RSCAS 2020/21 the Strasbourg Court Judgement N.D. and N.T. V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RSCAS 2020/21 the Strasbourg Court Judgement N.D. and N.T. V RSCAS 2020/21 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Migration Policy Centre The Strasbourg Court Judgement N.D. and N.T. v Spain A Carte Blanche to Push Backs at EU External Borders? Sergio Carrera European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Migration Policy Centre The Strasbourg Court Judgement N.D. and N.T. v Spain A Carte Blanche to Push Backs at EU External Borders? Sergio Carrera EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2020/21 Terms of access and reuse for this work are governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC- BY 4.0) International license. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper series and number, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Sergio Carrera, 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published in March 2020 by the European University Institute. Badia Fiesolana, via dei Roccettini 9 I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual author(s) and not those of the European University Institute. This publication is available in Open Access in Cadmus, the EUI Research Repository: https://cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics. The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes, projects and data sets, in addition to a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration, the expanding membership of the European Union, developments in Europe’s neighbourhood and the wider world. For more information: http://eui.eu/rscas The EUI and the RSCAS are not responsible for the opinion expressed by the author(s). Migration Policy Centre (MPC) The Migration Policy Centre (MPC) is part of the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute in Florence. It conducts advanced research on the transnational governance of international migration, asylum and mobility. It provides new ideas, rigorous evidence, and critical thinking to inform major European and global policy debates. The MPC aims to bridge academic research, public debates, and policy-making. It proactively engages with users of migration research to foster policy dialogues between researches, policy-makers, migrants, and a wide range of civil society organisations in Europe and globally. The MPC seeks to contribute to major debates about migration policy and governance while building links with other key global challenges and changes. The MPC working paper series, published since April 2013, aims at disseminating high-quality research pertaining to migration and related issues. All EUI members are welcome to submit their work to the series. For further queries, please contact the Migration Policy Centre Secretariat at [email protected] More information can be found on: http://www.migrationpolicycentre.eu/ Disclaimer: The EUI, RSCAS and MPC are not responsible for the opinion expressed by the author(s). Furthermore, the views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union. Abstract This Paper examines the N.D. and N.T v Spain judgment by the European Court of Human Rights (EtCHR) of 13 February 2020. The Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg Court concluded that expedited expulsions to Morocco (pushbacks or ‘hot returns’) by Spanish authorities at the border fences in Melilla did not amount to a violation of the prohibition of collective expulsions under Article 4 Protocol 4 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). Counterintuitively, the Court’s ruling is not a carte blanche for states to engage in automatic expulsions or push backs of irregular immigrants and asylum seekers at EU external borders. The Grand Chamber has confirmed that the notion of expulsion for ECHR purposes covers non-admission border management policies, and it applies to every individual irrespective of seeking asylum or not. It has also held that governments must not instrumentally frame certain parts of their territory through law as ‘non-territory’ to escape from their ECHR obligations in the context of border policies. The Grand Chamber has also demanded that States provide genuine and effective access to legal entry mechanisms for purposes of asylum and employment. The N.D. and N.T v Spain judgement is, however, fraught with legal inconsistencies and factual inaccuracies. It denies justice to voiceless victims of human rights violations. The ruling’s inconsistent legal argumentation leaves crucial nuances to avoid arbitrariness and rule of law violations in states’ border policies. By focusing on the individuals’ own conduct instead of the Spanish authorities’ compliance with the ECHR, the judgement displaces the individual from the heart towards the periphery of the ECHR system. It wrongly