DOCSLIB.ORG

Conference Proceedings of JITP 2010: the Politics of Open Source

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conference Proceedings of JITP 2010: the Politics of Open Source University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst The ourJ nal of Information Technology and Politics The oP litics of Open Source Annual Conference 2010 Conference Proceedings of JITP 2010: The olitP ics of Open Source Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/jitpc2010 Part of the Library and Information Science Commons "Conference Proceedings of JITP 2010: The oP litics of Open Source" (2010). The Politics of Open Source. 1. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/jitpc2010/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The ourJ nal of Information Technology and Politics Annual Conference at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in The oP litics of Open Source by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2nd Annual Journal of Information Technology & Politics Thematic Conference “Politics of Open Source” University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA May 6 – 7, 2010 Conference Chairs Stuart W. Shulman University of Massachusetts Amherst Charles M. Schweik University of Massachusetts Amherst Sponsors Microsoft Google Department of Political Science Department of Computer Science Texifter Open Source Software Institute Qualitative Data Analysis Program Center for Public Policy and Administration National Center for Digital Government Journal of Information Technology & Politics Conference website http://politicsofopensource.jitp.net/ Copyright Politics of Open Source Conference © 2010 Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike Program Committee Ezendu Ariwa, London Metropolitan University M.V. Lee Badgett, University of Massachusetts Amherst Paul M.A. Baker, Georgia Institute of Technology Deborah Bryant, Oregon State University Open Source Lab Andrea Calderaro, European University Institute Mark Cassell, Kent State University Edward Cherlin, Earth Treasury Gabriella Coleman, New York University Robert English, Daystar Computing & University of Massachusetts Amherst Joseph Feller, University College Cork Jelena Karanovic, Rutgers University Dave Karpf, University of Pennsylvania/Miller Center for Public Affairs Andrea Kavanaugh, Virginia Tech Jose Marichal, California Lutheran University Jens Hardings Perl, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Charles Schweik, University of Massachusetts Amherst, co-chair Stuart Shulman, University of Massachusetts Amherst, co-chair Megan Squire, Elon University Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Research Information System for Developing Nations Louis Suarez-Potts, Sun Microsystems, Inc. & OpenOffice.org Anas Tawileh, Cardiff University & Meedan.net Letter from the Conference co-Chairs Welcome to the University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst and the 2nd Annual Journal of Information Technology & Politics thematic conference, “Politics of Open Source.” We wish to thank the Program Committee for their hard work in putting together a truly exciting program that highlights the vast diversity of research being conducted on open source software and the FLOSS movement. The conference is generously supported by Microsoft and Google. We also wish to acknowledge the financial support of Andy Barto and the UMass Amherst Department of Computer Science, John Hird and the UMass Amherst Department of Political Science, and the Texifter LLC. We have additionally received support from the Center for Public Policy and Administration at UMass Amherst, the Journal of Information Technology & Politics, the Qualitative Data Analysis Program, the National Center for Digital Government, and the Open Source Software Institute. As always, any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Again, welcome to UMass, and enjoy the conference! Sincerely, Stuart Shulman & Charles Schweik Conference Co-Chairs Table of Contents What Can Wikipedia Tell Us about Open Source Politics?...................................................... 2 David Karpf, Brown University Open Source as Practice and Ideology: The 2003-2004 Howard Dean Campaign’s Organizational and Cultural Innovations in Electoral Politics ............................................... 32 Daniel Kreiss, Stanford University Free, Open Source Software Advocacy as a Social Justice Movement: The Discourse of Digital Rights in the 21st Century.............................................................. 56 John Sullivan, Muhlenberg College Promoting Openness by “Patching” European Directives: Internet-based Activism & EU Telecommunication Reform.................................................. 