DOCSLIB.ORG

Jonathan Barnes Department of Linguistics Boston University 621 Commonwealth Ave., Room 119 Boston, MA 02215 (617) 353-6222 [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jonathan Barnes Department of Linguistics Boston University 621 Commonwealth Ave., Room 119 Boston, MA 02215 (617) 353-6222 Jabarnes@Bu.Edu Jonathan Barnes Department of Linguistics Boston University 621 Commonwealth Ave., Room 119 Boston, MA 02215 (617) 353-6222 [email protected] CURRICULUM VITAE Employment History July 2020-present Chair, Boston University Department of Linguistics July 2015-July 2020 Associate Chair, Director of Graduate Studies, BU Department of Linguistics (formerly Linguistics Program). July 2012-July 2015 Director, BU Graduate Program in Applied Linguistics. Fall 2008-present Associate Professor of Linguistics, Department of Romance Studies, and BU Linguistics Program Fall 2009-present Research Affiliate, Speech Communication Group, MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics. 2002-2008 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Department of Romance Studies, formerly Modern Foreign Languages and Literatures, and Program in Applied Linguistics. Summer 2005 Faculty member, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, June 27-August 5, MIT and Harvard. (LSA 310, Introduction to Phonology, with Sharon Inkelas, UC Berkeley). Spring 2001 Graduate Student Researcher working on Phonetic Studies of Endangered Languages project (NSF Grant BCS-9817345), with Prof. Ian Maddieson. Spring 2001, 1999 Graduate Student Researcher working on Turkish Electronic Living Lexicon (TELL) project (NSF Grant BCS-9911003), with Prof. Sharon Inkelas. AY 1993-1994 Graduate Student Researcher working on Typology of Lexical Valence project with Prof. Johanna Nichols. Education 2002 Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley. Dissertation: Positional Neutralization: A Phonologization Approach to Typological Patterns. Committee: -1- Prof. Sharon Inkelas, Committee chair, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley Prof. Andrew Garrett, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley Prof. Larry Hyman, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley Prof. Alan Timberlake, Dept. of Slavic Languages & Literatures, UC Berkeley 1997 M.A. in Linguistics, UC Berkeley. 1994 M.A. in Slavic Linguistics, UC Berkeley. 1992 B.A. Columbia University, Summa Cum Laude in Russian Language and Literature, Phi Beta Kappa. Awards 2005 Frank and Lynne Wisneski Award for Excellence in Teaching, Boston University College of Arts and Sciences. 2000 UC Berkeley Outstanding Graduate Student Instructor Award. Grants and Fellowships Awarded August 1, 2015-January 31, 2017. Principal Investigator. BCS-1542161, Linguistics, National Science Foundation: “Facilitating Remote Participation at International Scientific Conferences”. Funded. $25,500. May 1, 2015-April 30, 2019 Principal Investigator. Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement grant, BCS-1451663, Linguistics, National Science Foundation: “Doctoral Dissertation Research: The Interaction of Pitch and Timing in the Perception of Prosodic Grouping”. C0-PI: Alejna Brugos. Funded. $7,884. September 21, 2010-September 20, 2014. Principal Investigator. Collaborative research grant, BCS-1023853, Linguistics, National Science Foundation: "Integrating Shape, Scaling, and Alignment in a Global Approach to F0 Events in Intonation Systems", with Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (MIT, Speech Communication Group, Research Laboratory of Electronics) and Nanette Veilleux (Simmons College, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science). Funded. $392,159 total; $252,555 for BU component. August 11, 2010-February 10, 2011. Co-Principal Investigator. BCS-1026724, National Science Foundation: "Medumba [BYV] Linguistic Fieldwork and Collaborative Language Development", with Mary Catherine O'Connor (BU) PI. Funded. $92,085. -2- June 1, 2009-May 31, 2010 Principal Investigator. Collaborative research grant, BCS-0842912, National Science Foundation: “Global Measures of Tonal Alignment in a Level-based Theory of Intonational Phonology”, with Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (MIT, Speech Communication Group, Research Laboratory of Electronics) and Nanette Veilleux (Simmons College, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science). Funded. $127,171 total; $80,897 for BU component. April 15, 2007-September 30, 2009 Principal Investigator. Collaborative research grant, BCS-0643134, National Science Foundation: “Prosodic categories of American English in form and function”, with Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (MIT, Speech Communication Group, Research Laboratory of Electronics) and Nanette Veilleux (Simmons College, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science). Funded. $254,826 total; $144,724 for BU component. 2006-2007. Boston University Humanities Foundation Junior Fellow. 2006-2007. Boston University Special Program for Research Initiation Grant (SPRInG), “Consequences of Early Experience for Language Acquisition”, with Leher Singh (BU Sargent College, Dept. of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences). $21,600. 