Wolfgang Ischinger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Wolfgang Ischinger CURRICULUM VITAE Born 6 April 1946 in Beuren, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. | Married, 3 Children 1963-64 Exchange pupil in US (AFS) 1966-72 Law School, Universities of Bonn and Geneva, State Examination in Law (1972) 1972-73 Graduate studies in international law, international relations and economics at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and at Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (M.A., Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, 1973) 1973-75 Cabinet of UN Secretary-General, New York 1975-79 German Foreign Ministry/Policy Planning, Bonn 1979-82 German Embassy, Washington 1982-90 Private Secretary to the Foreign Minister and later, Head of Parliament and Cabi- net Division, Foreign Office, Bonn 1990-93 Minister-Counselor and Head of Political Department, German Embassy, Paris 1993-95 Director Policy Planning Staff, Foreign Office, Bonn 1995-98 Director-General (Political Director), Foreign Office, Bonn 1998-2001 State Secretary, Foreign Office, Berlin (Deputy Foreign Minister) 2001-06 German Ambassador to the United States of America 2006-08 German Ambassador to the Court of St. James’s 2007 EU Representative in the Troika negotiations on Kosovo 2014 Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office for National Dialogue Roundtables in Ukraine 2008-2014 Global Head of Government Relations, Allianz SE 2008-present Chairman, Munich Security Conference 2015-2016 Chairman, OSCE Panel of Eminent Persons on European Security as a Common Project 2015- present Professor for Security Policy and Diplomatic Practice, Hertie School, Berlin Wolfgang Ischinger is Founding Director of the Hertie School’s Centre for International Se- curity. He advises the private sector, governments, and international organizations on strategic issues. He has published widely on foreign, security and defence policy issues. Wolfgang Ischinger is a member of the Trilateral Commission and the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) and serves on a number of non-profit boards and advisory coun- cils, including the German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), the American Academy Berlin, and the Atlantik-Brücke. He is also a member of the Supervisory Board of Hensoldt AG and of the International Advisory Council of Investcorp, London. 1 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Advancing Strategic Stability in the Euro-Atlantic Region 2021 and Beyond
June 2021 STATEMENT BY THE EURO-ATLANTIC SECURITY LEADERSHIP GROUP (EASLG) Prepared for Presidents, Prime Ministers, Parliamentarians, and Publics Advancing Strategic Stability in the Euro-Atlantic Region 2021 and Beyond n one of the best accounts of the lead-up to World War I, the historian Christopher Clark details how a group of European leaders—“The Sleepwalkers”—led their nations into a conflict that none of them wanted. Gripped by nationalism and ensnared by competing interests, mutual mistrust, and Ialliances, they made a series of tragic miscalculations that resulted in 40 million casualties. One of the more sobering aspects of this period was the speed with which events transpired in the summer of 1914, following the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, Sophie, in Sarajevo on June 28. The subsequent ultimatums, mobilizations, declarations of war, and finally, war itself unfolded in roughly one month. Leaders of that era found themselves with precious little time for considering their decisions—and the world paid a horrific price. In the Euro-Atlantic region today, leaders face risks of deployments that should cause leaders to reflect on the miscalculation, compounded by the potential for the use of adequacy of the decision time available to them to prevent nuclear weapons, where millions could be killed in minutes. or deescalate a crisis. Emerging technologies such as evasive Do we have the tools to prevent an incident from turning hypersonic missiles or robotic nuclear torpedoes could into unimaginable catastrophe? significantly compress decision-time. When combined with artificial intelligence including machine learning, humans While leaders, governments and publics are strained by may be removed from being “in” or “on” the decision- the developing and constantly changing challenge of the making loop, especially when responding to a perceived or COVID-19 pandemic, there is a growing risk of—and a real attack.
