DOCSLIB.ORG

EU Banking Structures, October 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU Banking Structures, October 2007 EU BANKING STRUCTURES OCTOBER 2007 EU BANKING STRUCTURES OCTOBER 2007 In 2007 all ECB publications feature a motif taken from the €20 banknote. © European Central Bank 2007 Address Kaiserstrasse 29 60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Postal address Postfach 16 03 19 60066 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Telephone +49 69 1344 0 Website http://www.ecb.europa.eu Fax +49 69 1344 6000 Telex 411 144 ecb d All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. The cut-off date for data in this report is 31 July 2007. ISSN 1830-1878 (online) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2.3.1 Structural developments 25 Shorter time horizon for 1 OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS payment obligations: IN EU BANKING STRUCTURES 10 real-time systems and increased 1.1 Regulatory developments 10 internationalisation 26 1.2 Consolidation and mergers 11 Developments in the 1.3 Internationalisation of the funding structure of EU banking market 13 EU banks 26 1.4 Market structure 15 2.3.2 Cross-border pooling 1.5 Developments of liquidity and use of in intermediation 17 collateral recent 1.6 Conclusions 18 developments 28 Potential barriers 30 2 LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT 2.4 The liquidity risk management OF CROSS-BORDER BANKING GROUPS of banks 32 IN THE EU 19 2.4.1 Structure and governance 2.1 Liquidity risk management: of liquidity risk issues from a fi nancial stability management perspective 19 in banks - the role 2.1.1 Rationale underlying the of ALCO and ALM 32 interest of supervisors 2.4.2 Internal organisation and central banks of liquidity risk in the liquidity risk management - management of banks 19 centralisation 2.1.2 The international fl ow vs. decentralisation 33 of liquidity and 2.4.3 Quantitative models and collateral and its impact approaches 34 on the liquidity risk Internal liquidity management of banks 21 risk models 34 Stress testing and 2.2 Regulatory framework for contingency planning 35 liquidity risk in the EU 21 2.5 Main fi ndings and 2.2.1 Regulatory requirements conclusions 36 for liquidity risk at the national level 22 3 DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS IN RETAIL 2.2.2 Implementation of the BANKING 39 home-host supervisory arrangements 3.1 Distribution channels operated by the banks for liquidity risk 23 39 2.2.3 Regulatory infl uence 3.1.1 Channels with physical on intra-group presence branches 39 Automated teller cross-border liquidity fl ows 24 machines (ATMs) Industry perspective 24 41 3.1.2 Electronic distribution Supervisory perspective 25 channels 42 2.3 Recent developments regarding Internet banking 42 liquidity risk management Mobile phone and by banks 25 telephone banking 45 ECB EU banking structures October 2007 3 3.2 Cooperation with non-banks 46 3.3 Financial stability implications 48 3.4 Main fi ndings and conclusions 49 ANNEXES 51 1 Structural indicators of the EU banking sector 51 2 Methodological note on the structural indicators 65 ECB EU banking structures 4 October 2007 ABBREVIATIONS COUNTRIES LU Luxembourg AT Austria LV Latvia* BE Belgium MT Malta* BG Bulgaria NL Netherlands CY Cyprus* NO Norway CZ Czech Republic* PL Poland* DE Germany PT Portugal DK Denmark RO Romania EE Estonia* SE Sweden ES Spain SI Slovenia* FI Finland SK Slovakia* FR France UK United Kingdom GR Greece HU Hungary* IE Ireland IT Italy LT Lithuania* OTHERS EU (EU25) European Union (25 countries, after enlargement on 1 May 2004) EU15 European Union (15 countries, before enlargement on 1 May 2004) MU12 Monetary Union (12 countries participating in the euro area) NMS New Member States (10 countries, marked with *) RoW Rest of the World (non-EU25 countries) ECB EU banking structures October 2007 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The EU banking structures report is an of 2007 increased and a number of signifi cant annual publication containing information deals is currently in progress. on structural developments in the EU banking sector. It is based on a wide range of The structure of the banking markets still indicators and on the exchange and assessment varies signifi cantly within the EU, but the of qualitative information by the Banking dispersion of most capacity indicators has been Supervision Committee (BSC) of the European declining over time, closing the gap between System of