Relational Sacrifice Across Family Relationships and Contexts by Hilary Dalton Pippert B.S., Brigham Young University, 2014 M.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Relational Sacrifice Across Family Relationships and Contexts by Hilary Dalton Pippert B.S., Brigham Young University, 2014 M.S Relational sacrifice across family relationships and contexts by Hilary Dalton Pippert B.S., Brigham Young University, 2014 M.S., Brigham Young University, 2017 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Applied Human Sciences College of Health and Human Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2020 Abstract The first study in this dissertation proposes and seeks to validate a new measure of relational sacrifice, the Relational Sacrifice Processes Scale (RSPS). Items were developed based on gaps identified through an extensive literature review and edited based on feedback from content experts. Through this process, a two-factor solution was hypothesized: active and passive. However, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a three-factor solution. Through these analyses, the initial pool of 31 items was cut down to 20 total items across three subscales, identified as developing dependence, communication, and managing habits. Each of these concepts matches to themes existent within interdependence theory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978, Rusbult & Buunk, 1993). The RSPS was designed to have wide-reaching applicability across a variety of family relationships and contexts, rather than solely being used to explore sacrifice within romantic relationships, a common shortcoming of current assessment tools. The second study operationalizes and tests a theorized model of sacrifice within family relationships; the model suggests that motivations to sacrifice, transformation of motivations to sacrifice, types of sacrifice, types of self-care, and family processes are all interrelated with bidirectional influence (Pippert et al., 2019). This model was operationalized and tested using a sample of adults with minor children who were coparenting apart (divorced, separated, etc.). A structural equation model was fit and demonstrated that one will be more likely to sacrifice in a relationship as they increase personal and relational efforts. One’s motivations to sacrifice and relationship quality were found to influence one’s relational sacrifice as well, providing partial support for the theorized model from Pippert and colleagues (2019). Faith and self-care practices at Wave 1 were directly related to relational sacrifice at Wave 1, while only faith practices were indirectly related to relational sacrifice at Wave 2. The third study validates the RSPS among the parent-child relationship, within a military family context. It specifically explores how motivations to sacrifice in a mother-child relationship moderate the effects of relational sacrifice on the mother, child, and family as a whole. Multi-group moderation was employed to determine how varying levels of motivation (high avoidance and high approach, low avoidance and low approach, or either high approach and low avoidance or low approach and high avoidance) influenced the relationships between relational sacrifice and the mother, child, and family as a whole. Moderation was found between relational sacrifice and each of the dependent variables. Results of these analyses suggest that those who were high in both approach and avoidance motivations demonstrated a more complete approach to sacrifice. Taken together these studies demonstrate that it may be meaningful to explore a holistic motivation to sacrifice, as compared to separating out distinct motivations, in studies exploring relational sacrifice processes. The RSPS can aid practitioners in helping their clients (within various relationships and contexts) understand that the self, the other, and the relationship are important to consider when striving to build successful and healthy relationships. Relational sacrifice across family relationships and contexts by Hilary Dalton Pippert B.S., Brigham Young University, 2014 M.S., Brigham Young University, 2017 A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Applied Human Sciences College of Health and Human Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2020 Approved by: Co-Major Professor Anthony J. Ferraro, Ph.D. Approved by: Co-Major Professor Melinda Stafford Markham, Ph.D. Copyright © Hilary D. Pippert 2020. Abstract The first study in this dissertation proposes and seeks to validate a new measure of relational sacrifice, the Relational Sacrifice Processes Scale (RSPS). Items were developed based on gaps identified through an extensive literature review and edited based on feedback from content experts. Through this process, a two-factor solution was hypothesized: active and passive. However, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a three-factor solution. Through these analyses, the initial pool of 31 items was cut down to 20 total items across three subscales, identified as developing dependence, communication, and managing habits. Each of these concepts matches to themes existent within interdependence theory (Kelley & Thibaut, 1978, Rusbult & Buunk, 1993). The RSPS was designed to have wide-reaching applicability across a variety of family relationships and contexts, rather than solely being used to explore sacrifice within romantic relationships, a common shortcoming of current assessment tools. The second study operationalizes and tests a theorized model of sacrifice within family relationships; the model suggests that motivations to sacrifice, transformation of motivations to sacrifice, types of sacrifice, types of self-care, and family processes are all interrelated with bidirectional influence (Pippert et al., 2019). This model was operationalized and tested using a sample of adults with minor children who were coparenting apart (divorced, separated, etc.). A structural equation model was fit and demonstrated that one will be more likely to sacrifice in a relationship as they increase personal and relational efforts. One’s motivations to sacrifice and relationship quality were found to influence one’s relational sacrifice as well, providing partial support for the theorized model from Pippert and colleagues (2019). Faith and self-care