[Show full text]
A Diplomatic History of the 1998–99 Kosovo Conflict
FROM DAYTON TO ALLIED FORCE: A DIPLOMATIC HISTORY OF THE 1998–99 KOSOVO CONFLICT by Christian Novak A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Sydney 2017 ii I declare that the research presented here is my own original work and has not been submitted to any other institution for the award of a degree iii Abstract This thesis reconstructs the diplomatic response of the international community to the Kosovo conflict of 1998–99. It outlines the process which resulted in the failure of negotiations involving outside agencies and individuals as well as the recourse to air strikes against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Using primary sourced material from the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, personal interviews and other carefully selected primary sources, this thesis explores why international attempts to find a negotiated solution failed. iv Acknowledgements Numerous people have assisted in the completion of this thesis. I would firstly like to acknowledge my research supervisor, Professor Glenda Sluga, for her guidance over the years. My gratitude is also extended to John Drewienkiewicz, Josef Janning, Richard Miles, Klaus Naumann, and Lord David Owen, all of whom took out time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. In particular, I wish to thank Wolfgang Petritsch. His accessibility and willingness to explain the events of 1998–99 considerably enhanced my own understanding of the crisis. Special thanks is reserved for my parents, Anne and David, who have gone above and beyond to support me.
[Show full text]
Germany's European Imperative
Chapter 21 | Germany’s European Imperative 139 Germany’s European Imperative Wolfgang Ischinger enry Kissinger once suggested that political decisions should be guided by two core questions: “What are we Htrying to achieve?” and “what are we trying to prevent?”1 For Germany, the answers to both questions are clear. What we need to prevent at all costs is Europe falling apart, paving the way for a return of nationalism, which has brought war twice in the past century. What we want to achieve is equally clear: we want Europe to be able to defend its political, economic, and societal model. This is why Germany must now embrace a “European imperative”2 as the basis for its decision-making. Whatever Berlin intends to do, it should first ask what its actions would mean for Europe’s ability to recover from the crisis and for Europe’s capacity to protect its values, interests, and sovereignty on the world stage. The pandemic has upended plans for the current German presidency of the Council of the EU. The primary task will be that of “maintaining EU integration as such.”3 The pandemic risks deepening rifts between Europe’s hard-hit south and the countries of the north, it threatens to widen fissures between eastern and western EU member states over migration and the rule of law, and it generally risks strengthening Euroskeptic forces across member states. And as if this were not enough, emboldened external actors—Russia and China in particular—are eager to exploit the pandemic in efforts “to undermine democratic debate and exacerbate social polarization”4 in Europe to advance their own agendas.
[Show full text]
Brexit and the Future of the US–EU and US–UK Relationships
Special relationships in flux: Brexit and the future of the US–EU and US–UK relationships TIM OLIVER AND MICHAEL JOHN WILLIAMS If the United Kingdom votes to leave the European Union in the referendum of June 2016 then one of the United States’ closest allies, one of the EU’s largest member states and a leading member of NATO will negotiate a withdrawal from the EU, popularly known as ‘Brexit’. While talk of a UK–US ‘special relation- ship’ or of Britain as a ‘transatlantic bridge’ can be overplayed, not least by British prime ministers, the UK is a central player in US–European relations.1 This reflects not only Britain’s close relations with Washington, its role in European security and its membership of the EU; it also reflects America’s role as a European power and Europe’s interests in the United States. A Brexit has the potential to make a significant impact on transatlantic relations. It will change both the UK as a country and Britain’s place in the world.2 It will also change the EU, reshape European geopolitics, affect NATO and change the US–UK and US–EU relationships, both internally and in respect of their place in the world. Such is the potential impact of Brexit on the United States that, in an interview with the BBC’s Jon Sopel in summer 2015, President Obama stated: I will say this, that having the United Kingdom in the European Union gives us much greater confidence about the strength of the transatlantic union and is part of the corner- stone of institutions built after World War II that has made the world safer and more prosperous.
