DOCSLIB.ORG

3. MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES the Coastal Waters of Cambodia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3. MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES the Coastal Waters of Cambodia 3. MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES The coastal waters of Cambodia support a large number of marine fish and invertebrate species. Try (2003) gives the scientific, English and Kmer names for those marine species recorded from the country: 476 species of marine finfish, 20 species of marine crabs, 42 species of marine gastropods and 24 species of marine bivalves. In the marine fisheries statistics published by the Department of Fisheries (DoF, 2002), nine different groups are given. The 2001 landings of these groups by province/municipality are provided in Table 2 below. Little quantitative information is available on the composition of the finfish component. Table 2 Marine fishery landings recorded by DoF, 2001 Province Krill Krill Ray Sea Fish Crab Shrimp Total Snail Trash fish cucumber Cephalopod Blood cockle Slipper lobster Kampot 2 703 1 786 284 165 247 0 870 176 199 0 0 6 430 Sihanouk 6 943 4 287 1 730 0 1 496 40 897 1 236 226 210 0 17 065 Koh 7 104 4 764 1 606 42 604 0 1 410 1 082 762 0 26 17 400 Kong Kep 123 10 42 2 8 0 285 0 0 470 123 1 063 Total 16 873 10 847 3 662 209 2 355 40 3 462 2 494 1 187 680 149 41 958 Source: DoF, 2002. These recorded 2001 landings are depicted in Figure 2 below. It can be seen that about two- thirds of the catch consists of “fish” and “trash fish”. Figure 2. Marine fishery landings recorded by DoF, 2001 Fish Trash fish Shrimp Other Cephalopod Crab Snail Cockle Source: Table 2. 4 FAO/FishCode Review No. 4 The following descriptive accounts offer some insight into the important species: • Try (2003) indicated that 33 species of finfish are commonly exploited, but only five species are very abundant in the landings: Megalaspis cordyla (torpedo scad6), Scomberomorus commersoni (narrowbarred spanish mackerel), Rastrelliger brachysoma (short mackerel), Rastrelliger kanagurta (indian mackerel) and Atule mate (yellowtail scad). • A World Bank study (APIP, 2001b) stated that the catch mainly consists of “Atule mate (Scads), Sela crumenophthalmus (big eyes scads), Decapterus maruadsi (yellowtail round scads) and others such as Leiognathidae (pony fishes), Scombridae (tunas, mackerels), Lutjanidae (snappers).” • Touch and Todd (2002) name the target and secondary species caught by 16 types of fishing gear (see Section 6), but indicate that in the official statistics, estimates of production quantities by fish species are completely absent. • During the present review, heads of the provincial/municipal fisheries offices were questioned on the major finfish species. As expected, the responses varied considerably between areas. In Kep the groupers and snappers are the most important by weight. In Kampot and Koh Kong the rastrelliger mackerels are the most important, while in Sihanoukville both groupers and rastrelliger mackerels are important. Csavas et al. (1994) state that information on the landings of marine fish in Cambodia can be inferred from records of fish landings from the Thai portion of the Gulf of Thailand. In this area the major finfish in order of decreasing abundance are: Indian mackerels, sardinellas, longtail tuna, carangids, Indian scad, threadfin bream, frigate and bullet tunas and kawakawa, big eyes, lizard fishes, croakers, and drums. In some respects, mangroves are considered a “fishery” resource in Cambodia. This is partly due to the fact that the harvest of mangroves is covered by the present fisheries law. According to Tana (1997), mangrove forests in Cambodia cover an area of about 85 100 ha of which about three quarters are in the Koh Kong province. The International Center for Living Aquatic Resource Management (ICLARM) cites a study which identified 34 species of mangroves along the Cambodian coast (ICLARM, 1999). 