DOCSLIB.ORG

About Rebuilding America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
About Rebuilding America “Supporting Rebuilding America Now is one of the best ways to stop Hillary Clinton and help elect Donald Trump our next President!” Governor Mike Pence ABOUT REBUILDING AMERICA NOW Rebuilding America Now is a Super PAC supporting Donald spend at least $90 million trying to cover up the truth about Trump in the 2016 General Election. We are dedicated to Hillary and to smear Donald Trump. Rebuilding America Now showing Americans the truth about Hillary Clinton and her will counteract this nationwide advertising offensive with real record. effective, unyielding messages about Hillary Clinton’s record. Supporting Donald Trump: No one else is producing ads with such clear and powerful Our name is centered on the idea that there is work to be messages about Hillary Clinton’s record. With your help, we done, by Americans, for Americans, in our country. Our roads, will continue to make and disseminate these hard-hitting ads our economy, and our status in the world need rebuilding. and show voters the truth about Hillary. We will promote the conservative vision for our future The American people need to see these ads. The Democratic embodied by Donald Trump’s candidacy to the men and campaign machine and Priorities USA will continue pushing women whose livelihoods have been impacted by President vague platitudes about the benefts of a Hillary Clinton Obama and Hillary Clinton’s policies. presidency while attacking Donald Trump. Rebuilding America Now will ensure Americans know the whole story. Taking on Hillary Clinton: A major Super PAC effort is necessary to counter Priorities We will run a national campaign just like Priorities USA, but USA Action, the Super PAC backing Hillary Clinton, which will we will do it better. LAURANCE GAY, CLETA MITCHELL, Managing Director Foley & Lardner, General Counsel Laurance Gay is CEO of Business, Strategies & Insight, a Cleta is a renowned Republican campaign lawyer with 40 public affairs company. His political experience is extensive years experience in campaign fnance and election law. beginning with Ronald Reagan in 1979. She has represented both the National Senate Committee and the Congressional Committee. She is a Partner at Foley & Lardner, LLP and enjoys the highest performance KEN MCKAY, rating with Martindale-Hubbell’s peer review rating system. Political Director Ken served as manager for Governor Christie’s Presidential CHRISTINA CULVER, campaign. He was Political Director at the Republican Governors Association. He acted as Senior Advisor to Finance Director Governor Rick Scott’s frst Gubernatorial campaign. He is a In addition to a background in political and charitable lawyer and former Chief of Staff to the Republican National fundraising Christina has deep experience in political Committee. He served as Chief of Staff to Rhode Island affairs and education policy. Christina worked in the Governor Don Carcieri and managed his two winning White House and served as Acting Assistant Secretary campaigns. He was a Senior Advisor to U.S. Senator Ron and Deputy Assistant Secretary at the U.S. Department Johnson and is an Army veteran. of Education. She also served as the Director of the Presidential Roundtable fundraising program for the ALEX CASTELLANOS, National Republican Senatorial Committee. National Media, Creative & Production Leader Alex, in addition to an extensive Corporate practice, served as media strategist for campaigns including, Bob Dole, George H.W. Bush, Jeb Bush for Governor, George W. Bush and Mitt Romney. Alex’s corporate clients have included, BP, PhARMA, and the U. S. Chamber of Commerce PAID FOR BY REBUILDING AMERICA NOW NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEE. WWW.REBUILDINGAMERICANOW.COM REBUILDING AMERICA NOW In the News Trump blesses major super PAC effort Top Trump Aides Signal Support for a Super-PAC Alex Isenstadt and Kenneth P. Vogel Zachary Mider July 20, 2016 July 20, 2016 Donald Trump spent the primary bashing major donors and insisting he Top aides to Donald Trump’s campaign signaled support for a group that didn’t want super PAC help, but his campaign on Wednesday signaled can collect contributions of unlimited size from wealthy donors, as the that it has dropped its opposition to both and is now openly encouraging Republican nominee tries to narrow the massive fi nancial lead enjoyed donors to give to a super PAC that has raised $5 million in recent days. by Democrat Hillary Clinton. “Reinforcing the message that the Trump campaign wants donors to give to Rebuilding America, Trump’s top strategist Paul Manafort called into the meeting to discuss the campaign and make clear that the PAC was the only one he is addressing, according to three attendees.” POLITICO 07/20/16 PAID FOR BY REBUILDING AMERICA NOW NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEE. WWW.REBUILDINGAMERICANOW.COM REBUILDING AMERICA NOW Frequently Asked Questions What is Rebuilding America Now?” Are contributions to Rebuilding