DOCSLIB.ORG

The Vowels of California English Before /R /, /!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Vowels of California English Before /R /, /! The Vowels of California English before /r/, /!/, and /r\/ by Joshua Samuel Guenter B.A. (University of Oregon) 1992 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 1994 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor John J. Ohala, Chair Professor Gary Holland Professor James M atiso ff Professor Thomas Shannon Spring 2000 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The Vowels of California English before /r/, /l/, and /q/ © Copyright 2000 by Joshua Samuel Guenter Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................... v ii List of Tables ...................................................................................................... xi List of Abbreviations and Symbols ............................................................. x ii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................x iii C hapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................1 C hapter 2: Historical Background ..................................................................16 2.1. Introduction ................................................................................... 16 2.2. The Changes ....................................................................................21 2.2.1. Deletion of Short Vowels .............................................23 2.2.2. Assimilatory Changes ................................................... 26 2.2.3. Middle English Long High Vowels ............................ 30 2.3. Recent Mergers .............................................................................35 2.4. Summary of Changes ...................................................................36 2.5. Changes to the Phonological System ....................................... 38 C hapter 3: The Problem ..................................................................................41 3.1. Criteria for Deciding Mono- vs. Biphonemicity .........................42 3.1.1. Trubetzkoy's Rules .................................................................. 45 3.1.2. Other Criteria ........................................................................... 53 3.1.3. Evaluation of the RGDs According to the Criteria 55 3.2. Past Phonological Analyses of the RGDs .....................................62 3.2.1. Syntagmatic Treatments ......................................................64 3.2.1.1. Tense Vowel Treatments .......................................... 65 i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Blo o m fie ld 1933 .......................................................................... 65 T eeter 1966 ..................................................................................... 66 H arris 1 994 ...................................................................................68 H a m m o n d 1999 ..............................................................................72 3.2.1.2. Lax Vowel Treatments ...................................................7 3 Bronstein 1960 ..............................................................................73 Kenyon & Knott 1 953 .................................................................7 3 L ehiste 1964 ................................................................................... 74 A k m a jia n e t a l . 1 9 95 ................................................................76 3-2.1.3. Archiphonemic Treatments: .......................................... 7 7 3.2.1.4. Arbitrary Treatments .......................................................7 9 3-2.2. Diphthongal Treatments: ............................................................81 3 2.2.1. Monophonemic Treatments: .......................................... 82 De Camp 1945 .................................................................................82 3-2.2.2 "Glide-Slot" Analyses .........................................................8 4 T r a g e r &c Bloch 1941 .................................................................84 Kahn 1980 ........................................................................................87 V eatch 1991....................................................................................89 3 2.3. Other Treatments ............................................................................ 93 3 3. W hat Needs to Be Determined: ............................................................ 9 5 Chapter 4: Vowels before / l / ................................................................................. 10 1 4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 10 1 4.2. Comparison of /!/ to /r /..........................................................................103 4.3. W hat Needs to be Determined .......................................................110 4.4. Past Phonological Analyses................................................................. 111 ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Chapter 5: Vowels before / r)/ .......................................................................114 Chapter 6: Acoustic Analysis ....................................................................... 12 1 6.1. Speech M aterial ................................................................................12 1 6.1.1. Speakers ................................................................................... 12 1 6.1.2. Data.............................................................................................122 6.1.3. Recording and Measurements .............................................. 126 6.2. Vowels before / r / .............................................................................132 6.2.1. Formant Dynamics (Line Graphs) .......................................132 6.2.2. Ranges of Allophony (Scatter Graphs) .............................. 142 6.2.3. Conclusions: Vowels before / r / ........................................... 