[Show full text]
Spring Program February – July 2021
SPRING PROGRAM FEBRUARY – JULY 2021 The American Academy in Berlin SPRING PROGRAM FEBRUARY – JULY 2021 We are delighted to present the spring 2021 program of events at the American Academy in Berlin. While we do hope to welcome our guests in person to the Hans Arnhold Center this spring, at the time of this printing the public health situation remains dynamic; event dates and formats may change accordingly. Until the public health situation allows us to again host events at the American Academy, all events will be held online. We therefore request that you please visit our website, americanacademy.de, for the most up-to- date information about our programs and register in advance for all events. We remain committed to providing a safe environment for our speakers and guests and very much look forward to resuming our regular in-person programming as conditions allow. FEBRUARY Tuesday, February 23 7:30 p.m. NINA MARIA GORRISSEN LECTURE Tuesday, February 2 6:00 p.m. Roman Diversity: Modern Lessons from an AMERICAN ACADEMY LECTURE AT HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN Ancient Empire A Tale of Two Camps: Nandini Pandey, Associate Professor of Im / mobilities and Inequalities Classics, University of Wisconsin-Madison in the Horn of Africa Nathalie Peutz, Associate Professor Wednesday, February 24 7:30 p.m. of Anthropology, New York University Abu Dhabi KURT VIERMETZ LECTURE Registration via [email protected] Some Assembly Required: In cooperation with the Integrative Research Decoding Four Billion Years of Institute Law & Society, Faculty of Law, Life, from Ancient Fossils to DNA Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Neil Shubin, Robert R.
[Show full text]
The Legacy of Kosovo: German Politics and Policies in the Balkans
THE LEGACY OF KOSOVO: GERMAN POLITICS AND POLICIES IN THE BALKANS Wolfgang-Uwe Friedrich editor GERMAN ISSUES 22 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University THE LEGACY OF KOSOVO: GERMAN POLITICS AND POLICIES IN THE BALKANS Wolfgang-Uwe Friedrich Wolfgang Ischinger Rudolf Scharping GERMAN ISSUES 22 The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (AICGS) is a center for advanced research, study, and discussion on the politics, culture, and society of the Federal Republic of Germany. Established in 1983 and affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University but governed by its own Board of Trustees, AICGS is a privately incorporated institute dedicated to independent, critical, and comprehensive analysis and assessment of current German issues. Its goals are to help develop a new generation of American scholars with a thorough understanding of contemporary Germany, deepen American knowledge and understanding of current German developments, contribute to American policy analysis of problems relating to Germany, and promote interdisciplinary and comparative research on Germany. Executive Director: Jackson Janes Research Director: Carl Lankowski Board of Trustees, Cochair: Steven Muller Board of Trustees, Cochair: Harry J. Gray The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©2000 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-51-2 Additional copies of this AICGS German Issue are available from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-2217. Telephone 202/332-9312, Fax 202/265-9531, E-mail: [email protected], Web: http://www.aicgs.org C O N T E N T S Foreword ..........................................................................................
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2016
Annual Report 2016 Annual Report 2016 Table of Contents Foreword 5 The MSC Foundation in 2016 7 The MSC Foundation 8 The Advisory Council 10 The MSC Foundation Team 12 The New MSC Foundation Office in Berlin 14 Organizational Structure 15 The Munich Security Conference 2016 17 Key Facts 20 Selected Speakers 21 Side Events 22 The Munich Security Report 2016 25 Other MSC Events and Activities in 2016 29 MSC Kick-Off & Launch of the MSR 2016 31 Core Group Meeting Addis Ababa 32 Core Group Meeting Beijing 33 European Defense Series 34 Energy Security Series 36 Cyber Security Series 38 Health Security Series 40 Munich Strategy Forum 42 Munich Young Leaders Reunion 44 Reach and Visibility in 2016 47 Press Coverage of the Main Conference 48 Other Media Activities 50 Digital MSC 52 Outreach, Partnerships and Sponsoring 55 Outreach Activities 56 Partnerships 58 Sponsorships 59 Finances 60 The Year Ahead 62 3 Annual Report 2016 4 Annual Report 2016 Foreword Dear Readers, 2016 has been a turbulent year for international security, marked by serious risks to peace and security in the Euro-Atlantic region, tragic conflicts in the Greater Middle East, unresolved disputes in the Asia-Pacific, and unprecedented uncer- tainties in transatlantic relations. Today, the Western liberal order is at greater risk than at any time in the past 25 years. As global governance in general, and international security in particular, is becoming messier and more difficult to manage, the Munich Security Conference’s (MSC) raison d’être is more relevant than ever: we need a frank and open exchange among international leaders on how to solve the many crises of our time.
