DOCSLIB.ORG

Biology and Illustrated Key for the Identification of Twenty Species of Economically Important Noctuid Pests a D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports LSU AgCenter 1981 Biology and illustrated key for the identification of twenty species of economically important noctuid pests A D. Oliver Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp Recommended Citation Oliver, A D., "Biology and illustrated key for the identification of twenty species of economically important noctuid pests" (1981). LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports. 260. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/agexp/260 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the LSU AgCenter at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Agricultural Experiment Station Reports by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Biology and Illustrated Key for the Identification of Twenty Species of bconomically Impor tant Noctuid Pests A.D. C liver and J. B Chapin LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE Center for Agricultural Sciences And Rural Dei lopment ALVIN C HARPER CHANCE. LOP AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT Sia;ION DO^E C-1 AMBERS, DIRECT "P Table of Contents Page Introduction 3 4 Identifying Noccuid Larvae The Larval Key 6 Dichotomous Ke\ to the Larvae of 20 Species of Important Noctuid Pests Identifying Noctuid Adults 9 Summary Descriptions, Distributions, Hosts, and Seasonal Histories 9 Varieeated Cutworm, Peridroma saucia (Hiibner) 9 Granulate Cutworm, Feltia subterranea (F.) 10 () Dingy Cutworm, Feltia ducens Walker ' Black Cutworm. Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) 10 Claybacked Cutworm, Agrotis gladiaria Morrison 11 Palesided Cutworm, Agrotis malefida Guene'e 11 Tobacco Budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.) 1- Cotton Boll worm, Heliothis zea (Boddie) '2 Cotton Leafworm, Alabama argillacea (Hiibner) .... 13 Green Cloverworm, Plathypena scabra (F.) 13 Velvetbean Caterpillar, A nticarsia gemmatalis Hiibner 13 A Giassworm. inicla infecta (Ochsenheimer) 14 Armyworm. P udaletia unipuncta (Haworth) • '4 Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) Beet Armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) I Southern Armyworm, Spodoptera eridaniu (Cramer) 15 An Armyworm. Spodoptera sutua (Guenee) l f Yellowstriped \t my worm. Spodoptera ornithogalli (Guenee) 16 An Armyworm, Spodoptera latifascia (Walker) 17 An Armvworm. Spodoptera doliehos (F.) 17 Color Plates 19 Glossary of Terms 24 Bibliography . 26 Acknowledgments The authors thank Gerald Lenhard for the photography; Michelle Schlueter and Pat MacLeod for illustrations; and Dr. B. H. Wilson. Dr. L. D. Newsom. and Dr. J. B. Graves for reviewing the manuscript Biology and Illustrated Key for the Identification Noctuid Pests of Twenty Species of Economically Important 1 A. D. Oliver and J. B. Chapin Introduction plates lor This bulletin contains keys, figures, and species of noctuid cater- use in the identification of 20 Louisiana agricul- pillars and moths of importance to is the elon- ture. According to Webster, a caterpillar noctuid gated, wormlike larva of a butterfly or moth. A moths in caterpillar therefore, is the wormlike larva of the fa.mil) Noctuidae 3 order Lepidop- o Noctuidae is the largest family in the U species or about 30 tera, consisting oi 2.500 to 2,800 * 5 Most percent ol the Lepidoptera in North America. Typical species are nocturnal, that is. active at night. The noctuid moths have a wingspan of 25 to 50 mm. States is the largest noctuid moth reported in the United ot black witch, Evehus odom (L.), with a wingspan smallest have a wingspread of about 1 2 cm. Some o! the '' are 25 to 50 mm long. PROLEG J^yf^S 17 to 17 mm. Typical larvae CROCHETS Manx of the most serious insect pests in the world belongto this family. Often referred to as worms, e.g.. ' used to place a larva in the fami 1 :utworms, armyworms, leafworms, earworms, and Fig. l. —Characteristics Noctuidae. budworms, the larvae are annual pests of many crops A .—Prothoracic segment with bisetose prespiracu'ar tubercle. rown in Louisiana. seta be- B. Abdominal segment with primarj setae onl\: 4 instars (stages) through 6 or 7 i These larvae develop hind and seta 5 below the spiracle. Proleg crochets are optimum oxer a period of about 30 to 50 days under uniordinal, uniserial, longitudinal mesoseries. conditions. The time interval between any two instars is is referred to as a stadium. When a caterpillar molts, it each other so developmental period or Because many species resembie I ) i the next instar stage and at times to make pror the last 2 or 3 closely, it will be difficult stadium It is during the development of habitat are not injury identification especially if host and nstars that most food is consumed and crop cannot be too careful in ascertaining the occurs. known. One and exact location where a caterpillar was Because of the importance ot noctuid caterpillars as time of year part ot the host fed as an its host, the growth stage and crop pest- in Louisiana, this bulletin