Poison Frogs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poison Frogs Current Biology Magazine appetite for grasshoppers, crickets, Quick guide preferences in different species for beetles, and caterpillars likely benefi t novel, brighter, or familiar colors, gardeners and farmers, and one early Poison frogs have both played a role in producing explorer of the American west actually a brilliant spectrum of color and kept a pair of grasshopper mice in pattern across the family. Coloration 1 2 his basement as an effective form of Jennifer L. Stynoski , Lisa M. Schulte , is an honest indicator of toxicity in 3 ‘cockroach control’, opening the door to and Bibiana Rojas some species, but not in others, their cage each evening, closing the door and is associated with territorial when the mice returned, contentedly What are poison frogs? Poison aggressiveness and boldness in satiated, in the morning. And although frogs, also commonly called ‘dart some cases. Recently, one Peruvian still a long way off, the novel mechanism poison frogs’ or ‘poison arrow frogs’, species, Ranitomeya imitator, was evolved by the mice for dealing with are charismatic amphibians forming found to be a true Müllerian mimic the intense and prolonged pain from a a spectacular adaptive radiation, of sympatric congeneric species. In bark scorpion sting could lead to the comparable to that of African cichlids. addition, the males and females of development of a completely new class Many of the diurnally active species several species are territorial and of analgesics, perhaps one lacking the have skin toxins and bright coloration have particularly good orientation and unfortunate side effects of opiates — the (Figure 1), and display numerous homing ability. Male communication benefi ts for people suffering chronic pain terrestrial reproductive modes includes both acoustic (calls) and would be incalculable. including elaborate parental care visual (vocal sac infl ation) signals But maybe we should rethink the and complex social behaviors. The (Figure 1H); each of these signals is question. Most biologists consider most diverse and well-studied group, not as effective to repel intruders as all species ‘good’ in the sense that superfamily Dendrobatoidea, consists the multimodal signal. every plant, animal, fungus, virus, of two families, Dendrobatidae and and bacterium is interesting and thus Aromobatidae, and is found from How do they reproduce? Several meritorious in its own right, worthy of Nicaragua to northern South America. species guard mates and some are our curiosity, investigation, and respect. Although less popular, other groups completely monogamous. These Many species, if not most, may also play known as poison frogs exist in South strategies are associated with the most some critical role in their community we America (family Bufonidae, genus striking behavior observed in poison don’t understand until it is too late — Melanophryniscus), Madagascar frogs: elaborate parental care. Parents dodos, for example, appear to have (family Mantellidae) and Australia guard terrestrial egg clutches and been important to forest regeneration (family Myobatrachidae, genus transport newly hatched tadpoles to on Mauritius, while sea otters serve a Pseudophryne), as well as two species water bodies (Figure 1G). Some species keystone function promoting healthy kelp in Cuba (family Eleutherodactylidae). transport all tadpoles at once to small beds in the Pacifi c. Who knows what Here, we focus on the traditional streams or puddles (Figure 1E,K). Other critical roles grasshopper mice might ‘poison frogs’, the dendrobatids. species transport tadpoles to very small play in the deserts and grasslands they pools in plants (phytotelmata; Figure currently patrol, howling? Are they called poison dart frogs, 1C) where there is less predation risk poison arrow frogs, dart-poison (Figure 1F). Parents that place offspring Where can I learn more about frogs, or just poison frogs? in smaller pools generally transport grasshopper mice? There are three species of poison tadpoles individually to separate pools Bailey, V., and Sperry, C.C. (1929). Life history and habits of grasshopper mice, genus Onychomys, frog (genus Phyllobates) to which to avoid competition for scarce food USDA Techn. Bull. 145, 1–19. common names including ‘arrow’ or resources and even larval cannibalism Horner, B.E., Taylor, J.M., and Padykula, H.A. (1965). ‘dart’ can be justly attributed. The (Figure 1B). Parents assess the quality Food habits and gastric morphology of the grasshopper mouse. J. Mamm. 45, 513–535. epithet comes from the use that and potential danger of tadpole Langley, W.M. (1994). Comparison of predatory some Colombian native tribes made deposition sites via chemical or visual behaviors of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster). of these species’ secretions, which cues. In some species, parental care J. Comp. Psychol. 