DOCSLIB.ORG

Leopoldina News 05

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leopoldina News 05 Leopoldina news 5|2017 Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – German National Academy of Sciences Halle (Saale), 10 Oktober 2017 Genome editing: Medicine of the future? The Annual Assembly of the Leopoldina discusses aspects of genome editing SYMPOSIUM P. 2 ANNUAL ASSEMBLY P. 3-5 FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMME P. 8 Science and society Cutting-edge research Studies on chemistry in dialogue on genome editing and neurobiology What next after the New molecular genetic Postdocs spend two years March for Science? methods discussed working in California 05|2017 // LEOPOLDINA NEWS 2 Editorial Dear Members and Friends of the Leopoldina, “Quo vadis, Providing po- liticians with science communication?” science-based advice is a core What next after the March for Science? function of the Leopoldina. Its experts and ex- pertise are in greater demand than ever when it comes to political decision-making. Yet at the same time, science and politics do not always communicate with one another in suf- ficient depth: the politicians would -of ten like more recommendations for di- rect, concrete action. Scientists, on the other hand, sometimes feel that they are not being consulted or listened to enough. So how might we reconcile expecta- tions and potential whilst maintaining a sense of balance? What opportu- Scientific expertise can be very beneficial when discussing social issues. This is evident from the large nities exist for incorporating scienti- number of conferences and symposia held – not least by the Leopoldina. Photo: David Ausserhofer fic knowledge – with an awareness of political processes and timeframes Scientists from all over the world took to to exist? If we are to obtain answers to and precisely because of this – in de- the streets on 22 April to join the March these questions, then there needs to be a mocratic discourse? And how can for Science. They were demonstrating in frank exchange of views, and not just bet- views be exchanged with members favour of scientific freedom, and remin- ween scientists. Above all, new methods of of the public? How can their interests ding us of the value of scientific research science communication need to be put to be given due weight when providing in tackling the problems of society. One the test, and these must be developed by science-based advice to politicians? All of the positive outcomes of the March for collaborating with a number of different of these questions will be addressed Science was that it drew the attention of target groups from the very outset. at the event, ‘Science needs society’, a broad section of the public to one of the From protest to dialogue to the real which is to take place in a few days’ challenges facing world: the steps time at Schloss Herrenhausen (see science; namely that 25/26 OKTOBER 2017 which need to be ta- the accompanying article). The Robert it needs to be more ken over and above Bosch Foundation, the Leopoldina and successful at incre- ‘Science needs society – what next after the March for Sci- the weekly journal DIE ZEIT will be as- asing public awa- the March for Science?’ is the title of a sym- ence are to be dis- king, in collaboration with the Volks- reness of research posium to be held in Hanover by the Volks- cussed in a series of wagen Foundation, “What next after methods, the dis- wagen Foundation on 25 and 26 October lectures, panel dis- the March for Science?” The march in coveries made as a 2017 in conjunction with the Leopoldina, cussions and wor- April united hundreds of thousands of result, and their rele- the Robert Bosch Foundation, and DIE ZEIT. king groups at the people from all over the world, who vance to our lives. PROGRAMME AND REGISTRATION symposium ‘Wissen- demonstrated for scientific freedom One possible st- (ONLY IN GERMAN) schaft braucht Ge- and protested against the hurdles fa- arting-point for this sellschaft’ (‘Science cing scientists. In the light of these might be the ‘scien- needs society’). Its encouraging signs, science must also tific barometer’, an annual survey which principal objective is to provide the sti- play its part by being open and honest questions Germans on their attitudes to mulus for real-life projects which can help with the public, communicating with science and research. According to the counteract the dissemination of a world- a broad section of the population on most recent survey in July 2017, roughly view which is hostile towards science. The an equal footing, suggesting solutions two thirds of those questioned claimed to President of the Leopoldina, Prof. Dr. Jörg to problems which have been identi- be convinced that