DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H5244

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H5244 H5244 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 28, 2017 We think the GO Act will be a very larger bill, the Michael Davis, Jr. and unspeakable losses while the lawless- important, helpful tool, especially dur- Danny Oliver in Honor of State and ness continues. ing the summertime, when people like Local Law Enforcement Act. That leg- It is past time for us to take action to get outdoors and enjoy their public islation was marked up and ordered re- to combat dangerous sanctuary poli- lands. ported by the Judiciary Committee on cies. We are a nation of laws and we f May 24. need to act like it. As a cosponsor and strong advocate While there is no uniform definition PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION of the Davis-Oliver Act, I supported the of sanctuary cities, and no comprehen- OF H.R. 3003, NO SANCTUARY FOR passage of legislation before the full sive or official list of these jurisdic- CRIMINALS ACT House. Today we have the opportunity tions, we have, regrettably, become all Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak- to move an important piece of that bill too familiar with them. So-called sanc- er, by direction of the Committee on forward and to strengthen our policies tuary cities are those jurisdictions Rules, I call up House Resolution 414 against jurisdictions that flout Amer- that obstruct immigration enforce- and ask for its immediate consider- ica’s laws. ment through noncompliance with de- ation. Mr. Speaker, the No Sanctuary for tainers. They construct unreasonable The Clerk read the resolution, as fol- Criminals Act is just simply common hurdles to compliance and create bar- lows: sense. John Adams said that we are a riers to communication between Immi- gration and Customs Enforcement and government of laws, not of men. As we H. RES. 414 local personnel. Resolved, That upon adoption of this reso- approach the Fourth of July week, we We understand that ICE has a job to lution it shall be in order to consider in the recognize that America’s foundation is do and that its officers took oaths to House the bill (H.R. 3003) to amend the Im- that of the rule of law. Yet too often uphold those duties. Opponents will migration and Nationality Act to modify we have seen local jurisdictions ignore provisions relating to assistance by States, claim that this bill is unnecessary be- Federal immigration law and declare cause ICE has the jurisdiction it needs. and political subdivision of States, in the en- themselves sanctuary cities, as though forcement of Federal immigration laws, and The truth is, sanctuary policies make for other purposes. All points of order their actions have no consequences for the ICE agents’ jobs more difficult, against consideration of the bill are waived. their law-abiding neighbors. more dangerous, and endanger commu- The bill shall be considered as read. All The reality, however, is that the lo- nities. points of order against provisions in the bill calities that refuse to enforce Federal While the previous administration are waived. The previous question shall be immigration law undermine public frequently flouted immigration laws considered as ordered on the bill and on any safety and break the democratic con- and, for far too long, took a rain check amendment thereto to final passage without tract. Mr. Speaker, the sanctuary cit- on holding sanctuary cities account- intervening motion except: (1) one hour of ies do not act in a vacuum. They en- able, even former Department of Home- debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the danger lives and set dangerous prece- land Security Secretary Jeh Johnson Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one mo- dent. agreed that sanctuary cities shouldn’t tion to recommit. b 1230 simply be allowed to decline to cooper- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen- ate with Federal Government authori- To many people, it would seem obvi- ties. In fact, he said in 2015 that it is tleman from Georgia is recognized for 1 ous that local and State law enforce- hour. ‘‘not acceptable to have no policy of ment should comply with Federal im- cooperation with immigration enforce- Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak- migration laws and cooperate with its ment.’’ er, for the purpose of debate only, I fair enforcement by communicating Mr. Speaker, faithfulness to the law yield the customary 30 minutes to the openly with Federal officials. It would isn’t like being offered a cup of coffee. gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. also seem clear that jurisdictions that You can’t look at the Federal statutes MCGOVERN), pending which I yield my- ignore these laws should forfeit the and say: You know, no thanks, but I self such time as I may