164 6.3. Vowels before / I / .............................................................................165 6.31. Phonetic Classification of Post-vocalic / l / ....................166 6.3.2. Existence of Stressed Syllabic / l / ....................................168 6.3.3- Mergers of Vowels before / l/ ............................................ 169 6.3-4. Acoustic Categorization of Vowels before / l/ ................174 6.3.4.1. Formant Dynamics (Line Graphs) ............................ 175 6.3.4.2. Ranges of Allophony (Scatter Graphs) ...................194 6.3.4.3. Conclusion: Vowels before / l / ...................................196 6.3.5- Syllabicity of /diphthong-1/ Sequences ..........................197 6.3 6. Absence of Glides after Tense Vowels before / l / ........202 6.4. Vowels before /q / ........................................................................... 205 6.4.1. Formant Dynamics (Line Graphs) ..................................... 206 6.4.2. Range of Allophony (Scatter Graphs) ..............................219 6.4.3- Conclusion: Vowels before /q / ...........................................22 1 Chapter 7: Psycholinguistic Evidence ........................................................ 230 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 7.1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 230 7.2. The Experiment .................................................................................234 7.2.1. Expectations ............................................................................ 254 7.3. Results and Discussion ..................................................................... 255 7.31. Control Sets ............................................................................256 7.3.2. Set R ..........................................................................................262 [ I r l Pairs........................................................................................ 262 (Erl P a irs....................................................................................... 265 [Or] P airs....................................................................................... 267 [ar] Pairs......................................................................................... 269 [A r] P a irs...................................................................................... 271 7.3.3. Diphthongs ...............................................................................272 7.3.4. Set NG ....................................................................................... 275 <ong> Pairs .................................................................................... 275 <ung> Pairs .................................................................................... 276 <ing> Pairs ..................................................................................... 277 <eng> Pairs ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4. R-Influence on Vowels
    4. R-influence on vowels Before you study this chapter, check whether you are familiar with the following terms: allophone, centring diphthong, complementary distribution, diphthong, distribution, foreignism, fricative, full vowel, GA, hiatus, homophone, Intrusive-R, labial, lax, letter-to-sound rule, Linking-R, low-starting diphthong, minimal pair, monophthong, morpheme, nasal, non-productive suffix, non-rhotic accent, phoneme, productive suffix, rhotic accent, R-dropping, RP, tense, triphthong This chapter mainly focuses on the behaviour of full vowels before an /r/, the phonological and letter-to-sound rules related to this behaviour and some further phenomena concerning vowels. As it is demonstrated in Chapter 2 the two main accent types of English, rhotic and non-rhotic accents, are most easily distinguished by whether an /r/ is pronounced in all positions or not. In General American, a rhotic accent, all /r/'s are pronounced while in Received Pronunciation, a non-rhotic variant, only prevocalic ones are. Besides this, these – and other – dialects may also be distinguished by the behaviour of stressed vowels before an /r/, briefly mentioned in the previous chapter. To remind the reader of the most important vowel classes that will be referred to we repeat one of the tables from Chapter 3 for convenience. Tense Lax Monophthongs i, u, 3 , e, , , , , , , 1, 2 Diphthongs and , , , , , , , , triphthongs , Chapter 4 Recall that we have come up with a few generalizations in Chapter 3, namely that all short vowels are lax, all diphthongs and triphthongs are tense, non- high long monophthongs are lax, except for //, which behaves in an ambiguous way: sometimes it is tense, in other cases it is lax.
    [Show full text]
  • An Acoustic Analysis of the Vowels in Fuzhou Chinese
    AN ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF THE VOWELS IN FUZHOU CHINESE Changhe Chen Department of Linguistics and Translation, City University of Hong Kong [email protected] ABSTRACT acoustic analysis based on speech samples from speakers (20 speakers for monophthongs and 10 for This study is an acoustic description of the vowels in diphthongs and triphthong) in their fifties in 2011. At Fuzhou Chinese produced by 10 speakers (5 males present, no published article is found for the vowels and 5 females) in their thirties. The vowels include 8 of the younger generation, but some vowel changes monophthongs .h x d 1 ` N n t., 14 diphthongs .ht th are expected. dh dt `h `t nt 1x Nx hd h` xn tn t`., and 1 triphthong This study aims at reinvestigating the vowels in .t`h. in open syllable. Compared with existing Fuzhou Chinese of speakers aged 30-39, younger studies, this study finds (i) that sometimes .d. is than those in [6]. diphthongized; (ii) that diphthong may undergo .xn. 2. METHODOLOGY change to become ZX\; (iii) that diphthong .Nx. seems to have merged with .t`h. and .1x. in open syllable, All test words are (C)V and (C)VS syllables, 2 and .dt. also shows a tendency to merge with .ht.; frequently used in daily life . For each diphthong and (iv) that the acoustic realization of diphthong .nt. can triphthong, two syllables associated with two types of be Zɞt\, ZPt\ and ZNt\ but not Znt\, and diphthong tones are used in order to investigate possible vowel alternation. But due to space limit, only results of the .hd.