Central Banks (ESCB). The BSC Member States. Finally, banking intermediation comprises representatives of the central banks continues to increase, as the total assets of and banking supervisory authorities of the EU credit institutions have been growing faster Member States and of the European Central than GDP. Bank (ECB). The chapter on liquidity risk management of The report focuses on the structural cross-border banking groups in the EU focuses developments that took place in 2006 and, mainly on issues related to liquidity regulation where possible, provides information on the and to developments in the organisation of fi rst half of 2007. The overview chapter starts liquidity risk management of banks in the period with the main regulatory developments in the covered by the report (i.e. until the end of 2006), fi nancial sector, including the implementation as well as their fi nancial stability implications. of two very signifi cant Directives, the Capital The link between the static evaluation of Requirements Directive and the Markets in liquidity and the dynamic one (i.e. market Financial Instruments Directive. Moreover, liquidity in stress conditions) was outside the the assessment of the Lamfalussy framework scope of the analysis. The chapter is based on in terms of speeding up the adoption of a survey aiming to assess potential obstacles Community legislation in the fi nancial sector and as perceived by large EU cross-border banking promoting its consistent implementation at the groups to their liquidity risk management national level will be completed by the end of practices. Its main fi ndings and conclusions can the year. be summarised in the following points: Consolidation in the banking sector continued Although liquidity risk management by in 2006, although there were signs of European cross-border banks takes place in deceleration compared to previous years. a rather fragmented regulatory environment, Whereas the number of credit institutions liquidity risk regulation is not perceived declined, total assets of the EU banking sector to impose undue restrictions on the cross- increased, signalling the emergence of larger border management of intra-group liquidity. institutions. While consolidation continued, Cross-border banks do not object to the concentration, for the fi rst time during the existence of liquidity regulation per se, but period under examination, stagnated at previous would like supervisors to take a concerted year levels in terms of market share of the fi ve approach within a banking group. Other largest institutions and even slightly declined regulations identifi ed by the banks as posing when examining the entire market using the possible obstacles relate to the home/host Herfi ndahl index. The cross-border banking arrangements and the large exposures limits. landscape in the EU also remained largely unchanged compared with the previous year. Major market developments identifi ed as This could be attributed partly to the decline impacting the liquidity risk management of in both the number and value of cross-border banks include the shortening time horizon for intra-EU M&A activity observed in 2006. Still, payment obligations, the use of more market- the value of M&A transactions in the fi rst half based and potentially more volatile funding ECB EU banking structures October 2007 7 sources and the increasing need for high quality their own internal models also for regulatory collateral. From a fi nancial stability perspective, purposes and the smaller banks that use, and given the absence of stress events in the period intend to continue using, the regulatory liquidity under review, it was considered premature to ratios also for internal management purposes. ascertain whether these market developments The use of more sophisticated internal liquidity encourage improved liquidity risk management risk approaches (e.g. “Liquidity at Risk” practices or, given the increased complexity models) is still not a common practice, although and interconnectivity of fi nancial systems, they cross-border banks are increasingly developing could increase the severity of a liquidity event. such approaches for internal risk management. Stress testing procedures are associated with Despite the initiatives taken by central forward-looking scenarios which simulate banks to address problems of international abnormal market periods and are often not fl ows of liquidity and the cross-border use of refl ected in the historical data of the