\ Governing Board Meeting

Agenda and Meeting Information

December 18, 2007 9:00 a.m. District Headquarters 2379 Broad Street • Brooksville, (352) 796-7211 • 1-800-423-1476

Weeki Wachee River

2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org

The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate upon the basis of any individual’s disability status. This An Equal Opportunity nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions including one’s access to participation, employment, or treatment in Employer its programs or activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodations as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should con tact the General Services Department at (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), extension 4527, TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only).

AGENDA

E GOVERNING BOARD MEETING

DECEMBER 18, 2007 9:00 a.m.

K All meetings are open to the public. J

¾ Viewing of the Board meeting is available at each of the service offices. ¾ Public input for issues not listed on the published agenda will be heard shortly after the meeting begins.

Unless specifically stated, scheduled items will not be heard at a time certain.

At the discretion of the Board, items may be taken out of order to accommodate the needs of the Board and the public.

The meeting will recess for lunch at a time to be announced and a closed attorney-client session will be held during the break (notice follows ANNOUNCEMENTS).

The current Governing Board agenda and the minutes of previous meetings are on the District's web site: www.WaterMatters.org

TUESDAY,DECEMBER 18, 2007

9:00 A.M. ‘ ‘ ‘ CONVENE MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BOARD ‘ ‘ ‘ AND PUBLIC HEARING (TAB A)

1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation 3. Additions/Deletions to Agenda 4. District Recognition – Award from North American Lake Management Society MEETING NOTIC for Research Related to Minimum Flows and Levels SWFWMD GOVERNING BOARD AGENDA -2- DECEMBER 18, 2007

5. Employee Recognition 6. Public Input for Issues Not Listed on the Published Agenda

CONSENT AGENDA (TAB B)

Regulation Committee -- Environmental Resource Permits 7. ERP No. 43032695.000 - The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor – Charlotte County 8. ERP No. 43033161.000 - Jack’s Branch Subdivision – Charlotte County 9. ERP No. 46031947.000 - Drew Park Townhomes (DENIAL) – Hillsborough County 10. ERP No. 43030040.000 - Estuary Golf Estates – Manatee County 11. ERP No. 43023781.018 - Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore – Pasco County 12. ERP No. 43023781.022 - Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard – Pasco County 13. ERP No. 43028022.001 - Legacy Hills – Pasco County 14. ERP No. 43029915.002 - McAlpin Excavation – Pinellas County 15. ERP No. 49000887.089 - Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village – Polk County 16. ERP No. 43027132.001 - Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation – Polk County 17. ERP No. 49028690.001 - Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual – Polk County 18. ERP No. 49028690.002 - Lakeland Central Park – Polk County 19. ERP No. 49029630.002 - The Meadows – Polk County 20. ERP No. 43030664.000 - Loughman Crossing at County Road 54 – Polk County 21. ERP No. 43031157.000 - Waterside East – Sarasota County 22. ERP No. 43032133.001 - Cocoplum Village Shops – Sarasota County Regulation Committee -- Water Use Permits 23. WUP No. 20000985.007 - Balm Farm/Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC – Hillsborough County 24. WUP No. 20001415.009 - Plant City Phosphate Complex/C.F. Industries, Inc. – Hillsborough County 25. WUP No. 20007345.005 - Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County – Manatee County 26. WUP No. 20011440.002 - Bear Bay East/John Falkner – Manatee County Regulation Committee -- Other 27. Final Approval of Changes to the Proposed Amendments to 40D-2.091, 40D-2.321, and 40D-2.801(3)(c), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Part B Basis of Review of the Water Use Permit Information Manual to Establish the Central Florida Coordination Area and to Provide Regulations for the Area 28. Electrical Power Plant Site Certification – SWFWMD Agency Report on Progress Energy Florida's Crystal River Nuclear Unit 3 Uprating – Citrus County 29. Electrical Transmission Line Certification – SWFWMD Agency Report on Tampa Electric Company's Willow Oak-Wheeler-Davis Transmission Line – Hillsborough and Polk Counties Resource Management & Development Committee 30. Five-Year Water Resource Development Work Program 31. Resolution Requesting Encumbrance of Funds within the Water Management Lands Trust Fund for Lake Hancock Preacquisition Costs 32. Interlocal Agreement with Pasco County, Appraisals, Purchase/Sale Agreement and Resolution Requesting Funds – Weekiwachee Preserve, SWF Parcel No. 15-773-143 33. Utility Easement to the DeSoto County Utilities Department – RV Griffin Reserve, SWF Parcel No. 20-223-127X 34. Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) Program a. Citrus Creek Grove, LLC – Charlotte County b. Walters Grove – Charlotte County c. Keystone Groves, LLC – DeSoto County d. Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. – Hardee County e. Hopewell Business Center, LLC – Hillsborough County f. Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc. – Hillsborough County g. McClure Properties, LTD – Manatee County SWFWMD GOVERNING BOARD AGENDA -3- DECEMBER 18, 2007

35. Peace River Regional Reservoir Expansion and Peace River Facility Expansion 36. Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C., to Establish Minimum Flows for the Upper Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs 37. Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C., to Establish Minimum Flows for the Braden River 38. Initiate Rulemaking to Amend 40D-8.624, F.A.C., to Add Minimum and Guidance Levels for Lakes Angelo, Denton, Placid, Tulane, and Verona in Highlands County; Lakes King, King-East, and Linda in Pasco County; and Crooked Lake in Polk County 39. Continue Public Hearing Requested by James P. Gills, Trustee, on Proposed Minimum and Guidance Levels for Crews Lake in Pasco County Finance & Administration Committee 40. Board Travel 41. Budget Transfer Report General Counsel’s Report 42. Consent Order – ERP No. 44025778.003 – Cameron-Wingate Development, LLC 43. Consent Order – Surface Water Activity - David R. Spiker, Pamela J. Spiker and AAA Top Quality Asphalt, L.L.C. – Polk County Executive Director’s Report 44. Approval of Minutes – November 26, 2007 Governing Board Meeting

REGULATION COMMITTEE (TAB C)

Discussion Items 45. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion 46. Enhanced Public Supply Water Conservation 47. Water Conserving Rate Structure Requirements, Programs and Implementation 48. Water Shortage Rule – Variance Provisions for Local Plans 49. Water Shortage Actions – Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority and the Potential Need for Additional Conservation Actions Submit & File Reports– None Routine Reports 50. Demand Management 51. Overpumpage Report 52. Southern Water Use Caution Area Quantities 53. Water Production Supply Summary 54. Public Supply Benchmarks 55. Resource Regulation Significant Initiatives Report

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT &DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (TAB D)

Discussion Items 56. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion 57. Adopt Recommended Changes to Governing Board Policy 130-4, Cooperative Funding Initiative 58. Tampa Bay Estuary Program Submit & File Reports – None Routine Reports 59. Significant Water Supply and Resource Development Projects 60. Watershed Management Program and Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization Status Report 61. Florida Forever Funding Status Report 62. Minimum Flows and Levels Status Report 63. Hydrologic Conditions Status Report 64. Structure Operations Status Report SWFWMD GOVERNING BOARD AGENDA -4- DECEMBER 18, 2007

FINANCE &ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE (TAB E)

Discussion Items 65. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion 66. Financial and Budget Update 67. District Climate Change Initiative Status Report 68. Strategic Systems and Water Management Information System Initiative Semi-Annual Update Submit & File Report 69. Treasurer's Report, Payment Register, and Contingency Reserves Report Routine Report 70. Management Services Status Report

OUTREACH &PLANNING COMMITTEE (TAB F)

Discussion Items 71. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion 72. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Surface Water Quality Classification System Submit & File Report 73. Legislative Update Routine Reports 74. Significant Activities Report 75. Speakers Bureau 76. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report 77. Review of Developments of Regional Impact

GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT (TAB G)

Discussion Items 78. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion Submit & File Reports – None Routine Reports 79. Litigation Summary and Report 80. Rulemaking Update

REPORTS (TAB H)

81. Basin Board Land Resources Committee 82. Executive Director’s Report 83. Chair’s Report – Performance Evaluations of the Executive Director and Inspector General

‘ ‘ ‘ RECESS PUBLIC HEARING ‘ ‘ ‘

ANNOUNCEMENTS

x Governing Board Meeting and Workshop Schedule: Meeting – Brooksville ...... January 29, 2008 Meeting – Brooksville ...... February 26, 2008 Meeting – Tampa ...... March 25, 2008 x Basin Board Meeting Schedule: Pinellas-Anclote River – New Port Richey ...... February 6, 2008 Alafia River – Tampa ...... February 7, 2008 Northwest Hillsborough – Tampa ...... February 7, 2008 Peace River – Bartow ...... February 8, 2008 Hillsborough River – Tampa ...... February 11, 2008 SWFWMD GOVERNING BOARD AGENDA -5- DECEMBER 18, 2007

Manasota – Sarasota ...... February 13, 2008 Withlacoochee River – Brooksville ...... February 14, 2008 Coastal Rivers – Weeki Wachee ...... February 14, 2008 x Joint Governing and Basin Boards Planning Workshop – Thonotosassa ..... February 22, 2008 x Basin Board Education Committee – Tampa ...... March 11, 2008 x Basin Board Land Resources Committee – New Port Richey ...... March 20, 2008 x Advisory Committee Meeting Schedule: Industrial – Tampa ...... January 8, 2008 Public Supply – Tampa ...... January 8, 2008 Well Drillers – Tampa ...... January 16, 2008 Green Industry – Tampa ...... February 28, 2008 Agricultural – Tampa ...... February 28, 2008 Environmental – Tampa ...... March 10, 2008

12:00 p.m. Notice of Closed Attorney-Client Session

Location: Board Conference Rooms A and B

Meeting Attendees: SWFWMD Governing Board Members; Executive Director David L. Moore; General Counsel William S. Bilenky; Deputy General Counsel Karen West; Assistant General Counsel Joseph Ward

Closed attorney-client session pursuant to Section 286.011(8), Florida Statutes, to discuss strategy related to litigation in Southwest Florida Water Management District v. City of Weeki Wachee, et al. in the Circuit Court, Fifth Judicial Circuit, Case No. H-27-CA-2004-366RT. The subject matter of the meeting shall be confined to pending litigation.

The meeting is not open to the public. Pursuant to Florida Law, the entire attorney-client session shall be recorded by a certified court reporter. No portion of the meeting shall be off the record. A copy of the transcript will be made part of the public record at the conclusion of the litigation.

ADJOURNMENT

The Governing Board may take action on any matter on the printed agenda including such items listed as reports, discussions, or program presentations. The Governing Board may make changes to the printed agenda only for good cause as determined by the Chair, and stated in the record.

If a party decides to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at a hearing or these meetings, that party will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose that party may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.

If you wish to address the Board concerning any item listed on the agenda or an issue that does not appear on the agenda, please fill out a speaker's card at the reception desk in the lobby and give it to the recording secretary. Your card will be provided to the Chair who will call on you at the appropriate time during the meeting. Comments will be limited to three minutes per speaker. In appropriate circumstances, the Chair may grant exceptions to the three-minute limit.

The Board will accept and consider written comments from any person if those comments are submitted to the District at: Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899

The comments should identify the number of the item on the agenda and the date of the meeting. Any written comments received after the Board meeting will be retained in the file as a public record. GOVERNING BOARD COMMITTEES

Effective August 2007

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Maritza Rovira-Forino, Chair Todd Pressman, Chair Thomas G. Dabney, Vice Chair Heidi B. McCree, Vice Chair Ronald E. Oakley, Second Vice Chair Patsy C. Symons, Second Vice Chair

FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OUTREACH AND PLANNING COMMITTEE COMMITTEE Jennifer E. Closshey, Chair Neil Combee, Chair Sallie Parks, Vice Chair Patricia M. Glass, Vice Chair Vacant, Second Vice Chair Vacant, Second Vice Chair

The full Board serves as the members for each committee.

STANDING COMMITTEE LIAISONS Agricultural Advisory Committee Patsy C. Symons Basin Board Education Committee Maritza Rovira-Forino Basin Boards Land Resources Committee Heidi B. McCree Environmental Advisory Committee Todd Pressman Green Industry Advisory Committee Sallie Parks Industrial Supply Advisory Committee Jennifer E. Closshey Public Supply Advisory Committee Neil Combee Well Drillers Advisory Committee Thomas G. Dabney A. Public Hearing & Meeting Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

9:00 a.m.

‘ ‘ ‘ CONVENE MEETING OF THE GOVERNING BOARD ‘ ‘ ‘ AND PUBLIC HEARING

1. Call to Order ...... 2

2. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation ...... 2

3. Additions/Deletions to Agenda ...... 2

4. District Recognition – Award from North American Lake Management Society for Research Related to Minimum Flows and Levels ...... 3

5. Employee Recognition ...... 4

6. Public Input for Issues Not Listed on the Published Agenda ...... 6 Items 1 - 2 - 3

Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

1. Call to Order

The Board Chair calls the meeting to order. The Board Secretary confirms that a quorum is present. The Board Chair then opens the public hearing.

Anyone wishing to address the Governing Board concerning any item listed on the agenda or any item that does not appear on the agenda should fill out and submit a speaker's card. Comments will be limited to three minutes per speaker, and, when appropriate, exceptions to the three-minute limit may be granted by the Chair. Several individuals wishing to speak on the same issue/topic should designate a spokesperson.

2. Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation

The Board Chair leads the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. Mr. Bilenky offers the invocation.

3. Additions/Deletions to Agenda

According to Section 120.525(2), Florida Statutes, additions to the published agenda will only be made for "good cause" as determined by the "person designated to preside." The items that have been added to the agenda were received by the District after publication of the regular agenda. The Board was provided with the information filed and the District staff's analyses of these matters. Staff has determined that action must be taken on these items prior to the next Board meeting.

Therefore, it is the District staff's recommendation that good cause has been demonstrated and should be considered during the Governing Board's meeting.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve the recommended additions and deletions to the published agenda.

Presenter: David L. Moore, Executive Director

2 Item 4

Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

District Recognition

Award from North American Lake Management Society for Research Related to Minimum Flows and Levels

The North American Lake Management Society (NALMS) recognized the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) by awarding them a Technical Merit Award for Research related to the development of minimum flows and levels. The award was presented at the NALMS Annual Conference which was held in Orlando this year.

In presenting the award, the Society's outgoing president, Dr. Ken Wagner, noted that Florida's five water management Districts have been legislatively mandated to set minimum flows and levels (MFLs) on waterbodies within the state. It was recognized that the water management districts have collectively set MFLs, or environmental flows as they are known in the scientific literature, on over 200 waterbodies statewide, producing at least that many technical reports, as well as numerous scientific papers that have appeared in peer reviewed journals. He also noted that the development of MFLs has spawned considerable research on a diverse range of topics including climatic cycles and habitat requirements of selected aquatic species including fish, macroinvertebrates and manatees. Dr. Wagner further noted that two water management districts in particular, the SJRWMD and the SWFWMD, have generated a large volume of work and were nominated for a Technical Merit Award for Research. Doug Leeper, Chief Environmental Scientist in the Ecologic Evaluation Section, accepted the award on behalf of the District.

The North American Lake Management Society is a nonprofit group whose mission is to forge partnerships among citizens, scientists, and professionals to foster the management and protection of lakes and reservoirs for today and tomorrow. The Society publishes an international peer reviewed journal, The Journal of Lake and Reservoir Management.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Board’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Martin H. Kelly, Ph.D., Interim Director, Resource Conservation & Development Department

3 Item 5

Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Employee Recognition

The District's employees are its most valuable resource. We are pleased and proud that the average tenure of all employees at the District is 12 years and that we are able to retain such remarkable talent. Each year, many District employees reach significant longevity milestones in their service to the District and many reach momentous milestones, which make them eligible for retirement. The District as a whole, as well as each employee’s department, acknowledges and celebrates these milestones/retirements and the tremendous individual contributions they represent to the achievement of the District’s mission.

At the Governing Board meeting, Executive Director David Moore will make presentations to the Board for all employees who have achieved milestones of 20 years or greater, to specially acknowledge and commend the contributions of these individuals. Mr. Moore will also recognize promotions and welcome new members of management.

This item provides the Board with the opportunity to personally recognize and thank our dedicated employees who have reached five-year increments in service to the District and those employees who have completed at least 30 years of employment in the Florida Retirement System and are retiring from the District. We have fourteen employees that have achieved longevity milestones for the period of November 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and two retirees.

Employee Recognition – Service/Retirement

Employee Office Milestone Title Department Name Location

Tom Cappuccio Fleet Maintenance Technician 2 General Services Brooksville Retirement Dan DeWitt Survey Coordinator Land Resources Brooksville

30 Years Charlotte Davis Administrative Supervisor Brooksville Regulation Brooksville

25 Years None for this meeting.

Dave Dunnett Senior Field Technician Operations Brooksville Glenn Hoffmann Senior Tradesworker General Services Brooksville Marty Kelly Environmental Manager Res.Conservation.& Dev. Brooksville 20 Years Will Miller Land Use & Protection Manager Land Resources Brooksville Philip Rhinesmith Senior Environmental Scientist Resource Management Brooksville Dave Sauskojus Senior Environmental Scientist Brooksville Regulation Brooksville

15 Years Rich Schultz Sr. Professional Geologist/Eng. Res.Conservation.& Dev. Brooksville

Brian Armstrong Water Supply & Res. Dev. Mgr. Res.Conservation & Dev. Brooksville 10 Years Ed Bozman Sr.Regulation Processing Spec. Tampa Regulation Dept. Tampa

Charlie Bitter Senior Project Manager Information Resources Brooksville Thomas Hackney Senior Field Technician Brooksville Regulation Brooksville 5 Years Stephanie Powers Staff Environmental Scientist Resource Management Tampa Shelia Roush Senior Fiscal Assistant Finance Brooksville

4 Item 5

The District also welcomes and congratulates new members of its management team and provides the Board the opportunity to welcome these new members of management. We have one new manager for the period of June 26, 2007 to November 6, 2007.

Employee Recognition – New Water Use Regulation Manager

Employee Office Title Department Name Location

Promotion Paul Williams Water Use Regulation Manager Brooksville Regulation Brooksville

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Board’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: David L. Moore, Executive Director

5 Item 6

Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Public Input for Issues Not Listed on the Published Agenda

At this time, the Board will hear public input for issues not listed on the published agenda.

6 B. Consent Agenda Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Consent Agenda

Regulation Committee -- Environmental Resource Permits 7. ERP No. 43032695.000 - The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor – Charlotte County .... 3 8. ERP No. 43033161.000 - Jack’s Branch Subdivision – Charlotte County ...... 8 9. ERP No. 46031947.000 - Drew Park Townhomes (DENIAL) – Hillsborough County ...... 14 10. ERP No. 43030040.000 - Estuary Golf Estates – Manatee County ...... 16 11. ERP No. 43023781.018 - Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore – Pasco County ...... 22 12. ERP No. 43023781.022 - Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard – Pasco County ...... 34 13. ERP No. 43028022.001 - Legacy Hills – Pasco County ...... 45 14. ERP No. 43029915.002 - McAlpin Excavation – Pinellas County ...... 55 15. ERP No. 49000887.089 - Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village – Polk County ...... 63 16. ERP No. 43027132.001 - Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation – Polk County ...... 72 17. ERP No. 49028690.001 - Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual – Polk County ...... 80 18. ERP No. 49028690.002 - Lakeland Central Park – Polk County ...... 88 19. ERP No. 49029630.002 - The Meadows – Polk County ...... 101 20. ERP No. 43030664.000 - Loughman Crossing at County Road 54 – Polk County ...... 107 21. ERP No. 43031157.000 - Waterside East – Sarasota County ...... 112 22. ERP No. 43032133.001 - Cocoplum Village Shops – Sarasota County ...... 124 Regulation Committee -- Water Use Permits 23. WUP No. 20000985.007 - Balm Farm/Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC – Hillsborough County ...... 135 24. WUP No. 20001415.009 - Plant City Phosphate Complex/C.F. Industries, Inc. – Hillsborough County ...... 144 25. WUP No. 20007345.005 - Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County – Manatee County ...... 155 26. WUP No. 20011440.002 - Bear Bay East/John Falkner – Manatee County ...... 166 Regulation Committee -- Other 27. Final Approval of Changes to the Proposed Amendments to 40D-2.091, 40D-2.321, and 40D-2.801(3)(c), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Part B Basis of Review of the Water Use Permit Information Manual to Establish the Central Florida Coordination Area and to Provide Regulations for the Area ...... 178 28. Electrical Power Plant Site Certification – SWFWMD Agency Report on Progress Energy Florida's Crystal River Nuclear Unit 3 Uprating – Citrus County ...... 190 29. Electrical Transmission Line Certification – SWFWMD Agency Report on Tampa Electric Company's Willow Oak-Wheeler-Davis Transmission Line – Hillsborough and Polk Counties ...... 192 Resource Management & Development Committee 30. Five-Year Water Resource Development Work Program ...... 194 31. Resolution Requesting Encumbrance of Funds within the Water Management Lands Trust Fund for Lake Hancock Preacquisition Costs ...... 196 32. Interlocal Agreement with Pasco County, Appraisals, Purchase/Sale Agreement and Resolution Requesting Funds – Weekiwachee Preserve, SWF Parcel No. 15-773-143 ...... 197 33. Utility Easement to the DeSoto County Utilities Department – RV Griffin Reserve, SWF Parcel No. 20-223-127X ...... 201 34. Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) Program a. Citrus Creek Grove, LLC – Charlotte County ...... 203 b. Walters Grove – Charlotte County ...... 206 c. Keystone Groves, LLC – DeSoto County ...... 209 d. Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. – Hardee County ...... 212 e. Hopewell Business Center, LLC – Hillsborough County ...... 215 f. Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc. – Hillsborough County ...... 218 g. McClure Properties, LTD – Manatee County ...... 221 35. Peace River Regional Reservoir Expansion and Peace River Facility Expansion ...... 224 36. Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C., to Establish Minimum Flows for the Upper Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs ...... 227 37. Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C., to Establish Minimum Flows for the Braden River ...... 234 38. Initiate Rulemaking to Amend 40D-8.624, F.A.C., to Add Minimum and Guidance Levels for Lakes Angelo, Denton, Placid, Tulane, and Verona in Highlands County; Lakes King, King-East, and Linda in Pasco County; and Crooked Lake in Polk County ...... 239 39. Continue Public Hearing Requested by James P. Gills, Trustee, on Proposed Minimum and Guidance Levels for Crews Lake in Pasco County ...... 259 Finance & Administration Committee 40. Board Travel ...... 260 41. Budget Transfer Report ...... 261 General Counsel’s Report 42. Consent Order – ERP No. 44025778.003 – Cameron-Wingate Development, LLC ...... 264 43. Consent Order – Surface Water Activity - David R. Spiker, Pamela J. Spiker and AAA Top Quality Asphalt, L.L.C. – Polk County ...... 265 Executive Director’s Report 44. Approval of Minutes – November 26, 2007 Governing Board Meeting ...... 267

2 CONSENT ITEM 7

3 CONSENT ITEM 7 Default Date: January 13, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43032695.000

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor

GRANTED TO: Burnt Store Land Group, LLC 255 Alhambra Circle, Suite 325 Coral Gables, FL 33134

ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a surface water management system to serve a 74.24-acre residential development known as The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor. The project is located on State Highway 765 (Burnt Store Road), approximately 3.0 miles south of U.S. 41, in Charlotte County. Information regarding the surface water management system, 100-year floodplain, wetlands and/or surface waters is stated below and on the permitted construction drawings for the project.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor Master Property Owners' Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Charlotte

SEC/TWP/RGE: 5/42S/23E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 80.53

PROJECT SIZE: 74.24 Acres

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: April 6, 2007

AMENDED DATE: N/A

4 Permit No.: 43032695.000 Project Name: The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK Lake 28.31 Wet Detention TOTAL 28.31

Comments: The activities approved for this project are for the construction of a residential subdivision consisting of 44 multi-family units and 46 single-family lots, and includes the associated roadway, driveway, and sidewalk facilities, along with the surface water management system. Water quality treatment will be provided in the proposed surface water management system through wet detention. The project discharges stormwater onto state owned lands which are directly connected to an Outstanding Florida Water body. Therefore, the surface water management system provides treatment for a volume 50 percent more than required for the type of treatment system. The post-developed peak discharge rate of 20.79 cubic feet per second does not exceed the pre-developed peak discharge rate of 25.41 cubic feet per second.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A

Comments: The FEMA floodplain is due to a tidal surge. Compensation is not required; however, all finish floors and living areas are above the 100-year floodplain elevation. Historic basin storage impacts associated with impacts to wetlands and other surface water are addressed in the hydrologic/hydraulic drainage modeling.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 5 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Ditch 2.01 2.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 2 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 OSW 3 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.63 0.00 OSW 4 2.12 0.00 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 5 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 TOTAL 6.26 2.012.12 0.00 2.13 0.00

Wetland Comments: There are no wetlands located within the project area. However, wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the project area that will not be adversely impacted. This project consists of four borrow ponds totaling 4.25 acres, and one 2.01 acre drainage ditch. Permanent filling impacts of 2.12 acres will occur to the borrow ponds for construction, and temporary impacts of 2.13 acres of the borrow ponds for stormwater pond construction for a multi-family residential community.

5 Permit No.: 43032695.000 Project Name: The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation will not be required for permanent filling and/or temporary dredging impacts of 4.25 acres to the borrow ponds pursuant to Section 3.2.2 of the Basis of Review. Under this section, mitigation is not required for impacts to nonfunctional habitat.

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Sarasota Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, FL 34240-9711

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Sarasota Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland and surface water areas

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

6 Permit No.: 43032695.000 Project Name: The Preserve at Charlotte Harbor

7. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"No owner of property within the subdivision may construct or maintain any building, residence, or structure, or undertake or perform any activity in the wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas, upland conservation areas and drainage easements described in the approved permit and recorded plat of the subdivision, unless prior approval is received from the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Sarasota Regulation Department."

8. Copies of the following documents in final form, as appropriate for the project, shall be submitted to the Sarasota Regulation Department:

A. homeowners, property owners, master association or condominium association articles of incorporation, and

B. declaration of protective covenants, deed restrictions or declaration of condominium.

The Permittee shall submit these documents either: (1) within 180 days after beginning construction or with the Statement of Completion and as-built construction plans if construction is completed prior to 180 days, or (2) prior to any lot or unit sales within the project served by the surface water management system, whichever occurs first.

9. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"Each property owner within the subdivision at the time of construction of a building, residence, or structure shall comply with the construction plans for the surface water management system approved and on file with the Southwest Florida Water Management District."

10. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

11. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Sarasota Service Office.

12. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

7 CONSENT ITEM 8

8 CONSENT ITEM 8 Default Date: January 15, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43033161.000

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Jack's Branch Subdivision

GRANTED TO: Jack's Branch Grove, LLC 2000 Webber Street Sarasota, FL 34239

ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a surface water management system to serve a 175.24-acre single-family residential development and borrow pit excavation project known as Jack's Branch Subdivision. The project is located approximately four miles east of U.S. Highway 17 and north of Washington Loop Road (State Highway 764), in Charlotte County. Information regarding the surface water management system, 100-year floodplain, wetlands and/or surface waters is stated below and on the permitted construction drawings for the project.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Jack's Branch Subdivision Homeowners' Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Charlotte

SEC/TWP/RGE: 14,23/40S/24E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 175.24

PROJECT SIZE: 175.24 Acres

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: July 23, 2007

AMENDED DATE: N/A

9 Permit No.: 43033161.000 Project Name: Jack's Branch Subdivision

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK 1 40.04 Wet Detention 2 41.58 Wet Detention SWMA 0.17 Effluent Filtration TOTAL 81.79

Comments: This project consists of 17 single-family residential lots, roadways, and associated infrastructure, as well as dirt mining (borrow pit). Excess fill from the two borrow pits will be hauled off site. The borrow pits will be reclaimed as two man-made wet detention ponds (Pond Nos. 1 and 2). These ponds and one system of detention with effluent filtration will provide water quality treatment and peak discharge attenuation for the residential development. Specific Condition No. 13 prohibits the beneficial occupancy of the residential portion of the project site until the proposed mining operation has ceased.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A

Comments: The 100-year floodplain is not located within the project area. Historic basin storage impacts associated with impacts to wetlands and other surface waters are addressed in the hydrologic/hydraulic drainage modeling.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 10 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* OSW 1.21 0.00 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 5.31 0.00 5.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.29 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.60 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 0.62 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW 4.71 0.00 4.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 14.81 0.0014.81 0.00 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

10 Permit No.: 43033161.000 Project Name: Jack's Branch Subdivision

Wetland Comments: Wetlands are not located within the project area. However, the project area contains ten (10) surface water features, comprising of nine (9) upland-cut ditches totaling 13.60 acres and one (1) agricultural pond totaling 1.21 acre. Permanent filling impacts are proposed to the 14.81 acres of upland--cut ditches and pond for lot and road construction.

Mitigation Comments: Wetland mitigation will not be required for 14.81 acres of permanent impacts to the upland-cut ditches and pond pursuant to Section 3.2.2 of the Basis of Review. Under this section, wetland mitigation is not required for impacts to nonfunctional habitat.

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Sarasota Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, FL 34240-9711

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Sarasota Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

11 Permit No.: 43033161.000 Project Name: Jack's Branch Subdivision

6. Copies of the following documents in final form, as appropriate for the project, shall be submitted to the Sarasota Regulation Department:

A. homeowners, property owners, master association or condominium association articles of incorporation, and

B. declaration of protective covenants, deed restrictions or declaration of condominium.

The Permittee shall submit these documents either: (1) within 180 days after beginning construction or with the Statement of Completion and as-built construction plans if construction is completed prior to 180 days, or (2) prior to any lot or unit sales within the project served by the surface water management system, whichever occurs first.

7. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"Each property owner within the subdivision at the time of construction of a building, residence, or structure shall comply with the construction plans for the surface water management system approved and on file with the Southwest Florida Water Management District."

8. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Sarasota Service Office.

9. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration or systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration and retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed 18 months after operation is authorized and every 18 months thereafter.

10. Prior to installation of the filter media, the Permittee's contractor shall submit a certified test of the media to the Permittee's Professional Engineer and the District. The test shall address the following parameters: uniformity coefficient, effective grain size, sieve analysis, percent silts, clays and organic matter, and permeability testing (constant head). If testing indicates the actual permeability rate is less than the value specified in the permitted design, a permit modification will be required to lengthen the effluent filtration system. The Permittee shall also notify the Surface Water Regulation Manager, Sarasota Regulation Department, at least 48 hours prior to commencement of construction of the effluent filtration system, so that District staff may observe this construction activity.

11. All lots abutting wet detention ponds shall have the following language (or similar language as approved in writing by the Sarasota Regulation Department) as part of the deed restrictions.

"The lot owners shall not remove native vegetation (including cattails) that becomes established within the wet detention ponds abutting their property. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Lot owners shall address any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds to SWFWMD, Sarasota Service Office, Surface Water Regulation Manager."

12 Permit No.: 43033161.000 Project Name: Jack's Branch Subdivision

12. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

13. There shall be no residential beneficial occupancy of the project site until the proposed mining operation has ceased.

14. The existing wells, assigned District ID Nos. 0001 and 0002, must be shown to be properly abandoned through plugging by a professional well driller and a completion report for the plugging must be provided at the time of the as-built inspection for this construction permit.

15. No dewatering associated with this mining operation may occur until the appropriate Water Use Permit is obtained.

16. If prehistoric or historic artifacts, such as pottery or ceramics, stone tools or metal implements, or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American cultures, or early colonial or American settlement are encountered at any time within the project site area, the permitted project should cease all activities involving subsurface disturbance in the immediate vicinity of such discoveries. The Permittee, or other designee, should contact the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Review and Compliance Section at (850) 245-6333 or (800) 847-7278, as well as the appropriate permitting agency office. Project activities should not resume without verbal and/or written authorization from the Division of Historical Resources. In the event that unmarked human remains are encountered during permitted activities, all work shall stop immediately and the proper authorities notified in accordance with Section 872.05, Florida Statutes.

17. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

13 CONSENT ITEM 9

14 CONSENT ITEM 9 Default Date: December 19, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ERP GENERAL FOR MINOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

DENIAL OF GENERAL FOR MINOR SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 46031947.000 DATE OF DENIAL: December 18, 2007

Staff recommends denial of this application for permit due to lack of completeness, in accordance with District Rules 40D-1.1020 and 40.301, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.).

PROJECT NAME: Drew Park Townhomes OWNER/APPLICANT: Jana Goodman Jaco Development, Inc. 2924 West Coachman Avenue Tampa, FL 33611

ABSTRACT: The proposed project consists of a 1.32-acre residential development. The stormwater management system consists of two, inter-connected on-line detention ponds to treat the first ½" of stormwater runoff via percolation. The applicant has not adequately responded to the District’s April 4, 2007 “Clarification of Received Information” letter, which addressed this incomplete application in detail. The site is located on North Hubert Avenue, north of West Woodlawn Avenue, in Hillsborough County, Florida.

COUNTY: Hillsborough

SEC/TWP/RGE: 09/29S/18E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED: 1.32 acres

PROJECT SIZE: 1.32

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: October 17, 2006

AMENDED DATE: N/A

Information has not been provided that would allow the District to determine whether the following criteria have been met:

TECHNICAL AND LEGAL INFORMATION

1. The Applicant did not provide reasonable assurance that discharges from the site would meet state water quality standards. The calculations and construction drawings indicated that the required water quality treatment volume would not be provided in accordance with the criteria listed in Section 5.2 of the Basis of Review in the Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual. [Refer to the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rule 40D-40.301(1)(f), F.A.C.]

2. The applicant did not provide reasonable assurance that the operation and maintenance of the surface water management system will be conducted by an entity with legal and administrative capability of ensuring the activity will be undertaken in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit. The submitted draft homeowners association documents were incomplete and did not meet all the requirements listed in Section 2.6 of the Basis of Review in the Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual. [Refer to the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rule 40D-4.301(1)(i) and (j), F.A.C.]

15 CONSENT ITEM 10

16 CONSENT ITEM 10 Default Date: January 20, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43030040.000

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Estuary Golf Club Estates

GRANTED TO: Robinson Farms, Inc. Post Office Box 439 Parrish, FL 34219

ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a surface water management system to serve a 201.99 golf course and residential development. The project area is located in Manatee County, north of Manatee Avenue, between 99th Street Northwest and Perico Bayou. Information regarding the surface water management system, 100-year floodplain, wetlands and/or surface waters is stated below and on the permitted construction drawings for the project.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Estuary Golf Club Estates Community Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Manatee

SEC/TWP/RGE: 13,14,23,25,26/34S/16E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 201.99

PROJECT SIZE: 201.99 Acres

LAND USE: Single-family Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: November 30, 2005

AMENDED DATE: February 19, 2007

17 Permit No.: 43030040.000 Project Name: Estuary Golf Estates

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK 1-A 11.52 Wet Detention 1-B 2.47 Wet Detention 1-C 5.59 Wet Detention 1-D 0.95 Wet Detention 1-E 0.99 Wet Detention 2 1.80 Wet Detention 3-A 1.20 Wet Detention 3-B 1.40 Wet Detention 3-C 2.70 Wet Detention 4 0.62 Wet Detention 5 0.74 Wet Detention 6 5.56 No Treatment- Reuse Storage TOTAL 35.54

Comments: The activities approved for this project are for the construction of a golf course and a 20-lot single-family residential development, which includes the associated roadways, driveways, sidewalk facilities, and the surface water management system. Water quality treatment will be provided in the proposed surface water management system through a series of wet detention ponds. The project discharges directly into an Outstanding Florida Water body. Therefore, the surface water management system provides treatment for a volume 50 percent more than required for the type of treatment system. Attenuation is not required since the project discharges directly into the unrestricted tidal waters of Perico Bayou.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A

Comments: The FEMA floodplain is due to a tidal surge. Compensation is not required for fill encroachment; all finish floors are above the 100-year floodplain elevation. Historic basin storage impacts associated with impacts to wetlands and other surface waters are addressed in the hydrologic/hydraulic drainage modeling.

18 Permit No.: 43030040.000 Project Name: Estuary Golf Estates

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 4 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* SW-2 0.66 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-3 1.18 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upland-Ditches 2.90 0.00 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hydric-Ditches 0.71 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 5.45 0.005.45 0.00 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: There are no wetlands located within the project area. However, wetlands are located immediately adjacent to the defined project area and no wetland impacts are proposed. The project contains 1.84 acres of ponds excavated within uplands and 3.61 acres of ditches. The construction of this development will impact all of the ponds and ditches within the project area.

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation is not required for impacts to upland-cut ponds or ditches pursuant to Section 3.2.2.2 and 3.2.2 of the Basis of Review. Under these sections, mitigation is not required for impacts to non-functional habitat.

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Sarasota Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, FL 34240-9711

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

19 Permit No.: 43030040.000 Project Name: Estuary Golf Estates

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Sarasota Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

7. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Sarasota Service Office.

8. Copies of the following documents in final form, as appropriate for the project, shall be submitted to the Sarasota Service Office:

A. homeowners, property owners, master association or condominium association articles of incorporation. B. declaration of protective covenants, deed restrictions or declaration of condominium.

The Permittee shall submit these documents either: (1) within 180 days after beginning construction or within the Statement of Completion and as-built construction plans if construction is completed prior to 180 days, or (2) prior to any lot or unit sales within the project served by the surface water management system, whichever occurs first.

9. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"Each property owner within the subdivision at the time of construction of a building, residence, or structure shall comply with the construction plans for the surface water management system approved and on file with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD)."

10. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

20 Permit No.: 43030040.000 Project Name: Estuary Golf Estates

11. Within 120 days of commencement of construction, the Permittee shall complete the construction of the 29" x 45" bypass piping system and perimeter north-south ditch improvements shown on Sheet 5 of 27 of the District-approved construction drawings. In the event construction of the referenced bypass piping system and ditch improvements cannot be completed by June 1, 2008, the Permittee shall construct a stabilized swale of adequate capacity, in a similar alignment as the outfall pipe and ditch improvements, to provide positive drainage for adjacent easterly property. Works associated with this swale alternative shall also be completed by June 1, 2008. The performance time frames in this Specific Condition include the submittal of partial as-built drawings and photographic documentation of the completed works. Following the completion of the described works, and appropriate notification to the District, the District shall authorize the prompt severance (backfilling or plugging) of the hydraulic connection between the north-south ditch and east-west ditch, as shown on Sheet 5 of 27 of the approved construction drawings and located directly east of the 14th Hole Fairway.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

21 CONSENT ITEM 11

22 CONSENT ITEM 11 Default Date: February 7, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43023781.018

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

GRANTED TO: Pasco County Development Services 7530 Little Road, Suite 320 New Port Richey, FL 34654

ABSTRACT: This permit is for the construction of a new surface water management system to serve ~ 1.5 miles of new roadway within a 218.76-acre project area. The project site is located on the north side of SR 54, approximately one mile west of US 41, in southern Pasco County. Adjacent permitted facilities, which abut the project, include LeDantec – Phases 1A and 1B (ERP No. 44023781.002) to the south and Concord Station - Phase 1, Unit G and Phase 2, Unit C (ERP No. 44023781.007) to the west. Information regarding the surface water management system and wetlands is included in the tables below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Pasco County Development Services

COUNTY: Pasco

SEC/TWP/RGE: 15,21,22/26S/18E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 218.76

PROJECT SIZE: 218.76 Acres

LAND USE: Road Project

DATE APPLICATION FILED: December 18, 2006

AMENDED DATE: November 9,2007

23 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK J3 0.33 Wet Detention Wetland J 1.41 Wet Detention K1 0.24 Wet Detention K3 3.82 Wet Detention L2 1.01 Wet Detention L3 0.35 Wet Detention N3 1.29 Wet Detention O1 0.48 Wet Detention O2 0.30 Wet Detention O4 2.58 Wet Detention TOTAL 11.81

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 NE Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: NE = No Encroachment MI = Minimal Impact based on modeling of existing stages vs. post-project encroachment. N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 8 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Wetland H 37.68 36.43 1.25 0.85 0.00 0.00 Wetland J 0.83 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland L 2.39 0.00 2.39 1.12 0.00 0.00 Wetland M 1.30 0.00 1.30 0.61 0.00 0.00 Wetland N 0.79 0.00 0.79 0.37 0.00 0.00 Wetland N2 1.66 0.26 1.40 0.46 0.00 0.00 Wetland O 64.88 64.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland Q 48.29 48.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 157.82 150.697.13 3.41 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

24 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

Wetland Comments: There are 157.82 acres of wetlands within the project area. The project proposes to impact 7.13 acres of wetland.

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 7 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Upland Buffer Enhance 0.00 0.00 12.12 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R1 1.06 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R2 4.18 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 R3 2.67 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C2 0.70 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C3 1.14 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland Preservation 0.00 0.00 149.59 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 9.75 1.23161.71 2.20 0.000.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: Project construction will result in 7.13 acres of wetland impacts with 3.41 units of functional loss. The loss is mitigated by the creation of 1.84 acres of wetlands (C2 and C3), the restoration of 7.91 acres of wetlands (R1, R2, and R3), the enhancement of 10.98 acres of upland buffers, and the preservation/enhancement of 149.59 acres of forested wetlands. The mitigation results in 3.43 units of functional gain. The excess functional gain is not available for future applications.

A regulatory conservation easement is required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Brooksville Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

25 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Brooksville Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA - Buffer Enhancement

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a vegetated upland buffer.

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES 75 Vaccinium corymbosum Myrica cerifera Muhlenbergia capillaris Calicarpa americana Spartina bakeri

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES 50 Ilex cassine Acer rubrum Ulmus americana Pinus elliottii Quercus laurifolia

E. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting is unacceptable except in those locations where the buffer area is 15 feet or less.

F. Species composition of recruiting vegetation is indicative of the ecotype specified in criterion "A".

26 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

G. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA - R2

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. The upland buffer mitigation will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the addition or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Cypress Wetland with hardwoods, as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth, and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the ecotype specified in criterion "A."

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES A 80 Panicum hemitomon Saururus cernuus Pontederia cordata Sagittaria lancifolia Cephalanthus occidentalis

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES C 100 Taxodium spp. Nyssa sylvatica 100 Taxodium spp. Itea virginica Persea palustris Ilex cassine Pinus elliottii

E. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting will be unacceptable and will require a replant.

27 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

F. Species composition of recruiting vegetation is indicative of the ecotype specified in criterion "A".

G. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed 5 percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA - C2

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Freshwater Marsh with Cornus center , as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES A 100 Cephalanthus occidentalis Appropriate herbs in all zones Panicum hemitomon B 100 Panicum hemitomon Pontederia cordata C 75 Saururus cernuus Sagittaria lancifolia

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES C 75 Cornus foemina

28 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

E. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

F. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting is unacceptable and will require replanting.

G. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

H. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREAS - C3 and R3

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. The upland buffer mitigation will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the addition or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Cypress Wetland with hardwoods, as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth, and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the ecotype specified in criterion "A."

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES A 80 Panicum hemitomon Saururus cernuus Pontederia cordata Sagittaria lancifolia Cephalanthus occidentalis

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

29 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES C 100 Taxodium spp. Nyssa sylvatica B 100 Taxodium spp. Itea virginica Persea palustris Ilex cassine Pinus elliottii

E. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting will be unacceptable except in those locations where the buffer area is 15 feet or less.

F. Species composition of recruiting vegetation is indicative of the ecotype specified in criterion "A".

G. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of

30 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected semi-annually.

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

11. In the event wetland impacts for which the preservation parcel is providing mitigation are not conducted, the permittee will notify the District in writing. Upon District verification that these wetland impacts have not occurred, the District will release any executed and recorded conservation easement.

12. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

13. The Permittee shall commence construction of the mitigation areas within 30 days of wetland impacts, if wetland impacts occur between February 1 and August 31. If wetland impacts occur between September 1 and January 31, construction of the mitigation areas shall commence by March 1. In either case, construction of the mitigation areas shall be completed within 120 days of the commencement date unless a time extension is approved in writing by the District.

14. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

15. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

16. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

31 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

A. wetland buffers B. upland preservation C. limits of approved wetland impacts

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

17. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

18. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"No owner of property within the subdivision may construct or maintain any building, residence, or structure, or undertake or perform any activity in the wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas, upland conservation areas and drainage easements described in the approved permit and recorded plat of the subdivision, unless prior approval is received from the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville Regulation Department."

19. Rights-of-way and easement locations necessary to construct, operate and maintain all facilities, which constitute the permitted surface water management system (including wetlands and wetland buffers), shall be shown on the final plat recorded in the County Public Records. Documentation of this plat recording shall be submitted to the District with the Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity Form, and prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the site.

20. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

21. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Brooksville Service Office.

22. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease.

23. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

24. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

32 Permit No: 43023781.018 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard North of Mentmore

25. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

26. Title Insurance commitment and draft conservation easement are to be provided for District review at least 60 days prior to any wetland impacts. The commitment and draft conservation easement should be described to specifically include only the mitigation for this permit. The conservation easement is to be distinguished from those areas preserved in the Concord Station Sunlake Blvd from SR 54 to Mentmore (43023781.022) permit.

27. The conservation easement is to be dedicated to The Southwest Florida Water Management District.

28. No wetland impacts are to occur prior to recordation of the final conservation easement except through a formal modification to this permit.

29. Signs are to be installed at the wetland buffers and mitigation areas every 100' or less. The signs shall be printed as shown on the Wetland and Impact and Mitigation Plan sheet received November 9, 2007.

30. All construction within the project area is prohibited, until the permittee acquires the right of entry by dedicated easement or order of taking under its power of eminent domain.

31. The flood study used to establish upstream inflows into the project area is preliminary and is subject to refinement by a subsequent flood study currently under review by the District and the Florida Department of Transportation. If the results of the final approved flood study reveal the inflows from upstream property exceed the inflows estimated from the preliminary flood study, the permittee shall modify this permit to address changes in floodplain storage and conveyance impacts.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

33 CONSENT ITEM 12

34 CONSENT ITEM 12 Default Date: January 16, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43023781.022

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

GRANTED TO: Pasco County Development Services 7530 Little Road, Suite 320 New Port Richey, FL 34654

ABSTRACT: This permit is for construction of a new surface water management system to serve an ~ 0.77 mile of new roadway within a 41.47-acre project area. The project site is located on the north side of SR 54, approximately one mile west of US 41, in southern Pasco County. Adjacent permitted facilities which abut the project include DOT-SR 54/Meadowbrook Dr. #14570-1521 (ERP No. 43016251.000) to the south, Pasco County – High School DDD and Middle School EE (ERP No. 44023781.013) to the west, and LeDantec – Phases 1A and 1B (ERP No. 44023781.002) to the north and east. Information regarding the surface water management system and wetlands is contained in the tables below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Pasco County Development Services

COUNTY: Pasco

SEC/TWP/RGE: 21,28/26S/18E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 41.47

PROJECT SIZE: 41.47 Acres

LAND USE: Road Project

DATE APPLICATION FILED: April 26, 2007

AMENDED DATE: N/A

35 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK SUN 2.22 Wet Detention TOTAL 2.22

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 NE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: NE = No Encroachment MI = Minimal Impact based on modeling of existing stages vs. post-project encroachment. N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 1 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Wetland II 4.36 0.00 4.36 2.46 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 4.36 0.004.36 2.46 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: There are 4.36 acres of wetlands within the project area. The project proposes to impact all the wetlands in the project area.

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 3 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Upland Buffer Enhance 0.00 0.00 9.98 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C4 2.20 0.86 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 C5 5.82 0.91 0.000.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 8.02 1.77 9.980.71 0.000.00 0.00 0.00

36 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

Mitigation Comments: Project construction will result in 4.36 acres of wetland impacts with 2.46 units of functional loss. Mitigation for the loss is provided by 9.98 acres of upland buffer enhancement and 8.02 acres of wetland creation. The mitigation results in 2.48 units of functional gain. The excess functional gain is not available for future applications.

A regulatory conservation easement is required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Brooksville Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Brooksville Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION - AREA C4

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

37 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Freshwater Marsh, as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES C 100 Cephalanthus occidentalis Appropriate herbs in all zones Itea virginica B 100 Panicum hemitomon Itea virginica Cladium A 75 Saururus cernuus Pontedaria lancifolia Canna flaccida

D. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

E. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting is unacceptable and will require a replant.

F. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

G. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION - AREA C5

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

38 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Cypress and Hardwood Forest, as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES D 85 Panicum hemitomon Appropriate natives in all zones C 100 Cephalanthus occidentalis 100 Pontedaria cordata Sagittaria lancifolia A 75 Saururus cernuus

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES D 85 Pinus elliottii Ilex cassine Magnolia virginiana Itea virginica C 100 Persea palustrus Itea virginica B 100 Taxodiumspp. A 75 Nyssa sylvatica Taxodiumspp

E. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

F. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting is unacceptable and will require a replant.

G. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

H. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

39 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA - Buffer Enhancement

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. The upland buffer mitigation will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the addition or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a vegetated upland buffer.

B. Topography, water depth, and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the ecotype specified in criterion "A."

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species shall meet the criteria specified:

PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES 75 Vaccinium corymbosum Myrica cerifera Muhlenbergia capillaris Calicarpa americana Spartina bakeri

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT COVER SPECIES SPECIES 50 Ilex cassine Acer rubrum Ulmus americana Pinus elliottii Quercus laurifolia

E. All plants are to be planted in naturalistic clusters. Linear planting will be unacceptable except in those locations where the buffer area is 15 feet or less.

F. Species composition of recruiting vegetation is indicative of the ecotype specified in criterion "A".

G. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

These criteria must be achieved within five years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

40 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected semi-annually.

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

41 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

11. In the event wetland impacts for which the preservation parcel is providing mitigation are not conducted, the permittee will notify the District in writing. Upon District verification that these wetland impacts have not occurred, the District will release any executed and recorded conservation easement.

12. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

13. The Permittee shall commence construction of the mitigation areas within 30 days of wetland impacts, if wetland impacts occur between February 1 and August 31. If wetland impacts occur between September 1 and January 31, construction of the mitigation areas shall commence by March 1. In either case, construction of the mitigation areas shall be completed within 120 days of the commencement date unless a time extension is approved in writing by the District.

14. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

15. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

16. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland buffers B. upland preservation C. limits of approved wetland impacts

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

17. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

18. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"No owner of property within the subdivision may construct or maintain any building, residence, or structure, or undertake or perform any activity in the wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas, upland conservation areas and drainage easements described in the approved permit and recorded plat of the subdivision, unless prior approval is received from the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville Regulation Department."

19. Rights-of-way and easement locations necessary to construct, operate and maintain all facilities, which constitute the permitted surface water management system (including all wetlands and wetland buffers), shall be shown on the final plat recorded in the County Public Records. Documentation of this plat recording shall be submitted to the District with the Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity Form, and prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the site.

42 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

20. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

21. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Brooksville Service Office.

22. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease.

23. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

24. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

25. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

26. All construction within the project area is prohibited, until the permittee acquires the right of entry by dedicated easement or order of taking under its power of eminent domain.

27. The flood study used to establish upstream inflows into the project area is preliminary and is subject to refinement by a subsequent flood study currently under review by the District and the Florida Department of Transportation. If the results of the final approved flood study reveal the inflows from upstream property exceed the inflows estimated from the preliminary flood study, the permittee shall modify this permit to address changes in floodplain storage and conveyance impacts.

28. Title Insurance commitment and draft conservation easement are to be provided for District review at least 60 days prior to any wetland impacts. The commitment and draft conservation easement should be described to specifically include only the mitigation for this permit. The conservation easement is to be distinguished from those areas preserved in the Concord Station Sunlake Blvd N of Mentmore (ERP No. 43023781.018).

43 Permit No: 43023781.022 Project Name: Concord Station Sunlake Boulevard from SR 54 to Mentmore Boulevard

29. No wetland impacts are to occur prior to recordation of the final conservation easement except through a formal modification to this permit.

30. Signs are to be installed at the wetland buffer every 100 feet or less. The signs shall be printed as shown on the Wetland and Impact and Mitigation Plan sheet received October 18, 2007.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

44 CONSENT ITEM 13

45 CONSENT ITEM 13 Default Date: February 6, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43028022.001

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Legacy Hills

GRANTED TO: Legacy Hills, LLC 215 Celebration Place, Suite 500 Celebration, FL 34747

ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a new surface water management system to serve a proposed residential development within a project and total land area of 40.31 acres known as Legacy Hills. The project is located at the SW corner of the intersection of US 39 and Chancey Road in the City of Zephyrhills, Pasco County. Information regarding the surface water management system and wetlands is contained within the tables below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Legacy Hills, LLC

COUNTY: Pasco

SEC/TWP/RGE: 23/26S/21E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 40.31

PROJECT SIZE: 40.31 Acres

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: November 13, 2006

AMENDED DATE: N/A

46 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK A 1.29 Permanent Pool B 1.92 Permanent Pool C 1.69 Permanent Pool D 2.03 Permanent Pool TOTAL 6.93

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 7.22 13.52 EE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: EE = Equivalent Excavation to offset project filling per Section 4.4 of the District's Basis of Review; MI = Minimal Impact based on modeling of existing stages vs. post-project encroachment. N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 7 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* 2 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 3A/3B 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.29 0.00 0.00 4 0.32 0.30 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 6A/6B 0.91 0.00 0.91 0.33 0.00 0.00 7A/7B 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 8A 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 9A 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 2.22 0.301.92 0.62 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The project contains 2.22 acres of wetlands and surface waters. Project construction will result in 1.92 acres of permanent impacts.

47 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 1 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain M-1 2.30 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 2.30 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: To mitigate for wetland impacts the Permittee will create 2.30 acres of wetlands from uplands. Pursuant to the ERP Basis of Review (Subsections 3.2.2.1 and 3.2.2.2) five of the wetland/surface water impacts, totaling 0.50 acres, provide no significant habitat; therefore no habitat mitigation is required for these impacts.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Brooksville Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Brooksville Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

48 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA M-1

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a freshwater marsh fringed with a mixed forested wetland and having a shrubby upland buffer, as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species (or plant species providing the same function) shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE PERCENT SPECIES COVER Woody Buffer 30 Myrica cerifera Pinus elliottii Ilex cassine Liquidambar styraciflua Upper 80 Spartina bakeri Panicum hemitomon Paspalum distichum Iris hexagona Middle 80 Panicum hemitomon Pontederia cordata Sagittaria lancifolia Spartina bakeri Juncus effusus Paspalum distichum Iris hexagona Middle Shrub 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis Lower 80 Pontederia cordata Sagittaria lancifolia Panicum hemitomon Lower Shrub 2 Cephalanthus occidentalis

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than three years shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE DENSITY (#/acre) SPECIES

49 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

ZONE PERCENT SPECIES COVER Upper 30 Quercus laurifolia Ilex cassine Acer rubrum Middle 5 Taxodium distichum Lower 5 Taxodium distichum

E. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

F. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed 5 percent at any location in the mitigation site and 5 percent for the entire mitigation site.

G. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

This criterion must be achieved within seven years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of

50 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected annually.

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

11. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

12. The Permittee shall, within 120 days of initial wetland impact and prior to beneficial use of the site, complete all aspects of the mitigation plan, including the grading, mulching, and planting, in accordance with the design details in the final approved construction drawings.

13. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

14. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

15. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland and surface water areas B. wetland buffers C. limits of approved wetland impacts

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

51 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

16. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

17. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"No owner of property within the subdivision may construct or maintain any building, residence, or structure, or undertake or perform any activity in the wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas, upland conservation areas and drainage easements described in the approved permit and recorded plat of the subdivision, unless prior approval is received from the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Brooksville Regulation Department."

18. Rights-of-way and easement locations necessary to construct, operate and maintain all facilities, which constitute the permitted surface water management system (including wetlands and wetland buffers), shall be shown on the final plat recorded in the County Public Records. Documentation of this plat recording shall be submitted to the District with the Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity Form, and prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the site.

19. Copies of the following documents in final form, as appropriate for the project, shall be submitted to the Brooksville Regulation Department:

A. homeowners, property owners, master association or condominium association articles of incorporation, and

B. declaration of protective covenants, deed restrictions or declaration of condominium.

The Permittee shall submit these documents either: (1) within 180 days after beginning construction or with the Statement of Completion and as-built construction plans if construction is completed prior to 180 days, or (2) prior to any lot or unit sales within the project served by the surface water management system, whichever occurs first.

20. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"Each property owner within the subdivision at the time of construction of a building, residence, or structure shall comply with the construction plans for the surface water management system approved and on file with the Southwest Florida Water Management District."

21. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

22. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Brooksville Service Office.

23. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease.

52 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

24. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

25. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

26. The Permittee shall execute the final draft financial responsibility instrument approved by the District prior to initiating activities authorized by this permit. The final draft financial responsibility instrument shall be consistent with the draft instrument submitted with the permit application and approved by this permit.

27. The Permittee shall submit the original executed financial responsibility instrument to the District at the address below:

Brooksville Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899

28. The Permittee shall provide the financial responsibility required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C., until the District determines that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met; or the District approves a request to transfer the permit to a new owner and receives an acceptable substitute financial responsibility mechanism from the new owner.

29. The Permittee may request, in writing, a release from the obligation to maintain certain amounts of the financial assurance required by this permit as phases of the mitigation plan are successfully completed. The request shall include documentation that the mitigation phase or phases have been completed and payment for their completion has been made. Following the District's verification that the phase or phases have been completed in accordance with the mitigation plan, the District will authorize release from the applicable portion of the financial assurance obligation.

30. The District will notify the Permittee within 30 days of its determination that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met. Concurrent with this notification, the District will authorize, in writing, the appropriate entity to cancel or terminate the financial responsibility instrument.

31. The Permittee's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit pertaining to the successful completion of all mitigation activities in accordance with the mitigation plan shall be deemed a violation of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. In addition to other remedies that the District may have, the District may draw upon the financial responsibility instrument for any funds necessary to remedy a violation, upon such notice to the Permittee as may be specified in the financial responsibility instrument or if none, upon reasonable notice.

32. The Permittee shall notify the District by certified mail within 10 days of the commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding:

53 Permit No.: 43028022.001 Project Name: Legacy Hills

A. To dissolve the Permittee; B. To place the Permittee into receivership; C. For entry of an order for relief against the Permittee under Title XI (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code.; and D. To assign of the Permittee's assets for the benefit of its creditors under Chapter 727, Florida Statutes.

33. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the issuing institution; or the suspension or revocation of the authority of the issuing institution to issue letters of credit or performance bonds, the Permittee shall be deemed without the required financial assurance and shall have 60 days to reestablish the financial assurance required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C.

34. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D-4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

35. The Permittee will maintain Ponds A and B for nuisance and exotic plant species in perpetuity. As described on Sheet 29 of the approved construction drawings, Pond A's edges and littoral zone and Pond B's edges will be maintained. Maintenance will mean the removal of nuisance and exotic plant species so that coverage of these species does not exceed 5 percent within the specified areas.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

54 CONSENT ITEM 14

55 CONSENT ITEM 14 Default Date: January 23, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43029915.002

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: McAlpin Excavation

GRANTED TO: Ken McAlpin 2000 North Highland Avenue Tarpon Springs, FL 34688

ABSTRACT: This permit application is for the expansion of an existing borrow pit and construction of the related conveyance and stormwater management facilities. The existing borrow pit will be deepened to secure additional fill material. The existing bottom elevation of -5.0 feet NGVD will be advanced to a depth of -28.0 feet NGVD. Soils test information that is provided demonstrates that the borrow pit will be constructed within sandy medium and that the confinement will be maintained intact. Supporting calculations demonstrate that the runoff from a 100-year/24-hour storm will be retained within the borrow pit without discharge. A hydraulic wet dredge in conjunction with a settling pond will be used to excavate the borrow pit. Dewatering for construction of the borrow pit is not proposed.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Ken McAlpin

COUNTY: Pinellas

SEC/TWP/RGE: 08/27S/16E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 55.37

PROJECT SIZE: 55.37 Acres

LAND USE: Commercial

DATE APPLICATION FILED: February 14, 2007

AMENDED DATE: June 19, 2007

56 Permit No.: 43029915.002 Project Name: McAlpin Excavation

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK Borrow Pond 6.65 N/A TOTAL 6.65

Comments: Supporting calculations demonstrate that the runoff from a 100-year/24-hour storm will be retained within the borrow pit without discharge.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type Result (feet) 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 1 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Surface Water Pond 2.31 0.00 0.20 0.05 2.11 0.00 TOTAL 2.31 0.000.20 0.05 2.11 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: There are 2.31 acres of an excavated lake within the project area. The proposed expansion and deepening of the borrow pit will permanently impact 0.2-acre of the vegetated wetland habitat provided by the pond and temporarily impact 2.11 acres of the surface water area of the pond. The wetland impacts were reviewed utilizing the Unified Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). The wetland impacts will result in the loss of 0.05 functional wetland units.

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 1 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Mitigation Area 0.70 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 0.70 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: The 0.2-acre of wetland impacts will be offset by the creation of a 0.7- acre littoral area for the expanded lake. The wetland mitigation was reviewed using the UMAM. The creation of the 0.7-acre of herbaceous wetland will result in the gain of 0.32 functional wetland units. The wetland impacts require the use of 0.05 functional wetland units of wetland mitigation to offset the wetland impacts. The remaining 0.27 functional wetland units will be utilized to offset the secondary impacts from the temporary disturbance and temporal loss of wetland functions of the 2.11 acre of surface waters.

57 Permit No.: 43029915.002 Project Name: McAlpin Excavation

Wetland impacts and related mitigation Wetland: Surface Water Pond Impact Areas: Wetland -1 Mitigation: Mitigation Area

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Tampa Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 U.S. Highway 301 , FL 33637-6759

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Tampa Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will

58 Permit No.: 43029915.002 Project Name: McAlpin Excavation

be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Freshwater Marsh (641) as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species (or plant species providing the same function) shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE STRATUM % COVER SPECIES 1 Herbaceous 80 Juncus effusus Spartina bakeri 2 Herbaceous 80 Scirpus validus Pontederia cordata 3. Harbaceous 80 Sagittaria lancifolia Nyphaea odorata

D. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

E. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent at any location in the mitigation site and five percent for the entire mitigation site.

F. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

This criterion must be achieved within three years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

59 Permit No.: 43029915.002 Project Name: McAlpin Excavation

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected annually.

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

11. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

12. The Permittee shall, within 90 days of initial wetland impact and prior to beneficial use of the site, complete all aspects of the mitigation plan, including the grading, mulching, and planting, in accordance with the design details in the final approved construction drawings received by the District and information submitted in support of the application.

13. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

60 Permit No.: 43029915.002 Project Name: McAlpin Excavation

14. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

15. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland and surface water areas, B. wetland buffers. and C. limits of approved wetland impacts.

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

16. Wetland boundaries as shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

17. The Permittee shall notify the District at least 48 hours prior to the maximum excavation of each retention/detention pond and must notify the District upon the completion of each retention/detention pond.

18. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease.

19. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

20. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

21. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

22. Monitoring well water elevation reports shall be recorded daily and submitted to the Tampa Service Office, referencing the permit number, on a monthly basis.

61 Permit No.: 43029915.002 Project Name: McAlpin Excavation

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

62 CONSENT ITEM 15

63 CONSENT ITEM 15 Default Date: January 24, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 49000887.089

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

GRANTED TO: Drummond Company, Inc. 3604 Harden Boulevard Lakeland, FL 33803

ABSTRACT: This permit authorization is for the construction of a surface water management system serving an 18.70-acre, 16-building, 102-unit condominium project as named above and as shown on the approved construction drawings. The project is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Harden Boulevard and the Polk Parkway in the city of Lakeland, Polk County. Information regarding the surface water management systems, 100-year floodplain and wetlands is contained within the tables and comments below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: TCR Grasslands West Condominium Association, Inc. 495 North Keller Road Maitland, FL32751

COUNTY: Polk

SEC/TWP/RGE: 35/28S/23E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 1,400.00

PROJECT SIZE: 18.70 Acres

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: July 20, 2007

AMENDED DATE: N/A

64 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK 1 2.65 Wet Detention TOTAL 2.65

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 NE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: NE = No Encroachment N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

Comments: Historic basin storage impacts associated with impacts to wetlands and other surface waters are addressed in the hydrologic/hydraulic modeling.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 1 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Wetland W6 1.20 0.00 1.20 0.52 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1.20 0.001.20 0.52 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The project area includes a 1.20-acre non-forested wetland. Permanent impacts are proposed to the 1.20-acre wetland.

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 1 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Mitigation Area A 1.75 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1.75 0.650.00 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for permanent impacts to a 1.20-acre non-forested wetland is provided by creation of a 1.75-acre non-forested wetland.

65 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

The functional loss of 0.52 due to the wetland impacts associated with this project is offset by the functional gain of 0.65 provided by the mitigation. The functional loss and functional gain were calculated using the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Methodology (Ch. 62-345, F.A.C.).

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Bartow Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA A

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

66 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Freshwater Marsh (FLUCCS # 641) as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species (or plant species providing the same function) shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE % COVER SPECIES A 85 Andropogon glomeratus Juncus effusus Muhlenbergia capillaris Panicum hemitomon Spartina bakeri B 85 Eleocharis sp. Nymphaea odorata Panicum hemitomon Pontederia cordata Sagittaria sp.

D. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

E. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five (5) percent at any location in the mitigation site and five (5) percent for the entire mitigation site.

F. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

This criterion must be achieved within three (3) years of mitigation area construction. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

67 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected semi-annually.

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

11. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

12. The Permittee shall commence construction of the mitigation areas within 30 days of wetland impacts, if wetland impacts occur between February 1 and August 31. If wetland impacts occur between September 1 and January 31, construction of the mitigation areas shall commence by March 1. In either case, construction of the mitigation areas shall be completed within 120 days of the commencement date unless a time extension is approved in writing by the District.

13. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

68 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

14. Rights-of-way and easement locations necessary to construct, operate and maintain all facilities, which constitute the permitted surface water management system, shall be shown on the final plat recorded in the County Public Records. Documentation of this plat recording shall be submitted to the District with the Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity Form, and prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the site. The plat shall include the locations and limits of the following:

A. all wetlands

15. Copies of the following documents in final form, as appropriate for the project, shall be submitted to the Bartow Regulation Department:

A. homeowners, property owners, master association or condominium association articles of incorporation, and

B. declaration of protective covenants, deed restrictions or declaration of condominium.

The Permittee shall submit these documents either: (1) within 180 days after beginning construction or with the Statement of Completion and as-built construction plans if construction is completed prior to 180 days, or (2) prior to any lot or unit sales within the project served by the surface water management system, whichever occurs first.

16. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"Each property owner within the subdivision at the time of construction of a building, residence, or structure shall comply with the construction plans for the surface water management system approved and on file with the Southwest Florida Water Management District."

17. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

18. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Bartow Service Office.

19. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

20. The Permittee shall execute the final draft financial responsibility instrument approved by the District prior to initiating activities authorized by this permit. The final draft financial responsibility instrument shall be consistent with the draft instrument submitted with the permit application and approved by this permit.

21. The Permittee shall submit the original executed financial responsibility instrument to the District at the address below:

69 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

22. The Permittee shall provide the financial responsibility required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C., until the District determines that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met; or the District approves a request to transfer the permit to a new owner and receives an acceptable substitute financial responsibility mechanism from the new owner.

23. The Permittee may request, in writing, a release from the obligation to maintain certain amounts of the financial assurance required by this permit as phases of the mitigation plan are successfully completed. The request shall include documentation that the mitigation phase or phases have been completed and payment for their completion has been made. Following the District's verification that the phase or phases have been completed in accordance with the mitigation plan, the District will authorize release from the applicable portion of the financial assurance obligation.

24. The District will notify the Permittee within 30 days of its determination that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met. Concurrent with this notification, the District will authorize, in writing, the appropriate entity to cancel or terminate the financial responsibility instrument.

25. The Permittee's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit pertaining to the successful completion of all mitigation activities in accordance with the mitigation plan shall be deemed a violation of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. In addition to other remedies that the District may have, the District may draw upon the financial responsibility instrument for any funds necessary to remedy a violation, upon such notice to the Permittee as may be specified in the financial responsibility instrument or if none, upon reasonable notice.

26. The Permittee shall notify the District by certified mail within 10 days of the commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding:

A. To dissolve the Permittee; B. To place the Permittee into receivership; C. For entry of an order for relief against the Permittee under Title XI (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code.; and D. To assign of the Permittee's assets for the benefit of its creditors under Chapter 727, Florida Statutes.

27. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the issuing institution; or the suspension or revocation of the authority of the issuing institution to issue letters of credit or performance bonds, the Permittee shall be deemed without the required financial assurance and shall have 60 days to reestablish the financial assurance required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C.

28. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

70 Permit No.: 49000887.089 Project Name: Trammell Crow Residential at Lakeside Village

29. This Construction Permit No. 49000887.089, alters previously issued Construction Permit No. 49000887.038, and affects only the project area identified in this Application submittal.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

71 CONSENT ITEM 16

72 CONSENT ITEM 16 Default Date: December 23, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. 43027132.001

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

GRANTED TO: Paul Richard Yager and Henry Martin Yager as the duly appointed Co-personal Representatives of the Estate of Hilda M. Yager 2816 South MacDill Avenue Tampa, FL 33629

Paul Richard Yager and Henry Martin Yager as the sole Co-Managers of ATP Holdings, LLC 2816 South MacDill Avenue Tampa, FL 33629

Paul Richard Yager and Henry Martin Yager Individually and as Co-trustees of the J. Allen Yager Security Trust, dated April 23, 1998 2816 South MacDill Avenue Tampa, FL 33629

ABSTRACT: This permit authorization is for the modification of the wetland mitigation area for a 167.50- acre residential development and a commercial parcel previously authorized by Permit No. 43027132.000. The 3.88-acre project area includes the previously authorized wetland creation area, and the new wetland creation and adjacent upland buffer. The project is located southeast of the intersection of Drane Field Road and Pipkin Road in the city of Lakeland, Polk County. Information regarding the surface water management systems, 100-year floodplain and wetlands is contained within the tables and comments below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Hunterfield Homeowners Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Polk

SEC/TWP/RGE: 2/29S/23E

73 Permit No.: 43027132.001 Project Name: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 443.71

PROJECT SIZE: 3.88 Acres

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: May 31, 2006

AMENDED DATE: N/A

I. Water Quantity/Quality

There are no proposed changes to the previously authorized detention ponds and associated outfall structures that provide water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 NE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: NE = No Encroachment N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

III. Environmental Considerations

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 1 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain 1 1.41 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1.41 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for previously authorized impacts to 1.61 acres of herbaceous wetlands is provided by 1.41 acres of herbaceous wetland creation (Mitigation area 1). This wetland mitigation replaces mitigation previously authorized by ERP 43027132.000. The wetland impacts were also authorized by ERP 43027132.000, and are not included in this permit.

The previously authorized wetland impacts and mitigation were permitted prior to implementation of Chapter 62-345, F.A.C., Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). Therefore, no UMAM assessment information is included in this mitigation modification.

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

74 Permit No.: 43027132.001 Project Name: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Bartow Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA MITIGATION AREA: 1

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Freshwater Marsh (FLUCCS #641) wetland as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

75 Permit No.: 43027132.001 Project Name: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

C. Planted or recruited herbaceous or shrub species (or plant species providing the same function) shall meet the criteria specified:

ZONE % COVER SPECIES A 85 Pontederia cordata Juncus effusus B 85 Juncus effusus C 85 Spartina bakeri Myrica cerifera

D. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

E. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent (5%) at any location in the mitigation site and five percent (5%) for the entire mitigation site.

F. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of

maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected semi-annually.

76 Permit No.: 43027132.001 Project Name: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

11. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

12. The Permittee shall, within 60 days of initial wetland impact and prior to beneficial use of the site, complete all aspects of the mitigation plan, including the grading, mulching, and planting, in accordance with the design details in the final approved construction drawings received by the District on September 24, 2007, and information submitted in support of the application.

13. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

14. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

15. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland buffers

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

16. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

17. This modification, Construction Permit No. 43027132.001, amends the previously issued Construction Permit No. 43027132.000, and changes conditions 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 27. All other original permit conditions remain in effect.

77 Permit No.: 43027132.001 Project Name: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

18. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

19. The Permittee shall execute the final draft financial responsibility instrument approved by the District prior to initiating activities authorized by this permit. The final draft financial responsibility instrument shall be consistent with the draft instrument submitted with the permit application and approved by this permit.

20. The Permittee shall submit the original executed financial responsibility instrument to the District at the address below:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

21. The Permittee shall provide the financial responsibility required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C., until the District determines that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met; or the District approves a request to transfer the permit to a new owner and receives an acceptable substitute financial responsibility mechanism from the new owner.

22. The District will notify the Permittee within 30 days of its determination that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met. Concurrent with this notification, the District will authorize, in writing, the appropriate entity to cancel or terminate the financial responsibility instrument.

23. The Permittee's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit pertaining to the successful completion of all mitigation activities in accordance with the mitigation plan shall be deemed a violation of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. In addition to other remedies that the District may have, the District may draw upon the financial responsibility instrument for any funds necessary to remedy a violation, upon such notice to the Permittee as may be specified in the financial responsibility instrument or if none, upon reasonable notice.

24. The Permittee shall notify the District by certified mail within 10 days of the commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding:

A. To dissolve the Permittee; B. To place the Permittee into receivership; C. For entry of an order for relief against the Permittee under Title XI (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code.; and D. To assign of the Permittee's assets for the benefit of its creditors under Chapter 727, Florida Statutes.

25. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the issuing institution; or the suspension or revocation of the authority of the issuing institution to issue letters of credit or performance bonds, the Permittee shall be deemed without the required financial assurance and shall have 60 days to reestablish the financial assurance required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C.

26. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder

78 Permit No.: 43027132.001 Project Name: Hunterfield Wetland Mitigation Relocation

to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

79 CONSENT ITEM 17

80 CONSENT ITEM 17 Default Date: January 22, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CONCEPTUAL PERMIT NO. 49028690.001

Expiration Date: December 18, 2009 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapter 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to use the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District), to proceed with further applications for construction permitting.

PROJECT NAME: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

GRANTED TO: Flagler Development 10151 Deerwood Park Boulevard, Building 100, Suite 330 Jacksonville, FL 32256

ABSTRACT: This permit authorization is for the conceptual approval of a surface water management system serving a 724.44-acre mixed-use office and light industrial facility with commercial and retail development as named above and as shown on the approved conceptual drawings. The project site is located south of County Road 542, west of Airport Road, and north of the Polk County Parkway in the city of Lakeland, Polk County. Information regarding the surface water management systems, 100-year floodplain and wetlands is contained within the tables and comments below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Lakeland Central Park Master Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Polk

SEC/TWP/RGE: 20,28,29,32,33/28S/23E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 724.44

PROJECT SIZE: 724.44 Acres

LAND USE: Commercial

DATE APPLICATION FILED: May 19, 2006

AMENDED DATE: N/A

81 Permit No.: 49028690.001 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK SMA-1 4.05 Wet Detention SMA-2A 2.76 Wet Detention SMA-2B 7.66 Wet Detention SMA-3 5.45 Wet Detention SMA-4 9.00 Wet Detention SMA-5 3.07 Wet Detention SMA-6A 7.96 Wet Detention SMA-6B 15.31 Wet Detention SMA-7 4.90 Wet Detention SMA-8A 4.18 Wet Detention SMA-8B 3.41 Wet Detention SMA-9 8.18 Wet Detention SMA-10 2.83 Wet Detention SMA-11 0.88 Wet Detention SMA-12A 4.59 Wet Detention SMA-12B 1.99 Wet Detention SMA-13A 2.57 Wet Detention SMA-13B 4.36 Wet Detention TOTAL 93.15

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 24.56 24.56 EE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ] 17.69 23.84 SM [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: EE = Equivalent Excavation to offset project filling per Section 4.4 of the District's Basis of Review; SM = Storage Modeling hydrographs of pond and receiving stages indicate timing separation; N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

III. Environmental Considerations

82 Permit No.: 49028690.001 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 58 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* W-1 22.24 20.56 1.68 1.17 0.00 0.00 W-2 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.50 0.00 0.00 W-3 7.28 6.95 0.33 0.21 0.00 0.00 W-4 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-5 2.36 2.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-6 30.37 29.89 0.48 0.34 0.00 0.00 W-7 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-8 25.16 25.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-9 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-10 1.90 1.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-11 2.30 0.00 2.30 1.38 0.00 0.00 W-12 4.82 4.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-13 5.74 5.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-14 1.48 0.00 1.48 1.19 0.00 0.00 W-15 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-16 1.04 0.00 1.04 0.83 0.00 0.00 W-17 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-18 27.55 26.71 0.84 0.59 0.00 0.00 W-19 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-20 1.99 0.00 1.99 1.36 0.00 0.00 W-21 0.69 0.00 0.69 0.50 0.00 0.00 W-22 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-23 1.91 0.00 1.91 1.47 0.00 0.00 W-24 3.07 0.00 3.07 2.36 0.00 0.00 W-25 2.00 0.00 2.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 W-26 0.74 0.00 0.74 0.39 0.00 0.00 W-27 4.74 4.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-28 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-29/30 3.64 3.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-31 6.40 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-32 2.24 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-33 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-34 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-35 3.08 3.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-36 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.10 0.00 0.00

83 Permit No.: 49028690.001 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 58 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres AcresAcres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* W-37 6.94 3.86 3.08 2.16 0.00 0.00 SW-1 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.06 0.00 0.00 SW-1A 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.09 0.00 0.00 SW-1B 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 SW-5 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-6 2.64 0.00 2.64 1.06 0.00 0.00 SW-6A 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 SW-6-8 1.80 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8 2.88 0.00 2.88 1.15 0.00 0.00 SW-8A 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8B 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8C 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8D 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8E 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.23 0.00 0.00 SW-11 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-17A,B,C 4.40 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-20 0.34 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-21 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.00 SW-29 0.66 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-32 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-37 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-38 0.66 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-38A,B,C,D 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 193.26 155.2238.04 18.83 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The project area includes 193.26 acres of wetlands and surface waters consisting of 98.36 acres of predominately forested wetlands (Wetlands W-1, W-2, W-4, W-5, W- 6, W-8, W-9, W-10, W-20, W-21, W-22, W-27, W-28, W-32, W-33, W-35, and W-36), 78.86 acres of non-forested wetlands (Wetlands W-3, W-7, W-11, W-12, W-13, W-14, W-15, W-16, W-17, W- 18, W-19, W-23, W-24, W25, W26, W-29/30, W-31, W-34, and W-37), 8.94 acres of wetland conveyances (SW-1, SW-1A, SW-1B, SW-5, SW-6, SW-6A, SW-6-8, SW-8, SW-8B, SW-8C, SW-8D, SW-8E, and SW-21), and 7.10 acres of upland-cut ditches and ponds (SW-8A, SW-11, SW-17A,B,C, SW-20, S-29, SW-32, SW-38, SW-37 and SW-38A,B,C,D). Permanent impacts are conceptually proposed to 6.47 acres of forested wetlands (W-1, W-2, W-6, W-20, W-21, W-22, W- 33, and W-36), 17.63 acres of non-forested wetlands (W-3, W-7, W-11, W-14, W-16, W-17, W-18, W-23, W-24, W-25, W-26, W-34, and W-37), 6.88 acres of wetland conveyances (SW-1, SW-1A, SW-1B, SW-5, SW-6, SW-6A, SW-8, SW-8E, and SW-21), and 7.10 acres of upland-cut ditches and ponds (SW-8A, SW-11, SW-17A,B,C, SW-20, SW-29, SW-32, SW-38, and SW-38A,B,C,D).

84 Permit No.: 49028690.001 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 25 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain W-1 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 20.561.23 0.00 0.00 W-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.05 0.00 0.00 W-6 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 29.921.20 0.00 0.00 W-8 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 25.160.64 0.00 0.00 W-18 0.00 0.00 0.000.00 18.050.36 0.00 0.00 W-27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.74 0.10 0.00 0.00 W-28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.00 0.00 W-29/30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.65 0.07 0.00 0.00 W-31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.40 0.13 0.00 0.00 W-32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 W-35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 W-37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.08 0.06 0.00 0.00 SW-6-8, 8B,8C,8D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 WC-1 2.43 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-2 5.11 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-3 1.25 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-4 0.76 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-5 7.75 3.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-6 1.01 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upland Forest Preservation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.13 3.07 0.00 0.00 Upland Preservation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.67 1.72 0.00 0.00 W-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 0.28 W-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.04 W-9,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.54 0.10 W-12,13,15,18,19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.34 0.89 TOTAL 18.31 8.68 0.000.00 184.318.86 32.87 1.31

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for permanent impacts to 24.10 acres of wetlands and 6.88 acres of wetland conveyances is conceptually approved to be offset by 121.51 acres of wetland preservation, 62.80 acres of upland preservation, 18.31 acres of forested wetland creation, and 32.87 acres of combined wetland preservation and vegetative enhancement. Preservation will be by means of a conservation easement dedicated to the District. The easement will be provided as a condition of the associated construction permit.

Mitigation is not required for impacts to 2.66 acres of upland-cut ponds (SW-11, SW-17A, SW- 17C, SW-29, and SW-38) because the ponds were constructed in uplands, are wholly owned, are less than 1.0 acre in area, and do not provide significant habitat for threatened or endangered species, pursuant to Subsection 3.2.2.2 of the District’s Basis of Review.

Mitigation is not required for impacts to 1.18 acres of upland-cut ditches (SW-8A, SW-20, SW-32, SW-38A, SW-38B, SW-38C, and SW-38D) because they were constructed in uplands, do not provide significant habitat for threatened or endangered species, and were not constructed to divert natural stream flow, pursuant to Subsection 3.2.2.2 of the District’s Basis of Review.

Mitigation is not required for impacts to a 3.26-acre upland-cut pond (SW-17B) because the effect

85 Permit No.: 49028690.001 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

of the impact on fish, wildlife, and threatened or endangered species is insignificant.

The functional loss of 18.83 due to the wetland and surface water impacts associated with this project is conceptually offset by the functional gain of 18.85 provided by the mitigation. The functional loss and gain were calculated using the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method.

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

5. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

6. Pursuant to Chapter 40D-4.321(1)(a), unless revoked or otherwise modified, the duration of this Conceptual Permit shall be two years from the date of issuance, unless within that period an application for a construction permit is filed for any portion of the project. If the application for a construction permit is approved and construction is commenced according to Rule 40D-4.321, F.A.C., then the Conceptual Permit is valid so long as the conceptually permitted phases are

86 Permit No.: 49028690.001 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park - Conceptual

under construction consistent with a phased development master plan for a surface water management system that has been permitted by the District. If construction of the permitted phases is discontinued or is inconsistent with the phased development master plan, then the Conceptual Permit shall expire.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

87 CONSENT ITEM 18

88 CONSENT ITEM 18 Default Date: January 20, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 49028690.002

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Lakeland Central Park

GRANTED TO: Flagler Development 10151 Deerwood Park Boulevard Building 100, Suite 330 Jacksonville, FL 32256

ABSTRACT: This permit authorization is for the construction of a new surface water management system serving a 724.44-acre mass grading project for future mixed-use office and light industrial facilities with commercial and retail development as named above and as shown on the approved construction drawings. The project site is located south of County Road 542, west of Airport Road, and north of the Polk County Parkway in the city of Lakeland, Polk County. Information regarding the surface water management systems, 100-year floodplain and wetlands is contained within the tables and comments below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Flagler Development

COUNTY: Polk

SEC/TWP/RGE: 20,28,29,32,33/28S/23E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 724.44

PROJECT SIZE: 724.44 Acres

LAND USE: Commercial

DATE APPLICATION FILED: May 19, 2006

AMENDED DATE: N/A

89 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK SMA-1 4.05 Wet Detention SMA-2A 2.76 Wet Detention SMA-2B 7.66 Wet Detention SMA-3 5.45 Wet Detention SMA-4 9.00 Wet Detention SMA-5 3.07 Wet Detention SMA-6A 7.96 Wet Detention SMA-6B 15.31 Wet Detention SMA-7 4.90 Wet Detention SMA-8A 4.18 Wet Detention SMA-8B 3.41 Wet Detention SMA-9 8.18 Wet Detention SMA-10 2.83 Wet Detention SMA-11 0.88 Wet Detention SMA-12A 4.59 Wet Detention SMA-12B 1.99 Wet Detention SMA-13A 2.57 Wet Detention SMA-13B 4.36 Wet Detention TOTAL 93.15

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 24.56 24.56 EE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ] 17.69 23.84 SM [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: EE = Equivalent Excavation to offset project filling per Section 4.4 of the District's Basis of Review; SM = Storage Modeling hydrographs of pond and receiving stages indicate timing separation; N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

90 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 58 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* W-1 22.24 20.56 1.68 1.17 0.00 0.00 W-2 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.50 0.00 0.00 W-3 7.28 6.95 0.33 0.21 0.00 0.00 W-4 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-5 2.36 2.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-6 30.37 29.89 0.48 0.34 0.00 0.00 W-7 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-8 25.16 25.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-9 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-10 1.90 1.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-11 2.30 0.00 2.30 1.38 0.00 0.00 W-12 4.82 4.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-13 5.74 5.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-14 1.48 0.00 1.48 1.19 0.00 0.00 W-15 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-16 1.04 0.00 1.04 0.83 0.00 0.00 W-17 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-18 27.55 26.71 0.84 0.59 0.00 0.00 W-19 2.19 2.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-20 1.99 0.00 1.99 1.36 0.00 0.00 W-21 0.69 0.00 0.69 0.50 0.00 0.00 W-22 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-23 1.91 0.00 1.91 1.47 0.00 0.00 W-24 3.07 0.00 3.07 2.36 0.00 0.00 W-25 2.00 0.00 2.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 W-26 0.74 0.00 0.74 0.39 0.00 0.00 W-27 4.74 4.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-28 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-29/30 3.64 3.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-31 6.40 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-32 2.24 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

91 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* W-33 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-34 0.17 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-35 3.08 3.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W-36 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.10 0.00 0.00 W-37 6.94 3.86 3.08 2.16 0.00 0.00 SW-1 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.06 0.00 0.00 SW-1A 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.09 0.00 0.00 SW-1B 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 SW-5 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-6 2.64 0.00 2.64 1.06 0.00 0.00 SW-6A 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.03 0.00 0.00 SW-6-8 1.80 1.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8 2.88 0.00 2.88 1.15 0.00 0.00 SW-8A 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8B 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8C 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8D 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-8E 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.23 0.00 0.00 SW-11 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-17A,B,C 4.40 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-20 0.34 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-21 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.10 0.00 0.00 SW-29 0.66 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-32 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-37 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-38 0.66 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 SW-38A,B,C,D 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 193.26 155.2238.04 18.83 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The project area includes 193.26 acres of wetlands and surface waters consisting of 98.36 acres of predominately forested wetlands (Wetlands W-1, W-2, W-4, W-5, W- 6, W-8, W-9, W-10, W-20, W-21, W-22, W-27, W-28, W-32, W-33, W-35, and W-36), 78.86 acres of non-forested wetlands (Wetlands W-3, W-7, W-11, W-12, W-13, W-14, W-15, W-16, W-17, W- 18, W-19, W-23, W-24, W25, W26, W-29/30, W-31, W-34, and W-37), 8.94 acres of wetland conveyances (SW-1, SW-1A, SW-1B, SW-5, SW-6, SW-6A, SW-6-8, SW-8, SW-8B, SW-8C, SW-8D, SW-8E, and SW-21), and 7.10 acres of upland-cut ditches and ponds (SW-8A, SW-11, SW-17A,B,C, SW-20, S-29, SW-32, SW-38, SW-37 and SW-38A,B,C,D). Permanent impacts are proposed to 6.47 acres of forested wetlands (W-1, W-2, W-6, W-20, W-21, W-22, W-33, and W- 36), 17.63 acres of non-forested wetlands (W-3, W-7, W-11, W-14, W-16, W-17, W-18, W-23, W- 24, W-25, W-26, W-34, and W-37), 6.88 acres of wetland conveyances (SW-1, SW-1A, SW-1B, SW-5, SW-6, SW-6A, SW-8, SW-8E, and SW-21), and 7.10 acres of upland-cut ditches and ponds (SW-8A, SW-11, SW-17A,B,C, SW-20, SW-29, SW-32, SW-38, and SW-38A,B,C,D).