4. THREATS TO FISHERIES RESOURCES The various reviews of Cambodia’s marine fisheries cite a wide variety of serious threats to the resources. These mainly fall under the categories of excess fishing effort and habitat destruction. Excess fishing effort and associated declines in abundance of target species is thought to be a serious problem for most of Cambodia’s marine fisheries. The key causes appear to be population increases coupled with: (a) an economy that is not expanding rapidly enough to cater to rising needs; and (b) the Government policy of allowing everyone the opportunity to fish for subsistence or income. Unregulated foreign fishing activity is another reason. Improved management in the forestry sector, however desirable, has produced an increase in migration of people to the coastal zone. Many become involved in fishing, where entry costs are low. Export demand also encourages additional fishing effort, especially the high value species in overseas markets. Habitat destruction is another threat to Cambodia’s marine resources. Important causes include destructive fishing (dynamiting, cyanide fishing) and mangrove forest destruction (firewood, shrimp aquaculture). The use of trawling gear is believed to have negative impacts 6 English names are according to the latest FAO Species Identification Guide covering the area. FAO/FishCode Review No. 4 5 on the sea floor ecology. Siltation and the effects of urbanization/industrialization are on the rise. ADB (1999) reports perceptions of threats from the perspective of coastal villagers. Causes of the declines in important fisheries often cited by residents are the increasing use of large trawlers in shallow waters, the use of push nets, destructive fishing methods, the increasing number of fishers, and aquaculture. The threat to marine fishery resources posed by population deserves additional emphasis. Cambodia’s 2.6 percent population increase brings more than 300 000 new entrants into the economy annually. With about 39 percent of the population under the Government’s poverty line, there are many poor people and the number is quickly growing. Whether legal or illegal, natural resource use tend to become the poor person’s last resort for food and income (Master Plan for Fisheries). Furthermore, there is some indication that the population is growing faster in coastal areas than in the rest of the country. In the period 1993 to 1998 the population of the four coastal provinces/municipalities increased by 25 percent (APIP, 1999b), primarily through migration from areas that offer fewer livelihood opportunities (UNEP-GEF 2003). 6 FAO/FishCode Review No. 4 FAO/FishCode Review No. 4 7 4 No. Review FAO/FishCode Three important marine fishery resources: grouper (top left), anchovy (top right), and mackerel (bottom right) [Photos: R. Gillet] 5. MARINE FISHERY PRODUCTION Department of Fisheries statistics (DoF, 2002) on the production from marine fisheries are given in Figure 3. Marine production is compared to all fishery production in Figure 4. Figure 3. Production from marine fisheries in Cambodia 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 Metric Tonnes Metric 10,000 5,000 0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Source: DoF (2002). Figure 4. Inland, marine and aquaculture production 600,000 500,000 400,000 Aquaculture 300,000 Marine Inland 200,000 Metric Tonnes 100,000 0 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 Source: DoF (2002). 8 FAO/FishCode Review No. 4 Try (2003) and the Agriculture Productivity Improvement Project of the World Bank (APIP, 2001b) offer several comments on the above official statistics: • Since 1999, the annual inland production figures have included rice field fisheries (about 45 000 mt) and inland family fisheries (about 115 000 mt); • in the late 1990s the inland fisheries data system was refined7 but such improvements did not occur for the marine fisheries; • catches by subsistence fishers in marine areas are not included; and • catches by Cambodian and foreign vessels landed outside Cambodia, estimated to be about 25 percent of all marine fisheries production in Cambodia, are not included. From the figures and above comments, a number of observations can be made: • comparisons between marine and inland fisheries using the official figures above are not valid as the inland statistics are much more comprehensive; • inclusion of fish landed outside Cambodia and catches by marine subsistence fishers would result in a remarkable increase in the marine production estimate; • the half-decade starting in the mid-1980s was a period of extremely fast growth in marine fisheries landings; • a secondary period of expansion in landings starting from the mid-1990s, appears to have taken place during a time in which some fisheries (e.g Rastrelliger, anchovy) were in decline. It appears that “trash fish” landings in Sihanoukville municipality were responsible for much of the increase, suggesting a situation of “fishing down the food web”. Not much