institution. collateral, which are acknowledged by the Further work in this area could focus on the industry, cross-border banks still identify specifi c models and parameters used by banks the existence of certain obstacles regarding with regard to their stress testing models and the pooling of liquidity and the cross-border the stress levels designed in the context of their use of collateral. These obstacles relate to contingency funding plans. transaction costs, different time and currency zones, the divergence in standards of access The chapter on distribution channels in retail to central bank money outside the euro area, banking presents the evolution of channels the non-connectivity of payment and security operated by banks (branches, ATMs and settlement systems and legal issues. From a electronic channels), explores the cooperation fi nancial stability perspective, the potential of banks with non-banks (post-offi ces, retailers improvement in the effi ciency of liquidity risk and fi nancial agents/services groups) and management of banks resulting from the lifting assesses the main risks posed by developments of technical barriers (if any) would be welcome. in the distribution strategies of banks and their With regard to other potential barriers that are respective fi nancial stability implications.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Folge 2020/1
    Bank und Geschichte Historische Rundschau Nr. 42 Juni 2020 N-Ost-algie Als die Deutsche Bank vor 30 Jahren ihr Geschäft in den Neuen Bundesländern aufbaute, entsandte sie rund 1 000 westdeutsche Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in den Osten. Über 400 erklärten sich bereit, für mehrere Jahre in Ostdeutschland zu blei- ben. Einer von ihnen war Michael Freiherr Truchseß von Wetzhausen, der von Juni 1990 bis Dezember 1992 als Filialdirektor in Erfurt tätig war. Deutsche Bank Filiale Erfurt 1990 „Ab jetzt für Sie da“ – Lesen Sie nachfolgend seine persönlichen Sicht- Geschäftsstart am 1. Juli 1990 weisen und Erinnerungen an diese außergewöhn- Landkarte der DDR mit geplantem Filialnetz 1990 liche Zeit, ergänzt um zahlreiche Abbildungen. 1 Vorbemerkung Durch eine Reihe von Zufällen auf meinem Berufsweg bin ich bereits im Juni 1990, also noch vor der Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion am 1. Juli 1990, mit 147 Kollegen aus der Deutschen Bank nach Thüringen gegangen, um dort ein schon vor dem Zweiten Weltkrieg existierendes Filialnetz der Deutschen Bank AG wieder aufzubauen. Den Prozess des Wandels von der Planwirtschaft zur Marktwirtschaft habe ich als „Leiter Thüringen“ der Deutsche Bank Kreditbank AG (so firmierten wir am Anfang) also aus erster Hand sehr direkt und intensiv miterlebt, da wir in der Bank schon vor unserem Eintreffen vor Ort, Monate vor der Wiedervereinigung und rechtzeitig vor der Wirtschafts- und Währungs- union (Einführung der D-Mark), in der Bank mit unseren Vorbereitungen für eine Arbeit in Ostdeutschland begonnen hatten. Trotz aller damit verbundenen Herausforderungen (extreme Arbeitsbelastung, viel Fahrerei, Wochenend-Ehe, Trennung von Weib und Kindern, Hotelbleibe und so weiter) habe ich diese Zeit sehr intensiv erlebt und in mich aufgenommen.
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Year Financial Report 2017 2 | DKB Half-Year Financial Report 2017
    Half-year Financial Report 2017 2 | DKB Half-year Financial Report 2017 Performance indicators EUR million 30 Jun 2017 2016 Net interest income 429.2 795.1 Risk provisions 59.1 128.7 Net commission income –12.9 6.9 Administrative expenses 216.5 417 Profit before taxes 113.3 331.2 Cost/income ratio (CIR) in % 52.2 % 45.8 % Return on equity (RoE) in % 8.2 % 12.4 % Balance sheet figures EUR million 30 Jun 2017 2016 Balance sheet total 74,625.7 76,522.3 Equity 3,104.1 3,019.1 Core capital ratio in % 8.7 % 8.9 % Client receivables 63,369.2 63,228.3 Client deposits 51,607.0 53,438.0 Client receivables as % share of total assets 84.9 % 82.6 % Contents | 3 Contents Group interim management report 5 Basic principles 6 Report on the economic position 7 Report on opportunities and risks 15 Report on expected developments 24 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements 25 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 26 Reconciliation of comprehensive income for the period 27 Consolidated balance sheet 28 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 30 Condensed consolidated cash flow statement 32 Selected explanatory notes to the financial