“We Were So Far Away”: Exhibiting Inuit Oral Histories of Residential Schools Heather Igloliorte

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“We Were So Far Away”: Exhibiting Inuit Oral Histories of Residential Schools Heather Igloliorte GSPNUIFCPPL$VSBUJOH%JGGJDVMU,OPXMFEHF7JPMFOU1BTUTJO 1 1VCMJD1MBDFT &EJUFECZ-FISFS .JMUPO1BUUFSTPO “We were so far away”: Exhibiting Inuit Oral Histories of Residential Schools Heather Igloliorte In the spring of 2008, two Inuit residential school Survivors1 from each of the four Inuit geographic territories of Canada—the Inuvialuit settle- ment region, Nunavut, Nunavik, and Nunatsiavut—traveled to Ottawa, Ontario to share their stories for the creation of a national exhibition about the Inuit experience of the residential school system. During the sensitive filmed interviews, the Survivors recounted the impact that residential schools had had on their lives before, during, and after their time as students. Individually, their stories described a range of distinct circumstances, as they attended schools in different times, in different parts of the country, and experienced varying degrees of abuse, trauma, and long-term negative impact. Yet read together, themes emerged that resonated across the stories of all eight of the Survivors, providing invaluable source material around which to build the exhibition. As curator of “We were so far away”: The Inuit Experience of Residential Schools, it was my great honor to conduct these interviews with the eight participants and bear witness to their personal testimonies. It was my responsibility to take care of these stories and the people who shared them with me. Doing so depended on the development of a unique curatorial approach to representing this sensitive knowledge to a particular hierarchy of audiences: residential school Survivors, Inuit communities across the Arctic and Subarctic where the exhibi- tion would tour, and the broader Canadian public. While these eight testimonies became the foundation of the exhibition, we also included historical images from archives across Canada, along with the Survivors’ personal photographs and objects that they felt were important to their memory of residential schools. We hoped that these personal stories, combined with their intimate childhood images, would help make this difficult history more tangible to the general public, and more relatable 23 24 The Inuit Experience of Residential Schools to other Survivors in the North. A year later, at the first opening of the exhibition at Library and Archives Canada, one of those eight Survivors, Carolyn Weetaltuk of Kuujjuarapik, Nunavik, recognized her mother in one of the unlabeled archival photographs of “anonymous” school children, thereby reclaiming a piece of this history for herself. It was a remarkable moment—and it reinforced our conviction that the primary audience for this exhibition was first and foremost Inuit Survivors and their families and communities. For Inuit, none of the archival images were “anonymous,” and every archival photograph held the potential to be personal. The nationally-touring exhibition “We were so far away”: The Inuit Experience of Residential Schools is thus the culmination of a collaborative effort between myself, the Legacy of Hope Foundation (LHF), and the eight courageous Inuit Survivors who shared their stories. The exhibi- tion is intended to supplement, assist, and encourage the many healing initiatives that are already being undertaken in communities across the Canadian North. This chapter explores some of the challenges that arose and the strategies we developed in creating an exhibition with a motive to heal, and a mandate to tour the Arctic. 1.1 The residential school system in Canada, from the 1830s to the 1970s The exhibition was conceived at a significant moment in the history of Canada’s settler/indigenous relations. While the Aboriginal Healing Foundation was formed in 1998 to encourage and support community- based, Aboriginal-directed healing initiatives to address the legacy of residential schools, the history of the residential school system had only very recently come to the attention of Canada’s national media, reaching its greatest exposure in June of 2008 when the Canadian government made its first public apology to First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples.2 Yet still today there is a lack of public comprehension around the federally funded, church-run boarding schools that operated in Canada for more than a century, and this lack of public knowledge and understanding is exacerbated by the exclusion of this history from our educational system, and the unwillingness or inability (until very recently) of Survivors to speak about their experiences in the schools. Simply put, the purpose of residential schools was to assimilate the Aboriginal population into the dominant colonial culture by removing children from the care of their parents and communities and placing them into institutions far from their homes, where they could