president Andrew Johnson voiced grave concern over one particular conspirator, middle-aged Catholic widow Mary Surratt. As the mother of escaped conspirator, John Surratt, Johnson viewed Mrs. Surratt as an individual that needed to be treated with a particular urgency, resulting in a series of events that led to Mrs. Surratt’s execution, less than three months after the assassination, on July 7, 1865. This paper analyzes the actions of Johnson and considers the American public’s responses to Mary Surratt’s hanging. Additionally, this paper looks at the later writings of Andrew Johnson in order to gain an understanding of his feelings on Mrs. Surratt in the weeks, months, and years after her execution, as well as -
Mary Surratt
FREDERICK AIKEN and the TRIAL of MARY SURRATT 0. FREDERICK AIKEN and the TRIAL of MARY SURRATT - Story Preface 1. MARY SURRATT 2. EVENTS at the SURRATT BOARDINGHOUSE 3. JOHN WILKES BOOTH and HIS PLANS 4. CAPTURE and DEATH of JOHN WILKES BOOTH 5. CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION 6. FREDERICK AIKEN and the TRIAL of MARY SURRATT 7. EXECUTION of MARY SURRATT 8. AFTER THE CONSPIRACY TRIAL The National Police Gazette’s issue of July 15, 1865 ran this illustration. It purports to show “Mrs. Surratt Preparing for Death.” We cannot be sure whether this drawing depicts an actual scene, in the prison cell, or whether it is an artist’s interpretation. Among other visitors, such as her daughter Anna, Mrs. Surratt would have seen her spiritual advisors Father Wiget and Father Walter. Online via the Library of Congress. Mary Surratt hired a well-respected lawyer to defend her before the military commission. Reverdy Johnson - also a U.S. Senator from Maryland - was seriously opposed to trying the defendants before a group of Union generals. Although he gave a long and impassioned plea against the process, on Mary’s behalf, it was of no use. The head judge - Major General David Hunter - was a close friend (and pall bearer) of President Lincoln. He had no interest in hearing arguments that President Johnson’s order - requiring military justice in the Surratt matter - was wrong. And ... he had no problem with the dual roles of Joseph Holt (as chief prosecutor and impartial legal advisor to the tribunal) - at least, not initially. -
A Rhetorical Analysis of the Speaking of John A. Bingham with Emphasis on His Role in the Trial of the Lincoln Conspirators
This dissertation has been 64-6992 microfilmed exactly as received BOGARAD, Allen Boyd, 1935 — A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SPEAKING OF JOHN A. BINGHAM WITH EMPHASIS ON HIS ROLE IN THE TRIAL OF THE LINCOLN CONSPIRATORS. The Ohio State University, Ph. B., 1963 Speech, theater University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SPEAKING OF JOHN A. BINGHAM WITH EMPHASIS ON HIS ROLE IN THE TRIAL OF THE LINCOLN CONSPIRATORS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Allen Boyd Bogarad, B, A,, M. A, The Ohio State University 1963 Approved by Adviser Department of Speech ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my indebtedness to those who helped make this work possible: to Dr. Paul A. Carmack whose advice, encouragement, an.d patience were never ceasing; to Dr. Franklin Knower and Dr. Keith Brooks who read the manuscript; to Milton Ronsheim of the Cadiz Republican for the use of Bingham’s papers; to many librarians, lawyers, and my colleagues for their assistance and criticism; to my infant son, Leonard, who remained unruffled by his father's frenetic activity; and most important, to my wife, Carley, 11 TABLE OP CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................... 11 INTRODUCTION . , ............................... 1 Chapter I. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A S P E A K E R ................ 3 Franklin College Orator Courtroom and Campaign Speaker Congressional Debater Basis for Successful Speaking Speech Philosophy II. THE TRIAL BEGINS ........................... 27 A Murder Is Investigated Judges on The Bench Obstacles for The Accused Bingham Debates Ben Butler Duties of The Judge Advocate III. -
From the Civil War to 9/11: Democracy and the Right to a Fair Trial Alan S
