DOCSLIB.ORG

2006 Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2006 Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Assessment Waste Monitoring Program 2006 Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Assessment November 2006 PREPARED BY: Cascadia Consulting Group, Inc. In cooperation with WIH Resource Group Acknowledgments This study would not have been possible without the cooperation and assistance of the management and operators of the four Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) who generously agreed to participate. Studies of this kind are an imposition on their time and their cooperation is greatly appreciated. Special thanks are given to the following MRFs which hosted and assisted sampling activities in addition to providing tonnage data and market information. Allied Waste, Rabanco Recycling Center (Third & Lander) in Seattle, Waste Management, Cascade Recycling Center in Woodinville, Smurfit-Stone, Renton Reclamation Plant, in Renton, and Waste Connection, Recycling Center in Tacoma. Market information and quantity and composition data resulting from the collection and sorting of material samples at each of the MRFs was obtained under confidentiality agreements and is not presented within this report. Instead, the data from individual facilities was aggregated. Thanks to the numerous material brokers, end-users, and industry experts for their time, insight, and information on recycled commodity markets and specifications. And finally, thank you King County and City of Seattle staff for assistance in identifying a separate sorting location. Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................i Material Flow and Associated Issues .........................................................................................................................i Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................. iii Incoming Stream .................................................................................................................................................. iii Residual Stream................................................................................................................................................... iii Product Stream ....................................................................................................................................................iv Recommendations.....................................................................................................................................................v Issue 1: The adverse impact of glass shards and fines.........................................................................................v Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................v Issue 2: Contamination in incoming streams.......................................................................................................vi Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................................vi Issue 3: The loss of recyclables in the residual streams ......................................................................................vi Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................................vi Issue 4: Prohibitives in product streams.............................................................................................................. vii Recommendations .............................................................................................................................................. vii Issue 5: Loss of recyclables in product streams.................................................................................................. vii Recommendations .............................................................................................................................................. vii Section 1 : Introduction and Objectives..........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................................1 Section 2 : Summary of Methods...................................................................................................................................2 Section 3 : Findings........................................................................................................................................................4 3.1 Quantities and Composition Results by Material Stream............................................................................4 3.1.1 Interpreting the Results ..........................................................................................................................4 3.1.2 Recyclability Groupings..........................................................................................................................4 3.1.3 Quantities and Composition of Incoming Material..................................................................................5 3.1.4 Quantities and Composition of Residual Material...................................................................................8 3.1.5 Quantities and Composition of Select Products ...................................................................................11 3.2 MRF Assessment......................................................................................................................................23 3.2.1 Analysis of Incoming Stream................................................................................................................23 3.2.2 Analysis of Residual Stream ................................................................................................................24 3.2.3 Analysis of Product Stream..................................................................................................................25 Section 4 : Conclusions................................................................................................................................................29 Section 5 : Issues and