statements (Notes) 33 Responsibility statement by the Board of Management 68 Review report 69 4 | DKB Half-year Financial Report 2017 Group interim management report | 5 Group interim management report Basic principles 6 Report on the economic position 7 Report on opportunities and risks 15 Report on expected developments 24 6 | DKB Half-year Financial Report 2017 Basic principles Deutsche Kreditbank (DKB), headquartered in Berlin, is The interim management report for the first half of 2017 one of Germany’s largest banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Deutsche Kreditbank AG Annual Report 2017 We open up new perspectives for local authorities, companies and people 2DKB | DKB Annual Annual Report Report 2017 2017 Company profile Inclusion and diversity are of great importance to us. The statements that follow therefore apply to all people, irrespective of their identity. For ease of reading, we use gender-neutral language in the text. Company profileChapter | 1 title | 1 Deutsche Kreditbank AG (DKB), with approximately 3,400 employees and total assets of EUR 77.3 billion, is one of Germany’s top 20 banks. Our products are leaders in the market and distinguished by fair terms. We serve more than 3.7 million clients. They are able to conduct their banking transactions comfortably and securely online using the latest technology. Our industry experts assist our business clients in person at their offices. Entrepreneurial and sustainable actions are of great importance to us: this is why we use approx. 83 % of our net assets for loans, such as for the construction of apartments suitable for the elderly and families, energy-efficient real estate, out- patient and inpatient health facilities, and for con- struction projects in schools and day care centres in Germany. We ensure that the local agricultural sector remains competitive by investing in factors of production and bioenergy. We have also financed a number of renewable energy projects in wind, sun and water since 1996. We foster a culture of appreciation and together- ness – both among ourselves as well as with Deutsche Kreditbank AG our clients and business partners. A variety of tasks and development opportunities for our employees and optimal framework conditions for daily working life make us a responsible and attractive employer.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Deutsche Kreditbank AG Annual Report 2016 Investing in assets that last: land and people 2DKB | DKB Annual Annual Report Report 2016 2016 Company profile Company profileKapiteltitel | 1 | 1 Deutsche Kreditbank AG (DKB) employs more than 3,300 people, has net assets of approx. EUR 76.5 billion and is one of the top 20 banks in Germany. Our products are leaders in the market and distinguished by fair terms. We serve more than 3.5 million customers. They can conduct their banking transactions comfortably and securely online using the latest technology. Our industry experts assist our business customers in person at their offices. Entrepreneurial, sustainable actions are of great importance to us: this is why we use more than 80% of our net assets for loans, e. g. for the construction of energy-efficient housing adapted to the needs of the elderly and families as well as in- and outpatient healthcare facilities and building projects in schools and daycare facilities in Germany. We ensure that the local agricultural sector remains competitive by investing in factors of production and bioenergy. In addition, we have been providing loans for a large number of renewable energy projects in the wind, solar and hydropower sectors since 1996. We foster a culture of appreciation and together- Deutsche Kreditbank AG ness – both amongst ourselves as well as with our customers and business partners. A variety of tasks and development opportunities for our employees and optimal framework conditions for daily working life make us a responsible and attractive employer. The DKB MANAGEMENT SCHOOL is our in-house further education and training academy for strengthening our em- ployees’ and customers’ competencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 1 | DKB Annual Report 2018 | Key Figures