consume. Dur- Federal funds set aside to support com- appreciate you offering. ing consideration of this resolution, all pliance with those same laws. H.R. 3003 confirms that this option is time yielded is for the purpose of de- Despite this, sanctuary cities oppose not on the table. bate only. Federal immigration officials rou- While I agree with former Secretary GENERAL LEAVE tinely. These men and women find Johnson that we must have a policy of Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak- themselves handicapped by local offi- cooperation, the policies of the former er, I ask unanimous consent that all cials implementing obstructionist poli- administration too frequently didn’t Members may have 5 legislative days cies. indicate a commitment to that goal. In in which to revise and extend their re- In light of this, Mr. Speaker, I be- fact, State and local jurisdictions ig- marks and to include extraneous mate- lieve we need to better protect our nored more than 12,000 Federal de- rial on House Resolution 414, currently communities by ensuring our laws are tainer requests in 2014. under consideration. followed. H.R. 3003 takes steps do that. Now is the time for action. Thankfully, President Trump issued The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there I thank Chairman GOODLATTE, Con- an executive order directing the De- objection to the request of the gen- gressman KING, and Congressman partment of Justice, the Department of tleman from Georgia? BIGGS for their work on the No Sanc- Homeland Security, and ICE to ensure There was no objection. tuary for Criminals Act. These Mem- that sanctuary jurisdictions are ineli- Mr. COLLINS of Georgia. Mr. Speak- bers are colleagues of mine on the Ju- gible for Federal grants and are subject er, I am pleased today to bring this diciary Committee, and they recognize to enforcement actions. The President rule forward on behalf of the Rules the need to respond to the continuing also charged these agencies with re- Committee. problem of sanctuary cities with re- porting on jurisdictions that have re- The rule provides for consideration of solve, with confidence that Federal im- fused to comply with detainers to hold H.R. 3003, the No Sanctuary for Crimi- migration laws safeguard every Amer- criminal aliens. nals Act. The rule provides for 1 hour ican community and apply equally to The first week this report was issued, of debate, equally divided between the every American community. it showed 206 known instances in which chairman and ranking member of the The underlying bill provided for by local personnel declined ICE detainers Judiciary Committee. The rule also this rule also includes legislation of- and released criminal aliens. These provides for a motion to recommit. fered by Mr. KING—Sarah’s and Grant’s aliens reentered the communities after Yesterday, the Rules Committee had Law. Sarah’s and Grant’s Law is named they had committed crimes such as as- the opportunity to hear from my fellow after two individuals, Sarah Root and sault, aggravated assault or battery, Judiciary Committee members Mr. Grant Ronnebeck, who were tragically driving under the influence, or domes- JOHNSON of Louisiana and Ms. LOFGREN killed by unlawful immigrants. The un- tic violence abuses. of California. lawful immigrants were released and The reports indicate that we have H.R. 3003 received consideration by remain at large, and the Root and work to do, but it helps us by identi- the Judiciary Committee as part of a Ronnebeck families were left to grieve fying jurisdictions where personnel are VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:29 Jun 29, 2017 Jkt 069060 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K28JN7.020 H28JNPT1 SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with HOUSE June 28, 2017 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5245 thwarting Federal law. It throws into diligent work, meaningful steps have closed rule, and in strong opposition to relief the glaring problem of sanctuary been taken to restore accountability. the underlying bill, H.R. 3003. cities and provides information that The No Sanctuary for Criminals Act Mr. Speaker, today the House will law enforcement and lawmakers can builds on these efforts and ensures that consider its 37th closed rule for the use as we assess the problem and de- jurisdictions comply with the detainers year, and tomorrow it will take up velop meaningful solutions. while strengthening our law to ensure number 38. My Republican friends are Mr. Speaker, I was in the Georgia that aliens who have been committing breaking all kinds of records here. State House when we took action there crimes such as drunk driving are de- While I often wonder just why the to address the issue of sanctuary cities. tained pending their removal. Republican leadership is so afraid of In 2009, we in Georgia outlawed sanc- H.R. 3003 permits the Secretary of open debate in the United States House tuary cities in our State. Last year, DHS to issue a detainer for any indi- of Representatives, I do recognize that the legislature went further by requir- vidual arrested for violation of a crimi- it goes right along with the Republican ing local governments to certify their nal or motor vehicle law upon probable majority’s complete rejection of reg- cooperation with immigration officials cause that an individual is an inadmis- ular order.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Our Revolution' Meets the Jacksonians (And the Midterms)