92 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 25 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain W-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.56 1.23 0.00 0.00 W-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.05 0.00 0.00 W-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.92 1.20 0.00 0.00 W-8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.16 0.64 0.00 0.00 W-18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.05 0.36 0.00 0.00 W-27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.74 0.10 0.00 0.00 W-28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.00 0.00 W-29/30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.65 0.07 0.00 0.00 W-31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.40 0.13 0.00 0.00 W-32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 0.04 0.00 0.00 W-35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.04 0.06 0.00 0.00 W-37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.08 0.06 0.00 0.00 SW-6-8, 8B,8C,8D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 WC-1 2.43 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-2 5.11 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-3 1.25 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-4 0.76 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-5 7.75 3.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WC-6 1.01 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Upland Forest Preservation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.13 3.07 0.00 0.00 Upland Preservation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.67 1.72 0.00 0.00 W-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.98 0.28 W-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.04 W-9,10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.54 0.10 W-12,13,15,18,19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.34 0.89 TOTAL 18.31 8.68 0.000.00 184.31 8.86 32.87 1.31

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for permanent impacts to 24.10 acres of wetlands and 6.88 acres of wetland conveyances is provided by 121.51 acres of wetland preservation, 62.80 acres of upland preservation, 18.31 acres of forested wetland creation, and 32.87 acres of combined wetland preservation and vegetative enhancement. The preservation is by a conservation easement dedicated to the District.

Mitigation is not required for impacts to 2.66 acres of upland-cut ponds (SW-11, SW-17A, SW- 17C, SW-29, and SW-38) because the ponds were constructed in uplands, are wholly owned, are less than 1.0 acre in area, and do not provide significant habitat for threatened or endangered species, pursuant to Subsection 3.2.2.2 of the District’s Basis of Review.

Mitigation is not required for impacts to 1.18 acres of upland-cut ditches (SW-8A, SW-20, SW-32, SW-38A, SW-38B, SW-38C, and SW-38D) because they were constructed in uplands, do not provide significant habitat for threatened or endangered species, and were not constructed to divert natural stream flow, pursuant to Subsection 3.2.2.2 of the District’s Basis of Review.

Mitigation is not required for impacts to a 3.26-acre upland-cut pond (SW-17B) because the effect of the impact on fish, wildlife, and threatened or endangered species is insignificant.

93 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

The functional loss of 18.83 due to the wetland and surface water impacts associated with this project is offset by the functional gain of 18.85 provided by the mitigation. The functional loss and gain were calculated using the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method.

A regulatory conservation easement is required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

5. A. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA - MITIGATION AREAS WC-1, WC-2, WC-3, WC-4, WC-5, and WC-6

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands constructed for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. The mitigation area can reasonably be expected to develop into a Cypress (FLUCCS #621) wetland as determined by the Florida Land Use and Cover and Forms Classification System (third edition; January 1999).

94 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the mitigation area are characteristic of the wetlands/ surface water type specified in criterion "A".

C. Planted or recruited canopy and herbaceous species (or plant species providing the same function) shall meet the criteria specified, and,

D. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than 3 years shall meet the criteria specified:

1 ZONE % COVER SPECIES Canopy 400 trees/ac. Taxodium distichum Ground 85 Pontederia cordata Sagittaria lancifolia Spartina bakeri

1 Tree species must be greater than 12 feet in height and have been planted for greater than three (3) years.

E. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

F. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent (5%) at any location in the mitigation site and five percent (5%) for the entire mitigation site.

G. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

This criterion must be achieved within 5 years of mitigation area construction. The Pemittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA - ENHANCEMENT AREAS W-3, W-4, W-9,10, and W-12, 13, 15, 18, 19

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological wetland functions. Wetlands enhanced for mitigation purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the additional or removal of vegetation.

A. Planted or recruited canopy and herbaceous species (or plant species providing the same function) shall meet the criteria specified, and,

95 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

B. Planted or recruited tree species that are greater than or equal to 12 feet in height and established for more than 3 years shall meet the criteria specified:

1 ZONE % COVER SPECIES Canopy (W-4 only) 400 trees/ac. Nyssa sylvatica Magnolia virginiana Ground 85 Juncus effusus Cephalanthus occidentalis Spartina bakeri

1 Tree species must be greater than 12 feet in height and have been planted for greater than three (3) years.

C. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation is indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A".

D. Coverage by nuisance or exotic species does not exceed five percent (5%) at any location in the mitigation site and five percent (5%) for the entire mitigation site.

E. The wetland mitigation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according the Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

This criterion must be achieved within 5 years of mitigation area construction. The Pemittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

6. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

7. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

8. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

96 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected semi-annually.

9. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

10. In the event wetland impacts for which the preservation parcel is providing mitigation are not conducted, the permittee will notify the District in writing. Upon District verification that these wetland impacts have not occurred, the District will release any executed and recorded conservation easement.

11. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

12. The Permittee shall, within 150 days of initial wetland impact and prior to beneficial use of the site, complete all aspects of the mitigation plan, including the grading, mulching, and planting, in accordance with the design details in the final approved construction drawings and information submitted in support of the application.

13. The Permittee shall commence construction of the mitigation areas within 30 days of wetland impacts, if wetland impacts occur between February 1 and August 31. If wetland impacts occur between September 1 and January 31, construction of the mitigation areas shall commence by March 1. In either case, construction of the mitigation areas shall be completed within 120 days of the commencement date unless a time extension is approved in writing by the District.

97 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

14. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

15. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

16. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland and surface water areas B. upland preservation C. limits of approved wetland impacts

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

17. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

18. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

19. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Bartow Service Office.

20. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease.

21. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

22. The Permittee shall execute the final draft financial responsibility instrument approved by the District prior to initiating activities authorized by this permit. The final draft financial responsibility instrument shall be consistent with the draft instrument submitted with the permit application and approved by this permit.

23. The Permittee shall submit the original executed financial responsibility instrument to the District at the address below:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

98 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

24. The Permittee shall provide the financial responsibility required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C., until the District determines that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met; or the District approves a request to transfer the permit to a new owner and receives an acceptable substitute financial responsibility mechanism from the new owner.

25. The Permittee may request, in writing, a release from the obligation to maintain certain amounts of the financial assurance required by this permit as phases of the mitigation plan are successfully completed. The request shall include documentation that the mitigation phase or phases have been completed and payment for their completion has been made. Following the District's verification that the phase or phases have been completed in accordance with the mitigation plan, the District will authorize release from the applicable portion of the financial assurance obligation.

26. The District will notify the Permittee within 30 days of its determination that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met. Concurrent with this notification, the District will authorize, in writing, the appropriate entity to cancel or terminate the financial responsibility instrument.

27. The Permittee's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit pertaining to the successful completion of all mitigation activities in accordance with the mitigation plan shall be deemed a violation of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. In addition to other remedies that the District may have, the District may draw upon the financial responsibility instrument for any funds necessary to remedy a violation, upon such notice to the Permittee as may be specified in the financial responsibility instrument or if none, upon reasonable notice.

28. The Permittee shall notify the District by certified mail within 10 days of the commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding:

A. To dissolve the Permittee; B. To place the Permittee into receivership; C. For entry of an order for relief against the Permittee under Title XI (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code.; and D. To assign of the Permittee's assets for the benefit of its creditors under Chapter 727, Florida Statutes.

29. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the issuing institution; or the suspension or revocation of the authority of the issuing institution to issue letters of credit or performance bonds, the Permittee shall be deemed without the required financial assurance and shall have 60 days to reestablish the financial assurance required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C.

30. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

31. For wetland impact mitigation the Permittee shall submit the executed conservation easement, as recorded in the County Public Records, to the District prior to beginning any construction authorized by this permit. The conservation easement shall identify the District as the grantee and shall cover the following areas: W-1, W-3, W-4, W-5, W-6, W-8, W-9,10, W-12,13,15,19, W- 18, W-27, W-28, W-29/30, W-31, W-32, W-35, W-37, SW-6-8, SW-8B, SW-8C, and SW-8D

99 Permit No.: 49028690.002 Project Name: Lakeland Central Park

Upland Preservation and Upland Forested Preservation). The Permittee shall receive approval from the District for any proposal to modify the conservation easement prior to conducting any activity prohibited by the terms of the conservation easement.

32. The final title insurance policy for the conservation easement, in the amount and under the terms approved in the Commitment for Title Insurance No. TLF06-000085-L, issued by LandAmerica Lawyers Title Insurance Company and received by the District on October 15, 2007, must be submitted to the District within 30 days of recording the conservation easement and prior to beginning authorized construction that will cause adverse impacts to wetlands or other surface waters.

33. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Bartow Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C., and signed, dated, and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

34. For the areas shown on the construction drawings as Future,a permit modification shall be obtained for any construction in this/these areas. As a requirement of the permit modification for this/these areas, the Permittee shall submit a Statement of Completion and as-built drawings.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

100 CONSENT ITEM 19

101 CONSENT ITEM 19 Default Date: January 10, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE CONCEPTUAL PERMIT NO. 49029630.002

Expiration Date: December 18, 2009 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapter 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to use the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District), to proceed with further applications for construction permitting.

PROJECT NAME: The Meadows

GRANTED TO: The Meadows, LLC 1031 West Morse Boulevard, Suite 325 Winter Park, FL 32789

ABSTRACT: This permit authorization is for the conceptual approval of a surface water management system serving a 215.68-acre residential and commercial development as named above and as shown on the approved conceptual drawings. The project site is located north of Interstate 4 and south of County Road 54 approximately 1,000 feet west of the intersection of Interstate 4 and County Road 54 in northeast Polk County. Information regarding the surface water management system, 100-year floodplain, and wetlands is contained within the tables and comments below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: The Meadows Owners' Association, Inc.

COUNTY: Polk

SEC/TWP/RGE: 05,08/26S/27E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 215.68

PROJECT SIZE: 215.68 Acres

LAND USE: Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: June 6, 2007

AMENDED DATE: N/A

102 Permit No.: 49029630.002 Project Name: The Meadows

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK 100 0.84 Wet Detention 200 0.68 Wet Detention 300 0.44 Wet Detention 400 0.87 Wet Detention 500 0.74 Wet Detention 1 0.87 Wet Detention 2 0.96 Wet Detention 2A 2.59 Wet Detention 3 0.51 Wet Detention 4 1.45 Wet Detention 5 0.71 Wet Detention 6 1.00 Wet Detention 7 0.84 Wet Detention 8 0.55 Wet Detention 9 1.55 Wet Detention 10 0.76 Wet Detention 11 1.44 Wet Detention TOTAL 16.80

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 5.68 6.33 EE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: EE = Equivalent Excavation to offset project filling per Section 4.4 of the District's Basis of Review; N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

103 Permit No.: 49029630.002 Project Name: The Meadows

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 8 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Wetland 100A/100B 80.97 80.53 0.44 0.18 0.00 0.00 Wetland 200 3.48 3.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland 300 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland 400 0.12 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland 500 4.74 4.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland 600 0.67 0.44 0.23 0.18 0.00 0.00 Wetland 700 3.27 3.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland 800 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 94.84 94.050.79 0.36 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The project area includes 94.84 acres of predominantly herbaceous wetlands. Permanent impacts are conceptually proposed to 0.79 acre of wetlands (Wetlands 100A/100B, 400, and 600).

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 7 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Wetland 100A/100B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.53 3.21 0.00 0.00 Wetland 200 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.48 0.03 0.00 0.00 Wetland 300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.01 0.00 0.00 Wetland 500 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.74 0.24 0.00 0.00 Wetland 700 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.27 0.13 0.00 0.00 Wetland 800 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 Upland Buffer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.29 3.32 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106.90 6.98 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for permanent impacts to 0.67 acre of herbaceous wetlands (Wetland 100A/100B and Wetland 600) is conceptually approved to be offset by the preservation of 93.61 acres of herbaceous wetlands (Wetlands 100A/100B, 200, 300, 500, 700, and 800) and 13.29 acres of adjacent uplands. Preservation will be by means of a conservation easement dedicated to the District. The conservation easement will be provided as a condition of a subsequent construction permit. Mitigation for impacts to Wetland 400 is not required because the wetland is isolated, less than one-half acre in size, not used by threatened or endangered species, not located in an Area of Critical State Concern, and is of minimal value to fish and wildlife, pursuant to Subsection 3.2.2.1 of the District's Basis of Review.

The functional loss of 0.36 due to wetland impacts associated with this project is conceptually offset by the functional gain of 6.98 provided by the mitigation. The functional loss and functional gain were calculated using the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Methodology (Ch. 62-345, F.A.C.).

104 Permit No.: 49029630.002 Project Name: The Meadows

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

4. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

5. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

6. Pursuant to Chapter 40D-4.321(1)(a), unless revoked or otherwise modified, the duration of this Conceptual Permit shall be two years from the date of issuance, unless within that period an application for a construction permit is filed for any portion of the project. If the application for a construction permit is approved and construction is commenced according to Rule 40D-4.321 of the Florida Administrative Code., then the Conceptual Permit is valid so long as the conceptually permitted phases are under construction consistent with a phased development master plan for a surface water management system that has been permitted by the District. If construction of the permitted phases is discontinued or is inconsistent with the phased development master plan, then the Conceptual Permit shall expire.

105 Permit No.: 49029630.002 Project Name: The Meadows

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

106 CONSENT ITEM 20

107 CONSENT ITEM 20 Default Date: January 28, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43030664.000

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Loughman Crossing at County Road 54

GRANTED TO: 17-92, LLC 33 Southeast 4th Street, Suite 100 Boca Raton, FL 33432

ABSTRACT: This permit authorization is for the construction of a new surface water management system serving a 23.82-acre commercial shopping center project as named above and as shown on the approved construction drawings. The project site is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of County Road 54 and U.S. Highway 17-92 in Polk County. Information regarding the surface water management systems, 100-year floodplain and wetlands is contained within the tables and comments below.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: 17-92, LLC

COUNTY: Polk

SEC/TWP/RGE: 12/26S/27E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 23.82

PROJECT SIZE: 23.82 Acres

LAND USE: Commercial

DATE APPLICATION FILED: March 22, 2006

AMENDED DATE: N/A

108 Permit No.: 43030664.000 Project Name: Loughman Crossing at County Road 54

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK TREATMENT TYPE 1 2.70 Wet Detention 2 0.10 Exfiltration TOTAL 2.80

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 NE [ X ] Depth [ N/A ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: NE = No Encroachment N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 1 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* Wetland 1.10 0.00 1.10 0.77 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1.10 0.001.10 0.77 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The project area includes a 1.10-acre forested wetland. Permanent impacts are proposed to a 1.10-acre forested wetland.

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 1 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Reedy Creek Mitigation Bank 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for permanent impacts to a 1.10-acre forested wetland is provided by the purchase of 0.80 Freshwater, Forested, State wetland credits from the Reedy Creek Mitigation Bank.

109 Permit No.: 43030664.000 Project Name: Loughman Crossing at County Road 54

The functional loss of 0.77 due to the wetland impacts associated with this project is offset by the functional gain of 0.80 provided by the mitigation. The functional loss and functional gain were calculated using the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Methodology (Ch. 62-345, F.A.C.).

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Bartow Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, FL 33830-7700

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Bartow Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. All wetland boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

7. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Bartow Service Office.

110 Permit No.: 43030664.000 Project Name: Loughman Crossing at County Road 54

8. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration or systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration and retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed 18 months after operation is authorized and every 18 months thereafter.

9. Prior to installation of the filter media, the Permittee's contractor shall submit a certified test of the media to the Permittee's Professional Engineer and the District. The test shall address the following parameters: uniformity coefficient, effective grain size, sieve analysis, percent silts, clays and organic matter, and permeability testing (constant head). If testing indicates the actual permeability rate is less than the value specified in the permitted design, a permit modification will be required to lengthen the effluent filtration system. The Permittee shall also notify the Surface Water Regulation Manager, Bartow Regulation Department, at least 48 hours prior to commencement of construction of the effluent filtration system, so that District staff may observe this construction activity.

10. For the areas shown on the construction drawings as Outparcel Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, a permit modification shall be obtained for any construction in this/these areas. As a requirement of the permit modification for this/these areas, the Permittee shall submit a Statement of Completion and as-built drawings.

11. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

12. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

13. The Permittee shall, prior to any wetland impacts, provide to the District documentation of the purchase of 0.80 mitigation credits from the Reedy Creek Mitigation Bank. That documentation shall be in the form of a Modification of Permit issued to the Reedy Creek Mitigation Bank, which deducts 0.80 mitigation credits from the bank’s credit ledger.

14. The existing stormwater quality treatment system associated with Permit No. EO 7650 will be abandoned as a result of the construction activities associated with this permit authorization.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

111 CONSENT ITEM 21

112 CONSENT ITEM 21 Default Date: January 7, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43031157.000

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Waterside East

GRANTED TO: Xcel Investments 722 Shamrock Boulevard Venice, FL 34293

Brady Family, LLC 722 Shamrock Boulevard Venice, FL 34293

ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a surface water management system to serve a 101.20-acre mixed use residential and commercial development known as Waterside East. The project is located along the east side of Jacaranda Boulevard just north of Center Road in Sarasota County. Information regarding the surface water management system, 100-year floodplain, wetlands and/or surface waters is stated below and on the permitted construction drawings for the project.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Venice Center Property Owners' Association

COUNTY: Sarasota

SEC/TWP/RGE: 15/39S/19E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 103.86

PROJECT SIZE: 101.20 Acres

LAND USE: Multi-family Residential

DATE APPLICATION FILED: June 1, 2006

AMENDED DATE: December 19, 2006

113 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK 1 0.85 Wet Detention 2 2.90 Wet Detention 3 2.71 Wet Detention 4 6.35 Wet Detention 5 1.84 Wet Detention CR-057 12.72 Wet Detention TOTAL 27.37

Comments: The project is a mixed use development consisting of 130,450 square feet of commercial space and 384 residential condominium units. Six wet detention ponds will provide water quality treatment and peak attenuation storage for the project. Existing Pond CR-057 area at top of bank will be modified from 10.43 acres to 12.72 acres. Pond CR-057 was previously permitted under Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 44024769.002, entitled Sarasota County - Center Road at Jacaranda Boulevard, issued on March 22, 2005.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) NE [ ] Depth [ N/A ] EE [ ] Depth [ N/A ] SM [ ] Depth [ N/A ] 9.59 31.10 MI [ X ] Depth [ 0.019 ]

*Codes [ X ] for the type or method of compensation provided are as follows: NE = No Encroachment EE = Equivalent Excavation to offset project filling per Section 4.4 of the District's Basis of Review; SM = Storage Modeling hydrographs of pond and receiving stages indicate timing separation; MI = Minimal Impact based on modeling of existing stages vs. post-project encroachment. N/A = Not Applicable

**Depth of change in flood stage (level) over existing receiving water stage resulting from floodplain encroachment caused by a project that claims MI type of compensation.

Comments: According to FEMA floodplain determinations, portions of the project lie within Flood Zone A. The Sarasota County drainage model was updated with site specific information and used to demonstrate project compliance with Section 4.4 of the ERP Basis of Review. Historic basin storage impacts associated with impacts to onsite wetlands and other surface waters are included in the hydrologic/hydraulic drainage modeling.

114 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 10 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* WL-2 0.72 0.00 0.72 0.52 0.00 0.00 WL-3 1.12 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-4 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-5 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-6 0.16 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-7 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hatchett Creek 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OSW Ditch 0.60 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-1 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.56 0.00 0.00 WL-8 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 5.29 2.752.54 1.08 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: There are eight freshwater herbaceous wetlands totaling 3.69 acres, one upland excavated ditch totaling 0.60 acre, and a dredged channel referenced as Hatchett Creek totaling 1.00 acre located within the project area. The dredged channel referenced as Hatchett Creek extends off site draining westward. There will be 1.94 acres of permanent wetland impacts for construction of 384-unit residential condominiums, associated mini storage, and a commercial area. The results of the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) analysis indicate a functional loss of 1.08 units due to the impacts proposed. There will be 0.60 acre of permanent impacts to the upland excavated ditch. Hatchett Creek will not be impacted by this project.

Mitigation Information Count of Mitigation: 4 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Creation Area 1 1.70 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-4 Enhancement 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WL-3 Enhancement 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Creation Area 2 0.33 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 2.03 0.86 1.73 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: Mitigation for permanent wetland impacts will be provided by 2.03 acres of wetland creation located adjacent to Wetlands WL-4 and WL-7, and 1.73 acres of wetland enhancement to Wetlands WL-3 and WL-4. The results of the UMAM analysis indicate a functional gain of 1.11 units due to the proposed mitigation. Wetland mitigation will not be required for the permanent impacts to the upland excavated ditch or to the isolated less than half acre wetlands (Wetlands WL-5, WL-6, and WL-8), pursuant to Sections 3.2.2.2 and 3.2.2.1, respectively, of the Basis of Review. Under these sections, mitigation is not required for impacts to nonfunctional habitat and to isolated less than one-half acre in size wetlands.

115 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Sarasota Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, FL 34240-9711

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Sarasota Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA – WETLAND CREATION AREA #1 (1.70 acres)

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological functions. Areas constructed for restoration purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the addition or removal of vegetation.

116 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

A. The mitigation area can be reasonably expected to develop into a Palustrine Emergent wetland as determined by the USFWS Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the creation area are characteristic of the wetland/surface water type specified in criterion "A."

C. The dominant and subdominant species of desirable wetland plants comprising each vegetation zone and stratum shall be as follows:

1 ZONE STRATUM PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT SPECIES 1 COVER SPECIES 1 Groundcover 85% Spartina bakeri Any desirable wetland species as Panicum listed in 62-340.450, F.A.C. hemitomon 2 Groundcover 85% Panicum Any desirable wetland species as hemitomon listed in 62-340.450, F.A.C. Juncus effusus 3 Groundcover 85% Pontederia Panicum hemitomon cordata Juncus effusus

1 Plant species providing the same function as those listed may also be considered in determining success.

This criterion must be achieved within three (3) years of initial monitoring. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a formal permit modification to the District for evaluation.

D. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation are indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A."

E. Coverage of nuisance and exotic vegetation does not exceed five (5) percent.

F. The wetland creation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according to Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA – WETLAND CREATION AREA #2 (0.34 acre)

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological functions. Areas constructed for restoration purposes will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the addition or removal of vegetation.

117 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

A. The mitigation area can be reasonably expected to develop into a Palustrine Emergent wetland as determined by the USFWS Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.

B. Topography, water depth and water level fluctuation in the creation area are characteristic of the wetland/surface water type specified in criterion "A."

C. The dominant and subdominant species of desirable wetland plants comprising each vegetation zone and stratum shall be as follows:

1 ZONE STRATUM PERCENT DOMINANT SUBDOMINANT SPECIES 1 COVER SPECIES 1 Groundcover 85% Spartina bakeri Any desirable wetland Panicum hemitomon species as listed in 62- 340.450, F.A.C. 2 Groundcover 85% Panicum hemitomon Any desirable wetland Juncus effusus species as listed in 62- 340.450, F.A.C.

1 Plant species providing the same function as those listed may also be considered in determining success.

This criterion must be achieved within three (3) years of initial monitoring. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a formal permit modification to the District for evaluation.

D. Species composition of recruiting wetland vegetation are indicative of the wetland type specified in criterion "A."

E. Coverage of nuisance and exotic vegetation does not exceed five (5) percent.

F. The wetland creation area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according to Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

The mitigation area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

WETLAND MITIGATION SUCCESS CRITERIA - WETLAND ENHANCEMENT - WETLANDS 3 AND 4 (1.73 acres)

Mitigation is expected to offset adverse impacts to wetlands and other surface waters caused by regulated activities and to achieve viable, sustainable ecological and hydrological functions. Enhancement areas will be considered successful and will be released from monitoring and reporting requirements when the following criteria are met continuously for a period of at least one (1) year without intervention in the form of irrigation or the addition or removal of vegetation.

118 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

A. The mitigation area can be reasonably expected to develop into Palustrine Emergent wetlands as determined by the USFWS Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States.

B. The criterion must be achieved within three (3) years of enhancement area activity. The Permittee shall complete any activities necessary to ensure the successful achievement of the mitigation requirements by the deadline specified. Any request for an extension of the deadline specified shall be accompanied with an explanation and submitted as a permit letter modification to the District for evaluation.

C. The dominant and subdominant species of desirable wetland plants shall be at 85 percent or greater and indicative of the vegetation types typically found in the freshwater marshes.

D. Coverage of nuisance and exotic vegetation in the wetland does not exceed five (5) percent.

E. Coverage by upland vegetation does not exceed 15 percent during the wet season.

F. The wetland enhancement area can be determined to be a wetland or other surface water according to Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.

The mitigation enhancement area may be released from monitoring and reporting requirements and be deemed successful at any time during the monitoring period if the Permittee demonstrates that the conditions in the mitigation area have adequately replaced the wetland and surface water functions affected by the regulated activity and that the site conditions are sustainable.

7. The Permittee shall monitor and maintain the wetland mitigation areas until the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above are met. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions identified by the District if the District identifies a wetland mitigation deficiency.

8. The Permittee shall undertake required maintenance activities within the wetland mitigation areas as needed at any time between mitigation area construction and termination of monitoring, with the exception of the final year. Maintenance shall include the manual removal of all nuisance and exotic species, with sufficient frequency that their combined coverage at no time exceeds the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Herbicides shall not be used without the prior written approval of the District.

9. A Wetland Mitigation Completion Report shall be submitted to the District within 30 days of completing construction and planting of the wetland mitigation areas. Upon District inspection and approval of the mitigation areas, the monitoring program shall be initiated with the date of the District field inspection being the construction completion date of the mitigation areas. Monitoring events shall occur between March 1 and November 30 of each year. An Annual Wetland Monitoring Report shall be submitted upon the anniversary date of District approval to initiate monitoring.

Annual reports shall provide documentation that a sufficient number of maintenance inspection/activities were conducted to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above. Note that the performance of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will normally need to be conducted more frequently than the collection of other monitoring data to maintain the mitigation areas in compliance with the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions above.

Monitoring Data shall be collected semi-annually.

119 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

10. Termination of monitoring for the wetland mitigation areas shall be coordinated with the District by:

A. notifying the District in writing when the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been achieved;

B. suspending all maintenance activities in the wetland mitigation areas including, but not limited to, irrigation and addition or removal of vegetation; and

C. submitting a monitoring report to the District one year following the written notification and suspension of maintenance activities.

Upon receipt of the monitoring report, the District will evaluate the wetland mitigation sites to determine if the Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions have been met and maintained. The District will notify the Permittee in writing of the evaluation results. The Permittee shall perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas that fail to maintain the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

11. Following the District’s determination that the wetland mitigation has been successfully completed, the Permittee shall operate and maintain the wetland mitigation areas such that they remain in their current or intended condition for the life of the surface water management facility. The Permittee must perform corrective actions for any portions of the wetland mitigation areas where conditions no longer meet the criteria set forth in the Wetland Mitigation Success Criteria Conditions.

12. The Permittee shall, within 60 days of initial wetland impact and prior to beneficial use of the site, complete all aspects of the mitigation plan, including the grading, mulching, and planting, in accordance with the design details in the final approved construction drawingsand information submitted in support of the application.

13. The Permittee shall commence construction of the mitigation areas within 30 days of wetland impacts, if wetland impacts occur between February 1 and August 31. If wetland impacts occur between September 1 and January 31, construction of the mitigation areas shall commence by March 1. In either case, construction of the mitigation areas shall be completed within 120 days of the commencement date unless a time extension is approved in writing by the District.

14. The construction of all wetland impacts and wetland mitigation shall be supervised by a qualified environmental scientist/specialist/consultant. The Permittee shall identify, in writing, the environmental professional retained for construction oversight prior to initial clearing and grading activities.

15. Wetland buffers shall remain in an undisturbed condition except for approved drainage facility construction/maintenance.

16. The following boundaries, as shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be clearly delineated on the site prior to initial clearing or grading activities:

A. wetland and surface water areas B. wetland buffers C. limits of approved wetland impacts

The delineation shall endure throughout the construction period and be readily discernible to construction and District personnel.

120 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

17. Wetland WL-1, WL-2, WL-3, WL-4, WL-5, WL-6, WL-7, AND WL-8 boundaries shown on the approved construction drawings shall be binding upon the Permittee and the District.

18. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"No owner of property within the subdivision may construct or maintain any building, residence, or structure, or undertake or perform any activity in the wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas, upland conservation areas and drainage easements described in the approved permit and recorded plat of the subdivision, unless prior approval is received from the Southwest Florida Water Management District, Sarasota Regulation Department."

19. Rights-of-way and easement locations necessary to construct, operate and maintain all facilities, which constitute the permitted surface water management system, shall be shown on the final plat recorded in the County Public Records. Documentation of this plat recording shall be submitted to the District with the Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity Form, and prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the site. The plat shall include the locations and limits of the following:

A. all wetlands B. wetland buffers C. 100-yr floodplain areas D. floodplain compensation areas

20. Copies of the following documents in final form, as appropriate for the project, shall be submitted to the Sarasota Regulation Department:

A. homeowners, property owners, master association or condominium association articles of incorporation, and

B. declaration of protective covenants, deed restrictions or declaration of condominium.

The Permittee shall submit these documents either: (1) within 180 days after beginning construction or with the Statement of Completion and as-built construction plans if construction is completed prior to 180 days, or (2) prior to any lot or unit sales within the project served by the surface water management system, whichever occurs first.

21. The following language shall be included as part of the deed restrictions for each lot:

"Each property owner within the subdivision at the time of construction of a building, residence, or structure shall comply with the construction plans for the surface water management system approved and on file with the Southwest Florida Water Management District."

22. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

23. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Sarasota Service Office.

121 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

24. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

25. The Permittee shall execute the final draft financial responsibility instrument approved by the District prior to initiating activities authorized by this permit. The final draft financial responsibility instrument shall be consistent with the draft instrument submitted with the permit application and approved by this permit.

26. The Permittee shall submit the original executed financial responsibility instrument to the District at the address below:

Sarasota Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, FL 34240-9711

27. The Permittee shall provide the financial responsibility required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C., until the District determines that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met; or the District approves a request to transfer the permit to a new owner and receives an acceptable substitute financial responsibility mechanism from the new owner.

28. The Permittee may request, in writing, a release from the obligation to maintain certain amounts of the financial assurance required by this permit as phases of the mitigation plan are successfully completed. The request shall include documentation that the mitigation phase or phases have been completed and payment for their completion has been made. Following the District's verification that the phase or phases have been completed in accordance with the mitigation plan, the District will authorize release from the applicable portion of the financial assurance obligation.

29. The District will notify the Permittee within 30 days of its determination that the specific success criteria contained in this permit have been met. Concurrent with this notification, the District will authorize, in writing, the appropriate entity to cancel or terminate the financial responsibility instrument.

30. The Permittee's failure to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit pertaining to the successful completion of all mitigation activities in accordance with the mitigation plan shall be deemed a violation of Chapter 40D-4, F.A.C. In addition to other remedies that the District may have, the District may draw upon the financial responsibility instrument for any funds necessary to remedy a violation, upon such notice to the Permittee as may be specified in the financial responsibility instrument or if none, upon reasonable notice.

31. The Permittee shall notify the District by certified mail within 10 days of the commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding:

A. To dissolve the Permittee; B. To place the Permittee into receivership;

122 Permit No.: 43031157.000 Project Name: Waterside East

C. For entry of an order for relief against the Permittee under Title XI (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code.; and D. To assign of the Permittee's assets for the benefit of its creditors under Chapter 727, Florida Statutes.

32. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the issuing institution; or the suspension or revocation of the authority of the issuing institution to issue letters of credit or performance bonds, the Permittee shall be deemed without the required financial assurance and shall have 60 days to reestablish the financial assurance required by Rule 40D-4.301(1)(j), F.A.C.

33. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

34. After receipt of the Statement of Completion and as-built drawings from the Permittee and prior to transfer to operation phase, the District shall inspect and evaluate the enhancement areas for compliance with the criteria listed in the environmental narrative submitted by Biological Research Associates, Inc., on May 21, 2007 and subsections 3.2.2 (a-b) and 3.2.2.3 (a-d) of the Basis of Review. No dredging and/or filling activities or secondary impacts are to occur as a result of the wetland enhancement. If the enhancement areas are not in compliance with the aforementioned listed subsections of the Basis of Review and the enhancement plan details, corrective actions will be required to bring this matter into compliance within 60 days upon District notification of the deficiencies. Following review and acceptance by District staff an annual monitoring plan shall be implemented until such a time that the success criteria is obtained.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

123 CONSENT ITEM 22

124 CONSENT ITEM 22 Default Date: January 22, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. 43032133.001

Expiration Date: December 18, 2012 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code, (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.

PROJECT NAME: Cocoplum Village Shops

GRANTED TO: Benderson 85 - 1 Trust, Ben Mill Associates, Inc., River-Ridge Associates, Ronald Benderson 1995 Trust, WR-1 Associates, Ltd. 8441 Cooper Creek Boulevard Bradenton, FL 34201

ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a surface water management system to serve a 39.97-acre commercial development known as Cocoplum Village Shops. The project is located on the north side of U.S. Highway 41, approximately 5.5 miles east of CR 777 (River Road), in Sarasota County. An Incidental Site Activities (ISA) Permit was issued for the project on November 7, 2007, authorizing limited earthwork, installation of erosion and sediment control measures and limited clearing and excavation in upland areas of the project. Information regarding the surface water management system, 100-year floodplain, wetlands and/or surface waters is stated below and on the permitted construction drawings for the project.

OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Benderson 85-1 Trust, Ben Mill Associates, Inc., River-Ridge Associates, Ronald Benderson 1995 Trust, WR-1 Associates, Ltd.

COUNTY: Sarasota

SEC/TWP/RGE: 33/39S/21E

TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 39.97

PROJECT SIZE: 39.97 Acres

LAND USE: Commercial

DATE APPLICATION FILED: April 6, 2007

AMENDED DATE: October 11, 2007

125 Permit No.: 43032133.000 Project Name: Cocoplum Village Shops

I. Water Quantity/Quality

POND AREA TREATMENT TYPE NO. ACRES @ TOP OF BANK 100 3.06 Wet Detention 200 1.08 Wet Detention TOTAL 4.14

Comments: The activities approved for this project are for the construction of a commercial development, which includes the associated parking and sidewalk facilities, along with the surface water management system. The total area of the commercial buildings proposed on the site equals 341,583 square feet. Water quality treatment will be provided in the proposed surface water management system through wet detention. The combined post-developed peak discharge rate of 29.44 cubic feet per second does not exceed the combined pre-developed peak discharge rate of 35.96 cubic feet per second.

A mixing zone is not required. A variance is not required.

II. 100-Year Floodplain

Encroachment Compensation Compensation Encroachment (Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type* Result**(feet) 0.00 0.00 N/A N/A

Comments: The 100-year floodplain is not located within the project area. Historic basin storage impacts associated with impacts to wetlands and other surface water are addressed in the hydrologic/hydraulic drainage modeling.

III. Environmental Considerations

Wetland/Surface Water Information Count of Wetlands: 2 Wetland Name Total Not Impacted Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Acres Acres Acres Functional Acres Functional Loss* Loss* 1A 0.63 0.00 0.63 0.36 0.00 0.00 1B 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.52 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1.55 0.001.55 0.88 0.00 0.00

* For impacts that do not require mitigation, their functional loss is not included.

Wetland Comments: The site contains a single 1.55 acre isolated wetland consisting of both forested (0.63 acre) and herbaceous (0.92 acre) components. The entire 1.55 acres of wetland will be permanently impacted by the construction of this project for a parking lot. The proposed permanent wetland impacts were evaluated utilizing the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). The functional analysis identified a total functional loss of 0.88.

126 Permit No.: 43032133.000 Project Name: Cocoplum Village Shops

Mitigation information Count of Mitigation: 2 Mitigation Name Creation/Restoration Enhancement Preservation Other Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Acres Functional Gain Gain Gain Gain Myakka Mitigation Bank 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Myakka Mitigation Bank 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mitigation Comments: The mitigation proposed to offset the functional loss of Wetland No. 1 consists of the purchase of 0.52 freshwater herbaceous and 0.36 forested credit from the Myakka Mitigation Bank (ERP No. 43003997.005). The purchase of a total of 0.88 mitigation credit adequately offsets the project's proposed impacts to functional wetland habitat.

A regulatory conservation easement is not required.

A proprietary conservation easement is not required.

SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.

2. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to:

Sarasota Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, FL 34240-9711

The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.

3. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction.

4. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Sarasota Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1.659, F.A.C., and signed, dated and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings.

127 Permit No.: 43032133.000 Project Name: Cocoplum Village Shops

5. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site.

6. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule.

For systems utilizing retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed two (2) years after operation is authorized and every two (2) years thereafter.

7. The removal of littoral shelf vegetation (including cattails) from wet detention ponds is prohibited unless otherwise approved by the District. Removal includes dredging, the application of herbicide, cutting, and the introduction of grass carp. Any questions regarding authorized activities within the wet detention ponds shall be addressed to the District's Surface Water Regulation Manager, Sarasota Service Office.

8. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease.

9. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery.

10. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed.

11. If prehistoric or historic artifacts, such as pottery or ceramics, stone tools or metal implements, or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American cultures, or early colonial or American settlement are encountered at any time within the project site area, the permitted project should cease all activities involving subsurface disturbance in the immediate vicinity of such discoveries. The Permittee, or other designee, should contact the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Review and Compliance Section, as well as the appropriate permitting agency office. Project activities should not resume without verbal and/or written authorization from the Division of Historical Resources. In the event that unmarked human remains are encountered during permitted activities, all work shall stop immediately and the proper authorities notified in accordance with Section 872.05, Florida Statutes.

12. The Permittee shall ensure that prior to the construction of wetland impacts, a letter modification for Myakka Mitigation Bank (ERP No. 43003997.005) shall be submitted to the District requesting the withdrawal of 0.52 freshwater herbaceous credit and 0.36 mixed forested credit for Cocoplum Village Shops. The letter modification request shall reference the project name, Cocoplum Village Shops and ERP No. 43032133.001. Failure to submit this letter modification requesting a credit withdrawal from the bank prior to the commencement of wetland impacts shall be a violation of this permit.

128 Permit No.: 43032133.000 Project Name: Cocoplum Village Shops

13. This permit is issued based upon the design prepared by the Permittee’s consultant. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance of Permits in Rules 40D- 4.301 and 40D-4.302, F.A.C., have not been met, upon written notice by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system and/or mitigation areas.

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.

______Authorized Signature

129 The following General Conditions are included on all Environmental Resource Permits issued pursuant to 40D-4 and 40D-40, Florida Administrative Code.

130 EXHIBIT "A"

1. All activities shall be implemented as set forth in the plans, specifications and performance criteria as approved by this permit. Any deviation from the permitted activity and the conditions for undertaking that activity shall constitute a violation of this permit.

2. This permit or a copy thereof, complete with all conditions, attachments, exhibits, and modifications, shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. The complete permit shall be available for review at the work site upon request by District staff. The permittee shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this permit.

3. For general permits authorizing incidental site activities, the following limiting general conditions shall also apply:

a. If the decision to issue the associated individual permit is not final within 90 days of issuance of the incidental site activities permit, the site must be restored by the permittee within 90 days after notification by the District. Restoration must be completed by re- contouring the disturbed site to previous grades and slopes re-establishing and maintaining suitable vegetation and erosion control to provide stabilized hydraulic conditions. The period for completing restoration may be extended if requested by the permittee and determined by the District to be warranted due to adverse weather conditions or other good cause. In addition, the permittee shall institute stabilization measures for erosion and sediment control as soon as practicable, but in no case more than 7 days after notification by the District.

b. The incidental site activities are commenced at the permittee's own risk. The Governing Board will not consider the monetary costs associated with the incidental site activities or any potential restoration costs in making its decision to approve or deny the individual environmental resource permit application. Issuance of this permit shall not in any way be construed as commitment to issue the associated individual environmental resource permit.

4. Activities approved by this permit shall be conducted in a manner which does not cause violations of state water quality standards. The permittee shall implement best management practices for erosion and a pollution control to prevent violation of state water quality standards. Temporary erosion control shall be implemented prior to and during construction, and permanent control measures shall be completed within 7 days of any construction activity. Turbidity barriers shall be installed and maintained at all locations where the possibility of transferring suspended solids into the receiving waterbody exists due to the permitted work. Turbidity barriers shall remain in place at all locations until construction is completed and soils are stabilized and vegetation has been established. Thereafter the permittee shall be responsible for the removal of the barriers. The permittee shall correct any erosion or shoaling that causes adverse impacts to the water resources.

5. Water quality data for the water discharged from the permittee's property or into the surface waters of the state shall be submitted to the District as required by the permit. Analyses shall be performed according to procedures outlined in the current edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater by the American Public Health Association or Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If water quality data are required, the permittee shall provide data as required on volumes of water

131 discharged, including total volume discharged during the days of sampling and total monthly volume discharged from the property or into surface waters of the state.

6. District staff must be notified in advance of any proposed construction dewatering. If the dewatering activity is likely to result in offsite discharge or sediment transport into wetlands or surface waters, a written dewatering plan must either have been submitted and approved with the permit application or submitted to the District as a permit prior to the dewatering event as a permit modification. A water use permit may be required prior to any use exceeding the thresholds in Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C.

7. Stabilization measures shall be initiated for erosion and sediment control on disturbed areas as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 7 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased.

8. Off-site discharges during construction and development shall be made only through the facilities authorized by this permit. Water discharged from the project shall be through structures having a mechanism suitable for regulating upstream stages. Stages may be subject to operating schedules satisfactory to the District.

9. The permittee shall complete construction of all aspects of the surface water management system, including wetland compensation (grading, mulching, planting), water quality treatment features, and discharge control facilities prior to beneficial occupancy or use of the development being served by this system.

10. The following shall be properly abandoned and/or removed in accordance with the applicable regulations:

a. Any existing wells in the path of construction shall be properly plugged and abandoned by a licensed well contractor. b. Any existing septic tanks on site shall be abandoned at the beginning of construction. c. Any existing fuel storage tanks and fuel pumps shall be removed at the beginning of construction.

11. All surface water management systems shall be operated to conserve water in order to maintain environmental quality and resource protection; to increase the efficiency of transport, application and use; to decrease waste; to minimize unnatural runoff from the property and to minimize dewatering of offsite property.

12. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of activity authorized by this permit, the permittee shall submit to the District a written notification of commencement indicating the actual start date and the expected completion date.

13. Each phase or independent portion of the permitted system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to the occupation of the site or operation of site infrastructure located within the area served by that portion or phase of the system. Each phase or independent portion of the system must be completed in accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to transfer of responsibility for operation and maintenance of that phase or portion of the system to a local government or other responsible entity.

132 14. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the permittee shall submit a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C. Additionally, if deviation from the approved drawings are discovered during the certification process the certification must be accompanied by a copy of the approved permit drawings with deviations noted.

15. This permit is valid only for the specific processes, operations and designs indicated on the approved drawings or exhibits submitted in support of the permit application. Any substantial deviation from the approved drawings, exhibits, specifications or permit conditions, including construction within the total land area but outside the approved project areas, may constitute grounds for revocation or enforcement action by the District, unless a modification has been applied for and approved. Examples of substantial deviations include excavation of ponds, ditches or sump areas deeper than shown on the approved plans.

16. The operation phase of this permit shall not become effective until the permittee has complied with the requirements of the conditions herein, the District determines the system to be in compliance with the permitted plans, and the entity approved by the District accepts responsibility for operation and maintenance of the system. The permit may not be transferred to the operation and maintenance entity approved by the District until the operation phase of the permit becomes effective. Following inspection and approval of the permitted system by the District, the permittee shall request transfer of the permit to the responsible operation and maintenance entity approved by the District, if different from the permittee. Until a transfer is approved by the District, the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the terms of the permit.

17. Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the permitted system, the District shall be notified of the changes prior to implementation so that a determination can be made whether a permit modification is required.

18. This permit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any required federal, state, local and special District authorizations including a determination of the proposed activities' compliance with the applicable comprehensive plan prior to the start of any activity approved by this permit.

19. This permit does not convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any property right, or any interest in real property, nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property which is not owned or controlled by the permittee, or convey any rights or privileges other than those specified in the permit and Chapter 40D-4 or Chapter 40D-40, F.A.C.

20. The permittee shall hold and save the District harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities which may arise by reason of the activities authorized by the permit or any use of the permitted system.

21. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the permit application, including plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be considered binding unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal determination under section 373.421(2), F.S., provides otherwise.

22. The permittee shall notify the District in writing within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or other transfer of ownership or control of the permitted system or the real property at which the permitted system is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of a permit are subject to the requirements of Rule 40D-4.351, F.A.C. The permittee transferring the permit shall remain liable

133 for any corrective actions that may be required as a result of any permit violations prior to such sale, conveyance or other transfer.

23. Upon reasonable notice to the permittee, District authorized staff with proper identification shall have permission to enter, inspect, sample and test the system to insure conformity with District rules, regulations and conditions of the permits.

24. If historical or archaeological artifacts are discovered at any time on the project site, the permittee shall immediately notify the District and the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources.

25. The permittee shall immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted information that is later discovered to be inaccurate.

134 CONSENT ITEM 23

135 CONSENT ITEM 23 Default Date: January 2, 2008

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT NO. 20000985.007

EXPIRATION DATE: December 18, 2013 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

The Permittee is responsible for submitting an application to renew this permit no sooner than one year prior to the expiration date, and no later than the end of the last business day before the expiration date, whether or not the Permittee receives prior notification by mail. Failure to submit a renewal application prior to the expiration date and continuing to withdraw water after the expiration date is a violation of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code, and may result in a monetary penalty and/or loss of the right to use the water. Issuance of a renewal of this permit is contingent upon District approval.

TYPE OF APPLICATION: Modification

GRANTED TO: Diehl Family Limited Partnership Belmont, LLC Post Office Box 154 2360 South Falkenburg Road Wimauma, FL 33598 Riverview, FL 33569

PROJECT NAME: Balm Farm

WATER USE CAUTION AREA: Southern - Most Impacted Area

PROPERTY LOCATION: 1,575 owned acres in Hillsborough County, at the northwest intersection of State Road 674 and Balm Wimauma Road, Wimauma.

ABSTRACT: This is a modification of an existing agricultural water use permit (WUP) with an increase in quantities. The quantities authorized in this modification are a standard annual average of 2,328,000 gallons per day (gpd) and a peak month of 4,847,000 gpd. The standard annual average quantity increases by 906,600 gpd and the peak month quantity increases by 147,200 gpd. The increase in the annual average reflects a correction of the previous permit and a self-relocation of 611,400 gpd. This modification is for the irrigation of 510.8 acres of spring tomatoes and 489.2 acres of fall tomatoes.

Special conditions include those that require the Permittee to maintain existing meters, record and report monthly meter readings, cap withdrawals not in use, plug one withdrawal point, address utilization of alternative water supplies (AWS) by investigating the feasibility of tailwater and reuse, notify the District when additional AWS is obtained, submit an application to modify this permit to incorporate additional AWS sources, implement irrigation conservation measures, comply with irrigation allotments, submit seasonal crop reports, and investigate well complaints.

CHANGES FROM PRIOR PERMIT: This permit corrects the standard annual average quantity associated with the previous crop plan and includes quantities self-relocated from Water Use Permit 20008673. The crop plan has changed from corn, potatoes, and citrus included on the previous permit to fall and spring tomatoes.

136 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

Permit Information Applicant Staff Existing Requested Recommendation 2017 2017 Annual Average (gpd) 1,421,400 2,698,543 2,328,000 Ground Water 1,421,400 2,698,543 2,328,000 Surface Water 0 0 0 1 Drought Annual Average (gpd) 1,421,400 2,698,543 2,328,000 Ground Water 1,421,400 2,698,543 2,328,000 Surface Water 0 0 0 2 Water Conservation Credits (g) N / A N / A N / A Ground Water N / A N / A N / A Surface Water N / A N / A N / A 3 Peak Month (gpd) 4,694,200 6,702,229 4,847,000 Ground Water 4,694,200 6,702,229 4,847,000 Surface Water 0 0 0 4 Maximum (gpd) N / A N / A N / A Ground Water N / A N / A N / A Surface Water N / A N / A N / A Fall Tomatoes Irrigated Acres 0 1,025 489.2 Irrigation Method N / A Drip w/ Mulch Drip w/Mulch Standard Irrigation Rate N / A 38 25.17 Drought Irrigation Rate N / A 38 25.17 Spring Tomatoes Irrigated Acres 0 1,025 510.8 Irrigation Method N / A Drip w/ Mulch Drip w/ Mulch Standard Irrigation Rate N / A 38.5 36.66 Drought Irrigation Rate N / A 38.5 36.66 Feed Corn Irrigated Acres 825.1 0 0 Irrigation Method Seepage N / A N / A Standard Irrigation Rate 12.96 N / A N / A Drought Irrigation Rate 15.97 N / A N / A Potatoes Irrigated Acres 829.1 0 0 Irrigation Method Seepage N / A N / A Standard Irrigation Rate 14.39 N / A N / A Drought Irrigation Rate 15.36 N / A N / A Citrus Irrigated Acres 40 0 0 Irrigation Method Microspray N / A N / A Standard Irrigation Rate 12.66 N / A N / A Drought Irrigation Rate 18.12 N / A N / A

137 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

1 Annual average limit when less than historical average rainfall if sufficient Water Conserving Credits exist in the Permittee's account. 2 The volume of water on account for use when greater than the Standard Annual Average is necessary to pump up to the Drought Annual Average. 3 Average daily use during the highest water use month. 4 Maximum use allowed in any 24-hour period/ Frost Freeze protection of crops.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

All conditions referring to approval by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, shall refer to the Director, Tampa Regulation Department, Resource Regulation.

1. All reports and data required by conditions of the permit shall be submitted to the District according to the due dates contained in the specific condition. If the report or data is received on or before the tenth day of the month following data collection, it shall be deemed as a timely submittal. The Permittee may use the District’s website to submit data, plans or reports online. To set up an account, the Permittee can address the request to [email protected]. All mailed reports and data are to be sent to:

Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899

Submission of plans and reports: Unless submitted online or otherwise indicated in the special condition, the original and two copies of each plan and report, such as conservation plans, environmental analyses, aquifer test results, per capita annual reports, etc. are required.

Submission of data: Unless otherwise indicated in the special condition, an original (no copies) is required for data submittals such as crop report forms, meter readings and/or pumpage, rainfall, water level evapotranspiration, or water quality data

2. The Permittee shall investigate the feasibility of using reclaimed water as a water source and submit a report describing the feasibility to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, by January 1, 2010. The report shall contain an analysis of reclaimed water sources for the area, including the relative location of these sources to the Permittee's property, the quantity of reclaimed water available, the projected dates of availability, costs associated with obtaining the reclaimed water, and an implementation schedule for reuse, if feasible. Infeasibility shall be supported with a detailed explanation.

3. The Permittee shall meter withdrawals from surface waters and/or the ground water resources, and meter readings from each withdrawal facility shall be recorded on a monthly basis within the last week of the month. The meter readings shall be reported to the Data Management Section, Regulation Performance Management Department on or before the tenth day of the following month. District-supplied scanning forms shall be used to submit the meter readings unless another arrangement for submission of this data has been approved by the District. The following withdrawal facilities shall be metered:

A. Existing permitted withdrawal facilities shall continue to be metered with non-resettable, totalizing flow meters or other flow measuring devices as approved by the Regulation Department Director, District ID Nos.1, 2, 3, 4, and 14 Permittee ID Nos. North, North Shop, North of Arena, West, and South.

138 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

The meters shall adhere to the following descriptions and shall be installed or maintained as follows:

1. The meters shall be non-resettable, totalizing flow meters that have a totalizer of sufficient magnitude to retain total gallon data for a minimum of the three highest consecutive months permitted quantities. If other measuring devices are proposed, prior to installation, approval shall be obtained in writing from the Regulation Department Director. 2. The Permittee shall report non-use on all metered standby withdrawal facilities on the scanning form or approved alternative reporting method. 3. If a metered withdrawal facility is not used during any given month, the meter report shall be submitted to the District indicating the same meter reading as was submitted the previous month. 4. The flow meters or other approved devices shall have and maintain an accuracy within five percent of the actual flow as installed. 5. Accuracy testing requirements: (a) For newly metered withdrawal points, the flow meter installation shall be designed for inline field access for meter accuracy testing. (b) The meter shall be tested for accuracy on-site, as installed, every five years beginning from the date of its installation for new meters or from the date of initial issuance of this permit containing the metering condition with an accuracy test requirement for existing meters. (c) The testing frequency will be decreased if the Permittee demonstrates to the satisfaction of the District that a longer period of time for testing is warranted. (d) The test will be accepted by the District only if performed by a person knowledgeable in the testing equipment used. (e) If the actual flow is found to be greater than 5% different from the measured flow, within 30 days, the Permittee shall have the meter re- calibrated, repaired, or replaced, whichever is necessary. Documentation of the test and a certificate of re-calibration, if applicable, shall be submitted within 30 days of each test or re-calibration. 6. The meter shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for achieving accurate flow to the specifications above, or it shall be installed in a straight length of pipe where there is at least an upstream length equal to ten (10) times the outside pipe diameter and a downstream length equal to two (2) times the outside pipe diameter. Where there is not at least a length of ten diameters upstream available, flow straightening vanes shall be used in the upstream line. 7. Broken or malfunctioning meter: (a) If the meter or other flow measuring device malfunctions or breaks, the Permittee shall notify the District within 15 days of discovering the malfunction or breakage. (b) The meter must be replaced with a repaired or new meter, subject to the same specifications given above, within 30 days of the discovery. (c) If the meter is removed from the withdrawal point for any other reason, it shall be replaced with another meter having the same specifications given above, or the meter shall be reinstalled within 30 days of its removal from the withdrawal. In either event, a fully functioning meter shall not be off the withdrawal point for more than 60 consecutive days. 8. While the meter is not functioning correctly, the Permittee shall keep track of the total amount of time the withdrawal point was used for each month and multiply those minutes times the pump capacity (in gallons per minute) for total gallons. The estimate of the number of gallons used each month during that period shall

139 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

be submitted on District scanning forms and noted as estimated per instructions on the form. If the data is submitted by another approved method, the fact that it is estimated must be indicated. The reason for the necessity to estimate pumpage shall be reported with the estimate. 9. In the event a new meter is installed to replace a broken meter, it and its installation shall meet the specifications of this condition. The permittee shall notify the District of the replacement with the first submittal of meter readings from the new meter.

4. Any wells not in use, and in which pumping equipment is not installed shall be capped or valved in a water tight manner in accordance with Chapter 62-532.500(3)(a)(4), F.A.C.

5. The Permittee shall:

A. Incorporate best water management practices, specifically including but not limited to irrigation practices, as recommended for the permitted activities in reports and publications by the IFAS. B. Limit daytime irrigation to the greatest extent practicable to reduce losses from evaporation. Daytime irrigation for purposes of system maintenance, control of heat stress, crop protection, plant establishment, or for other reasons which require daytime irrigation are permissible; but should be limited to the minimum amount necessary as indicated by best management practices. C. Implement a leak detection and repair program as an element of an ongoing system maintenance program. This program shall include a system-wide inspection at least once per year. D. Evaluate the feasibility of improving the efficiency of the current irrigation system or converting to a more efficient system. This condition includes implementation of the improvements or conversion when determined to be operationally and economically feasible.

6. Permittee shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the total irrigated acres by the total allocated acre-inches per irrigated acre per season for each crop type. For all crops except Citrus, an irrigated acre, hereafter referred to as "acre," is defined as the gross acreage under cultivation, including areas used for water conveyance such as ditches, but excluding uncultivated areas such as wetlands, retention ponds, and perimeter drainage ditches. For Citrus, an irrigated acre is based on 74% shaded area, equivalent to 89.4% of the gross acreage minus uncultivated areas such as wetlands, retention ponds, and perimeter drainage ditches.

An applicant or permittee within the Southern Water Use Caution Area may obtain the total allocated acre-inches per acre per season for their crops, plants, soil types, planting dates, and length of growing season by completing the “Irrigation Water Allotment Form” and submitting it to the District. The District will complete and return the form with the calculated total allocated acre- inches and water conserving credit per acre per season per crop, if applicable, based on the information provided. The “Irrigation Water Allotment Form” is available upon request.

7. The Permittee shall record the following information on the appropriate “Irrigation Water Use Form”, provided by the District, for each permitted irrigation withdrawal: A. Items (1) through (7) for seasonal crops (example: vegetables) and nurseries; B. Items (1) though (4) and item (7) for annual crops and plants (example: Citrus, pasture, lawn and landscape); C. Items (1) through (4) and item (8) for golf courses (annual); The list of items are: 1. Crop type;

140 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

2. Monthly irrigated acres per crop for seasonal crops; annual irrigated acres for annual crops (Citrus growers, give total acres; the District will calculate “shaded area” for the groves.) 3. The dominant soil type per crop or the number of acres per crop on that dominant soil type; 4. Irrigation methods; 5. Planting dates (the date the plants are actually placed in the beds, not the date the field is prepared); 6. Season length (in days); 7. Crop protection quantities (total gallons); and 8. Number of acres of tees and greens.

D. Additionally, if used, the following shall be documented separately: 1. Beginning and ending dates of irrigation for field preparation/crop establishment and supplemental irrigation; 2. Beginning and ending hour and date of each use of quantities for crop protection; 3. Non-irrigation use from irrigation well: Quantities from the withdrawals listed on these forms that were for other uses not related to irrigation demand. Such uses may include filling of spray tanks, livestock needs, and cleaning equipment and facilities. 4. Use of tailwater recovery.

This information shall be submitted to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, for irrigation activity during the previous season or year on the appropriate District form according to the following schedule:

Irrigation Water Use Form No. Form Title Submit By WUP-12 Form 46.20-012 (10/01) Winter and Spring Seasonal August 1 WUP-13 Form 46.20-013 (10/01) Summer and Fall Seasonal February 1

8. By December 31, 2009, District ID No. 8, Permittee ID No. P and A shall be properly abandoned (plugged bottom to top) by a licensed water well contractor in accordance with Chapter 62- 532.500(4), F.A.C., under a Well Abandonment Permit issued by the District unless an extension of time is granted by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation.

9. By January 1, 2010, the Permittee shall submit a detailed study regarding the feasibility of utilizing a tailwater recovery system on the property for the purposes of irrigation. The report shall address and include:

A. Economic factors, water quality, the total quantity of tailwater available, and other associated considerations; and B. An implementation schedule for the tailwater reuse, if such use is determined by the Permittee and the District to be feasible.

If the use of a tailwater recovery system is found not to be feasible, information detailing why such an operation is not feasible will be included.

If the use of a tailwater recovery system for irrigation purposes is determined to be feasible by the Permittee and the District, the Permittee shall submit an implementation plan to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, for review and approval, within 30 days after the feasibility report is approved in writing by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation. The District will require the construction and implementation of the

141 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

approved tailwater recovery system into the Permittee's irrigation operation within a period of time agreed upon by the District and the Permittee. A modification of the Water Use Permit may be required by the District after approval of the implementation plan.

10. The Permittee shall investigate peak month withdrawal-related well complaints within the area specified in Exhibit B. The complaint handling/mitigation procedure shall be as follows: A. Within 48 hours of complaint receipt by the Permittee, the Permittee shall perform a preliminary investigation and determine whether the Permittee's withdrawals may have caused the problem. B. If this preliminary assessment indicates that the Permittee may be responsible, the Permittee shall, within 72 hours of complaint receipt, supply the complainant with any water necessary for health and safety purposes, such as drinking water. C. If the detailed investigation confirms that the complainant's problem was caused by the Permittee's withdrawals, the complainant's problem shall be fully corrected within 15 days of complaint receipt. Full correction shall be restoration of the complainant's well to pre- impact condition or better, including the aspects of pressure levels, discharge quantity, and water quality. This detailed investigation shall include, but not be limited to, an analysis of water levels and pumpage impacts at the time of the complainant's problem, well and pump characteristics including depths, capacity, pump curves, and irrigation system requirements. D. If the resulting investigation determines that the Permittee was not responsible for the well problem, the Permittee shall document the reasons for this determination. E. The Permittee shall file a report of the complaint to the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, for review and approval within 20 days of the receipt of any complaint. The report shall include:

1. The name and address of each complainant; 2. The date and nature of the complaint; 3. A summary of the Permittee's investigation; 4. A summary of the Permittee's determination, including details of any mitigation activities; and 5. Cost of mitigation activity for each complaint.

A copy of the report shall also be sent to the complainant within 20 days of complaint receipt.

11. This Permit is located within the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA). Pursuant to Section 373.0421, Florida Statutes, the SWUCA is subject to a minimum flows and levels recovery strategy, which became effective on January 1, 2007. The Governing Board may amend the recovery strategy, including amending applicable water use permitting rules based on an annual assessment of water resource criteria, cumulative water withdrawal impacts, and on a recurring five-year evaluation of the status of the recovery strategy up to the year 2025 as described in Chapter 40D-80, Florida Administrative Code. This Permit is subject to modification to comply with new rules.

12. Compliance with the allocated standard annual average quantity and drought annual average quantities is based on a rolling 12-month calculation where the current pumpage is added to the pumpage for the previous 11 months, and the total is then divided by the number of days in those 12 months for gallons per day. If the Permittee exceeds the allocated standard annual average quantity or drought annual average quantities during any month, within 30 days the Permittee must submit a report to the District that includes reasons why the allocated quantities were exceeded, efforts already taken to attempt meeting the allocated quantities, and a plan to bring the permit into compliance. Reports for Permittees not achieving the allocated quantities are subject to District approval. Justification for exceeding the allocated quantities does not constitute a waiver of the District's authority to enforce the terms and conditions of the permit.

142 Permit No.: 20000985.007 Project Name: Balm Farm / Diehl Family Limited Partnership and Belmont, LLC

WITHDRAWAL POINT QUANTITY TABLE Water use from these withdrawal points are restricted to the quantities given below:

I.D. NO. DEPTH PERMITTEE/ DIAM. TTL./CSD.FT. GALLONS PER DAY DISTRICT (IN.) (feet bls) USE AVERAGE PEAK MONTH 1 / 1 12 UNK IR 1,560,300 3,227,600 2 / 2 12 UNK IR 534,600 1,127,100 3 / 3 12 UNK IR 100,100 204,900 4 / 4 12 UNK IR 74,700 164,100 14 / 14 12 UNK IR 58,300 123,300

IR = Irrigation

WITHDRAWAL POINT LOCATION TABLE

DISTRICT I.D. NO. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE 1 274426.42/821559.01 36/31/20 2 274352.04/821604.28 01/32/20 3 274325.02/821624.37 02/32/20 4 274353.34/821643.11 02/32/20 14 274258.05/821635.20 11/32/20

STANDARD CONDITIONS:

The Permittee shall comply with the Standard Conditions attached hereto, incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.

______Authorized Signature SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

This permit, issued under the provision of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code 40D-2, authorizes the Permittee to withdraw the quantities outlined above, and may require various activities to be performed by the Permittee as described in the permit, including the Special Conditions. This permit does not convey to the Permittee any property rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the Permittee from complying with any applicable local government, state, or federal law, rule, or ordinance.

143 CONSENT ITEM 24

144 CONSENT ITEM 24 Default Date: December 19, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT NO. 20001415.009

EXPIRATION DATE: December 18, 2017 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

The Permittee is responsible for submitting an application to renew this permit no sooner than one year prior to the expiration date, and no later than the end of the last business day before the expiration date, whether or not the Permittee receives prior notification by mail. Failure to submit a renewal application prior to the expiration date and continuing to withdraw water after the expiration date is a violation of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code, and may result in a monetary penalty and/or loss of the right to use the water. Issuance of a renewal of this permit is contingent upon District approval.

TYPE OF APPLICATION: Renewal

GRANTED TO: C.F. Industries, Inc. 10608 Paul Buchman Highway Plant City, FL 33566

PROJECT NAME: Plant City Phosphate Complex

WATER USE CAUTION AREA: Northern Tampa Bay

PROPERTY LOCATION: 3,327 owned acres in Hillsborough County, approximately 4.5 miles north of County Road 582, on the east side of Paul Buchman Highway (State Road 39).

ABSTRACT: This is a renewal of an existing industrial/commercial permit with an increase in quantities. The source of water authorized for use by this permit is from groundwater, reclaimed water, and surface water. Approximately 2,000,000 gallons per day (gpd) of reclaimed water is received from the City of Plant City for facility operations. The quantities are based on a projected increase in phosphoric acid plant production, a loss of available process water due to the draining of the pore water from a closed gypsum stack, and historical pumpage.

Special conditions include those that require the Permittee to submit required reports, maintain meters on existing withdrawal points and submit the meter readings monthly; report reclaimed quantities; confirm meter accuracy every five years; monitor and report water quality data quarterly; report any temporary or permanent losses of reclaimed water; modify the permit if reclaimed water is no longer acceptable or available; investigate well complaints; cap withdrawals not in use; practice irrigation conservation; report new reclaimed connections; implement and report water conservation activities; document and report any exceedance of the annual average quantity.

CHANGES FROM PRIOR PERMIT: The previous authorization allocated a standard annual average daily groundwater and surface water quantity of 4,051,000 gpd with a peak month of 7,723,000 gpd. This renewal authorizes a standard annual average daily groundwater and surface water quantity of 4,240,100 gpd and a peak month quantity of 7,721,600 gpd, representing an annual average increase of 189,100 gpd and a peak month decrease of 1,400 gpd, respectively. The increase in the annual average quantity reflects an expansion of three sulfuric acid production units and the decrease of pore water drainage from the closed gypsum stack.

145 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

Permit Information Existing Applicant Staff Requested Recommendation 2017 2017 Annual Average (gpd) 4,051,000 4,240,100 4,240,100 Ground Water 3,881,000 4,070,100 4,070,100 Surface Water 170,000 170,000 170,000 Reclaimed Water 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Drought Annual Average(gpd)2 N / A N / A N / A Ground Water N / A N / A N / A Surface Water N / A N / A N / A Reclaimed Water 1 N / A N / A N / A Water Conservation Credits 3 N / A N / A N / A Ground Water N / A N / A N / A Surface Water N / A N / A N / A Reclaimed Water 1 N / A N / A N / A Peak Month (gpd)4 7,723,000 7,721,600 7,721,600 Ground Water 7,435,000 7,433,600 7,433,600 Surface Water 288,000 288,000 288,000 Reclaimed Water 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Maximum (gpd)5 N/A N/A N/A Phosphate Chemical Processing 3,970,000 4,167,000 4,167,000 Lawn/Landscape irrigation 9,800 8,700 8,700 Personal Sanitary Use 71,200 64,400 64,400

1 Not a limit 2 Annual average limit when less than historical average rainfall if sufficient Water Conserving Credits exist in the Permittee's account. 3 The volume of water on account for use when greater than the Standard Annual Average is necessary to pump up to the Drought Annual Average. 4 Average daily use during the highest water use month. 5 Maximum use allowed in any 24-hour period/ Frost and Freeze protection of crops.

FACILITY NAME Plant City Phosphate Complex

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

All conditions referring to approval by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, shall refer to the Director, Tampa Regulation Department, Resource Regulation.

1. All reports and data required by conditions of the permit shall be submitted to the District according to the due dates contained in the specific condition. If the report or data is received on or before the tenth day of the month following data collection, it shall be deemed as a timely submittal. The Permittee may use the District’s website to submit data, plans or reports online. To set up an account, the Permittee can address the request to [email protected]. All mailed reports and data are to be sent to:

146 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 Submission of plans and reports: Unless submitted online or otherwise indicated in the special condition, the original and two copies of each plan and report, such as conservation plans, environmental analyses, aquifer test results, per capita annual reports, etc. are required.

Submission of data: Unless otherwise indicated in the special condition, an original (no copies) is required for data submittals such as crop report forms, meter readings and/or pumpage, rainfall, water level evapotranspiration, or water quality data

2. The Permittee shall investigate the feasibility of using reclaimed water as a water source for the uranium processing facility and submit a report describing the feasibility to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, by January 1, 2010. The report shall contain an analysis of reclaimed water sources for the area, including the relative location of these sources to the Permittee's property, the quantity of reclaimed water available, the projected dates of availability, costs associated with obtaining the reclaimed water, and an implementation schedule for reuse, if feasible. Infeasibility shall be supported with a detailed explanation.

3. The Permittee shall meter withdrawals from surface waters and/or the ground water resources, and meter readings from each withdrawal facility shall be recorded on a monthly basis within the last week of the month. The meter readings shall be reported to the Data Management Section, Regulation Performance Management Department on or before the tenth day of the following month. District-supplied scanning forms shall be used to submit the meter readings unless another arrangement for submission of this data has been approved by the District. The following withdrawal facilities shall be metered:

A. Existing permitted withdrawal facilities shall continue to be metered with non-resettable, totalizing flow meters or other flow measuring devices as approved by the Regulation Department Director, District ID Nos.1, 2, 3, 68, 80, 88, 89, 101, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, and 147. Permittee ID Nos.CPI-1, CPI-2, CPI-3, CPI-3D, CPI-14D, CPI-18DI, CPI- 18D2, CPI-31D, RW-1, RW-2, RW-3, RW-4, RW-5, RW-6, and 147.

The meters shall adhere to the following descriptions and shall be installed or maintained as follows:

1. The meters shall be non-resettable, totalizing flow meters that have a totalizer of sufficient magnitude to retain total gallon data for a minimum of the three highest consecutive months permitted quantities. If other measuring devices are proposed, prior to installation, approval shall be obtained in writing from the Regulation Department Director. 2. The Permittee shall report non-use on all metered standby withdrawal facilities on the scanning form or approved alternative reporting method. 3. If a metered withdrawal facility is not used during any given month, the meter report shall be submitted to the District indicating the same meter reading as was submitted the previous month. 4. The flow meters or other approved devices shall have and maintain an accuracy within five percent of the actual flow as installed. 5. Accuracy testing requirements: (a) For newly metered withdrawal points, the flow meter installation shall be designed for inline field access for meter accuracy testing.

147 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

(b) The meter shall be tested for accuracy on-site, as installed, every five years beginning from the date of its installation for new meters or from the date of initial issuance of this permit containing the metering condition with an accuracy test requirement for existing meters. (c) The testing frequency will be decreased if the Permittee demonstrates to the satisfaction of the District that a longer period of time for testing is warranted. (d) The test will be accepted by the District only if performed by a person knowledgeable in the testing equipment used. (e) If the actual flow is found to be greater than 5% different from the measured flow, within 30 days, the Permittee shall have the meter re- calibrated, repaired, or replaced, whichever is necessary. Documentation of the test and a certificate of re-calibration, if applicable, shall be submitted within 30 days of each test or re-calibration. 6. The meter shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for achieving accurate flow to the specifications above, or it shall be installed in a straight length of pipe where there is at least an upstream length equal to ten (10) times the outside pipe diameter and a downstream length equal to two (2) times the outside pipe diameter. Where there is not at least a length of ten diameters upstream available, flow straightening vanes shall be used in the upstream line. 7. Broken or malfunctioning meter: (a) If the meter or other flow measuring device malfunctions or breaks, the Permittee shall notify the District within 15 days of discovering the malfunction or breakage. (b) The meter must be replaced with a repaired or new meter, subject to the same specifications given above, within 30 days of the discovery. (c) If the meter is removed from the withdrawal point for any other reason, it shall be replaced with another meter having the same specifications given above, or the meter shall be reinstalled within 30 days of its removal from the withdrawal. In either event, a fully functioning meter shall not be off the withdrawal point for more than 60 consecutive days. 8. While the meter is not functioning correctly, the Permittee shall keep track of the total amount of time the withdrawal point was used for each month and multiply those minutes times the pump capacity (in gallons per minute) for total gallons. The estimate of the number of gallons used each month during that period shall be submitted on District scanning forms and noted as estimated per instructions on the form. If the data is submitted by another approved method, the fact that it is estimated must be indicated. The reason for the necessity to estimate pumpage shall be reported with the estimate. 9. In the event a new meter is installed to replace a broken meter, it and its installation shall meet the specifications of this condition. The permittee shall notify the District of the replacement with the first submittal of meter readings from the new meter.

4. The Permittee shall meter, record, and report alternative water supply (AWS) quantities received and used from each alternative water supply inflow line (line coming onto the property from an off- site source) and each AWS re-pump surface water withdrawal point from any storage facility. The meters shall be read on a monthly basis within the last week of each month and be reported to the Data Management Section, Regulation Performance Management Department on or before the tenth day of the following month. The Permittee shall use District-supplied scanning forms, unless another arrangement for submission of this data has been approved by the District.

The following AWS inflow lines and AWS re-pump facilities shall be metered:

148 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

A. Continue to maintain and operate existing, non-resettable, totalizing flow meters or other flow measuring devices as approved by the Regulation Department Director on: 1. AWS inflow lines, District ID Nos. 999, Permittee ID Nos. Reclaimed.

The meters shall adhere to the following requirements and shall be installed and maintained as follows:

1. All meters shall be non-resettable, totalizing flow meters that have a totalizer of sufficient magnitude to retain total gallon data for a minimum of the three highest consecutive months permitted quantities. If other measuring devices or other accounting methods are proposed, prior to installation, the Permittee shall submit documentation that the other measuring devices or accounting methods meet the stipulations listed in this condition. Approval for other measuring devices or accounting methods must be obtained in writing from the Regulation Department Director. 2. The flow meters or other approved devices shall have and maintain an accuracy within five percent of the actual flow as installed. 3. Accuracy testing requirements: (a) For newly metered AWS inflow lines and re-pump withdrawal point, the flow meter installation shall be designed for inline field access for meter- accuracy testing. (b) The meter shall be tested for accuracy on-site, as installed, every five years beginning from the date of its installation for new meters or from the date of initial issuance of this permit containing the metering condition with an accuracy-test requirement for existing meters. (c) The testing frequency will be decreased if the Permittee demonstrates to the satisfaction of the District that a longer period of time for testing is warranted. (d) The test will be accepted by the District only if performed by a person knowledgeable in the test equipment used. (e) If the actual flow is found to be greater than 5% different from the measured flow, within 30 days, the Permittee shall have the meter re- calibrated, repaired, or replaced, whichever is necessary. Documentation of the test and a certificate of re-calibration, if applicable, shall be submitted within 30 days of each test or re-calibration 4. If the alternative accounting method involves a meter belonging to another entity or to the alternative water supply provider, the Permittee shall submit documentation from the owner/supplier that the meter readings continue to be accurate to 5% of the actual flow as installed. Such documentation is subject to approval by the District. 5. The meter shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for achieving accurate flow to the specifications above, or it shall be installed in a straight length of pipe where there is at least an upstream length equal to ten (10) times the outside pipe diameter and a downstream length equal to two (2) times the outside pipe diameter. Where there is not at least a length of ten diameters upstream available, flow straightening vanes shall be used in the upstream line. 6. If a metered AWS inflow line or re-pump withdrawal point is not utilized during a given month, the meter report shall be submitted to the District showing the same meter reading that was submitted the previous month. 7. Broken or malfunctioning meter: (a) If the meter or other flow measuring device malfunctions or breaks, the Permittee shall notify the District within 15 days of discovering the malfunction or breakage.

149 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

(b) The meter must be replaced with a repaired or new meter, subject to the same specifications given above, within 30 days of the discovery. (c) If the meter is removed from the alternative water supply line or re-pump withdrawal point for any other reason, it shall be replaced with another meter having the same specifications given above, or the meter shall be reinstalled within 30 days of its removal from the withdrawal. In either event, a fully functioning meter shall not be off the withdrawal point for more than 60 consecutive days. 8. While the meter is not functioning correctly, the Permittee shall keep track of the total amount of time the withdrawal point was used for each month and multiply those minutes times the pump capacity (in gallons per minute) for total gallons. The estimate of the number of gallons used each month during that period shall be submitted on District scanning forms and noted as estimated per instructions on the form. If the data is submitted by another approved method, the fact that it is estimated must be indicated. The reason for the necessity to estimate pumpage shall be reported with the estimate. 9. In the event a new meter is installed to replace a broken meter, it and its installation shall meet the specifications of this condition. The permittee shall notify the District of the replacement with the first submittal of meter readings from the new meter.

5. Water quality samples from monitor wells shall be collected and analyzed for the District ID No., parameters, and frequency(ies) specified in the table below. Water quality samples shall be collected after pumping the monitor wellss to a constant temperature, pH, and conductivity. Sampling methods shall be designed to collect water quality samples that are chemically representative of the zone to be sampled. Water quality samples shall be analyzed by a laboratory certified by the Florida Department of Health utilizing the standards and methods applicable to the parameters analyzed and to the water use pursuant to Chapter 64E-1, Florida Administrative Code, “Certification of Environmental Testing Laboratories”. The Permittee's sampling procedures shall follow the handling and chain of custody procedures designated by the certified laboratory which will undertake the analysis. A report describing the sampling and chain of custody procedures shall be included with the first data submitted after the date this permit is granted, and upon any change in sampling and/or analytical methods. Any variance in sampling and/or analytical methods shall have prior approval of the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation. Reports of the analyses shall be submitted to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, on District forms on or before the tenth day of the following month, and shall include the signature of an authorized representative and certification number of the certified laboratory that undertook the analysis. The parameters and frequency of sampling and analysis may be modified by the District as necessary to ensure the protection of the resource.

District Permittee ID No. ID No. Parameter Sample Frequency 2 CPI-2 Chlorides, Sodium, February, May, August, and Sulfates, TDS November (Quarterly)

3 CPI-3 Chlorides, Sodium February, May, August, and Sulfates, TDS November (Quarterly)

Water quality samples shall be collected based on the following timetable:

Quarterly Same week of months specified

150 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

Analyses shall be performed according to procedures outlined in the current edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater by the American Public Health Association-American Water Works Association-Water Pollution Control Federation (APHA-AWWA-WPCF) or Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

6. If the reclaimed water source is no longer available to the Permittee for reasons beyond their control, or the Permittee demonstrates that it is no longer feasible to use an available reclaimed water source, the Permittee may apply to modify this permit to restore in full the withdrawal quantities which are required for the permitted water uses which were existing prior to the utilization of reclaimed water. If the Permittee demonstrates to the satisfaction of the District that the reclaimed water source is no longer available or feasible for use, then the quantities which are required shall be considered an existing use of water and not a new use, provided the proposed replacement water source is the same as was previously used. If the Permittee does not so demonstrate, then the quantities which are required shall be considered a new use which may result in a recommendation of denial of the application based on the rules in effect at the time which limit or prohibit new withdrawals. The Permittee should notify the District immediately when a termination of use of reclaimed water is contemplated which will necessitate increased utilization of another water source beyond the permitted capacity, and shall obtain the required modification of this permit in accordance with Condition No. 7.

7. If the Alternative Water Supply (AWS) (reclaimed water) becomes unavailable, insufficient or unsuitable for a duration greater than 30 days, the Permittee shall notify the District in writing within 45 days of the first day the AWS became unavailable, insufficient or unsuitable. The notification must continue to be submitted monthly for each subsequent 30-day period, for up to one year from the date of first loss, insufficiency, or unsuitability. From the date of the first loss, and while the AWS delivery remains unavailable, insufficient or unsuitable, the Permittee is authorized to withdraw groundwater quantities on standby from the existing withdrawal facilities sufficient to meet the combined permitted and AWS quantities. The withdrawn quantities under these circumstances shall not exceed the authorized groundwater and reclaimed (AWS) quantities combined. If the loss of the AWS exceeds one year, upon request of the Permittee, the District shall issue a Letter of Modification to reinstate the standby quantities as active quantities, subject to all requirements of Rule 40D-2.331(2), F.A.C.

8. The Permittee shall investigate withdrawal related well complaints within the area specified in Exhibit "B" The complaint handling/mitigation procedure shall be as follows:

A. Within 48 hours of complaint receipt by the Permittee, the Permittee shall perform a preliminary investigation and determine whether the Permittee's withdrawals may have caused the problem. B. If this preliminary assessment indicates that the Permittee may be responsible, the Permittee shall, within 72 hours of complaint receipt, supply the complainant with any water necessary for health and safety purposes, such as drinking water. C. If the detailed investigation confirms that the complainant's problem was caused by the Permittee's withdrawals, the complainant's problem shall be fully corrected within 15 days of complaint receipt. Full correction shall be restoration of the complainant's well to pre-impact condition or better, including the aspects of pressure levels, discharge quantity, and water quality. This detailed investigation shall include, but not be limited to, an analysis of water levels and pumpage impacts at the time of the complainant's problem, well and pump characteristics including depths, capacity, pump curves, and irrigation system requirements.

151 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

D. If the resulting investigation determines that the Permittee was not responsible for the well problem, the Permittee shall document the reasons for this determination. E. The Permittee shall file a report of the complaint, the findings of facts, appropriate technical data, and any mitigating action taken or to be taken by the Permittee, to the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, for review and approval within 20 days of the receipt of any complaint. The report shall include:

1. The name and address of each complainant; 2. The date and nature of the complaint; 3. A summary of the Permittee's investigation; 4. A summary of the Permittee's determination, including details of any mitigation activities; and 5. Cost of mitigation activity for each complaint.

A copy of the report shall also be sent to the complainant within 20 days of complaint receipt.

9. Any wells not in use, and in which pumping equipment is not installed shall be capped or valved in a water tight manner in accordance with Chapter 62-532.500(3)(a)(4), F.A.C.

10. Compliance with the allocated standard annual average quantity and drought annual average quantities is based on a rolling 12-month calculation where the current pumpage is added to the pumpage for the previous 11 months, and the total is then divided by the number of days in those 12 months for gallons per day. If the Permittee exceeds the allocated standard annual average quantity or drought annual average quantities during any month, within 30 days the Permittee must submit a report to the District that includes reasons why the allocated quantities were exceeded, efforts already taken to attempt meeting the allocated quantities, and a plan to bring the permit into compliance. Reports for Permittees not achieving the allocated quantities are subject to District approval. Justification for exceeding the allocated quantities does not constitute a waiver of the District's authority to enforce the terms and conditions of the permit.

11. The Permittee shall:

A. Incorporate best water management practices, specifically including but not limited to irrigation practices, as recommended for the permitted activities in reports and publications by the IFAS. B. Limit daytime irrigation to the greatest extent practicable to reduce losses from evaporation. Daytime irrigation for purposes of system maintenance, control of heat stress, crop protection, plant establishment, or for other reasons which require daytime irrigation are permissible; but should be limited to the minimum amount necessary as indicated by best management practices. C. Implement a leak detection and repair program as an element of an ongoing system maintenance program. This program shall include a system-wide inspection at least once per year. D. Evaluate the feasibility of improving the efficiency of the current irrigation system or converting to a more efficient system. This condition includes implementation of the improvements or conversion when determined to be operationally and economically feasible.

