DOCSLIB.ORG

Arete 5.4.1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arete 5.4.1.Pdf Arete The Rutgers University Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy Issue 5, Summer 2012 Arete Acknowledgements The editors would like to thank Professor Ruth Chang and Mr. Preston Greene, both of the Rutgers University Philosophy Department, for their invaluable assistance in maintaining the presence of the undergraduate philosophy journal on campus, for giving us the opportunity to work with the hardworking and talented authors whose arguments fill the pages of this issue, and for trusting us to, in a limited capacity, represent the University and the Philosophy department. Of course, no journal could not exist without the essays that populate it, and so we must acknowledge the efforts of both the authors whose work we are proud to present here and those whose articles could not be accommodated in this issue. As a last note we would like to thank those whose patience, support, encouragement, and help aided each of us in the long editing process, as well as those who preceded us in the administration of Arete, and those we entrust it to in the future. Cover Illustration by Andrew Foltz-Morrison Adapted for Print by Connie Pollex Copyright © 2012, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 2 The Rutgers University Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy 2011-2012 Staff Executive Board Editor in Chief Brian Pollex Corresponding Editor David Colaço Publishing Editor Andrew Foltz-Morrison Manuscript Readers & Editors David Colaço Richard Garzon James Goodrich Benjamin Gunn Ethan Karmel Brian Pollex John Ryan Jared Trachtenberg Readers Greg Arutiunov Tamika Baldwin Tom Coghlan Joshua Curtiss Andrew Foltz-Morrison Matt Menchaca Marcos Picchio Nick Rodriguez Batya Rosenblum Editors Arthur Kutoroff Matthew Rohal Zeerak Siddiqui 3 Arete Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………..........6 Brian Pollex A Note from the Editor in Chief…………………………………............7 Fully Tracked Belief Greg Arutiunov, Rutgers University Introduction……………………………………………………………...9 Zeerak Siddiqui, Ethan Karmel, and Richard Garzon Article Text………………………………………………………………10 Rethinking the Republic Peter Zuk, Pepperdine University Introduction……………………………………………………………...15 Brian Pollex and Arthur Kutoroff Article Text………………………………………………………………17 The Variance Model of Perceived Value Natasha Dudzinski, Rutgers University Introduction……………………………………………………………...28 Benjamin Gunn and David Colaço Article Text………………………………………………………………29 What Emancipation Requires from Rawls’ Law of Peoples Kevin Chamow, University of Pittsburgh Introduction……………………………………………………………...41 John Ryan and James Goodrich Article Text………………………………………………………………42 Solving Parfit’s Puzzles Marcos Picchio, Rutgers University Introduction……………………………………………………………...55 Matthew Rohal and Jared Trachtenberg Article Text………………………………………………………………56 Brief Responses to the Articles…………………………………………..71 Arete Staff 4 The Rutgers University Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy 5 Arete Introduction Arete is a journal of philosophy written and edited by undergraduates. This is the fifth issue; each of the previous four are available online for free download in PDF format under the custodianship of the Rutgers University philosophy department. At the date of publication each issue is also made available in limited-run hard copy version. Some of these issues are kept at the Rutgers department, some are sent to nearby departments, and each published author receives an issue. The purpose of the journal is to showcase exceptional analytic work by undergraduates from around the English-speaking world, and to allow students to gain facility in editing philosophy. Arete is staffed entirely by Rutgers University undergraduates, who do their work for the journal as a one-credit course at Rutgers through the Philosophy department. Each year’s Editor in Chief supervises the class and reports to the Undergraduate Supervisor—there is no faculty presence in the room or controlling influence on the decisions of the staff, in terms of inclusion or editing of articles. The views expressed in the articles publishing within this issue are not a reflection of the considered position of any member of the R.U. Philosophy Department or the 2011-2012 Arete board. Arete only accepts work from students either in pursuit of a baccalaureate degree or who recently attained one. All publication decisions are made blind—that is, without the name of the author or his or her institution of higher education, to ensure fairness. Each essay is made the special province of a group of editors; these editors are also responsible for writing the introduction to the paper they worked with, and so the assignments are all revealed on the table of contents. Each paper’s lead editor is credited first in the byline of their respective introduction. Every issue begins with a Call for