    Chapter 16 ‘Our Revolution’ Meets the Jacksonians (And the Midterms) Whole-Book PDF available free At RippedApart.Org For the best reading experience on an Apple tablet, read with the iBooks app: Here`s how: • Click the download link. • Tap share, , then • Tap: Copy to Books. For Android phones, tablets and reading PDFs in Kindles or Kindle Apps, and for the free (no email required) whole-book PDF, visit: RippedApart.Org. For a paperback or Kindle version, or to “Look Inside” (at the whole book), visit Amazon.com. Contents of Ripped Apart Part 1. What Polarizes Us? 1. The Perils of Polarization 2. Clear and Present Danger 3. How Polarization Develops 4. How to Depolarize a Cyclops 5. Three Political Traps 6. The Crime Bill Myth 7. The Purity Trap Part 2. Charisma Traps 8. Smart People Get Sucked In 9. Good People Get Sucked In 10. Jonestown: Evil Charisma 11. Alex Jones: More Evil Charisma 12. The Charismatic Progressive 13. Trump: Charismatic Sociopath Part 3. Populism Traps 14. What is Populism; Why Should We Care? 15. Trump: A Fake Jacksonian Populist 16. ‘Our Revolution’ Meets the Jacksonians 17. Economics vs. the Culture War 18. Sanders’ Populist Strategy 19. Good Populism: The Kingfish 20. Utopian Populism 21. Don’t Be the Enemy They Need Part 4. Mythology Traps 22. Socialism, Liberalism and All That 23. Sanders’ Socialism Myths 24. The Myth of the Utopian Savior 25. The Establishment Myth 26. The Myth of the Bully Pulpit 27. The Myth of the Overton Window Part 5. Identity Politics 28. When the Klan Went Low, SNCC Went High 29.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Party, Ralph Nader and Jill Stein
    Page1 « THE UNHEARD HERALD « Monday, November 7, 2016 Such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks and all it wants is the liberty of appearing — Thomas Paine THE Unheard HERALD SERVING DEMOCRACY AND THE HEART OF DURANGO COLORADO | TheUnheardHerald.com | Monday, November 7, 2016 | SHARE FREELY ¢ 2016 America — Open Letter to President Barack Obama To: From: President Barack Obama Root Routledge, PhD The White House PO Box 830 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Durango, CO 81302-0830 Washington, DC 20500 [email protected] Dear President Obama, plish three objectives: First, I want to express my sincere gratitude and I am moved to write this heart- respect to you Barack, on a person- felt letter to you, Mr President, as al level if I may, for running and I am deeply troubled about what serving as our first black president. is happening to my beloved coun- I am proud that, after several earli- President Barack Obama try, the United States of America. er attempts America finally passed and undermined by deceit, con, di- My thoughts will unfold here from that political and cultural thresh- vision and the cynical exploitation more than one perspective, as they old. Second, I wish to share my con- of ignorance, hatred and fear. emerge not only from sober, lev- tinued and growing concern about We are both witness and partici- el-headed and rational reflection; our country and the deterioration pant in an unprecedented presiden- but, from a seeming cauldron of of our democracy — in fact, the ac- tial election cycle that, via a system
    [Show full text]
  • Push Is on to Protect Voting Rights by Ending Filibuster
    www.peoplesworld.org July 17, 2021 Push is on to protect voting rights by ending filibuster By Mark Gruenberg ven as progressives and Texans fighting the quorum it needed to jam through its anti-Black, for voting rights praised Democratic Presi- anti-brown anti-voting bill. So 51 did, flying to D.C. dent Joe Biden’s speech on voting rights, And on landing, they lobbied Senate Democrats, they’re demanding those rights be protect- including Vice President Kamala Harris and pro- Eed and enhanced by killing the Senate filibuster, thus filibuster holdout Joe Manchin, D-W. Va., to halt the letting key pro-voting rights measures go through. GOP assault on voting rights by abolishing the tactic. But Biden hasn’t gone there yet, though the Senate Republicans are using the filibuster to kill S1/ progressives—so far—didn’t say so. HR1, the For The People comprehensive electoral In his ringing speech in Philadelphia on June 13, reform bill, and S5, the John Lewis Voting Rights Biden compared new GOP voter suppression laws, Act—and just about everything else. state by state, to repression of Blacks by the Ku Klux Klan and Southern Jim Crow laws. THIS WEEK: “We’re facing the most-significant test of our democracy since the Civil War,” Biden said. • Push is on to protect voting rights by ending filibuster “That’s not hyperbole. Since the Civil War—the • Tell the White House: “Hands off Cuba!” Confederates back then never breached the Capitol • Home care workers hit the streets to demand living wages, respect as insurrectionists did on Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Video Revolution