2001-2002. Dissertation-year fellowship, Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. 1999, 2000. Summer FLAS fellowships to study Turkish in Istanbul, Turkey. 1998-1999. Academic-Year FLAS fellowship to study Turkish at UC Berkeley. 1997, 1998. Summer FLAS fellowships to study Serbo-Croatian in Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. 1996. American Council of Learned Societies summer language training grant for Bulgarian in Sofia, Bulgaria. 1995. Summer FLAS fellowship to study Bulgarian in Sofia, Bulgaria. 1992. Regents Fellowship for four years graduate study, UC Berkeley. Publications BOOKS AND EDITED VOLUMES: -3- Barnes, Jonathan, Alejna Brugos, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Nanette Veilleux (eds.) 2016. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Speech Prosody. Boston, MA. DOI: 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016 Barnes, Jonathan. 2006. Strength and Weakness at the Interface: Positional Neutralization in Phonetics and Phonology. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. BOOK CHAPTERS: Barnes, Jonathan, Alejna Brugos, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Nanette Veilleux. 2012. On the nature of perceptual differences between accentual peaks and plateaux. Understanding Prosody: The Role of Context, Function and Communication, ed. by Oliver Niebuhr, pp. 93-118. Language, Context, and Cognition series. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Barnes, Jonathan. 2002. Palatalization in Bulgarian dialects: an experiment in phoneme categorization. Revitalizing Bulgarian Dialectology. ed. by Ronelle Alexander and Vladimir Zhobov, University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection, Edited Volume #2, 2002. ARTICLES IN REFEREED JOURNALS: Barnes, Jonathan, Nanette Veilleux, Alejna Brugos, & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2012. Tonal Center of Gravity: A global approach to tonal implementation in a level-based intonational phonology. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 3(2): 343-389. Singh, Leher, Jacqueline Liederman, Robyn Mierzejewski, & Jonathan Barnes. 2011. Rapid reacquisition of native phoneme contrasts after disuse: you do not always lose what you do not use. Developmental Science 14, 5: 949-959. Barnes, Jonathan, Alejna Brugos, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Nanette Veilleux. 2010. Turning points, tonal targets, and the English L- phrase accent. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 7-9: 982-1023. Nichols, Johanna, with Jonathan Barnes & David Peterson. 2006. The robust bell curve of morphological complexity. Linguistic Typology 10(1): 96-106. Nichols, Johanna, David Peterson, & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8: 149-211. Barnes, Jonathan. 1997. Tsuu khaa tii hla?: Deixis, demonstratives, and discourse particles in Lai Chin . Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. Volume 21.2:53-86. CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: Barnes, Jonathan, Nanette Veilleux, Alejna Brugos & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2019. The interaction of timing and scaling in a lexical tone system: an example from Shilluk. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019. -4- Brugos, Alejna, Mara Breen, Nanette Veilleux, Jonathan Barnes & Stefanie Shattuck- Hufnagel. 2018. Cue-based annotation and analysis of prosodic boundary events. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018, 245-249. Barnes, Jonathan, Alejna Brugos, Nanette Veilleux & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2015. Perception of Pseudoswedish tonal contrasts by native speakers of American English: Implications for models of intonation perception. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4. Paper number 926. 1-5. Brugos, Alejna & Jonathan Barnes. 2015. Intonational schemas, perceived grouping, and distortions of perceived duration. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4. Paper number 952. 1-5. Jonathan Barnes, Alejna Brugos, Nanette Veilleux & Stefanie Shattuck Hufnagel. 2014. Segmental Influences on the Perception of Pitch Accent Scaling in English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, Campbell, Gibbon, and Hirst (eds.), pp. 1125-1129. Alejna Brugos & Jonathan Barnes. 2014. Effects of dynamic pitch and relative scaling on the perception of duration and prosodic grouping in American English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 7, Campbell, Gibbon, and Hirst (eds.), pp. 388-392. Alejna Brugos & Jonathan Barnes. 2014. Dynamic pitch and pitch range interact in distortions of perceived duration of American English speech tokens. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 135, 2425. Nanette Veilleux, Jonathan Barnes, Alejna Brugos & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Akumbu & Hyman Nasals and L Tone PLAR
