RESTRICTED WT/TPR/S/390 11 June 2019 (19-3978)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RESTRICTED WT/TPR/S/390 11 June 2019 (19-3978) RESTRICTED WT/TPR/S/390 11 June 2019 (19-3978) Page: 1/127 Trade Policy Review Body TRADE POLICY REVIEW REPORT BY THE SECRETARIAT THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA This report, prepared for the second Trade Policy Review of the Republic of North Macedonia, has been drawn up by the WTO Secretariat on its own responsibility. The Secretariat has, as required by the Agreement establishing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization), sought clarification from the Republic of North Macedonia on its trade policies and practices. Any technical questions arising from this report may be addressed to Mr. Mark Koulen (tel: 022 739 5224); Ms. Martha Lara Fernandez (tel: 022 739 6033); and Mr. Pierre Latrille (tel: 022 739 5266). Document WT/TPR/G/390 contains the policy statement submitted by the Republic of North Macedonia. Note: This report is subject to restricted circulation and press embargo until the end of the first session of the meeting of the Trade Policy Review Body on the Republic of North Macedonia. This report was drafted in English. WT/TPR/S/390 • The Republic of North Macedonia - 2 - CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 7 1 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................ 13 1.1 Main Features of the Economy .....................................................................................13 1.2 Recent Economic Developments ...................................................................................13 1.2.1 Monetary and exchange rate policy ............................................................................16 1.2.2 Fiscal policy ............................................................................................................16 1.2.3 Structural issues ......................................................................................................16 1.2.3.1 Tax and public financial management reform ............................................................17 1.2.3.2 Labour market ......................................................................................................17 1.2.3.3 Business environment ...........................................................................................17 1.2.4 Balance of payments ................................................................................................18 1.3 Developments in Trade and Investment ........................................................................20 1.3.1 Trends and patterns in merchandise trade ..................................................................20 1.3.2 Trends and patterns in FDI .......................................................................................23 2 TRADE AND INVESTMENT REGIMES........................................................................... 24 2.1 General Framework ....................................................................................................24 2.2 Trade Policy Formulation and Objectives ........................................................................24 2.3 Trade Agreements and Arrangements ...........................................................................25 2.3.1 WTO ......................................................................................................................25 2.3.2 Regional and preferential agreements ........................................................................26 Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) with the European Union .....................27 2.3.2.2 Free Trade Agreement with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) .....................28 2.3.2.3 The Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA) ...............................................28 2.3.2.4 Free Trade Agreement with Turkey .........................................................................29 2.3.2.5 Free Trade Agreement with Ukraine ........................................................................29 2.3.3 Other agreements and arrangements .........................................................................29 2.4 Investment Regime ....................................................................................................30 3 TRADE POLICIES AND PRACTICES BY MEASURE ........................................................ 33 3.1 Measures Directly Affecting Imports ..............................................................................33 3.1.1 Customs procedures, valuation, and requirements .......................................................33 3.1.1.1 Customs procedures and requirements ....................................................................33 3.1.1.2 Customs valuation ................................................................................................35 3.1.1.3 Pre-shipment inspection ........................................................................................36 3.1.1.4 Special customs regimes ........................................................................................36 3.1.2 Rules of origin .........................................................................................................37 3.1.3 Tariffs ....................................................................................................................38 