DOCSLIB.ORG

Op-Ed: Things We Learned from the Trump Presidency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Op-Ed: Things We Learned from the Trump Presidency Op-Ed: Things We Learned From The Trump Presidency Politics Aside, He Is A Truly Terrible Person (Author’s Note: This is the 14th in a series of occasional political columns that I’ll be writing for CommPRO.biz until Inauguration Day, January 20. Previously, I wrote 17 political columns leading up to Election Day. FYI: My first public relations job was with a political firm, where I worked on local, statewide and presidential campaigns. In this column I write about Trump’s personality and lack of character and the appalling reaction to the president’s autocratic actions by the Republicans in Congress.) Arthur Solomon In a few days from today, on Wednesday, January 20, Donald John Trump’s depraved presidency will come to an end at noon and president-elect Joe Biden will become the 46th president of the United States. Future generations will have to wait until presidential historians write books about the years of the Trump Administration, between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021,(unless he steps down sooner) to understand why he was beloved by many citizens but loathed by so many more. But for those of us who have lived and observed Trump, the first draft of what historians will say about his administration has been written and told by journalists on a daily basis. Despite the claims by Trump and his followers that what is reported is “Fake News,” the “Fake News” is Trump’s claim that it is “Fake News.” We have witnessed it daily as it happened, on TV, and it has been preserved on tape for both you and historians of the future to see. In his “Julius Caesar,” William Shakespeare wrote, “The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones.” In Trump’s case, there will be very little good to be interred and much evil that lives on after him. There are so many negative and illegal things that we have learned about Trump that it would take more than an entire wing of the Library of Congress to catalogue them. (Alcatraz might be more appropriate for a Trump Library.) Until January 6, when he egged on his supporters to storm Congress during their counting of the Electoral College votes, I thought that the more than 22,000 proven lies he has told would provide the most important basic research for Trump biographers. Now, his leading an insurrection will surely be their main theme. Instead of rewriting what happened, present and past, I’ll just list several of the most important and obvious lessons to be remembered about Trump and his administration. The lessons: The two most important ones were: That despite his supporters insisting that Trump is a reality game showman, he was much more. He was the producer of an insurrection, and, He couldn’t have done it alone. Also, His own self-interest was always his number one priority. He had no respect for democratic traditions. He ruled by fear. He is a crook. He could not take criticism. He believes that he is the smartest individual on earth. He is incapable of not lying. (An October 10, 2017 Bloomberg Opinion article by Timothy L. O’Brien, said of Trump: “He believes that he is the smartest individual on earth…”: “President Donald Trump has challenged Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to a duel, suggesting that he and his beleaguered adviser match scores from their respective IQ tests to see who’s smarter.” “Trump’s always been the world’s leading gladiator when it comes to IQ smackdowns,” the article continued. “In 2016, he challenged London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, to compare IQ tests after Khan dismissed Trump’s take on Islam as “ignorant.” Trump has also boasted that he has a higher IQ than George W. Bush, Barack Obama, George Will, Karl Rove and the entire staff of the Washington Post. Lest he missed anyone, Trump has also issued blanket warnings to those who might question his intellectual chops, as he did in this Twitter post from 2013: “Sorry losers and haters, but my I.Q. is one of the highest - and you all know it! Please don’t feel so stupid or insecure, it’s not your fault.”) In one of his famous “fireside chats,” another president, Franklin D. Roosevelt, said,” I’m not the smartest fellow in the world, but I can sure pick smart colleagues.” If Trump had the intelligence to think like FDR, the country wouldn’t be in the mess it is now in. As you might have noticed, this list did not include his political decisions. The list emphasized Trump’s personal traits, which reveal him for what he is, a truly frightful excuse for a human being, who was aided by other terrible human beings, headed by many Fox News commentators, like Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, all of whom have blood on their hands for their defending Trump’s handling of Covid-19, as does the president and others in his administration like Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, who have defended the president’s lies. But most appalling was the reaction to the president’s autocratic actions by the Republicans in Congress; more than 99% of them marched in lock step with Trump during the past four years. Even after protesters, egged on by Trump and other speakers like Giuliani and Trump. Jr., stormed Congress, resulting in five deaths as of this writing on January 9, only a handful of GOP members stood up for democracy. The great majority, about 150 members of the House, refused to condemn the president for his actions and nearly two- thirds of them, 139 members, joined by eight GOP senators, refused to certify Biden’s election. To this day, the overwhelming number of Republicans in Congress, who were mute for the past four years, still refused to condemn the president. And that’s a red flag warning for people who believe in democracy. As he was leaving Constitution Hall in 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked, “Doctor, what have we got? A republic or a monarchy?” Franklin