practices at Wave 1 were directly related to relational sacrifice at Wave 1, while only faith practices were indirectly related to relational sacrifice at Wave 2. The third study validates the RSPS among the parent-child relationship, within a military family context. It specifically explores how motivations to sacrifice in a mother-child relationship moderate the effects of relational sacrifice on the mother, child, and family as a whole. Multi-group moderation was employed to determine how varying levels of motivation (high avoidance and high approach, low avoidance and low approach, or either high approach and low avoidance or low approach and high avoidance) influenced the relationships between relational sacrifice and the mother, child, and family as a whole. Moderation was found between relational sacrifice and each of the dependent variables. Results of these analyses suggest that those who were high in both approach and avoidance motivations demonstrated a more complete approach to sacrifice. Taken together these studies demonstrate that it may be meaningful to explore a holistic motivation to sacrifice, as compared to separating out distinct motivations, in studies exploring relational sacrifice processes. The RSPS can aid practitioners in helping their clients (within various relationships and contexts) understand that the self, the other, and the relationship are important to consider when striving to build successful and healthy relationships. Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... xii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1 - Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Interdependence Theory ............................................................................................................. 1 Relational Sacrifice ..................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Study 1: A New Measure of Sacrifice: Relational Sacrifice Processes Scale ............................ 6 Study 2: Relational Sacrifice Processes among Those Coparenting across Households: Insights from Interdependence Theory ..................................................................................................... 7 Study 3: Impact of Military Wives’ Motivations to Sacrifice on the Self, Child, and Family ... 8 Chapter 2 - A New Sacrifice Measure: Relational Sacrifice Processes Scale .............................. 10 Interdependence Theory ........................................................................................................... 11 Definitions of Sacrifice ............................................................................................................. 11 Current Sacrifice Scales ...........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Obama's Discourse of "Hope": Making Rhetoric Work Politically
    Obama's discourse of "hope": Making rhetoric work politically Marcus Letts University of Bristol © Marcus Letts School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies University of Bristol Working Paper No. 04-09 Marcus Letts is a former undergraduate student in the Department of Politics, University of Bristol. This paper, originally a BSc dissertation, received the highest mark awarded to any BSc dissertation in Politics at the University of Bristol in 2008-2009. A revised version of this paper is currently being prepared for submission to the journal New Political Science. University of Bristol School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies Title: Obama's discourse of "hope": Making rhetoric work politically (Morris, C. 2008) Question: What is articulated in Obama's discourse of "hope"? How did this rhetoric work politically? Marcus Letts Word Count: 9,899 2 Contents: Introduction: The US elections of 2008: A contextualisation The "strange death of Republican America": A grand theme of change................................ 5 A "rhetorical situation"?.......................................................................................................... 6 The birth of "Brand Obama": An exceptional campaign........................................................ 7 The nature of American "polyarchy"...................................................................................... 9 Literature Review: Two theories of discourse. Derrida's deconstruction and Laclau logics: A theory of discourse.......................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Oral Poetics of Professional Wrestling, Or Laying the Smackdown on Homer
    Oral Tradition, 29/1 (201X): 127-148 The Oral Poetics of Professional Wrestling, or Laying the Smackdown on Homer William Duffy Since its development in the first half of the twentieth century, Milman Parry and Albert Lord’s theory of “composition in performance” has been central to the study of oral poetry (J. M. Foley 1998:ix-x). This theory and others based on it have been used in the analysis of poetic traditions like those of the West African griots, the Viking skalds, and, most famously, the ancient Greek epics.1 However, scholars have rarely applied Parry-Lord theory to material other than oral poetry, with the notable exceptions of musical forms like jazz, African drumming, and freestyle rap.2 Parry and Lord themselves, on the other hand, referred to the works they catalogued as performances, making it possible to use their ideas beyond poetry and music. The usefulness of Parry-Lord theory in studies of different poetic traditions tempted me to view other genres of performance from this perspective. In this paper I offer up one such genre for analysis —professional wrestling—and show that interpreting the tropes of wrestling through the lens of composition in performance provides information that, in return, can help with analysis of materials more commonly addressed by this theory. Before beginning this effort, it will be useful to identify the qualities that a work must possess to be considered a “composition in performance,” in order to see if professional wrestling qualifies. The first, and probably most important and straightforward, criterion is that, as Lord (1960:13) says, “the moment of composition is the performance.” This disqualifies art forms like theater and ballet, works typically planned in advance and containing words and/or actions that must be performed at precise times and following a precise order.