3.1.3.1 Tariff rate quotas ..................................................................................................41 3.1.3.2 WTO bindings .......................................................................................................42 3.1.3.3 Preferential tariffs .................................................................................................43 WT/TPR/S/390 • The Republic of North Macedonia - 3 - 3.1.4 Other charges affecting imports .................................................................................44 3.1.5 Import prohibitions, restrictions, and licensing ............................................................44 3.1.6 Anti-dumping, countervailing, and safeguard measures ................................................45 3.2 Measures Directly Affecting Exports ..............................................................................46 3.2.1 Customs procedures and requirements .......................................................................46 3.2.2 Taxes, charges, and levies ........................................................................................46 3.2.3 Export prohibitions, restrictions, and licensing .............................................................46 3.2.4 Export support and promotion ...................................................................................46 3.2.5 Export finance, insurance, and guarantees ..................................................................48 3.3 Measures Affecting Production and Trade .......................................................................49 3.3.1 Taxation .................................................................................................................49 3.3.2 Incentives ...............................................................................................................50 3.3.3 Standards and other technical requirements ...............................................................53 3.3.4 Sanitary and phytosanitary measures .........................................................................55 3.3.4.1 Sanitary regulations ..............................................................................................57 3.3.4.2 Veterinary regulations ...........................................................................................57 3.3.4.3 Phytosanitary regulations .......................................................................................58 3.3.5 Competition policy, state aid and price controls ...........................................................60 3.3.5.1 Competition policy ................................................................................................60 3.3.5.2 State aid ..............................................................................................................62 3.3.5.3 Price controls........................................................................................................63 3.3.6 State trading, state-owned enterprises, and privatization .............................................63 3.3.7 Government procurement .........................................................................................64 3.3.8 Intellectual property rights ........................................................................................70 4 TRADE POLICIES BY SECTOR ..................................................................................... 75 4.1 Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries ...............................................................................75 4.1.1 Features and market development .............................................................................75 4.1.2 Policy objectives and administration ...........................................................................79 4.1.3 Policy instruments ...................................................................................................81 4.1.3.1 Border measures ..................................................................................................81 4.1.3.1.1 Measures affecting imports ..................................................................................81
Recommended publications
  • TV Channel Distribution in Europe: Table of Contents
    TV Channel Distribution in Europe: Table of Contents This report covers 238 international channels/networks across 152 major operators in 34 EMEA countries. From the total, 67 channels (28%) transmit in high definition (HD). The report shows the reader which international channels are carried by which operator – and which tier or package the channel appears on. The report allows for easy comparison between operators, revealing the gaps and showing the different tiers on different operators that a channel appears on. Published in September 2012, this 168-page electronically-delivered report comes in two parts: A 128-page PDF giving an executive summary, comparison tables and country-by-country detail. A 40-page excel workbook allowing you to manipulate the data between countries and by channel. Countries and operators covered: Country Operator Albania Digitalb DTT; Digitalb Satellite; Tring TV DTT; Tring TV Satellite Austria A1/Telekom Austria; Austriasat; Liwest; Salzburg; UPC; Sky Belgium Belgacom; Numericable; Telenet; VOO; Telesat; TV Vlaanderen Bulgaria Blizoo; Bulsatcom; Satellite BG; Vivacom Croatia Bnet Cable; Bnet Satellite Total TV; Digi TV; Max TV/T-HT Czech Rep CS Link; Digi TV; freeSAT (formerly UPC Direct); O2; Skylink; UPC Cable Denmark Boxer; Canal Digital; Stofa; TDC; Viasat; You See Estonia Elion nutitv; Starman; ZUUMtv; Viasat Finland Canal Digital; DNA Welho; Elisa; Plus TV; Sonera; Viasat Satellite France Bouygues Telecom; CanalSat; Numericable; Orange DSL & fiber; SFR; TNT Sat Germany Deutsche Telekom; HD+; Kabel
