DOCSLIB.ORG

Rulers of the British Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rulers of the British Empire RULERS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE The following atudy8i8 of th~ me-n wllO rule the Bri,tish Empi'r~ ull~overs the bad'ground and interrelationship of ~ ez-pone·nt8 ai' the Chamberlai11s, Baldwin, Eden, and Churchill and provides valuable information Ot~ the mmmer in which British leadership i~ formed and maintained. The material for this article wall laken from Brittlll' §ourcell and edited by K. H. AbBhagen, a 8pUiali.8t 1m British affairs.-K.M. N December 10,1900, the Hon. Mem­ family held shares to a total value of £121,000 ber for Carnarvon Borough, a young in this company, which had received a large O hot-blooded lawyer with a shock of number of orders to equip the docks of black hair, rose to his feet in order to dis­ Her Majesty's Navy. close to the House some facta which were to shake the British social structure to its PROFITABLE PRISON CAMPS foundations. This young M.P. from Wales, whose name was David Lloyd George, was Excitement in the House rose to a high at that time almost unknown in the political pitch after these disclosures, for Joseph world. What he had to say was the follow. Chamberlain and his whole family were in ing. those days the central figures in Britain's political life. His biographer writes that As fa.r as he had been able to ascertain, the Secretary of State for the Colonies lis­ the Right Hon. gentleman, Mr. Joseph tened to this attack with a stoical mien. But Chamberlain, Secretary of State for the Lloyd George was not to be disconcerted. Colonies, as well as the Hon. Member for He proceeded to speak of a third company East Worcestershire, his son Mr. Austen in which the Chamberlain family was in­ Chamberlain, Financial Secretary to the terested and which was receiving Govern. Treasury, were shareholders in three com· ment orders, curiollS orders, indeed, as it panies which in the course of the Boer War transpired later. He was referring to the had amassed huge profits from Government Colombo Commercial Company, a speculative contracts for armaments by cutting out all concern dealing in miscellaneous merchandise ot.her competitors. The first of these com­ in Ceylon. In the BoerWar, Lord Roberts had panies was known 'as Hoskins & Sons, Ltd. taken many thousands of prisoners in 1899 Lloyd George was in a position to inform and 1900. They had at first been deported the House that this firm, which handled to St. Helena and subsequently to Ceylon Admirn.lty contracts exclusively, was owned on instructions from the Secretary of State alm08t entirely by the Chamberlain family. for the Colonies, the most pressing problem The second firm was the Birmingham Trust, being to accommodate these prisoners in which the family of the Secretary of in Ceylon by building barracks for them. State for the Colonies had invested £67,000. In August 1900, the Ceylon Ob8c'rver stated The Birllliugham Trust was a holding com· that HI iron barracks for soldiers and 30 pany incorporating two other armament for Boer prisoners had already been Pllt lip fnctories, namely, Tubes Limited and Elliot's by the Colombo Commercial Company, and 'Metal Company. Tubes LU1. was owned that more would follow. by ]\{r, Arthur Chamberlain, brother of the Secretary of State for the Colonies, who It was an awkward fact, Lloyd George held 74,800 shares in this concern. Mr. said in his speech, but a fact which could Neville Chamberlain, second son of the not be concealed, that the Chamberlain Secreta.ry of St.ate for the Colonies, was the family were among the leading shareholders managing director of Elliot's l\letal Company. of this company. "r eaJlJlot conceive a Theso two armament factories had, as Lloyd more unfortunate investment at the present George showed, made substantial profits in moment than an investment in making past years by very favorable contract,s with prisons for the Boers. .. ." the Admiralty. As far as Elliot's Metal Lloyd George concluded by saying that Company was concerned, Lloyd George was the Chamberlain family was, moreover, in· able to point out that t,he Chamberlain terested to the extent of £250,000 in the RULERS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE 7. Kynoch Company Ltd. This oompany was The eecond War Cabinet, formed in May what was popularly caned a. munitions 1915, had already included ConservativC8 factory; unfortunately it could not be denied as members of the Coalition Government. that this munitions factory, which was Except for the first MacDonald Cabinet larRely controlled by the Chamberlain family, (January to November 1924) and the second bail made very substantial profits during Labor Cabinet (July 1929 to August 1931) the Boer War, chiefly because it was in the Conservatives, led by Bonar Law, Stanley the favorable position of being able to Baldwin, and finally Neville Chamberlain, realize considerably higher prices for its have thus been in power without a break. products than those concerns unconnected 10 the present Parliament they hold 415 of with governmental