science served a use- Hacker ML, will ask what science and po- fied, and campaigning ceaselessly for ful purpose (see page 7). What problems litics (still?) have to say to one another. an appreciation of the complexity of is science communication now having to A realistic appraisal is essential if we are science. tackle, and what are the reasons behind to be able to evaluate the potential of sci- On this note, I would like to thank you them? Which strategies should scientific ence-based advice to resonate in our digi- for your support. organisations be adopting to confront the talised democracies. crisis of confidence which they have found (art) 05|2017 // LEOPOLDINA NEWS 3 About the changeability of the genome More than 400 Members of the Leopoldina and guests attended the Annual Assembly in Halle The Annual Assembly of the National Academy of Sciences on 22 and 23 Sep- tember focused on ‘Genome editing – challenges for the future’. The develop- ment of targeted genetic interventions by scientists specialising in molecular biology prompted a discussion about as- pects of their application in relation to plants, animals and humans, and about the ethical, legal and technical issues in- volved. “We are dealing with an area of re- search which is nothing less than revoluti- onary.” These were the words with which the President, Prof. Dr. Jörg Hacker ML, welcomed the more than four hundred guests to the 2017 Annual Assembly. Since 2015, new processes in the field of molecular genetics, in particular CRISPR/ Some fifty gifted schoolchildren from Germany were our guests at the Annual Assembly of the Cas9 molecular scissors, had spread from Leopoldina. They attended the lectures, discussed the issues with scientists, and found out more one research laboratory to another like about the publications produced by the Leopoldina. Photo: Markus Scholz wildfire. That is why Armin Willingmann, Minister of Economic Affairs, Science and (Potsdam) explained the biotechnologi- the earlier contributions. These revolved Digitisation of the State of Saxony-Anhalt, cal methods used with plants. Prof. Dr. again and again around the relationship also welcomed this choice of ‘groundbrea- Ephrat Levy Lahad (Jerusalem/Israel), between actions, ethics and knowledge. king topic’. Georg Schütte, Secretary of Prof. Dr. Andy Greenfield (Harwell/UK) Prof. Dr. Manfred Eigen ML, winner of the State at the Federal Ministry of Education and Prof. Dr. Jochen Taupitz ML (Mann- 1967 Nobel Prize for Chemistry, put this and Research, also stressed the need to heim) later drew on their own national in a nutshell when he said, “The more we bring the debate on the genome into the perspectives when talking about the legal, can do, the less we should do. The less we public spotlight, and to continue the con- ethical and regulatory repercussions asso- should do, the more we must know.” This versation in both specialist and political ciated with genome editing. quotation, with which Jörg Hacker ope- circles. In-depth conversations then took ned the Annual Assembly, will no doubt As expected, the speakers were keen place at the Annual Assembly between also shape our future discourse. for there to be more discussion about the different specialist disciplines, based on (dw) various fields of application and the soci- al relevance of genome editing. Prof. Dr. Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker ML (Munich) began by talking about how modern ge- netics “sets out its stall”; not only offering a solution to chronic sleep disorders, but also promising to help us to live longer and to provide a cure for breast cancer. Prof. Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier ML (Berlin), Prof. Dr. Rudolf Jaenisch ML (Cambridge, MA/USA) and Prof. Dr. Ethan Bier (San Diego, CA/USA) then went on to exp- lain the origins, breakthroughs, starting- points and operating principles of genome editing. Applications in the field of human biology were exemplified by Prof. Dr. Eric Olson (Dallas, TX/USA), Prof. Dr. Bo- ris Fehse (Hamburg) and Prof. Dr. Ugur Georg Schütte, Secretary of State at the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and Armin Sahin (Mainz), while Prof. Dr. Jens Boch Willingmann Minister of Economic Affairs, Science and Digitalisation of the State of Saxony-Anhalt, were (Hanover) and Prof. Dr. Ralph Bock ML taken through the Annual Assembly in the company of Jörg Hacker (l to r). Photo: Thomas Meinicke 05|2017 // LEOPOLDINA NEWS 4 Debate on principles of Outstanding gene therapy procedures research Panel raises medical, ethical and legal issues Prizes and medals awarded Nine scientists were awarded prizes and medals by the Leopoldina this year for their outstanding research. Prof. Dr. Fritz Melchers ML (Berlin) and Prof. Dr. Joachim Trümper ML (Garching) recei- ved the Cothenius Medal for their lifetime achievements in science. The research conducted by Prof. Melchers has contri- buted fundamentally to our understan- ding of the formation of blood cells and immune system malfunctions. Joachim Trümper enjoys an international repu- tation as a pioneer of X-ray astronomy. He was the driving force behind and sci- entific director of the ROSAT satellite Members of the Leopoldina and the Young Academy and other scientists discuss the consequences of mission, which succeeded in conducting germline therapy and somatic gene therapy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Brain That Changes Itself
