UNITED NATIONS Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNITED NATIONS Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) UNITED NATIONS Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Situation Report No. 8 on the Situation in Georgia 27 August 2008 The following information is based on reports from the UN Country Team and humanitarian partners in Tbilisi and North Ossetia, as well as information received from countries involved in the response. 1.0 General Humanitarian Overview 1.1 Humanitarian partners continue to have access to Gori as well as locations in western and eastern Georgia. However, as of 27 August there is no humanitarian access to South Ossetia from the south. ICRC remains the only international humanitarian actor that is operational in Tskhinvali, South Ossetia. 1.2 Spontaneous and organized returns continue to take place, and an estimated 21,000 IDPs have returned since 23 August, mostly to Gori. Meanwhile, new displacements have been reported from villages north of Gori, near South Ossetia. 1.3 The Government of Georgia (GoG) is facilitating the return of IDPs from Tbilisi to Gori and surrounding areas, including the identification of temporary accommodation for those without shelter in Gori. Additionally, with the support of UNHCR, a small tented camp was set up on the edge of Gori that can hold up to 400 of those newly displaced on 26 August. 1.4 Authorities in Ajara and Imereti regions along with the Georgian Ministry of Refugee and Accommodation (MRA) and humanitarian partners have been identifying the immediate needs of the returning populations. Access to free health care has been facilitated for IDPs by the GoG, and the Georgia National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) is monitoring for outbreaks of communicable diseases in the collective centers in Tbilisi. 1.5 According to the most recent report from the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Emergency Situations (EMERCOM), the current status of the estimated 35,300 people who crossed the border into North Ossetia following the recent conflict is as follows: 23,609 people have returned to South Ossetia; 8,707 are in the North Caucasus staying with relatives; and 2,950 people are living in 41 temporary shelters. 1.6 On 25 August, the Southern Federal District authorities began the return of South Ossetians to Tskhinvali. EMERCOM’s branch in North Ossetia has reported that people housed in temporary accommodation centers will return to South Ossetia by 1 September. 2.0 Coordination and Humanitarian Response in Georgia – Sectoral Updates Given the rapidly changing situation on the ground, the Coordination Groups in Georgia are enhancing their operational capacity in Gori and are discussing possible displacement assumptions to facilitate planning. Draft planning assumptions include: • Immediate return of IDPs in Gori and surrounding villages where control has been handed back to Georgian authorities (Timeline: next 30 days, Locations: Gori, Kaspi, Khashuri and Samegrelo); • Later return of IDPs whose villages affected still not under control by Georgian authorities (Timeline: March – June 2009; Locations: Kareli and villages bordering S. Ossetian border, Gori, Kaspi and Khashuri); and • Longer–term return of IDPs recently displaced from S. Ossetia which is difficult to ascertain and dependent on relations between Tbilisi and Tskhinvali (Timeline: n/a, Location: S. Ossetia, Kareli and Upper Khodori (Abkhazia)). An information management working group was established today, bringing together information management focal points from the Coordination Groups, to look at inter/intra-sectoral information management, including supporting the development and implementation of an initial rapid assessment of the conflict affected areas. 1 2.1 FOOD Lead Agency: WFP Participants: ACF/ACH, CARE, SCF, WVI, MercyCorps, NRC, Premiere Urgence, Caritas, CHF. Humanitarian Response & Achievements • As of today, WFP food assistance has reached 137,100 people. Today, food was provided to 12,600 IDPs and people living in conflict affected areas. Deliveries included complementary rations from the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) in eight districts in Kakheti. WFP dry food reached also three districts of Samtskhe Javakheti for the first time. Gaps & Planning • Following discussions with the Ministry of Finance, it has been agreed to resume distribution of basic and complementary commodities to the remaining IDPs in Tbilisi. This follows an earlier request by the Government to suspend distribution of these commodities, to allow for the provision of US Government- provided humanitarian rations. • Complimentary food rations will be distributed in Tbilisi by World Vision, Save the Children and Care, during an initial 10-day period. 