information is available on the production of vessels fishing offshore. According to DoF internal reports, catches from the licensed Thai vessels in Cambodian waters are estimated to be from 26 500 mt to 37 500 mt. If this is indeed the case, this amount would approach the total marine catch recorded for all Cambodian vessels. Furthermore, it is thought that there is a substantial amount of illegal fishing by non-licensed vessels from both Thailand and Viet Nam. Butcher (1999) studied the situation of illegal Thai trawlers and indicated that between 40 and 60 percent of the total catch of Thai vessels came from outside Thai waters. The report stated that Thai trawlers had long fished in Cambodian waters under unofficial agreements. Butcher concluded that Thailand has a huge number of trawlers, and not many fish, while at the same time there are far more fish in the waters of nearby countries. Some mention should be made of marine aquaculture production. According to Try (2003), marine shrimp culture was established in the early 1990s in Koh Kong province and quickly expanded to Sihanoukville and Kampot municipalities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status and Prospects of Mackerel and Tuna Fishery in Bangladesh
    Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh Item Type article Authors Rahman, M.J.; Zaher, M. Download date 27/09/2021 01:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34189 Bangladesh]. Fish. Res.) 10(1), 2006: 85-92 Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh M. J. Rahman* and M. Zaher1 Marine Fisheries & Technology Station, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute Cox's Bazar 4700, Bangladesh 1Present address: BFRI, Freshwater Station, Mvmensingh 2201, Bangladesh *Corresponding author Abstract Present status and future prospects of mackerel and tuna fisheries in Bangladesh were assessed during July 2003-June 2004. The work concentrated on the fishing gears, length of fishes, total landings and market price of the catch and highlighted the prospects of the fishery in Bangladesh. Four commercially important species of mackerels and tuna viz. Scomberomorus guttatus, Scomberomorus commerson, Rastrelliger kanagurta, and Euthynnus affinis were included in the study. About 95% of mackerels and tuna were caught by drift gill nets and the rest were caught by long lines ( 4%) and marine set-bag-net (1 %). Average monthly total landing of mackerels and tunas was about 264 t, of which 147 t landed in Cox's Bazar and 117 tin Chittagong sites. Total catches of the four species in Cox's Bazar and Chittagong sites were found to be 956 and 762 t, respectively. The poor landing was observed during January-February and the peak landing was in November and July. Gross market value of the annual landing of mackerels and tunas (1,718 t) was found to be 1,392 lakh taka.
    [Show full text]
  • King Mackerel, Scomberomorus Caval/A, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast
    King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, Mark- Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast Item Type article Authors Schaefer, H. Charles; Fable, Jr. , William A. Download date 04/10/2021 08:14:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/26474 King Mackerel, Scomberomorus caval/a, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast H. CHARLES SCHAEFER and WILLIAM A. FABLE, JR. Introduction reproductive capacity causing stock re­ Panama City Laboratory, began a co­ ductions and declining recruitment operative mark-recapture study on king King mackerel, Scomberomorus cav­ (Godcharles I). King mackerel have mackerel to determine movements in alla, is a coastal, pelagic scombrid been jointly managed by the South At­ both the Gulf of Mexico and along the found off the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of lantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Man­ Atlantic coast. Subsequently, biologists Mexico coasts. This species has histori­ agement Councils since the implemen­ from both agencies tagged king mack­ cally contributed to commercial and tation of the Coastal Pelagic Fishery erel (17,042 releases, 1,171 returns) recreational catches throughout its Management Plan (CPFMP) in 1983. from 1975 through 1979 (Sutherland range in the southeastern United States. The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and Fable, 1980; Sutter et aI., 1991; Commercial exploitation intensified for the U.S. king mackerel resource is Williams and Godcharles3). Results there in the 1960's with the introduc­ currently estimated at 26.2 million from this study indicated that the spe­ tion of large power-assisted gillnet pounds (NMFS2). cies consisted of at least two migratory boats and spotter aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗
    Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗ I examine the estimated economic, ecological, and food security effects of future fishery management reform in Asia. Without climate change, most Asian fisheries stand to gain substantially from reforms. Optimizing fishery management could increase catch by 24% and profit by 34% over business- as-usual management. These benefits arise from fishing some stocks more conservatively and others more aggressively. Although climate change is expected to reduce carrying capacity in 55% of Asian fisheries, I find that under climate change large benefits from fishery management reform are maintained, though these benefits are heterogeneous. The case for reform remains strong for both catch and profit, though these numbers are slightly lower than in the no-climate change case. These results suggest that, to maximize economic output and food security, Asian fisheries will benefit substantially from the transition to catch shares or other economically rational fishery management institutions, despite the looming effects of climate change. Keywords: Asia, climate change, fisheries, rights-based management JEL codes: Q22, Q28 I. Introduction Global fisheries have diverged sharply over recent decades. High governance, wealthy economies have largely adopted output controls or various forms of catch shares, which has helped fisheries in these economies overcome inefficiencies arising from overfishing (Worm et al. 2009) and capital stuffing (Homans and Wilen 1997), and allowed them to turn the corner toward sustainability (Costello, Gaines, and Lynham 2008) and profitability (Costello et al. 2016). But the world’s largest fishing region, Asia, has instead largely pursued open access and input controls, achieving less long-run fishery management success (World Bank 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Rastrelliger Systematics Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome B Sequences
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 9(21), pp. 3063-3067, 24 May, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB DOI: 10.5897/AJB09.1569 ISSN 1684–5315 © 2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Rastrelliger systematics inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences Jamsari Amirul Firdaus Jamaluddin1, Abu Talib Ahmad3, Samsudin Basir3, Masazurah Abdul Rahim3 and Siti Azizah Mohd Nor1,2* 1School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. 2Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. 3Fisheries Research Institute, Batu Maung, Penang, Malaysia. Accepted 20 April, 2010 The fish genus Rastrelliger is composed of three morphologically recognized species; Rastrelliger kanagurta, Rastrelliger brachysoma and Rastrelliger faughni. In this study, cytochrome b gene sequencing was applied to address the systematics and phylogenetic relationships of these species. In agreement with previous morphological data, the results corroborate monophyletic discrimination between all the species. However, inconsistent bootstrap support (< 50 to 88%) between R. kanagurta and R. brachysoma was observed indicating limited divergence between these two species. R. faughni is recognized as the most basal species for this genus with high statistical support (99 and 100%). Diversification of Rastrelliger might have happen in two epochs, Miocene and early Pleistocene. Key words: Molecular systematics, cytochrome b, genus Rastrelliger. INTRODUCTION Rastrelliger genus is comprised of three recognized areas while R. kanagurta and R. faughni are more species: Rastrelliger kanagurta (Indian mackerel), oceanic (Chee, 2000). In the West Coast of Peninsular Rastrelliger brachysoma (Indo Pacific mackerel) and Malaysia, Rastrelliger landings make up a large portion of Rastrelliger faughni (island mackerel) (Matsui, 1967; the total catch of small pelagic fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection and Size Sampling on Neritic Tuna Fisheries in Andaman