[Show full text]
Discussion Paper
Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung Center for European Integration Studies Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Discussion Paper Rafael Biermann The Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe - potential, problems and perspectives C 56 1999 Dr. Rafael Biermann, born in 1964, studied Political Science, Medieval and Modern History, and German Lit- erature in Cologne, Osnabrück and Los Angeles. In 1990 and 1991, during the German unification process, he worked in the Office of the German Chancellor. Afterwards he did his PhD in International Relations at Bonn University, writing about the Soviet policy towards German unification in 1989/1990 (”Zwischen Kreml und Kanzleramt. Wie Moskau mit der deutschen Einheit rang”, Paderborn, 2nd ed., 1997). In 1995 he joined the Policy and Advisory Staff of the Ministry of Defence, where he became Head of Central Planning in 1997. Since August 1999, Rafael Biermann has been responsible for establishing a Task Force ‘South Eastern Europe’ at the Center for European Integration Studies. Rafael Biermann The Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe - potential, problems and perspectives 1. Europe and the Balkans at a cross-roads Crises sometimes happen to be turning points in history, serving as eye- openers that stimulate a fundamental reversal of behaviour. The Chinese language has created a symbol uniquely reflecting this reality: the ideo- gram for ‘crisis’ is composed of two characters which separately mean ‘danger’ and ‘opportunity’. In retrospect, historians might view the date of 10 June 1999 as such a turning point in history, embodying both tragedy and hope. It was on this very day that the United Nations Security Council issued Resolution No.
[Show full text]
Kosovo and U.S. Policy: Background to Independence
Order Code RL31053 Kosovo and U.S. Policy: Background to Independence Updated June 20, 2008 Julie Kim Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Steven Woehrel Specialist in European Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Kosovo and U.S. Policy: Background to Independence Summary Close to nine years after NATO intervened militarily in the southern Serbian province of Kosovo, Kosovo declared itself an independent and sovereign state on February 17, 2008. A new Kosovo constitution came into force on June 15. These developments marked a new stage in, but not the end of, international concern and engagement in the western Balkan region. Serbia strenuously objects to and does not recognize Kosovo’s independence. Kosovo represented the last major unfinished business from the wars of Yugoslav succession in the 1990s. In 1998 and 1999, the United States and its NATO allies engaged in collective action to end escalating violence in Kosovo. These efforts culminated in a 78-day NATO bombing campaign (Operation Allied Force) against Serbia from March until June 1999, when then-Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic agreed to withdraw his forces from the province. Afterward, Kosovo was governed through a combination of U.N. and local Kosovar interim governing structures. Under the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999), the U.N. Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) retained ultimate political authority in the province. A NATO-led peacekeeping force, KFOR, was charged with providing a secure environment. UNSC Resolution 1244 did not settle Kosovo’s disputed status. The ethnic Albanian majority demanded full independence for Kosovo; Serbs insisted that Kosovo remain an integral part of Serbia.
[Show full text]
Wolfgang Ischinger Speaker Profile
Wolfgang Ischinger Chairman of the Munich Security Conference CSA CELEBRITY SPEAKERS Wolfgang Ischinger is the Chairman of the Munich Security Conference and Global Head of Government Relations, Allianz SE, Munich. From 1998 to 2000 he was Deputy Foreign Minister in Berlin, then German Ambassador to the US and later to the UK. "Wolfgang Ischinger has published widely on foreign policy, security, and arms control policy as well as on European & transatlantic issues In detail Languages Wolfgang Ischinger studied law at the universities of Bonn and He presents in German and English. Geneva where he obtained his law degree. He continued studying international law, foreign economic relations and history at the Want to know more? Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and at Harvard Law Give us a call or send us an e-mail to find out exactly what he School, Cambridge, USA. His long career in the German Foreign could bring to your event. Service gave him specific expertise in international negotiating processes, having been involved with the Bosnia Peace Talks at How to book him? Dayton, Ohio and negotiations on NATO enlargement and the Simply phone, fax or e-mail us. Kosovo crisis. In 2007, he represented the European Union in the troika negotiations on the future of Kosovo. He is also Chairman of the Ambassadors Advisory Board of the Executive Council on Diplomacy in Washington, D.C What he offers you Wolfgang Ischinger is an experienced German diplomat with the current mandate as Chairman of the Munich Conference on Security Policy to bring people together to discuss the central security issues of our time.