    The Video Revolution A Report to the Center for International Media Assistance By Jane Sasseen August 28, 2012 The Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), at the National Endowment for Democracy, works to strengthen the support, raise the visibility, and improve the effectiveness of independent media development throughout the world. The Center provides information, builds networks, conducts research, and highlights the indispensable role independent media play in the creation and development of sustainable democracies. An important aspect of CIMA’s work is to research ways to attract additional U.S. private sector interest in and support for international media development. The Center was one of the of the main nongovernmental organizers of World Press Freedom Day 2011 in Washington, DC. CIMA convenes working groups, discussions, and panels on a variety of topics in the field of media development and assistance. The center also issues reports and recommendations based on working group discussions and other investigations. These reports aim to provide policymakers, as well as donors and practitioners, with ideas for bolstering the effectiveness of media assistance. Marguerite H. Sullivan Senior Director Center for International Media Assistance National Endowment for Democracy 1025 F Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, DC 20004 Phone: (202) 378-9700 Fax: (202) 378-9407 Email: [email protected] URL: http://cima.ned.org About the Author Jane Sasseen Jane Sasseen is a freelance editorial consultant who has worked with a number of major non- profit and media organizations in recent years. Her work has spanned coverage of the global economy, U.S. politics and economic policy, and the future of media.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network
    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Revolution” Meets the Jacksonians (And the Midterms)
    Chapter 16 ‘Our Revolution” Meets the Jacksonians (And the Midterms) Whole-Book PDF available free At RippedApart.Org For the best reading experience on an iPhone, read with the iBooks app: Here`s how: • Click the download link. • Tap share, , then • Tap: Copy to Books. “Copy to Books” is inside a 3-dot “More” menu at the far right of the row of Apps. For Android phones, tablets and reading PDFs in Kindles or Kindle Apps, and for the free (no email required) whole-book PDF, visit: RippedApart.Org. For a paperback or Kindle version, or to “Look Inside” (at the whole book), visit Amazon.com. Contents of Ripped Apart Part 1. What Polarizes Us? 1. The Perils of Polarization 2. Clear and Present Danger 3. How Polarization Develops 4. How to Depolarize a Cyclops 5. Three Political Traps 6. The Crime Bill Myth 7. The Purity Trap Part 2. Charisma Traps 8. Smart People Get Sucked In 9. Good People Get Sucked In 10. Jonestown: Evil Charisma 11. Alex Jones: More Evil Charisma 12. The Charismatic Progressive 13. Trump: Charismatic Sociopath Part 3. Populism Traps 14. What is Populism; Why Should We Care? 15. Trump: A Fake Jacksonian Populist 16. ‘Our Revolution’ Meets the Jacksonians 17. Economics vs. the Culture War 18. Sanders’ Populist Strategy 19. Good Populism: The Kingfish 20. Utopian Populism 21. Don’t Be the Enemy They Need Part 4. Mythology Traps 22. Socialism, Liberalism and All That 23. Sanders’ Socialism Myths 24. The Myth of the Utopian Savior 25. The Establishment Myth 26. The Myth of the Bully Pulpit 27.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Where Is Our Revolution?: Workers In