    IOTC–2018–WPNT08–15 Data Collection and size sampling on Neritic Tuna Fisheries in Andaman Sea Kanokwan Maeroh, Sichon Hoimuk, Suchart Inthong, and Supachai Rodpradit Upper Andaman Sea Fisheries Research and Development Center (Phuket) 77 Moo 7 Vichit Sub-District, Muang District, Phuket Province 83000 Tel. 0 7639 1138-40 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract In the Andaman Sea Coast of Thailand, there are many kinds of fishing gears can catch neritic tuna but most of it were caught by purse seine. The other gears are Otter board trawl, Anchovy falling nets and Squid Falling nets. There are 3 organizations along Andaman sea under Marine Fisheries Research and Development Division responsible to collect the data on fish composition and size distribution, especially for neritic tuna and others importantly economic fish, from more than 10 types of fishing gears. All kind of fishing gears in which both commercial and artisanal fisheries were conducted fisheries data for 3-5 days a month. There are 7 organizations along Andaman sea under Fishing and Fleets Management Division responsible to collected fishing data from logbook and catches landing of marine fish, to recorded and reported the data to Fishing-Info data base. Study on CPUE and MSY were conducted by Fisheries Statistics Analysis and Research Group and Fisheries Resources Assessment Group which are under the Department of Fishery. The purse seine is the mainly fishing gear for pelagic species. Pair trawls and otter board trawls are the main fishing gears for demersal species. The other gears which have a specific name to target species, such as gill nets, hand line and long line.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of Terengganu East Coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia Ii Iii
    i Fishes of Terengganu East coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia ii iii Edited by Mizuki Matsunuma, Hiroyuki Motomura, Keiichi Matsuura, Noor Azhar M. Shazili and Mohd Azmi Ambak Photographed by Masatoshi Meguro and Mizuki Matsunuma iv Copy Right © 2011 by the National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publisher. Copyrights of the specimen photographs are held by the Kagoshima Uni- versity Museum. For bibliographic purposes this book should be cited as follows: Matsunuma, M., H. Motomura, K. Matsuura, N. A. M. Shazili and M. A. Ambak (eds.). 2011 (Nov.). Fishes of Terengganu – east coast of Malay Peninsula, Malaysia. National Museum of Nature and Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Kagoshima University Museum, ix + 251 pages. ISBN 978-4-87803-036-9 Corresponding editor: Hiroyuki Motomura (e-mail: [email protected]) v Preface Tropical seas in Southeast Asian countries are well known for their rich fish diversity found in various environments such as beautiful coral reefs, mud flats, sandy beaches, mangroves, and estuaries around river mouths. The South China Sea is a major water body containing a large and diverse fish fauna. However, many areas of the South China Sea, particularly in Malaysia and Vietnam, have been poorly studied in terms of fish taxonomy and diversity. Local fish scientists and students have frequently faced difficulty when try- ing to identify fishes in their home countries. During the International Training Program of the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (ITP of JSPS), two graduate students of Kagoshima University, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Calling for Suggestions, Views, Comments Etc from WTO- SPS Committee Members Within a Period of 60 Days on the Draft Noti
    Notice Calling for suggestions, views, comments etc from WTO- SPS Committee members within a period of 60 days on the draft notification related to Standards for list of Histamine Forming Fish Species and limits of Histamine level for Fish and Fishery Products. 1. In the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011, in regulation 2.5, relating to “Other Contaminants”, after sub-regulation 2.5.1 the following sub-regulation shall be inserted, namely:- “2.5.2 Histamine in Fish and Fishery Products contaminants, Toxins and Residues 1. Fish species having potential to cause histamine poisoning Sl.No. Family Scientific Name Common Name 1. Carangidae Alectis indica Indian Threadfish Alepes spp. Scad Atropus atropos Cleftbelly trevally Carangoides Yellow Jack bartholomaei Carangoides spp. Trevally Caranx crysos Blue runner Caranx spp. Jack/Trevally Decapterus koheru Koheru Decapterus russelli Indian scad Decapterus spp. Scad Elagatis bipinnulata Rainbow Runner Megalaspis cordyla Horse Mackerel/Torpedo Scad Nematistius pectoralis Roosterfish Oligoplites saurus Leather