78 Yana Breindl, Universiti Libre de Bruxelles Where the Cathedrals and Bazaars Are: An Index of Open Source Software Activity and Potential .................................................. 104 Art Seavey, Georgia Institute of Technology Collective Ownership in Free/Libre and Open Source Software: The OpenSolaris Case........................................................................................................... 138 Maurizio Teli, Universiti degli Studi di Trento Expanding Open Source into Other Domains: Analysis of Open Source Biomedical Research ................................................................... 160 Shishir Kumar Jha & Amrutaunshu Nerurkar, IIT Bombay Open Source Approach to Public Policy: The Cases of ERT and OLPC in Greece............................................................................... 186 Vasilis Kostakis, Tallinn University of Technology Promoting Open Source Software in Government: The Challenges of Motivation and Follow-Through ............................................................ 200 Andy Oram, O’Reilly Media The Status of Free/Open Source Software among Local Governments: Lessons from Three German Cities ...................................................................................... 220 Mark Cassell, Kent State University Insurgent Expertise: The Politics of Free/Livre and Open Source Software in Brazil......... 238 Aaron Shaw, University of California, Berkeley Participation in Online Creation Communities: Ecosystemic Participation? ...................... 270 Mayo Fuster Morrell, European University Institute Open Source and the Moral Field of Computing.................................................................. 296 Jon Smajda, University of Minnesota Politics of Open Source 1 What Can Wikipedia Tell Us about Open Source Politics? David Karpf Taubman Center for Public Policy and American Institutions Brown University Abstract This paper considers the emergence of large-scale “commons- based peer production” projects such as Wikipedia.org from an institutional development perspective in order to comment on the potential and limitations of so-called “open source politics.” The argument it makes is threefold. First, that that the lowered transaction costs and information abundance found online transform a subset of public goods problems, essentially replacing free ridership with mass coordination as a central challenge. Second, that the boundaries of this subset are defined by a “power law topology” and by existing “interest horizons.” These parameters limit the overall impact of commons-based peer production for the political space. Third, that all such hubs move through a common five-stage institutional development process, directly related to standard models of the diffusion of innovation. The paper concludes by deriving a set of hypotheses regarding the circumstances under which commons-based peer production is likely to be successfully applied to political action. Keywords: Web 2.0, open source politics, diffusion of innovations, user-generated content David Karpf is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Brown University's Taubman Center for Public Policy. He completed his PhD in Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania in 2009 and will be starting as an Assistant Professor in the School of Communication and Information at Rutgers University in September 2010. His research primarily concerns the emergence of "netroots" political associations, including large-scale community blogs, internet-mediated organizations like MoveOn, and the effects of internet communication on longstanding advocacy organizations. Correspondence concerning this article may be addressed to [email protected]. Politics of Open Source 2 Introduction “Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing.” – Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia The rise of “commons-based peer production,” first in the field of open source software development and recently spreading to a diverse array of fields, has produced wide hopes for the emergence of “open source politics.” No consensus definition exists for the term, but it generally represents an amalgamation of hopes and dreams for social transformation from political commentators, consultants, futurists, and open source software practitioners. If clusters of volunteer software developers can group together online and peer-produce a successful challenge to corporate giants like Microsoft, couldn’t citizens likewise group together to mobilize for large-scale political change? Such hopes run inevitably into the challenges of collective action that have long been the purview of political scientists. Has collective action fundamentally been changed by the novel communication patterns found online? If so, just how far do these changes extend?