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Human Sacrifice
    EIGHT AZTEC HUMAN SACRIFICE ALFREDO LOPÉZ AUSTIN, UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO, ANO LEONARDO LÓPEZ LUJÁN, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ANTROPOLOGíA E HISTORIA Stereotypes are persistent ideas of reality generally accepted by a social group. In many cases, they are conceptions that simplify and even caricaturize phenomena of a complex nature. When applied to societies or cultures, they l11ayinclude value judgments that are true or false, specific or ambiguous. If the stereotype refers to orie's own tradition, it emphasizes the positive and the virtuous, and it tends to praise: The Greeks are recalled as philosophers and the Romans as great builders. On the other hand, if the stereotype refers to another tradition , it stresses the negative, the faulty, and it tends to denigrate: For many, Sicilians naturally belong to the Mafia, Pygrnies are cannibals, and the Aztecs were cruel sacrificers. As we will see, many lines of evidence confirm that hurnan sacrifice was one the most deeply rooted religious traditions of the Aztecs. However, it is clear that the Aztecs were not the only ancient people that carried out massacres in honor of their gods, and there is insufficient quantitative inforrnation to determine whether the Aztecs were the people who practiced hu- man sacrifice 1110stoften. Indeed, sacred texts, literary works, historie documents, and especially evidence contributed by archaeology and physical anthropology, enable religious historians to determine that the practice of hurnan sacrifice was common in most parts of the ancient world. For exarnple, evidence of sacrifice and can n iba lism has emerged in l11any parts ofEurope, dating to the Neolithic and Bronze Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament Joel N
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons Benerd School of Education Faculty Articles Gladys L. Benerd School of Education 7-1-2009 Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament Joel N. Lohr University of the Pacific, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ed-facarticles Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Lohr, J. N. (2009). Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament. Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 71(3), 485–496. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ed-facarticles/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Gladys L. Benerd School of Education at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Benerd School of Education Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Righteous Abel, Wicked Cain: Genesis 4:1-16 in the Masoretic Text, the Septuagint, and the New Testament JOEL N. LOHR Trinity Western University Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada THERE APPEARS TO BE a long-standing interpretive crux in the story of Cain and Abel (Gen 4:1-16) regarding why God looks with favor on Abel but not on Cain. The interpretive instinct to determine the reasons for God's favor is perhaps quite natural: religiously speaking, a deity who favors or disfavors without reason could appear arbitrary or unjust, an issue to resolve. The Old Greek (LXX) translation of the story also seems to explain God's favor toward Abel and not Cain in a partic­ ular way, perhaps providing one of the earliest extant examples of this interpretive practice.1 Through what might be called a theological translation, the LXX paints a negative portrait of Cain (in his offering and in other ways), one that has left an indelible mark on later tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018/19 Annual Report the Shadow of STIGMA People with Mental Health Challenges Say the Stigma Is Worse Than the Illness
    Treatment and Support for children, youth and families. 2018/19 Annual Report The shadow of STIGMA People with mental health challenges say the stigma is worse than the illness. Meet Ken Client talks Stigma When it comes to STIGMA, I think about feelings or misunderstandings that usually come from fear or anger. For instance, anyone who is angry at an addict, or who believes addicts should be treated like criminals or lesser-than, those feelings probably come from fear. And I think that fear comes from a lack of understanding. You have to ask, ‘Why is a person an addict? Why are they willing to sacrifice so much?’ As soon as you’re willing to ask those questions, you’ll begin to understand and break down the stigma toward people who are addicts and who are struggling. And if we want to see all of us grow in terms of quality of life, our quality as people, as individuals, we need to take care of one another – no matter what that looks like. If you see someone suffering, it hurts all of us to simply look down your nose at them. It’s simple. If you want the world to be a better place, if you want to be a better person, try to make things better for people around you. Sometimes that’s as simple as listening to a person and really trying to understand their situation. Anyone who is willing to listen, is already making things better for those who are misunderstood. And it breaks down the fear and the anger.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes November 16, 2017 6:00 Pm Town Hall Lower Level Conference Room