Recommendations...................................................................................................................32 5.1 Issue 1: The adverse impact of glass shards and fines ...........................................................................34 5.1.1 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................34 5.2 Issue 2: Contamination in incoming streams ...........................................................................................35 5.2.1 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................35 5.3 Issue 3: The loss of recyclables in the residual streams...........................................................................35 5.3.1 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................35 5.4 Issue 4: Prohibitives in product streams ...................................................................................................36 5.4.1 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................36 5.5 Issue 5: The loss of recyclables in product streams .................................................................................36 5.5.1 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................................36 Section 6 : Barriers to Meeting Performance Standards..............................................................................................38 APPENDIX A: MATERIAL DEFINITIONS APPENDIX B: DETAILED METHODOLOGY APPENDIX C: COMPOSITION CALCULATIONS APPENDIX D: FIELD FORMS APPENDIX E: REGIONAL MRF CAPACITY ANALYSIS Table of Tables Table 1: Material Groupings by Recyclability .................................................................................................................5 Table 2: Estimated Composition and Tons of Incoming Material, Four Puget Sound MRFs (2005 tons) ....................7 Table 3: Estimated Composition and Tons of Residual Material, Four Puget Sound MRFs (2005 tons)....................10 Table 4: Estimated Composition and Tons of Newspaper Product, Four Puget Sound MRFs (2005 tons) ................13 Table 5: Estimated Composition and Tons of Mixed Paper Product, Four Puget Sound MRFs (2005 tons) ..............16 Table 6: Estimated Composition and Tons of PETE Product, Four Puget Sound MRFs (2005 tons).........................19 Table 7: Estimated Composition and Tons of Glass Product, Four Puget Sound MRFs (2005 tons) .........................22 Table of Figures Figure 1. Summary of Material Streams, Issues, and Recommendations .....................................................................ii
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sector N: Scrap and Waste Recycling
    Industrial Stormwater Fact Sheet Series Sector N: Scrap Recycling and Waste Recycling Facilities U.S. EPA Office of Water EPA-833-F-06-029 February 2021 What is the NPDES stormwater program for industrial activity? Activities, such as material handling and storage, equipment maintenance and cleaning, industrial processing or other operations that occur at industrial facilities are often exposed to stormwater. The runoff from these areas may discharge pollutants directly into nearby waterbodies or indirectly via storm sewer systems, thereby degrading water quality. In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed permitting regulations under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to control stormwater discharges associated with eleven categories of industrial activity. As a result, NPDES permitting authorities, which may be either EPA or a state environmental agency, issue stormwater permits to control runoff from these industrial facilities. What types of industrial facilities are required to obtain permit coverage? This fact sheet specifically discusses stormwater discharges various industries including scrap recycling and waste recycling facilities as defined by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Major Group Code 50 (5093). Facilities and products in this group fall under the following categories, all of which require coverage under an industrial stormwater permit: ◆ Scrap and waste recycling facilities (non-source separated, non-liquid recyclable materials) engaged in processing, reclaiming, and wholesale distribution of scrap and waste materials such as ferrous and nonferrous metals, paper, plastic, cardboard, glass, and animal hides. ◆ Waste recycling facilities (liquid recyclable materials) engaged in reclaiming and recycling liquid wastes such as used oil, antifreeze, mineral spirits, and industrial solvents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Case for Zero Waste GM Blueprint Summarizes Waste-Reduction Strategies and Global Landfill-Free Program Updated: Feb
    The Business Case for Zero Waste GM blueprint summarizes waste-reduction strategies and global landfill-free program Updated: Feb. 28, 2018 DETROIT – Industrial facilities in the United States generate and manage about 7.6 billion tons of nonhazardous industrial waste in land disposal units annually, according the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. General Motors, however, reuses, recycles or composts 84 percent of its worldwide manufacturing waste and has 142 landfill-free facilities. The landfill-free program allows GM to reduce its waste footprint, while creating greater environmental awareness among employees and communities where it makes and sells cars and trucks. The GM workforce is consistently encouraged to find new ways to operate leaner and more efficiently. The following summarizes GM’s blueprint for attaining landfill-free leadership. It is intended to help companies of all sizes and industries reduce waste and create efficiencies. GM Program Overview GM achieved its first landfill-free site at our Flint Engine operations in 2005. The continued progress to 142 global sites has inspired an aspirational goal to have all manufacturing sites send zero waste to landfill. GM has more landfill-free facilities and recycles more waste from its worldwide facilities than any other automaker. GM uses a number of strategies to achieve corporate sustainability goals, but the underlying philosophy is thinking of waste as a resource out of place. The company’s zero-landfill facilities demonstrate this. Waste reduction also often enhances productivity, quality, efficiency and throughput. This is why GM merged its environmental efforts with its manufacturing sustainability goals. The result is a more sustainable company poised to provide products to global customers well into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Waste Recycling & Disposal