12. The Permittee shall begin carrying out the provisions of its District approved conservation plan upon receipt of this permit. The Permittee shall submit progress reports to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, concerning implementation of the plan on January 31 of each year of the permit duration.

152 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

WITHDRAWAL POINT QUANTITY TABLE Water use from these withdrawal points are restricted to the quantities given below:

I.D. NO. DEPTH PERMITTEE/ DIAM. TTL./CSD.FT. GALLONS PER DAY DISTRICT (IN.) (feet bls) USE AVERAGE PEAK MONTH

CPI-1 / 1 18 820 / 261 I 3,997,000 7,340,000 Standby I 2,000,000 7,340,000 Standby CPI-2 / 2 20 543 / 200 I 3,997,000 7,340,000 2,000,000 Standby CPI-3 / 3 12 1,094 / 139 I 64,400 71,200 CPI-5 / 5 4 400 / 200 I 5,000 N / A CPI-6 / 6 3 100 / UNK I 3,700 N / A CPI14D / 80 2 78 / 65 U 36,000 36,000 CPI18D / 88 4 75 / 50 U 36,000 36,000 CPI18D2 / 89 4 150 / 125 U 36,000 36,000 CPI131D / 101 2 76 / 65 U 36,000 36,000 RW-1 / 139 8 290 / 90 U 468,000 N / A RW-2 / 140 8 290 / 90 U 351,000 N / A RW-3 / 141 8 290 / 90 U 351,000 N / A RW-4 / 142 8 290 / 90 U 351,000 N / A RW-5 / 143 8 290 / 90 U 351,000 N / A RW-6 / 144 8 290 / 90 U 468,000 N / A 147 / 147 4 N/A I 170,000 288,000

I = Industrial U = Recovery of Contaminants

WITHDRAWAL POINT LOCATION TABLE

DISTRICT I.D. NO. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE

1 280957.76/820827.17 06/27/22 2 280956.43/820825.23 06/27/22 3 281016.09/820827.33 06/27/22 5 281007.46/820830.74 06/27/22 6 281016.45/820918.96 06/27/22 80 280923.99/820841.00 06/27/22

153 Permit No.: 20001415.009 Project Name: Plant City Phosphate Complex / C.F. Industries, Inc.

DISTRICT I.D. NO. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE

88 280923.34/820840.22 07/27/22 89 280923.18/820841.20 07/27/22 101 280933.02/820836.84 06/27/22 139 281005.51/820832.16 06/27/22 140 280957.58/820836.29 06/27/22 141 280949.30/820833.44 06/27/22 142 280940.27/820831.49 06/27/22 143 280934.51/820839.14 06/27/22 144 280925.74/820844.99 06/27/22 147 280908.87/820708.63 09/27/22

STANDARD CONDITIONS:

The Permittee shall comply with the Standard Conditions attached hereto, incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.

______Authorized Signature SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

This permit, issued under the provision of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code 40D-2, authorizes the Permittee to withdraw the quantities outlined above, and may require various activities to be performed by the Permittee as described in the permit, including the Special Conditions. This permit does not convey to the Permittee any property rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the Permittee from complying with any applicable local government, state, or federal law, rule, or ordinance.

154 CONSENT ITEM 25

155 CONSENT ITEM 25 Default Date: December 20, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT NO. 20007345.005

EXPIRATION DATE: December 18, 2017 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

The Permittee is responsible for submitting an application to renew this permit no sooner than one year prior to the expiration date, and no later than the end of the last business day before the expiration date, whether or not the Permittee receives prior notification by mail. Failure to submit a renewal application prior to the expiration date and continuing to withdraw water after the expiration date is a violation of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code, and may result in a monetary penalty and/or loss of the right to use the water. Issuance of a renewal of this permit is contingent upon District approval.

TYPE OF APPLICATION: Renewal

GRANTED TO: Manatee County Utility Operations Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC 4410 66th Street West Post Office Box 2000 Bradenton, FL 34210-2611 Mulberry, FL 33860

PROJECT NAME: IMC- Manatee Wellfield

WATER USE CAUTION AREA: Southern

PROPERTY LOCATION: 994 owned acres in Manatee County, 24 miles east of the City of Bradenton. The total serviced area is 152,279 acres.

ABSTRACT: Renewal of an existing water use permit for public supply with no change in quantities. The permitted quantities for this renewal are a standard annual average of 1,960,000 gallons per day (gpd) and a peak month of 1,960,000 gpd. This permit is one of the three permits that supply water to the entire Manatee County water supply system. Additional demand on the Manatee County system during the term of the permit will be met through the County's other wellfields and the Manatee River Reservoir.

Special conditions include those that require the Permittee to submit required reports, record and report monthly meter readings, submit water quality data, cap any withdrawals not in use, submit per capita rate reports annually and maintain a rate of less than 150 gpcd, adopt and report water conserving rate structure, report reuse annually, provide billing and meter reading information to customers annually, document and report any exceedance of the annual average quantity, update service area maps, achieve a minimum 50% beneficial reuse, utilize groundwater for emergency, maximize the use of surface water, comply with recovery strategies within the SWUCA, submit annual reports on wellfield operation and submit water conservation reports.

CHANGES FROM PRIOR PERMIT: There are no changes in the permitted quantities for this permit. The gross per capita daily decreases from 113 gpcd to 107 gpcd. The population served increases from 291,000 persons to 370,100 persons.

156 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

Permit Information Applicant Staff Existing Requested Recommendation 2017 2017 Annual Average (gpd) 1,960,000 1,960,000 1,960,000 Ground Water 1,960,000 1,960,000 1,960,000 Surface Water 0 0 0 Peak Month (gpd) 1,960,000 1,960,000 1,960,000 Ground Water 1,960,000 1,960,000 1,960,000 Surface Water 0 0 0 Population Served 291,000 370,100 370,100 Imports (gpd) 1,493,000 1,960,000 1,960,000 Exports (gpd) 12,695,000 11,547,000 11,547,000 Treatment Losses (gpd) 1,377,000 1,651,000 1,651,000 Gross Use (gpd) 32,819,000 39,648,000 39,648,000 Gross Per Capita (gpd/person) 113 107 107 Adjustments: Significant Uses (gpd) 2,320,000 4,460,000 4,460,000 Environmental Mitigation (gpd) 0 0 0 Reclaimed Water Offsets 0 0 0 Adjusted Gross Per Capita (gpd/person) 105 95 95 Residential Use (gpd) 22,973,000 25,230,000 25,230,000 Residential Per Capita (gpd/person) 79 68 68 Unaccounted Water Use (gpd) 2,692,000 3,304,000 3,304,000 Waste Water Inflow (gpd) 24,279,000 36,887,000 36,887,000 Reclaimed Water Flow (gpd) 24,279,000 36,887,000 36,887,000 Beneficially Used (gpd) 18,873,000 35,043,000 35,043,000 Potable Water Offset (gpd) 18,873,000 35,043,000 35,043,000 Percent Potable Water Offset (gpd) 78% 95% 95%

1 This is one of three permits that supply water to the County. The demand information is for the entire county, which includes all of the County's permits, and begins with population served. 2 Existing column from 2006 Annual Public Supply Survey.

SERVICE AREA NAME IMC- Manatee Wellfield

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

All conditions referring to approval by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, shall refer to the Director, Sarasota Regulation Department, Resource Regulation.

1. All reports and data required by conditions of the permit shall be submitted to the District according to the due dates contained in the specific condition. If the report or data is received on or before the tenth day of the month following data collection, it shall be deemed as a timely submittal. The Permittee may use the District’s website to submit data, plans or reports online. To set up an account, the Permittee can address the request to [email protected]. All mailed reports and data are to be sent to:

157 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899

Submission of plans and reports: Unless submitted online or otherwise indicated in the special condition, the original and two copies of each plan and report, such as conservation plans, environmental analyses, aquifer test results, per capita annual reports, etc. are required.

Submission of data: Unless otherwise indicated in the special condition, an original (no copies) is required for data submittals such as crop report forms, meter readings and/or pumpage, rainfall, water level evapotranspiration, or water quality data.

2. The Permittee shall meter withdrawals from surface waters and/or the ground water resources, and meter readings from each withdrawal facility shall be recorded on a monthly basis within the last week of the month. The meter readings shall be reported to the Data Management Section, Regulation Performance Management Department on or before the tenth day of the following month. District-supplied scanning forms shall be used to submit the meter readings unless another arrangement for submission of this data has been approved by the District. The following withdrawal facilities shall be metered:

A. Standby withdrawal facilities (those that provide back-up water for another withdrawal point in the event the other withdrawal point becomes unusable), District ID Nos. 1 and 2, Permittee ID Nos. PTW-1 and PTW-2 before using the standby quantities. B. Existing permitted withdrawal facilities shall continue to be metered with non-resettable, totalizing flow meters or other flow measuring devices as approved by the Regulation Department Director, District ID No. 3, Permittee ID No. PTW-3.

The meters shall adhere to the following descriptions and shall be installed or maintained as follows:

A. The meters shall be non-resettable, totalizing flow meters that have a totalizer of sufficient magnitude to retain total gallon data for a minimum of the three highest consecutive months permitted quantities. If other measuring devices are proposed, prior to installation, approval shall be obtained in writing from the Regulation Department Director. B. The Permittee shall report non-use on all metered standby withdrawal facilities on the scanning form or approved alternative reporting method. C. If a metered withdrawal facility is not used during any given month, the meter report shall be submitted to the District indicating the same meter reading as was submitted the previous month. D. The flow meters or other approved devices shall have and maintain an accuracy within five percent of the actual flow as installed. E. Accuracy testing requirements: 1. For newly metered withdrawal points, the flow meter installation shall be designed for inline field access for meter accuracy testing. 2. The meter shall be tested for accuracy on-site, as installed, every five years beginning from the date of its installation for new meters or from the date of initial issuance of this permit containing the metering condition with an accuracy test requirement for existing meters. 3. The testing frequency will be decreased if the Permittee demonstrates to the satisfaction of the District that a longer period of time for testing is warranted. 4. The test will be accepted by the District only if performed by a person knowledgeable in the testing equipment used.

158 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

5. If the actual flow is found to be greater than 5% different from the measured flow, within 30 days, the Permittee shall have the meter re-calibrated, repaired, or replaced, whichever is necessary. Documentation of the test and a certificate of re-calibration, if applicable, shall be submitted within 30 days of each test or re- calibration. F. The meter shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for achieving accurate flow to the specifications above, or it shall be installed in a straight length of pipe where there is at least an upstream length equal to ten (10) times the outside pipe diameter and a downstream length equal to two (2) times the outside pipe diameter. Where there is not at least a length of ten diameters upstream available, flow straightening vanes shall be used in the upstream line. G. Broken or malfunctioning meter: 1. If the meter or other flow measuring device malfunctions or breaks, the Permittee shall notify the District within 15 days of discovering the malfunction or breakage. 2. The meter must be replaced with a repaired or new meter, subject to the same specifications given above, within 30 days of the discovery. 3. If the meter is removed from the withdrawal point for any other reason, it shall be replaced with another meter having the same specifications given above, or the meter shall be reinstalled within 30 days of its removal from the withdrawal. In either event, a fully functioning meter shall not be off the withdrawal point for more than 60 consecutive days. H. While the meter is not functioning correctly, the Permittee shall keep track of the total amount of time the withdrawal point was used for each month and multiply those minutes times the pump capacity (in gallons per minute) for total gallons. The estimate of the number of gallons used each month during that period shall be submitted on District scanning forms and noted as estimated per instructions on the form. If the data is submitted by another approved method, the fact that it is estimated must be indicated. The reason for the necessity to estimate pumpage shall be reported with the estimate. I. In the event a new meter is installed to replace a broken meter, it and its installation shall meet the specifications of this condition. The permittee shall notify the District of the replacement with the first submittal of meter readings from the new meter.

3. Water quality samples shall be collected and analyzed, for parameters, and frequency(ies) specified below. Water quality samples from production wells shall be collected whether or not the well is being used, unless infeasible. If sampling is infeasible the Permittee shall indicate the reason for not sampling on the water quality data form. Water quality samples shall be analyzed by a laboratory certified by the Florida Department of Health utilizing the standards and methods applicable to the parameters analyzed and to the water use pursuant to Chapter 64E-1, F.A.C., "Certification of Environmental Testing Laboratories". At a minimum, water quality samples shall be collected after pumping the well at its normal rate for a pumping time specified in the table below, or to a constant temperature, pH, and conductivity. In addition, the Permittee's sampling procedure shall follow the handling and chain of custody procedures designated by the certified laboratory which will undertake the analysis. Any variance in sampling and/or analytical methods shall have prior approval of the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation. Reports of the analyses shall be submitted to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, (using District forms) on or before the tenth day of the following month, and shall include the signature of an authorized representative and certification number of the certified laboratory which undertook the analysis. The parameters and frequency of sampling and analysis may be modified by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, as necessary to ensure the protection of the resource.

159 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

District Permittee Minimum Pumping ID No. ID No. Time (minutes) Parameter Sampling Frequency

3 PTW-3 15 Chlorides, February, May, Sulfates, and August and November T.D.S.

Water quality samples shall be collected based on the following timetable:

Monthly Same week of each month

Analyses shall be performed according to procedures outlined in the current edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater by the American Public Health Association-American Water Works Association-Water Pollution Control Federation (APHA- AWWA-WPCF) or Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

4. Any wells not in use, and in which pumping equipment is not installed shall be capped or valved in a water tight manner in accordance with Subsection 62-532.500(3)(a)(4), F.A.C.

5. Compliance with the allocated standard annual average quantity and drought annual average quantities is based on a rolling 12-month calculation where the current pumpage is added to the pumpage for the previous 11 months, and the total is then divided by the number of days in those 12 months for gallons per day. If the Permittee exceeds the allocated standard annual average quantity or drought annual average quantities during any month, within 30 days the Permittee must submit a report to the District that includes reasons why the allocated quantities were exceeded, efforts already taken to attempt meeting the allocated quantities, and a plan to bring the permit into compliance. Reports for Permittees not achieving the allocated quantities are subject to District approval. Justification for exceeding the allocated quantities does not constitute a waiver of the District's authority to enforce the terms and conditions of the permit.

6. This Permit is located within the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA). Pursuant to Section 373.0421, Florida Statutes, the SWUCA is subject to a minimum flows and levels recovery strategy, which became effective on January 1, 2007. The Governing Board may amend the recovery strategy, including amending applicable water use permitting rules based on an annual assessment of water resource criteria, cumulative water withdrawal impacts, and on a recurring five-year evaluation of the status of the recovery strategy up to the year 2025 as described in Chapter 40D-80, Florida Administrative Code. This Permit is subject to modification to comply with new rules.

7. The Permittee shall submit an Annual Report to the District, by April 1 of each year, that includes: A. Service area functional population (FP) served and methodology for determining service area functional population. As of April 1, 2009, for the 2008 calendar year data, the Permittee shall utilize the methodology described in “Requirements for the Estimation of Permanent and Temporal Service Area Populations,” Part D of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications and its applicable appendices Part D of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications (BOR). The applicable Worksheets from Part D and supporting documentation for calculations of per capita rates are required. B. Non-residential significant water use (SU) that complies with criteria listed in Part B, Chapter 3, Section 3.6 of the BOR. All significant uses and associated quantities shall be listed even if not deducted. For those significant uses that are deducted in the calculation of adjusted per capita use, the Permittee shall identify the following: 1. The Type of significant use chosen. 2. The name, location and mailing address for each significant use.

160 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

3. Meter type. 4. Use of the water 5. Meter readings or other documentation of the annual average quantity provided 6. Conservation plans appropriate to the Type of significant use chosen, and 7. Documentation that the conservation plan is being implemented. C. Total withdrawals (WD). The permittee may use data from a master meter for this item. D. Treatment losses (TL), including a description of how the losses are calculated. E. District-required environmental mitigation (EM) quantities, including details concerning the environmental features mitigated and the method of mitigation. F. Imported (IM) and Exported (EX) transfers of bulk water. Include: 1. Monthly and annual average gallons per day with quantities determined at your departure point. 2. Meter type and size. 3. Receiver name, mailing address, telephone number, location (latitude and longitude) of point of receivership. 4. The water use permit number for any receiver that has a wholesale water use permit. 5. A description of how recipients of bulk transfers of water or wholesale purchasers adhere to your water conservation plan if they do not have a water use permit. G. Calculation of the adjusted gross per capita rate as follows:

WD + IM – EX – TL – SU – EM FP

H. Water Rate Structure: A description of the current water rate structure, how it has promoted water conservation to customers, water use savings due to the water rate structure, and any proposed amendments to the structure that is designed to promote water conservation. I. Water Conservation: A detailed description of the Permittee's water conservation activities for the previous year as well as a description of ongoing and planned water conservation activities. J. Unaccounted Water Loss: Annual Average daily quantity of unaccounted water lost and the percentage of unaccounted water lost relative to total withdrawals. K. Water Audit Update: Summary of the Permittee’s ongoing Water Audit activities that includes but is not limited to a description of all unaccounted water losses, the ongoing leak detection, and meter change-out programs. If the unaccounted water losses are 12% or more of total withdrawals after subtracting treatment losses, the Permittee shall submit a comprehensive water audit report yearly on or before October 1 which specifically addresses the unaccounted water losses and provides an implementation schedule for remedial actions to reduce these losses below 12%. The water audit report shall continue to be submitted annually until the unaccounted water losses are less than 12% of total withdrawals after subtracting treatment loss. L. Residential Water Use: Total water use information on residential water use (including indoor and outdoor use) for the following categories of residential use. Describe the methodology used to determine the number of residences in each category. Estimates based on meter size will not be accepted. 1. The number of single family units served. 2. The number of multi-family units served. 3. The number of mobile homes served, unless mobile homes are included in the number of single-family units. M. Suppliers of Alternative Water Report. The report must document the quantity of reclaimed water or stormwater supplied as beneficial reuse to residential customers and to bulk customers on both an annual average daily and monthly basis. Include with the report:

161 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

1. Meter readings of actual deliveries, but if this is not available, billing information may be submitted if the bill indicates quantities delivered. 2. For all individual customer reuse connections with line sizes of four inches or greater, include: (a) Account name and address. (b) Location of connection by latitude-longitude. (c) Line size. (d) If metered: i. Metered quantities and ii. Ownership of the meter. (e) The customer's stated use for the water. (f) Water Use Permit number for those customers having a water use permit from the District. N. Disposal: Documentation of quantities of reclaimed water and stormwater disposed, location of disposal site, and manner of disposal. O. Service Area Map: With every sixth yearly report, a current service area map as described in the Service Area Map Special Condition.

The Permittee may use the Public Supply Surveys to provide the information required by this condition, completing only the parts required by this condition. The survey forms are usually sent to the Permittee by the first week of January of each year, or they may be requested or downloaded from the District’s website. In addition, the Permittee will find further description and assistance with completion of the annual report on the District's website.

8. By January 1 of each year, for the preceding calendar year or fiscal year (October 1 through September 30), the Permittee shall submit a report detailing:

A. Quantity of total reclaimed water provided by the Permittee for reuse on both a total annual average daily and monthly basis; B. For all individual customer reuse connections with line sizes of 4 inches or greater, list:

1. account name and address; 2. location of connections by latitude - longitude; 3. line size; 4. meter (yes or no); and 5. metered quantities, if metered.

9. The Permittee shall read each customer's meter and bill the customer no less frequently than bi- monthly (every other month), and the customer's billing period usage shall be indicated on each bill. In addition, the Permittee shall provide the following information to all water customers at least once each calendar year:

A. Rate structure information describing applicable fixed and variable charges rates, minimum quantity charges, block size and pricing, seasonal rates, and applicable months. If billing units are not in gallons, a means to convert the billing units to gallons must be described to the customer with this information. B. Historical billing period usage averaged over the three previous years for the applicable customer class.

10. The Permittee shall include an updated service area map with the Annual Report that is due April 1, 2009. The map shall adhere to the following guidelines:

162 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

A. The service area map shall build upon and clearly show any changes relative to the existing service area map in the District's electronic public supply service area boundary map file. If there are no changes, the Permittee may submit a statement with the Annual Report that there have been no changes to the map in the District map file. The Permittee may contact the District for assistance in accessing this map. B. If a service area map is not on file in the District's GIS, it may be submitted in paper format or in District-compatible electronic file format. The map must include a north arrow (or show S-T-R lines) and have the scale clearly indicated. If it is not an aerial photographic map, it must include readily recognizable roads or streets and other identifiable landmarks. It must contain a legend to define all symbols used. A paper map must have a minimum scale of 1 inch = 2,000 feet or larger. C. The map must clearly delineate the current area served, any areas proposed to be served within the permit term, and definable areas within the service area that are not served because the population uses domestic potable wells. If any of these un-served areas are scheduled to be included in the service area within the permit term, documentation such as a capital improvement plan that demonstrates the proposed inclusion is required to be submitted with the updated map. D. With each service area map submittal, the following information must be included: 1. A current general utility contact person name, title, email address and phone number. 2. A current contact person name, title, email address and phone number whom District staff may call concerning the service area map. 3. The metadata for the map if the map is submitted as an electronic file that is compatible with the District's format. 4. The District permit numbers and Florida Department of Environmental Protection Public Water Supply Identifier (PWSI) numbers and area designation names for each area served by a separate potable water treatment plant, as applicable. 5. A description of routine water transfer interconnections between service areas and other utilities or wholesale suppliers or recipients. 6. The name, phone number, and all District water use permit numbers for each utility that purchases water on a routine basis and the most recent year’s purchase quantity in millions of gallons per day. 7. The name, phone number, and District water use permit numbers of each utility from which that the permittee purchases water on a routine basis and the most recent year’s purchase quantity in millions of gallons per day.

11. The Permittee is encouraged to demonstrate that beneficial reuse of treated effluent is maximized so that 50% or more of the total annual treated effluent flow is beneficially reused. The calculation of the percentage beneficially reused will be based on the Permittee's waste water treatment plants that have a capacity of 0.5 million gallons per day or greater. Beneficial reuse includes:

A. Landscape irrigation of golf courses, playing fields, cemeteries, parks, playgrounds, school yards, retail nurseries and commercial, industrial and residential properties. B. Agricultural irrigation of food, fiber, fodder and seed crops, wholesale nurseries, “cut flowers", sod farms and improved pastures. C. Ground water recharge where such recharge results in environmental or water supply benefit. D. Industrial uses for cooling water, process water and wash waters. E. Wetlands restoration. F. Fire protection. G. Environmental enhancement, including discharges to surface waters to replace withdrawals.

163 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

Other useful purposes accepted by the District or allowed under a DEP permit pursuant to Chapter 62-610, F.A.C.

12. The Permittee shall adhere to the adjusted gross per capita (AGPC) requirements below:

A. The AGPC daily water use rate shall be no greater than 150 gallons per day (gpd) per person. The Permittee shall calculate the AGPC rate as described in the Annual Report Condition on this permit and shall submit the calculations with the Annual Report by April 1 of each year. B. If the AGPC rate is greater than 150 gpd per person, the Permittee shall submit a report that documents why this rate was exceeded, measures previously or currently taken to reduce their AGPC rate, and a plan that describes additional measures and implementation dates for those measures to bring their AGPC rate to or below 150 gpd per person. This report shall be submitted with the Annual Report by April 1 for each year the AGPC rate exceeds 150 gpd per person.

Reports for Permittees not achieving the required adjusted gross per capita rate are subject to District approval. Justification for exceeding the adjusted gross per capita rate does not constitute a waiver of the District's authority to enforce the terms and conditions of the permit.

13. The Permittee shall continue to have and maintain a water conservation oriented rate structure. A report on the effectiveness of the water conserving rate structure shall be submitted with each Annual Report by April 1 of each year. Changes made to the rate structure since 2004 and changes made during any year afterward and its impact on water conservation shall be included with the report.

14. During the term of this permit, should the supply of potable water from Lake Manatee (Manatee County Reservoir) be interrupted, rendered non-treatable, or fail from any cause, the Permittee, with District Executive Order approval, may make additional groundwater withdrawals in quantities necessary to meet this water supply emergency. Additional groundwater withdrawals from the Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County Wellfield may exceed the express authority of this permit for any period of time not to exceed three (3) months duration without further Governing Board action during the term of this permit.

15. Permittee shall maximize the use of surface water from Lake Manatee (WUP No. 20005387.007), in order to meet the public supply demands of Manatee County, prior to activating groundwater quantities authorized by this permit.

WITHDRAWAL POINT QUANTITY TABLE Water use from these withdrawal points are restricted to the quantities given below:

I.D. NO. DEPTH PERMITTEE/ DIAM. TTL./CSD.FT. GALLONS PER DAY DISTRICT (IN.) (feet bls) USE AVERAGE PEAK MONTH PTW-1 / 1 20 1,266 / 520 B 1,960,000 1,960,000 Standby PTW-2 / 2 20 1,254 / 476 B 1,960,000 1,960,000 Standby PTW-3 / 3 20 1,200 / 523 B 1,960,000 1,960,000

B = Public Supply

164 Permit No.: 20007345.005 Project Name: Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC and Manatee County

WITHDRAWAL POINT LOCATION TABLE

DISTRICT I.D. NO. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE 1 272819.87/821233.00 04/35/21 2 272838.85/821210.49 34/34/21 3 272847.60/821200.30 34/34/21

STANDARD CONDITIONS:

The Permittee shall comply with the Standard Conditions attached hereto, incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.

______Authorized Signature SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

This permit, issued under the provision of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code 40D-2, authorizes the Permittee to withdraw the quantities outlined above, and may require various activities to be performed by the Permittee as described in the permit, including the Special Conditions. This permit does not convey to the Permittee any property rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the Permittee from complying with any applicable local government, state, or federal law, rule, or ordinance.

165 CONSENT ITEM 26

166 CONSENT ITEM 26 Default Date: December 20, 2007

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE INDIVIDUAL PERMIT NO. 20011440.002

EXPIRATION DATE: December 18, 2017 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: December 18, 2007

The Permittee is responsible for submitting an application to renew this permit no sooner than one year prior to the expiration date, and no later than the end of the last business day before the expiration date, whether or not the Permittee receives prior notification by mail. Failure to submit a renewal application prior to the expiration date and continuing to withdraw water after the expiration date is a violation of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code, and may result in a monetary penalty and/or loss of the right to use the water. Issuance of a renewal of this permit is contingent upon District approval.

TYPE OF APPLICATION: Renewal

GRANTED TO: John Falkner 35100 State Road 64 East Myakka City, FL 34251

PROJECT NAME: Bear Bay East

WATER USE CAUTION AREA: Southern

PROPERTY LOCATION: 158 owned acres in Manatee County, approximately 3.5 miles west of the intersection of State Road 64 and Myakka-Wauchula Road.

ABSTRACT: This is a renewal of an existing agricultural water use permit with a change in permitted quantities for the irrigation of 130 acres of spring tomatoes and 130 acres of fall peppers. The permitted quantities for this renewal are a standard annual average of 574,000 gallons per day (gpd), a drought annual average of 574,000 gpd and a peak month of 1,147,000 gpd.

Special conditions include those that require the Permittee to maximize the use of tailwater, maintain existing meters and meter a proposed withdrawal, record and report meter readings monthly, cap withdrawals not in use, address additional utilization of alternative water supplies (AWS) and modify the permit to incorporate AWS when it is obtained, notify District of loss of alternative source, continue to implement irrigation conservation measures, comply with irrigation allotments, submit seasonal irrigation water use reports, eliminate off-site discharge through Best Management Practices, document and submit a report if the standard annual average or drought annual average daily quantities have been exceeded and comply with minimum flows and levels recovery strategy within the SWUCA.

Changes From Prior Permit: The standard annual average quantity and the drought annual average quantity are both decreased by 30,000 gpd and the peak month quantity is decreased by 251,000 gpd. The changes in the standard annual average, drought annual average and peak month quantities are due to the use of recovered tailwater, a decrease in the irrigated acreage and a change in crop type. The total irrigation demand for this farm is 604,000 gpd on a standard annual average daily basis. This permit authorizes an annual average daily quantity of 574,000 gpd from groundwater. The remaining 30,000 gpd irrigation demand is met through the use of recovered tailwater.

167 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

Permit Information Applicant Staff Requested Recommendation Existing 2017 2017 Annual Average (gpd) Ground Water 604,000 574,000 574,000 Surface Water N/A 30,000 30,000 Drought Annual Average (gpd)1 Ground Water 604,000 574,000 574,000 Surface Water N/A 30,000 30,000 Water Conservation Credits (g)2 Ground Water N/A N/A N/A Surface Water N/A N/A N/A Peak Month (gpd)3 Ground Water 1,398,000 1,147,000 1,147,000 Surface Water N/A 34,600 34,600 Maximum (gpd)4 Ground Water N/A N/A N/A Surface Water N/A N/A N/A Spring Peppers Irrigated Acres 150 N/A N/A Irrigation Method Seep/drip N/A N/A Standard Irrigation Rate 54.1 N/A N/A Drought Irrigation Rate N/A N/A N/A Fall Peppers Irrigated Acres 150 N/A N/A Irrigation Method Seep/Drip N/A N/A Standard Irrigation Rate 54.1 N/A N/A Drought Irrigation Rate N/A N/A N/A Spring Tomatoes Irrigated Acres N/A 130 130 Irrigation Method N/A Seep/drip Seep/drip Standard Irrigation Rate N/A 33.9 33.9 Drought Irrigation Rate N/A 33.9 33.9 Fall Peppers Irrigated Acres N/A 130 130 Irrigation Method N/A Seep/Drip Seep/Drip Standard Irrigation Rate N/A 29.0 29.0 Drought Irrigation Rate N/A 29.0 29.0

1 Annual average limit when less than historical average rainfall if sufficient Water Conserving Credits exist in the Permittee's account. 2 Water Conserving Credit: The volume of water on account for use when greater than the Standard A Annual Average is necessary to pump up to the Drought Annual Average. 3 Average daily use during the highest water use month. 4 Maximum use allowed in any 24-hour period/ Frost Freeze protection of crops.

168 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

All conditions referring to approval by the Regulation Department Director, Resource Regulation, shall refer to the Director, Sarasota Regulation Department, Resource Regulation.

1. All reports and data required by conditions of the permit shall be submitted to the District according to the due dates contained in the specific condition. If the report or data is received on or before the tenth day of the month following data collection, it shall be deemed as a timely submittal. The Permittee may use the District’s website to submit data, plans or reports online. To set up an account, the Permittee can address the request to [email protected]. All mailed reports and data are to be sent to:

Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899

Submission of plans and reports: Unless submitted online or otherwise indicated in the special condition, the original and two copies of each plan and report, such as conservation plans, environmental analyses, aquifer test results, per capita annual reports, etc. are required.

Submission of data: Unless otherwise indicated in the special condition, an original (no copies) is required for data submittals such as crop report forms, meter readings and/or pumpage, rainfall, water level evapotranspiration, or water quality data.

2. The Permittee shall meter withdrawals from surface waters and/or the ground water resources, and meter readings from each withdrawal facility shall be recorded on a monthly basis within the last week of the month. The meter readings shall be reported to the Data Management Section, Regulation Performance Management Department on or before the tenth day of the following month. District-supplied scanning forms shall be used to submit the meter readings unless another arrangement for submission of this data has been approved by the District. The following withdrawal facilities shall be metered:

A. Withdrawal facilities that are not yet constructed, District ID No. 2, Permittee ID No. 2 shall be metered within 90 days of completion of construction of the withdrawal. B. Existing permitted withdrawal facilities shall continue to be metered with non-resettable, totalizing flow meters or other flow measuring devices as approved by the Regulation Department Director, District ID No. 1, Permittee ID No. 1.

The meters shall adhere to the following descriptions and shall be installed or maintained as follows:

A. The meters shall be non-resettable, totalizing flow meters that have a totalizer of sufficient magnitude to retain total gallon data for a minimum of the three highest consecutive months permitted quantities. If other measuring devices are proposed, prior to installation, approval shall be obtained in writing from the Regulation Department Director. B. The Permittee shall report non-use on all metered standby withdrawal facilities on the scanning form or approved alternative reporting method. C. If a metered withdrawal facility is not used during any given month, the meter report shall be submitted to the District indicating the same meter reading as was submitted the previous month. D. The flow meters or other approved devices shall have and maintain an accuracy within five percent of the actual flow as installed.

169 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

E. Accuracy testing requirements: 1. For newly metered withdrawal points, the flow meter installation shall be designed for inline field access for meter accuracy testing. 2. The meter shall be tested for accuracy on-site, as installed, every five years beginning from the date of its installation for new meters or from the date of initial issuance of this permit containing the metering condition with an accuracy test requirement for existing meters. 3. The testing frequency will be decreased if the Permittee demonstrates to the satisfaction of the District that a longer period of time for testing is warranted. 4. The test will be accepted by the District only if performed by a person knowledgeable in the testing equipment used. 5. If the actual flow is found to be greater than 5% different from the measured flow, within 30 days, the Permittee shall have the meter re-calibrated, repaired, or replaced, whichever is necessary. Documentation of the test and a certificate of re-calibration, if applicable, shall be submitted within 30 days of each test or re- calibration. F. The meter shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for achieving accurate flow to the specifications above, or it shall be installed in a straight length of pipe where there is at least an upstream length equal to ten (10) times the outside pipe diameter and a downstream length equal to two (2) times the outside pipe diameter. Where there is not at least a length of ten diameters upstream available, flow straightening vanes shall be used in the upstream line. G. Broken or malfunctioning meter: 1. If the meter or other flow measuring device malfunctions or breaks, the Permittee shall notify the District within 15 days of discovering the malfunction or breakage. 2. The meter must be replaced with a repaired or new meter, subject to the same specifications given above, within 30 days of the discovery. 3. If the meter is removed from the withdrawal point for any other reason, it shall be replaced with another meter having the same specifications given above, or the meter shall be reinstalled within 30 days of its removal from the withdrawal. In either event, a fully functioning meter shall not be off the withdrawal point for more than 60 consecutive days. H. While the meter is not functioning correctly, the Permittee shall keep track of the total amount of time the withdrawal point was used for each month and multiply those minutes times the pump capacity (in gallons per minute) for total gallons. The estimate of the number of gallons used each month during that period shall be submitted on District scanning forms and noted as estimated per instructions on the form. If the data is submitted by another approved method, the fact that it is estimated must be indicated. The reason for the necessity to estimate pumpage shall be reported with the estimate. I. In the event a new meter is installed to replace a broken meter, it and its installation shall meet the specifications of this condition. The permittee shall notify the District of the replacement with the first submittal of meter readings from the new meter.

3. Any wells not in use, and in which pumping equipment is not installed shall be capped or valved in a water tight manner in accordance with Subsection 62-532.500(3)(a)(4), F.A.C.

4. By February 1, 2008, the Permittee shall submit to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, the specific location of District ID No. 2, Permittee ID No. 2, on an original blue line aerial with a minimum scale of 1" = 800' or by latitude/longitude.

5. The Permittee shall report connection to reclaimed water to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, within 30 days of connection to the reuse source. The Permittee shall list the source name, location, and monthly reclaimed quantities obtained in gallons, for each source, and submit this information to the Permit Data Section by the 10th day of the following month, in conjunction with the monthly pumpage report.

170 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

6. Within 90 days of the replacement of any or all withdrawal quantities from ground water or surface water bodies with an Alternative Water Supply, the Permittee shall apply to modify this permit to reflect incorporation of the alternative source of water to replace permitted quantities in equal amounts. The replaced water shall be put on standby and may be used in the event that some or all of the alternative source is not available.

7 If the Alternative Water Supply (AWS) becomes unavailable, insufficient or unsuitable for a duration greater than 30 days, the Permittee shall notify the District in writing within 45 days of the first day the AWS became unavailable, insufficient or unsuitable. The notification must continue to be submitted monthly for each subsequent 30-day period, for up to one year from the date of first loss, insufficiency, or unsuitability. From the date of first loss and while the AWS delivery remains unavailable, insufficient or unsuitable, the Permittee is authorized to withdraw the standby quantities on standby to meet the authorized use. The combined use AWS quantities (if any) and withdrawn standby quantities shall not exceed the permitted quantities or an authorized irrigation allocation rate. If the loss of the AWS exceeds one year, upon request of the Permittee, the District shall issue a Letter of Modification to reinstate the standby quantities as active quantities, subject to all requirements of Rule 40D-2.331(2), F.A.C.

8 Compliance with the allocated standard annual average quantity and drought annual average quantities is based on a rolling 12-month calculation where the current pumpage is added to the pumpage for the previous 11 months, and the total is then divided by the number of days in those 12 months for gallons per day. If the Permittee exceeds the allocated standard annual average quantity or drought annual average quantities during any month, within 30 days the Permittee must submit a report to the District that includes reasons why the allocated quantities were exceeded, efforts already taken to attempt meeting the allocated quantities, and a plan to bring the permit into compliance. Reports for Permittees not achieving the allocated quantities are subject to District approval. Justification for exceeding the allocated quantities does not constitute a waiver of the District's authority to enforce the terms and conditions of the permit.

9 This Permit is located within the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA). Pursuant to Section 373.0421, Florida Statutes, the SWUCA is subject to a minimum flows and levels recovery strategy, which became effective on January 1, 2007. The Governing Board may amend the recovery strategy, including amending applicable water use permitting rules based on an annual assessment of water resource criteria, cumulative water withdrawal impacts, and on a recurring five-year evaluation of the status of the recovery strategy up to the year 2025 as described in Chapter 40D-80, Florida Administrative Code. This Permit is subject to modification to comply with new rules.

10 The Permittee shall not exceed the quantity determined by multiplying the total irrigated acres by the total allocated acre-inches per irrigated acre per season for each crop type. For all crops except citrus, an irrigated acre, hereafter referred to as "acre," is defined as the gross acreage under cultivation, including areas used for water conveyance such as ditches, but excluding uncultivated areas such as wetlands, retention ponds, and perimeter drainage ditches. For citrus, an irrigated acre is based on 74% shaded area, equivalent to 89.4% of the gross acreage minus uncultivated areas such as wetlands, retention ponds, and perimeter drainage ditches.

An Applicant or Permittee within the Southern Water Use Caution Area may obtain the total allocated acre-inches per acre per season for their crops, plants, soil types, planting dates, and length of growing season by completing the "Irrigation Water Allotment Form" and submitting it to the District. The District will complete and return the form with the calculated total allocated acre- inches and water conserving credit per acre per season per crop, if applicable, based on the information provided. The "Irrigation Water Allotment Form" is available upon request.

171 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

11 The Permittee shall record the following information on the appropriate "Irrigation Water Use Form", provided by the District, for each permitted irrigation withdrawal:

A. Items (1) through (7) for seasonal crops (example: vegetables) and nurseries; B. Items (1) through (4) and item (7) for annual crops and plants (example: citrus, pasture, lawn and landscape); C. Items (1) through (4) and item (8) for golf courses (annual); The list of items are: 1) Crop type; 2) Monthly irrigated acres per crop for seasonal crops; annual irrigated acres for annual crops (Citrus growers, give total acres; the District will calculate "shaded area" for the groves.) 3) The dominant soil type per crop or the number of acres per crop on that dominant soil type; 4) Irrigation methods; 5) Planting dates (the date the plants are actually placed in the beds, not the date the field is prepared); 6) Season length (in days); 7) Crop protection quantities (total gallons); and 8) Number of acres of tees and greens. D. Additionally, if used, the following shall be documented separately: 1) Beginning and ending dates of irrigation for field preparation/crop establishment and supplemental irrigation; 2) Beginning and ending hour and date of each use of quantities for crop protection; 3) Non-irrigation use from irrigation well: Quantities from the withdrawals listed on these forms that were for other uses not related to irrigation demand. Such uses may include filling of spray tanks, livestock needs, and cleaning equipment and facilities. 4) Use of tailwater recovery.

This information shall be submitted to the Permit Data Section, Regulation Performance Management Department, for irrigation activity during the previous season or year on the appropriate District form according to the following schedule:

Irrigation Water Use Form No. Form Title Submit By WUP-12 Form 46.20-012 (10/01) Winter and Spring Seasonal August 1 WUP-13 Form 46.20-013 (10/01) Summer and Fall Seasonal February 1

12 The District has determined that excessive water in Flatford Swamp and other areas of the Upper Myakka River Watershed has caused adverse environmental impacts, and that off-site discharge from water use permitted sites has contributed to these adverse impacts. At the time of this permit issuance the District is attempting to resolve these impacts through cooperative and collaborative measures with the farmers, changes in irrigation management practices by Permittees, and other methods. If the effectiveness of these measures is determined to be insufficient to resolve these adverse impacts and irrigation management practices on this site appear to contribute to these continued impacts, the District may require modification and/or reconsideration of this permit upon notification to the Permittee.

13. This permit is issued based on the farming practices currently utilized on the property for drip irrigation of row crops. The District currently believes drip irrigation systems do not generate measurable offsite discharge of irrigation water (either through seepage or runoff). Should it be determined that the actual operation does generate measurable runoff and such runoff may contribute to any adverse impacts in the Myakka River Basin, the District may require the modification of this permit.

172 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

14. The Permittee shall implement irrigation management practices which maintain irrigation groundwater quantities on-site and avoid off-site discharge of groundwater (through direct runoff or seepage), to the maximum extent practicable.

15. Unless specified otherwise, time extensions to condition deadlines may be granted upon written request to the Regulation Department Director, provided that the request is made prior to the deadline, the Permittee has demonstrated a good faith effort in meeting the deadline set forth in the condition, and a reasonable modified deadline is proposed by the Permittee.

17. The Permittee shall implement irrigation management practices for the entire farm which maintain 6irrigation water on-site and avoid off-site discharge (through direct runoff or seepage) to the maximum extent practicable.

18. Permittee shall implement and maximize the use of tailwater for bed preparation, crop establishment, and other uses related to agricultural activities to the greatest extent practicable as described in the renewal of this permit. The tailwater recovery pump system and recovery trench shall be in place and operable by June 30, 2008 and shall be operated manually to ensure maximization of tailwater use. At any time when sufficient quantities are available in the tailwater recovery system, this source shall be utilized first and to the greatest extent practicable.

WITHDRAWAL POINT QUANTITY TABLE Water use from these withdrawal points are restricted to the quantities given below:

I.D. NO. DEPTH PERMITTEE/ DIAM. TTL./CSD.FT. GALLONS PER DAY DISTRICT (IN.) (feet bls) USE AVERAGE PEAK MONTH

1 / 1 16 1,240 / 540 IR 574,000 1,147,000 30,000 34,600 Standby 2 / 2 6 UNK / UNK IR 30,000 34,600 Alternative Use/ Unnamed Pond

IR = Irrigation

WITHDRAWAL POINT LOCATION TABLE

DISTRICT I.D. NO. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE

1 272236.76/820928.45 01/35/21 2 272136.13/820928.40 01/35/21

173 Permit No.: 20011440.002 Project Name: Bear Bay East / John Falkner

STANDARD CONDITIONS:

The Permittee shall comply with the Standard Conditions attached hereto, incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.

______Authorized Signature SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

This permit, issued under the provision of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes and Florida Administrative Code 40D-2, authorizes the Permittee to withdraw the quantities outlined above, and may require various activities to be performed by the Permittee as described in the permit, including the Special Conditions. This permit does not convey to the Permittee any property rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the Permittee from complying with any applicable local government, state, or federal law, rule, or ordinance.

174 The following Standard Conditions are included on all Water Use Permits issued pursuant to 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code.

175 40D-2 Exhibit "A"

WATER USE PERMIT STANDARD CONDITIONS

1. If any of the statements in the application and in the supporting data are found to be untrue and inaccurate, or if the Permittee fails to comply with all of the provisions of Chapter 373, F.S., Chapter 40D, or the conditions set forth herein, the Governing Board shall revoke this permit in accordance with Rule 40D-2.341, following notice and hearing.

2. This permit is issued based on information provided by the Permittee demonstrating that the use of water is reasonable and beneficial, consistent with the public interest, and will not interfere with any existing legal use of water. If, during the term of the permit, it is determined by the District that the use is not reasonable and beneficial, in the public interest, or does impact an existing legal use of water, the Governing Board shall modify this permit or shall revoke this permit following notice and hearing.

3. The Permittee shall not deviate from any of the terms or conditions of this permit without written approval by the District.

4. In the event the District declares that a Water Shortage exists pursuant to Chapter 40D-21, the District shall alter, modify, or declare inactive all or parts of this permit as necessary to address the water shortage.

5. The District shall collect water samples from any withdrawal point listed in the permit or shall require the Permittee to submit water samples when the District determines there is a potential for adverse impacts to water quality.

6. The Permittee shall provide access to an authorized District representative to enter the property at any reasonable time to inspect the facility and make environmental or hydrologic assessments. The Permittee shall either accompany District staff onto the property or make provision for access onto the property.

7. Issuance of this permit does not exempt the Permittee from any other District permitting requirements.

8. The Permittee shall cease or reduce surface water withdrawal as directed by the District if water levels in lakes fall below applicable minimum water level established in Chapter 40D-8 or rates of flow in streams fall below the minimum levels established in Chapter 40D-8.

9. The Permittee shall cease or reduce withdrawal as directed by the District if water levels in aquifers fall below the minimum levels established by the Governing Board.

10. The Permittee shall practice water conservation to increase the efficiency of transport, application, and use, as well as to decrease waste and to minimize runoff from the property. At such time as the Governing Board adopts specific conservation requirements for the Permittee's water use classification, this permit shall be subject to those requirements upon notice and after a reasonable period for compliance.

11. The District may establish special regulations for Water Use Caution Areas. At such time as the Governing Board adopts such provisions, this permit shall be subject to them upon notice and after a reasonable period for compliance.

176 12. The Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impact to existing legal uses caused by withdrawals. When adverse impacts occur or are imminent, the District shall require the Permittee to mitigate the impacts. Adverse impacts include:

A. A reduction in water levels which impairs the ability of the well to produce water; B. Significant reduction in levels or flows in water bodies such as lakes, impoundments, wetlands, springs, streams or other watercourses; or C. Significant inducement of natural or manmade contaminants into a water supply or into a usable portion of any aquifer water body.

13. The Permittee shall mitigate any adverse impact to environmental features or offsite land uses as a result of withdrawals. When adverse impacts occur or are imminent, the District shall require the Permittee to mitigate the impacts. Adverse impacts include:

A. Significant reduction in levels or flows in water bodies such as lakes, impoundments, wetlands, springs, streams or other watercourses; B. Sinkholes or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels; C. Damage to crops and other vegetation causing financial harm to the owner; and D. Damage to the habitat of endangered or threatened species.

14. When necessary to analyze impacts to the water resource or existing users, the District shall require the Permittee to install flow metering or other measuring devices to record withdrawal quantities and submit the data to the District.

15. A District identification tag shall be prominently displayed at each withdrawal point by permanently affixing the tag to the withdrawal facility.

16. Notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 40D-1.6105, F.A.C., persons who wish to continue the water use permitted herein and who have acquired ownership or legal control of permitted water withdrawal facilities or the land on which the facilities are located must apply to transfer the permit to themselves within 45 days of acquiring ownership or legal control of the water withdrawal facilities or the land.

17. All permits issued pursuant to these Rules are contingent upon continued ownership or legal control of all property on which pumps, wells, diversions or other water withdrawal facilities are located.

18. Within the Southern Water Use Caution Area, if the District determines that significant water quantity or quality changes, impacts to existing legal uses, or adverse environmental impacts are occurring, the Board, upon reasonable notice to the permittee, including a statement of facts upon which the District based its determination, may reconsider the quantities permitted or other conditions of the permit as appropriate to address the change or impact but only after an opportunity for the permittee to resolve or mitigate the change or impact or to request a hearing.

R. 08/08/2007

177 Item 27

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Regulation Committee -- Other

Final Approval of Changes to the Proposed Amendments to 40D-2.091, 40D-2.321 and 40D-2.801(3)(c), Florida Administrative Code, and Part B, Basis of Review, of the Water Use Permit Information Manual to Establish the Central Florida Coordination Area and to Provide Regulations for the Area

Background At its September 2007 meeting, the Governing Board authorized staff to publish a Notice of Proposed Rule in the Florida Administrative Weekly to amend the District’s water use permitting rules to address water supply issues in Central Florida. The Governing Boards of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) approved substantively identical rules at their September 2007 meetings. Each district published a Notice of Proposed Rule in the Florida Administrative Weekly on September 7, 2007. The three districts have consistently coordinated the rulemaking on the Central Florida Coordination Area (CFCA) so that all the new regulations will go into effect at the same time in the three water management districts to ensure equitable treatment of water use applicants in the area.

Under Florida administrative procedures law, substantially affected persons had until September 28, 2007, to submit a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative to the proposed rules which substantially accomplishes the objectives of the law being implemented. A lower cost regulatory alternative was submitted to the SFWMD and SJRWMD. Generally speaking, the proposals request that the affected person's water use be exempted from the proposed rules either on a geographic basis or based on the type of use. In response, as required by law, SFWMD and SJRWMD each prepared a economic analysis, referred to in the statute as a statement of estimated regulatory cost (SERC). The SERCs will be presented to the SFWMD and SJRWMD Governing Boards in early December for consideration, together with the same changes that are recommended for approval in this item.

The request submitted to the SJRWMD was to clarify that under the CFCA rules an application to the district for the conversion of existing permitted groundwater withdrawals to other reasonable-beneficial uses after 2013 would be considered. While the SERC was being prepared, in an effort to address the issue raised in this lower cost regulatory alternative, the three districts' staff agreed upon language that could be added as a clarification to the proposed rules that potentially will resolve the concern. The clarifying language is under discussion with the entity that submitted the lower cost alternative. The language to clarify that such an application will be considered is included in the bold italicized text in the exhibit to this item and, at the time that this recap was prepared, reads as follows:

If an application includes a request to change the use type, or the use within a use type, supplied by groundwater during the term of the permit, such change shall not trigger the requirements to develop and/or use supplemental water supply pursuant to paragraph B.2, above, and the corresponding permit duration provisions of 40D-2.321(7) and 1.9 of Chapter 1, Part B, Basis of Review, Water Use Permitting Information Manual ("Part B") and the CFCA permit condition described in section 6.2 of Part B, provided (1) the application does not propose an increase in groundwater withdrawal above that permitted for 2013; and (2) the groundwater drawdown is no greater than that associated

178 Item 27

with the use permitted for 2013. However, the provisions of this paragraph B.6. shall not be construed to affect any condition in the existing permit regarding the development and/or use of supplemental water supply.

The Board will be advised if this language changes.

Staffs of the three districts are not able to recommend any rule changes to address the lower cost regulatory alternative request submitted to SFWMD. That alternative proposal seeks to change the boundary of the CFCA within the SFWMD or to allow unrestricted groundwater withdrawals. That change would adversely affect the goal of the proposed rules to protect the water resources in the area and the development of supplemental water supplies.

In addition, the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee, a legislative committee charged with reviewing all agencies' proposed rules, has requested minor edits to the proposed rules. These edits consist of changing a "can" to "shall", adding rule cross references for clarity, and removing redundant language. These edits are included in the bold italicized text in the exhibit to this item.

The last change is to add a paragraph for clarity specifying that when evaluating whether an applicant is using the lowest quality of water, the District will only consider those supplemental water supplies that may be permitted within the CFCA, not other types of alternative water supplies that maybe available but that would exacerbate groundwater resource conditions. The language shown in the exhibit in bold italicized text is as follows:

In reviewing a consumptive use of groundwater in the CFCA under 40D2.301(1)(f) and section 4.4 of Part B regarding utilization of lowest quality water sources, the District will confine its analysis of lower quality sources to those sources listed in the definition of Supplemental Water Supply in paragraph A. 7., above.

These changes will be presented by the SJRWMD staff to the SJRWMD Governing Board on December 11 and by the SFWMD staff to the SFWMD Governing Board during its meeting on December 12 and 13. This District's staff will advise the Board if any modifications are made at those Board meetings to the changes included in the exhibit.

If all three districts approve the final changes this month, each district will publish a notice of change in the Florida Administrative Weekly. If no requests for hearings are filed in response to the notice, the three districts will file the proposed rules for adoption with the Secretary of State.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

District staff recommends approval of the changes shown in the Exhibit to the proposed 40D-2.091, 40D-2.321 and 40D-2.801(3)(c), Florida Administrative Code, and Part B, Basis of Review, of the Water Use Permit Information Manual to establish the Central Florida Coordination Area and to provide regulations for the Area.

Presenter: Richard Owen, Deputy Executive Director, Resource Regulation

179 EXHIBIT

SWFWMD Draft Rule Amendments – Proposed Changes Central Florida Coordination Area (CFCA)

11-21-07 DRAFT

Chapter 40D-2:

40D-2.091 Publications Incorporated by Reference. The following publications are hereby incorporated by reference into this Chapter, and are available from the District upon request:

(1) Part B, "Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications" (8/07) and Part D, "Requirements for the Estimation of Permanent and Temporal Service Area populations in the Southern Water Use Caution Area ( /07)(1/07), of the Water Use Permitting Manual;

(2) – (6) No change.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.118, 373.171, F.S. Law Implemented 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.0831, 373.116, 373.117, 373.118, 373.149, 373.171, 373.1963, 373.216, 373.219, 373.223, 373.229, 373.239, 373.243, F.S. History – New 10-1- 89, Amended 11-15-90, 2-10-93, 3-30-93, 7-29-93, 4-11-94, 7-15-98, 7-28-98, 7-22-99, 12-2- 99, 8-3-00, 9-3-00, 4-18-01, 4-14-02, 9-26-02, 1-1-03, 2-1-05, 10-19-05, 1-1-07, 8-23-07, ______.

40D-2.321 Duration of Permits.

(1) through (6) No change.

(7) Subject to the limitations on groundwater allocations explained in the provisions under the heading "REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS FOR GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS WITHIN THE CENTRAL FLORIDA COORDINATION AREA" set forth in Section 3.6 of the Basis of Review ("the Provisions"), within the Central Florida Coordination Area the maximum permit duration for a Public Supply Utility applicant or Similar Applicant proposing to withdraw groundwater shall be limited to December 31, 2013, unless the applicant will satisfy the requirements of B.2.a., or b., of the Provisions. If the applicant satisfies the requirements of B.2.a., or b., the permit duration shall be up to 20 years.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.103, 373.113, 373.171, F.S. Law Implemented 373.103, 373.171, 373.236, F.S. History - Readopted 10-5-74, Amended 12-31-74, 10-24-76, 1-6-82, 3- 11-82, Formerly 16J-2.13, Amended 10-1-89, 7-28-98, 1-1-03, 1-1-07, .

40D-2.801 Water-Use Caution Areas.

(1) - (3)(b) No change.

180 (3)(c) Central Florida Coordination Area ("CFCA") - The CFCA is located within portions of three water management districts and includes Polk, Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties, and southern Lake County. The portion of the CFCA located within this District is delineated below. In this area, stress on the water resources is escalating because of rapidly increasing withdrawals of groundwater. The public interest requires protection of the water resources from harm. The CFCA rules address the public interest by providing an interim regulatory framework to allow for the allocation of available groundwater in the area, subject to avoidance and mitigation measures to prevent harm, and by requiring the expeditious implementation of Supplemental Water Supply projects (as defined in Section 3.6 of the Basis of Review). This interim regulatory framework is one component of a comprehensive, joint water management district strategy for regional water resource management that also includes regional water supply planning, alternative water supply project funding and water resource investigations and analysis that will result in a long-term approach for water supply within the CFCA. The effective date of implementation of the interim CFCA rules is [effective date]. The interim CFCA rules shall remain in effect only through December 31, 2012, except that if the District initiates rulemaking to provide a long-term regulatory framework to replace the interim rules and a petition challenging all or part of the proposed rules is filed under Section 120.56 of the Florida Statutes before that date, the interim rules shall remain effective until 100 days after a final determination of the validity or invalidity of the proposed rules. 1. As shown in Figure 2-2, the boundary for the portion of the Central Florida Coordination Area located within this District is as follows:

Begin at the northwest corner of Section 6, Township 23 South, Range 24 East same being on the Sumter-Lake County line and run thence south along the range line dividing Ranges 23 and 24 East, to the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence westerly along the thread of said river, to its intersection with the range line dividing Ranges 22 and 23 East; thence south along said range line, to the township line dividing Townships 25 and 26 South; thence west along said township line, to the section line dividing Sections 3 and 4 in Township 26 South, Range 22 East; thence south along the section lines, to the township line dividing Townships 26 and 27 South; thence east along said township line, to the range line dividing Ranges 22 and 23 East; thence south along said range line, to an intersection with the range line between Ranges 22 and 23 East with the township line between Townships 32 and 33 South; thence east along said township line, to the southeast corner of Township 32 South, Range 28 East; thence north along the range line between Ranges 28 and 29 East, in Townships 32 and 31 South, to the northeast corner of Section 12 in Township 31 South, Range 28 East; thence east along the section line to the northeast corner of Section 7, Township 31 South, Range 29 East; thence north along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 17, Township 30 South, Range 29 East; thence east along the section line to 1 the northeast corner of the west /2 of Section 17, Township 30 South, Range 29 East; thence 1 1 north along the /2-section line to the northeast corner of the west /2 of Section 5, Township 30 South, Range 29 East; thence west along the section line to the southwest corner of Section 32, Township 29 South, Range 29 East; thence north along the section line to the northeast corner of Section 19 in Township 29 South, Range 29 East; thence west along the north boundaries of Section 19, Township 29 South, Range 29 East, and Sections 24, 23, 22, 21, and 20, Township 29 South, Range 28 East, to the northwest corner of said Section 20; thence north along the section line to the intersection of said section line with the west shore line of Lake Pierce in Township 29 South, Range 28 East; thence following the west shore of Lake Pierce to its intersection again with the west section line of Section 5, Township 29 South,

181 Range 28 East; thence north along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 5, Township 29 South, Range 28 East; thence east along the township line to the southwest corner of Section 33, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence north along the section line 1 1 to the northwest corner of the southwest /4 of the southwest /4 of Section 28, Township 28 1 1 South, Range 28 East; thence east along the /4-section line to the intersection of said /4- section line with Lake Pierce; thence follow the shore line northeasterly to its intersection with 1 1 the /2-section line of Section 28, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence north on the /2- 1 section line to the northwest corner of the southeast /4 of Section 28, Township 28 South, 1 Range 28 East; thence east to the northeast corner of the southeast /4 of Section 28, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence south along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 28 East; thence east along the section line to the northeast corner of Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 28 East; thence north along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 23, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence west along the section line to the southwest corner of Section 16, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence north along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 16, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence west along the section line to the southwest corner of Section 8, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence north along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 5, Township 28 South, Range 28 East; thence west along the township line to the intersection of said township line with Lake Marion; thence following the south shore line of Lake Marion to its intersection again with said township line; thence west along the township line to the southeast corner of Section 36, Township 27 South, Range 27 East; thence north along the range line between Ranges 27 and 28 East to the intersection of said range line with Lake Marion; thence following the west shore of Lake Marion to its intersection again with the range line between Ranges 27 and 28 East; thence north along said range line, in Townships 27 and 26 South, to the northeast corner of Township 26 South, Range 27 East, being on the Polk-Osceola County line; thence west along the Polk-Osceola County line to the northwest corner of Township 26 South, Range 27 East; thence north along the section line to the Lake-Polk County line; thence west along the county line to the southwest corner of Section 32, Township 24 South, Range 26 East; thence into Lake County, north along the section lines to the northeast corner of Section 30, Township 24 South, Range 26 East; thence west along the section lines to the northeast corner of Section 28, Township 24 South, Range 25 East; thence north along the section lines to the northeast corner of Section 16, Township 24 South, Range 25 East; thence west along the section line to the northwest corner of Section 16, Township 24 South, Range 25 East; thence north along the section line to the northeast corner of Section 8, Township 24 South, Range 25 East; thence west along the section lines to the range line between Ranges 24 and 25; thence north along the range line to the northeast corner of Section 1, Township 23 South, Range 24 East, also being on the township line between Townships 22 and 23 South; thence west along the township line to the Point of Beginning.

2. Applications for groundwater withdrawals located within the areas encompassed both by the SWUCA, as described in 40D-2.801(3)(b), F.A,C., or deemed within the SWUCA pursuant to 40D-2.801(3)(b)5. F.A.C., above, and the District's portion of the CFCA as described in 40D-2.801(3)(c), F.A.C., shall only be subject to the provisions of Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C., and the Basis of Review described in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C., applicable to groundwater withdrawals within the SWUCA. The CFCA provisions shall not be applicable to those permits. These provisions are in addition to all other regulations set forth in Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C., and Parts B and D of the Water Use Permit Information Manual.

3. Regulations applicable to the CFCA are specified in Rules 40D-2.321 and

182 40D-2.801(3)(c), F.A.C., and in Sections 1.9, 3.6 and 6.2 of the Basis of Review described in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C., and are incorporated into this rule, and are in addition to all other regulations set forth in Chapter 40D-2, F.A.C., and Part B and D of the Water Use Permit Information Manual. The CFCA regulations shall not be construed to affect any water use permit application that does not have a groundwater withdrawal point within the CFCA.

4. Special requirements for Public Supply Utility applicants for groundwater withdrawals are explained in the provisions under the heading "REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS FOR GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS WITHIN THE CENTRAL FLORIDA COORDINATION AREA" set forth in Sections 1.9, 3.6 and 6.2 of the Basis of Review described in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C. In addition, a Similar Applicant, as defined in Section 3.6 of the Basis of Review, is subject to those requirements.

5. In adopting the interim CFCA rules, the District acknowledges the increasing stress on the water resources in the CFCA and the mandate of the legislature to foster the development of additional water supplies and avoid the adverse effects of competition. However, the interim CFCA rules do not abrogate the rights of the Governing Board or of any other person under Section 373.233, F.S. The CFCA regulatory framework provides a comprehensive strategy for interim allocations of available groundwater and expeditious development of supplemental water supply projects, as defined in Section 3.6, paragraph A.7. under the heading Requirements For Applicants For Groundwater Withdrawals Within The Central Florida Coordination Area, in Part B, Basis of Review, of the Water Use Permit Information Manual, to minimize competition and thereby provide greater certainty of outcome than competition.

6. Any Public Supply Utility applicant, or Similar Applicant described in 40D- 2.801(3)(c)4., F.A.C., above, with an existing or proposed groundwater withdrawal point within the boundaries of the CFCA is deemed to be within the CFCA, provided that the regulation of that withdrawal is governed by 40D-2.801(3)(c)2., F.A.C., above.

7. The CFCA is a water resource caution area for purposes of Chapter 403, F.S., and Chapter 62-40, F.A.C.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171, F.S. Law Implemented 373.0395, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.171, 373.216, 373.219, 373.223, F.S. History - Readopted 10-5-74. Formerly 16J-3.30, Amended 10-1-89, 11-15-90, 3-1-91, 7-29-93, 1-1-03, 1-1-07, .

183 Figure 2-2

184 Basis of Review for Water Use Permits:

1.9 PERMIT DURATION

1. - 5. No change.

6. Subject to the limitations on groundwater allocations explained in the provisions under the heading "REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS FOR GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS WITHIN THE CENTRAL FLORIDA COORDINATION AREA" set forth in Section 3.6 of the Basis of Review ("the Provisions"), within the Central Florida Coordination Area the maximum permit duration for a Public Supply Utility or Similar Applicant proposing to withdraw groundwater shall be limited to December 31, 2013, unless the applicant will satisfy the requirements of B.2.a. or b., of the Provisions. If the applicant satisfies the requirements of B.2.a. or b., the permit duration shall be up to 20 years.

6. is renumbered as 7.

Amended ______, 2007

3.6 PUBLIC SUPPLY

REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS FOR GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS WITHIN THE CENTRAL FLORIDA COORDINATION AREA (CFCA)

A. The following definitions shall apply within the CFCA.

1. "Brackish Groundwater" –groundwater in or below the Lower Floridan Aquifer that has chloride concentrations at or above 1000 milligrams per liter (mg/L) or total dissolved solids concentrations at or above 1500 mg/L.

2. "Demonstrated 2013 Demand" –the quantity of water that an applicant establishes it will need to meet demands in 2013.

3. “Due Diligence” – Taking all actions that a reasonably prudent person would take to meet the schedule requirements in the permit for developing and using all required supplemental water supplies. Particular circumstances beyond the permittee's control will be considered in determining whether due diligence has been exercised.

4. "Public Supply Utility" - any municipality, county, regional water supply authority, special district, publicly or privately owned water utility, or multi-jurisdictional water supply authority, that provides water for use by the general public.

5. Saltwater – ground or surface water having chloride concentrations at or above 19,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L).

6. Similar Applicant - an applicant, other than a Public Supply Utility, whose projected water demand after 2013, will exceed its Demonstrated 2013 Demand.

185 7. Supplemental Water Supply – surface water, stormwater, water that is reused after one or more public supply, municipal, industrial, commercial or agricultural uses, and saltwater. Brackish groundwater may be considered a Supplemental Water Supply if it can be developed in a manner that will not cause or contribute to harmful impacts from cumulative groundwater withdrawals in the CFCA. This definition shall not govern the District's funding decisions made pursuant to Section 373.1961(3), F.S.

B. The following requirements shall apply to any Public Supply Utility applicant and Similar Applicants proposing to withdraw groundwater in the CFCA.

1. Except as provided for in paragraph 2. below, an applicant will be restricted to a maximum allocation of groundwater in an amount no greater than its Demonstrated 2013 Demand; however, an applicant may seek a duration that extends beyond 2013 for that level of allocation.

2. Any applicant seeking a permit duration extending beyond the year 2013 whose projected water demand after 2013 will exceed its Demonstrated 2013 Demand must: a. Identify at least one specific Supplemental Water Supply project that the applicant will develop (either singly or in concert with others) and use to meet all the increase in quantity above its Demonstrated 2013 Demand, for the duration of the permit; and provide for each identified project a project development schedule, with milestones that when followed, will result in the applicant using Supplemental Water Supply by the end of 2013; or b. Provide the following: i. A demonstration that the development (either singly or in concert with others) of sufficient Supplemental Water Supply to meet all the increase in quantity above its Demonstrated 2013 Demand is not economically, environmentally, or technically feasible; and ii. Verification that will establish that the applicant will maximize the use of Supplemental Water Supply to meet as much of the increase as is economically, environmentally, or technologically feasible and will obtain any remaining portion of the increase by using water from one or more Supplemental Water Supply projects when provided by others at a cost that is economically feasible. The affordability of an increase in water rates for a Public Supply Utility's customers is a consideration in evaluating economic feasibility; however, an increase in water rates shall not, by itself, constitute economic infeasibility.

3. The restriction in paragraph B.1. immediately above on groundwater allocations to an amount no greater than a permittee's Demonstrated 2013 Demand shall not limit permitted groundwater withdrawals from: a. Aquifer storage and recovery wells that receive only surface water, stormwater, or water that is reused after one or more public supply, municipal, industrial, commercial or agricultural uses, when the volume of water withdrawn does not exceed the volume of water injected, or b. The surficial aquifer immediately below or adjacent to a stormwater management system or surface water reservoir where any drawdown in the surficial aquifer will be offset by recharge from the system or reservoir, or c. An injection/recovery wellfield that injects surface water, stormwater, or water that is reused after one or more public supply, municipal, industrial, commercial or agricultural uses that is not provided to users in accordance with District rules, through one or more wells for storage within an aquifer zone and subsequently recovers it through wells from the same aquifer zone and in the same wellfield, when the volume of water withdrawn does not exceed the volume of water injected; or

186 d. A recharge/recovery project that receives only surface water, stormwater, or water that is reused after one or more public supply, municipal, industrial, commercial or agricultural uses that is not provided to users in accordance with District rules, when the volume of water recovered does not exceed the volume of water recharged, and the drawdown due to recovery of water from the Floridan aquifer will be offset in the: i. Surficial aquifer by recharge from the project, and ii. Floridan aquifer by recharge from the project, except immediately adjacent to the recovery well(s). 4. In determining the amount of Supplemental Water Supply that must be used as set forth in paragraph B.2. above, the applicant may subtract the portion of its demand that the applicant demonstrates will be satisfied by water conservation and the sources identified in paragraphs B.3.a., b., c. and d immediately above, in effect after 2013. 5. A permittee that will lack sufficient Supplemental Water Supply after 2013 from which to obtain the increase in quantity above its Demonstrated 2013 Demand shall can be allocated a temporary amount of groundwater to meet that increase only if it has exercised Due Diligence to meet all schedule requirements in the permit for developing and using Supplemental Water Supply and providing that other conditions of issuance in Rule 40D-2.301, F.A.C., and Parts B and D of the Water Use Permit Information Manual are met . Any such temporary allocation shall cease when water from the Supplemental Water Supply project becomes available. 6. If an application includes a request to change the use type, or the use within a use type, supplied by groundwater during the term of the permit, such change shall not trigger the requirements to develop and/or use supplemental water supply pursuant to paragraph B.2, above, and the corresponding permit duration provisions of 40D-2.321(7) and 1.9 of Chapter 1, Part B, Basis of Review, Water Use Permitting Information Manual ("Part B") and the CFCA permit condition described in section 6.2 of Part B, provided (1) the application does not propose an increase in groundwater withdrawal above that permitted for 2013; and (2) the groundwater drawdown is no greater than that associated with the use permitted for 2013. However, the provisions of this paragraph B.6. shall not be construed to affect any condition in the existing permit regarding the development and/or use of supplemental water supply.

New ______, 2007

4.4 UTILIZATION OF LOWEST QUALITY WATER

Consideration must be given to the lowest quality water available, which is acceptable for the proposed use. If a lower quality of water is available and is environmentally, technically and economically feasible for all or a portion of an Applicant's use, this lower quality water must be used. Use of a lower quality of water is not environmentally feasible if it interferes with recovery of a water body to its established minimum flow or level or the water body is either currently or projected to be adversely impacted, unless the use will provide a Net Benefit. Such lower quality water may be in the form of surface water, reclaimed water (treated wastewater effluent), recovered agricultural tailwater, collected stormwater, saline water, or other sources. In determining the economic feasibility of using reclaimed water or stormwater, the consideration shall include the costs and benefits of using the reclaimed water or stormwater, including the amount of reclaimed water or stormwater that can be produced or used relative to the cost.

187 Within the Central Florida Coordination Area the District will confine its analysis of lower quality water sources to those sources listed in the definition of Supplemental Water Supply in paragraph A. 7. under the heading Requirements For Applicants For Groundwater Withdrawals Within The Central Florida Coordination Area in Section 3.6, of Part B, Basis of Review, of the Water Use Permit Information Manual,

Amended 1-1-07, ______.

4.11 UTILIZATION OF ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLIES

Applicants shall demonstrate whether alternative water supplies are available and appropriate for use and shall incorporate use of alternative water supplies to the greatest extent practicable. Use of alternative water supplies is not environmentally feasible if it interferes with recovery of a water body to its established Minimum Flow or Level or if the water body is either currently or projected to be adversely impacted. In determining whether an Applicant has demonstrated that alternative water supplies are available and appropriate for use, the District shall consider whether the alternative water supplies are economically, environmentally and technically feasible. Additionally, applicants with groundwater withdrawals in the Central Florida Coordination Area are subject to the provisions in the Basis of Review in Section 3.6, under the heading "Requirements For Applicants For Groundwater Withdrawals Within The Central Florida Coordination Area".

Amended 1-1-07, ______, 2007

6.2 SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS

In addition to the general, standard and other conditions, permits for applicants specified in 40D-2.801(3)(c)4., F.A.C., authorizing groundwater withdrawals in the CFCA shall include special conditions that address the following;

1. Implementation of a District-approved plan to monitor hydrology, ecology and water quality in the areas subject to impacts from the permitted withdrawals, with at least annual data reporting and analysis.

2. Implementation of specific District-approved measures to mitigate or avoid harm that would otherwise occur as a result of the permitted allocation.

3. Implementation of District-approved mitigation or avoidance actions to address any unanticipated harm, if the District finds that harm will occur or has occurred as a result of the permitted allocation.

4. Expeditious Ddevelopment and use of Supplemental Water Supply to meet water demands in an expeditious manner as described in paragraph B.2. under the heading Requirements For Applicants For Groundwater Withdrawals Within The Central Florida Coordination Area in Section 3.6, of Part B, Basis of Review, of the Water Use Permit Information Manual,.

188 5. Submittal of five-year compliance reports as described in subsection 373.236(4), F.S., for 20-year duration permits.

6. The reduction in allocation or other modification of the permit, after review of each five-year compliance report or at any other time during the term of the permit, if needed to abate observed or projected harmful impacts as a result of the permitted use, unless the harmful impacts can be mitigated by the permittee. The permittee shall be provided with notice and an opportunity for a hearing under Chapter 120, F.S., if the District makes such a reduction or other modification.

New _____, 2007

189 Item 28

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Regulation Committee -- Other

Electrical Power Plant Site Certification – SWFWMD Agency Report on Progress Energy Florida Crystal River Nuclear Unit 3 Uprating – Citrus County

Procedural Overview The Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act (PPSA), Sections 403.501 – 403.518, Florida Statutes (F.S.), sets forth the process by which electric power companies can obtain certification to operate power plants having 75 megawatts (MW) or greater in steam electrical generating capacity. Certification can be obtained for ultimate or maximum generation capacity for a complex of facilities or individually for each power generation unit. Once conditions of certification are established for a power plant, these conditions constitute the only regulatory permitting requirements for the plant and are effective for the life of the facility unless subsequently modified in accordance with the provisions of the PPSA. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is the processing agency for all PPSA certifications. The Southwest Florida Water Management District is one of six statutory reviewing agencies for site certifications. Once DEP deems an application to be complete, statutory reviewing agencies submit Agency Reports concerning matters under their respective jurisdiction. The Agency Report must contain the conditions of certification necessary to meet the Agency’s applicable substantive permitting requirements. Reviewing agencies do not take final agency action on the application. DEP subsequently prepares a report with proposed conditions of certification. A certification hearing is then held by the assigned Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The certification hearing constitutes the sole hearing allowed by Chapter 120, F.S., to determine the substantial interests of a party regarding any required agency license or permit. At the conclusion of the hearing, the ALJ will submit a recommended order to the Siting Board (Governor and Cabinet), which issues a final order approving or denying certification.

Progress Energy Florida – Crystal River Nuclear Unit 3 Uprating

Progress Energy Florida (PEF) currently operates the Crystal River Energy Complex located north of Crystal River in Citrus County. The Complex consists of 4 coal-fired (Units 1, 2, 4 and 5) and 1 nuclear (Unit 3) power generation facilities. Only Units 4 and 5 are currently certified. PEF seeks to add an additional 180 megawatts of electrical power generation capacity to Unit 3. This "uprating" will require that Unit 3, which has been in operation since 1977, now become a certified facility in compliance with the PPSA. Unit 3 uses sea water for cooling water purposes. Groundwater use for boiler makeup and pollution control is also authorized through Water Use Permit (WUP) No. 2004695.004, which allows a total of 1,000,000 gallons per day (gpd) on an annual average basis and 1,500,000 gpd on a peak month basis for Units 1, 2 and 3. Groundwater is obtained through 5 wells, 2 of which supply brackish groundwater. No additional groundwater use is planned at this time for Unit 3.

Under the PPSA, when a power facility becomes certified, the conditions of certification constitute the only applicable regulatory requirements. In light of the commingled water use for Units 1, 2 and 3, PEF has requested that it not be required to segregate water use for Unit 3 and that Unit 3's water use continue to be regulated through WUP No. 2004695.004, which was issued by the District on November 26, 2007. As to proposed conditions of certification for Unit 3 concerning water use, DEP has indicated its concurrence with a condition of certification that would require continued compliance with the existing WUP and any subsequent modification/ renewal WUP as issued by the District. PEF also proposes to address any Environmental

190 Item 28

Resource Permit (ERP) substantive requirements through post-certification submittals. Thus, the District's Agency Report in this matter is limited. Certification is recommended, provided that groundwater use continues to be regulated by the District through the applicable WUP and any ERP-related requirements can be addressed post certification.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve the Agency Report and proposed conditions of certification to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection for Progress Energy Florida's Crystal River Nuclear Unit 3 Uprating.

Presenter: Martha A. Moore, Senior Attorney

191 Item 29

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Regulation Committee -- Other

Electrical Transmission Line Site Certification – SWFWMD Agency Report on Tampa Electric Company Willow Oak-Wheeler-Davis Transmission Line – Hillsborough and Polk Counties

Procedural Overview The Florida Electric Transmission Line Siting Act (TLSA), Sections 403.52 – 403.5365, Florida Statutes (F.S.), establishes a regulatory review and approval process very similar to that of the Florida Electrical Power Plant Siting Act, Sections 403.501 – 403.518, F.S. Once a transmission line corridor is certified by the Governor and Cabinet sitting as the Siting Board, the conditions of certification constitute the only regulatory permitting requirements for certified transmission lines. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is the processing agency for all TLSA certifications. The Southwest Florida Water Management District is one of several statutory reviewing agencies that participate in the certification process. Reviewing agencies do not take final agency action on the application. As a reviewing agency, the District is required to submit an Agency Report with recommended conditions of certification. DEP issues a combined report and proposed conditions for certification, which are presented at an administrative hearing, along with any proposed alternative corridors, to an Administrative Law Judge who issues a Recommended Order on the certification application, with the Final Order certifying the transmission line corridor issued by the Siting Board. The schedule for processing of Tampa Electric Company's application for the Willow Oak-Wheeler-Davis Transmission Line requires the District to submit its Agency Report to DEP by January 25, 2008. The administrative hearing is presently scheduled for March 3, 2008. Following certification of a transmission line corridor, rights-of-way will be acquired, which will allow the certified corridor to be narrowed accordingly.

Tampa Electric Company Willow Oak-Wheeler-Davis Transmission Line

Tampa Electric Company (TECO) seeks certification of a new 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to connect a planned Willow Oak substation located west of Mulberry in Polk County to a planned Davis substation to be located in Temple Terrace, Hillsborough County. An existing intermediate substation (Wheeler) located in Hillsborough County will be connected as part of the project. TECO predicts that by 2012, the existing transmission network in this area will not have sufficient capability to provide reliable service. The proposed transmission line will help meet projected electrical power needs for the northeast Hillsborough County area. If certified, the planned in-service date for the Wheeler-Davis portion of the transmission line is 2010, with the remaining Willow Oak-Wheeler portion of the project in service by 2012. The proposed transmission corridor is approximately 30 miles long and follows existing rights-of-way for much of its length. By co-locating the proposed transmission line in existing rights-of-way, adverse land use and environmental impacts are minimized. The proposed route will cross the Tampa Bypass Canal and cross through the Medard Reservoir and Alafia River Corridor properties owned by the District. On November 13, 2007, District staff requested additional information to address potential property issues and environmental concerns for the proposed route. TECO's responses are due December 4, 2007. Any remaining completeness issues must be identified by the reviewing agencies no later than December 18, 2007. TECO must provide its response by December 26, 2007. If the application is deemed complete at that time, the District's Agency Report will be due by January 25, 2008. If the application is not complete, the schedule is tolled. District staff anticipates that TECO will be able to address satisfactorily the property and surface

192 Item 29 water management concerns staff has raised and that certification of the proposed transmission line can be recommended with appropriate conditions.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve the Agency Report and proposed conditions of certification to be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection for Tampa Electric Company's Willow Oak – Wheeler – Davis Transmission Line.

Presenter: Martha A. Moore, Senior Attorney

193 Item 30

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Five-Year Water Resource Development Work Program

Purpose To approve revisions to the District's 2008 Five-Year Water Resource Development Work Program (Work Program) that was requested by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).

Background/History Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), requires the water management district to prepare annually a Work Program. This program must describe the District’s implementation strategy for the water resource development component of the approved Regional Water Supply Plan (RWSP). The program must be submitted to the FDEP, specified state and local government officials within 30 days after the adoption of the District’s final budget. The Proposed Work Program was approved by the Governing Board at the September 2007 meeting and forwarded to the FDEP for review and comments within the deadline.

The Work Program covers the period from fiscal year (FY) 2008 through FY2012. It is a comprehensive discussion of the District’s Water Resource Development activities that will help produce the 409 mgd of water needed through 2025. These activities include data collection and analyses efforts and 20 active water resource development projects the District is financially and technically participating in during FY2008.

The FDEP must review the Work Program within 30 days after receiving it from the District and must submit its findings, questions, and comments to the District. The review must include a written evaluation of the program’s consistency with promoting the goals of the RWSP and the adequacy of proposed expenditures. Within 45 days after receiving comments from the FDEP, the District must state in writing to the FDEP, its responses indicating which changes recommended by the FDEP will be incorporated into the Work Program or specify the reasons for not incorporating the changes. Staff is requesting approval of those responses to the FDEP at the Governing Board meeting today.

The FDEP reviewed the 2008 Work Program and submitted minor comments to the District in an email dated December 4, 2007. The District responded to the comments within the statutory 45 days and satisfied the FDEP's concerns. Those responses are included as an exhibit. The next step is for the FDEP to prepare a final evaluation report, including the District’s responses, and submit this report to the Governor, President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives. The final 2008 Work Program will be resubmitted as part of the Consolidated Annual Report required by Florida Statutes (Subsection 373.036(7)).

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

Approve the proposed revisions to the Work Program to be included in the 2008 Consolidated Report.

Presenter: Brian Armstrong, P.G., Manager, Water Supply & Resource Development Section, Resource Conservation and Development Department

194 FDEP Comments to Five-Year Water Resource Development Work Program Comments Responses 1 Page 5, Flood Control Projects – The subsection on CWM that was in CWM reference in introductory last year’s Work Program report has been removed, but the paragraph will be removed. introductory paragraph still discusses this activity. We recommend CWM is no longer listed in the either deleting this text or including the CWM subsection. District's Strategic Plan. The goals of CWM are being addressed in other programs. 2 Page 7, subsection h, paragraph 2 – We recommend removing the Page break will be removed. page break after this paragraph. 3 Page 10, Table 2, project 1.b), column 2 – In the 2006 WRDWP Phase 1 funding was left out of report, the Total Prior District Funding amount for this project was the total. To insure consistency $592,161, and in the 2007 report the Total Prior District Funding between the project description amount decreased to $382,264. We recommend including an and Table 2, the final report will explanation on how this change occurred. include the Phase 1 total. 4 The projects on pages 15, 24, 28, and 37 are new – We would like to District will contact FDEP to see all new projects included in a 2008 RWSP Amendment. Please discuss this option in January call us to discuss this idea. 2008. 5 Page 21, line 2 – The $100,000 change is not reflected in the Table 2 An existing contract was totals for this project. Please address. amending adding the $100,000 for the Pilot Lake Augmentation Project. Text will be clarified in final report. 6 Page 24, paragraph 2 – The CF Industries project discussed on p.180 There are two CF Industries of the 2006 RWSP is quite different from this project. The 2006 projects. This CF Industries ASR RWSP project is about blending reclaimed water and stormwater for project is discussed in Chapter 8 use by chemical manufacturers, such as CF Industries. It does not and mentioned specifically in mention ASR. On page 174 of the RWSP, there is an ASR project at Table 8-7. Paragraph 2 will be the Clear Springs Mine in Polk County, but we cannot find a specific revised. reference to a project at the South Pasture Mine in Hardee County. Please clarify. Also, the sentence in paragraph 2 is incomplete. 7 Page 25, paragraph 4 – The number of back-plugged wells, 54, is four The 2006 Artesian Well Plugging more than were stated as back-plugged in 2006 work program report. Annual Work Plan refers to the The District’s 2006 Artesian Well Plugging Annual Work Plan indicates Quality of Improvement of Water the average invoice for back-plugging a well is about $5,000, although program not the FARMS the amount can be around $8,000 for very deep wells. The work Irrigation Well Back-plugging program report indicates the FY 2007 funding for back-plugging was Program. These are two $158,879. There seems to be a large, unexplained cost difference. different programs. Please address. 8 Page 28 – Paragraph 1 says “This new program… is in the final Paragraph 1 will be revised to stages of development…” Paragraph 3 says “Over the life of the indicate Mini-Farms program has project there have been 11 projects…” Please clarify how a new been implemented in the final program under development already has a history of 20 projects. report. 9 Page 32, middle of paragraph 3 – The text says “A final review copy Status will be updated. [of the BODR] should be submitted by mid-July.” This draft report is dated September 25, 2007. Was the final review copy of the BODR submitted? The text following this sentence talks about what happened in June 2007. Please update this information. 10 Page 33 – Paragraph 1 mentions how FY 2007 funds will be used. Background will be updated and Please update for FY 2008. In addition, the discussion in paragraph 3 Status clarified in the final report. is very confusing. We recommend including brief information on what specific activities the work orders cover, and a brief description of the scopes of the first and second consulting agreements. 11 Page 36 – Paragraph 1 mentions how FY 2007 funds will be used. Background and Status will be Please update for FY 2008. Paragraph 3 discusses activities the staff updated. will complete in June and July. Please update this information through September. 12 The information on pages 38-41 is very helpful. Thank you for You are welcome. including it.

195 Item 31

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Resolution Requesting Encumbrance of Funds within the Water Management Lands Trust Fund for Lake Hancock Preacquisition Costs

Purpose The purpose of this item is to request the Governing Board approve a resolution requesting the encumbrance of $16,465,601 within the Water Management Lands Trust Fund (WMLTF) for preacquisition and other associated costs related to the Lake Hancock project.