    [Show full text]
  • State of Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement in Armenia
    State of intellectual property protection and enforcement in Armenia 2020 Supported by Implemented by Table of contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 5 About Editors ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 Contribution of IP system and IP protection to economic growth and development .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Importance of efficient IP system for economic growth and development ............. 13 1.2. Importance of IP protection for national economies ............................................... 15 Chapter 2. Current state of the IP system in Armenia ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UHD Content on Live TV
    Channel Overview Presentation UHD Content on Live TV We are covering the world with SPI is a leader in content distribution, movie channels, thematic channels entertainment and online media business. All you wanted to know about SPI and you were afraid to ask 21 FILM CHANNELS 11 WORLDWIDE THEMATIC CHANNELS 63 FEEDS 14 LANGUAGES 35+ CUMULATIVE mln SUBSCRIBERS For more than 20 years, SPI International has been a leading distributor of theatrical movies and television programming on the international market. SPI has strong alliances with producers such as Miramax, NBC Universal, Studio Canal, Pathé, Summit, Lakeshore and many others. These alliances have resulted in SPI establishing its leading position on the video and VOD segments of the market. SPI’s current catalogue consists of over 3000 movies and series. Over the last 8 years, in order to become a fully vertically integrated media company, SPI has developed local film channels. SPI has also invested in channel acquisition, film production, internet build up and hardware sales. SPI channels are delivered via cable and satellite (Astra, Thor and Eutelsat) and are available through all major platforms: Skylink, Digi, Blizoo, Total TV, Hello HD, UPC Direct, nc+, Cyfrowy Polsat, Freebox, Orange TV and many others. SPI INTERNATIONAL CHANNELS SPI all around the world USA TURKEY ISRAEL POLAND czech/sk ROMANIA HUNGARY germany France Switzerland PORTUGAl SPI all around the world Bosnia Lithuania Ukraine BULGARIA Serbia Croatia SLOVENIA Montenegro Macedonia albania and Herzegovina SPI all around the world Scandinavia UK LATAM brasil west africa east africa south africa Australia SPI’s high quality approach to 4k SPI is guaranteeing the highest picture quality and a clear focus on native 4K content.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group
    Annex 1 E PCT/WG/11/27 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: JANUARY 11, 2019 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group Eleventh Session Geneva, June 18 to 22, 2018 REPORT adopted by the Working Group 1. The Patent Cooperation Treaty Working Group held its eleventh session in Geneva from June 18 to 22, 2018. 2. The following members of the Working Group were represented at the session: (i) the following Member States of the International Patent Cooperation Union (PCT Union): Algeria, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lithuania, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam, Zimbabwe (69); and (ii) the following intergovernmental organizations: the European Patent Office (EPO), the Nordic Patent Institute (NPI), and the Visegrad Patent Institute (VPI) (3). 3. The following Member States of the International Union for the Protection of Industrial Property (Paris Union) participated in the session as an observer: Mauritius, Yemen (2). 4. The following intergovernmental organizations were represented by observers: African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), African Union (AU), Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), European Union (EU), Patent Office of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC Patent Office), South Centre (7).
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Harmonisation and Utilisation: First Europe and Then the World?
    Patent Harmonisation and Utilisation: First Europe and Then the World? Dr Mark Weaver 3 December 2009 Director Practice & Procedure Utilisation and Harmonisation - Drivers Challenges • Worldwide Patent Application Backlogs - Millions • Duplication of Work • Increased Costs • Lack of Consistency • Increased Legal Uncertainty Possible Solutions • Utilisation and Work Sharing • New Bilateral or Multi-Lateral Agreements • Improve on Existing Work Sharing Agreements • Substantive Patent Law Harmonisation • Simplified Language Requirements First Europe ... European Patent Landscape EPO - 36 Member States Unified Patent Litigation System Austria • Belgium • Bulgaria • Croatia • UPLS Cyprus • Czech Republic • Denmark • Estonia • Finland • France • Germany • Greece • Hungary • Iceland • Ireland • Italy • Latvia • Liechtenstein • Lithuania • Luxembourg • Former Yugoslav Republic of European and Macedonia • Malta • Monaco • Netherlands • Community Norway • Poland • Portugal • Romania • Community San Marino • Slovakia • Slovenia • Spain • Patents Court Patent Sweden • Switzerland • Turkey • United Kingdom ECPC European patent applications and patents can European also be extended at the applicant's request to Enhanced Patent Network the following states: Partnership Albania • Bosnia-Herzegovina • Serbia EPN Status: December 2009 European Patent Landscape • Unified Patent Litigation System • Draft Council Conclusions on an enhanced patent system in Europe http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st14/st14040.en09.pdf • Draft Council Agreement