    The Brain That Changes Itself Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science NORMAN DOIDGE, M.D. For Eugene L. Goldberg, M.D., because you said you might like to read it Contents 1 A Woman Perpetually Falling . Rescued by the Man Who Discovered the Plasticity of Our Senses 2 Building Herself a Better Brain A Woman Labeled "Retarded" Discovers How to Heal Herself 3 Redesigning the Brain A Scientist Changes Brains to Sharpen Perception and Memory, Increase Speed of Thought, and Heal Learning Problems 4 Acquiring Tastes and Loves What Neuroplasticity Teaches Us About Sexual Attraction and Love 5 Midnight Resurrections Stroke Victims Learn to Move and Speak Again 6 Brain Lock Unlocked Using Plasticity to Stop Worries, OPsessions, Compulsions, and Bad Habits 7 Pain The Dark Side of Plasticity 8 Imagination How Thinking Makes It So 9 Turning Our Ghosts into Ancestors Psychoanalysis as a Neuroplastic Therapy 10 Rejuvenation The Discovery of the Neuronal Stem Cell and Lessons for Preserving Our Brains 11 More than the Sum of Her Parts A Woman Shows Us How Radically Plastic the Brain Can Be Appendix 1 The Culturally Modified Brain Appendix 2 Plasticity and the Idea of Progress Note to the Reader All the names of people who have undergone neuroplastic transformations are real, except in the few places indicated, and in the cases of children and their families. The Notes and References section at the end of the book includes comments on both the chapters and the appendices. Preface This book is about the revolutionary discovery that the human brain can change itself, as told through the stories of the scientists, doctors, and patients who have together brought about these astonishing transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Linda Wilbrecht Department of Psychology Phone: +1 (510) 600–3560 Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute Email: [email protected] University of California, Berkeley Web: https://wilbrecht.org 2121 Berkeley Way West Pubmed: Wilbrecht L Berkeley, CA 94720-1650 ORCID: 0000-0003-3492-8141 Education 2007–2008 Postdoctoral Fellow, University of California, San Francisco Advisor: Michael Merzenich, Ph.D., UCSF 2003–2006 Postdoctoral Fellow, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY Advisor: Karel Svoboda, Ph.D., HHMI/Cold Spring Harbor, NY 1997–2003 Ph.D. The Rockefeller University, NY Advisor: Fernando Nottebohm, Ph.D.,Lab of Animal Behavior 1995–1997 B.A., with honours, University of Oxford, UK Experimental Psychology and Philosophy 1993–1994 Visiting student, University of Oxford, St. Catherine’s College, UK Studied social sciences with Drs. Avner Ofer and Paul Weindling 1990–1995 B.A. summa cum laude, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Department of Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature Appointments 2015–present Associate Professor, Department of Psychology Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley 2013–2015 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley 2008–2013 Assistant Professor in Residence, Department of Neurology UC San Francisco Principal Investigator, Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, Emeryville, CA Linda Wilbrecht CV October 2019 Honors and awards 2019–2020 Miller Professor, UC Berkeley Miller Institute 2011 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)
    [Show full text]
  • It's a Golden