Background/History On September 25, 2007, the Governing Board authorized the implementation of the Lake Hancock Lake Level Modification Project including acquisition of lands (initially on a voluntary basis) necessary for the project. The Board also approved the use of eminent domain (pursuant to Governing Board Resolution No. 07-34), if necessary, to complete the acquisition process. The District is required by state law (Section 373.042, Florida Statutes (F.S.)) to develop minimum flows and levels (MFL) on priority water bodies and aquifers. The purpose of the MFL is to ensure that adequate flows or levels are maintained to protect the state's water resources. The District has set minimum flows for the upper Peace River including 17 cubic feet per second (cfs) at Bartow, 27 cfs at Fort Meade, and 45 cfs at Zolfo Springs. Flows in the upper Peace River were below the minimum flows at Fort Meade approximately 28 percent of the time during the last 30 years. The District's Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) Recovery Strategy includes a specific recovery strategy, as required by state law (Section 373.0421, F.S.), for the upper Peace River because the minimum flows are not currently being met.

In addition to the cost of the land, as part of the eminent domain process, the District is obligated to pay all associated costs in the form of attorneys fees and expert witness fees. Moreover, the District is not only obligated to pay for the costs of its attorneys and experts, but also those costs incurred by the landowner in eminent domain proceedings. In order to ensure that funds will be available for these costs, staff suggests the Board adopt a resolution encumbering the estimated $16,465,601 in preacquisition costs associated with the Lake Hancock project within the WMLTF.

Funding Funds are within the WMLTF.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve the resolution requesting the encumbrance of $16,465,610 within the Water Management Lands Trust Fund for Lake Hancock preacquisition costs.

Presenter: Fritz Musselmann, Director, Land Resources Department

196 Item 32

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Interlocal Agreement with Pasco County, Appraisals, Purchase/Sale Agreement and Resolution Requesting Funds – Weekiwachee Preserve, SWF Parcel No. 15-773-143

Purpose The purpose of this item is to request the Governing Board: x Authorize staff to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Pasco County; x Accept the appraisals; x Reimburse Pasco County 50 percent of the land cost and 50 percent of the direct land acquisition costs; x Authorize the Land Resources Director to execute a management agreement with Pasco County and any amendments thereto; x Approve the resolution requesting funds; and x Designate the parcel as having been acquired for conservation purposes.

Background and History This proposed acquisition is included within the District’s Weekiwachee Preserve project boundaries. During one of the District-Pasco County routine partner coordination meetings, the District and County agreed that the County would be the lead negotiating entity to acquire parcel 15-773-143 for conservation purposes; the District would consider a 50 percent partnership; and the District would serve as the lead management entity. Accordingly, District and Pasco County staff have negotiated an interlocal agreement for the acquisition of SWF Parcel No.15-773-143. The property consists of 210.14 acres within the Weekiwachee Preserve. To date the District has acquired approximately 11,044 acres within the Preserve.

Pasco County acquired this property in November 2007 for $4,350,000.60 and the County and District discussed joint acquisition prior to that time. It was agreed that if the site were to be utilized for preservation and passive recreation, consistent with the District’s management of the Preserve, the District would consider being a partner in the transaction. A general location map of the parcel is included in the board packet as an exhibit to this item.

Acquisition of this parcel is consistent with the District’s Florida Forever Work Plan which specifically identifies the Weekiwachee Preserve Project for acquisition.

Acquisition of this parcel will meet the following Florida Forever goals: x Enhance the coordination and completion of land acquisition projects x Increase the protection of Florida's biodiversity at the species, natural community, and landscape levels x Protect, restore, and maintain the quality and natural functions of land, water, and wetland systems of the state x Increase natural resource-based public recreational and educational opportunities

Interlocal Agreement Through the approval of an interlocal agreement between the District and Pasco County Environmental Lands Acquisition Protection Program (ELAPP), the District will reimburse the County for 50 percent of its land cost, which amounts to $2,175,000.30, and 50 percent of its

197 Item 32 direct land acquisition cost which amounts to $2,375. A summary of the Interlocal Agreement terms include: x The County has provided the District with a title insurance commitment for an owner's title insurance policy, an environmental site assessment and a boundary survey; x At the closing with the County, the District will provide 50 percent of the purchase price contingent on approval of funding through Florida Forever and 50 percent of the direct land acquisition costs; x The County agrees that the title to the parcel shall be vested jointly in the District and the County free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, excluding those exceptions which may be agreed to in writing by both parties; x If either party declares all or part of the property surplus, the other party will have a right of first refusal to purchase at 50 percent of the offering price, including any direct acquisition costs; and x The District agrees that it will only use and manage the parcel for natural open space, preservation and restoration of natural systems, water management and other purposes as stated in Section 373.1391, Florida Statutes.

Property Description Location and Access – This property is located on the north side of Aripeka Road (SR 595), approximately 1,575 feet west of U.S. Highway 19, in the unincorporated area of northwest Pasco County.

Zoning – This property is zoned Master Planned Unit Development (MPUD) by Pasco County, allowing a maximum of 235 residential units or 1.12 single-family dwellings per acre.

Utilities and/or Improvements – Public electricity is available. The County agreed to provide water to the proposed development, according to a Pasco County Interoffice Memorandum, dated December 12, 2006.

Summary of Appraisals and Value Comparisons Pasco County obtained two appraisals on the parcel from Joseph S. String, with String Appraisal Services, and Frank A. Catlett, MAI, with Trigg, Catlett & Associates. The appraisal reports were prepared on March 9, 2007 and March 12, 2007, respectively. The reports were prepared to meet necessary legal and Pasco County requirements and contain the appraisers’ factual data leading to the value conclusion. In accordance with District policy, the appraisals were reviewed for Pasco County by Victor J. Scodius, ASA, on March 14, 2007. The reviews were prepared to meet the necessary legal and District standards. The District accepts the validity of the County appraisals and recommends their acceptance.

Highest and Best Use – The highest and best use, as determined by the appraisers, based on the physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible uses for this property, would be for single-family residential development.

The appraisers applied the Sales Comparison Approach (Market Approach) to determine the value of this property. The appraisers relied on recent sales of comparable property in Pasco County. The sales were adjusted for differences that included, conditions of sale, location/access, zoning/density, and physical characteristics including shape/development potential.

The following is a comparison of the total purchase price to the appraised values:

198 Item 32

Appraised Appraised Purchase Value String Value Catlett Amount Total Cost $3,800,000 $4,360,000 $4,350,000.60 Gross per acre cost $18,081 $20,746 $20,699.00

The purchase price is less than one percent lower than the Catlett appraisal and approximately 14 percent greater than the String appraisal.

The County has agreed to deliver marketable title free of all encumbrances objectionable to the District. The District will pay 50 percent of the land cost and accept 50 percent ownership, and pay 50 percent of the direct land acquisition costs.

Management Agreement Pasco County desires to enter into a management agreement with the District to authorize the District to manage the natural resources and recreation on the property as a part of the Preserve. District staff is requesting the Board authorize staff to enter into a management agreement with the County for the property and incorporate the management goals and work plans for the parcel into the update of the entire Weekiwachee Preserve Land Use and Management Plan.

Costs/Benefits Management Costs In Fiscal Year 2006 the District paid an average annual cost of $15.07 per acre for recurring management costs. Recurring management costs include, but are not limited to, fencing, prescribed burning, exotic species control, resource monitoring, road maintenance, recreational development, resource protection, restoration and contract administration. Based on the District's average annual management costs, it would cost approximately $3,170 annually to manage the tract. No fixed capital outlay has been identified at this time.

This item will be presented to the Coastal Rivers Basin Board as an information item at their February meeting.

Staff Recommendation:

(1) Authorization to execute an Interlocal Agreement with Pasco County; (2) Accept the appraisals; (3) Reimburse Pasco County 50 percent of the land cost and 50 percent of the direct land acquisition costs; (4) Authorize the Land Resources Director to execute a management agreement with Pasco County and any amendments thereto; (5) Approve the resolution requesting funds; and (6) Designate the parcel as having been acquired for conservation purposes.

Presenter: Eric Sutton, Assistant Director, Land Resources Department

199 Weekiwachee Preserve

IJ495

er iv R Creek ud Salt

M k

e e r Weeki Wa C ch 50 k ee c OP J e o R n R iv kin e s C r reek .! ow Cre inn ek M IJ597 ±

Spring Hill .! 574 I IJ n dia n C reek

IJ595

589 SWF Parcel No. !" 15-773-143 ¤£19 eek Cow Cr

Hudson 41 .! ¤£

B rit ch es C Bayonet Point 52 re e .! OP k Doo rshu tter CrSWFWMD Ownership Fivay Junction ng Gr ee Lo assy k C .! re e SWFWMD Conservation Easement k Other Conservation Lands le Hammock Doub Creek 012 SWFWMD Proposed Acquisition SWFWMDIJ77 Proposed Conservation Easement Miles 200 Item 33

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Utility Easement to the DeSoto County Utilities Department – RV Griffin Reserve, SWF Parcel No. 20-223-127X

Purpose To approve and execute a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement to DeSoto County for the installation and maintenance of a wastewater force main through District property.

Background and History The County is requesting easements be granted by the District to construct and operate a wastewater transmission line through a portion of the RV Griffin Reserve. A general location map is included in the board packet as an exhibit to this item. The DeSoto County Utilities Department is constructing a 16-inch force main to transport wastewater from the Lake Suzy area to the County's existing wastewater collection/transmission system. The proposed easements include a temporary construction easement of 0.39 acres and a permanent utility easement of 0.29 acres. The proposed easements will parallel Kings Highway and will run along the southeast property boundary of the Reserve.

The total appraised value of the proposed easements is $12,780. The market value of the permanent utility easement is $10,440; and the market value for the temporary construction easement is $2,340. The appraisal has been reviewed and accepted by District staff.

Benefits and Costs The new force main will provide wastewater transmission service to the Lake Suzy area reducing the need for private sewer systems thereby improving water quality in the area. The County will pay $12,780 to the District for the easement. The County has assumed all costs associated with the transaction.

This item was presented to the Peace River Basin Board at its December meeting.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

Approve conveyance of a permanent utility easement and a temporary construction easement to DeSoto County, SWF Parcel No. 20-223-127X.

Presenter: Chuck Lane, Senior Land Use Specialist, Land Resources Department

201

y

I

s

l

S a a

m n

K d

n

ig

h S T

t

r

C l

o o r

e

e u u

k H

B u

t B c g

i F ka ig

g C b l y S h o

M C l

p o

r re u b u e e g u k

d h

c

d e C

y k k a SWFWMD Ownership C SWFWMD Conservation Easement n C Other Conservation Lands r SWFWMD Proposed Acquisition

SWFWMD Proposed Conservation Easement a r e l e ek ek Murdock

M

u 780

d Slough

AAOACO. SARASOTA B

u

d Sandy

72 S

l o

u

g 41 h Port Charlotte AAOACO. SARASOTA 75

W

i l

Charlotte Harbor Charlotte d c

CHARLOTTE CO. a t S lo ugh

N MANATEE CO. Exhibit or th F or k P 202 A e ll a A ig c l a e li t R g o i a r v t C e o r r

r ee C

k 776

r e

RV Griffin Reserve e

k

a

n

c p Cr 761 h Dee eek

Shel

l d

C y

S

r B

o

e r u

a

t e h

k n P

N c

o h

r H

t u T n k h t e e e r r C h P 012 r o o n r g n

A

Miles t

l o

l

i Ogden Fort

g n

a 17

t

B o

70

r

r C

a

r L

e M

y n

r e

e t l

e e k

S c l

o

u B g h h r a n c h 74 761 760

M

yr

tle W

Cr ek a e l

k

e

r Nocatee

661

B

r

a

n

c H a

h m

p

t

o

n

B o h t r n

w e a

C H r

e

e r k

a

n

c h Item 34.a.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program – Citrus Creek Grove, LLC –Charlotte County

Purpose To request approval for a Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with Citrus Creek Grove, LLC, and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not-to-exceed limit of $8,936 (50 percent of total project costs). Of this amount, the balance of the 2003 ($1,954) and $2,514 of the 2007 State Appropriations will be used for $4,468, the Governing Board is requested to fund $2,234 and the Peace River Basin Board is requested to fund $2,234. Total project costs are estimated at $17,869.

Background/History The District's FARMS program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS Program staff received a project proposal from Citrus Creek Grove for their citrus grove located north of State Highway 74, west of State Highway 31, in Charlotte County, within the SWUCA. The property drains predominantly to the northwest where surface water enters Shell Creek, approximately 4.5 miles upstream of Punta Gorda's drinking water reservoir. The site currently utilizes both surface and ground water for irrigation. The Water Use Permit for this grove authorizes surface water and ground water withdrawals up to 679,400 gallons per day (gpd) for the irrigation of 668 acres of citrus. The moving annual average indicates that Citrus Creek is currently using 93 percent of their permitted quantities, and 61 percent of these quantities are from groundwater. The goal of the project is to reduce the withdrawal of mineralized intermediate aquifer groundwater through the use of a weather station and soil moisture sensors. It is expected that the soil moisture data, collected in ten different vertical depths at each station, will allow Citrus Creek to shorten irrigation events by applying moisture to the root zone only. The reduction in groundwater use will benefit the Shell Creek Watershed and the city of Punta Gorda’s water supply by reducing the quantity of lower quality groundwater entering Shell Creek.

This site currently has a FARMS project that is within the final year of the contract term. This project has been successful in capturing and reusing surface water and tailwater for citrus irrigation. Over the period of record, this project has offset 268 million gallons of lower quality

203 Item 34.a. ground water by using surface water, which averages 180,000 gpd. This amounts to 131.4 percent of the original projected ground water offset. The project will enhance the previous FARMS project goal by further reducing highly mineralized ground water withdrawals by approximately 27,170 gpd.

Benefits/Costs The proposed project involves water quality BMPs. Therefore, the project qualifies for a 50 percent cost-share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an estimate of five percent savings of permitted quantities, or approximately 27,170 gpd, yields a daily cost of $0.42 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over the proposed five-year contract term, and $0.13 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both projected values for groundwater savings costs are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for the implementation of improved irrigation techniques for similar operations. The decrease in use of mineralized intermediate aquifer ground water will improve surface water quality conditions in the basin. Total project costs are estimated at $17,869. The fiscal year 2007 State Appropriations will be used to fund one-half of the project reimbursement. The remainder will be divided evenly between the Peace River Basin Board and the Governing Board. Upon approval, the Governing Board and Peace River Basin Board will have $2,123,714 and $629,295, respectively, remaining in their FARMS program budgets.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

(1) Approve the Citrus Creek Grove, LLC FARMS Project for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $8,936, with $2,234 provided by the Peace River Basin, $2,234 provided by the Governing Board, and $4,468 provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $2,234 from fund 010 H017 Peace River Basin FARMS funds, $2,234 from fund 010 H017 Governing Board FARMS funds, and $4,468 from the 2007 State Appropriations allocated to fund 20 H017 FARMS funds, to the H548 Citrus Creek Grove, LLC FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric C. DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

204 205 Item 34.b.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program – Walters Grove – Charlotte County

Purpose To request approval for a Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with Walters Grove and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not-to- exceed limit of $2,000 (50 percent of total project costs). Of this amount, the 2007 State Appropriations will be used for $1,000, the Governing Board is requested to fund $500 and Peace River Basin Board is requested to fund $500. Total project costs are estimated at $4,000.

Background/History The District's FARMS Program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, and restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS Program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS Program staff received a project proposal from Walters Grove for their 14-acre citrus grove located in the Prairie Creek Watershed of the Shell, Prairie and Joshua Creek (SPJC) area, east of State Highway 17 in Charlotte County, within the SWUCA. The primary goal of the project is to reduce the withdrawal of mineralized intermediate aquifer groundwater through the installation of soil moisture probes and associated electronic components to remotely monitor soil conditions in the grove. The capability of monitoring soil moisture in real-time and sustaining moisture levels in an optimized range greatly reduces the potential for overwatering. The average annual groundwater withdrawal authorized by the Water Use Permit is 16,700 gallons per day (gpd). To date, actual withdrawals for irrigating the grove averaged nearly 100 percent of the permitted quantity. The reduction in groundwater use will benefit the Prairie Creek Watershed and the city of Punta Gorda’s water supply by reducing the quantity of lower quality groundwater entering Prairie Creek.

Benefits/Costs The proposed project involves water quality BMPs and therefore, qualifies for a 50 percent cost- share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an estimated five percent savings of total permitted quantities, or 835 gpd, yields a daily cost of $3.02 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over the proposed five-year contract term, and $0.91 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both values are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for improved irrigation

206 Item 34.b. techniques in flatwood citrus operations. The decrease in use of mineralized intermediate aquifer ground water will improve surface water conditions in the basin. Total project costs are estimated at $4,000. The fiscal year 2007 State Appropriations will be used for one-half of the reimbursement, with the remainder divided evenly between the Peace River Basin Board and the Governing Board. Upon approval, the Governing Board and Peace River Basin Board will have $2,125,948 and $635,997 remaining in their respective FARMS Program budgets.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

(1) Approve the Walters Grove FARMS Project for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $2,000 with $500 provided by the Peace River Basin, $500 provided by the Governing Board, and $1,000 provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $500 from fund 020 H017 Peace River Basin FARMS funds, $500 from fund 010 H017 Governing Board FARMS funds, and $1,000 from the 2007 State Appropriations allocated to fund 020 H017 Peace River Basin State Appropriations, to H547 Walters Grove FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric C. DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

207 208 Item 34.c.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program – Keystone Groves, LLC – DeSoto County

Purpose To request approval for a Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with Keystone Groves, LLC and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not- to-exceed limit of $7,500 (75 percent of total project costs). Of this amount, the 2007 State Appropriations will be used for $3,750, the Governing Board is requested to fund $1,875 and Peace River Basin Board is requested to fund $1,875. Total project costs are estimated at $10,000.

Background/History The District's FARMS Program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, and restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS Program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS Program staff received a project proposal from Keystone Groves, LLC for their 215- acre citrus grove located in the Myrtle Slough Watershed of the Shell, Prairie and Joshua Creek (SPJC) area, in DeSoto County, within the SWUCA. The average annual groundwater withdrawal authorized by the Water Use Permit is 173,600 gallons per day (gpd). To date, actual withdrawals for irrigating the grove averaged nearly 100 percent of the permitted quantity. The primary goal of the project is to reduce Upper Floridan Aquifer withdrawals through the installation of soil moisture probes and associated electronic components to remotely monitor soil conditions in the grove. The capability of monitoring soil moisture in real-time and sustaining moisture levels in an optimized range greatly reduces the potential for overwatering. The reduction in groundwater use will also benefit the Prairie Creek Watershed and the city of Punta Gorda’s water supply by reducing the quantity of lower quality groundwater entering Prairie Creek.

Benefits/Costs The proposed project involves both water quantity and water quality BMPs and therefore, qualifies for a 75 percent cost-share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an estimated five percent savings of total permitted quantities, or 8,680 gpd, yields a daily cost of $0.73 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over the proposed five-year contract term, and $0.22 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both values

209 Item 34.c. are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for improved irrigation techniques in flatwood citrus operations. In addition to the reduced Upper Floridan Aquifer withdrawals benefiting the SWUCA recovery strategy, this project improves surface water quality due to the reduction in use of mineralized ground water. Total project costs are estimated at $10,000. The fiscal year 2007 State Appropriations will be used for one-half of the reimbursement, with the remainder divided evenly between the Peace River Basin Board and the Governing Board. Upon approval, the Governing Board and Peace River Basin Board will have $ 2,126,448 and $637,497 remaining in their respective FARMS Program budgets.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

(1) Approve the Keystone Groves, LLC FARMS Project for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $7,500 with $1,875 provided by the Peace River Basin, $1,875 provided by the Governing Board, and $3,750 provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $1,875 from fund 020 H017 Peace River Basin FARMS funds, $1,875 from fund 010 H017 Governing Board FARMS funds, and $3,750 from the 2007 State Appropriations allocated to fund 020 H017 Peace River Basin State Appropriations, to H546 Keystone Groves, LLC FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric C. DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

210 211 Item 34.d.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program - Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. – Hardee County

Purpose To request approval for a Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not-to-exceed limit of $5,000 (50 percent of total project costs). Of this amount, the 2007 State Appropriations will be used for $2,500, the Governing Board is requested to fund $1,250 and Peace River Basin Board is requested to fund $1,250. Total project costs are estimated at $10,000.

Background/History The District's FARMS program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, and restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS program staff received a project proposal from Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. for three non-contiguous citrus groves they own within the middle Peace River watershed in Hardee County, within the SWUCA. The total irrigated grove area amounts to approximately 3,050 acres that is operated under three Water Use Permits with combined annual average groundwater withdrawals of 2,197,300 gallons per day (gpd). Since December 2002, the combined actual withdrawals for irrigating these groves averaged 1,573,400 gpd, or about 72 percent of permitted quantities. The primary goal of the project is to reduce Upper Floridan Aquifer withdrawals by providing components necessary to re-connect and update an existing system of weather and soil moisture monitoring stations located at each of the three groves, and to remotely monitor field conditions at each grove from a single site location. The ability to monitor soil moisture in real-time and better sustain an optimized range of field growing conditions greatly reduces the potential for over-irrigation. The technology provides another useful tool for the grower to optimize irrigation events and conserve groundwater resources in the region.

Benefits/Costs The proposed project involves water quantity BMPs and therefore, qualifies for a 50 percent cost-share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an estimated five percent savings of total permitted quantities, or 109,900 gpd, yields a daily cost of $0.06 per thousand

212 Item 34.d. gallons of groundwater reduced over the proposed five-year contract term, and $0.02 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both values are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for improved irrigation techniques in flatwood citrus operations. Total project costs are estimated at $10,000. The fiscal year 2007 State Appropriations will be used for one-half of the reimbursement, with the remainder divided evenly between the Peace River Basin Board and the Governing Board. Upon approval, the Governing Board and Peace River Basin Board will have $2,074,950 and $590,408 remaining in their respective FARMS program budgets.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

(1) Approve the Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. FARMS Project for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $5,000 with $1,250 provided by the Peace River Basin, $1,250 provided by the Governing Board, and $2,500 provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $1,250 from fund 020 H017 Peace River Basin FARMS funds, $1,250 from fund 010 H017 Governing Board FARMS funds, and $2,500 from the 2007 State Appropriations allocated to fund 020 H017 Peace River Basin State Appropriations, to H543 Twenty-Twenty Groves, Inc. FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric C. DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

213 214 Item 34.e.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program – Hopewell Business Center, LLC – Hillsborough County

Purpose To request approval for a Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with Hopewell Business Center, LLC, and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not-to-exceed limit of $112,500 (50 percent of total project costs). Of this amount, the 2005 State Appropriations for FARMS will be used for $56,250 of the reimbursement, the Governing Board is requested to fund $28,125, and Alafia River Basin is requested to fund $28,125. Total project costs are estimated at $225,000.

Background/History The District's FARMS program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS Program staff received a project proposal from Hopewell Business Center, LLC for their strawberry farm located in the Medard Park Run Watershed of the Alafia River, on the South side of State Road 60 in Hillsborough County, within the SWUCA. The previous Water Use Permit for this grove authorized an annual average groundwater withdrawal of 24,000 gallons per day (gpd) for the irrigation of 32 acres of citrus from two Upper Floridan Aquifer wells. The citrus grove has been destroyed due to disease and has been converted to strawberries and row crops. The Water Use Permit is currently in house for a modification due to the crop change; however, the expected annual average groundwater withdrawal that will be allowed under the permit modification is 225,000 gpd. The previous permit was a small general permit, which does not require meter readings, therefore no data is available to determine historical use. The modified permit will require meter readings. The primary goal of the project is to reduce upper Floridan groundwater withdrawals through the use of a tailwater recovery and surface water irrigation reservoir.

Benefits/Costs The proposed project involves water quantity BMPs. Therefore, the project qualifies for a 50 percent cost-share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an estimate of 50 percent savings of projected permitted quantities, or approximately 112,500 gpd, yields a daily cost of $1.26 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over the proposed five-year contract

215 Item 34.e. term, and $0.38 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both projected values for groundwater savings costs are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for the implementation of alternative water supplies. Total project costs are estimated at $225,000. The fiscal year 2005 State Appropriations will be used for one-half of the reimbursement, with the remainder divided evenly between the District Governing Board and the Alafia River Basin Board. Upon approval, the Governing Board and Alafia River Basin Board will have $2,087,763 and $48,550, respectively, remaining in their FARMS program budgets.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

(1) Approve the Hopewell Business Center, LLC FARMS Project for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $112,500, with $28,125 provided by the Alafia River Basin, $28,125 provided by the Governing Board, and $56,250 provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $28,125 from fund 011 H017 Alafia River Basin FARMS funds, $28,125 from fund 010 H017 Governing Board FARMS funds, and $56,250 from the 2005 State Appropriations allocated to fund 010 H017 FARMS funds, to H541 Hopewell Business Center, LLC FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric C. DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

216 217 Item 34.f.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program – Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc. – Hillsborough County

Purpose To request approval for a Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not-to-exceed limit of $46,251 (50 percent of total project costs). Of this amount, the balance of the 2005 ($17,012) and $6,113 of the 2008 State Appropriations will be used for $23,125 of the reimbursement, the Governing Board is requested to fund $11,563 and Hillsborough River Basin Board is requested to fund $11,563. Total project costs are estimated at $92,500.

Background/History The District's FARMS program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, and restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS program staff received a project proposal from Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc for their 15-acre container nursery located in the Turkey Creek Watershed, in Hillsborough County along State Highway 574 west of Plant City, within the Northern Tampa Bay Water Use Caution Area. The average annual groundwater withdrawal authorized by the Water Use Permit is 52,900 gallons per day (gpd). To date, actual withdrawals for irrigating the nursery averaged nearly 100 percent of the permitted quantity. The primary goal of the project is to reduce upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals utilizing an existing 1.5 acre surface water reservoir and tailwater recovery to augment nursery irrigation supplies. FARMS project components would include a pumping station, filter unit, valve controls, and pipe to connect the reservoir to the irrigation system.

Benefits/Costs The proposed project involves water quantity BMPs and therefore, qualifies for a 50 percent cost-share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an estimated twenty percent savings of total permitted quantities, or 10,580 gpd, yields a daily cost of $5.51 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over the proposed five-year contract term, and $1.65 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both values are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for improved irrigation techniques in container nursery operations. Total project costs are estimated at

218 Item 34.f.

$92,500. The fiscal years 2005 and 2008 State Appropriations will be used for one-half of the reimbursement, with the remainder divided evenly between the Hillsborough River Basin Board and the Governing Board. Upon approval, the Governing Board and Hillsborough River Basin Board will have $2,053,075 and $33,437 remaining in their respective FARMS program budgets.

Staff Recommendation:

(1) Approve the Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc. FARMS Project for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $46,250 with $11,563 provided by the Hillsborough River Basin, $11,563 provided by the Governing Board, and $23,125 provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $11,563 from fund 013 H017 Hillsborough River Basin FARMS funds, $11,563 from fund 010 H017 Governing Board FARMS funds, and $23,125 from the 2005 and 2008 State Appropriations allocated to fund 010 H017 Governing Board State Appropriations, to H544 Spring Valley Tree Farm, Inc. FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric C. DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

219 220 Item 34.g.

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems Program – McClure Properties, LTD – Manatee County

Purpose To request approval to modify a previously Board approved Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems (FARMS) project with McClure Properties, LTD, and approval to reimburse FARMS eligible costs up to a not-to-exceed limit of $36,133. This project modification is necessary because of the suspension of funds originally pledged by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) due to State budget cuts. The project modification removes FDACS funding and now requests the use of 2003 State Appropriations in the amount of $36,133. Total project costs are estimated at $548,370. This project was originally approved at the April 2003 Basin Board.

Background/History The District's FARMS program, developed by the District and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, is a public/private agricultural Best Management Practices (BMP) cost- share reimbursement program. FARMS is intended to expedite the implementation of production-scale agricultural BMPs that provide water resource benefits. Resource benefits of the FARMS Program include reduced Floridan aquifer withdrawals, water quality improvements (both from ground water and surface water sources) and/or conservation, restoration and augmentation of the area's water resources and ecology. The District's emphasis through the FARMS program is on reductions in Upper Floridan aquifer withdrawals that will improve ground water conditions as documented in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA) recovery strategy. In addition, the District also provides funding for projects that improve water quality affected by the use of mineralized ground water as documented in the Shell and Prairie Creek Watershed Management Plan – Reasonable Assurance Documentation. Reimbursement cost- share rates are capped at 50 percent for water quantity withdrawal reductions from the Upper Floridan aquifer or water quality improvements realized from decreasing the use of mineralized ground water, and at 75 percent for both water quantity and water quality improvements.

FARMS Program staff originally received a project proposal in 2003 from McClure Properties, LTD for their farm located in the Upper Myakka River Watershed, northeast of the town of Myakka City in Manatee County, within the SWUCA. The Water Use Permit for this farm at the time of approval authorized an annual average groundwater withdrawal of 3,239,900 gallons per day (gpd) for the irrigation of 1,203 acres of row crops. The primary goal of the project is to reduce Upper Floridan Aquifer groundwater usage by managing irrigation events, by maximizing the use of captured surface water and irrigation tailwater. This will result in improved onsite water quality and reduced impacts to the ecology of Flatford Swamp and the Upper Myakka River watershed. The project was approved in Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 and became partially operational in FY2007. District pumpage data shows this project has utilized captured surface water in five of the most recent seven months. September 2007 tailwater usage was 588,000 gpd, or approximately 60 percent of total water use for the month and 149 percent of the original projected offset.

Benefits/Costs The project involves both water quantity and quality BMPs. Therefore, the original project qualified for a 75 percent cost-share reimbursement rate under the FARMS Program. Using an

221 Item 34.g. estimate of 12 percent savings of permitted quantities, or approximately 374,100 gpd, yields a daily cost of $0.92 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over the original five-year contract term, and $0.28 per thousand gallons of groundwater reduced over a thirty-year term. Both projected values for groundwater savings costs are within the guidelines for the generally accepted average cost savings per thousand gallons for the implementation of alternative supplies and improved irrigation techniques for similar operations. Total project costs are estimated at $548,370. As originally approved, funding for the project reimbursement was allocated as 30 percent from State Appropriations and the remaining 70 percent split evenly between FDACS and the Manasota Basin Board. In June 2007 the funding allocations were changed when the FARMS Operating Agreement was amended and approved by the Governing Board and FDACS assumed full responsibility for funding this and two other projects, and released the District from its funding commitment. However, due to significant recent budgetary cutbacks from the Florida Legislature, FDACS is now unable to satisfy funding commitments for the final phase of this project. The FY2003 State Appropriations to the Manasota Basin Board budget will be used to fund the remaining reimbursement to the project participant. Upon approval, the Manasota Basin Board will have $942,642 remaining in its FARMS program budget.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

(1) Approve the McClure Properties, LTD FARMS Project funding amendment for a not-to-exceed project reimbursement of $36,133, provided from State Appropriations; (2) Authorize the transfer of $36,133 from the 2003 State Appropriations allocated to fund 021 H017 Manasota Basin State Appropriations to H503 McClure Properties, LTD FARMS project fund; (3) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the agreement.

Presenter: Eric DeHaven, P.G., Director, Resource Conservation and Data Department

222 223 Item 35

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Peace River Regional Reservoir Expansion and Peace River Facility Expansion Amendment

Purpose Approve the amendment to agreements with the Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority (Authority) to: 1) provide an additional $3,703,704 in out-of-cycle funding for the Peace River Regional Reservoir Expansion project, 2) approve changes to both project budgets to reflect approval of the out-of-cycle funding, additional fiscal year (FY) 2008 Water Protection and Sustainability Trust Fund (WPSTF) dollars and the increased project costs to be paid by the Authority, and 3) extend the substantial completion date for both expansion projects from October 31, 2008 to October 31, 2009 and the final completion date for both projects from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010. It is necessary for the District and the Authority to be in agreement with these changes in order to facilitate proper management of the projects and payment for work completed.

Background/History The Peace River facility is located in DeSoto County and provides potable water to residents of Charlotte, DeSoto and Sarasota counties. The source of supply to the facility is surface water from the Peace River. The facility is permitted to supply up to 32.7 million gallons per day (mgd) from the river on an annual average basis. It currently consists of a 24.0 mgd surface water treatment plant, a 625-million gallon off-stream reservoir, and an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) system that is capable of supplying 18.0 mgd during the dry season.

Over the years, the Peace River facility has undergone expansion in phases as demands have increased. The most recent expansion, the Peace River Option project, was completed in 2001 and increased the water treatment capacity of the plant from 12.0 to 24.0 mgd and added 12 ASR wells. The facility is currently capable of supplying up to 18.0 mgd of potable water to its customers and is in the process of expanding to its permitted capacity of 32.7 mgd.

In October 2005, the Authority requested the District amend the original agreements for both expansion projects so that the contract documents reflected changes that were made as a result of concerns regarding arsenic mobilization in ASR wells. Modifications included removing the proposed ASR wells from the facility expansion and increasing the size of the reservoir expansion from 2.6 to 6 billion gallons. These changes resulted in an overall increase in District funding of $3.6 million.

Recently the Authority has completed the bidding process and entered into agreements with contractors to construct the facility and reservoir expansions. The costs associated with these agreements are $43 million higher than what the Authority and District had anticipated while amending the agreements in October 2005. The Authority has requested the District increase its contribution for the expansion projects as a result of the increased costs. District staff has reviewed the Authority's request for additional funding and feel it is warranted based on the dramatic increase in building material and construction costs but do not feel it is appropriate to commit funding for the entire increase at this time.

The Manasota and Peace River Basin Boards face many challenges in meeting future financial demands for new alternative water supply projects. District staff is recommending that an additional $3,703,704 in out-of-cycle funding be allocated from the Water Supply and Resource Development (WSRD) Reserves to the reservoir expansion project. Of the $3,703,704, $500,000 will be requested from the Peace River Basin Board WSRD Reserves, $1,351,852 from the Manasota Basin Board WSRD Reserves, and $1,851,852 from Governing Board

224 Item 35

WSRD reserves. The recommended funding from the Manasota and Peace River Basin Boards represent what staff feels is an acceptable amount to be taken from their reserves and it maintains the percentage contribution between the Basins and Governing Board. The District recognizes the significance of these projects and would recommend re-evaluating the Authority's request on a yearly basis after the completion of each budget cycle.

Funding authorized in the WPSTF has been allocated to both projects every year since 2006. These funds have been applied towards construction expenses, reducing both the District's and the Authority's costs. In FY2008, $2,480,945 and $3,756,693 were allocated to the reservoir and facility expansion projects respectively. This brings the total amount of WPSTF dollars allocated to both projects to $25,495,212. The attached revised budgets reflect the addition of these trust funds and the additional $3,703,704 in FY2008 out-of-cycle funding, if approved, and the increased project costs to be paid by the Authority.

Both the reservoir and facility expansion plans and specifications are complete and the projects have been successfully bid. In addition the construction contracts for both projects have been awarded. Due to difficulties in obtaining all the necessary permits to construct the projects, the Authority has requested that the District extend the substantial completion date for both expansion projects from October 31, 2008 to October 31, 2009, and the final completion date for both projects from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010. Substantial completion is the beneficial use of the facilities to provide and deliver water.

This item will be presented to the Manasota and Peace River Basin Boards at their December meetings.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

Approve the second amendment to agreements with the Authority to: (1) Approve the transfer of $3,703,704 in FY2008 out-of-cycle funding from the WSRD Reserves for the Peace River Regional Reservoir Expansion (F032) project with the Governing Board's share being $1,851,852; (2) Approve changes to both project budgets to reflect approval of the out-of-cycle funding, additional FY2008 WPSTF dollars and the increased project costs to be paid by the Authority; (3) Extend the substantial completion date for both expansion projects from October 31, 2008 to October 31, 2009, and the final completion date for both projects from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010; and (4) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the amendments.

Presenter: Brian Armstrong, Manager, Water Supply and Resource Development Section, Resource Conservation and Development Department

225 EXHIBIT A

FY 2008 Regional Reservoir Expansion (F032) Activity AUTHORITY DISTRICT SB444 TOTAL

Construction Contracts: Regional Reservoir Expansion$ 41,791,547 $ 15,512,440 $ 9,357,114 $ 66,661,100 Raw Water Piping$ 1,426,734 $ 1,426,734 $ 101,533 $ 2,955,000 Mitigation$ 495,614 $ 495,614 $ 118,273 $ 1,109,500

Engineering Services: Regional Reservoir Expansion$ 2,503,900 $ 2,503,900 $ 5,007,800 Raw Water Piping$ 115,250 $ 115,250 $ 230,500 Mitigation$ 543,050 $ 543,050 $ 1,086,100

Total Conceptual Cost Estimate$ 46,876,094 $ 20,596,987 $ 9,576,920 $ 77,050,000

FY 2007 Regional Reservoir Expansion (F032) Activity AUTHORITY DISTRICT SB444 TOTAL Cost Cost Cost Cost Construction Contracts: Regional Reservoir Expansion$ 18,770,173 $ 13,133,658 $ 6,876,169 $ 38,780,000 Raw Water Piping$ 646,734 $ 646,734 $ 101,533 $ 1,395,001 Mitigation$ 753,363 $ 753,363 $ 118,273 $ 1,624,999

Engineering Services: Regional Reservoir Expansion$ 3,345,000 $ 3,345,000 $ 6,690,000 Raw Water Piping$ 117,500 $ 117,500 $ 235,000 Mitigation$ 137,500 $ 137,500 $ 275,000

Total Cost Estimate$ 23,770,270 $ 18,133,755 $ 7,095,975 $ 49,000,000

FY 2008 Peace River Facility Expansion (F033) Budget Activity AUTHORITY EPA DISTRICT SB444 TOTAL

Construction Contracts: Water Treatment Plant Expansion$ 38,587,945 $ 9,000,000 $ 9,553,517 $ 15,447,538 $ 72,589,000 River Pump Station/Piping$ 2,697,927 $ 2,078,829 $ 242,344 $ 5,019,100 Reservoir Pump Station/Piping$ 2,416,094 $ 1,959,296 $ 228,410 $ 4,603,800 DeSoto County RTS Extension$ 1,193,500 $- 1,556,000 $$ 2,749,500

Engineering Services: Water Treatment Plant Expansion$ 2,020,300 $ 2,020,300 $ 4,040,600 River Pump Station/Piping$ 179,600 $ 179,600 $ 359,200 Reservoir Pump Station/Piping$ 163,050 $ 163,050 $ 326,100 DeSoto County RTS Extension$ 227,950 $ 227,950 $ 455,900

Total Conceptual Cost Estimate$ 47,486,366 $ 9,000,000 $ 17,738,542 $ 15,918,292 $ 90,143,200

FY 2007 Budget Peace River Facility Expansion (F033)

Activity AUTHORITY EPA DISTRICT SB444 TOTAL Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Construction Contracts: Water Treatment Plant Expansion$ 24,790,737 $ 9,000,000 $ 6,779,417 $ 11,690,845 $ 52,261,000 River Pump Station/Piping$ 2,078,829 $ 2,078,829 $ 242,343 $ 4,400,000 Reservoir Pump Station/Piping$ 1,959,296 $ 1,959,296 $ 228,408 $ 4,147,000 DeSoto County RTS Extension$ 1,306,000 $- 1,556,000 $$ 2,862,000

Engineering Services: Water Treatment Plant Expansion$ 4,280,000 $ 4,280,000 $ 8,560,000 River Pump Station/Piping$ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 720,000 Reservoir Pump Station/Piping$ 340,000 $ 340,000 $ 680,000 DeSoto County RTS Extension$ 385,000 $ 385,000 $ 770,000

Total Cost Estimate$ 35,499,862 $ 9,000,000 $ 17,738,542 $ 12,161,596 $ 74,400,000

226 Item 36

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, Florida Administrative Code, to Establish Minimum Flows for the Upper Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs

Purpose Establishment of minimum flows for the upper segment of the Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs, in addition to acceptance of the report dated December 2007 entitled, "Proposed Minimum Flows and Levels for the Upper Segment of the Hillsborough River, from Crystal Springs to Morris Bridge, and Crystal Springs."

Background/History

Upper Hillsborough River Recommended minimum flows for the upper Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs and the methodologies used to develop these flow recommendations were presented to the Governing Board at its January 30, 2007 meeting. For development of Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) for the upper segment of the Hillsborough River, the District identified seasonal blocks corresponding to periods of low, medium, and high flows. Short-term minimum flow compliance standards for the Morris Bridge gage site were developed for each of these seasonal periods. A low flow threshold (LFT) of 52 cubic feet per second (cfs), based on fish passage depth and wetted perimeter inflection points was incorporated into the short-term compliance standards. The LFT is defined to be a flow that serves to limit withdrawals, with no withdrawals permitted unless the threshold is exceeded. The allowable flow reduction for the low flow period (Block 1, which runs from April 20 through June 24) was based on review of limiting factors developed using the Physical Habitat Simulation Model (PHABSIM) to model potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. Simulated reductions in historic flows greater than 10 percent resulted in more than 15 percent loss of available habitat during the low flow season (Block 1). Using these limiting factors, the prescribed flow reduction for the low flow period was defined as a 10 percent reduction in natural flow at the Morris Bridge gage.

For the high flow season of the year (which runs from June 25 to October 27), a prescribed flow reduction was based on review of limiting factors developed using the Hydrologic Engineering Centers-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) floodplain model and long-term inundation analyses to evaluate percent of flow reductions associated with changes in the number of days of inundation of floodplain features. It was determined that a stepped flow reduction of 13 percent and 8 percent of historic flows, with the step occurring at the 15 percent exceedance flow (470 cfs) resulted in a decrease of 15 percent or more in the number of days that flows would inundate floodplain features at the Morris Bridge gage. In order to protect high flows regardless of their seasonality, the high flow step of an 8 percent reduction for flows above 470 cfs is maintained throughout the year.

For the medium flow period (which runs from October 28 of one year to April 19 of the next), PHABSIM analyses were used to model flows associated with potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. In addition, flows associated with inundation of instream woody habitats were evaluated using the HEC-RAS model and long-term inundation analysis. Using the more conservative of the two resulting flows, it was determined that PHABSIM would define the percent flow reduction. It was

227 Item 36 determined that more than 15 percent of historically available habitat would be lost for specific species life-stages if flows were reduced by more than 11 percent at the Morris Bridge gage during the medium flow period.

Crystal Springs For development of MFLs for Crystal Springs, the District examined the contribution of Crystal Springs to the Hillsborough River. During the driest parts of the year, flow from Crystal Springs constitutes the vast majority of the flow in the Hillsborough River. A LFT of 52 cfs is recommended for the Hillsborough River. Flows in the river naturally fall below 52 cfs, but these conditions are unfavorable to many aquatic organisms. Recognizing that increasing the number of days that this state persists, and that Crystal Springs flows are most important to the river under these conditions, it was determined that flows in Crystal Springs should not allow the number of days, in a median year, that this occurs to increase by more than 15 percent. Long- term inundation analysis, combined with long-term flow records for Crystal Springs, determined that Crystal Springs flow should be maintained at a five-year mean/median of 46 cfs in order to avoid increasing the number of days that the Hillsborough River at Morris Bridge flow is below 52 cfs by more than 15 percent.

Because minimum flows are intended to protect the water resources or ecology of an area and because climatic variation can influence river flow regimes, staff develops long-term compliance standards when setting minimum flows. These standards are hydrologic statistics that represent flows that may be expected to occur during long-term periods when short-term compliance standards are being met. The hydrologic statistics including five and ten-year mean and median flows were determined and identified as long-term compliance standards. Collectively, the short and long-term compliance standards proposed for a river comprise the District's minimum flow. The standards are intended to prevent significant harm to the water resources or ecology of the river that may result from water use. Since future structural alterations could potentially affect surface water or groundwater flow characteristics within the watershed and additional information pertaining to minimum flows development may become available, the District is committed to the revision of the proposed levels as necessary.

Following a staff presentation to the Governing Board in January 2007, the draft upper segment of the Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs MFL report was submitted to an independent, scientific review panel for voluntary peer review. The panel’s mission was to review the validity of the technical approach used by the District to determine the proposed minimum flows. In doing so, the panel considers how well the conclusions in the report are supported by the data, procedures, and analyses that are presented. The Governing Board should give significant weight to the panel’s findings when adopting minimum flows for the upper segment of the Hillsborough River.

The panel submitted their report to the District and a presentation was made to the Governing Board at its September 2007 meeting by panel member, Dr. Mark Stewart. Staff responded to the peer review at the October 2007 meeting of the Resource Management and Development Committee. The peer review panel concluded that, "The peer review endorses the District's proposed minimum flows for the upper Hillsborough River and finds them to be based on sound science and best available information…" The peer review panel did express concern with the District's analysis of Crystal Springs flow, suggesting that a greater portion of the flow declines could be attributed to anthropogenic effect than the District concluded. Staff conclusions were based on the exclusion of some of the historic USGS data which was considered suspect after intense analysis. District staff has responded to the concern of the peer review panel and after discussions with the panel believes that the exclusion is warranted.

In summary, staff has finalized the January 2007 draft MFL document by addressing various editorial concerns, making changes recommended by the peer review panel, attaching the peer

228 Item 36 review panel's report as an appendix, and providing staff's response. This report, now dated December 2007, is available on the District's web site. The proposed rule language for establishment of MFL for the upper segment of the Hillsborough River and Crystal Springs is attached as an exhibit.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit / Report to be provided

(1) Acceptance of the MFL report entitled, "Proposed Minimum Flows and Levels for the Upper Segment of the Hillsborough River, from Crystal Springs to Morris Bridge, and Crystal Springs," dated December 2007. (2) Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C., to Establish Minimum Flows for the Upper Hillsborough River. (3) Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C., to Establish Minimum Flows for Crystal Springs.

Presenter: Adam Munson, Ph.D., Senior Environmental Scientist, Resource Conservation and Development Department

229 EXHIBIT

Amendments to RULE 40D-8.041, F.A.C. Crystal Springs MFL

40D-8.041 Minimum Flows (1)-(7) No change. (8) Minimum Flows for Crystal Springs Located Within the Hillsborough River Basin, Hillsborough County, Florida (a) The Minimum Flows are to ensure that the minimum hydrologic requirements of the water resources or ecology of the natural systems associated with the upper Hillsborough River are met. (b) The Minimum Flow for Crystal Springs is stated as the flow measured by USGS physical measurements. Flows from Crystal Springs are calculated as the difference between upstream flow measurements at USGS Gage No. 02301990 – Hillsborough River Above Crystal Springs near Zephyrhills, FL and downstream flow measurements at USGS Gage No. 02302010 – Hillsborough River Below Crystal Springs near Zephyrhills, FL measurements and constitute the combined flow of the main spring vent and numerous smaller vents in the river channel. The minimum flow for the Crystal Springs complex is 46 cfs based on a 5-year running mean and median.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171, FS. Law Implemented 373.036, 373.0361, 373.0395, 373.042, 373.0421, FS. History - Readopted 10-5-74, Amended 12-31-74, Formerly 16J-0.15, 40D-1.601, Amended 10-1-84, 8-7-00, ______.

230 EXHIBIT

Amendments to RULE 40D-8.041, F.A.C. Upper Hillsborough River MFL

40D-8.041 Minimum Flows (1) No change. (2) Minimum Flows for the upper Hillsborough River (a) The Minimum Flows are to ensure that the minimum hydrologic requirements of the water resources or ecology of the natural systems associated with the river are met. (b) Minimum Flows for the upper Hillsborough River at the USGS Hillsborough River near Morris Bridge Gage USGS # 02303330 ("Morris Bridge Gage") are set forth in Table 8-12 below. The long-term compliance standards set forth in Table 8-13 are established based on the application of the Minimum Flows to the lowest anticipated natural flow conditions. Minimum Flows for the upper Hillsborough River are both seasonal and flow dependent. Two standards are flow based and applied continuously regardless of season. The first is a Minimum Low Flow threshold of 52 cfs at the Morris Bridge Gage. The second is a Minimum High Flow threshold of 470 cfs at the Morris Bridge Gage. The Minimum High Flow is based on changes in the number of days of inundation of floodplain features. There are also three seasonally dependent or Block specific Minimum Flows. The Block 1 and Block 2 Minimum Flows are based on potential changes in habitat availability for fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. The Block 3 Minimum Flow is based on changes in the number of days of connection with floodplain features.

231 Table 8-12 Minimum Flow for Upper Hillsborough River at USGS Hillsborough River near Morris Bridge Gage Period Effective Where Flow on Minimum Flow Is Dates Previous Day Equals: Annually January 1 d52 cfs 52 cfs to December !52cfs and 470 cfs Seasonally dependent – see Blocks below 31 •470 cfs Previous day flow minus 8% Block 1 April 20 d52 52 cfs to June 24 !52cfs and 470 cfs previous day flow minus 10%

•470 cfs Previous day flow minus 8% Block 2 October d52 52 cfs 28 to April 19 !52cfs and 470 cfs previous day flow minus 11%

•470 cfs previous day flow minus 8% Block 3 June 25 to d52 cfs 52 cfs October 27 !52 cfs and 470cfs previous day flow minus 13%

•470 cfs previous day flow minus 8%

(c) Compliance - The Minimum Flows are met when the flows in Table 8- 13 are achieved.

Table 8-13 Compliance Standards for the Hillsborough River near Morris Bridge Gage Minimum Flow Hydrologic Statistic Flow (cfs) Annual Flow 10-Year Mean 190 10-Year Median 96 5-Year Mean 149 5-Year Median 74 Block 1 10-Year Mean 74 10-Year Median 62 5-Year Mean 57 5-Year Median 52 Block 2 10-Year Mean 153

232 Table 8-13 Compliance Standards for the Hillsborough River near Morris Bridge Gage Minimum Flow Hydrologic Statistic Flow (cfs) 10-Year Median 89 5-Year Mean 105 5-Year Median 72 Block 3 10-Year Mean 287 10-Year Median 150 5-Year Mean 235 5-Year Median 107

(3) – (6) Renumbered as (4) – (7)

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171, FS. Law Implemented 373.036, 373.0361, 373.0395, 373.042, 373.0421, FS. History - Readopted 10-5-74, Amended 12-31-74, Formerly 16J-0.15, 40D-1.601, Amended 10-1-84, 8-7-00, 2-6-06, 4-6-06, 1-1-07, 11-25- 07, ______.

233 Item 37

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, Florida Administrative Code, to Establish Minimum Flows for the Braden River

Purpose Establishment of minimum flows for the freshwater segment of the Braden River and acceptance of the report dated December 2007 entitled, "Proposed Minimum Flows and Levels for the Upper Segment of the Braden River, from Linger Lodge to Lorraine Road."

Background/History Recommended minimum flows for the upper Braden River and the methodologies used to develop these flow recommendations were presented to the Governing Board at its April 24, 2007 meeting. For development of Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) for the upper segment of the Braden River, the District identified seasonal blocks corresponding to periods of low, medium, and high flows. Short-term minimum flow compliance standards for the USGS gage near Lorraine were developed for each of these seasonal periods. A low flow threshold (LFT) of 7 cubic feet per second (cfs), based on fish passage depth and wetted perimeter inflection points was incorporated into the short-term compliance standards. The LFT is defined to be a flow that serves to limit withdrawals, with no withdrawals permitted unless the threshold is exceeded. The allowable flow reduction for the low flow period (Block 1, which runs from May 7 through June 19) was based on review of limiting factors developed using the Physical Habitat Simulation Model (PHABSIM) to model potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. Simulated reductions in historic flows greater than 10 percent resulted in more than 15 percent loss of available habitat during the low flow season (Block 1). Using these limiting factors, the prescribed flow reduction for the low flow period was defined as a 15 percent reduction in natural flow at the Braden River USGS gage near Lorraine.

For the high flow season of the year (which runs from June 20 to October 24), a prescribed flow reduction was based on review of limiting factors developed using the Hydrologic Engineering Centers-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) floodplain model and long-term inundation analyses to evaluate percent of flow reductions associated with changes in the number of days of inundation of floodplain features. It was determined that a stepped flow reduction of 19 percent and 10 percent of historic flows, with the step occurring at the 15 percent exceedance flow (54 cfs) resulted in a decrease of 15 percent or more in the number of days that flows would inundate floodplain features at the USGS gage near Lorraine.

For the medium flow period (which runs from October 25 of one year to May 6 of the next), PHABSIM analyses were used to model flows associated with potential changes in habitat availability for several fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. In addition, flows associated with inundation of instream woody habitats were evaluated using the HEC-RAS model and long-term inundation analysis. Using the more conservative of the two resulting flows, it was determined that PHABSIM would define the percent flow reduction. It was determined that more than 15 percent of historically available habitat would be lost for specific species life-stages if flows were reduced by more than 11 percent at the USGS gage near Lorraine during the medium flow period.

Because minimum flows are intended to protect the water resources or ecology of an area, and because climatic variation can influence river flow regimes, staff develops long-term compliance

234 Item 37 standards when setting minimum flows. These standards are hydrologic statistics that represent flows that may be expected to occur during long-term periods when short-term compliance standards are being met. The hydrologic statistics including five and ten-year mean and median flows were determined and identified as long-term compliance standards. Collectively, the short and long-term compliance standards proposed for a river comprise the District's minimum flow. The standards are intended to prevent significant harm to the water resources or ecology of the river that may result from water use. Since future structural alterations could potentially affect surface water or groundwater flow characteristics within the watershed and additional information pertaining to minimum flows development may become available, the District is committed to the revision of the proposed levels as necessary.

Following a staff presentation to the Board in April 2007, the draft upper segment of the Braden River MFL report was submitted to an independent, scientific review panel for voluntary peer review. The panel’s mission was to review the validity of the technical approach used by the District to determine the proposed minimum flows. In doing so, the panel considers how well the conclusions in the report are supported by the data, procedures, and analyses that are presented. The Governing Board should give significant weight to the panel’s findings when adopting minimum flows for the upper segment of the Braden River.

The panel submitted its report to the District and a presentation was made to the Governing Board at its September 2007 meeting by panel member, Dr. Charles Cichra. Staff responded to the peer review at the October 2007 meeting of the Resource Management and Development Committee. The peer review panel concluded that, "The approach used in setting MFLs for the upper Braden River follows the established protocols that have been effectively used by the District in the past. The panel continues to endorse the District's overall approach for setting MFLs in riverine ecosystems."

In summary, staff has finalized the March 2007 draft MFL document by addressing various editorial concerns, making changes recommended by the peer review panel, attaching the peer review panel's report as an appendix, and providing staff's response. This report, now dated December 2007, is available on the District's web site. The proposed rule language that would establish MFL for the upper segment of the Braden River as measured at the USGS gage near Lorraine as described above is attached as an exhibit.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit & Report

(1) Acceptance of the MFL report entitled, "Proposed Minimum Flows and Levels for the Upper Segment of the Braden River, from Linger Lodge to Lorraine Road," dated December 2007. (2) Approve Initiation of Rulemaking to Amend Rules 40D-8.041, F.A.C. to Establish Minimum Flows for the Braden River.

Presenter: Adam Munson, Ph.D., Senior Environmental Scientist, Resource Conservation and Development Department

235 EXHIBIT

Amendments to RULE 40D-8.041, F.A.C. Braden River MFL

40D-8.041 Minimum Flows (1) – (6) No change. (7) Minimum Flows for the Braden River (a) The Minimum Flows are to ensure that the minimum hydrologic requirements of the water resources or ecology of the natural systems associated with the river are met. (b) Minimum Flows for the Braden River at the USGS Braden River near Lorraine Gage USGS # 02300032 ("near Lorraine Gage") are set forth in Table 8-14 below. The long-term compliance standards set forth in Table 8-15 are established based on the application of the Minimum Flows to the lowest anticipated natural flow conditions. Minimum Flows for the Braden River are both seasonal and flow dependent. Two standards are flow based and applied continuously regardless of season. The first is a Minimum Low Flow threshold of 7 cfs at the near Lorraine Gage. The second is a Minimum High Flow threshold of 54 cfs at the near Lorraine Gage. The Minimum High Flow is based on changes in the number of days of inundation of floodplain features. There are also three seasonally dependent or Block specific Minimum Flows. The Block 1 and Block 2 Minimum Flows are based on potential changes in habitat availability for fish species and macroinvertebrate diversity. The Block 3 Minimum Flow is based on changes in the number of days of connection with floodplain features.

236 Table 8-14 Minimum Flow for Braden River at USGS Braden River near Lorraine Gage Period Effective Dates Where Flow on Minimum Flow Is Previous Day Equals: Annually January 1 to d7 cfs 7 cfs December 31 !7cfs and 54 cfs Seasonally dependent – see Blocks below

•54 cfs Previous day flow minus 10% Block 1 May 7 to June 19 d7 7 cfs

!7 cfs previous day flow minus 10%

Block 2 October 25 to May d7 7 cfs 6 !7 cfs and 54 previous day flow minus 11% cfs

•54 cfs previous day flow minus 10% Block 3 June 20 to October d7 cfs 7 cfs 24 !7 cfs and 54 previous day flow minus 19% cfs

•54 cfs previous day flow minus 10%

(c) Compliance - The Minimum Flows are met when the flows in Table 8-15 are achieved.

Table 8-15 Compliance Standards for Braden River near Lorraine Gage Minimum Flow Hydrologic Statistic Flow (cfs) Annual Flow 10-Year Mean 31 10-Year Median 3 5-Year Mean 26 5-Year Median 2 Block 1 10-Year Mean 5 10-Year Median 1 5-Year Mean 2 5-Year Median 0 Block 2 10-Year Mean 20 10-Year Median 3 5-Year Mean 10

237 Table 8-15 Compliance Standards for Braden River near Lorraine Gage Minimum Flow Hydrologic Statistic Flow (cfs) 5-Year Median 1 Block 3 10-Year Mean 65 10-Year Median 23 5-Year Mean 43 5-Year Median 7

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171, FS. Law Implemented 373.036, 373.0361, 373.0395, 373.042, 373.0421, FS. History - Readopted 10-5-74, Amended 12-31-74, Formerly 16J-0.15, 40D-1.601, Amended 10-1-84, 8-7-00, 2-6-06, 4-6-06, 1-1-07, 11-25- 07, ______.

238 Item 38

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Initiate Rulemaking to Amend 40D-8.624, Florida Administrative Code, to Add Minimum and Guidance Levels for Lakes Angelo, Denton, Placid, Tulane, and Verona in Highlands County; Lakes King, King-East, and Linda in Pasco County; and Crooked Lake in Polk County

Purpose Board approval of minimum and guidance levels for nine priority lakes.

Background/History Proposed minimum and guidance levels for Lakes Angelo, Crooked, Denton, King, King (East), Linda, Placid, Tulane and Verona have been developed using previously peer-reviewed, Governing Board adopted methods. Staff has also developed proposed levels for Lake Anoka in Highlands County, but has determined that additional analyses are necessary prior to finalization of the levels for this lake. These additional analyses are expected to be completed in 2008.

Minimum levels are water levels at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources of the area. Guidance levels are used to describe expected water level fluctuations and serve as advisory information for the District, lakeshore residents and local governments, or to aid in the management of water control structures. Technical documents outlining development of the proposed levels have been posted on the District's web site and distributed to interested parties.

Public workshops on the proposed lake levels were held in Babson Park, Land O' Lakes, and Sebring in November 2007. Information obtained as a result of these workshops has been summarized and made available to the Board upon request and, if appropriate, used to modify the proposed levels. Development of levels for Lake Anoka was discussed at the workshop held in Sebring, but proposed levels were not presented for public comment. Staff plans to schedule an additional workshop for discussion of proposed levels for Lake Anoka in 2008 following finalization of recommended levels, and will subsequently present the levels to the Board for approval.

It is anticipated that the proposed minimum levels for some of the lakes are not being met. In the event that water levels in any of the lake basins are not fluctuating in compliance with the proposed minimum levels, the recovery strategies outlined in Rules 40D-80.073 or 40D-80.074, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), will apply.

Staff has prepared rule amendments that incorporate the proposed minimum and guidance levels for Lakes Angelo, Crooked, Denton, King, King (East), Linda, Placid, Tulane and Verona into Table 8-2 in Rule 40D-8.624, F.A.C. (see Exhibit). The rule amendments also include deletion of currently adopted guidance levels for the lakes from Table 8-3 in Rule 40D-8.624, F.A.C.

Staff will be prepared to address any Board concerns regarding the proposed levels or the methods used for their development.

239 Item 38

Benefits/Costs Adoption of minimum levels for the priority lakes will support the District's water supply planning, water use permitting, and environmental resource permitting programs. Adoption of the guidance levels will provide advisory information for construction of lakeshore development and operation of water management structures.

If initiation of rulemaking is approved and no requests for hearing are received, staff will complete the rulemaking process without further Governing Board action.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

Approve initiation of rulemaking to amend Rule 40D-8.624, Florida Administrative Code, to delete previously adopted guidance level and add new guidance and minimum levels as shown in the Exhibit.

Presenter: Doug Leeper, Chief Environmental Scientist, Resource Conservation & Development Department

240 EXHIBIT

RULES OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT CHAPTER 40D-8 WATER LEVELS AND RATES OF FLOW

40D-8.624 Guidance and Minimum Levels for Lakes.

(1) - (12) No change

(13) Levels for lakes established during or after August 7, 2000, are set forth in the following table. After the High Minimum Lake Level and Minimum Lake Level elevation for each lake is a designation indicating the Method used, as described in subsection 40D-8.624(8), F.A.C., to establish the level. Compliance with the High Minimum and Minimun Lake Levels is determined pursuant to paragraphs (6)(b) and (7)(b) above. Guidance Levels established prior to August 7, 2000, are set forth in Table 8-3 in subsection 40D-8.624(14), F.A.C., below.

241 Table 8-2 Minimum and Guidance Levels Established During or After August 7, 2000. Levels are elevations, in feet above the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.

Location by County Name of Lake and Ten-Year High Guidance High Minimum Lake Low Gudiance and Basin Section, Township and Flood Level Minimum Level Level Range Information Guidance Lake Level Level (a) through (h) No change

(i) In Highlands Angelo, Lake 102.1' 101.3' 100.0' 99.6' County Within the S-25 T-33S (CAT 3) (CAT 3) Peace River Basin R-28E

Denton, Lake 114.9' 114.1' 112.8' 112.4' S-02 T-34S (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-28E

Jackson, Lake 104.1' 102.6' 102.4' 101.3' 100.2' S-30 T-34S (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-29E

June-in- 75.5' 74.7' 74.5' 74.0' 73.2' Winter, Lake (CAT 3) (CAT 3) S-34, T-36S, R-29E

Letta, Lake 100.5' 99.5' 99.5' 98.4' 97.1' S-31, T-33S, (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-29E

Little Jackson, Lake 104.1' 102.6' 102.4' 101.3' 100.2' S-06, T-35S, (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-29E

Lotela, Lake 108.5' 107.5' 106.8' 105.7' 105.0' S-26, T-33S, (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-28E

Placid, Lake 93.4' 92.6' 91.4' 90.9' S-24 T-37S (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-29E

Tulane, Lake 118.7' 117.9' 116.6' 116.2' S-27 T-33S (CAT 3) (CAT 3) R-28E

Verona, Lake 118.2' 117.4' 115.8' 115.1' S-23 T-33S (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

242 R-28E

(j) through (r) No change

(s) In Pasco County Bell, Lake 73.3' 71.6' 70.8' 69.4' 69.2' Within the S-13, T-26, R-18 (CAT 1) (CAT 1) Hillsborough County Basin Bird, Lake 68.2' 66.8' 66.6' 65.2' 64.3' S-36, T-26, R-18 (CAT 1) (CAT 1)

Buddy, Lake 96.9' 93.7' 93.7' 87.3' 83.9' S-17, T-25S, R-21E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Hancock, Lake 106.9' 102.5' 102.5' 100.2' 97.7' S-5, T-24S, R-20E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

King Lake 73.1' 72.4' 70.8' 69.7' S-7, T-26S, R-19E (CAT 1) (CAT 1)

King Lake (East) 105.7' 105.1' 102.7' 101.4' S-22, T-25S, R-20E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Middle, Lake 106.9' 103.1' 102.5' 100.2' 99.2' S-4, T-24S, R-20E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Padgett, Lake 71.5' 70.5' 70.5' 69.5' 68.4' S-24, T-26, R-18 (CAT 1) (CAT 1)

Pasadena, Lake 96.9' 93.7' 93.7' 87.3' 83.9' S-16, T-25S, R-21E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

(t) In Pasco County Camp, Lake 64.3' 63.8' 63.4' 62.0' 61.3' Within the Pinellas- S-34, T-26, R-18 (CAT 1) (CAT 1) Anclote River Basin Linda, Lake 66.3' 66.2' 64.7' 63.6' S-26, T-26S, R-18E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Parker (Ann), Lake 49.5' 48.3' 48.1' 46.7' 46.2' S-35, T-26, R-17 (CAT 1) (CAT 1)

(u) through (y) No change

(z) In Polk County Clinch, Lake 107.4' 105.5' 105.5' 104.4' 103.1' Within the Peace S-31, T-31S, R-28E (CAT 3) (CAT 3) River Basin Crooked Lake 121.2' 120.8' 117.9' 116.4'

243 S-01, T-31S, R-27E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Eagle, Lake 131.3' 129.6' 129.0' 127.9' 127.2' S-01, T-29S, R-25E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

McLeod, Lake 133.3' 129.4' 129.4' 128.3' 127.0' S-07, T-29S, R-26E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Parker, Lake 131.8' 130.6' 130.6' 129.6' 129.0' S-8, T-28S, R-24E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

Wales, Lake 114.1' ND 107.7' 106.6' ND S-01, T-30S, R-27E (CAT 3) (CAT 3)

(aa) through (cc) No change

(14) Guidance Levels established for lakes prior to August 7, 2000, are set forth in the following table:

Table 8-3 Guidance Water Levels adopted prior to August 7, 2000

Location of Ten-Year Flood High Level in Feet Low Level in Feet Extreme Low Impoundment by Guidance Level in Feet above Mean Sea Level above Mean Sea Level in Feet County and Basin Above Mean Sea Level (msl) Level (msl) Above Mean (msl) Sea Level (msl) (a) through (h) No change

(i) In Highlands County Within the Peace River Basin LAKES Sec. Twsp. Rng. Adelaide, Lake 110.00' 106.50' 104.00' 102.50' 5, 33S, 28E

Angelo, Lake 104.00' 99.50' 97.00' 95.00' 4, 27S, 25E

Anoka, Lake 124.00' 124.00' 122.00' 120.00' 27, 33S, 28E

Apthorpe, Lake 72.00' 71.50' 68.00' 66.00' 18, 36S, 30E

Blue, Lake 78.70' 77.50' 75.00' 73.50' 30, 36S, 30E

Bonnet, Lake 91.90' 90.75' 88.00' 86.00'

244 8, 34S, 29E

Brentwood, Lake 102.30' 102.75' 99.50' 98.00' 10, 33S, 28E

Buck, Lake 96.40' 94.00' 91.50' 89.50' 29, 37S, 30E

Byrd, Lake 110.60' 108.25' 105.50' 104.00' 9, 33S, 28E

Carrie, Lake 75.13' 75.50' 73.00' 72.50' 21, 36S, 29E

Charlotte, Lake 93.90' 93.75' 91.25' 89.75' 17, 35S, 29E

Chilton, Lake 116.30' 114.00' 111.00' 109.50' 7, 33S, 28E

Clay, Lake 79.00' 78.75' 76.00' 75.00' 29, 36S, 30E

Crews, Lake 120.50' 119.50' 117.00' 115.50' 32, 36S, 29E

Damon, Lake 102.30' 101.00' 98.00' 95.00' 3, 33S, 28E

Denton, Lake 117.10' 116.50' 114.00' 112.00' 2, 34S, 28E

Dinner, Lake 103.50' 102.50' 98.50' 97.00' 17, 34S, 29E

Francis, Lake 70.80' 70.50' 67.50' 66.50' 22, 36S, 29E

Glenada, Lake 118.40' 120.00' 117.00' 115.50' 34, 33S, 28E

Grassy, Lake 92.10' 91.50' 88.50' 87.50' 17, 37S, 30E

Harry, Lake`` 67.60' 67.50' 63.00' 62.00' 1, 36S, 29E

Henry, Lake 75.13' 75.50' 73.00' 72.50' 25, 36S, 29E

245

Hill, Lake 101.00' 99.25' 96.00' 94.50' 17, 36S, 29E

Huckleberry, Lake 104.80' 104.50' 102.00' 101.00' 7, 35S, 29E

Huntley, Lake 83.40' 83.75' 81.00' 79.50' 5, 37S, 30E

Josephine, Lake 72.70' 72.50' 69.00' 68.50' 32, 35S, 29E

Lake Lachard 79.56' 78.50' 76.00' 74.00' 36, 36S, 29E

Lelia, Lake 113.00' 114.50' 112.50' 110.50' 34, 33S, 29E

Little Bonnet, Lake 101.70' 100.00' 97.00' 96.00' 36, 33S, 28E

Little Red Water, Lake 104.10' 103.25' 100.50' 98.50' 14, 36S, 29E

Lost, Lake 90.60' 88.00' 84.00' 82.75' 12, 37S, 29E

McCoy, Lake 87.39' 87.00' 84.00' 82.00' 6, 37S, 30E

Mirror, Lake 94.70' 93.50' 90.00' 88.00' 7, 37S, 30E

Center Nellie 73.20' 71.50' 67.00' 65.00' 13, 36S, 29E

Nellie N.W., Lake 73.20' 71.50' 67.00' 65.00' 13, 36S, 29E

Nellie S.E., Lake 73.20' 71.50' 67.00' 65.00' 13, 36S, 29E

Olivia, Lake 118.10' 117.50' 114.50' 113.00' 6, 33S, 28E

Pearl, Lake 87.27' 87.00' 84.00' 82.00' 6, 37S, 30E

246 Persimmon, Lake 69.30' 68.25' 65.00' 63.50' 10, 36S, 29E

Pioneer, Lake 108.60' 108.00' 104.50' 103.00' 11, 33S, 28E

Placid, Lake 94.70' 94.50' 91.50' 90.00' 30, 36S, 30E

Pythias, Lake 101.20' 101.00' 98.00' 95.00' 2, 33S, 28E

Red Beach Lake 76.80' 76.50' 73.75' 72.75' 15, 35S, 29E

Red Water Lake 70.80' 70.50' 67.50' 66.50' 14, 36S, 29E

Ruth, Lake 94.20' 94.00' 91.50' 90.00' 18, 35S, 29E

Saddlebags, Lake 84.27' 84.00' 81.00' 79.00' 6, 37S, 30E

Sebring, Lake 107.60' 107.25' 104.50' 103.00' 14, 34S, 28E

Simmons, Lake 74.30' 72.50' 68.00' 66.50' 24, 36S, 29E

Sirena, Lake 87.27' 87.00' 84.00' 82.00' 1, 37S, 29E

Trout, Lake 100.60' 101.00' 98.00' 95.00' 34, 32S, 28E

Tulane, Lake 120.50' 120.00' 116.00' 114.00' 27, 33S, 28E

Unnamed Lake (B) 92.10' 91.50' 88.50' 87.50' 20, 37S, 30E

Unnamed Lake (F) 78.50' 78.00' 74.00' 72.00' 24, 36S, 29E

Verona, Lake 123.00' 119.00' 115.25' 113.00' 23, 33S, 28E

Viola, Lake 112.20' 109.50' 105.75' 104.00'

247 14, 33S, 28E

Wolf Lake 93.80' 92.50' 90.00' 88.00' 24, 35S, 28E

(j) through (r) No change

(s) In Pasco County Within the Hillsborough River Basin LAKES

Catfish, Lake 68.72' 68.00' 65.50' 63.50' S30, T25, R19

Cow (East), Lake 78.63' 78.50' 76.00' 75.00' S19, T26S, R19E

Floyd, Lake 68.41' 68.50' 66.00' 64.00' S36, T26, R19

Gooseneck, Lake 75.10' 73.50' 71.00' 69.00' S29, T26, R19

Hog (Joyce), Lake 76.66' 76.50' 73.50' 72.50' S19, T26S, R19E

Iola, Lake 147.55' 147.50' 145.00' 142.50' S15, T24S, R20E

Jessamine, Lake 144.18' 142.00' 138.00' 136.00' S11, T24S, R20E

JoAnn, Lake 68.72' 68.00' 65.50' 63.50' S30, T26, R19

King, Lake 73.58' 73.50' 71.50' 69.50' S7, T26S, R19E

King, Lake (East) 105.49' 105.25' 102.50' 100.00' S22, T25S, R20E

Moody, Lake 110.48' 110.00' 107.50' 105.50' S10, T24S, R20E

Myrtle, Lake 68.72' 68.00' 65.50' 63.50' S30, T26, R19

248

Saxon, Lake 71.34' 71.25' 69.00' 67.50' S30, T26S, R19E

Tampa (Turtle), Lake 66.00' 65.50' 63.00' 61.00' S32, T26, R19

Toni, Lake 68.72' 68.00' 65.50' 63.50' S30, T26, R19

Twin, Lake 68.35' 67.50' 65.00' 63.00' S28, T26, R19

Unnamed Lake #26 68.75' 68.00' 65.50' 63.50' S25, T26, R18

(t) In Pasco County Within the Pinellas- Anclote River Basin LAKES

Bass, Lake (Holiday) 48.80' 48.75' 45.75' 45.00' S34, T26E, R17S

Big Lake Vienna 70.70' 70.25' 67.00' 65.00' 23, 26, 18

Fishing, Lake 48.80' 48.75' 45.75' 45.00' S34, T26E, R17S

Geneva, Lake (Mud) 51.20' 50.00' 48.00' 46.00' S26, T26E, R17S

Linda, Lake 67.30' 66.75' 64.00' 62.00' 26, 26, 18

Little Moss (Como), 67.00' 66.00' 63.00' 62.00' Lake S35, T26, R18

Minniola, Lake 51.20' 50.00' 48.00' 46.00' S34, T26E, R17S

Moss, Lake 65.00' 64.00' 61.50' 59.00' 35, 26, 18

Seminole, Lake 49.20' 48.75' 46.00' 45.00' S35, T26E, R17S

249 Thomas, Lake 75.60' 75.00' 72.50' 71.50' 11, 26, 18

Wistaria, Lake 74.90' 74.00' 71.00' 69.00' S2, T26, R18

(u) through (y) No change

(z) In Polk County Within the Peace River Basin

Ada, Lake 123.80' 123.00' 120.00' 118.00' S33, T28, R27

Altamaha, Lake 122.60' 122.50' 120.00' 118.00' S11, T30, R27

Amoret, Lake 115.50' 115.25' 113.00' 111.00' 24, 30, 27

Annie, Lake 122.10' 119.00' 116.00' 114.00'

Ariana, Lake 137.10' 137.00' 134.50' 132.50' 3, 28, 25E

Aurora, Lake 103.30' 100.00' 97.00' 95.00' 13, 30, 28

Banana, Lake 106.75' 106.50' 103.50' 102.00' 10, 29, 24E

Belle, Lake 123.60' 120.00' 117.00' 115.00' 11, 30, 27

Bess, Lake 125.50' 125.25' 123.00' 121.00' 18 29S 27E

Big Gum, Lake 95.50' 95.00' 92.00' 89.00' 26, 29, R28

Blue, Lake 149.80' 149.00' 146.50' 144.50' S13, T28, R25

Blue Lake 118.00' 117.00' 114.00' – 24, 30S, 27E

250 Bonnie, Lake 113.30' 113.00' 110.00' 108.00' S31, T29, R28

Bonny, Lake 130.90' 130.50' 128.00' 126.00' 20, 28S, 24E

Buckeye, Lake 130.10' 129.00' 126.00' 124.50' S22, T28S, R26E

Buffum, Lake 132.75' 132.25' 129.25' – 12, 31S, 26E

Cannon, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 19, 28S, 26E

Conine, Lake 129.70' 128.75' 126.50' 124.50' 9, 28S, 26E

Cooper (Worth) 124.20' 123.50' 121.00' 119.00' S02, T30, R27

Crooked, Lake 122.60' 122.00' 118.50' – 1, 31S, 27E

Crystal, Lake 121.40' 121.25' 118.00' 115.00' S02, T30, R27

Crystal, Lake 122.90' 122.00' 119.00' 117.00' S21, T28, R27

Crystal, Lake 130.00' 129.50' 127.00' 125.00' 23, 29S, 26E

Cypress, Lake 100.20' 98.50' 95.00' 93.00' 36, 29, 28E

Lake Daisy 130.90' 130.00' 127.00' 126.00' S6, T29, R27

Lake Deer 141.30' 140.75' 138.50' 136.50' 25, 28, 25E

Dell, Lake 125.70' 123.75' 121.50' 119.50' S28, T28, R27

Lake Dexter 132.20' 132.00' 129.00' 127.50' S2, T29, R26

Dinner, Lake 120.90' 118.50' 116.00' 114.00'

251 15, 29S, 27E

Easy, Lake 115.50' 115.25' 113.00' 111.00' 19, 30, 28

Echo, Lake 132.30' 131.00' 128.00' 126.00' S05, T28, R26

Effie, Lake 119.60' 118.00' 115.00' 113.00' 3, 30, 27

Elbert, Lake 137.50' 135.50' 133.00' 131.50' S22, T28, R26

Eloise, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 3, 29S, 26E

Fannie, Lake 127.00' 125.75' 123.50' 120.00' 11, 28S, 26E

Lake Florence 128.80' 128.75' 127.00' 125.00' S35, T28, R26

Lake Fox 135.20' 135.00' 132.00' 131.00' S6, T29, R27

Garfield, Lake 105.70' 104.75' 101.00' 100.00' 5, 30, 26E

Gator, Lake 133.60' 133.00' 130.75' 128.50' 26, 30S, 26E

George, Lake 130.70' 130.00' 127.50' 125.50' S06, T28, R26

Gibson, Lake 144.20' 143.50' 141.50' 141.50' 25, 27S, 23E

Gordon, Lake 121.30' 119.00' 116.00' 114.00' S16, T28, R27

Lake Grassy 134.80' 129.00' 126.50' 125.50' 2, 29, 25E

Lake Gross 138.50' 136.00' 133.50' 132.00' (Grassy) S14, T29, R26

Hamilton, Lake 122.50' 121.50' 119.00' 117.25'

252 18, 28S, 27E

Hancock, Lake 102.40' 99.00' 96.00' 94.00' 8, 29S, 25E

Hart, Lake 124.70' 124.50' 122.00' 120.00' 24, 29S, 26E

Hartridge, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 8, 28S, 26E

Henry, Lake 160.10' 159.00' 156.00' 154.00' 16, 31S, 26E

Henry, Lake 127.00' 126.50' 124.50' 122.50' 36, 27S, 26E

Hickory, Lake 98.50' 98.50' 96.00' 94.00' 17, 32S, 28E

Howard, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 30, 28S, 26E

Ida, Lake 80.00' 79.00' 76.50' 75.00' 28, 31S, 28E

Ida, Lake 136.70' 135.25' 132.00' 130.50' S17, T28, R26

Idyl, Lake 134.90' 134.00' 131.50' 130.00' S16, T28, R26

Idylwild, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 18, 28S, 26E

Jessie, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 12, 28S, 25E

Josephine, Lake 121.30' 120.00' 116.50' 114.50' 13, 30, 27

Josephine, Lake 124.10' 121.50' 118.00' 116.50' S27, T28, R27

Lee, Lake 123.50' 123.50' 121.50' 120.00' S16, T28, R27

Lena, Lake 137.10' 137.00' 134.50' 132.50' 9, 28S, 25E

253

Leonore, Lake 87.40' 87.00' 84.50' 83.00' 10, 31S, 28E

Link, Lake 128.70' 128.00' 125.00' 123.00' 27, 28S, 26E

Little Aurora 103.30' 100.50' 98.00' 96.00'

Little Gum, Lake 96.80' 96.50' 94.00' 92.00' 35, 29S, 28E

Little Lake Hamilton 122.50' 121.50' 119.00' 117.25' 5, 28S, 27E

LuLu, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 4, 29S, 26E

Lee, Lake 122.10' 119.00' 116.00' 114.00' 10, 29S, 27E

Mabel, Lake 114.50' 110.75' 107.00' 105.00' 11, 29S, 27E

Mariam, Lake – 124.75' 122.75' 121.00' 27, 28S, 26E

Marie, Lake 121.00' 121.00' 118.00' 116.00' S27, T28, R27

Martha, Lake 142.50' 142.00' 139.00' 137.00' S21, T28, R26

Maude, Lake 141.70' 140.50' 137.50' 136.00' S21, T28, R26

May, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 29, 28S, 26E

Medora, Lake 140.40' 138.00' 134.50' 133.00' S36, T27, R25

Menzie, Lake 127.00' 122.00' 120.00' 118.00' S28, T28, R27

Middle Lake 122.50' 121.50' 119.00' 117.25' Hamilton 7, 28S, 27E

254 Lake Millsite 125.30' 123.50' 121.00' 119.00' 11, 29, 25E

Mirror, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 20, 28S, 27E

Moody, Lake 92.80' 93.50' 91.00' 89.00' 17, 31S, R28E

Myrtle, Lake 118.70' 118.50' 116.50' 114.50' 19, 29S, 27E

Lake Ned 129.60' 128.50' 126.00' 124.00' S1, T29, R26

North Lake Wales 116.80' 115.00' 112.00' 110.00' S01, T30, R27

Otis, Lake 128.70' 128.00' 125.00' 123.00' 28, 28S, 25E

Pansy, Lake 130.00' 129.00' 126.50' 124.50' S08, T28, R26

Parker, Lake 122.50' 122.00' 119.50' 117.50' 32, 29S, 27E

Parks, Lake 104.50' 102.50' 100.00' 98.00' 36, 29S, 28E

Polecat, Lake 142.40' 142.00' 139.50' 137.50' 27, 30S, 26E

Reedy, Lake 80.00' 79.75' 77.25' 75.25' 35, 31S, 28E

Reeves, Lake 125.10' 124.50' 122.00' 120.00' 13, 29S, 26E

Lake River 141.60' 139.50' 136.00' 134.00' S1, T29, R26

Rochelle, Lake 129.70' 128.75' 126.50' 124.50' 4, 28S, 26E

Round, Lake 129.40' 129.25' 126.50' 124.50' 13, 29S, 26E

Roy, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00'

255 34, 28S, 26E

Ruby, Lake 125.50' 125.25' 123.00' 121.00' 12, 29S, 26E

Ruth, Lake 123.50' 121.50' 117.50' 115.50' S28, T28, R27

Saddlebag, Lake 106.80' 105.00' 102.00' 100.00' 6, 30S, 29E

Saint Anne Lake 97.50' 96.00' 93.00' 91.00' 14, 30, 28

Sanitary (Mariana), 138.60' 137.50' 135.00' 133.00' Lake S01, T28, R25

Sara, Lake 122.50' 121.50' 119.00' 117.25' S17, T28, R27

Scott, Lake 168.60' 168.00' 165.00' 164.25' 18, 29S, 24E

Lake Sears 143.20' 141.00' 138.00' 136.00' 36, 28, 25E

Serena, Lake 125.30' 118.00' 115.00' 113.00' S12, T30, R27

Shipp, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 32, 28S, 26E

Silver, Lake 105.00' 103.00' 100.50' 98.50' 5, 32S, 28E

Silver, Lake 147.10' 146.50' 144.00' 142.00' S20, T28, R26

Smart, Lake 129.70' 128.75' 126.50' 124.50' 9, 28S, 26E

Lake Spirit 134.10' 131.50' 129.00' 127.00' 35, 28, 25E

Spring, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 20, 28S, 27E

Starr, Lake 115.50' 113.00' 110.00' 108.00'

256 14, 29, 27

Streety, Lake 108.70' 105.50' 102.50' 101.00' 24, 32S, 27E

Summit, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 34, 28S, 26E

Sunset, Lake 101.10' 98.00' 95.50' 93.50' 10, 30, 28

Surveyors, Lake 133.60' 133.00' 130.75' 128.50' 26, 30S, 26E

Thomas, Lake 104.20' 99.50' 97.00' 95.00' 1, 30E, 28E

Lake Thomas 135.60' 132.00' 128.00' 126.00' 35, 28, 25E

Tractor, Lake 125.00' 123.25' 121.00' 119.00' 14, 30, 27

Trask, Lake 114.90' 113.00' 108.00' 106.00' S22, T28, R27

Trout, Lake 100.60' 101.00' 98.00' 95.00' 34, 32S, 28E

Twin, Lakes 124.10' 123.75' 120.00' 118.00' S11, T30, R27

Venus, Lake 126.10' 125.00' 122.00' 120.00' 9, 29S, 27E

Walker, Lake 143.00' 141.00' 137.00' 135.00' 21, 30S, 26E

Warren, Lake 124.60' 123.50' 121.00' 119.00' S11, T30, R27

Weader (Weaver), 122.00' 121.75' 119.00' 117.00' Lake S03, T30, R27

Winterset, Lake 132.60' 132.00' 129.50' 127.00' 11, 29S, 26E

(aa) through (cc)

257 No change Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS. Law Implemented 373.036, 373.0361, 373.0395, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.086 FS. History–New 6- 7-78, Amended 1-22-79, 4-27-80, 10-21-80, 12-22-80, 3-23-81, 4-14-81, 6-4-81, 10-15-81, 11-23-81, 1-5-82, 3-11-82, 5-10-82, 7-4-82, 9-2-82, 11- 8-82, 1-10-83, 4-3-83, 7-5-83, 9-5-83, 10-16-83, 12-12-83, 5-8-84, 7-8-84, 12-16-84, 2-7-85, 5-13-85, 6-26-85, 11-3-85, 3-5-86, 6-16-86, Formerly 16J-8.678, Amended 9-7-86, 2-12-87, 9-2-87, 2-18-88, 6-27-88, 2-22-89, 3-23-89, 9-26-89, 7-26-90, 10-30-90, 3-3-91, 9-30-91, 10-7-91, 7-26-92, 3-1-93, 5-11-94, 6-6-96, 2-23-97, 8-7-00, 1-8-04, 12-21-04 (13), 12-21-04 (13), 6-5-05, 5-2-06, 1-1-07, 2-12-07, .