was prepared found, the type of injury caused such as defoliation, aid to entomological consultants, farmers, and exten- upon, and boring, etc. Some species are single- sion agents in making proper identification ot 20 stem or hud others have two or more broods a year. Some species ol caterpillars which are responsible for much brooded: migrate north- the key should species are native to Louisiana; others f the crop injur} in the state. Users of more southern areas and usually do not become familiar with the external anatomy of caterpil- ward from before attempting to overwinter here. lars (Fie. 1 A-B: Fig. 2 A-E) monitoring an insect population in the field, identify them. Use of all figures and plates as indicated When collects Several species (kinds) oi worms in the ke\ to species will aid material!) in making one often be be difficult to distinguish. Some max correct identifications. which max LSI' Baton Rouge. La 70803 Professor and Associate Professor, respectively. Department of Entomology. uted to genetics, host species, season of year, popula- tion density, and length of time since the last molt Color characteristics aid in identification but must bo- used with caution. Because of the remarkable similarities in anatomical characteristics of caterpillars, some people do not at- tempt to make an identification. It must be realized thai the small degree of variation in structures can be use;! B effectively in determining the species on hand Identifying Noctuid Larvae A larva must be placed in the correct family before species identification can be made The typical noctuid C caterpillar body is without numerous secondary setae but has primal) setae which are located in definite patterns or locations. It has more than one pair ot abdominal prolegs. There are two setae in the Kappa group (prespiracular) on the prothorax in most species, but some exceptions exist such as the cotton leal worm which has one seta. The proleg-bearing segments have seta 4 behind and seta 5 below the spiracle on abdomi- nal segments 1-6. The proleg crochets are arranged uniserially, uniordinally, and in a longitudinal mesoseries. These family characteristics are shown in Figs. 1-5. The keys, figures, and illustrations in this paper are Fig. 2. —External anatomy of a noctuid caterpillar. of some common noctu . A. and B. \ Lateral view and B. dorsal view of typical cater- for use in the identification ot crops in pillar. DA, dorsal area; VA, ventral area; SUBD. A., subdor- caterpillars which are usual ly pests subventral sal area; SUP. A., supraspiracular area; SI BY. S., Louisiana. The information is not intended to include stripe. all species in the state but. instead, to provide brief C, Lateral view of caterpillar showing body segmentation; Tl, information on identification, hosts, season i! distor- prothorax; T2, mesothorax: T3, metathorax; PL1, first pair of each species listed. abdominal prolegs; PL2, second pair of abdominal prolegs; tion, and type of injur) caused by PL3. third pair of abdominal prolegs; PL4, fourth pair of Spodopteru sunia (Guene'e) does not occur in Louisiana dodominal prolegs; APL, anal pair of prolegs. at this time but was included in case incipient infesta- and E. Head capsules. SM.A., submedian arc; ADF.S., ad- D tions become established. frontal suture; RET. I)., reticulations, dark color; RET.L., re- Figures are not drawn to scale but are furnished • ticulations, light color; ADE.A., adfrontal area; NO RET., no structures and characteristic s reticulations. aids in finding anatomical used m making identifications. The keys and figures cannot be used to identify worms not listed in this paper. Very young larvae of most species cannot be ace lately identified with this or any other known key. I also must be realized that hosts, egg deposition char are good aids in important pests: o hers may he incidental and present teristics. season, and larval habits stage ot de no problem. Nee... for proper identification, therefore, making identification- ot larvae in any is a most important consideration in pest control. velopment. one Naturally, othei important factors which influence After using the key in making an identification, descr.p pest control decisions are life cycle, seasonal history, should refer to the brief sections on summary given for seasonal distribution, and resurgence potential. The tion, hosts, seasonal history, and distribution comm. less experienced entomologist will face these problems each species. Species without accepted descrip- often and may require advice from others. names are indicated by an asterisk (*) in the Post-embryonic (after egg hatch) pigmentation of tions which follow the larval key . A glossary of some and caterpil- the bod\ wall often varies among individuals in the common terms used in describing moths copulation of a species. This variation may be attrib lars is provided at the end of the paper. 4 VERT T ^ y EPS. 0 2 / 6 ADF S ©3 3 n J A C iP 0 4 Op 6 4 © 5 © 5 j 06 © 6 J d 6 VERT T.
Recommended publications
  • Biological Aspects of Tiracola Grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868