circles. some 600 seats As the Opposition ill in a hopeless minority, these 415 men and women A MOTION REJEOTED are the virtual representatives of the Britisb people. Who are they? The main purpose of the sweeping attack on the Cha.mbcrlain family by Lloyd George DmEOTORS IN PARLL\l'tIENT W88 to persuade the House to accept It. Bill • . prohibiting Cabinet Ministers from holding The answer to this question was given ill shares in complLnies which dealt in Govern•. a book by Simon Haxey entitled Tory M.P., ment contracts. The motion was rejected which appeared in London in August 1939. by 269 to 127 votes. Its author, or authors-for it is assumed in In defending thelD8Olv08 against the weD· competent quarters that two well.lfflown substantiated accusations brought forward members of the House of Commonsbave by Lloyd George, the two members of the hidden their identity behind the non" do plume of Simon Haxey-havo based:J;heir Chamberlain family were only able to reo statidti~ taliate by weak and unconvincing state· analysis on oarefully collected menU!. And yet an .overwhelming majority material. No serious attempt has ever-boon in the House had immediately rallied round made to dispute the accuracy of the ftwts the cause of the Chamberlain family. The contained in this book. attaok by the Welsh outsider, it was felt, bad According to Haxey, 44 per cent of *hcse been dirc<:ted against tho whole caste, and 415 Conservative Members of Parliament­ had therefore to be countered by the demo· Le., 181-are managing directors or diro~tors cratic men.'Jure of a majority vote. No sueh of large British stock or trading compiinies. direct attack has ever been made again in Together, these 181 members hold no less the House, not even by the Labor Party. than 775 posts as managing direc~s or Today, Lloyd George himself may look back directors in 700 of the leading bank~, in· Upo/l this illcident as one of his youthful dustrial enterprises, shipping companies, and • escapades. But actually it was this debate overseas trading concerns. In other words, in Parliament in 1900 which first exposed the British Parliament, which is ruled by the roots of that system from which Britain's the C-ousorvativ08, proves, on closer examina· ruling classcs derived their power and sus· tion, to be the representative not of the tenance. Politically speaking, Britain is British nation but of thc most powerful Parliament, and Parliament, in its tum, capitalist interest.~ ever concentrated in one elects tbe Cabinet. But what is Parliament? country-except Wall Street. If we include in our calculation all those Mpnl bers of TOltY DOMINION Parliament who are not directors themselves Except for two short periods, the Con· but whoac brothers, sons, or sons-in-law Ilervat,ives have been in power in the House occupy important business posts, we may of Commons since the resignation of Lloyd well estimate that almost 80 per cent of all George's War Cabinet. Tho acccssion to the Conservative Members of Parliament are power of the Labor Party in 1924 and 1929 directly or indirectly linked with Big Busi­ ness. Politicalleadenlhip and financial aris­ meant nothing but 11 brief interregnum. This was termina.ted by Ramsay MacDonald tocracy are thus identical ill Brita·in. having fallen prey to the wiles of the ruling lt must be noted that it was impossible caste; for a few years he remained in Downing to inelude cases in which M.P.'s /l,re share­ Street u.s a puppet of the National Coalition holders in "private oompanies," i.e. enter· Government, whereas in reality the Consen'&­ prises which are not registered as publio tives governed the land and reoccupied thpir companies, although in some cases they may lucrative posts. enjoy an international reputat,ion; in all 80 THE XXth CENTURY probability these cases amount to several While he was Prime Minister, an exchange of hundreds. shares took place which closely linked up Unfortunately, no statistics are available Baldwin's Limited with the Vickers Arm­ ~trong conce~, to assess the total capital of the companies .the leading armament factory whose managers and directors are at present 1D Great Bfltam. As Earl Baldwin and a Members of Parliament. Such a calculation Member of the House of Lords, he was again e:\ists, however, for the period from 1924 able to act -as a. director of his company. to 1929, when there was a large Conservative The net profit of Baldwin's Limited amounted majority. During that time, 1,160 com­ in 1932 to £530,000, and it increased t() panies (including subsidiary companies) were £1,500,000 in 1938.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (C) Crown Copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/23/83 Image