Papers, which usually comes due in September. This year we received more than 40 submissions from philosophy students in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. During the fall, the staff chooses which of the submitted papers to publish in the forthcoming issue. The spring is spent in correspondence with the authors, finalizing the text of the articles, as well as preparing the introductions to each article. Typesetting and publication take place over the summer. A point of particular pride at Arete is our editing process—where many other undergraduate journals merely publish submitted papers as is, papers published in Arete go through a semester of close reading and editing, requiring commitment both from prospective authors and the staff of the journal. It is not unusual for a paper to go through three substantive drafts after being accepted for publication. This process is very labor-intensive, and so the number of papers we can publish is limited not by space in a print edition but by the number of qualified Rutgers students who come forward to do this work. While our commitment to this level of editorial involvement limits the number of papers we can accept for publication, it is our view that the papers we do accept, and therefore, the issues we publish, are materially improved by this attention. 6 The Rutgers University Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy A Note from the Editor in Chief Undergraduates are frequently called upon to identify their course of study. When the response is philosophy, confusion often follows. The colloquial usage of the term has long since come apart from the academic usage, and so what it is, exactly, that students of philosophy do is something they must often explain, and justify. Although this journal does not constitute an exhaustive answer, it might be a first step towards an explanation. Within it you will find undergraduates tackling perennial philosophical questions (What is knowledge? How should we decide what to do?) and engaging with canonical philosophers and works (Plato’s Republic, Derek Parfit’s Reasons and Persons, the writings of John Rawls) using the techniques of contemporary philosophy. Although the analysis in Natasha Dudzinski’s Variance Model or Greg Arutiunov’s Fully Tracked Belief may intimidate the uninitiated, it is my hope that the papers that follow also evince a continued interest in the questions that most fire the human imagination, and in so doing, show why philosophy continues to attract such talented pupils. The authors and editors, though, are not academics, at least not yet, and this is not one of their fora. While such journals assume some familiarity with the literature of the pertinent sub- fields of philosophy, the staff of Arete have taken pains to make each article accessible to the broadest audience possible by accompanying them with an introduction that takes no prior reading of philosophy for granted. In publishing these pieces we do not, as individuals or as a group, avow any belief in the correctness of the views presented by the authors. Rather, we take these articles to represent the best work submitted to the journal for publication. It is our view that, especially in the case of undergraduate work, a wrongheaded position, if it is prosecuted by way of meticulous and rigorous argumentation, can be the subject of a meritorious essay. Interested readers will find, in the final section of this issue, responses to the articles as a continuation of our attempt to frame our authors’ work as completely as our spatial limitations allow. I hope that beyond commending exceptional work, you will find what follows to be both thought-provoking reading and a useful primer on the scope and depth of undergraduate work in philosophy. It has been a great privilege to serve as the Editor in Chief of Arete, and my time with the journal has been among the most memorable aspects of my undergraduate career. I for one am convinced of the value of the role Arete and other undergraduate journals serve, and it pleases me to know that Rutgers’ journal will continue in the years to come. Brian Pollex Editor in Chief September 6th, 2012 7 Arete 8 The Rutgers University Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy Fully Tracked Belief: Introduction Noted philosopher Peter Klein holds that Epistemology is generally concerned with two questions: “What distinguishes knowledge from mere true belief?” and “What is the extent of our knowledge?” The difference between knowledge and true belief has been at the core of philosophy since the time of Plato. In Plato’s dialogue, Meno, Socrates confronts this question, arguing that true beliefs are capricious, whereas knowledge “tethers” down true beliefs via aitias logismos (reasoned explanation).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Republic CAMBRIDGE TEXTS in the HISTORY of POLITICAL THOUGHT
    CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT PLATO The Republic CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Series editors R a y m o n d G e u s s Professor of Philosophy, University of Cambridge Q u e n t i n S k i n n e r Professor of the Humanities, Queen Mary, University of London Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought is now firmly estab­ lished as the major student textbook series in political theory. It aims to make available to students all the most important texts in the history of western political thought, from ancient Greece to the early twentieth century. All the familiar classic texts will be included, but the series seeks at the same time to enlarge the conventional canon by incorporating an extensive range of less well-known works, many of them never before available in a modern English edition. Wherever possible, texts are pub­ lished in complete and unabridged form, and translations are specially commissioned for the series. Each volume contains a critical introduction together with chronologies, biographical sketches, a guide to further read­ ing and any necessary glossaries and textual apparatus. When completed, the series will aim to offer an outline of the entire evolution of western political thought. For a list of titles published in the series, please see end of book. PLATO The Republic EDITED BY G. R. F. FERRA RI University o f California, Berkeley TRANSLATED BY TOM GRIFFITH C a m b r i d g e UNIVERSITY PRESS C a m b r i d g e UNIVERSITY PRESS University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Formal and Informal Relationships in Settlement
    Understanding formal and informal relationships in settlement upgrading for planning just and inclusive cities: the case of Phnom Penh, Cambodia Johanna Brugman Alvarez Master of Science in Urban Development Planning Bachelor of Urban and Regional Planning with Honours A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Abstract Since colonial times a formal/informal divide entrenched in systems of urban planning in Phnom Penh, Cambodia has been used as a governmental tool by the state to marginalize and exclude informal settlements. This tool has also been used to impose a market-oriented model of urban development that is insufficient in progressing the aspirations, needs, and claims to justice of people living in these settlements. In fact, this model has led to the development of a highly unequal and unjust city. This problematic touches on a key aspect of planning knowledge which affects many other cities of the global south. Binaries are a characteristic of western thought and capitalism. This way of thinking reproduces a hierarchical worldview with a privileging pole and unequal power relationships by making divisions between formal/informal sectors, public/private property, ordinary/global cities, and individual/collective ways of life. Binaries turn the merely different into an absolute other and exclude and marginalize the reality of difference in cities. Despite growing evidence of formal and informal relationships in cities, most research has tended to concentrate on understanding these systems separately. My research addresses this knowledge gap. In this thesis I explain how formal and informal relationships are composed in the context of informal settlement upgrading practices in Phnom Penh with emphasis in three dimensions: a) land access, b) finance for housing, infrastructure and livelihoods, and c) political recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Interpretation of Plato's Protagoras and Gorgias
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Self-Deception and the City: A Political Interpretation of Plato’s Protagoras and Gorgias A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Philosophy Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Mary Elizabeth Halper Washington, D.C. 2019 Self-Deception and the City: A Political Interpretation of Plato’s Protagoras and Gorgias Mary Elizabeth Halper, Ph.D. Director: V. Bradley Lewis, Ph.D. Sophistry and rhetoric possess the disturbing power to appear to be precisely what they under- mine. Sophistry passes itself off as education even as it subverts genuine ethical and intellectual formation; rhetoric looks like a particularly compelling form of communication even as it sub- verts the possibility of seeking truth in speech. This dissertation begins with the claim that Plato wrote his Protagoras and Gorgias to treat of this disturbing power and its political consequences. I argue that the Protagoras and the Gorgias, as representative treatments of sophistry and rhetoric, should be read together in order to gain insight into the genuine art of politics, of which sophistry and rhetoric together form a subversive imitation. First I undertake an exegesis of the Protagoras and the Gorgias, both as individual dialogues and as a composite whole. Then I present systematic and philosophical arguments to support my central thesis, which emerges from my interpreta- tions and is supported by my thematic investigations. This thesis asserts that self-deception isan inherent feature of political communities, whereby political communities both must rely on the efficacy of appearance and cannot acknowledge this very reliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaces Between Theory and Praxis: Exploring Action and Actors in Toronto’S Food Justice Movement