be taught Heather Igloliorte 25 the Western way of life and corresponding “values.” Based upon the fundamental belief that the colonial culture was superior to that of Aboriginal peoples, the Canadian government and churches adopted the paternalistic goal of “saving” the Aboriginal population from their so-called savage, heathen ways through assimilation and conversion. As John Milloy describes in A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System, 1879–1986, it was believed that this trans- formation could best be accomplished by removing Aboriginal children to off-reserve boarding institutions that would “civilize” the Native pop- ulation and prepare them to participate in the Euro-Canadian economy as industrial laborers or domestic workers, while isolating the children from the interfering influence of Aboriginal parents or communities (Milloy, 1999: 26). In contrast to these idealistic goals, however, and tragically so, the disastrous legacy of the residential school system is most often a story about loss and neglect, abuse and mistreatment. Conditions in the off-reserve boarding schools were usually deplorable as chronic under- funding and gross mismanagement of resources and staff compounded the problems of substandard living conditions, over-crowding, and disease. Aboriginal languages and practices were considered unfit for civilized society, and children were prohibited from speaking their language or practicing their culture, frequently resulting in harsh punishments for minor “offences.” This widespread forced adaptation to English threatened to wipe out the dozens of Aboriginal languages spoken by First Nations, Métis, and Inuit. Many children suffered physi- cal, mental, and sexual abuses, and the legacy of that trauma has been passed on through generations from parent to child.3 As Prime Minister Harper noted in his now famous apology on behalf of Canada to former students of residential schools: For more than a century, Indian Residential Schools separated over 150,000 Aboriginal children from their families and communities. In the 1870s, the federal government, partly in order to meet its obliga- tion to educate Aboriginal children, began to play a role in the devel- opment and administration of these schools. Two primary objectives of the Residential Schools system were to remove and isolate children from the influence of their homes, families, traditions and cultures, and to assimilate them into the dominant culture. These objectives were based on the assumption [sic] Aboriginal cultures and spiritual beliefs were inferior and unequal. Indeed, some sought, as it was infamously said, “to kill the Indian in the child.” Today, we recognize 26 The Inuit Experience of Residential Schools that this policy of assimilation was wrong, has caused great harm, and has no place in our country. (Younging et al., 2009: 357) The LHF, a charitable organization formed in 2000 by the Aboriginal Healing Foundation, was created to educate, raise awareness, and foster understanding about this history of residential schools in Canada. For this exhibition, we hoped to raise that level of awareness to include an appreciation for the Inuit-specific residential school experiences and the legacies that still resonate in Inuit communities today. 1.2 The Inuit-specific experience of residential schools One of our main motivations for highlighting the Inuit experience of residential schools as unique within the broader history of the Canadian residential school system is that for Inuit, the residential school system was but one facet of massive and rapid cultural changes taking place in the first half of the twentieth century. In the few short decades preceding the introduction of the residential school system across the Canadian Arctic and Subarctic, Northern cultural practices had been significantly eroded by the incursion of European culture. While Aboriginal com- munities in southern Canada had undergone several centuries of inten- sifying Western European colonization and missionary involvement since the arrival of Columbus in 1492, Inuit communities, isolated by the harsh Arctic climate and the difficulty of traveling in the North, were relatively unaffected by outside contact until the early twentieth century. Within the span of only a few short decades, however, the pre- contact way of life underwent dramatic changes. One of the first of these tremendous changes was the settlement of Inuit in communities around trading posts for the purpose of becom- ing fur trappers, which often led to the over-hunting of wildlife in the immediate area and an increasing dependence upon preserved food and packaged goods imported from the South. This was soon coupled with a decreasing animal population and an
Recommended publications
  • Center for Performance Studies
