DOCSLIB.ORG

Kopulation, Sexualethologie Und Lunarerotik Von

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kopulation, Sexualethologie Und Lunarerotik Von ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Galathea, Berichte des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen e.V. Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 31 Autor(en)/Author(s): Mader Detlef Artikel/Article: Kopulation, Sexualethologie und Lunarerotik von Schwalbenschwanz, Segelfalter, Apollofalter und anderen Schmetterlingen 53-131 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.zobodat.at gal athea Band 31 • Beiträge des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen • 2015 • S. 53-131 Kopulation, Sexualethologie und Lunarerotik von Schwalbenschwanz, Segelfalter, Apollofalter und anderen Schmetterlingen DETLEF MADER Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite Zusammenfassung ....................................................................................................................................................55 Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................................55 Key Words .....................................................................................................................................................................56 1 Übersicht der Stellungen bei der Kopulation von Insekten ................................................56 2 Antipodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen ...........................................57 2.1 Schmetterlinge mit ausgebreiteten oder zusammengeklappten Flügeln ....................58 2.2 Schmetterlinge mit dachartig am Körper angelegten Flügeln ...........................................61 2.3 Schmetterlinge mit schräg übereinandergeschobenen Flügeln .......................................62 2.4 Europäische Apollofalter (Rhopalocera).........................................................................................63 2.5 Europäische andere Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) .............................................................................64 2.6 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ............................................................................................68 2.7 Europäische Kleinschmetterlinge (Microlepidoptera ...............................................................74 2.8 Außereuropäische Apollofalter (Rhopalocera ..............................................................................77 2.9 Außereuropäische andere Tagfalter (Rhopalocera ..................................................................77 2.10 Außereuropäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera .................................................................................80 3 Sympodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen ..........................................82 3.1 Europäische Apollofalter (Rhopalocera ..........................................................................................85 3.2 Europäische andere Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) .............................................................................86 3.3 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ............................................................................................89 3.4 Europäische Kleinschmetterlinge (Microlepidoptera) .............................................................91 3.5 Außereuropäische Apollofalter (Rhopalocera) ............................................................................92 3.6 Außereuropäische andere Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) ................................................................92 3.7 Außereuropäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera)................................................................................93 4 Epipodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen .............................................96 4.1 Europäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) ..............................................................................................96 4.2 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ............................................................................................97 4.3 Außereuropäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) .................................................................................98 4.4 Außereuropäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera)................................................................................98 5 Klinopodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen .........................................99 5.1 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ............................................................................................99 5.2 Europäische und außereuropäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) sowie außereuropäi- sche Nachtfalter (Heterocera) .......................................................................................................... 