DOCSLIB.ORG

Origin of Periclines in the Ozark Plateau, Missouri: a Field and Numerical Modeling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Origin of Periclines in the Ozark Plateau, Missouri: a Field and Numerical Modeling Scholars' Mine Doctoral Dissertations Student Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 Origin of Periclines in the Ozark Plateau, Missouri: A field and numerical modeling Chao Liu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations Part of the Geology Commons Department: Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering Recommended Citation Liu, Chao, "Origin of Periclines in the Ozark Plateau, Missouri: A field and numerical modeling" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 2818. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/doctoral_dissertations/2818 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORIGIN OF PERICLINES IN THE OZARK PLATEAU, MISSOURI: A FIELD AND NUMERICAL MODELING by CHAO LIU A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS 2019 Approved by: John Hogan, Advisor Andreas Eckert Jonathan Obrist-Farner Marek Locmelis Klaus Woelk 2019 Chao Liu All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT A series upright sub-horizontal folds in sandstones of the early Ordovician Roubidoux Formation are exposed in road cuts along US Highway 63 in the northern part of the Salem Plateau of central Missouri for over a distance of approximately 10 km. These folds are in marked contrast to the more typical horizontal to sub-horizontal Ordovician strata of the Ozark Plateau. The origin of those folds remains enigmatic. The inspection of the characteristics of these folds using stereographic analysis revealed a non- cylindrical geometrical pattern than a near cylindrical fold. Structural data of 54 folds indicate an alternating basin and dome pattern. However, acceptance of more traditional classification and interpretation as a viable explanation for the origin of these folds ultimately only serves to heighten the enigma. Combing the results of numerical models, a more realistic hypothesis is proposed to explain the occurrence of those localized folds. The result of numerical models implies a localized stress enhancement in the transpression zone and the basin and dome periclines is formed by applying unidirectional shortening. We propose that these folds are periclines formed in a transpression zone as a result of reactivation of basement faults with left-lateral slip during the late Paleozoic Alleghenian Orogeny which provides an E-W far-field compression. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Hogan for his guidance and advice. His sparking suggestions and encouragements are critical for this project. I would like to thank Dr. Eckert for his guidance on numerical models, which provides a brand new aspect to investigate the research problems. I would like to thank professors in my committee, Dr. Obrist, Dr. Locmelis and Dr. Woelk. They provided some brilliant ideas that inspired me. Also, I would like to thank those colleagues who offered assistance for the field work. I would like to acknowledge the financial support from a Geological Society of America Research Grant and the University of Missouri University of Science and Technology Radcliffe endowment. Finally, thanks to my parents, for their support and love. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... viii SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 2. GEOLOGIC SETTING .............................................................................................. 5 2.1. REGIONAL GEOLOGY .................................................................................... 5 2.1.1. The Ozark Plateau .................................................................................... 5 2.1.2. The Ozark Dome ...................................................................................... 5 2.1.3. Regional Fault Trends .............................................................................. 6 2.1.4. Regional Fold Trends ............................................................................... 9 2.2. LOCAL GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 11 2.2.1. Stratigraphy ............................................................................................ 11 2.2.2. Fault Trends ............................................................................................ 14 3. INITIAL WORKING HYPOTHESES .................................................................... 15 3.1. KARST COLLAPSE HYPOTHESIS ............................................................... 15 3.2. TECTONICS INDUCED BUCKLE FOLDS ................................................... 17 4. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 18 4.1. FIELD WORK .................................................................................................. 18 vi 4.2. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS............................................................................ 19 4.3. FINITE ELEMENT MODELS ......................................................................... 19 4.4. OTHER ATTEMPTS........................................................................................ 20 5. HUTCHINSON CEMETERY FOLDS .................................................................... 21 5.1. AREA ONE ...................................................................................................... 