applies an ‘own conduct doctrine’ to human rights which are absolute in nature and accept no exception. The judges’ arguments are also factually wrong, chiefly in respect of the practical accessibility by the applicants to legal channels for admission to Spain. The Grand Chamber’s choice to first assess whether the individual is worthy of human rights contradicts Article 1 ECHR and the Strasbourg Court mandate to impartially and independently supervise States parties’ compliance with everyone’s human rights within their jurisdiction. The ruling provides an inequivalent level of human rights calling for lower protection standards in contradiction to those required by United Nations human rights bodies. It is also incompatible with the Spanish government’s obligations under EU law to comply with human rights in border control and surveillance policies, and the fundamental right to asylum. Keywords European Union; Migration; Asylum; European Convention on Human Rights; Pushbacks; Border Fences; Hot Returns; Ceuta and Melilla; Right to Asylum; Prohibition against Collective Expulsions; Non-Refoulement I cannot accept that humans can treat humans like that. When my rights were violated by Spain, harm was done to me. What I would like for this Court is that measures are taken to stop such harm from being done to other people. I would like that justice exists even for those who are poor, vulnerable and don't have a voice Oral Statement by Mr. N.D. Lawyer before the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, Hearing, Strasbourg, 16 September 2018. Introduction* On 13 February 2020 the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Strasbourg delivered the much awaited judgement N.D. and N.T. v Spain.1 By a unanimous vote, the judges ruled in favour of the Spanish government and that the automatic expulsions of the two applicants to Morocco did not amount to a violation of Article 4 Protocol 4 and Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). Since 2005, the Spanish government has implemented a systematic official policy of ‘push backs’ or ‘hot returns’ (devoluciones en caliente) of people entering irregularly through the border fences barriers in Melilla and Ceuta.2 This policy has been subject to widespread criticism by international and regional human rights actors,3 particularly since it became part of the Organic Act 4/2015 on safeguarding the security of citizens or Public Security Act of 30 March 2015.4 The case before the Strasbourg Court dealt with one applicant from Mali and another from Ivory Coast, who together with other individuals tried to cross the Spanish border fence in Melilla.5 They alleged that they were subject to disproportionate violence and expedited expulsions by the Spanish authorities (Guardia Civil) who reportedly handcuffed them and handed them over to the Moroccan * The author would like to express his gratitude to Professor Andrew Geddes (MPC, EUI), Professor Jens Vedsted-Hansen (Aarhus University, Denmark) and Professor Valsamis Mitsilegas (Queen Mary University of London) for their comments and insights on a previous draft of this paper. 1 ECtHR, Case of N.D. and N.T. v. Spain, Applications nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, Grand Chamber, Strasbourg, 13 February 2020. 2 However, investigative journalism has reported that Spanish authorities had implemented this practice as an unofficial policy since 2001. Refer to El Diario (2013), España lleva 12 años expulsando ilegalmente inmigrantes en Melilla, 19 November 2013; Available at https://www.eldiario.es/desalambre/inmigrantes-expulsados-ilegalmente-Melilla- ultimos_0_198430239.html 3 A. López-Sala (2020), Keeping up Appearances: Dubious legality and migration control at the peripheral borders of Europe. The cases of Ceuta and Melilla, in S. Carrera and M. Stefan (eds), Fundamental Rights Challenges in Border Controls and Expulsions of Irregular Immigration in the European Union: Complaint Mechanisms and Access to Justice, Routledge Studies in Human Rights, pp. 26-42. See also I. Barbero and M. Illamola-Dausa (2020), Deportations without the right to complaint: cases from Spain, in S. Carrera and M. Stefan (eds), Fundamental Rights Challenges in Border Controls and Expulsions of Irregular Immigration in the European Union: Complaint Mechanisms and Access to Justice, Routledge Studies in Human Rights, pp. 43-63. 4 Ley Orgánica 4/2015 de protección de la seguridad ciudadana or ‘Ley Mordaza’, BOE núm. 77, 31/03/2015. According to the Tenth Additional Provision (Special Rules for Ceuta and Melilla). ‘1. Aliens attempting to penetrate the border containment structures in order to cross the border unlawfully, and whose presence is detected within the territorial demarcation lines of Ceuta or Melilla, may be returned in order to prevent their unlawful entry into Spain.