    Spaces Between Theory and Praxis: Exploring Action and Actors in Toronto’s Food Justice Movement By Maya Fromstein A thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Maya Fromstein, May, 2017 ABSTRACT Spaces Between Theory and Praxis: Exploring Action and Actors in a Movement Maya Fromstein Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Dr. John Smithers The Food Justice Movement has positioned itself as a response to the Alternative Food Movement’s alleged failure to address systemic injustices characterizing the conventional food system. Despite being rooted in a theory of justice and equity, there is uncertainty as to what the movement stands for, and how goals, values, and meanings can be translated into practice (Slocum & Cadieux, 2015; Slocum, et. al., 2016). Guided by a conceptual framework, this research combines content analysis of published materials and the distillation of semi-structured interviews with 21 representatives from 16 organizations to investigate programs, perceptions, and possibilities in the evolving Toronto food justice landscape. The study characterizes features of these organizations; explores individuals’ understandings of food justice; and makes connections between individual and systemic influences on their work. Employing prefigurative politics and emotional geographies, this study unpacks tacit theories within food justice literature that may expand the spaces food justice occupies. iii Acknowledgements I did not write this thesis alone. There are so many people to whom I owe endless thanks, hugs, and probably a drink or two for all the support, wisdom, laughter, and love they have given me that went into shaping this final product.
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity Agendas and the Limits of a Toronto Food Movement Led by Non-Profits Laura Lepper a Thesis Submitte
    TO FIGHT FOR FOOD? AUSTERITY AGENDAS AND THE LIMITS OF A TORONTO FOOD MOVEMENT LED BY NON-PROFITS LAURA LEPPER A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN GEOGRAPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN GEOGRAPHY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO September 2012 © Laura Lepper, 2012 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-91773-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-91773-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligent Troglodyte's Guide to Plato's Republic
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Philosophy Open Educational Resources Philosophy 2020 The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic Douglas Drabkin Fort Hays State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/philosophy_oer Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Drabkin, Douglas, "The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic" (2020). Philosophy Open Educational Resources. 1. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/philosophy_oer/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Open Educational Resources by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. The Intelligent Troglodyte’s Guide to Plato’s Republic Douglas Drabkin Table of Contents Last updated August 14, 2020. Please send any suggestions you may have for improving the site to the author at [email protected]. Contents I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X Preface Index Book I 1 A Religious Festival in the Piraeus 2 Being Old 3 Treasure for Heaven 4 Giving What is Owed 5 The Craft of Justice 6 Benefiting Friends and Harming Enemies 7 The Advantage of the Stronger 8 The Good Shepherd 9 The Blushing Argument 10 Function, Virtue, and the Soul Top Book II 11 The Division of Goods 12 The Social Contract Theory of Justice 13 The Magic Ring 14 The Challenge 15 The Teaching of Justice 16 Glaucon’s Lover 17 From Souls to Cities 18 Making the Most of Differences 19 Luxuries in the Just City 20 The Good
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoning the Ark in Durban: Development, Displacement, Resettlement and Livelihood Struggles