    Biological Aspects of Tiracola Grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868

    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.12212 Biological aspects of Tiracola grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): a polyphagous armyworm Specht, A.a,b*, Iltchenco, J.b, Fronza, E.b, Roque-Specht, VF.c, Luz, PC.b and Montezzano, DG.b aLaboratório de Entomologia, Embrapa Cerrados, BR 020, Km 18, CP 08223, CEP 73310-970 Planaltina, DF, Brazil bPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, Universidade de Caxias do Sul – UCS, CP 1352, CEP 95070-560, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil cFaculdade UnB Planaltina, Universidade de Brasília - FUP/UnB, Área Universitária n. 1, Vila Nossa Senhora de Fátima, CEP 73345-010, Planaltina, DF, Brazil *e-mail: [email protected] Received: July 4, 2012 – Accepted: November 27, 2012 – Distributed: February 28, 2014 Abstract We studied the biology of Tiracola grandirena (Herrich-Schäffer, 1868) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Hadeninae) at 25 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 10% RH and 14 hours of photo phase. Three experiments, using 150 larvae each, were conducted for the larval stage. In the first, used to assess the duration and survival of all stages, insects were reared individually and fed an artificial diet (Grenee). In the second, individuals were also reared separately, but were fed leaves of 10 plants from different families. In the third, the larvae were not individualised, the food plants were rotated such as to provide three plant species every 48 hours. In the first experiment, the viability of the eggs, larvae, pupae and prepupae was 91.9, 94.7, 32.49 and 43.5%, respectively. The average duration of the egg, larvae, prepupae, pupae and adult were 6.0, 25.3, 25.7, 21.4 and 12.7 days, respectively.
  • Invasive Insects (Adventive Pest Insects) in Florida1

    Invasive Insects (Adventive Pest Insects) in Florida1

    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. ENY-827 Invasive Insects (Adventive Pest Insects) in Florida1 J. H. Frank and M. C. Thomas2 What is an Invasive Insect? include some of the more obscure native species, which still are unrecorded; they do not include some The term 'invasive species' is defined as of the adventive species that have not yet been 'non-native species which threaten ecosystems, detected and/or identified; and they do not specify the habitats, or species' by the European Environment origin (native or adventive) of many species. Agency (2004). It is widely used by the news media and it has become a bureaucratese expression. This is How to Recognize a Pest the definition we accept here, except that for several reasons we prefer the word adventive (meaning they A value judgment must be made: among all arrived) to non-native. So, 'invasive insects' in adventive species in a defined area (Florida, for Florida are by definition a subset (those that are example), which ones are pests? We can classify the pests) of the species that have arrived from abroad more prominent examples, but cannot easily decide (adventive species = non-native species = whether the vast bulk of them are 'invasive' (= pests) nonindigenous species). We need to know which or not, for lack of evidence. To classify them all into insect species are adventive and, of those, which are pests and non-pests we must draw a line somewhere pests. in a continuum ranging from important pests through those that are uncommon and feed on nothing of How to Know That a Species is consequence to humans, to those that are beneficial.
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves

    Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves

    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
  • Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir

    Jordan Beans RA RMO Dir

    Importation of Fresh Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Shelled or in Pods, from Jordan into the Continental United States A Qualitative, Pathway-Initiated Risk Assessment February 14, 2011 Version 2 Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Pest Risk Assessment for Beans from Jordan Executive Summary In this risk assessment we examined the risks associated with the importation of fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), in pods (French, green, snap, and string beans) or shelled, from the Kingdom of Jordan into the continental United States. We developed a list of pests associated with beans (in any country) that occur in Jordan on any host based on scientific literature, previous commodity risk assessments, records of intercepted pests at ports-of-entry, and information from experts on bean production. This is a qualitative risk assessment, as we express estimates of risk in descriptive terms (High, Medium, and Low) rather than numerically in probabilities or frequencies. We identified seven quarantine pests likely to follow the pathway of introduction. We estimated Consequences of Introduction by assessing five elements that reflect the biology and ecology of the pests: climate-host interaction, host range, dispersal potential, economic impact, and environmental impact. We estimated Likelihood of Introduction values by considering both the quantity of the commodity imported annually and the potential for pest introduction and establishment. We summed the Consequences of Introduction and Likelihood of Introduction values to estimate overall Pest Risk Potentials, which describe risk in the absence of mitigation.
  • EPPO Reporting Service

    EPPO Reporting Service

    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN ET MEDITERRANEENNE PLANT PROTECTION POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 1 PARIS, 2021-01 General 2021/001 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List 2021/002 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in the Russian Federation 2021/003 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in Tajikistan 2021/004 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in Uzbekistan 2021/005 New and revised dynamic EPPO datasheets are available in the EPPO Global Database Pests 2021/006 Anoplophora glabripennis eradicated from Austria 2021/007 Popillia japonica is absent from Germany 2021/008 First report of Scirtothrips aurantii in Spain 2021/009 Agrilus planipennis found in Saint Petersburg, Russia 2021/010 First report of Spodoptera frugiperda in Syria 2021/011 Spodoptera frugiperda found in New South Wales, Australia 2021/012 Spodoptera ornithogalli (Lepidoptera Noctuidae - yellow-striped armyworm): addition to the EPPO Alert List 2021/013 First report of Xylosandrus compactus in mainland Spain 2021/014 First report of Eotetranychus lewisi in mainland Portugal 2021/015 First report of Meloidogyne chitwoodi in Spain 2021/016 Update on the situation of the potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida in Portugal Diseases 2021/017 First report of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in Belgium 2021/018 Update on the situation of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in Spain 2021/019 Update on the situation of Acidovorax citrulli in Greece with findings
  • Managing Armyworms in Pastures and Hayfields

    Managing Armyworms in Pastures and Hayfields

    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA7083 Managing Armyworms in Pastures and Hayfields Kelly Loftin Introduction (Spodoptera ornithogalli) and beet Associate Professor and armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) may Extension Entomologist Two species of armyworms can be attack forages but seldom reach pest significant pests of Arkansas forage status on Arkansas forage. and pasture production. Both species Gus Lorenz belong in the family Noctuidae along Damage from true armyworm Professor - Extension with other garden and agronomic and fall armyworm can seem to Entomologist and IPM pests such as cutworms, bollworms appear overnight. Although the Coordinator and budworms. damage might appear overnight, larvae have likely been feeding for a Ricky Corder In Arkansas, the “true” armyworm week or more before they or their (Pseudaletia unipuncta) is more of a damage appear. This is because when Program Associate ­ spring pest of cool-season grasses the worms are small (early instars) Entomology and tall fescue. The fall armyworm they do not eat much. It is not until (FAW) (Spodoptera frugiperda) is the fifth and sixth instar that the a summer/fall pest primarily of caterpillars begin consuming large bermuda grass, but it can also damage amounts of forage (Figure 1). In addi­ fall-seeded, newly established winter tion, large armyworms may move annuals, fescue and orchardgrass. into an uninfested field (or area of a field) adjacent to a field that was just In southern Arkansas, we can defoliated. Because armyworms are expect to see fall armyworm damage so destructive and compete with live- in bermudagrass as early as July.
  • Djvu Document