    Sarah Bay-Cheng Sarah Bay-Cheng [pronounced Bay-JUNG, rhymes with “sung”] is the Dean of the School of the Arts, Media, Performance and Design at York University in Toronto, Canada. She was formerly Chair and Professor of Theater and Dance at Bowdoin College, teaching theater history and theory, dramatic literature, and intermedia performance. Her research focuses on the intersections among theater, performance, and media including cinema history, social media, and digital technologies in performance. Recent publications include Performance and Media Taxonomies for a Changing Field (2015) and Mapping Intermediality in Performance (2010) as well as essays in Theater, Contemporary Theatre Review, and Theatre Journal, among others. She edits the Palgrave book series, 1 of 4 Avant-Gardes in Performance and is a co-host for On TAP: A Theatre and Performance Studies podcast. Bay- Cheng frequently lectures internationally and in 2015 was a Fulbright Visiting Scholar at Utrecht University in the Netherlands. She has served on the boards of Performance Studies international and the Association for Theatre i Higher Education, and is currently a member of the Executive Committee for the American Society for Theatre Research (ASTR). Bay-Cheng has also worked as a director and dramaturg with particular interest in intermedial collaborations and a fondness for puppetry. Daphne A. Brooks (https://afamstudies.yale.edu/people/daphne- brooks) Daphne A. Brooks is William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor of African American Studies, American Studies, Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies & Music at Yale University. She is the author of two books: Bodies in Dissent: Spectacular Performances of Race and Freedom, 1850-1910 (Durham, NC: Duke UP), winner of The Errol Hill Award for Outstanding Scholarship on African American Performance from ASTR, and Jeff Buckley's Grace (New York: Continuum, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Death and Life for Inuit and Innu
    skin for skin Narrating Native Histories Series editors: K. Tsianina Lomawaima Alcida Rita Ramos Florencia E. Mallon Joanne Rappaport Editorial Advisory Board: Denise Y. Arnold Noenoe K. Silva Charles R. Hale David Wilkins Roberta Hill Juan de Dios Yapita Narrating Native Histories aims to foster a rethinking of the ethical, methodological, and conceptual frameworks within which we locate our work on Native histories and cultures. We seek to create a space for effective and ongoing conversations between North and South, Natives and non- Natives, academics and activists, throughout the Americas and the Pacific region. This series encourages analyses that contribute to an understanding of Native peoples’ relationships with nation- states, including histo- ries of expropriation and exclusion as well as projects for autonomy and sovereignty. We encourage collaborative work that recognizes Native intellectuals, cultural inter- preters, and alternative knowledge producers, as well as projects that question the relationship between orality and literacy. skin for skin DEATH AND LIFE FOR INUIT AND INNU GERALD M. SIDER Duke University Press Durham and London 2014 © 2014 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Heather Hensley Typeset in Arno Pro by Copperline Book Services, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Sider, Gerald M. Skin for skin : death and life for Inuit and Innu / Gerald M. Sider. pages cm—(Narrating Native histories) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978- 0- 8223- 5521- 2 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn 978- 0- 8223- 5536- 6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Naskapi Indians—Newfoundland and Labrador—Labrador— Social conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Heather Igloliorte, Ed. Sakkijâjuk: Art and Craft from Nunatsiavut Charlotte Jones
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 3:16 p.m. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies Heather Igloliorte, ed. SakKijâjuk: Art and Craft from Nunatsiavut Charlotte Jones Volume 33, Number 2, 2018 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1058082ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1058082ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Faculty of Arts, Memorial University ISSN 1719-1726 (print) 1715-1430 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Jones, C. (2018). Review of [Heather Igloliorte, ed. SakKijâjuk: Art and Craft from Nunatsiavut]. Newfoundland and Labrador Studies, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.7202/1058082ar All Rights Reserved ©, 2019 Newfoundland and Labrador Studies This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ book reviews Heather Igloliorte, ed. SakKijâjuk: Art and Craft from Nunatsiavut. Fredericton, NB: Goose Lane Editions, and St. John’s: The Rooms Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador, Provincial Art Gallery Division, 2017. ISBN 978-0-86492-974-7 SakKijâjuk: Art and Craft from Nunatsiavut was published as a cata- logue to accompany the exhibition of the same name at The Rooms Provincial Art Gallery from October 2016 to January 2017 (currently on view at the Art Gallery of Nova Scotia and touring across the country).