108, 394–400. when rubbed on darts provide a lethal goes a step further: after deposition, Rowe, A.H., and Rowe, M.P. (2006). Risk assessment hunting weapon. The exudate of a adults feed tadpoles with unfertilized by grasshopper mice (Onychomys spp.) feeding on neurotoxic prey (Centruroides spp.). Anim. single golden arrow frog (Phyllobates eggs. In addition to providing food Behav. 71, 725–734. terribilis) — one of the most toxic in resource poor environments, Rowe, A.H., and Rowe, M.P. (2008). Physiological resistance of grasshopper mice (Onychomys spp.) vertebrates — can kill up to six this behavior supplies tadpoles to Arizona bark scorpion (Centruroides exilicauda) humans. with alkaloids to protect them from venom. Toxicon 52, 597–605. predators. Hungry tadpoles distinguish Rowe, A.H., Xiao, Y., Rowe, M.P., Cummins, T.R., and Zakon, H.H. (2013). Voltage-gated sodium channel Why are poison frogs interesting? between mothers and predators using in grasshopper mice defends against bark Besides being poisonous, many visual and tactile cues, and then scorpion toxin. Science 342, 441–446. species display bright colors and proceed to communicate with mother unique behaviors. Exceptional frogs by vibrating vigorously (Figure Neuroscience Program and Department of polymorphism and variation in 1I), which appears to stimulate egg Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, 293 Farm Lane, Room 108 Giltner Hall, East coloration is due to both natural and laying. Parental care can be performed Lansing, MI 48824, USA. sexual selection. Predator learning by mothers, fathers or both parents, *E-mail: [email protected] and recognition, as well as mating depending on the species. R1026 Current Biology 25, R1019–R1031, November 2, 2015 ©2015 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved Current Biology Magazine Figure 1. Examples of diversity of coloration and behaviors in poison frogs. (A) Mating pair of Dendrobates tinctorius in French Guiana and (B) tadpole of the same species which was bitten by a cannibalistic conspecifi c; (C) Excidobates mysteriosus in a bromeliad; (D) Peruvian Ranitomeya fantastica; (E) male Ameerega hahneli transporting all his tadpoles at once; (F) male of the monogamous R. imitator transporting a single tadpole and (G) embryo of same species; (H) calling male Oophaga granulifera; (I) ‘blue jeans’ female O. pumilio (one of the many different color morphs of this species) and its tadpole begging for nutritive eggs; (J) Allobates granti, an example of a poison frog species that is not brightly coloured; (K);Hyloxalus nexipus transporting tadpoles to a stream; (L) D. auratus from Costa Rica. What do we know about the poison heart arrhythmia and ultimately cardiac IUCN Red List of Threatened Species frogs’ toxins? Like all terrestrial arrest. Other less toxic alkaloids, such due in large part to devastation by amphibians, poison frogs face as histrionicotoxins, act as antagonists habitat loss. Also, some populations predators such as birds, spiders, bats, of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at have shown to be affected by the and snakes. Poison frogs use toxic the neuromuscular junction, inhibiting Chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium alkaloids as chemical defenses against signal transduction. Epipedobatine dendrobatidis), which is contributing predators. They sequester alkaloids also acts on acetylcholine receptors, to amphibian declines worldwide. from their diet of mostly mites and ultimately triggering the release of Today, dendrobatids are generally ants, and accumulate them in granular dopamine and norepinephrine; it was found in dense but isolated skin glands. To date, over 500 different a promising candidate for a non- populations in the remaining forest alkaloids have been described in opioid analgesic, but is not suitable for patches throughout their natural