Carlo Aymonino, One of the Most Important Architects of the Second
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
In memory of Carlo Aymonino | Manuel de Solà-Morales www.dur.upc.edu 02-2011 Carlo Aymonino, one of the most important architects of the second and in Compte’s philosophical neopositivism—but unless we harken In memory of Carlo Aymonino half of the twentieth century, died in Rome, the city of his birth, on back to Durand or Semper and all that was swept away by the winds of July 3, 2010 at the age of 83. In his writings, seminars, and designs he functionalism, there has been no parallel to Aymonino in contemporary tackled the fundamental problems raised by the shift from the Modern European architectural thought. Movement to the engagement with complexity and the beauty of the His proposal that we recognize the study of the city as a discipline basic real-life, historical, and contemporary city. to all architecture has been simplistically labeled the “typological” At a moment marked by disciplinary fundamentalism and ill approach, and while that may not be a mislabeling, it is notably temperedness, Aymonino advanced, through early writings such as reductive. Drawing similar conclusions as the folks who based the Origini e sviluppo della città moderna (1965), Il significato della città idea of architecture on the progressive rationalization of the hut (1975), and Le città capitali (1975), a vision of city architecture that and identified the origin of composite geometry within the logic of brimmed with tenderness and curiosity. construction, Aymonino is among those who proclaim the city—which is to say agglomeration, hierarchy, and, more generally, the relationship He always approached the city more as an apprentice than a prophet, | Manuel de Solà-Morales and was constantly interweaving the abstract values of urban life with between multifarious forms—as the principle that underlies all an appreciation for the uniquely textured event. architectural intelligence. Aymonino’s reading of the city as an all-encompassing matrix of To him, a building only made sense as a piece of the larger urban architectural cultures was not without scholastic precedent—it could puzzle, and as such, as the locus of some function in relation to its be found in Muratori’s typological analyses of Venice, for instance, context. And it was, moreover, the city plan, in all the richness of its 158 En la muerte de Carlo Aymonino | Manuel de Solà-Morales | Manuel de Solà-Morales Font: http://www.iuav.it El 3 de julio de este año moría en Roma Carlo Aymonino (Roma, 1926), uno de los arquitectos más significativos de la segunda mitad En la muerte de Carlo Aymonino del siglo XX. Su vida ha afrontado con textos, seminarios y proyectos los problemas fundamentales del paso del Movimiento Moderno al compromiso con la complejidad y la belleza de la ciudad real, histórica y contemporánea. En sus textos fundacionales Origini e sviluppo della città moderna (1965), Il significato della città (1975) y Le città capitali (1975), Aymonino propone, en un momento caracterizado por el fundamentalismo y el mal humor disciplinares de los 70’, una idea de ciudad-arquitectura llena de afecto y curiosidad. Su aproximación a la ciudad es siempre la de un aprendiz más que la de un profeta, cruzando continuamente la abstracción de las relaciones urbanas generales con la estima del episodio de la singularidad 02-2011 cualitativa. www.dur.upc.edu Su lectura de la ciudad como matriz de toda cultura arquitectónica tiene precedentes escolásticos sí, en los análisis tipológicos de Muratori 159 www.dur.upc.edu 02-2011 forms—be they cadastres, roads, streetlights or signs, overlapping or Taken as a body of work, Aymonino’s theoretical contributions are repeating—that contained within it the qualities peculiar to the urban transcendent not merely due to his architectural designs or the power In memory of Carlo Aymonino phenomenon. of his writings, but for his singular intellectual stance. He defended For two decades Aymonino ran the Italian university’s “Gruppo project-based urbanism (masked by its partisan commitments) from Architetture,” and it was with this collection of friends and followers— the urbanism of the planners, of the municipal expediters and architects Rossi, Canella, Grassi, Semerani, Polosello—that he undertook of objects. By introducing this defense (like Quaroni or Samonà) into prototypical studies of cities (first Padua, later Paris, Vienna…) Italy’s debate (arguably the richest of the 70s, 80s, and 90s) he broke and called into service a demonstration of the city’s meaning as an the tension between ideological architects and pragmatic politicians outgrowth of its architecture. and stood up to Anglo Saxon structuralism-in-disguise (Ceccarelli, Secchi). In 1969 the Barcelona Urbanism Laboratory undertook the first, admittedly modest translations and publication of the texts most But Aymonino’s historical significance must ultimately be understood emblematic of the theoretical debate that Aymonino inaugurated. as stemming