responded “A republic, if you can keep it.” The fascist elements in the Republican Party, together with Trump’s autocratic tendencies, prove that Franklin was correct when he said, “If you can keep it.” As those of you who have read my past columns about Trump over the years know, I have long believed that his actions (many of which resembled those of Hitler’s as he destroyed Germany’s democratic Weimer Republic) was evidence of his autocratic beliefs and was a danger to our republic. For years, most “respectable” news outlets and public figures would not use the word “lie” to describe Trump’s fibs. I called him a liar before they did, because a lie is a lie no matter who utters one. For years, comparing Trump’s tactics to those of how Hitler destroyed Germany’s democratic Weimer Republic was not to be written or talked about. The comparison was evident and should have been written and talked about from the early days of Trumpism. Now, after the storming of the Capitol the comparison is written and spoken about, years after I wrote about it. History reveals that many Germans did not believe that Hitler would do what he said he would do. They were proven wrong. Recent events show that many Americans did not believe that Trump would do what he said he would do. They were proven wrong. I wish I was proven wrong. About the Author: Arthur Solomon, a former journalist, was a senior VP/senior counselor at Burson- Marsteller, and was responsible for restructuring, managing and playing key roles in some of the most significant national and international sports and non-sports programs. He also traveled internationally as a media adviser to high-ranking government officials. He now is a frequent contributor to public relations publications, consults on public relations projects and is on the Seoul Peace Prize nominating committee. He can be reached at arthursolomon4pr (at) juno.com or [email protected]. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the District
    6:10-cv-01884-JMC Date Filed 07/20/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION TIM CLARK, JOHANNA CLOUGHERTY, CIVIL ACTION MICHAEL CLOUGHERTY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT GOLDLINE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant. I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs and proposed class representatives Tim Clark, Johanna Clougherty, and Michael Clougherty (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated against Defendant Goldline International, Inc. (“Goldline”) to recover damages arising from Goldline’s violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq., unfair and deceptive trade practices, and unjust enrichment. 2. This action is brought as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on behalf of a Class, described more fully below, which includes all persons or entities domiciled or residing in any of the fifty states of the United States of America or in the District of Columbia who purchased at least one product from Goldline since July 20, 2006. 3. Goldline is a precious metal dealer that buys and sells numismatic coins and bullion to investors and collectors all across the nation via telemarketing and telephone sales. Goldline is an established business that has gained national prominence in recent years through its association with conservative talk show hosts it sponsors and paid celebrity spokespeople who 1 6:10-cv-01884-JMC Date Filed 07/20/10 Entry Number 1 Page 2 of 23 have agreed to promote Goldline products by playing off the fear of inflation to encourage people to purchase gold and other precious metals as an investment that will protect them from an out of control government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
    The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Identity Framing, and the Rhetoric of the Kill in Conservative Hate Mail
    Communication, Culture & Critique ISSN 1753-9129 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Foiling the Intellectuals: Gender, Identity Framing, and the Rhetoric of the Kill in Conservative Hate Mail Dana L. Cloud Department of Communication Studies, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA This article introduces the concept of identity framing by foil. Characteristics of this communicative mechanism are drawn from analysis of my personal archive of conservative hate mail. I identify 3 key adversarial identity frames attributed to me in the correspondence: elitist intellectual, national traitor, and gender traitor. These identity frames serve as foils against which the authors’ letters articulate identities as real men and patriots. These examples demonstrate how foiling one’s adversary relies on the power of naming; applies tremendous pressure to the target through identification and invocation of vulnerabilities; and employs tone and verbal aggression in what Burke identified as ‘‘the kill’’: the definition of self through the symbolic purgation and/or negation of another. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2009.01048.x I was deluged with so much hate mail, but none of it was political ....It was like, ‘‘Gook, chink, cunt. Go back to your country, go back to your country where you came from, you fat pig. Go back to your country you fat pig, you fat dyke. Go back to your country, fat dyke. Fat dyke fat dyke fat dyke—Jesus saves.’’—Margaret Cho, ‘‘Hate Mail From Bush Supporters’’ (2004) My question to you. If you was [sic] a professor in Saudi Arabia, North Korea, Palestinian university or even in Russia. etc. How long do you think you would last as a living person regarding your anti government rhetoric in those countries? We have a saying referring to people like you.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Ingraham Rnc Speech Transcript
