Handbook Resources for Teaching IP Law Western Balkans Turkey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Handbook Resources for Teaching IP Law Western Balkans Turkey REGIONAL PROGRAMME ON INDUSTRIAL AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS AND TURKEY Handbook on Resources for Teaching IP Law in the Western Balkans and Turkey Prepared by Professor Michael Blakeney Queen Mary University of London (November 2010) An EU-funded project managed by DG Enlargement and implemented by the European Patent Offi ce This document has been produced with the fi nancial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to refl ect the offi cial opinion of the European Union. Table of contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................13 2. Teaching of intellectual property ...........................................................................14 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Why do we teach IP? ...................................................................................................................... 14 The changing IP constituency......................................................................................................... 15 What subjects should be taught?.................................................................................................... 16 Interdisciplinarity ............................................................................................................................. 17 What types of intellectual property programmes should be developed? ........................................ 17 What are the basic pedagogical methods?..................................................................................... 18 How should IP be taught?............................................................................................................... 19 Intellectual property faculty ............................................................................................................. 20 With whom can we co-operate in respect to IP teaching? .............................................................. 20 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 21 3. Survey of IP teaching in the Western Balkans and Turkey..................................22 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Albania ............................................................................................................................................ 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina................................................................................................................. 25 Teaching of IP at higher education institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2010 ..........25 Croatia ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Kosovo UNSCR 1244/99 ................................................................................................................ 29 The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia................................................................................ 29 Faculty of Law "Iustinianus Primus", Skopje:......................................................................29 Doctoral studies in Intellectual Property – course programme.................................. 30 Doctoral studies in Information Technology and Law ............................................... 31 Joint Master's degree programme in Intellectual Property........................................ 31 Organisation of the MA programme: ......................................................................... 31 1st semester courses (compulsory): .......................................................................... 31 2nd semester courses (compulsory): ......................................................................... 31 3rd semester courses (elective; students choose 5 courses from the list):................ 31 Other law schools (public and private) offering IP teaching at postgraduate level include: 32 Continuing education in IP law: ..........................................................................................32 Montenegro..................................................................................................................................... 33 Serbia.............................................................................................................................................. 34 Turkey ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Regional IP teaching....................................................................................................................... 37 4. Online teaching resources .....................................................................................38 EPO Academy courses................................................................................................................... 38 Inventor's handbook ...........................................................................................................39 EQE study guide.................................................................................................................39 Patent Litigation in Europe..................................................................................................40 Core modules:........................................................................................................... 40 Sub-modules............................................................................................................. 41 WIPO resources for students.......................................................................................................... 48 Law and legislation ......................................................................................................................... 49 Internet portals ................................................................................................................................ 56 Franklin Pierce Law Center IP Mall ....................................................................................56 Global directory of patent & trademark offices & related agencies & copyright consulting.56 Global directory of international resources .....................................................................................58 IP menu, global intellectual property...................................................................................62 IPRsonline.org ....................................................................................................................62 Resource guide for researching intellectual property law in an international context .........62 Europe's network of patent databases ...............................................................................62 Structure and content................................................................................................ 