    ABANDONING THE ARK IN DURBAN: DEVELOPMENT, DISPLACEMENT, RESETTLEMENT AND LIVELIHOOD STRUGGLES by TARA JADE FITZGERALD 218087625 Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN GEOGRAPHY in the School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences at The University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor: Professor Brij Maharaj January 2021 DECLARATION I, Tara Jade Fitzgerald, declare that: i. The findings of this research are my original work, except where otherwise indicated; ii. This thesis has not been submitted for any other degree at another university; iii. This thesis does not use another person’s data, graphs or pictures unless otherwise stated and acknowledged; iv. No other writings have been used, unless otherwise referenced. Where other written works have been used then: • their words have been rewritten and referenced appropriately; • where their exact words have been used, their writings have been placed in quotation marks and referenced appropriately. Signature: Date: 26/01/2021 Signature: Date: 26/01/2021 i DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to the former Ark residents. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my God, thank you for blessing me with wisdom, strength and perseverance. Meeting Professor Brij Maharaj can only be described as an act of divine intervention. While taking my niece to an open day at UKZN, I had a very fortunate encounter with Prof Maharaj who graciously offered to supervise this thesis. Thank you, Prof, for your constant guidance and reassurance throughout this journey. Most of all, thank you for teaching me the art of writing. To my family and friends, I could not have done this without your constant support.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Justice in Unequal Cities
    HOUSING JUSTICE IN UNEQUAL CITIES EDITED BY ANANYA ROY AND HILARY MALSON This page is intentionally left blank. HOUSING JUSTICE IN UNEQUAL CITIES EDITED BY ANANYA ROY AND HILARY MALSON This volume is part of the Housing Justice in Unequal Cities series, published by the Institute on Inequality and Democracy at the University of California, Los Angeles. Volume designed by Andrés Carrasquillo This page is intentionally left blank. Acknowledgements The Housing Justice in Unequal Cities Network is funded by the National Science Foundation (BCS 1758774) and is housed at the Institute on Inequality and Democracy at UCLA Luskin. The full program of the inaugural conference as well as more information on the Network, and how to join it, are available at http://unequalcities.org/. The Institute on Inequality and Democracy at UCLA Luskin, and by extension the Housing Justice in Unequal Cities Network, ac- knowledge the Tongva peoples as the traditional land caretakers of Tovaangar (Los Angeles basin, So. Channel Islands) and are grateful to have the opportunity to work for the taraaxatom (in- digenous peoples) in this place. As a land grant institution, we pay our respects to Honuukvetam (Ancestors), ‘Ahiihirom (El- ders), and ‘eyoohiinkem (our relatives/relations) past, present and emerging. 5 HOUSING JUSTICE IN UNEQUAL CITIES EDITED BY ANANYA ROY AND HILARY MALSON Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................................5 Artist Statement .................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Park Washington 0250E 13782.Pdf (1.065Mb)
    At Liberty and In Love Sooenn Park A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Christine Di Stefano, Chair Jason Mayerfeld Jack Turner III Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Political Science ©Copyright 2014 Sooenn Park University of Washington Abstract At Liberty and In Love Sooenn Park Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Christine Di Stefano Department of Political Science In this dissertation, I present three essays that study the significance of erōs in Plato’s political philosophy and explore its practical implication for the principle of democratic liberty. The love the word erōs refers to in Greek, compared to philia and agapē, has a distinctively physical and intensely visceral dimension: it evokes the irrational and embodied relational impulses of the human condition. When Plato in the Republic, Phaedrus, and Symposium situates the most rational and most liberating human endeavor, philosophy, within the condition of erōs, therefore, he presents us an account of human endeavor for happiness (eudaimonia) always-already embedded in the condition of plurality, embodied mortality, irreducible irrationality, and relation to supra-human reality. I argue that there emerges in Plato’s account of philosophy-cum-erōs what we could call an erotic human ontology, which at once legitimizes democratic liberty as a constitutional principle and equips us with requisite ethical resources for democratic processes, cultivating moral humility and respect for differences and individuality. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Socrates’ Palinode to Eros, Plato’s Palinode to Liberty 13 Chapter 2 Love and the Mystery of the Other 47 Chapter 3 A Socratic Human Image 78 Conclusion 111 Works Cited 117 iv Acknowledgments My thanks go to the Supervisory Committee of my dissertation, Christine Di Stefano, Jason Mayerfeld, and Jack Turner III.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUST CITY ESSAYS 26 Visions for Urban Equity, Inclusion and Opportunity