100 Seite 53 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.zobodat.at 6 Schizopodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen ................................... 100 6.1 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ......................................................................................... 101 6.2 Europäische Kleinschmetterlinge (Microlepidoptera) .......................................................... 101 6.3 Europäische und außereuropäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) sowie außereuropäi- sche Nachtfalter (Heterocera) .......................................................................................................... 102 7 Parallelopodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen .............................. 102 7.1 Europäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) ........................................................................................... 102 7.2 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ......................................................................................... 102 7.3 Außereuropäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) und außereuropäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ............................................................................................................................................... 103 8 Inverse sympodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen ...................... 103 8.1 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ......................................................................................... 103 8.2 Europäische und außereuropäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) sowie außereuropäi- sche Nachtfalter (Heterocera) .......................................................................................................... 104 9 Inverse antipodale Stellung bei der Kopulation von Schmetterlingen....................... 104 9.1 Europäische Nachtfalter (Heterocera) ......................................................................................... 104 9.2 Europäische und außereuropäische Tagfalter (Rhopalocera) sowie außereuropäi- sche Nachtfalter (Heterocera) .......................................................................................................... 105 10 Lunarerotik der Apollofalter ............................................................................................................... 105 10.1 Mosel-Apollo ............................................................................................................................................... 105 10.2 Altmühl-Apollo ........................................................................................................................................... 106 10.3 Blau-Apollo .................................................................................................................................................. 107 10.4 Franken-Apollo .......................................................................................................................................... 107 10.5 Königssee-Apollo ...................................................................................................................................... 108 10.6 Andere Unterarten des Apollofalters ............................................................................................ 109 10.7 Alpen-Apollo ................................................................................................................................................ 111 10.8 Schwarzer Apollo...................................................................................................................................... 111 10.9 Andere Arten der Gattung Parnassius ......................................................................................... 112 10.10 Falscher Apollo .......................................................................................................................................... 113 11 Anerkennung .............................................................................................................................................. 113 12 Literaturverzeichnis ................................................................................................................................ 113 13 Tafelerläuterungen ................................................................................................................................. 115 Bildtafeln ....................................................................................................................................................... 119 Seite 54 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.zobodat.at Zusammenfassung Die Kopulation von Insekten erfolgt in antipodaler, sympodaler, epipodaler, klinopodaler, schizopodaler, cyclopodaler oder sinusoidaler Stellung von Männchen und Weibchen. Die Kopulation von anderen Insekten findet