Jacket Pseudocaranx dentex White trevally Sl.No. Family Scientific Name Common Name Scomberoides Talang queenfish commersonnianus Scomberoides spp. Leather Jacket/Queen Fish Selene spp. Moonfish Seriola dumerili Greater/Japanese Amberjack or Rudder Fish Seriola lalandi Yellowtail Amberjack Seriola quinqueradiata Japanese Amberjack Seriola rivoliana Longfin Yellowtail Seriola spp. Amberjack or Yellowtail Trachurus capensis Cape Horse Mackerel Trachurus japonicas Japanese Jack Mackerel Trachurus murphyi Chilean Jack Mackerel Trachurus Yellowtail Horse Mackerel novaezelandiae Trachurus spp. Jack Mackerel/Horse Mackerel Trachurus trachurus Atlantic Horse Mackerel Uraspis secunda Cottonmouth jack 2. Chanidae Chanos chanos Milkfish 3. Clupeidae Alosa pseudoharengus Alewife Alosa spp. Herring Amblygaster sirm Spotted Sardinella Anodontostoma chacunda Chacunda gizzard shad Brevoortia patronus Gulf Menhaden Brevoortia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Mackerel J
    2.1.10.6 SSM CHAPTER 2.1.10.6 AUTHORS: LAST UPDATE: ATLANTIC SPANISH MACKEREL J. VALEIRAS and E. ABAD Sept. 2006 2.1.10.6 Description of Atlantic Spanish Mackerel (SSM) 1. Names 1.a Classification and taxonomy Species name: Scomberomorus maculatus (Mitchill 1815) ICCAT species code: SSM ICCAT names: Atlantic Spanish mackerel (English), Maquereau espagnol (French), Carita del Atlántico (Spanish) According to Collette and Nauen (1983), the Atlantic Spanish mackerel is classified as follows: • Phylum: Chordata • Subphylum: Vertebrata • Superclass: Gnathostomata • Class: Osteichthyes • Subclass: Actinopterygii • Order: Perciformes • Suborder: Scombroidei • Family: Scombridae 1.b Common names List of vernacular names used according to ICCAT, FAO and Fishbase (www.fishbase.org). The list is not exhaustive and some local names might not be included. Barbados: Spanish mackerel. Brazil: Sororoca. China: ᶷᩬ㤿㩪. Colombia: Sierra. Cuba: Sierra. Denmark: Plettet kongemakrel. Former USSR: Ispanskaya makrel, Korolevskaya pyatnistaya makrel, Pyatnistaya makrel. France: Thazard Atlantique, Thazard blanc. Germany: Gefleckte Königsmakrele. Guinea: Makréni. Italy: Sgombro macchiato. Martinique: Taza doré, Thazard tacheté du sud. Mexico: Carite, Pintada, Sierra, Sierra común. Poland: Makrela hiszpanska. Portugal: Serra-espanhola. Russian Federation: Ispanskaya makrel, Korolevskaya pyatnistaya makrel, Pyatnistaya makrel; ɦɚɤɪɟɥɶ ɢɫɩɚɧɫɤɚɹ. South Africa: Spaanse makriel, Spanish mackerel. Spain: Carita Atlántico. 241 ICCAT MANUAL, 1st Edition (January 2010) Sweden: Fläckig kungsmakrill. United Kingdom: Atlantic spanish mackerel. United States of America: Spanish mackerel. Venezuela: Carite, Sierra pintada. 2. Identification Figure 1. Drawing of an adult Atlantic Spanish mackerel (by A. López, ‘Tokio’). Characteristics of Scomberomorus maculatus (see Figure 1 and Figure 2) Atlantic Spanish mackerel is a small tuna species. Maximum size is 91 cm fork length and 5.8 kg weight (IGFA 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Growth of King Mackerel, Scomberomorus Cavalla, from the U.S
    Age and Growth of King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, From the U.S. Gulf of Mexico CHARLES S. MANOOCH, III, STEVEN P. NAUGHTON, CHURCHILL B. GRIMES, and LEE TRENT Introduction incomplete knowledge concerning recre­ resource management. Resulting data ational catch and effort. migratory pat­ may be used to evaluate the impacts of The importance of king mackerel, terns, stock identity, and large-scale life fishing on the stocks or determine how Scomberomorus cavalla. to recreational history studies. Fishermen, scientists, they respond to different levels and and commercial fisheries along the and fishery managers still recognize strategies of fishing. Most studies on the southeastern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico these as priority research areas critical to age and growth of king mackerel have coasts of the United States has been thor­ the management of king mackerel stocks shared the deficiency of being restricted oughly documented (Manooch et aI., which are judged to be heavily exploited by either time or space (Manooch et al. 1978: Manooch, 1979: Collette and along both coasts. The National Marine 1978), however. Johnson et al. (1983) Russo. 1984). Unfortunately, the impor­ Fisheries Service. regional universities, provided the most comprehensive geo­ tance of this coastal migratory species and state conservation agencies have re­ graphic coverage. and the need for large-scale, regionally sponded to this need and have initiated Herein we report on an independent coordinated research has not been recog­ extensive research efforts under the study on the Gulf of Mexico king mack­ nized until recentlyl.2 Manooch et al. Marine Fisheries Initiative (MARFIN) erel management unit. The objectives (1978) provided an annotated bibliogra­ Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • The FAD Fishery in the Gulf of Thailand
