E951 Volume 2

_M L ...... _7 Public Disclosure Authorized

.1 ~ W|: ' -r-_

.4X - -o Public Disclosure Authorized

Ghana Water Sector Restructuring Project Environmental Assessment and Management Plan

Part 2: Environmental Management Plan Public Disclosure Authorized

April 2004 Draft final report 9P2503 Public Disclosure Authorized g AY & ACONSULT UNITED W ..ad E-n --.wImetlCnl ROYAL HASKONING FILE COPY 00

ROYAL HASKONING

HASKONING NEDERLAND BV WATER

Barbarossastraat 35 P.O. Box 151 Nijmegen 6500 AD The Netherlands +31 (0)24 328 42 84 Telephone 0031(0)243231603 Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Arnhem 09122561 CoC

Document title Water Sector Restructuring Project Environmental Assessment and Management Plan Document short title Ghana WSRP EAMP Status Draft final report Date April 2004 Project name Environmental, Resettlement and Dam Safety Study for Ghana WSRP Project number 9P2503 Reference RH/Nijm/RO2/PS/MUHB Author(s) Peter Scheren/Martine Leman/Henk Blok - Royal Haskoning Seth A. Larmie - AY&A Consult Limited Client Ghana Water Company Ltd.

Drafted by Peter Scheren

Checked by Martine Leman Date/initials check ...... Approved by Henk Blok

Date/initials approval ...... KOYAL HASKONING

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

EAMP Environmental Assessment and Management Plan EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESR Environmental Scoping Report GOG GWCL Ghana Water Company Ltd. h.h. Household HSES Health, Safety, Environment(al) and Social HSES-MP Health, Safety, Environment and Social Management Plan IDA International Development Association PMU Project Management Unit ROW Right of Way RPE Regional Project Engineer SE Supervising Engineer VRA Volta River Authority WRC Water Resources Commission WSRP Water Sector Restructuring Project

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report i April 2004 000

ROYAL HASKONING

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Page

1 INTRODUCTION 1

2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS 2

3 MITIGATION MEASURES 7 3.1 Dredging activities and dredge spoil dump site at Brimsu 7 3.2 Location of proposed boreholes 9 3.3 Alignment of pipelines 10 3.4 Decommissioning of pipelines 10

4 MONITORING AND REPORTING 11 4.1 Contractor performance monitoring 11 4.1.1 HSES Management Plan 11 4.1.2 Environmental Supervising Engineer (ESE) 12 4.1.3 HSES reporting 13 4.2 Monitoring of the effectiveness of mitigation measures 14

5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 15 5.1 Stakeholders 15 5.2 Roles and Responsibilities 15 5.3 Institutional capacity and training of GWCL 17 5.3.1 Resettlement training and capacity building 17 A training workshop on Resettlement is to be organized as part of this assignment 17 5.3.2 General environmental training 18 5.3.3 Specific HSES training 18 5.3.4 Training of contractors personnel 19

6 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 20

7 COST ESTIMATES 21

Appendix 1 Overview of project components Appendix 2 Definition of key terms used in the EMP Appendix 3 Overview of potential environmental and social impacts per project component Appendix 4 Overview of mitigation measures per activity group and phase of the project Appendix 5 Format for HSES reporting in progress reports Appendix 6 Sample format for incident notification and reporting

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report ii April 2004 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~01

ROYAL HAIKONING

INTRODUCTION

This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) was prepared within the context of the First Year Investment Plan (FYIP)of the Water Sector Restructuring Project (WSRP) in Ghana, and forms Part 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment and Management Plan (EAMP) for these works. The EMP is based upon the results of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as presented in Part 1 of the EAMP.

The principle purpose of the EMP is to present a set of mitigation, monitoring, and institutional measures to be taken during planning and design, construction, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning of the first year civil works of the WSRP. The objective of these measures is to eliminate adverse environmental and social impacts, offset them, or reduce them to acceptable levels. The plan includes practical actions needed to implement these measures, which may largely be readily incorporated into: (a) construction specifications and drawings for inclusion in tender documents; and (b) operation and maintenance manuals. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) presents the following topics:

* Summary of imoacts: The predicted adverse environmental and social impacts for which mitigation is required are identified and briefly summarised. * Mitigation measures: Feasible and cost effective measures to reduce potentially significant adverse environmental and social impacts to acceptable levels are defined. * Monitorina measures: Activities to monitor the effectiveness of the defined mitigation measures are defined. These monitoring activities will allow for any additional remedial measures to be undertaken if mitigation measures are inadequate or the impacts have been underestimated within the EIA report, in particular where the results are not in compliance with the obtained permits, national standards and World Bank Group requirements and guidelines. * Institutional measures: Responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring will be clearly defined as well as arrangements for co-ordination between the various actors responsible for mitigation. Furthermore, training and capacity building requirements are presented. * Implementation schedule: The timing, frequency, and duration of mitigation measures are specified in an implementation schedule. * Costs estimates and sources of funds: For initial investment and recurring expenses for implementing of measures contained in the EMP, cost estimates are presented, in order to allow for integration into the total project costs.

An overview of important terms used in this EMP is presented in Appendix 2.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 1 April 2004 ROYAL HAIKONING

2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS

Based on the results of the EIA, this section summarizes the potential environmental and social impacts of the project, for which mitigation measures need to be put in place. An overview of potential environmental and social impacts of the various project components is presented in Appendix 3. Impacts are grouped into four categories, under the following headings:

. Impacts related to pioeline construction, operation and maintenance and decommissioning';

* Impacts related to dredging operations in Brimsu reservoir and disposal, as well the operational consequences thereof 2;

. Impacts related to borehole construction, operation and maintenance and decommissioning;

* Impacts related to VRA power line extensions, operation and maintenance and decommissioning.

Impacts have been categorized into three classes:

* Minor impact: where an effect will be experienced, but the impact magnitude is sufficiently small and well within accepted standards, and/or the receptor is of low sensitivity/value.

* Moderate impact: will be within accepted limits and standards. Moderate impacts may cover a broad range, from a threshold below which the impact is minor, up to a level that might be just short of breaching an established (legal) limit.

* Maior impact: is one where an accepted limit or standard may be exceeded or large magnitude impacts occur to highly valued/sensitive resource/receptors.

The criteria used for analyzing the potential levels of impact of the various aspects of the project activities are presented in chapter 5 of the EIA.

Within the urban development in which most project activities take place the potential impacts of construction, maintenance and decommissioning works in terms of common impacts such as air and noise pollution, visual amenities, and in, most cases, flora and fauna and are considered to be minor. There are, however, a number of aspects of the project which have a potential for moderate to major impact levels.

2 Including tank rehabilitation and booster station construction. 2Decommissioning is not an aspect with respect to the dredging operations.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 2 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

Potentially major impacts that have been identified are:

Soil erosion The construction of the water distribution network (pipelines) requires the clearance of sites from vegetation, as well as the execution of excavation works. Inappropriate construction practices and soil protection measures may induce or accelerate erosion, leading to soil instability and landslides in hilly areas. Although the majority of works takes place along existing roads, it may be anticipated that the clearing of vegetation in the ROW will lead to temporary increase in soil erosion, until re-vegetation has occurred. The risks of increased soil erosion are particularly prevalent in the hilly communities of the Ashanti Region particularly in Obuasi and also in the Volta Region.

Safety of the Constructions sites, in particular excavated trenches and pits, public transportation and, movement of heavy equipment and obstructions of roads may cause safety problems to the public. The risks of such is particularly important in the case of construction works near frequented public buildings such as the schools in Kumasi South and West, Obuasi, Mampong, Cape Coast, Tamale and Ho.

Furthermore, the dredge spoil disposal site at Brimsu causes risks of drowning to the public.

Disturbance and Construction and maintenance activities may only be temporary, but interruption of they may be spread over a long period of time. Without adequate commercial and planning and communication of activities, construction activities may social activities cause traffic disruptions and congestion, resulting in disturbance and interruption of commercial and social activities. This is particularly the case in the high density urban environments. An important point of attention is furthermore the many (illegal) roadside shops established within the existing pipeline ROW, which may need to be (temporarily) removed/relocated. Also, in certain cases, private property (land) might be temporarily or permanently affected. Permanent land-take will be involved in particular with the dump site for sediments from dredging operations in the Brimsu reservoir, the booster station in Kumasi North-East, and the new boreholes in the Ashanti and Upper East regions.

Construction activities may furthermore cause damage to other infrastructure (roads, sewerage pipes, drains, buildings, etc.), and therewith lead to (short-term) disruption of certain public services. Particular points of attention in this respect are the Hospital facilities on the Bakano-Ola road in Cape Coast as well as sections of the Elmina Market.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 3 April 2004 con

ROYAL HASKONING

Land take The land required for the dumpsite for dredge spoil from the Brimsu reservoir will amount to approximately 25 ha. The presently proposed site is located in an area that is partly reforested with Acacia trees and partly used for low-intensity agricultural purposes. Furthermore, there is cottage industrial activity involving charcoal burning in deprived sections of the site. The land will have to be acquired from the Apewosika chief.

Conflicting Groundwater is an important source of water in the dry northern part demands for of Ghana. With the ever-increasing demand for water from the water use. expanding population there is, however, a serious risk of conflicts between various demands for water use, where it is for drinking water, for irrigation, or for other purposes. In the ultimate case, uncontrolled groundwater extraction could lead to depletion. The proposed borehole developments in the Upper East Region pose a risk in this respect. Data on safe yield and on natural recharge of the aquifer are, however, inadequate to analyse the real impact at this stage in time.

Public health If well planned, constructed and maintained, boreholes may be an risks to water important source of relatively clean water. However, they do pose a users as a result risk of accidental and structural contamination that might go of contaminated unnoticed, therewith causing health risks to water users. Also, water groundwater may be naturally contaminated. The well fields planned in the Upper East region pose a genuine risk in this respect, since the aquifer extracted from is relatively shallow and the existence of many badly-maintained boreholes in the area involves a risk of cross-contamination. Moreover, the area is used for seasonal agricultural (rice and cattle raising) activities, involving a risk of bacterial and nitrate contamination.

Considered to be moderate impacts are the following:

Raw material The amount of raw material used for pipeline construction can be use substantial. Depending on the type of pipe material selected this may generally be plastics such as PVC, concrete and/or steel. Parts of these materials may be imported. Furthermore, a certain amount of materials such as sand and gravel will be required from local quarries.