63 General sites................................................................................................................................... 64 IP newsflash .......................................................................................................................64 Complete world copyright website......................................................................................64 Institut de recherche en propriété intellectuelle ..................................................................64 IP blogs ........................................................................................................................................... 64 Exams ............................................................................................................................................. 64 Dissertations ................................................................................................................................... 64 5. Global directory of intellectual property educational programmes....................65 IP grad programs LLM .................................................................................................................... 65 IP grad programs non-law IP .......................................................................................................... 71 6. Selection of curricula for different courses ..........................................................73 Survey courses ............................................................................................................................... 74 Introduction to intellectual property for undergraduate law students ..................................74 Course description .................................................................................................... 74 Course objectives...................................................................................................... 74 Course status............................................................................................................ 74 Teaching and learning method.................................................................................. 74 Schedule ................................................................................................................... 74 Syllabus....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • State of Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement in Armenia
    State of intellectual property protection and enforcement in Armenia 2020 Supported by Implemented by Table of contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 5 About Editors ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 Contribution of IP system and IP protection to economic growth and development .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Importance of efficient IP system for economic growth and development ............. 13 1.2. Importance of IP protection for national economies ............................................... 15 Chapter 2. Current state of the IP system in Armenia ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Commissions for UNESCO: Annual Report, 2017; 2018
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Annual Report of National Commissions for UNESCO – 2017 – 2017 for UNESCO ReportAnnual of National Commissions Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture | Rapport annuel des Commissions nationales pour l’UNESCO – 2017 pour nationales l’UNESCO Commissions Rapport des annuel National Commissions for UNESCO Commissions nationales www.unesco.org pour l’UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and www.unesco.int Cultural Organization Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture Annual Report | Rapport annuel 2017 Cover photo: © UNESCO Amman office / Christien van den Brink • Place: Amman, Jordan; • Event: A young boy content in his classroom; • People: A student. CLD 681.18 National Commissions for UNESCO Commissions nationales pour l'UNESCO Annual Report | Rapport annuel 2017 The Symbolic Globe situated at UNESCO Headquarters in Paris, France, surrounded by the flags of Member States © UNESCO/Christelle ALIX FOREWORD AVANT-PROPOS National Commissions play a crucial role in shaping public Les Commissions nationales jouent un rôle crucial en perception of UNESCO, raising the Organization’s profile in contribuant à façonner la perception de l'UNESCO auprès Member States, and mobilizing educational, scientific and du public, à accroître la visibilité de l'Organisation au sein artistic communities. des États membres et à mobiliser les communautés éducatives, scientifiques et artistiques. The Annual Report of National Commissions for UNESCO is an important tool for sharing information and best practices Le Rapport annuel des Commissions nationales pour l'UNESCO, among National Commissions, highlighting their successes, est un outil important pour le partage d'informations et de achievements and challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group
    Annex 1 E PCT/WG/11/27 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: JANUARY 11, 2019 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group Eleventh Session Geneva, June 18 to 22, 2018 REPORT adopted by the Working Group 1. The Patent Cooperation Treaty Working Group held its eleventh session in Geneva from June 18 to 22, 2018. 2. The following members of the Working Group were represented at the session: (i) the following Member States of the International Patent Cooperation Union (PCT Union): Algeria, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lithuania, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam, Zimbabwe (69); and (ii) the following intergovernmental organizations: the European Patent Office (EPO), the Nordic Patent Institute (NPI), and the Visegrad Patent Institute (VPI) (3). 3. The following Member States of the International Union for the Protection of Industrial Property (Paris Union) participated in the session as an observer: Mauritius, Yemen (2). 4. The following intergovernmental organizations were represented by observers: African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), African Union (AU), Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), European Union (EU), Patent Office of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC Patent Office), South Centre (7).
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Harmonisation and Utilisation: First Europe and Then the World?