[Show full text]
A Community of Leaders Council
A community of leaders Council Austria Estonia Germany Latvia Slovakia Turkey Erhard Busek Toomas Ilves Niels Annen Nils Muiznieks Juraj Bayer Pavol Ekim Alptekin Steven Heinz Mart Laar Roland Berger Vaira Vike-Freiberga Demeš (Turkey/The Gerald Knaus Peter Bofinger Mikuláš Dzurinda Netherlands) Finland Lithuania Albert Rohan Franziska Brantner Miroslav Lajcˇák Ipek Cem Taha Martti Ahtisaari Valdas Adamkus Wolfgang Schüssel Daniel Cohn-Bendit Katarina Mathernova Ahmet Davutoglu Tarja Halonen Gerhard Cromme Karla Wursterová Kemal Dervis Belgium Heidi Hautala Luxembourg Our annual Council meeting stands out in a Hans Eichel Lydie Polfer Hanzade Dog˘an Thomas Leysen Jaakko Iloniemi Slovenia ECFR’s pan-European Joschka Fischer Boyner crowded market of conferences and events, Minna Järvenpää Aleš Debeljak Bulgaria Karl-Theodor zu The Netherlands Ibrahim Kalin retaining the intimacy and interactivity of a (Finland/US) Tanja Fajon Svetoslav Bojilov Guttenberg Dick Benschop Suat Kiniklioglu reach is enhanced by Olli Kivinen Danilo Türk private club while rivals balloon in size. It follows Ivan Krastev Annette Heuser Han ten Broeke Soli Özel Alexander Stubb Samuel Žbogar Meglena Kuneva Wolfgang Ischinger Ian Buruma our Council of prominent the energy of the European debate to different Teija Tiilikainen Steven Everts United Kingdom Nickolay Mladenov Roderich Kiesewetter Spain Erkki Tuomioja Beatrice de Graaf Douglas Alexander locations and seven cities have hosted the Council Georgi Pirinski Eckart von Klaeden José M. de Areilza Jaap de Hoop Charles Clarke Europeans, who Vessela Tcherneva France Caio Koch-Weser Carvajal meeting – Berlin, Madrid, Paris, Stockholm, Scheffer Robert Cooper Daniel Valtchev François Burgat Alexander Graf Gustavo de Aristegui Ben Knapen Andrew Duff through their individual Tallinn, Warsaw, and Vienna.
[Show full text]
Learn More About the Participants in English
V. CO-CHAIRS AND PARTICIPANTS V . CO-CHAIRS AND PARTICIPANTS Co-ChAIRS PARTICIpaNTS Des Browne (United Kingdom). Lord Browne of Ladyton. Steve Andreasen (United States). National security con- Convener, Top Level Group of UK Parliamentarians for sultant to the Nuclear Threat Initiative. Lecturer, Hubert Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Convener, European Leadership Network for Multilateral Minnesota. Former Director for Defense Policy and Arms Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. Former Control, White House National Security Council. Secretary of Defence of the United Kingdom. Robert Berls (United States). Senior Advisor, Nuclear Wolfgang Ischinger (Germany). Chairman, Munich Materials Security Program. Director, Moscow Security Conference. Global Head of Government Representative Office, Nuclear Threat Initiative. Relations, Allianz SE, Munich. Former German Ambassador to the United Kingdom and to the United Charles Boyd (United States). Starr Distinguished States. Former German Deputy Foreign Minister. National Security Fellow, Center for the National Interest. Former Deputy Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Forces in Igor Ivanov (Russia). President, Russian International Europe. General, U.S. Air Force (retired). Affairs Council. Professor, Moscow State Institute for International Relations. Former Minister of Foreign James Cartwright (United States). Former Vice Chairman, Affairs of the Russian Federation. Former Secretary of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. General, U.S. Marine Corps (retired). Security Council of the Russian Federation. Corresponding Member, Russian Academy of Sciences. James Collins (United States). Director, Russia and Eurasia Program, Carnegie Endowment for International Sam Nunn (United States). Co-chairman and Chief Peace. Former U.S. Ambassador to the Russian Federation. Executive Officer of the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
[Show full text]