America Rebuilding America Now is an independent expenditures Now disclosed publicly? (“IE”) PAC fled with the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) Yes. The name, address, employer and occupation of all donors to Rebuilding America Now whose contributions What is the mission of Rebuilding America exceed $200 in a calendar year are reported to the FEC. Now? When does Rebuilding America Now report To support the candidacy of Donald Trump for President in the 2016 General Election. its donors a to the FEC? • Rebuilding America Now fled its organizing documents with What is a “SuperPAC” or Independent the FEC on June 2, 2016, its frst quarterly report on July Expenditures PAC – what can it do and not 15, 2016 and another quarterly report is fled on October 15, 2016, as well as a pre-general and post-general report, do? which includes donor information. An independent expenditures PAC such as Rebuilding • Independent Expenditures for public communications America Now is a federal PAC that makes no contributions supporting Donald Trump or opposing Hillary Clinton must to candidates and is permitted to make unlimited express also be reported to the FEC on separate reports, but no advocacy expenditures regarding candidates and political donor information is included in the IE reports. parties, provided that such expenditures and communications are independent of any campaign and any GOP Party What does it mean to be ‘independent’ of the Committee. Trump campaign? This is the most important Who can give to Rebuilding America Now requirement! and what are the limits? • All public communications paid for by Rebuilding America Now must be independently developed and may not be Rebuilding America Now is permitted to accept unlimited requested, discussed or orchestrated directly or indirectly contributions from individuals, corporations, partnerships, by the campaign. and any other source except that no foreign contributions are permitted – no foreign nationals without permanent resident • Vendors/ consultants to and employees of Rebuilding status in the US and no foreign corporations. Contributions America Now cannot also serve in the same capacity to the from domestic subsidiaries of foreign corporations are Trump campaign or any political party committee. permissible. No contributions from national banks or federal • Persons involved in the leadership of Rebuilding America contractors are allowed. It is only the actual contracting Now cannot be privy to non-public information about the entity is prohibited from contributing so, for example, if XYZ “needs, activities, plans or projects” of the Trump campaign. Corporation has a contract with the federal government, then treasury funds of XYZ Corporation cannot be contributed to Rebuilding America Now. However, shareholders, employees What can donors to Donald Trump do with and officers of XYZ Corporation can make contributions to the PAC because they are not parties to the federal contract. respect to Rebuilding America Now? • Donors to the campaign are permitted to contribute to Do contributions to Rebuilding America Now Rebuilding America Now, in whatever amounts they choose count against a donor’s federal contribution to donate, and from whatever source(s), other than foreign corporations or foreign nationals who lack permanent limits either to the Trump Pence Campaign resident status in the United States. or the Trump Victory Committee (the RNC – • Fundraising and donor lists for Rebuilding America Now Donald Trump joint fundraising committee)? should be developed by Rebuilding America Now but the PAC may receive information, donor lists and prospects No. from the campaign. Note: • Paid fundraisers and fnance committee members of a Donald J. Trump, Inc. is the Trump Pence Campaign candidate’s campaign are permitted to donate whatever committee, with a maximum individual contribution of $2700. they choose to Rebuilding America Now but should not Trump Victory Committee is the RNC – Donald Trump Joint simultaneously serve in same or similar fundraising Fundraising Committee, see the Trump Victory Committee capacities with Rebuilding America Now. website for more information about giving information. • Key volunteers with the Trump campaign and the Trump RNC joint fundraising committees are also permitted to participate with Rebuilding America Now, as long as they PAID FOR BY REBUILDING AMERICA NOW NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE’S COMMITTEE. WWW.REBUILDINGAMERICANOW.COM REBUILDING AMERICA NOW Frequently Asked Questions...continued ...are not designated by the Trump campaign or the RNC as How can I contribute to Rebuilding America ‘agents’ of the RNC or the Trump campaign. For instance, co-chairs of the Trump fnance committee and/or the joint Now? Contributions can be sent: fundraising committees with the RNC who are have not been designated as ‘agents’ by the Trump campaign or By check, payable to: RNC may host events for Rebuilding America Now, solicit Rebuilding America Now contributions for Rebuilding America Now and help the PAC P. O . B o x 2 6 1 4 1 identify prospective donors. Alexandria, Virginia 22313 • Donors to the Trump campaign and the Trump RNC joint Contact: fundraising committees are permitted to contribute unlimited Ryan Call amounts to Rebuilding America Now.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BEFORE the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 1 2 3 in the Matter Of