    Patent Harmonisation and Utilisation: First Europe and Then the World? Dr Mark Weaver 3 December 2009 Director Practice & Procedure Utilisation and Harmonisation - Drivers Challenges • Worldwide Patent Application Backlogs - Millions • Duplication of Work • Increased Costs • Lack of Consistency • Increased Legal Uncertainty Possible Solutions • Utilisation and Work Sharing • New Bilateral or Multi-Lateral Agreements • Improve on Existing Work Sharing Agreements • Substantive Patent Law Harmonisation • Simplified Language Requirements First Europe ... European Patent Landscape EPO - 36 Member States Unified Patent Litigation System Austria • Belgium • Bulgaria • Croatia • UPLS Cyprus • Czech Republic • Denmark • Estonia • Finland • France • Germany • Greece • Hungary • Iceland • Ireland • Italy • Latvia • Liechtenstein • Lithuania • Luxembourg • Former Yugoslav Republic of European and Macedonia • Malta • Monaco • Netherlands • Community Norway • Poland • Portugal • Romania • Community San Marino • Slovakia • Slovenia • Spain • Patents Court Patent Sweden • Switzerland • Turkey • United Kingdom ECPC European patent applications and patents can European also be extended at the applicant's request to Enhanced Patent Network the following states: Partnership Albania • Bosnia-Herzegovina • Serbia EPN Status: December 2009 European Patent Landscape • Unified Patent Litigation System • Draft Council Conclusions on an enhanced patent system in Europe http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st14/st14040.en09.pdf • Draft Council Agreement
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Kazakhstan
    DOING BUSINESS 2021 IN KAZAKHSTAN Doing Business in Kazakhstan 2021 Baker McKenzie – CIS, Limited Almaty office Samal Towers, 8th Floor 97 Zholdasbekov Street Almaty, Kazakhstan 050051 Phone: +7 727 3 300 500 Facsimile: +7 727 258 40 00 [email protected] www.bakermckenzie.com The information in this brochure is for informational purposes only and it may not reflect the most current legal developments, judgments or settlements. This information is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The Firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything and in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of Baker McKenzie’s “Doing Business in Kazakhstan” brochure. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this brochure without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances. Doing Business in Kazakhstan Table of Contents 1 Kazakhstan — an overview ..................................................... 1 1.1 Geography .................................................................... 1 1.2 Population .................................................................... 1 1.3 History.......................................................................... 1 1.4 Government and political system ................................. 2 1.5 Economy .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Patent Cooperation
    TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13-1218.1 ________________________________________________________________________ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Patent Cooperation Treaty Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and OTHER GOVERNMENTS Adopted at Geneva June 1, 2000 with Amended Schedule Adopted May 15, 2008 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” MULTILATERAL Intellectual Property: Patent Cooperation Treaty adopted at Geneva June 1, 2000; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate September 5, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-12, 109th Congress, 2d Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations September 11, 2007 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-6, 110th Congress, 1st Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate December 7, 2007; Ratified by the President May 6, 2008; Ratification deposited September 18, 2013; Entered into force December 18, 2013. With Amended Schedule adopted May 15, 2008. PATENT LAw TREATY (PLT) PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT) and REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY Done at Geneva on June 1, 2000 and EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY and THE REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY 2 NOTE: This page appears to be intentionally blank, except for page number.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralization Process in Republic of Macedonia, Main Issues, Trends