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Quadrature Du Net Campaigning on Telecoms Package Pan-European Activism for Patching a “Pirated” Law
    25th Chaos Communication Congress Nothing to hide Berlin, 2008-12-30 La Quadrature du Net Campaigning on Telecoms Package Pan-european activism for patching a \pirated" law by J´er´emieZimmermann <[email protected]> \Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi Contents Prelude 3 Who are we ? 4 Who is La Quadrature du Net ...................................4 Why this name?..........................................4 They support La Quadrature du Net ...............................5 Campaign on Telecoms Package6 Squaring the net..........................................6 The debate is open.........................................7 European Parliament rejects graduated response........................8 Will France Introduce the Digital Guillotine in Europe?....................8 Privacy: Film industry pirates European law..........................9 MEPs want to torpedo the Free Internet on July 7th...................... 10 The \Telecoms Package": out of the shadows, into the light.................. 10 Telecoms Package: vote postponed................................ 11 Telecoms Package: the spectre of the graduated response hangs over Europe......... 12 Telecoms Package: protect the free and just society!...................... 12 Telecoms Package: European democracy's victory already threatened............. 13 Letter sent to all MEPs on september 23rd........................... 14 Graduated Response: The Lesson................................. 15 \Graduated response": Will France
    [Show full text]
  • "Cloud Computing Is a Model for Enabling Convenient, On
    What is Cloud Computing? "Cloud computing is a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction." National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Forum May 2010 http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/cloud-computing/forum-workshop_may2010.html Cloud Computing concept... it's been around longer than you think "In 1984, John Gage and Bill Joy of Sun Microsystems were credited with saying, "The network is the computer," one of the most memorable slogans of the information age. This concept, based on the tenet of making computing resources available to all users irrespective of location, as long as they are connected to the network, forms the basis of the Internet as we know it, and foretold the advent of cloud computing." Garry Metcalf, Analysys Mason, Sep 2009 http://www.analysysmason.com/about-us/news/newsletter/Previous-news-articles/Now-the-network-really-is-the-computer 2 The Cloud Pyramid What is App Engine? •App Engine is a platform •You build & test your app •Then upload your app to Google •App Engine runs everything •No need to worry about machines, network, storage, scalability, etc. 4 Challenges building web apps What keeps you up at night? 5 The Components of Google App Engine Components Language Runtimes Web-based SDK Admin Console Scalable Infrastructure 7 Components Linux Scalable GFS Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening and Unifying the Visual Identity of Wikimedia Projects: a Step Towards Maturity
    Strengthening and unifying the visual identity of Wikimedia projects: a step towards maturity Guillaume Paumier∗ Elisabeth Bauer [[m:User:guillom]] [[m:User:Elian]] Abstract In January 2007, the Wikimedian community celebrated the sixth birthday of Wikipedia. Six years of constant evolution have now led to Wikipedia being one of the most visited websites in the world. Other projects developing free content and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation have been expanding rapidly too. The Foundation and its projects are now facing some communication issues due to the difference of scale between the human and financial resources of the Foundation and the success of its projects. In this paper, we identify critical issues in terms of visual identity and marketing. We evaluate the situation and propose several changes, including a redesign of the default website interface. Introduction The first Wikipedia project was created in January 2001. In these days, the technical infrastructure was provided by Bomis, a dot-com company. In June 2003, Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia and owner of Bomis, created the Wikimedia Foundation [1] to provide a long-term administrative and technical structure dedicated to free content. Since these days, both the projects and the Foundation have been evolving. New projects have been created. All have grown at different rates. Some have got more fame than the others. New financial, technical and communication challenges have risen. In this paper, we will first identify some of these challenges and issues in terms of global visual identity. We will then analyse logos, website layouts, projects names, trademarks so as to provide some hindsight.