Recommended publications
  • What Elpais.Com's and Eldiario.Es' Narratives Tell About the Migrant Crossings of the Morocco- Spain Border
    This is a repository copy of Exploring online news: What elpais.com's and eldiario.es' narratives tell about the migrant crossings of the Morocco- Spain border. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/115947/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Di Renzo, F. orcid.org/0000-0001-8172-4163 (2017) Exploring online news: What elpais.com's and eldiario.es' narratives tell about the migrant crossings of the Morocco- Spain border. Journalism. ISSN 1464-8849 https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917708866 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Original Article Exploring online news: What elpais.com's and eldiario.es' narratives tell about the migrant crossings of the Morocco- Spain border Abstract This article explores the narrative construction of online news about the migrant crossings of the Morocco-Spain border.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontespizio Ric Ok
    Corso di Laurea magistrale in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate – International Relations Tesi di Laurea Ceuta e Melilla La questione irrisolta tra Spagna e Marocco Relatore Ch. Prof. Antonio Trampus Correlatore Ch. Prof.ssa Sara De Vido Laureando Giorgia Busato Matricola 827573 Anno Accademico 2013 / 2014 INDICE INTRODUZIONE i ABSTRACT vi PRIMA PARTE - LE CITTÀ DI CEUTA E MELILLA 1 CAPITOLO 1 – CEUTA 3 1.1. Geografia 3 1.2. Storia 4 1.3. Economia 25 1.3.1 Il porto di Ceuta 27 1.4. Società 31 CAPITOLO 2 – MELILLA 33 2.1 Geografia 33 2.2 Storia 34 2.3 Economia 63 2.3.1 Il porto di Melilla 64 2.4 Società 69 SECONDA PARTE – CEUTA E MELILLA NELLA LEGISLAZIONE SPAGNOLA 71 CAPITOLO 3 - IL PERCORSO VERSO L’AUTONOMIA 73 CAPITOLO 4 – STATUTO DI AUTONOMIA DELLA CITTÀ DI CEUTA 83 CAPITOLO 4 – STATUTO DI AUTONOMIA DELLA CITTÀ DI MELILLA 87 TERZA PARTE - LE CONTROVERSIE TRA SPAGNA E MAROCCO SULLA QUESTIONE DI CEUTA E MELILLA 91 CAPITOLO 6 - LE RELAZIONI TRA SPAGNA E MAROCCO DOPO IL 1956 93 6.1 Dal 1956 al 1999 94 6.2 Dal 2000 a oggi 105 6.2.1 La crisi di Perejil 108 6.2.2 La crisi diplomatica del 2007 119 Approfondimento: le barriere di Ceuta e Melilla 122 APPENDICI 131 1. Statuto di Autonomia della città di Ceuta 131 2. Statuto di Autonomia della città di Melilla 151 INDICE DELLE IMMAGINI 171 BIBLIOGRAFIA 175 SITOGRAFIA 179 INTRODUZIONE Ceuta e Melilla sono due città spagnole sulla costa settentrionale del continente africano. La peculiarità di queste due città autonome è la loro posizione geografica: esse si trovano, infatti, all’interno dei confini marocchini, il che le qualifica come “exclave”.