Social Education 75(4), pp 196–198 ©2011 National Council for the Social Studies From the Civil War to 9/11: Democracy and the Right to a Fair Trial Alan S. Marcus n the United States, our right to a fair trial is protected by the Constitution. The The Conspirator as Hollywood Text ideal of justice is a critical underpinning of our democracy. However, while the Hollywood is famous for creating “visual IUnited States is a model of an honorable and just court system most of the time, texts” that bring the past to life, broaden our constitutional rights are occasionally stretched or broken. The rationale is often traditional historical narratives, connect national security, but others assert that political shenanigans and moral lapses are the the past and the present, and enrich our real culprits. One instance when constitutional rights were suspended was the case understanding of the past. Hollywood of Mary Surratt. Surratt was one of eight people accused in the plot to assassinate is also infamous for creating composite Abraham Lincoln. Her story is explored in the filmThe Conspirator, released on April characters, distorting historical time, 15, 2011, to coincide with the anniversary of Lincoln’s death and the 150th anniversary playing loose with the historical record, of the Civil War. In this article, I analyze The Conspirator through four questions that and “enhancing” films with fictional teachers can apply to any historical film they show.1 elements.4 When evaluating a “Hollywood his- The Case of Mary Surratt death warrant despite a recommendation tory” film as an historical text there are Although Mary Surratt denied any from the military judges that her sentence four particularly relevant and revealing involvement in the assassination of be commuted to life in prison. -
The Civil War and Dutchess County, New York Part II
The Civil War and Dutchess County, New York Part II Dutchess County Historical Society 2016 Yearbook • Volume 95 Candace J. Lewis, Editor The Society is a not-for-profit educational organization that collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Dutchess County, New York, from the period of the arrival of the first Native Americans until the present day. Publications Committee: Candace J. Lewis, Ph.D., Editor Roger Donway, Deborah Golomb, Eileen Hayden Julia Hotton, Carla Lesh, Patty Moore and Melodye Moore Designer: Marla Neville, Main Printing mymainprinter.com Printer: NetPub, Inc. www.netpub.net Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook 2016 Volume 95 • Published annually since 1915 Copyright © by Dutchess County Historical Society ISSN: 0739-8565 ISBN: 978-0-944733-09-7 Cover: Firing Demonstration of the 150th New York at Gettysburg, 2003. Each Columbus Day Weekend since 2001 the 150th New York has presented a living history program at the Gettysburg National Military Park. This image shows the company firing from the area of Union line on July 2nd and 3rd, across the field toward the Confederate lines. This field is the one best known for Pickett’s Charge, July 3, 1863. Photograph. Collection of Pete Bedrossian. The Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook does not assume responsibility for statements of fact or opinion made by the authors. Dutchess County Historical Society P.O. Box 88 Poughkeepsie, NY 12602 845-471-1630 Email: [email protected] www.dutchesscountyhistoricalsociety.org This issue of the Dutchesss County Historical Society’sT ITLE iii yearbook has been generously underwritten by the following: Anonymous L In loving memory of Mildred Strain (1908-1986), a devoted supporter of the Dutchess County Historical Society. -
The Case for Mrs. Surratt
TION. MpJ THE GREAT CBJME Hanging of Mrs. Sun , Payne Harold and Ateerott. Full and Complete Detai of the Affair. Efforts to Defer the Execution Mrs. Surratt. m A Writ of ffaheas Corpus Issued for but it is Disregarded by Pmj. dent Johnson's Orders. How the Prisoners Pi An, nd n '„ <*ican mihZ ^ "»ed by Their Last Night. a nafion tsft of ^:c;r Mrs. Surratt and Payne Pr Their Stolid Indifferent to the End. $8* THE AXSA-. .fiATiC or |! PRES'iLINCOV FULLt.^TICl Iran W %.A Vj $3.00 THE CASE FOR MRS. SURRATT Seven men and a woman were tried for the murder of Abraham Lincoln. Three men and the woman were hanged. THIS IS THE story of the woman — Mary Eugenia Surratt of Surrattsville, Maryland, an obscure boarding house- keeper who became the central figure in the most dramatic trial in the history of the nation — a trial that rocked the world and wrecked an administration. The world will never know whether or not she was completely innocent. Testimony brought out at the trial would never have convicted her in a civil court, and this same testimony would tend to prove that she was rail- roaded by a military commission under Secretary of War Stanton. There can be little doubt that her trial represents the low point in American jurispru- dence. American democracy was on trial with her and both lost— democracy temporarily. The case of Mrs. Surratt has been of interest to all students of history for (Continued on back flap) ( %{ {a,k fcrJfri. Jumitt LINCOLN ROOM UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY MEMORIAL the Class of 1901 founded by HARLAN HOYT HORNER and HENRIETTA CALHOUN HORNER THE CASE FOR MRS. -
Download the Pdf File Here
