Amami Rabbit Iriomote Cat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Question1: How important are the mammals on the four islands containing the property? Answer1: It has been confirmed that 22 species of indigenous mammals inhabit the property, accounting for 19% of the total 108 indigenous species found across Japan. They include globally threatened species such as Amami rabbit, Iriomote cat, and Okinawa spiny rat. Amami rabbit Iriomote cat Question2: How important are the amphibians in the four islands containing the property? Answer2: The islands are home to 21 species or 28% of the total of 74 indigenous amphibian species in Japan. They show extremely high endemism with 18 species or 86% of the total species being endemic to the islands. 12 species are listed as EN on the IUCN Red List (2018) including Amami Ishikawa's frog, Otton frog and Holst's frog. Question3: Are the four islands containing the property inhabited? Answer3: The four islands containing the property are all inhabited. There are no residents living within the boundaries of the property, and only two villages within the buffer zones. Question4: Do the property and its buffer zones and surrounding conservation areas to be inscribed on the World Heritage List refer only to the land areas of the four islands, or include the sea surrounding the four islands? Answer4: The property and its buffer zones and surrounding conservation areas to be inscribed on the World Heritage List refer only to the land areas of the four islands. Question5: Will the surrounding conservation areas of the property possibly be extended beyond the four islands? Answer5: Given that boundaries of surrounding conservation areas of natural heritages are decided based on scientific examination, the surrounding conservation areas of the property for inscription are the land areas of the four islands mentioned above. It is therefore obvious that there are not any reasons or grounds for the areas to be extended beyond the land areas of the islands. Question6: Where are the boundaries of the property and its buffer zones and surrounding conservation areas for inscription in accordance with the IUCN recommendation drawn? Answer6: The boundaries of the property and its buffer zones and surrounding conservation areas for inscription in accordance with the IUCN recommendation are shown in the map below. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3)
PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3) Investigation of Pallas’s cat activity patterns and temporal interactions with sympatric species Authors: Katarzyna Ruta, Gustaf Samelius, David Barclay, Emma Nygren PICA - “Conservation of the Pallas’s cat through capacity building, research, and global planning” 1. Introduction: 1.1 Activity patterns of wild felids: Activity patterns form a part of species’ adaptation to their environment (Beltran & Delibes, 1994) and are therefore a fundamental aspect of animal behaviour (Nielsen, 1983; Weller & Bennett, 2001). Felids are generally considered to be crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity (Kitchener, 1991), although they are well adapted to function in a wide range of light conditions (Sunquist & Sunquist, 2002). Numerous abiotic pressures and biotic interactions are known to shape the temporal behaviour of (cat-like) carnivores (Marinho et al., 2018), including changes in temperature (Beltran & Delibes, 1994; Podolski et al., 2013), light (Huck et al., 2017; Heurich et al., 2014) and season (Podolski et al., 2013; Manfredi et al., 2011), sex and reproductive status of the animal (Kolbe & Squires, 2007; Schmidt, 1999; Schmidt et al., 2009), predation risk (Caro, 2005; Farías et al., 2012) and human disturbance (Wolf & Ale, 2009; Ale & Brown, 2009). Owing to the dietary constraints of carnivores whose preys have their own well-defined circadian rhythms (Halle, 2000; Zielinski, 2000), the availability and vulnerability of prey is, however, considered as one of the main influences on predator temporal activity (Zielinski, 1988; Lodé, 1995). According to Optimal Foraging Theory, predators are expected to synchronize their daily activity with the activity of their most profitable prey, increasing the probability of encounters while reducing energy expenditure (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Monterroso et al., 2013; Emmons, 1987).