    Aquat. Living Resour. 26, 85–96 (2013) Aquatic c EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2013 DOI: 10.1051/alr/2013045 Living www.alr-journal.org Resources The FAD fishery in the Gulf of Thailand: time for management measures Pavarot Noranarttragoon1,a, Piyachok Sinanan2, Nantachai Boonjohn3, Pakjuta Khemakorn4 and Amararatne Yakupitiyage1 1 Asian Institute of Technology, PO Box 4, Klong Luang, 12120 Pathum Thani, Thailand 2 Eastern Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center (Rayong), 2 Phe, Muang, 21160 Rayong, Thailand 3 Chumphon Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center, 408 Paknam, Muang, 86120 Chumphon, Thailand 4 Southern Marine Fisheries Research and Development Center (Songkhla), 79/1 Wichianchom Rd., Bo-yang, Muang, 90000 Songkhla, Thailand Received 3 May 2012; Accepted 9 January 2013 Abstract – Fish aggregating devices (FADs) used in the Gulf of Thailand are made of bamboo poles, twisted wire and coconut leaves, fastened to a concrete block. Purse seines with 2.5 cm mesh size are used to surround the fish, using fishing boats ranging from 18 to 26 m in overall length. Fishing grounds are located in the central Gulf of Thailand at a depth of 25–60 m. Catch per unit effort (CPUE), species composition and size of economically important species were analyzed by collecting data from fishing boats using FADs at nine main fishing ports along the Gulf of Thailand between January and December 2007. The results show that the average CPUE was 3351 kg day−1,which was composed of 88% pelagic fishes, 5% demersal fishes, 4% trash fishes and 2% squids and cuttlefishes. The major pelagic species were Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta), Indian scad (Decapterus russelli) and bigeye scad (Selar crumenophthalmus), which made up 25%, 24% and 8% of the total catch, respectively, while neritic tunas (kawakawa; Euthynnus affinis, frigate tuna; Auxis thazard thazard and longtail tuna; Thunnus tonggol) made up 8% of the total catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Surat Thani Blue Swimming Crab Fishery Improvement Project
    Surat Thani Blue Swimming Crab Fishery Improvement Project -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Milestone 33b: Final report of bycatch research Progress report: The study of fishery biology, socio-economic and ecosystem related to the restoration of Blue Swimming Crab following Fishery improvement program (FIP) in Bandon Bay, Surat Thani province. Amornsak Sawusdee1 (1) The Center of Academic Service, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80160 The results of observation of catching BSC by using collapsible crab trap and floating seine. According to the observation of aquatic animal which has been caught by main BSC fishing gears; floating seine and collapsible crab trap, there were 176 kind of aquatic animals. The catch aquatic animals are shown in the table1. In this study, aquatic animal was classified into 11 Groups; Blue Swimming Crab (Portunus Pelagicus), Coelenterata (coral animals, true jellies, sea anemones, sea pens), Helcionelloida (clam, bivalve, gastropod), Cephalopoda (sqiud, octopus), Chelicerata (horseshoe crab), Hoplocari(stomatopods), Decapod (shrimp), Anomura (hermit crab), Brachyura (crab), Echinoderm (sea cucambers, sea stars, sea urchins), Vertebrata (fish). Vertebrata was the main group that was captured by BSC fishing gears, more than 70 species. Next are Helcionelloida and Helcionelloida 38 species and 29 species respectively. The sample that has been classified were photographed and attached in appendix 1. However, some species were classified as unknow which are under the classification process and reconcile. There were 89 species that were captured by floating seine. The 3 main group that were captured by this fishing gear are Vertebrata (34 species), Brachyura (20 species) Helcionelloida and Echinoderm (10 Species). On the other hand, there were 129 species that were captured by collapsible crab trap.
    [Show full text]