    [Show full text]
  • Rr Ee Aa Dd Ee Rr
    Turbulence July 2006 CSDS, Delhi The SaraiProgramme 06 saraiREADER / i i ii / Sarai Reader 2006: Turbulence / iii iv / Sarai Reader 2006: Turbulence SARAI READER 06: Turbulence Produced and Designed at the Sarai Media Lab, Delhi Editors: Monica Narula, Shuddhabrata Sengupta, Ravi Sundaram, Awadhendra Sharan, Jeebesh Bagchi + Geert Lovink Associate Editor: Smriti Vohra Translations: Shveta Sarda Editorial Collective: Monica Narula, Shuddhabrata Sengupta, Ravi Sundaram, Ravi S. Vasudevan, Awadhendra Sharan, Jeebesh Bagchi + Geert Lovink Design: Mrityunjay Chatterjee Design Intern: Mrinalini Aggarwal Cover Design: Mrinalini Aggarwal Back Cover Photo: Monica Narula Published by: The Director Centre for the Study of Developing Societies 29 Rajpur Road, Delhi 110054, India Tel: (+91) 11 2396 0040, Fax: (+91) 11 2392 8391 E-mail: [email protected] www.sarai.net Delhi 2006 ISBN 81-901429-7-6 Any part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the prior written permission of the publishers for educational and non-commercial use. The contributors and publishers, however, would like to be informed. Sarai Reader 06: Turbulence <http://www.sarai.net/journal/reader_06.html> Sarai Reader 06: Turbulence is part of 'the Documenta 12 Magazines Project’ <http://www.documenta12.de/english/magazines.html> 608 pages, 14.5 cm X 21 cm Paperback: Rs 350, US$ 20, € 20 Printed at Impress, Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi / v CONTENTS In Turbulence - Editorial Collective - vii TRANSFORMATIONS: REFLECTIONS ON UNCERTAINTY - 1 The Time of Turbulence - R. Krishna -
    [Show full text]
  • Time and the Migrant Other: European Border Controls and the Temporal Economics of Illegality
    Ruben Andersson Time and the migrant other: European border controls and the temporal economics of illegality Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Andersson, Ruben (2014) Time and the migrant other: European border controls and the temporal economics of illegality. American Anthropologist . ISSN 0002-7294 (In Press) © 2014 John Wiley & Sons This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/57802/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2014 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Time and the migrant Other: European border controls and the temporal economics of illegality The rich world’s borders increasingly seem like a battleground where a new kind of ‘threat’ is fought back – the so-called ‘illegal migrant’. At Europe’s southern frontiers, sea patrols, advanced surveillance machinery and fencing keep migrants out, much like at the US, Israeli or Australian borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Konstruktion Menschlicher Identität Durch Biometrische Erkennungsverfahren Bei Personenkontrollen an Nationalstaatengrenzen
    Institut für Informatik Informatik in Bildung und Gesellschaft Diplomarbeit Die Konstruktion menschlicher Identität durch biometrische Erkennungsverfahren bei Personenkontrollen an Nationalstaatengrenzen Autorin: Erstgutacher: Andrea Knaut Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Coy Zweitgutachterin: HD Dr. Sigrid Schmitz Matrikel-Nr.: 151321 E-Mail: [email protected] Druckfassung abgegeben am: 27. März 2009 Inhaltsverzeichnis Zusammenfassung.......................................................................... 5 Abstract ......................................................................................... 5 Vorbemerkung ............................................................................... 6 1 Einleitung ................................................................................. 9 1.1 Methoden der Arbeit......................................................................................... 12 2 Zentrale Begriffe..................................................................... 13 2.1 Konstruktion ........................................................................................................ 13 2.2 Identität.................................................................................................................. 15 3 Biometrische Verfahren in Grenzkontrollen ............................ 19 3.1 Der generische Prozess und die Basiskomponenten eines biometrischen Systems.................................................................................... 22 3.1.1 Positive und negative Identifikation?...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Embodying Borders Everyday Realities at the Euro-African Frontier