    It’s A Golden Age Miracles happen, and emotional plasticity may be one of them. A few years ago, I met with a warm, fatherly psychiatrist to explain the science and methods of EBT. During our conversation, there came a moment when words failed me. I suggested that he try one of the tools, and he demurred, so I volunteered to demonstrate the technique. I had not been aware of how stressed I was at the time – that I feared that I would never get this method out and would go to my grave with the tools still inside me. However, in the warm womb of his comfy office, I launched into using a tool. I fired up anger that sported a few expletives, made a brief pass through sadness with tears sparkling in my eyes, next touched on fear, and then on guilt. At that point, the bottom of my reptilian brain opened up. I had unlocked a previously unconscious, completely unreasonable expectation that had taken up residence in my brain. Perfect! Moments later, I had switched that expectation to a reasonable one of my choosing, and a burst of dopamine, oxytocin, and endorphins came over me. I was in joy! All of this had taken less than four minutes. He sat quietly. I had no idea what he would say. Then he gazed straight into my eyes and said, “Nothing in my 40 years of psychiatry has prepared me to explain what I just observed.” Through his eyes, my use of the tools must have seemed strange in two ways.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 Neuronal Plasticity Prize of the Fondation Ipsen: Helen J. Neville, Isabelle Peretz and Robert J. Zatorre Awarded for Their
    Press release 22nd Neuronal Plasticity Prize of the Fondation Ipsen: Helen J. Neville, Isabelle Peretz and Robert J. Zatorre awarded for their pioneering research into the domain of “Music and Brain Plasticity” Paris (France), 19 July 2011 – The 22nd annual Neuronal Plasticity Prize of the Fondation Ipsen has been awarded to Helen J. Neville (University of Oregon, Eugene, USA), Isabelle Peretz (Brams – University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada) and Robert J. Zatorre (Montreal Neurological Institute and Brams Laboratory, Montreal, Canada, USA) for their pioneering research in the domain of “Music and Brain Plasticity”. The €60,000 prize was awarded on July 15, 2011 by an international jury1 led by Professor Nikos Logothetis (Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tubingen, Germany) at the 8th International Brain Research Organization (IBRO) World Congress of Neuroscience, Florence, Italy. About the laureates Helen J. Neville is currently The Robert and Beverly Lewis Endowed Chair and Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience, Director of the Brain Development Lab, and Director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Oregon in Eugene. Her work experience includes Director of the Laboratory for Neuropsychology at the Salk Institute. She has published in many journals such as Nature, Nature Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Cerebral Cortex and Brain Research and has made a DVD about the brain for non-scientists. She has received many honors like being elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the Board of Governors of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, the Academic Panel of Birth to Three and is active in many educational outreach programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Trends Reporting the Latest News in Molecular Surgery
    Jan-Feb-Mar 2013 Volume 14, Issue 1 Targeting Trends Reporting the latest news in Molecular Surgery Role of cholinergic neurons in the nucleus accumbens and their involvement in schizophrenic pathology Contributed by François LaPlante. Dept of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada A post-mortem reduction in the density of targeting choline acetyltransferase (anti-ChAT- cholinergic interneurons in the ventral striatum SAP; Cat. #IT-42), microinjected bilaterally or nucleus accumbens (N.Acc.) has been (250-ng/side) into the N.Acc. of adult Sprague- Inside this issue: reported in schizophrenic brains.1,2 In this Dawley rats. We found a localized and selective Targeting Topics region the cholinergic interneurons interact 40-50% loss of cholinergic interneurons Scientific References 3 anatomically and functionally with the (minimum two weeks post-lesion) with sparing dopaminergic nerve terminals notably to of adjacent areas.3 Similarly, the toxin infusion Targeting Talk dampen the effects of excessive dopamine resulted in a 34% reduced tissue level of Spring Brain Conference 5 activity. We hypothesized that the lower level acetylcholine in the N.Acc. Targeting Tools of cholinergic neurons and subsequently the We have previously shown that partial Featured Products 7 acetylcholine release in the N.Acc may be depletion of cholinergic neurons resulted in relevant to the enhanced (ventral) striatal heightened behavioral sensitivity to Targeting Teaser dopaminergic neurotransmission, well- amphetamine and impaired sensorimotor Word Quiz 8 described in schizophrenia, and may contribute function3 analogous to those seen in to the emergence of schizophrenic symptoms. schizophrenia. Recently we observed that such The purpose of our work is to reproduce in lesions also significantly impaired performance rats the selective reduction of cholinergic in a T-maze task, a measurement of working Newsletter interneurons in the N.Acc.