    Electronics... We are surrounded by electronics – You buy them. at home, at work and at school. Almost everything we do involves electronic devices. You break them. Unfortunately, when they break it is often Now do the right thing. cheaper to buy new ones than to have them repaired. Plus, technology changes so Recycle them! rapidly they become obsolete in no time. Old Electronics? Recycle Them! Electronic waste is the fastest growing Almost four million pounds of electronic municipal waste in the U.S.* It is 2% of waste are discarded annually with less than America’s trash but 70% of our toxic waste! 30% being recycled (U.S.EPA 2012 data). Old tube TVs and computer monitors, LCD and plasma monitors contain lead, mercury and other toxic materials. Cell phones contain varying levels of lead, mercury, cadmium, and bromine.** For safe disposal, bring all electronics to a community collection center near you. Find one near you inside! White River Regional Solid Waste Management District P.O. Box 2396 | Batesville, AR 72503 Safe Disposal of Electronic Waste Phone: (870) 793-5233 | Fax: (870) 793-4035 [email protected] | WhiteRiverSWMD.org Community Drop-Off Centers Serving Cleburne, Fulton, Independence, Izard, in North Central Arkansas *US EPA, Common Wastes & Materials – eCycling. Jackson, Sharp, Stone, Van Buren, White and ** e-Cycle.com Woodruff counties in north central Arkansas. Why Not Landfill Recycle These Electronics: White River District Electronics? TVs, VCRs, DVD Players, Cell Phones Collection Centers All Computers, Components & Accessories Lead, mercury, cadmium and bromine are Cleburne County iPads, iPods, MP3s, Tablets, E-Readers Heber Springs Sanitation Department present in many electronics.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Cycling Brochure
    Lake County Household About Your Household Hazardous Waste Hazardous Waste Collection Center Collection Center 13130 County Landfill Rd., Whether you're at home or at work, did Tavares, FL 32778 you know that unwanted cleaners, auto- Telephone #: (352) 343-3776 motive fluids and various hazardous chemicals, materials, substances or Note: There is a small fee for some electronics. products that are improperly generated Please call for more information. or discarded can be toxic to the public and pose a threat to the environment? HOURS OF OPERATION These materials can be dangerous and Monday—Friday should be properly managed and stored. 7:30am—5:00pm Lake County Environmental Utilities pro- Saturday from 7:30 am—5:00pm vides a County-wide service for proper management of hazardous and toxic Astatula materials and waste from County resi- County Landfill dents and qualified small businesses at Road the Lake County Household Hazardous Be An Waste (HHW) Collection Center and for Hwy 448 HOUSEHOLDS ONLY at the five residen- tial drop-off centers. Hwy 561 AT HOME AND AT Various chemicals, automotive fluids, WORK! pesticides, latex and oil-based paint, Hwy 19 Howey fluorescent lamps, batteries and elec- tronic waste from households can be Driving Directions dropped off at the HHW. From Tavares: On US Hwy 441, turn left onto Hwy 19. Turn left on Hwy 561. Follow to County Landfill Road on the Instead of storing hazardous waste at right. your home or business, call the House- From Clermont: On US Hwy 27N, turn right on Hwy 561. Why E-Scrap & Household Follow thru Astatula to County Landfill Road on the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Risky Business What You Need to Know About
    Risky Business What You Need To Know About... Scrap Metal Recycling Scrap Metal Recycling is a $20 billion industry and recycles 120 million tons per year 1 Scrap metals, in general, are divided into two basic categories:2 Ferrous scrap: Metal that contains iron Scrap metal recycling is the process of turning Nonferrous scrap: used metal material into new products and Metal that does not contain iron resources for manufacturing. Non-Ferrous Scrap Metal Facts: The United States provides more than 20% of the world supply of x25,000 recovered copper. The United States annually recycles enough copper to provide the copper content for Used aluminum cans are recycled 25,000 Statues of Liberty. and back on the grocery shelf in as little as 60 days. An estimated 85% to 90% of The United States annually processes more all automotive aluminum is than 250 billion lbs. of scrap material — the recovered and recycled. weight of more than 70 million cars. Nonferrous scrap metal recovery in 2015 included (in metric tons): 5.04 Million 1.78 Million 1.16 Million 0.12 0.10 Million Million Aluminum Copper Lead Zinc Nickel, Stainless Steel, Alloy Ferrous Scrap Metal Facts: Ferrous metals have a recovery rate as follows:3 100% 98% 90% 70% 66.8% Cars Structural Appliances Reinforcement Steel Cans Steel Steel Benefits: Recycling 1 ton of steel conserves: 2,500 lbs. of iron ore 120 lbs. of limestone 1,400 lbs. Recycling 1 ton of aluminum of coal conserves 4 metric tons of bauxite ore Recycled metal requires less energy to produce compared to raw metal: Recycled Aluminum 95% less energy used Recycled Copper 90% less energy used Recycled Steel 56% less energy used In the United States, domestically recycled aluminum cans saved the energy equivalent of 17 million barrels of gasoline — enough to fuel more Diversion of materials than one million vehicles on the road for 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero Waste Guide for City of Arcata Residents