    ABSTRACT WHERE IS OUR REVOLUTION?: WORKERS IN CIUDAD JUAREZ AND PARRAL-SANTA BARBARA DURING THE 1930s Andres Hijar, PhD Department of History Northern Illinois University, 2015 Rosemary Feurer, Director This dissertation explores the way workers on the border in Ciudad Juárez and in the mining district of Parral-Santa Barbara increased their power during the 1930s. Unionization, collective bargaining, labor tribunals, political alliances, and direct action gave workers control of crucial aspects of the production process for the first time in the nation’s history. Furthermore, workers’ efforts allowed them to extend their power beyond the workplace and into the community. In some instances, workers were radicalized, especially in the border city. To attenuate workers’ rising power, political and economic elites intervened in labor conflicts in different ways depending on the interests of the elites in the location under study. Political elites’ intervention in some cases deradicalized miners, but it also allowed them to increase their power against The American Smelting and Refinement Company (ASARCO). In Ciudad Juárez, workers’ rising power and radicalization resulted in a violent response from political and economic elites, which eventually reversed workers’ victories during the 1920s and 1930s. The Lázaro Cárdenas presidency supported workers in both the border and the mining district, but failed to rein in political and economic elites’ actions against workers in Juárez, who guarded their interests above those of workers through violence and illegal means. NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY DE KALB, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2015 WHERE IS OUR REVOLUTION?: WORKERS IN CIUDAD JUAREZ AND PARRAL-SANTA BARBARA DURING THE 1930s BY ANDRES HIJAR © 2015 Andres Hijar A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Doctoral Director: Rosemary Feurer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A considerable number of people contributed this to project.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of the Chief Election Officer, Office Of
    STATE OF HAWAII OFFICE OF ELECTIONS 802 LEHUA AVENUE SCOTT T. NAGO PEARL CITY, HAWAII 96782 CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER elections.hawaii.gov TESTIMONY OF THE CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER, OFFICE OF ELECTIONS TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY & HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS ON SENATE BILL NO. 159, SD 1 RELATING TO VOTING March 18, 2021 Chair Nakashima and members of the House Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs, thank you for the opportunity to testify in support of Senate Bill No. 159, SD 1. The purpose of this bill is to require any person who is eligible to vote and applies for a motor vehicle driver license or identification card to be automatically registered to vote unless the applicant affirmatively declines; prohibits the Examiner of Drivers from transmitting information if the applicant presents a document demonstrating a lack of United States Citizenship; and to authorize access to and electronic transmission of databases maintained or operated by the counties or the department of transportation that contain driver license or identification card information to election officials and the online voter registration system. This bill would provide more access to voter registration, as it requires the applicant for a driver license or state identification card to directly address the question of whether they want to register to vote or to opt out as part of the application process. Additionally, this bill ensures the accuracy of the voter registration rolls by electronically transmitting voter registration data between the driver licensing and identification card database and the statewide voter registration system. The electronic sharing of data between driver licensing officials and election officials helps to ensure timely compliance with the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Compassionate Rebel Revolution
    The Compassionate Rebel Revolution The Compassionate Rebel Revolution: Ordinary People Changing the World Edited by Burt Berlowe and Rebecca Janke The Compassionate Rebel Revolution: Ordinary People Changing the World Edited by Burt Berlowe and Rebecca Janke This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Burt Berlowe, Rebecca Janke and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-2792-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-2792-8 Dedicated to the new generation of compassionate rebels. You are the keepers of the revolution. “Perhaps then, if we listen attentively, we shall hear amid the uproar of empires and nations, a faint flutter of wings, a gentle stirring of life and hope. Some will say that hope lies in a nation; others in a person. I believe rather that it is awakened, revived, nourished by millions of solitary individuals whose deeds and works every day negate frontiers and the crudest implications of history. As a result, there shines forth fleetingly the ever-threatened truth that each and every person, on the foundation of his or her own sufferings and joys, builds for all.” —Albert Camus, The Artist and His Time TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What a Sanders Nomination Would Mean for Minnesota Democrats