2.2 LOGISTICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS Lead Agency: WFP/UNHCR Participants: ACH/ACF, DRC, SDC, WVI Humanitarian Response & Achievements • The port of Batumi is fully operational for commercial cargo. • The main road between Poti and Tbilisi is open and there are no checkpoints along the road. • The railroad has been repaired and, according to railway officials, is open for commercial transport. • The Logistics Working Group has established inter-agency warehouses in Tbilisi and Gori. The WFP warehouse in Poti also has some spare capacity to accommodate inter-agency cargo. Storage in inter-agency warehouses is provided free of charge to participating agencies for a period of 3 months. 2.3 SHELTER AND NON FOOD ITEMS Lead Agency: UNHCR Participants: CARE, Counterpart, DRC, IRD, NRC, Oxfam GB, SDC, IOM, SCF, WVI, CHF Humanitarian Response & Achievements • UNHCR together with UNICEF, WFP, IRC and the Italian Red Cross are currently ensuring that the basic standards for tented camps are observed with regard to water/sanitation, food, non-food items and tents for those IDPs without shelter in Gori. Gaps & Planning • The GoG is being advised that the tented camp in Gori should only be a temporary solution to alleviate the current situation. More viable accommodation is needed in view of the approaching winter. Agency/Region Beneficiaries reached Items distributed UNHCR1 Western Georgia 420 Blankets, kitchen sets, jerry cans tents Eastern Georgia -- Distribution finalized Atheni Valley / Gori region 1.212 Blankets, tents 2.4 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE Lead Agency: UNICEF Participants: ACF/ACH, CARE, ICRC, IRD, Oxfam GB, UNFPA, CHF 1 Items distributed by UNHCR, 27 August 2008. Situation at 4 PM 2 Humanitarian Response & Achievements • The coordination group is working to identify the needs of the returnees in Gori, including WASH services in the new collective centres and tent camps. 1,000 hygiene kits are being procured locally for IDPs in the western regions. Gaps & Planning • IDPs still residing in Tbilisi are in need of water and sanitation services. UNICEF estimates that these services will need to be provided to a major caseload in Tbilisi in the next two weeks. • In Adjara region, the health authorities have agreed on a distribution plan for locally procured hygiene kits, as well as school-in-a-box and recreational kits, using the established municipal distribution channels. 2.5 HEALTH AND NUTIRITION Lead Agency: WHO/UNICEF Participants: ACF/ACH, ADRA, Counterpart, IRD, MSF-France, Oxfam GB, SCF, SDC, WVI, UNICEF, USAID, UMCOR, MdM, UNFPA. Humanitarian Response & Achievements • A temporary center for internally displaced pregnant women and mothers with infants has been established in Tbilisi by Georgian authorities. In response to a request by the GoG, UNICEF has provided hygiene supplies, beds, and baby clothes to the center. • Coordination with the Food Aid CG is taking place for a longer term nutritional policy. This will include the containment and targeted distribution of infant formula, supplied by USAID. Save the Children will be the designated distribution agency of the formula. Yesterday, a public statement on infant feeding in emergency situations was issued by UNICEF. • The GoG has announced that all major IDP centers have dedicated primary care providers. 2.6 PROTECTION Lead Agency: UNHCR Participants: Every Child, ICRC, NRC, Save the Children, World Vision, UNICEF, WFP, Halo Trust Humanitarian Response & Achievements • UNHCR carried out systematic monitoring on three issues of concern: the new displacement from villages north of Gori; alleged pressure on IDPs to vacate collective centers in Tbilisi; and failed attempts of returnees to reach their villages north of Gori. • Monitoring results indicate that while there is still return movements from Tbilisi to Gori, a number of families or family members who left to inspect the situation have returned to Tbilisi. Gaps & Planning • The level of concern and aggression is growing in collective centers. IDPs claim that they get inconsistent information as to the safety, status of mine clearance etc in their places of origin, and have to rely on information received from neighbors and relatives. • Consultations with partner organizations dealing with SGBV indicate that the number or rapes and other incidents of SGBV during the recent fighting is higher than initially estimated. 3.0 Access and Security 3.1 As of today 18 checkpoints remain north of Gori. Commercial transporters are available to take cargo between Poti and Tbilisi. However, they are reluctant to travel north of Gori and surrounding areas unless part of a UN convoy, due to insecurity. 3.2 The newly displaced that arrived in Gori have reported incidents of intimidation, physical violence and looting. Of equal concern are villages that are not accessible to humanitarian organizations within the zone around South Ossetia. 3 4.0 International Assistance