Occupational Construction works unavoidably expose workers to occupational health and health and safety risks. Activities to mention in this respect are safety risks excavations; working with heavy equipment; working in confined spaces; working on and along traffic roads; heavy lifting; storage, handling and use of dangerous substances and wastes; working under noisy conditions; and handling of old pipes made of asbestos.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 4 April 2004 ofoo

ROYAL HASKONING

Water pollution Water pollution may result from wastewater produced by construction camps, and from the accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants and other chemicals. Furthermore, increased soil erosion and dust and sand at construction sites, sediment rich water pumped out of excavated trenches, and drainage water from the dumpsite for sediment from dredging operations in the Brimsu reservoir may lead to increased turbidity in surface watercourses. Also, draining water from the Impacts may occur during construction, but also from maintenance and decommissioning of facilities. Fortunately, there are only a limited number of cases where surface watercourses were found in the direct vicinity of the planned construction works in Kumasi (Subin stream) and Cape Coast (Fosu lagoon), of which only the latter is considered to be relatively ecologically sensitive.

Furthermore, the dredging works in Brimsu reservoir will disturb the bottom sediments in the reservoir and therewith have an impact on the turbidity, in particular in the lower parts of the lake. This in turn, may have impacts on the flora and fauna in the reservoir. Also, the fine materials on the dredge spoil dump site may drain into rivers and streams, causing increased turbidity.

Finally, groundwater pollution may result from well drilling, and from accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants and other chemicals used in the process. The groundwater levels in the borehole fields in the Upper East region, where several boreholes are proposed, are high, which increases the risk of such contamination. The Missiga well field is also a notable rice growing area because it is low lying and swampy in the wet months. The extensive use of organic manure (and limited use of agrochemicals) in the Missiga well field, which is used for rice growing, pose potential water quality pollution problems.

Public health Public health problems may occur in the case of badly managed problems from construction camps and work sites. In the case of the proposed construction works, it is not expected that large construction camps will be camps and established. However, the number of imported labourers may be sites, and from quite substantial causing health risks such as HIV. Furthermore, imported labour at construction sites pools of standing water may form in pits, holes, excavated ditches, etc. In the tropical of Ghana, this creates suitable habitats for insect disease vectors such as .

Alteration of The underground pipelines may locally alter the drainage patterns, natural drainage block water flows or create preferred pathways. The highest potential patterns for such impact is along the -Anloga pipeline extension routes, which run through a wetland area, along the track of the planned Kumasi southern by- pass road project and in hilly areas in some regions.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 5 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONINC

Nuisances and Piped water distribution systems are particularly sensitive to public health operational failures, in particular accidental ruptures of pipelines and risks as a result structural degradation of pipelines as a result of ageing and poor of incidental and maintenance, accompanied by low pressure in the pipes. Also, structural improper branch connections (both legal and illegal) increase risks. (institutional) operational Furthermore, accidents and leaks due to ruptures of pipelines may failures of the cause flooding with consequential effects, including disturbance of distribution socio-economic activities due to flooding, and public health risks due network to overflowing of drainage systems and still-standing water creating habitat for insect disease vectors such as malaria.

An indirect impact is furthermore the fact that that water consumption will increase as a result of the extended distribution system, which in turn will increase the amount of wastewater produced.

Impacts on flora Because of the urban environment in which much of the project and fauna components take place, the impacts on flora and fauna are anticipated to be minor. The exception is the dredging works in the Brimsu reservoir, which requires the clearance of land required for the provision of access to the shoreline, for the installation of pumps and a pipeline for the evacuation of sludge, and for the dredge spoil dump site (approximately 25 ha). The surroundings of the lake are of a locally to nationally important value. The area is not known for particular importance in terms of internationally protected species. The imprint of the project will involve a considerable change in the environment, although partly temporarily.

Increased The increased capacity of the Brimsu reservoir will enable increased sludge drinking water production and distribution. It is anticipated that production from drinking water production could increase from an average 13,700 water treatment m3/day to approximately 18,000 m3/day. The amount of sludge produced (and to be disposed of) by the water treatment process will therefore increase. Overall, the amount of treatment sludge could increase up to 30%. Although in technical terms the amounts produced are not of large concern (in particular in view of the space available in the area), the current practice of discharge of sludge back into Kakum stream does make this fact an issue of important consideration. Impacts associated with this are water pollution and land take (for sludge drying and disposal).

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 6 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

3 MITIGATION MEASURES

For each of the identified impacts specific mitigation measures have been defined as part of the EIA process. The general rule in designing such measures is:

* Avoidance of major impacts: major impacts are generally considered unacceptable, certainly ones that would endure into the long-term or extend over a large area.

* Reduction of major and moderate Impacts to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP) by planning, designing and controlling mitigation measures. This implies that mitigation measures will be applied up until the limitations of cost- effectiveness and practical application are reached. The limitations are established by best international practice.

* Implementation of good Contractor practices for aspects having minor impacts, in order to ensure that the impacts are managed within good reason.

Measures have been defined separately for the four groups of project activities identified in section 2, and for each project phase (construction, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning). The individual sets of measures presented in Appendix 4. Table 1 presents guidance to these mitigation tables.

Table 1 Reference to the sets of mitigation measures define for the various project activities (Appendix 4) Activity group Phase Construction Operation and Decommissioning maintenance Pipelines Al A2 A3 Dredging B1 B2 n/a Boreholes C1 C2 C3 Power lines Dl D2 D3

Apart from the mitigation measures presented in Appendix 4, the EIA has identified the need for further investigation of project alternatives where it concerns the location of the dumpsite for dredge spoil from the Brimsu reservoir, the location of boreholes and the detailed alignment of pipelines. Section 7 of the EIA presents considerations in this regard. The key elements required for such analysis are presented in the following sections.

3.1 Dredging activities and dredge spoil dump site at Brimsu Any dredging method used will necessarily result in some re-suspension of sediment. The degree of re-suspension depends on numerous factors. Four groups can be distinguished, as there are: - the soil being dredged, - the method of dredging, - the hydrodynamic regime in the dredging area, - the existing water quality and characteristics.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 7 April 2004 000

ROYAL HASKONING

The estimated sedimentation of the Brimsu reservoir is some 620,000m3 (Atkins, 1999). However, in order to select the proper dredging method, the quantity and properties of the sediment have to be assessed in more detail. Next to this, the hydrodynamic characteristics have to be taken into account since the Brimsu reservoir is in terms of dredging a relative shallow and small lake and the function of raw water reservoir should stay unimpaired during the dredging activities.

The dredging method should also not be evaluated without considering for instance the means of transportation of the spoil. Some dredging methods produce relatively high concentrations of suspended sediment but do have a favourable way of transporting the sludge to the disposal site or visa versa. It is generally acknowledged that the greatest single contribution to suspended sediment generation from some dredging methods arises from overflowing during loading. Next to this, it is also the mode of operation that influences the suspended sediment generation for a great deal. The degree to which particular dredging methods causes turbidity in the water body may not, therefore be the sole consideration when selecting the appropriate method.

Since the disposal site will be located close by, a dredging method making use of a delivery pipe seems favourable. However, if the dredging method requires make-up water for creating the slurry, a possible shortage of water, especially during the dry should be taken into account. In this case the make-up water could be collected in settlement ponds at the disposal site and pumped back into the reservoir. Dredging can be carried out during the day and make-up water can be pumped back during the night.

The site selected by GWCL Cape Coast for dumping of dredge spoil is located 500 m to the south-east of the Brimsu dam. Figure 1 shows its rough location. The oval shape represents the approximate surface area required for dumping of the spoil, approximately 250,000 M2. The site selected represents an area that is partially occupied with Acacia trees planted by the Forestry Department, and partly used for small-scale agricultural purposes and for the production of charcoal. With regard to the latter, the site does not appear to be of crucial importance for the subsistence of the local population. The nearest human settlements of any importance are the villages of Fameye and Apewosika. The area has a natural appeal but is not of any particular ecological importance.

The key drawback of the proposed location of the dredge spoil dump site is its location directly in the Kakum riverbed, which entails the risk of high sediment influx into the river and consequently increased turbidity levels. In this respect, it should, however be noted that the ecological value of the Kakum river, downstream from the Brimsu dam is very low, as a result of the fact that the river virtually dries up for parts of the year, when water demand exceeds inflow from the upstream Kakum catchment area.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 8 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~ X

Figure 1 Map showing the area of the proposed dredge-spoil dumpsite at Brimsu reservoir. The oval shape represents the location proposed by GWCL. The hatched area represents the area of possible alternative locations.

In the light of considerations presented in the EIA it has been recommended to review the availability of alternative location for dredge spoil disposal in the area to the east of Kakum river, in the region between the river and the villages of Apewosika and Fameye. This area is demarcated by the hatched area in Figure 1. The dump site should be selected on the basis of a thorough site investigation, including an ecological baseline survey and inventory of land use.

3.2 Location of proposed boreholes

The proposed borehole developments may be subdivided into two categories:

* Rehabilitation and development of existing boreholes (Bawku and Navrongo, in the Upper-East region). * Drilling of new boreholes (Agona/Jamasi in Ashanti region and possibly Navrongo in the Upper-East region3).

The bottom line for borehole development is the availability of a sufficient supply of water. In this respect, much will depend on the results of geohydrological survey and tests that will need to determine the safe yield of the boreholes to be developed. On a micro-scale, however, a number of aspects should be taken into consideration:

3 Depending on the pump tests for the existing wells in the Navrongo well fields, new wells may need to be drilled.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 9 April 2004 Eol on ROYAL HABKONING

* Avoidance of the occupation of land presently used for residential, agricultural, sanitary or other socio-economic uses as much as possible. * Avoidance of any areas of important ecological value as much as possible. * Avoidance of any areas having a high risk of increased erosion as a result of construction activities. * Maintenance of a certain safety distance from existing wells in order to avoid the risk of water-use conflicts and cross-contamination of wells. * Avoidance of interference with structures of cultural or archaeological importance. * Avoidance of locations in the direct vicinity of residential structures to avoid impacts related to noise generation during borehole operations (pumping).

It is recommended that the above-listed aspects should be taken into consideration in the selection of appropriate new borehole locations.

3.3 Alignment of pipelines

With regard to possible alternative alignment of pipelines, it is noted that at the time of the EIA, the exact alignment of pipelines has not yet been determined. Key considerations defined in the EIA for the selection of appropriate alignment are:

* Use of existing RoWs as much as possible. * Avoidance of the occupation of land presently used for residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural or other socio-economic uses as much as possible. * Avoidance of any areas of important ecological value as much as possible. * Avoidance of any areas having a high risk of increased erosion as a result of construction activities. * Avoidance of interference with structures of cultural or archaeological importance. * Avoidance of interference with other infrastructure and utilities. * Avoidance of (temporary) disturbance of socio-economic activities during construction.

3.4 Decommissioning of pipelines

The identified negative impacts of pipeline decommissioning are among others related to soil erosion and contamination, disturbance and interruption of activities including resettlement. Leaving the pipeline in the soil may have negative impacts as there is the occupation of space and (inert) waste at an inappropriate location. However, comparing the latter impacts with those in case of decommissioning one might consider leaving the pipeline in the ground. A notable exception however, is at the Unilever road works in Tema where for lack of space, the steel pipeline will have to be removed.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 10 April 2004 I s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~on

ROYAL HASKONING

4 MONITORING AND REPORTING

As part of the environmental management of the project, environmental performance monitoring needs to be undertaken to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and have the intended result. Additional remedial measures may be undertaken if mitigation measures are inadequate or the impacts have been underestimated within the EIA report, in particular where the project would be in breach with permits, national standards and World Bank Group requirements and guidelines. Monitoring requirements may be subdivided into two main topics:

* Performance monitoring of the implementation of mitigation measures by the works Contractor(s); * Direct monitoring of the effectiveness of mitigation measures.