    [Show full text]
  • Dare to Be Different!
    TOURISM DESTINATION VISITOR APPEAL ASSESSMENT: LABRADOR REGION Labrador Tourism Destination Visitor Appeal Appraisal Dare to Be Different! Conducted by: Submitted by: Tourism Café Canada & Brain Trust Marketing & Communications (January 2015) TOURISM DESTINATION VISITOR APPEAL ASSESSMENT: LABRADOR REGION Map of Labrador Visitor Region Submitted by: Tourism Café Canada & Brain Trust Marketing & Communications (January 2015). TOURISM DESTINATION VISITOR APPEAL ASSESSMENT: LABRADOR REGION Executive Summary In 2009, the tourism industry and province of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) released their vision to double tourism revenues to $1.58B by 2020. Titled Uncommon Potential: A Vision for Newfoundland and Labrador Tourism (Vision 2020) this document has been a blueprint growth in NL guided by seven strategic directions. Underpinning the vision is respect for home, residents, travellers, communities and profitability. Labrador is an emerging destination that has been described as the ‘last tourism frontier’ to be developed in North America. VISION STATEMENT Newfoundland and Labrador be a leading tourism destination, offering an authentic and exotic experience, through the ‘creativity brand pillars of people, culture and the natural environment’. Uncommon Potential Situated near the iconic Gros Morne National Park and the Viking Trail, which have had decades of investment and collaborative development, comparatively Labrador is in its infancy. As such, for tourism to be key economic driver of growth, building regional pride, and creating employment, it requires significant infrastructure investments such as roads and communications, but also requires building the human resource capacity and the depth, diversity and quality of authentic experiences that attract high- yield residents and non-resident travelers to experience “The Big Land.” Strategic directions #4 was product development aimed at ensuring NL delivers memorable, travel experiences to attract visitors from around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report, 2015-2016
    Image used with permission from Rae Hutton, Design by Lauren Bosc THINKING THROUGH THE MUSEUM: DIFFICULT KNOWLEDGE IN PUBLIC Annual Report SSHRC Partnership Development Grant March 25, 2015 – April 30, 2016 Prepared by Lauren Bosc (Project Coordinator) This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2015-2016 THINKING THROUGH THE MUSEUM page 2 RESEARCH TEAM & ASSISTANTS: The Research Team includes: • Dr. Angela Failler (Project Director, University of Winnipeg) • Dr. Heather Igloliorte (Concordia University) • Dr. Erica Lehrer (Concordia University) • Dr. Monica Patterson (Carleton University) • Lauren Bosc (Project Coordinator, University of Figure 1: Research Team members (L to R): Erica Lehrer, Angela Failler, Winnipeg) Heather Igloliorte, and Monica Patterson. (photo credit: Lauren Bosc) The Research Assistants on this project for the reporting period include: • Michelle K. Barron (MA student, Carleton University) • Sylvia Dreaver (Dueck) (BA Hons. student, University of Winnipeg) • Anna Huard (MA student, University of Winnipeg) • Alexandra Nahwegahbow (PhD student, Carleton University) • Amy Prouty (MA student, Carleton University) • Jordana Starkman (BA student, Concordia University) • Travis Wysote (PhD student, Concordia University) 2015-2016 THINKING THROUGH THE MUSEUM page 3 PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES: Research Meetings/Workshops Inaugural Team Meeting (Winnipeg, August 8-10, 2015) From August 9-12, 2015, the PDG team met in Winnipeg, Manitoba to launch “Thinking Through the Museum: Difficult Knowledge in Public.” The four-day meeting involved collaborators and research assistants, and included a field trip to Shoal Lake 40 First Nation’s Museum of Canadian Human Rights Violations, a visit with curators and researchers at the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, and a visioning session for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Newfoundland & Labrador's