    [Show full text]
  • Diphthongs Andtriphthongs
    chapter 5 Diphthongs and Triphthongs 5.1 Introduction The combination of a vowel and either of the semivowels *w and *y in the same syllable is traditionally referred to as a diphthong in Semitic linguistics, although it is unclear to what degree these combinations behaved like single vocalic phonemes, as the term ‘diphthong’ implies. Similarly, the combination of two vowels with an intervening semivowel is frequently called a triphthong; strictly speaking, this is incorrect, as ‘triphthong’ usually describes a single phoneme with three vocalic places of articulation occurring within the same syllable, while Semitic triphthongs are always disyllabic. To avoid confusion, however, the traditional terminology will be maintained in this chapter. The reader will recall that W represents any semivowel, i.e. *w or *y. Diphthongs and triphthongs are often treated together, but as we shall see, they are better considered separately. Accordingly, the first section of this chap- ter will investigate the development of the original diphthongs *aw and *ay. The other diphthongs are not discussed, as their development is either unprob- lematic or very difficult to ascertain. Quite clearly, *iy > *ī and *uw > *ū, as in he was‘ הוַּרד < he will suck (pause)’,*huwrada > *hūrad‘ ִייָ֑נק < yiynaqu > *yīnaq* brought down’. *uy seems to develop to *ī, but the evidence is limited to a few ויישם it may be poured (pause)’ in Exod 30:32 and the kṯiḇ form‘ ִיי ָ֑סְך forms like ,(in Gen 24:33 ַוֻיּיַשׂם in Gen 50:26 and ַוִ֫יּיֶשׂם and he/it was placed’ (vocalized‘ most other cases of *uy having been affected by analogy.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Character of Vowel Changes in the Evolution of Latin Into French
    ON THE CHARACTER OF VOWEL CHANGES IN THE EVOLUTION OF LATIN INTO FRENCH Chae-Seong Chang . The purpose of this paper is to show that Latin vowel changes are included in the important phenomena of the forward movement which includes the simplifica­ tion of the word by vowel-dropping. The Vulgar Latin has been deeply transformed in Gau!. The Gallic population could not understand the delicate variation of the Latin language and thus its vowel system suffered deep transformations. We tried to show the direction of these transformations in the oral cavity. I. INTRODUCTION Pronunciation evolves according to time and space. When the circumstances allow it, sounds alter very rapidly and the words change to the point of becoming unrecognizable_ The circumstances allowing such changes are the absence of any stable authority that would keep an unchanging and uniform faith to the word's original pronunciation. Correct pronunciation of a word is to give to each of its elements, vowels or consonants, the values that they ought to have_ But even people who have studied their own mother tongue following precise grammatical rules, and who tried to pronounce it correctly cannot help modifying its pronunciation accord­ ing to the climate and the age. The Vulgar Latin, transferred to different peoples, has undergone many changes as in Gaul. The Gallic population which received Latin tried to adapt it in such a way that everybody could speak it well without any special effort. In that way great pronunciation-change occurred inside the Latin vowel system. The study of the character of these vowel changes will be the object of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded an Applet That Would Allow the Recordings to Be Collected Remotely
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report Title A Survey of English Vowel Spaces of Asian American Californians Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w84m8k4 Journal UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report, 12(1) ISSN 2768-5047 Author Cheng, Andrew Publication Date 2016 DOI 10.5070/P7121040736 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UC Berkeley Phonetics and Phonology Lab Annual Report (2016) A Survey of English Vowel Spaces of Asian American Californians Andrew Cheng∗ May 2016 Abstract A phonetic study of the vowel spaces of 535 young speakers of Californian English showed that participation in the California Vowel Shift, a sound change unique to the West Coast region of the United States, varied depending on the speaker's self- identified ethnicity. For example, the fronting of the pre-nasal hand vowel varied by ethnicity, with White speakers participating the most and Chinese and South Asian speakers participating less. In another example, Korean and South Asian speakers of Californian English had a more fronted foot vowel than the White speakers. Overall, the study confirms that CVS is present in almost all young speakers of Californian English, although the degree of participation for any individual speaker is variable on account of several interdependent social factors. 1 Introduction This is a study on the English spoken by Americans of Asian descent living in California. Specifically, it will look at differences in vowel qualities between English speakers of various ethnic
    [Show full text]
  • Language Variation and Ethnicity in a Multicultural East London Secondary School