[Show full text]
Volume 2. Animals
AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
[Show full text]
Protection and Recovery Program for the Iriomote Cat (Prionailurus Bengalesis Iriomotensis)
Protection and Recovery Program for the Iriomote Cat (Prionailurus bengalesis iriomotensis) July 17, 1995 Environment Agency Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries I. Objectives of the Program The Iriomote cat (Prionailurus bengalensis iriomotensis) is a feline species found only on Iriomote Island in Okinawa Prefecture. The total population of this species is estimated to be about 100 in this habitat, mainly in the lowland areas of the island. This species was confirmed to represent a new species relatively recently, in 1967*. Subsequent surveys do not suggest precipitous population declines. However, given the restricted range and small population, many factors may affect the steady survival of the current wild population. These factors include the progressive shrinking and fragmentation of the natural habitat in the lowland areas critical to its survival, frequent roadkills, and the risks of introduction and outbreak of contagious disease. The objectives of this program is to ensure the stable survival of the cat in a natural state by monitoring and gathering information on the status of the species; maintaining and improving the environmental conditions necessary for the species; and mitigating and removing factors that pose threats to the species. II. Program areas Mainly on Iriomote Island (Okinawa Prefecture) III. Overview of the Program 1. Understanding the species status and monitoring The following surveys will be undertaken to appropriately and effectively implement the program, based on regular observations of the
[Show full text]
Cats on the 2009 Red List of Threatened Species
ISSN 1027-2992 CATnewsN° 51 | AUTUMN 2009 01 IUCNThe WorldCATnews Conservation 51Union Autumn 2009 news from around the world KRISTIN NOWELL1 Cats on the 2009 Red List of Threatened Species The IUCN Red List is the most authoritative lists participating in the assessment pro- global index to biodiversity status and is the cess. Distribution maps were updated and flagship product of the IUCN Species Survi- for the first time are being included on the val Commission and its supporting partners. Red List website (www.iucnredlist.org). Tex- As part of a recent multi-year effort to re- tual species accounts were also completely assess all mammalian species, the family re-written. A number of subspecies have Felidae was comprehensively re-evaluated been included, although a comprehensive in 2007-2008. A workshop was held at the evaluation was not possible (Nowell et al Oxford Felid Biology and Conservation Con- 2007). The 2008 Red List was launched at The fishing cat is one of the two species ference (Nowell et al. 2007), and follow-up IUCN’s World Conservation Congress in Bar- that had to be uplisted to Endangered by email with others led to over 70 specia- celona, Spain, and since then small changes (Photo A. Sliwa). Table 1. Felid species on the 2009 Red List. CATEGORY Common name Scientific name Criteria CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR) Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus C2a(i) ENDANGERED (EN) Andean cat Leopardus jacobita C2a(i) Tiger Panthera tigris A2bcd, A4bcd, C1, C2a(i) Snow leopard Panthera uncia C1 Borneo bay cat Pardofelis badia C1 Flat-headed
[Show full text]
No. 407/2009 Amending Council Regulation (EC)
19.5.2009 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 123/3 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 407/2009 of 14 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Bolitoglossa dofleini, Cynops ensicauda, Echinotriton andersoni, Pachytriton labiatus, Paramesotriton spp., Sala mandra algira and Tylototriton spp. – which are currently not listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European are being imported into the Community in such numbers Community, as to warrant monitoring. Those species should therefore be included in Annex D to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 338/97. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein ( 1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof, (5) At the 14th Conference of the Parties to CITES in June 2007 new nomenclatural references for animals were adopted. Some inconsistencies between the CITES Appendices and the scientific names in those nomen clatural references as regards the species Asarcornis Whereas: scutulata and Pezoporus occidentalis, the families Rheobatra chidae and Phasianidae as well as the order Scandentia were discovered. Since those inconsistencies also appear in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 338/97, it should be (1) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and plant species adapted accordingly. in respect of which trade is restricted or controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the Appendices to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter ‘the CITES Convention’.
[Show full text]
Habitat and Prey Resource Overlap Between the Iriomote Cat
Mammal Study 28: 47–56 (2003) © the Mammalogical Society of Japan Habitat and prey resource overlap between the Iriomote cat Prionailurus iriomotensis and introduced feral cat Felis catus based on assessment of scat content and distribution Shinichi Watanabe*, Nozomi Nakanishi and Masako Izawa Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan Abstract. The Iriomote cat Prionailurus iriomotensis occurs only on Iriomote Island in the Ryukyu Archipelago of southern Japan. The population is estimated at 100 individuals and is on the decline. We examined resource overlap for prey and habitat between this species and introduced cats Felis catus by scat census and analysis of scat contents. The distribution of scats was completely different between the two species. The distribution of scats from Iriomote cats was associated with environmental factors such as vegetation types and terrain conditions, while the distribution of scats from feral cats mainly depended on locations of garbage dumps. Although the feral cat heavily utilized human rubbish, it also preyed upon thirteen species of native animals, ten of which were also used by Iriomote cats. From 1997 to 2001, the number of observed scats from Iriomote cats declined significantly, while feral cat scat became more common. Feral cats on Iriomote Island still depend on humans, but the expansion of their distribution into habitats of Iriomote cats may increase the competition for prey and habitat resources in the future. Key words: Felis catus, habitat use, interspecific competition, introduced species, Prionailurus iriomotensis. Introduced species often greatly affect local fauna and status or even extinction (Kitching and Jones 1981; King flora through predation, resource competition and 1984).
