Changing Party Fortunes, 1918-31 Cheat Sheet by Cescaharpham Via Cheatography.Com/50083/Cs/13852

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

changing party fortunes, 1918-31 Cheat Sheet by cescaharpham via cheatography.com/50083/cs/13852/ Background Rise of Labour Labour becomes the main A minor party, until 1923 when it got opposition party. more votes than Liberals and Ramsay Liberals are kicked to third place. MacDonald became the first Labour Conser vat ives are relatively the PM. same. Labour party biggest in 1929, MacDonald PM again. Decline of the Liberals Causes: Unified post-WWI Pre-WWI was one of two major Huge growth in TU membership parties, main rival the Ran local politics well: e.g. didn't Conserv ati ves. discrim inate candidates by class Key figures: Asquith and Lloyd Growing working -class identity George. Liberal split- Asquith backed Labour Causes: government but gambled and lost, Dangerf ield said: failure to MacDona ld's economic policies good, cope with threat of TU strikes, NI would be remembered in 1929 and suffrag ette militancy. Bernstein said: failure to adopt Consistent Conserv atives to class -based voting habits. Most historians reject these views: Conser vative staying the same would have been able to survive if Stays consistent through out, always not for events after 1914. one of top two biggest parties. Stability, Wilson said: "r ampant family values. omnibus "; split of party. Key figures: Stanley Baldwin. Coupon Election: cemented Causes: the split, alliance of LG with Rebranding began in 1872 under Tories. Benjamin Disraeli. One-nation party ROTP Act 1918: allowed idea. Built on by Baldwin. Labour to rise, but Liberals failed Targeted the Liberals to win. Better to adapt. alterna tive to combat Labour. LG's Cash for Honours Benefitted from ROTP Act (plural scheme. voting for Oxbridge student s/s taff, FPTP system: favoured bi- wealthier, Tory voters), Irish party system. indepen dence, FPTP system. By cescaharpham Not published yet. Sponsored by Readability-Score.com Last updated 7th December, 2017. Measure your website readability! Page 1 of 1. https://readability-score.com cheatography.com/cescaharpham/.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Ebook Download Freedoms Power the History and Promise Of
FREEDOMS POWER THE HISTORY AND PROMISE OF LIBERALISM 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Paul Starr | 9780465081875 | | | | | Freedoms Power The History and Promise of Liberalism 1st edition PDF Book Enslin, Penny Spencer Perceval , Tory, - Perceval bears a dubious distinction as the only British prime minister to be assassinated. Within a week, Britain was forced into an embarrassing climb-down. The disagreement among liberals over whether government should promote individual freedom rather than merely protect it is reflected to some extent in the different prevailing conceptions of liberalism in the United States and Europe since the late 20th century. On the equity feminist view, a law prohibiting women to become surgeons is coercive because it constitutes a threat of loss of liberty or property. It is this very eagerness to welcome and encourage useful change, however, that distinguishes the liberal from the conservative , who believes that change is at least as likely to result in loss as in gain. In its intellectual and political life, Europe has become distinctly more liberal than at any time at least since By far the most common argument in the classical-liberal or libertarian feminist literature is consequentialist. Is it unlimited? They also support laws against sex discrimination in education, employment, and public accommodations. Thus freedom from coercive interference fails to capture what human dignity requires. Instead, she calls on the women's movement to cultivate in women and men a sensitivity and an aversion to this kind of injustice, and to develop remedies. Banting, K. That is, families must be just. Spinner-Halev, J. Walker, John D.
[Show full text]
Baroness Thatcher Booklet
Margaret Thatcher Rt. Hon. Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven L.G., O.M., F.R.S. Official booklet to mark the unveiling on 21st February 2007 of the bronze statue of Baroness Thatcher sculpted by Antony Dufort for the House of Commons. Edited by Malcolm Hay, Curator of Works of Art, Palace of Westminster. Clay for the portrait head of Margaret Thatcher, June 2005 (Photo: Antony Dufort) “This historic commission is a very fitting way to remember Margaret Thatcher’s time in the House of Commons and I am very pleased to welcome the statue joining those of the other Prime Ministers of the 20th Century in Members’ Lobby.” Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP Speaker of the House of Commons Baroness Thatcher is the latest 20th Century Prime Minister to be represented in Members’ Lobby immediately outside the House of Commons Debating Chamber. This over life-size bronze statue by Antony Dufort recognises her contribution to British politics during her three terms of office as premier and records her rightful place in parliamentary history as the United Kingdom’s first woman Prime Minister. Her statue looks towards the doors of the Commons Chamber, facing that of Sir Winston Churchill by Oscar Nemon, which since the late 1960s has stood sentinel to this historic Chamber, its foot touched in the early years for good luck by Tory Members before giving speeches in the Chamber and more recently by all those visiting the House. Since then, statues of David Lloyd George and Clement Attlee have been added to this historic space, together with busts of James Ramsay MacDonald, Harold Wilson, James Callaghan, Edward Heath, Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan, Stanley Baldwin and Alec Douglas-Home.