    MUR709200195 1 BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 4 In the Matter of ) 5 ) MURs 7011 and 7092 6 HC4President and Kyle Prall ) 7 in his official capacity as treasurer ) 8 Socially Responsible Government and ) 9 Grace Rogers in her official capacity ) 10 as treasurer ) 11 Kyle Prall 12 13 SECOND GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 14 I. ACTIONS RECOMMENDED 15 We recommend that the Commission: (1) take no further action against HC4President 16 and Kyle Prall in his official capacity as treasurer (“HC4P”) except for issuing a letter of 17 admonishment; (2) take no further action against Socially Responsible Government and Grace 18 Rogers in her official capacity as treasurer (“SRG”) except for issuing a letter of admonishment; 19 (3) take no further action against Kyle Prall in his personal capacity except for issuing a letter of 20 admonishment; (4) instruct the Reports Analysis Division (“RAD”) to administratively terminate 21 HC4P and SRG as federal political committees; and (5) close the matter and send the appropriate 22 letters. 23 II. BACKGROUND 24 On April 24, 2018, the Commission found reason to believe that HC4P, SRG, and Kyle 25 Prall in his personal capacity violated 52 U.S.C. § 30124(b) based on information that indicated 26 that the HC4P and SRG websites, which Prall controlled, were designed to mislead visitors into 27 believing that HC4P represented Hillary Clinton’s authorized presidential campaign and that 28 SRG represented Bernie Sanders’s authorized presidential campaign.1 The Commission 1 See Certification, MURs 7011 and 7092 (Apr. 25, 2018). MUR709200196 MURs 7011 and 7092 (HC4President, et al.) Second General Counsel’s Report Page 2 of 14 1 authorized the use of compulsory process to obtain further facts regarding HC4P and SRG, 2 3 4 On January 15, 2019, a federal grand jury indicted Prall on three counts of mail fraud 5 (18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions and 187 Last-Minute Appointments
    Trump Administration Allies Have Burrowed Into 24 Critical Civil Service Positions And 187 Last-Minute Appointments SUMMARY: Following the outgoing administration’s “quiet push to salt federal agencies with Trump loyalists,” an Accountable.US review has found that, as of February 22, 2021, at least 24 Trump administration political appointees have “burrowed” into long-term civil service jobs in the new Biden administration. This includes at least four figures in the national security apparatus, nine figures with environmental regulators, three figures in the Department of Justice, two figures in the embattled Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and at least six other appointees elsewhere who have refused to step down in the transition. Burrowing of this sort is not treated lightly, as officials who transfer from political appointments to career positions must undergo scrutiny by federal personnel overseers for a full five years—and some of these cases have been found to violate federal laws and have drawn congressional scrutiny. However, there is a much wider slate of concerning Trump administration appointments that are not subject to such strict oversight: During the Trump administration’s waning days following the 2020 election, it announced 187 last-minute appointments to various boards, commissions, and councils that don’t require Senate confirmation. While some of these appointments have already drawn alarm for going to campaign staffers, megadonors, and top administration allies, Accountable.US has unearthed even more troubling names in Trump’s outgoing deluge. Similar to how early Trump administration personnel picks were directly conflicted against the offices they served, many of these late Trump appointments are woefully underqualified or have histories directly at odds with the positions to which they were named—and they are likely to stay in long into the Biden administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2017 No. 173 Senate The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was U.S. SENATE, his first year. Democrats have invoked called to order by the Honorable LU- PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, this delay for every single one of Presi- THER STRANGE, a Senator from the Washington, DC, October 26, 2017. dent Trump’s judicial nominees, so far, State of Alabama. To the Senate: except one. This week, they are at it Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby again. f appoint the Honorable LUTHER STRANGE, a Today, we will have a cloture vote on Senator from the State of Alabama, to per- the nomination of Trevor McFadden to PRAYER form the duties of the Chair. the U.S. District Court for the District The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- ORRIN G. HATCH, of Columbia. Not a single Democrat on fered the following prayer: President pro tempore. the Judiciary Committee registered an Let us pray. Mr. STRANGE thereupon assumed objection to the nomination; yet we O God, our King, we are grateful that the Chair as Acting President pro tem- still have to waste time in overcoming righteousness and justice are the foun- pore. a procedural hurdle from our Demo- dation of Your throne. Give our law- f cratic colleagues before the Senate can makers such a connection with You take up the nomination and consider RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY that they will hate evil.