    Michael Lennox, Chairman TOWN OF NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH Keith Lapointe, Vice-Chairman BOARD OF SELECTMEN Paul J. Belham, Sr. 43 South Washington Street John C. Rhyno North Attleborough MA 02760 Patrick Reynolds 508-699-0100 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH BOARD OF SELECTMEN MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 2017 6:00 PM TOWN HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Lennox called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. and invited the assembly to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. Members Present: Chairman Michael Lennox Vice-Chairman Keith Lapointe Selectman Paul J. Belham, Sr. Selectman John Rhyno Selectman Patrick Reynolds Members Absent: Documents Reviewed: Executive Session Minutes April 6, 2017 Executive Session Minutes April 20, 2017 Executive Session Minutes June 8, 2017 Executive Session Minutes June 22, 2017 Executive Session Minutes July 27, 2017 Executive Session Minutes August 31, 2017 Executive Session Minutes October 5, 2017 Payroll Warrant Number 19 Expense Warrant Number 171117 Application for change of manager Newell Blaise Post Common Victualler/All- Alcohol License Memo from Board of Assessors regarding information for FY2018 Classification Hearing Statutory Exemption Information Sample Value and Tax Fiscal 2014-2018 Town of North Attleborough Historical Information – Fiscal 2018 Summary and warrant articles – Special Town Meeting – January 22, 2018 Application/Permit for Use of Town Highways from Downtown Associates of North Attleborough for their Annual Christmas Parade Page 1 of 9 Michael Lennox, Chairman TOWN OF NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH Keith Lapointe, Vice-Chairman BOARD OF SELECTMEN Paul J. Belham, Sr. 43 South Washington Street John C. Rhyno North Attleborough MA 02760 Patrick Reynolds 508-699-0100 II.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    THE ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 1 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 ABOUT US 5 STAFF AND BOARD 6 MESSSAGE FROM OUR LEADERS 10 GROWING ALONGSIDE OUR YOUTH 12 FULL CIRCLE OF SERVICE 14 NEW HORIZONS 16 SPARKING A PASSION 18 HISTORIC MOMENTS 20 MENTORING IMPACT 24 GIRLS MAKING HISTORY 26 PASSIONATE PEOPLE 28 STRONGER TOGETHER 30 PAVING THE WAY 32 OUR SUPPORTERS 34 INDIVIDUAL DONORS 2 36 ORGANIZATIONAL DONORS 0 40 2018-19 FINANCIALS 1 9 ANNUAL R E P O R T PAGE 4 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ABOUT US BRIEF HISTORY Beat the Streets Philadelphia was founded on the principle that all children have the potential to become positively contributing citizens when provided the proper support. This belief has endured since the establishment of our first program in 2009 located in the city of Camden, NJ. To this day, the organization remains focused on creating the greatest positive impact for over 1100 youth living in at risk communities. OUR MISSION Beat the Streets Philadelphia (BTSP is a sports-based youth development nonprofit that is committed to fostering the holistic growth studenof t-athletes from underserved communities. BTSP builds and implements mentoring, academic support, and wrestling programs throughout the greater Philadelphia region as vehicles to ‘Positively Alter ifL e’s Trajectory.’ PAGE 5 STAFF AND BOARD COMMITMENT TO POSITIVE CHANGE The growth of the programs at BTSP bring about a number of necessary evolutionary challenges. Everyone involved within the work of helping these student-athletes are ready, willing, and able to meet those challenges. BTSP staff are committed to uphold organizational values, and all understand the importance of adapting as we expand our mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacrifice and Sacred Honor: Why the Constitution Is a "Suicide Pact"
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2011 Sacrifice and Sacred Honor: Why the Constitution is a "Suicide Pact" Peter Brandon Bayer University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Bayer, Peter Brandon, "Sacrifice and Sacred Honor: Why the Constitution is a "Suicide Pact"" (2011). Scholarly Works. 774. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/774 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SACRIFICE AND SACRED HONOR: WHY THE CONSTITUTION IS A "SUICIDE PACT" Peter Brandon Bayer* ABSTRACT Most legal scholars and elected officials embrace the popular clich6 that "the Constitution is not a suicide pact." Typically, those commentators extol the "Constitution of necessity," the supposition that Government, essentially the Executive, may take any action-may abridge or deny any fundamental right-to alleviate a sufficiently serious national security threat. The "Constitution of necessity" is wrong. This Article explains that strict devotion to the "fundamental fairness" prin- ciples of the Constitution's Due Process Clauses is America's utmost legal and moral duty, surpassing all other considerations, even safety, security and survival. The analysis begins with the most basic premises: the definition of morality and why nations must be moral. This Article defends deontology: the philosophy that because moral principles are a priori, they must be obeyed regardless of terrible outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland's Constitution of 1997 with Amendments Through 2009
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:45 constituteproject.org Poland's Constitution of 1997 with Amendments through 2009 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:45 Table of contents Preamble . 3 Chapter I: THE REPUBLIC . 3 Chapter II: THE FREEDOMS, RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF PERSONS AND CITIZENS . 7 Chapter III: SOURCES OF LAW . 18 Chapter IV: THE SEJM AND THE SENATE . 20 Chapter V: THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND . 26 Chapter VI: THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AND GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION . 32 Chapter VII: LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT . 37 Chapter VIII: COURTS AND TRIBUNALS . 38 Chapter IX: ORGANS OF STATE CONTROL AND FOR DEFENCE OF RIGHTS . 44 Chapter X: PUBLIC FINANCES . 47 Chapter XI: EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES . 50 Chapter XII: AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION . 52 Chapter XIII: FINAL AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS . 52 Poland 1997 (rev. 2009) Page 2 constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:45 • Source of constitutional authority • God or other deities Preamble • Motives for writing constitution • Preamble • Reference to country's history Having regard for the existence and future of our Homeland, Which recovered, in 1989, the possibility of a sovereign and democratic determination of its fate, We, the Polish Nation - all citizens of the Republic, Both those who believe in God as the source of truth, justice, good and beauty, As well as those not sharing such