258 Item 39

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Continue Public Hearing Requested by James P. Gills, Trustee, on Proposed Minimum and Guidance Levels for Crews Lake in Pasco County

Purpose To approve continuation of a public hearing requested by Mr. Gills, as Trustee, concerning proposed rule amendments for Crews Lake in Pasco County.

Background/History The Governing Board approved proposed Minimum and Guidance Levels for Crews Lake at its meeting in March 2007. In April 2007, a Notice of Proposed Rule concerning rule amendments that include the proposed levels was published in the Florida Administrative Weekly (FAW).

Mr. Gills, the owner of approximately 1,000 acres of land bordering Crews Lake, timely filed a request for a public hearing before the Board on the proposed Minimum and Guidance Levels for Crews Lake pursuant to paragraph 120.54(3)(c), Florida Statutes. A public hearing was scheduled and noticed in the FAW for the July 2007 Governing Board meeting. This type of public hearing allows the person requesting the hearing to present evidence and argument to the Governing Board about the proposed levels.

Staff met with Mr. Gills' representatives on July 10, 2007 to discuss his concerns with the proposed rule. At the meeting, Mr. Gills' representatives requested certain data to review and then to meet with staff again. Staff agreed to provide the additional data and to participate in a second meeting to address a few unresolved issues pertaining to the proposed levels. Staff has provided the requested data to Mr. Gills' representatives and is prepared for a second meeting. Given that the outcome of the planned meeting is unknown, the public hearing has been continued month to month, and it is prudent to again reschedule the public hearing for the January 2008 Governing Board meeting to allow adequate preparation time.

Benefits/Costs Continuation of the public hearing until the January 2008 Board meeting will contribute to the process of adopting Minimum and Guidance Levels for the group of lakes that includes Crews Lake. If the continuation is not approved, the requested public hearing has to be conducted at the December 2007 Board meeting or the proposed rule will have to be withdrawn and rulemaking restarted.

Staff Recommendation:

Continue the public hearing requested by James P. Gills, Trustee, on the proposed Minimum and Guidance Levels for Crews Lake in Pasco County until the January 2008 Governing Board meeting.

Presenter: Doug Leeper, Chief Environmental Scientist, Resource Conservation & Development Department

259 Item 40

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Finance and Administration Committee

Board Travel

District policy states that in accordance with Chapters 112 and 373, Florida Statutes, travel expenses may be incurred for official District business or for a public purpose beneficial to the District. Travel to any conference or convention requires prior approval.

Within the geographic boundaries of the District, Governing Board members may incur travel expenses to attend Governing and Basin Board meetings or for other purposes beneficial to the District, excluding conferences and conventions. Scheduled travel for Governing Board members outside the District or to attend conferences or conventions requires prior approval through the consent agenda of a regular monthly Governing Board meeting. Non-scheduled travel outside the District or to attend any conference or convention requires prior approval of the Governing Board Chair, or in her absence, the Vice Chair.

As of December 5, 2007, no travel is planned for outside the geographic boundaries of the District.

Staff Recommendation:

No action required at this time.

Presenter: Lou Kavouras, Deputy Executive Director

260 Item 41

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Finance and Administration Committee

Budget Transfer Report

Purpose Request approval of the Budget Transfer Report covering all budget transfers made during the month of November 2007.

Background In accordance with Board Policy No. 130-8, all transfers approved by the Basins, Executive Director and Finance Director under delegated authority are regularly presented to the Finance and Administration Committee for approval on the Consent Agenda at the next scheduled meeting. The exhibit for this item reflects all such transfers executed since the date of the last report for the Committee's approval.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

Request approval of the Budget Transfer Report covering all budget transfers for November 2007.

Presenter: Linda R. Pilcher, Assistant Director, Finance Department

261 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Budget Transfer Report November 2007 --- TRANSFERRED FROM ------TRANSFERRED TO --- Item Department / Department / Transfer No. Expenditure Category Expenditure Category Reason For Transfer Amount Basin Board Approved Hillsborough River Basin: 1 5Resource Management 5Resource Management Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate project code for the Robinson Preserve $ 1,500,000 3431 Contracted Construction 8101 Grant - Financial Assistance Environmental Restoration project.

Total Basin Board Approved $ 1,500,000 Executive Director Approved - FY2008 General Fund: 1 5Resource Conservation & Dev 5Resource Conservation & Dev Transfer of funds originally budgeted for the Climate Variability Study. The study was initiated $ 5,000 3111 Consultant Services 3117 Special Events in FY2007; portion of FY2008 funds are not needed. The funds were needed to sponsor the North American Lake Management Society Symposium.

2 6Operations 6Operations Transfer of funds originally budgeted for wellfield data collection. Bids were less than 7,700 3401 Other Contractual Services 3411 Cooperative Program - USGS anticipated. The funds were needed for the U.S. Geological Survey Estimation of Evapotranspiration project.

3 1Finance 1Finance Transfer of salary funds for vacant Executive Director authorized temporary position to 41,000 1201 Regular Salaries and Wages 3111 Consultant Services contractual services. Department will contract for temporary accounting assistance within the

262 Accounting and Financial Reporting Section.

Total Executive Director Approved $ 53,700 Finance Director Approved - FY2007 1 5Resource Conservation & Dev 5Resource Conservation & Dev Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate project code and expenditure category to merge $ 43,985 9913 Reserves for Identified NWSI 9915 Reserves for WSRD the remaining New Water Sources Initiative reserves with the Water Supply and Resource Development reserves.

Finance Director Approved - FY2008 2 5Resource Conservation & Dev 5Resource Conservation & Dev Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate expenditure category for the Lake Wimauma: A 37,500 8102 Grant - Water Conservation 3111 Consultant Services Hydrologic Investigation to Evaluate the Minimum Lake Level project.

3 0Information Resources 1Finance Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate department for salaries of a full-time position 80,245 1201 Regular Salaries and Wages 1201 Regular Salaries and Wages which was reassigned. 2101 FICA 2101 FICA 2201 Retirement 2201 Retirement 2301 Group Insurance 2301 Group Insurance

4 0Information Resources 0Human Resources & Risk Mgmt Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate department for project management training 2,814 3Resource Conservation & Data 4004 Districtwide Training Programs class. 5Resource Management 7Land Resources 4Regulation Performance Management 4003 Travel - Training SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Budget Transfer Report November 2007 --- TRANSFERRED FROM ------TRANSFERRED TO --- Item Department / Department / Transfer No. Expenditure Category Expenditure Category Reason For Transfer Amount 5 0General Services 0Information Resources Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate department and expenditure category for 150,000 4702 Micro/Digital Imaging Service REC1 Records Management Software replacement of the Records Management software.

6 5Resource Management 3Resource Conservation & Data Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate sections and expenditure categories for supplies 48,368 3111 Consultant Services 5Resource Management and laboratory analysis of water quality samples and field data from 19 lakes within the Lake 5201 Parts and Supplies Tsala Apopka Chain of Lakes. 5208 Lab Charges

7 5Resource Conservation & Dev 5Resource Conservation & Dev Transfer of budgeted funds necessary to establish the new Water Supply section within the 8,113,941 3401 Various Expenditure Categories PRJ6 Various Expenditure Categories Resource Conservation and Development Department.

8 5Resource Conservation & Dev 5Resource Conservation & Dev Transfer of budgeted funds to segregate portion of alternative water supply development 2,000,000 8102 Grant - Water Conservation 8102 Grant - Water Conservation appropriation that was not funded by the State as anticipated due to $2 million reduction of FY2008 funding for the Water Protection and Sustainability Trust Fund.

9 0Office of General Counsel 4Regulation Performance Management Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate department for expert testimony and analysis 51,551 3111 Consultant Services 3111 Consultant Services related to the Tampa Bay Optimized Regional Operations Plan.

10 5Resource Management 5Resource Management Transfer of budgeted funds to the appropriate expenditure category for site development permit 1,500 263 3431 Contracted Construction 4905 Miscellaneous Permits & Fees and stormwater inspection fees related to the Lower Hillsborough Flood Detention Area, Phase V project.

Total Finance Director Approved $ 10,529,904

Total Transfers for Governing Board Approval$ 12,083,604

This report identifies transfers made during the month that did not require advance Governing Board approval. These transfers have been approved by either the Basin Boards, Executive Director, or Finance Director consistent with Board Policy number 130-8, and are prese for Governing Board approval on the consent agenda. All Basin transfers are made based on Basin Board authority and are presented to the Governing Board via this report for ratification or approval. Executive Director approved transfers are made for a purpose other than the original budget intent, but are limited to individual transfer amounts of $50,000 or less. Finance Director approved transfers are accounting type transfers with no change to the original budget intent. Item 42

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

General Counsel’s Report

Consent Order – ERP No. 44025778.003 – Cameron-Wingate Development, LLC – Polk County

On January 16, 2004, the District issued Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 44025778.000 (Permit) to Cameron-Wingate Development, LLC to authorize the construction of a surface water management system serving the first phase of a commercial development located on 13.94 acres of land in Polk County. Phase 2 was noted on the approved construction drawings, but the Permit specifically required that a modification of the Permit be obtained prior to its construction. On December 11, 2006, while conducting a routine site visit, District staff observed that the construction of Phase 2 was underway. An application for a Permit modification to construct Phase 2 was not received until December 18, 2006.

On January 18, 2007, District staff issued a Notice of Unauthorized Construction. On February 28, 2007, the District issued Permit Number 44025778.003 for the construction of Phase 2.

A Notice of Violation and proposed Consent Order were issued on November 5, 2007 to address the failure to obtain a Permit modification prior to commencing construction. The proposed Consent Order assessed penalties and costs of $5,500 as follows: x $3,500 – for a Permit condition violation; and x $2,000 – the standard cost assessment for matters involving unauthorized construction.

Cameron-Wingate Development, LLC has tendered payment for the full amount and has indicated its willingness to resolve this matter as proposed. District staff anticipates receiving a signed Consent Order prior to the Governing Board meeting.

Staff Recommendation:

Approve the proposed Consent Order and authorize the initiation of litigation against Cameron- Wingate Development, LLC to obtain compliance with the Consent Order.

Presenter: Carrie N. Felice, Staff Attorney

264 Item 43

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

General Counsel’s Report

Consent Order – Surface Water Activity - David R. Spiker, Pamela J. Spiker and AAA Top Quality Asphalt, L.L.C. – Polk County

In March 2006, District staff received a complaint of possible wetland filling occurring on property located on State Road 60 near Mulberry, Polk County. District staff investigation revealed various fill material had been placed in what appeared to be wetlands on property owned by David R. Spiker, Pamela J. Spiker and their business entity, AAA Top Quality Asphalt, L.L.C. (Owners). No Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) had been issued to authorize the placement of fill within wetlands. On April 18, 2006, District staff conducted a site visit on the property and determined that approximately 0.11 acre of wetland had been excavated, approximately 0.22 acre of wetland had been filled, and additional fill material had been placed in approximately 0.64 acre of 100-year floodplain. On May 2, 2006, District staff observed that additional fill had been placed in wetlands and floodplain areas of the property. On May 8, 2006, staff issued a Notice of Unauthorized Construction to the Owners.

On March 12, 2007, a Notice of Violation and proposed consent order were issued. The consent order required that an ERP be obtained and assessed penalties and costs totaling $9,780 as follows:

• $1,000 – for potential water quality degradation within the penalty matrix range of $250 - $2,499 for such violations; • $1,000 – for potential water quantity impacts within the penalty matrix range of $250 - $2,499 for such violations; • $2,580 – for wetland dredge and fill impacts resulting in a functional loss of 0.129 multiplied by $20,000 for herbaceous wetlands; • $3,200 – for 0.64 acre of floodplain filling assessed at $5,000 per acre; and • $2,000 – the standard cost assessment for unauthorized construction.

On October 22, 2007, Owners provided a counteroffer to the March 12, 2007 proposed Consent Order wherein they offered to pay $4,000 to settle the matter. Their counteroffer was not acceptable to District staff. However, a revised proposed Consent Order was sent to Owners on November 7, 2007 in which District staff proposed revised penalties and costs totaling $7,880 as follows:

• $250 – for potential water quality degradation within the penalty matrix range of $250 - $2,499 for such violations; • $250 – for potential water quantity impacts within the penalty matrix range of $250 - $2,499 for such violations; • $2,580 – for wetland dredge and fill impacts resulting in a functional loss of 0.129 multiplied by $20,000 for herbaceous wetlands; • $3,200 – for 0.64 acre of floodplain filling assessed at $5,000 per acre; and • $1,600 – the standard cost assessment for unauthorized construction (reduced by $400 as no additional site visits were conducted by District staff).

Owners have indicated their willingness to resolve this matter as proposed. District staff anticipates receiving a signed Consent Order prior to the Governing Board meeting.

265 Item 43

Staff Recommendation:

Approve the proposed Consent Order and authorize the initiation of litigation against David R. Spiker, Pamela J. Spiker, AAA Top Quality Asphalt, L.L.C. and any other appropriate parties to obtain compliance with the Consent Order.

Presenter: Carrie N. Felice, Staff Attorney

266 Item 44

Consent Agenda December 18, 2007

Executive Director’s Report

Approval of Minutes – November 26, 2007 Governing Board Meeting

The minutes will be provided prior to the meeting.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit (to be provided)

Approve the minutes as presented.

Presenter: David L. Moore, Executive Director

267 268 C. Regulation Committee Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Regulation Committee

Discussion Items

45. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion

46. Enhanced Public Supply Water Conservation ...... (20 minutes) ...... 3 (Strategic Plan: Water Supply – Conservation)

47. Water Conserving Rate Structure Requirements, Programs and Implementation ...... (20 minutes) ...... 5 (Strategic Plan: Water Supply – Conservation)

48. Water Shortage Rule – Variance Provisions for Local Plans ...... (20 minutes) ...... 6 (Strategic Plan: Water Supply – Conservation)

49. Water Shortage Actions – Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority and the Potential Need for Additional Conservation Actions ...... (20 minutes) ...... 8 (Strategic Plan: Water Supply – Conservation)

Submit & File Reports – None

Routine Reports

50. Demand Management Activities ...... 10

51. Overpumpage Report ...... 12

52. Southern Water Use Caution Area Quantities ...... 19

53. Water Production Supply Summary ...... 21

54. Public Supply Benchmarks ...... 22

55. Resource Regulation Significant Initiatives Report ...... 24 2 Item 46

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Enhanced Public Supply Water Conservation

Purpose To provide the Regulation Committee with a status report of the ongoing activities to develop rules to enhance public supply water conservation in the District.

Background The Governing Board has previously authorized initiation of various efforts that address enhanced water conservation and water use management strategies in the northern portions of the District. Initially, these efforts included (1) conducting a water conservation summit, (2) expanding the Northern Tampa Bay Water Use Caution Area (NTBWUCA) in the remainder of Pasco and northern Hillsborough counties, (3) expanding the Southern WUCA per capita requirements Districtwide, (4) potentially establishing a WUCA in portions of Marion and Sumter counties, and (5) potentially establishing a WUCA in all or parts of Citrus and Hernando counties. In addition, at its April 24, 2007 meeting, the Governing Board directed staff to initiate rulemaking to enhance public supply water conservation throughout the District as an additional component of these integrated efforts.

Significant progress has been made to-date in these efforts. The Water Conservation Summit, held in cooperation with the St Johns River Water Management District on March 20, 2007 in Ocala was well attended and considered to be an extremely successful outreach, education and networking opportunity. An additional Summit is being planned for the first half of 2008. The NTBWUCA rules have been expanded and are now in effect. At its August 28, 2007 meeting the Governing Board approved the rules expanding the SWUCA per capita requirements Districtwide. Several stakeholders have expressed concerns with the rules, particularly the 150 gallons per person per day (gpcd) compliance standard, and staff is working on potential rule revisions to address these concerns. It is anticipated revised rules will be presented at the January 2008 Board meeting. Public input meetings have been held for the potential to create new WUCAs in portions of Marion, Sumter, Citrus and Hernando counties. Finally, a staff interdepartmental team has been formed to develop recommendations for enhanced public supply water conservation, the team has met with the University of Florida staff administering the Conserve Florida Clearinghouse, and initial rule concepts have been developed.

Historically, the District has developed and incorporated more stringent conservation requirements in its rulemaking process as part of the overall management strategy to help address specific regional water resource issues in the District. This was evident in the development of the NTB, Highlands Ridge and Eastern Tampa Bay WUCA management strategies, and most recently the SWUCA Recovery Strategy, where specific rules were developed, including enhanced conservation requirements, to help improve water use efficiency in those areas. That is why today, public supply conservation requirements vary throughout the District. Conservation requirements in the SWUCA and NTBWUCA are more stringent than in the northern District area. In the northern District area, general conservation rules exist under the Conditions of Issuance and the Basis of Review for all water use permits. In the SWUCA rules, conservation requirements for public supply permittees include having a per-capita rate of

3 Item 46

150 or less, adopting a water conserving rate structure, having water bills that provide relevant consumption and conservation information to consumers, conducting a water audit and having unaccounted for water of no greater than 12 percent, and providing an annual report to the District to document compliance with these and other conditions. If permittees exceed the 150 gpcd standard, they must submit a plan for District approval on how they will comply with the standard.

Based upon recent Board direction, it is now recommended that public supply conservation requirements not be predicated upon regional differences in resource conditions. Rather, all public supply permittees throughout the District would be held to the same standards of efficiency, regardless of the availability or lack of traditional water supplies. Expansion of the SWUCA per capita requirements, previously approved by the Board, will make the per capita calculation requirements and the 150 gpcd standard District-wide. Under this enhanced public supply conservation rule making, complimentary conservation requirements in the SWUCA rules will also be made Districtwide. Enhancements to these requirements will also be considered. In doing so, it may no longer be necessary to establish distinct new WUCAs in the Citrus/Hernando and Marion/Sumter county areas in the northern District.

At a minimum, the enhanced public supply water conservation rules would include expansion of the SWUCA public supply conservation requirements (rate structures, etc.); require effective landscape ordinances; include provisions for reclaimed water credits; set specific percentages for components of unaccounted water; require submittal of information regarding all aspects of public supply conservation at the time of application; and allow goal-based conservation programs, including Conserve Florida, to achieve or surpass the 150 gpcd standard. Staff is also considering whether the conservation requirements for recreational and aesthetic uses need strengthening.

Staff will continue to evaluate all possible options to enhance public supply, and possibly recreational and aesthetic uses conservation in the District, and will coordinate with and seek input from our Advisory Committee in this endeavor.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Bobby Lue, P.E., Director, Brooksville Regulation Department

4 Item 47

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Water Conserving Rate Structure Requirements, Programs and Implementation

Purpose Provide information on: x Water conserving rate structure requirements x How the requirements are implemented by the District x District programs to facilitate the use of water conserving rate structures x Polk County's recently enacted water conserving rate structures as a model example

Background/History The District first proposed water conserving rate structure requirements in the early 1990s as part of the original three water use caution areas' (WUCA) rules. Rate structures that send an appropriate price signal to consumers were seen as an essential component of public supply water conservation efforts. To assist permittees and applicants in complying with these rule requirements, minimum guidelines were developed. These requirements and guidelines have stood the test of time, with the District having successfully defended the water conserving rate structure requirement and the associated guidelines in an administrative hearing. District staff will provide an overview of the key provisions of these requirements and guidelines.

In an effort to support implementation of the new rate structure requirements, the District embarked on a research and rate modeling program in the early 1990s to alleviate any uncertainty among affected permittees regarding the potential impact of these requirements on revenues and to encourage utilities to implement water conserving rate structures. The District undertook a comprehensive analysis of price elasticities and developed an associated rate model that could be used by utilities to project the effects of changes in rates and rate structures on consumption and revenues. Initially completed in 1993, the rate model (WATERATE) has undergone several improvements and was re-released in 2006 using updated price elasticities developed in a 2005 multi-district price elasticity study led by the SWFWMD. WATERATE has been provided, at no charge, to utilities in the District since 1993.

Since 1993, non-conserving rate structures have been eliminated in the WUCAs and the water conserving rate structure requirement is scheduled to be a component of the enhanced public supply water conservation rules to be addressed by the Board in 2008. This would spread the water conserving rate structure requirement District-wide.

Recently, Polk County adopted a revised water conserving rate structure building upon the District's requirements and the results of research funded by the District. Polk County staff will provide an overview of the new rate structure.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenters: Jay Yingling, Senior Economist, Planning Department Polk County Utilities Staff

5 Item 48

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Water Shortage Rule – Variance Provisions for Local Plans

Background This topic was raised during the November 26, 2007 joint workshop with Tampa Bay Water's Board of Directors. The Governing Board specifically directed staff to provide a summary for its December meeting.

The current version of the District’s Water Shortage Plan (Rule 40D-21, F.A.C.) was a product of a multi-year, multi-rule revision process, including extensive public input, which concluded with the Board's approval of an updated plan in April 2006. The Plan includes a new Water Shortage Mitigation Plan (WSMP) mechanism that allows a regional water supply authority or local water supplier, under certain specified criteria, to request a variance or waiver from the District from provisions of the Plan in order to tailor water shortage responses to the authority's or local supplier's system's needs and characteristics. The District's intent in offering this WSMP provision (40D-21.441, F.A.C.) was to encourage local participation in the planning and implementation of appropriate water shortage responses. The rule provisions allow for a regional authority or local supplier to request such a variance to approve its WSMP in advance of any District-declared water shortage restrictions.

Tampa Bay Water's Plan District staff participated in all five meetings of a special technical advisory committee that was first convened by Tampa Bay Water on September 20, 2005 to provide input to Tampa Bay Water staff and consultants updating Tampa Bay Water's Drought Mitigation Plan. The Drought Mitigation Plan, which was approved by Tampa Bay Water's Board of Directors in December 2001, relied heavily on supply-side actions such as pumping water from the Morris Bridge Sinkhole. Tampa Bay Water's update effort was intended to reflect subsequent experience, such as operation of the regional system with the C.W. Bill Young Regional Reservoir, and also to assure consistency with the District's WSMP provision. After several meetings that primarily focused on proposed revisions to the Drought Mitigation Plan's action triggers, local demand management differences, and current supply-side response options, the technical advisory committee received the first draft of Tampa Bay Water's WSMP for review on March 19, 2007.

District staff met with Tampa Bay Water staff and consultants on April 4, 2007 to offer suggestions and express concerns with certain aspects of the draft WSMP (these review comments were subsequently formalized and sent to Tampa Bay Water on April 26, 2007). One of the many points raised by the District was that the draft WSMP, as written, appeared to constitute a total subrogation of the District's exclusive authority to issue a water shortage order in Tampa Bay Water's service area, regardless of circumstances. During the April 4, 2007 meeting, Tampa Bay Water representatives expressed a willingness to consider adding a sentence to the WSMP acknowledging that the District retained its authority to impose restrictions throughout its jurisdiction, and that nothing in Tampa Bay Water's WSMP would be contrary to this authority. However, in a July 12, 2007 letter, Tampa Bay Water staff asserted that they did essentially expect subrogation of the District's authority.

District and Tampa Bay Water staff met on July 24, 2007 to discuss these issues and concerns. During this meeting Tampa Bay Water staff expressed that one of their primary intents in developing their WSMP was to enable Tampa Bay Water to control when water shortage

6 Item 48 restrictions are imposed within their three-county area pursuant to the supply-based triggers contained in their WSMP, what level of restrictions are imposed, and, most importantly, when water shortage restrictions are rescinded, and to have such actions not require any further District approvals. District staff expressed that this could be inconsistent with the intent of the District's Water Shortage rule provisions and contrary to the District's statutory authority and responsibilities. One of the outcomes of this meeting was a commitment by District staff to ask the Governing Board to initiate rulemaking to formally clarify the WSMP and WSMP-related provisions of the District's Water Shortage Plan. To date, Tampa Bay Water has not reconvened the WSMP technical advisory committee, provided a revised draft WSMP for additional review, nor submitted a petition for a variance to the District under the WSMP provision. District staff remains committed to working with Tampa Bay Water as they finalize the draft WSMP to assure consistency with the District's rules.

Recent District Action On September 25, 2007, the Governing Board approved staff's recommendation to authorize initiation of rulemaking to amend the WSMP and WSMP-related provisions of the Water Shortage Plan. The proposed amendments specifically include language to clarify that it is the District's intent to proactively authorize customized local action for future circumstances in which local action is appropriate through a WSMP, yet retain the right to impose District restrictions when needed, which may include modifying the actions otherwise specified in the WSMP.

Staff's recommendation specifically included a timeline that included seeking input from the Public Supply Advisory Committee at its October 16, 2007 meeting, then continuing with the rest of the rulemaking process without requesting additional approval from the Board unless substantive input was received. Tampa Bay Water's representative at the October 16, 2007 meeting indicated that Tampa Bay Water had no objection to the proposed amendments. No substantive input was received from members of the Public Supply Advisory Committee by the requested date (October 30, 2007), so rule development has proceeded as previously authorized. Proposed amendments were published in the Florida Administrative Weekly on November 9, 2007. This means that the window for requesting a hearing based on challenging the published amendments closes on November 30, 2007.

As of November 27, 2007, no request for a hearing has been received. Staff will also attempt to meet with Tampa Bay Water staff prior to the December Board meeting to identify any mutually acceptable alternatives to the issues Tampa Bay Water has raised. Staff will be available to provide an update on the rulemaking process.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Richard S. Owen, AICP, Deputy Executive Director, Resource Regulation

7 Item 49

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Water Shortage Actions – Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority and the Potential Need for Additional Conservation Actions

Background The Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority relies on diversions from the Peace River to meet the water needs of over 250,000 residents in the City of North Port and the counties of Charlotte, DeSoto and Sarasota. During periods of high flow, surface water withdrawals in excess of immediate demand are stored in the Authority's off-stream reservoir and two Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wellfields. This storage is for use during the annual dry season when river withdrawals are not sufficient to meet potable water demand. When full, the reservoir stores approximately 625 million gallons of water and the two ASR wellfields together store approximately 7.4 billion gallons.

Ongoing drought conditions have resulted in critically low water storage levels for the Authority. On September 5, the Authority's Board of Directors approved the pursuit of additional water conservation efforts and a list of near-term water supply projects to mitigate the effects of the low storage levels and related water quality concerns. These projects include maximizing the use of existing interconnects between Authority customer governments and adjacent public supply systems, expediting and then activating additional interconnects, an emergency Intermediate Aquifer System wellfield, and rehabilitation or replacement of some ASR wells. Some of these projects can provide additional water from local sources to offset depletion of the Authority's storage, whereas others are intended to improve the quality and reliability of water being delivered.

Emergency Authorizations, to date On August 10, 2007, the Authority requested an emergency District action to allow a temporary increase in withdrawals from the Peace River to augment storage in its reservoir and ASR wellfields. The District granted this request through Executive Director Order No. SWF 07-045 on August 13, 2007, with an expiration date of August 29, 2007.

Executive Director Order No. SWF 07-045 has been subsequently modified on two occasions at the Authority's request. As modified, this emergency authorization is currently scheduled to expire on April 19, 2008 and it temporarily changes the diversion schedule in the Authority's Water Use Permit No. 20010420.004 as follows: (1) the low-flow threshold for diversions is changed from 130 cfs as measured by the Peace River at Arcadia gauge, to 90 cfs of the previous day's combined daily flow as measured by the Peace River at Arcadia, Horse Creek and Joshua Creek gauges; (2) the maximum withdrawal rate is changed from 10 percent of the previous day's daily flow as measured by the Peace River at Arcadia gauge, to 14 percent of the previous day's combined daily flow as measured by the Peace River at Arcadia, Horse Creek and Joshua Creek gauges when the combined flow is between 90 cfs and 330 cfs; and (3) the maximum withdrawal rate is further increased to 46.2 cfs (14 percent of the combined daily flow at 330 cfs) plus 21 percent of the previous day's combined daily flow above 330 cfs when combined daily flow exceeds 330 cfs.

As of November 26, 2007, the series of emergency authorizations for Peace River diversions has allowed the Authority to divert approximately 900 million gallons more than the Permit would have normally allowed. However, as of that date, the combined flows specified in Executive

8 Item 49

Director Order No. 07-045 were only 104 cfs and the Authority was anticipating needing to stop all river diversion within a matter of days due to low river flow conditions; diversions had already been reduced due to low flow and declining water quality.

Current Conditions On November 26, the Authority reported that its reservoir level was at 24.1 feet NGVD, down 3.4 feet compared to two weeks prior and representing storage of only 452 million gallons. Recharge of both ASR wellfields was suspended on November 9 due to low stream flow, and 606 million gallons are in ASR storage. This means that a total of about 1.06 billion gallons is currently in storage, compared to a capacity of about 8 billion gallons.

The Peace River's flow, as measured near Arcadia, is down and continuing to decline. As of the morning of November 28, stream flow was only 68 cfs, well below the historical median of 289 cfs for this time of year.

Recent and Potential Actions The Authority, its customer governments and adjacent public supply systems continue to pursue implementation of the near-term water supply projects previously authorized by its Board of Directors. For example, the Authority has begun installation of a test well for the emergency Intermediate Aquifer System wellfield, to be located on the R.V. Griffin Reservation in DeSoto County. The boards of county commissioners for Sarasota and Manatee counties have cleared the way for increased use of the interconnection that allows Manatee County to supply water to portions of Sarasota County, reducing Sarasota County's reliance on the Authority's regional water supply and eventually allowing for some water to be temporarily pushed to the Authority.

District staff will meet with the Authority, customer governments, and adjacent public supply systems on December 7 to receive an update regarding the near-term water supply projects, explore how the District may be able to further assist these efforts, and discuss additional demand management options commensurate with the severity of current public supply conditions. These options include additional local restrictions or a District declaration of Phase IV water shortage conservation measures, further reducing water uses not essential to immediate public health and safety.

Staff will provide an update based on the December 7 meeting and additional interaction with the Authority.

Staff Recommendation:

Staff will present at the meeting any recommendations for Board action regarding additional water shortage actions.

Presenter: Richard S. Owen, AICP, Deputy Executive Director, Resource Regulation

9 Item 50

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Demand Management Activities

Background The Demand Management Program includes administration of the District's Water Shortage Plan (Rule 40D-21, Florida Administrative Code), Year-Round Water Conservation Measures (Rule 40D-22, F.A.C.) and water conservation efforts in support of Water Use Permitting activities.

Since the current rainfall deficit began over twenty months ago, the District has issued nine emergency authorizations to assist public water systems with drought-related water supply concerns. As of November 27, 2007, a tenth emergency authorization was under development. The applicable Executive Director Order will be considered as a separate item in the discussion portion of the Regulation Committee's agenda.

The District also took regional action on January 9, 2007, issuing Water Shortage Order No. SWF 07-02 to declare once-per-week lawn watering restrictions and other modified "Phase II" (Severe Water Shortage) restrictions for the entire sixteen county area. This Order specifically acknowledges that some local governments already had once-per-week lawn watering restrictions in effect prior to the District's declaration, allowing those local governments to retain any special watering schedule that is at least as restrictive as the intent of modified "Phase II" restrictions. The Governing Board has extended the Water Shortage Order three times, most recently at is meeting on November 26, 2007.

Current Conditions District staff has continued to monitor rainfall, ground water levels, stream flow and other drought indicators specified in the District's Water Shortage Plan. Of particular concern is below- normal rainfall in the southeastern portion of the District and how that deficit has resulted in below-normal surface water flows and also impacted water supply storage efforts by the Peace River / Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority. Details can be found in the monthly Hydrologic Conditions report, weekly news releases and current emergency authorizations.

Public Outreach Outreach remains an integral part of regional Demand Management efforts. Since November 26, 2007, staff has been focused on preparing and implementing the newspaper ads, permittee notices, letters to local officials and other communication efforts that are required each time a Water Shortage Order is declared, modified or extended. Staff also continued to maintain the toll-free hotline (1-800-848-0499) and an e-mail address ([email protected]) that citizens and local officials use to ask questions, report possible violations, and request water conservation information. Calls and e-mails often result in follow-up activity, including: first-time restriction violation letters, enforcement referrals to local governments, written clarifications, and face-to-face meetings. Such customized water conservation outreach efforts augment and complement the District's media messaging and speakers bureau activities.

Local Assistance In addition to supporting local governments through emergency authorizations and normal hotline services, staff also provides technical assistance upon request. For example, staff is

10 Item 50 reviewing a recent revision to Marion County's draft ordinance for enforcement of year-round water conservation measures and temporary water shortage declarations.

Interagency Coordination The District and the St. Johns River Water Management District ("St. Johns") share Marion County, so staff has been working with colleagues from St. Johns on an Interagency Agreement that will facilitate Marion County's efforts to have uniform year-round water conservation measures, and future water shortage declarations on a countywide basis. Staff anticipates bringing this Agreement to the Governing Board for consideration at its January meeting.

Statewide coordination efforts in response to the current drought have included deliberations about how to systematically address different year-round water conservation measures and water shortage declarations in all shared jurisdictions. Participants have agreed that, within any one local government, uniform year-round water conservation measures and water shortage declarations is generally preferable, especially in relation to education and enforcement of lawn watering schedules. The Interagency Agreement being developed by the District and St. Johns River has been proposed as a model for handling similar situations elsewhere in the state. Also, participants have expressed interest in seeking appropriate consistency in year-round water conservation measures and regional water shortage plans, with St. Johns specifically expressing an interest in adopting many features of the District's current year-round water conservation measures rule.

Staff also continues to regularly compile a drought status report that Department of Environmental Protection uses to keep other state agencies and the Governor's Office fully informed regarding conditions and impacts. These reports supplement Secretary Sole's regular coordination calls with agency heads. In addition to water shortage notification and consultation efforts based on the current drought, staff also remains active in other statewide initiatives, such as ongoing participation in Conserve Florida that is summarized in Resource Regulation's Significant Activities report.

Staff will be available to provide a brief presentation or answer questions.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Paul O'Neil, P.E., Director, Regulation Performance Management Department

11 Overpumpage Activity Report October 2007

Table 1. Overpumpage Report Summary

Projects Under Preparing for RPM / Justified/Closed Since Consent Order Service Active Files in Legal Review Legal Previous Report Monitoring Total Files Office (Table 5) (Table 2) (Table 3) (Table 4) (Table 6)

Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Month Bartow 3 0 0 0 2 3 4 4 0 0 9 7

Brooksville 8 9 1 2 3 0 8 8 3 3 23 22

Sarasota 3 3 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 5 12 Tampa 0 4 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 6 5

Totals 14 16 2 3 10 3 14 14 3 3 43 39

RPM = Regulation Performance Management Department Overpumpage Report October 2007

Table 2. Projects Under Review (1) Months on Permit No. Permit Holder (2) Service Office Use Type Report New Since Previous Report 2012517.000 Silverthorn, LLC R 1 Brooksville 2010266.002 Pulte Homes Corp. R 1 Brooksville 2007681.004 Stephens Road Farm A 1 Tampa 2008410.004 Russell Weiss A 1 Tampa 2009551.001 Wentworth Golf Club, Inc. R 1 Tampa 2010161.004 Lowry Park Zoo R 1 Tampa Continuing From Previous Report

13 2002319.004 Holiday Water Works Corp. P 2 Brooksville 2012545.003 Southern Hills Plantation R 2 Brooksville 2002296.003 St. Leo College Inc. P 5 Brooksville 2003673.004 Suntacc & Company Inc. R 5 Brooksville 2008639.001 Timber Pines Community R 6 Brooksville 2000923.005 Traveler’s Rest RV Park P 10 Brooksville 2008165.003 Marion County Utilities (Quail Meadows) P 11 Brooksville 2009727.005 Friedrich Schiller A 5 Sarasota 2012606.000 FC LLC & Myakka Ranch Holdings A 5 Sarasota 2009648.006 Thomas Beddard A 9 Sarasota

(1) These projects are under review by the Service Office and have not been determined to be in non-compliance at this time (2) Use Types: P = Public Supply R = Recreational A = Agricultural MD = Mining/Dewatering IC = Industrial/Commercial Overpumpage Report October 2007

Table 3. Preparing for Regulation Performance Management / Legal (1) Original Permitted Current Use Report Date Permit No. Permit Holder Annual Annual Average Use Service Office Type (2) Annual Avg. Use Average Percent Over Percent Over New Since Previous Report 6/27/07 10/26/07 2012843.001 Vikings LLC R 263,000 gpd 500,427 gpd 728,251 gpd Brooksville 90.3% 176% Continuing From Previous Report 1/27/07 10/26/07 2011589.002 Lexington Oaks Golf 54 LLC R 310,000 gpd 311,496 gpd 348,154 gpd Brooksville 14 0.5% 12.3%

02/28/07 10/26/07 2010483.003 Bill and Hiram Saffold A 400,000 gpd 418,100 gpd 717,912 gpd Sarasota 4.5% 79.5%

(1) Preliminary determination that permit is in non-compliance; file being prepared for or under review by Regulation Performance Management (2) Use Types: P = Public Supply R = Recreational A = Agricultural MD = Mining/Dewatering IC = Industrial/Commercial Overpumpage Report October 2007

Table 4. Justified / Closed Since Previous Report (1)

Permit No. Permit Holder Use Type (2) Months on Report Service Office

2000222.005 Central Florida Truss, Inc. A 1 Bartow 2004099.005 Rolling Meadow Ranch, Inc. A 1 Bartow 2008503.000 Keck Groves, Inc. A 1 Bartow Closed from Legal None 15

(1) Determination that Permit is in compliance – no further action (2) Use Types: P = Public Supply R = Recreational A = Agricultural MD = Mining/Dewatering IC = Industrial/Commercial Overpumpage Report October 2007

Table 5. Active Files in Legal (1)

Use Permitted Original Report Date Current Permit Holder Annual Annual Average Use Annual Average Use Service Office Type (2) Average Percent Over Percent Over New Since Previous Report

None

Continuing From Previous Report 07/26/06 10/26/07 Sun’ N Lakes of Sebring P 1,006,200 gpd 1,054,200 gpd 1,202,666 gpd Bartow 4.8% 19.5%

16 06/28/06 09/26/07* Sebring Land LP & Highlands P 223,700 gpd 275,833 gpd 301,813 gpd Bartow 23.3% 34.9%

05/26/06 10/26/07 John G Wood P, R 89,900 gpd 109,485 gpd 71,849 gpd Bartow 21.8% (19.3)%

01/31/06 09/26/07* Country Club Utilities, Inc. P 183,000 gpd 256,852 gpd 252,033 gpd Bartow 40.4% 37.7%

05/26/06 10/26/07 City of Zephyrhills P 2,746,000 gpd 2,950,504 gpd 2,831,334 gpd Brooksville 7.4% 3.1%

05/26/06 10/26/07 Pasco County Utilities (Lake Jovita) P 327,000 gpd 331,981 gpd 418,055 gpd Brooksville 1.5% 27.8%

(1) Regulation Performance Management concurs with non-compliance and file in Legal for enforcement (2) Use Types: P = Public Supply R = Recreational A = Agricultural MD = Mining/Dewatering IC = Industrial/Commercial *Current pumpage information not available due to permit holder non-submittal of data Overpumpage Report October 2007

Table 5. Active Files in Legal (1)

Use Permitted Original Report Date Current Permit Holder Annual Annual Average Use Annual Average Use Service Office Type (2) Average Percent Over Percent Over 11/28/06 10/26/07 Citrus County Utilities P 2,575,000 gpd 2,645,779 gpd 3,123,014 gpd Brooksville (Citrus Springs/Pine Ridge) 2.7% 21.2% 06/28/06 10/26/07 Spruce Creek Development R 445,800 gpd 462,416 gpd 562,613 gpd Brooksville 3.7% 26.2%

06/28/06 09/26/07* Lindrick Service Corporation P 870,000 gpd 882,547 gpd 821,726 gpd Brooksville 1.4 % (5.5)% 17 04/27/06 10/26/07 Citrus County Utilities (Sugarmill Woods) P 2,010,000 gpd 2,552,635 gpd 2,947,222 gpd Brooksville 26.9% 46.6%

06/28/06 10/26/07 Hernando County Water and Sewer P 6,970,000 gpd 8,365,537 gpd 10,891,000 gpd Brooksville (West Hernando) 20.0% 56.2%

05/26/06 10/26/07 Hernando County Water and Sewer P 14,060,100 gpd 15,719,491 gpd 11,081,980 gpd Brooksville (Spring Hill) 11.8% (21.2)%

04/27/07 10/26/07 H.C. and W.E. Saffold A 678,400 gpd 685,200 gpd 775,942 gpd Sarasota 1.0% 14.4%

10/28/06 10/26/07 Spencer Farms, Inc. A 274,700 gpd 602,959 gpd 446,316 gpd Tampa 119.5% 62.4%

(1) Regulation Performance Management concurs with non-compliance and file in Legal for enforcement (2) Use Types: P = Public Supply R = Recreational A = Agricultural MD = Mining/Dewatering IC = Industrial/Commercial *Current pumpage information not available due to permit holder non-submittal of data Overpumpage Activity Report October 2007

Table 6. Consent Order Monitoring (1) Original Report Permitted Current Use Date GB Apprvd Permit Holder Annual Annual Average Use Service Office Type (2) Annual Average Use CO Date Average Percent Over Percent Over New Since Previous Report

None

Continuing From Previous Report 11/2000 10/26/07 Aloha Utilities P 2,040,000 gpd 2,885,176 gpd 3,750,426 gpd Brooksville 3/2002 41.4% 83.8% 05/26/06 10/26/07 18 LWV Utilities, Inc. P 55,000 gpd 59,471 gpd 74,216 gpd Brooksville 3/2007 8.1% 35.5% 05/26/06 10/26/07 Sun Country Estates/Paddock Down P 633,000 gpd 714,197 gpd 721,568 gpd Brooksville 3/2007 (Windstream Utilities) 12.8% 13.9%

(1) Legal pursued enforcement action and a Consent Order has been signed; corrective actions are now being monitored for compliance (2) Use Types: P = Public Supply R = Recreational A = Agricultural MD = Mining/Dewatering IC = Industrial/Commercial SOUTHERN WATER USE CAUTION AREA

FLORIDAN AQUIFER PERMITTED QUANTITIES November 16, 2007

1,300

1,250

1,200

1,150 19

1,100

1,050

Million Gallons Per Day 1,000 Annual Average Quantities

950

900 Jul-98 Jul-99 Jul-00 Jul-01 Jul-02 Jul-03 Jul-04 Jul-05 Jul-06 Jul-07 Mar-99 Mar-00 Mar-01 Mar-02 Mar-03 Mar-04 Mar-05 Mar-06 Mar-07 Nov-98 Nov-99 Nov-00 Nov-01 Nov-02 Nov-03 Nov-04 Nov-05 Nov-06 Nov-07 MONTH-YEAR

December 2007 11/19/07 Governing Board SOUTHERN WATER USE CAUTION AREA

INTERMEDIATE AQUIFER PERMITTED QUANTITIES November 16, 2007

115

105

20 The SWUCA Recovery Strategy

95 anticipates that up to an additional 35 MGD will be obtained from the surficial and intermediate aquifers. Million Gallons Per Day Million Gallons 85

Annual Average Quantities

75 Jul-98 Jul-99 Jul-00 Jul-01 Jul-02 Jul-03 Jul-04 Jul-05 Jul-06 Jul-07 Mar-99 Mar-00 Mar-01 Mar-02 Mar-03 Mar-04 Mar-05 Mar-06 Mar-07 Nov-98 Nov-99 Nov-00 Nov-01 Nov-02 Nov-03 Nov-04 Nov-05 Nov-06 Nov-07

MONTH-YEAR

December 2007 11/19/07 Governing Board Item 53

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Water Production Supply Summary

The updated monthly Water Production Summary will be distributed at the meeting; the data used in this summary is submitted by the various agencies between the tenth and fifteenth of each month.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit (to be provided)

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Paul O'Neil, P.E., Director, Regulation Performance Management Department

21 Item 54

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Public Supply Benchmarks

The Board has expressed an interest in having comparative information available for public supply water use. This chart includes information relating to both potable and reclaimed water usage from county and regional perspectives. Utility, population, per capita use, and water rate information is contained on the left side of the table. Wastewater flow and reclaimed water information is presented on the right side, including the amount of ground water offset by the reclaimed water. Sources and notes are displayed below the chart. The table was updated in November with provisional 2006 information in order to make available the most recent data on hand. Note, however, that the data are still being analyzed and are subject to refinement after further review.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: None

22 Potable and Reclaimed Water Benchmarks, 2006.

Gross Fixed 8 Service Area 7 Ann. Avg. Waste Water Ann. Avg. Reclaimed Avg. Offset from County or # Per Charge Part Total Water Bills Population (# Waste Water Disposed (AADF) Water Utilized (mgd) Reclaimed Water Region Utilities Capita of Water persons) Flow (mgd) Use1 Bills 8 Kgal 12 Kgal 16 Kgal mgd% mgd % mgd % Charlotte 6 168,931 101$ 17.49 $ 48.04 $ 66.22 $ 87.27 9.54 7.11 75% 9 2.43 25% 1.95 80% Citrus 12 87,576 208$ 7.90 $ 17.82 $ 23.23 $ 29.04 3.28 3.25 99% 10 0.03 1% 0.02 67% DeSoto 2 10,563 99$ 17.51 $ 32.03 $ 43.64 $ 55.25 1.39 0.61 44% 9 0.78 56% 0.48 62% Hardee 3 10,968 131$ 8.65 $ 14.97 $ 20.73 $ 26.54 1.25 0.31 25% 9 0.94 75% 0.94 100% Hernando 3 148,770 177$ 6.00 $ 14.96 $ 20.30 $ 26.03 4.87 2.61 54% 10 2.26 46% 1.91 85% Highlands 13 84,369 112$ 9.09 $ 24.44 $ 33.33 $ 42.62 2.38 2.38 100% 10 00%00% Hillsborough 14 1,221,035 117$ 5.66 $ 22.60 $ 34.38 $ 47.73 99.06 64.65 65% 9 34.41 35% 25.29 73% Lake2 0------0.00 0.00 0% 10 00%00% Levy 3 5,848 131$ 11.36 $ 26.94 $ 38.52 $ 51.41 0.16 0.16 100% 10 00%00% Manatee 4 382,103 110$ 7.49 $ 21.52 $ 29.89 $ 41.08 30.80 11.04 36% 9 19.76 64% 12.08 61% Marion 19 50,055 249$ 8.88 $ 20.68 $ 27.61 $ 34.56 4.70 3.40 72% 10 1.30 28% 0.94 72% Pasco 23 386,178 120$ 6.32 $ 23.37 $ 33.83 $ 45.11 24.60 8.30 34% 10 16.30 66% 9.03 55% Pinellas 11 1,084,311 98$ 7.22 $ 34.82 $ 53.29 $ 72.61 98.46 44.38 45% 9 54.08 55% 29.20 54% Polk 38 538,707 144$ 7.83 $ 19.36 $ 27.73 $ 37.25 30.13 9.07 30% 11 21.06 70% 19.58 93% Sarasota 8 408,469 87$ 12.14 $ 33.33 $ 51.01 $ 78.48 23.91 11.58 48% 9 12.33 52% 9.19 75% Sumter 9 75,612 228$ 7.83 $ 16.74 $ 22.30 $ 29.71 4.33 -0.58 -13% 10,12 4.91 113% 3.58 73% 23 Total 168 4,663,495 119$ 7.61 $ 26.47 $ 39.29 $ 54.15 338.86 168.27 50% 170.59 50% 114.19 67% NTB Area3 45 2,386,986 110$ 7.00 $ 31.98 $ 48.46 $ 65.78 204.54 108.60 53% 95.94 47% 57.53 60% SWUCA - Coastal Area4 21 1,264,041 101$ 7.94 $ 26.05 $ 38.76 $ 54.89 81.83 27.32 33% 43.37 67% 29.21 67% SWUCA - Inland Area5 56 644,607 139$ 8.16 $ 20.14 $ 28.58 $ 38.03 35.15 12.37 35% 22.78 65% 21.00 92% 6 Northern Area 46 367,861 203$ 7.29 $ 16.96 $ 22.68 $ 29.07 17.34 8.84 51% 8.50 49% 6.45 76% Total 168 4,663,495 119$ 7.61 $ 26.47 $ 39.29 $ 54.15 338.86 157.13 46% 170.59 54% 114.19 67% Water use data source: 2006 Estimated Water Use Report, Table A-1 (Unpublished Draft SWFWMD, October 2007) Reclaimed water data source: 2006 Reuse Inventory, SWFWMD Revision (SWFWMD, 2007) 1Gross Per Capita Use= [withdrawal + imports - exports - treatment loss] / total service area population, calculated for each county or planning area. 2 There are no utilities in the portion of Lake County within the District. 3 Includes Pasco and Pinellas counties, and the portion of Hillsborough County not in the SWUCA. 4 Includes the coastal area of the SWUCA captures all of Manatee, Sarasota, and Charlotte counties, and the portion of Hillsborough County in the SWUCA. 5 Includes the inland area of SWUCA and captures all of DeSoto, Hardee, Highlands and Polk counties. 6 Includes the six northern counties within the District (north of, and not including, Pasco County). 7 Population-weighted average water bill for 8,000, 12,000 and 16,000 gallons per month (FY 2007). 8 Treated wastewater available for use (i.e., reclaimed water). 9 Recharge to the Floridan Aquifer from disposal of reclaimed water in rapid infiltration basins is low in the county. 10 Recharge to the Floridan aquifer from disposal of reclaimed water is high in most of the county. 11 Recharge to the Floridan aquifer from disposal of reclaimed water in rapid infiltration basins ranges from very low to very high in the county. 12 Negative value for discharge reflects the use of reclaimed water from Marion County, outside of District boundaries, to serve the Villages in Sumter County, within District boundaries. November 2007 Item 55

Regulation Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Resource Regulation Significant Initiatives Report

This report provides information regarding significant activities within the Resource Regulation Division. Recent activity within each of the District's major permitting programs is provided, followed by information regarding other significant activities.

Monthly Resource Regulation Activity

Environmental Resource Permits Issued – October 2007 Type of Permit Bartow Brooksville Sarasota Tampa Totals Gen Minor Sys 6 14 11 25 56 Noticed Generals 3 8 6 10 27 Generals 37 35 28 53 153 Individuals 4 5 4 0 13 Formal Wetland 243514 Determinations ERP Conceptuals 1 0 1 0 2 Totals 53 66 53 93 265 Water Use Permits Issued – October 2007 Type of Permit Bartow Brooksville Sarasota Tampa Totals Small Generals 25 5 11 4 45 Generals 4 2 7 2 15 Individuals 2 1 0 1 4 Totals 31 8 18 7 64 Well Construction Permits Issued – October 2007 Type of Permit Bartow Brooksville Sarasota Tampa Totals Well Construction 217 243 83 271 814 Compliance Activities – October 2007 Description Bartow Brooksville Sarasota Tampa Totals As-Builts Processed 38 54 61 83 236 ERP Const Inspections 102 248 95 263 708 Transfer to Operation 31 58 56 47 192 Complaints Investigated 33 41 9 37 120 Well Const Inspections 26 292 99 75 492 Totals 230 693 320 505 1748  x Central Florida Coordination Area - Regulation and Legal staff have been coordinating with St. John's River and South Florida district staff on the development of regulations for the Central Florida Coordination Area. Meetings have been held with stakeholders on draft rule language. It appears the rules are nearly final and have the concurrence of all interested parties. The rules will generally restrict groundwater quantities in the area to the amount needed in 2013, with subsequent growth in demand to be met by supplemental (alternative) water supplies. Initiation of rulemaking on the first phase of regulations was approved by all three Governing Boards at their August meetings. These rules should become effective in December. Staff from the three Districts is in the planning stage for the second phase of regulations, which will focus on longer-term solutions to the area's water resource issues. Authorization to publish notice of the proposed rules was approved at the August Governing Board Meeting. Both the St. Johns River Water Management District and South Florida Water Management Districts received lower cost regulatory alternative proposals. New activities

24 Item 55

since last meeting: Staff from three districts is working to resolve the lower cost regulatory alternative proposals. Anticipate final approval will occur at the December Board meeting. x Conserve Florida - Statewide Water Conservation - Staff is actively engaged in Conserve Florida (the statewide initiative to develop a water conservation program for public supply) because there are many potential regulatory implications. Active engagement involves participation in a statewide workgroup and its various committees. The main product of this initiative, to date, is a web-based computer application called The Guide which a utility can use to develop or update its water conservation plan. The Guide identifies recommended and optional elements to include in the water conservation plan based on the utility's profile (size, mix of customers, existing efforts, etc). In late 2006 and early 2007, staff participated in a pilot project involving three utilities who tested the application and the interaction that it facilitates between utility representatives and regulatory staff. This pilot project resulted in the identification of needed fixes and recommended enhancements, and these changes were prioritized and are now in the process of being implemented. In addition to work directly related to The Guide, the Conserve Florida workgroup, and its committees, continue to contribute oversight and ideas to the Conserve Florida Clearinghouse (a website presence and initiative-related outreach by University of Florida staff and students, including technical support for The Guide and an on-line water conservation library that is under development). In addition to recruiting utilities to use Conserve Florida resources, so that utilities and water management district staff gain more experience with The Guide in regulatory settings, staff has been providing input to the University of Florida staff updating the Clearinghouse's long- term work plan and staff has also been participating in a committee that is charged with drafting research agenda for the Clearinghouse to facilitate in future budget years. This committee drafted a research agenda, essentially a list of research questions that will be to be revised based on a November 30 workshop in Gainesville. New activities since last meeting: The committee's plans for the November 30 research agenda workshop have been finalized, and staff will be facilitating a portion of the workshop as well as participating in all applicable discussions. The goal is to have researchers and cooperators help refine the draft document by identifying existing studies, prioritizing unmet needs, and discussing potential funding sources. The next full Conserve Florida workgroup is scheduled for December 13. In addition to receiving Clearinghouse work updates and discussing the research agenda, topics will include the status of ideas included in "Being Drought Smart – Recommendations for a Drought Resistant Florida" (a report from FDEP with recommendations for improving the state's ability to respond to future droughts). xStatewide Per-Capita Consistency – At the DEP/WMD Regulatory Coordination meeting in September, the districts and DEP agreed to the use of two general per capita measures for reporting to DEP. The first is the Uniform Gross Per Capita Measure which includes all water use by the utility and is calculated in a manner similar to the District's methodology. The second is the Uniform Residential Per Capita Measure and includes only water use supplied to dwelling units served by the utility. In both measures, the population is a served residential population calculated as the number of dwelling units served times an estimated number of persons per household. The SWFWMD will be able to calculate these measures with some additional effort, assuming the residential use reporting requirements of the proposed SWUCA II per capita expansion rules are adopted. Several districts will be required to shift or add additional staff resources and introduce new permittee reporting requirements to calculate these measures. No changes will be required to the ways in which SWFWMD calculates per capita for permitting and compliance purposes. This resolution to the issue was discussed and approved at the September Interdistrict/FDEP Coordination meeting among the Secretary, Board Chairs and Executive Directors. A new draft of the guidance document was emailed to Work Group members on October 7th. As requested, the District prepared comments on the draft guidance document. New activities since last meeting: The Statewide Per Capita Consistency Workgroup met by teleconference on November 7, 2007. The discussion focused on the details of estimating the agreed upon gross per capita and residential per capita measures and the deadline for being able to produce those measures. x Statewide Stormwater Rule –Staff continues to coordinate with the FDEP and other water management districts regarding potential changes to the water quality components of the ERP

25 Item 55

program. These changes include enhancements to existing best management practices (BMPs) and the addition of new BMPs to achieve higher levels of pollutant removal. Improvements in pollutant removal efficiencies are necessary to meet the performance standards established in the State Water Resource Implementation Rule (62-40, F.A.C.) and to meet Total Maximum Daily Loads established for impaired waters. New activities since last meeting: The executive directors and staff from the water management districts met with DEP Secretary Sole and his staff on October 26 to discuss pertinent issues related to the new stormwater rule. Among the issues discussed were urban redevelopment, scientific peer review, and the possibility of legislation to guide rule development. A complete draft rule for public review is still under development. FDEP is expected to assemble advisory groups of technical experts and regulated interests in early 2008. No specific target date has been identified for the new rule but it is likely that rulemaking will take at least another year. x Cooperation with USDA-NRCS – At the close of FY 2007, the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) completed the design of 30 agricultural exemption projects (17 Ordinary Farming category, 2 Temporary Farming category, 11 Permanent Farming category) as part of the District's Agricultural Ground & Surface Water Management (AGSWM) program. Staff attended two AGSWM pre-application field prescreen meetings during the month of November. To date in this fiscal year, there have been six agricultural exemption projects initiated (Three Ordinary Farming category, Two Temporary Farming category, One Permanent Farming category). During the month of November 2007, the RPM regional agricultural team held two service office agricultural team meetings for coordination/training purposes; assisted in one agricultural related legal resolution case; attended the semi-annual Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (FDACS) interagency agricultural coordination meeting, and participated in the Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission public workshop for their proposed wetland rulemaking effort. New activities since last meeting: In the month of December 2007, staff attended an annual Florida Agricultural Expo sponsored by IFAS and conducted four monthly service office agricultural team meetings. In addition, there were two AGSWM field pre-application meetings scheduled in December 2007. x National Ground Water Association - The National Ground Water Association (NGWA) contacted the District's Well Construction Manager and asked that we provide instruction and function as a cooperator for a nation-wide field inspector training program. The one and one- half day training session will be held in Gainesville on (October 17-18, 2007). Training will provide an overview of: The hydrogeology within Florida; Various well designs; Inspector protocol (what to look for during construction or pre-construction); Water supply and water resource issues faced by the state (for example: Southern Water Use Caution Area, Central Florida Coordination Area, and Lake Okeechobee); Discussions regarding relevant contaminants in Florida. This training will provide an actual on-site drilling demonstration, from start to finish what an inspector should be looking for during construction of a well. New activities since last meeting: Per NGWA's request, the District provided instruction for the nation-wide field inspector training in October. As a show of appreciation, the NGWA provided the District with complimentary registrations to their December Trade Show in Orlando, thus, saving the District money in registration fees.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Richard S. Owen, Deputy Executive Director, Resource Regulation

26 D. Res. Mgt. & Dev. Comte. Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Resource Management and Development Committee

Discussion Items

56. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion

57. Adopt Recommended Changes to Governing Board Policy 130-4, Cooperative Funding Initiative ...... (15 minutes) ..... 3 (Strategic Plan: Water Supply – Alternative Water Supplies)

58. Tampa Bay Estuary Program ...... (20 minutes) .... 11 (Strategic Plan: Natural Systems and Water Quality – Ecologic Conservation and Restoration, Water Quality Maintenance and Improvement)

Submit & File Reports – None

Routine Reports

59. Significant Water Supply and Resource Development Projects ...... 12

60. Watershed Management Program and Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization Status Report ...... 22

61. Florida Forever Funding Status Report ...... 38

62. Minimum Flows and Levels Status Report ...... 42

63. Hydrologic Conditions Status Report ...... 46

64. Structure Operations Status Report ...... 48 2 Item 57

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Adopt Recommended Changes to Governing Board Policy 130-4, Cooperative Funding Initiative

Purpose The purpose of this item is to adopt recommended changes to Cooperative Funding Initiative (CFI) Policy 130-4. A copy of the proposed changes is included in Exhibit 1, attached.

Background/History At its November 2007 meeting, District staff provided the Governing Board with recommended changes to its CFI Policy 130-4. The changes represented discussions and direction from the Board over the course of several meetings which began last summer principally to address the Board’s long-standing position to not fund the construction of brackish groundwater supply facilities and to strengthen the District's commitment to regional water supply authorities. During its November meeting, the Board directed staff to incorporate additional language into the draft. These additions were:

1. Guideline 2. This guideline references the District's commitment to diversity. Added language requires that applicants entering into an agreement with the District will be required to document and report to the District the amount spent and, to the extent such information is known, all contractors and sub-contractors utilized for the project that are minority owned or small business enterprises. 2. Guideline 12. The Board requested additional language be incorporated into the definition of multijurisdictional that requires the utilities to be physically interconnected and that some form of agreement on conjunctive use of supplies be established. 3. Guideline 13. The Board requested that the term perpetual and the word "or" be added to the language on ownership and control by the respective Regional Water Supply Authority. 4. Guideline 14. The Board requested that similar language on perpetual ownership and control, including the addition of "or" be added to this guideline. 5. Guideline 17. The Board requested the language on conservation water rate structures be included.

These changes reflect the Board's direction and a copy of the Policy was provided to the Public Supply and Environmental Advisory Committees, Regional Water Supply Authorities and other interested parties advising them of the proposed changes and to inform them that the Board will consider them for adoption in December.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

Recommend the Governing Board adopt the recommended changes to the Board's Cooperative Funding Initiative Policy 130-4.

Presenter: Bruce C. Wirth, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Resource Management and Development

3 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 1 OF 42 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT 120/2418/2 109/247/20 EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEADTALMADGE G. RICE,CHAIR 0067 056

STATEMENT OF POLICY:

In accordance with Florida Statutes Sections 373.0695(2)(d), (2)(e) and (4); 373.1961(1)(i); and 373.451, the Governing Board or Basin Board(s) may jointly participate and cooperate with county governments, municipalities, water supply authorities, and other interested entities in water management programs and projects of mutual benefit, provided such programs and projects are consistent with the District’s statutory authority and will ensure proper development, utilization, and conservation of the water resources and ecology within the jurisdictional boundaries of the District. In addition, the Governing Board and Basin Boards will implement the state’s Water Protection and Sustainability Program through its Cooperative Funding Initiative.

POLICY GUIDELINES:

The following guidelines apply to all projects:

1. The Board(s) will give priority consideration to those projects designed to further the implementation of the District Strategic Plan, Water Management Plan, appropriate Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans, Surface Water Improvement and Management Plans, and Regional Water Supply Plan.

2. The District is committed to supplier diversity in the performance of all contracts associated with District Cooperative Funding projects. The District requires the second party to make good faith efforts to encourage the participation of minority and women-owned business enterprises, both as prime contractors and sub-contractors, in accordance with applicable laws. Applicants will be required to document all contractors and sub-contractors who perform work in association with the project, including the amount spent and, to the extent such information is known, whether each contractor or sub-contractor was a minority owned or small business enterprise. The applicant will be required to provide the District with a report of this information upon completion of the project prior to final payment, or within 30 days of the execution of any amendment of an agreement that increases project funding and prior to dispersement of any additional funds by the District.

3. The Board(s) will consider the applicant’s efforts in developing, implementing, and enforcing best water management practices, including but not limited to, conservation oriented water rate structures and irrigation, landscape and flood protection ordinances.

4. Funding may be provided to assist with the cost of data collection, research, feasibility studies, conservation and environmental education initiatives;, ecosystem restoration, water resource investigation and plan development;, and design and feasibility studies, design, permitting and construction of capital projects. ,. Funding is not available for operation operation and /maintenance, payment of debt or submittal, and responses to required District permits.. any other aspect of the project as deemed appropriate by the Board(s).

5. Funding assistance will be contingent upon concurrent project action and commitment by the county, municipality, water supply authority, or other interested entity to ensure the project goals will be implemented.

6. The Board(s) will consider funding based on the applicant's ability to demonstrate that such funding is necessary to make the project economically feasible.

4 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 2 OF 42 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT 120/2418/2 109/247/20 EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEADTALMADGE G. RICE,CHAIR 0067 056

7. The cooperating entity must demonstrate any matching funds have been appropriated, are contained within a Capital Improvement Plan or otherwise committed to the project.

8. Any state or federal appropriations or grant monies received by a county government, a municipality, or a water supply authority for a specific project shall be first applied toward the total cost of the cooperator’s proposed project. The District will typically fund up to half of the remaining project costs with a similar match from the cooperator.

9. Pursuant to the provisions of the Laws of Florida Chapter 2001-201, Section 5, the Board(s) may reduce or waive requirements for matching funds when requested by rural counties or municipalities, as defined by Florida Statutes Section 288.0656(2)(b).

10. All applications submitted for funding consideration by the Board(s) must be signed by a single Senior Administrator acting as a coordinator for the Cooperative Funding Initiative, for the county, municipality, water supply authority, or interested entity. If an entity submits multiple applications, a ranking of all proposals by the Basin from which funding is requested, as well as an overall ranking of the projects, is required. Final decisions regarding the funding of project proposals are the exclusive responsibility of the appropriate Board(s).

11. Refer to District Procedure Number 13-4 for additional guidance.

The following additional guidelines apply to potable alternative water supply projects:

12. It is the express intent of the Board(s) to utilize its incentive based funding to encourage the development of fully integrated robust multijurisdictional water supply systems comprised of diverse sources (i.e., groundwater, surface water, offstream reservoirs, desal, etc.), managed in a manner that takes full advantage of Florida's intense climatic cycles to ensure reliable, sustainable and drought resistant systems, which maximize the use of alternative supplies to the greatest extent practicable. Multijurisdictional means two or more water utilities or local governments organized into a larger entity, or have entered into an interlocal agreement or contract for the purpose of more efficiently pursuing water supply development or alterative water supply development projects listed pursuant to a regional water supply plan. The water supply systems of the multijurisdictional entity must be interconnected and must have a formalized operational management agreement that ensures the interconnected supplies are managed as described in the Board'(s) intent as described herein. All operational agreements between multijurisdictional entities will be evaluated by the District and must be deemed consistent with the Board'(s) intent as described herein.

13. 13. Consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 373.1961(3), Florida Statutes, the District shall prioritize funding for alternative water supply projects as follows:

5 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 3 OF 42 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT 120/2418/2 109/247/20 EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEADTALMADGE G. RICE,CHAIR 0067 056

x Highest priority -– Alternative water supply projects owned, operated and controlled, or perpetually controlled, by a Regional Water Supply Authority (RWSA). x Medium priority -– Alternative water supply projects that are not owned, operated and controlled, or perpetually controlled, by a RWSA, but meet the definition of multijurisdictional. x Lowest priority - Projects that do not meet the multijurisdictional criteria. Funding for these projects would be limited too consideration by the appropriate Bbasin Bboard(s).

14. If a member government of a RWSA proposes a potable water supply project, it must be submitted by the RWSA to be considered for District funding.

15. Projects submitted by non-member governments within the service area of a RWSA, will be considered for funding only if the non- member government has reviewed its plan with the RSWA to ensure the project is not inconsistent with the RWSA plan. An affirmative written statement from the RWSA indicating that the project is not inconsistent is required.

16. In determining whether, and how much, funding will be provided by the District, the District will consider the project's total cost per 1,000 gallons and the cost per gallon of water supply produced. These costs shall exclude distribution system components, and will be compared to among other things:

a. The cost of other available potable water supply that could be purchased by the applicant from a supplier who is capable of meeting the demand. b. The cost to develop other viable alternative water supplies.; c. The unitary rate or wholesale water cost of the RWSA in the area where the applicant is located. For applicants outside the area of a RWSA, or within the service area of a RWSA that does not own, operate and control an alternative water supply project, cost information from other RWSAs with alternative water supplies can be used for comparison purposes. d. The applicant's current cost of water supply and projected cost of water supply after the project is in operation.

All cost information must be certified and adjusted to reflect present values for the current fiscal year.

17. The District will consider the applicant's conservation oriented water rate structures and per capita water use rate as factors in its incentive based funding. Funding may be limited to conservation projects for those applicants without effective conservation rate structures or per capita water use rates that exceed the current District-wide goal of a 150 gallons per daygpd per person.

6. All alternative water supply projects, with the exception of reuse, conservation or exploration projects, must adhere to the following: a.Member governments and customers of a Water Supply Authority must work through the authority to meet their potable water supply needs. b.If a member government or customer proposes a potable water supply project, it must be submitted by the Authority to be considered for District funding and the Authority must retain some element of ownership and control over the completed project. c.Non-member governments within the service area of a Water Supply Authority must

6 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 4 OF 42 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT 120/2418/2 109/247/20 EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEADTALMADGE G. RICE,CHAIR 0067 056

coordinate their water supply needs with the Authority. Projects submitted by non- member governments will be considered for funding only if they have worked with the Authority to ensure the project is compatible with the Authority’s regional plans. An affirmative written statement must be submitted by the Authority recommending the District provide alternative water supply funding.

7.The cooperating entity must demonstrate any matching funds have been appropriated, are contained within a Capital Improvement Plan or otherwise committed to the project. 8.Any state or federal appropriations or grant monies received by a county government, a municipality, or a water supply authority for a specific project shall be first applied toward the total cost of the cooperator’s proposed project. The District will typically fund up to half of the remaining project costs with a similar match from the cooperator. 9.Pursuant to the provisions of the Laws of Florida Chapter 2001-201, Section 5, the Board(s) may reduce or waive requirements for matching funds when requested by rural counties or municipalities, as defined by Florida Statutes Section 288.0656(2)(b). 10.All applications submitted for funding consideration by the Board(s) must be signed by a single Senior Administrator acting as a coordinator for the Cooperative Funding Initiative, for the county, municipality, water supply authority, or interested entity. If an entity submits multiple applications, a ranking of all proposals by the Basin from which funding is requested, as well as an overall ranking of the projects, is required. Final decisions regarding the funding of project proposals are the exclusive responsibility of the appropriate Board(s).

REFERENCES: Florida Statutes Sections 288.0656, 373.069, 373.451, and 373.1961 Laws of Florida Chapter 2001-201, Section 5

SUPERSEDES: 11/01/01, 3/25/03, 9/28/04, 9/27/05

7 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 1 OF 3 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT

EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: 10/24/2006 APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEAD,CHAIR 12/18/2007

STATEMENT OF POLICY:

In accordance with Florida Statutes Sections 373.0695(2)(d), (2)(e) and (4); 373.1961; and 373.451, the Governing Board or Basin Board(s) may jointly participate and cooperate with county governments, municipalities, water supply authorities, and other interested entities in water management programs and projects of mutual benefit, provided such programs and projects are consistent with the District’s statutory authority and will ensure proper development, utilization, and conservation of the water resources and ecology within the jurisdictional boundaries of the District. In addition, the Governing Board and Basin Boards will implement the state’s Water Protection and Sustainability Program through its Cooperative Funding Initiative.

POLICY GUIDELINES:

The following guidelines apply to all projects:

1. The Board(s) will give priority consideration to those projects designed to further the implementation of the District Strategic Plan, Water Management Plan, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans, Surface Water Improvement and Management Plans, and Regional Water Supply Plan.

2. The District is committed to supplier diversity in the performance of all contracts associated with District Cooperative Funding projects. The District requires the second party to make good faith efforts to encourage the participation of minority and women-owned business enterprises, both as prime contractors and sub-contractors, in accordance with applicable laws. Applicants will be required to document all contractors and sub-contractors who perform work in association with the project, including the amount spent and, to the extent such information is known, whether each contractor or sub-contractor was a minority owned or small business enterprise. The applicant will be required to provide the District with a report of this information upon completion of the project prior to final payment, or within 30 days of the execution of any amendment of an agreement that increases project funding and prior to dispersement of any additional funds by the District.

3. The Board(s) will consider the applicant’s efforts in developing, implementing, and enforcing best water management practices, including but not limited to, conservation oriented water rate structures and irrigation, landscape and flood protection ordinances.

4. Funding may be provided to assist with the cost of data collection, research, feasibility studies, conservation and environmental education initiatives; ecosystem restoration, water resource investigation and plan development; and design, permitting and construction of capital projects. Funding is not available for operation and maintenance, payment of debtor submittal, and responses to required District permits.

5. Funding assistance will be contingent upon concurrent project action and commitment by the county, municipality, water supply authority, or other interested entity to ensure the project goals will be implemented.

6. The Board(s) will consider funding based on the applicant's ability to demonstrate that such funding is necessary to make the project economically feasible.

8 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 2 OF 3 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT

EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: 10/24/2006 APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEAD,CHAIR 12/18/2007

7. The cooperating entity must demonstrate any matching funds have been appropriated, are contained within a Capital Improvement Plan or otherwise committed to the project.

8. Any state or federal appropriations or grant monies received by a county government, a municipality, or a water supply authority for a specific project shall be first applied toward the total cost of the cooperator’s proposed project. The District will typically fund up to half of the remaining project costs with a similar match from the cooperator.

9. Pursuant to the provisions of the Laws of Florida Chapter 2001-201, Section 5, the Board(s) may reduce or waive requirements for matching funds when requested by rural counties or municipalities, as defined by Florida Statutes Section 288.0656(2)(b).

10. All applications submitted for funding consideration by the Board(s) must be signed by a single Senior Administrator acting as a coordinator for the Cooperative Funding Initiative for the county, municipality, water supply authority, or interested entity. If an entity submits multiple applications, a ranking of all proposals by the Basin from which funding is requested, as well as an overall ranking of the projects, is required. Final decisions regarding the funding of project proposals are the exclusive responsibility of the appropriate Board(s).

11. Refer to District Procedure Number 13-4 for additional guidance.

The following additional guidelines apply to potable alternative water supply projects:

12. It is the express intent of the Board(s) to utilize its incentive based funding to encourage the development of fully integrated robust multijurisdictional water supply systems comprised of diverse sources (i.e., groundwater, surface water, offstream reservoirs, desal, etc.), managed in a manner that takes full advantage of Florida's intense climatic cycles to ensure reliable, sustainable and drought resistant systems, which maximize the use of alternative supplies to the greatest extent practicable. Multijurisdictional means two or more water utilities or local governments organized into a larger entity, or have entered into an interlocal agreement or contract for the purpose of more efficiently pursuing water supply development or alterative water supply development projects listed pursuant to a regional water supply plan. The water supply systems of the multijurisdictional entity must be interconnected and must have a formalized operational management agreement that ensures the interconnected supplies are managed as described in the Board's intent as described herein. All operational agreements between multijurisdictional entities will be evaluated by the District and must be deemed consistent with the Board's intent as described herein.

13. Consistent with Florida Statutes Chapter 373.1961(3), the District shall prioritize funding for alternative water supply projects as follows:

x Highest priority – Alternative water supply projects owned, operated and controlled, or perpetually controlled by a Regional Water Supply Authority (RWSA). x Medium priority – Alternative water supply projects that are not owned, operated and controlled, or perpetually controlled by a RWSA, but meet the definition of multijurisdictional. x Lowest priority - Projects that do not meet the multijurisdictional criteria. Funding for these

9 BOARD POLICY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

TITLE: COOPERATIVE FUNDING INITIATIVE COMMUNITY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS NUMBER: 130-4 PAGE: 3 OF 3 SECTION/DEPT.: DEPARTMENT

EFFECTIVE DATE: SUPERSEDES: 10/24/2006 APPROVED BY: JUDITH C. WHITEHEAD,CHAIR 12/18/2007

projects would be limited to consideration by the appropriate Basin Board(s).

14. If a member government of a RWSA proposes a potable water supply project, it must be submitted by the RWSA to be considered for District funding.

15. Projects submitted by non-member governments within the service area of a RWSA will be considered for funding only if the non-member government has reviewed its plan with the RSWA to ensure the project is not inconsistent with the RWSA plan. An affirmative written statement from the RWSA indicating that the project is not inconsistent is required.

16. In determining whether, and how much, funding will be provided by the District, the District will consider the project's total cost per 1,000 gallons and the cost per gallon of water supply produced. These costs shall exclude distribution system components and will be compared to among other things:

a. The cost of other available potable water supply that could be purchased by the applicant from a supplier who is capable of meeting the demand. b. The cost to develop other viable alternative water supplies. c. The unitary rate or wholesale water cost of the RWSA in the area where the applicant is located. For applicants outside the area of a RWSA, or within the service area of a RWSA that does not own, operate and control an alternative water supply project, cost information from other RWSAs with alternative water supplies can be used for comparison purposes. d. The applicant's current cost of water supply and projected cost of water supply after the project is in operation.

All cost information must be certified and adjusted to reflect present values for the current fiscal year.

17. The District will consider the applicant's conservation oriented water rate structures and per capita water use rate as factors in its incentive based funding. Funding may be limited to conservation projects for those applicants without effective conservation rate structures or per capita water use rates that exceed the current District-wide goal of a 150 gallons per day per person.

REFERENCES: Florida Statutes Sections 288.0656, 373.069, 373.451, and 373.1961 Laws of Florida Chapter 2001-201, Section 5

SUPERSEDES: 11/01/01, 3/25/03, 9/28/04, 9/27/05

10 Item 58

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Tampa Bay Estuary Program

Purpose This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no Board action is required.

Background/History In 1987, the Florida Legislature established the Surface Water Improvement and Management Program. (SWIM) Act having recognized that water quality and habitat in surface waters throughout the state have degraded or in danger of being degraded. The Act requires the District maintain a priority list of water bodies of regional or statewide significance within their boundaries. The Act listed Tampa Bay as the District's number one priority. The District prepared the first SWIM Plan for Tampa Bay in 1988 with updates in 1992 and 1999. A fourth update is underway.

In 1990, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) identified Tampa Bay as an estuary of Federal Significance and included it in the National Estuary Program. As a result of this designation, the Tampa Bay National Estuary Program was established in 1991 to assist the region in developing a comprehensive plan for the restoration and protection of Tampa Bay. The first Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) for Tampa Bay, entitled "Charting the Course", was prepared in 1996 and updated in 2006. In 1998, the members entered into an Interlocal Agreement and formed the Tampa Bay Estuary Program (TBEP) (dropping the Federal designation) as a partnership of federal, state and local agencies and governments including several private industries. These entities include the USEPA, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the District, Hillsborough, Manatee and Pinellas counties and the cities of St. Petersburg, Tampa and Clearwater. The Interlocal Agreement identified a long term commitment to the program, which for the District, requires annual funding approval at the Basin Board level. Since 1998 the District and other partners have completed numerous stormwater retrofit and habitat restoration projects toward achieving the goals of the CCMP and the SWIM Plan.

The Executive Director of the TBEP will provide an overview of the Tampa Bay Estuary Program and an update of the projects that have been completed as well as the projects that are proposed in the coming years.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Committee’s information only, and no action is required.

Presenter: Jennette Seachrist, SWIM Manager, Resource Management Department Dick Eckenrod, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Estuary Program

11 Item 59

Resource Management & Development Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Significant Water Supply and Resource Development Projects

This report provides information on significant Resource Management and Development projects and programs in which the Governing Board is participating in funding. The report provides a short status of significant activities associated with the project that have recently occurred or are about to happen. For greater detail, refer to the Project Notes write-ups or request information directly from the project managers.