Dendrobatoidea, of which about humans because the pharmaceutical ranges. Also, in the 1960s and two-thirds are unique to them. For concentration is too similar to the 1970s, poison frogs became very example, batrachotoxin, the most toxic lethal dose. Phantasmidine, a recently popular among hobbyists in North poison frog alkaloid, binds irreversibly identifi ed and more selective alkaloid America and Europe because of their to voltage-gated sodium channels in might lead to useful pharmaceuticals. beauty. For decades this pet trade neuron- and muscle-cell membranes, has posed a serious threat to natural causing permanent depolarization Are poison frogs endangered? populations, as traders looking to sell by sodium infl ux and thus paralysis, Many species are indeed on the new color variants extract countless Current Biology 25, R1019–R1031, November 2, 2015
Recommended publications
  • Predation Upon Mantella Aurantiaca in the Torotorofotsy Wetlands, Central-Eastern Madagascar
    Herpetology Notes, volume 2: 95-97 (2009) (published online on 10 July 2009) Predation upon Mantella aurantiaca in the Torotorofotsy wetlands, central-eastern Madagascar Olga Jovanovic1*, Miguel Vences1, Goran Safarek2, Falitiana C.E. Rabemananjara3, Rainer Dolch4 Abstract. Malagasy poisonous frogs of genus Mantella are small, diurnal frogs with skin glands containing alkaloids and characterised by aposematic colouration. Due to their noxiousness and warning colouration, it is thought that they do not have many natural predators. Until now, only one successful and one aborted predation on Mantella frogs were reported. Herein, we account about two successful predations on M. aurantiaca in Torotorofotsy wetland, in central-eastern Madagascar. The first predation was observed by lizard Zoonosaurus sp. and the second predation by a snake probably belonging to Thamnosophis lateralis. Both predators did not seem to mind the taste of the M. aurantiaca and ingested it. Keywords. Amphibia: Mantellidae, poison frogs, Thamnosophis, Zoonosaurus Only little is known about predation on poisonous genus Melanophryniscus of southeastern South America, frogs in general, in particular for those containing in Malagasy poison frogs of the genus Mantella (family skin alkaloids. Until now, there are around 30 reports Mantellidae) of Madagascar, and the myobatrachid published on predation on poisonous frogs, mostly genus Pseudophryne of Australia (Daly, Highet and belonging to the families Bufonidae and Leptodactylidae Myers, 1984; Daly et al., 2002). All of
    [Show full text]
  • (Rhacophoridae, Pseudophilautus) in Sri Lanka
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 132 (2019) 14–24 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Diversification of shrub frogs (Rhacophoridae, Pseudophilautus) in Sri Lanka T – Timing and geographic context ⁎ Madhava Meegaskumburaa,b,1, , Gayani Senevirathnec,1, Kelum Manamendra-Arachchid, ⁎ Rohan Pethiyagodae, James Hankenf, Christopher J. Schneiderg, a College of Forestry, Guangxi Key Lab for Forest Ecology and Conservation, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, PR China b Department of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka c Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA d Postgraduate Institute of Archaeology, Colombo 07, Sri Lanka e Ichthyology Section, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia f Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA g Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Pseudophilautus comprises an endemic diversification predominantly associated with the wet tropical regions ofSri Ancestral-area reconstruction Lanka that provides an opportunity to examine the effects of geography and historical climate change on diversi- Biogeography fication. Using a time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny, we analyze the tempo of diversification in thecontextof Ecological opportunity past climate and geography to identify historical drivers of current patterns of diversity and distribution. Molecular Diversification dating suggests that the diversification was seeded by migration across a land-bridge connection from India duringa Molecular dating period of climatic cooling and drying, the Oi-1 glacial maximum around the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. Lineage- Speciation through-time plots suggest a gradual and constant rate of diversification, beginning in the Oligocene and extending through the late Miocene and early Pliocene with a slight burst in the Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Anura, Rhacophoridae)