    [Show full text]
  • Pace University) Political Journalism 374-001 Fall Semester 2008 Thursday 1:30-4:15 P.M
    1 George Mason University (in collaboration with C-SPAN, the University of Denver, The Cable Center and Pace University) Political Journalism 374-001 Fall Semester 2008 Thursday 1:30-4:15 p.m. (14 sessions) 328 and 455 Innovation Hall Instructor: Steve Klein (with Steve Scully and Chris Malone) POLITICS & THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY A comprehensive course focusing on the 2008 presidential campaign & the presidency Websites: http://www.C-SPAN.org/Distance_Learning/ http://mason.gmu.edu/~sklein1/ http://webpage.pace.edu/cmalone/ 2 “For most Americans the president is the focal point of public life. Almost every day, they see the president on television newscasts interpreting current events, meeting with foreign dignitaries, proposing policy, or grappling with national problems. This person appears to be in charge, and such recurrent images of an engaged leader are reassuring. But the reality of the presidency rests on a very different truth: presidents are seldom in command and usually must negotiate with others to achieve their goals….Those who invented the presidency in 1787 did not expect the office to become the nation’s central political institution…Students of the presidency commonly divide the office’s developments into two major periods: traditional and modern. In the traditional era, presidential power was relatively limited, and Congress was the primary policymaker. The modern era, on the other hand, is typified by the presidential dominance in the policymaking process and a significant expansion of the president’s powers and resources.” Joseph A. Pika Anthony Maltese Co-Authors, “The Politics of the Presidency” When the Framers sat down in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 to draft the Constitution, they had little idea of how they were going to design the office of the presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance Regulation of Online Political Speech: Background and Implications of the FEC’S Latest Ruling
    Communication Law Review Campaign Finance Regulation of Online Political Speech: Background and Implications of the FEC’s Latest Ruling Scott W. Dunn, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill1 Abstract The Federal Election Commission faces a paradox when regulating political speech on the Internet. On the one hand, Reno v. ACLU established that Internet content should be largely free of regulation, and it generally has been. However, many political actors use the Internet to disseminate content that would be regulated under campaign finance statutes if distributed through other media. This paper examines the FEC’s resolution of this tension up to this point. Following passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, the FEC attempted to exempt all Internet communication from regulation. After a federal appellate court ruled that at least some Internet communications must be regulated under the statute (Shays v. FEC), the commission issued a ruling in 2006 that exempted all Internet communications except paid advertising. The effect is to give the Internet a nearly complete exemption analogous to the blanket exemption given to media outlets. The FEC’s rules raise larger questions about the Constitutionality of campaign finance laws. As new technologies make political activism more accessible to private citizens, it may be necessary to reexamine the effects of finance regulation on political speech. The 2004 presidential election may have marked a turning point in American electoral politics as, for the first time, the Internet
    [Show full text]
  • MDM & Integration
    MDM & Integration Past, Present & Future John Jacobs Jacobs Consulting Four Decades of Change Late 70s to early 80s Change Is Coming 1990s Standards Movement The Standards “Wars” Integration Technologies Late 90s to 2012 Today’s Buzz The Future 70s – 80s What Did We Worry About Machines did not network well EBCDIC vs ASCII Big Endian vs Little Endian (byte order) Format Conversions (why are they always different) READ(*,'(2I5,F10.2)') READ(*,"(5F10.2)") WRITE(*,"(10F5.2)") Change Is Coming Mainframes started to give way to “minicomputers” VAX 11/780 Introduced in 1977 (32-bit) Sun Microsystems 1982 (RISC) "the network is the computer,” John Gage 1984 The Personal Computers Arrive Commodore 64 1982 First IBM PC 1982 Apple’s Lisa 1983 First Mac 1984 Computer Aided Exploration (CAEX) Intergraph InterPro 32 was introduced in 1984 1MB 1st Landmark workstation 1984 3D Interpretation on PC architecture (Intel 286 chip) GeoQuest 1984 2D on VAX Sun E&P’s Geophysical Workstation 1987 1990s Standards Movement 1988 Open Software Foundation (OSF): Motif (GUI Standard), X- Windows The PPDM organization got its start in 1988 when, recognizing the need for petroleum data standards, a group of petroleum industry players and data experts joined forces in 1991 to create the Public Petroleum Data Model Association.* Petroleum Open Software Company (POSC) was formed in October 1990 by five founding sponsor oil companies: BP, Chevron, Elf (since merged into Total), Mobil (since merged into ExxonMobil), and Texaco (since merged into Chevron). Now known as Energistics.* IBM’s Mercury project to establish a logical data model for the petroleum industry.