22 5.2. AREA TWO...................................................................................................... 24 5.3. AREA THREE .................................................................................................. 26 5.4. AREA FOUR .................................................................................................... 28 6. DISCUSSIONS ........................................................................................................ 31 6.1. KARST COLLAPSE ........................................................................................ 31 6.2. "BASIN AND DOME” FOLD INTERFERENCE PATTERN ........................ 33 6.3. CONICAL FOLDS ........................................................................................... 34 6.4. NUMERICAL MODELING APPROACH ...................................................... 38 6.4.1. 2D Transpression Model ........................................................................ 38 6.4.2. 3D Pericline Model ................................................................................ 40 7. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 44 APPENDICES A. FIELD DATA OF HUCHISON CEMETERY FOLDS .......................................... 46 B. GOVERNERING EQUATIONS ............................................................................. 64 C. PALEOMAGNETIC FOLD TEST ......................................................................... 67 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................. 71 VITA ................................................................................................................................ 80 vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 2.1 Map of the study area in the Ozark Plateau and structural trends. ...............................7 2.2 The localized map of study area. ................................................................................10 2.3 Stratigraphic column of Canadian Series, Ordovician. ...............................................13 3.1 Conceptual sketches of initial hypotheses ..................................................................17 5.1 Area one, showing a road sketch, stereograms and a rose diagram. ...........................22 5.2 Area two, showing a road sketch, stereograms and a rose diagram. ..........................26 5.3 Area three, showing a road sketch, stereograms and a rose diagram. ........................27 5.4 Area four, showing a road sketch, stereograms and a rose diagram. ..........................30 6.1 Rose diagram of all hinge lines, showing the trends of fold structure. .......................35 6.2 2D transpression model...............................................................................................40 6.3 Three-dimentional model sketch and resutls. .............................................................43 viii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 5.1 Field data of Hutchison Cemetery folds. ....................................................................23 6.1 Material properties for each unit of the 3D pericline model. ......................................43 1. INTRODUCTION Within the central interior of the gently rolling terrain of the Ozark Plateau, in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Long-Range Petroleum Migration in the Illinois Basin CRAIG M
    ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Interior Cratonic Basins, 1991, edited by Reprint Series 1991 - T26 M. W. Leighton, D. R. Kalata, D. F. Oltz, and J. J. Eidel: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 51,819 p. CHAPTER 26 Long-Range Petroleum Migration in the Illinois Basin CRAIG M. BETHKE DONALD F. OLTZ University of Illinois Illinois State Geological Survey Urbana, Illinois Champaign, Illinois JACKIE D. REED ARCO Oil and Gas Company Plano, Texas Editor's note: No treatment of oil and gas in the Illinois In this section, we define the migration that has basin would be complete without an overview of occurred in the Illinois basin on the basis of shale hydrocarbon migration. The following is a condensed petrographic observations and geochemical correla­ version, made especially for this volume, of an article tions. We emphasize the origin of oils found in shallow that will appear in the American Association of reservoirs, mostly in Silurian strata to the north and Petroleum Geologists Bulletin in 1991. northwest of the central basin (Figure 26-2), because these oils seem to have migrated farthest from source beds. We show that these oils, which are produced from reservoirs more than 125 mi (200 km) from the basin's depocenter, were derived from Devonian source rocks in the deep basin. We then use quantitative models of the basin's paleohydrology to INTRODUCTION investigate the past subsurface conditions that drove the migration. We conclude that long-range migration The distribution of petroleum production from the was not related to processes occurring as the basin Illinois basin extends considerably beyond the area subsided and infilled.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province
    Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 By Catherine B. Enomoto1, James L. Coleman, Jr.1, John T. Haynes2, Steven J. Whitmeyer2, Ronald R. McDowell3, J. Eric Lewis3, Tyler P. Spear3, and Christopher S. Swezey1 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192 2 James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 3 West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, WV 26508 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic and Geochemical Studies of the New Albany Shale Group (Devonian-Mississippian) in Illinois