    International Conference DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MAIN ISSUES, TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FUTURE January, 25th 2013 South East European University –Tetovo January, 26th 2013 Institute of Spiritual and Cultural Heritage of the Albanians – Skopje, Macedonia ORGANIZED BY INSTITUTE FOR POLITICAL AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES – SKOPJE www.ispn.org.mk 1 International Scientific Conference “DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MAIN ISSUES, TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FUTURE” PROGRAM AND ABSTRACT BOOK JANUARY, 25th 2013 South East European University –Tetovo, Macedonia JANUARY, 26th 2013 Institute of Spiritual and Cultural Heritage of the Albanians – Skopje, Macedonia www.ispn.org.mk 2 CONTENTS About IPIS…………………………………………………………………………….....4 IPIS Scientific Committee……………………………………………………………...5 IPIS Organizing Committee…………………………………………………………....6 Motivation…………….………………………………………………………………….8 Conference Program…………………………………………………………………...9 Abstract Book…………………………………………………………………………..15 Directory of participants……………………………………………………………….47 3 The Institute for Political and International Studies (IPIS) is an independent, non-partisan, non-governmental and non-profit, think-tank organization. It has been created by a group of intellectuals and analysts with extensive experience in foreign policy and policy-making issues who are interested in ideas of democracy, solidarity, globalization, European integration, political and international studies and regional cooperation. The long term objectives of the institute are to work on balanced socio- economic development, capacity building and training, active citizen engagement and participative political environments. In these directions we focus our activities on rule of law, evidence based policy research, good governance and multi-ethnic and multicultural co-existence. Our Institute for Political and International Studies (IPIS) works primarily on stoichiometric research and project-based activities. We believe that human capital is a key precondition for positive social change.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2017 RESETTLEMENT ACTION
    C ONSULTANT: RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROTECTION DYKE IN THE CITY OF BIJELJINA UNDER THE DRINA FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT IN BIH FOR STAGE 3 OF SECTION 2 IN A LENGTH OF L=3.47 KM Civil Engineering Institut(FROM THEe CHAINAGEIG LLC 9+851.71, Banja ENDING Luka AT THE CHAINAGE 13+316.83) Kralja Petra I Karađeorđevića 92-98 78000 Banja Luka 00 387 51 348 360 SFG3906 v3 00 387 51 348 372 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED FOR : RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FORESTRY AND WATER PROTECTION DYKE IN THE CITY MANAGEMENT OF THE OF BIJELJINA UNDER THE DRINA REPUBLIKA SRPSKA AGRICULTURE PROJECT FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT COORDINATION UNIT IN BIH Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized STAGE 3 OF SECTION 2 L=3.47 KM (FROM THE CHAINAGE 9+851.71, ENDING AT THE CHAINAGE 13+316.83) October 2017 1 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROTECTION DYKE IN THE CITY OF BIJELJINA UNDER THE DRINA FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT IN BIH FOR STAGE 3 OF SECTION 2 IN A LENGTH OF L=3.47 KM (FROM THE CHAINAGE 9+851.71, ENDING AT THE CHAINAGE 13+316.83) RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROTECTION DYKE IN THE CITY OF SUBJECT BIJELJINA UNDER THE DRINA FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECT IN BIH FOR STAGE 3 OF SECTION 2 IN A LENGTH OF L=3.47 KM (FROM THE CHAINAGE 9+851.71, ENDING AT THE CHAINAGE 13+316.83) Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of the Republika CLIENT Srpska / Agriculture Project Coordination Unit CONSULTANT Civil Engineering Institute "IG" LLC Banja Luka PROTOCOL NUMBER IZ-IGBL-IN-EK – 2882/17 Nebojša Knežević, PhD Technology Saša Dunović, MSc Technology Siniša Cukut, Msc Technology Velibor Komlenić, grad.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Advocate… ………… … 291
    REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA PEOPLE’S ADVOCATE ANNUAL REPORT On the activity of the People’s Advocate 1st January – 31stDecember 2013 Tirana, February 2014 REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA ANNUAL REPORT On the activity of the People’s Advocate 1st January – 31st December 2013 Tirana, February 2014 On the Activity of People’s Advocate ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Honorable Mr. Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Albania, Honorable Members of the Assembly, Ne mbeshtetje te nenit 63, paragrafi 1 i Kushtetutes se republikes se Shqiperise dhe nenit26 te Ligjit N0.8454, te Avokatit te Popullit, date 04.02.1999 i ndryshuar me ligjin Nr. 8600, date10.04.200 dhe Ligjit nr. 9398, date 12.05.2005, Kam nderin qe ne emer te Institucionit te Avokatit te Popullit, tj’u paraqes Raportin per veprimtarine e Avokatit te Popullit gjate vitit 2013. Pursuant “ to Article 63, paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and Article 26 of Law No. 8454, dated 04.02.1999 “On People’s Advocate”, as amended by Law No. 8600, dated 10.04.2000 and Law No. 9398, dated 12.05.2005, I have the honor, on behalf of the People's Advocate Institution, to submit this report on the activity of People's Advocate for 2013. On the Activity of People’s Advocate Sincerely, PEOPLE’S ADVOCATE Igli TOTOZANI ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Table of Content Prezantim i Raportit Vjetor 2013 8 kreu I: 1Opinione dhe rekomandime mbi situaten e te drejtave te njeriut ne Shqiperi …9 2) permbledhje e Raporteve te vecanta drejtuar Parlamentit te Republikes se Shqiperise.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Tirana Municipality TIRANA TRAMWAY PROJECT