    [Show full text]
  • View (E50) Sherif Badawy, Lisa Kuhns
    JMIR mHealth and uHealth Mobile and tablet apps, ubiquitous and pervasive computing, wearable computing and domotics for health Volume 5 (2017), Issue 4 ISSN: 2291-5222 Contents Original Papers Usability of a Novel Mobile Health iPad App by Vulnerable Populations (e43) David Miller Jr, Kathryn Weaver, L Case, Donald Babcock, Donna Lawler, Nancy Denizard-Thompson, Michael Pignone, John Spangler. 3 Processes and Recommendations for Creating mHealth Apps for Low-Income Populations (e41) Laura Stephan, Eduardo Dytz Almeida, Raphael Guimaraes, Antonio Ley, Rodrigo Mathias, Maria Assis, Tiago Leiria. 14 Immediate Mood Scaler:Tracking Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Novel Mobile Mood Scale (e44) Mor Nahum, Thomas Van Vleet, Vikaas Sohal, Julie Mirzabekov, Vikram Rao, Deanna Wallace, Morgan Lee, Heather Dawes, Alit Stark-Inbar, Joshua Jordan, Bruno Biagianti, Michael Merzenich, Edward Chang. 23 Development and Testing of the MyHealthyPregnancy App: A Behavioral Decision Research-Based Tool for Assessing and Communicating Pregnancy Risk (e42) Tamar Krishnamurti, Alexander Davis, Gabrielle Wong-Parodi, Baruch Fischhoff, Yoel Sadovsky, Hyagriv Simhan. 38 Technology Use and Preferences for Mobile Phone±Based HIV Prevention and Treatment Among Black Young Men Who Have Sex With Men: Exploratory Research (e46) Ian Holloway, Terrell Winder, Charles Lea III, Diane Tan, Donte Boyd, David Novak. 49 Texting and Mobile Phone App Interventions for Improving Adherence to Preventive Behavior in Adolescents: A Systematic Review (e50) Sherif Badawy, Lisa Kuhns. 64 User Interest in Digital Health Technologies to Encourage Physical Activity: Results of a Survey in Students and Staff of a German University (e51) Annett Salzwedel, Sophie Rabe, Thomas Zahn, Julia Neuwirth, Sarah Eichler, Kathrin Haubold, Anne Wachholz, Rona Reibis, Heinz Völler.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Kandel's Personal Collection.)
    IN SEARCH OF MEMORY The Emergence of a New Science of Mind ERIC R. KANDEL Copyright © 2006 ISBN 0-393-05863-8 POUR DENISE CONTENTS Preface xi ONE 1. Personal Memory and the Biology of Memory Storage 3 2. A Childhood in Vienna 12 3. An American Education 33 TWO 4. One Cell at a Time 53 5. The Nerve Cell Speaks 74 6. Conversation Between Nerve Cells 90 7. Simple and Complex Neuronal Systems 103 8. Different Memories, Different Brain Regions 116 9. Searching for an Ideal System to Study Memory 135 10. Neural Analogs of Learning 150 THREE 11. Strengthening Synaptic Connections 165 12. A Center for Neurobiology and Behavior 180 13. Even a Simple Behavior Can Be Modified by Learning 187 14. Synapses Change with Experience 198 15. The Biological Basis of Individuality 208 16. Molecules and Short-Term Memory 221 17. Long-Term Memory 240 18. Memory Genes 247 19. A Dialogue Between Genes and Synapses 201 FOUR 20. A Return to Complex Memory 279 21. Synapses Also Hold Our Fondest Memories 286 22. The Brain's Picture of the External World 295 23. Attention Must Be Paid! 307 FIVE 24. A Little Red Pill 319 25. Mice, Men, and Mental Illness 335 26. A New Way to Treat Mental Illness 352 27. Biology and the Renaissance of Psychoanalytic Thought 363 28. Consciousness 376 SIX 29. Rediscovering Vienna via Stockholm 393 30. Learning from Memory: Prospects 416 Glossary 431 Notes and Sources 453 Acknowledgments 485 Index 489 PREFACE Understanding the human mind in biological terms has emerged as the central challenge for science in the twenty-first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Paul Stryker