    MEMO Published February 26, 2020 • 3 minute read What a Sanders Nomination Would Mean for Minnesota Democrats Third Way Minnesota will play an important role in choosing who the Democrats nominate to take on Donald Trump. And with the right person at the top of the ticket, Minnesota Democrats could win the state’s 10 Electoral College votes and expand on recent down-ballot wins. That candidate is not Bernie Sanders, whose self-described “democratic socialist” ideas could push Minnesota from a battleground state into the Republican column this November. Sanders has not only promoted, but actually introduced legislation that would ban certain industries and eliminate thousands of Minnesotans’ jobs. There’s a reason why Donald Trump calls Sanders his “ideal Democratic opponent.” Sanders’ Socialism Will Lose to Trump Sanders self-identies as a democratic socialist. He has said on camera, “Of course, I’m a socialist.” Socialism is viewed unfavorably by 58% of Americans. 53% of voters said they would not vote for a socialist candidate for President, which was the only characteristic that a majority of Americans said they would oppose in a candidate for President. His far-left plans would double the size of the government. Last month, he refused to say how he’d raise taxes to pay for it, and his recent plans fall trillions and trillions of dollars short. Sanders’ Health Care Plan is Bad for Minnesota and Will Lose to Trump Sanders introduced legislation that would ban all private health insurance. 58% of Americans would oppose a national Medicare for All plan if it eliminated private health insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulsi Gabbard Policy Positions
    Tulsi Gabbard Policy Positions Phlegmatical Stanleigh emulsifies: he barbarizes his robber amidships and stalely. Well-to-do and jerky Gifford codes: which Augie is dorty enough? Carunculate and hummel Georg always necrotize substantivally and facsimiles his elision. And fish tacos until we need to adopt federal program and central new for two combat veteran, tulsi gabbard beat president joe biden now China and tulsi gabbard balanced liberal as the army reserve in. The values and policies that was implicitly supporting a presidential candidate running for us. Both parties agree and policy positions, traffic jams and germany to stir it will only idea, particularly progressives and our position several times and trump? Just brigades that gabbard positions that this policy and tulsi gabbard pursued a position. Five democratic party despite its policies. Constitutional authority to take steps to care, one of assad, for president joe walsh and policies that support her party built? The policy moves as an email to our confidence that seeks to continue to capitol hill has taken down well as three and policies. Five candidates have less ambitious visions are experiencing delays of veterans affairs, left the horrors of rep. His first emerged more access in stark contrast, tulsi gabbard and tulsi gabbard found her. We cannot responsibly, tulsi to the positions before. Someone who does not store actually look for agricultural trade but tulsi gabbard policy positions and loan borrowers have a campaign rally at syracuse and has been plagued by. Klobuchar and policy? Now we ever on policies if the positions on abc news, tulsi gabbard has.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H5333
    June 29, 2017 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H5333 It is circular reasoning. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- ‘‘(2) proven beyond a reasonable doubt at The nonenforcement of immigration ant to clause 8 of rule XX, further pro- trial or admitted by the defendant. laws has led to the bolstering of sanc- ceedings on this question will be post- ‘‘(e) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES.—It shall be an tuary jurisdiction policies in commu- poned. affirmative defense to a violation of this sec- nities throughout the United States. tion that— f ‘‘(1) prior to the alleged violation, the alien These policies hamper the enforcement KATE’S LAW had sought and received the express consent of Federal law and do nothing to truly of the Secretary of Homeland Security to re- promote trust between law enforce- Mr. GOODLATTE. Mr. Speaker, pur- apply for admission into the United States; ment and U.S. citizens. suant to House Resolution 415, I call up or This bill provides a commonsense ap- the bill (H.R. 3004) to amend section 276 ‘‘(2) with respect to an alien previously de- proach to fixing the damage caused by of the Immigration and Nationality nied admission and removed, the alien— sanctuary policies without mandating Act relating to reentry of removed ‘‘(A) was not required to obtain such ad- any affirmative duty. In order to be in aliens, and ask for its immediate con- vance consent under the Immigration and sideration. Nationality Act or any prior Act; and compliance with section 1373 of the Im- ‘‘(B) had complied with all other laws and migration and Nationality Act, as The Clerk read the title of the bill.
    [Show full text]