    Tirana Municipality TIRANA TRAMWAY PROJECT February 2012 Çamlıca / İSTANBUL CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 0 1. LOCATION OF ALBANIA .................................................................................. 0 2. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY BETWEEN 1990 – 2005 .................... 2 3. LOCATION OF TRAMLINES ON STRATEGIC PLAN 2017 OF TIRANA. 4 4. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ................................................................................ 7 5. SENSIBILITY ANALYSIS ................................................................................. 11 6. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................... 12 TABLE LIST Page Table 1 : Historical Population of Tirana. ................................................................... 3 Table 2 : Basic operation parameters .......................................................................... 8 Table 3 : Investment Breakdown for 1st Alternative (with new trains) ....................... 9 Table 4 : Investment Breakdown for 2nd Alternative (with second hand trains) ....... 10 Table 5 : Credit Summary ......................................................................................... 10 Table 6 : Credit Payment Breakdown (with new trains) ............................................... Table 7 : Credit Payment Breakdown (with second hand trains) .................................. Table 8 : Internat rate of
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings
    Conference proceedings ICSNS XV - 2021 FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON: “SOCIAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES – GLOBAL CHALLENGE 2021” 16 June Brussels Organized by International Institute for Private- Commercial- and Competition Law (Austria) in Partnership with Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences (Germany), Keiser University (USA), Institute of History and Political Science of the University of Białystok (Poland) and School of American Law (Greece) Book of proceedings FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON: “SOCIAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES – GLOBAL CHALLENGE 2021” (ICSNS XV-2021) Brussels, 16 June 2021 Organized by International Institute for Private- Commercial- and Competition Law (Austria) in Partnership with Institute of History and Political Science of the University of Białystok (Poland-EU), Keiser University (USA), Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences (Germany), School of American Law (Greece) Edited by: Dr. Lena Hoffman 1 International Scientific Committee ICBLAS III-2015 ICBLASICSNS(ICSNSICIS V- IVXII-2021) I- 2016 -2017 2016 Prof. Dr. Helmut Flachenecker, Universität Wuerzburg (Germany) Prof. Dr. John Rowley Gillingham, University of Missouri (USA) Prof. Dr. Jürgen Wolfbauer, Montanuniversitaet Leoben (Austria) Prof. Dr. Jürgen Wolfb auer, Montanuniversität Leoben (Austria) Prof.Prof. Dr. Dr. John H. Rowley Ekkehard Gillingham, Wolff , Universität University Leipzigof Missouri (Germany) (USA) Prof.Prof. Em. Dr. LinditaDr. Karl Milo Otwin (Lati) Becker,, University Universität of Tirana Graz (Albania) (Austria) TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Edlira Jorgaqi
    EDLIRA JORGAQI PERSONAL INFORMATION Date & Place of birth: October 15th 1970/ Tirana Residence: Tirana Civil status: Married e-mail [email protected] Mobile 0692041882 _________________________________________________________________________ Education: 1992 – 1993 Faculty of Law, University of Trento – Italy (TEMPUS), for four exams: Commercial Law, European Community Public Law, European Community Private Law, Public International Law 1989-1993 Faculty of Law, University of Tirana, title “LAWYER” 1985 – 1989 “Petro Nini Luarasi” General High School, Tirana Certificates and qualifications: The title “DOCTOR OF SCIENCES” at the Faculty of Law of the University of Tirana with the topic "Criminal Judicial Statistics, Measurement of Crime in Albania and Comparison with European and International Standards", rated 98 points out of 100 possible. Master's Degree (Master of Science of Second Level) at the Faculty of Law of the University of Tirana, with the topic "Criminal Judicial Statistics and Measurement of Crime in Albania", assessed with a maximum grade and with average marks for exams of subjects of 9,9. The title “Advocate” by the National Chamber of Advocacy. March-May 1995 Specialization on “Democracy and Human Rights”, University of Padova, Department of International Law, Italy May- June 1995 “Enterprises and Investment Lawyers Course”, specialization organized by IDLI - Roma (International Development Law Institute) Faburary – May 1998 3- Months Specialization on “Development Lawyers Course” (counseling, negotiation, legal writing
    [Show full text]