    557 3M SuMr IL6of 1980-2 Final Report Geologic and Geochemical Studies of the New Albany Shale Group (Devonian-Mississippian) in Illinois R. E. Bergstrom and N. F. ShimP/ Principal Invistigators Robert M. Cluff, Project Coordinator Illinois State Geological Survey Open File Series 1980-2 June 30, 1980 Illinois State Geological Survey Urbana, IL 61801 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Morgantown Energy Technology Center Morgantown, WV 2 6505 Contract: U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC21-76ET12142 , Note to readers: Printouts of the data contained on the computer file and copies of the structure map mentioned in this report can be obtained from the Illinois State Geological Survey upon written request, This report was prepared as an account of work partially sponsored by the U.S. Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Depart- ment of Energy, nor any of their employees , contractors, subcontractors or employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. '^'NOIS STATE QEOLOQICAL SURVEY 3 305 Final Report Geologic and Geochemical Studies of the New Albany Shale Group (Devonian-Mississippian) in Illinois R. E. Bergstrom and N. F. Shimp, Principal Invistigators Robert M. Cluff, Project Coordinator Illinois State Geological Survey Open File Series 1980-2 SEP 1 1 1996 |L uluu ourWtY June 30, 1980 Illinois State Geological Survey Urbana, IL 61801 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Morgantown Energy Technology Center Morgantown, WV 2 6505 Contract: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Illinois Basin in the Context of Basin Evolution
    Mineral Resources of the Illinois Basin in the Context of Basin Evolution St. Louis, Missouri, January 22-23,1992 Program and Abstracts Edited by Martin B. Goldhaber and J. James Eidel U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-1 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey, Illinois State Geological Survey, Kentucky Geological Survey, Missouri Division of Geology and Land Survey, and Indiana Geological Survey standards. PREFACE The mineral resources of the U.S. midcontinent were instrumental to the development of the U.S. economy. Mineral resources are an important and essential component of the current economy and will continue to play a vital role in the future. Mineral resources provide essential raw materials for the goods consumed by industry and the public. To assess the availability of mineral resources and contribute to the abib'ty to locate and define mineral resources, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has undertaken two programs in cooperation with the State Geological Surveys in the midcontinent region. In 1975, under the Conterminous U.S. Mineral Assessment Program (CUSMAP) work began on the Rolla 1° X 2° Quadrangle at a scale of 1:250,000 and was continued in the adjacent Springfield, Harrison, Joplin, and Paducah quadrangles across southern Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Arkansas, and Oklahoma. Public meetings were held in 1981 to present results from the Rolla CUSMAP and in 1985 for the Springfield CUSMAP. In 1984, the Midcontinent Strategic and Critical Minerals Project (SCMP) was initiated by the USGS and the State Geological Surveys of 16 states to map and compile data at 1:1,000,000 scale and conduct related topical studies for the area from latitude 36° to 46° N.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook for Field Trips for the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North-Central Section of the Geological Society of America
    Guidebook for Field Trips for the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North-Central Section of the Geological Society of America April 23-24, 2001 David Malone, Editor ISGS Guidebook 33 2001 George H. Ryan, Governor Department of Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William W. Shilts, Chief EDITOR'S MESSAGE Greetings from the Executive Committee of the North Central Section of the Geological Society of America! As geologists, we all recognize the great importance of field experiences. This year's meeting includes a diverse and excellent set of field trips. Collectively, this year's field trips visit a broad spectrum of the geologic features of Illinois and Missouri that range in age from Precambrian to Quaternary. These trips present a number of new ideas and interpretations that will broaden the perspectives of all field trip participants. Your participation, interaction, and exchange of ideas with the field trip leaders are encouraged at all times These trips are the culmination of the time and energy freely given by a number of individuals. I would like to thank and recognize the field trip leaders for their hard work in planning the field trips and preparing the individual field guides. I would also like to thank the technical reviewers at Illinois State University and the Illinois State Geological Survey for their efforts. I appreciate the efforts of Jon Goodwin and the publication staff at the Illinois State Geological Survey for their substantial work in preparing this field guide. A special thanks goes out to the property owners who have been most helpful in planning these trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Reservoir Quality and Diagenetic