It is noted that the first aspect of monitoring is relevant to the execution of works by external contractors, principally during the construction stage, but also for major maintenance works and decommissioning.

4.1 Contractor performance monitoring

4.1.1 HSES Management Plan

In order to ensure that the Contractor is fully aware and prepared for the management of health, safety, environmental and social (HSES) aspects of the project, the Contractor(s) of the works should be required to prepare an HSES Management Plan (HSES-MP) for the specific works to be executed under his contract. The Contractor's HSES-MP will serve two main purposes:

* For the Contractor, for internal purposes, to ensure that all measures are in place for adequate HSES management, and as an operational manual for his staff. * For the Client, supported where necessary by a Supervising Engineer (SE), to ensure that the Contractor is fully prepared for the adequate management of the HSES aspects of the project, and as a basis for monitoring of the Contractor's HSES performance.

On the basis of this EMP, the Contractor's HSES-MP should provide: * an overview of the HSES aspects and impacts related to construction works. * relevant Ghanaian legislation and Ghanaian and WB standards to which the Contractor will comply, including the way in which he will monitor such compliance, specifying: o Standards against which the monitoring will be set (national and WB), o Which parameters and limits will be monitored, o Frequency at which monitoring will be undertaken. * a clear definition of specific mitigation measures that are intended to be implemented in order to minimize the impacts. * the internal organisational, management and reporting mechanisms put in place for such.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 11 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

The Contractor's HSES-MP should be reviewed and approved by the Client before start of the works. This review should demonstrate if the Contractor's HSES-MP covers all of the identified impacts, and has defined appropriate measures to counteract any potential impacts.

4.1.2 Environmental Supervising Engineer (ESE)

It is advised to contract out the environmental supervision of the works to a third party, an Environmental Supervising Engineer (ESE), independent of the Contractor. The ESE would preferably be an international expert since the works are complex and will probably be carried out by an International Contractor. The quantity of works to be carried out calls for a team of supervisors (international and national), each dedicated to a specific region and /or kind of work. It is recommended that an international ESE is involved part time during the whole year of civil works, together with two local Environmental Engineers.

The ESE will assist the Client in the environmental supervision of the works, as there is:

Transportation: The management of motor vehicles used for the transport of materials and personnel should be monitored and include the following: * Motor vehicles condition and maintenance * Vehicle safety signals * Loading and off-loading procedures * Vehicle license and permit to drive, and * Kit for first aid and fire extinguisher

Execution of civil Works: The monitoring criteria should include the following: * Noise levels * Water pollution, including sediment flux into watercourses * Plant and equipment maintenance * Management of construction site aesthetics * Dust levels * Destruction of flora and fauna

Wastes management: Solid and liquid wastes which will be generated will have to be disposed off accordingly. Monitoring should include: * Waste storage, including sanitary and hazardous waste * Implementation of opportunities for waste reduction and reuse/recycling * Adequate disposal of waste

Raw material use: Measures to be monitored are: * Selection of environmentally-friendly raw materials and suppliers * Implementation of opportunities for reduction in raw material use

Soil protection: In areas and at sites with increased risk of erosion as a result of construction works, the Contractor's practices to be monitored include: * Implementation of erosion-protection measures (e.g. silt screens, terracing) * Separation and reinstatement of topsoil * Implementation of environmental engineering measures and ecological restoration after completion of works * Prevention and remediation of soil contamination

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 12 April 2004 oon

ROYAL HASKONING

Protection of public safety: The Contractor's practices with regard to protecting public safety should be monitored with regard to: * Bordering and signalling of works . (Timely) provision of information to the public | Traffic management * Restriction of access to work sites

Disturbance and interruption of commercial and social activities: Key Contractor management measures to be monitored include: * (Timely) provision of information to the public * Traffic management * Avoidance of relocation * Provision of access to sites to allow continuation of socio-economic activities * Prevention of land take where possible * Prevention of destruction/disruption of other utilities and infrastructure * Prevention of destruction/interference with cultural property

4.1.3 HSES reporting

The Contractor should be required to prepare weekly progress reports, which shall contain, among others, safety statistics, including details of any hazardous incidents and activities related to other HSES aspects. In line with this requirement it should be expected that the Contractor report on: . HSES management actions/measures taken; . Problems encountered in relation to HSES aspects (incidents, including delays, cost consequences, etc. as a result thereof); I (Lack of) compliance with contract requirements on the part of the Contractor; * Changes of assumptions, conditions, measures, designs and actual works in relation to HSES aspects; * Observations, concerns raised and/or decisions taken with regard to HSES management during site meetings.

A sample reporting format for HSES reporting by Contractors is presented in Appendix 5. The form is to be completed by the Contractor, and could serve as the basis for discussions on HSES during the weekly progress meetings between Contractor, ESE and the Client's Project Engineer. After review, the report should be approved by the ESE.

It is advised that reporting on incidents shall be done "as soon as practicable"4. Such incident reporting shall therefore be done individually. Also, it is advised that the Contractor is required to keep records and make reports on health, safety and welfare of persons, and damage to property. It is advisable to include such records, as well as copies of incident reports as Appendixes to the weekly reports. A sample incident report is presented in Appendix 6. The Contractor may, however, want to choose his own format. The ESE will pay site visits on a regular basis in order to familiarise himself with the activities of the Contractor and to have checks on the weekly reports of the Contractor. Details of HSES performance will be reported to the Client in the SE's reports to the

4 It is advisable to limit this reporting time to 24 hours.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 13 April 2004 Do

ROYAL HASKONING

Client. A proposal for the role of the client in supervising Contractor HSES performance is presented in Box 1. Box 1 Role of the Client in Contractor HSES performance monitoring Regional Project Engineers (RPE) will be assigned in each project region to supervise the work. The RPE of GWLC will be monitoring the works in the field on a day-to-day basis. This to ensure that works are executed according to technical specifications, schedule and budget, and taking into consideration any HSES management measures as defined in the relevant documents. Regularly, and at least twice a week, the RPE will inspect the works on the ground. Furthermore the works will be monitored by reviewing the weekly and monthly progress reports of the ESE and by attending the weekly work meetings (advised to make compulsory for the Contractor to organise) with the Contractor and the SE. The RPE will report to the PMU on a monthly basis in order to give input for the management of the project on a national level. In this respect, the RPE will draft a monthly report for the PMU and includes the monthly reports of the ESE as Appendixes.

4.2 Monitoring of the effectiveness of mitigation measures

During construction, maintenance and decommissioning works the majority of potential impacts is not related to effects that can be easily monitored through a receptor-based monitoring program (for example sampling and analysis of air, water and soil quality). Effectiveness of mitigation measures should therefore rather be managed through the Contractor HSES performance program defined in section 4.1. Where appropriate, the mitigation measures presented in Appendix 4 define requirements on the part of the contractor to monitor compliance with standards. This is, for instance, important for potential water pollution issues related to the dredge spoil dump site at Brimsu.

During operation, the most important impact is related to public health risks as a result of bad drinking water quality. In this respect, a monitoring programme is required to ensure that public health is sufficiently protected. The two main factors, in this respect, can be subdivided into (a) the commissioning and operation of boreholes, and (b) operation of the distribution system. The proposed monitoring programme is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Proposed monitoring program for operation of the water supply systems Parameters to be Location Tlming and frequency Responsibility monitored WHO drinking water At borehole Prior to commissioning Contractor parameters WHO drinking water At borehole Monthly for the first year, GWCL parameters half-yearly thereafter (one in the wet and one in the dry season) Residual chlorine, pH, At sample locations in the monthly GWCL Coliforms, Turbidity distribution net

It is recommended to establish a monitoring programme in the region in order to have a water resource assessment and in the long run a regional water balance.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 14 April 2004 oroo

ROYAL HASKONING

5 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

5.1 Stakeholders

For a successful implementation of EIA recommendations and the EMP, the roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders should be well defined and clear to all parties. In the section below, responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring will be clearly defined as well as arrangements for co-ordination between the various actors responsible for mitigation and monitoring. The institutions are at different levels comprising: 1. International institution- World Bank as the donor support agency. 2. National institutions for planning and policy issues- Ministry of Works and Housing, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Ministry of Environment and Science. 3. National institutions for regulation and implementation of policies- Environmental Protection Agency, Water Resources Commission, Ghana Water Company Limited, Community Water and Sanitation Agency, Lands Commission, Project Management Unit, Engineering Coordination Committee for Road Reservation Management. 4. Regional institutions- Regional Coordinating Council, Regional Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Ghana Water Company Limited, Regional Engineering Coordination Committee for Road Reservation Management. 5. District institutions- District Assembly, District Town and Country Planning, District Engineering Coordination Committee for Road Reservation Management. 6. Community- Traditional council, Office of the Assemblyman. 7. Others- Private sector (contractor, consultants), NGOs.

5.2 Roles and Responsibilities

World Bank * Request for Environmental and Social Management Report, * Provide financial support to carry out recommended mitigation measures.

Ministry of Works and Housing * Supervise the Ghana Water Company, Water Resources Commission roles in the implementation of the mitigation plans and monitoring programme.

Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development * Supervise the Regional Coordinating Council and Metropolitan/ Municipal/ District Assemblies to perform their roles in the implementation of the programme.

Ministry of Environment and Science * Supervise the EPA role in the programme implementation.

Water Resources Commission * Assist to select sites for observational boreholes in the Jamasi/ Agona (Ashanti Region) and Bawku/ Navrongo (Upper East Region),

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 15 April 2004 Don

ROYAL HASKONING

* Monitoring of observational boreholes, evaluate and manage data for sustainable resource use.

Environmental Protection Agencv * Responsibility to task GWCL to ensure implementation of prescribed mitigation and monitoring programmes, * Provide expertise to GWCL for implementation/ dissemination of the mitigation and monitoring programmes.

GWCL . To ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to manage the implementation of the EMP, * Ensure bid documents include actions to address adverse impacts resulting from construction work, * To ensure that the EMP reflects any changes during the construction process that may have a significant environmental or social impact, * Ensure deposition of copies of EMP to stakeholders including Regional Offices, Metropolitan/ Municipal/ District Assemblies and EPA, and for use by the Contractor, * Liaison with the environmental authorities, . Organize seminars to disseminate EMP document to relevant stakeholders, communities, etc.

Environmental Supervising Engineer (ESE as gresented in section 4.1.2) * ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to supervise the environmental issues of the works. * ensure that any changes during the construction process that may have a significant environmental or social impact are communicated to GWCL in time and advise on actions to be taken and costs involved. * ensure that GWCL is sufficiently informed on monitoring results.