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchestrating Public Opinion
    Paul ChristiansenPaul Orchestrating Public Opinion Paul Christiansen Orchestrating Public Opinion How Music Persuades in Television Political Ads for US Presidential Campaigns, 1952-2016 Orchestrating Public Opinion Orchestrating Public Opinion How Music Persuades in Television Political Ads for US Presidential Campaigns, 1952-2016 Paul Christiansen Amsterdam University Press Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 188 1 e-isbn 978 90 4853 167 7 doi 10.5117/9789462981881 nur 670 © P. Christiansen / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2018 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Every effort has been made to obtain permission to use all copyrighted illustrations reproduced in this book. Nonetheless, whosoever believes to have rights to this material is advised to contact the publisher. Table of Contents Acknowledgments 7 Introduction 10 1. The Age of Innocence: 1952 31 2. Still Liking Ike: 1956 42 3. The New Frontier: 1960 47 4. Daisies for Peace: 1964 56 5. This Time Vote Like Your Whole World Depended On It: 1968 63 6. Nixon Now! 1972 73 7. A Leader, For a Change: 1976 90 8. The Ayatollah Casts a Vote: 1980 95 9. Morning in America: 1984 101 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Actuarial Update
    Actuarial JULY 2017 OF ACTUARIES OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY THE NEWSMONTHLY Academy Informs Nation’s Health Care Debate Work Includes Issue Brief, FAQs on CSRs and Risk Pooling HE ACADEMY’S WORK in informing the Barb Klever, vice chairperson of that committee, important and ongoing national health care debate presented July 14 at the National Conference of Insur- Tcontinued in July, with Academy papers and pub- ance Legislators summer meeting in Chicago on the lications highlighting timely, diverse issues surrounding issue brief’s key points, which included trends in health both the current Affordable Care Act (ACA) mar- care costs; legislative and regulatory uncertainty kets and efforts to repeal and/or replace the regarding cost-sharing reduction (CSR) ACA, as well as Medicare. subsidies and enforcement of the indi- The Health Practice Council sent a vidual mandate; whether risk-sharing letter July 25 to U.S. Senate leadership programs for high-cost enrollees are on the potential adverse conse- provided; changes in the risk pool quences of legislation to eliminate composition and insurer assump- the ACA’s individual mandate, tions from 2017; and resumption which would lead to lower enroll- of the health insurer fee. ment, a deterioration of the risk The Academy’s work drew pool, and higher premiums. CNN widespread media coverage, Money quoted Shari Westerfield, the including a July 5 New York Times Academy’s vice president, health, who story that quoted Senior Health wrote that “a balanced risk pool requires Fellow Cori Uccello and the Acade- enrollment of healthy individuals to keep my’s June 30 letter to Senate leaders in UPDATE premiums affordable and stable.” a story on an amendment proposed by Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • PS: Political Science & Politics the News Media And
    PS: Political Science & Politics http://journals.cambridge.org/PSC Additional services for PS: Political Science & Politics: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns John G. Geer PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 45 / Issue 03 / July 2012, pp 422 ­ 427 DOI: 10.1017/S1049096512000492, Published online: 12 June 2012 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1049096512000492 How to cite this article: John G. Geer (2012). The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics,45, pp 422­427 doi:10.1017/S1049096512000492 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/PSC, IP address: 74.220.233.54 on 22 Aug 2012 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... SYMPOSIUM ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns John G. Geer, Vanderbilt University ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Policy Consequences of Senate Obstruction