Recommended publications
  • Georgia's 2008 Presidential Election
    Election Observation Report: Georgia’s 2008 Presidential Elections Election Observation Report: Georgia’s saarCevno sadamkvirveblo misiis saboloo angariSi angariSi saboloo misiis sadamkvirveblo saarCevno THE IN T ERN at ION A L REPUBLIC A N INS T I T U T E 2008 wlis 5 ianvari 5 wlis 2008 saqarTvelos saprezidento arCevnebi saprezidento saqarTvelos ADV A NCING DEMOCR A CY WORLD W IDE demokratiis ganviTarebisTvis mTel msoflioSi mTel ganviTarebisTvis demokratiis GEORGI A PRESIDEN T I A L ELEC T ION JA NU A RY 5, 2008 International Republican Institute saerTaSoriso respublikuri instituti respublikuri saerTaSoriso ELEC T ION OBSERV at ION MISSION FIN A L REPOR T Georgia Presidential Election January 5, 2008 Election Observation Mission Final Report The International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 www.iri.org TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 II. Pre-Election Period 5 A. Political Situation November 2007 – January 2008 B. Presidential Candidates in the January 5, 2008 Presidential Election C. Campaign Period III. Election Period 11 A. Pre-Election Meetings B. Election Day IV. Findings and Recommendations 15 V. Appendix 19 A. IRI Preliminary Statement on the Georgian Presidential Election B. Election Observation Delegation Members C. IRI in Georgia 2008 Georgia Presidential Election 3 I. Introduction The January 2008 election cycle marked the second presidential election conducted in Georgia since the Rose Revolution. This snap election was called by President Mikheil Saakashvili who made a decision to resign after a violent crackdown on opposition street protests in November 2007. Pursuant to the Georgian Constitution, he relinquished power to Speaker of Parliament Nino Burjanadze who became Acting President.
    [Show full text]
  • South Ossetia-Georgia Mission Notes
    Peacekeeping_4_v2final.qxd 1/28/08 10:07 AM Page 131 4.19 South Ossetia–Georgia While Georgia’s establishment of a parallel administration in South Ossetia at the CIS–South Ossetia Joint Peacekeeping Forces (JPKF) end of 2006 was designed to change the status quo and reduce support for the Tskhinvali ad- • Authorization Date 24 June 1992 ministration, negotiations remained frozen • Start Date July 1992 during 2007 and a missile incident in August • Head of Mission Major-General Marat Kulakhmetov kept tensions high. Continued statements link- (Russia) ing the outcome of the Kosovo status talks • Strength as of Troops: 1,500 with South Ossetia’s future contributed to un- 30 September 2007 ease in Tbilisi, while the lack of productive high-level talks by the Joint Control Commis- sion (JCC) left negotiations at a stalemate. Violent conflict erupted in Georgia’s OSCE Mission to Georgia South Ossetia region in January 1991 after the Georgian government denied a request by Ossetian officials for autonomous status within • Authorization Date 6 November 1992 Georgia. The war continued until June 1992, • Start Date December 1992 leaving some 1,000 dead, 100 missing, more • Head of Mission Ambassador Terhi Hakala (Finland) than 65,000 internally displaced, and the • Budget $14 million (October 2006–September 2007) South Ossetian administrative center, Tskhin- • Strength as of Civilian Staff: 29 vali, destroyed. The 1992 “Agreement on the 30 September 2007 Principles of Settlement of the Georgian- Ossetian Conflict Between Georgia and Rus- sia” (also known as the Sochi Accords) estab- lished both a cease-fire and the Joint Control Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Container Market and Georgia's Positioning
