Diagnosis of Prenatal-Onset Achondrogenesis Type II by a Multidisciplinary Assessment: a Retrospective Study of 2 Cases
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Skeletal Dysplasias
Skeletal Dysplasias North Carolina Ultrasound Society Keisha L.B. Reddick, MD Wilmington Maternal Fetal Medicine Development of the Skeleton • 6 weeks – vertebrae • 7 weeks – skull • 8 wk – clavicle and mandible – Hyaline cartilage • Ossification – 7-12 wk – diaphysis appears – 12-16 wk metacarpals and metatarsals – 20+ wk pubis, calus, calcaneus • Visualization of epiphyseal ossification centers Epidemiology • Overall 9.1 per 1000 • Lethal 1.1 per 10,000 – Thanatophoric 1/40,000 – Osteogenesis Imperfecta 0.18 /10,000 – Campomelic 0.1 /0,000 – Achondrogenesis 0.1 /10,000 • Non-lethal – Achondroplasia 15 in 10,000 Most Common Skeletal Dysplasia • Thantophoric dysplasia 29% • Achondroplasia 15% • Osteogenesis imperfecta 14% • Achondrogenesis 9% • Campomelic dysplasia 2% Definition/Terms • Rhizomelia – proximal segment • Mezomelia –intermediate segment • Acromelia – distal segment • Micromelia – all segments • Campomelia – bowing of long bones • Preaxial – radial/thumb or tibial side • Postaxial – ulnar/little finger or fibular Long Bone Segments Counseling • Serial ultrasound • Genetic counseling • Genetic testing – Amniocentesis • Postnatal – Delivery center – Radiographs Assessment • Which segment is affected • Assessment of distal extremities • Any curvatures, fracture or clubbing noted • Are metaphyseal changes present • Hypoplastic or absent bones • Assessment of the spinal canal • Assessment of thorax. Skeletal Dysplasia Lethal Non-lethal • Thanatophoric • Achondroplasia • OI type II • OI type I, III, IV • Achondrogenesis • Hypochondroplasia -
Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta
medicina Review Current Overview of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mari Deguchi *, Shunichiro Tsuji , Daisuke Katsura , Kyoko Kasahara, Fuminori Kimura and Takashi Murakami Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu 520-2192, Shiga, Japan; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (F.K.); [email protected] (T.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), or brittle bone disease, is a heterogeneous disorder charac- terised by bone fragility, multiple fractures, bone deformity, and short stature. OI is a heterogeneous disorder primarily caused by mutations in the genes involved in the production of type 1 collagen. Severe OI is perinatally lethal, while mild OI can sometimes not be recognised until adulthood. Severe or lethal OI can usually be diagnosed using antenatal ultrasound and confirmed by various imaging modalities and genetic testing. The combination of imaging parameters obtained by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resource imaging (MRI) can not only detect OI accurately but also predict lethality before birth. Moreover, genetic testing, either noninvasive or invasive, can further confirm the diagnosis prenatally. Early and precise diagnoses provide parents with more time to decide on reproductive options. The currently available postnatal treatments for OI are not curative, and individuals with severe OI suffer multiple fractures and bone deformities throughout their lives. In utero mesenchymal stem cell transplantation has been drawing attention as a promising therapy for severe OI, and a clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cell therapy is currently ongoing. -
Ultrasonic Demonstration of Fetal Skeletal Dysplasia Case Reports
222 SAMJ VOLUME 67 9 FEBRUARY 1985 Ultrasonic demonstration of fetal skeletal dysplasia Case reports L1NNIE M. MULLER, B. J. CREMIN Toshiba linear array scanners (with 3,5 mHz transducers) and a Philips SDU 7000 Sector/Static scanner. A routine obstetric Summary scan does not involve complete examination of all limbs, but Reports on prenatal diagnosis in cases of skeletal when a bony abnormality is noted a skeletal survey is dysplasia have mostly been in high-risk mothers attempted. Real-time ultrasound offers a flexible technique, with a suspect genetic background where the fetal and when the infant is in the prone vertex position the linear lesion could probably be predetermined. We deal array has the advantage of a wider range of skeletal visualiza with routine ultrasonographic appraisal of the fetal tion. skeleton when dysplasia is not initially suspected, A complete skeletal survey consists of an evaluation of the and relate our experience of the lethal forms of this bones of the skull, spine, thorax and limbs and of correlating these other fetal structures. We first measured the biparietal condition. During the 4-year period 1981 - 1984,6 cases of skeletal dysplasia, including thanatophoric diameter (BPD) and then noted the echogenic characteristics dysplasia, achondrogenesis, the Ellis-van Creveld of the skull and facial contours. A comprehensive evaluation of syndrome (chondro-ectodermal dysplasia) and the spine is possible from 17 weeks' gestation onwards. In a osteogenesis imperfecta, were detected; the ultra longitudinal plane the posterior elements form segmented sonographic findings are discussed. bands of echoes that conform to the fetal kyphosis, but it is not always possible to visualize the whole spine. -
2 Achondrogenesis, Type IB A