    (c) crown copyright Catalogue Reference:CAB/23/83 Image Reference:0029 (THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT). SECRET. COPY NO. CABINET 29 (36). Meeting of the Cabinet to be held in the Prime Minister's Room, House of Commons, on THURSDAY, 9th APRIL, 1936, at 12 Noon. AGENDUM. PROGRAMME OF NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR 1936. ' (Reference Cabinet 10 (56) (b) to (e)). Memorandum by the First Lord of the Admiralty CP. 105 (56) - circulated herewith. (Signed) M.P.A. HANKEY, Secretary to the Cabinet. 2, Whitehall Gardens, S.W.1. 8th April, 1956. '(THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HIS BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT) SECRET. COPY NO. CABINET 29 (36). CONCLUSIONS of a Meeting of the Cahinet held in the prime Minister's room, House of Commons, on THURSDAY, 9th APRIL, 1936, at 12 noon. PRESENT: The Right Hon. Stanley Baldwin,- M.P. , Prime Minister. (in the Chair). The Right.. Hon. The Right Hon. J. Ramsay MacDonald, M. P. , Neville Chamberlain, M.P. , Lord president of the Council, Chancellor of the Exchequer. Tie Right Hon. The Right Hon. '. The Viscount Hailsham, Sir John Simon, G.C.S.I., Lord Chancellor. K.C.V.O., O.B.E., K.C., M.P., Secretary of State for Home Affairs. The Right Hon. The Right Hon. A. Duff Cooper, D.S.O., M.P., Malcolm MacDonald, M.P., Secretary of State for War, Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs. The Right Hen, The Most Hon. The Viscount Swinton, G.B.E., The Marquess of Zetland, M.C., Secretary of State for G.CS.I., G.CI.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old War Office Building
    MINISTRY OF DEFENCE The Old War Office Building A history The Old War Office Building …a building full of history Foreword by the Rt. Hon Geoff Hoon MP, Secretary of State for Defence The Old War Office Building has been a Whitehall landmark for nearly a century. No-one can fail to be impressed by its imposing Edwardian Baroque exterior and splendidly restored rooms and stairways. With the long-overdue modernisation of the MOD Main Building, Defence Ministers and other members of the Defence Council – the Department’s senior committee – have moved temporarily to the Old War Office. To mark the occasion I have asked for this short booklet, describing the history of the Old War Office Building, to be published. The booklet also includes a brief history of the site on which the building now stands, and of other historic MOD headquarters buildings in Central London. People know about the work that our Armed Forces do around the world as a force for good. Less well known is the work that we do to preserve our heritage and to look after the historic buildings that we occupy. I hope that this publication will help to raise awareness of that. The Old War Office Building has had a fascinating past, as you will see. People working within its walls played a key role in two World Wars and in the Cold War that followed. The building is full of history. Lawrence of Arabia once worked here. I am now occupying the office which Churchill, Lloyd-George and Profumo once had.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Why Tories Won: Accounting for Conservative Party Electoral
    'Why Tories Won: Accounting for Conservative Party Electoral Success from Baldwin to Cameron' Dr Richard Carr, Churchill College, Cambridge - 15 November 2012 [email protected] Thank you Allen for that kind introduction. Thank you too, of course, to Jamie Balfour and the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust for the support that enabled the research that I will lay out in part today. The research grant was extremely valuable for an early career academic – providing the means to support archival research that still informs my work some two years later, which has borne fruit in three of the articles that will be referred to at the bottom of the slides behind me, and in three monographs on twentieth century British politics I am due to publish in 2013. 6 publications and counting therefore owe part of their genesis to this grant, not withstanding the good work of my two sometime co-authors throughout this period, Dr Bradley Hart (a former PhD student here at Churchill College and current lecturer at California State University Fresno), and Rachel Reeves MP.1 By final way of preamble I must also thank the staff here at the Churchill Archives Centre, and indeed the Master, for various kindnesses over the years – not least in relation to a conference Bradley and I played a small role in coordinating in November 2010, during my By-Fellowship.2 So, today’s lecture is entitled ‘Why Tories Won: Accounting for Conservative Party Electoral Success from Baldwin to Cameron.’ Now, given Stanley Baldwin became Conservative Party leader in 1923, and David Cameron – Boris and the electorate permitting – seems likely to serve until at least 2015, that is quite an expanse of time to cover in 40 minutes, and broad brush strokes – not to say, missed policy areas - are inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Labour Party and the Reform of the House of Lords, 1918 to Date