    Annual Report 2018 1 | DKB Annual Report 2018 | Key figures Performance indicators EUR millions 2018 2017 Net interest income 976.7 935.2 Risk result1 111.8 127.3 Net commission income –33.7 –39.2 Administrative expenses 474.7 446.3 Profit/loss before taxes 301.2 264.7 Cost/income ratio (CIR) in % 51.5 50.8 Return on equity (RoE) in % 10.2 9.6 Balance sheet figures EUR millions 2018 2017 Total assets 77,387.6 77,322.9 Equity 3,340.4 3,255.5 CET1 ratio in % 9.1 8.6 Client receivables 65,932.5 64,552.2 Client deposits 54,366.1 53,931.0 Customer figures 2018 2017 Number of clients 4,073,875 3,761,498 Number of retail current accounts (DKB Cash) 2,980,293 2,746,526 Employee figures 2018 2017 FTE | headcount as at 31 Dec. 3,431 | 3,731 3,084 | 3,379 Average age in years 42.9 43.1 Average length of service in years 8.4 8.5 Gender breakdown m | f in % 43.8 | 56.2 43.3 | 56.7 Gender breakdown by management position m | f in % 62.4 | 37.6 60.5 | 39.5 Workforce availability in % 95.1 95.1 Training days/employee 3.8 3.4 1 Risk provision until 2017 2 | DKB Annual Report 2018 Company profile Deutsche Kreditbank AG (DKB), with approximately 3,700 employees and total assets of EUR 77.4 billion, is one of Germany’s top 20 banks. Our products are leaders in the market and are distinguished by fair terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Year Financial Report 2019 | 2
    Half-Year Financial Report 2019 2 | DKB Half-Year Financial Report 2019 Performance indicators in EUR million 30 June 2019 30 June 2018 Net interest income 479.0 510.5 Risk result – 40.4 – 28.9 Net commission income – 12.1 – 11.3 Administrative expenses – 269.9 – 231.8 Profit/loss before taxes 155.0 191.8 Cost/income ratio (CIR) in% 53.30% 48.60% Return on equity (RoE) in% 10.00% 13.20% Balance sheet figures in EUR million 30 June 2019 31 Dec. 2018 Total assets 80,111.40 77,387.60 Equity 3,548.00 3,340.40 Client receivables 67,482.10 65,932.50 Client deposits 56,809.70 54,366.10 Client receivables as a share of balance sheet total in% ~ 84% ~ 85% 3 | DKB Half-Year Financial Report 2019 | Contents Contents Group interim management report 4 Basic principles 5 Report on the economic position 6 Report on opportunities and risks 16 Report on expected developments 23 Condensed interim consolidated financial statements 24 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 2019 25 Consolidated balance sheet 27 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 29 Condensed consolidated cash flow statement 31 Selected explanatory notes to the financial statements (Notes) 32 Responsibility statement by the Board of Management 70 Review report 71 4 | DKB Half-Year Financial Report 2019 | Group interim management report Group interim management report Basic principles 5 Report on the economic position 6 Report on opportunities and risks 16 Report on expected developments 23 5 | DKB Half-Year Financial Report 2019 | Group interim management report | Basic principles Basic principles Deutsche Kreditbank (DKB), headquartered in Berlin, is The interim management report for the first half of 2019 one of Germany’s largest banks.
    [Show full text]
  • 02012009 Basisprospekt
    Basisprospekt vom 02.01.2009 für Pfandbriefe und (Standard-)Schuldverschreibungen - 1 - Basisprospekt der DKB AG Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG DES PROSPEKTES ..........................................................................5 1.1 Wichtige Hinweise...............................................................................................5 1.2 Die Deutsche Kreditbank AG ..............................................................................5 1.2.1 Kurzbeschreibung der Emittentin ........................................................................5 1.2.2 Zusammenfassung ausgewählter Finanzinformationen.......................................6 1.2.3 Risikofaktoren hinsichtlich der Emittentin ............................................................6 1.3 Die Inhaberschuldverschreibungen.....................................................................6 1.3.1 Beschreibung......................................................................................................6 1.3.2 Risikofaktoren hinsichtlich der Wertpapiere.........................................................7 2 RISIKOFAKTOREN.................................................................................................................9 2.1 Emittentin............................................................................................................9 2.2 Wertpapiere ......................................................................................................10 3 EMITTENTENBESCHREIBUNG............................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report and Accounts Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Financial Statements