Lake Hancock Lake Level Modification Project In October 2004, the Governing Board authorized staff to proceed with the preliminary design and engineering to prepare a conceptual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application for the Lake Hancock Lake Level Modification project with a target operating level of up to 100 feet. In January 2006, the Board authorized staff, upon reaching agreement through a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Polk County, to submit the conceptual ERP application. The Governing Board approved the MOA in July 2006 and the County approved the MOA in August 2006. The District submitted the conceptual ERP application to FDEP on August 31, 2006, and FDEP issued the Conceptual ERP on June 14, 2007. In September 2007, the Governing Board authorized staff to implement the Lake Hancock Lake Level Modification Project including the final design, permitting, and construction of the necessary improvements for a lake operating level of 100.0 feet NGVD; adopted the Resolution Authorizing Proceedings in Eminent Domain, including a Declaration of Taking; amended the 2007 Update to the Florida Forever Work Plan to include all lands identified as necessary for the Project, and designated $41 million in Florida Forever Trust Funds for the Project; and designated and encumbered $79 million in General Fund Water Supply and Resource Development Reserves for the Project. New Activities Since Last Meeting: District staff continues to coordinate with affected property owners or their legal counsel. Several homeowners have obtained appraisals and presented them to the District for consideration. Negotiations resulted in four purchase/sale agreements being approved by the Governing Board at its November meeting. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has been furnished all necessary information for publishing their notice of intent (NOI) to permit which should occur in December 2007. The consultant for the Lake Hancock Project has completed the hydrologic assessment for Highway 540 and the Parkway for FDOT permitting of the Project and is planning to meet with FDOT to present the findings in December. Project Managers: Harry Downing/Steve Blaschka

Lake Hancock Outfall Treatment Project At the February 2006 Governing Board meeting, the Board approved the staff recommendation to adopt a 27 percent nitrogen load reduction goal and to utilize wetlands as the primary treatment component. The District's consultant (Parsons) has completed constructability and the initial geotechnical testing at the proposed location of the treatment wetlands and a Basis of Design Report (BODR). This report establishes the objectives, data, and assumptions that form the foundation of design (configuration of wetland cells and infrastructure). The next phase includes design, permitting and additional geotechnical evaluation. The District initiated the plant establishment study in June 2007 that is scheduled to be completed in August 2008. The objectives of the study are to evaluate wetland construction methods, different types of wetland plants, exotic plant control techniques, and water quality trends. New Activities Since Last Meeting: District staff (Resource Management, Land Resources, and Operations) met on November 15 to discuss and coordinate activities associated with the replacement of Structure P-11 at the outfall from Lake Hancock for the Lake Hancock Lake Level Modification Project. It is anticipated that notice to proceed with design will be issued to the consultant in December 2007. Project Manager: Janie Hagberg

12 Item 59

Pilot Testing Of Biological Treatment Systems At the February 2006 Governing Board meeting, following the vote on the Lake Hancock Outfall Treatment Project, the Board directed staff to initiate a project for pilot testing of biological water treatment systems. At the May 2006 Governing Board meeting, the Board authorized staff to proceed with the pilot testing of biological water treatment systems and to hire a consultant to assist the District in the pilot testing project. At the November 2006 meeting, the Board approved the transfer of $200,000 from General Fund Reserves for Contingencies to fund the consultant services for the pilot testing project and authorized staff to enter into an agreement with CH2M Hill, Inc. The agreement with the consultant was signed on January 7, 2007, and a kick-off meeting was held January 17, 2007. On February 20, 2007, District staff and members of the consultant team visited a 15 million gallon per day (mgd) periphyton-based water treatment system in Okeechobee County that was constructed for the South Florida Water Management District. The vendors who developed and operate the system were present to provide the tour and answer questions. A detailed literature review of periphyton-based biological water treatment systems, a review of potential pilot test sites, project work plan, and project delivery method document have been completed. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was advertised on October 12, 2007 and will close on November 29, 2007. The RFP has two alternatives (study an existing system, construct a small pilot system) on which vendors may bid. The District believes this approach will provide the most cost efficient means of meeting project objectives, while also providing vendors some flexibility in the ways they can demonstrate the effectiveness of their systems. New Activities Since Last Meeting: The District amended the RFP to allow the vendors to report Capital and O & M Costs for nutrient removal information in cost per pound removed. The closing date for the RFP was extended from November 29, 2007, to December 18, 2007, to address questions raised by the vendors and allow them time to prepare their proposals. The District continues to work with the South Florida Water Management District to review initial performance data from their Taylor Creek biological water treatment system. Project Manager: Williams

Peace Creek Watershed In 2005, the Governing Board and Peace River Basin Board agreed to take on the responsibility to maintain and, where possible, improve the water conveyance/storage capabilities of the Peace Creek Canal. One of the primary tasks includes research on property ownership, so the District can seek necessary easements over the system. The work directly related to the Peace Creek Canal is part of the larger District effort, which started years earlier with watershed modeling, expanded in 2005, and will develop a watershed management plan that evaluates approximately 13,000 acres of lakes and 13,000 acres of wetland areas for potential surface water storage systems within the Peace Creek Watershed. The District continues to provide aquatic plant maintenance in the canal; a treatment was completed in October 2006. A permanent spraying schedule is to be implemented in FY2007. The District applied for permits from the FDEP and US Army Corps to remove sediments in strategic reaches of the canal in 2005. The FDEP permit was received in 2006. Polk County began acquiring 18 residential properties along the canal that have repeatedly flooded. The District (Governing Board and Peace River Basin) is providing up to $250,000 to the County, as matching funds for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant, to acquire the properties. A draft Watershed Management Plan Alternatives Report was completed in December 2006. Staff is analyzing the technical aspects of the report and will prepare recommendations accordingly. New Activities Since Last Meeting: The Operations Department continues to perform aquatic weed control activities within the canal. The Notice General Permit package for nine additional sediment removal sites was submitted to FDEP on November 20, 2007. Staff has begun to set up meetings with the individual property owner's associated with the permit to discuss the sediment removal activities accordingly. Staff continues to calculate the size of a maintenance easement corridor along the canal based on future maintenance activities. Project Manager: Shelley Thornton

13 Item 59

Watershed Management Program/Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization The District initiated a partnership with the FEMA to modernize Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) as part of its Watershed Management Program (WMP). Flood protection and floodplain information has been a priority at the District since the inception of the organization and that priority was renewed following the El Niño weather event in 1997-1998. In addition to studies conducted by the District (primarily through the Basin Boards) and others, information on floodplains (elevations) is available through the FEMA Federal Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). However, many of the existing maps do not accurately represent the flood prone areas either because the initial studies were technically limited or the maps are outdated due to significant land use changes since completion. To improve the floodplain information and improve local government's understanding of their flood protection level of service the District reached out to local governments and initiated the WMP in the late nineties. The District recognized a potential funding partner in FEMA as they had mutual goals to improve the existing FIRMs to better identify risks of flooding within the District. The District and the FEMA executed a Cooperating Technical Partners (CTP) Memorandum of Agreement on September 14, 2001, to formalize the relationship. As a CTP, the District is eligible for federal funds to act as FEMA's partner in modernization of the FIRMs. The District is implementing the map modernization program through the WMP. The federal funds have allowed the District and local governments to accomplish significantly more than would have otherwise been possible. To date, the District has received approximately $11.2 million in federal funds from FEMA for countywide map modernization projects for Pasco, Sarasota, Hernando, Marion, Polk, Hardee, Desoto, Citrus, Sumter, Levy, and Highlands counties. An additional $0.9 million is expected in future fiscal years for countywide map modernization projects for Manatee County. The Map Modernization Program also includes federal funding for management support. For FY2004 through FY2007, the District received $713,240 and could receive an additional $500,000 through FY2012. The District currently has completed or continues to work on 170 of the 419 watersheds identified within its boundaries. A comprehensive list of watersheds and the status is attached. FEMA began Marion FIRM updates before the District became a CTP. FEMA submitted preliminary FIRMS to the county in 2005 and revised preliminary maps May 2006. FEMA has gone through the public comment, appeals period, and is currently addressing the appeals. After all appeals have been addressed, the FIRMs will be finalized for adoption by the county. The District's only involvement at this point is to provide FEMA with technical support of the submitted information to address appeals. New Activities Since Last Meeting: District Engineering staff completed the reviews of the watershed models for Pasco and Sarasota counties in October and Hernando County in November. Staff requested the District’s consultants working on the watershed models in Pasco, Sarasota, and Hernando counties address all errors and omissions at no cost to the District. Staff is working with the consultants to develop schedules and budgets to update the watershed models to account for infiltration and incorporate the latest topographic and other watershed information (to the extent practicable) into the models. Work orders to update the watershed models for Pasco County have been executed. Staff is also collecting Environmental Resource Permits (ERPs) for areas altered since the models were developed and to obtain information on percolation. Staff has gathered high water mark information at numerous locations in Pasco and Hernando counties to use as verification of the model results. District staff will be meeting with Hernando, Pasco, and Sarasota county staff to obtain any additional information regarding high water marks or known flooding information that they may have. In a letter to FEMA dated November 8, 2007, the District requested additional time to correct and update the watershed models and prepare preliminary FIRMs for Pasco and Sarasota counties. Staff is following up with FEMA to determine if they need any additional information. Project Manager: Gordon McClung

Myakka River Watershed Initiative At the February 2006 Governing Board meeting, this project was initiated with funding in the amount of $500,000 for collection of topographic information in eastern Manatee County using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping technologies and the hiring of a consultant team to perform elements of the Watershed Management Program. Staff attended a Myakka Comprehensive Watershed Management meeting to listen to the discussion on ongoing issues, and development of goals. The agreement with the consultant, the Singhofen & Associates

14 Item 59 team, was executed, and the kick-off meeting was held with District staff on December 11, 2006. The consultant team held the first outreach meeting on February 14, 2007. During the meeting, attendees discussed the project in detail and solicited stakeholder input on issues and available sources of data. Staff has made several introductory presentations to various stakeholder groups (Myakka Conservancy, Environmental Advisory Committee, etc). These meetings have provided excellent input that has allowed us to refocus our outreach efforts to better meet the specific interests from groups. In addition to the consultant work, the District was contacted by a land owner in the upper portion of the watershed (Coker Creek) regarding potential impediments to historical conveyance ways that are causing the back up of water. District survey staff gathered stream profile information for determination of existing conditions. The survey on the Coker Creek area was evaluated against existing information looking for impediments to conveyance. The LiDAR project in eastern Manatee has been finalized and the information has been forwarded to the consultant for use. An update on the project was presented to the Peace River and Manasota Basin Boards in April 2007. A project website is being developed for www.watermatters.org. Several meetings with entities have taken place to coordinate efforts for the water quality modeling. Watershed issues were discussed at the April 11, 2007 CWM meeting. Mike-SHE, an integrated surface water and ground water computer model, was chosen for the water budget task. The computer model has been used for impact studies on water resources dealing with land use changes and wetlands restoration. Work Order #2 covering the majority of the water budget tasks for the Upper Myakka area was executed in the middle of June 2007. Work orders 3, 4 and 5 were executed to complete the digital topographic information element, geospatially reference existing survey data from throughout the watershed, develop content for a project web page, start survey in the upper Myakka and complete historic land use mapping. Coordination efforts were discussed at a scoping meeting for the Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority (Authority) Source Feasibility Study between the District's Myakka River Watershed Initiative and the cooperatively funded feasibility study. Field reconnaissance, survey, and hydrologic model parameterization (irrigation contribution, rainfall) continues for the water budget for the upper Myakka watershed. Survey efforts continue in the upper Myakka area, though staff is discussing solutions to the reluctance of some owners to allow access to their property. The Peer Review plan of the Upper Myakka Water Budget was discussed, and staff is assembling an independent panel consisting of three members. Anticipate executing Work Order No. 6 that involves tasks such as quality assurance and updating of existing watershed models, and beginning the water quality loading model parameterization. A joint field visit was held with Authority Source Feasibility Study team. Survey efforts for the water budget in the Upper Myakka area are complete. The peer review panel for the Upper Myakka Water Budget is set. The three member panel is comprised of Bill Wise, Ph.D., University of Florida, Jennifer Jacobs, Ph.D., University of New Hampshire, and Joe Hughes, Ph.D., of DHI. Staff is developing purchase orders to secure their services. The development of the Digital Terrain Model continues. Mock-ups for the project website are under review. Staff began review of the existing conditions model for the water budget. New Activities Since Last Meeting: A coordination meeting was held with the City of North Port for analysis in the Big Slough Watershed. Coordination efforts continue between the Authority Source Feasibility Study and the Myakka River Watershed Initiative. Staff continues reviewing project deliverables and is developing the scope for the next Work Order which will include historic vegetation investigation in Flatford Swamp and beginning the Quality Assurance work on two of the existing watershed models within the Myakka. Project Manager: Lisann Morris

Tampa Bay Water

Tampa Bay Regional Reclaimed Water Project The Tampa Bay Regional Reclaimed Water Project partners last met January 10, 2007, to discuss project configuration scenarios and the transition to the City of Tampa becoming the lead agency on the project. The City of Tampa is proceeding with ongoing projects such as the Area Reuse (STAR) and, while committed to the Regional Project, considers it one for later implementation. Meanwhile, work continues on some core project elements, including wet weather storage in Pasco and Hillsborough counties. New Activities Since Last Meeting: Construction on Pasco County's 100-million-gallon reclaimed water reservoir in Land

15 Item 59

O'Lakes is approximately 75 percent complete although, due to subsurface anomalies, additional grouting and geotechnical work has been required, significantly increasing costs to the project. County staff is considering other options for completing the project and is coordinating with Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for the related permits. The project is anticipated to be completed in May 2008. District staff has evaluated a request to consider increasing its original funding commitment to the reservoir project. The evaluation looked at the reasons(s) for the cost increases, the cost/benefit of an additional contribution by the District, and the ability of the affected Basin Boards to contribute additional funds from their respective Water Supply and Resource Development Reserves. Staff will inform Pasco County that it could support recommending that the Governing Board, Coastal Rivers, Hillsborough River, and Pinellas-Anclote River Basin Boards collectively contribute an additional $2.4 million, representing a 25 percent share of the unanticipated cost increases. In September, staff received a letter from the Tampa Water Department Director, indicating the City of Tampa plans to focus its resources on areas identified in the South Tampa Area Reclaimed Water Expansion Evaluation Report at this time, which does not include several of the elements associated with the North Tampa pipeline element of the Regional Project. In the letter, the City requested the use of funds be set aside for the Regional Project for use in the STAR Expansion Project. District staff is currently completing a comparison of costs and benefits of the STAR Expansion Project to the Regional Project and will take a position of future funding based on the outcome. Project Manager: Kathy Scott

System Configuration II Project The Governing Board approved the agreement with Tampa Bay Water (TBW) for the System Configuration II project at its February 2007 meeting. The project, when completed in 2011, is expected to provide up to 25 mgd of alternative water to the regional system. The estimated total project cost is $235,122,500, with the District committing to half of eligible costs of $232,000,000, or $116,000,000. The project seeks to increase TBW's overall system capacity by drawing more water from the Hillsborough River during high flows, via the Tampa Bypass Canal (TBC), in combination with increasing the allowable percentage of withdrawals from the TBC. The projects are primarily associated with the construction of improvements to the regional systems treatment, transmission, and storage infrastructure. The project agreement was executed in May 1, 2007, and TBW received approval of its Water Use Permit in June 2007. New Activities Since Last Meeting: TBW is currently working on the final design of the various project components. Nine of the ten basis of design reports were completed in November. The remaining basis of design report is scheduled to be complete by December 2008. Project Manager: Audrie Liszewski

Remediation of the Seawater Desalination Plant American Water Pridesa (AWP) assumed operation of the plant in January 2005 and began full- scale pilot testing to locate deficiencies and determine remediation strategies. Following completion of this process, TBW issued a notice to proceed in October 2005 to construct the repairs. The agreement between TBW and AWP called for the acceptance test to start on September 21, 2006, and completion of the facility by October 20, 2006. AWP filed delay claims and rescheduled the acceptance test and completion date for November 13 and 26, 2006, respectively. AWP again revised the date for completion of the facility and acceptance test to December 22, 2006. After receiving approval from the FDEP on April 4, 2007, TBW began putting desalinated water into its regional distribution system. After conducting a series of tests in November to improve facility efficiency, AWP successfully completed the required run-in period, acceptance test and acceptance test report. New Activities Since Last Meeting: TBW is currently reviewing the acceptance test report. If the acceptance test results are approved, TBW will be entitled to 25 percent of the $85 million currently being held by the District. Project Manager: Brian Armstrong

16 Item 59

Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority

Regional Expansion Projects:

Reservoir: Final design for the Regional Reservoir Expansion has been completed and DEP has issued the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) for the reservoir construction. In June, the Authority received three bids for the reservoir expansion. The low bid of $64,910,500 was 21 percent higher than the engineer's estimate. The project Kick-off Meeting was held in late September. As with the Facility Expansion, the Authority has asked the District to provide additional funding as a result of the increased costs. Land Resources and Authority staff have met several times to address the issues surrounding the Authority’s reservoir expansion project on the RV Griffin Reserve. The Authority is defining areas and land interests required to complete expansion of its reservoir and to mitigate for wetland impacts. Prior to the District granting various easement interests in the property, the Authority will have the areas surveyed and will submit draft easement documents to the District for review and Board approval. Other issues the staffs are coordinating include public access, land management issues, relocation of recreational amenities, and reconfiguration of an existing cattle lease. The Authority Board approved the reservoir construction contract at its July 25 meeting and issued a limited notice to proceed to the contractor to begin initial work and permitting. New Activities Since Last Meeting: The contractor and engineer have submitted pre-construction plans to DEP for their review. In addition, the Army Corps of Engineers is in the process of issuing the companion permit to the ERP. Consensus was reached on all outstanding issues between District and Authority staff to convey the necessary interests. The District will convey a perpetual exclusive easement and a perpetual nonexclusive easement to the Authority. The District will also convey a conservation easement to the DEP over the mitigation area to satisfy permit requirements established by DEP. All easements were approved by the Governing Board in November. District and Authority staff have also relocated all recreational amenities to accommodate the project. The Gopher Tortoise relocation is on-going.

Facility: In February, the Authority received one bid for Contract 2 for major components of the Facility Expansion. The bid was approximately $17 million over the original engineer's estimate of probable cost. Since receiving the bid, Authority staff and the contractor have negotiated a revised project cost $14 million below the original bid price. The Authority's Board approved the revised cost and authorized staff to enter into an agreement with the contractor in April. Even with the newly negotiated bid price, the overall revised project cost remains $19 million over the original project cost in the contract between the District and the Authority. Construction of the Facility Expansion Project will occur through three separate contracts. The first contract, completed in May, focused on site preparation. The second contract is for construction of a maintenance building, dewatering facility, filters, storage tanks, thickeners, and chemical feed and disinfection stations. The third contract is for construction of an operations center. New Activities Since Last Meeting: Construction continues on the Facility Expansion. Recent progress includes completion of concrete work for the powdered activated carbon (PAC) storage tanks, recycle pump station, and sludge thickener #2. In addition, wall forming is complete for the PAC contact structure. Installation of the ductile iron pipe that connects the river to the reservoir and reservoir to the plant continues. All the restoration required in the contractual agreement between the District and the Authority has been completed and is undergoing final certification. Current activities include continuing to pour the walls for the new filter building and construction of the foundations, footers, and stem walls for both chemical buildings. In addition, the North Regional High Service Pump Building work continues on all sub-grade slabs. Project Manager: Audrie Liszewski

Regional Integrated Loop System Project Originally, the first phase of the Regional Integrated Loop System Project consisted of an interconnect between the Authority and Punta Gorda's water treatment plant on Shell Creek. Although the design for the first phase was completed and a guaranteed maximum price provided to the Board, a decision was made to postpone the project. Since cancellation of Phase 1, Charlotte County, Punta Gorda, and the Authority have approved an agreement for the Regional Integrated Loop System Phase 1A. Similar to Phase 1, this pipeline creates an

17 Item 59 interconnect between the Authority and Punta Gorda's Water Treatment Plant (WTP) on Shell Creek while providing Charlotte County with additional opportunities for interconnects into the regional distribution system. Total cost for Phase 1A is estimated at $19,015,000. The District anticipates providing $11,028,700 toward the project, assuming the State's Trust Funds remain available. The Authority Board approved work orders for Phases 2 and 3 of the Regional Loop System, while later issuing notices to proceed for preliminary engineering. As currently envisioned, the Phase 2 pipeline would provide an interconnect between the Authority's Peace River facility and the City of North Port's WTP, and Phase 3 would be an extension of the Authority's regional transmission system currently terminating at the Carlton WTP. A workshop was held after the Authority's regularly scheduled meeting on July 25 to discuss future pipeline funding. New Activities Since Last Meeting: Staff awaits the Authority's pipeline funding policy, scheduled for February 2008, before moving forward with agreements for final design and construction of Phases 2 and 3. Project Manager: Audrie Liszewski

Regional Water Supply Source Feasibility Study At its March 2006 meeting, the Authority's Board authorized staff to enter into an agreement with HDR Engineering to complete the Integrated Regional Water Supply Master Plan (IRWSMP) and Regional System Reliability Model (RSRM). The IRWSMP provides for the phased development of six new water supply sources (Shell Creek, Myakkahatchee Creek, Peace River, Upper Myakka System, Cow Pen Slough/Dona Bay, and the Carlton Wellfield), integration of those sources within the Regional Loop System, and development of costs for the Authority's seven-year capital improvement program. The RSRM will support those goals. The Regional Water Supply Source Feasibility Study will build upon the IRWSMP to focus on three of those alternative water supply sources, the Shell Creek, Cow Pen Slough/Dona Bay, and Upper Myakka River Systems. The Authority received three submittals on April 25 for consultant services to conduct water supply feasibility studies. The Authority Board interviewed and ranked the consultants at its June meeting and authorized contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, the PBS&J team. The contract was awarded in July 2007. A cooperative funding agreement with the Authority for the feasibility study is under development. A request for out-of- cycle funding to initiate the study was approved at the June Governing Board and the Peace River Basin Board meetings and at the July Manasota Basin Board meeting. A kick-off meeting with the consultant was held on August 2, 2007, to begin the gathering and evaluation of existing data. The Authority, Consultant team, and District staff participated in field visits to all three project areas under consideration. The funding agreement was executed. A coordination meeting was held with District staff to discuss MFLs for Shell Creek and Dona Bay and effects on the study. The first deliverable was reviewed, a technical report summarizing inventoried data and relevant technical reports and/or models, and a database of the inventoried data. A technical advisory committee (TAC) meeting was held November 16, 2007, to discuss the first deliverable and major supply opportunities for each source area. New Activities Since Last Meeting: Reservoir siting in the Upper Myakka and Shell Creek watersheds and updates to Sarasota County’s work on Dona Bay were incorporated in the newly developed Work Order #2. In addition, the Preliminary Alternatives Analysis was presented to the Authority Board at its December meeting. This document identified opportunities for water supply within the three major source areas. Project Manager: Lisann Morris

Aquifer Storage and Recovery – Arsenic Research The District is engaged in a project that is investigating methods to control the mobilization of arsenic occurring during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) activities. This effort will help water suppliers meet the recently lowered drinking water standard for arsenic. The project consists of the design, permitting, and construction of a degasification system to remove dissolved oxygen (DO) from the injection water prior to storage. This project is being co-funded by the Authority, South Florida Water Management District, St. John's River Water Management District, and the City of Bradenton. The pilot degasification project will be performed at the City of Bradenton's ASR site which is typical of most potable water ASR systems in the state. The degasification system will be capable of processing water at 700 gallons per minute (gpm) at 99.96 percent DO removal, but is capable of flow rates as high as 1,000 gpm with lower DO removal efficiency. A TAC has been formed consisting of a representative from each of the co-funders, as well as Jon Arthur from the Florida Geological Survey; June Mirecki from the

18 Item 59

Army Corps of Engineers; and Jeff Greenwell, Richard Duerling, and Joe Haberfield from the FDEP. The primary purpose of the TAC is to design the testing program to demonstrate the effectiveness of DO reduction in the control of arsenic mobilization. Testing will first consist of recovery of all prior injected water and any additional water necessary to achieve near ambient water quality conditions in the storage zone. This will be followed by an injection of 40 million gallons without degasification and recovery, to test the equipment upgrades to the control systems and establish a new baseline for future tests. This water will be recovered until ambient water quality conditions return. The 40 million gallon injection will then be repeated with de-oxygenated water, and the results will be compared to the prior cycle. Two large volume cycles, consisting of 300 million gallons (mg) of injection, will then be performed. A final report documenting the effectiveness of DO removal will be prepared at the end of cycle testing, which is expected in two years. New Activities Since Last Meeting: The City of Bradenton continues to prepare for implementation of the degasification testing program. During November, the following work was performed: bids for the construction of the degasification and dechlorination equipment were received and the low bid was within 10 percent of the estimated costs provided in the project budget; bid specifications for the facility site work were advertised, and the bid opening is scheduled for December 9; the first baseline 40 mg cycle test with oxygenated water was completed on November 20, and early water quality results are being reviewed by the TAC. A TAC status meeting was held on November 27. Project Manager: Don Ellison

Lower Hillsborough River MFL Recovery Strategy – Implementation At its August 28, 2007, meeting, the Governing Board established the minimum flow for the Lower Hillsborough River (LHR) by adoption of amendments to Rule 40D-8, Florida Administrative Code. As required by statute, if the actual flow of a water course is below the proposed minimum flow or is projected to fall below the proposed minimum flow over the next 20 years, a "recovery strategy" is developed as part of the minimum flow development process. In the case of the LHR, a recovery strategy was needed. The proposed recovery strategy was incorporated into Rule 40D-80 and approved by the Board at its August 28, 2007 meeting, as well. The recovery strategy includes a number of projects to divert water from various sources to help meet the minimum flow. Projects that are planned under the recovery strategy include diversions of water from , Blue Sink, the TBC, and Morris Bridge Sink. At its September meeting, the Board approved the transfer of $1,000,000 from reserves for installation of temporary pumping facilities on the TBC and at the dam on the lower Hillsborough River. Funds will go toward: 1) temporary pumping facilities expected to be in place by January 2008, 2) consultant to provide more permanent pumping facilities, and 3) consultant to look at the costs and design for moving water from the Morris Bridge Sink to the TBC. New Activities Since Last Meeting: Staff continues to move forward on the installation of the three temporary pumping facilities at the TBC and at the City of Tampa’s (City) reservoir. Staff anticipates having an engineering consultant on board after the first of the year to assist in the planning and design of the permanent pumping facility at Morris Bridge Sink. Temporary rental pumps will be mobilized to the two locations on the TBC and at the reservoir on December 15. The pumps will be tested on December 27 and will be operational by the January 1, 2008. The rental pumps will be replaced in approximately three months with the permanent pumps which will remain in place until October 2013. District staff met with City and Tampa Bay Water staff on October 23 to discuss operational considerations related to diverting water from the TBC to below the Hillsborough River reservoir. The City has provided the District with a draft license agreement related to access for the installation, operation, and maintenance of the temporary pumping facility near the City’s dam. It is anticipated the license agreement will have been executed by the District prior to December 15 so as not to delay mobilizing the temporary pump to the reservoir site. Legal staff from both the City and District are developing a scope of work for the peer review panelists. The feasibility analysis consists of the peer review of the projected water savings anticipated from construction of the Transmission Pipeline Project. Project Manager: Marty Kelly

Fire Activity As steward of over 300,000 acres of public conservation lands, the District is heavily involved in fire management, both prescribed fire and wildfire. The primary focus of the District’s fire

19 Item 59 management personnel and material resources is prescribed burning, resulting in an annual average of 25,000 acres burned. However, these resources are also responsible for the efficient response to wildfires that occur on District lands.

The District is a wildland fire cooperator with the Florida Division of Forestry (FDOF), the agency statutorily empowered to manage fire in the state. As such, the District’s fire management personnel and material resources provide support to the FDOF in the suppression of all wildfires that occur on District lands, and on larger fire incidents that occur on non-District lands within its 16-county jurisdiction. This relationship has been in place for many years and is highly successful.

The period fall through spring of 2006/2007 was among the driest on record, resulting in a very active wildfire season in Florida and on District lands. The following table summarizes 23 fires, totaling approximately 1,959 acres that occurred on District lands during the height of the wildfire season (May through July 2007).

FIRE DATE ACRES STATUS Potts Preserve 1 5-3-07 417 Out Deer Prairie Creek 5-4-07 140 Out Cypress Creek 5-5-07 <1 Out Starkey (1) 5-6-07 <1 Out Upper Hillsborough 5-7-07 120 Out Green Swamp West (Miller) 5-7-07 1 Out Green Swamp West (Tully) 5-7-07 550 Out Prairie Shell Creek 5-7-07 13 Out Flying Eagle 5-10-07 <1 Out Green Swamp East 5-12-07 3 Out RV Griffin Reserve 5-13-07 20 Out Deer Prairie Creek (Schewe) 5-14-07 3 Out Green Swamp West (Cedar) 5-15-07 220 Out Weekiwachee Preserve 5-18-07 100 Out Starkey (Longleaf) 6-07-07 42 Out Starkey (Crescent) 6-07-07 1 Out Potts Preserve (Dike) 6-07-07 3 Out Conner Preserve (Ehren) 6-23-07 118 Out Starkey (Echo) 6-26-07 90 Out Starkey (Rabbit) 6-26-07 77 Out Starkey (Little Pond) 6-26-07 9 Out Starkey (Cottee) 6-26-07 12 Out Green Swamp (Palm Tree) 7-01-07 <1 Out Starkey (Back Forty) 7-08-07 16 Out Conner Preserve (Open Road) 8-20-07 40 Monitoring Deep Creek 9-07-07 3 Out Starkey (Two Strikes) 9-10-07 20 Out

20 Item 59

New Activities Since Last Meeting: The month of November brought little rain, but surface conditions conducive to prescribed burning persisted on many District lands. Approximately 1,400 acres of prescribed burning was completed, and one wildfire totaling one acre was reported at Cypress Creek. The origin was an untended camp fire.

Land Resources Events Land Resources and Communication staff recently held an event in support of one our strategic initiatives to increase diversity and youth on conservation land education. On July 31, the Boys and Girls Club brought approximately 70 children to the Weekiwachee Preserve in Hernando County. Some of the older boys fished, while the remainder of the group was split in half. Land Resources staff led one group on a guided hike along one of the Preserve’s trails. Staff created an “I Spy” activity where the children had to find and identify plants, animals, and different species commonly found in a pine flatwoods ecosystem. Staff planted objects such as deer and raccoon skulls and tortoise shells along the trail to prompt discussion about the variety of wildlife that lives in the Preserve. Communication staff led the second group in a discussion about the importance of protecting the watershed and in a hands-on Project WET activity. On October 13, 2007, Land Resources staff set up a display table at the 13th Annual National Wildlife Refuge celebration held at the Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Complex in Crystal River. It is estimated that over 300 people were in attendance. On October 28, 2007, Land Resources staff held a volunteer work day at Lake Panasoffkee. Six volunteers attended and accomplished the tasks for the day which included mowing, trimming, reposting of approximately five miles of trails and removal of three fallen trees. Afterwards, lunch was served, and the volunteers hitched up the horses and enjoyed the cleared trails. New Activities Since Last Meeting: On November 10, 2007, Land Resources staff held a volunteer work day at the Serenova tract in the Starkey Wilderness Preserve in Pasco County. For approximately eight hours, five volunteers worked on lifting the tree canopy in the day use parking area, trimming trails and cleaning up two camp grounds. The following day, staff attended a Suncoast Trail Riders meeting to give a brief presentation and answer questions regarding recreation on District property. Also on November 10, another volunteer work day was held at the District’s Jack Creek property in Highlands County. Staff and four volunteers with the Ridge Rangers spent the day removing a dumpster full of trash and debris.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Bruce C. Wirth, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Resource Management and Development

21 Item 60

Resource Management & Development Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Watershed Management Program and Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization Status Report

District staff continues to work on various steps of the District’s Watershed Management Program and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map Modernization. Attached for the Board’s information is the current schedule that identifies the status of each watershed for the topographic information, watershed evaluation, watershed management plan, and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). The list also indicates whether the updated FIRMs will be a redelineation of the existing FIRMs or based on a detailed study.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Mark A. Hammond, Director, Resource Management Department

22 Exhibit - Watershed Management Program and FEMA Map Modernization Schedule December 2007

Topographic Information Year Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Watershed Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs Charlotte Effective 2003 Gannet Slough 2006 N.S. N.S. Gully 2006 N.S. N.S. Fordham/Niagra 2006 Complete Complete Little Alligator C N.S. Complete Complete Apollo/Jupiter Wtr N.S. N.S. N.S. Rock Creek 2 N.S. N.S. N.S. Big Slough Canal 2006 N.S. N.S. Prairie Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Myrtle Slough 2 2006 N.S. N.S. Prairie Creek 2006 N.S. N.S.

23 Shell Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Lee Branch 2006 N.S. N.S. DR to Myakka River 2006 Complete Complete Deep Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Sam Knight Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. DR to Peace River 2006 N.S. N.S. Como Waterway N.S. N.S. N.S. Cypress Slough 2006 N.S. N.S. Deep Creek Subdiv. 2006 N.S. N.S. Rainey Slough 2006 N.S. N.S. Pellam/Auburn Wtrw 2006 Complete Complete Myrtle Slough 1 2006 N.S. N.S. Jacks Branch 2006 N.S. N.S. Unnamed Ditch 2006 N.S. N.S. Cleveland Cem Ditch 2006 N.S. N.S. Rock Creek Ditch 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Peace River 2006 N.S. N.S. Broad Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Rock Creek 2006 N.S. N.S.

Page 1 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Watershed Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Telegraph Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Lemon Bay Gulf 2006 N.S. N.S. DR to Bay N.S. N.S. N.S. Oyster Creek N.S. Complete Complete N. Fork Alligator Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Punta Gorda Isles 2006 N.S. N.S. Punta Gorda Isles 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Lemon Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. N. Prong Alligator 2006 N.S. N.S. Mangrove Point Canal 2006 N.S. N.S. Buck Creek N.S. N.S. N.S.

24 Gator Slough Canal 2006 N.S. N.S. Daugherty Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Alligator Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Lemon Bay Gulf 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Lemon Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. Coral Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. DR To Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. Whidden Branch 2006 N.S. N.S. Whidden Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Catfish Creek Bayou 2006 N.S. N.S. Pirate Canal 2006 N.S. N.S. Unnamed Canal 1 2006 N.S. N.S. Trout Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Cypress Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Mound Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Gasparilla Sound 2006 N.S. N.S. Winegourd Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Bay 2006 N.S. N.S.

Page 2 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Watershed Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Popash Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Boggess Hole Outflow 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. Spanish Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Yucca Pen Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Gasparilla Sound 2006 N.S. N.S. Bear Branch 2006 N.S. N.S. Stroud Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Powell Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Lee County Creek 1 2006 N.S. N.S. Lee Cnty Creek 2 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Gasparilla

25 Sound 2006 N.S. N.S. DR To Peace River 2006 Dec-07 Dec-08 DR to Peace River 2006 N.S. N.S. DR to Peace River 2006 N.S. N.S. Venus Waterway N.S. N.S. N.S. DR To Myakka River 2006 N.S. N.S. Direct Runoff To Bay 2006 N.S. N.S. Gottfried Creek 2006 N.S. N.S. Unnamed 2006 N.S. N.S.

Note: FIRMs for Charlotte County were effective as of 2003, and not part of the District's work with FEMA

Citrus September 2010 Lower Withlacoochee River 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Red Level 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Withlacoochee River 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Withlacoochee River 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Withlacoochee River 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation North of Barge Canal 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Page 3 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Crystal River 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Tsala Apopka Outlet 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Shinn Ditch 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Ozello 2004 N.S.N.S. Redelineation Homosassa South Fork 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Leslie Heifner Canal 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Cardinal Lane 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Chassahowitzka River 2004 Apr-09 Jun-11 Detailed Lizzie Hart Sink 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation McKethan Lake Outlet 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Bradley 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Floral City 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed

26 Inverness 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Center Ridge 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Homosassa River - South 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Homosassa River - North 2004 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed DeSoto January 2009 Big Slough 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Horse Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Limestone Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hampton Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Walker Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Peace River 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Thornton Branch 2005 Feb-08 Dec-08 Detailed Lee Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Deep Creek Gully 2005 Dec-07 Dec-08 Detailed Bear Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Sand Gully 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Mare Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation McBride Slough 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Joshua Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Page 4 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Fish Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Oak Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Prairie Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Prairie Creek (2 x 4 Ranch) 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Oak Hill Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Peace River North 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Peace River South 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hardee March 2009 Horse Creek 2005 Feb-08 Dec-08 Detailed Big Slough 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Payne Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hog Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

27 Peace River 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Charlie Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Troublesome Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hickory Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Oak Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Limestone Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bear Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Little Charlie Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Max Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Unnamed Stream 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hickory Stream 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Alligator Branch 2005 Dec-07 Dec-08 Detailed Buzzards Roost Run 2005 Feb-08 Dec-08 Redelineation Thompson Branch 2005 Dec-07 Dec-08 Detailed Sand Gully 2005 N.S. N.S. Detailed Hernando December 2008 Centralia 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Chassahowitzka River 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Lizzie Hart Sink 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed

Page 5 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

McKethan 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Withlacoochee River 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Tooke 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Wiscon 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Blue Sink 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Croom 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Oman Quarry 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Spring Hill Lakes 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Willow Sink 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Peck Sink 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Bystre Lake 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Indian Creek 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed

28 Aripeka 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Weeki Wachee Prairie 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Powell 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Crews Lake Outlet 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Squirrel Prairie 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Toachodka 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Little Withlacoochee 2007 Complete Sep-08 Detailed Highlands TBD Old Town Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Grassy Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bonnet Creek 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bee Branch 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Carter Creek 2005 Dec-07 Dec-08 Detailed Little Red Water Lake 2005 Dec-07 Dec-08 Detailed Little Charley Bowlegs 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Josephine Creek 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Lucas 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Yellow Bluff Creek 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Fish Eating Creek 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Page 6 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Lake Francis Outlet 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Grassy Creek 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bay Swamp 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Highlands/SFWMD 1988 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Note: The schedule for Preliminary FIRMs is being developed.

Hillsborough December 2006 Brooker Creek Complete Complete Complete Double Branch Creek Complete Complete Dec-07 Rocky/ Brushy Creek Complete N.S. N.S. Sweetwater Creek Complete N.S. N.S.

29 Lower Sweetwater Creek Complete N.S. N.S. Pemberton Creek/Baker Canal 2007 N.S. N.S. Duck Pond Area Complete Complete Complete Silver/ Twin Lakes 2007 N.S. N.S. East Lake Area Complete Complete Complete Delaney/Archie/North Archie Cr Complete N.S. N.S. Curiosity Creek Complete Complete Complete Cypress Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Hillsborough River 2007 Dec-08 Oct-09 Tampa Bypass Canal 2007 Dec-08 Oct-09 Alafia River 2007 Aug-08 Aug-09 Bullfrog Creek/Wolf Branch 2007 N.S. N.S. Little Manatee River 2007 N.S. N.S. ANCLOTE 2007 N.S.N.S. Fish Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Lemmon Street Ditch Complete N.S. N.S. Drain Complete N.S. N.S. Payne Creek Complete N.S. N.S.

Note: Hillsborough County and FEMA produced the Preliminary FIRMs.

Page 7 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Lake Effective 2002 Big Prairie 2007 Aug-08 Aug-09 Little Withlacoochee River 2007 N.S. N.S. Devils Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Tanic Road Slough 2007 N.S. N.S. Withlacoochee River 2007 N.S. N.S. Green Pond Drain 2007 N.S. N.S. Unnamed Ditch 2007 N.S. N.S. Unnamed Drain 2007 N.S. N.S. Little Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Lake/SJRWMD 2007 N.S.N.S.

30 Note: FIRMs for Lake County were effective as of 2002, and not part of the District's work with FEMA

Levy TBD East Bronson Drains N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Priest Prairie Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Stafford N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Spring Run N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Turtle Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Demory Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Withlacoochee River N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Barge Canal N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bell Branch N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Blue Run N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Rt. 337 Corridor N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Levy/SRWMD N.S. N.S.N.S. Redelineation

Note: The schedule for Preliminary FIRMs is being developed.

Page 8 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Manatee 2012 Anna Maria Isl. N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Big Chimney Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Big Slough N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bowlees Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Canal Rd Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Carr Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Cedar Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Cedar Hammock N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Cooper Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Frog Creek 2007 Complete Jun-08 Detailed

31 Gamble Creek 2007 Dec-07 Oct-08 Detailed Glen Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Government Hammock N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Horse Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Manatee N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Little Manatee River 2007 Mar-09 Mar-11 Detailed Longboat Key N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lower Braden R N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lower Manatee Dir. N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Manatee Mouth Dir. N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Manatee River W N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Mcmullen Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Middle Braden N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Middle Manatee R N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Mill Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Myakka N.S. N.S.N.S. Redelineation Palma Sola Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Pearce Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Rattlesnake Slough N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Sarasota Bay N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Page 9 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Sugar House Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Tpa Gap Drain N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Tpa_Terra Direct N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Upper Braden R N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Williams Creek N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Deer Prairie Slough N.S. N.S. N.S. Redelineation Marion 2006 Priest Prairie Drain 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Flemington 2003 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Blichton 2003 Complete Dec-07 Detailed West Ocala 2003 May-08 Feb-09 Redelineation Lake Stafford South 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

32 Lake Stafford East 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hog Prairie 2003 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Cotton Plant 1 2003 Complete Dec-07 Detailed SR200 2003 Complete Dec-07 Detailed SR200 (Martel) 2003 Complete Dec-07 Detailed Northwest Ocala 2003 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Cotton Plant 2 2003 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Cotton Plant 3 2003 Jun-08 Jun-10 Detailed Blue Run 2003 Complete Dec-07 Redelineation Withlacoochee River 2003 Complete Dec-09 Redelineation East Bronson 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bell Branch 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Turner Creek 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Gum Swamp 2003 May-08 Feb-09 Redelineation Big Jones Creek 2003 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Withlacoochee Region 2003 Complete Dec-09 Detailed Withlacoochee River 2 2003 Complete Dec-09 Redelineation Pasco TBD Hammock Creek 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Bear Creek 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed

Page 10 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs Pithlachascottee River 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Upper Pithlachascottee 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Double Hammock 2004 Mar-09 Mar-10 Redelineation Lower Coastal 2004 Mar-09 Mar-10 Redelineation Pinellas Anclote 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Squirrel Prairie 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Cypress Creek 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed South Lakes 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed North Lakes 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Blanton Lake 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Upper East Cypress Creek 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Duck Lake 2004 May-08 May-09 Redelineation East Zephyrhills 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed Aug-08

33 Lake Zephyr 2004 Complete Detailed Upper Withlaccoochee River 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Upper Hillsborough River 2004 May-08 May-09 Redelineation New River 2004 May-08 May-09 Redelineation Trout Creek 2004 Complete Aug-08 Detailed

Note: Schedule for updating the watershed management plans and FIRMs is being developed.

Pinellas Effective 2005 Anclote River 2007 N.S. N.S. Klosterman Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Lake Tarpon 2007 Dec-09 Dec-10 Brooker Creek 2007 Complete Dec-08 Oldsmar 2007 N.S.N.S. South Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Sutherland Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Smith Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Cedar Creek 2007 Complete Complete Curlew Creek 2007 Complete Complete Possum Branch 2007 N.S. N.S.

Page 11 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs

Bishops Creek 2007 Complete Complete Mullet Creek 2007 Complete Complete Alligator Creek 2007 Complete Complete Spring Branch 2007 Complete Complete Coastal Zone 4 2007 N.S. N.S. Coastal Zone 2007 N.S. N.S. Stevensons Creek 2007 Complete Complete Allens Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Coastal Zone 2 2007 N.S. N.S. Coastal Zone 3 2007 N.S. N.S. Long Branch 2007 N.S. N.S. Roosevelt 2007 Dec-07 Dec-08

34 Cross Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Starkey Road 2007 Dec-09 Dec-10 Lake Seminole 2007 Complete Jun-08 McKay Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Coastal Zone 5 2007 N.S. N.S. Pinellas Pk. Ditch 2007 N.S. N.S. Sawgrass Lake 2007 N.S. N.S. Tinney Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. N.E. St. Petersburg 2007 N.S. N.S. 70th Ave. N. Canal 2007 N.S. N.S. 54th Ave. E. Canal 2007 N.S. N.S. Joes Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Long Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Pasadena Lake 2007 N.S. N.S. S.W. St. Petersburg 2007 N.S. N.S. Bear Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Booker Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. N. Coffee Pot Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. 45 Ave. N. E Ave 2007 N.S. N.S. Coffee Pot Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S.

Page 12 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs Albert Whitted 2007 N.S. N.S. 34th Street 2007 N.S. N.S. Clam Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Gulfport 2007 N.S.N.S. Frenchmans Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Lk Maggiore/Salt Cr 2007 N.S. N.S. Big Bayou 2007 N.S. N.S. Little Bayou Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Pinellas Point 2007 N.S. N.S.

Note: FIRMs for Pinellas County were effective as of 2006, and not part of the District's work with FEMA.

Polk December 2008

35 Gator Creek 2005 Complete Complete Detailed Pony Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Big Creek West 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Big Creek East 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Reedy Creek 2005 Dec-09 Dec-10 Redelineation Blackwater Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Saddle Creek 2005 Complete Complete Detailed Lake Lulu -PCDC 2005 Dec-07 Sep-08 Detailed Lake Hamilton -PCDC 2005 Dec-07 Sep-08 Detailed Lake Pierce 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Itchepackesassa Creek 2005 Complete Complete Detailed Poley Creek/North Alafia 2005 Complete Complete Detailed McCullough Creek 2005 Dec-10 Dec-10 Redelineation Peace Creek Drainage Canal 2005 Dec-07 Sep-08 Detailed Lake Weohyakapka 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Hookers Prairie/South Alafia 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Little Payne Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bowlegs Creek 2005 Dec-09 Dec-10 Redelineation Crooked Lake 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Reedy 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Page 13 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs Livingston Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Charlie Creek 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Polk City 2005 Dec-07 Dec-08 Detailed Lake Hatchineha 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Kissimmee 2005 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Sarasota TBD Island Of Venice 2004 Complete Jun-08 Detailed Whitaker Bayou 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Hudson Bayou 2004 Complete Jun-08 Detailed Phillippi Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Matheny Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Holiday/Elligraw/Clower 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Catfish Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Redelineation 36 North Creek 2004 Complete TBD South Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Shakett/Fox/Cow Pen 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Curry Creek 2004 Complete Jun-08 Detailed Hatchett Creek 2004 Complete Jun-08 Detailed Alligator Creek 2004 Complete Jun-08 Detailed Woodmere Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Forked Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Gottfried Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Ainger Creek 2004 Complete TBD Redelineation Braden River 2004 Complete Dec-07 Redelineation Myakka River 2004 Aug-08 Dec-09 Redelineation Little Salt Creek 2004 Aug-08 Dec-09 Redelineation Deer Prairie Slough 2004 Aug-08 Dec-09 Redelineation Big Slough Canal 2004 Complete Complete Detailed Upper Myakka River 2004 Aug-08 Dec-09 Redelineation Oyster Creek 2004 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Note: Schedule for updating the watershed management plans and FIRMs is being developed.

Page 14 of 15 Topographic Information Year Watershed Watershed FEMA Study Watershed Acquired Evaluation Management Plan Type Countywide Preliminary FIRMs Sumter TBD Withlacoochee River 2007 Oct-08 Feb-09 Detailed Gum Swamp 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Big Jones Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lady Lake 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Half Moon 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Miona 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Little Jones Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Deaton 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Robinson Lake 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Outlet River 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Shady Brook 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Lake Okahumpka 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

37 Helena Run 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Big Prairie 2007 Aug-08 Aug-09 Detailed Clearwater Lake 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Jumper Creek Canal 2007 Aug-08 Aug-09 Detailed Gum Slough 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Bushnell 2007 Complete Nov-08 Detailed Webster 2007 Complete Complete Detailed Gant Lake 2007 Aug-08 Aug-09 Detailed Little Withlacoochee 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Gator Hole Slough 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation Devils Creek 2007 N.S. N.S. Redelineation

Note: The schedule for Preliminary FIRMs is being developed.

L:\Res Mgmt\Eng\LIBRARY\WMP Status\Recaps-Exhibits\Exhibit.doc

Page 15 of 15 Item 61

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Florida Forever Funding Status Report

Purpose No Board action is required. This item is submitted for information purposes only.

Background/History Attached for the Board’s use and information is the monthly funding status report for the Florida Forever program. The projects have been categorized as acquisitions or projects for: restoration; capital improvements for restoration; water resource development; and preservation. In addition to Florida Forever funding, staff continues to explore all funding opportunities.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Eric Sutton, Assistant Director, Land Resources Department

38 Southwest Florida Water Management District Florida Forever Status

Fee LTF Governing Parcel/Project Funds Available Estimated Cost Acres Acres Comments Bd Date Florida Forever Funds Available -- Inception to Includes $13,170,753 from the Water Management Lands Trust Fund Date $ 226,353,472 and $3,182,719 from the P2000 Trust Fund

Completed Acquisitions Panasoffkee/Outlet Tract - Gibbons (19-441-105) 74,758 10 Closed 01/18/2001 Annutteliga Hammock (mega parcels) 205,744 38 Closed between 08/09/2001 and 02/09/2005 - 23 parcels Weekiwachee Preserve - Wooley (15-773-168) 869,732 65 Closed 10/04/2001 Weekiwachee Preserve - Jones (15-773-121) 317,785 54 Closed 10/12/2001 Weekiwachee Preserve - Leahon (15-773-180) 42,933 49 Closed 03/13/2002 RV Griffin Reserve - Longino (21-599-102C) 1,188,231 3,802 Closed 07/18/2002 - used P2000 & Florida Forever funds Annutteliga Hammock - Strait (15-228-1204) 179,200 32 Closed 07/22/2002 Green Swamp - Distefano (10-200-1242) 1,125 3 Closed 08/09/2002

Tampa Bay - Furtick (21-728-121) 830,000 127 Closed 12/30/2002 Prairie/Shell Creek - Burchers (20-649-105) 254,016 108 Closed 01/16/2003 Prairie/Shell Creek - Leonard (20-649-104) 85,036 40 Closed 01/16/2003 Alafia River Corridor - Fish Hawk (11-709-131) 4,800,000 899 Closed 02/06/2003 - used P2000 & Florida Forever funds Myakka River - Eagle Ridge (21-708-126) 1,670,269 997 Closed 02/07/2003

Lake Pretty - Robinson (14-009-108) 60,000 3 Closed 03/27/2003 Weekiwachee Preserve - GMB Investments (15- 773-183) 422,000 56 Closed 05/28/2003 - used WMLTF funds 39

Tampa Bay - Kushmer (11-728-108) 82,500 16 Closed 07/18/2003

Tampa Bay - Pine Island (21-728-118) 450,000 86 Closed 08/09/2003

Lake Panasoffkee - Beville (19-528-135) 1,840,000 525 Closed 09/18/2003 - used WMLTF funds Lake Panasoffkee - Beville (19-528-135C) 4,160,000 5,553 Closed 09/18/2003 - used WMLTF funds Annutteliga Hammock - 1029 Land Trust (15-228- 1207) 1,087,200 288 Closed 09/24/2003 Pasco 1 - Connerton (15-704-102) 9,792,677 2,981 507 Closed 09/29/2003 Lake Hancock - Old Florida Plantation (20-502- 101) 30,500,000 3,535 Closed 11/21/2003

Tampa Bay - TECO (11-728-110) 1,713,572 2,347 Closed 12/11/2003

Tampa Bay - Huber (21-728-105) 3,287,657 102 Closed 12/18/2003 Panasoffkee/Outlet Tract - Lake Panasoffkee Water Assoc. (19-441-107) 57,000 6 Closed 08/18/2004

Annutteliga Hammock - Kalathakis (15-228-1268) 90,000 16 Closed 09/23/2004 Green Swamp - Davis (10-200-1238) 10,500 25 Closed 10/13/2004 Lake Manatee Lower Watershed - Strickland (21- 601-111C) 225,180 25 Closed 11/16/2004

Tampa Bay - Shell Pit (11-728-109) 395,672 147 Closed 12/02/2004 Flying Eagle - Boy Scouts (19-334-133) 13,500,000 5,484 Closed 12/14/2004

11/28/2007 Page 1 of 3 Southwest Florida Water Management District Florida Forever Status

Fee LTF Governing Parcel/Project Funds Available Estimated Cost Acres Acres Comments Bd Date Green Swamp - Beck (10-200-1246) 11,250 15 Closed 12/14/2004 - used P2000 funds

Lake Hancock - Griffin (20-503-105) $ 4,900,000 213 Closed 12/30/2004 Weekiwachee Preserve - Suncoast Seabird Sancturary (15-773-128) 625,139 309 Closed 12/30/2004 Annutteliga Hammock - Rush (15-228-1280) 278,480 40 Closed 02/09/2005 Lower Peace River Corridor - McLeod (20-695- 101) 309,550 62 Closed 02/09/2005 Green Swamp West - Little Everglades Ranch (19- 410-120C) 3,784,550 1,792 Closed 02/11/2005 Myakka River - LOR, Inc. (21-708-125) 7,999,807 3,319 Closed 03/18/2005 - used WMLTF & Florida Forever funds Green Swamp - Jones (10-200-1251) 2,200 3 Closed 05/31/2005 Green Swamp - Glass (10-200-1254) 200,000 20 Closed 06/01/2005

Lake Hancock - Coscia and Nguyn (20-503-102) 5,225,000 590 Closed 08/04/2005 Green Swamp East - Crowell (10-200-1237) 2,500 4 Closed 2/16/2006 Closed 5/31/2006 - used WMLTF, Florida Forever, Polk Co. and State Green Swamp East - Overstreet (10-200-1145) 24,101,645 5,067 funds Flying Eagle - Keough (19-334-137) 25,535 20 Closed 10/12/2006

Lake Hancock - Kent (20-503-122) 3,726,950 370 Closed 10/26/2006 Green Swamp - Raulerson (10-200-1258) 400,000 20 Closed 04/13/2007 40 Annutteliga Hamock - O'Brien (15-228-1288) 87,000 3 Closed 07/13/2007 Annutteliga Hamock - Tyte (15-228-1287) 570,000 30 Closed 07/13/2007

Lake Hancock - Powell (20-503-152) 30,000 2 Closed 07/26/2007

Lower Hillsborough FDA - Guerard (13-300-110) 1,750,000 70 Closed 09/06/2007 Green Swamp West - Barnes (19-410-123C) 1,125,000 300 Closed 10/30/2007 Gum Slough - King/Phebus (19-193-195) 94,500 35 Closed 11/25/2007 Subtotal Completed Parcels/Projects $ 133,441,893 28,232 11,979 Subtotal Funds Available $ 92,911,579 Parcels/Projects Approved By Board (Funds Encumbered within DEP Trust Fund)

Myakkahatchee Creek - Carlton (21-694-101C) 20,700,000 4,746 7,630 Anticipte closing by 12/31/2007 Nov-07 Myakka Prairie - Harrison (21-199-109) 818,490 663 Anciticpate closing after 1/1/2008 Jul-07

South Saddle Creek Restoration and Water Quality Treatment Project $ 13,435,446 N/A N/A Funds encumbered Subtotal Parcels/Projects Approved By Board $ 34,953,936 4,746 8,293 Subtotal Funds Available $ 57,957,643 Ongoing Acquisitions/Projects

Lake Hancock - Hampton (20-503-103) 2,036 Appraisals being obtained through District's outside counsel TBD Upper Peace River - Clear Springs, LLC (20-502- 107) 1,900 Clear Springs preparing Sector Plan TBD

11/28/2007 Page 2 of 3 Southwest Florida Water Management District Florida Forever Status

Fee LTF Governing Parcel/Project Funds Available Estimated Cost Acres Acres Comments Bd Date 50/50 partnership with Hillsborough County; working on interlocal Alafia River Corridor - Gooch (11-709-112) 750 agreement; Hillsborough County has acquired parcel Feb-07

Lake Panasoffkee - Patterson (19-528-112) 1 Owner declined cleanup; Sumter Co. Code Enforcement involved TBD Lower Manatee River Floodway - Green (21-602- 110) 43 Preparing offer TBD Lower Manatee River Floodway - Potter (21-602- 111) 21 Reevaluating; further discussions with Manatee County necessary TBD Potts Preserve - Goodgame (19-484-123) 20 Received appraisal; preparing exchange offer Feb-07 Weekiwachee Preserve - Aripeka Heights (15-773- 50/50 partnership with Pasco County; County acquired the parcel in 143) 210 November Dec-07 Tampa Bay Estuarine Ecosystem - Amerson (21- 728-124) 20 On hold until State determines partnership status TBD Tampa Bay Estuarine Ecosystem - Bascom (21- 728-125) 6 On hold until State determines partnership status TBD Subtotal Ongoing Acquisitions/Projects $ 92,165,000 5,007 - Grand Total $ (34,207,357) $ 260,560,829 37,985 20,272 Note that projected monies to be spent exceed current funding. This is due to the fact that not all acquisitions will be consummated since the District’s acquisition program is opportunity- driven and primarily voluntary. 41

11/28/2007 Page 3 of 3 Item 62

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Minimum Flows and Levels Status Report

District staff continues to work on various phases of Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) development for waterbodies on the District's MFLs priority list. Attached for the Board's use and information is the current Minimum Flows and Levels Priority List and Schedule – Waterbody Timelines report that identifies the status of each waterbody in regard to our five phase process of MFL establishment.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Martin H. Kelly, Ph.D., Interim Director, Resource Conservation & Development Department

42 Board Adopted 2008 Priority List Schedule and Timeline Exhibit A

RIVERS, SPRINGS and ESTUARIES

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Data Collection Data Analysis Rpt to Board / Peer Review Recovery Rule Adoption & Internal Draft MFL Report Strategy 2007 Braden River System (freshwater) completed completed completed NA Dec 2007

Upper Hillsborough River System completed completed completed NTB/Aug 2000 Dec 2007 Crystal Spring completed completed completed NTB/Aug 2000 Dec 2007 2008 Alafia River System (estuary) completed completed completed / Jan 2008 TBD Apr 2008 Buckhorn Spring completed completed completed TBD Apr 2008 Lithia Spring completed completed completed TBD Apr 2008

Anclote River System completed Apr 2008 May 2008 / Aug 2008 TBD Nov 2008

Blind Springs Feb 2008 May 2008 Jun 2008 / Sep 2008 TBD Dec 2008

Chassahowitzka River System Feb 2008 May 2008 Jun 2008 / Sep 2008 TBD Dec 2008 Chassahowitzka Spring et al. Feb 2008 May 2008 Jun 2008 / Sep 2008 TBD Dec 2008

Cow Pen Slough/Canal completed completed Mar 2008 / Jun 2008 TBD Sep 2008

Little Manatee River System completed May 2008 Jun 2008 / Sep 2008 TBD Dec 2008

Lower Myakka River System completed Apr 2008 May 2008 / Aug 2008 TBD Nov 2008

Lower Peace River Estuary completed completed completed / Feb 2008 NA May 2008

Manatee River System completed Apr 2008 May 2008 / Aug 2008 TBD Nov 2008

Weekiwachee River System completed completed Feb 2008 / May 2008 NA Aug 2008 Weeki Wachee Spring et al. completed completed Feb 2008 / May 2008 NA Aug 2008 2009 Homosassa River System Jan 2009 May 2009 Jul 2009 / Oct 2009 TBD Nov 2009 Homosassa Spring Jan 2009 May 2009 Jul 2009 / Oct 2009 TBD Nov 2009

Rainbow Springs Jan 2009 May 2009 Jul 2009 / Oct 2009 TBD Nov 2009

Middle Withlacoochee River System Jan 2009 May 2009 Jul 2009 / Oct 2009 TBD Nov 2009 Upper Withlacoochee River System Jan 2009 May 2009 Jul 2009 / Oct 2009 TBD Nov 2009 (Green Swamp) 2010 Crystal River System Jan 2010 May 2010 Jul 2010 / Oct 2010 TBD Nov 2010 Kings Bay Spring Jan 2010 May 2010 Jul 2010 / Oct 2010 TBD Nov 2010

Gum Springs Group Jan 2010 May 2010 Jul 2010 / Oct 2010 TBD Nov 2010

Hidden River Springs 1 and 2 Jan 2010 May 2010 Jul 2010 / Oct 2010 TBD Nov 2010

Northern Tampa Bay - Phase II Jan 2010 May 2010 Jul 2010 / Oct 2010 TBD Nov 2010

Pithlachascotee River System Jan 2010 May 2010 Jul 2010 / Oct 2010 TBD Nov 2010 2011 Lower Withlacoochee River System Jan 2011 May 2011 Jul 2011 / Oct 2011 TBD Nov 2011

Brooker Creek Jan 2011 May 2011 Jul 2011 / Oct 2011 TBD Nov 2011

Upper Peace River Jan 2011 May 2011 Jul 2011 / Oct 2011 TBD Nov 2011 "Middle" and "High" Minimum Flows 2012 Charlie Creek (Peace River drainage) Jan 2012 May 2012 Jul 2012 / Oct 2012 TBD Nov 2012 Horse Creek (Peace River drainage) Jan 2012 May 2012 Jul 2012 / Oct 2012 TBD Nov 2012

North Prong Alafia River Jan 2012 May 2012 Jul 2012 / Oct 2012 TBD Nov 2012 South Prong Alafia River Jan 2012 May 2012 Jul 2012 / Oct 2012 TBD Nov 2012

At the Board's direction, staff have added projected dates on which: we expect to have internal draft reports complete, presentation of draft to Board, report of peer review to Board, and return for rule establishment.

Updated Nov 30, 2007

43 Board Adopted 2008 Priority List Schedule and Timeline Exhibit A LAKES

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Data Collection Data Analysis Peer Review Recovery Rule Adoption & Draft MFL Report Strategy 2007 Highlands County Lakes Angelo completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Anoka completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Denton completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Placid completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Tulane completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Verona completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Pasco County Lakes Linda completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 King completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 King (East) completed completed NA completed Dec 2007 Polk County Lakes Crooked completed completed NA completed Dec 2007

2008 Hillsborough County Lakes Raleigh completed Aug 2008 completed completed Dec 2008 Rogers completed Aug 2008 completed completed Dec 2008 Starvation completed Aug 2008 completed completed Dec 2008 Wimauma June 2008 Aug 2008 NA TBD Dec 2008 Polk County Lakes Hancock completed Aug 2008 NA completed Dec 2008

Updated Nov 30, 2007

44 Board Adopted 2008 Priority List Schedule and Timeline Exhibit A

Minimum Flows and Levels Established to Date

ƒ Alafia River (upper freshwater segment)

ƒ Citrus County Lakes (Ft. Cooper, Tsala Apopka – Floral City, Inverness and Hernando Pools)

ƒ Hernando County Lakes - Hunters, Lindsey, Mountain, Neff, Spring and Weekiwachee Prairie

ƒ Highland County Lakes - Jackson, Little Lake Jackson, June-in-Winter, Letta and Lotela

ƒ Hillsborough County Lakes – Alice, Allen, Barbara, Bird, Brant, Calm, Charles, Church, Crenshaw, Crescent, Crystal, Cypress, Dan, Deer, Dosson, Echo, Ellen, Fairy [Maurine], Garden, Halfmoon, Harvey, Helen, Hobbs, Horse, Jackson, Juanita, Little Moon, Merrywater, Mound, Platt, Pretty, Rainbow, Reinheimer, Round, Saddleback, Sapphire, Stemper, Strawberry, Sunset, Sunshine, Taylor and Virginia.

ƒ Hillsborough River (lower segment)

ƒ Levy County Lake (Marion)

ƒ Peace River (middle segment)

ƒ Peace River (upper segment – "low" minimum flows)

ƒ Northern Tampa Bay - 41 Wetland sites

ƒ Northern Tampa Bay – 7 Wells – Floridan Aquifer/Saltwater Intrusion

ƒ Pasco County Lakes – Bell, Big Fish, Bird, Buddy, Camp, Clear, Crews, Green, Hancock, Iola, Jessamine, Middle, Moon, Padgett, Parker aka Ann, Pasadena, Pasco, Pierce, unnamed #22 aka Loyce

ƒ Polk County Lakes – Annie, Bonnie, Clinch, Dinner, Eagle, Lee, Mabel, McLeod, Parker, Starr, Venus, and Wales

ƒ Myakka River (upper freshwater segment)

ƒ Sulphur Springs

ƒ Sumter County Lakes – Big Gant, Black, Deaton, Miona, Okahumpka and Panasoffkee

ƒ SWUCA – Floridan Aquifer

ƒ Tampa Bypass Canal

Updated Nov 30, 2007

45 Item 63

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Hydrologic Conditions Status Report

This routine report provides information on the general state of the District's hydrologic conditions, by comparing rainfall, surface water, and groundwater levels for the current month to comparable data from the historical record. The data shown are typically considered final, fully verified monthly values, but occasionally, due to timing of publication, some data are identified as "provisional," meaning that the values shown are best estimates based on incomplete data. The information presented below is a summary of data presented in much greater detail in the Hydrologic Conditions Report published the week before the Governing Board meeting, which also includes an updated provisional summary of hydrologic conditions as of the date of publication. It is available at http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us/waterres/hydro/hydro.htm.

Rainfall Provisional rainfall totals (as of November 28) were below-normal for all three regions of the District. The normal range is defined as rainfall totals that fall on or between the 25th to 75th percentiles derived from the historical data for each month x The northern region received an average of 0.36 inch of rainfall, equivalent to the 10th percentile. x The central region received 0.35 inch of rainfall, equivalent to the 14th percentile. x The southern region recorded an average of 0.18 inch of rain, equivalent to the 3rd percentile. x The average rainfall District-wide was 0.29 inch, equivalent to the 5th percentile.

Streamflow Provisional streamflow (as of November 26) decreased in the all three regions of the District, compared to last month. Streamflow was also below normal in the northern and southern regions, while it was within the normal range in the central region of the District. Normal streamflow is defined as falling between the 25th and 75th percentiles. x The average streamflow in the Withlacoochee River near Holder in the northern region was in the 3rd percentile. x The average streamflow measured in the Hillsborough River near Zephyrhills in the central region was in the 26th percentile. x The average streamflow measured in the Peace River at Arcadia in the southern region was in the 2nd percentile.

Groundwater Levels Groundwater data (as of November 27), relative to the Aquifer Resource Index, indicate levels in the Floridan/Intermediate aquifer decreased in the all three regions of the District, compared to last month. Groundwater levels in the northern and southern counties were below the normal range, while the central counties were within the normal range of historic monthly values. x The average groundwater level in the northern counties decreased 0.49 foot and was 0.63 foot below the bottom of the monthly normal range of historical values. The normal range in the northern region is 0 to 4 feet. x The average groundwater level in the central counties decreased 0.98 foot but was 0.93 foot above the bottom of the normal range. The normal range in the central counties is 0 to 6 feet. x The average groundwater level in the southern counties decreased 2.89 feet and was 0.89 foot below the bottom of the normal range. The normal range in the southern counties is 0 to 8 feet.

46 Item 63

Lake Levels Lake levels decreased in the all four regions of the District during November. On a regional basis, average lake levels ended the month below the base of the annual normal range. Normal lake levels are generally considered levels that fall between the minimum low management level and the minimum flood level. x Average levels in the Northern region decreased 0.22 foot and were 3.66 feet below the base of the annual normal range. x Average lake levels in the Tampa Bay region decreased 0.36 foot and were 1.72 feet below the base of the annual normal range. x Average lake levels in the Polk Uplands region decreased 0.29 foot and were 1.55 feet below the base of the annual normal range. x Average lake levels in the Lake Wales Ridge region decreased 0.33 foot and were 3.75 feet below the base of the annual normal range.

Issues of Significance The District is now two months into the 8-month dry season. The twelve-month District-wide rainfall deficit is about 10.8 inches below the long-term average and has remained below- average for 19 consecutive months. Provisional rainfall totals for the first 28 days of November are again significantly below normal.

Hydrologic indicators remain well below normal throughout the most of the District, and are continuing to decline. Lake levels in the Polk Uplands and Lake Wales Ridge regions are already lower than they were at the end of the last dry season.

As of November 27, the US Drought Monitor indicates part of Highlands, Desoto, and Charlotte Counties are still experiencing "severe drought" conditions, while the remainder of the District continues to experience "abnormally dry" or "moderate drought" conditions. NOAA climate forecasts predict below-normal rainfall through May 2008, as La Niña conditions in the Pacific Ocean appear to be strengthening. Below-normal rainfall will worsen overall hydrologic conditions and could increase resource-related impacts during the coming dry season.

Updated weather forecasts will be available in mid-December. Staff will continue to closely monitor conditions in accordance with the District's updated Water Shortage Plan, including any necessary supplemental analysis of condition data.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Granville Kinsman, Manager, Hydrologic Data Section

47 Item 64

Resource Management and Development Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Structure Operations Status Report

Structure Operations continues to focus on conserving water. NOAA climate forecasts are predicting below-normal rainfall for the month of December. NOAA forecasts a continuation of this "below-normal" trend for December 2007 through May 2008, based on indications that La Niña conditions in the Pacific Ocean will continue to strengthen. Below normal rainfall during the dry season would worsen overall hydrologic conditions and could increase resource-related impacts during the coming dry season. The US Drought Monitor (11/27/07 edition) indicates part of Highlands, Desoto, and Charlotte Counties are experiencing "severe drought" conditions, while the remainder of the District continues to experience "moderate drought" conditions.

Rainfall Provisional rainfall totals (as of November 28) were below-normal for all three regions of the District. The normal range is defined as rainfall totals that fall on or between the 25th to 75th percentiles derived from the historical data for each month x The northern region received an average of 0.36 inch of rainfall, equivalent to the 10th ercentile. x The central region received 0.35 inch of rainfall, equivalent to the 14th percentile. x The southern region recorded an average of 0.18 inch of rain, equivalent to the 3rd percentile. x The average rainfall District-wide was 0.29 inch, equivalent to the 5th percentile.

A summary of the operations made in November is as follows: x Inglis Water Control Structures: The Inglis Bypass Spillway was operated during the month of November in order to maintain water levels on Lake Rousseau and provide flow to the lower Withlacoochee River. The average monthly water level for Lake Rousseau was 27.65' NGVD. The recommended maintenance level for the reservoir is 27.5’ NGVD. x Withlacoochee River Basin: All structures on the Tsala Apopka chain of lakes remained closed during the month of November with the exception of the Leslie Heifner Structure, which remained open to allow flow (and navigation) from the Withlacoochee River into the Floral City Pool. The Wysong-Coogler Water Conservation Structure main gate is in the fully raised position (39.5’ NGVD) to aid in increasing and maintaining Lake Panasoffkee's water level. The Wysong-Coogler Water Conservation Structure low flow gate was operated in order to maintain an average flow of 40 cfs downstream of the structure. x Alafia River Basin: The environmental gate at the Medard Reservoir Structure was operated during the month of November in order to maintain water levels in the reservoir and provide flow into the Little Alafia River. The average monthly water level for the Medard Reservoir was 58.7' NGVD. The recommended maintenance level for the reservoir is 58.5’ NGVD. x Hillsborough River Basin: There were no structure operations within the basin during the month of November. The average monthly water level for Lake Thonotosassa was 36.17' NGVD compared to the recommended maintenance level of 36.5' NGVD. x Pinellas-Anclote River Basin: Structure S-551 (Lake Tarpon) weir gates were operated during the month of November to maintain water levels on Lake Tarpon. Structure S-551 weir gates

48 Item 64

are open to 3.2' NGVD, maintaining the recommended maintenance level of 3.2' NGVD. The average monthly water level for Lake Tarpon was 3.12' NGVD. x Northwest Hillsborough River Basin: There were no structure operations within the basin during the month of November. The average monthly water level for Lake Pretty was 42.58' NGVD compared to the recommended maintenance level of 44.5' NGVD. x Peace River Basin: G-90 structure was not operated during the month of November. The average monthly water level for Lake June-in-Winter was 73.84 NGVD compared to the recommended maintenance level of 75.0’ NGVD.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Board's information only, and no action is required.

Presenter: Tanase Bude, Manager, Structure Operations Section

49 STRUCTURE OPERATIONS SECTION HYDROLOGIC REPORT December 3, 2007

ELEVATION CURRENT POSITION OF ELEVATION CURRENT POSITION OF STRUCTURE DIFFERENCE LEVEL STRUCTURESTRUCTURE DIFFERENCE LEVEL STRUCTURE

FLINT CREEK 36.14 FLORAL CITY POOL 39.13 HIGH LEVEL 37.00 -0.86 Gates Closed HIGH LEVEL 42.50 -3.37 Leslie Heifner Open MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 36.50 -0.36 All drop gates: 36.00' MSL MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 42.25 -3.12 Floral City closed Golf Course Golf Course closed LOW LEVEL 34.50 1.64 invert 32.9' LOW LEVEL 40.25 -1.12 invert 38.0' Moccasin slough closed

KELL 63.39 INVERNESS POOL 34.98 HIGH LEVEL 66.00 -2.61 Closed HIGH LEVEL 40.50 -5.52 Brogden Bridge closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 65.50 -2.11 No logs MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 40.25 -5.27 Bryant Slough gates closed LOW LEVEL 63.50 -0.11 invert 64.66' Brogden Bridge LOW LEVEL 38.25 -3.27 invert 34.25' KEENE 59.81 Keene 1: 2-6" log HIGH LEVEL 63.00 -3.19 Keene 2: One 6" log HERNANDO POOL (S353) 34.62 MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 62.50 -2.69 1-invert 61.5' Keene 3: no logs HIGH LEVEL 39.00 -4.38 S-353 Van Ness closed LOW LEVEL 60.50 -0.69 2-invert 61.6' Sherry's Brook: 18" of Logs MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 38.75 -4.13 invert 36.5' S-353 gates closed

STEMPER 56.87 LOW LEVEL 36.75 -2.13 HIGH LEVEL 62.00 -5.13 Two 4" logs installed Two Mile Prairie (max) 35.00 -11.70 23.30 MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 61.25 -4.38 LOW LEVEL 59.50 -2.63 invert 60.25' LESLIE HEIFNER 39.26 Upstream (RIVER level) HIGH LEVEL 42.50 -3.24 39.27 Downstream (POOL level) HANNA 57.47 MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 42.25 -2.99 Gate Fully Open to 9.00' HIGH LEVEL 62.50 -5.03 18" of stop log installed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 61.75 -4.28 LOW LEVEL 40.25 -0.99 invert 35.0' LOW LEVEL 59.50 -2.03 invert 60.28' WYSONG-COOGLER CYPRESS CREEK Flood Stage UPSTREAM 39.50 -0.36 39.14 Main Gate Closed to 39.00' WORTHINGTON GARDENS 8.00 -5.59 2.41 Drop gate open 3.0'. DOWNSTREAM 34.91 Low Flow Gate at 38.70' 52 cfs total flow MEDARD RESERVOIR INGLIS 27.66 MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 60.00 -1.34 58.66 Gate Open 0.50' HIGH LEVEL 28.00 -0.34 By-pass Total Gate Opening 1.70' MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 27.50 0.16 Main Gates Closed TARPON (S551) 3.05 LOW LEVEL 26.50 1.16 invert 11.3' 552 Total cfs flow HIGH LEVEL 3.80 -0.75 Main gates Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 3.20 -0.15 All Drop gates @ 3.20 LAKE BRADLEY LOW LEVEL 2.20 0.85 MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 42.50 -4.92 37.58 Lake Gauge at mud level (Bottom)

ANNE PARKER 45.31 LAKE CONSUELLA HIGH LEVEL 48.75 -3.44 5-6" logs MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 41.50 -5.40 36.10 Lake Gauge at mud level (Bottom) MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 48.25 -2.94 LOW LEVEL 45.75 -0.44 invert 46.40' HANCOCK (P11) 96.39 Gauge at structure HIGH LEVEL 99.00 -2.61 96.45 Gauge on lake WHITE TROUT 33.38 MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 98.50 -2.11 HIGH LEVEL 36.50 -3.12 CREST = 33.94' MSL LOW LEVEL 96.00 0.39 invert 91.7' Gate Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 36.00 -2.62 12" of stop log installed HENRY (P5) 123.53 LOW LEVEL 34.00 -0.62 invert 32.94' HIGH LEVEL 126.50 -2.97 LRLMD MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 126.00 -2.47 KEYSTONE 38.74 LOW LEVEL 124.00 -0.47 invert 122.0' HIGH LEVEL 42.00 -3.26 Gates Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 41.75 -3.01 SMART (P6) 125.07 LOW LEVEL 39.75 -1.01 invert 37.2' HIGH LEVEL 128.75 -3.68 LRLMD MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 128.50 -3.43 CRESCENT 38.81 LOW LEVEL 126.50 -1.43 invert 127.2' HIGH LEVEL 42.50 -3.69 Gate Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 42.00 -3.19 FANNIE (P7) 0.00 LOW LEVEL 40.00 -1.19 invert 38.5' HIGH LEVEL 125.75 -125.75 LRLMD MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 125.50 -125.50 ISLAND FORD 37.58 LOW LEVEL 123.50 -123.50 invert 119.5' HIGH LEVEL 41.50 -3.92 Gates Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 41.00 -3.42 invert 35.0' HAMILTON (P8) 118.13 LOW LEVEL 39.00 -1.42 crest 41.25' HIGH LEVEL 121.50 -3.37 LRLMD MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 121.25 -3.12 PRETTY 42.82 LOW LEVEL 119.00 -0.87 invert 110.5' HIGH LEVEL 45.50 -2.68 Main Gate Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 44.50 -1.68 Drops Closed LENA (P1) 134.45 LOW LEVEL 42.75 0.07 invert 38.0' HIGH LEVEL 137.00 -2.55 Gates closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 136.75 -2.30 MAGDALENE 47.27 Lake gauge LOW MANAGEMENT 134.50 -0.05 invert 134.47' HIGH LEVEL 50.00 -2.73 47.28 Structure gauge MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 49.50 -2.23 JUNE-IN-WINTER (G90) 73.75 LOW MANAGEMENT 47.50 -0.23 invert 45.6' Gates closed HIGH LEVEL 75.50 -1.75 Gates Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 75.00 -1.25 Overflow at 75.25' MSL BAY 45.11 LOW LEVEL 73.00 0.75 invert 65.37' HIGH LEVEL 46.75 -1.64 Gates Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 46.00 -0.89 ARIETTA (P3) 139.06 LOW LEVEL 44.00 1.11 invert 44.0' HIGH LEVEL 144.00 -4.94 Gate closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 142.50 -3.44 ELLEN-LIPSEY 39.83 Structure Gauge LOW LEVEL 141.00 -1.94 invert 137.4' HIGH LEVEL 41.50 -1.67 39.99 Lake Gauge MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 41.00 -1.17 Gate Closed GIBSON 142.72 LOW LEVEL 39.00 0.83 invert 37.6' Drops: 40.62 - Stems 13.5" HIGH LEVEL 143.50 -0.78 Gate Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 143.00 -0.28 Stop log bays at 142.60' crest CARROLL 34.55 Low Level 141.50 1.22 invert 141.4' HIGH LEVEL 37.00 -2.45 24" of stop log installed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 36.50 -1.95 PARKER 128.51 LOW LEVEL 34.50 0.05 invert 34.17' HIGH LEVEL 131.00 -2.49 Gate closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 130.75 -2.24 ARMISTEAD 39.71 LOW LEVEL 128.75 -0.24 invert 129.15' HIGH LEVEL 44.00 -4.29 Gate Closed MAXIMUM DESIRABLE 43.00 -3.29 PEACE RIVER Flood Stage LOW LEVEL 40.50 -0.79 BARTOW 8.00 -5.02 2.98 ZOLFO SPRINGS 16.00 -12.05 3.95 HILLSBOROUGH RIVER Flood Stage ARCADIA 11.00 -9.83 1.17 MORRIS BRIDGE 32.00 -7.59 24.41 S-155 is open FOWLER 29.00 -8.19 20.81 LITTLE MANATEE RIVER Flood Stage WIMAUMA 11.00 -8.30 2.70 WITHLACOOCHEE R. Flood Stage TRILBY 61.27 -11.10 50.17 ALAFIA RIVER Flood Stage CROOM 47.94 -7.28 40.66 LITHIA 13.00 -10.17 2.83 HIGHWAY. 48 39.32 LAKE PANASOFFKEE 40.70 -1.25 39.45 MYAKKA RIVER Flood Stage HOLDER 35.52 -7.08 28.44 MYAKKA STATE PARK 7.00 -4.55 2.45

ANCLOTE RIVER Flood Stage MANATEE RIVER Flood Stage ELFERS 20.00 -12.42 7.58 MYAKKA HEAD 11.00 -8.68 2.32

50 Lake Gibson Lake Tarpon, S-551

145.00 5.50

144.50 5.00

144.00 4.50

143.50 4.00

143.00 3.50

142.50 3.00

142.00 2.50

141.50 2.00 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water Water Surface Elevation 141.00 1.50

140.50 1.00

140.00 0.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 480 Acres Low Slab = 144.81' Daily Average Values 2006-07 Structure Gauge Datum = 100.00' Lake Surface Area =2,534 Lake Gauge Datum = 135.00 MSL SCADA Device # 6491 SCADA Device Number 2427

51 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level High Level Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood

Lake Thonotosassa Lake Anne Parker

39.50 49.50 39.00 49.00 38.50 48.50 38.00 48.00 37.50 37.00 47.50

36.50 47.00

36.00 46.50 35.50

Water Surface Elevation 46.00 35.00 45.50

34.50 Water Surface Elevation Above M.S.L. 34.00 45.00 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 93 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 824 Acres Low Slab = 40.09' Low Slab = 39.0' SCADA Device Number: 8491 Flint Creek Gauge Datum = 32.16 SCADA Device #6807

Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Hanna Lake Keene 63.50 64

63.00 63.5 62.50 63 62.00 62.5 61.50

61.00 62

60.50 61.5 60.00 61 59.50 60.5 59.00 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 58.50 60 Water Surface Elevation Elevation Surface Water 58.00 59.5 57.50 59 57.00 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2005-06 Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 29 Acres Lake Surface Area = 31 Acres Low Slab = 63.68' SCADA Device Number 7631 SCADA Device #7531 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood 52

Lake Kell Lake Stemper

67.50 63.00

62.50 67.00 62.00 66.50 61.50

66.00 61.00

65.50 60.50

60.00 65.00 59.50 64.50 59.00 64.00 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 58.50 Water Surface Elevation 63.50 58.00

57.50 63.00 57.00 62.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 56.50 Lake Surface Area = 31 Acres 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 68.09' Lake Surface Area = 58.32 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = 62.95' Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 63.70 Lake Gauge Datum = 54.45' MSL Lake Gauge Datum = 30.3 MSL SCADA #1981 SCADA Device # 2067

Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Bay Lake Lake Carroll

48.0 38.5 47.5 38 47.0 37.5 46.5 37 46.0 36.5 45.5 36 45.0 35.5 44.5 35 Water Surface Elevation

44.0 Elevation Surface Water 34.5 43.5 34 43.0 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 33.5 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface area = 37 Acres Low Slab = 47.80' Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 188 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Read Low Slab = 39.50' Structure Gauge Datum = 31.86' Lake auge Datum = Direct Read Lake Gauge Datum = 30.0 MSL SCADA Device Number = 1647 SCADA Device Number: 2087 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desireable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr.Flood 53 Crescent Lake Lake Island Ford

44.50 43.00 44.00 42.50 43.50 42.00 43.00 41.50 42.50 41.00 42.00 40.50 41.50 40.00 41.00 39.50 40.50 39.00 40.00 Elevation Surface Water 38.50 Water Surface Elevation in Feet above (MSL) in Feet Elevation Surface Water 39.50 39.00 38.00 38.50 37.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Lake Surface Area = 50 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 44.63' Lake Surface Area = 96 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Low Slab = 42.64 Read Structure Gauge Datum = 36.54' Lake Gauge Datum = Direct Read SCADA Device number = 1621 Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood SCADA Device Number = 1667 WSE Low Level Max Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Keystone Lakes Ellen and Lipsey

43.50 42.50 43.00 42.00 42.50 41.50 42.00 41.00 41.50 40.50 41.00

40.50 40.00

40.00 39.50

Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 39.50 39.00 Water Surface Elevation 39.00 38.50

38.50 38.00

38.00 37.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 388 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 43.53' Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Read Lake Surface Area = 22 Acres Lake Gauge Datum = Direct Read Low Slab = 42.35' SCADA Device Number: 6161 SCADA Device Number 1791 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lipsey WSE Lake Ellen Low Level Max. Desirable Min. Flood 54 Lake Magdalene Lake Pretty 51.00 47.50

50.50 47.00 46.50 50.00 46.00 49.50 45.50

49.00 45.00

48.50 44.50

48.00 44.00 43.50

47.50 Elevation Surface Water Water Surface Elevation 43.00 47.00 42.50 46.50 42.00

46.00 41.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 184 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 (Pretty, Rock, Josephine combined) Lake Surface Area = 232 Acres Low Slab = 47.10' Low Slab = 51.80' Structure Gauge Datum = 40.00' Structure Gauge Datum = 45.52 Lake Gauge Datum = 31.74' MSL Lake Gauge Datum = 30.0 MSL SCADA Device #1967 Structure Level Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood Lake White Trout Lake Lowery

38.50 132.00 38.00 131.50 37.50 37.00 131.00 36.50 130.50 36.00 130.00 35.50 35.00 129.50 34.50 129.00 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 34.00 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 128.50 33.50 33.00 128.00 32.50 127.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 75 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 39.41' Lake Surface Area = 903 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = 33.38' Low Slab = 131.61 Lake Gauge Datum = 19.98' MSL SCADA Device Number 6181 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 55 Lake Rousseau Lake Arietta (P-3) 144.50 29.50 144.00 29.00 143.50 28.50 143.00 28.00 142.50

27.50 142.00

27.00 141.50

26.50 141.00

26.00 140.50

Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 140.00 25.50 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 139.50 25.00 139.00 24.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 138.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 758 Acres Lake Surface Area = 3657 Acres Lake Gauge Datum = 100.00' Structure Gauge Datum = 10.00 SCADA Device Number 7431 SCADA Device Number 6137 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level Hernando Pool Inverness Pool

40.50 42.00 40.00 41.50 39.50 41.00 40.50 39.00 40.00 38.50 39.50 38.00 39.00 37.50 38.50 38.00 37.00 37.50 36.50 37.00 36.00 36.50 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 35.50 36.00 35.50 35.00 35.00 34.50 34.50 34.00 34.00 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 6200 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 8000 Acres Low Slab = 40.47' Low Slab = 42.54' Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Read Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Read Lake Gauge Datum = Direct Read Lake Gauge Datum = Direct Read SCADA # 2027 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood SCADA # 2047 Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood 56 Leslie Heifner Floral City Pool

43.00 43.50 42.50 43.00 42.00 42.50 42.00 41.50 41.50 41.00 41.00 40.50 40.50 40.00 40.00 39.50 39.50 39.00 39.00 M.S.L. 38.50 38.50 38.00 38.00 37.50 Water Surface Elevation 37.50 37.00 37.00 36.50 36.50 36.00

Water Surface Elevation in Feet Above Feet in Elevation Surface Water 36.00 35.50 35.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 9100 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 44.10' Lake Surface Area = 37 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Read Low Slab = 47.80' Lake Gauge Datum = Direct Read SCADA Device #6767 & #6766 SCADA #2007 Upstream Level Downsream Level Low Level Max.Desirable High Level Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood Lake Fannie (P-7) Lake Hamilton (P8)

128.00 123.00 127.50 122.50 127.00 126.50 122.00 126.00 121.50 125.50 121.00 125.00 120.50 124.50 120.00 124.00 123.50 119.50 Water Surface Elevation Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 123.00 119.00 122.50 118.50 122.00 118.00 121.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 833 Acres Lake Surface Area = 2,640 Acres Low Slab = 127.60' Lake Gauge Datum = 120.36 MSL Lake Gauge Datum = 115.00' SCADA Device #2187 SCADA Device Number = 1747 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood 57 Lake Hancock (P-11) Lake Henry (P-5)

103.00 128.00 102.50 102.00 127.50 101.50 127.00 101.00 100.50 126.50 100.00 126.00 99.50 125.50 99.00 98.50 125.00 98.00 124.50 97.50 97.00 124.00 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water Water Surface Elevation 96.50 123.50 96.00 123.00 95.50 95.00 122.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec

Lake Surface Area = 4,541 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Gauge Datum = 92.78' MSL Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 861 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = 84.08' Structure Gauge Datum = 100.00' MSL SCADA Device Number = 1767 & 4087 S.R. Gauge Datum = 120.00' MSL SCADA Device Number 1807 Gauge at Structure Lake Level Low Level Max Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 Yr. Flood Lake Lena (P-1) Lake June-in-Winter (G-90)

138.00 77.00

137.50 76.50

137.00 76.00

136.50 75.50

136.00 75.00

135.50 74.50 74.00 135.00 73.50 134.50 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water Water Surface Elevation Surface Water 73.00 134.00 72.50 133.50 72.00 133.00 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 3,504 Acres Lake Surface Area = 207 Acres Structure Gauge Datum = Direct Read Lake Gauge Datum = 132.12 Lake Gauge Datum = 65.38 MSL SCADA Device Number 7451 SCADA Device Number=6136 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood 58 Lake Parker Lake Smart (P-6)

133.00 130.50 132.50 130.00 132.00 129.50 129.00 131.50 128.50 131.00 128.00

130.50 127.50 130.00 127.00 129.50 126.50 Water Surface Elevation Surface Water Water Surface Elevation 129.00 126.00 125.50 128.50 125.00 128.00 124.50 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep 1-Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec Daily Average Values 2006-07 Lake Surface Area = 1,820 Acres Daily Average Values 2006-07 Low Slab = 131.43' Lake Surface Area = 2,272 Acres Lake Gauge Datum = 120.00' MSL Lake Gauge Datum = 100.00' SCADA Device Number: 2167 SCADA Device Number 7721 Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable High Level 10 yr. Flood Lake Level Low Level Max. Desirable Max. Desirable 10 Yr. Flood E. Finance & Admin. Comte. Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Finance and Administration Committee

Discussion Items

65. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion

66. Financial and Budget Update ...... (20 minutes) ...... 3

67. District Climate Change Initiative Status Report ...... (20 minutes) ...... 17 (Strategic Plan: Mission Support)

68. Strategic Systems and Water Management Information System Initiative Semi-Annual Update ...... (20 minutes) ...... 19 (Strategic Plan: Mission Support)

Submit & File Report

69. Treasurer's Report, Payment Register, and Contingency Reserves Report ...... 32

Routine Reports

70. Management Services Status Report ...... 35 2 Item 66

Finance and Administration Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Financial and Budget Update

Purpose A. Provide an update on the SBA Local Government Investment Pool (SBA Pool) status. B. Request acceptance of the fiscal year (FY) 2009 Budget Development Process establishing budget strategic priorities and general preparation assumptions.

Background A. On December 6, 2007, a letter was provided to all members of the Governing Board regarding the status of SBA Pool and the District's investment in the SBA Pool. A copy is provided as an exhibit for this item. At the meeting, staff will provide an update on the SBA Pool status. B. District staff will begin the FY2009 budget development process in January. A memorandum with attachments has been prepared for Governing Board review that provides an overview of the planned budget development process.

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibits

Accept the planned FY2009 Budget Development Process as described in the memorandum and attachments.

Presenters: Daryl F. Pokrana, Finance Director Linda R. Pilcher, Assistant Finance Director Eugene A. Schiller, Deputy Executive Director

3 4 TO: Governing Board Members SUBJECT: Status of District Funds in SBA Local Government Investment Pool Page 2 December 6, 2007

Fund B will be composed of impaired assets or those currently considered at-risk. It is anticipated that the November 2007 income for all Pool participants (including participants that withdrew funds in November) plus the current loss reserve account will be added to Fund B. Eighty percent of Fund B is expected to mature by June 2008. The redemption date of the remaining assets in Fund B is uncertain.