    NEWFOUNDLAND & LABRAdor’s VitalSigns® A province-wide check-up of quality of life in Newfoundland & Labrador communities for 2016. A collaboration between the Community Foundation of Newfoundland & Labrador and Memorial University’s Harris Centre. instead of Corner Brook, Parson’s Pond the 2016 national report explores how Cana- VitalSigns instead of Paradise. dian communities make their members feel So in this year’s report, we’re focusing included and what we can do to build strong on what it means to live in both urban and and lasting relationships with our neigh- BONAvistA rural areas of this province. To dig deep bours. Visit vitalsignscanada.ca to download into the differences between these types the national report. of communities, we’ve enlisted the help of How we as a country understand and Alvin Simms and Jamie Ward, promote belonging is all the more im- whose work on functional portant as we invite new Cana- economic regions gives dians to our shores. On page us a way to break the 14 of this report you’ll province down based find a story of what on population and one region is doing to how far residents make Syrian refugees have to travel for We’re focusing on feel at home and how services. You may what it means to live they see welcoming be surprised to in both urban and new immigrants as an learn where your rural areas of this important investment Welcome. community fits in and province. in the future for rural what other places you parts of the province. have the most in common We would like to From Paul McDonald, Chair, Community Foundation of Newfoundland and Labrador with: your community’s thank TC Media, our media and Rob Greenwood, Executive Director, Harris Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submission to Special Senate Committee on the Arctic by Stephen Borys, Phd, MBA, Director & CEO, Winnipeg Art Gallery November 2018
    Written submission to Special Senate Committee on the Arctic by Stephen Borys, PhD, MBA, Director & CEO, Winnipeg Art Gallery November 2018 The Inuit Art Centre project at the Winnipeg Art Gallery As we build the new Inuit Art Centre at the Winnipeg Art Gallery, I am constantly thinking about – and rethinking – the idea of the museum; not just what it looks like, but how it functions, communicates, and what and who it stands for today. The Winnipeg Art Gallery houses the world’s largest collection of contemporary Inuit art with close to 14,000 carvings, drawings, prints, textiles, and new media. In addition, the Government of Nunavut has placed on long-term loan their entire fine art collection comprising almost 8,000 works. The WAG began collecting Inuit art in the 1950s when this art form was largely unknown in Canada’s south. Supported by an unparalleled record of exhibitions, publications, research, and outreach, this collection represents Inuit identity, culture, and history – and it lies at the heart of the Inuit Art Centre journey. To celebrate the art and to honour the people who have created these Inuit works, the WAG is building an Inuit Art Centre, the first of its kind in the world. This new 40,000 square foot structure, adjacent and connected to the Winnipeg Art Gallery, will be a centre for exhibitions and programs, research and learning, studio practice and artmaking. It will be a bridge, enabling peoples from the North and South to meet, learn, and work together. It will be a gathering place— a community hub for exploration and advancement—with the art serving as a lens on Canada’s Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Committee on the Arctic
    May 3, 2019 Canada Research Coordinating Committee Senate Committee on the Arctic April 3rd Meeting Follow-up May 3, 2019 Canada Research Coordinating Committee SSHRC Materials Senate Committee on the Artic - Follow-up to April 3rd Meeting Materials included: 1. List of programs (new and existing) that are open to Indigenous communities, researchers and not for profits 2. List of research projects/programs funded under circumpolar collaboration 3. Number of northerners and Indigenous northerners on board of governors 4. Copy of the National Dialogue Summary Notes (SSHRC on behalf of the agencies) List of SSHRC programs (new and existing) open to Indigenous