    European Scientific Journal November 2018 edition Vol.14, No.31 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Black Sea Container Market and Georgia’s Positioning Irakli Danelia, (PhD student) Tbilisi State University, Georgia Doi:10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 Abstract Due to the strategically important geographical location, Black Sea region has a key transit function throughout between Europe and Asia. Georgia, which is a part of Black sea area, has a vital transit function for Caucasus Region, as well as for whole New Silk Road area. Nevertheless, still there is no evidence what kind of role and place Georgia has in The Black Sea container market. As the country has ambition to be transit hub for containerizes cargo flows between west and east and is actively involved in the process of formation “One Belt One Road” project, it is very important to identify Country’s current circumstances, capacities and future potential. Because of this, the purpose of the study is to investigate cargo flows and opportunities of the Black Sea container market, level of competitiveness in the area and define Georgia’s positioning in the regional Container market. Keywords: Geostrategic Location, New Silk Road, Transit Corridor, Cargo flow, Container market, Georgia, Black Sea Methodology Based on practical and theoretical significance of the research the following paper provides systemic, historical and logical generalization methods of research in the performance of the work, scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis methods are also used. Introduction Since the end of the Cold War, the Black Sea region has no longer been a static border between the West and the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Report: Georgia, Port of Poti
    Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Audit Report September 2009 Prepared by Scientific Research Firm Gamma for Poti Sea Port Corporation This report has been submitted to ADB by Poti Sea Port Corporation and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. Poti Sea Port Corporation Environmental Audit Report for Current Operations of Poti Sea Port Executed by: Scientific Research Firm Gamma President Vakhtang Gvakharia Tbilisi-Poti 2009 9 M. Alexidze st, 0193, Tbilisi, Georgia tel: +(995 32) 330 274, 330 374 tel/fax +(995 32) 333 268 e-mail: [email protected] SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Environmental Audit, Poti Sea Port Corp. Page 2 of 38 Content 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................3 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF POTI SEA PORT OPERATIONS ........................................................................4 2.1 ABOUT POTI SEA PORT .............................................................................................................................4 2.2 PORT’S EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................7 3 DESCRIPTION OF PORT’S TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES .....................................................................7 3.1 TECHNOLOGICAL SCHEME AND CAPACITY OF OIL PRODUCT HANDLING ..................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”
    Cultural -Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi” (The results of the rapid assessment conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” in its target regions) Ekaterine Gamakharia Fund “Sukhumi” 5/1/2020 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Methodology and Demographics ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Negative Impact of Covid-19 on the People’s Lives .......................................................................... 4 2.2. Covid-19 Impact on Gender Roles – Unequal Distribution of the Household Responsibilities ........ 5 2.3. Covid-19 Impact on Economic Security............................................................................................. 6 2.4. Covid-19 Impact on the Possibility to Receive Education ................................................................. 8 2.5. Covid-19 Impact on the Physical Safety of Women – Increased Domestic Violence ....................... 9 2.6. Covid-19 Impact on Food Security .................................................................................................. 11 2.7. Covid-19 Impact on Health Security ................................................................................................ 12 2.8. Covid-19 Impact on
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Tamara Grdzelidze D.Phil., Ph.D