[Show full text]
His Is What L. I. 0. C. IS an Aoour
"It's always a thrill, whether it's number 1 or the 20th baby to be weighed in. Ocelots are one of the most beautiful babies at birth with their dark spots, shiny HOT pink noses, flashy white whiskers and big BIG sootted feet. She's one horn old, dry and a miqhty 9 ounces.' Submitted for the Photo Contest, this entry by Ethel Hauser just seemed made for the cover. -- - his is what L. I. 0.C. IS an aoour Branches FLORIDA: Danny Treanor. 5151 Glasgow, Orlando, F1. 3281 9, (305) 351 -3058 OREGON EDUCATIONAL EXOTIC FELINE CLUB: Ethel Hauser, 14622 N.E. 99th St., Vancouver, WA 98662 (206) 892-9994 GREATER NEW ENGLAND: Karen Jusseaume, 168 Taffrail ~d., Quincy, Mass. 02169 (617) 472-5826 -MID-ATLANTIC STATES: Suzl Wood, 6 E. Lake Circle Or., Medford. N. J. 08055 (609) 983-6671 SOUTHWESTERN: Jean Hamil, 31307 Debbi, Magnolia, Texas, 77355 * Affiliates EXOTICS UNLTO: 343 Walnut St., Petaluma, CA 94952 Bonnie Cromwell (707) 762-6944 LEOPARD CAT SOCIETY:P.O.Box 7535, San Diego, CA 92107 NATIONAL ASSOC. FOR SOUND WILDLIFE PROGRAMS:2455 S.E. 184 Terrace, Miami. F1. 33160 WORLD PET SOCIETY: PLO.8ox 343. Tarzana, CA 91356 published bi-monthly by the LIOC Endangered Species Conservation Federation, Inc., 1454 Fleetwood 0r.E. Mobile, Alabama 36605. LIOC is a non-profit, non-comn- ercial club, international in membership, devoted to the welfare of exotic felines. Reproduction of the material in this Newsletter may not be made without written permission of the authors and/or the copy- right owner, LIOC.
[Show full text]
Full Account (PDF)
FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Felis catus Felis catus System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Common name cat (English), domestic cat (English), pusiniveikau (English, Fiji), house cat (English), Hauskatze (German), poti (Maori), feral cat (English) Synonym Similar species Summary Felis catus was domesticated in the eastern Mediterranean c. 3000 years ago. Considering the extent to which cats are valued as pets, it is not surprising that they have since been translocated by humans to almost all parts of the world. Notable predators, cats threaten native birdlife and other fauna, especially on islands where native species have evolved in relative isolation from predators. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Felis catus is a small animal in the wild (up to 5kg, but more commonly 1.5 -3.0kg) but may be considerably heavier when domesticated. Colour is extremely variable in domesticated varieties and feral cats commonly revert to black, tabby or tortoiseshell with varying extents of white starting from the belly and breast. Lifecycle Stages Gestation: 65 days. Weaning: 35-40 days. Sexual maturity: 9 months. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species profile Felis catus. Available Pag. 1 from: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=24 [Accessed 07 October 2021] FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Felis catus Habitat Description Feral cats adapt to a variety of habitat types and circumstances. On the Australian continent they inhabit forests and woodland habitats in eastern, western and northern parts of the country (Dickman 1996). On Hahajima Island, Japan, feral cats have been observed widely in various kinds of habitats, including primary forests (Kawakami and Higuchi 2002).
[Show full text]
Borneo Bay Cat (Pardofelis Badia)
12/02/2019 Borneo bay cat factsheet on Arkive - Pardofelis badia Borneo bay cat (Pardofelis badia) Also known as: bay cat, Bornean bay cat, Bornean marbled cat Synonyms: Catopuma badia, Felis badia French: Chat Bai Spanish: Gato Rojo De Borneo Kingdom Animalia Phylum Chordata Class Mammalia Order Carnivora Family Felidae Genus Pardofelis (1) Size Male head-body length: 45.5 - 67 cm (2) Female head-body length: 45.2 - 62 cm ( 2) Male tail length: 32.5 - 38.5 cm (2) (3) Female tail length: 32 - 40.3 cm (2) Estimated weight: 3 - 4 kg (3) Top facts Fewer than 25 Borneo bay cats have ever been recorded, making it one of the rarest and least- studied cats in the world. The Borneo bay cat is rather unusual-looking for a wild cat, as it is only the size of a large house cat, but has a relatively long tail. There are two different colour variations of the Borneo bay cat, with the red-brown form being more common than the grey-black form. Little is known about the Borneo bay cat’s preferred habitats, but it has been observed in dense forest and along watercourses. The Borneo bay cat is classified as Endangered (EN) on the IUCN Red List (1) and is listed on Appendix II of CITES (4). The Borneo bay cat is one of the rarest and least-studied cats in the world (2) (5) with fewer than 25 individuals having ever been recorded (2). The Borneo bay cat has an unusual appearance for a wild cat, being only around the size of a large house cat (3), but with a relatively long body and tail (3) (5) (6) and short, rounded ears low on the sides http://www.arkive.org/borneo-bay-cat/pardofelis-badia/factsheet 1/3 12/02/2019 Borneo bay cat factsheet on Arkive - Pardofelis badia of the head (5).