    Embodying Borders Everyday realities at the Euro-African Frontier Renee Middendorp Supervisor: Dr. Bram Jansen Second Assessor: Dr. Alberto Arce Thesis International Development Studies Sociology of Development and Change Wageningen University and Research Centre August, 2016 1 Embodying Borders Everyday realities at the Euro-African Frontier Major Thesis Renee Middendorp Student number: 890529570060 Supervisor: Dr. Bram Jansen Second assessor: Dr. Alberto Arce International Development Studies Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen, August 1st 2016 Word count: 39304 Picture on front page: graffiti wall art made by an Italian artist in Melilla, Spain. Translation: ‘the essential is invisible to the eyes’. Picture taken by the author. All pictures depicted in this thesis have been taken by the author, unless indicated differently. 2 Clandestino I come only with my punishment There comes only my conviction Running is my fate In order to deceive the law Lost in the heart Of the great Babylon They call me the clandestine 'cause I don't carry any papers To a northern city I went for work I left my life behind Between Ceuta and Gibraltar I'm a just a rake on the sea A ghost in the city My life is prohibited Says the authority I'm the sell-out of law Black clandestine hand Peruvian Clandestine African Clandestine Marijuana illegal I come only with my punishment There comes only my conviction To run is my fate In order to deceive the law Lost in the heart Of the great Babylon They call me the clandestine 'cause I don't carry any papers Algerian Clandestine Nigerian Clandestine Bolivian Clandestine Black illegal hand Manu Chao, translated from Spanish 3 Content Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Refugee Deaths
    List of 36 570 documented deaths of refugees and migrants due to the restrictive policies of "Fortress Europe" Documentation by UNITED as of 1 April 2019 Death by Policy - Time for Change! Campaign information: Facebook - UNITED Against Refugee Deaths, UnitedAgainstRefugeeDeaths.eu, [email protected], Twitter: @UNITED__Network #AgainstRefugeeDeaths UNITED for Intercultural Action, European network against nationalism, racism, fascism and in support of migrants and refugees Amsterdam secretariat: Postbus 413, NL-1000 AK Amsterdam, Netherlands, tel +31-6-48808808, [email protected], www.unitedagainstracism.org The UNITED List of Deaths can be freely re-used, translated and re-distributed, provided UNITED is informed in advance and source (UnitedAgainstRefugeeDeaths.eu) is mentioned. Researchers can obtain this list with more data in xls format from UNITED. found name, gender, age region of origin cause of death source dead number 28/03/19 2 N.N. (men) unknown drowned, bodies recovered off coast of Chios (GR), 36 rescued HelCoastG/IOM 27/03/19 1 Ali (boy, 18) Afghanistan suicide in shelter for unaccompanied minor asylum seekers in Geneva (CH), bad housing conditions Vivre/RTS/Le Courrier/TribuneGeneve 26/03/19 1 N.N. Sub-Saharan Africa drowned, found in advanced state of decomposition on beach near Tetouan, south of the Strait of Gibraltar (MA) El Pueblo de Ceuta/IOM 26/03/19 1 N.N. Sub-Saharan Africa drowned, found dead on beach in Azla (MA), presumably while trying to reach Spain FaroCeuta 26/03/19 1 N.N. Sub-Saharan Africa drowned, found floating in advanced state of decomposition in sea in Tarajal area of Ceuta (ES) FaroCeuta/Ceutaaldia/El Pueblo de Ceuta/IOM 26/03/19 4 N.N.
    [Show full text]
  • No Protection at the Border [ 1 ]
    NO PROTECTION AT THE BORDER HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE SOUTHERN FRONTIER: BETWEEN NADOR AND MELILLA NO PROTECTION AT THE BORDER [ 1 ] NO PROTECTION AT THE BORDER HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE SOUTHERN FRONTIER: BETWEEN NADOR AND MELILLA [ 2 ] NO PROTECTION AT THE BORDER WRITING AND EDITING: Cristina Manzanedo Negueruela Nuria Ferré Trad María José Castaño Reyes Josep Buades Fuster SJ Juan Iglesias Martínez PHOTOS: José Palazón Osma DESIGN LAYOUT: colomerasociados.com COLLABORATIONS: Fernando Pombo Foundation http://www.fundacionpombo.org/ The Fernando Pombo Foundation promotes the legal profession’s engagement with the rights of the underprivileged. To achieve this, it develops various lines of action. With regards to this document, the Fernando Pombo Foundation has participated in financing a scho- larship for a student of the Master’s Degree for Admission to the Bar of the Comillas Pontifical Uni- versity in his practical curriculum, to pay for his stay in Melilla during the months from