Achondrogenesis,Type IB 579 2 Achondrogenesis,Type IB A Fraccaro type Extremities • Extremely short tubular bones, with squared, Severely shortened long bones with loss of longitudi- trapezoid, or stellate appearance nal orientation; unossified fibulas; deficient ossifica- • Wide and cupped ends of the long bones, with lat- tion of vertebral bodies, pelvis, and sacrum eral spurs • Unossified fibulas Frequency: 1 in 50,000 births. Skull • Ossified or only mildly underossified calvarium Genetics Autosomal recessive (OMIM 600972), caused by mutations in the DTDST gene at 5q32-q33 Bibliography Clinical Features Beluffi G. Achondrogenesis, type I. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rönt- • Fetal hydrops, polyhydramnios genstr Nuklearmed 1977; 127: 341–4 • Borochowitz Z, Lachman R, Adominan GE, Spear G, Jones K, Premature birth, stillbirth or death within min- Rimoin DL. Achondrogenesis type I: delineation of further utes in large proportion of cases heterogeneity and identification of two distinct subgroups. • Marked micromelic dwarfism J Pediatr 1988; 112: 23–31 • Normocephaly, but head appearing large because Jaeger HJ, Schmitz-Stolbrink A, Hulde J, Novak M, Roggen- of small body kamp K, Mathias K. The boneless neonate: a severe form of • achondrogenesis type I. Pediatr Radiol 1994; 24: 319–21 Severe midface hypoplasia Maroteaux P, Lamy M: Le diagnostic des nanismes chrondro- • Low nasal bridge dystrophiques chez les nouveau-nés. Arch Fr Pediatr 1968; • Micrognathia 25: 241–62 • Short neck Spranger JW, Langer LO, Wiedemann HR. Bone dysplasias. An • Short trunk, barrel-shaped chest atlas of constitutional disorders of skeletal development. • W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1974, pp. 24–5 Overdistended abdomen Superti-Furga A, Hastbacka J, Wilcox WR, Cohn DH, van der • Edema of soft tissues Harten HJ, Rossi A, Blau N, Rimoin DL, Steinmann B, Lan- • Prenatal detection of micromelia by ultrasound der ES, Gitzelmann R. -
Blueprint Genetics Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal
Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel Test code: MA4301 Is a 374 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. This panel covers the majority of the genes listed in the Nosology 2015 (PMID: 26394607) and all genes in our Malformation category that cause growth retardation, short stature or skeletal dysplasia and is therefore a powerful diagnostic tool. It is ideal for patients suspected to have a syndromic or an isolated growth disorder or a skeletal dysplasia. About Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders This panel covers a broad spectrum of diseases associated with growth retardation, short stature or skeletal dysplasia. Many of these conditions have overlapping features which can make clinical diagnosis a challenge. Genetic diagnostics is therefore the most efficient way to subtype the diseases and enable individualized treatment and management decisions. Moreover, detection of causative mutations establishes the mode of inheritance in the family which is essential for informed genetic counseling. For additional information regarding the conditions tested on this panel, please refer to the National Organization for Rare Disorders and / or GeneReviews. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Comprehensive Growth Disorders / Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel and their clinical significance Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD ACAN# Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, aggrecan type, AD/AR 20 56 Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, Kimberley -
Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Recent Findings Shed New Light on This Once Well-Understood Condition Donald Basel, Bsc, Mbbch1, and Robert D
COLLABORATIVE REVIEW Genetics in Medicine Osteogenesis imperfecta: Recent findings shed new light on this once well-understood condition Donald Basel, BSc, MBBCh1, and Robert D. Steiner, MD2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview ...........................................................................................................375 Differential diagnosis...................................................................................380 Clinical manifestations ................................................................................376 In utero..........................................................................................................380 OI type I ....................................................................................................376 Infancy and childhood................................................................................380 OI type II ...................................................................................................377 Nonaccidental trauma (child abuse) ....................................................380 OI type III ..................................................................................................377 Infantile hypophosphatasia ....................................................................380 OI type IV..................................................................................................377 Bruck syndrome .......................................................................................380 Newly described types of OI .....................................................................377 -
Blueprint Genetics Comprehensive Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders
Comprehensive Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders Panel Test code: MA3301 Is a 251 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. Is ideal for patients with a clinical suspicion of disorders involving the skeletal system. About Comprehensive Skeletal Dysplasias and Disorders This panel covers a broad spectrum of skeletal disorders including common and rare skeletal dysplasias (eg. achondroplasia, COL2A1 related dysplasias, diastrophic dysplasia, various types of spondylo-metaphyseal dysplasias), various ciliopathies with skeletal involvement (eg. short rib-polydactylies, asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia dysplasias and Ellis-van Creveld syndrome), various subtypes of osteogenesis imperfecta, campomelic dysplasia, slender bone dysplasias, dysplasias with multiple joint dislocations, chondrodysplasia punctata group of disorders, neonatal osteosclerotic dysplasias, osteopetrosis and related disorders, abnormal mineralization group of disorders (eg hypopohosphatasia), osteolysis group of disorders, disorders with disorganized development of skeletal components, overgrowth syndromes with skeletal involvement, craniosynostosis syndromes, dysostoses with predominant craniofacial involvement, dysostoses with predominant vertebral involvement, patellar dysostoses, brachydactylies, some disorders with limb hypoplasia-reduction defects, ectrodactyly with and without other manifestations, polydactyly-syndactyly-triphalangism group of disorders, and disorders with defects in joint formation and synostoses. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description -
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0134109 A1 Gaitanaris Et Al
US 2006O134109A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0134109 A1 Gaitanaris et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 22, 2006 (54) GPROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS AND in-part of application No. 60/461.329, filed on Apr. 9. USES THEREOF 2003. (75) Inventors: George A. Gaitanaris, Seattle, WA Publication Classification (US); John E. Bergmann, Mercer Island, WA (US); Alexander Gragerov, (51) Int. Cl. Seattle, WA (US); John Hohmann, La CI2O I/68 (2006.01) Conner, WA (US); Fusheng Li, Seattle, C7H 2L/04 (2006.01) WA (US); Linda Madisen, Seattle, WA (US); Kellie L. McIlwain, Renton, WA CI2P 2/06 (2006.01) (US); Maria N. Pavlova, Seattle, WA A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) (US); Demitri Vassilatis, Seattle, WA C07K I4/705 (2006.01) (US); Hongkui Zeng, Shoreline, WA (52) U.S. Cl. ......................... 424/143.1: 435/6: 435/69.1; 435/320.1; 435/325; 530/350; (US) 536/23.5 Correspondence Address: SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLC (57) ABSTRACT 701 FIFTHAVE SUTE 63OO The present invention provides GPCR polypeptides and SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092 (US) polynucleotides, recombinant materials, and transgenic (73) Assignee: Nura Inc., Seattle, WA (US) mice, as well as methods for their production. The polypep tides and polynucleotides are useful, for example, in meth (21) Appl. No.: 10/527,265 ods of diagnosis and treatment of diseases and disorders. The invention also provides methods for identifying com (22) PCT Fed: Sep. 9, 2003 pounds (e.g., agonists or antagonists) using the GPCR polypeptides and polynucleotides of the invention, and for (86) PCT No.: PCT/USO3/28226 treating conditions associated with GPCR dysfunction with the GPCR polypeptides, polynucleotides, or identified com Related U.S. -
Prenatal Diagnosis, Management and Outcomes of Skeletal Dysplasia
logy & Ob o st ec e tr n i Alouini et al., Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 2019, y c s G 9:4 Gynecology & Obstetrics ISSN: 2161-0932 Research Article Open Access Prenatal Diagnosis, Management and Outcomes of Skeletal Dysplasia Souhail Alouini1*, Jean Gabriel Martin1, Pascal Megier1 and Olga Esperandieu2 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Foetal Medicine Unit Regional Hospital Center of Orleans, 45000, Orléans, France 2Department of Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Regional Hospital Center Of Orleans, 45000, Orléans, France *Corresponding author: Souhail Alouini, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Surgery, Regional Hospital Center of Orleans, 14 Avenue de l’hospital, Orleans, 45100, France, Tel: +33688395759; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: March 02, 2019; Accepted date: May 02, 2019; Published date: May 09, 2019 Copyright: © 2019 Alouini S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Objective: To evaluate prenatal ultrasound findings of Skeletal Dysplasia (SD) and examine the contribution of radiological, histological and genetic exams. Methods: Retrospective study including all cases of SD managed in a tertiary maternity center between 1996 and 2010. Results: Eight cases of SD were diagnosed (1.4/10,000 births) by ultrasonography (USE). Three (38%) cases of SD were discovered in the first trimester, and five in the second trimester. We found short femurs in all cases. Anomalies consisted of the thickness of the femoral diaphysis, broad epiphysis, short and squat long bones, costal fractures, thinned coasts, anomalies of the profile and vertebrae, and a short and narrow thorax. -
Discover Dysplasias Gene Panel