    UC Berkeley Phonetics and Phonology Lab Annual Report (2016) Nasals and Low Tone in Grassfields Noun Class Prefixes Pius W. Akumbu & Larry M. Hyman University of Buea* University of California, Berkeley (*Fulbright Scholar in Linguistics Department, Berkeley, during Sept. 2015- May 2016) Abstract As it is well known, noun class prefixes are low tone in Narrow Bantu and classes 1, 3, 4, 6(a), 9, and 10 have nasals (Meeussen 1967). However, just outside Narrow Bantu, noun class prefixes are usually high tone and the nasals are typically missing. A dichotomy is found in Grassfields Bantu where Eastern Grassfields resembles Narrow Bantu but the Ring and Momo sub-groups of Western Grassfields have high tone prefixes and lack nasals except sporadically. Drawing on data from Babanki and other Ring languages, we show that this relationship is not accidental. In a number of contexts where we expect a high tone prefix, a stem-initial NC cluster requires that it rather be low. We provide some speculations in this paper as to why nasals should be associated with low tone, an issue that has not been fully addressed in the literature on consonant types and tone. 1 Introduction Over the past four decades, the study of noun classes in Grassfields Bantu languages has uncovered a number of issues concerning the tones of noun prefixes. As seen in Table 1 (next page), Proto (Narrow) Bantu, henceforth PB, is reconstructed with L tone noun prefixes, several of which also have a nasal consonant. The same *L tone reconstructions work for Eastern Grassfields Bantu (EGB), but not for Western Grassfields Bantu (WGB).
    [Show full text]
  • Florian Lionnet Curriculum Vitae Updated 24 October 2020
    Florian Lionnet Curriculum Vitae Updated 24 October 2020 Program in Linguistics Department contact: (609) 258-8577 1-S-19 Green Hall Phone: (609) 258-6988 Princeton University Email: [email protected] Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Webpage: www.princeton.edu/~flionnet ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2017-present Assistant Professor, Program in Linguistics, Princeton University VISITING POSITIONS Mar-Dec 2020 Invited researcher LLACAN (Langage, Langues et Cultures d'Afrique), CNRS, Paris, France Jan-Mar 2010 Visiting graduate student UCLA, Department of Lingusitics 2007-2008 Research student (研究生) Tokyo University (東京大学), Department of Linguistics EDUCATION 2016 Ph.D. in Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley 2012 M.A. in Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley 2007 M.A. in Linguistics, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Ulm & Université Paris 8. "Mention Très Bien" (magna cum laude). 2005-2010 Elève at the Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Ulm 2002-2005 CPGE (khâgne) [classes which prepare for the competitive entrance exams to the Grandes Ecoles], Lycée Louis-le-Grand, Paris. (French literature, English language and literature, Latin, Ancient Greek, Philosophy, Contemporary and Ancient History) 2001 Baccalauréat (high-school graduation degree); major: Science; emphasis: Mathematics. "Mention Très Bien" (magna cum laude). GRANT FUNDING 2020-(2023) National Science Foundation DLI-DEL grant. Research project #1953310: Linguistic and Anthropological Documentation of Kulaale, an Endangered Language of Chad. $294,662 2015-2018 Volkswagen Foundation DOBES grant (Documentation of Endangered Languages). Research project #89843: “Documentation of Laal - extension”. €195,700. - Co-applicant (with Tom Güldemann, Humboldt University, Berlin). - Head of research and fieldwork team. 2011-2015 Volkswagen Foundation DOBES grant (Documentation of Endangered Languages). Research project #85538: “Documentation of Laal (Chad)”.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Santa Cruz Nasalization, Neutral
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ NASALIZATION, NEUTRAL SEGMENTS, AND OPACITY EFFECTS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in LINGUISTICS by Copyright © by Rachel Leah Walker Rachel Leah Walker June 1998 1998 The Dissertation of Rachel Leah Walker is approved: ________________________________ Professor Jaye Padgett, Chair ________________________________ Professor Junko Itô ________________________________ Professor Armin Mester __________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies Table of Contents 3.3.4 Cross-morphemic spreading and fixed affixes......................116 NASALIZATION, NEUTRAL SEGMENTS, AND OPACITY EFFECTS 3.3.5 Another abstract alternative....................................................138 3.4 Some points of comparison between harmonic and constraint-based sympathy............................................................................................... 142 Abstract....................................................................................................................................... vi 3.5 Finnish....................................................................................................152 3.6 An evaluation metric for opacity........................................................155 Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................. viii 3.7 Appendix: German and harmonic sympathy revisited.................... 158 Chapter 1 Background...........................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Typology ∧ Phonology