communities, researchers and not-for-profits Available Participant Roles Program Sub-program Indigenous Researchers Indigenous Communities Indigenous Not-for-profit Organizations Insight Research Insight grants Applicant (if affiliated with an Professional service providers Professional service providers eligible Canadian postsecondary institution) End-users or any other role other End-users or any other role other Co-Applicant (if affiliated with an than PI or Co-applicant or than PI or Co-applicant or eligible Canadian postsecondary collaborator collaborator institution) Collaborator- no restriction Insight Development grants Applicant (if affiliated with an eligible Canadian postsecondary institution) Co-Applicant (if affiliated with a postsecondary institution) Collaborator- no restriction Research Training and Talent Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Applicant (if undertaking master’s
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia University Detailed Faculty Information
    Concordia University Detailed Faculty Information Year University Year Hired Departed Professor Gender B.A. BA (Country) M.A. MA (Country) Ph.D. Ph.D. (Country) Subfield Specialization Concordia University 1969 2010 Sandra Paikowsky female George William Canada Toronto Canada None CANADIAN Canadian art Concordia University 1970 1996 Donald F. P. Andrus male Toronto Canada Toronto Canada None MODERN modern Concordia University 1970 1996 Ellen James female Penn USA Columbia USA McGill Canada ARCHITECTURE architecture Concordia University 1971 2005 Joan Acland female Carleton Canada Concordia Canada Concordia Canada ARCHITECTURE architecture Concordia University 1975 1982 Gary Walters male Princeton USA Princeton USA Princeton USA MODERN modern/Renaissance Concordia University 1975 2001 Reesa Greenberg female McGill Canada Toronto Canada None MODERN modern Concordia University 1977 1989 Laurier Lacroix male Ottawa Canada Montreal Canada Laval Canada QUEBEC Canadian/Quebec Concordia University 1977 1997 Edwy F. Cooke male Toronto Canada Iowa (mfa) USA None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN Concordia University 1977 1997 Hardy George male Texas USA UCLA USA University of London UK 19TH CENTURY 19th c. European Concordia University 1977 2007 Warren Sanderson male Boston USA Boston USA NYU USA EARLY MODERN Renaissance Concordia University 1978 1980 J. Russell Harper male Toronto Canada Toronto Canada NSCAD Canada CANADIAN Canadian Concordia University 1979 2012 Jean Belisle male Montreal Canada Montreal Canada Paris France ARCHITECTURE Architecture Concordia
    [Show full text]
  • Pilimmaksarniq | Pijariuqsarniq Report 2
    INUIT FUTURES IN ARTS LEADERSHIP: THE PILIMMAKSARNIQ | PIJARIUQSARNIQ PROJECT INAUGURAL EVENT: OCTOBER 16 – 20, 2018 At OCAD University, Toronto, Ontario SSHRC Partnership Development Grant Hosted by Toronto partners; Indigenous Visual Culture at OCAD and Inuit Art Foundation Prepared by Adrienne Huard (Local Project Coordinator) This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Page !1 of !14 INUIT FUTURES IN ARTS LEADERSHIP: THE PILIMMAKSARNIQ | PIJARIUQSARNIQ PROJECT INUIT LEADERSHIP GROUP •Reneltta Arluk (Akpik Theatre) •Alethea Arnaquq-Baril (Unikkaat Studios) •Dr. Heather Igloliorte (Concordia University) •Jessica Kotierk (Nunavut Film Development Corporation) •Taqralik Partridge (Independent Artist) •Jesse Tungilik (Government of Nunavut) PARTNERS •Stephen Borys (Winnipeg Art Gallery) •Sandra Dyck (Carleton University) •Britt Gallpen (Inuit Art Foundation) •Karine Gaucher (La Guilde) •Anna Hudson (York University) •Serena Keshavjee (University of Winnipeg) •Lindsay Lachance (National Arts Centre) •Jason Lewis (Concordia University) •Julie Nagam (University of Winnipeg) •Alysa Procida (Inuit Art Foundation) •Ryan Rice (OCAD University) •Carla Taunton (Nova Scotia College of Art and Design) •Katherine Wolforth (The Rooms Corporation) SECONDARY PARTNERS • RESEARCH ASSISTANTS •Adrienne Huard (OCAD University, MFA student) •Kathryn Florence Math (Concordia University, MA student) •Amanda Shore (Concordia University, MA student) •Emma Steen (Inuit Art Foundation, MA student at OCAD University) Page !2 of !14 INUIT FUTURES IN ARTS LEADERSHIP: THE PILIMMAKSARNIQ | PIJARIUQSARNIQ PROJECT PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES: Preliminary Meeting - Inuit Leadership Group, OCAD University, 12-4pm (Toronto, October 16, 2018) Members from the Inuit Leadership Group gathered to set goals and objectives for the midway point of the grant (Year 4 - 2021-2122). They also discussed certain challenges that may arise and how to monitor and measure the success of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Annual Symposium on the Future Imaginary