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 以黃豹天蠶蛾屬為例 Evolutionary Plasticity and Functional Diversity of Eyespot Wing Pattern in Loepa Silkmoths
    國立中山大學生物科學系 碩士論文 Department of Biological Sciences National Sun Yat-sen University Master Thesis 翅面眼紋之演化可塑性與功能多樣性－ 以黃豹天蠶蛾屬為例 Evolutionary plasticity and functional diversity of eyespot wing pattern in Loepa silkmoths 研究生：蘇昱任 Yu-Jen Su 指導教授：顏聖紘 博士 Dr. Shen-Horn Yen 中華民國 106 年 7 月 July 2017 致 謝 非常感謝顏聖紘副教授，不辭辛勞地從我一開始入學對研究毫無頭緒，到制 定研究方向與題目、想法討論、方法的修改與問題指正，以及海報與論文等書面 修正等，一路指導教育我。 感謝小鳥們健康的活著陪我完成研究，沒有因為被我做的假餌嚇到而拒絕進 食或行為異常。 曾經在研究過程中提供給我幫助的朋友們：陳鍾瑋，引發我部份實驗設計的 構想。陳怡潔，提供我鳥類飼養與部分研究基礎認知。韋家軒，提出我實驗設計 上的缺失並點出我思考方向與研究中可能遭遇的問題與癥結。杜士豪、周育霆、 楊昕，協助我飼養鳥隻。非常謝謝你們的幫助。此外還有不少朋友們，在研究以 外的事務上提供我不少協助，使我能有更多心力專注於研究，感謝各位提供的幫 助，雖然無法將你們的名字在此一一列出，但你們的功勞我依然會銘記在心。 另外感謝一些商家與團體所提供無償的協助：中華民國生物奧林匹亞委員會， 借我使用攝影器材與印刷設備。社團法人高雄市野鳥協會，提供部分實驗用的鳥 隻。北站鳥園、五甲鳥藝坊、藍寶石鳥獸寵物大賣場，提供我不同鳥類飼養的技 巧與經驗分享。 最後我要在此鄭重感謝，高雄醫學大學生物醫學暨環境生物學系，謝寶森副 教授，以及國立中山大學生物科學系，黃淑萍助理教授。兩位老師願意抽空擔任 口試委員，並在短時間內閱讀與修改我的論文，提供我論文修訂上莫大的幫助。 iii 摘 要 眼紋(eye spot)是一種近圓形且具有同心圓環的斑紋。眼紋存在於許多動物體 表，目前最廣為人知的功能是防禦天敵。眼紋禦敵的機制包含威嚇天敵或誘導攻 擊失誤。黃豹天蠶蛾(Loepa)是天蠶蛾科(Saturniidae)下的一屬夜行性蛾類，其屬內 所有物種皆具有眼紋，但研究不如日行性的蛺蝶如此豐富透徹。黃豹天蠶蛾的翅 面斑紋變化不像蛺蝶那麼複雜，僅具有弧度或位置上些微差異，眼紋位置也相似， 推斷應有相同的禦敵機制，但卻在尺寸上有劇烈的變化，甚至有少數物種具有其 他斑紋使眼紋醒目程度下降或比眼紋更顯眼。這些變化與誠實訊號(honest signaling) 及威嚇理論有所牴觸，因此我們認為有必要釐清黃豹天蠶蛾眼紋的變化與其功能 性。首先我們分析了黃豹天蠶蛾所有物種的翅面紋路，歸納出翅紋的模式與少數 具其他斑紋的物種。然而因為黃豹天蠶蛾翅面具大面積黃色，鳥類可能會具有先 天色彩偏見，因此利用人工假餌檢測鳥類先天色彩偏見，之後才進行眼紋尺寸的 變化與其功能性差異的檢測。最後檢測部分具有其他斑紋的物種，這些斑紋是否 具有不同禦敵功效。結果顯示，黃豹天蠶蛾的眼紋效果確實與威嚇理論相符，但 是遭遇不同天敵時的效果有所差異。具有其他斑紋的少數物種在特定情況下反而 能呈現隱蔽作用，而比眼紋顯眼的斑紋則也有類似眼紋的威嚇作用。因此我們認 為在探討斑紋功能時，除了檢測現有功能假說外，還要考慮掠食者的認知多樣性 及共域物種的性狀，亦不可忽略其有功能多樣性的可能，如此才能更了解真實的 獵物-獵食者關係。 關鍵字：眼紋(Eye spot)、黃豹天蠶蛾(Loepa)、威嚇作用(Intimidating
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Insekteufauna Der DDR: Lepidoptera — Crambidae
    j Beitr. Ent. • Bd. 23 • 1973 • H. 1 -4 • S. 4 -5 5 - Berlin Institut für Pflaiizenscliutzforschung (BZA) der Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der D D R zu Berlin Zweigstelle Eberswalde Abteilung Taxonomie der Insekten (ehem. DEI) Ebersw alde Gü n t h e r Pe te r se n , Gerrit F r ie se & Gü n th er R in n h o eer Beiträge zur Insekteufauna der DDR: Lepidoptera — Crambidae Mit 42 Figuren und 51 Farbabbildungen1 Inhalt E in le itu n g ......................................................................................................................... 5 Artenbestand ................................................................................................................... 5 Zoogeograpbische A n alyse ......................................................................... ............ 7 Ökologie ............................................................................................................................. s8 Bestimnumgstabelle ................................................................................................. 11 Systeuiatiseh-fannistiscbes Verzeichnis der Gattungen und Arten 2 0 Verzeichnis (Checklist) der Crambxden der D D R .................................. 50 L it e r a t u r .......................................................................................................................... 53 In d ex ................................................................................................................................... 5 4 Einleitung Im Gegensatz zu den meisten anderen
    [Show full text]
  • Révision Taxinomique Et Nomenclaturale Des Rhopalocera Et Des Zygaenidae De France Métropolitaine
    Direction de la Recherche, de l’Expertise et de la Valorisation Direction Déléguée au Développement Durable, à la Conservation de la Nature et à l’Expertise Service du Patrimoine Naturel Dupont P, Luquet G. Chr., Demerges D., Drouet E. Révision taxinomique et nomenclaturale des Rhopalocera et des Zygaenidae de France métropolitaine. Conséquences sur l’acquisition et la gestion des données d’inventaire. Rapport SPN 2013 - 19 (Septembre 2013) Dupont (Pascal), Demerges (David), Drouet (Eric) et Luquet (Gérard Chr.). 2013. Révision systématique, taxinomique et nomenclaturale des Rhopalocera et des Zygaenidae de France métropolitaine. Conséquences sur l’acquisition et la gestion des données d’inventaire. Rapport MMNHN-SPN 2013 - 19, 201 p. Résumé : Les études de phylogénie moléculaire sur les Lépidoptères Rhopalocères et Zygènes sont de plus en plus nombreuses ces dernières années modifiant la systématique et la taxinomie de ces deux groupes. Une mise à jour complète est réalisée dans ce travail. Un cadre décisionnel a été élaboré pour les niveaux spécifiques et infra-spécifique avec une approche intégrative de la taxinomie. Ce cadre intégre notamment un aspect biogéographique en tenant compte des zones-refuges potentielles pour les espèces au cours du dernier maximum glaciaire. Cette démarche permet d’avoir une approche homogène pour le classement des taxa aux niveaux spécifiques et infra-spécifiques. Les conséquences pour l’acquisition des données dans le cadre d’un inventaire national sont développées. Summary : Studies on molecular phylogenies of Butterflies and Burnets have been increasingly frequent in the recent years, changing the systematics and taxonomy of these two groups. A full update has been performed in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Keweenaw County, Michigan, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Native Animals of RI