    Frans Plank An implicational universal to defy: typology ⊃ ¬ phonology ≡ phonology ⊃ ¬ typology ≡ ¬ (typology ᴧ phonology) ≡ ¬ typology v ¬ phonology Abstract: The purpose of this chapter is twofold: first, to assess how typology has been dealing with phonology (§2), from early days (§2.1) to the present (§2.2); second, focusing on phonology (§3), to ask about an imbalance of phonology and syntax- inflection in general (§3.1) and about typological concerns in phonology itself (§3.2). Looked at from both angles, the phonology–typology relationship is seen to be special, and the impression is confirmed that, in comparison especially with syntax, phonological typology as well as typological phonology are behindhand in the quest for system in linguistic diversity. (Though not all is well about the syntax–typology relationship, either.) Explanations are suggested in terms of the substance of subject matters (§3.1) and of the attitudes to description and theory in different subcommunities in linguistics (§3.2). 1 The typological programme and where it is in arrears In linguistics, typology is a research programme, not a subfield or a theory, and its remit is (i) to chart linguistic diversity, (ii) to discover order or indeed unity in diversity, and (iii) to make sense of what has been charted and discovered. Regrettably but perhaps understandably, given how this enterprise has usually been named after Gabelentz (1894, 1901) and given the meanings of this term in other fields, typology has sometimes been taken to be about the classification of the discipline’s cherished cardinal individuals, namely languages, into types; but for linguistic typology “type” in this sense of “class” is really a secondary and indeed expendable concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Sound Change
    –––– -Alan-Yu-Prelims-drv Allan-Yu (Typeset by SPi) i of xvi September , : OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, //, SPi Origins of Sound Change –––– -Alan-Yu-Prelims-drv Allan-Yu (Typeset by SPi) ii of xvi September , : OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, //, SPi –––– -Alan-Yu-Prelims-drv Allan-Yu (Typeset by SPi) iii of xvi September , : OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, //, SPi Origins of Sound Change Approaches to Phonologization Edited by ALAN C. L. YU 1 –––– -Alan-Yu-Prelims-drv Allan-Yu (Typeset by SPi) iv of xvi September , : OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, //, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © editorial matter and organization Alan C. L. Yu © the chapters their several authors Themoralrightsoftheauthorshavebeenasserted First Edition published in Impression: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available ISBN –––– Printed in Great Britain by MPG Books Group, Bodmin and King’s Lynn –––– -Alan-Yu-Prelims-drv Allan-Yu (Typeset by SPi) v of xvi September , : OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, //, SPi Contents Preface vii Acknowledgements xii Notes on Contributors xiii Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • High Tone in Moro: Effects of Prosodic Categories and Morphological Domains
    Nat Lang Linguist Theory DOI 10.1007/s11049-011-9120-x High tone in Moro: effects of prosodic categories and morphological domains Peter Jenks · Sharon Rose Received: 2 July 2009 / Accepted: 14 January 2011 © The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This paper presents a description and analysis of the tonal system of Moro, a Kordofanian language of Sudan, showing that the distribution of H(igh) tone is sen- sitive to a number of morphological and prosodic factors. First, we demonstrate that the distribution of H on nouns is sensitive to the OCP, both within roots and with affixes. Nouns also exhibit lexical distinctions between forms that exhibit unbounded rightward spreading of H and those that show no spreading. We model this distinc- tion using cophonologies. While the distribution of H on Moro verb stems bears some We are immensely grateful to our Moro speakers, Elyasir Julima and Ikhlas Elahmer, for sharing their language with us. We thank audiences at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, the Annual Conference on African Linguistics 37 and 40, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Florida, the University of California, Santa Barbara and Harvard University for useful feedback and comments. We appreciate in-depth comments and discussion from Eric Bakovic,´ Larry Hyman, Victor Manfredi, Andrew Nevins, David Odden, and participants in the San Diego Phonology Interest Group and UCSD Phonetics Laboratory meetings. The members of the Moro Language Project, particularly Farrell Ackerman and George Gibbard, helped in numerous, immeasurable ways in both checking the data and refining the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Authors' Ms. of Chapter in Larry Hyman & Frans Plank, Eds., Phonological