The United States Courthouse, Washington, D.C. — Courtesy, The National Archives AN ANECDOTAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1801-1976 By MATTHEW F. McGUIRE SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE "When the public mind is agitated, when wars, and rumors of wars, plots, conspiracies and treasons excite alarm, it is the duty of a court to be peculiarly watchful lest the public feeling should reach the seat of justice, and thereby precedents be established which may be come the ready tools of faction in times more disastrous. The worst of precedents may be established from the best of motives. We ought to be upon our guard lest our zeal for the public interest lead us to overstep the bounds of the law and the Constitution; for although we may thereby bring one criminal to punishment, we may furnish the means by which an hundred innocent persons may suffer. "The Constitution was made for times of commo tion. In the calm of peace and prosperity there is seldom great injustice. Dangerous precedents occur in dangerous times. It then becomes the duty of the judi ciary calmly to poise the scales of justice, unmoved by the arm of power, undisturbed by the clamor of the multitude . ." —William Cranch, Chief Judge, dissenting: United States v. Bollman and Swartout, D. C. Reports 1, Cranch 1, December Term 1806 at Washington (January 23, 1807). Foreword This is not intended in any sense as a formal history of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Anecdotal and episodic, its only purpose is to point up the great traditions of a great Court, a Court unique in origin yet an integral part of the fed eral system. -
The Men and Women of Civil War Reenactment A
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles What They Fight For: The Men and Women of Civil War Reenactment A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Christopher George Bates 2016 What They Fight For: The Men and Women of Civil War Reenactment by Christopher George Bates Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Joan Waugh, Chair Abstract This study examines the three generations of Civil War reenactors: the veterans, the centennial reenactors, and the modern community. It argues that they are an excellent case study for examining the evolving memory of the Civil War, particularly when considered in the context of five interpretative traditions: the “Lost Cause,” the “Union Cause,” the “Reconciliationist Cause,” the “Emancipationist Cause,” and the “White Supremacist Cause.” At the same time, a careful analysis of the modern community illustrates the myriad ways in which contemporary individuals interact with and utilize the past. - ii - The dissertation of Christopher George Bates is approved. Janice L. Reiff Gary W. Gallagher Joan Waugh, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2016 - iii - - iv - Table of Contents ______________________________________________________________________________ Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 1: “Grand Armies of the Republic”: The Veteran Reenactors .....................................................25 -
CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION
MARY SURRATT 0. MARY SURRATT - Story Preface 1. MARY SURRATT 2. EVENTS at the SURRATT BOARDINGHOUSE 3. JOHN WILKES BOOTH and HIS PLANS 4. CAPTURE and DEATH of JOHN WILKES BOOTH 5. CONSPIRATORS and the MILITARY COMMISSION 6. FREDERICK AIKEN and the TRIAL of MARY SURRATT 7. EXECUTION of MARY SURRATT 8. AFTER THE CONSPIRACY TRIAL This photographic image of Mary Surratt is maintained by the Surratt House Museum in Washington, D.C. What had caused Mary Surratt - an upstanding woman by all accounts - to be charged as a conspirator in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln? What did a 42-year-old widow have to do with the death of the President? Mary Jenkins Surrat was a Southerner, born on a Maryland plantation in 1823. Although her parents weren’t wealthy, they were financially secure. When Mary Elizabeth was twelve, she began attending a Catholic boarding school in Alexandria, Virginia. When the school - called the Academy for Young Ladies - closed in 1839, sixteen-year-old Mary returned to her family’s plantation. By that time, she had converted to the Catholic faith. Soon after she returned home, Mary met John Harrison Surratt. The following year - when Mary was seventeen - she married John (who was ten years older than she). The couple had a small plantation, including slaves, and three children (Isaac, Anna and John, Jr.). John, Sr. was a drinker who reportedly abused his wife, both physically and emotionally. Although the couple were well-off financially, their fortunes dramatically changed when their farm home at "Pasture and Gleanings" burned to the ground in 1851.