District Status: Of the District’s total cash and investments of $569 million on December 5, 2007, approximately $288 million was invested in the SBA Pool accounts of which 86 percent or $248 million was placed in Fund A and 14 percent or $40 million was placed in Fund B. Fund A will be composed of high quality AAA rated investments. Fund B will hold the impaired assets for which current liquidity is not available. BlackRock has categorized the assets in Fund B as 56 percent impaired or under stress and 44 percent at risk.

The District’s liquidity (funds available for payments) is mainly held within the SBA Pool account. The BlackRock recommendation, as accepted by the SBA Board, allows participants to withdraw 15 percent or $2 million, whichever is greater, from Fund A. Today, the District exercised the 15 percent withdrawal of $40.7 million from Fund A, leaving a balance of $247.3 million invested in the entire SBA Pool.

As shown in the pie chart, 3 percent ($17.7 million) of the District’s total cash and investments, in a worst-case scenario, is at risk at this time. Current District Cash & Investments (Total $569 million)

$17.7M $22.3M $69.7M 3% 4% 12%

Cash on Deposit

$207.3M Government Securities 36% SBA Fund A $252M SBA Fund B Impaired 45% SBA Fund B At Risk

The District has taken measures to withhold future payments into Pool Fund A (which includes tax revenues) in anticipation of cash needs (liquidity) and there are scheduled maturities of government security investments that will provide required cash, until such time as additional SBA Fund A investments are available.

It is the opinion of District staff that the District is capable of meeting payment of all obligations within the current budget year.

5 TO: Governing Board Members SUBJECT: Status of District Funds in SBA Local Government Investment Pool Page 3 December 6, 2007

It should be noted that, as of this date, staff believes that the assets carried in Fund A of the SBA do not present a risk of loss; whereas, high risk assets within Fund B do have the potential to present a risk. However, interest earnings projected at a rate of 3 to 5 percent from the earnings on the entire SBA account coupled with the interest earned on securities could minimize the impact of any potential loss. Staff will continue to monitor the SBA funds held within the Pool and report to the Governing Board in December with further recommendations as to investments or actions required by the Board.

Please contact Daryl Pokrana at 352-796-7211, extension 4122, should you have any questions regarding this matter.

DFP:spa cc: David L. Moore, Executive Director Senior Staff Brett Cyphers, EOG

6 December 7, 2007

MEMORANDUM

TO: Governing Board Members

THROUGH: David L. Moore, Executive Director

FROM: Eugene A. Schiller, Deputy Executive Director Daryl F. Pokrana, Finance Director Linda R. Pilcher, Assistant Finance Director

SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Development Process

This memorandum and attachments provide an overview of the District’s planned fiscal year (FY) 2009 budget development process. The following are provided for your review and acceptance to enable staff to proceed with development of the draft budget:

Budget Calendar: The calendar illustrates the District’s budget development process for FY2009, including the statutory notice and hearing requirements for Truth-In-Millage (TRIM) and the Executive Office of the Governor’s (EOG) standard reporting process for water management districts. The process starts in January 2008 with the distribution of budget preparation guidelines to the departments.

Budget Strategic Priorities: The budget strategic priorities for FY2009 are listed. The strategic priorities have been excerpted from the District's Strategic Plan that was approved by the Governing Board on November 26, 2007. The strategic priorities provide focus for departments to identify the budgetary requirements necessary to carry out District programs. These priorities are consistent with the Governor’s letter dated September 17, 2007, which is attached for reference.

General Budget Preparation Assumptions: The general budget preparation assumptions needed to start the development of the FY2009 budget are outlined.

Program and Activity Allocations Report: The Program and Activity Allocations report, which is a standard format required by the EOG as part of the August 1 tentative budget submission by the water management districts, is provided for reference. This report displays the District’s FY2008 budget according to the six statutorily defined program areas and the underlying program activities. The program budgets are then allocated into the District’s four statutorily established areas of responsibility: Water Supply, Water Quality, Flood Protection, and Natural Systems.

LRP:jlm Attachments (5) cc: Jennifer E. Closshey, Treasurer Senior Staff Budget Staff Department Budget Contacts

7 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Calendar Rev. 12/07/07

DATES ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITY

October Annual Basin Board Planning Workshops and Governing Board Meeting Basin Boards/Governing Board Formal Update WS&WRD Funding Plan Over Planning Horizon of 2025 October Cooperative Funding Meetings Staff/Prospective Cooperators/Public

December 1-31 Develop FY2009 Budget Preparation Guidelines Executive/Budget December 7 FY2009 Cooperative Funding Applications Due Prospective Cooperators December 18 Governing Board Review FY2009 Budget Development Process Governing Board/Budget/ Planning/Public

January 1-31, 2008 Review FY2009 Cooperative Funding Applications Staff January 2 FY2008 First Quarter Financial Report & Planning Forecast Directors/Budget Beginning January 22 Budget Preparation and BRASS Software Training Budget/Financial Systems/Staff Distribute FY2009 Budget Preparation Guidelines Budget January 29 Special Election on Proposed Constitutional Amendment for Property Tax Reform

February 1 Identify New or Continued FY2009 Alternative Water Supply & Water Staff Resource Development (WS&WRD) Projects from Cooperative Funding Submittals February Rank FY2009 Cooperative Funding Applications Staff February Basin Boards Review Cooperative Funding Applications Basin Boards February 15 Recurring Budget Requests and Staff Resource Allocations Due Directors February 22 New and Non-Recurring Budget Requests Due Directors February 26 Special Election Results/FY2009 Budget Update Governing Board February 29 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Requirements Due Directors February 29 General Services and Information Resources Departments Directors New and Non-Recurring Budget Requests Due

March 7 Preliminary Budget Summary Executive/Budget March 10-14 Executive Review of Budget Submissions Executive/Budget/Directors March 17-21 Departmental Follow-up Review (Executive Adjustments) Executive/Budget/Directors March 25 Present FY2009 WS&WRD Projects; Review Past SB 444 Allocations; Executive/Budget/Governing Board Update Existing Project Costs and Schedule

April Basin Boards Review Preliminary Budgets Basin Boards April Present FY2009 Basin WS&WRD Projects; Review Past SB 444 Basin Boards Allocations; Update Existing Project Costs and Schedule April 2 FY2008 Second Quarter Financial Report & Planning Forecast Directors/Budget April 7 Executive Budget Summary (All Funds) Executive/Budget April 21-25 Final Executive Review of Recommended Combined FY2009 Budget Executive/Budget

May 27 Review Draft Information Resources Five-Year Plan & Computer Sinking Executive/Budget/Governing Board Fund Strategy and Draft Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan May 28 Picture-In-Time for FY2009 Annual Budget Workshop Budget

June Basin Boards Review Tentative Budgets & Proposed Millage Rates Basin Boards June Review Elements of WS&WRD Funding Plan Relative to Costs & Schedule of Proposed or Modified Projects, Legislative Appropriation(s) Basin Boards of SB 444 and Grants June 24 FY2009 Annual Budget Workshop Executive/Budget/Governing Board June 27 Picture-In-Time for August 1 Tentative Budget Submission Budget

July 1-15 Certifications of Property Value Property Appraisers/Budget July 2 FY2008 Third Quarter Financial Report & Planning Forecast Directors/Budget July 16-24 Basin Boards Review Final Budgets & Adopt Final Millage Rates & Basin Boards Budgets July 16-24 Update WS&WRD Funding Plan Revenue Assumptions with Final Basin Boards Ad Valorem Revenue Estimates & Make Necessary Adjustments to Budget July 29 FY2009 Budget Update Governing Board July 29 Adopt Proposed Millage Rates for District and Watershed Basins Governing Board

8 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Calendar (continued) Rev. 12/07/07

August 1 Submit Standard Format Tentative Budget to Governor, Budget President of the Senate, Speaker of the House, Legislative Committee Chairs, Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection, and each County Commission August 4 Submit Proposed Millage Rates & Preliminary Disclosure of Maximum Budget Millage Levy to Property Appraisers August 26 FY2009 Budget Update Executive/Budget/Governing Board August 26 Update WS&WRD Funding Plan Revenue Assumptions with Final Executive/Budget/Governing Board Ad Valorem Revenue Estimates & Make Necessary Adjustments to Budget (completed July 2008) August Executive Office of the Governor (EOG) Budget Review EOG/Executive/Budget

September 5 House and Senate Appropriations Chair Comments Due Legislature September 16 Public Hearing (Tentative Budget) - Tampa Service Office Governing Board September 23 EOG Budget Review Comments Due EOG September 25-28 Advertise Millage Rates and Budget Budget September 30 Public Hearing (Final Budget) - District Headquarters Brooksville Governing Board

October 3 Forward Resolution to Property Appraisers and Tax Collectors Budget October 3 Pre-Filing Certification of Compliance, Final Disclosure of Maximum Millage Levy, and Vote Record for Final Adoption of Millage Levy to Department of Revenue October 10 Issue FY2009 Budget in Brief Report Budget October 30 Certify Compliance to Department of Revenue Budget October Annual Basin Board Planning Workshops and Governing Board Meeting Basin Boards/Governing Board Formal Update WS&WRD Funding Plan Over Planning Horizon of 2025

December 15 Report on Water Management District Budgets for FY2009 EOG December 31 Certify Compliance to Department of Financial Services Budget

March 1, 2009 Submit Consolidated Water Management District Annual Report Planning/Budget (including the Five-Year CIP) to Governor, President of the Senate, Speaker of the House, Legislative Committee Chairs, Secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection, and each County Commission

9 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Strategic Priorities

The District Governing Board establishes budget strategic priorities to anticipate and respond to changing resource management needs. The following FY2009 budget strategic priorities are included in the District’s Strategic Plan that was approved by the Governing Board on November 26, 2007.

Regional Water Supply Planning – Identify, communicate and promote consensus on the strategies and resources necessary to meet future reasonable and beneficial water supply needs.

Conservation – Enhance water use efficiencies in all water use sectors to reduce demands on all water supplies.

Alternative Water Supplies – Increase development of alternative sources of potable water to ensure ground and surface waters are sustainable.

Reclaimed Water – Maximize beneficial use of reclaimed water to offset demand of ground and potable alternative water supplies.

Floodplain Management – Develop better floodplain information and utilize the information in the implementation of regulatory and non-regulatory floodplain management programs to maintain floodplain storage and conveyance and to minimize flood damage.

Flood and Emergency Response – Operate District flood control and water conservation structures and provide effective and efficient assistance to state and local governments and the public to minimize flood damage during and after storm events.

Water Quality Monitoring – Collect and analyze water quality data to determine the region’s water quality status and trends.

Water Quality Maintenance and Improvement – Develop and implement programs, projects and regulations to maintain and improve water quality.

Minimum Flows and Levels (MFL) Establishment and Monitoring – Establish and monitor MFLs to ensure maintenance of the hydrology necessary to sustain the region’s natural systems.

MFL Recovery – Develop regionally accepted recovery plans and oversee the successful implementation of the plans to ensure the recovery of all water resources not meeting MFLs.

Ecologic System Identification and Monitoring – Identify and monitor critical ecosystems to promote awareness of the region’s ecologic systems and their status.

Ecologic Conservation and Restoration – Develop plans for acquisition, conservation and restoration of selected ecosystems and monitor, assist and oversee the successful completion of the plans to ensure protection, recovery and function of these ecosystems.

10 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Strategic Priorities (continued)

To successfully achieve the budget strategic priorities, the District must excel in each of the following processes:

Water Resources Planning and Knowledge Management – oversees watershed and basin management planning for inter- and intra-District water and related resources (including the development of minimum flows and levels) and other water comprehensive resource planning in partnership with local, state, regional, federal and other stakeholders. This process also includes identifying, collecting, analyzing and timely disseminating relevant and accurate data to interested parties.

Innovative Projects: Public Works, Restoration and Land Acquisition – initiates and supports creative, collaborative projects to produce measurable benefits to the environment, water resources, critical knowledge and the regional community. The process includes capital projects for water resource development and water supply development assistance, water control and conservation, land acquisition, restoration of lands and water resources, administrative facilities construction and internal projects.

Outreach/Education – provides citizens, visitors, media, elected officials, educators and other stakeholders with essential water resource information and ombudsman support to foster behaviors, secure funding and assist in developing laws that conserve, protect and sustain Florida’s precious water and related natural resources.

Regulation – involves multiple permit activities that promote a fair allocation of the water resources, protect wetlands, enforce well construction standards and ensure that new development does not increase the risk of flooding or degrade water quality. The permitting process also monitors subsequent operational performance of permitted systems to protect the region’s citizens and water resources.

Land and Structure Operations – operates and maintains District lands and water control and conservation structures to restore and sustain natural systems, minimize flood damage and provide opportunities for education and recreation.

Long-Range Financial Plan – provides financial incentives on a pay-as-you-go basis to encourage and align partnership efforts for the purpose of conserving water and developing alternative water supplies, enhancing natural systems and water quality, and promoting flood management activities.

Mission Support – includes vital functions in support of other core business processes. These functions include human resource development, online information technology, facility and fleet support, records management, risk management, financial, legal counsel and audit services.

11 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2009 General Budget Preparation Assumptions

Revenues x Ad valorem revenue to remain at FY2008 levels with additional funds directed for water supply and resource development. Final millage rates and ad valorem revenue will be determined after the Certifications of Taxable Value have been received by July 15. The maximum millage rates will be based on the Rolled-Back Rate (the same ad valorem revenue received in FY2008 plus an adjustment for new construction) increased by the Per Capita Florida Personal Income (currently estimated to be 3.88 percent). This calculation is prescribed by the tax reform legislation (HB 1B) enacted in 2007. Based on a preliminary analysis released by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research from their November 8, 2007 Ad Valorem Estimating Conference, taxable property values are estimated to increase statewide by 3.15 percent. However, property values could be reduced by the passage of the Property Tax Amendment scheduled for the January 29, 2008 ballot. x Water Supply and Resource Development (WSRD) program to continue consistent with the Long-Range Water Supply and Water Resource Development Funding Plan of the Regional Water Supply Plan through 2025. The WSRD is targeted at not less than $60 million per year (General Fund $30 million and Basins $30 million). x State's Florida Forever Trust Fund anticipated funding of $26.25 million for land acquisition, equal to the annual appropriation amount. Consistent with the actual and planned Florida Forever acquisitions, the budget appropriation will be tentatively allocated as follows: $13.125 million or 50 percent for acquisition of lands or easements primarily for water resource development and $13.125 million or 50 percent for acquisition of lands primarily for restoration and conservation purposes. x State's Water Management Lands Trust Fund (WMLTF) anticipated funding of $14.75 million for preacquisition costs, land acquisition ancillary costs, land management costs and payments in lieu of taxes, and the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program (to be matched by Basins). x State's Water Protection and Sustainability Trust Fund anticipated funding of $13 million for alternative water supply development assistance. Funding matched by the District, Basins and local funding partners x Permit fees projected at $3 million. x Interest earnings based on 3 percent rate of return. x Balance forward estimate for the General Fund to be provided December 18 at the Governing Board meeting.

12 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Fiscal Year 2009 General Budget Preparation Assumptions (continued)

Expenditures x All recurring and non-recurring expenditures (excluding salaries and benefits) will be targeted for planning purposes, subject to reduction or reallocation, at 5 percent below FY2008 levels, including contracts, computer hardware and software, and other capital outlay. This 5 percent target applies to the General Fund, as well as the Basins. x The following non-recurring accounts will be zero-based and each budget item must be separately justified:

-- Contract Labor (including part-time and temporary positions) -- Computer Hardware and Software -- Consultant Services -- Contracted Construction -- Capital Outlay x No increases are currently anticipated in Governing Board authorized positions or Executive Director authorized positions. x Salary pool budget remains at 3 percent (annualized 4 percent). x All budget requests will be linked to the District Strategic Plan and the District Water Management Plan (DWMP) through the District's program budget. x All budget requests will be consistent with Governor Charlie Crist's and the District's Climate Change Initiative to increase energy efficiency and reduce carbon footprint. x Facilities improvements and associated revenue contribution will be consistent with the Governing Board approved Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). x Internal service charges for Central Garage will be used for Basins and grant-funded projects to budget the General Fund reimbursement for vehicle and equipment use. x Special budget instructions for equipment and vehicle requests:

o New and replacement personal computers, peripherals, and software requests will be entered by the requesting department into a separate section established in the Information Resources Department budget. The computers and software will be evaluated by the Information Resources Department for inclusion in its final budget request, consistent with the approved Information Resources Department Five-Year Plan.

o New and replacement vehicles will generally be budgeted by the General Services Department based on fleet management requirements and departmental requests. Vehicles to be funded by the Water Management Lands Trust Fund will be budgeted by the requesting department after evaluation by the General Services and Land Resources Departments.

o New and replacement outside equipment will be budgeted by the requesting department after evaluation by the General Services Department. Outside Equipment to be funded by the Water Management Lands Trust Fund will also be evaluated by the Land Resources Department.

13 PROGRAM AND ACTIVITY ALLOCATIONS (ADOPTED)1 For Fiscal Year 2007 - 2008 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

FISCAL YEAR PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES Water Supply Water Quality Flood Protection Natural Systems 2007 - 2008 1.0 Water Resources Planning and Monitoring $44,214,036 $12,925,273 $9,442,432 $9,442,432 $12,403,899 1.1 - District Water Management Planning 26,262,367 1.1.1 Water Supply Planning 521,372 X 1.1.2 Minimum Flows and Levels 5,922,938 XX 1.1.3 Other Water Resources Planning 19,818,057 XXXX 1.2 - Research, Data Collection, Analysis and Monitoring 16,591,963 XXXX 1.3 - Technical Assistance 1,359,706 XXXX 1.4 - Other Water Resources Planning and Monitoring Activities - XXXX 2.0 Acquisition, Restoration and Public Works $232,417,632 $158,746,471 $24,940,727 $23,817,495 $24,912,939 2.1 - Land Acquisition 24,487,880 XXXX 2.2 - Water Source Development 151,633,722 2.2.1 Water Resource Development Projects 17,549,743 X 2.2.2 Water Supply Development Assistance 132,980,190 X 2.2.3 Other Water Source Development Activities 1,103,789 XX 2.3 - Surface Water Projects 52,410,683 XXX 2.4 - Other Cooperative Projects - XXXX 2.5 - Facilities Construction and Major Renovations 1,600,000 XXXX 2.6 - Other Acquisition and Restoration Activities 2,285,347 XXXX 14 3.0 Operation and Maintenance of Lands and Works $29,100,646 $4,114,456 $6,034,840 $12,565,250 $6,386,100 3.1 - Land Management 11,072,832 XXXX 3.2 - Works 11,093,289 XXX 3.3 - Facilities 5,384,991 XXXX 3.4 - Invasive Plant Control 864,301 XXX 3.5 - Other Operation and Maintenance Activities 685,233 XX 4.0 Regulation $22,414,311 $3,592,122 $6,986,233 $4,849,724 $6,986,232 4.1 - Consumptive Use Permitting 5,600,836 X X X 4.2 - Water Well Construction Permitting and Contractor Licensing 1,191,342 XX X 4.3 - Environmental Resource and Surface Water Permitting 10,491,009 XXX 4.4 - Other Regulatory and Enforcement Activities 5,131,124 XXXX 5.0 Outreach $5,993,786 $1,498,447 $1,498,447 $1,498,446 $1,498,446 5.1 - Water Resource Education 4,438,171 XXXX 5.2 - Public Information 1,376,664 XXXX 5.3 - Public Relations - XXXX 5.4 - Lobbying / Legislative Affairs / Cabinet Affairs 178,951 XXXX 5.5 - Other Outreach Activities - XXXX SUBTOTAL - Major Programs (excluding Management and Administration) $334,140,411 $180,876,769 $48,902,679 $52,173,347 $52,187,616 6.0 District Management and Administration $55,883,259 6.1 - Administrative and Operations Support 20,821,969 6.2 - Computers / Computer Support 15,528,013 6.3 - Reserves 11,750,000 6.4 - Other (Tax Collector / Property Appraiser Fees) 7,783,277 TOTAL $390,023,670 1 Does not include interfund transfers of $4,977,835 for a total budget of $395,001,505. 15 16 Item 67

Finance and Administration Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

District Climate Change Initiative Status Report

Purpose This is an informational item to update the Governing Board on the status of the District's Climate Change Initiative.

Background

On July 12-13, 2007, at a two-day Florida’s climate change summit in Miami, Florida Governor Crist launched an action plan to explore groundbreaking technologies and strategies that will place our state at the forefront of the growing world-wide movement to reduce greenhouse gases. Governor Crist has joined with other states and nations to move forward with this initiative.

On July 13, 2007, Governor Crist signed three Executive Orders (07-126, 127 and 128) initiating Florida’s energy policy. These Executive Orders demonstrate a commitment to reducing Florida’s greenhouse gases and increasing energy efficiency. In these orders, Governor Crist called for all State Agencies to implement plans to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases through a wide variety of means, including use of alternative fuel sources such as solar and biodiesel fuels, as well as by implementing smart building and operational practices to reduce the carbon footprint of government in Florida. Governor Crist further called upon other Florida Governments to voluntarily support the efforts of the state.

The Southwest Florida Water Management supports and applauds Governor Crist’s efforts to move toward more environmentally sustainable governance practices. Florida’s Water Management Districts already lead the way in water conservation. Incorporating an emphasis on energy efficiency in our day-to-day operations makes sense and fits well with our focus on sustainable growth and environmental responsibility.

Accordingly, Executive Director Dave Moore has selected Gene Schiller, Deputy Executive Director, Management Services Division, to examine ways that the District can continue its past practice of incorporating environmentally friendly initiatives into its daily operations. Mr. Schiller has in turn appointed Elaine Kuligofski, Director of Human Resources & Risk Management, to coordinate the efforts of a cross-functional staff team, whose mission is to assess the District’s past and ongoing energy efficiency efforts and also to establish a project plan to enhance these efforts into the future. The goal is to meet or exceed Governor Crist’s expectations for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions but, more importantly, to serve as an example of the use of smart, efficient and environmentally wise practices in District operations.

The District’s Project Team has assembled a list of potential action items for review to establish a baseline for what the District has already achieved through its past practices as well as to initiate projects for further enhancements. The project team has begun to examine the District’s entire operations – facilities, construction, fleet management, procurement of goods and services, internal process enhancements, education for employees and many other activities in which the District may be able to achieve efficiencies and reduce its carbon emissions. Additionally, all District employees are encouraged to submit ideas for potential energy-saving initiatives.

17 Item 67

The Team has finalized an initial, overall project plan, with individual project assigned to appropriate subteams for feasibility evaluation, cost assessment and, where appropriate, prioritization of projects for implementation.

The District works cooperatively with project team members from other Districts so that we can share ideas and move forward in a coordinated fashion. We also coordinate with the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Management Services regarding the State’s development of a carbon scorecard for Governor’s agencies and departments. The District provided the requested report on fuel and energy consumption to the Department of Management Services on September 24, 2007.

Additionally, the District has become a member of the United States Green Business Council (USGBC). Several staff and Board Treasurer, Jennifer Closshey, have attended Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) training to become familiarized with the LEED construction standards for new and existing building. Staff is also evaluating the possibility of participation in other nationally recognized programs, such as the Environmental Protection Agency's EnergyStar program. Michael Molligan, Communications Director, and his staff in the Communications Department are working to establish messaging both for internal staff and for the public to provide a consistent "look and feel" for the District's Climate Change Initiative.

Quarterly and annual reports on progress will be provided to the District’s Executive staff and to the Governing Board. Additionally, the Team will continue to provide required reports to DEP and the Governor’s Office

Benefit/Costs

Through these efforts the District seeks to establish its baseline energy consumption and carbon output, and then in the future reduce these in accordance with Governor Crist's Climate Change Initiative. The goal is not only to implement more environmentally friendly practices, but also where possible to achieve efficiency and cost reductions in District operations.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Gene Schiller, Deputy Executive Director, Management Services Division Elaine M. Kuligofski, Human Resources & Risk Management Director

18 Item 68

Finance and Administration Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Strategic Systems and Water Management Information System (WMIS) Initiative Semi-Annual Update

Purpose The purpose of this item is to provide the Governing Board with a semi-annual update on Information Resources Department's Five-Year Technology Plan, Fiscal Years 2008-2012, execution and a demonstration of the current Water Management Information System (WMIS) initiative, a key component of this plan.

Background The Governing Board approved the Information Resources Department Five-Year Technology Plan in April 2007 with a request for a semi-annual update. This update will include a demonstration of the latest WMIS functionality. The WMIS integrates existing database systems, and creates a simplified user access to all District data and improves data visibility, data access and data analysis. The last increment, released in October 2007, provided Water Use Permitting small general renewals and additional Resource Data reporting capabilities. Well Construction Permitting and Well Contractor Licensing capabilities were made available to the public in earlier releases

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is presented for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenters: Terry Redman, Director, Information Resources Department Sommer Mercer, Records and Data Manager, Regulation Performance Management Department Margit Crowell, Senior Hydrologist, Hydrologic Data Section

19 Strategic Systems Update 20

Governing Board December 18, 2007 Agenda

• Strategic Priorities • Strategic Investments

21 • Strategic Projects • Project Roadmaps – WMIS, LaRIS and PIMS • WMIS Project Demonstrations – Water Use Permits and Resource Data District Strategic IT Priorities

• Align resources, systems and strategy • Focus resources on data collection, analysis, reporting and storage • Customer service focus • Develop, refine, and implement the District’s IT Governance and 22 data management processes • Develop, refine, and implement the District’s Enterprise Architecture • Improve work processes • Improve business continuity • Develop nimble information systems • District-wide approach to information content • Scheduled hardware and software refresh Strategic Investments FY 2008 – FY 2012 23 Project Portfolio 24 WMIS Purpose To develop an integrated system that provides for the entry, analysis, dissemination and presentation of the District’s scientific and regulatory data. • Consistent User Interface 25 • Integrated with Regulatory Data • GIS Integration • Work Flow/Document Management • Replace Mainframe • Create a system that we can build upon WMIS Roadmap On time and within budget

Current Project Complete: March 2010

System Refinement and Mainframe removal: Oct 09 – Mar 10

26 ERP, SSL Compliance: Oct 08 – Oct 09

WUP, Compliance, MFL, Resource Data: Oct 07 – Oct 08

SMA WUP Renewals, WCP, Resource Data: Jan 07- Oct 07

Well Contractor Licensing: Mar 07-May 07

Initial Production release: Jan 07 LaRIS Roadmap On time and within budget

Current Project Complete: January 2010 Permits, benchmarks, summary reports: Nov 08 – Jan 10

Wildfires, volunteers, exotics: May 08 – Dec 08 27 Land Use Agreements, Easements, Security: Oct 07 – June 08

Prescribed Burns and Land Acquisition: Oct 05 – Oct 07

Site design: Feb 07

Elaboration: Aug 04 – Jan 06 (GeoAnalytics, Inc)

Inception: Sept 2003 - Feb 2004 (In-house) PIMS Roadmap On time and within budget

Current Project Complete: May 2008

LaRIS, WMIS Integration: Feb 08 – May 08

28 Project Lifecycle and on-line Cooperator entry: Jul 07 – Jan 08

Enhanced Reporting and Document Management: Mar 07 – Jul 07

Release of Basin Board Booklet: Mar 07

Initial Production release: Jan 07 Water Use Permit (Initial Release)

The current focus is Small General permit renewals.

• Internal spatial comparison review 29 • Internal data evaluation

• Permittee proposed application

• On-line acceptance and submittal

• Permit issuance with work flow Resource Data (Initial Release)

The focus is to replace the functionality of the Water Management Database (scheduled for retirement by December 30, 2007). 30 • Water Levels

• Atmospheric (Rainfall and Evapotranspiration)

• Water Quality

• Improved Site Information Demonstrations 31

WUP Renewal – Sommer Mercer Resource Data – Margit Crowell Item 69

Finance and Administration Committee December 18, 2007

Submit & File Report

Treasurer's Report, Payment Register, and Contingency Reserves Report

Purpose Presentation of the Treasurer's Report, Payment Register, and Contingency Reserves Report.

Background In accordance with Board Policy No. 130-3, a monthly report on investments shall be provided to the Governing Board. Attached is a copy of the Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2007, which reflects total cash and investments at a market value of $544,576,416.

In accordance with Board Policy No. 130-1, all general checks written during a period shall be reported to the Governing Board at its next regular meeting. The Payment Register listing disbursements since last month's report is available upon request. The Payment Register includes checks and electronic funds transfers (EFTs).

The FY2008 Contingency Reserves Report (District only) follows:

ORIGINAL BUDGET AMOUNT: $6,000,000 Date of Board Action Less Approved Transfers No transfers have been made to date this fiscal year.

BALANCE: $6,000,000

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

These items are presented for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Daryl F. Pokrana, Director, Finance Department

32 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TREASURER'S REPORT TO THE GOVERNING BOARD November 30, 2007

AGENCY SECURITIES EFFECTIVE CUSIP INTEREST CALLABLE/ PURCHASE MATURITY DURATION (YRS) DAYS TO PURCHASE MARKET ACCRUED % OF NUMBER RATE BULLET DATE DATE OF SECURITY MATURITY COST VALUE INTEREST PORTFOLIO

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT 31331vae6 4.54 Callable 09/27/2005 03/27/2008 2.50 118 $10,000,000 $10,000,533 $79,450 31331s5j8 5.05 Callable 09/17/2007 04/08/2009 1.56 495 9,937,500 9,999,792 65,521 31331xsj2 5.15 Callable 03/12/2007 03/12/2010 3.00 833 10,000,000 10,023,350 111,583 31331xwx6 5.20 Callable 04/30/2007 04/30/2010 3.00 882 10,000,000 10,032,878 43,333 31331yet3 4.45 Callable 11/26/2007 11/26/2010 3.00 1092 10,000,000 10,046,544 4,944 TOTAL FEDERAL FARM CREDIT $49,937,500 $50,103,097 $304,831 9.25

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 3133xdxn6 5.00 Callable 12/14/2005 12/14/2007 2.00 14 $7,025,000 $7,026,378 $161,965 3133xc7g2 4.25 Callable 06/28/2005 12/28/2007 2.50 28 10,000,000 10,000,243 179,444 3133xjsd1 5.25 Bullet 01/30/2007 01/02/2008 0.92 33 10,000,000 10,005,998 437,500 3133xjwx2 5.25 Bullet 03/01/2007 02/01/2008 0.92 63 10,000,000 10,012,000 392,292 3133xl6b4 5.13 Bullet 06/07/2007 06/04/2009 1.99 552 10,000,000 10,206,573 250,556 3133xflg9 5.20 Bullet 07/09/2007 06/12/2009 1.93 560 10,008,600 10,204,000 245,000 3133xlk93 5.38 Callable 06/25/2007 09/25/2009 2.25 665 10,000,000 10,054,688 231,424 3133xkyf6 5.25 Callable 05/25/2007 05/27/2010 3.01 909 10,000,000 10,039,260 4,375 3133xlkd4 5.63 Callable 07/09/2007 07/09/2010 3.00 952 10,000,000 10,012,298 220,313 3133xmd73 5.00 Callable 10/05/2007 09/24/2010 2.97 1029 10,000,000 10,068,641 91,667

33 3133xkq99 5.25 Callable 09/14/2007 11/02/2010 3.14 1068 4,999,650 5,017,676 20,417 3133xmsv4 4.70 Callable 11/15/2007 11/15/2010 3.00 1081 10,000,000 10,011,731 19,583 3133xmxq9 4.63 Callable 11/19/2007 11/19/2010 3.00 1085 10,000,000 10,062,167 14,132 TOTAL FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK $122,033,250 $122,721,653 $2,268,668 22.59

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION 3128x5g93 5.32 Callable 03/06/2007 03/06/2009 2.00 462 $10,000,000 $10,000,609 $124,133 3128x5xa1 5.24 Callable 03/02/2007 01/11/2010 2.87 773 10,000,000 10,009,840 202,708 TOTAL FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION $20,000,000 $20,010,449 $326,841 3.70

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 3136f5c90 5.43 Bullet 07/12/2006 06/02/2008 1.89 185 $9,958,000 $10,037,525 $257,111 31359m6u2 5.44 Callable 08/15/2007 03/29/2010 2.62 850 10,000,000 10,009,494 90,958 3136f8js5 5.35 Callable 04/12/2007 04/12/2010 3.00 864 10,000,000 10,010,000 71,333 31398aee8 5.50 Callable 07/09/2007 07/09/2010 3.00 952 10,000,000 10,137,000 215,417 3136f8uq6 5.05 Callable 11/01/2007 11/01/2010 3.00 1067 10,000,000 10,020,400 40,681 TOTAL FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION $49,958,000 $50,214,419 $675,500 9.25 PRIVATE EXPORT FUNDING CORPORATION 742651cj9 5.05 Bullet 05/09/2007 07/31/2008 1.23 244 $10,095,300 $10,108,900 $195,667 TOTAL PRIVATE EXPORT FUNDING CORPORATION $10,095,300 $10,108,900 $195,667 1.87

TOTAL AGENCY SECURITIES $252,024,050 $253,158,518 $3,771,507 46.66

Weighted average yield on agency securities at November 30, 2007 is 5.10%. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TREASURER'S REPORT TO THE GOVERNING BOARD November 30, 2007

STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION (SBA) ACCOUNTS EFFECTIVE ACCOUNT ACCOUNT INTEREST PURCHASE MARKET ACCRUED % OF NUMBER DESCRIPTION RATE COST VALUE INTEREST PORTFOLIO

271413 SBA General Investments (1) $252,525,692 $252,525,692 271411 SBA Workers' Compensation (1) 1,329,336 1,329,336 271412 SBA Benefit Plan (1) 29,658 29,658 271414 SBA Land Resources (1) 5,643,547 5,643,547 271415 SBA Advanced State Funding (1) 26,470,407 26,470,407 271416 SBA Advanced State Funding (FDOT Maintenance and Monitoring) (1) 2,061,240 2,061,240 271417 SBA Weeki Wachee Rent Overpayments (1) 23,601 23,601 TOTAL STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION (SBA) ACCOUNTS $288,083,481 $288,083,481 53.34

TOTAL INVESTMENTS $540,107,531 $541,241,999 100.00

CASH, SUNTRUST DEMAND ACCOUNT 3,334,417 3,334,417

TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $543,441,948 $544,576,416

(1) SBA has not yet reported the participant interest earnings rate for November 2007, and has not paid November interest earnings to Pool participants. A report on the status of the District's investment in the SBA Local Government Investment Pool will be provided at the December 18 Governing Board meeting. 34

EQUITY - CASH AND INVESTMENTS

DISTRICT AND BASINS District General Fund $ 258,247,303 47.52% Alafia River Basin 11,991,903 2.21% Hillsborough River Basin 26,442,342 4.87% Northwest Hillsborough Basin 27,448,553 5.05% Coastal Rivers Basin 11,792,006 2.17% Pinellas-Anclote River Basin 105,900,948 19.49% Withlacoochee River Basin 12,065,604 2.22% Peace River Basin 29,145,543 5.36% Manasota Basin 50,831,933 9.35% SWIM Program 7,845,409 1.44% FDOT Mitigation Program 1,730,404 0.32% TOTAL EQUITY IN CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 543,441,948 100.00% Item 70

Finance and Administration Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Management Services Activities Report

Tampa Service Office – Building 2 Renovation Project Building 2 is a one story building that includes office space, a data center, and a mechanical mezzanine. The building was constructed in 1988 and houses staff from the Information Resources Department. For the past several years, this building experienced mold problems due mainly to roof leaks. In 2005, a new roof was installed which fixed the leaks. In order to determine what needed to be done to remediate the mold problem, an Industrial Hygienist was brought in to assess the situation. Their recommendation was to remove all the drywall ceilings and any walls with visible mold or water stains. Along with this work, the HVAC system will be replaced and the electrical systems will be updated. In order to find a qualified contractor to perform this work, a set of plans and specs were developed by Woodroofe Corporation Architects and staff. A bid was then sent out which resulted in a contract with Rauh-Co to remediate the mold and renovate the building. New Activities Since Last Meeting: As of the end of November, all the work on the automatic transfer switch has been completed. The contractor is finishing up the last couple of punch list items. The County has issued a certificate of occupancy. The installation of the office and modular furniture is underway. A plan is in place to begin relocating staff into the building on December 3. The project is on schedule, within budget, and Rauh-Co advises will be completed by November deadline.

Land Map Imaging Currently there are approximately 5000 large scale paper drawings that are the only available record copy. For business continuity it is important to image these records to prevent the loss of information due to an unforeseen disaster at the District. For migration of these maps into the WMIS system at a later time, data about the maps will also be included as metadata. Budget for Land Maps is $70,000; project is expected to be under budget. New Activities Since Last Meeting: Work has begun on the Hillsborough River Basin with blueline printing of some aerials. Blueline is an old process and we are working in-house and with offsite vendors to expedite the process.

Library – Reports & Publications Online District staff and engineers have a need to access and reference District and USGS Reports and Publications. To physically store these reports would require more than127 cubic feet of self space, plus additional library space for engineers to review reports. Through the use of the Library software In Magic, these reports and publications are being imaged and made available online to internal staff and engineers. Reports and Publications physical volume is approximately 10.6 Gigabytes, which translates to 212,000 pages of records. Volume is equal to 84.8 shelf bins in the Technical Library. No costs are associated with this effort. Return on Investment (ROI) would have to be translated into value of floor space to the District. New Activities Since Last Meeting: There are 566 reports and publications that still require processing.

Imaging – Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Plans The District currently has a need to image ERP Plans to reduce on-site storage space and provide easy access for these records. Document Services has provided a solution in its imaging program. Customer satisfaction with this project is very high. ERP Plans are sent to off-site storage once complete. Images are provided with metadata to support migration into Water Management Information System (WMIS) application at a later date. ROI on investment for this project is measured in compliance with Chapter 119, F.S., and ease of access for engineers and field technicians. Repurposing for the MAN Soil Survey project resulted in a savings to date of approximately $500,000. This savings will increase as the Soil Survey project

35 Item 70 expands. This project is budgeted for $70,000. New Activities Since Last Meeting: This is only for the Brooksville Service Office. IRD is determining if these images can be repurposed for WMIS.

Learning Management System Training and staff development represent a critical investment in the District's staff. A Learning Management System (LMS) is a major component of the comprehensive Human Resources Information System (HRIS) discussed in the previous item. The LMS component of our HRIS is scheduled for implementation in October 2009. To provide much of the needed functionality between now and October 2009, the District has undertaken some significant interim initiatives. First, the District currently has deployed an internally developed database, Training Central, which centralizes the administration of all internal, District-sponsored training. This database automates and standardizes many of the routine training functions: course and class creation, catalog publication, registration, notification, confirmation, managing prerequisites, budget and cost information and student training history. In addition, before the end of this calendar year, we will add functionality to improve the manager's and supervisor's view of employee history, to capture and report on external training, and on licensure and certification requirements where applicable, and to store employee education (college degree) information. In addition, we will add more information, available to all employees regarding college and university offerings of all types. Current Status: Functionality has been added to Training Central to allow supervisors to view their employees' internal (District sponsored) training history. A new Training Central feature rolled out on September 4, 2007. 'My Education' allows an employee to add their academic degrees, professional certifications, licensures, and certificate programs to the Training Central database. Managers and supervisors have the ability to view education history for their employees. The work team for collecting external training through Training Central is anticipating a prototype by the end of December. A new Training web page has been developed by IRD and HRD staff to provide employees with current information on the District's training initiatives. It gives staff the ability to link to all departments that offer training. External links are also included to educational and other relevant sites. The web page will be released to all employees by the end of December 2007 and will be updated and enhanced on a regular basis.

Employee Turnover Employee turnover is widely viewed as a key indicator of an employer's ability to attract and retain the critical talent required to move the enterprise forward. As a public sector employer, the District has historically enjoyed turnover relatively low compared to the private sector and, generally, to other public sector organizations in its geographic area. This District began to experience an upturn in turnover in 2005 that continued in 2006. Specifically, total turnover increased from 7.62% in FY2004 to 9.35% in FY2005 and to 11.33% in FY2006. Early in 2006, with the full support of the Governing Board, the District undertook a major study of its compensation and benefit practices. This effort resulted in the adoption of significant improvements to our direct compensation program, several changes to our benefit plans and the adoption of a District matching contribution arrangement for participants in the deferred compensation plan. In FY2007 the District experienced a decrease of overall employee turnover to 6.33% versus the record high of 11.33% the prior fiscal year. Current Status: For the first two months of the 2008 fiscal year (October-November 2007), employee turnover (regular, board-authorized positions) was 1.1%, the same as October-November 2006. The number of vacancies as of December 1, 2007 was 21, one less than November 2007. This represents a significant decline from a high of 58 in February 2006 and 37 vacancies on October 3, 2006. If current trends continue, annual turnover for FY2008 would be 6.6%. Human Resources staff will continue to track and report to management on turnover trends to ensure that we are prepared to respond to any unusual upward trends that may occur in the future.

36 Item 70

Risk Management and Safety The District is committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for employees. This activity includes both internal and extracurricular wellness and safety programs which can benefit both employees and their dependents. Funds to support this initiative are budgeted annually by the Human Resources/Risk Management Department. Wellness and safety programs have been shown to increase workplace productivity, reduce incidents of accident and illness, and improve the overall mental, physical and emotional health and well being of employees and their families and reduce health care and lost time costs to the District. Current Status: The District provides an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) to employees and family members which includes referrals for short term counseling and referrals to legal and financial assistance. The current provider, The Allen Group, recently partnered with a national organization, Horizon Behavioral Health, a partnership which has enhanced access to mental health providers both locally and nationally. Risk Management and Safety also coordinate and schedule safety training programs on topics such as first aid training to include cardio- pulmonary-resuscitation (CPR) and automatic external defibrillator (AED) training, defensive driving, chain saw safety, all terrain vehicle training and boating safety. These programs are applicable to both work and home activities and ultimately help to keep employees safe and protected on and off the job. The Risk Management website is updated on a regular basis to provide employees with the most current information about Wellness and Safety at the District.

Water Management Information System (WMIS) The vision for the Water Management Information System (WMIS), as defined in the 2005 Vision Statement, is that it will support the District's activities related to Water Use Permitting, Environmental Resource Permitting, and Well Construction Permitting. In addition, the system will have the ability to store and retrieve Scientific and Regulatory data, as well as the ability to capture and track compliance activities. Specifically, it will: x Facilitate and allow for comprehensive demonstration of the District’s accomplishment of its mission and accountability for its performance in meeting its areas of responsibility. x Provide for the entry, maintenance, analysis, and presentation of the District’s scientific and regulatory data. x Be easy to use, robust, nimble, and enable appropriate decision-making through the consistent application of the District’s scientific, regulatory, and business processes. x Be a component of the District’s Strategic Information Systems architecture. This project is scheduled for completion in FY 2010 with planned interim releases designed to continuously improve well-defined District regulatory and scientific functions. . Current Status: The WUP Small General permit renewal and scientific data search, Portfolio / Site Maintenance components were released in October 2007. Training has been conducted for both WUP processing and the scientific data analysis application. Next Major Milestone: The next major functional software release will include: WUP Small General permit modification and renewal, basic permitting compliance, external scientific data search and several system enhancements that have been requested by the user community. These are scheduled for release during March, 2008.

Enterprise Content Management (ECM) The District's critical information is currently located in multiple repositories including desktop computers, network file systems, CD-ROMS, USB drives and multiple electronic systems. The Information Resources Department (IRD) and Records Management share in this task of managing the District's critical information in this environment. Daily volumes of general correspondence, email, spreadsheets, digital images, video, audio, and web content, make it necessary to manage the totality of content at the District. Enterprise Content Management (ECM) provides for the centralized management of all content and allows quick access to the information in a structured manner. It is critical to the District's business continuity that this information is safe, secured and easily retrievable on demand. The ECM strategic project is a collaborative effort between IRD and Records Management. Records Management is working on procedural changes and documenting those procedures to support the ECM effort. IRD is working on the technical architecture and system interfaces required for implementation and operation. Due to requirements listed in FAC 1B-26.003, storage for the electronic records is also a major concern that will be addressed with an ECM infrastructure. The District has

37 Item 70 already implemented some components of content management such as imaging and workflow processing in the Water Management Information System (WMIS). South Florida and St. Johns Water Management Districts are in like stages of their ECM implementations. Current Status: In FY2007, funds were approved for consulting services to conduct requirements, return on investment and risk analyses on expanding the limited, existing content management efforts to other areas of the District. These include areas such as Communications, Finance, Human Resources, Land Resources, Office of the General Counsel, and Records Management. As identified in the April Governing Board approved IRD Five-Year Technology Plan Fiscal Years 2008–2102, a multi-year Enterprise Content Management implementation plan is proposed. Funding for this project is projected over a five-year period. FY2008 is the initial year of implementation. The RFP for the analysis portion of the project was issued in December 2006 and awarded to HCL, America Inc. (HCL) in May 2007. HCL staff was on-site June 4, 2007, with the project kick-off meeting held on June 5, 2007 with all the project stakeholders. All deliverables, including the meeting minutes, strategy, scope, As-Is, To-Be, Business Case and Executive Summary have been completed, delivered and accepted by the sponsors. An Executive-level business case is being developed by the Information Resources Department. Vendor demonstrations were completed to help the Architecture Review Board (ARB) evaluate the options and provide recommendations for the Request for Proposal (RFP). The outcome of the vendor demonstrations have been discussed with the ARB and the resulting recommendations are being compiled into the RFP requirements. The RFP structure and final requirements are being reviewed by the ARB. Next Major Milestones: Upon completion of the ARB review and Senior Management evaluation, a RFP will be issued to implement an ECM solution via the most qualified vendor.

Land Resources Information System (LaRIS) In 1981, the Save Our Rivers program was established by the Florida Legislature for the acquisition of lands necessary for water management, water supply, protection and conservation of water resources. This program was broadened in 1990 with the Preservation 2000 Act and revised in 1999 with the Florida Forever Act. Utilizing these programs, the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) has acquired fee simple interest in over 330,000 acres and less than fee interest in over 67,000 acres for various water management requirements. The lands that are acquired by the District require management and maintenance to provide public access, recreational use and protection of the natural systems. Managing these resources requires that District staff have access to comprehensive information for each of the District's properties The Land Resources Information System (LaRIS) was envisioned to meet land acquisition and management requirements and significantly improve the business processes. The 2005 LaRIS vision statement states that the system will: x Provide a common, centralized storage location for detailed Land Resources data. x Have user-friendly applications for the input and maintenance of Land Resources data. x Validate information is in proper format. x Generate required documentation output such as detailed reports and map documents. x Allow District staff to easily and efficiently access and utilize the necessary information pertaining to District-owned lands to perform the duties of their jobs. Funding for this project is reimbursable through the Water Management Lands Trust Fund. Current Status: The third iteration of Land Management (Burn Planning, Burn Prescriptions, Burn Evaluations and Burn Coordination) user acceptance testing is complete. Based on this testing, changes have been addressed and are ready to release to production. The first few Land Acquisition components (Parcel Information, Eminent Domain & Surplus Lands) have been completed. They were moved to acceptance are now being tested by the users. The NameSearch component, allowing us to share a common data source with WMIS, PIMS and other applications, has also been implemented and is in user acceptance testing. The latest release also included the first components of Stellent document management integration. This was originally scheduled for later in the project, but was moved up to achieve better WMIS integration. We have also made future development easier ensuring all coding is done in well- defined modules, and is easier to reuse in other parts of the projects. Next Major Milestones: The Land Management Burn Components are scheduled to move to Production in early December; the first set of Land Acquisition Components is scheduled to move to production in late January; and the Land Use Components are scheduled to begin user acceptance testing in

38 Item 70 late 2007/early 2008. The Land Use Components will include Land Use Agreements, Land acquisition Status reports and Land Owner Documentation. The next set of Land Acquisition components will include Conservation Easements and Land Owner information. These will be ready for user acceptance testing in early December.

Project Information Management System (PIMS) The Project Information Management System (PIMS) project was started in FY 2006 as a replacement for a limited function project management system written in Domino/Lotus Notes. The earlier project management solution was a critical resource used by the Governing Board and Basin Boards to evaluate the progress of existing projects. This evaluation is used by the board to determine the direction of funding for projects on an annual basis. The previous system had no automated integration with the financial system, and required an extensive manual effort to achieve this integration. The previous application also failed to provide appropriate security and auditing to verify the source of the information. The proposed PIMS solution provides an easier to use process for project definition, automates the integration with the financial systems and provides integration with other district applications including the Water Management Information System (WMIS), the Surface Water Improvement Management (SWIM) program and document management. It is designed to reduce the administrative effort to maintain the information, improve the accuracy of the information and provide more flexibility in how the information is reported. Current Status: PIMS is in Phase 2. Enhanced usability features for PIMS and the Web applications for the Cooperative Funding Initiative (CFI) with Electronic Document Management were released on October 1, 2007. The CFI internal administration tool and the New Fiscal year 09 Basin Board Booklet were released in November. 2007. Next Major Milestones: The next release in Phase 2 will include enhancements to the CFI administration application, incorporating the CFI application into PIMS and transferring on-going support for the Basin Board booklet to District staff. This release is scheduled for deployment in December 2007. Phase 3 will start January 2, 2008.

Human Resources Information System (HRIS) As identified in the Information Resources Department Five-Year Technology Plan, FY2008 to FY2012, the District requires greater functionality from its Human Resource and Payroll processes. The existing applications, Hewitt CYBORG Human Resource and Payroll, are not fully integrated or as robust as required for current demands. The data is currently on multiple hardware and software platforms and must be better integrated to meet current and future processing requirements and to significantly improve workflows. Replacing the currently disparate systems and processes with an integrated solution, will improve data integrity and data analysis. It will also reduce the staff impact caused by developing multiple interfaces to integrate the current systems. Additionally, replacing the current systems with a more current technology will help ensure the District's technical architecture standards are met and will ensure the orderly removal of legacy systems from the IBM Enterprise Server (Mainframe). Current Status: A team from Finance, Human Resources and Information Resources developed and evaluated a Request for Proposal (RFP) to achieve the objectives stated above. The RFP was released in May 2007. Five vendors submitted responsive proposals. The three strongest vendors were invited to present live demonstrations of their products during the last week in August. Based on District staff evaluations, NuView Systems was chosen as the best system meeting the required functional, technical and cost criteria. As also indicated in the IRD Five Year Technology Plan, $794,000 is available for HRIS implementation in FY2008 and $400,000 and $150,000 are planned for FY2009 and FY2010, respectively. The FY2009 and FY2010 HRIS budget will be significantly reduced to only the recurring software maintenance costs and any final conversion/implementation costs. More detailed numbers will follow in the FY2009-FY2013 IRD Five Year Technology Plan. After the NuView software is implemented, Hewitt software budgetary costs will be eliminated. The NuView contract and licensing agreement details have been negotiated and contract award is planned for early December 2007. Next Major Milestones: Once the contract is signed, NuView will assign a Project Manager to SWFWMD and a multi-functional implementation team will be established. The estimated start time for the project is mid December to early January depending on Holiday schedules. Estimated project completion is mid calendar year 2009. During the early phases of the project, a more detailed project plan to include more precise timelines and resource

39 Item 70 requirements will be established. The District has already started documenting the process flows and technical requirements needed by NuView to complete the installation. This early work will help reduce the implementation time.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Gene Schiller, Deputy Executive Director, Management Services

40 F. Outreach & Planning Comte. Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Outreach and Planning Committee

Discussion Items

71. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion

72. Florida Department of Environmental Protection Surface Water Quality Classification System ...... (20 minutes) ...... 3

Submit & File Report

73. Legislative Update ...... 4

Routine Reports

74. Significant Activities Report ...... 5

75. Speakers Bureau ...... 11

76. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report ...... 13

77. Review of Developments of Regional Impact ...... 18 2 Item 72

Outreach and Planning Committee December 18, 2007

Discussion Item

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Surface Water Quality Classification System

Purpose The goal of this presentation is to enhance the Governing Board's understanding of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (FDEP) surface water quality classification system and the process/criteria for reclassification.

Background In June of 2007, Tampa Bay Water staff facilitated a presentation to the Alafia Basin Board indicating its intention to pursue the reclassification of the Alafia River from Class III to Class I. At the November 2007 Governing Board/Tampa Bay Water Joint Workshop, Tampa Bay Water's effort to reclassify the Alafia River became an open discussion item among the respective Board members. At this workshop, it was requested that this topic be scheduled for a future Board meeting to better inform the Board of the issue.

To enhance understanding of the issue Eric Shaw from the FDEP, Water Quality Standards & Special Projects Program, will provide an overview of FDEP's surface water quality classification system and the process/criteria for reclassification.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenters: Roy Mazur P.E., Director, Planning Department Eric Shaw, Program Manager, FDEP

3 Item 73

Outreach and Planning Committee December 18, 2007

Submit & File Report

Legislative Update

State Legislative Issues Update

HB 181 Requires Posting of Government Expenditures This proposed bill applies to all water management districts. The bill would require the Department of State to create and manage a website that is accessible and searchable by the general public at no charge. The website must list, by quarter, each expenditure made by a governmental entity to a person under contract, including the name of the governmental entity, the name of the person to whom payment is made, the date of expenditure, amount of expenditure, and purpose of expenditure. This would include all expenditures associated with contracts, purchase orders and contracts in amounts of $5,000 or more. The purpose appears to be to aggregate total Florida government spending by vendor and to make government spending more transparent.

Sunset Review Continues The staff Director of the Senate Environmental Preservation Committee visited the District on November 30 to continue discussions regarding the sunset review. District staff provided presentations regarding permitting, SWIM, land resources and development of alternative water supply projects.

The presentations enabled staff to provide an additional overview of the District, its uniqueness and funding issues. Additionally, conversation centered on the District's core mission and our strategic priorities in the areas of water supply, flood protection, natural systems and water quality protection and restoration. Additional time was allotted for questions. The focus of the committee staff was the potential for streamlining processes and gaining efficiencies.

Federal Legislative Issues Update

Congress Overrides Veto of Water Resources Development Act The House and Senate overrode President Bush's veto of the Water Resource Development Act (WRDA). This was the first override of Bush's presidency and only the 107th in history.

The $23 billion WRDA authorization will provide nearly $2 billion for the Everglades restoration effort. The bill also provides federal assistance with maintenance dredging of Manatee Harbor and efforts to restore water quality, hydrology and habitat in Charlotte Harbor. Congress has not authorized a Water Resources Development Act since 2000.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is submitted for the Committee’s information, and no action is required.

Presenter: David Rathke, Director, Community and Legislative Affairs Department

4 Item 74

Outreach and Planning Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Significant Activities Report

Conservation and Drought Communications

Drought Communications Three 60-second and two 30-second radio advertising spots continued to air during the "Skip a Week" media messaging campaign in November. The campaign was developed because of the continuing drought situation — lower than normal summer rain, falling aquifer and lake levels, and low flows in surface water bodies. The theme of the ads is to skip a week of irrigation during cooler months to save water. With up to 50 percent of residential water use going to landscapes, skipping a week of irrigation could cut water use by up to 25 percent. The scripts were generated in-house and District staff provided some of the voices for the ads. The ads ran every other week in October and November in all radio markets within the District, reaching a diverse demographic. The alternate week approach was to make the budgeted funds go further by increasing the impact of the advertising within concentrated periods. In addition to radio, two newspaper ads ran in each of the major circulation newspapers in the District, along with ads in two publications that cater to the Hispanic audience and two publications that specialize in reaching the African-American community. The total cost for the fall advertising buy was $150,000, with $75,000 being spent each month. With the holiday distractions in December and the potential political advertising in January, the District has not planned any advertising buys for these two months. Instead, the District is employing a grassroots effort using existing tools such as the Speakers’ Bureau, news media outreach, public affairs programming, Florida Yards & Neighborhoods program and Youth Education, as well as outreach to homeowners associations, churches, retail outlets and others. The District has also developed a web page at WaterMatters.org/drought/. The major concentrated advertising buy, $750,000, is still planned for February–June. New radio, print and television advertising will be developed. District staff will continue monitoring hydrologic conditions to determine appropriate messaging for the advertising. New Activities Since Last Meeting — Fifteen billboard posters were placed throughout the Tampa Bay area at the end of November and are scheduled to stay up throughout December. Ten of those posters will remain up throughout January. The District's water conservation/FYN regional builder/developer landscape specialist was interviewed on 970 WFLA-AM's Florida Gardening show. Topics covered included the District's "Skip a Week" message, Florida-friendly landscaping and current hydrologic conditions. In addition, the District's Hispanic spokesperson was interviewed on Hispanic radio stations WYUU-FM 92.5 and WQBN-AM, as well as WVEA-TV Ch 62 Univision. The same topics were covered in addition to the District's new Spanish web page and publications. The District distributed a news release on Skip a Week and conducted numerous interviews, which garnered coverage in the following newspapers, radio and television stations: Bradenton Herald, Daily Commercial, News-Sun, Ocala Star-Banner, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Tampa Tribune, Villages Daily Sun, Winter Haven News Chief, 970 WFLA-AM, Bay News 9 and WTSP-TV Ch 10. Communications staff began implementing the Intermediate Phase of the FY2008 Drought Communications Plan by developing and distributing a PowerPoint presentation, copy points and collateral materials to District staff to reach several of the key target audiences. Print ads and articles promoting Florida-friendly landscaping are being offered to homeowners associations (HOAs), churches, public supply utilities and others for use in their newsletters. As of Nov. 28, the Skip a Week ad was being distributed to 956 HOAs in Hillsborough County, 100+ neighborhood associations in St. Petersburg, 86 in Sarasota County and 11 in Citrus County. A speaking engagement is being scheduled in Polk County for the President's Alliance, a group of approximately 73 neighborhood associations. The District is continuing efforts to contact additional HOAs throughout the District. Following the November 26 Governing Board meeting, the District

5 Item 74 secured significant drought media coverage in all major daily newspapers within the District, along with coverage on WFTS-TV Ch 28, 970 WFLA-AM, WFLA-TV Ch 8, WTVT-TV FOX 13 and Bay News 9.

College Conservation Project This project was created to develop programs that target the 19–25 age group. It is important that this group adopt conservatory behaviors that will help set the standard for behaviors they will carry on through their adult lives. Staff felt that members of this demographic would be best suited to create programs to target their peers. Therefore, in cooperation with USF’s Public Relations School and the USF Collaborative for Children, Families and Communities, a team of five USF public relations students has completed rigorous qualitative and quantitative research to uncover barriers and benefits to water conservation habits among college students. New Activities Since Last Meeting — Focus groups were conducted on October 9 with students at USF’s Tampa campus. Data collected was used to create a web survey that was sent to all USF students to collect attitudes and opinions on conservation and the water issues in Florida. A goal was set to collect at least 384 responses to the survey. The team collected 391 completed responses. A Spotlight Gala will be held on December 14 at USF's Tampa campus. The gala will showcase the student's efforts on this project and will include a presentation of strategies and tactics they developed based on the research.

Irrigation Pilot Program –– Community-Based Social Marketing A community-based social marketing pilot program is under way in neighborhoods in Sumter, Polk and Charlotte counties. Residents will be asked to “take control of their irrigation systems” during the months of July, August and September, when rainfall can allow residents to turn off their systems for extended periods of time, and to "water only every other week” during the months of January and February. The specific education interventions will be determined after qualitative (focus groups) and quantitative (survey) research is conducted to determine the best way to educate the residents to achieve the desired behaviors. New Activities Since Last Meeting — Since the current drought response media campaign promotes "Skip a Week" of irrigation, the irrigation pilot project has been restructured to begin with the education interventions for the July, August and September portion of the project and then pilot the January and February intervention in 2009. The audio recordings from the focus groups have been used to guide the creation of a telephone survey questionnaire. The survey has been tested with small sample audiences to ensure its understandability and clarity of responses. The survey will undergo further revisions to include questions to gather input on the current "Skip a Week" campaign. Data collection is scheduled to begin in late December 2007 and continue through early January 2008. Staff is gathering sample usage reports from participating utilities and beginning to structure data compilation reports. Florida Yards & Neighborhoods (FYN) Recognizing the potential of water conservation and water quality protection through promotion of Florida-friendly landscaping practices, the District began partnering with the University of Florida in FY2001 to support Florida-friendly landscaping education. Currently, approximately 228,000 people are reached annually through homeowner programs in eight counties, builder and developer programs in five counties and community/homeowner association programs that reach four counties. With up to 50 percent of a typical household's water use going to outdoor irrigation, outreach to builders, developers and irrigation specialists became available Districtwide in FY2007. New Activities Since Last Meeting — The final components of the FloridaYards.org web site have been completed. The web site, which provides general information on Florida-friendly landscaping, an interactive landscape planning exercise and a Florida-friendly plant database, now includes three multimedia stories for building industry professionals. Two of these feature locations within the District: "A Lawn Care Company Grows With Florida-Friendly Landscapes" features Wild Rose Lawncare of Lutz, and "Sarasota County Leads the Way to Sustainable Living" highlights successful all-community Florida-friendly landscaping and Angela Maraj, the District's water conservation/FYN regional builder/developer specialist. In November, a "How to Create an Award-Winning Landscape" workshop was held for members of the Manasota/Sarasota County Builders Association. Also in November, the Charlotte/DeSoto Building Industry Association agreed to include the District's Water-Wise

6 Item 74

Program in its spring Parade of Homes event. Communications staff will provide Florida-friendly landscaping information to be included in the Clear Springs Land Company Sector Plan — Conceptual Plan Overlay. This new multiuse development will involve approximately 18,000 acres of land east and south of the City of Bartow. University of Florida’s Environmental Horticulture Department is reviewing the Florida Water Star Program criteria, which was created by the SJRWMD.

Water Conservation Hotel And Motel Program (Water CHAMP) Water CHAMP promotes water conservation in hotels and motels through a towel and linen reuse program that encourages guests to use their towels and linens more than once during their stay. Participating hotels and motels receive materials that explain Water CHAMP to staff members and guests. Materials include towel reuse cards, linen reuse cards, environmental table brochures, guest comment cards, staff training materials and an environmental self-audit checklist, all free of charge. Educational workshops on additional ways to save water are also provided to the participating hotels and motels. Surveys of guests staying in Water CHAMP properties indicate that guests like the program and believe conserving water makes a difference to the environment. From 2002–2003, Pinellas County Utilities and the City of Tampa Water Department conducted comparison studies of the water use of 71 hotels in their area before and after implementing Water CHAMP. The studies showed that in total the 71 participants saved a cumulative 100 million gallons of water in only one year after implementing Water CHAMP. New Activities Since Last Meeting — Nine new properties joined Water CHAMP in November, bringing the total number of participating properties to 351. These properties represent a 38 percent participation rate Districtwide and account for more than 56 percent of the available hotel rooms. Staff will attend the Green Lodging ceremony for the Tampa Airport Marriott on Nov. 28. This will be the first certified Green Lodge in the City of Tampa and the sixth certified hotel in the District. An additional 37 hotels in the District are in the application process to become a Green Lodge.

Watershed Education

The District's watershed education efforts encourage residents to understand and protect their local water resources. Education relating to water quality, stormwater runoff, water conservation and natural systems is delivered through decision-maker workshops, field trips and tours, speaking engagements, pond adoptions, special events, educational kiosks and stormdrain marking activities. New Activities Since Last Meeting — As part of the Crystal River/Kings Bay and Rainbow River Watershed Education program, District staff is conducting research to determine what will motivate residents of Citrus and the District's portion of Marion counties to fertilize appropriately and to properly maintain their septic systems. This research includes a series of four focus groups conducted within the target area. Approximately 54 residents attended the focus groups, which were held November 14, 20 and 21 in three locations: Crystal River City Hall, the Residence Inn by Marriott in Marion County and the Citrus Springs Community Center. The District is also developing a preevaluation survey to determine what residents know about these issues. The first draft of the preevaluation survey has been received from the consultant for review. Once the focus groups and preevaluation surveys are complete, District staff will develop an education program based on the results. After implementation, a post-campaign evaluation will assess behavior change.

Youth Education

The District provides water resources education programs to county school districts, private schools, homeschool groups and nonformal educators through teacher training workshops, mini-grants, field trip programs and educational resources for students and educators. New Activities Since Last Meeting — The Weedon Island Preserve Cultural and Natural History Center celebrated the grand opening of its exhibit hall, which features six interactive exhibits about the Tampa Bay watershed, the Tampa Bay estuary and the archaeological significance of the preserve. FY2006 Pinellas-Anclote River basin and SWIM funding supported the development of two of the six new exhibits at the center. Youth Education staff unveiled the new K–3 Watershed Resources Box at the November Basin Board Education Committee meeting.

7 Item 74

This new resources box features hands-on activities for students in grades K–3, a teacher's guide with background information on Florida's watersheds, and an original big book, Wonderful Watersheds, illustrated by the District's Visual Communications staff. The resource box is available through the Splash! mini-grant program.

Strategic Planning

On May 3, 2007, the Executive Director chartered a three tiered Strategic Team consisting of District staff at the Executive, Director, and Manager levels. The Executive Director's intent was and is to enhance the District's strategic planning process to achieve the following objectives: x Clarify and gain agreement on the District's strategic direction, establish priorities over time and intended actions; x Create a communication document for internal and external use; x Refine the tracking and reporting methodology for Board meetings to enhance Board satisfaction level, as well as to streamline production efforts; and x Use the strategic plan process internally to develop tactical plans, improve organizational alignment and reduce duplication of strategies, tactics and efforts. The Strategic Team has been meeting on a regular basis to identify and map the initiatives that help the District achieve its goals in the areas of Water Supply, Water Quality, Natural Systems, and Flood Protection. Monthly status reports to the Governing Board have been presented, allowing the Board to be involved in the process and guide its development. New Activities Since Last Meeting – The 2009-2013 Strategic Plan was approved by the Governing board at the November meeting. The concept for the 2010 update will be presented to Executive for concurrence and/or direction in December.

Local Government 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plans

Seventy-seven local governments in the District's 10-county Regional Water Supply Planning Area will be required to prepare water supply plans for their jurisdictions, known as 10-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plans (Work Plans). These plans are required to be adopted into their comprehensive plans by May 30, 2008. Polk and Highlands counties (but not their municipalities) have a slightly later deadline, June 14th, 2008, because they are included in two Regional Water Supply Plans.

Planning Department staff are engaged in multiple efforts to provide technical assistance and promote sound water supply planning by local governments. Staff recently worked with the other four water management districts and the Departments of Community Affairs (DCA) and Environmental Protection (DEP) to produce an updated guidance document to help local governments meet the various water supply planning requirements passed by the legislature over the past five years. The guidelines have been distributed to all local governments and are posted on the DCA website. The same interagency team will be meeting in the next six weeks to ensure a consistent statewide approach to technical assistance and in the review of the Work Plans and comprehensive plan amendments.

Staff participated in a technical assistance workshop, jointly sponsored by the Central Florida Regional Planning Council, the South Florida Water Management District and this District, in Avon Park in early November. The workshop was well attended by planning and utility staff from central Florida local governments and follow up meetings are being arranged with key cities and counties.

Sumter County Development Activity

In November, Planning Department staff received the DRI submittal from the Landstone Communities Development in central Sumter County. The development proposes construction of 8,025 residential units and up to 430,000 square feet of retail and office space. The Landstone project, which will require a large-scale comprehensive land use plan amendment from the City of Wildwood, will average four dwelling units per acre over the entire 4,200 acre parcel.

8 Item 74

While the Landstone Development by itself, while imposing, is not out of the ordinary, it is attracting increased attention as to the east, two DRI projects have been submitted for development approval along the Lake-Sumter County line. The Renaissance Trails community in Sumter County has approximately 2,262 dwelling units on 2,324 acres, and in Lake County, the Secret Promise DRI project for 9,211 residential units on 3,747 acres. In addition, the Wildwood Springs DRI (located north of Webster) includes 3,000 dwelling units on 1,025 acres. In total, these development projects represent approximately 22,860 future dwelling units.

District Planning Department staff is coordinating with the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council, the East-Central Florida Regional Planning Council, the St. Johns Water Management District, the Lake – Sumter Metropolitan Planning Organization, and, internally, with the Regulatory, Water Supply, and Environmental teams to provide a comprehensive review of all the land use planning documentation.

Regional Planning Council Update

Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council At the November meeting attended by Governing Board member Todd Pressman and Planning Department staff, new officers were elected. Vice Mayor Deborah Kynes of Dunedin was elected Chair; Reverend (Councilman) James Golden of Bradenton, Vice Chair; and Commissioner Jack Mariano of Pasco County, Secretary/Treasurer. The new officers will be sworn in next month and begin service in January.

Water Management District Coordination

North Central Florida Coordination Area – Outreach and Communications In the fall of 2006, the SWFWMD and the SJRWMD began developing mechanisms for formal coordination and communication in the area of north-central Florida where the boundaries of the districts come together. The SWFWMD subdivided staff into six work groups one of which addresses Outreach and Communications. In November, the Outreach and Communication Work Group submitted a draft Action Plan to the SJRWMD for their review and concurrence. The Action Plan features three primary objectives each with several associated tasks.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Lou Kavouras, Deputy Executive Director

9 Item 74

Special Events Calendar

January 1 through January 31, 2008

Event Title: Tampa Bay Black Heritage Festival Date: January 19–20, 2008 Time: Noon to 6 p.m. Location: Al Lopez Park, 4810 N. Himes Ave., Tampa Sponsoring Organization: Tampa Bay Black Heritage Festival, SWFWMD and others Event Details: This annual event celebrates black history and heritage through music, food and vendors. The District's water conservation restroom will include information on Florida-friendly landscaping. District Contact Information Name: Melissa Roe Phone: (352) 796-7211, ext. 4776 Email: [email protected]

10 Item 75

Outreach and Planning Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Speakers' Bureau

Purpose This report is provided for the Committee's information and shows District staff participation in the outreach performed by the Speakers' Bureau program.

Background The District has had a Speaker’s Bureau Program since the early 1970s. For the past 20 years, the Program has been administered by the Community and Legislative Affairs Department (CLA) or the Communications Department. Currently the program is managed by Ed Hobin of the CLA. The Speakers Bureau coordinates staff experts and generalists to speak or make presentations to interested community or business groups, or to address professional, governmental or technical groups on a variety of issues. The types of groups and organizations requesting a speaker is varied: civic organizations (Rotary, Kiwanis, Sertoma, etc.), chambers of commerce, colleges and high schools, and associations (homeowners, engineering, realtors, developers, etc.). Every request in the past two years has been honored. Over the past several years, staff has developed a library of PowerPoint presentations to go along with our popular Water 101 video. State-of-the-art audio-visual equipment is available in all of the service offices to accommodate presentations in those areas.

The following table summarizes the Speakers Bureau activities for the past three months.

Organization Topic Aud. Speaker September 2007 Sharp Crime Watch Future Water Supplies 23 Ed Hobin Fairfield Village HOA Water Shortage/ Conservation 80 Ed Hobin Pinellas Co. Environmental Health District Overview/Alternative Water 50 Ed Hobin Conference Supplies On Top of the World HOA Water Supplies/Conservation 76 Ed Hobin Timber Oaks HOA Conservation 20 Ed Hobin Florida Restaurant & Lodging Assoc. Conservation 40 Brent White Kiwanis Club of Bartow Southern Water Use Caution Area 35 Danny Kushmer Manatee Chamber of Commerce West-Central Florida WRAP 20 Colleen Thayer Legislative Affairs Committee Legislative Sunset Committee District Programs and Policies 6 David Rathke Environmental and Agricultural Lobby West-Central Florida WRAP 11 David Rathke Marion Co. Springs Festival Springs Protection 160 Jimmy Brooks PR/MRWSA Peace River MFL 100 Dave Moore Charlotte Sun Herald Editorial Board Lower Peace River MFL 3 Dave Moore Withlacoochee RWSA Regional Water Supply Issues 75 Dave Moore Florida Water Environment Assoc. Water Resources 100 Dave Moore October 2007 Zephyrhills WC Water Conservation 28 Ed Hobin Tampa Bay Nova Future Water Supplies 55 Ed Hobin Beverly Hills HOA Water Conservation 118 Ed Hobin Timber Pines HOA Future Water Supplies 70 Ed Hobin Rotary Club of Spring Hill Water Resources Update 10 Ed Hobin

11 Item 75

Organization Topic Aud. Speaker UF Master Gardener State Conf. State of Water Resources 160 Ed Hobin Rotary Club of Auburndale West Central Florida WRAP 30 Ed Hobin UF Master Gardener State Conf. WMD Rules and Regulations 130 Ed Hobin Industrial Community Advisory Panel Peace Creek Canal 30 Danny Kushmer Lake Rousseau HOA Water Supply 45 Jimmy Brooks South Gulf Cove Yacht Club Water Conservation 40 Terri Behling PR/MRWSA Board Meeting West Central Fl. WRAP 50 Colleen Thayer Sarasota Chamber of Commerce West Central Fl. WRAP 25 Colleen Thayer Marion County Commission Rainbow and Silver Springs MFL 20 Marty Kelly Tampa Bay Assoc. of Environmental Florida Springs 40 David Dewitt Professionals Braden River and Lower Peace Manatee Chamber of Commerce 12 Michael Heyl MFLs Citrus County Commission Citrus County Water Supply Issues 50 Dave Moore DeSoto/Charlotte Farm Bureau Trends in Water Management 300 Dave Moore American Groundwater Trust Hillsborough River Watershed 25 Dave Moore American Groundwater Trust Same as above 25 Dave Moore Rotary Club of Brandon Water Conservation 25 Rand Frahm USDA Water Well Inspection Forum Well Design 100 Tony Gilboy USDA Water Well Inspection Forum Groundwater Challenges 100 Tony Gilboy Hillsborough River TAC Water Shortage Orders 12 Lois Sorenson Sun Coast Golf Course Assoc. Water Shortage Orders 47 Lois Sorenson Sarasota Shrine Club Alternative Water Supplies 48 Ross Morton 2007 Leadership Manatee Water Conservation 40 Ross Morton November 2007 Southeastern University District Overview/Water Issues 10 Mark Hurst Rotary Club of East Lake Sunrise Alternative Supplies/Conservation 25 Ed Hobin Florida Engineering Society/Tampa Future Water Supplies 40 Ed Hobin Florida Shrine Association Alternative Water Supplies 70 Ed Hobin Greater Tampa Sertoma Club Current and Future Water Supplies 21 Ed Hobin Dunnellon High School Water Supply/Springs Protection 33 Ed Hobin Home Depot Water Conservation/Overview 80 Tammy Antoine Highlands County HOA SWUCA's/Water Conservation 90 Lou Kavouras Florida Engineering Society/Pinellas Comprehensive Watershed Mgt. 30 Bruce Wirth Central Florida RPC Regional Water Supply Planning 35 Chan Springstead Hernando County Masonic Lodge Sinkholes 40 Tony Gilboy Florida Assn of Sinkhole Specialists Sinkholes 160 Tony Gilboy

Benefits/Costs The benefit of the Speakers' Bureau program is the ongoing education of the public and community leaders regarding water resource management. The program provides an opportunity for interaction among the public and District staff knowledgeable in all areas of the District's statutory responsibilities and it provides a mechanism for communication of District priorities and concerns. Additionally, the program is utilized as a tool to influence behavior change in the areas of water conservation and to ensure support for the District's legislative initiatives.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: David Rathke, Director, Community and Legislative Affairs Department

12 Item 76

Outreach and Planning Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report

Purpose This report is provided for the Committee’s information and shows District activity in the review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Amendments. Staff updates the report monthly, showing new or changed information in bold.

Background/History The District provides technical and policy information on water resources and water resource management to local governments as they prepare amendments to their local government comprehensive plans. This information encompasses all aspects of water resource management, including water supply, flood protection, water quality and natural systems, and is intended to support sound land use decisions. A number of statutory provisions direct the District in the provision of this assistance, particularly Section 373.0391, Florida Statutes (F.S.), Technical Assistance to Local Governments. As a part of the District's efforts to ensure that appropriate water resource information and policy direction is reflected in local government comprehensive plans, the District conducts reviews of local government proposed plan amendments. The state land planning agency, the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), administers this review process. Comments submitted by the District typically become a part of DCA's "objections, recommendations, and comments" report to the local government. In addition, the District will often perform informal reviews of draft plan updates working directly with local governments.

Benefits/Costs The benefits of the District's local government technical assistance program are to ensure local government elected officials have sound water resource technical and policy information as they amend their local government comprehensive plans. This helps to ensure local plans are compatible with the District's plans, programs and statutory direction. Costs for this program primarily include staff time and are budgeted in Fund 10 (Governing Board).

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Roy Mazur, Planning Director, Planning Department

13 As of November 28, 2007

Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report

DCA Comment Adopted DCA Assigned Amend. Received Request Letter Comments DCA ORC Report Amend DCA NOI In Local Government Project # Planner Type** from Gov't Received Sent Received Received Received Compliance? Comments/Issues/Objections CHARLOTTE Charlotte 07-1ER Davies EAR based 01/02/07 02/02/07 02/13/07 03/02/07 05/02/07 06/21/07 Yes EAR based Charlotte 07-2 Davies Regular 01/08/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A 08/20/07 No Returned - no approved EAR Charlotte 07-D1 Davies DRI 05/13/07 05/13/07 06/06/07 07/13/07 Resubmittal from 2006 Charlotte 08-1 Davies Regular 09/07/07 09/06/07 10/04/07 11/02/07 Punta Gorda 07-1 Davies Regular 01/08/07 02/04/07 None 03/06/07 05/22/07 06/29/07 Yes FLU Element text amendments Punta Gorda 07-2 Davies Regular 04/24/07 04/30/07 None 7/3/2007 08/29/07 Yes FLUM amendments CITRUS 06-1ER Sanders EAR Based 03/14/06 03/16/06 04/14/06 05/17/06 06/08/07 Not Rcvd Yes 16 EAR -Based Amendments Citrus 06-2 Sanders Regular 07/06/06 07/11/06 08/11/06 09/08/06 11/02/06 12/20/06 Yes 450 Residential Units Citrus 07-01 Sanders Regular 03/21/07 03/30/07 04/20/07 05/29/07 07/25/07 05/25/07 Yes Text amendments (Floral City Community Plan) Citrus 07-02 Sanders Regular 08/23/07 08/28/07 09/27/07 10/26/07 Adoption of Springs/Springshed Protection Citrus 07-D1 Sanders DRI 06/01/07 06/05/07 06/26/07 08/03/07 128 acre residential increase Inverness 07-01 Sanders Regular 04/20/07 04/26/07 05/23/07 06/27/07 175 acre residential development Inverness 07-2ER Sanders EAR Based 10/09/07 Not Rcvd 11/06/07 175 acre residential development DESOTO HARDEE Hardee 07-1 Springstead Regular 12/15/06 01/07/07 02/01/07 03/07/07 N/A 09/13/07 Yes Hardee 07-2 Springstead Regular 07/16/07 07/26/07 08/09/07 09/26/07

14 Wauchula 07-1 Springstead Regular 10/09/07 10/10/07 11/07/07 Zolfo Springs 07-1 Springstead Regular Not Received 12/19/06 None 02/16/07 04/02/07 05/17/07 Yes HERNANDO Hernando 06-01 Sanders Regular 04/14/06 04/20/06 04/26/06 06/16/06 01/11/07 02/21/07 Yes 184 acre residential development Hernando 06D-1 Sanders DRI 06/12/06 07/18/06 07/24/05 09/15/06 05/14/07 06/20/07 Yes Final Hickory Hill DRI public hearing 4/26/07 Hernando 06-02 Sanders Regular 09/13/06 10/18/06 11/01/06 02/20/07 Not Rcvd 02/20/07 No 5-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements Hernando 07-01 Sanders Regular 04/02/07 04/05/07 05/08/07 06/04/07 10/11/07 Yes 30-acre industrial land use Hernando 07-02 Sanders Regular 08/20/07 08/22/07 09/07/07 10/22/07 Overlay Districts Brooksville 06-01 Sanders Regular 05/16/06 05/26/06 06/16/06 07/24/06 02/21/07 11/09/06 Yes Annexation of 765 acres HIGHLANDS Highlands 07-1 Springstead Regular 02/08/07 02/13/07 03/16/07 4/16/2007 N/A 09/20/07 Yes Highlands 07-2 Springstead Regular 09/13/07 09/13/07 10/10/07 11/14/2007 Lake Placid 07-1 Springstead Regular 07/13/07 07/16/07 08/23/07 9/14/2007 Lake Placid 07-2 Springstead Regular 08/13/07 08/27/07 10/26/2007 Hillsborough 07-1 Neasman Regular 05/11/07 05/16/07 06/18/07 07/13/07 09/07/07 10/20/07 Yes No substantive comments Hillsborough 07-2 Neasman Regular 10/08/07 08/28/07 10/12/07 10/26/07 No substantive comments Public education amendments - No substantive Hillsborough 07PEFE1 Neasman Regular 09/11/07 09/11/07 10/10/07 comments Plant City 07-2 Neasman Regular 07/23/07 07/25/07 09/05/07 09/21/07 made water supply comments Public education amendments - No substantive Plant City 07PEFE1 Neasman Regular 09/11/07 09/11/07 10/10/07 comments Tampa 07M1-1 Neasman Regular 05/07/07 05/09/07 06/04/07 07/06/07 No substantive comments Tampa 07-2 Neasman Regular 07/09/07 07/11/07 08/21/07 09/10/07 No substantive comments Public education amendments - No substantive Tampa 07PEFE1 Neasman Regular 09/11/07 09/11/07 10/10/07 comments Public education amendments - No substantive Temple Terrace 07PEFE1 Neasman Regular 09/11/07 09/11/07 10/10/07 comments LAKE 07WSA1 Sanders Regular 04/07/07 04/10/07 04/27/07 Map amendments/Wekiva Study Area LEVY 07-1 Sanders Regular 07/30/07 08/01/07 08/25/07 09/28/07 Progress Energy Nuclear Power Plant Levy 06-2 Sanders Regular 07/18/06 07/26/06 08/07/06 09/26/06 12/15/06 12/27/06 Yes 33 acres commercial development Levy 06-1ER Sanders EAR-Based 03/15/06 03/21/06 04/04/06 09/22/06 Not Rcvd 12/05/06 Yes 12 Amendments Inglis 07-1 Sanders Regular 04/29/07 04/04/07 05/07/07 06/04/07 07/16/07 06/04/07 Yes New Economic Development Element As of November 28, 2007

Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report

DCA Comment Adopted DCA Assigned Amend. Received Request Letter Comments DCA ORC Report Amend DCA NOI In Local Government Project # Planner Type** from Gov't Received Sent Received Received Received Compliance? Comments/Issues/Objections Commented on water quality concerns for proposed construction debris and demolition Manatee County 07-1 Neasman Regular 06/04/07 06/01/07 07/03/07 08/01/07 09/28/07 landfill. Manatee County 07-2 Neasman Regular 10/01/07 08/28/07 10/23/07 11/01/07 No substantive comments Manatee County 08PEFE1 Neasman Regular 10/26/07 11/09/07 11/28/07 School Facilities Element Bradenton 06-2 Neasman Regular 09/05/06 08/24/06 10/03/06 10/19/06 12/22/06 02/06/07 Yes No substantive comments - Amendment found "in Bradenton 07-1 Neasman Regular 06/18/07 06/19/07 07/31/07 08/03/07 09/14/07 10/30/07 Yes compliance"

Anna Maria 07-1ER Neasman EAR-Based 08/15/07 08/20/07 09/20/07 10/14/07 No substantive comments EAR Review - comments addressed water supply, coastal management and stormwater Holmes Beach NA Neasman EAR 04/25/07 04/30/07 05/30/07 management. MARION 07-1 Sanders Regular 06/08/07 06/14/07 07/12/07 08/13/07 09/20/07 579 acres residential development Marion 07-2 Sanders CIE 08/01/07 08/06/07 08/22/07 09/14/07 09/26/07 Capital Improvement Plan annual update Marion 06-01 Sanders Regular 04/24/06 05/15/06 06/01/06 07/10/06 Not Rcvd 02/12/07 No Springs Protection Zone Marion 06-2 Sanders Regular 08/23/06 08/28/06 09/25/06 10/24/06 12/19/06 01/26/07 Yes/No 3 of 4 amendments not in compliance Ocala 07-01 Sanders Regular 06/21/07 06/27/07 07/27/07 08/24/07 26 acres residential development Ocala 07-02 Sanders Regular 10/01/07 10/04/07 10/30/07 1.41 million commercial sq. ft. 15 PASCO Cypress Creek Tn Cntr. Settlement agreemt Pasco 04D2 Renner DRI 04/12/04 04/12/04 05/12/04 06/15/04 12/13/04 01/25/05 No 05/11/05. Challenged Pasco 06-2 Burke Regular 08/21/06 08/23/06 09/21/06 No Comments 12/15/06 01/31/07 Yes FLUM Amendment RES-3 to RES-24 & CON Pasco 07D1 Burke DRI 12/12/06 12/14/06 01/09/07 02/09/07 Not Received Trinity Proposed Phase Transmittal Pasco 07D2 Burke DRI 12/12/06 12/14/06 01/12/07 02/09/07 Not Received Pasco Town Centre Pasco 07D3 Burke DRI 01/31/07 02/02/07 02/23/07 04/02/07 07/31/07 09/13/07 Yes Wiregrass Pasco 07-1 Burke Regular 05/23/07 05/25/07 06/22/07 07/30/07 11 FLUM Amendments Pasco 07D4 Burke DRI 05/24/07 05/23/07 06/18/07 07/23/07 10/12/07 11/20/07 Yes Ashley Glen Pasco 07D5 Burke DRI 08/01/07 08/07/07 08/31/07 10/05/07 Starkey Ranch 12 FLUM, 3 Text Amendments + Pasadena Hills Pasco 07-2 Burke Regular 09/10/07 09/13/07 10/11/07 11/14/07 AP Port Richey 07-1ER Burke EAR-Based 09/21/07 09/28/07 10/23/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A WITHDRAWN Text Amendments St. Leo EAR Burke EAR 12/18/06 12/21/06 01/09/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Zephyrhills EAR Burke EAR 11/28/06 12/08/06 01/04/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review San Antonio EAR Burke EAR 04/09/07 04/19/07 05/08/07 N/A 07/19/07 N/A N/A EAR Review Dade City EAR Burke EAR 10/10/07 10/17/07 11/06/07 EAR Review New Port Richey 07-1ER Burke EAR-Based 06/21/07 06/25/07 07/24/07 08/24/07 Text Amendments PINELLAS Belleair 07-1ER Burke EAR-Based 09/03/07 09/06/07 10/05/07 Text Amendments Belleair Beach 07-1ER Sanders EAR-Based 10/19/07 10/18/07 11/02/07 Text Amendments Belleair Bluffs 07-1ER Burke EAR-Based 10/05/07 09/27/07 10/26/07 Text Amendments Bellair Shore EAR Belangia EAR 07/27/06 07/25/06 08/23/06 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Clearwater 07-1 Belangia Regular 05/04/07 05/09/07 05/14/07 2 FLUM Changes & 1 Text Amendment Clearwater 07-2AR Sanders Regular 09/26/07 10/01/07 10/19/07 10/26/07 566 residential units Dunedin 08-1PSFE Burke PSFE 09/28/07 10/05/07 Public School Facilities Element Dunedin 07-1 Sanders Regular 03/08/07 12/06/06 03/16/07 1/5/2007 04/20/07 Yes Text Amendments Dunedin EAR Belangia EAR 10/02/06 10/05/06 10/16/06 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Gulfport EAR Belangia EAR 12/07/06 12/21/06 01/05/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Indian Shores EAR Belangia EAR 12/06/06 12/06/06 12/27/06 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Largo EAR Belangia EAR 01/10/07 01/09/07 01/19/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Largo 06-1 Belangia Regular 04/26/06 04/28/06 None 07/05/06 Vineyard River FLUM As of November 28, 2007

Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report

DCA Comment Adopted DCA Assigned Amend. Received Request Letter Comments DCA ORC Report Amend DCA NOI In Local Government Project # Planner Type** from Gov't Received Sent Received Received Received Compliance? Comments/Issues/Objections DCA noted deficiency in submitted ammendment Largo 07-1 Sanders Regular 02/20/07 02/20/07 04/20/07 on 12/26/06 Largo 07-2AR Burke Regular 07/25/07 07/30/07 07/31/07 08/23/07 11/01/07 7 FLUM Amendments Madeira Beach 07-1 Belangia Regular 12/11/06 12/12/06 01/05/07 02/09/07 04/12/07 05/30/07 Yes 1 Text Amendment Madeira Beach EAR Belangia EAR 12/11/06 12/12/06 12/27/06 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review N. Redington Beach EAR Sanders EAR 02/01/07 Not Received 03/02/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review N. Redington Beach 07-1ER Sanders EAR 06/23/07 06/26/07 08/22/07 09/25/07 10-Year Water Supply Plan Oldsmar EAR Sanders EAR 01/31/07 Not Received 03/02/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Oldsmar ASRPP Sanders Regular 08/29/07 Not Rcvd 09/13/07 Public School Facilities Element Redington Beach EAR Belangia EAR N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Redington Shores EAR Belangia EAR 02/01/07 03/02/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Pinellas County 07PEFE-1 Burke PSFE 08/28/07 09/05/07 08/31/07 Public School Facilities Element Pinellas County 07-1 Belangia Regular 12/11/06 12/14/06 01/05/07 02/09/07 04/23/07 2 FLUM Changes Pinellas County 06-02 Sanders Regular 01/17/07 01/12/07 02/05/07 Yes Text Amendments Pinellas Park EAR Sanders EAR 03/23/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Pinellas Park 07PEFE-1 Burke PEFE 10/16/07 10/18/07 10/19/07 Public School Facilities Element Capital Improvement Element, DCA will NOT Safety Harbor 06CIE1 Belangia CIE 01/20/06 None None DCA will not review N/A N/A N/A Review.