    Authors’ ms. of chapter in Larry Hyman & Frans Plank, eds., Phonological typology, 273–311. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110451931-008 Contrastive feature hierarchies as a new lens on typology B. Elan Dreshera, Christopher Harveya, & Will Oxfordb University of Torontoa & University of Manitobab Abstract: We propose a way of looking at phonological typology that is based on a fundamental distinction between a phonetic and phonological analysis of the sound systems of languages. We build on approaches to phonology pioneered by Sapir and the Prague School (Jakobson and Trubetzkoy), instantiated within a generative grammar. We view phonemes as being composed of contrastive features that are themselves organized into language-particular hierarchies. We propose that these contrastive feature hierarchies shed light on synchronic and diachronic phonological patterns, and therefore offer a new lens on phonological typology. Thus, on this view the subject matter for typological investigation is not a phonetic sound (e.g., [i]) or a phoneme (/i/), or even a phonemic inventory (/i, a, u/), but an inventory generated by a feature hierarchy: for example, /i, a, u/ generated by the hierarchy [low] > [round]. This yields a different set of representations from the same terminal symbols generated by the hierarchy [round] > [low]. We will illustrate this approach to phonological representations with a synchronic analysis of Classical Manchu, and then show how it accounts for the results of typological surveys of rounding harmony in Manchu-Tungusic, Eastern Mongolian, and Turkic, and for the distribution of palatalization in Yupik-Inuit dialects. We will then propose that contrast shift should be recognized as a type of phonological change, and show how it applies to diachronic developments of the Algonquian and Ob- Ugric vowel systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need Tone Features? G.N
    Do we need tone features? G.N. Clements, Alexis Michaud, Cédric Patin To cite this version: G.N. Clements, Alexis Michaud, Cédric Patin. Do we need tone features?. Hume, Elizabeth; Gold- smith, John; Wetzels, Leo. Tones and Features, De Gruyter Mouton, pp.3-24, 2011. halshs-00456364 HAL Id: halshs-00456364 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00456364 Submitted on 16 Feb 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Do we need tone features? Nick Clements, LPP (CNRS/Université Paris 3) Alexis Michaud, LACITO (CNRS/Université Paris 3) Cédric Patin, LLF (CNRS/Université Paris 7) Abstract. In the earliest work on tone languages, tones were treated as atomic units: High, Mid, Low, High Rising, etc. Universal tone features were introduced into phonological theory by Wang 1967 by analogy to the universal features commonly used in segmental phonology. The implicit claim was that features served the same functions in tonal phonology as in segmental phonology. However, with the advent of autosegmental phonology (Goldsmith 1976), much of the original motivation for tone features disappeared. Contour tones in many languages were reanalyzed as sequences of simple level tones, calling into question the need for tonal features such as [±falling].
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Anne Pycha Associate Professor Department of Linguistics University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI 53201 U.S.A. [email protected] http://people.uwm.edu/pycha/ Current as of: January, 2021 A. Background information 1. Formal education 2008 Ph.D, Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley 1993 B.A. with honors, Religious Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 2. Doctoral Thesis Morphological Sources of Phonological Length Advisors: Sharon Inkelas (chair), Keith Johnson, Larry Hyman 3. Academic and Professional Positions Held 2018-present. Associate Professor. Department of Linguistics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 2012- 2018. Assistant Professor. Department of Linguistics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 2010-2012. Visiting Assistant Professor. Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 2008-2010. IGERT Post-Doctoral Fellow, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania. 2002-2008. Graduate student, Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley. 2000-2002. Graduate student, Linguistics, University of Chicago. 1999. Science writer, freelance. 1996-1998. Research associate, Scientific Learning Corporation, Oakland, California 1993-1996. Technical writer, Lotus Development Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts 4. Special honors, awards, and research grants Honors and awards 2018. Nominee for UWM Undergraduate Research Mentor of the Year. 2015. Fellow, Kavli Scientist-Writer Workshop, New York University (competitive award for travel, accommodation, and tuition to one-week workshop) 2014. Fellow, Trans-Disciplinary Challenge Seminar on Language, Center for 21st Century Studies, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (competitive award for course release) 2007. Abigail Hodgen Publication Award, University of California, Berkeley 2006. Outstanding Graduate Student Instructor Award, University of California, Berkeley Anne Pycha Funding activity 2015, 2016. Submitted proposal. “Listener perception of prefixes, roots, and suffixes.” Principal investigator: Anne Pycha.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharon Inkelas