Contractor * ensure that there are sufficient resources (time, money and people) to manage the environmental issues of the works. * be responsible for ensuring that all site staff, including sub-contractors and sub- contracted activities will comply with the projects EMP. * ensure that any changes during the construction process that may have a significant environmental or social impact are communicated to the Supervising Engineer in time and manage them accordingly. * ensure that the Environmental Supervising Engineer is sufficiently informed on Contractor's monitoring results. * organising the weekly work meetings

Engineerina Coordination Committee * Advise and encourage coordination and a uniform approach to minimize conflicts in installation of pipelines with other utility services.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 16 April 2004 ROYAL HAIKONING

Regional GWCL * Assist the GWCL head office and PMU in the overall implementation of the EMP.

Metropolitan/ Municipal/ District Assemblies * Participate in field inspection programmes and site meetings to confirm implementation of environmental action plans, * Support community sensitization programmes highlighting environmental actions.

Private sector (Consultant, NGO) * Provide expertise to GWCL for dissemination of EMP.

Traditional Council/ Assemblymen * Support for land acquisition/ relocation/ compensation issues, * Community opinion leaders to assist in public sensitization effort to advance implementation of EMP.

5.3 Institutional capacity and training of GWCL

We identified whether there is sufficient capacity in terms of numbers of employees to carry out the EMP, and have further identified training needs.

It seems that the PMU has sufficient capacity in terms of number of staff. However, in the Regions not all positions are filled in appropriately. During the execution of the first year civil works however, no major obstacles in this sense are foreseen.

Environmental and social awareness raising is an important element in ensuring effective implementation of environmental and social management measures. Training needs of relevant GWCL staff and consultants, who will be involved in the WSRP, and more specific in the execution of the EMP and the Resettlement Plans, are identified. On the basis of this training needs assessment, the following is concluded:

* general training on environmental and social management should be provided for selected GWCL staff involved in the WSRP; * specific training should be provided for staff who will undertake regular monitoring of the Contractors of the works to ensure compliance with the EMP; these are the Regional Project Engineers.

It is recommended that the different training components are organised by a third party who is fully acquainted with international environmental management practices and relevant WB guidelines. An exception here is the training for personnel of the Contractor (see 5.3.4).

5.3.1 Resettlement training and capacity building

A training workshop on Resettlement is to be organized as part of this assignment. Based on the training needs assessment and as discussed with GWCL a total of 20 staff (including local consultants) will be trained in a workshop of 5 days. For detailed

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 17 April 2004 non ROYAL HASKON INC

information on resettlement training, reference is made to the Resettlement Training Plan (Ghana WSRP Resettlement Training Plan, April 2004).

In addition to this session, the following activities are proposed with respect to technical support and capacity building in relation to resettlement:

* The first RAP to be prepared in the framework of this Project should be developed by Ghanaian consultants with support from an experienced international consultant, in order to bring in international experience into field practice; * At implementation stage, it is recommended that Ghanaian consultants provide support to GWCL officers and other parties involved.

N.B. The above is accounted for in the cost estimate for the EMP

5.3.2 General environmental training

The environmental management training for GWCL staff (a total of 25 staff to be trained in a 5 day workshop) should include but not be limited to the following topics: * The WB project cycle and relevant Safeguard Policies * Environmental and Social Impact Assessment * Project Management * Monitoring and Inspections . Reporting * Communication

In this training, one or more sessions on communication and training should be included for a selected group of stakeholders, for instance, Regional Officers and local consultants. The so trained people can disseminate their knowledge and skills to other people. For this 'train-the-trainer' principle we recommend to have a training session on (among others): * Communication * Preparing a training programme * Preparing a training session * Presentation techniques

This training package should be further developed by a third party and the training should be organised before the start of the actual execution of the works.

5.3.3 Specific HSES training

The Regional Project Engineers are acquainted with the supervision and monitoring of civil works in general but are not familiar with up-to-date environmental management practices.

Specific training for the Project Engineers should contain a theoretical module, explaining the general principles of HSES Management, in particular its 'why' and 'how'. And a more practical session on the execution of HSES field audits. With regard to the former, an overview will be presented of the various steps involved like: scoping, collection of baseline data, assessment of impacts, HSES management plans, public consultation, etc. The practical session should focus on construction readiness audits (to

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 18 April 2004 noo cooo ROYAL HASKONING

check whether the Contractor has everything in place to assure adequate HSES management) and HSES performance audits. It is recommended that both sessions will also be attended by the Environmental Supervising Engineer and by the senior staff of the Regional Offices of GWCL (some 25 people). A four days training is foreseen for this. It is further recommended to have 2 sessions for this group, each with some 12 participants. This training package should be further developed by a third party and the training should be organised before the start of the actual execution of the works.

5.3.4 Training of contractors personnel

The Contractor should provide sufficient training to his own personnel to ensure that they are all aware of the relevant aspects of the EMP and are able to fulfil their roles and functions (contractor's responsibility). Specific training should be provided to those employees that have specific tasks associated with the implementation of the EMP.

General topics should be: * HSES in general (working procedures) * emergency procedures * social and cultural aspects (awareness raising on social issues).

This kind of training should be a requirement in the contract for the Contractor of the works.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 19 April 2004 n o 0 rsoz ROYAL HASKOFdING

6 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The timing, frequency, and duration of mitigation measures can not be specified in great detail since the works are not planned in detail yet. However, Appendix 4 presents for each mitigation measure as defined in the EMP, the appropriate timing of their implementation, including details on timing, duration and frequency.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 20 April 2004 000

ROYAL HASKONING

7 COST ESTIMATES

Costs estimates and sources of funds for initial investment and recurrent expenses for implementing all measures contained in the EMP, should be integrated into the total project costs by the Client. Table 3 presents cost estimates of key cost for planning and implementation of mitigation measures as defined in this EMP. Appendix 7 shows the detailed cost estimate. Costs for resettlement are included in this table. Estimates are provided only for measures that are outside of the scope of general good construction practices, i.e. where specific endeavours, incurring additional costs, are expected.

It should be noted that many of the regular construction practices with regard to HSES management may provide financial benefits to the Contractor. For example, the reduction of the use of raw material will result in a direct reduction in cost. Furthermore, proper planning and implementation of solid waste management will result in gains through for example reduction in wastes to be handled and benefits from recycling material. Good maintenance of activities will not only protect the environment through lower air and noise emissions, but will also lead to lower consumption, longer lifetime, etc. Many of the measures recommended in this EMP will therefore result in a win-win situation.

Table 3 Cost estimates (in USD) for planning and implementation of mitigation measures (including monitoring) specific to each activity group

Activity group Phase Construction Operation and maintenance Decommissioning First year Subsequent yrs Pipelines 172,000 1,700 1,700 74,600 Dredging 118,700 11,100 1,100 n/a Boreholes 34,200 77,000 11,000 10,000 Power lines 4,700 nil nil 3,700 Sub-total 329,600 89,800 13,800 88,300 Planning and 164,800 44,900 6,900 44,200 management

(50% sub-total) _ TOTAL 494,400 134,700/yr 20,700/yr 132,500

Table 4 Cost estimates (in USD) for training, resettlement and supervising during construction phase Budget component Cost estimate Training/Capacity building Resettlement 50,000 General Environmental 50,000 Specific HSES 75,000 Resettlement 614,000 Environmental supervising Engineers team (1 international and 2 locals for 1 year) 300,000 Total 1,089,000

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 21 April 2004 0 u ROYAL HASKONING

APPENDIX 1 OVERVIEW OF PROJECT COMPONENTS

Ashanti * Obuasi: Mains extensions (13km) Region * Agona/Jamasi: New (2) and redevelopment of (1) boreholes * Kumasi City: Mains extensions (8km) and reinforcement/renewal (1Okm) * Kumasi South: Mains extension (0.5km) * Kumasi West: Mains extension (14km) * Kumasi East: Mains extensions (2km) * Kumasi North/East: Mains extensions (5km) plus booster station * Mampong: Mains extensions (8km)

Central * Cape Coast: Dredge Brimsu reservoir; mains renewals (4km) and Region extensions (6.6km) * Elmina: Relocation of pipelines (3.2km) * Komenda: Reinforcement of pipelines (5km)

Greater * Accra Northwest: Mains extensions (35.5km); pipeline Accra replacements (6.5km) * Accra West: Mains extensions (25km); pipeline replacements (2.8km) * Accra East: Mains extensions (11km); pipeline replacements (5.2km) * Tema: Mains extensions (14.6km)

Northern * Tamale: Pipeline extensions (8km) and replacements (8.4km) Region

Upper East * Navrongo: New boreholes and power extensions (3); new Region transmission mains (3km); tank rehabilitation * Bawku: Rehabilitation of boreholes (5); extension of VRA grid (1Okm); new transmission mains (3km)

Volta * Ho: Mains extensions (12.5km); distribution improvement (3km) Region * Hohoe: Mains relocation (2km) and extension (3km) * Denue/Aflao: Mains extension (5km) and tank rehabilitation * Peki: Mains extensions (2km)

Western * Secondi/Takoradi: Mains extensions (19.5km) Region

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 1 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

APPENDIX 2 DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS USED IN THE EMP

The following key terms are used in the EMP: * component; * phase; * activity; * aspect; * environmental impacts; * environmental resources; and * environmental receptors.

A component is a major element of the project. The WSRP has a large number of such project components, mainly related to the different regions in the country. A component could be for example a 13 km mains extension in Obouasi, Ashanti region, or the rehabilitation of boreholes in Bawku, Upper East Region. An overview of the various project components is presented in Appendix 1.

A phase refers to the stage of project implementation. Three phases will be considered in the EIA: * construction; * operation and maintenance; and * decommissioning.

In the definition as used in this EMP, the construction stage incorporates also aspects related to design and planning of works.

An activityis a particular action, which is necessary as part of one of the phases. Excavation of trenches and pipe laying are examples of activities. In some cases, an activity may consist of a series of subsidiary sub-activities. For example, the 'right-of- way (ROW) clearance' activity during pipeline construction might consist of the following sub-activities: fencing the ROW, clearance of vegetation.

An aspect is an element of an activity that will, or has the potential to, lead to an environmental impact. Examples include noise and light emissions and the generation of solid and liquid wastes.

An environmental impact is an environmental change that occurs as a consequence of an activity. Different types of environmental impact are defined in Box 2.

Environmental resources are those elements of the environment that are essential to, or of value to, the functioning of natural or human systems. These include areas or elements of ecological, landscape, agricultural value, soil, air and water.