16 Safety Harbor EAR Belangia EAR 12/29/06 01/09/07 01/17/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Seminole EAR Belangia EAR 04/24/07 04/30/07 05/10/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review South Pasadena EAR Belangia EAR 04/24/07 05/01/07 05/10/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Text Amendments & Future Land Use St. Petersburg 06-2 Belangia Regular 03/31/06 03/30/06 04/26/06 06/05/06 11/01/06 12/15/06 Yes Amendments St. Petersburg 07-1 Sanders Regular 03/06/07 Not Received Not Received Not Received 04/13/07 Yes Changes to FLUM St. Petersburg 07-2 Sanders Regular 10/15/07 Not Received 10/19/07 Public School Facilities Element St. Petersburg EAR Sanders EAR 12/12/06 03/07/07 03/30/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review Tarpon Springs EAR Belangia EAR 12/04/06 12/06/06 01/04/07 N/A N/A N/A N/A EAR Review POLK Polk County 07-1 Springstead Regular 03/12/07 03/16/07 05/14/07 05/16/07 N/A 08/09/07 Yes Polk County 07-2 Springstead Regular 09/10/07 09/12/07 10/22/07 Polk County 07-D1 Springstead DRI 06/21/07 06/25/07 07/18/07 08/23/07 Polk County 07-2 Springstead Regular 09/10/07 09/12/07 10/22/07 11/15/07 Auburndale 07-1 Springstead Regular 09/06/07 09/12/07 None 11/13/07 Bartow 07-1 Springstead Regular 10/18/07 10/23/07 None 1 LU change - County to City - no increase in demand Dundee 08-1 Springstead Regular 11/05/07 11/08/07 Eagle Lake 07-1 Springstead Regular 06/15/07 06/15/07 None 08/14/07 11/19/07 Yes Frostproof 07-2 Springstead Regular 08/24/07 08/27/07 10/17/07 11/01/07 Haines City 07-1ER Springstead EAR-based 02/05/07 02/07/07 03/16/07 04/09/07 N/A 08/22/07 Yes Haines City 07-2 Springstead Regular 08/06/07 08/06/07 08/10/07 10/22/07 Lake Alfred 07-1 Springstead Regular 04/13/07 04/18/07 None 06/18/07 N/A 08/31/07 Yes No Comments Lake Wales 07-1 Springstead Regular 08/01/07 08/02/07 None 10/01/07 11/16/07 Lake Wales 07-2 Springstead Regular 10/03/07 10/04/07 Lakeland 07-1 Springstead Regular 06/11/07 06/13/07 None None N/A 10/03/07 Yes Not Reviewed by DCA Lakeland 07-1PEFE Springstead Schools 10/19/07 10/22/07 None 11/27/08 Schools Element Mulberry 07-1 Springstead Regular 06/01/07 05/30/07 None 07/31/07 Res Low to Commercial & Conservation Polk City 07-1 Springstead Regular 07/05/07 07/03/05 08/10/07 08/31/07 Winter Haven 07-1 Springstead Regular 04/26/07 05/01/07 None 07/03/07 N/A 08/31/07 Yes Winter Haven 07-2 Springstead Regular 08/29/07 09/04/07 None 11/01/07 SARASOTA Sarasota 07-1 Davies Regular 01/09/07 01/17/07 None 03/15/07 05/10/07 06/25/07 Yes 3 Amendments-CIE, FLU, Housing Sarasota 07-D1 Davies DRI 02/08/07 02/12/07 None 04/11/07 08/03/07 09/13/07 No SIPOC - FLUM amendment As of November 28, 2007

Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Related Reviews Report

DCA Comment Adopted DCA Assigned Amend. Received Request Letter Comments DCA ORC Report Amend DCA NOI In Local Government Project # Planner Type** from Gov't Received Sent Received Received Received Compliance? Comments/Issues/Objections Sarasota 07-1ISBA Davies Regular 06/13/07 06/13/07 07/06/07 08/17/07 11/05/07 No comments City of Sarasota 07-2A Davies Regular 04/04/07 None 06/29/07 10/29/07 City of Sarasota 07-1 Davies Regular 04/04/07 04/09/07 None 06/29/07 07/05/07 08/15/07 Yes 5/11/07 notification received to not review City of Sarasota 07-2B Davies Regular 05/02/07 05/04/07 None 09/04/07 11/07/07 Yes 2 FLUM amendments Venice 07-1 Davies Regular 07/24/07 Yes not received from local government Venice 07-1CIE Davies Regular 07/24/07 Yes not received from local government Venice 07-2ER Davies EAR based 07/09/07 07/19/07 08/14/07 09/17/07 Longboat Key 07-1ER Davies EAR based 04/24/07 04/26/07 05/25/07 06/23/07 EAR-based amendments SUMTER 07-1 Sanders Regular 11/27/06 12/01/06 12/20/06 02/01/07 04/06/07 05/29/07 Yes 72 acres mixed use development Sumter 07-2 Sanders Regular 07/24/07 08/06/07 08/27/07 10/02/07 60-acre sand mine Sumter 06-2 Sanders Regular 07/27/06 07/31/06 08/28/06 09/26/06 02/14/07 Not Rcvd N/A 100 residential units Bushnell 06-1 Sanders Regular 10/05/06 10/11/06 11/03/06 12/12/06 04/09/07 Not Rcvd N/A 297 acre annexation Center Hill 06-1 Sanders Regular 03/23/06 04/11/06 05/05/06 06/21/06 11/03/06 01/11/07 Yes 1,500 acre annexation Center Hill 06-2 Sanders Regular 06/30/06 07/12/06 08/04/06 09/12/06 Not Rcvd Not Rcvd N/A 600 homes Wildwood 07D1 Sanders DRI 07/24/07 07/26/07 08/23/07 09/25/07 3,000 homes Wildwood 07D2 Sanders DRI 07/24/07 07/26/07 08/23/07 09/25/07 862 homes Wildwood 07-1 Sanders Regular 07/06/07 06/29/07 07/27/07 08/27/07 1,632 acre annexation Wildwood 06-1 Sanders Regular 10/10/06 10/19/06 11/17/06 12/13/06 Not Rcvd Not Rcvd N/A 1,777 acre annexation

17 Center Hill 07-2 Burke Regular 05/25/07 06/27/07 07/24/07 08/24/07 Text Amendments

NOTES ** Amendment Types may include: Regular; DRI; EAR Based; Water Supply Plan; ASRPP

Evaluation and Appraisal Reports (EARs) are not plan amendements but are required every 7 years. EAR-Based amendments are required 18 months after the report is determined to be sufficient by the State.

Key to Abbreviations: DCA = FL Dept. of Community Affairs ORC Report = Objections, Recommendations & Comments NOI = Notice of Intent = Determination by DCA whether amendment is in compliance with statutes and rules EAR = Evaluation and Appraisal Report DRI = Development of Regional Impact PRD = Preliminary Review Determination ASRPP=DCA pilot program for Pinellas and Broward Counties, and the cities of Tampa and Hialeah Item 77

Outreach and Planning Committee December 18, 2007

Routine Report

Review of Development of Regional Impact

Purpose This report is provided for the Committee's information and shows District activity in the review of Developments of Regional Impact (DRIs). Staff updates the report monthly, showing new or changed information in bold.

Background/History The District participates in the review of Developments of Regional Impact (DRIs) pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. DRI's are large-scale development projects that exceed statutorily specified thresholds such that the project is assumed to have potential impacts that transcend multiple local government jurisdictions. The District is one of several agencies that are required to participate in the review process, which is administered by the regional planning councils. The District has also entered into memoranda of agreement with the Central Florida, Southwest Florida, Tampa Bay and Withlacoochee regional planning councils to more specifically outline the District's DRI review responsibilities. The District provides water resource management technical and policy information to the regional planning councils and local governments to assist them in making well-informed growth management decisions.

Benefits/Costs The benefits of the District's DRI review program are to ensure regional planning councils and local government elected officials have sound water resource technical and policy information as they consider large scale development proposals. This helps to ensure these developments are compatible with the District's plans, programs and statutory directives. Costs for this program primarily include staff time and are budgeted in Fund 10 (Governing Board).

Staff Recommendation: See Exhibit

This item is provided for the Committee's information, and no action is required.

Presenter: Roy Mazur, Planning Director, Planning Department

18 Page 1 of 4 As of November 28, 2007 DRI Activity Report

Sufficiency Final Assigned Appl. Pre-App Receipt Comments Comments Project Name Planner Govt's Project Type Acreage Type Mtg. Date Date Sent Sent Comments

CFRPC Application originally submitted in April, 2000, Phosphate April 2000 subsequently put on hold, then reactivated with Ona Mine Springstead Hardee Mine 20,595 ADA 7/11/05 5/2/05 the 5-2-05 submittal FL International Airport/ Mixed Significant transportation improvements may Aiport Springstead Hardee & Polk Use 22,400 ADA 3/23/05 accompany this major project. Four Corners Town Commercial center (open air mall) at SR 54 and Center Springstead Polk Commercial 130 ADA 3/1/05 7/7/05 HWY 27 in NE Polk County Mosaic Regional Process Water Project to address water storage and water Treatment Pond Springstead Polk Industrial 173 SD 6/23/05 8/8/05 quality at Mosaic chemical plants. Village of Valencia Lake Springstead DeSoto County Mixed Use 4,000 ADA 10/30/07 Major new project proposed in eastern DeSoto 19 Carlton Ranch Springstead DeSoto Mixed Use 5,860 ADA 8/8/05 County; 17,000 homes proposed SWFRPC

Harborview Davies Charlotte Co. Mixed Use 653 SD 11/17/2006 Pre-App only

Harborview Davies Charlotte Co. Mixed Use 653 SD 11/17/2006 8/20/07 9/20/07 ADA Suffiency The Loop at Punta Rayo Davies Charlotte Co. Mixed Use 204 ADA 2/15/07 3/13/07 The Loop at Punta Rayo Davies Charlotte Co. Mixed Use 204 ADA 7/25/07 8/14/07 8/14/2007 2nd Suffiency - no comments The Loop at Punta Rayo Davies Charlotte Co. Mixed Use 204 ADA 10/18/07 none none 3rd Suffiency - no comments

Isles of Athena Davies North Port Mixed Use 5,740 ADA 2/16/07 4/5/07 2nd Suffiency

Isles of Athena Davies North Port Mixed Use 5,740 ADA 9/10/07 10/11/07 3rd Suffiency Punta Gorda Town Center Davies Punta Gorda Mixed Use 195.6 Pre-App 9/21/2005 9/15/05 Pre-App only so far

Sandhill Davies Charlotte Mixed-Use NOPC 7/30/2007 7/14/2007 none No comments - Traffic assessment

North Port Gardens Davies Sarasota Co. Mixed Use 259 ADA 4/24/2007 4/4/2007 Pre-App only

North Port Gardens Davies Sarasota Co. Mixed Use 513 ADA 7/17/2007 8/13/2007 ADA Suffiency Page 2 of 4 As of November 28, 2007 DRI Activity Report

Sufficiency Final Assigned Appl. Pre-App Receipt Comments Comments Project Name Planner Govt's Project Type Acreage Type Mtg. Date Date Sent Sent Comments

North Port Gardens Davies Sarasota Co. Mixed Use 513 ADA 11/1/2007 2nd Suffiency Lakewood Ranch Corporate Park Davies Sarasota Co. Mixed Use 513 NOPC 9/26/2007 none none Palmer Ranch Construction and buildout date extension - no Increment XII Davies Sarasota Co. Mixed Use NOPC 5/31/2007 none none comments TBRPC

09/22/05 10/13/05 12/14/05 03/15/06 Not 09/23/06 Review on 9/22/05 dealt with time extension for Apollo Beach Neasman Hillsborough Mixed Use Provided NOPC 9/8/05 01/18/07 build out.

20 Hillsborough Co Phosphate 04/26/06 Proposes the addition of 1,599 acres to the Mines Addition Neasman Hillsborough Mine 1,599 SD 3/30/06 03/01/07 5/3/2007 existing DRI boundary. 05/24/2007 Proposes the addition of 70 acres to existing Fishhawk Ranch Neasman Hillsborough Residential 70 NOPC 4/24/07 08/06/2007 DRI.

12/19/05 04/17/06 Proposal to extend build out, add 24 acres, add Gulf Coast Factory 09/19/06 7,500 s.f. restaurant, relocate drainage and Shops Neasman Manatee Commercial 25 NOPC 11/22/05 02/22/07 establish additional project entrance. 03/01/06 08/15/06 12/18/06 Proposal to add 812 residential units, 120,000 sf University Lakes Neasman Manatee Mixed Use 4,033 NOPC 3/1/06 07/27/07 of office and 405 hotel rooms. Phosphate Proposal to add 299 acres to Four Corners Four Corners Mine Neasman Manatee Mining 299 NOPC 2/19/07 3/22/07 boundary. 04/10/2007 Proposes to add 60,578 sf of commercial University Commons Neasman Manatee Commercial 30 NOPC 3/16/07 10/02/2007 development. Proposes the addition of 103 acres and other Mosaic SE Tract Phosphate changes to connect property with the Wingate (Manson-Jenkings) Neasman Manatee Mining 103 NOPC 7/20/07 8/15/07 Creek.

Mosaic Wingate Phosphate Proposes changes to mine plan, setback area, Creek Mine Neasman Manatee Mining N/A NOPC 7/20/07 8/15/07 waste disposal plan and trucking route.

8/25/2006 9/22/2006 Two Rivers Burke Pasco Mixed Use 3,532 ADA 4/25/05 01/23/07 02/16/07 Page 3 of 4 As of November 28, 2007 DRI Activity Report

Sufficiency Final Assigned Appl. Pre-App Receipt Comments Comments Project Name Planner Govt's Project Type Acreage Type Mtg. Date Date Sent Sent Comments

1/28/2005 06/12/06 2/23/2005 10/12/06 01/31/06 01/12/07 07/06/06 03/15/07 01/22/07 Mixed-Use Development East of I-75 and South Pasco Town Centre Burke Pasco Mixed Use 929 ADA 6/28/04 04/30/07 03/28/07 5/29/2007 of SR52

11/14/2005 05/05/06 5/25/2006 11/06/06 11/29/06 Revised to increase office component by 1 Renner 01/31/07 02/22/07 million square feet and the residential Ashley Glen Burke Pasco Mixed Use 260 ADA 7/25/05 04/09/07 04/23/07 6/18/2007 component by 300 units.

03/13/06 6/5/2006 4/7/2006 10/31/06 06/19/06 21 03/07/07 11/28/06 Headwaters of Anclote R., drains to Starkey Starkey Ranch Burke Pasco Mixed Use 2,500 ADA 8/22/05 04/30/07 03/28/07 6/18/2007 Wellfield SunWest 3/6/2007 3/23/2007 co-applicant. 2,570 res; 540,000 sf office/retail; Harbourtowne Burke Pasco Mixed Use 2,640 ADA 3/26/07 10/03/07 11/01/07 hotel; marina; golf course.

Connerton Renner Pasco Mixed Use 1,115 NOPC 12/27/05 Development of Village 5 Extension request, Transportation analysis Bexley Ranch Burke Pasco Mixed Use NOPC 7/25/07 7/31/07 changes unused shift office entitlements, add Research Suncoast Crossings Burke Pasco Mixed Use 66 NOPC 7/20/07 7/31/07 and Development uses

Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council is asking for more comments in order to consider the Bay Area Outlet Mall Belangia Largo Mixed Use 34 NOPC 4/24/06 N/A changes proposed not a Substantial Deviation. 10/11/2006 Developer provided answers to questions Largo Town Center Belangia, 10/3/2006 01/22/07 proposed in regards to traffic generation and (AKA) Bay Area Burke & 01/18/07 04/05/07 specific development order changes./ Declared Outlet Mall Sanders Largo Mixed Use 34 NOPC 09/21/07 10/19/07 sufficient.

Additional information sent by Law Office Belangia & handling DRI for client. SWFWMD does not Trinity Communities Renner Pasco & Pinellas Mixed Use 3,741 NOPC 4/13/06 N/A have any further comments. Page 4 of 4 As of November 28, 2007 DRI Activity Report

Sufficiency Final Assigned Appl. Pre-App Receipt Comments Comments Project Name Planner Govt's Project Type Acreage Type Mtg. Date Date Sent Sent Comments

Extend buikld out date, add 136K mediucal Belangia & 4/5/2007 4/23/2007 office space, 115 residential units, reduce Trinity Communities Burke Pasco & Pinellas Mixed Use 4 NOPC 10/01/07 10/05/07 commnercial/retail use. Response to questions posed on Transportation Gateway Centre Belangia Pinellas Park Mixed Use 558 NOPC 5/2/07 N/A issues. WRPC

Beverly Hills Sanders Citrus Mixed Use 630 SD 4/16/07 3/9/07 Reduction of 254 residential units

Beverly Hills Sanders Citrus Mixed Use N/A NOPC N/A 5/24/07 6/1/07 Model home sales center

8/4/2006 9/25/06 Lake Hideaway Sanders Hernando Mixed Use 986 ADA 2/9/06 1/25/06 3/12/07 2,400 residential units 22 9/11/06 Secret Promise Sanders Lake Mixed Use 3,747 ADA 12/29/05 8/21/06 8/06/07 9.211 residential units

Timber Pines Sanders Hernando Mixed Use N/A NOPC N/A 7/7/07 7/20/07 30-bed assisted living facility

Villages Sanders Sumter Mixed Use 340 SD 6/18/2007 5/21/07 Third Town Center

Landstone Sanders Sumter Mixed Use 4,159 ADA 5/14/2007 3/12/07 8,025 Residential Units

On Top of the World Sanders Marion Mixed Use 101 NOPC N/A 11/2/07 11/21/07 101 residential units

Quarry Preserve Sanders Hernando Mixed Use 4,250 ADA 6/7/2007 5/29/07 1,900 residential units 06/29/07 Wildwood Springs Sanders Sumter Mixed Use 1,025 ADA 09/25/06 6/1/07 11/14/07 3,000 Residential Units Key to Abbreviations: CFRPC: Central Florida Regional Planning Council WRPC: Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council SWFRPC: Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council ADA: Application for Development Approval TBRPC: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council NOPC: Notice of Proposed Change SD: Substantial Deviation DRI: Development of Regional Impact Notes: For NOPCs and SDs, acreage shown represents the proposed change in project area Bold text indicates a change from previous report G. General Counsel's Report Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

General Counsel’s Report

Discussion Items

78. Consent Item(s) Moved for Discussion

Submit & File Reports – None

Routine Reports

79. Litigation Summary and Report ...... 2

80. Rulemaking Update ...... 24 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT RECENT LITIGATION ACTIVITY December 2007

STYLE/CASE NO. ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS

Blanco, Dr. Octavio v. J. Smith Administrative proceedings on Administrative hearing scheduled for December 3 – 5, 2007. Win-Suncoast, Ltd. objection to permit and SWFWMD/ Case No. 07-3945

SWFWMD v. Weeki F. Miller/J. Complaint regarding lease Mediation scheduled for December 10, 2007. Wachee Springs, LLC, Ward/B. Bilenky et al./Case No. H-27- CA-2004-366-RT

L:\PRIVATE\Jan Kaesemeyer\Litigation Reports\2007LitRpts\December 2007 Litigation Summary.doc 2 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT LITIGATION REPORT December 2007 (Changes in status since last month are in boldface type)

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/2007)

SWFWMD v. Jose Division of J. Ward Formal Administrative 6/21/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. and Liliana Administrative Proceedings on Administrative 7/2/07 - Respondent's Request for Formal Administrative Aristizabal/Case Hearings/J. Johnston Complaint and Order for Hearing served. 7/25/07 – Notice of Hearing and Order of No. 07-3207 construction without ERP Pre-Hearing Instructions entered. 8/8/07 Resolution Session Report; Respondent's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Admissions to Petitioner, SWFWMD, served. 10/5/07 - Order Granting Continuance and Re-Scheduling Hearing (set for March 5 - 7, 2008 in Bartow) entered. 11/19/07 - Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel and Termination of Representation (of attorney for Respondents, Aristizabal) served. Blanco, Dr. Division of J. Smith Formal Administrative 8/22/07 - Petition for Administrative Hearing served. 9/11/07 Octavio v. Win- Administrative Proceedings on objection to – Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 10/31, 11/1 and 11/2, Suncoast Ltd. and Hearings/B. Canter issuance of ERP No. 2007) served, Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions and Order SWFWMD /Case 43024788.004 (granting in part Motion to Expedite Discovery) entered. No. 07-3945 9/20/07 – (Petitioner's) Motion for Continuance served. 9/21/07 – (Win-Suncoast's) Objection to Petitioner's Motion 3 for Continuance served. 10/2/07 – Order denying Motion for Continuance entered. 10/4/07 – Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoena, and Response to Petitioner's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoena served. 10/10/07 – Order (granting Motion to Quash Subpoena, and denying Request for Hearing) entered. 10/12/07 – Cross Notices of Taking Depositions served. 10/15/07 – Order (granting Request for Official Recognition) entered; Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Petitioner Dr. Blanco served. 10/18/07 – Order (Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Petitioner has been withdrawn, matter is moot, request for continuance of the final hearing granted, Motion to compel Better Answers to Interrogatories is granted, depositions to be conducted between 11/3 and 11/21/07, and prehearing stipulation to be filed by 11/29/07); and Notice of Hearing entered. Hearing now scheduled for 12/3, 4 and 5/07. 11/9/07 – Respondent SWFWMD's Response to Petitioner's Request for Production; Second Amended Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum of B. Baca; Third Amended Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum of M. C. Rains, Ph.D.; Second Amended Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum of M. McElveen, MAI; and Response to Request for Production served. 11/13/07 – (SWFWMD's) Cross Notices of Taking Deposition served. 11/14/07 – Petitioner's Motion to Compel

1 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Discovery and Motion for Protective Order served. 11/15/07 – (Petitioner's) Motion for Continuance served. 11/16/07 – Order on Motions (no ruling required for Motion to Compel and Motion on Protective Order is granted) entered. 11/20/07 – (Win-Suncoast's) Objection to Petitioner's Motion for Continuance served. 11/21/07 – (SWFWMD's) Objection to Petitioner's Motion for Continuance served. 11/26/07 – Third Amended Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum of M. McElveen, MAI served. 11/27/07 – Amended Cross Notice of Taking Deposition served, and Order on Motions entered. 11/28/07 - Petitioner's Request for Reconsideration Regarding Respondent's Motion in Limine served. 11/29/07 – (SWFWMD's) Notice of Appearance of Additional Counsel served. In Re: Florida Division of M. Moore Whether the application of 1/10/07 – Initial Order entered. 1/16/07 – Motion to Power and Light Administrative Florida Power and Light Intervene filed by Schroeder-Manatee Ranch, Inc. and Lake Company Hearings/B. Canter Company for the Bobwhite- Club Investors LLC. 1/17/07 – DEP's Notice of Filing of Bobwhite-Manatee Manatee 230 Kilovolt Transmission Line Siting Application served. 1/23/07 – 230KV transmission line project should Notice of Hearing entered by DOAH, and Order Establishing Transmission Line be certified under the State of Site Certification Application Schedule entered. 1/26/07 – Project Florida Transmission Line SWFWMD's Notice of Intent to be a Party served. 2/1/07 – Transmission Line Siting Act SWFWMD's Request for Additional Information served. 4 Siting Application 2/2/07 – Preliminary Statement of Issues served by No. TA07-14/Case Sarasota County. 2/8/07 – Department of Transportations' No. 07-0105TL Notice of Intent to be a Party served. Department of Environmental Protection's Determination of Incompleteness served. 2/12/07 – Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions entered. 2/13/07 – Manatee County's Notice of Intent to Hold an Informational Public Meeting; Manatee County's Request to Have a Public Hearing in Manatee County; and Manatee County's Notice of Intent to be a Party served, and Order Granting Motion to Intervene by Schroeder-Manatee, Ranch entered. 2/16/07 – Joint Stipulation and Motion for Alteration of Time Limit served by DEP. 2/21/07 – SWFWMD's Preliminary Statement of Issues served. 2/22/07 – Florida Power & Light's Notice of Filing Completeness Response served. 2/22/07 – Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Florida Power & Light's Amended Joint Stipulation and Motion for Alteration of Time Limit served. 2/26/07 – Florida Department of Transportations' Preliminary Statement of Issues received. 2/26/07 – Order Altering Time Limit entered. 3/7/07 – Recommendations of Manatee County as to Completeness of the Application for the Bobwhite-Manatee Transmission Line Project served. 3/15/07 – DEP's Determination of Completeness served. 3/20/07 – SWFWMD's Agency Report Site Certification Application – Staff Recommendation - Approval served.

2 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

4/2/07 – Manatee County's Notice of Filing Agency Report; Notice of Filing Sarasota County's Agency Report served. Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Notice of Filing Agency Report served. 4/6/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene of Gum Slough entered. 4/12/07 – Notice of Proposed Alternate Corridor on behalf of John Falkner served. 4/16/07 – Schroeder-Manatee and Lake Club's Notice of Proposed Alternate Corridors served. Falkner Amended Notice of Proposed Alternate Corridor served. Taylor and Fulton Notice of Proposed Alternate Corridors served. 4/19/07 – Order Granting ManaSota 88, Inc.'s Motion to Intervene entered. Motion to Amend Notice of Proposed Corridors filed by Taylor and Fulton served. 4/23/07 – DEP's Acceptance of Alternate Corridor Proposals for Consideration served. Order accepting Taylor and Fulton's Notice of Proposed Alternative Corridors entered. FPL's Notice of Acceptance for Consideration of Alternate Corridors Proposed by Falkner, Taylor and Fulton and Schroeder-Manatee Ranch and Lake Club Investors served. 4/25/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene filed by John Falkner entered. Order Canceling Hearing entered. 4/27/07 – DEP's Notice of Filing of Written Analysis served. Motion to Temporarily Defer Setting of Certification Hearing Date

5 served. 5/3/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene filed by Taylor and Fulton entered. 5/7/07 – Clarification of FPL's Position on Schroeder-Manatee and Lake Club's Motion to Amend Proposed Alternate Corridor served. 5/9/07 – Order on Motion of FP&L to Defer Setting Date for Certification Hearing entered. 5/15/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene by Myakka Ranch; and Order on Pending Motions entered. 5/21/07 – Joint Stipulation of DEP and FP&L and Motion for Alteration of Time Limits served. 5/20/07 – Order Altering Time Limits entered. 6/7/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene of Concession Land Development entered. 6/8/07 – Manatee County's Notice of Filing Completeness Response for Alternative Corridors; FP&L's Response to John Falkner's First Request for Production of Documents; SWFWMD's Notice of Filing Completeness Comments; Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council's Request for Additional Information served. 6/12/07 – Notice of Filing Sarasota County's Completeness Response served. 6/22/07 – DOAH's Notice of Filing re: L-3 Partnership's letter to be treated as public comment entered. DEP's Notice of Incompleteness served. 6/26/07 Second Joint Stipulation and Motion for Alteration of Time Limits served. 6/28/07 – Notice of Appearance and Petition to Intervene o/b/o John Cannon Homes – Eastmoor, LLC; Schwartz Farms, Inc.; Michael and Joanne Schwartz; Sarasota One, LLC; Indian Creek Dev. and BDR 3 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Investments; and Petition to Intervene o/b/o Pacific Land served. Order Granting Motion for Alteration of Time Limits entered. 7/2/07 Department of Community Affairs' Notice of Intent to be a Party served. 7/10/07 – Order on Petition to Intervene of K. Chapman entered. 7/13/06 – Order Granting Petitions to Intervene of Pacific Land et al. entered. 7/25/07 – Notice of Hearing for Certification Hearing entered. 7/26/07 – Determination of Alternate Corridor Filing Completeness served. 8/13/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene of East County HOA entered. 8/22/07 – Notice of Filing Sarasota County's Report on Alternative Corridors, and SWFWMD's Notice of Filing Completeness Report; Notice of Filing of Sarasota County's Report on Alternative Corridors, and Manatee County's Notice of Filing Agency Report on Alternative Corridors served. 9/7/07 – DEP's Notice of Filing of Revised Staff Analysis served. 10/8/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene on Hunsader's Amended Petition to Intervene entered. 10/9/07 – Schroeder-Manatee and Lake Club's Notice of Withdrawal of Alternate Corridors entered. 10/10/07 – FP&L's Response in Opposition to Motion in Limine served. 10/11/07 – Order Granting Petition to Intervene of High Hat Ranch, and Order Denying Motion in Limine entered. 10/12/07 – FP&L Notice

6 of Filing Prehearing Stipulation served; Order Rescinding 10/11/07 Order Denying Motion In Limine entered. 10/17/07 – Order Denying Motion in Limine by SMR and LCI entered. 10/19/07 – FP&L's Notice of Filing Additional Signatures for the Prehearing Stipulation; and FP&L's Unopposed Motion for an Order to Adopt Confidentiality Agreements served. 10/26/07 – Concession Land Development and Concession Golf Club's Notice of Joinder and Adoption served. 11/5/07 – Order Granting Continuance entered. 11/7/07 – Unopposed Joint Motion for Continuance of Hearing and Alteration of Time Limit served. 11/9/07 – Order Continuing the Certification Hearing and Altering Limit for Consideration of Alternate Corridors entered. Errata Sheets for 10/2/07 depositions of Analee Mayes and Philip Simpson served. 11/19/07 – Concession Land and Concession Golf Notice of Proposed Alternate Corridor served. 11/21/07 – Schroeder-Manatee and Lake Club's Notice of Proposed Alternate Corridor served. Fryman, Russell J. Division of M. Moore Formal Administrative 11/28/06 – Request for Administrative Hearing served. 1/3/07 as Co-Trustee of Administrative Proceedings on objection to – Order of Dismissal With Prejudice (dismissing Russell the Virginia B. Hearings/J.L. issuance of ERP No. Fryman in his individual capacity) and Notice of Entry of Final Fryman Trust and Johnston 44027361.002 Order entered. 1/17/07 – Second Amended Verified Petition Virginia Fryman v. for Formal Administrative Proceedings served. 2/21/07 – SWFWMD and Notice of Hearing (set for June 20 and 21, 2007) served. Highlands County 5/2/07 – Joint Motion to Abate proposed by Petitioners and

4 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Board of County Joint Stipulation to Hold Action in Abatement served. 5/24/07 Commissioners – Joint Stipulation to Hold Action in Abatement filed. 5/25/07 – Case No. 07-0465 Order Canceling Hearing and Placing Case in Abeyance entered. 8/1/07 – Order Continuing Case in Abeyance entered. 10/29/07 – Order Continuing Case in Abeyance entered.

Grey Oaks HOA v. Division of A. Vining Formal Administrative 4/10/07 – Petition for Administrative Hearing served. 4/23/07 Nohl Crest Homes Administrative Proceedings on objection to – Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice entered. 5/7/07 – Corp. and Hearings/T. Kent issuance of ERP Nos. Amended Petition for Administrative Hearing served. 5/29/07 SWFWMD/Case Wetherell, II 49002364.137 and .138 – Notice of Hearing (for 8/28-29/07) and Order of Pre-Hearing No. 07-2199 Instructions entered. 8/13/07 – Joint Motion for Continuance served. 8/14/07 – Order Granting Continuance entered. 8/23/07 – Notice of Filing Status Report served. 8/24/07 – Order Placing Case in Abeyance entered. 10/24/07 – Joint Status Report served; and Order Continuing Case in Abeyance entered.

City of Lakeland v. Division of J. Ward/D. Graziano Formal Administrative 1/22/07 – City of Lakeland, Florida’s Petition for Formal SWFWMD/Case Administrative Proceedings on City of Administrative Proceedings served. 5/11/07 - Order Granting No. 07-0564 Hearings/T.K. Lakeland’s objection to Continuance and Re-Scheduling Hearing entered. 7/31/07 – Wetherell, II conditions of WUP No. Joint Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Pre- 20004912.006 Hearing Stipulation served; and Order Granting Extension of

7 Time (due on 8/3/07) entered. 8/3/07 – Pre-Hearing Stipulation filed. 8/31/07 - Notice of Filing Petitioner’s Hearing Exhibits served. 9/6/07 - Joint Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File Proposed Recommended Order served. 9/7/07 - Order Granting Extension of Time (Proposed Recommended Order due 10/12/07) entered. 10/10/07 - Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Proposed Recommended Orders served. 10/11/07 - Order (granting Motion to Extend Time for Filing Proposed Recommended Order to no later than 10/22/07) entered. 10/16/07 - Notice of Filing Respondent’s Hearing Exhibits served. 10/18/07 - Order to Show Cause entered. 10/22/07 - SWFWMD’s Proposed Recommended Order served; City of Lakeland’s Proposed Recommended Order served. 10/25/07 - Response to Order to Show Cause served. 11/1/07 - Order (striking Respondent’s Exhibit 1 from exhibits filed) entered.

SWFWMD v. Division of A. Vining Formal Administrative 5/9/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. Manuel Martinez Administrative Proceedings regarding 5/21/07 – Request for hearing served. 6/19/07 – Notice of and Wendy Hearings/T.K. Administrative Complaint and Hearing (for 9/20-21/07) and Order of Pre-Hearing Martinez/Case No. Wetherell Order for construction without a Instructions entered. 8/8/07 – Unopposed Motion to Reset 07-2485 permit and Continue Final Hearing served. 8/9/07 – Order Granting Continuance and Re-Scheduling Hearing entered. Hearing scheduled for 11/13 & 14/07. 9/21/07 – SWFWMD's Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum served. 9/24/07 – Motion to Withdraw as Counsel served. 9/28/07 Order 5 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Granting Motion to Withdraw as Counsel entered. 10/4/07 – Certificate of Non-Attendance entered. 10/9/07 - Petitioner SWFWMD's Witness List entered. 10/16/07 – Respondent's Motion to Continue Hearing served. 10/17/07 – Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum served. 10/18/07 – SWFWMD's Objection to Respondent's Motion to Continue Hearing served; and Order Denying Continuance entered. 10/29/07 – Corrected Order Denying Continuance entered. 11/6/07 – Petitioner's Prehearing Statement served. 11/8/07 – Respondents'' Motion to Withdraw Request for Hearing served. 11/9/07 – SWFWMD's Response to Respondent's Motion to Withdraw Request for Hearing served, and Order Closing File entered. Progress Energy Division of M. Moore Formal Administrative 6/18/07 – DEP's Notice of Receipt of Power Plant Siting Florida Site Administrative Proceedings regarding Site Application and Request for Assignment of ALJ; DEP's Certification Hearings/T.K. Certification Application Proposed Site Certification Application Schedule; and DEP's Application for Wetherell, II Statement of Additional Agencies Entitled to Copies of the Crystal River Unit Application and Amendments served. 6/19/07 – Initial Order 3 Uprate entered; and DEP's Notice of Filing Site Certification Project/Case No. Application served. 6/28/07 – DOT's Notice of Intent to be a 07-2713 EPP Party; and DEP's Response to the Initial Order served. 7/10/07 – SWFWMD's Notice of Filing Completeness Comments served. 7/20/07 – DEP's Determination of 8 Incompleteness served. 7/27/07 – SWFWMD's Notice of Intent to be a Party served. 8/2/07 Citrus County's Determination of Compliance with Local Land Use Plans and Zoning served. 8/22/07 – PEF's Notice of Filing Sufficiency Responses; Notice of Filing Certified proof of Publication for Notice of Filing Application for Electrical Power Plant Site Certification for Power Plant; and Notice of Filing Certified Proof of Publication for Notice of Receipt of Citrus County's Determination of Land Use and Zoning Consistency for Electrical Power Plant served. 9/11/07 – Notice of Appearance Toni Sturtevant, DEP; and DEP's Determination of Incompleteness served. 9/12/07 – Corrected DEP's Determination of Completeness served. 10/16/07 – DOT's Preliminary Statement of Issues served. 10/22/07 – SWFWMD's Preliminary Statement of Issues served. SWFWMD v. Division of A. Duffey Formal Administrative 6/23/06 – Petition for Formal Hearing received from Renna, Edward Administrative Proceedings regarding Respondent. 11/2/06 – Notice of Hearing (set for 12/13 – /Case No. 06-4114 Hearings/D. Administrative Complaint and 14/06) served. 12/11/06 – Order Granting Continuance Alexander Order for Construction without entered. 1/5/07 – Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 4/16 - ERP 4/17/07) served. Mediation held on 3/7/07. 4/10/07 – Renna's Motion to Continue served. 4/11/07 – Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case In Abeyance entered. 5/22/07 – Response to Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance served. 6 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

6/12/07 – Notice of Hearing for 2/12-13/08 entered. 11/27/2007 – Amended Notice of Hearing for 3/3-3/4/08 entered. Tampa Bay Water Division of A. Vining Formal Administrative 7/20/07 – Petition for Formal Administrative Hearings served. v. SWFWMD/ Administrative Proceedings objection to 7/31/07 – Initial Order entered. 8/13/07 – Notice of Hearing, Case No 07-3493 Hearings/T.K. conditions of WUP No. and Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions entered. 9/5/07 – Joint Wetherell 20004352.006 Motion to Abate Administrative Hearing served. 9/6/07 – Order Canceling Hearing and Placing Case in Abeyance entered. 11/8/07 – Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction served. 11/9/07 – Order Closing File entered.

Tampa Electric Division of M. Moore Transmission Line Certification 10/16/07 – Initial Order entered. 10/17/07 Amended Initial Company Willow Administrative Order entered. 10/17/07 – DEP's Proposed Transmission Line Oak-Wheeler-Davis Hearings/J. Lawrence Site Certification Schedule served; and DEP's Statement of Transmission Line Johnston Additional Agencies Entitled to Copies of Application and Siting Application Amendments served. 10/19/07 – Tampa Electric's Notice of No. TA07-15/Case Distribution of Additional Copies of Corridor Certification No. 07-4745TL Application served; and DEP's Notice of Filing Transmission Siting Application served. 10/25/07 – DEP's Response to Initial Order served. 10/26/07 – Notice of Hearing for 3/4-3/7 and 3/10-3/14, 2008 entered; and Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions entered. 11/9/07 – DOT's Notice of Intent to be a Party served. 11/13/07 – Dept. of Community Affairs' 9 Notice of Intent to be a Party served; and City of Temple Terrace's Recommendations and First Set of Completeness Questions served. 11/14/07 – Completeness Review served; and SWFWMD's Notice of Intent to be a Party served. 11/20/07 – DEP's Determination of Incompleteness served.

Southeastern Division of A. Duffey Formal Administrative 6/26/07 – Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing served. Freight Lines, Inc. Administrative Proceedings on objection to 7/13/07 – Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 12/3 & 4/07), and v. Board of County Hearings/D. issuance of ERP No. Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions entered. 10/1/07 – Commissioners- Alexander 44032094.000 Amended Notice of Hearing (amended as to Specific Location Charlotte County and Time of Hearing Only) entered. 11/5/07 – Stipulated and SWFWMD/ Motion to Abate Proceedings served. 11/6/07 – Order Case No. 07-3023 Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance entered.

DELEGATED ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING MATTERS

Carlisle, Franklin A. Vining Request for Administrative 10/22/07 – Request for Administrative Hearing served. and Debra Hearing regarding WUP 10/31/07 – Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice entered. 20001640.005 11/30/07 – Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered.

Dail, Dustin A. Vining Request for Administrative 10/19/07 – Request for Administrative Hearing served. Hearing regarding WUP 10/31/07 – Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice entered. 20001640.005 11/30/07 – Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered. 7 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Wal-Mart Stores, A. Vining Request for Extension of Time to 10/1/07 – Request for Extension of Time to File Petition for LP v. SWFWMD File Petition for Extension of Hearing. 10/9/07 – Order Granting Request for Extension of Hearing Time entered.

ENFORCEMENT CASES (Including Administrative Complaints)

SWFWMD v. 6th Judicial Circuit, J. Ward Complaint and Petition to Complaint filed 9/23/02. 4/2/03 – Defendant's Stipulated Motion Aloha Utilities, Pasco County/S. Enforce Consent Order and to File First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Inc./Case No. 51- Mills pursue new WUP violations Counterclaim served. 7/13/04 – Joint Stipulation to Stay Action 2002-CA-2549 served. 7/14/04 – Order Approving Joint Stipulation to Stay WS, Section G Action entered. Governing Board 10th Judicial Circuit, M. Moore Complaint and Petition for Complaint filed by SJRWMD 1/22/01. 3/9/04 - Order substituting of the St. Johns Polk County/M. Enforcement for Construction of SWFWMD as Plaintiff entered; Supplement to Complaint filed. River Water McCarthy Subdivision without ERP 4/4/04 - Answer filed. 8/24/04 – Settlement Agreement Management approved by Governing Board. 9/21/04 – Consent Final District v. Vista Judgment entered. 2/2/05 - Order Adjudging Defendant in Park Contempt entered. 4/6/05 - Order of Transfer and Development, Reassignment entered. 4/15/05 - Notice of Filing (providing Inc./Case No. notice to shareholders of entry of Order of Appointment of GCG-01-444-08 Receiver Pendente Lite) served. Payment of $6,229.22 received 10 from Vista Park Receiver. Order of denial on Intervention Motion issued 5/26/05. 9/22/05 – Order denying Motion to Intervene entered. 5/11/06 – ERP Application received, which seeks to address pending compliance issues involving Vista Park Phase II. 8/28/06 – Notice demanding payment of $10,000 contempt penalty sent. 8/31/06 – Contempt penalty of $10,000 received. ERP addressing compliance matters issued to JB Development of Davenport, Inc. on 10/12/06. SWFWMD v. R.J. A. Vining Administrative Complaint and 9/27/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. Bunbury Homes, Order Inc. Derek Welling v. 10th Judicial Circuit, M. Moore Complaint for Dissolution of the 2/28/05 - Motion to Intervene by SWFWMD served. 3/2/05 - Vista Park Polk County/R. named corporate defendants Order Granting Motion to Intervene by SWFWMD entered. Development, Inc., Doyel 3/7/05 - Order Appointing Receiver Pendente Lite entered. Vista Park 9/22/05 – Orders granting Motions to Intervene entered. 6/23/06 Management, Inc., Order granting Motion for Approval of Payment by Receiver and Vista Park entered. 8/29/06 – Order Approving Payment to Creditor Homes, Inc. v. entered. SWFWMD v. Carlos Goffi/Case No. 2005-CA- 000515 SWFWMD v. Lake 5th Judicial Circuit, J. Ward Complaint and Petition for Complaint served 4/19/04. 6/24/05 - District's Motion for Summary

8 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Erie Corporation/ Lake County/W. G. Enforcement of Consent Order Judgment served. 11/4/05 - Order for Partial Summary judgment Case No. Law for ERP violations entered (deeming Requests for Admissions to Defendant 04CA1239 admitted). 4/11/07 – Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (with Amended Complaint) and Notice of Hearing (set for 7/30/07) served. 5/9/07 – Records Custodian of Superior Concrete Construction, LLC served. 7/10/07 - Amended Notice of Hearing (on SWFWMD’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint) served (hearing set for 9/25/07). 9/12/07 - Motion for Entry of Final Judgment served. 9/13/07 - Notice of Cancellation of Hearing (on Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint) served; Notice of Hearing (on Motion for Entry of Final Judgment - set for 10/30/07) served. 9/13/07 - Notice of Hearing (on Motion for Entry of Final Judgment - set for October 30, 2007) served. 10/26/07 - Amended Notice of Hearing (on Motion for Entry of Final Judgment - set for November 13, 2007) served. 11/02/07 - Second Amended Notice of Hearing (on Motion for Entry of Final Judgment - set for 12/11/07) served.

SWFWMD v. John 6th Judicial Circuit, A. Vining Complaint and Petition for 7/6/06 - Summons and Complaint served on Defendant. Belcher/Case No. Pinellas County/F. Enforcement of Administrative 10/27/06 – Motion for Default by the Court, and Notice of 06-4467CI-8 Quesada Complaint and Order Hearing served. 11/13/06 – Order Denying Motion for Default by the Court entered. 1/17/07 – Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to 11 Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses entered. SWFWMD v. A. Duffey Administrative Complaint and 10/22/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. Manasota Electric, Order Administrative Complaint and Order entered (SWF 07-058). Inc. SWFWMD v. A. Vining Administrative Complaint and 9/25/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. McClendon, J.C., Order 10/29/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order entered (SWF Jr. 07-056). SWFWMD v. M. Moore Administrative Complaint and 3/19/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. 7/26/07 – James A. Order Administrative Complaint and Order entered (SWF 07-41). Messana SWFWMD v. Sean A. Duffey Administrative Complaint and 10/23/07 – Administrative Complaint and Order served. M. Murphy and Order Shelly A. Murphy SWFWMD v. Polk 10th Judicial Circuit, M. Moore Suit to enforce Consent Order Complaint filed 5/27/99. Cone Constructors Inc. filed for Properties, Inc., et Polk County/C. bankruptcy 6/9/00. 4/3/01 – District filed Proof of Claim for al./Case No. G99- Moore $443,240 with Bankruptcy Court. Final Judgment entered 1779-08 against Polk Properties, Inc., for $547,859 on 6/15/01. Bankruptcy still open. SWFWMD v. 6th Circuit Court, J. Ward Complaint and Petition for 2/9/07 - Complaint and Petition for Enforcement filed; Summons David Richardson Pinellas County Enforcement Issued to Defendants. Return of Service (served 2/27/07). and Lisa 5/3/07 – Plaintiff’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default Against

9 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Richardson/Case Defendants filed. 5/30/07 - Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for No. 07-1395CI-07 Clerk’s Entry of Default Against Defendants (with Affidavit of Non-Military Service) served. 8/22/07- Default entered. 9/20/07 - Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Entry of Final Judgment After Default (with proposed Order) served. 9/21/07 - Final Judgment entered. 11/26/07 - Recorded certified copy of Final Judgment in public records of Pinellas County. SWFWMD v. Alan 10th Judicial Circuit, M. Moore Complaint and Petition for 3/23/05 – Complaint and Petition for Enforcement filed. 6/8/05 - J. Rieder and Polk County/D. Enforcement to enforce Mediation held. 6/28/05 - Mediation Settlement Agreement Cynthia F. Maloney Administrative Complaint and approved by Governing Board. 9/27/05 – Third payment Rieder/Case No. Order No. 05-09 received pursuant to Settlement Agreement. 10/19/05 – 2005CA-001184- Payment received. 11/15/05 – Payment received. 4/20/06 – 0000 Payment received. 7/7/06 – Order Approving and Enforcing Mediation Agreement entered. 10/30/06 – Order Adjudging Defendants in Contempt served, setting 1/1/07 as compliance date or daily penalty of $250 thereafter. 11/13/06 – Order Adjudging Defendants in Contempt entered. Compliance with Contempt Order being monitored. SWFWMD v. 5th Judicial Circuit, D. Graziano/J. Complaint enforcing Final Order Complaint filed 7/7/03. 3/2/04 – Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion Danny J. Suggs, Sumter County/J. Pepper No. SWF 03-050 for Temporary Injunction entered. 5/11/04 – Order denying et al./Case No. Booth Defendants' Motion for Stay/Motion to Modify Injunction entered.

12 2003-CA-000724 6/11/04 – Order Granting Attorney's Fees (for motion to compel inspection of land) entered. 7/12/04 – Order Granting Attorney's Fees (for motion to compel production of documents) entered. 4/25/05 – Order Adjudging Defendants in Contempt entered. 8/31/05 – Order denying Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment entered. 5/18/06 – Order Granting Defendants' Amended Motion for Judicial Inspection, Order on Defendants' Amended Motion for Evaluation of Defendants' Proposed Activity, and Order on Defendants' Motion to Modify Injunction entered. 7/28/06 – Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Add Parties, etc. entered. 8/1/06 – Order on Motion to Modify Injunction After Considering the Party's Memoranda entered. 8/28/06 – Answer of new defendants served. 8/29/06 – Notice of Appeal of a Non-Final Order served. 2/13/07 – Order Granting Amended Motion for Protective Order entered. 3/15/07 – Objection to Entry of Qualified Protective Order; and Notice of Filing Neuropsychological Report served. 3/29/07 – Order on Ex Parte Motion for Qualified Protective Order entered. 10/8/07 – Order Setting Status Conference entered. Status Conference scheduled for 1/2/08. 11/1/07 – Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically served. 11/6/07 - Order Granting Leave to Appear Telephonically entered. SWFWMD v. 13th Judicial Circuit, J. Ward Complaint to enjoin defendant to 5/31/05 – Complaint filed. 10/25/05 - Order entered granting Tomko Hillsborough complete activities required by District's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses. 2/13/06 - Development, Inc. County/Judge ERP Nos. 4419967.000, .001 (Southwell’s) Motion to Withdraw (as counsel for Tomko) served. 10 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

and Built To The Nielson 7/13/06 - Order (granting Motion to Amend Complaint) entered. T, Inc./Case No. 8/2/06 - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count III of Amended 05-4689, Division Complaint served. 11/10/06 - Built To The T served. 12/29/06 – F Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Response of Defendant Built To The T, Inc. served. 1/23/07 – Defendant Built To The T, Inc.’s Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint served. 9/10/07 - (SWFWMD’s) Notice of Hearing (on Tomko’s Motion to Dismiss Count III of Amended Complaint - set for 11/21/07) served. 9/28/07 - Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Tomko Development, Inc. to Produce Documents served. 10/3/07 - Notice of Hearing on Motion to Compel (set for 11/21/07) served. 10/5/07 - The McIntyre Law Firm, P.L.’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant, Built To The T, Inc. served. Notice of UMC Hearing (on Motion to Withdraw; set for 10/30/07) served. 10/16/07 - Notice of Hearing (on Southwell’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Tomko - set for 11/8/07) served. 11/1/07 - Amended Motion to Withdraw (Southwell and his firm as counsel for Tomko) served. 11/8/07 - Order Granting the McIntyre Law Firm, P.L.’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant, Built To The T, Inc. entered. 11/13/07 - Order Granting Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Tomko entered. 13

SWFWMD v. 6th Judicial Circuit, J. Ward Complaint and Petition for Complaint filed 11/5/03. 8/7/06 – Order granting Motion to Trimar Southeast Pasco County/W. Enforcement of Consent Order Withdraw; and Order granting Third Motion for Extension of Time Developments, Cobb for ERP violations to Respond to Discovery entered. 6/6/07 – Return of Service (of Inc./Case No. Subpoena Duces Tecum for Deposition to R. Byrd served on 512003CA- 5/31/07) served. 6/11/07 - Return of Service (of Subpoena Duces 3209ES, Section Y Tecum for Deposition to J. Ryan served on 6/1/07) served. 9/7/07 - Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum served. 10/24/07 - Notice of Taking Deposition (of corporate representative of Trimar) served. 10/26/07 - Amended Notice of Taking Deposition (of corporate representative of Trimar) served.

MISCELLANEOUS

Crowley Museum 12th Judicial Circuit, J. Ward Complaint for inverse 11/21/06 - Order Granting Leave to Amend the Complaint and Nature Center, Sarasota County/B. condemnation, trespass, nuisance entered. 12/11/06 - SWFWMD & SWFWMD Governing Board's Inc. v. SWFWMD, A. Titus and negligence Motion to Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint served. 1/24/07 - et al./Case No. Defendant SWFWMD’s Amended Motion to Dismiss, Motion to 2002-CA- Strike, Motion for a More Definite Statement, and Supporting 015283NC Memorandum of Law served. 3/20/07 – Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant SWFWMD’s Amended Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike and Motion for a More Definite Statement served. 4/16/07 – Order Granting With Prejudice Defendant SWFWMD’s Amended Motion to Dismiss entered. 4/18/07 – (Crowley’s) 11 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Notice of Appeal filed. (See Appeals) 14

12 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Ham, Lance H. 13th Judicial Circuit, E. Suit for damages and injunctive 11/10/05 – Summons and Complaint served. 11/21/05 – Plant and Norma G. Hillsborough County Kohlmyer/J. relief alleging inverse City's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Cause of Action Ham v. City of /C. Isom Ward condemnation served. 12/13/05 – SWFWMD's Motion to Dismiss and/or Plant City, Motion to Abate and/or Motion for a More Definite Statement'; Hillsborough and Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint served. 1/3/06 – County and Hillsborough County's Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of SWFWMD/Case Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint served. 1/10/06 – Defendant, No. 05-CA-9419 R SWFWMD's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint served. 1/17/06 – Defendant Plant City's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint served. 7/27/07 - Third Amended Notice of Hearing on Defendant City of Plant City's Motion for Summary Judgment (Amended as to date) served. 8/22/07 - Amended Notice of Hearing on City’s Motion for Summary Judgment (on 11/19/07) served. 10/29/07 - Defendant City of Plant City’s Notice of Filing (deposition transcripts of the Hams, affidavits of Burke, Bruegger & Farrell); and Defendant City of Plant City’s Motion for Summary Judgment served. 10/30/07 - Defendant City of Plant City’s Notice of Filing of Amended Affidavit of Mark Farrell, P.E. served. 11/16/07 - Plaintiffs’ Response to City of Plant City’s Motion for Summary Judgment served. 11/16/07 - Defendant City of Plant City’s Memorandum of 15 Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment served. 11/29/07 - Defendant City of Plant City’s Motion to Dismiss for Fraud on the Court or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Affidavits and Memorandum of Law served. Hames, Cedar and 12th Judicial Circuit, D. Graziano Suit for damages alleging inverse 4/4/07 – Amended Complaint and Summons served. 4/23/07 - Nora H. Scholin v. Manatee County/P. /J. Ward condemnation State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s State of FL Dubensky Motion to Dismiss served. 5/16/07 - Order from Middle District of Department of Florida remanding case back to circuit court entered. 5/18/07 - Environmental SWFWMD’s Motion to Dismiss served. 5/24/07 - Notice of Protection and Hearing (on DEP’s & SWFWMD’s Motions to Dismiss – SWFWMD/Case scheduled for 7/18/07) served. 8/7/07 – SWFWMD's Answer No. 2007-CA- served. 8/9/07 - Plaintiffs’ Reply to Affirmative Defenses and 001649 Motion to Strike served. 8/15/07 - Defendant SWFWMD’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion served. 8/23/07 - (Plaintiff’s) Motion to Bifurcate served. 8/24/07 - Motion to Set Status Conference and Bench Trial on Taking Issue; Notice of Hearing (on above Motion and Motion to Bifurcate); and Notice of Hearing (on SWFWMD’s Motion for Summary Judgment served. Hearing scheduled for 9/11/07. 8/30/07 - Amended Notice of Hearing (on SWFWMD’s Motion for Summary Judgment - set for 11/2/07) served. 9/18/07 - Order Scheduling Case for Non-Jury Trial (for week beginning 1/22/08); and Order of Referral to Mediation entered. 10/1/07 - 13 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Stipulation as to Mediator served. 10/12/07 - Defendant SWFWMD’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion served. 10/17/07 - (Plaintiffs’) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to SWFWMD’s Liability for Taking Under Counts I, II, IV, V, VII, VIII, X, XI, XIII, XIV, XVII, XX and XXIII of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint served; (Plaintiffs’) Notice of Filing (of affidavits of C. W. Haynes, Jr., W. C. Ward and D. West); and Notice of Court Ordered Mediation (set for 12/13/07) served. 10/31/07 - Notice of Rescheduled Hearing (on our Amended Motion for Summary Judgment - set for 11/8/07) served. 11/6/07 – Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment served. 11/14/07 - Second Amended Order Scheduling Case for Non-Jury Trial (set for 1/23/08) entered.

Hewett, Carol v. U.S. District Court, J. Ward Suit for injunctive relief to compel 2/26/07 – Summons and complaint received via certified mail. SWFWMD, et al. Middle District of SWFWMD to conduct 3/16/07 – Defendant SWFWMD’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Case No. 5:07-CV- Florida, Ocala/Wm. investigations into activities of the and Motion for More Definite Statement, and Incorporated 57-OC-10GRS Terrell Hodges, Sr. Rainbow River Ranch, LLC, and Memorandum of Law served. 3/28/07 - Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay District Judge and to enforce state laws and of Proceedings served. 5/8/07 - First Amended Complaint filed. Gary R. Jones, regulations 5/21/07 - Summons with First Amended Complaint served. Magistrate Judge 16 6/19/07 - Motion for Leave to Substitute Party Defendant; Notice of Change of Address; and Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Dismiss served. 7/6/07 -Defendant’s Response to Motion for Leave to Substitute Party Defendant, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law served. 8/8/07 - Order (granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Substitute Party Defendant to the extent that she is given leave to file a Second Amended complaint and denied in all other respects and denying as moot the District’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Motion for a More Definite Statement) entered. 8/23/07 - Order to Show Cause entered. 8/28/07 - Second Amended Complaint served. 9/4/07 – Plaintiff's Reply to Court's Order to Show Good Cause served. 9/13/07 - Summons and Second Amended Complaint served on D L Moore. 10/1/07 - Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law served. 10/12/07 - Plaintiff’s Response to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint and Memorandum of Law served.

Spirtos, Nicki v. Division of T. Suit regarding discharge from 3/16/07 – Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed. SWFWMD/Case Administrative Gonzalez public employment 4/23/07 - Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing (regarding Nos. 07-1617 and Hearings/T. Whistleblower complaint) filed. 5/7/07 – Initial Order and Order 07-1949 Wetherell, II Consolidating Cases entered. 5/16/07 – Response to Petition for Formal Administrative hearing ("Name Clearing"); and Response to Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing

14 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

("Whistleblower Complaint") served. 5/23/07 – Order Continuing Case in Abeyance entered. 6/1/07 – (Petitioner's) Response to May 23, 2007 Order; and Respondent's Legal Brief served. 6/5/07 – Order (that cases shall remain consolidated and mutually agreeable dates for hearing shall be served by 6/19/07) entered. 6/19/07 – Joint Response Regarding Proposed Dates for Final Hearing served. 6/21/07 – Notice of Hearing; and Order of Pre-Hearing Instructions entered. 7/9/07 – (Florida Commission on Human Relations') Notice of Termination of Investigation (regarding Whistleblower Complaint) filed. 10/18/07 – Petitioner's Motion for Entry onto SWFWMD Property to Inspect Documents and to Depose Witnesses; and Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Interrogatories served; Case Status Motion Hearing held and Order (that Respondent shall produce documents referenced at hearing, and deposition of J. Pepper shall take place at Respondent's Brooksville office) entered. 10/23/07 – Respondent's Emergency Motion for Protective Order and Respondent's Motion for Emergency Hearing on Protective Order served. 10/30/07 – Respondent's Pre-Hearing Statement; (Petitioner's) Motion to Continue Final Hearing and 17 Compel Discovery; and Petitioner's Prehearing Statement served. 10/31/07 – Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing entered; and (Respondent's) Response to Motion to Continue Final Hearing and Compel Discovery served. 11/2/07 – Notice of Appearance; Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories; and Petitioner's Prehearing Statement served. 11/5/07 – Pre-Hearing Conference held. 11/6/07 – Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by 12/6/07) entered. SWFWMD v. 5th Judicial Circuit, F. Miller/J. Complaint for Declaratory Complaint filed and Summons served 3/31/04. 4/2/04 – Weeki Wachee Hernando County/R. Ward/ B. Judgment regarding lease (SWFWMD's) First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Springs, LLC, et Tombrink Bilenky Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate served. 7/18/04 al./Case No. H-27- – Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Complaint entered. 8/17/04 CA-2004-366-RT – Notice of Filing of Petition for Writ of Prohibition, or, in the Alternative, Notice of Appeal of Non-Final Order served. (See Appeals) 8/30/04 – Verified Motion for Emergency Temporary Injunction served. 9/20/04 – Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Strike, Without Prejudice, and Ordering Mediation and Conflict Resolution Procedures, Under Section 164.1041(1), F.S. entered. Mediation held 11/18/04. Mediation to be continued. 1/5/05 - Notice of Mediation served. Continued mediation held on 2/3/05. 2/14/05 – (SWFWMD's) Motion to

15 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Dispense with Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act served. 2/21/05 – Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Dispense with Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act served. 5/3/05 - Motion to Abate Action Pursuant to Sections 164.101 – 164.1061, F.S., the Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act served. 5/19/05 – Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendants' Motion to Abate served. 6/28/05 - City's Supplemental Memorandum, Both: (a) in Opposition to SWFWMD's Motion to Dispense with Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act; and (b) in Support of City's Motion to Abate Action Pursuant to §§164.101 – 164.1061, Fla. Stat., the Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act served. 6/29/05 – Order Granting Motion to Withdraw entered. 7/6/05 – Order imposing stay of proceedings until conclusion of Circuit Court Appellate Panel entered. 8/5/05 – Mediation Results Report filed. 8/11/05 – Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Notice of Hearing for August 29, 2005, and Notice of Hearing served. 12/12/05 – Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Dispense with Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act served. 12/14/05 – Hearing on Motion to Dispense with Florida Governmental 18 Conflict Resolution Act held. 1/23/06 – Motion for Reconsideration of Ruling Establishing Logistical Requirements for Joint Public Meeting; and Notice of Hearing served. (Hearing conducted on 2/3/06). 2/1/06 – Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing; and Notice of Filing served. 2/3/06 – Order (a) Granting Defendant's Motion to Abate Action; (b) Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Dispense with Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act; and (c) Establishing Logistical Guidelines for Joint Public Meeting entered, and Notice of Filing served. 3/9/06 – Notice of Meeting Pursuant to This Court's Order Dated February 3, 2006 served. 4/25/06 – Meeting to negotiate settlement pursuant to Court's Order. 5/12/06 – Notice of Compliance with Chapter 164, F.S., and Motion to Re-Institute Court Proceedings served. 5/30/06 – The City of Weeki Wachee's: (a) Objection to the SWFWMD's Notice of Compliance with Chapter 164, F.S., and Motion to Reinstitute Court Proceedings; and (b) Motion for Order Requiring that Compliance with the Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act Be Recommenced served. 6/20/06 – Order Re-Instating Court Proceedings entered. 7/20/06 – (Defendants') Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees served. 8/24/06 – Motion for Order Reconsidering Order Declining to Enforce Ch. 164, F.S., with Incorporated Memorandum of Law 16 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

in Support Thereof and Notice of Filing served. 8/30/06 – Showing of Good Cause, and Motion to Consolidate (with Case No. H-27-CA-2005-552-RT) served. 9/5/06 - Order Denying Motion for Order Reconsidering Order Declining to Enforce Ch. 164, Fla. Stat., With Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof entered. 12/14/06 – Order Scheduling Case Management Conference entered. 12/18/06 – Amended Order Scheduling Case Management Conference entered. 1/25/07 - District's Response to Case Management Order served. 1/26/07 – Case Management Statement by Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC and City of Weeki Wachee served. 1/28/07 – Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment for Failure to State a Cause-Of-Action, and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof served. 2/8/07 – Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment served. 2/13/07 – Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss entered. 2/21/07 – Order Pursuant to Case Management Conference entered. 2/23/07 – Motion for Reconsideration of February 13, 2007, Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss served. 3/8/07 – Plaintiff's 19 Response to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of February 13, 2007 Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss served. 3/14/07 – Notice of Unexplained Pleading entered. 3/16/07 – Plaintiff's Response to Notice of Unexplained Pleading served. 4/18/07 - Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default served. 4/20/07 – Response to Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default served. 4/30/07 – Notice of Hearing (on Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default and Motion to Compel) served. Hearing scheduled for 5/11/07. 5/2/07 – Order denying Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of February 13, 2007 Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss entered. 5/4/07 – Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default and Quash Notice of Hearing Thereon; Notice of Hearing on Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default and Quash Notice of Hearing Thereon; Motion to Compel Production of Documents; and Notice of Hearing on Motion to Compel Production of Documents served. 5/7/07 – Order denying Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default and Quash Notice of Hearing Thereon entered. 5/9/07 – Amended Notice of Hearing on Motion to Compel Production of Documents served. 5/10/07 – Plaintiff's Witness List; Defendants'/Counter Plaintiffs' Preliminary Witness List; and Verified Answer, Affirmative 17 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Defenses, Counterclaim, Demand for Attorneys' Fees, and Demand for Jury Trial of Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC, and the City of Weeki Wachee, Regarding the First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief of the SWFWMD served. 5/11/07 – Amended Notice of Hearing (cont'd); Motion to Reconsider May 7, 2007, Order on Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default and Quash Notice of Hearing Thereon; and Notice of Hearing served. 5/14/07 – Amended Notice of Hearing (as to Date and Time) served. 5/15/07 – Motion for Clarification of Deadline to File Dispositive Motions; Notice of Hearing served; and Amended Order denying Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Default and Quash Notice of Hearing Thereon Correcting Misstatements Contained Therein entered. Hearing on motions held 5/15/07. 5/18/07 – Order Regarding Consolidation and Abatement entered. 5/21/07 – Verified Motion for Disqualification of Judge; and Affidavit of Robyn A. Anderson served. 5/29/07 Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery entered. 5/30/07 – Order Granting Verified Motion for Disqualification of Judge entered. 5/31/07 – Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to 20 Compel Discovery served. 6/4/07 – Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; (SWFWMD's) Notice of Filing (deposition of Robyn Anderson); Denial of Affirmative Defenses; Answer to Counterclaim; and Plaintiff/Counter Defendant's Motion to Strike Certain Portions of Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs' Verified Answer and Affirmative Defenses served. 6/4/07 – Order of Reassignment entered. 6/21/07 – (Weeki Wachee's) Objection to Entry of Proposed Order; and Verified Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC, and City of Weeki Wachee Motion for Summary Final Judgment, and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof served. 6/22/07 – Order Setting Case Management Conference entered. Set for 7/27/07. Memorandum to Court File and to Attorneys/Pro Se Parties of Record entered. 6/29/07 – Notice of Hearing (regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike scheduled for 7/27/07); and Notice of Scheduling Conflict with Order Setting Case Management Conference served. 6/30/07 – LLC's and City's Motion to Strike Footnote No. 1 from SWFWMD's Denial of Affirmative Defenses; LLC's and City's Motion to Strike Plaintiff/Counter Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; LLC's and City's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim to Clarify Requested Relief; and Amended Counterclaim, Demand 18 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

for Attorneys' Fees, and Demand for Jury Trial of Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC, and the City of Weeki Wachee served. 7/1/07 – LLC's and City's Motion to Quash Notice of Hearing served. 7/5/07 – SWFWMD's letter to judge objecting to proposed order granting Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim served. 7/9/07 – Plaintiff's Response Opposing Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim served. 7/11/07 – Order Rescheduling Case Management Conference and Order on Pending Motions (rescheduled for 8/16/07) served. 7/13/07 – Second Request by the LLC and the City for Production of Documents and Things by SWFWMD served. 7/16/07 – Amended Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 8/16/07 on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike) served. 7/20/07 – Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 8/16/07 on Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim to Clarify Requested Relief) served. 7/27/07 – Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 8/16/07 on Defendants' June 21, 2007, Verified Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC and City of Weeki Wachee Motion for Summary Final Judgment, and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Final 21 Judgment dated Dec. 7, 2004) served. 8/3/07 – Notice of Hearing (scheduled for 8/16/07 on various Defendants' Motions) served. 8/9/07 – LLC's and City's Motion to Quash Notice of Hearing Regarding the SWFWMD's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof served. 8/10/07 – Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Final Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Final Judgment served. 8/14/07 – Notice of Filing Affidavits, LLC's and City's Motion for Leave to Amend Affirmative Defenses, Verified Amendment to Affirmative Defenses of the LLC and the City, Memorandum of Law: (a) In Support of LLC's and City's Motion to Strike Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (b) In Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, LLC's and City's Verified Motion to Strike Plaintiff/Counter Defendant's Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and Memorandum in Support Thereof, and Notice of Hearing (for 8/16/07) served. 8/16/07 – Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Second Request for Production of Documents served. 8/17/07 – (Defendants') Response to the Court's Request for Additional Authority and Second Motion to Compel Discovery, and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof served. 8/27/07 – Plaintiff/Counter- 19 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Defendant's Memorandum in Response to Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC's and the City of Weeki Wachee's Thirteenth Affirmative Defense, and to Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC's and the City of Weeki Wachee's Motion to Strike Plaintiff/ Counter- Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment served. 9/6/07 – Reply and Memorandum of Law of Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC and City of Weeki Wachee to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Memorandum in Response to Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC's and the City of Weeki Wachee's Thirteenth Affirmative Defense, and to Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC's and the City of Weeki Wachee's Motion to Strike Plaintiff/ Counter-Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment served. 9/6/07 – Order of Referral to Mediation served. 10/10/07 – Notice of Mediation (scheduled for 10/23/07). 10/17/07 – Amended Notice of Mediation (as to time and location only); (SWFWMD's) Mediation Memorandum; and Mediation Memorandum of Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC and City of Weeki Wachee served. 10/18/07 – Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Amended Mediation Memorandum served. 10/22/07 – Supplement to Mediation Memorandum of Weeki Wachee Springs, LLC, and City of Weeki Wachee served. 10/24/07 – Confirmation that 22 mediation will reconvene on 11/5/07. 11/2/07 – Confirmation of rescheduling mediation conference to 11/16/07. 11/7/07 – Notice of Continuation of Mediation served. 11/17/07 – Notice of Non-Availability served. 11/27/07 – Amended Notice of Continuation of Mediation served. Mediation scheduled to continue on 12/10/07. Trinkaus, Regina 5th Judicial Circuit, F. Miller/L. Complaint for breach of contract 2/26/07 – Complaint served. 3/16/07 – Defendant’s Motion to v. SWFWMD/Case Hernando County/D. Tetreault Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failure to State a Cause of No. H27CA2007- Merritt, Sr. Action, or, Alternatively, Motion for More Definite Statement, 175 and Memorandum of Law served. 6/21/07 - Defendant’s Reply Memorandum served. 10/2/07 - Order (granting SWFWMD's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice) entered. 10/02/07 - Amended Complaint served. 10/19/07 - Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Failure to State A Cause of Action and Memorandum of Law served. Weeki Wachee Hernando County F. Miller/J. Complaint for declaratory 3/28/07 – Complaint and summons served. 4/5/07 – Springs, LLC v. Circuit/ Ward judgment regarding lease Defendant's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Section SWFWMD/Case 57.105(3), F.S., served. 4/16/07 – Defendant's Motion to No. H-27-CC- Dismiss or Strike Complaint served. 4/27/07 – Defendant's 2007-322 Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Section 57.105(3), F.S., filed. 7/10/07 – Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment Regarding Non-Monetary Disputes Between Landlord and 20 STYLE/CASE NO. COURT/JUDGE ATTORNEY DESCRIPTION STATUS (current as of 11/29/07)

Tenant Relating to the Use and/or Possession of Real Property served. 7/13/07 – First Request by the LLC for Production of Documents and Things by SWFWMD served. 7/20/07 – Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Strike Amended Complaint served. APPEALS

Crowley Museum Second District J. Ward Appeal of order granting with 4/18/07 – (Crowley’s) Notice of Appeal filed. 5/31/07 - Index to and Nature Center, Court of Appeal prejudice SWFWMD's Amended Record filed served. 6/28/07 - Initial Brief of Appellant served Inc. v. SWFWMD, Motion to Dismiss (with Appendices). 8/13/07 - Appellant’s Motion to Supplement et al./Case No. . the Record with Order on Motion for Clarification served. 8/31/07 2D07-2013 - Appellant’s Motion to Amend the Initial Brief (with Amended Initial Brief of Appellant) served. 9/4/07 - Supplemental Index served. 9/10 /07 - Appellant Nature Center’s Motion for Leave to File Reply to District’s Response to Motion for Leave to File An Amended Initial Brief served. 9/13/07 - Revised Supplemental Index. 10/5/07 - SWFWMD’s Agreed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Answer Brief served. 10/26/07 - Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File 25 Page Reply Brief served. 10/31/07 - Order Authorizing Longer Brief entered. 11/5/07 - Reply Brief of Appellant Crowley Museum and Nature Center, Inc. served; 23 Appellant’s Request for Oral Argument served.

CONSENT ORDERS

VIOLATOR BOARD POLICY ATTORNEY VIOLATIONS STATUS

Earl Pruitt 160-6 A. Vining Failure to Obtain a Permit Prior to 10/22/07 – CO signed by Earl Pruitt the Construction of a Water Well 11/12/07 – CO signed by Executive Director

Russ Putnal 160-6 A. Duffey Failure to Submit Meter Reading 11/15/07 – CO signed by Russ Putnal Reports 11/30/07 – CO signed by Executive Director

L:\PRIVATE\Jan Kaesemeyer\Litigation Reports\2007LitRpts\LitigationRptDec07.doc

21 Item 80

RULEMAKING UPDATE December 2007

PROPOSED RULES FOR WHICH THE GOVERNING BOARD HAS AUTHORIZED INITIATION OF RULEMAKING

Rule Initiation Next Scheduled Projected Date Action Board Approval Date 1. (40D-1.603, 40D-2.091, 40D-2.361) Nov 2007 Effective N/A Rulemaking to clarify timeliness of Approximately renewal applications Apr 2008 2. (40D-1.607, 40D-1.659, 40D-4.331, 40D- Nov 2007 Effective N/A 40.331) Rulemaking to adopt Approximately application form for minor Apr 2008 Environmental Resource Permit modifications and allow extension of permit duration without fee 3. (40D-1.659) Rulemaking to adopt Jul/Aug Effective N/A amendments to WUP application 2006 Approximately forms to request information on Jan 2008 corporate, partnership and other business entity applicants 4. (40D-1.659) Rulemaking to amend Nov 2007 Effective N/A rules to incorporate supplement Approximately Environmental Resource Permit Apr 2008 application forms addressing homeowner and property owner association documentation requirements 5. (40D-1.659) Rulemaking to adopt Nov 2007 Effective N/A electronic transaction agreement for Approximately use by permit applicants filing permit Apr 2008 applications electronically 6. (40D-1.659, 40D-2.091) Rulemaking to Nov 2007 Effective N/A incorporate by reference revised Approximately information submittal requirements Apr 2008 for small general water use permit renewal and modification applications 7. (40D-2) Rulemaking to adopt Oct 2006 Governing Dec 2007 amendments to address Central Board Florida Coordination Area (CFCA) Final Approval issues Dec 2007 8. (40D-2.091) Expand SWUCA per capita Jan 2007 Governing TBA requirements District-wide Board Jan 2008 9. (40D-2.091) Rulemaking to enhance Apr 2007 TBA TBA public supply water conservation requirements 10. (40D-2.091, BOR 1.14) Rulemaking to Nov 2007 Effective N/A repeal Section 1.14, Permit Approximately Compliance, of the WUP Information Apr 2008

24 Item 80

Rule Initiation Next Scheduled Projected Date Action Board Approval Date Manual Part B, Basis of Review 11. (40D-2.091, BOR 6) Amend rule to Oct 2007 Effective N/A conform BOR Chapter 6, WUP Approximately Standard Condition 16 to Rule 40D- Apr 2008 2.381(3)(p); amend rule to update permit reporting condition in BOR 12. (40D-2.091, 40D-2.801, BOR 7.3) Nov 2007 Effective N/A Rulemaking to delete discretionary Approximately language and correct the legal Apr 2008 description of the NTBWUCA 13. (40D-2.301) Amend rule to clarify type Sep 2007 Governing Jan 2008 of ERP required prior to obtaining a Board WUP Jan 2008 14. (40D-2.321, BOR 1.9) Amend rules to Jul/Aug Governing Jan 2008 provide for a 20-year permit for uses 2006 Board with both traditional and AWS Jan 2008 sources, 5 year compliance review, population growth report and establish permit fee 15. (40D-4.021, 40D-4-041, 40D-4.051) Aug 2007 Effective N/A Rulemaking to revise the definitions Approximately of Alteration and New Surface Water Jan 2008 Management System 16. (40D-4.091) Rulemaking to incorporate Oct 2005 TBA TBA clarifying language in the water quantity section of the ERP BOR 17. (40D-4.091) Amendments to ERP BOR Oct 2007 Effective N/A Appendix 4 regarding mitigation Approximately banks; amendments to allow multiple Apr 2008 authorizations on mitigation bank credit withdrawals 18. (40D-4.091) Rulemaking to incorporate Nov 2007 Effective N/A by reference Operating Agreement Approximately between the USACOE and SWFWMD, Apr 2008 pursuant to programmatic general permit (PGP) PGP-SAJ-95 19. (40D-8.041) Rulemaking to add Nov 2005 Governing TBA minimum flows for the freshwater Board segment of the Alafia River Public Hearing Jan 2008 20. (40D-8.624) Minimum levels for Lakes Nov/Dec Governing TBA Crews, Iola, Jessamine, Pasco, Pierce, 2006 Board and Unnamed Lake No. 22 (also Public Hearing known as Loyce) in Pasco County Dec 2007 21. (40D-8.624) Minimum levels for Lakes Oct 2007 Effective N/A Annie, Bonnie, Dinner, Lee, Mabel, Approximately Starr and Venus in Polk County Jan 2008 22. (40D-8.624) Rulemaking to repeal the Oct 2007 Effective N/A 10-year flood levels Approximately Apr 2008

25 Item 80

Rule Initiation Next Scheduled Projected Date Action Board Approval Date 23. (40D-21.231, 40D-21.331, 40D-21.441) Sep 2007 Effective N/A Clarify intent of Public Supply Water Approximately Shortage Mitigation Plan provisions of Jan 2008 the District's Water Shortage Plan 24. Rulemaking to adopt the District’s Oct 2006 TBA TBA Program “Facilitating Agricultural Resource Management Systems” (FARMS)

26 H. Reports Items 81 – 82 – 83

Governing Board Meeting December 18, 2007

Reports

81. Basin Board Land Resources Committee

This report provides an overview of the Basin Board Land Resources Committee meeting held on December 7, 2007, in Sarasota.

Staff Recommendation:

This item is presented for the Board's information only, and no action is required.

Presenter: Heidi B. McCree, Chair, Basin Board Land Resources Committee

82. Executive Director’s Report

83. Chair’s Report – Performance Evaluations of the Executive Director and Inspector General ...... 2 Item 83

Reports December 18, 2007

Chair’s Report

Performance Evaluations of the Executive Director and Inspector General

Purpose Governing Board Members received their performance appraisal packets at the October 2007 Board Meeting and have submitted their performance comments and recommendations for improvement and professional development. These have been incorporated into draft 2007 performance appraisals for the Executive Director and Inspector General. Board members also received and reviewed the proposed 2008 Goals and Objectives for the Executive Director and Inspector General. This agenda item is to allow Governing Board members to:

1. Review and discuss these draft appraisals, make edits agreed to by the majority of the Board and approve the final 2007 appraisals; and

2. Discuss the proposed 2008 Goals & Objectives, make edits agreed to by the majority of the Board and approve these Goals & Objectives.

Background Board Policy No. 710-2 governs the performance evaluation process for the Executive Director and Inspector General. At its September 2007 meeting, the Board approved the proposed performance appraisal schedule and selected the District's Human Resources Director to assist Governing Board members with this process.

In accordance with the Board's policy and approved schedule, the performance appraisal process begins when the Executive Director and Inspector General each submit statements of accomplishments for the past year and proposed performance objectives for the upcoming year to the Governing Board. A packet including these accomplishments, as well as other forms, documents and instructions needed by the Board to complete the performance appraisals, were provided to each Board member at their October 2007 meeting for their review and use.

Upon receiving the performance review packets, Governing Board members independently completed separate Performance Evaluation Forms for the Executive Director and Inspector General reflecting that Board member's assessment of the employee's performance for the year. The forms also reflected any recommendations for improvement and professional development ("recommendations") suggested by Board members.

The Human Resources Director assembled the recommendations submitted by each Board member into a master document that was returned to the Governing Board. Each Board member then independently selected the recommendations s/he would like to have included in the final appraisal.

The Human Resources Director also combined the individual Performance Evaluation Forms submitted by Board members into a single, draft performance appraisal for each employee, following the procedures described in Board Policy No. 710-2. Only those recommendations for improvement and professional development receiving endorsement from a majority of the Governing Board members were included in the draft performance appraisals. The remaining recommendations will be provided to the employees under separate cover.

2 Item 83

The draft performance appraisals will be presented to the full Board for review, discussion, editing and final approval at the December 18, 2007 Board Meeting. At this same meeting, the Board will:

1. Review, recommend, vote upon and approve any changes to the draft Board performance evaluations reflecting the 2007 performance achievements of the Executive Director and Inspector General;

2. Review, recommend, vote upon and approve any changes to the draft recommendations for improvement and professional development for these employees;

3. Review recommend, vote upon and approve any changes to the 2008 performance goals and objectives for these employees;

4. Authorize the draft appraisals, recommendations for improvement and professional development and performance goals and objectives to be finalized, incorporating any changes voted for and approved by the Governing Board; and

5. Authorize the Governing Board Chairman to sign the final, approved appraisals and deliver them to the employees on behalf of the Governing Board.

Benefit/Costs This agenda item provides an opportunity for the Governing Board to ask any questions they may have about the performance evaluation packets or process.

Impact If Not Adopted Not applicable

Staff Recommendations:

(1) Approve the 2007 performance appraisals of the Executive Director and Inspector General and authorize them to be finalized; (2) Authorize the Governing Board Chairman to sign the final, approved appraisals and deliver them to the employees on behalf of the Governing Board; (3) Approve the 2008 Goals & Objectives for the Executive Director and Inspector General.

Presenter: Elaine M. Kuligofski, Director, Human Resources & Risk Management

3 4