    [Show full text]
  • SI 410 Ethics and Information Technology
    Author(s): Paul Conway, PhD, 2010 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ We have reviewed this material in accordance with U.S. Copyright Law and have tried to maximize your ability to use, share, and adapt it. The citation key on the following slide provides information about how you may share and adapt this material. Copyright holders of content included in this material should contact [email protected] with any questions, corrections, or clarification regarding the use of content. For more information about how to cite these materials visit http://open.umich.edu/privacy-and-terms-use. Any medical information in this material is intended to inform and educate and is not a tool for self-diagnosis or a replacement for medical evaluation, advice, diagnosis or treatment by a healthcare professional. Please speak to your physician if you have questions about your medical condition. Viewer discretion is advised: Some medical content is graphic and may not be suitable for all viewers. Citation Key for more information see: http://open.umich.edu/wiki/CitationPolicy Use + Share + Adapt { Content the copyright holder, author, or law permits you to use, share and adapt. } Public Domain – Government: Works that are produced by the U.S. Government. (17 USC § 105) Public Domain – Expired: Works that are no longer protected due to an expired copyright term. Public Domain – Self Dedicated: Works that a copyright holder has dedicated to the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Net Neutrality in the Telecoms Package
    September 24th, 2009 Protecting Net Neutrality In the Telecoms Package Network Neutrality is a constitutional principle of the Internet's architecture. It was conceived as an efficient decentralized network and was designed according to an axiom that technological neutrality is the foundation of freedom in communications infrastructure. Built into the network was also an idea about equality, that society as a whole benefits when we defend against discrimination and unfair advantage. Moreover, Net neutrality stimulates the virtuous circle of a development model based on the growth of a common communication network that enables new uses and tools, as opposed to one relying on investments in filtering and controlling, that would lead to a fragmentation of the Internet. Network Neutrality is the safeguard of civil and human rights, and of fair competition for innovation. It is now that the principle of network neutrality is being challenged in the current version of the Telecom Package that it has become a matter of public policy debate in Europe. The shape of our future networks and the rights and freedoms of citizens on the Internet is what is being voted on in this major reform of the European framework for telecommunications regulation. This memorandum lays out the public interest issues at stake in the Telecoms Package. It explains what Network Neutrality is and why openness is important to telecommunications infrastructure. It outlines the social and economic benefits of a regulatory regime that preserves network neutrality. It identifies the specific language in the key provisions that risk fundamental rights and freedoms. It concludes with a guide to making Network Neutrality a fundamental regulatory principle in the European telecommunications market.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I Definitions
    Annex I Definitions Free and Open Source Software (FOSS): Software whose source code is published and made available to the public, enabling anyone to copy, modify and redistribute the source code without paying royalties or fees. Open source code evolves through community cooperation. These communities are composed of individual programmers and users as well as very large companies. Some examples of open source initiatives are GNU/Linux, Eclipse, Apache, Mozilla, and various projects hosted on SourceForge1 and Savannah2 Web sites. Proprietary software -- Software that is distributed under commercial licence agreements, usually for a fee. The main difference between the proprietary software licence and the open source licence is that the recipient does not normally receive the right to copy, modify, redistribute the software without fees or royalty obligations. Something proprietary is something exclusively owned by someone, often with connotations that it is exclusive and cannot be used by other parties without negotiations. It may specifically mean that the item is covered by one or more patents, as in proprietary technology. Proprietary software means that some individual or company holds the exclusive copyrights on a piece of software, at the same time denying others access to the software’s source code and the right to copy, modify and study the software. Open standards -- Software interfaces, protocols, or electronic formats that are openly documented and have been accepted in the industry through either formal or de facto processes, which are freely available for adoption by the industry. The open source community has been a leader in promoting and adopting open standards. Some of the success of open source software is due to the availability of worldwide standards for exchanging information, standards that have been implemented in browsers, email systems, file sharing applications and many other tools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It the Harvard Community Has