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reservoir Quality and Diagenetic Evolution of Upper Mississippian Rocks in the Illinois Basin: Influence of a Regional Hydrothermal Fluid-Flow Event During Late Diagenesis U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1597 Availability of Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey Order U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications from the Documents. Check or money order must be payable to the offices listed below. Detailed ordering instructions, along with Superintendent of Documents. Order by mail from— prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Superintendent of Documents Survey." Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Books, Maps, and Other Publications Information Periodicals By Mail Many Information Periodicals products are available through Books, maps, and other publications are available by mail the systems or formats listed below: from— Printed Products USGS Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Printed copies of the Minerals Yearbook and the Mineral Com­ Denver, CO 80225 modity Summaries can be ordered from the Superintendent of Publications include Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water- Documents, Government Printing Office (address above). Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Printed copies of Metal Industry Indicators and Mineral Indus­ Circulars, Fact Sheets, publications of general interest, single try Surveys can be ordered from the Center for Disease Control copies of permanent USGS catalogs, and topographic and and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and thematic maps. Health, Pittsburgh Research Center, P.O. Box 18070, Pitts­ burgh, PA 15236-0070. Over the Counter Mines FaxBack: Return fax service Books, maps, and other publications of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological and Geophysical Maps of the Illinois Basin-Ozark Dome Region
    Prairie Research Institute Illinois State Geological Survey 615 East Peabody Drive GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL MAPS OF THE ILLINOIS BASIN–OZARK DOME REGION Champaign, Illinois 61820-6918 (217) 244-2414 http://www.isgs.illinois.edu MAP 10: MAGNETIC ANOMALY Digitally compiled by Curtis C. Abert, Stephen Marshak, and Timothy H. Larson 2016 90° 89° 88° Data Source 90° 0' 0" W Raster cell size is approximately 1,026 meters. Data were extracted from the fol- lowing source: 40° 0' 0" N STATES Bankey, V., A. Cuevas, D. Daniels, C.A. Finn, I. Hernandez, P. Hill, R. Kucks, W. 1 Missouri 42° 42° Miles, M. Pilkington, C. Roberts, W. Roest, V. Rystrom, S. Shearer, S. Snyder, 2 3 2 Illinois 3 Indiana 85° R. Sweeney, J. Velez, J.D. Phillips, and D. Ravat, 2002, Digital data grids for 1 4 86° 4 Kentucky Chicago! the magnetic anomaly map of North America: Denver, Colorado, U.S. Geo- 87° logical Survey, Open-File Report 02-414, http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geophysics/ aeromag.html (accessed September 9, 2015). 91° Magnetic Anomaly Nanotesla (nT) 400 200 41° 150 41° 100 90 95° 94° 70 93° 92° 50 30 20 10 0 40° Ϫ10 40° Ϫ20 Ϫ30 Ϫ40 ! Indianapolis Ϫ60 Ϫ80 Ϫ100 Ϫ125 95° Ϫ175 Ϫ200 Ϫ300 ! Kansas City 39° 39° 84° 83° St. Louis! Louisville ! 38° 38° 82° 82° 37° 37° 83° 85° 84° 87° 86° 94° 93° 92° 91° 89° 88° 36° 36° 90° 1: 1,500,000 Vector base data from 2009 Esri Data and Maps Digital cartography by Curtis C. Abert and Jennifer E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Oolites and Petroleum Reservoirs in the United States—An Overview
    Chapter 1 • Mississippian Oolites and Petroleum Reservoirs in the United States—An Overview Brian D. Keith Indiana Geological Survey and Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA Charles W. Zuppann Indiana Geological Survey Bloomington, Indiana, USA • ABSTRACT A coincidence of tectonic, eustatic, and geochemical conditions resulted in substantial deposits of oolitic limestone during later Mississippian time in the continental United States. These oolitic limestones have formed petrole­ um reservoirs with favorable primary and secondary recovery characteris­ tics. Significant potential reserves in stratigraphic traps remain to be discovered and developed in these reservoirs. INTRODUCTION oolitic limestone deposition on the North American continent was during the Mississippian. Mississippian rocks of the continental U.S. have With the recent emphasis on global-scale geologic been the subject of two previous compilation vol­ processes, we recognize that attention must be given umes by the USGS (Craig and Connor, 1979; U.S. to Mississippian oolitic deposition on a broader scale, Geological Survey, 1979), both concentrating on the seeking to understand the factors that influenced and Mississippian system as a whole, the former on controlled oolitic deposition at that time. A prerequi­ Mississippian and Pennsylvanian stratigraphy and site to interpreting worldwide depositional patterns the latter on the paleotectonic history of the of Mississippian oolitic rocks is to study these Mississippian. However, there has not been a publi­ deposits at both the regional and the continental cation specifically emphasizing Mississippian oolitic scales. The abundant occurrence and widespread dis­ rocks. Geologists have reported oolitic limestones in tribution of Mississippian oolitic rocks, and the Mississippian rocks in many areas of the United wealth of available subsurface information, make the States for years, but Wilson (1975, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of the Galena Area