Discover Dysplasias Gene Panel Discover Dysplasias tests 109 genes associated with skeletal dysplasias. This list is gathered from various sources, is not designed to be comprehensive, and is provided for reference only. This list is not medical advice and should not be used to make any diagnosis. Refer to lab reports in connection with potential diagnoses. Some genes below may also be associated with non-skeletal dysplasia disorders; those non-skeletal dysplasia disorders are not included on this list. Skeletal Disorders Tested Gene Condition(s) Inheritance ACP5 Spondyloenchondrodysplasia with immune dysregulation (SED) AR ADAMTS10 Weill-Marchesani syndrome (WMS) AR AGPS Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata type 3 (RCDP) AR ALPL Hypophosphatasia AD/AR ANKH Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD) AD Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI), also known as Maroteaux-Lamy ARSB syndrome AR ARSE Chondrodysplasia punctata XLR Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia with joint laxity type 1 (SEMDJL1) B3GALT6 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome progeroid type 2 (EDSP2) AR Multiple joint dislocations, short stature and craniofacial dysmorphism with B3GAT3 or without congenital heart defects (JDSCD) AR Spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia (SEMD) Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TADD), with or without additional BGN features, also known as Meester-Loeys syndrome XL Short stature, facial dysmorphism, and skeletal anomalies with or without BMP2 cardiac anomalies AD Acromesomelic dysplasia AR Brachydactyly type A2 AD BMPR1B Brachydactyly type A1 AD Desbuquois dysplasia CANT1 Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED) AR CDC45 Meier-Gorlin syndrome AR This list is gathered from various sources, is not designed to be comprehensive, and is provided for reference only. This list is not medical advice and should not be used to make any diagnosis. -
Recessive Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia – Clinical Characteristics Caused by T Rare Compound Heterozygous SLC26A2 Genotypes Mehran Kausara,B, Riikka E
European Journal of Medical Genetics 62 (2019) 103573 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect European Journal of Medical Genetics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejmg Recessive multiple epiphyseal dysplasia – Clinical characteristics caused by T rare compound heterozygous SLC26A2 genotypes Mehran Kausara,b, Riikka E. Mäkitieb, Sanna Toiviainen-Saloc, Jaakko Ignatiusd, Mariam Aneesa, ∗ Outi Mäkitieb,e,f,g, a Department of Biochemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan b Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland c Department of Pediatric Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland d Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland e Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland f Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden g Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Pathogenic sequence variants in the solute carrier family 26 member 2 (SLC26A2) gene result in lethal rMED (achondrogenesis Ib and atelosteogenesis II) and non-lethal (diastrophic dysplasia and recessive multiple epi- Chondrodysplasia physeal dysplasia, rMED) chondrodysplasias. We report on two new patients with rMED and very rare compound SLC26A2 heterozygous mutation combinations in non-consanguineous families. Patient I presented in childhood with Double-layer patella waddling gait and joint stiffness. Radiographs showed epiphyseal changes, bilateral coxa plana–deformity and Robin sequence knee valgus deformity, for which he underwent surgeries. At present 33 years his height is 165 cm. Patient II presented with cleft palate, small jaw, short limbs, underdeveloped thumbs and on radiographs, cervical ky- phosis with an underdeveloped C4. -
A Diagnostic Approach to Skeletal Dysplasias
CHAPTER 16 A Diagnostic Approach to Skeletal Dysplasias SHEILA UNGER,ANDREA SUPERTI-FURGA,and DAVID L. RIMOIN [AU1] INTRODUCTION and outlines some of the more important radiographic ®ndings. The skeletal dysplasias are disorders characterized by developmental abnormalities of the skeleton. They form a large heterogeneous group and range in severity from BACKGROUND precocious osteoarthropathy to perinatal lethality [1,2]. Disproportionate short stature is the most frequent clin- Each skeletal dysplasia is rare, but collectively the ical complication but is not uniformly present. There are birth incidence is approximately 1/5000 [4,5]. The ori- more than 100 recognized forms of skeletal dysplasia, ginal classi®cation of skeletal dysplasias was quite sim- which can make determining a speci®c diagnosis dif®cult plistic. Patients were categorized as either short trunked [1]. This process is further complicated by the rarity of (Morquio syndrome) or short limbed (achondroplasia) the individual conditions. The establishment of a precise [6] (Fig. 1). As awareness of these conditions grew, their diagnosis is important for numerous reasons, including numbers expanded to more than 200 and this gave rise to prediction of adult height, accurate recurrence risk, pre- an unwieldy and complicated nomenclature [7]. In 1977, natal diagnosis in future pregnancies, and, most import- N. Butler made the prophetic statement that ``in recent ant, for proper clinical management. Once a skeletal years, attempts to classify bone dysplasias have been dysplasia is suspected, clinical and radiographic indica- more proli®c than enduring'' [8]. The advent of molecu- tors, along with more speci®c biochemical and molecular lar testing allowed the grouping of some dysplasias into tests, are employed to determine the underlying diagno- families.