    THE JUST CITY ESSAYS 26 Visions for Urban Equity, Inclusion and Opportunity VOLUME ONE EDITED BY TONI L. GRIFFIN | ARIELLA COHEN | DAVID MADDOX ESSAYS Published by The J.Max Bond Center on Design for theJust City at the Spitzer School of Architecture, City College of New York, Next City and The Nature of Cities ©2015 All rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of The J. Max Bond Center, Next City and The Nature of Cities. Illustrations by Andrea Posada Thank you to the Municipal Art Society of New York for support in the production of this collection. The Just City Essays were produced with funding from the Ford Foundation. TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Introduction DESIGNING FOR AGENCY Toni L. Griffin, Ariella Cohen 46 Karachi and the Paralysis of Imagination and David Maddox Mahim Maher TEARING DOWN INVISIBLE WALLS 50 Up from the Basement: The Artist and the Making of the Just City 6 Defining the Just City Beyond Black and White Theaster Gates Toni L. Griffin 53 Justice that Serves People, Not Institutions 10 In It Together Mirna D. Goransky Lesley Lokko 55 Resistance, Education and the Collective Will 15 Cape Town Pride; Cape Town Shame Jack Travis Carla Sutherland 18 Urban Spaces and the Mattering of Black Lives Darnell Moore INCLUSIVE GROWTH 21 Ceci n’est pas une pipe: 60 The Case for All-In Cities Angela Glover Blackwell Unpacking Injustice in Paris François Mancebo 63 A Democratic Infrastructure for Johannesburg Benjamin Bradlow REINVIGORATING DEMOCRACY 67 Creating Universal Goals for Universal Growth Betsy Hodges 26 Right to the City for All: A Manifesto for Social Justice in an Urban Century 70 The Long Ride Lorena Zárate Scot T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Smart Cities: Borders, Security and Value in New Town
    The Making of Smart Cities: Borders, Security and Value in New Town Kolkata and Cape Town Ilia Antenucci Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Culture and Society Western Sydney University New South Wales March 2020 Acknowledgements This thesis has been a long and not always easy journey, through which I have learnt much. As this journey comes to an end, I want to thank all those who made it possible, those whom I met and who have supported me along the way. Brett Neilson has been the best supervisor I could possibly hope for. I am forever grateful for his intellectual generosity as well as for his kindness and patience. I also want to thank my co-supervisor, Ned Rossiter, for being a fantastic source of inspiration, insight and humour. The Institute for Culture and Society (ICS) welcomed me into an exciting and supportive academic environment, and made this research possible. Among the many ICS scholars from whom I have learnt so much, I want to thank Gay Hawkins for her generous advice. I also gratefully acknowledge the HDR Directors – Greg Noble, Megan Watkins and Denis Byrne – who guided and supported me during my candidature. I want to thank Tsvetelina for her thoughtfulness and for always sharing so many great ideas, information, and funny stories. Jack, for those lovely days of study and laughter. Mithilesh, for our endless conversations and for a bond that time won’t change. Cecelia, Giulia and Jasbeer for being wonderful friends. Amanda, for a few months of absolute bliss. To Andrea, my brilliant friend and partner in crime, I owe more than words can say.
    [Show full text]
  • 46Th Annual Meeting Social Justice in the Global City?
    46th Annual Meeting Photo by Joanne DiBona courtesy of San Diego Tourism Social Justice in the Global City? Contested Views on Social Control, Borders, and Equity San Diego, California March 16-19, 2016 UAA 46th Annual Conference March 16-19, 2016 San Diego, California We are Grateful for Substantial Support from our Sponsors! Social Justice in the Global City? Contested Views on Social Control, Borders, and Equity San Diego, California | March 16-19, 2016 Table of Contents About UAA Urban Affairs Association Mission and History ........................................................................ 1 UAA Governing Board, 2015-2016 ........................................................................................... 2 Executive Office and Conference Staff ................................................................................. 3 Recognition of UAA Institutional Home .................................................................................... 4 Recognition of Journal of Urban Affairs Editorial Team, Board, & Reviewers ..................... 5 Conference Committees ............................................................................................................... 8 Workshop Sponsors and Facilitators .............................................................................................. 9 In Memoriam ................................................................................................................................... 10 2017 Call for Participation ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]