    Zero Waste Guide For City of Arcata Residents Welcome, and thank you for picking up the new zero waste guide for City of Arcata residents. This guide is divided into six sections, with each section detailing a different aspect of zero waste. To minimize paper waste, only a limited number of guides were printed out. Once you are finished using this guide or no longer have the need for it, please consider passing it on to someone else instead of recycling it or throwing it away. Below are some ideas on how you can pass it on to the next person. Give it to your family, friends, or roommate Give it to your co-worker or leave it in your office break room Donate it to a local cafe or restaurant for their customers to read Return it to the City of Arcata Environmental Services at 736 F st Arcata, CA 95521 for redistribution. To track how many times this has been reused, sign your name and date below! Feel free to leave your personal zero waste ideas and tips in the “notes” section too! Name Date Notes Do you have ideas and/or tips on how we can improve this guide? We would love to hear from you! Contact the City of Arcata Environmental Services at (707) 822-8184 or [email protected] to leave a feedback! 2 Defining Zero Waste Zero waste is a materials management approach that first prevents waste and then establishes reuse and recycling policies, programs, and infrastructure for all discarded materials. The goal is to ensure that nothing is sent to a landfill or incinerator by ensuring that resources we take from the earth continue to be used efficiently without waste and excess burden on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • End-Of-Life Modelling
    Best Practice LCA: End-of-Life Modelling October 28, 2014 Agenda 1. Modelling EoL in LCA 2. Recycled content approach 3. Avoided burden approach 4. Value-corrected substitution 5. PE’s recommendations 6. Current PEF discussions 2 Modelling EoL in LCA 3 Modelling EoL in LCA General challenge • “Allocation” is commonly used to assign burdens associated with the upstream supply chain to each product of multi-output processes. • EoL modelling gives rise to a similar problem due to its multi-functionality – treat waste and produce valuable products (material and/or energy) • Focus on how the burden of virgin material production and the burden of EoL treatment be allocated between the first application in one product system and its subsequent application in the same or another product system. • Chosen allocation approach will affect modelling of other EoL pathways as well (e.g., landfill). 4 Modelling EoL in LCA Most common approaches • Recycled content approach (a.k.a. cut-off, 100/0) • Avoided burden approach (a.k.a. End-of-Life recycling, 0/100) • Value-Corrected Substitution 5 Recycled content approach 6 Recycled content approach General description • Scrap inputs to the product system are modelled as being free of any primary material burden (all assigned to the first life cycle). • The recycling of scrap generated by the product system is not part of the product system and the system boundary is drawn at the point of scrap generation. No credits for subsequent recycling. • When modelling other disposal processes (e.g., incineration with energy recovery, landfill with landfill gas capture), burdens are included, but no credits should be given for energy recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Homemade Food Scrap Digester
    Five Steps to Natural Yard Care 1. Build healthy soil 2. Plant right for your site 3. Practice smart watering 4. Think twice before using pesticides 5. Practice natural lawn care Homemade Food Scrap Digester Your new digester is ready to use! Collect food scraps, storing them in a container in your kitchen, and once or twice a week, throw the food scraps into the Food Scrap Digester. If odor or fruit fl ies are a problem, you can stockpile bags of brown leaves, coarse sawdust, straw, or shredded paper near the digester and use the material to place a thin layer on top of each new food scrap addition to the digester. No worms need to be added to this digester. Worms will fi nd their way into the digester through the holes and will help break down the food scraps. Harvesting the Compost Depending on your household’s food habits, a digester will fi ll in 6- 12 months. Harvest the compost by shoveling the upper foot or so of Properly composted food scraps can be turned into an excellent undecomposed food off to one side and fertilizer for gardens. However, composting food scraps in an open pile shoveling the dark, soil-like compost or mixed with yard waste can attract some unwanted urban pests— out of the bottom of the digester. If the rats, mice, raccoons and opossums! Here’s how to easily make your unfi nished compost is wet and smelly, own pest-proof food waste digester that will avoid pest problems. mix it with some soil and wait a week for it to turn drier and sweet smelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Dismantling: a Status Report on South Asia
    SHIP DISMANTLING A status report on South Asia A project funded by EU-INDIA ACTION PLAN SUPPORT FACILITY – ENVIRONMENT the European Union i SHIP DISMANTLING: A STATUS REPORT ON SOUTH ASIA SHIP DISMANTLING: A status report on South Asia Author: Mr Ramapati Kumar Reviewed and edited by: Dr Johan Bentinck, Dr Paul R Holmes This publication is produced by Euroconsult Mott MacDonald and WWF-India. Further information Euroconsult Mott MacDonald: www.euroconsult.mottmac.nl, www.mottmac.com. WWF-India: www.wwfindia.org Information about the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (www.europa.eu) and the website of the Delegation of the European Union to India (www.delind.ec.europa.eu). Legal notices: European Union This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication is the sole responsibility of the Technical Assistance Team and Mott MacDonald in consortium with WWF and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or the Delegation of the European Union to India. Mott MacDonald This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.
