Honors Program Honors Program Theses University of Puget Sound Year 2015 Dum conderet urbem: Poetic Portraits of Aeneas as Political Commentaries on Augustus Alicia Matz
[email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/honors program theses/12 Dum conderet urbem: Poetic Portraits of Aeneas as Political Commentaries on Augustus Alicia Matz University of Puget Sound Director: Aislinn Melchior, Associate Professor and Chair, Classics Reader: Eric Orlin, Professor, Classics Matz 1 Many ancient authors believed that Vergil’s Aeneas was the epitome of a good man. One such author, Tiberius Claudius Donatus, wrote a commentary, published in the fourth century CE, which includes about one hundred pages of paraphrase per book of the Aeneid. Writing in order “to help his son read the Aeneid ” (Starr 26), the very first thing Donatus sets about explaining is the kind of work that Vergil wrote: Primum igitur et ante omnia sciendum est quod materiae genus Maro noster adgressus sit; hoc enim nisi inter initia fuerit cognitum, vehementer errabitur. et certe laudativum est… ( “First therefore also before everything it must be known what kind of material our Maro undertook; for unless this is understood amongst the beginnings, it will vehemently be in error. And certainly it is laudatory…,” Donatus 1.2.7-10).1 Not wanting his son to be confused, at the outset he wants to make sure that he knows that the main genre of the Aeneid is praise, and as a result of this “Vergil’s basic goal is to praise Aeneas and, therefore, Augustus” (Starr 29).