    [Show full text]
  • Global Pay TV Operator Forecasts
    Global Pay TV Operator Forecasts Table of Contents Published in October 2016, this 190-page electronically-delivered report comes in two parts: A 190-page PDF giving a global executive summary and forecasts. An excel workbook giving comparison tables and country-by-country forecasts in detail for 400 operators with 585 platforms [125 digital cable, 112 analog cable, 208 satellite, 109 IPTV and 31 DTT] across 100 territories for every year from 2010 to 2021. Forecasts (2010-2021) contain the following detail for each country: By country: TV households Digital cable subs Analog cable subs Pay IPTV subscribers Pay digital satellite TV subs Pay DTT homes Total pay TV subscribers Pay TV revenues By operator (and by platform by operator): Pay TV subscribers Share of pay TV subscribers by operator Subscription & VOD revenues Share of pay TV revenues by operator ARPU Countries and operators covered: Country No of ops Operators Algeria 4 beIN, OSN, ART, Algerie Telecom Angola 5 ZAP TV, DStv, Canal Plus, Angola Telecom, TV Cabo Argentina 3 Cablevision; Supercanal; DirecTV Australia 1 Foxtel Austria 3 Telekom Austria; UPC; Sky Bahrain 4 beIN, OSN, ART, Batelco Belarus 2 MTIS, Zala Belgium 5 Belgacom; Numericable; Telenet; VOO; Telesat/TV Vlaanderen Bolivia 3 DirecTV, Tigo, Entel Bosnia 3 Telemach, M:Tel; Total TV Brazil 5 Claro; GVT; Vivo; Sky; Oi Bulgaria 5 Blizoo, Bulsatcom, Vivacom, M:Tel, Mobitel Canada 9 Rogers Cable; Videotron; Cogeco; Shaw Communications; Shaw Direct; Bell TV; Telus TV; MTS; Max TV Chile 6 VTR; Telefonica; Claro; DirecTV;
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Kazakhstan
    DOING BUSINESS 2021 IN KAZAKHSTAN Doing Business in Kazakhstan 2021 Baker McKenzie – CIS, Limited Almaty office Samal Towers, 8th Floor 97 Zholdasbekov Street Almaty, Kazakhstan 050051 Phone: +7 727 3 300 500 Facsimile: +7 727 258 40 00 [email protected] www.bakermckenzie.com The information in this brochure is for informational purposes only and it may not reflect the most current legal developments, judgments or settlements. This information is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The Firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything and in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of Baker McKenzie’s “Doing Business in Kazakhstan” brochure. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in this brochure without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances. Doing Business in Kazakhstan Table of Contents 1 Kazakhstan — an overview ..................................................... 1 1.1 Geography .................................................................... 1 1.2 Population .................................................................... 1 1.3 History.......................................................................... 1 1.4 Government and political system ................................. 2 1.5 Economy .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Patent Cooperation
    TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13-1218.1 ________________________________________________________________________ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Patent Cooperation Treaty Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and OTHER GOVERNMENTS Adopted at Geneva June 1, 2000 with Amended Schedule Adopted May 15, 2008 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” MULTILATERAL Intellectual Property: Patent Cooperation Treaty adopted at Geneva June 1, 2000; Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate September 5, 2006 (Treaty Doc. 109-12, 109th Congress, 2d Session); Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations September 11, 2007 (Senate Executive Report No. 110-6, 110th Congress, 1st Session); Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate December 7, 2007; Ratified by the President May 6, 2008; Ratification deposited September 18, 2013; Entered into force December 18, 2013. With Amended Schedule adopted May 15, 2008. PATENT LAw TREATY (PLT) PATENT LAW TREATY (PLT) and REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY Done at Geneva on June 1, 2000 and EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE PATENT LAW TREATY and THE REGULATIONS UNDER THE PATENT LAW TREATY 2 NOTE: This page appears to be intentionally blank, except for page number.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero-Rating Practices in Broadband Markets