    RARE NATIVE ANIMALS OF RHODE ISLAND Revised: March, 2006 ABOUT THIS LIST The list is divided by vertebrates and invertebrates and is arranged taxonomically according to the recognized authority cited before each group. Appropriate synonomy is included where names have changed since publication of the cited authority. The Natural Heritage Program's Rare Native Plants of Rhode Island includes an estimate of the number of "extant populations" for each listed plant species, a figure which has been helpful in assessing the health of each species. Because animals are mobile, some exhibiting annual long-distance migrations, it is not possible to derive a population index that can be applied to all animal groups. The status assigned to each species (see definitions below) provides some indication of its range, relative abundance, and vulnerability to decline. More specific and pertinent data is available from the Natural Heritage Program, the Rhode Island Endangered Species Program, and the Rhode Island Natural History Survey. STATUS. The status of each species is designated by letter codes as defined: (FE) Federally Endangered (7 species currently listed) (FT) Federally Threatened (2 species currently listed) (SE) State Endangered Native species in imminent danger of extirpation from Rhode Island. These taxa may meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Formerly considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Federal listing as endangered or threatened. 2. Known from an estimated 1-2 total populations in the state. 3. Apparently globally rare or threatened; estimated at 100 or fewer populations range-wide. Animals listed as State Endangered are protected under the provisions of the Rhode Island State Endangered Species Act, Title 20 of the General Laws of the State of Rhode Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi (8.011Mb)
    1 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) 2 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) ÖZET* 3 AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Yapılan bu çalışma ile Amasya, Sivas ve Tokat illerinin Kelkit havzasına ait kısımlarında bulunan ve farklı böcek takımlarında parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae (Diptera) türleri, bunların tanımları ve yayılışlarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için farklı böcek takımlarına ait türler laboratuvarda kültüre alınarak parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae türleri elde edilmiştir. Kültüre alınan Lepidoptera takımına ait türler içerisinden, Euproctis chrysorrhoea (L.), Lymantria dispar (L.), Malacosoma neustrium (L.), Smyra dentinosa Freyer, Thaumetopoea solitaria Freyer, Thaumetopoea sp. ve Vanessa sp.,'den parazitoit elde edilmiş,
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Poole Harbour Species List
    Moths of Poole Harbour is a project of Birds of Poole Harbour Moths of Poole Harbour Species List Birds of Poole Harbour & Moths of Poole Harbour recording area The Moths of Poole Harbour Project The ‘Moths of Poole Harbour’ project (MoPH) was established in 2017 to gain knowledge of moth species occurring in Poole Harbour, Dorset, their distribution, abundance and to some extent, their habitat requirements. The study area uses the same boundaries as the Birds of Poole Harbour (BoPH) project. Abigail Gibbs and Chris Thain, previous Wardens on Brownsea Island for Dorset Wildlife Trust (DWT), were invited by BoPH to undertake a study of moths in the Poole Harbour recording area. This is an area of some 175 square kilometres stretching from Corfe Castle in the south to Canford Heath in the north of the conurbation and west as far as Wareham. 4 moth traps were purchased for the project; 3 Mercury Vapour (MV) Robinson traps with 50m extension cables and one Actinic, Ultra-violet (UV) portable Heath trap running from a rechargeable battery. This was the capability that was deployed on most of the ensuing 327 nights of trapping. Locations were selected using a number of criteria: Habitat, accessibility, existing knowledge (previously well-recorded sites were generally not included), potential for repeat visits, site security and potential for public engagement. Field work commenced from late July 2017 and continued until October. Generally, in the years 2018 – 2020 trapping field work began in March/ April and ran on until late October or early November, stopping at the first frost.