    Zoologica Scripta Patterns of reproductive-mode evolution in Old World tree frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae) MADHAVA MEEGASKUMBURA,GAYANI SENEVIRATHNE,S.D.BIJU,SONALI GARG,SUYAMA MEEGASKUMBURA,ROHAN PETHIYAGODA,JAMES HANKEN &CHRISTOPHER J. SCHNEIDER Submitted: 3 December 2014 Meegaskumbura, M., Senevirathne, G., Biju, S. D., Garg, S., Meegaskumbura, S., Pethiya- Accepted: 7 May 2015 goda, R., Hanken, J., Schneider, C. J. (2015). Patterns of reproductive-mode evolution in doi:10.1111/zsc.12121 Old World tree frogs (Anura, Rhacophoridae). —Zoologica Scripta, 00, 000–000. The Old World tree frogs (Anura: Rhacophoridae), with 387 species, display a remarkable diversity of reproductive modes – aquatic breeding, terrestrial gel nesting, terrestrial foam nesting and terrestrial direct development. The evolution of these modes has until now remained poorly studied in the context of recent phylogenies for the clade. Here, we use newly obtained DNA sequences from three nuclear and two mitochondrial gene fragments, together with previously published sequence data, to generate a well-resolved phylogeny from which we determine major patterns of reproductive-mode evolution. We show that basal rhacophorids have fully aquatic eggs and larvae. Bayesian ancestral-state reconstruc- tions suggest that terrestrial gel-encapsulated eggs, with early stages of larval development completed within the egg outside of water, are an intermediate stage in the evolution of ter- restrial direct development and foam nesting. The ancestral forms of almost all currently recognized genera (except the fully aquatic basal forms) have a high likelihood of being ter- restrial gel nesters. Direct development and foam nesting each appear to have evolved at least twice within Rhacophoridae, suggesting that reproductive modes are labile and may arise multiple times independently.
    [Show full text]
  • Historically, Direct-Developing Frogs of The
    Historically, direct-developing frogs of the genus Eleutherodacylus (Family: Eleutherodactylidae) have been some of the most perplexing and taxonomically challenging amphibians in the New World to investigate. In the following paper, the authors studied these frogs in western Mexico, and conducted a series of morphological, molecular, and vocalization analyses. Their results revealed the existence of six new species. Pictured here is an individual from Ixtlahuacán, Colima, in its natural habitat, one of the species being described. ' © Christoph I. Grünwald 6 Grünwald et al. Six new species of Eleutherodactylus www.mesoamericanherpetology.com www.eaglemountainpublishing.com Version of record: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3EDC9AB7-94EE-4EAC-89B4-19F5218A593A Six new species of Eleutherodactylus (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae: subgenus Syrrhophus) from Mexico, with a discussion of their systematic relationships and the validity of related species CHRISTOPH I. GRÜNWALD1,2,3,6, JACOBO REYES-VELASCO3,4,6, HECTOR FRANZ-CHÁVEZ3,5,6, KAREN I. 3,6 3,5,6 2,3,6 4 MORALES-FLORES , IVÁN T. AHUMADA-CARRILLO , JASON M. JONES , AND STEPHANE BOISSINOT 1Biencom Real Estate, Carretera Chapala - Jocotepec #57-1, C.P. 45920, Ajijic, Jalisco, Mexico. E-mail: [email protected] (Corresponding author) 2Herpetological Conservation International - Mesoamerica Division, 450 Jolina Way, Encinitas, California 92024, United States. 3Biodiversa A. C., Chapala, Jalisco, Mexico. 4New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 5Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Carretera a Nogales Km. 15.5. Las Agujas, Nextipac, Zapopan, C.P. 45110, Jalisco, Mexico. 6Herp.mx A.C., Villa de Alvarez, Colima, Mexico. ABSTRACT: We present an analysis of morphological, molecular, and advertisement call data from sampled populations of Eleutherodactylus (subgenus Syrrhophus) from western Mexico and describe six new spe- cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service 2012 Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae) Christina A. Olson Utah State University, [email protected] Karen H. Beard Utah State University, [email protected] William C. Pitt National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Olson, Christina A.; Beard, Karen H.; and Pitt, William C., "Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae)" (2012). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 1174. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/1174 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae)1 Christina A. Olson,2 Karen H. Beard,2,4 and William C. Pitt 3 Abstract: The greenhouse frog, Eleutherodactylus planirostris, is a direct- developing (i.e., no aquatic stage) frog native to Cuba and the Bahamas. It was introduced to Hawai‘i via nursery plants in the early 1990s and then subsequently from Hawai‘i to Guam in 2003. The greenhouse frog is now widespread on five Hawaiian Islands and Guam.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibia: Anura: Eleutherodactylidae), from Eastern Cuba
    124 SOLENODON 12: 124-135, 2015 Another new cryptic frog related to Eleutherodactylus varleyi Dunn (Amphibia: Anura: Eleutherodactylidae), from eastern Cuba Luis M. DÍAZ* and S. Blair HEDGES** *Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Cuba, Obispo #61, Esquina Oficios, Plaza de Armas, Habana Vieja, CP 10100, Cuba. [email protected] **Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-530, USA. [email protected] ABSTRacT. A new cryptic frog, Eleutherodactylus beguei sp. nov., is described from the pine forests of La Munición, Yateras, Guantánamo Province, Cuba. It is sympatric with E. feichtin- geri, another recently described grass frog closely related to E. varleyi, but differs in morphol- ogy, vocalization and DNA sequences of the mitochondrial Cyt-b gene. One female of the new species was found vocalizing in response to a calling male, a behavior that is still poorly documented in anurans. Same male and female were found in axillary amplexus and sur- rounded by 9 eggs (3.5–3.7 mm in diameter) 5 hours after being isolated in a small container. Key words: Amphibia, Anura, Eleutherodactylidae, Eleutherodactylus, new species, Terrarana, Euhyas, West Indies, Guantánamo, female reciprocation calls, eggs. INtrODUCtION After a recent review of the geographic variation of the Cuban Grass Frog Eleutherodactylus varleyi Dunn, Díaz et al. (2012) described E. feichtingeri, a cryptic species widely distributed in central and eastern Cuba. the two species differ primarily in tympanum size, supratympanic stripe pattern, and advertisement calls. Species recognition was also supported by genetic and cytogenetic data. One of the authors (SBH) conducted DNA sequence analyses that confirmed the existence of two species at La Munición, Humboldt National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Table S1. Temporal, Spectral, and Scaling Variables from Calls Of
    Table S1. Temporal, spectral, and scaling variables from calls of poison frogs including phylogeny identifier (Phy ID), locality, call behavior, habit, temperature, size, number of recordings, multinote call features, units of repetition (UR), initial pulse-note, and middle pulse-note parameters. Analyzed Phy Locality Call Temp SVL (mm) Genus Species Latitude Longitude Habit recordings ID ID Behavior °C N ! SD N of ♂ Allobates algorei 60 El Tama 7.65375 -72.19137 concealed terrestrial 23.50 8 18.90 0.70 3 Allobates brunneus 37 Guimaraes -15.2667 -55.5311 -- terrestrial 26.50 1 16.13 0.00 1 Allobates caeruleodactylus 48 Borba -4.398593 -59.60251 exposed terrestrial 25.60 12 15.50 0.40 1 Allobates crombiei 52 Altamira -3.65 -52.38 concealed terrestrial 24.10 2 18.10 0.04 2 Allobates femoralis 43 ECY -0.633 -76.5 concealed terrestrial 25.60 20 23.58 1.27 6 Allobates femoralis 46 Porongaba -8.67 -72.78 exposed terrestrial 25.00 1 25.38 0.00 1 Allobates femoralis 44 Leticia -4.2153 -69.9406 exposed terrestrial 25.50 1 20.90 0.00 1 Allobates femoralis 40 Albergue -12.8773 -71.3865 exposed terrestrial 26.00 6 21.98 2.18 1 Allobates femoralis 41 CAmazonico -12.6 -70.08 exposed terrestrial 26.00 12 22.43 1.06 4 Allobates femoralis 45 El Palmar 8.333333 -61.66667 concealed terrestrial 24.00 27 25.50 0.76 1 Allobates granti 49 FG 3.62 -53.17 exposed terrestrial 24.60 8 16.15 0.55 1 Allobates humilis 59 San Ramon 8.8678 -70.4861 concealed terrestrial 19.50 -- 21.80 -- 1 Allobates insperatus 54 ECY -0.633 -76.4005 exposed terrestrial 24.60 18 16.64 0.93 7 Allobates aff.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Chemical Defense in Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae): Ecology, Pharmacokinetics, and Autoresistance