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1960 The rB itish Labour Party and the reform of the House of Lords, 1918 to date. Yousan Wang University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Wang, Yousan, "The rB itish Labour Party and the reform of the House of Lords, 1918 to date." (1960). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2557. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2557 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BRUiSH LABOUR PART/ THE REFORM OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS, 1918 TO DATE YU SAN WANG 1960 THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY AND THE REPOEM OF THE HOUSE OP LORDS, I9I8 TO DATE Yu San Wang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Massachusetts Amherst August , i960 TABLE OP CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II, A BRIEF HISTORY OP EFFORTS WITHIN THE LABOUR PARTY TO REFORM THE HOUSE OP LORDS, 1918 TO dak: 8 III. THE REFORM OF THE POWERS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS 30 IV, PROPOSALS FOR MINOR MODIFICATIONS OP THE COMPOSITION OP THE HOUSE OP LORDS , , , , 46 V, PROPOSALS FOR THE WHOLESALE RECONSTRUCTION OP THE HOUSE OP LORDS 62 VI, PROPOSALS FOE THE ABOLITION OF THE HOUSE OP LORDS 71 VII, CONCLUSION AND PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE .
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of the Conservative Party
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository THE ROLES OF THE CONSERVA TIVE PARTY AND THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT DURING THE 'PHONEY WAR', SEPTEMBER 1939 TO MAY 1940. BY NIGEL ANTHONY PETER JOHNSON A thesis submitted to The University ofBirmingham For the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY Department ofMedieval and Modem History School ofHistorical Studies The University ofBirmingham March 200 1 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is a detailed study of the interaction between the Conservative party and the National government during the nine months of the 'phoney war'. It concentrates on the potential strength of Chamberlain's position and the Conservative party at the outbreak of war. The Conservative party entered the Second World War full of confidence. The party dominated British politics at a national level. However, Chamberlain's failure to widen the government damaged his credibility as a wartime leader when Labour's leaders rejected his offer of key seats in the war cabinet of the National government.
    [Show full text]
  • Englishness and Post-Imperial Space
    Englishness and Post-imperial Space Englishness and Post-imperial Space: The Poetry of Philip Larkin and Ted Hughes By Milton Sarkar Englishness and Post-imperial Space: The Poetry of Philip Larkin and Ted Hughes By Milton Sarkar This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Milton Sarkar All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8598-3 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8598-0 To Professor Himadri Lahiri who taught me to look ahead CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................................... ix Chapter I ...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction Chapter II ................................................................................................... 29 Philip Larkin’s Response to Post-imperial Space Chapter III ................................................................................................. 71 Ted Hughes’s Response to Post-imperial Space Chapter IV ............................................................................................... 113 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Hatfield House Archives PAPERS of Elizabeth, 5 Marchioness Of
    Hatfield House Archives PAPERS OF Elizabeth, 5th Marchioness of Salisbury - file list *Please note that the numbering of these papers is not final* Ref: 5MCH The collection comprises 12 boxes. Boxes 1-8 contain letters in bundles and each bundle has been treated as a file. Except bundle 1 (where the letters were numbered by Betty), letters in Box 1 and Box 2 bundle 1 have been numbered consecutively according to their original bundle e.g. letters in bundle 2 are numbered 2/1 – 57. These bundles were also divided into packets so that they could be foldered. This level of processing and repackaging could not be maintained in the time available for the project so from Box 2 bundle 2 onwards the original bundles have been retained with the total number of letters in each bundle being recorded. Letters are usually annotated with correspondent’s name and date of receipt by Betty, these names/nicknames have been used in the file lists to facilitate locating letters within the bundles. Full names and titles of significant correspondents are given in Appendix A. Unidentified correspondents are listed first for each bundle with additional information that may help to identify them later. Correspondents are listed once for each bundle containing their letter/letters. Box 1a, Box 1b Bundle 6, Box 3 Bundle 12-Box 8 Bundle 14 are listed alphabetically by surname but names have not been reversed Box 1b Bundle 7 & 8, Box 2 Bundle 1-Box 3 Bundle 11 are listed alphabetically by first name or title where no first name is given Box1b Bundles 9-11 and Box 2 Bundle2/1-20 only contain letters from “Bobbety”, Robert Gascoyne-Cecil Boxes 9 & 10 contain personal papers and ephemera which have been listed individually.