    2011 Annual Report and Accounts Facts | Figures BAYERNLB | 2011 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Financial Statements Bayerische Landesbank Brienner Strasse 18 80333 Munich Germany www.bayernlb.de Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe in Bavaria Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe Market leader in Bavaria • Aggregate total assets (bank business): EUR 488 billion • Aggregate regulatory capital (excl. BayernLB): EUR 16.2 billion • Aggregate premium volume (insurance business): EUR 6.6 billion • Staff: Approx. 63,000 BayernLB 72 savings banks Versicherungskammer Bayern Consolidated total assets: Total assets: EUR 175 billion Premium volume: EUR 6.6 billion EUR 309.1 billion Staff: 45,394 Staff: 8.507* Staff: • Branches: 2,437 Investment portfolio: EUR 38.6 billion Bank: 4,034 • Self-service branches: 350 Group: 10,893 • Advisory centres: 467 Germany’s largest public-sector insurance provider Customer loans: EUR 105 billion Customer deposits: EUR 135 billion Market leader in Bavaria and the Palatinate Market share • Approx. 40 % of SMEs Entities within the Bayerische Landesbausparkasse • Two-thirds of trade businesses Versicherungskammer Bayern Group • 50 % of company start-ups (VKB) Portfolio of 2.1 million home loan savings contracts with a volume of Sparkassen-Immobilien • Composite insurers EUR 60.2 billion Vermittlungs GmbH & Co. KG • Life insurers Volume of business brokered: • Health insurers EUR 1.85 billion • Re-insurers Bayerische Landesbodenkreditanstalt DekaBank Lending volume (proprietary and Share of Bavarian savings banks fiduciary business): EUR 21.3 billion organisation: 14.7 % State subsidised business (number of Consolidated total assets: apartments and residences): 10,583 EUR 132 billion** BayernLB Group companies include Landesbank Berlin • Deutsche Kreditbank AG, Berlin Share of Bavarian savings bank • Banque LBLux S.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Supervised Entities (As of 1 January 2018)
    List of supervised entities Cut-off date for significance decisions: 1 January 2018 Number of significant supervised entities: 118 This list displays the significant (part A) and less significant credit institutions (part B) which are supervised entities. The list is compiled on the basis of significance decisions adopted and notified by the ECB that refer to events that became effective up to the cut-off date. A. List of significant supervised entities Belgium 1 Investeringsmaatschappij Argenta nv Size (total assets EUR 30 - 50 bn) Argenta Bank- en Verzekeringsgroep nv Belgium Argenta Spaarbank NV Belgium 2 AXA Bank Belgium SA Size (total assets EUR 30-50 bn) (**) AXA Bank Europe SCF France 3 Banque Degroof Petercam SA Significant cross-border assets Banque Degroof Petercam France S.A. France Banque Degroof Petercam Luxembourg S.A. Luxembourg Bank Degroof Petercam Spain, S.A. Spain 4 Belfius Banque S.A. Size (total assets EUR 150-300 bn) 5 Dexia SA Size (total assets EUR 150-300 bn) Dexia Crédit Local France Dexia Kommunalbank Deutschland AG Germany Dexia Crediop S.p.A. Italy 6 KBC Group N.V. Size (total assets EUR 150-300 bn) KBC Bank N.V. Belgium CBC Banque SA Belgium KBC Bank Ireland plc Ireland Československá obchodná banka, a.s. Slovakia ČSOB stavebná sporiteľňa, a.s. Slovakia 7 The Bank of New York Mellon S.A. Size (total assets EUR 30-50 bn) Germany 8 Aareal Bank AG Size (total assets EUR 30-50 bn) 9 Barclays Bank PLC Frankfurt Branch Size (total assets EUR 30-50 bn) 10 Bayerische Landesbank Size (total assets EUR 150-300 bn) Deutsche Kreditbank Aktiengesellschaft Germany 11 COMMERZBANK Aktiengesellschaft Size (total assets EUR 300-500 bn) European Bank for Financial Services GmbH (ebase) Germany comdirect bank AG Germany Commerzbank Finance & Covered Bond S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutsche Kreditbank AG 1 July 2020