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor of Private Military Contractors
    Outsourcing Sacrifice: The Labor of Private Military Contractors Mateo Taussig-Rubbo* Numerous scandals arising from the United States government's increased use of armed private military contractors have drawn attention to the contractors' legally ill-defined position. But the complexity of the contractors' relation to various bodies of law and doctrine-including military law, international law, state tort law, employment law, and sovereign immunity-is not the only salient issue. The contractors are also awkwardly positioned in relation to the traditional understanding of sacrifice, which has structured Americans' imaginings about those who kill and are killed on behalf of the nation. In this understanding, there is a mutually constitutive relationship between citizenship and sacrifice. This Article examines the contractors' relation to the tradition of sacrifice and finds that they are officially excluded from it-their deaths are not included in body counts, for instance, and they are not given medals and honors. It construes the emergence of the contractor as an effort by U.S. officials to avoid the political liability entailed in calling a loss a sacrifice and discusses the way in which the legal form of contract and the policy of privatization have been means through which this is attempted. The Article then focuses on one case in which this effort ran into difficulties: the spectacular and grotesque killing, dismembering and immolation of four Blackwater contractors in Fallujah, Iraq. In this event, individuals who had contracted their services came to be seen as having sacrificed for the U.S. In conclusion, the Article urges that while it is important to address the lack of legal clarity surrounding contractors, it is also necessary to address their position in the tradition of sacrifice and attend to the deeper issues of popular and governmental sovereignty which that tradition articulates.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: a Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice
    OREGON TRANSPORTATION OTREC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM FINAL REPORT Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: a Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice OTREC-RR-08-03 December 2008 A National University Transportation Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration UNDERSTANDING AND MEASURING BICYCLING BEHAVIOR: A FOCUS ON TRAVEL TIME AND ROUTE CHOICE Final Report OTREC-RR-08-03 by Jennifer Dill, Ph.D. John Gliebe, Ph.D. Portland State University for Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 December 2008 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. OTREC-RR-08-03 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: A Focus on Travel Time and Route choice December 2008 Final Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jennifer Dill, Ph.D. John Gliebe, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Urban Studies/Center for Transportation Studies Portland State University 11. Contract or Grant No. PO Box 751 Portland, OR 97201-0751 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Oregon Transportation Research 14. Sponsoring Agency Code and Education Consortium (OTREC) P.O. Box 751 Portland, Oregon 97207 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract With rates of obesity, heart disease, and related health problems increasing in the U.S., many policy makers are looking for ways to increase physical activity in everyday life. Using a bicycle instead of a motor vehicle for a portion of everyday travel could help address these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Debt a Toolkit for Action
    BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE at New York University School of Law CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEBT A TOOLKIT FOR ACTION By Roopal Patel and Meghna Philip ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on the fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution – part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group – the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communications to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S JUSTICE PROGRAM The Brennan Center’s Justice Program pursues justice system reforms designed to reduce the “justice gap,” the distance between the nation’s promise of equal justice and the reality that people of color and low-income litigants face in our courts. We work to achieve a justice system in which the ability of people to rely on courts and other agencies to secure the rule of law and prevent harms is not controlled by wealth, ethnicity, immigration status or the community from which they come. Cover photo © José Marí a Riola / Getty Images © 2012. This paper is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http://creativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is credited, links to the Center’s web page is provided, and no charge is imposed.
    [Show full text]