    Language Variation and Ethnicity in a Multicultural East London Secondary School Shivonne Marie Gates Queen Mary, University of London April 2019 Abstract Multicultural London English (MLE) has been described as a new multiethnolect borne out of indirect language contact among ethnically-diverse adolescent friendship groups (Cheshire et al. 2011). Evidence of ethnic stratification was also found: for example, “non-Anglo” boys were more likely to use innovative MLE diphthong variants than other (male and female) participants. However, the data analysed by Cheshire and colleagues has limited ethnographic information and as such the role that ethnicity plays in language change and variation in London remains unclear. This is not dissimilar to other work on multiethnolects, which presents an orientation to a multiethnic identity as more salient than different ethnic identities (e.g. Freywald et al. 2011). This thesis therefore examines language variation in a different MLE-speaking adolescent community to shed light on the dynamics of ethnicity in a multicultural context. Data were gathered through a 12-month ethnography of a Year Ten (14-15 years old) cohort at Riverton, a multi-ethnic secondary school in Newham, East London, and include field notes and interviews with 27 students (19 girls, 8 boys). A full multivariate analysis of the face and price vowels alongside a quantitative description of individual linguistic repertoires sheds light on MLE’s status as the new London vernacular. Building on the findings of Cheshire et al. (2011), the present study suggests that language variation by ethnicity can have social meaning in multi-ethnic communities. There are apparent ethnolinguistic repertoires: ethnic minority boys use more advanced vowel realisations alongside high rates of DH-stopping, and the more innovative was/were levelling system.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in English /L
    The University of Manchester Research Variation in English /l/ Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Turton, D. (2014). Variation in English /l/: synchronic reections of the life cycle of phonological processes. University of Manchester. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:08. Oct. 2021 Variation in English /l/: Synchronic reections of the life cycle of phonological processes A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 Danielle Turton School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Contents List of Figures 7 List of Tables 11 Abstract 15 Declaration 16 Copyright 17 Acknowledgements 18 1 Introduction 20 1.1 Goals of the thesis . 21 1.1.1 Theoretical issues . 21 1.1.2 Empirical issues . 22 1.1.3 Peripheral goals .
    [Show full text]
  • Uptalk in Southern British English
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305684920 Uptalk in Southern British English Conference Paper · May 2016 DOI: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-32 CITATION READS 1 332 2 authors, including: Amalia Arvaniti University of Kent 93 PUBLICATIONS 2,044 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Components of intonation and the structure of intonational meaning View project Modelling variability: gradience and categoriality in intonation View project All content following this page was uploaded by Amalia Arvaniti on 28 August 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Speech Prosody 2016 31 May - 3 Jun 2106, Boston, USA Uptalk in Southern British English Amalia Arvaniti1, Madeleine Atkins1 1 University of Kent [email protected], [email protected] Abstract but with different melodies for each: L* L-H% is used primarily with statements, and H* H-H% and L* H-H% with questions The present study deals with the realization and function of [4]. New Zealand English also uses uptalk for both statements uptalk in Southern British English (SBE), a variety in which the and questions [3], with the tunes used for each function use of uptalk has been little investigated. Eight speakers (4 becoming increasingly distinct [5]. In Australian English, on the male, 4 female) were recorded while taking part in a Map Task other hand, uptalk is used with statements mostly when the and playing a board game. All speakers used uptalk for a variety speaker wishes to hold the floor [3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Real California1
    THE REAL CALIFORNIA1 PENELOPE ECKERT AND NORMA MENDOZA-DENTON When most Americans think of California English, they might remember the stereotypes made famous by Frank and Moon Unit Zappa in their song "Valley Girl," circa 1982. "Like, totally! Gag me with a spoon! " intoned Moon Unit, instantly cementing a stereotype of California English as being primarily the province of Valley Girls and Surfer Dudes. But California is not just the land of beaches and blonds. While Hollywood images crowd our consciousness, the real California, with a population of nearly 34 million, is only 46.7% white (most of whom are not blond and most of whom don't live close to the beach or in the San Fernando Valley). California has for generations been home to a large Latino population Ð a population that today accounts for 32.4% of Californians. Also for generations it has been the home of a large Chinese-American and Japanese-American population and in recent years, with the influx of immigrants from other parts of Asia, it now boasts a large and diverse Asian American population (11.2%). Most of the sizeable African-American population (16.4%) in California speak some form of African-American Vernacular English, with few traces of surfer dude or valley girl. Each of these groups brings a distinctive style, which provides a rich set of linguistic resources for all inhabitants of the state. Ways of speaking are the outcome of stylistic activity Ð activity that people engage in collaboratively as they carve out a distinctive place for themselves in the social landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Typesetting Catalan Texts with TEX