[Show full text]
October 2019 PAPER 6: BRITISH POLITICAL HISTORY SINCE 1880
1 October 2019 PAPER 6: BRITISH POLITICAL HISTORY SINCE 1880 Sources clockwise from top left: United Ireland, The British Library, Jeff Johnston, Tony Withers, Imperial War Museum. FACULTY READING LIST AND LIST OF CORE AND SURVEY LECTURES Between 1880 and the beginning of the twenty-first century, the United Kingdom became a full political democracy based on universal suffrage, and witnessed major party-political realignments as well as the rise of social rights, identity politics and new non-governmental movements. The UK also experienced civil war (in Ireland, 1916-1923 and in Northern Ireland from 1972 to 1998), total war (in 1914-18 and 1939-45), and the loss of a global empire. Throughout the period there was a vigorous debate on the role of the state and the freedom of the markets in a globalized and deeply unequal economic system. This 1 2 was accompanied by struggles over what it meant to be a citizen of the United Kingdom and who had the right to belong. All had profound political consequences, although these have not always been immediately obvious. The party system and much of the constitution remains in place, parliamentary democracy has survived the challenges of Fascism and Communism apparently unscathed, and politicians have spent much of the past hundred years congratulating themselves on the country’s remarkable capacity to ‘return to normal’ in the aftermath of major crises. Many recent or on-going political controversies, such as devolution, the future of the House of Lords, or Britain’s relationship with Europe have obvious parallels with late Victorian debates.
[Show full text]
'Why Tories Won: Accounting for Conservative Party Electoral
'Why Tories Won: Accounting for Conservative Party Electoral Success from Baldwin to Cameron' Dr Richard Carr, Churchill College, Cambridge - 15 November 2012 [email protected] Thank you Allen for that kind introduction. Thank you too, of course, to Jamie Balfour and the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust for the support that enabled the research that I will lay out in part today. The research grant was extremely valuable for an early career academic – providing the means to support archival research that still informs my work some two years later, which has borne fruit in three of the articles that will be referred to at the bottom of the slides behind me, and in three monographs on twentieth century British politics I am due to publish in 2013. 6 publications and counting therefore owe part of their genesis to this grant, not withstanding the good work of my two sometime co-authors throughout this period, Dr Bradley Hart (a former PhD student here at Churchill College and current lecturer at California State University Fresno), and Rachel Reeves MP.1 By final way of preamble I must also thank the staff here at the Churchill Archives Centre, and indeed the Master, for various kindnesses over the years – not least in relation to a conference Bradley and I played a small role in coordinating in November 2010, during my By-Fellowship.2 So, today’s lecture is entitled ‘Why Tories Won: Accounting for Conservative Party Electoral Success from Baldwin to Cameron.’ Now, given Stanley Baldwin became Conservative Party leader in 1923, and David Cameron – Boris and the electorate permitting – seems likely to serve until at least 2015, that is quite an expanse of time to cover in 40 minutes, and broad brush strokes – not to say, missed policy areas - are inevitable.