[Show full text]
Distribution of Wild Mammal Assemblages Along an Urban–Rural–Forest Landscape Gradient in Warm- Temperate East Asia
Distribution of Wild Mammal Assemblages along an Urban–Rural–Forest Landscape Gradient in Warm- Temperate East Asia Masayuki Saito*¤, Fumito Koike Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan Abstract Urbanization may alter mammal assemblages via habitat loss, food subsidies, and other factors related to human activities. The general distribution patterns of wild mammal assemblages along urban–rural–forest landscape gradients have not been studied, although many studies have focused on a single species or taxon, such as rodents. We quantitatively evaluated the effects of the urban–rural–forest gradient and spatial scale on the distributions of large and mid-sized mammals in the world’s largest metropolitan area in warm-temperate Asia using nonspecific camera-trapping along two linear transects spanning from the urban zone in the Tokyo metropolitan area to surrounding rural and forest landscapes. Many large and mid-sized species generally decreased from forest landscapes to urban cores, although some species preferred anthropogenic landscapes. Sika deer (Cervus nippon), Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi), Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata), Japanese squirrel (Sciurus lis), Japanese marten (Martes melampus), Japanese badger (Meles anakuma), and wild boar (Sus scrofa) generally dominated the mammal assemblage of the forest landscape. Raccoon (Procyon lotor), raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides), and Japanese hare (Lepus brachyurus) dominated the mammal assemblage in the intermediate zone (i.e., rural and suburban landscape). Cats (feral and free-roaming housecats; Felis catus) were common in the urban assemblage. The key spatial scales for forest species were more than 4000-m radius, indicating that conservation and management plans for these mammal assemblages should be considered on large spatial scales.
[Show full text]
Molecular Survey for Selected Viral Pathogens in Wild Leopard Cats
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.21.960492; this version posted February 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Molecular Survey for Selected Viral Pathogens in Wild Leopard Cats 2 (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Taiwan with an Emphasis on the Spatial and 3 Temporal Dynamics of Carnivore Protoparvovirus 1 4 5 Chen-Chih Chen,a,f#† Ai-Mei Chang,b† Wan-Jhen Chen,a Po-Jen Chang,c Yu-Ching 6 Lai,d Hsu-Hsun Leee 7 8 aInstitute of wildlife conservation, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung 9 University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan 10 bGraduate Institute of Animal Vaccine Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, 11 National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan 12 cFormosan Wild Sound Conservation Science Center, Miaoli, Taiwan 13 dDepartment of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Design, Huafan University 14 eDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung 15 University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan 16 fResearch Center for Animal Biologics, National Pingtung University of Science and 17 Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan 18 19 Running Head: viral pathogens in wild leopard cats 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.21.960492; this version posted February 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
[Show full text]
Classification of the Recent Carnivora
APPENDIX Classification of the Recent Carnivora W. CHRIS WoZENCRAFT The following list of species is taken from Honacki et al. (1982). I have compared it with the classifications of Ewer (1973) and Corbet and Hill (1986); these references should be consulted for distributions of Recent taxa and for further taxonomic information. Although Honacki et al. (1982) is used as a basis for discussion, this does not imply agreement with their taxonomy. Their classification was assembled from primary literature through 1980 by several authors who did not necessarily concur on the final taxonomic arrange ment. The scheme proposed by Honacki et al. is used here as a yardstick with which additional information is compared at the end of each family list. Ewer (1973) considered the Otariidae, Phocidae, and the genus Odobenus to constitute a separate order, the Pinnipedia, although she stated that it was "customary to classify them as a suborder within the Carnivora" (p. 6). The inclusion of these families within the Carnivora is well established (Tedford 1976; Wozencraft, this volume). Common English names are consistent with Ewer (1973), King (1983), MacDonald (1984), and Corbet and Hill (1986). Families are listed in a phylogenetic order consistent with the hypothesis pres ent in Wozencraft (this volume). Species are presented in alphabetical order, grouped by subfamily; where subfamilial classification is uncertain, the taxa are included at the end of the list. In some families (Canidae, Procyonidae, Ursidae, Phocidae) either the branching sequence or lack of consensus in the recent literature does not warrant subfamilial classifications at this time. Spe cies names preceded by an asterisk ( •) are discussed in the remarks for each family.
[Show full text]