    Sharon Inkelas Department of Linguistics University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 • USA [email protected] http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~inkelas/ Education 1989 Ph.D., Linguistics. Stanford University. 1984 B.A. magna cum laude, Mathematics. Pomona College. Current positions 2017-present Special Faculty Advisor to the Chancellor on Sexual Violence/Sexual Harassment 2004-present Professor, Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. Academic positions 1996-2004 Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. 1992-1996 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. 1990-2002 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science. 1989-92 Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland (on leave 1990-92). 1989 Lecturer, Department of Linguistics, UCLA. Other teaching 2017 Morphophonology (co-taught with Prof. Larry Hyman). Four-week graduate-level course, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, University of Kentucky. 2015 Morphophonology. Four-week graduate-level course, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, University of Chicago. 2011 Introduction to Morphology. Four-week graduate-level course, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, University of Colorado. 2009 The Phonology-Morphology interface. Three-week graduate-level course, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, UC Berkeley. 2005 Introduction to Phonology (Co-taught with Prof. Jonathan Barnes). Six-week graduate-level course. Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2001 Introduction to Phonology (Co-taught with Prof. Cheryl Zoll). Six-week graduate-level course. Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara. 1994 Visiting Researcher, OTS, Utrecht University. (June-July). 1994 Taught one-week national AIO course to junior researchers, University of Leiden. 1993 The Phonology-Morphology interface.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigms and Questionnaires: Studying the Verbal Tone System of a Bantu Language* Michael R
    Paradigms and questionnaires: studying the verbal tone system of a Bantu language* Michael R. Marlo University of Missouri * I would like to thank the audience members at the 42nd Annual Conference on African Linguistics for their com- ments and Larry Hyman for follow-up discussion. In addition, I would like to thank David Odden, who provided helpful comments on an earlier draft. Any errors are my own. 1 This paper describes a methodology for studying the verbal tonal systems of Bantu languages, emphasizing techniques for constructing paradigms and identifying the types of data that should be collected by researchers in order to produce comprehensive descriptive analyses. In the simple approach advocated here, which is not new but which also has not been articulated in print be- fore, the researcher surveys a number of properties that are known to influence the realization of tone in Bantu in order to determine which ones trigger tonal alternations. On the basis of this survey, the researcher can then construct systematic questionnaires for data collection in which the appropriate grammatical factors affecting surface tonal patterns are permuted. The main thrust of this paper is delineating these factors known to influence tonal outputs in Bantu lan- guages, providing background on the micro-typology of Bantu verbal tonal systems and discuss- ing how these considerations impact the data-gathering process. 2 1. Introduction This paper continues in the spirit of two recent workshops in (1), organized as part of National Science Foundation-funded research projects, which highlighted important methodological is- sues concerning linguistic data collection and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural and Unnatural Sound Patterns: a Pocket Field Guide
    Natural and Unnatural Sound Patterns: A Pocket Field Guide Juliette Blevins (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany) Natural sound patterns are those grounded in physical properties of speech, while unnatural sound patterns arguably have no such physical basis. This study pro- vides a brief history of the study of natural and unnatural sound patterns from antiquity forward. Definitions of natural and unnatural sound patterns are exam- ined in a range of frameworks, and as applied to both synchronic and diachronic phonology. Examples of natural and unnatural sound patterns are provided, with attempts to move beyond linguistic intuitions by providing documentation from phonetic research, psycholinguistics, and laboratory phonology of the types of sound patterns grounded in physical properties of speech. A final issue discussed is the logic and empirical for encoding naturalness in synchronic grammars. Many common and recurrent sound patterns can be explained in terms of the way humans articulate and perceive speech, but phonetic explanation should be properly segregated from grammatical description and analysis. 1. Introduction: the study of sound patterns Phonology is the study of sound patterns of spoken human languages. In all spoken languages it is possible to discover sound patterns that characterize the form and content of words and phrases. These patterns can be divided into three basic types: patterns in contrastive sound inventories, also known as contrasts; patterns in the static distribution of sounds, also known as phonotactics; and patterns defined by the variable realization of sounds in different contexts, also known as alternations. Synchronic phonology investigates systems of contrasts, phonotactics and alternations at a particular point in time, while historical or diachronic phonology concerns itself with changes in these sound patterns over time.
    [Show full text]