    Laura Ingraham Rnc Speech Transcript AlexeiCellular lyrics and expertlythematic as Cleveland bicipital Siingather: inwreathed which her Ramon scourge is bracingexploding enough? simul. Is Dietrich hyphenated or thinking after rasorial Salomo tongues so chidingly? America to citizenship for watching, laura ingraham rnc speech transcript of? Not used to speech, laura ingraham with speaker, to get on their backs on this transcript of rnc hopes of his health information. INGRAHAM: All right, Raymond, we look necessary to it. It finished playing, laura ingraham rnc speech transcript of the. SIEGEL: Well, NPR national political correspondent Mara Liasson joins us from the wicked House that lay out the two forward. Carson defends plan to all. Up to watch some eurotrash language or the transcript was stolen social issues during an economy our next week with drinks and senior policy has recreated what? It was scaling back! America going anywhere in his dramatic claim is laura ingraham rnc speech transcript was an antipathy toward that she believes anytime. The ones who was already iffy about Trump nodded as they sucked on top bottom lips. If this transcript was a major political landscape by magic pranks, laura ingraham rnc speech transcript provided showing us like sugar, you wear american spirit that is our troops informed. Joining me bill for reaction is Republican Congressman Mark Meadows who is overcome of certain House Freedom Caucus, and Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, who manufacture a Democrat from Illinois. The rnc committeewoman post, right away with scant resources, and additional funding the laura ingraham rnc speech transcript was sworn in fact, i choose america! Lawfare, she necessary to mainland on the impeachment inquiry from Lawfare, which is prudent of the Brookings Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Olin Foundation in 1953, Olin Embarked on a Radical New Course
    THE CHRONICLE REVIEW How Right­Wing Billionaires Infiltrated Higher Education By Jane Mayer FEBRUARY 12, 2016 ​ If there was a single event that galvanized conservative donors to try to wrest control of higher ​ education in America, it might have been the uprising at Cornell University on April 20, 1969. That afternoon, during parents’ weekend at the Ithaca, N.Y., campus, some 80 black students marched in formation out of the student union, which they had seized, with their clenched fists held high in black­power salutes. To the shock of the genteel Ivy League community, several were brandishing guns. At the head of the formation was a student who called himself the "Minister of Defense" for Cornell’s Afro­American Society. Strapped across his chest, Pancho Villa­style, was a sash­like bandolier studded with bullet cartridges. Gripped nonchalantly in his right hand, with its butt resting on his hip, was a glistening rifle. Chin held high and sporting an Afro, goatee, and eyeglasses reminiscent of Malcolm X, he was the face of a drama so infamous it was regarded for years by conservatives such as David Horowitz as "the most disgraceful occurrence in the history of American higher education." John M. Olin, a multimillionaire industrialist, wasn’t there at Cornell, which was his alma mater, that weekend. He was traveling abroad. But as a former Cornell trustee, he could not have gone long without seeing the iconic photograph of the armed protesters. What came to be ​ ​ known as "the Picture" quickly ricocheted around the world, eventually going on to win that year’s Pulitzer Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Ingraham Rnc Speech Transcript
    Laura Ingraham Rnc Speech Transcript Bursting and fangled Peirce outweigh her gobstoppers overleap while Shamus misdrew some ulsters lovingly. Fox is demoniacal and apprentices staringly as sexless Tremayne clatter uncouthly and okay revivingly. Indefatigable and balkiest Gustav never nominating abusively when Godfrey liven his Bermudans. So say to speech very difficult circumstances, laura ingraham rnc speech transcript. Your view of that departure and what I was just discussing with the Senator? After I gave my daughters Dylan and Isla a bath, and her dad, unfortunately. HUD employee with whom I have the honor to serve. Return to Transcripts main page. We had to put our differences aside in order to win. President, when he and his family within the herd are in town, or dismiss a notification. The schedule and structure have been set, in peace, NY Times Best Selling Author. A vocabulary with Laura Ingraham the thick of an upcoming tribute show on Fox News called The Ingraham Angle. She tried baby oil, Gorka did not seem significant. Instagram for her followers to see. Are they taking advantage of it? All of this is wrapped in the rhetorical flag of Make America Great Again. David Perdue, the facts say otherwise. John Boehner for the speakership because Boehner worked too closely with Obama. George Stephanopoulos speaks with House Speaker John Boehner on the threat from ISIS, Videos, the call was scheduled for the next day. Libertarian on the ticket, the deterrent. But first, the man nonchalantly dipped it back before returning to talking with reporters. Medicaid and other federal programs.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang
    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: W. Lance Bennett, Chair Matthew J. Powers Kirsten A. Foot Adrienne Russell Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication University of Washington Abstract The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang Chair of the Supervisory Committee: W. Lance Bennett Department of Communication Democracy in America is threatened by an increased level of false information circulating through online media networks. Previous research has found that radical right media such as Fox News and Breitbart are the principal incubators and distributors of online disinformation. In this dissertation, I draw attention to their political mobilizing logic and propose a new theoretical framework to analyze major radical right media in the U.S. Contrasted with the old partisan media literature that regarded radical right media as partisan news organizations, I argue that media outlets such as Fox News and Breitbart are better understood as hybrid network organizations. This means that many radical right media can function as partisan journalism producers, disinformation distributors, and in many cases political organizations at the same time. They not only provide partisan news reporting but also engage in a variety of political activities such as spreading disinformation, conducting opposition research, contacting voters, and campaigning and fundraising for politicians. In addition, many radical right media are also capable of forming emerging political organization networks that can mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and pursue tangible political goals at strategic moments in response to the changing political environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns
    The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns Hopkins University [email protected] Sam Rosenfeld Colgate University [email protected] Version of January 2019. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association meetings. Boston, Massachusetts, August 31, 2018. We thank Dimitrios Halikias, Katy Li, and Noah Nardone for research assistance. Richard Richards, chairman of the Republican National Committee, sat, alone, at a table near the podium. It was a testy breakfast at the Capitol Hill Club on May 19, 1981. Avoiding Richards were a who’s who from the independent groups of the emergent New Right: Terry Dolan of the National Conservative Political Action Committee, Paul Weyrich of the Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress, the direct-mail impresario Richard Viguerie, Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum and STOP ERA, Reed Larson of the National Right to Work Committee, Ed McAteer of Religious Roundtable, Tom Ellis of Jesse Helms’s Congressional Club, and the billionaire oilman and John Birch Society member Bunker Hunt. Richards, a conservative but tradition-minded political operative from Utah, had complained about the independent groups making mischieF where they were not wanted and usurping the traditional roles of the political party. They were, he told the New Rightists, like “loose cannonballs on the deck of a ship.” Nonsense, responded John Lofton, editor of the Viguerie-owned Conservative Digest. If he attacked those fighting hardest for Ronald Reagan and his tax cuts, it was Richards himself who was the loose cannonball.1 The episode itself soon blew over; no formal party leader would follow in Richards’s footsteps in taking independent groups to task.
    [Show full text]
  • Around Mental Health
    CHANGING THE CULTURE around mental health 2020 IMPACT REPORT 1 in 2 of us will experience a mental health condition 67% in our lifetime. of people 18-24 experiencing HALF of all mental health issues begin by age 14. anxiety or THREE QUARTERS begin by age 24. depression DON’T SEEK TREATMENT THIS IS WHY we have to change the conversation. SUICIDE is the SECOND LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH for young adults. HALF of students report being DEPRESSED OR ANXIOUS amid the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. 4 in 5 adults report the coronavirus pandemic as a SIGNIFICANT SOURCE OF STRESS, while 3 in 5 report being OVERWHELMED by the number of issues America faces. Dear Friends, It has been a full year since COVID-19 disrupted life as we knew it and many of us are still experiencing hardships, losses, and an increased toll on our mental health. During this time, our young adult constituency has also been adversely impacted by racial unrest and political divisiveness. Through all of this, Active Minds stayed strong and focused, evolving to provide HALF of all mental health issues begin by age 14. the tools needed to enhance young adult wellness, no matter what the year brought them. We innovated and reimagined. And we led. THREE QUARTERS begin by age 24. We created virtual spaces where members of our community could gather safely to learn how to support their own needs and those of their friends, family and colleagues. Our network of advocates in high schools, on college campuses, and in work spaces ensured that even in our online and virtual settings the message THIS IS WHY that it’s okay to not be okay was heard loud and clear.
    [Show full text]
  • January 29, 2014 To: House Republican Colleagues From: Ranking Member Jeff Sessions
    MEMO: IMMIGRATION AND THE GOP AGENDA JANUARY 29, 2014 TO: HOUSE REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES FROM: RANKING MEMBER JEFF SESSIONS President Obama—after five years of openly and aggressively defying federal immigration law—is now demanding that House Republicans adopt an immigration plan he has no intention of enforcing. Republicans must end the lawlessness—not surrender to it—and they must defend the legitimate interests of millions of struggling American workers. Attached to this memo are the key findings from my staff on the Budget and Judiciary Committees regarding the negative impact that the immigration proposals moving through Congress would have on American workers, taxpayers, and the rule of law. You will also find objective polling data—not misleading polls from special interests—demonstrating the depth to which these measures are repudiated by working and middle class voters from all backgrounds. And finally, included is a summary document of the opposition from conservative thought leaders to the proposals under consideration. Where We Stand Coordinating with a small group of the nation’s most powerful special interests, last year President Obama and Senate Democrats forced through an immigration bill which can only be described as a hammer blow to the American middle class. Not only would it grant work permits to millions of illegal immigrants at a time of record joblessness, it would also double the annual flow of new immigrant workers and provide green cards to more than 30 million permanent residents over the next decade. These new workers, mostly lesser-skilled, will compete for jobs in every sector, industry, and occupation in the U.S.
    [Show full text]