    Chapter 21 A Review of Chemical Defense in Poison Frogs (Dendrobatidae): Ecology, Pharmacokinetics, and Autoresistance Juan C. Santos , Rebecca D. Tarvin , and Lauren A. O’Connell 21.1 Introduction Chemical defense has evolved multiple times in nearly every major group of life, from snakes and insects to bacteria and plants (Mebs 2002 ). However, among land vertebrates, chemical defenses are restricted to a few monophyletic groups (i.e., clades). Most of these are amphibians and snakes, but a few rare origins (e.g., Pitohui birds) have stimulated research on acquired chemical defenses (Dumbacher et al. 1992 ). Selective pressures that lead to defense are usually associated with an organ- ism’s limited ability to escape predation or conspicuous behaviors and phenotypes that increase detectability by predators (e.g., diurnality or mating calls) (Speed and Ruxton 2005 ). Defended organisms frequently evolve warning signals to advertise their defense, a phenomenon known as aposematism (Mappes et al. 2005 ). Warning signals such as conspicuous coloration unambiguously inform predators that there will be a substantial cost if they proceed with attack or consumption of the defended prey (Mappes et al. 2005 ). However, aposematism is likely more complex than the simple pairing of signal and defense, encompassing a series of traits (i.e., the apose- matic syndrome) that alter morphology, physiology, and behavior (Mappes and J. C. Santos (*) Department of Zoology, Biodiversity Research Centre , University of British Columbia , #4200-6270 University Blvd , Vancouver , BC , Canada , V6T 1Z4 e-mail: [email protected] R. D. Tarvin University of Texas at Austin , 2415 Speedway Stop C0990 , Austin , TX 78712 , USA e-mail: [email protected] L.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of Amphibian Species Listed in the CITES
    CoP17 Doc. 81.1 Annex 5 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of Amphibian Species listed in the CITES Appendices and the Annexes of EC Regulation 338/97 Species information extracted from FROST, D. R. (2015) "Amphibian Species of the World, an online Reference" V. 6.0 (as of May 2015) Copyright © 1998-2015, Darrel Frost and TheAmericanMuseum of Natural History. All Rights Reserved. Additional comments included by the Nomenclature Specialist of the CITES Animals Committee (indicated by "NC comment") Reproduction for commercial purposes prohibited. CoP17 Doc. 81.1 Annex 5 - p. 1 Amphibian Species covered by this Checklist listed by listed by CITES EC- as well as Family Species Regulation EC 338/97 Regulation only 338/97 ANURA Aromobatidae Allobates femoralis X Aromobatidae Allobates hodli X Aromobatidae Allobates myersi X Aromobatidae Allobates zaparo X Aromobatidae Anomaloglossus rufulus X Bufonidae Altiphrynoides malcolmi X Bufonidae Altiphrynoides osgoodi X Bufonidae Amietophrynus channingi X Bufonidae Amietophrynus superciliaris X Bufonidae Atelopus zeteki X Bufonidae Incilius periglenes X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides asperginis X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides cryptus X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides frontierei X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides laevis X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides laticeps X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides minutus X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides paulae X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides poyntoni X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides pseudotornieri X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides tornieri X Bufonidae Nectophrynoides vestergaardi
    [Show full text]
  • F3999f15-C572-46Ad-Bbbe
    THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (CHAPTER 92A) (Original Enactment: Act 5 of 2006) REVISED EDITION 2008 (1st January 2008) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275) Informal Consolidation – version in force from 22/6/2021 CHAPTER 92A 2008 Ed. Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Appointment of Director-General and authorised officers PART II CONTROL OF IMPORT, EXPORT, ETC., OF SCHEDULED SPECIES 4. Restriction on import, export, etc., of scheduled species 5. Control of scheduled species in transit 6. Defence to offence under section 4 or 5 7. Issue of permit 8. Cancellation of permit PART III ENFORCEMENT POWERS AND PROCEEDINGS 9. Power of inspection 10. Power to investigate and require information 11. Power of entry, search and seizure 12. Powers ancillary to inspections and searches 13. Power to require scheduled species to be marked, etc. 14. Power of arrest 15. Forfeiture 16. Obstruction 17. Penalty for false declarations, etc. 18. General penalty 19. Abetment of offences 20. Offences by bodies corporate, etc. 1 Informal Consolidation – version in force from 22/6/2021 Endangered Species (Import and 2008 Ed. Export) CAP. 92A 2 PART IV MISCELLANEOUS Section 21. Advisory Committee 22. Fees, etc., payable to Board 23. Board not liable for damage caused to goods or property as result of search, etc. 24. Jurisdiction of court, etc. 25. Composition of offences 26. Exemption 27. Service of documents 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Revision of the Ranitomeya Fantastica Species Complex with Description Of
    TERM OF USE This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use. Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website site is prohibited. Zootaxa 1823: 1–24 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Revision of the Ranitomeya fantastica species complex with description of two new species from Central Peru (Anura: Dendrobatidae) JASON L. BROWN1,4, EVAN TWOMEY1,5, MARK PEPPER2 & MANUEL SANCHEZ RODRIGUEZ3 1Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA 2Understory Enterprises, Charing Cross, Ontario, Canada 3Understory Enterprises, Iquitos, Peru 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author. E-mail:[email protected] Abstract We describe two new species of poison frogs (genus Ranitomeya) from the central Rio Huallaga drainage and adjacent Cordillera Azul in central Peru. Both species were previously considered to be members of Ranitomeya fantastica, a spe- cies described from the town of Yurimaguas, Peru. Extensive sampling of putative R. fantastica (including near-topo- typic material) throughout central Peru, and the resulting morphological and phylogenetic analysis has led us to conclude that R. fantastica sensu lato is a complex of three closely related species rather than a single, widely distributed species. The first of these species occurs near the type locality of R. fantastica but bears significant dissimilarity to the original type series and forms a monophyletic clade that is distributed throughout an expansive lowland zone between Rio Huall- aga and Rio Ucayali. This species is diagnosable by its brilliant red head and advertisement call differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Record of the 26Th Meeting of the Animals Committee
    Original language: English AC26 summary record CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Twenty-sixth meeting of the Animals Committee Geneva (Switzerland), 15-20 March 2012 and Dublin (Ireland), 22-24 March 2012 SUMMARY RECORD Animals Committee matters 1. Opening of the meeting The Chair opened the meeting and welcomed all participants, before giving the floor to the Secretary- General, who also welcomed everyone and introduced new members of the Secretariat's scientific team (Mr De Meulenaer and Ms Kwitsinskaia) and enforcement team (Ms Garcia Ferreira, Ms Jonsson and Mr van Rensburg). He wished the Committee well in its deliberations. The Chair thanked the Secretary-General and invited suggestions as to how the Conference of the Parties could establish stronger measures to support the Committee as well as export countries, which deserved particular assistance. No other intervention was made during discussion of this item.1 2. Rules of Procedure The Secretariat introduced document AC26 Doc. 2 and proposed amending Rule 22 as follows: “On request, the Secretariat shall distribute printed and translated documents...”. The Secretariat explained that most members regularly indicated that they did not need printed copies and that this proposal was made to reduce costs. Although not opposed to the change in principle, a Party regretted that the suggestion had not been presented in the document, which would have given Parties time to consider it, and was concerned that this unannounced proposal might create a precedent. Another Party asked a question on the procedure to accept observers, but the Chair invited it to raise this topic under agenda item 4 on Admission of observers.
    [Show full text]