September to December. This scholarship is part of the collaboration of the Fernando Pombo Foundation with legal training of the 21st century.” JESUIT MIGRANT SERVICE - SPAIN: The Jesuit Migrant Service - Spain (SJM) belongs to the Jesuit Social Apostolate. It is devoted to the study of migration movements; to welcoming and training immigrants; and to the promotion of an in- clusive, integrated and intercultural society. They work mainly in Madrid (Pueblos Unidos), Barcelo- na (Migra Studium), Valencia, Seville (Asociación Claver) y Bilbao (Centro Ellacuría); but their ne- twork extends to Burgos (Red Atalaya Intercultural), Tudela (Centro Lasa) and Valladolid (Red Íncola). UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF STUDIES ON MIGRATION: Created by the Comillas Pontifical University in 1994, the University Institute of Studies on Migra- tion-IUEM is a centre specialised in research and teaching, in response to the complexity and to the political and social transformations produced by migrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Borders Toolkit to Explore Refuge and Migration Issues File
    BEYOND BORDERS a toolkit of creative and participatory approaches for exploring refuge and migration issues in secondary school classrooms Fair Use and sharing of this resource in an educational context is welcome. Please contact GOWC about onward use. Except where otherwise noted, content of this resource may be used in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. Except where otherwise noted, images on this site are © the attributed photographer/ artist/illustrator or representative agency. galwayowc.org “We are made for goodness. We are made for love. We are made for friendliness. We are made for togetherness. We are made for all of the beautiful things that you and I know. We are made to tell the world that there are no outsiders. All are welcome...all, all, all. We all belong to this family, this human family … and all of us are given the task of trying to make this world a little more hospitable to these beautiful things.” - Archbishop Desmond Tutu Painting: Gaza Children’s Dance (2019) by Palestinian artist, Malak Mattar Galway One World Centre has been designing and delivering workshops and educational materials for schools, youth and community groups for almost 30 years. Our work addresses a range of global justice issues, including root causes of global inequality, refuge and migration, human rights, debt, trade and tax justice and anti-racism perspectives. Produced by Galway One World Centre (2019) Kilcornan Clarinbridge County Galway www.galwayowc.org Written by Vicky Donnelly We are grateful for the input, inspiration, contributions and feedback that have been made by a wide variety of people and groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Balance 2019
    #FronteraSur20 Migration balance 2019 Ana Rosado and Rafael Lara 1. The Marlaska effect: the number of arrivals drops by 53% compared to 2018 In January 2019, the Spanish government announced a plan to reduce the number of arrivals of people and boats to our coasts by 50%. At the time, few people thought that it would be possible to achieve this goal without addressing the root causes of migration behind the arrival of 64,120 people the previous year. These root causes included the closure of the Sicilian channel by Italian authorities in 2018, the chaos and warfare in Libya (a key transit country in the Mediterranean migratory system), as well as poverty and social conflict in countries such as Morocco, which affected thousands of young people and forced them to flee. 1 #FronteraSur20 Chart: Evolution of migrants' inflows to southern European countries The plan laid down by the Delegate Committee for Migration Affairs toward the end of 2018 did not, however, address these root causes. Instead, this plan depended on Morocco’s greater involvement in the control of migration flows – both in its mainland and maritime Search and Rescue responsibilities. In addition, the Spanish government planned to increase its immigrant detention and deportation capacity, by enhancing detention infrastructure as well as increasing resources allocated to detention, identification and deportation procedures along the Andalusian coast. At sea, the government sought to limit the actions of Salvamento Marítimo, the Spanish civil agency responsible for sea Search and Rescue operations, to the bare minimum by making the agency’s working conditions more precarious and by outsourcing some of its responsibilities to Morocco.