Environmental receptors are the recipients of environmental impacts, in other words, those species of animals and fauna that are affected. Environmental receptors are also people as users of dwellings, users of places of recreation and users of places of employment and community facilities. The EIA will address the implications of environmental impacts on people's wellbeing and livelihood.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 1 April 2004 nooo oDo ROYAL HASKONING

Box 2 Types of environmental impacts

Direct (orprimary) - impacts Ihat resull trom a direct inleraction between an activily/aspect and the receiving environment (e.g. between an effluenl discharge and receiving waler quatity). Secondary- impacis Ihal follow on Irom the primary interactions between Ihe project and its environmenl as a result of subsequent interactions within Ihe environment le.g. loss of part of a habitat affects the viabilily oaa species population over a wider area). Indirect- impacts that result Irom other developments or aclivilies thal are encouraged lo happen as a consequence ol Ihe original development (e.g. a new development stimulates a requirement tor improved road access). Cumulative- impacts thal act together with other impacis lo affect the same environmental resource or receptor. Permanent impacts thal occur once on development oaIhe protect and cause a permanent change in the affecled receptor or resource (e.g. Ihe felling oaold growth forest as a result of occupation of a site, the diversion oaa watercourse). Short-term: impacts Ihat are predicted lo last only tor a limited period (e.g. during construction, seismic studies, drilling or decommissioning) but will cease on completion ot the activity, or as a result of mitigation/reinstatement measures and nalural recovery. Long-term: impacts that will continue over an extended period, (e g. noise trom operalton of a development, impacts from operational discharges or emissions). These will include impacis that may be inlermittent or repeated rather than conlinuous if they occur over an extended time period (e.g. repeated seasonal disturbance ot species as a result ot well operalions. impacts resulling trom annual mainlenance activilies). Non-Normal Impacts: impacts that result trom non-normal events within the project (e.g breakdowns. failures and emergencies) or in the external environment aftecting the project (e.g. Iloods, seismic acltivily. landslip). In these cases Ihe assessment should take account ot the probabilily ot the event. Local: impacts Ihal affect locally important environmenlal resources or are restricted lo a single habitaL/biolope, a single (local) administrative area, a single community. Regional: impacis Ihat affect regionally importanl environmental resources or are fell at a regional scale as determined by administralive boundaries, habitat type. National: impacts Ihat affect nationally important environmental resources or affect an area that is nationally important/protected. International: impacts that aHlect internalionally important environmental resources such as areas protecled by Internalional Conventions.

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 2 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

APPENDIX 3 OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS PER PROJECT COMPONENT

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 1 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

APPENDIX 4 OVERVIEW OF MITIGATION MEASURES PER ACTIVITY GROUP AND PHASE OF THE PROJECT

This Appendix presents mitigation measures related to the first year of implementation plan of WSRP. Measures have been defined separately for the four groups of project activities, and for each project phase (construction, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning). The table below present guidance to the various sets of mitigation measures.

Activity group Phase Construction Operation and Decommissioning maintenance Pipelines Al A2 A3 Dredging B1 B2 n/a Boreholes C1 C2 C3 Power lines Dl D2 D3 ROYAL HASKONING

APPENDIX 5 FORMAT FOR HSES REPORTING IN PROGRESS REPORTS

I 000

ROYAL HASKONING

Health, Safety, Environmental and Social Report

Contract: Period of reporting:

HSES management actions/measures:

Summarise HSES management actions/measures taken during period of reporting, including planning and management activities (e.g. risk and impact assessments), HSES training, specific design and work measures taken, etc.

HSES incidents:

Report on any problems encountered in relation to HSES aspects, including its consequences (delays, costs) and corrective measures taken. Include relevant incident reports.

HSES compliance:

Report on compliance with Contract HSES conditions, including any cases of non-compliance.

Changes:

Report on any changes of assumptions, conditions, measures, designs and actual works in relation to HSES aspects.

Concerns and observations:

Report on any observations, concerns raised and/or decisions taken with regard to HSES management during site meetings and visits.

Contractor Representative Engineer Representative Client Representative Signature: Signature: Signature: Name: Name: Name: Title: Title: Title: Date: Date: Date:

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 2 April 2004 ROYAL HASKONING

APPENDIX 6 SAMPLE FORMAT FOR INCIDENT NOTIFICATION AND i REPORTING l

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 1 April 2004 noD

ROYAL HASKONING

INCIDENT NOTIFICATION FORM

Provide within 24 hrs to Head of Project Implementation Unit and Supervising Engineer

Originators Reference No: Date ot Incident: Time: Location ot Incident: Name of Person(s) involved:

Employing Company: Type of Incident:

Descri tion of Incident: Where, when, what, how, who, o eration in ro ress at the time onl factual

Immediate Action: Immediate remedial action and actions taken to prevent reoccurrence or escalation

Signature Name Title Date

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 2 April 2004 onn

ROYAL HASKONING

Detailed Incident Report

The Incident Notification should be follow-up by an Incident Report, containing the following information where applicable:

1. Incident Summary 2. Specific Details * Date * Time * Place * WeatherNisibility * Road conditions 3. Persons Involved * Name/s * Age/s * Experience * Date joined Company * Last Medical Check * Current Medical Treatment * Evidence of Drugs/Alcohol * Last Safety Meeting attended * Infringements/Incidents record 4. Equipment Involved 5. Description of Incident 6. Findings of Investigation Team Interim/Final * Investigation Team Members * Persons Interviewed * Recommendations & Remedial Actions * Investigation Methodology 7. Attachments * Photographs * Witness Statements and Initial Report

Ghana WSRP EAMP 9P2503 Draft final report 3 April 2004

.* . . . ' .

I--- *c eelJUsZasaX>JawsasaXaJUaJasa>asaFaDaJaawJ.. I .II . I . I . I .. a a wa h>ZZ a

. . ;I ...... I . I . . . I

...... EaZ I 85*I...... I*Z l * l l 3ISJ5 * * 3l 3 .5 5.. 31

_ IU...... 1....._ a E _ a a

L ^. _ ...... w,n_.

Q n_B^: _ _ ls-......

a x a_ __

E~~~~~~~.. . .. w.._.-.-=ff.

s ~ ~~. It -- *1 _ _-_ I: .,", S!3 lul'IIlIIIl 1 111$ l5S584l5 ffi ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ... ._ ....

.. .- Ii...... *-X

I 3*=*as*sm.. a...... I

^S t!!~~~~~~~~~-..l S

I . I . . . . I On-1tes of elEgationmcue peeactiity growp and Project ph..

SET:Al Attivrrv GROUPW LR S o. - - f-- . -HgAfLf P CaNPRUCTION ______

Tnmnswom WABO omawv =m ~ ._. * ',.- -- :" T. Ka uso c oo

- or*cA..o*t**d ..-.. '.q'oou.-aer...o S.'A -uoi 5rILqS. ttot.h.

us. of goodqualify fuelcod lubria.anf. 0 C 0 Comonprooto P.reofion of dusf through siprhrkficgduring periodsof dry weffe.tho C 20k10 2.400 Dailyolaoo ofaoes WOyOi0 ftre cighbcorhoad of orfksie reoa of searffand sandl)f prou-t doef. o C 4.0 ok2g3 f 000 0,5 macdayw-ihe pci day. of murk Collfcoflo, and fomprary fraga of eamitar-yIwod .1t.anig waofeo,as cmli as garbage, II coties C dy Nose pollatioc aim.imauterof nose sourcesIIr aucrdacu with EPAstacdards 0 CoimOO yractic Owaranari i::0:,: 0 5 a503..&,.rS-..leara c3 . .. ..-.... ri

u..r.aar,.ci'ar..iihs.i.ircr:-c-S.c. l*. Q *C....P

w.t., P.11.1..T -1.~~~~~ 0 .:'Iro .slr - -r-r ci e. -- ' : -: a'

Ding dewfeiog oporatics, (whererepirod). wafar should ho sampledsold ara1ysed for cootami-cab,, IIcbraoah of EPA 0 0 Veryuikofly baccauseho ofandards,Whore EPAsfadardu arebreached,adde should ho sogh fmm EPAwith regard wo prope, r.ooofmocidisuharge. gro-dmalor able a deep0most

Wafer from prsaur fosthigshould be tfetfedfor cootmra. tior, prior fodcisuhage. Where EPAsfa.dard ore broached,adulue o C 0 'arrro,ara 40 l 5ieO'-m 0 C S Commor,pracilc 14.r:.aroe..a ar.. af 005.'.'i e4 a- j...cr3cr--rra,31 C 24k15 2O002m2uofhuldod areamade of

pr (ctce.g.impermeable srlace, seler anldo4 separafor),eur, hi 0000third-pony worhhops aeusd. during marteaocU.... fM.Wtsfor the

from e.nfnig the ..wefucor. work don'tfakr yiaon odjce,,t ot ,afercoorse lihdwaste Th.eCoryator shouldpraperse StolidWaste MraogewecfPlar hiohshouldcocmtai,: 0 rrdr 10 7.000 1r mr-dayo iroiaiclclocal gooation Aric,eoory of the type and qluanfiis of wastefo ho prodaced, ruudiogthek hazarduels: package contractr P.r flonderp.okago Arassmect of anyopprtuIons for redc.g oold wate gereratoc. in poricuolarof hazerdoos anldurcosilrahie (poruatetm ai,d nun-re..sahle)type of wtauo, Por each gp of woof, the whoofappyropriate aeste maoragewerfiapproach should ho deatermied.Th. wouldge-rally kiclude detailson (temporary) stowage,therprt coidfersl ideshnohonr of the waste.WOr regards to tho latter,t he most appropriateway would ho reuse, fofbowedby rooylicglreooey enldfhralfy depos arladlor irncireretw; De1ormr howand bywhom Th af aaeet measre moud .hoImlmentd .. -Confrauforor third ponty- apeoifyr,g

eld wlast, aod makothese aoa1ebf, to the work supersis uponhis request aaproof of prope saute waegomeot paukge tenderpackage

Moywafe dspooall.in,ludhigi disasrnbfed faoiltieu,should coourat sites appwo-olby the rmmuociol4ty a C 240km tO 0.400 f ton of wasteyroductod por km porelir, pipoino Costosfor dumping1 too olf

Since adequateprocessig fauif.11sfor sbesft-osmoof piplitnesare abslentit is reco-Ineded to Ieaoe the old p~O ir, the 0 C0 Nof costsin,oiced groud when replauod. E,icaotted soNsshoufd be resed ewmuch as powableas hiflingrmatelaf. Contamiratedsot should ho corulsderedas wate C 240 km too 24.0001 tespyrkmofpyipelire(mineral oI

0 30 -p-low1505'-3r *.mc-3%na.40r 'r,-.,,rwOhi Uor. W-i.hoI:c~o ~'r .u,a3.:.i1.r.o C 245 kin 5 1.200Hrhg costofhtuck (h LISDA-o

-wafeare Pofplluted. h,kcoc s,olso,soead .ta Wat"rPols*f`hon oiferoimonln Applicahonlof appropriateeru.-i ropetftin eaues poricoulorwhrMtcnen ok nsoe o nora 20Cmmo rco co rnfmnaticn Or-O3 I S-a..ocs. ..':r.rair.ailouio1na. . -*o. : yarn.1.6.- .in.:1 i. - I' ..a ci .d . 0 Corwoo prackc