from his role as a father figure and mentor to Aldo Rossi. His generosity and admiration for Rossi made it possible for his Printed in the department’s primitive booklets (3.2), The Meaning of | Manuel de Solà-Morales Cities was the first. Then, in 1972 Gustavo Gilli published the Spanish dazzling Milanese friend to largely overshadow him. For Aymonino, translation of his 1965 The Origins and Development of the Modern standing up for Rossi’s ideas was a lifelong commitment, and their City as a real book, one of a series (Ciencia Urbanística, 11). A collaboration was a source of so many of the shades of meaning and subsequent version of The Meaning of Cities was published in Madrid subtle differences that made that era among Italy’s—and the world’s— in 1981 by Blume. most prolific in terms of new architectural ideas. 160 | Manuel de Solà-Morales para Venecia y en el neopositivismo filosófico de Compte, pero no Durante veinte años dirigió en la universidad italiana, el “Gruppo tiene paralelismos en el pensamiento arquitectónico europeo, si no nos Architettura”, y es con el grupo de sus discípulos amigos -Rossi, remontamos a Durand o Semper y todo lo arrastrado por el vendaval Canella, Grassi, Semerani, Polosello- con quienes a través de estudios En la muerte de Carlo Aymonino funcionalista. prototípicos sobre ciudades (primero fue Padova, después París, Su propuesta de reconocer el estudio de la ciudad como la disciplina Viena...) desplegaron la demostración del significado urbano construido básica de la arquitectura, ha sido simplistamente etiquetada como desde la arquitectura. método “morfo-tipológico”. No se trata de una etiqueta falsa, pero El Laboratorio de Urbanismo de Barcelona inició, en el año 1969 sí muy reductiva. Llegando a conclusiones similares a las de quienes las primeras traducciones y publicaciones, aun muy modestas, de los fundamentan la idea de arquitectura a la racionalización progresiva de textos emblemáticos del debate teórico suscitado por Aymonino. El la cabaña y la de lógica de la construcción como origen de la geometría significado de las ciudades fue el primero, en los primitivos cuadernos compositiva, Aymonino es de los que proclaman la ciudad -es decir del Departamento (3.2). Poco después, ya como libro formal de Gustavo la agrupación, la jerarquía y en general las relaciones entre formas Gili, se editó Orígenes y desarrollo de la ciudad moderna (1972) en la múltiples- como el principio original de la inteligencia arquitectónica. colección morada (Ciencia Urbanística, 11). Después ha habido una Para él, el edificio solo tiene sentido como pieza urbana, y por tanto, versión de El significado de las ciudades, editada por Blume en Madrid también como sede de alguna función relacional. Y es sobre todo la en 1981. planta urbana, con la riqueza de sus formas catastrales, viarias, focales En conjunto, la contribución teórica de Aymonino es tan trascendente 02-2011 www.dur.upc.edu o textuales, superpuestas o repetitivas, la que contiene los aspectos más no solo por su labor como arquitecto y por la fuerza de sus textos, propios del fenómeno urbano. sino sobre todo por la singularidad de su posición intelectual. Defensor 161 www.dur.upc.edu 02-2011 After finishing at Rome’s Sapienza University, Aymonino went to of the liberal left/Christian Democrats (Benèvolo, Salzano). During work in the studio of his uncle, the powerful Marcello Piacentini, the 1970s he was renowned for his controversial positions, and for and soon found himself working with Quaroni and Ridolfi on the bringing debates over urbanism, planning, and the socialist city into design for the Campus Martius district, which they proceeded to the Italian Communist Party congresses, along with other hot topics of build between 1949 and 1954 and made into the ultimate expression the moment like the unceasing flow of capitalist development and the of architectural “neorealism.” At the end of the 1950s, together with countervailing Soviet and Chinese models. his brother Maurizio, Alessandro de Rossi, and the Baldo brothers, Aymonino was reliably unmerciful on such topics. Against the grain of Aymonino started the AIDE studio. Beginning in 1974 came the virtually all his contemporaries, he maintained that the city could never famous Gallaratese project in a mixed-use neighborhood of Milan, the escape its history and that new modes of production would necessarily master plan for Pesaro’s historic downtown, and, from 1978 to ’81, bring about changes in the relationships between the city’s distinctive In memory of Carlo Aymonino the provocative Casa-Parcheggio in that same city. More recently his components, which, though still comprised of public facilities and monument to the Colossus of Rome in the Forum constituted what may housing, would be re-combined in novel ways. have been his final project. As editor of Casabella and Il Contemporaneo, Aymonino became Translation: Philip Kay Among his multiplicity of designs, texts, lectures, and seminars known for his ideological diatribes and his endless dinner conversations.