    The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Jonathan L. Zittrain, The Future of the Internet -- And How to Citation Stop It (Yale University Press & Penguin UK 2008). Published Version http://futureoftheinternet.org/ Accessed July 1, 2016 4:22:42 AM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4455262 This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH Terms of Use repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms- of-use#LAA (Article begins on next page) YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page i The Future of the Internet— And How to Stop It YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page ii YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iii The Future of the Internet And How to Stop It Jonathan Zittrain With a New Foreword by Lawrence Lessig and a New Preface by the Author Yale University Press New Haven & London YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iv A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org. The cover was designed by Ivo van der Ent, based on his winning entry of an open competition at www.worth1000.com. Copyright © 2008 by Jonathan Zittrain. All rights reserved. Preface to the Paperback Edition copyright © Jonathan Zittrain 2008. Subject to the exception immediately following, this book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FOSS Philosophy 6 the FOSS Development Method 7
    1 Published by the United Nations Development Programme’s Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia www.apdip.net Email: [email protected] © UNDP-APDIP 2004 The material in this book may be reproduced, republished and incorporated into further works provided acknowledgement is given to UNDP-APDIP. For full details on the license governing this publication, please see the relevant Annex. ISBN: 983-3094-00-7 Design, layout and cover illustrations by: Rezonanze www.rezonanze.com PREFACE 6 INTRODUCTION 6 What is Free/Open Source Software? 6 The FOSS philosophy 6 The FOSS development method 7 What is the history of FOSS? 8 A Brief History of Free/Open Source Software Movement 8 WHY FOSS? 10 Is FOSS free? 10 How large are the savings from FOSS? 10 Direct Cost Savings - An Example 11 What are the benefits of using FOSS? 12 Security 13 Reliability/Stability 14 Open standards and vendor independence 14 Reduced reliance on imports 15 Developing local software capacity 15 Piracy, IPR, and the WTO 16 Localization 16 What are the shortcomings of FOSS? 17 Lack of business applications 17 Interoperability with proprietary systems 17 Documentation and “polish” 18 FOSS SUCCESS STORIES 19 What are governments doing with FOSS? 19 Europe 19 Americas 20 Brazil 21 Asia Pacific 22 Other Regions 24 What are some successful FOSS projects? 25 BIND (DNS Server) 25 Apache (Web Server) 25 Sendmail (Email Server) 25 OpenSSH (Secure Network Administration Tool) 26 Open Office (Office Productivity Suite) 26 LINUX 27 What is Linux?
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Preface . ix 1. Open Source Licensing, Contract, and Copyright Law . 1 Basic Principles of Copyright Law 1 Contract and Copyright 3 Open Source Software Licensing 4 Issues with Copyrights and Patents 7 The Open Source Definition 8 Warranties 11 2. The MIT, BSD, Apache, and Academic Free Licenses . 14 The MIT (or X) License 14 The BSD License 15 The Apache License, v1.1 and v2.0 17 The Academic Free License 24 Application and Philosophy 30 3. The GPL, LGPL, and Mozilla Licenses . 34 GNU General Public License 35 GNU Lesser General Public License 49 The Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1) 62 Application and Philosophy 81 4. Qt, Artistic, and Creative Commons Licenses . 85 The Q Public License 85 Artistic License (Perl) 90 Creative Commons Licenses 98 vii 5. Non-Open Source Licenses . 114 Classic Proprietary License 114 Sun Community Source License 120 Microsoft Shared Source Initiative 144 6. Legal Impacts of Open Source and Free Software Licensing . 147 Entering Contracts 148 Statutory Developments Related to Software Contracts 150 The Self-Enforcing Nature of Open Source and Free Software Licenses 151 The Global Scope of Open Source and Free Software Licensing 153 The “Negative Effects” of Open Source and Free Software Licensing 154 Community Enforcement of Open Source and Free Software Licenses 158 Compatible and Incompatible Licensing: Multiple and Cross Licensing 159 7. Software Development Using Open Source and Free Software Licenses . 164 Models of Open Source and Free Software Development 164 Forking 171 Choosing an Open Source or Free Software License 174 Drafting Open Source Licenses 176 Appendix: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License .
    [Show full text]