The Co-hocfor should presen procodere for, andlensure Implemenfaho of measuresto pntwtf acts fwm ary accldenf1or 0 C S structuralconfakaimtio.. Sforage of haardeus watsrod sanitry enduleaorg wastes shouldho deco Instorage faicilfieis(tahioonf/callireml and at n C S See aboneunder 'Water pelfuini

r,:.33

Cal,fafig hays, absorbe1:matrluaf and toe fightirg eqlulp.metshould ho prouwid at fuelstorgo tasks, a C I 201cityifow 1 000 11.000 Ore tenderpachage of such material an,dequipemer por cityito-o]

OSshould ho storedhi origiral drums anldplaoed n ant im,permeble layer (e.g.concrte or tot) the C-nyactor, storehousea a C 0 Co.mino yractice

or a ra.fl3~ raa.4s*dSpo,e ,ad.s..h I.n.o a .. Commor,piacton

--.-h5'.r.4'Pn role ti in e.r,-~a-x'or~~IdpI i -ahsc.hh'a aSa. 4 C 5 a c-.-a o 1 ustrr'3rrf,-a'c Ioa.as..oaarsaa.-p:n. h O aa.a.-uc irad a C O Co,ltaom.ted .utIncludardil, thol typeo'fcon,tomiratio. tnnTrm pipha menti-oneaton lImpactoo floraanld IThe Contractorshoul minhrihethe deeUtrahnof flra anddelimit the wrldrng areato procentunneessay acolegical o C2 0

.o.:a - o:rn-.o,uasr:3rI -rn. al'r haln .ais.n.1. I wi I Ourn darn *auac1.i.. nr.:.ol C j 751tee 31 O225F..up., tenoc

- -- 1'..r 1 0, .Sr.. Poi.h .0 ki-*4.'.0:h 6A 3r.,1 r .0 - lh'. ,. eg 5 4 00 d C S Hardlyany racIa 5005.crossed by (rstrhos rehathaloc shod be andert1akec.hInludirng restorahion of topeoilsandl (no-) introd-oud,n of ge..elti spoces to tho ypoeiie.Onlly o..uterutatlon site. ______n-sabls the naura locl, acolon 0w aera use Tho Cotractor should faire intocooslderafio the -nui.wmoco1performee .. o f suppOorsof rawmatril Inhos selaction a C

______ir..:..SoP--ro..sn - : d.-a. .sr.-..3.e 0.05 : h-h'SPue..0 Puhlw health Au-!. .rr:e roj ... 4 ..a. .00. ion Wrse~aI0 - doeal-ohuruder'Soldwaste Problemsfrom gnrlo co-slructioocamps OJ,a'. t" sal.i.¼i. I.r.:,..dfPda. e,P r.sO..a: ..50d50..O .ae'ohi 'usa 0 C 0 anldsite, anrd Oh.Oar-aa I. e.. a, S,ou.55 su Iu 000 t-an.. .o.'ca'tn. I'¾o ir.~-.; a C 0 importedlahour cz, i.hdaIO¾e -othoehr33 ra.,.n .rrda.l.h.a Lur-..sa.r:ra3nlnirraa,&coeaer..e4 loaaiw: a-. arcorEa.,n .a,3:.ra- ..i.lr.ob.ro C 0

l'"r'd I.4ai3 aCc5.,lO .ll ¾,5...0 rOn ri -h.d.I00hra- I.Oie Qn'4I , d.k C SCommor-ipractere ______od throgh the eoa o ae Intw ithe ahe.r.falo grudeater Winftaon. Safetyof the public jAdeqate protefo and sIgnallIngofwok eitos esapocially -aanfinwork), in pertiularduring the night,with clear markinlg C u Commo practoe

-.irsc a- -l.s- r.I :1,.:5 .l hrI,-n r .c.r- arr-. .M., oc. 0 Sea ao.uwundnrNoisep.fut1imc Eatablementmof talff plans atI-toaroe of (pedeil)bloockege of roads.,o I 2 itnr 450 090o3 days local consuiflnt to makeplan

Impl-mantoho of apppropatetranfic contol at each lahs,posuby oth the help of the localpoliun. a .00dy of- f2 4800002 man-daysper day of'work work rashitoUd.The lagtershould noose.at least placesocoupied by operatonm wchanhial and electric equipmien,opw. heruhes, amnho anholes andohainhrs Vicl arht o.Rstrkctioof the size of constooohDnsites and cmps.. -:.-so.vrk-.-'.ega'As. - cOOS'rl'r-ua-:-ae.-c..u-.elrzr.....rsrw.ra . -- S~~~~~~~~~~~~ S.SOOr.O.4.Utii..i0.iO3,da sr.Xi* hqn,i :a Wd:..PrC -W.rc . - ... ::'.r-.rr.r.s:ai-.cu--f ::-- Orornw of mtIgatIonme u apu atnty groupend probe pha

SEr: Al I ACT I COMM. CPIII .CS |||

inler-plo of commercialaod Limialion of any omprary erforencewilt, prrst proprty (og. pipolheolands).crossi.s overlontt prtatet Threx. gthofoi o C

.~~ ~~ IId,' ~ ~ ~7 ~~u...... ~ ~:t' -.~~~~~~- ; bbde ..; 1, E C] CW gm ... t_

61-, , Dr j Ir:F :> as snr:|.^ b o. r.r55s .- :0 -: . n. . - ..,...... <...... ;Hls:r*.s*-is.4...... comp.nuarrn riaocros hrffotlod ppulabor prir ttarofto conse.c.t. Co-pen-ar Wil b scorduocod0cur with tho

Poblic) DailycleaninG of access apyin vhunet bxrhoxd of work riles (romovedof errth and sand),and .nrtenanceof each o C 0|al roads. Where a00080roado arebloked temprary acoessways shooldbe ostablihod,whore psiblo. Indensely popula.td areas- C 0 Cost inolcdd to tho tolc planoand wlt, heavytafl'r/ movementthe asstahnceof poloe yafc wardenswill be sotght to redacotcononen.ce to the motortg wepl.ennatbn of "aftrccontrol (seo poblic. abovecoder 'Solety of the Pubic")

and eliriety networks).In caseo o C ctyrtewn 1501 3.300 Coordinationof work at crossingpots with other tilty networkownew (water,tlecom 1 I

"u- _ ;.,.0 ,,' .. .ri:i.. tinIds^ C 0 Ishoras pcssie.

e'da .c. . '".i .c- a :a j"a. l 0

Landtoke o sAs5~-nI Jl ap0-i , rgu....,...-1:1-:.: eR -am an ur auns s e' ,- l r ;og_:u. r; .t....Paulo PoleyFr-mwotk. A articlar casein ths regard sthe p.p1s..d b rostWrstainto kamas. North-East b__doet ccupat-bnalhealth IToContactr uhold prepareand implementspecie hoalth endsolety mea .srand pre.ent thesein a Healthand §alety x a C ender 2000 14.000 Two mandayshv-rnatmnal coosulant andoalety i -*.-.::, in .r ., --:is --.irs,:iu.s. . paok-ge +local consaltanl preparethe pt.n c : ;. ; .....-. t.rI and de trining

O t1:1 it. 1 z1j !- ] }w":ifE i :s | il j X 1 I. o !,s.tria,;:.sX v,;.1si...i.~~ ,-i..,.a,-,or . r5 - J .:*o:;-:co:..e iq ia.;1:Cs.CIu 0,,5 indnvdual staffgroups. o : -S-- ,1..'- -nns,o:iei.,ri.ar:..... <1(- qlj, o 50,ca i I.j! !.,;sri.r- ':1 a.w!rsnirsnWr .....nh:a

o 5.r.o.vii-r.rc,aiiia:- , o wc

;.ulilesshould be r iIctrld. Paso. rles with regardto proteion of publichealth. ncludingmost imporny hygieneand desese(Hh/) preyentbl.

TOTAL = = = = = 171.77! ______1 I" = __1. . __ 4 ~~~~_ 2

'4 'i 1 K.S

I Lt I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2 O(eentawof Ntttgatiae,ea par Wh,leltygrasp *nd prwleetph. SEr: A3 ' " '' 1 * t

fauna_ ___ Publi,1 healdth..IE . 1...... ,a...,,..a, a,.nt tar - ... ; 0 t00%Otnnutuinnatncbnnpha.e1 o-f .- t-t.o.. p.Noble atrma:e, : -la- consrutancmptinnnanrpsoo~~.t--P. Lt&...... z.n: Br.... .3.eVi]i'. ~-An.. -r .:.e Ci.L AK'.Z n53tntt.$qcI,. 2 t4 t,Siic I gCOT] ...... 1'...... r...... tt andSala, andfronm dbeaaalHtOpreventbon.______ImponedIlbour SSilsatnding wataronf cnsiwdon te huMldbe n he hgprnpar aantanna If the a. (l-ueltngnoftheaurace) a C aMdtffrouh the removaloi watet fru ditch=after raInfall = orroundwater ten Safety f th. public Samemeasures a, during nn-trunt- phase u C 57.900100% nSteit in trun pha.e

D-t-rbanceand tr -r, ...i-ar.: .I.- nx... .: . .., ._ 2.475 75%at cfsht -cnatrucnph.a. Interteptinnt - t.';. .t- ;. a, ulau te-rEcr:swlf>e.: ;.p...... et vtihe ,j...... , .n56d.t..... cmmarcial and nc.es,ta..e;r:..e1:a s.):. :0. ac-I., ;e.,-4. Annialacbtiulen ai.. z-- . .r: ::

roada. Whereacceds roads ra bilokdd tenpoaary wan-nceea ahnctd bh eWtabiihed,wtrar palaibl, up-n the appw_ at tofne x authhritta Coordtnatonnt wurlaaturunning poinse wlt aotherutt ly netwarkowners (water, tetecnm and electriciy natwadna).In case nt ax

OciapatinnaALealt.. r.n. a 5.T. . 14.00050% ofat ste h nnactint ph_ end nalety I ...... ______. ______TOTAL ______7469 _ Overevw of orhigathosm ur pr ethlty group en projet ph-u

! ErR |C r P ME -aLS -,i -Y, A -! .MO .. IPHASL'CMr,TRUCT|O i- C- oni- - N-;1 - -