[Show full text]
Parliamentary Private Secretaries to Prime Ministers Since 1906 Prime Minister Parliamentary Private Secretary Notes
BRIEFING PAPER Number 06579, 11 March 2020 Parliamentary Private Compiled by Secretaries to Prime Sarah Priddy Ministers since 1906 This List notes Parliamentary Private Secretaries to successive Prime Ministers since 1906. Alex Burghart was appointed PPS to Boris Johnson in July 2019 and Trudy Harrison appointed PPS in January 2020. Parliamentary Private Secretaries (PPSs) are not members of the Government although they do have responsibilities and restrictions as defined by the Ministerial Code available on the Cabinet Office website. A list of PPSs to Cabinet Ministers as at June 2019 is published on the Government’s transparency webpages. It is usual for the Leader of the Opposition to have a PPS; Tan Dhesi was appointed as Jeremy Corbyn’s PPS in January 2020. Further information The Commons Library briefing on Parliamentary Private Secretaries provides a history of the development of the position of Parliamentary Private Secretary in general and looks at the role and functions of the post and the limitations placed upon its holders. The Institute for Government’s explainer: parliamentary private secretaries (Nov 2019) considers the numbers of PPSs over time. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Parliamentary Private Secretaries to Prime Ministers since 1906 Prime Minister Parliamentary Private Secretary Notes Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman (1905-08) Herbert Carr-Gomm 1906-08 Assistant Private Secretary Herbert Asquith (1908-16) 1908-09 Vice-Chamberlain of
[Show full text]
Durham Research Online
Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 19 June 2013 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Williamson, Philip (1999) 'Stanley Baldwin : conservative leadership and national values.', Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item1143340/?sitelocale = enGB Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Sample chapter deposited. 'Introduction', pp. 1-20. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Introduction: the historical problem Few British political leaders have been so successful and sig- nificarnt as Stanley Baldwin. Yet few have suffered so much belittlement and abuse in retirement, and later biographers and historians have had considerable difficulty in producing plausible explanations for his ascendancy. More nonsense has been written has about him than about any other modern prime minister. This had consequences for wider understandings of twentieth-century Britain, as interpretations of his politics are integral to several major debates: on the Conservative party's long-term electoral dominance, on constitutional issues, on `national culture', and on Britain's industrial, imperial, and international decline.
[Show full text]
The Conservatives in Opposition, 1906–79 the Conservatives in Opposition, 1906–79: a Comparative Analysis
1 Stuart Ball The Conservatives in opposition, 1906–79 The Conservatives in opposition, 1906–79: a comparative analysis Stuart Ball The experience of being in opposition for a lengthy period is not one which the modern Conservative Party is used to, and it has tended to find it difficult. Since the 1880s, the Conservatives have grown accustomed to being seen – and to see themselves – as the party of government. They have been in office for so much of the period that exercising power has seemed to be the natural state of affairs, and this adds to Conservative frustration during spells in opposition. The party can feel – even if it does not always articulate this – that their removal has been in some sense unfair or a mistake, and this can hinder an analysis of the situation and the selection of strategies to tackle it. This problem is less apparent in shorter spells out of office, in which the impact of the previous defeat is still strong. However, as time passes, and especially if the prospect of recovery is not becoming apparent, impatience leads to tension and criticism within the party. The Conservatives have generally been better at holding their nerve – and even at staying united – whilst under pressure in government than they have been in the comparatively less-demanding role of opposition. This insecurity, which leads to inconsist- encies, rushed decisions, grumbling in the ranks and mutterings about the leadership, has tended to diminish their effectiveness as an opposition party, even though they have often had a vulnerable government as a target.
[Show full text]
1 Randolph Churchill and the Wavertree By-Election, February 1935
A MAD HATTER CONTEST FROM BEGINNING TO END': 1 RANDOLPH CHURCHILL AND THE WAVERTREE BY-ELECTION, FEBRUARY 1935 David Button In recent times intense media attention has served to suggest that the outcome of almost every parliamentary by-election carries with it enormous political significance. Professional pundits are ready to assert that each result represents a decisive moment in the fortunes of the government, a turning point in the progress of the official opposition or a revival in the prospects of a third-party force. In reality, however, very few of the several hundred by-elections which have taken place over the last sixty years have possessed anything approaching such decisive importance. It is surely clear that the behaviour of the electorate on occasions other than general elections is often erratic, inconsistent and of little lasting significance. Only occasionally can the evidence of a by-election, in suggesting the withdrawal or return of support to a government, transform the political mood. Yet the fascination remains, not least for governments themselves. By early 1935, for example, the Conservative-dominated National Government, which had secured a massive overall parliamentary majority of 493 seats little over three years earlier, had been reduced to a state of near panic by a depressing series of by-election results. One veteran Conservative observed: 'I never knew our Central Office people so rattled as they were in February. They looked on no seat as safe'.2 With hindsight, it is difficult to believe that this degree of alarm was at all justified. The government defended forty-eight 180 Damd Button seats during the course of the parliament, of which only nine were lost, and there was no extended period during which the swing to the Labour party had been sufficiently strong to imply a Labour victory at the next general election.3 The result of the 1931 election had, after all, been exceptional, with the Conservatives and their supporters winning many seats which had been traditional Labour strongholds.