    Future Imaginary Symposium Kelowna - Heather Igloliorte Heather Igloliorte (transcript) 2nd Annual Symposium on the Future Imaginary hosted by University of British Columbia Okanagan & Initiative for Indigenous Futures 5 August 2016 Kelowna, British Colombia video available at http://abtec.org/iif/symposia/2nd-annual-symposium-on-the-future-imaginary/ [email protected] 03/02/17 Page 1 of 12 Future Imaginary Symposium Kelowna - Heather Igloliorte [pause] 00:30 Speaker 1: We now have the lovely Heather Igloliorte who will be speaking. She is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Art History at Concordia University where she holds a New Scholar Research Chair in Indigenous Art History and Community Engagement. Heather's research, teaching, and curatorial practices center on native north American visual performance and new media art, the global exhibition of indigenous arts and culture, and issues of colonization, sovereignty and the three Rs, resistance, resilience, and resurgence. I'm really happy to welcome you here today, Heather, and looking... She's always a good speaker. [chuckle] So, I'm looking forward to it. Again. [applause] 01:20 Heather Igloliorte: Another no-pressure introduction. [laughter] Ulaakut, good morning everyone. I won't repeat all the same thanks as acknowledgements as our colleagues have already done. I think they've done a beautiful job. I wasn't sure if I missed the recognition of Ayumi as our organizer and I just wanted to give her a shout out for doing a wonderful job this weekend. [applause] 01:45 HI: My name is Heather Igloliorte. I am Inuit from Nunatsiavut, which is the Inuit region of Labrador, it's in the Eastern Arctic.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Stories: Agency and Identity Through Language Loss
    INSIDE STORIES: AGENCY AND IDENTITY THROUGH LANGUAGE LOSS NARRATIVES IN NUNATSIAVUT by © Martha MacDonald A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Interdisciplinary Program Memorial University of Newfoundland June 2015 ABSTRACT This thesis examines narratives told about language loss in the Inuit territory of Nunatsiavut in Northern Labrador, NL, based on forty-five interviews carried out in 2002/2003 and in 2013/2014. (These are narratives in the folkloristic sense of a text that tells a story.) Language shift in Nunatsiavut has progressed rapidly since the mid- twentieth century until the current population of active speakers is low enough to cause concern about the survival of Inuttitut. The following questions were addressed: what people think caused the decline of the language; what the effect of Inuttitut language retention or shift has been on Labrador Inuit identity; and how these narratives have changed in their character and use over time. Analysis of the interviews and accompanying research on Moravian education, literacy, and the use of narrative revealed that people’s explanations for language loss varied according to their age, and, accordingly, they had different ideas on the importance of Inuttitut retention as a part of Inuit identity. The oldest generation of people interviewed, most of them Inuttitut speakers, identified a combination of circumstances that arose from community decisions, but they retained their feeling that the language was a vital part of identity. The next generation felt that Inuttitut had been removed from their communities through the combined forces of school, church and government, and felt that it was possible to be Inuit without the language, but that it continues to be important.
    [Show full text]