    [Show full text]
  • MRF) for Municipal Solid Waste
    Swachh Bharat Mission - Urban ADVISORY ON MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF) for Municipal Solid Waste Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO) Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs Government of India www.swachhbharaturban.gov.in | www.cpheeo.gov.in June 2020 Swachh Bharat Mission - Urban ADVISORY ON MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF) for Municipal Solid Waste Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO) Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs Government of India www.swachhbharaturban.gov.in | www.cpheeo.gov.in ADVISORY ON LANDFILL RECLAMATION 3 4 Advisory on MATERIAL RECOVERY FaCILITY (MRF) ADVISORY ON LANDFILL RECLAMATION 5 6 Advisory on MATERIAL RECOVERY FaCILITY (MRF) ADVISORY ON LANDFILL RECLAMATION 7 8 Advisory on MATERIAL RECOVERY FaCILITY (MRF) Table of Contents 1. Background 12 2. Municipal Solid Waste as per SWM Rules 2016 13 2.1 3R approach for Waste Minimization 14 2.2 Broad Categorization of MSW 17 2.3 Composition of Municipal Solid Waste 18 2.4 Material Recovery Facility (MRF) in SWM Rules 2016 18 2.5 Dry Waste as per SWM Rules 2016 19 2.6 Duty of ULB to setup MRF as per SWM Rules 2016 19 3. What is Material Recovery Facility (MRF): 19 3.1 Need of Material Recovery Facility (MRF) 20 3.2 Advantages of MRF 21 3.3 Types of Material Recovery Facility by Ownership and Operations 22 3.3.1 Mixed MRF 22 3.3.2 Dry MRF or Clean MRF 22 3.3.3 Manual MRF 23 3.3.4 Semi-Automated MRF 24 3.3.5 Mechanical / Automated MRF 24 3.4 Selection of MRF 24 3.5 Siting Criteria for MRF 25 3.6 Authorizations/ Permissions Required 26 3.7 Pictorial presentation of Type of MRF 27 3.8 Constituents in an MRF can be as follows: 27 3.9 Standard Process Flow of MRF 29 3.10 General Categories of dry Waste Segregation in MRF: 29 3.11 Typical Value Chain of MRF 30 3.12 Unit Processes in MRF 30 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hazardous Effects of Ship Scrapping and Recycling on Workers' Rights and the Environment
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2015 The Hazardous Effects of Ship Scrapping and Recycling on Workers' Rights and the Environment Maytee Gomez Salgueiro CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/370 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Hazardous Effects of Ship Scrapping and Recycling on Workers’ Rights and the Environment Maytee Gomez Salgueiro May 2015 Master’s Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master’s of Arts in International Affairs (MIA) at the City College of New York Advisor: Jean Krasno 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review: Adequacy and Weaknesses in Relation to my Argument 8 Chapter 3: The History of Shipbreaking 21 Chapter 4: Environmental and Health Hazards of Shipbreaking 26 Chapter 5: Conventions, Organizations, and Laws Regarding Ship breaking 33 Chapter 6: Chittagong, Bangladesh 42 Chapter 7: Alang, India 49 Chapter 8: Conclusion 54 2 The Hazardous Effects of Ship Scrapping and Recycling on Workers’ Rights and the Environment. Chapter 1: Introduction When we sail away on a cruise ship or when we execute a simple task such as pouring gas in our cars, we seldom ponder that there is a massive industry behind both activities. All types of vessels including cruise ships, bulk carriers, merchant ships, destroyers, as well as oil tankers, have a lifespan.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Comments Regarding Scrap Metal Waste; Subject: SCRP
    DCN PH4A004 COMMENTER Heritage Environmental Services RESPONDER RE SUBJECT SCRP SUBJNUM 004 COMMENT Scrap Metal Heritage agrees with EPA's conclusion that scrap metal is a valuable national resource, the recycling of which should be encouraged. In addition, scrap metal has little potential for release of hazardous constituents to the environment. Therefore, Heritage supports EPA's proposal to exempt processed scrap metal that is recycled from the definition of solid waste. Heritage further encourages EPA to include unprocessed scrap metal that is recycled in the exemption from the definition of solid waste. While Heritage does not have hard data demonstrating unprocessed scrap metal is a similarly minimal environmental risk, it is intuitive that if it is destined for recycling it: a) has undergone some minimal processing, such as collection for shipment, dismantling of equipment, or sizing prior to shipping to a scrap dealer, smelter, mill or foundry; b) has economic value as it will eventually be processed and sold in a manner similar to processed scrap metal; c) is just as analogous to raw metal concentrates as process scrap metal; and d) has the same end market (i.e., scrap metal reclamation) as processed scrap metal, otherwise it would not be destined for recycling. If EPA determines it will not exempt all scrap metal destined for recycling from the definition of solid waste, Heritage supports maintaining the existing exclusion from the definition of hazardous waste for recycled scrap metal other than processed scrap metal. Heritage would like to point out that some scrap metal is marketed directly to the foundry, mill or smelter without the involvement of a scrap metal dealer trading-on the recycling market.
    [Show full text]