116 c n. 0 corn..~~~~~~p, off vtlr. PE;|d;uilrlun Pqj4...... 44urws.:rs ~...... -t - -e 3 540 M- 50-'. ;..10'-.| a:.*. et *a.-E-a. .. o11:31utDs-e#a .-u- _.dy

a ;sa:.,.. :.~ ca.- :c-;a0.-. ao -e e.:.r*i.G.. rt. re -rraC 0 Commonpralcte N ""-- ;.noo-30..-.sr. ~~5 a.c0'rIJ..id.8 .. ,strl 3..red..uunsIai .t. hIi 55d 0. .ass.a~~~~~~~~~p t in . dupes.h..d 0 CommonPIootmo 5 uE.gina n.n ra. - h- no C 0 Common_pnacthi i . m.sru.;i.a:;.au-.e .. .nc .~...... s..n-"-vauorrOg.i,.t;r.r.m,f. -. .. 0 ...... I S Oupot5tImeouothorado Gioodmakntonanoo of oehFlolsand equpdmentsuoundiog too *poirotiol nopait/nedulonpnognammo. o C 0|common pnactrco 14000ponvenOon moasuono u,000s mufflers hnstalledon oohiclousnd eauipmenl. a C - |0Commonpractice ______oinos of oehiolouand moohinoms ohhed off ohon rotli uua. a C 'I Commonpnactico Wator polluton Th drudgingmehod soleotd wud ensnur minzation 1 nmpact i trm- of inonoasd turbdity. C Commonpnactce Diachangoof untn-ad wastewatanshould bh prohibitd. Sanitaryand cleaningwtes maybe disohargedaftte Palmntl or C 0 tmporarily atonedand Shipped ashro for disposalaftn uhor-ased trotont. tra::in.aaw-..n.- *4 .5..i i :.a nin r.cior.u- a - -.i-a.I... arM o C 0 1-r..so.Onr ... - A. I. --...I -.. r.at.aa,.sM - S ao4es.:(.n: a si.,rI.. -.--...rsI.-'-s. a C |Commonpracithe disohangoooours. Tho qoalityof the seeimeotssuhold be determied throughsamplng and analysis.as a bauelin. Drainagoeaten uhouldbh I 2] morning 500 13000 Analpusof sediments to be negolarlymonitored for cootamhiation(rooommndd is at bost meekly,bu in orao of any onorms arisingfrom t. baseline _eeko perfonmeddurin dosgo phate (info tho should bh mo" regolar), cluding at lbast pH, suspnded sofls and BOD. In co tre bhasotie samplingand analysis IGIP) moulddetermne any panamotonsof ooncenn(a.g. h-ay moels or yeltcaed), analysisof wch shooldbe incorporatedin the Aoalysu of draage water.meekly -: ic;4 va. .n - during holo onstructbn period o C 0 rA.arr.-.-...-. ir.:.a... ii .a ..... Orar.s.a.s..aa..c..n.o..r -;r. i,LH i0 'i i: :n:G.::o . C I 0 ______J.oi.n..r.. : .:ri-0.jn<.cs.:aq..n...... arro...rsa.- 4 .anio..rnril5 5...5c...d.>L.lr...... nirim..i..a...... S

|;r.,.-..-. 1.a nrc.;e. .r.ra. i.rrs ..c.Dra 0u.2h3-A ... a1. 5.e W ru. ;. 3 1 Xr.uF i*.r - I

r 3-cv.i..,r:;.s ; i r 0,..an .:r c l. . 3i-UO*'rs.r - r4l n.jr. --.,,,TU4 :*n :."K r.,.- sn.l .- cr G,1. .i5Hao *-- :.. iQ I MM-.r,a.s -a.crrcn. le:esin.0..c.noh.'.a .. a ::.-co. r. nr.rlunr.sa . Er-uuguascbo. E st sSl]:s s .a-. 3.:u 5 .nr .: .: :|:co: 'i- r7, puir .: .|1 :.______-,.. ia..r,r.r i- r....narc -.7,a,,sAsus; r. 0 ..n oc.i koc...r...... : ;.r js.-.....:',..-gj:.r .. . 's.1:.-.

rauna ecologicaldamages. Cloarig and outonWof tnes shouldonly o wlthm.Uccr appropriateauthordy's onnoani For the proposeddumpuk, 0 is I t. troe 3 45 FFnou per nee cut epoctd that amongothrs appronmatelytI siWR 00ttot0 ars locatedin the proposeddoposal ste and mayneed tobh .:r.rasr.ob .c Cla iFroetrret o..n...;.; : r.%r.sr.>:reoaran.a.n.Geciacfia:cc ts.Loaur.E0i *.udorlul... rr.o ,.dr.-a l.vanr..iae '.5.00 aIr: oar'.+a.oo;:4r.sc.na:..a.o *cc 01-:s-r' u-.m...... -a r.-gra..-j r.:'ua.g . ..o.. I ...... 25 ha ahoy gyspo Restoraoncoustyer ha |noutorahon tro-I ol to.osos and inhoduottonof gonsitosoecis t no-estbfoh rhonatural loca ecol-on. Publicsalety Tho dredgespoil dumpssta shouldbh adquatelyfono.d and safoguerdedto ptsoont accessto the pubhc. _ o C tao days 3 540 Guard 50%time on the site dupe Landtake Selecon of an appropratelwdl saltofor dodgo spoil deposol The selecton processshould considerat least: mrniMna _ I Cost g-en under "ReSeIemonr ocopoabono lnd uuedfor hahitabonor sooD-eSconorcbuic itoa (e g agriulture) and mrinral oupaton oland haufo budget ______impodu3ntecologica vadoes._ __ _ Occopatonalhealth To Contractorshould bh requird to prpare and impoimontspecific health andsafety moasros end presentth os a a C 2.000T"o mandys internabnal consoitant and safety Healthand SafetyPlan. Measures should inoludo(bht not ho resuoted to). local onoultantto preparethe plan 5n.0I ci le_ a; ,h.:aaA ...... c...n.oirr n *.; : rea and du Prabinin

ears;.|r5.l..n .ol-:t0. |] a.m| r,,a. .- - w - 4 sa :i 3 untacysali6S- l..- ; XvEs#.i

Adoqu.te health andsafty trainingof all emplyes, includingcoining on spociic pnoceduresas appropriateto rlous indianuil StaffgmuDs. ; e o..r.ara.nsca.rIo s far-acasomIa.a,s

5.50a.,0n-0L5 .;'la.C *: . un .a-sr .* s -A r 0 s''a 'I Q I 4

- ai:ty. 1 *j0r i:1 c.a.. u.raa 0-ares

Provisn of adequat -ast an matrial storagotacilts (seaalso 'oild wastegeneration" show). Acoeu to such r:.as|z. ira..yc.arrjo-ass-g e0.O. rt0.i

TOTAL I = 1l8.6751 Ov.-vb.. of m1lgationmtowm pw tMaellty grouptod proisotpha..

Phbafety ansteadr cn t I I I 5.36Ida Y3Fi0 I Gard 0%Weo the.ato

ITDTAL(-l a, oratoos -o..) ______Overvie of mitigaetiontmsun p.eeatNiotygroup and projaW phaa- SET:Cl ACT",T GROUl- IDI'OM~mureu

-'a'*k''ewttOt s~~~~~~.s'r-a0a~~~~.s0e 03...' o~~~~~~~~~ C IIf lborohoo 1001 11001 futorilltmo L'a5~~ Cs 5a~~~tOa.r.0.aa.~ twataa 0ot.hO A 'tI5l 'a' asn,-.trO5Is0 .r E.6a I.-. 0 C Colcbnandtmp, r Etroof sofr odcengwos aswll asogarbge, in containers Noso pollution M1efr,mwiatio,of 00is sources,in atcoordoncewith EPAetaodards. Adequatoattentin t. ontro010f0000 and Oebramo.00 000e. Provisonof siom tia .twad.Uhn looa commnitino wil regard towok programme, andstirct odhorone, 10sach. 0

Enones f noksas andahkroIry swiched off when 01tinu60. I"- Wae oiuin Waterfrom well tootingshouldl be tote for contamuinaiIon to enur complisn"nwh EPAeffluent guldent 0 gaWloes I 11 boroeroles 2500 27.000One analysis of WHO ledor Package woud he broached,adobce sthould he tlooghtlton EPAwItn regard to properdischarge. atcomnisoi,ing. 2000 USD ..c Ie--a. ~c E.o.et.evaa.c.0.eEwI.srei, 0.-r 1 .nIa- ilE 0.: d I C; OCommonp-tcic tiC' *IO m a.'e nyu-rnL'O I 1 .--'I-6.0,. 1SIe mr n -53' a C 3Sofa roo 050 Hi.ocontainnrlforone Year

Vehicleparking shouild where posoibleoccur on panedplatloocs.c Tan,ksfor Wtoostorges shoald be leak-proofand installedinsa bondled .ma. Poolstorage Lankra shall be checked dagy,ond In 0 C ft oroholos 00 500020 m2 of bondledara from ie'' iI.' .".s'pa a-ora--.a.im,permeble malorteal(20USD/mo)

preention (e.g. mIpe-meablesorface. settlemsand of se.pnato), -n Incas Uhrkd-ipayworkhops r uted. doring mainteance achotvi. tonthe rotal durationof the onoJnyt Sold malte The Contractorshould woekopportunities for Urnreduchon of solidwaut generato, In partoolarof h.andous and a C 0 CommonPractee gonoration undesirable (pemsistentend non-reosable)typos of mate. For each type ofowte, Urnmoot appropriate waste mhanagementapproach shoold he dotenmknd.Ths agold generally n C 0 Inuludedetails on (temporary)otorage, hanspoil and!final dostrnatn of' Urnwast. With rgegars10100e lagter. the moost

at sOnesapyroud hyPte monicipallity.Topsoi should be minord and stored in separatepiles aed reinstated(0 not contaImntedI). Waste100 recycled, neconeredor disposed00f gnoteallyshoold he transferredthrough acknowledgedracycling companwo. 0 C U No sigrnkuantmotto ond rocyctEng

Prov -isinlmaeiltrgeon site shoold be detigned andundertaken in such away at toensur that soils and underground a c r ,aterornot olutd Uitemson end Worksshould n010 eoaootadunder aggrsate weathar odtondns (,ston winds). 0 ontamination The Contractorshould pr-tent procedures,for, and ensue inpiementationof rnmeasure toprotect suis from any acctiteta or o C srtructoralcontamnination. lintoding (but not eud.losly). Storage.of anyhzardoos -waate.as el at sanitaryand clnan.ing mates shouldhe done in storge faisoities a c (tankeocontaine"s(an at sitn appronedby the EPA. Tanks for fuelstorages should be leak-proofend instaIlledon a ococreteplatform wih guttersend grease, sefpartors. C Ea __ j..vu*'' r.a w-g ta' I orIco :-'aaevrinaes aC,-es...r so/sa Cties ioi,..,eEntiI0.Ev sossa r . .ri,Cr .i2i-rktaav :is5a5aEOQsC,~ .. Cr.n.jE re.E o C thould be preparedand applied. Implementationof such procedlkiesshould be adequatelyenforced and m.1onhrd.

iEtsvc-.sra..rnn..anna s..a E.,sr..rou..n.rrt.-aEt, .*05 3 r.r 6 ,.-n.-. o C

Inakage prenentio (e.g.imIpermnala esilace, sierila and oil aEpantorl. nahnIn c005, Uhird-paryworkshops are used.