    [Show full text]
  • 8932 the LONDON GAZETTE, 20Ra OCTOBER 1964
    8932 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 20ra OCTOBER 1964 172. Huyton County Constituency 210. Manchester Gorton Borough Constituency • The Right Honourable James Harold WILSON, Konni ZILLIACUS, Esquire. O.B.E. 211. Manchester Moss Side Borough Constituency 173. Ince County Constituency Frank Henry TAYLOR, Esquire. • Michael Thomas McGuiRE, Esquire. 212. Manchester Openshaw Borough Constituency 174. Lancaster County Constituency Charles Richard MORRIS, Esquire, Humphry John BURKELEY, Esquire. 213. Manchester Withington Borough Constituency 175. Middleton and Prestwich County Constituency Lieutenant Sir Robert Archibald CAREY, Baronet. Sir John Denman BARLOW, Baronet. 214. Manchester Wythenshawe Borough Constituency 176. Morecambe and Lonsdale County Constituency Alfred MORRIS, Esquire. Alfred George Fletcher HALL-DAVIS, Esquire. 215. Nelson and Colne Borough Constituency 177. Newton County Constituency Samuel Sydney SILVERMAN, Esquire. Frederick LEE, Esquire. 216. Oldham East Borough Constituency 178. North Fylde County Constituency Charles MAPP, Esquire. Richard Oliver STANLEY, Esquire (commonly called 217. Oldham West Borough Constituency Captain The Hon. Richard Oliver STANLEY). Charles Leslie HALE, Esquire. 179. Ormskirk County Constituency 218. Preston North Borough Constituency Brevet Colonel Douglas GLOVER. Captain The Right Honourable Harold Julian 180. South Fylde County Constituency AMERY. Colonel Claude Granville LANCASTER. 219. Preston South Borough Constituency 181. Westhoughton County Constituency Peter MAHON, Esquire. Joseph Thomes PRICE, Esquire. 220. Rochdale Borough Constituency 182. Widnes County Constituency John McCANN, Esquire. James Eugene MACCOLL, Esquire. 221. Rossendale Borough Constituency 183. Accrington Borough Constituency Flight Lieutenant Arthur William James Anthony Henry HYND, Esquire. GREENWOOD. 184. Ashton under Lyne Borough Constituency 222. St. Helens Borough Constituency Robert Edward SHELDON, Esquire. Leslie SPRIGGS, Esquire. 185. Barrow-in-Furness Borough Constituency 223. Salford East Borough Constituency Walter MONSLOW, Esquire.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Anthony Eden and the Suez Crisis of 1956 the Anatomy of a Flawed Personality
    Sir Anthony Eden and the Suez Crisis of 1956 The Anatomy of a Flawed Personality by Eamon Hamilton A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Master of Arts by Research Centre for Byzantine Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Department of Classics Ancient History and Archeology College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham June 2015 1 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Acknowledgements I am very grateful to the staff at the following institutions: The Bodleian Library, University of Oxford Churchill College Library, University of Cambridge Cadbury Research Library, University of Birmingham Manx National Heritage, Douglas, Isle of Man The National Archives, Kew 2 When Anthony Eden became British Prime Minister on 6 April 1955 it seemed the culmination of a brilliant career in politics. Less than two years later that career was over, effectively destroyed by his behaviour over the nationalisation of the Suez Canal Company by the Egyptian President, Gamal Nasser.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatives in Opposition, 1906–79 the Conservatives in Opposition, 1906–79: a Comparative Analysis