    [Show full text]
  • Maquetación 1
    About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union composed of both government and civil society organisations. It harnesses the experience, resources and reach of its 1,300 Member organisations and the input of some 15,000 experts. IUCN is the global authority on the status of the natural world and the measures needed to safeguard it. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ IUCN – The Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of more than 10,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. http://www.iucn.org/theme/species/about/species-survival-commission-ssc IUCN – Global Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland. The Species Programme includes a number of technical units covering Species Trade and Use, the IUCN Red List Unit, Freshwater Biodiversity Unit (all located in Cambridge, UK), the Global Biodiversity Assessment Initiative (located in Washington DC, USA), and the Marine Biodiversity Unit (located in Norfolk, Virginia, USA). www.iucn.org/species IUCN – Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The Centre was opened in October 2001 with the core support of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Environment, the regional Government of Junta de Andalucía and the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Crambidae) Ростовской Области
    Эверсманния. Энтомологические исследования Eversmannia в России и соседних регионах. Вып. 17-18. 15. VI. 2009: 57–70 No. 17-18. 2009 А.Н. Полтавский 1, К.С. Артохин 2, Ю.А. Силкин 3 1г. Ростов-на-Дону, Ботанический сад Южного Федерального университета 2г. Ростов-на-Дону, ООО «Агролига России» 3г. Ростов-на-Дону, Ростовское отделение РЭО К фауне огнёвок (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Crambidae) Ростовской области A.N. Poltavsky, K.S. Artokhin, Y.A. Silkin. To the fauna of Pyralid and Crambid moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Crambidae) of Rostov-on-Don Province. SUMMARY. Since 1978, during day- and night-time moth monitoring in Rostov-on-Don Province, 5397 ex. of 137 species Pyralidae and Crambidae were collected in 36 localities. Preliminary studies of S.N. Alpheraky [Алфера- ки, 1876] represented 63 species. The total list now includes 157 species of both families. Two species of Pyralidae (Phycitinae), Pempelia amoenella (Zeller, 1848) and Metallosticha argyrogrammos (Zeller, 1847), re reported from Russia for the first time. The most common and mass species are: Nomophila noctuella ([Den. & Schiff.]), Etiella zinckenella (Tr.), Aporodes floralis (Hb.), Euchromius ocellea (Hw.), Actenia brunnealis (Tr.), Homoeosoma nimbella (Dup.), Mecyna flavalis ([Den. & Schiff.]), Synaphe moldavica (Esp.), Pediasia luteella ([Den. & Schiff.]), Lamoria anella ([Den. & Schiff.]), Endotricha flammealis ([Den. & Schiff.]), Parapoynx stratiotata (L.), Hypsopygia costalis (F.), Calamotropha paludella (Hb.), Thisanotia chrysonuchella (Scop.), Agriphila tristella ([Den. & Schiff.]). Введение Для Ростовской области известен единственный список огнёвок, включающий 63 вида [Ал- фераки, 1876], причем часть указаний нуждается в уточнении. Особую актуальность изучение региональной фауны огнёвок имеет в связи с тем, что эта группа представляет весомую часть биоразнообразия, включает значительное число угрожаемых видов и индикаторов малонару- шенных природных комплексов [Большаков, 1999].
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Fauna of Wadi Al-Quff Protected Area, Palestine
    80 Jordan Journal of Natural History Invertebrate Fauna of Wadi Al-Quff Protected Area, Palestine Mazin Qumsiyeh Palestine Museum of Natural History and Palestine Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainability, Bethlehem University ABSTRACT We report results of a preliminary survey of the invertebrate fauna of Wadi Al-Quff area (occupied Palestine). We recorded 23 species of butterflies in 5 families. Moths were a difficult group to classify but we have at least 45 species. Dragon flies and damsel flies were noted in the Wadi Hasaka area. Four mantids in three families, two species of stick insects, one earwig species (Dermeptera) and at least seven species of Orthoptera were noted. There were at least 13 species of Hemiptera (true bugs) and 5 species of Neuroptera (netwing insects). We noted at least 13 species in ten families of the Order Diptera (the flies). We also collected/observed at least 17 species of Hymenoptera in eight families. In the Order Blattoidae (roaches), we noted two species only but the Order Coleoptera (Beetles) was very richly represented with at least 23 species in 10 families. Among parasitic arthropods we collected two species of fleas and three species of ticks (Ixodidae), one of the latter involved in transmittal of spotted fever. Five species of scorpions were noted, the largest being the Jericho or Mt. Nebo scorpion Nebo hierichonticus and the smallest being the brown scorpion Compsubuthus werneri. Two species of pseudoscorpions and two species of camel spiders were collected. A more difficult group was the regular spiders (Araneae) and we noted over two dozen species in at least 8 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]