    Tamara Grdzelidze D.Phil., Ph.D. [email protected] APPOINTMENTS • Cyrus Vance Visiting Professor in International Relations at Mount Holyoke College, MA, USA, January – May 2020 • Aileen Driscoll Research Fellow in Ecumenical Theology at the University of St. Michael’s College, University of Toronto, Canada, January – December 2019 • Research Fellow of the Institute of PhilosoPhy at the faculty of Humanities, Tbilisi State University, APril 2018 – April 2020 • Ambassador Extraordinary and PleniPotentiary of Georgia to the Holy See (Vatican) and Sovereign Military Order of Malta, June 2014 – December 2018 • Program Executive at Faith and Order Secretariat, World Council of Churches, Geneva Switzerland, January 2001 – January 2014. • Coordinator of the WCC Project on Ecumenical Theology, Tbilisi, Georgia, January-December 2000. • Director of Education Program at the Soros Foundation in Georgia, July 1998 – October 1999. • Research Fellow in Georgian Hagiography, Shota Rustaveli Institute of Georgian Literature, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1985–1991. • Professor of Georgian Language and Literature, Guram Ramishvili Gymnasium, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1985-1991. EDUCATION • Doctor of PhilosoPhy in Theology, University of Oxford, 1998. Dissertation: “The ConcePt of SPace/Place in the Writings of Maximus the Confessor.” Under the suPervision of Bishop Dr Kallistos Ware, Pembroke College. Committee: Rt. Rev. Dr Rowan Williams, Dr Sebastian Brock. • Graduate Studies, RiPon College Cuddesdon, Oxford, UK, 1993 – 1994. • Graduate Studies, St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary, NY, USA, 1992 – 1993. • Doctor of Humanities, Tbilisi State University, 1984. Dissertation: “Symbols in Georgian Hagiography of the 5th to 11th Centuries.” 1 • MA and BA of Humanities in Georgian Philology, Tbilisi State University, Georgia, 1974- 1979. • Undergraduate Courses in classical Farsi language and literature, Tbilisi State University, Georgia, 1977 – 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Care Cascade in the Country of Georgia: Monitoring Progress Towards Elimination
    IVHEM 2019. November 22-23, 2019, Amsterdam EVALUATION OF THE HEPATITIS C CARE CASCADE IN THE COUNTRY OF GEORGIA: MONITORING PROGRESS TOWARDS ELIMINATION Tengiz Tsertsvadze,1,2 Amiran Gamkrelidze,3 Nikoloz Chkhartishvili,1 Akaki Abutidze,1 Lali Sharvadze,2,4 Maia Butsashvili,5 David Metreveli,6 Lia Gvinjilia,7 Shaun Shadaker,8 Muazzam Nasrullah,8 Tamar Gabunia, 9 Ekaterine Adamia,9 Stefan Zeuzem,10 Nezam Afdhal,11 Sanjeev Arora,12 Karla Thornton,12 Francisco Averhoff8 1Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center, Tbilisi, Georgia; 2Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia; 3National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia; 4Hepatology clinic HEPA, Tbilisi, Georgia; 5Health Research Union, Tbilisi, Georgia; 6Medical Center Mrcheveli, Tbilisi, Georgia; 7CDC Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia; 8Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD&TB Prevention, Atlanta, USA; 9Ministry of IDPs, Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia; 10Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany; 11Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Liver Center, Boston, USA; 12University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center Disclosure No relevant financial relationship exists Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center 12 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE ON TRACK TO ELIMINATE HEPATITIS C INFECTION BY 2030 Georgia’s HCV elimination program builds on delivering
    [Show full text]
  • Batumi Bypass Road Project (Complaint Received: 2 October 2018)
    Final Report of the Special Project Facilitator Project Number: 50064-001 Loan Numbers: 3520/8328 September 2019 Georgia: Batumi Bypass Road Project (Complaint Received: 2 October 2018) This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy. ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank CRO - complaint receiving officer CWRD - Central and West Asia Department EIA - environmental impact assessment GRM - grievance redress mechanism LARP - land acquisition and resettlement plan OSPF - Office of the Special Project Facilitator RDG - Roads Department of Georgia SPF - special project facilitator NOTE In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars unless otherwise stated. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CONTENTS Page KEY DATES I. BACKGROUND 1 A. The Project 1 B. The Complaint 1 C. Determination of Eligibility 1 II. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT AND PROBLEM-SOLVING 2 A. Review and Assessment 2 B. Negotiated Settlement 3 III. LESSONS LEARNED 4 IV. CONCLUSIONS 4 APPENDIXES 1. Project Summary 6 2. Complaint Letter 7 KEY DATES 1. Project approved by ADB Board 28 March 2017 2. Complaint filed with CRO 25 July 2018 3. Complaint forwarded to OSPF 2 October 2018 4. Complaint declared eligible for OSPF problem-solving 9 October 2018 5. Review and Assessment Mission 16–17 October 2018 Action Plan Implementation 6. Independent valuation report 24 April 2019 7.