    BK-SFN-NEUROSCIENCE_V11-200147-Stryker.indd 372 6/19/20 2:19 PM Michael Paul Stryker BORN: Savannah, Georgia June 16, 1947 EDUCATION: Deep Springs College, Deep Springs, CA (1964–1966) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, BA (1968) Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, PhD (1975) Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Postdoctoral (1975–1978) APPOINTMENTS: Assistant Professor of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco (1978–1983) Associate Professor of Physiology, UCSF (1983–1987) Professor of Physiology, UCSF (1987–present) Visiting Professor of Human Anatomy, University of Oxford, England (1987–1988) Co-Director, Neuroscience Graduate Program, UCSF (1988–1994) Chairman, Department of Physiology, UCSF (1994–2005) Director, Markey Program in Biological Sciences, UCSF (1994–1996) William Francis Ganong Endowed Chair of Physiology, UCSF (1995–present) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): W. Alden Spencer Award, Columbia University (1990) Cattedra Galileiana (Galileo Galilei Chair) Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy (1993) Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1999) Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2002) Member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences (2009) Pepose Vision Sciences Award, Brandeis University (2012) RPB Stein Innovator Award, Research to Prevent Blindness (2016) Krieg Cortical Kudos Discoverer Award from the Cajal Club (2018) Disney Award for Amblyopia Research, Research to Prevent Blindness (2020) Michael Stryker’s laboratory demonstrated the role of spontaneous neural activity as distinguished from visual experience in the prenatal and postnatal development of the central visual system. He and his students created influential and biologically realistic theoretical mathematical models of cortical development. He pioneered the use of the ferret for studies of the central visual system and used this species to delineate the role of neural activity in the development of orientation selectivity and cortical columns.
    [Show full text]
  • RFS Briefings July 15, 2016
    RFS Briefings July 15, 2016 _______________________________________________________ MacArthur to Give $100 Million to 1 Group to Solve 1 Big Problem, philanthropy.com, June 2, 2016 “Dream big,” says the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation to organizations that are pitching proposals on how to solve any of the world’s biggest problems in order to win a single $100 million grant through the competition 100%Change. The goal? “To find ideas that would ‘significantly mitigate a major problem or seize a compelling opportunity,’” according to Julia Stasch, the new leader of the MacArthur Foundation. The prize is open to all organizations with a proven solution to any major social problem. The application deadline is September 2, 2016. Read more. How We Became Human, live.newscientist.com, May 30, 2016 Do you ever wonder what makes us human? Alice Roberts, professor at University of Birmingham, has spent years exploring this very question. She has looked deep inside the human body, looked back in time to discover how we as humans have evolved to the way we are, followed the ancestral journeys which led to humans emerging from their homeland of Africa to colonize the globe, and she’s even had her own brain scanned and 3D printed to see if she can find any clues there. Are you ready to hear all of Professor Roberts’ discoveries and find out where you came from? Hear Professor Roberts speak at Scientist Live, a four-day festival of ideas and discovery in London on September 22-25, 2016. Read more. Whitehall Foundation Invites LOIs for Bioscience Research Projects, philanthropynewsdigest.com, June 3, 2016 The Whitehall Foundation, which assists scholarly research in the life sciences through its research grants and grants-in-aid programs, is accepting Letters of Intent (LOI).