    Typesetting Catalan Texts with TEX Gabriel Valiente Feruglio Universitat de les Illes Balears Departament de Ciencies Matematiques i Inforrnatica E-07071 Palma de Mallorca (Spain) Internet: dmi gvaO@ps. ui b . es Robert Fuster Universitat Politecnica de Valencia Departament de Matematica Aplicada Cami de Vera, 14. E-46071 Valencia (Spain) Internet: mat5rf c@cci. upv .es Abstract As with other non-American English languages, typesetting Catalan texts imposes some special requirements on TEX. These include a particular set of hyphenation patterns and support for a special ligature: unlike other Romanic languages, Catalan incorporates the middle point in the 11 digraph. Hyphenation rules for Catalan are reviewed in ths paper, after a short introduction to hyphenation by TEX. A minimal set of hyphenation patterns covering all Catalan accents and diacritics is also presented. A discussion about the 1'1 ligature concludes the paper. This work represents a first step towards the Catalan TLP (TEX Language Package), under development within the TWGMLC (Technical Working Group on Multiple Language Coordination), where the first author is chairing the Catalan linguistic subgroup. Resum Aixi com en altres llengiies, la composicio de textos escrits en catala demana requeriments especials a1 TEX. Aquests inclouen un conjunt particular de patrons de guionat, aixi com suport per a un lligam especial ja que, a diferencia d'altres llengiies romaniques, el catala incorpora el punt volat a1 digraf I'l. En aquest paper es fa una introduccio a1 guionat arnb TEX i es revisen les regles de guionat per a1 catala. Tanmateix, es presenta un conjunt minim de patrons de guionat que cobreix tots els accents i marques diacritiques del catala.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 9 ELA Released Test Questions
    CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST GRADE Released Test Questions English–Language Arts 9 Introduction - Grade 9 English–Language Arts The following released test questions are taken from the Grade 9 English–Language Arts Standards Test. This test is one of the California Standards Tests administered as part of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program under policies set by the State Board of Education. All questions on the California Standards Tests are evaluated by committees of content experts, including teachers and administrators, to ensure their appropriateness for measuring the California academic content standards in Grade 9 English–Language Arts. In addition to content, all items are reviewed and approved to ensure their adherence to the principles of fairness and to ensure no bias exists with respect to characteristics such as gender, ethnicity, and language. This document contains released test questions from the California Standards Test forms in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. First on the pages that follow are lists of the standards assessed on the Grade 9 English– Language Arts Test. Next are released passages and test questions. Following the questions is a table that gives the correct answer for each question, the content standard that each question is measuring, and the year each question last appeared on the test. The following table lists each strand/reporting cluster, the number of items that appear on the exam, and the number of released test questions that appear in this document. NUMBER OF NUMBER OF STRAND/REPORTING
    [Show full text]
  • An Added Dimension for Language Teaching
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 History of French : an added dimension for language teaching Marcia J. Hass The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hass, Marcia J., "History of French : an added dimension for language teaching" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8207. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8207 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mike and Maureen MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be under^en only with the author’s written consent. University of Montana Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. HISTORY OF FRENCH: AN ADDED DIMENSION FOR LANGUAGE TEACHING By Marcia J. Hass B. A., University of Colorado, 1967 M. A., University of Montana, 1990 Presented in partial fu lfil liment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1990 Approved by of Examiners De^, Graduate SchSÏÏ Date 7 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]