    [Show full text]
  • TTT - Tips for Tbilisi Travelers
    TTT - Tips for Tbilisi Travelers Venue V.Sarajishvili Tbilisi State Conservatoire (TSC) Address: Griboedov str 8-10, Tbilisi 0108, Georgia Brief info about the city Capital of Georgia, Tbilisi, population about 1.5 million people and 1.263.489 and 349sq.km (135 sq.miles), is one of the most ancient cities in the world. The city is favorably situated on both banks of the Mtkvari (Kura) River and is protected on three sides by mountains. On the same latitude as Barcelona, Rome, and Boston, Tbilisi has a temperate climate with an average temperature of 13.2C (56 F). Winters are relatively mild, with only a few days of snow. January is the coldest month with an average temperature of 0.9 C (33F). July is the hottest month with 25.2 C (77 F). Autumn is the loveliest season of a year. Flights Do not be scared to fly to Georgia! You will most probably need a connecting flight to the cities which have direct flights and you will have to face several hours of trips probably arriving during the night, but it will be worth the effort! Direct Flights To Tbilisi are from Istanbul, Munich, Warsaw, Riga, Vienna, Moscow, London: Turkish Airlines - late as well as "normal" arrivals (through Istanbul or Gokcen) Lufthansa (Munich) Baltic airlines (Riga) Polish airlines lot (Warsaw) Aeroflot (Moscow) Ukrainian Airlines - (Kiev) Pegasus - (Istanbul) Georgian Airlines (Amsterdam, Paris, Vienna) Aegean (Athens) Belavia - through Minsk Airzena - through London from may Parkia - through Telaviv Atlas global - through Istanbul Direct flights to Kutaisi ( another city in west Georgia and takes 3 hr driving to the capital) - these are budget flights and are much more cheaper – shuttle buses to Tbiisi available Wizzair flies to Budapest London Vilnius kaunas Saloniki Athens different cities from Germany - berlin, dortmund, minuch, Milan katowice, warsaw Ryanair - from august Air berlin - from august Transfer from the airport - Transfer from the airport to the city takes ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten-Year Development Plan for Georgian Gas Transmission Network 2019-2028
    TEN-YEAR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GEORGIAN GAS TRANSMISSION NETWORK 2019-2028 Tbilisi 2018 The document represents a 10-year Georgian gas transmission and related infrastructure development plan. It is the continuation of 2016-year edition of “The 10-Year Development Plan for Georgian Gas Transmission Infrastructure 2017-2026’’ and 2017-year edition of “The 10-year Gas Network Development Plan, 2018-2027” considering the actual situation of current period. The 10-Year Gas Network Plan will be discussed and the section covering the short-term plan will be approved by the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia. Consultations regarding the information used in and information on the project implemen- tation of the 10-Year Gas Network Development Plan can be obtained from GOGC Strategic Planning and Projects Department. Head of the Department: Teimuraz Gochitashvili, Dr. Sci, professor, Tel: + (995 32) 2244040 (414); E-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................3 Executive summary ..................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................7 1.1. General provisions............................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Formal and methodological basis
    [Show full text]