    SECOND PARTY OPINION (SPO) on the alignment with the Draft Model of EU Green Bond Standard 1 Sustainability Quality of the Issuer and Asset Pool Deutsche Kreditbank AG 1 July 2020 1 Usability Guide EU Green Bond Standard (March 2020) https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg- green-bond-standard-usability-guide_en.pdf © 2020 | Institutional Shareholder Services and/or its affiliates SECOND PARTY OPINION Sustainability Quality of the Green Bond Asset Pool CONTENTS Overall Evaluation of the Green Bond Programme ................................................................................ 3 ISS ESG ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 3 Contribution of the Green Bond Programme to environmental objectives and to the UN SDGs ...... 4 ISS ESG SPO ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................... 5 PART I: DRAFT MODEL OF EU GREEN BOND STANDARD .................................................................... 5 PART II: ALIGNMENT OF THE ASSET POOL WITH THE EU TAXONOMY ............................................. 14 PART III: ASSESSMENT OF DKB’S ESG PERFORMANCE ...................................................................... 19 ANNEX 1: ISS ESG Corporate Rating ...................................................................................................... 21 About ISS ESG SPO
    [Show full text]
  • List of Sis and Lsis
    List of supervised entities Cut-off date for changes: 1 July 2019 Number of significant entities directly supervised by the ECB: 114 This list displays the significant supervised entities, which are directly supervised by the ECB (part A) and the less significant supervised entities which are indirectly supervised by the ECB (Part B). Based on Article 2(20) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (OJ L 141, 14.5.2014, p. 1 - SSM Framework Regulation) a ‘supervised entity’ means any of the following: (a) a credit institution established in a participating Member State; (b) a financial holding company established in a participating Member State; (c) a mixed financial holding company established in a participating Member State, provided that the coordinator of the financial conglomerate is an authority competent for the supervision of credit institutions and is also the coordinator in its function as supervisor of credit institutions (d) a branch established in a participating Member State by a credit institution which is established in a non-participating Member State. The list is compiled on the basis of significance decisions which have been adopted and notified by the ECB to the supervised entity and that have become effective up to the cut-off date. A. List of significant entities directly supervised by the ECB Country of LEI Type Name establishment Grounds for significance MFI code for branches of group entities Belgium 1 LSGM84136ACA92XCN876 Credit Institution AXA Bank Belgium SA ; AXA Bank Belgium NV Size (total assets EUR 30-50 bn) (*) CVRWQDHDBEPUUVU2FD09 Credit Institution AXA Bank Europe SCF France 2 549300NBLHT5Z7ZV1241 Credit Institution Banque Degroof Petercam SA ; Bank Degroof Petercam NV Significant cross-border assets 54930017BFF0C5RWQ245 Credit Institution Banque Degroof Petercam France S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking on States? the Divergent Trajectories of European Finance After the Crisis
    Banking on States? The divergent trajectories of European finance after the crisis By Elsa Clara Massoc A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah Levy, Co-Chair Professor Paul Pierson, Co-Chair Professor Steve Vogel Professor John Zysman Professor Neil Fligstein Summer 2018 Abstract Banking on States? The divergent trajectories of European finance after the crisis by Elsa Clara Massoc Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Paul Pierson, Co-Chair Professor Jonah Levy, Co-Chair Many conventional theories in Economics and Political Science stress that the liberalization and globalization of finance have homogenized the behavior of state and market actors. Some even go so far as to assume that states have become irrelevant actors. However, these theories cannot account for empirical observations laid out in my dissertation research: that responses to the financial crisis in Europe have largely been crafted at the national level. Since the crisis of 2008, there have been different trajectories of finance across Europe. In France, banks have grown bigger, as they have developed their operations in market-based banking as well as in traditional banking, both globally and at home. In Germany, Deutsche Bank maintained, and even developed, its global market activities until 2014-5. On the other side, local banks have reinforced their incumbent position in domestic retail markets. British banks have shrunk quite dramatically. They have largely retreated from the game of global finance, while foreign financial institutions have continued to use the infrastructures provided by the City of London as a base for their global market operations.
    [Show full text]