    Zero-rating practices in broadband markets Report by Competition EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Competition E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels [Cataloguenumber] Zero-rating practices in broadband markets Final report February 2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Les informations et opinions exprimées dans ce rapport sont ceux de(s) l'auteur(s) et ne reflètent pas nécessairement l'opinion officielle de la Commission. La Commission ne garantit pas l’exactitude des informations comprises dans ce rapport. La Commission, ainsi que toute personne agissant pour le compte de celle-ci, ne saurait en aucun cas être tenue responsable de l’utilisation des informations contenues dans ce rapport. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 Catalogue number: KD-02-17-687-EN-N ISBN 978-92-79-69466-0 doi: 10.2763/002126 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 121
    Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 121 Investment in Bulgaria 2018 KPMG in Bulgaria kpmg.com/bg © 2018 KPMG Bulgaria EOOD, a Bulgarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Investment in Bulgaria Edition 2018 Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 3 Preface Investment in Bulgaria is one of a series of booklets published by firms within the KPMG network to provide information to those considering investing or doing business internationally. Every care has been taken to ensure that the information presented in this publication is correct and reflects the situation as of April 2018 unless otherwise stated. Its purpose is to provide general guidelines on investment and business in Bulgaria. As the economic situation is undergoing rapid change, further advice should be sought before making any specific decisions. For further information on matters discussed in this publication, please contact Gergana Mantarkova, Managing Partner. KPMG in Bulgaria Sofia Varna 45/A Bulgaria Boulevard 3 Sofia Street, floor 2 1404 Sofia 9000 Varna Bulgaria Bulgaria Tel: +359 2 96 97 300 Tel: +359 52 699 650 Fax: +359 2 96 97 878 Fax: +359 52 611 502 [email protected] kpmg.com/bg © 2018 KPMG Bulgaria EOOD, a Bulgarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 070340/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt Am 23/06/15
    070340/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt am 23/06/15 Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 June 2015 (OR. en) 10217/15 TELECOM 151 AUDIO 17 COMPET 316 MI 414 DATAPROTECT 108 COVER NOTE From: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 19 June 2015 To: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union No. Cion doc.: SWD(2015) 126 final Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communication - 2015 Delegations will find attached document SWD(2015) 126 final. Encl.: SWD(2015) 126 final 10217/15 DG E2B EN www.parlament.gv.at EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.6.2015 SWD(2015) 126 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communication - 2015 EN EN www.parlament.gv.at Table of Contents 1. MARKET OVERVIEW ........................................................................................... 4 1.1. Indicators ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2. International comparison ................................................................................... 7 1.3. Market developments ........................................................................................ 9 2. MARKET REGULATION ..................................................................................... 10 2.1. Market analysis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT on the Operations of the Group of Makedonski Telekom AD - Skopje in 2011
    Confidential Makedonski Telekom AD – Skopje Orce Nikolov bb, 1000 Skopje ANNUAL REPORT on the operations of the Group of Makedonski Telekom AD - Skopje in 2011 On 13 February 2006, Magyar Telekom Plc., the controlling owner of Makedonski Telekom AD – Skopje (the Company), (via Stonebridge Communications AD - Skopje (under liquidation), majority shareholder of the Company), announced that it was investigating certain contracts entered into by another subsidiary of Magyar Telekom Plc. to determine whether the contracts were entered into in violation of Magyar Telekom Plc. policy or applicable law or regulation. Magyar Telekom’s Audit Committee retained White & Case, as its independent legal counsel to conduct the internal investigation. Subsequent to this on 19 February 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company, based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee of the Company and the Audit Committee of Magyar Telekom Plc., adopted a resolution to conduct an independent internal investigation regarding certain contracts in Macedonia. Based on publicly available information, as well as information obtained from Magyar Telekom and as previously disclosed, Magyar Telekom’s Audit Committee conducted an internal investigation regarding certain contracts relating to the activities of Magyar Telekom and/or its affiliates in Montenegro and Macedonia that totalled more than EUR 31 million. In particular, the internal investigation examined whether Magyar Telekom and/or its Montenegrin and Macedonian affiliates had made payments prohibited by U.S. laws or regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). The Company has previously disclosed the results of the internal investigation. Magyar Telekom’s Audit Committee informed the U.S.
    [Show full text]