___ Jnetyp_ of contaroinahon. Empacteon fionaand IThaContrator should miniriant th. dest-otion of flor anwddalini tho workingama to pen,enlunwcessaay ecological 0 C0 fauna damage. ('ii C*~irt.e.n.ri.En.v:r.v..E..C.E..aerrtat 6yc so. -..r.0 1,C'u vet weE n-,-e- mc.-,-,s-E.n.eIOpen aa,ro otthoetocut

(strhn,rehsliaon shoudhudertaken, includin realoringIopsUil and (In-)inho.ducfion of gene.ticspecies tore- establishUr nat"Ionaocl ocoyoub. Raw matrrl060 Toe Contractorshould ulaka010 consideration enunonmentalperro- -cc of supplier of ra materia1in his.aeco process. a C U

;;L vr.s.:igu oas marn.t =,euv15 nra Xma`.a'.,aesaet .,., t.

Saflay of rke pubtic Adquatproeon an aigaltrri of okslsi atulrdrngUengi trda okn o r aeyhoe nte o I worksperimeter. 1 Hr., te. s.(.aaE H.O-.ti cm. 3r..E55.. .. 'ai ..

restricted'.The ltater should inCclueat least places occupiedby operationmechanical and electri eqiipm,nt, Opentrnnches, manholes and chamnnrs. D*torban,ceandc is, -'C. -c rir.. enaCC. ,--r.w -iCHIecc-C.s.I-- .N..o.t.n interruptionof *c *uvCerccj.M 1 -- v.ivra..-C..na .H.da.' H.. ac ar..a..Hn..I .... n...ei.C. .t"aEI1 m~.IEE o I comn,rercal and 61nor 1 ~I' l:r,,.Un c.-Ca --.... r

roads. Where accsai roadusr blocked,temporary acc.ta ways shooldhe established,whew poustle, uponthe apprunalof local o C authorities.

*-..nnu..-.su.ysrns.,u.evu- -cIo/na-,y...ar-v n..a :c 1c..ri.afdE.H.ano.C1o C wok with the appropriateauthorelt on a suitableapproach t0 safeguardsuch. The contactfarwoud he partialariy carohil of

Land take uiirzf.fUnseo lands 100 ocupe byUehrhle an reatd shoctoreC Where land take can not he a-ohid, adeqat resettoomn hmeatr should he determhinedand impl.emeted in accordanceo I Costgive under Rloottlemnenr whOthe GWCL fiesetr menFaewr.Rosetnm= t Actim Plans should he developedin such cases, i.nrling the bhonto Tindaa prta ledrii r UorEs oion whomoy owe the land. Ooathonslhealth To ContractorShould he required10 prepare and implementapecitic heoalthad safetymneasures, Including (bu1 not be C 2 tender 2.000 4.000 Twom-ndays.n r..enaroal consultant and safety retroted to): package , loca consultantto ProPanethe Plan Tr .:v vi no rn-aE n'.aus. a-ern-.E s oC.s- a nd do tramtEng

5.nv.eou'a-aaEe.-as-.-n. IHu.na.,u_- .'. di C.u' 'aneC t a.n ove... .i:s Ctsuv .ied0CC

Proceduresfor Urnhandling anduse of dangewus ashtwmancsen astes. Pr_cdureutmethid statementetar ecntos Proedure for heavyItian.C Proswn.'of adequatewaste and mnateehlstorge faciltises(see alta acidmatte generationrabove). Accesa to such n C

rTOTAL 34.200 ______Onamia of mtIgatIon mates pe. otStlty gtes end p.ojactpha

bn soo s prm ulgantdby the Comme-l t obtai p-rmi for groundwater bstorutian1det0 c *uonty.

Nude poliutio Designof pumphousa tu keep ni. Ieuelsand u itratinsto a minimum,using whore necessaryneed prau-tion measure | 0 C

c intamoardmuter |Upper East egin Before omtsbnhg, arshould be analysedor anycontaminatin Furthrmore, durig the fit year tenderpackage(500 USD) ooperation is recommeedthat samples at thesoueaetakes eeky. Thereafter, the frequencymight be redued, Oat f boreholes 1 000 11.000 Foltowingyeas tW p year.r, least contambbn is not oud to be of co0cI. Ireduced WHO tender package (000 I USD) Ensurecorrect operatinad maitenance of the borele andrelated equpment (pumps).Such measuresshould bedened IC- as part of the opeation and mantennemanual of GWCL. jFtublF hvolvemenlt the detectin of putenal contamira6bnthrough awareness aeatbn and the openrg of a complalt | C ______deal. TOTAL(fist Ya.) T_OO ______TOTAL(yprly -epe.att sta) ______11000 r; |3 Dy Inreof crftlgatlhr cr . peractIIty group*nd praiWotph...

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~O ! TQAVTlPSOAM-, 1;1M-=ttwAEl ...... K- -SWtv

@f _li0 ~~~--t- alhji *n¶ a i y- '4.--1|f7t-%'"'' ; .- | ,5 ,r, _, mw , C Ic Ne f "'t''1'- --'- ''4st"

Well shouldbe properysealed aeterdecommssonhig, cordert anod anyusdes-redcontameaton. I0 Temwprarystorage of sanitry and cleanIrg wastes h -ounbinens.D'posal shrold occur at stes approyedby the munpality. a 450

Vehcle parlkingshotd whee posable occuro0 payed platfors. C 0 Maintenance,selling andcleanig ol nehikesand equkyneotshould take place atortruhops/siteswth adeqrpte leakage a C 00 preeetionlea. mpermeabresu.ce seWttersand of se"'aratorl.even mncuaw rrd-"artpourbshogsare used. Sold waste For each tPe of waste, the moatapproprIate waste managementapproach should be det.-hed Theswoud generally _ C generation inclde detail on (temWporary)stOrae. ransor and foaladestiny of Whewiste. Wethregas to Whelater, the most appropriate

i:IrIe' Wr:et. *:.:*ve .apntcr..cru.C,a.,,a: eo totn C.tCf.tiCCCACr 0iJ C.e C:, ar.tt. r.Ie 5'.Cuthet-2C i.C' Cns..5.x ,1.r-...... e.a.v,C. s -,-n.c-. .:. .-r, 0 C

mwaterare nt Cllr Sot erosionend | Worb1 should ot be e,wcsted under aggresatiaweather condtiins (rains, sturng olds). _ C contamination .4: r' .'.' ,-:.eo A st. ooja, 00*-,-nc.' hr urw.rs'.a',i.:c-45'o.… e. b 'O'.n'l 0 I 0 n t': ar.cl, :','s rloca', ae'r'jIeosnn ISs "- 'C,:' 'au s. 0 I f,t ha 3500| 3550 Raeutatemontolfoftprint(ossnsoed as 0,1ha pemmelt) 3500USD ppmha.

i. r' }: 'C it t1e : r.; .I V.' I 'C il: . 'mu S'S C&r" _ ' '.' ' i's: o I 0

1 j iv;r1e | f1i~, .r',' :~..".s',eC'.:r.Yl ICeI..n.a }j. C rriJ .C.t'-.'e _ .nn'

: r ~.o'ri.'i:i.r~.ire1::c:1dE. ut? }rt. )i: rs.e .;l. f:r.:.,.-.o.:.-..oson:j ...... m:.,. ... _'_.- socil acltivies roads. Whereaccess uadsare blocted, tempowraryaccess ways shouldbe estabished,whe. posable,upn Wheappyotl 01local s C

O psa5ti-nalhealth ISame as in constructionphase . C 4 0Of nOdsale _ TOTAL = = =I IO.Oex ______l ~~ ___~ ______

l _ ~~~~T.s_ _ v__0A -. _ | 1-''.) '.' i'|'! ._' L l 'V -b|.|- | ' 1 3 - o 1l' ' ' . _ *~~~~~~~~~~~ l _- s~ ~ ~~~-_ _U.I Ei _*__ : S l a_ ;~~~~ 7I " ""6 1 1 Y l . ^.N ... ~~~~~~

'A~~~~~~~~~9 *1 e l S . _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

i S I ir r s * § t k t s : 07 s * P _ '3 _ 'I ] A:j);~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-T On,rviem of Niligtlon ere porihy group *nd proi.ph... iTt D T ACII POW:IIUI ---. - -. - . -R O l lillA i___A __

ist~~ ~~~~~-i rb vs - lsz<-el a TiswC:"lo_il. ,1.i1 - E .

junk ; . P~5 1Aa SOel*

Prevenoteasv climbi a nio coastsfhhsoDh one.no ora o.r means, a C ONa sNinfcant casts ivolved iandsoaping and Take intocansdalrtn effectsanvirRia amenifes e Lhiealiginmentatpomorlines. C F ., - . n, '5551amenities iso materialstatht ntMthie e =itinenrnmeal a C 1c, - c1. A tnr 11 f onPaine as in constractmnaltose,C: a C< -. . 4

Iod uate Same as in constmacia phrase a C O Noeigonir-caat Cat invoived oenototon Sol esosn and Sameas cnstaccta-n ph.asa. a _ c Na aignrcaatcsts inv-ol-d aontaminatian Impachton flla and Sameas et Donstcianphase.. a C 0 Na aigtican cast in-olvod fauna Pamma-lW use Sameas in c abasehnshwain _a =10 sniicanf- csts incled Ditatsuanceand Sameas in canaffactianphase a C c N. st.ii-tant cast invo-ied Wiarnsptionat camancial and socal actidoes Ucepaia1nal hialth Sane as Inoonstction phase. C 0 Nasigni.fnt ca st in-alved and saLteL TOTAi. T ....L K'1 I I |______O.oWn.b of .1t1gftln ra_.rs p. r that group *ad proj,ct ph."

______l - 1 ; O];il.. 1] s 15

pprelos powerlhede nomtsoned.CoDSS thr _1_l 2.Odunmping I ton ofwaste std USk.

Wastetoa rebynied,re-o'ered or diposed off eternallyshouid betansbrred t hro-gh adnowledgd recyclingo-ntpan xa. C t-i.

P materal"toonal storage on site shoud he desgnedand undertaken ' such a y ast that soils andundergroun Tc a waterare nol soniuted Soi arnsibnand Appcatbn oa appropriateerosno-protectin orasares. tn particular where k wods_onnoerns on elopes and in,,a,aea C contaminaton srt O.f. .

S a:..--,:nc- ph-.c ..-. ar -e,s.ts..s.n.cr,o.. :.a.r.rreapw...sr.rri.....s s.V,aht.:*"*, C

tmpactSon flora and Spamasf oontamination phase.c fauna_ __ _ Dthrtarhncoand seamsas hroonstnuctbon phase r C int-rnuptbnof sommercialand rsial 0050105e Oacspafon al health Same scasnahurntort o phasea. _ T_c andsafeta TOTAL _ =_| | 3.700(