    5 (^$UiAA>*>M C 3 Guide to the Geology of the Galena Area Jo Daviess County, Illinois Lafayette County, Wisconsin David L. Reinertsen Field Trip Guidebook 1992B May 16, 1992 Department of Energy and Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LIBRARY. Cover photos by D. L. Reinertsen Clockwise from upper left: Silurian dolomite cap on Scales Mound, early crevice mine south of Galena near the Mississippi River, and downtown Galena as viewed from the old Galena High School. Geological Science Field Trips The Educational Extension Unit of the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) conducts four free tours each year to acquaint the public with the rocks, mineral resources, and landscapes of various regions of the state and the geological processes that have led to their origin. Each trip is an all-day excursion through one or more Illinois counties. Frequent stops are made to explore interesting phenomena, explain the processes that shape our environment, discuss principles of earth science, and collect rocks and fossils. People of all ages and interests are welcome. The trips are especially helpful to teachers who prepare earth science units. Grade school students are welcome, but each must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. High school science classes should be supervised by at least one adult for each ten students. A list of guidebooks of earlier field trips for planning class tours and private outings may be obtained by contacting the Educational Extension Unit, Illinois State Geological Survey, Natural Resources Building, 615 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820. Telephone: (217) 244- 2407 or 333-7372.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Coal Mine Ground Control Issues in the Illinois Basin
    Overview of coal mine ground control issues in the Illinois Basin G.M. Molinda, C. Mark, D.M. Pappas and T.M. Klemetti Gerologist, mining engineer, civil engineer and mining engineer, respectively, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Abstract Some of the most difficult coal mine roof in the United States can be found in the Illinois Basin. Factors contributing to the high roof fall rate include weak, moisture-sensitive roof rock; high horizontal stress; and limited longwall mining. The depth of cover ranges from 27 to 300 m (90 to 1,000 ft), and roof dam- age from horizontal stress can be severe. Moisture-sensitive roof rock, which contributes to roof skin deterioration and roof fall, is common above the Springfield-Harrisburg Herrin #5 and #6 seams in the Illinois Basin. The roof fall rate increases significantly in the humid summer months. Using laboratory and field studies, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has shown that highly moisture-sensitive roof rock can be directly correlated to poor roof conditions. Controlling the skin is the key to reducing rock fall injuries, and roof screening is, by far, the best remedy. Illinois Basin coal operators have been successful in reducing the number of rock fall injuries in recent years. NIOSH has documented best practices for screen installation, which has resulted in safe, efficient operations. Other solutions to skin failure include the use of denser five bolts/row patterns to reduce spans between bolts; systematic supplemental support in intersections; straps and large pans to protect operators; and air conditioning to remove moisture from the intake air.
    [Show full text]
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Confluence | Fall/Winter 2016–2017 Paddle the Spring-Fed Rivers of Ozark National Forest South of Winona
    So Much to Learn: The Ozark National Scenic Riverways and Its Karst Landscape BY QUINTA SCOTT 14 | The Confluence | Fall/Winter 2016–2017 Paddle the spring-fed rivers of Ozark National Forest south of Winona. It has two major tributaries: Scenic Riverways, the Current and its tributary, the Greer Spring and Hurricane Creek, a classic Ozark Jacks Fork. Montauk Spring, Welch Spring, Cave losing stream. Spring, Pulltite Spring, Round Spring, Blue Spring, Use your imagination to understand the and Big Spring are also Current tributaries. A second subterranean drainage of the three rivers. Consider Blue Spring and Alley Spring feed the Jacks Fork. Hurricane Creek, the losing stream with a Put in below at Akers, below Welch Spring, where topographic watershed of 116 square miles. Yes, it’s it is the sixth largest spring in the state and turns the a tributary to the Eleven Point River, but only its last Current from a lazy Ozark stream into a first-class mile carries surface water to the river. The rest seeps float. Don’t forget the Eleven Point, the Wild and into a subterranean system that carries water under Scenic River that flows through Mark Twain National the drainage divide between the Eleven Point and the Current to deliver water to Big Spring. The same holds true for Logan Creek, a losing stream that is a tributary to the Black River. Rain falls on Logan Creek, spills into the subterranean system, crosses under the surface divide between the Black and the Current, and delivers water to Blue Spring. Alley Spring draws from an amazing system of sinkholes and losing streams, including Spring Valley Creek, which becomes a tributary of the Current, once it passes through Round Spring.
    [Show full text]