    [Show full text]
  • 3 25Th Annual Puerto Rico Neuroscience Conference
    25TH ANNUAL PUERTO RICO NEUROSCIENCE CONFERENCE Invited Speakers Dr. Nancy Kanwisher, ProFessor @ MIT-Department oF Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Investigator @ MIT- McGovern Institute For Brain Research. Title: Functional Specificity in the Human Brain. Host: University oF Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras Dr. Paul Vezina ProFessor Department oF Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience The University oF Chicago Title: PKC signaling and enhanced responding to stimulant drugs Host: Ponce Health Sciences University Dr. Baljit S. Khakh, ProFessor oF Physiology and Neurobiology David GeFFen School oF Medicine at UCLA. Title: Astrocyte functions in neural circuits Host: Universidad Central del Caribe Dr. Michael Merzenich FRANCIS A. SOOY PROFESSOR Executive Chairman, ChieF ScientiFic OFFicer, Posit Science Corporation 2016 Kavil Prize Award with Karla Shatz and Eve Marder Title: Brain Plasticity-based Therapeutics Host: University oF Puerto Rico-School oF Medicine 3 About the invited Speakers Dr. Michael Merzenich Dr. Michael Merzenich, PhD, is one oF the scientists responsible For our current understanding oF brain plasticity–the notion that the brain can change itselF at any age. For nearly Five decades, he and his colleagues have conducted seminal research deFining the Functional organization oF the auditory and somatosensory nervous systems. Research on cortical plasticity conducted in his laboratory has greatly contributed to our current understanding oF the phenomenology oF brain plasticity across the human liFetime. Dr. Merzenich has received numerous prestigious awards and prizes For his research and holds nearly 100 patents For his work. He is a member oF both the National Academy oF Sciences and the Institute oF Medicine. In 2016, Dr. Merzenich was awarded one oF the world’s top neuroscience prizes, the Kavli Prize, For his achievements in the Field oF brain plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • National-Academies-Letter.Pdf
    July 6, 2009 Dear Governor Schwarzenegger: The three hundred signers of this letter write to you as members of the US National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine, and as professors at the University of California to express our deep concern about the latest round of proposed cuts to the UC budget. Current proposals being weighed by your office and the Legislature call for a 19% reduction from 2007-8 levels in state support for UC, producing an $800 million shortfall in the UC budget for the 2009-10 fiscal year. This will lead to increases in student fees, reductions in pay or furloughs for faculty and staff, and cuts in virtually all University services. These cuts will be devastating to every part of the University’s mission, but as scientists and engineers we are particularly concerned about their effects on the future of science and technology in California. While we recognize that our state faces an unprecedented financial crisis, the proposed cuts come on top of a decades-long trend of declining state support for the University of California. The situation has reached a breaking point. Further cuts of the magnitude being contemplated in the latest round of budget proposals are likely to destroy UC’s status as the leading public university in the United States. This would undermine prospects for economic recovery and damage California’s competitiveness for decades. Before making a decision in the heat of a crisis that will have negative consequences for decades to come, we ask that you consider the following: • It is estimated that 85% of per capita economic growth in the United States is due to technological change1, and the University of California has been a leading driver of that change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Enchanted Loom: a History of Research on the Brain with a Select Who’S Who in Neurology, Neuroscience and Neuropsychology
    The Enchanted Loom: A History of Research on the Brain with a Select Who’s Who in Neurology, Neuroscience and Neuropsychology Charles J. Vella, PhD January 27, 2016 www.charlesjvellaphd.com All of my lectures in PDF files In Ollie Brain Class section of my website: www.charlesjvellaphd.com Or in the OLLIE Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B- 99S2HCCnmMVDZkdDJxT3htdkk&usp=sharing Email: [email protected] Enchanted Loom: The Brain And God… 4000, BC: First written mention of the Brain The first known writing about brain function is found in ancient Sumerian records dated around 4000, BC. The anonymous writer describes euphoric mind- altering effect of ingesting the common poppy. 2500 BC: Egyptians Egyptians believed that the heart was the most important body organ. The Book of the Dead, which instructs that a dead man's heart must be weighed against feathers to determine the balance of good to evil it contains. The brain, on the other hand, is considered a minor, unimportant organ. They discard it during the embalming process even as they ceremoniously preserve other organs for mummification. Egyptian Mummification: No Canopic Jar: Brain was worthless Egyptian method used to remove brain in mummification Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus by Imhotep, 1700 B.C. “Brain” in First written record about brain Hieroglyphic anatomy: 27 head injury cases Brain mentioned 7 times Case 6: TBI, brain convolutions, meninges, CS fluid Spinal Cord Injury in Assyria, 600 BC Midthoracic spinal cord injury = flaccid paralysis Machu Picchu: Neurological Procedure Neolithic Neurology: Trephination Trephination: as early as 13,000 years ago in Morocco; Egyptians used it around 4,000 years ago, as did pre-Inca groups living in South America 1,000 years ago.
    [Show full text]