    1 Stuart Ball The Conservatives in opposition, 1906–79 The Conservatives in opposition, 1906–79: a comparative analysis Stuart Ball The experience of being in opposition for a lengthy period is not one which the modern Conservative Party is used to, and it has tended to find it difficult. Since the 1880s, the Conservatives have grown accustomed to being seen – and to see themselves – as the party of government. They have been in office for so much of the period that exercising power has seemed to be the natural state of affairs, and this adds to Conservative frustration during spells in opposition. The party can feel – even if it does not always articulate this – that their removal has been in some sense unfair or a mistake, and this can hinder an analysis of the situation and the selection of strategies to tackle it. This problem is less apparent in shorter spells out of office, in which the impact of the previous defeat is still strong. However, as time passes, and especially if the prospect of recovery is not becoming apparent, impatience leads to tension and criticism within the party. The Conservatives have generally been better at holding their nerve – and even at staying united – whilst under pressure in government than they have been in the comparatively less-demanding role of opposition. This insecurity, which leads to inconsist- encies, rushed decisions, grumbling in the ranks and mutterings about the leadership, has tended to diminish their effectiveness as an opposition party, even though they have often had a vulnerable government as a target.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 Issue
    Bulletin of the Social Work History Network VOLUME 3, ISSUE 1 JUNE 2016 In this issue: to coincide with the Social Work History Network’s event marking 25 years since the implementation of the Children Act 1989 in England and Wales, Keith Bilton, co-founder of the Network, examines the century of child care law leading up to the landmark legislation Editorial Sarah Matthews....................................page 1 Social work practice: historic lessons from Serious Case Reviews To the Editor........................................page 3 Jessica Wagner.....................................page 31 Edith Emily Mudd (1863-1941) – Pioneer In brief...................................................page 4 Almoner Andrew Sackville.................................page 35 CPAG and social work: reflections on a critical friendship Book review: Someone To Love Us Dave Burnham.....................................page 44 Jane Tunstill...........................................page 5 A century of child care law – 1889 to 1989 kcl.ac.uk/scwru/swhn @SociWorkHistory Keith Bilton..........................................page 12 Bulletin of the Social Work History Network Published by Social Work History Network, London Articles © 2016 Social Work History Network ISSN 2056-8029 Editor: Sarah Matthews Sub-editor: Stephen Martineau About the Social Work History Network The Social Work History Network (SWHN) exists to explore the nature and growth of social work in order to inform contemporary policy and practice. Founded in 2000, it is an informal network of social workers, historians, archivists, researchers, educators, students, and social work policymakers. The Network meets three or four times a year in the United Kingdom to discuss papers given by invited speakers. Meetings are open to all. The Bulletin of the Social Work History Network is an e-journal: it is available on the Network website and via email to those on the mailing list.
    [Show full text]
  • British Policy Towards Kenya, 1960-1980
    Durham E-Theses `Kenya is no doubt a special case':British policy towards Kenya, 1960-1980 CULLEN, CATRIONA,POPPY How to cite: CULLEN, CATRIONA,POPPY (2015) `Kenya is no doubt a special case':British policy towards Kenya, 1960-1980, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11180/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ‘Kenya is no doubt a special case’: British policy towards Kenya, 1960-1980 Poppy Cullen Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Durham University 2015 Abstract ‘Kenya is no doubt a special case’: British policy towards Kenya, 1960-1980 Poppy Cullen This thesis examines the ways British policy towards Kenya was made from 1960 to 1980 – from the last years of British colonial rule and through the first two decades of Kenya’s existence as an independent state.
    [Show full text]