    [Show full text]
  • Keep Out? Illustrated by the Situation in Calais, Ceuta and Melilla, and Sicily Table of Contents
    OBSERVATION REPORT EUROPEAN BORDERS KEEP OUT? ILLUSTRATED BY THE SITUATION IN CALAIS, CEUTA AND MELILLA, AND SICILY Table of contents INTRODUCTION 4 01 BLOCKING ACCESS TO EUROPEAN TERRITORY AT ANY COST, EVEN LIVES 6 1.1 Calais and the enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla: cooperating to contain “undesirables” 7 1.2 Militarisation of the Mediterranean: “surveillance is not the equivalent of watching over” 8 1.3 Dramatic consequences to the security logic 8 Published by La Cimade 02 SORT AND KEEP AWAY: HOTSPOTS AND OTHER STRATEGIES 10 Communications Department 2.1 The hotspot approach: sort quickly and expel 11 64 rue Clisson – 75013 Paris 2.2 Other ways of sorting and keeping away in Calais and in Ceuta and Melilla 12 Tel: +33 (0)1 44 18 60 50 Fax: +33 (0)1 45 56 08 59 [email protected] 03 Asylum – a fundamentAL RIGHT TO BE PROTECTED 14 www.lacimade.org 3.1 The yet-to-be-seen cooperation to receive asylum seekers: from the failure of the Dublin Regulation to the failure of relocation 15 3.2 Ceuta and Melilla: treacherous access to asylum 15 3.3 Inadequate and deterring reception conditions 15 Publication and missions coordinated by: Gipsy Beley, Eva Ottavy and Anne-Sophie Wender. 04 THE LEGAL BOUNDARY: CIRCUMVENTED LAWS AND VIOLATED RIGHTS 16 Also participating in the missions: 4.1 Legal uncertainty that benefits the EU Member States 17 Marie-Dominique Aguillon (La Cimade), 4.2 Circumventing the law: detention to “empty out Calais” 17 Nathanaël Caillaux (La Cimade Nord-Picardie), 4.3 Legalisation of practices that violate rights and impunity in Ceuta and Melilla 17 Filippo Furri (Migreurop), Stéphane Julinet (Gadem), Déborah Maire (APDHA), Sara Prestianni (ARCI), Camille Six (La Cimade Nord-Picardie) 05 BORDERS: AGAINST ALL ODDS, PLACES OF SOLIDARITY AND MOBILISATION 18 and Elsa Tyszler (Gadem).
    [Show full text]
  • Ifsh 25.04.2016 1
    (Martime) Migration as a Challenge for Europe 2nd European-South American Regional Security Symposium 27 April 2016 Dr. Patricia Schneider IFSH 25.04.2016 1. Numbers and facts: global migration Countries with the largest numbers of refugees: 60 million people migrate worldwide, this number includes: migrants, returnees, asylum seekers and internally displaced persons (IDP‘S) 90 percent of the migrants are taken by developing countries IDP‘s are the biggest group: in 2014 38,2 Million IDP‘s have been counted Source : BMZ, Daten auf Abb. von Ende 2014 Link:https://www.facebook.com/BMZ.Bund/photos/a.193549867372151.47951.192941487432989/957773320949798/?type=3&fref=nf Date: 31.10.2015 IFSH Page 2 1. Numbers and facts: Global migration 2014: most of the refugees are in Turkey (1,51 million), Iran (982 Tsd), Destination countrys of Syrian migrants 2014: Ethiopia (659 Tsd) and Jordan (654 Tsd) March 2016: 4.8 Mio. registreed Syrian Refugees: Türkey (2.7 Mio.), Libanon (1.07 Mio.), Jordan (639 Tsd.), Irak (246 Tsd.), Ägypten (118 Tsd). EU: 616 Tsd registrations (4th place); plus IDPs: 6,5 Mio., hum. assistance for 13.5 UNHCR programs for refugees (not only for Syria) chronically underfinanced (only 61% of needed budget end of 2015) IFSH Page 3 Migrant Routes Source: http://missingmigrants.iom.int/ IFSH Page 4 2. Maritme migrants and European missions European missions/initiatives: 1. Mare Nostrum 2. Triton 3. EUROSUR 4. MARSUR Picture: http://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2016number-03/eu-fluechtlingeof-tuerkeidead-balkanroutemartime-obergrenzen migrants in 5. EUNAVFOR MED the Mediterran has risen considerably Operation Sophia (2015: 3,770 deads/missing) 6.
    [Show full text]