    Djvu Document

    Vol. 5, No. 3-4, September-December 1991 185 Color identification of economically important Spodoptera larvae in Honduras (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) S Passoa USDftJAPHISlPPQ 8995 E. Main Street Bldg. 3, Room 109 Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 Abstract Spodopterafrugiperda (J. E. Smith), S. exigua (HUbner), S.lati(ascia (Walker), S. ornithogalli (Guenee), S. dolichos (Fabricius), S. sunia (Guenee), and S. eridania (Cramer) are commonly associated with crops in Honduras. A key to these species with color illustrations ofrare and typical forms is presented. Potential problems in identifying Spodoptera species are discussed. Additional key words: morphology. Noctuoidea Introduction mens are misidentified (Figures 9.1, 9.4, and 11.2 label three forms of S odo tera lati ascia as S. pests throughout the world (Kranz etal. 1977, Hill ] 975) At least eight species are known to occur in 1 Honduras. Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), azzom e al. mcorrect y la e ed a p oto- Spoooptera exigua (Hubner), Spodoptera lati{Q.scia graph ofS. 8unia as S. eridania. PNalker), and 8podoptera sunia (Guenee) are eon This work should facilitate identification of sidered economically important pests whereas common Spodoptel a 1m vae in Honduras by pI esen- Spodoptera eridania Wratner), Spodoptera orni- ~~;e~~;~:~~~~~o:o~~~~:~:~:~o~;:i~:~~ thogalli (Guenee), and Spodoptera dolichos (Fabri­ cius) are rarely abundant enough to cause serious allow accfrate identification of most Spodoptera damage to Honduran crops (Passoa 1983). An adult Spodoptera androgea (Cramer) was collected onthe north coast of HondUIas (La Lima, DepaItment of impossible. Cortes) in October, but its larva is unknown. The host range of Spodoptera is very wide including Methods and Materials most vegetable crops and several basic grains (passoa Most ofthe specimens used in this study were 1983, Andrews 1984, King and Saunders 1984).
  • An Annotated Bibliography of the Dingy Cutworm Complex

    An Annotated Bibliography of the Dingy Cutworm Complex

    RESEARCH CIRCULAR 202 SEPTEMBER 197 5 An Annotated Bibliography of the Dingy Cutworm Complex Feltia ducens Walker and Feltia subgothica Haworth FRED J. ARNOLD OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESE CONTENTS * * * * Introduction ................................................................... 1 Bibliography ................................................................... 4 Index . 22 Dingy Cutworm Larva Dingy Cutworm Adult AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE DINGY CUTWORM COMPLEX, Feltia ducens Walker and Feltia subgothica (Haworth) Roy W. Rings 1 , Beth A. Baughman 2 , and Fred J. Arnold 2 Introduction The purpose of this circular is to consolidate the abstracted literature on the dingy cutworm complex, Feltia ducens Walker and Feltia subgothica (Haworth). The term "dingy cutworm complex" is used since there is much con­ fusion and disagreement between both earlier and contemporary taxonomists as to the correct usage of the scientific name of the economically important dingy cutworm. Contemporary taxonomists agree that Feltia ducens and Feltia subgothica have been considered distinct species for more than 70 years. In the past there has been debate as to whether the latter species should be called sub­ gothica or jaculifera. In this publication, the authors are following the nomenclatural policy of the United States National Museum which is based upon Forbes' interpretation of the complex. The photographs on the contents page illustrate the species which the authors consider the dingy cutworm, Feltia ducens Walker. Forbes (1954) believed that Haworth (1810) probably had ducens and subgothica mixed up. He implied that it is not certain which species Haworth described as subgothica and therefore Forbes called it jaculifera. Several other authors (Hampson 1903; McDunnough 1938; Smith 1893) believed that Haworth had only a single specimen.
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell J.A.Caldwell71@Gmail.Com 1-925-949-8696 Note