    AP Photo/L A wrence J A ckson The Policy Consequences of Senate Obstruction Tony Carrk April 2010 www.americanprogressaction.org The Policy Consequences of Senate Obstruction Tony Carrk April 2010 Contents 1 Unprecedented obstruction in Congress 2 Obstruction tools: Cloture and the filibuster 2 Obstruction tools: The hold 4 The impact of obstruction 4 Putting economic assistance on hold 4 Key posts remain vacant 6 Obstructing health care brought gridlock to the Senate for 14 months 9 Opening the door to special interests 11 More than 240 bipartisan House bills delayed 13 Conclusion 14 Endnotes Unprecedented obstruction in Congress Congress, particularly the U.S. Senate, boasts established rules for members to delay legislation. These rules have historically been reserved to ensure proper deliberation and consideration on the most important issues facing the nation. Recently, however, the Republican Party embraced these obstructionist tactics to subvert progressives so much that they have rendered the government dysfunctional.1 This report is intended as a guide to understanding obstruction in the Senate. It will exam- ine the tools used by Republicans to prevent the effective functioning of government via the filibuster and holds, how they’ve used these different tools in both policy debates and executive appointments, and which special interests benefit from such obstructionism. Obstruction by the numbers 112 Number of cloture votes in the 110th Congress (2007-08), a record number and more than double the cloture votes in the 109th Congress 2,000 percent Increase in the number of executive branch nominations facing filibuster under President Barack Obama over the previous six decades 15 Number of President Obama’s top national security picks, out of 30, that took longer to be confirmed than recommended by the 9/11 Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Advertising 2016: Referendum on Character
    Campaign Advertising 2016: Referendum on Character Prashanth Bhat, Alyson Farzad-Phillips, Morgan Hess, Lauren Hunter, Nora Murphy, Claudia Serrano Rico, Kyle Stephan, Gareth Williams, & Dr. Shawn Parry-Giles 2 Campaign Advertising 2016: Referendum on Character Since 1952, campaigns ads have been one of the major ways that voters learn about presidential candidates.1 Campaign ads function as a “second voice” for the campaign – teaching voters about the important issues and activating political discussion among citizens.2 This report is produced by the Political Advertising Resource Center at the University of Maryland and identifies what these voices say about the 2016 presidential candidates: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. By analyzing the 2016 campaign advertising, we seek to understand what the advertising revealed and concealed about the candidates and the state of American politics. Our analysis examines campaign ads released after the major conventions through late October.3 We argue that the 2016 campaign ads represent a referendum on the character of the candidates. Both campaigns used appeals to fear and anger in their ads to assault the character of their opponent, elevating the anxiety and cynicism surrounding the campaign beyond levels in recent memory.4 The takeaway message is that no leader is fit to lead. These character attacks will likely resonate long after Election Day, inhibiting the ability of the next president to govern a divided electorate, no matter the outcome of the election. We begin this analysis by situating the 2016 election within a historical context of televised campaign advertising and finance reporting. We then examine the campaign ad strategies of Clinton and Trump, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Democrats Republicans 40 60
    V18, N14 Monday, Nov. 5, 2012 Final HPI Forecast: Donnelly, Pence Mourdock disaster shows signs of impacting races down ballot By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Howey Politics Indiana is forecasting a Democratic U.S. Senate seat pickup in Indiana as Joe Donnel- ly is likely to defeat Republican Richard Mourdock, probably in the 7 to 9% plurality range. The most fascinating 11th hour dynamic is the RMDE - the Richard Mourdock Disaster Effect - that is impacting the Indiana gubernatorial and other down ballot races. The impact is that Mourdock’s “God intends” ated independent and female voters. rape remark is likely to devour any notion of a GOP “wave” Howey/DePauw Indiana Battleground pollsters in the gubernatorial and Indiana House races. Christine Matthews, a Republican, and Fred Yang, a Demo- It could also impact the 2nd CD race where Demo- crat, both believe the Senate race will tighten up from the cratic Party tracking had Donnelly winning big and Brendan Oct. 28-30 survey that had Donnelly leading 47-36%. HPI Mullen within 2% of Republican favorite Jackie Walorski. believes that some of the undecided GOP voters will return While the pro-life and evangelical movements have embraced Mourdock, we believe that Mourdock has alien- Continued on page 4 A teachable moment in polling By BRIAN A. HOWEY NASHVILLE, Ind. – When you have $25 million of mostly outside, special interest money spilling into a U.S. Senate race, it isn’t surprising that emotions run high with the investment, particularly when one ‘‘Obama has temporarily been a campaign realizes it is about to lose.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Communications in a Warming World