[Show full text]
Standard Note: SN/PC/4256 Last Updated: 7 March 2011
Prime Ministers Standard Note: SN/PC/4256 Last updated: 7 March 2011 Author: Oonagh Gay and Mary Durkin Section Parliament and Constitution Centre This note lists the Prime Ministers that have served in the United Kingdom, since 1721. It summarises the reasons behind each change in Prime Minister since 1900, and it notes debate and discussion that took place in the House of Commons, and the media, when the identity of the Prime Minister changed during the course of a Parliament, rather than at a general election. Finally, it lists the locations of Prime Ministerial papers, where known. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required. This information is provided subject to our general terms and conditions which are available online or may be provided on request in hard copy. Authors are available to discuss the content of this briefing with Members and their staff, but not with the general public. Contents 1 Chronological list of Prime Ministers 3 1.1 Eighteenth Century Prime Ministers, period of office and political party 3 1.2 Nineteenth Century Prime Ministers, period of office and political party 3
[Show full text]
The Irish Boundary Crisis and the Reshaping of British Politics: 1920
The Irish Boundary Crisis and the Reshaping of British Politics: 1920-1925 by Charles Kevin Matthews The London School of Economics and Political Science A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London. 2000 UMI Number: U150458 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U150458 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 "Theses . F. 3 5 W - 5 ■ ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the interaction between the evolution of the Irish Question and the re-emergence of Britain's two-party political system after World War I. It challenges the contention summed up in A.J.P. Taylor's suggestion that David Lloyd George 'conjured' the Irish Question out of existence with the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921. Here, it is shown that on the contrary the Irish dispute continued to be a highly sensitive issue for successive British governments until the Treaty's Boundary Commission report was shelved in 1925. This was so because British politics was then undergoing a profound revolution.
[Show full text]
7 Constitutional Constraints: Limitations That Led To
CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS: There are historians who have only offered one-sided analysis LIMITATIONS THAT LED TO ABDICATION of the abdication in the form of the “blame game.” Lord Beaverbrook’s 1966 posthumous book, edited by A.J.P. Taylor, places the blame of Amanda Terrell the abdication on the shoulders of Stanley Baldwin. Sir Oswald Mosely, in his 1968 autobiography My Life, accused Baldwin of manipulating the government in order to maximize his power. The 1930s were a time of ambiguity. Subsequently, the reality Conversely Robert Rhodes James reveals, in Memoirs of a Conservative: fails to coincide with recollection, or, at least, the desired recollection. J.C.C. Davidson’s Memoirs and Papers 1910-1937, that Davidson, a Despite being mired in economic hardship and diplomatic tensions, the Baldwin supporter, faulted Edward’s impossible demands for the thirties are remembered with a sense of dramatic nostalgia because it abdication. was the period before the world was plunged into war. Many Other historians have provided more balanced analysis of the historians have not escaped the trap of wistfulness when chronicling abdication. Some simply provide that the abdication was inevitable. the abdication of Edward VIII—the British king who relinquished his Linda Rosenweig, in her 1975 article “Abdication of Edward VIII”, throne in order to marry the woman he loved. argues that Edward’s complex mental state cost him his throne. The authors who are easily ensnared are the biographers and Rosenweig argues the abdication from a psychiatric point of view. In autobiographers. Most prominent of these are the Duke and Duchess 1964 Ronald Blythe wrote The Age of Illusion: Britain in the Twenties of Windsor.
[Show full text]
Interested in Sculpture?
Houses of Parliament Field Marshal Jan Smuts by Jacob Epstein, bronze, unveiled 1956 Interested David Lloyd George by Glynn Williams, bronze, unveiled 2007 in sculpture? Sir Winston Churchill by Ivor Roberts-Jones, bronze, unveiled 1973 Westminster is full of statues and sculptures. [Westminster Council cares for these statues in This leaflet gives you a free tour of a few close Parliament Square] to Parliament which you might like to visit and learn about. Start your tour outside the front of the Houses of Parliament (see map on back page) 1. Oliver Cromwell by William Hamo Thornycroft, bronze, installed 1899 1 2 The statue was presented to Parliament by the then Prime 6 3 5 Minister, Lord Rosebery, in 1895. Its position outside Westminster Hall was formerly occupied by the old law 4 courts which previously adjoined the Hall. The statue shows Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658) holding a sword and the Bible, his head bowed in thought. The sculptor, Hamo Thornycroft (1850-1925), was a leading figure of the ‘new sculpture movement’ in the late 19th century. The movement sought to make sculpture more life-like and vital. To find out more about this statue, and see how it was conserved in 2008 go to www.parliament.uk/cromwell Walk along the pavement, away from Elizabeth Tower (Big Ben), and past St Stephen’s Entrance and you will find: 2. Richard Coeur de Lion by Carol Marochetti (aka Richard I; Richard the Lion Heart), bronze, installed 1860 This large equestrian statue stands outside the House of To find out more about the Parliamentary Art Collection Lords.
[Show full text]