    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note

    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
  • Quick Scan Number: QS.ENT.2014.12

    Quick Scan Number: QS.ENT.2014.12

    National Plant Protection Organization, the Netherlands Quick scan number: QS.ENT.2014.12 Quick scan date : 19 December 2014 1 What is the scientific name (if possible up to Spodoptera cosmioides (Walker, 1858) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) (Silvain & Lalanne-Cassou 1997). species level + author, also include (sub)family and Synonyms: Prodenia cosmioides Walker 1858. order) and English/common name of the organism? Note: S.cosmioides was considered a synonym of S.latifascia untill 1997. Add picture of organism/damage if available and publication allowed . Left female, middle male (wingspan 40-45 mm), right 4 th instar larva. 2 What prompted this quick scan? The finding of a young caterpillar at import inspection of 13,634 plants of Dracaena marginata Organism detected in produce for import, export, in (Agavaceae) from Costa Rica, intended for further cultivation in a greenhouse (sample number cultivation, nature, mentioned in publications, e.g. 4715660) on 23 October 2014. EPPO alert list, etc. 3 What is the current area of distribution? Tropical America: Central- and South-America from Costa Rica to Argentina, including: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, French Guyana, Guyana, Panama, Paraquay, Peru, Trinidad, Venezuela (Pogue 2002). It has been intercepted on produce (Momordica sp.) from Surinam. 1 4 What are the host plants? Authors refer in the introduction of articles to the polyphagous nature of the pest e.g. Bavaresco et al . (2004): “In Brazil, the cultures of pineapple (seedlings), cotton (bolls), rice, eggplant, onions (green parts), eucalyptus trees (seedlings), mango, peppers and tomatoes, among other vegetables, are considered host plants.” Bavaresco et al. (2004, referring to Nora & Reis Filho (1988) and Nora et al.
  • Weather and Pests

    Weather and Pests

    Volume 52 Number 02 April 20, 2007 Weather and Pests The last remnants of the winter season have passed and a series of annual spring events has begun to unfold. Temperatures have finally moderated, reaching the 50s and 60s during the daytime, and farm activity has progressed in the past few days. Relatively little planting has been done but many fields are prepared. Insect activity has also escalated noticeably. The first round of early-season orchard pests, which includes spotted tentiform leafminer and redbanded leafroller moths, has taken flight throughout the south. In addition, the first overwintered alfalfa weevils were swept from fields earlier in the week and a few more black cutworm moths made their way into the state. Growing Degree Days through 04/19/07 were GDD 50F 2006 Sine 48F 40F Historical GDD Dubuque, IA 138 148 134 321 March 1-April 19 Lone Rock 125 144 118 302 Beloit 130 160 126 312 Madison 107 130 102 274 Sullivan 108 142 101 268 Juneau 102 129 97 261 Waukesha 110 123 102 270 Hartford 104 123 98 260 Racine 103 104 99 259 Milwaukee 100 107 94 251 Appleton 84 109 78 221 Green Bay 73 84 67 204 Big Flats 102 138 94 253 Hancock 96 132 89 241 Port Edwards 98 136 89 235 La Crosse 128 162 124 308 Eau Claire 99 149 91 243 Cumberland 81 123 70 203 Bayfield 40 71 33 140 Predicted mortality Wausau 75 113 68 200 Medford 71 115 65 192 of overwintered bean leaf beetles Crivitz 51 84 45 169 Crandon 55 98 44 160 WEB: http://pestbulletin.wi.gov z EMAIL: [email protected] z VOLUME 52 Issue No.