    CHANGING COMMUNICATIONS IN A WARMING WORLD An analysis of the failures of environmental education and the lack of clear communication during natural disasters Courtney Cohen Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 Part I ........................................................................................................................................ 2 What is Environmental Education? ........................................................................................... 2 Why Environmental Education is Failing ............................................................................... 3 Key Points 6 Suggestions for Environmental Education: 7 Ways to implement EE into all Curriculums: 7 Part II ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Why is the Public Not Engaged with Climate Change? .............................................................. 8 References 9 How to Improve Climate Change Communication ................................................................ 9 Examples of Techniques to Raise Awareness: 11 References 11 Part III .................................................................................................................................... 12 How Technology is Impacting the Coverage of Natural Disasters ............................................ 12 Why Do Natural Disaster Communications
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 SENATE RACES 34 Senate Races 20 Republican
    2002 SENATE RACES 34 Senate Races 20 Republican-held Seats --14 Democrat-held Seats 6 Open Seats (NH, NJ NC, SC, TN, TX) – 5 currently Republican-held, 1 Democrat-held Current Senate Breakdown: 50 (D), 49 (R), 1 Independent (Votes With Democrats) PARTY STATE NOW DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN SEN. JEFF ALABAMA R Susan Parker SESSIONS ALASKA R Frank Vondersaar SEN. TED STEVENS ARKANSAS SEN. TIM R AG Mark Pryor HUTCHINSON COLORADO SEN. WAYNE R Tom Strickland ALLARD DELAWARE D SEN. JOSEPH BIDEN Ray Clatworthy GEORGIA D SEN. MAX CLELAND Rep.Saxby Chambliss IDAHO R Alan Blinken SEN. LARRY CRAIG ILLINOIS SEN. RICHARD D DURBIN Jim Durkin IOWA* D SEN. TOM HARKIN U.S. Rep. Greg Ganske KANSAS R No Democratic Candidate SEN. PAT ROBERTS KENTUCKY SEN. MITCH R Lois Combs Weinberg MCCONNELL LOUISIANA** SEN. MARY D LANDRIEU Three GOP Candidates MAINE SEN. SUSAN R Chellie Pingree COLLINS MASSACHUSETTS No Republican D SEN. JOHN KERRY Candidate MICHIGAN D SEN. CARL LEVIN Andrew Raczkowski MINNESOTA*** SEN. PAUL D WELLSTONE Norm Coleman MISSISSIPPI SEN. THAD R No Democratic Candidate COCHRAN MISSOURI SEN. JEAN D CARNAHAN Jim Talent MONTANA No Republican D SEN. MAX BAUCUS Candidate NEBRASKA SEN. CHUCK R Charles Matulka HAGEL NEW HAMPSHIRE R Gov. Jeanne Shaheen U.S. Rep. John Sununu NEW JERSEY Fmr. Sen. Frank D Lautenberg Douglas Forrester NEW MEXICO SEN. PETE R Gloria Tristani DOMENICI NORTH CAROLINA R Erskine Bowles Elizabeth Dole OKLAHOMA SEN. JAMES R David Walters INHOFE OREGON**** SEN. GORDON R Bill Bradbury SMITH RHODE ISLAND D SEN. JACK REED Bob Tingle SOUTH CAROLINA R Alex Sanders Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Digital Divas: Women, Politics and the Social Network
    Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-63, June 2011 Digital Divas: Women, Politics and the Social Network by Alexis Gelber Shorenstein Center Goldsmith Fellow, Spring 2011 Formerly, Newsweek magazine © 2011 President and Fellows of Harvard College. All rights reserved. Introduction∗ In the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama emerged as the champion of new media by using social networking tools in innovative ways to turn on and turn out young voters. Since then, some of most visible and creative users of social media in the political realm have been women: • After humiliation and defeat in 2008, Sarah Palin resurfaces as a powerful force in the Republican Party through Facebook and Twitter. • Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill is featured in Time magazine’s 2009 “Top 10 Celebrity Twitter Feeds” for her microblogs about her family, her diet and CEO bank pay that she writes herself (as she noted in a tweet).1 • Hillary Clinton digitizes diplomacy as Secretary of State after a lackluster new media campaign in her run for the presidency; Huffington Post calls her “Obama’s Unsung Tech Guru.”2 • Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota propels herself into a role as Congressional Tea Party Caucus leader and presidential contender, streaming video on her Facebook page and creating an iPhone app for supporters.3 • Tea Party organizers—many of them stay-at-home mothers with young children—use Twitter and other social networking platforms to connect conservative activists in a movement that upends the 2010 midterm elections. In addition, surveys indicate that women outnumber men on social networking sites.
    [Show full text]